Fitch Ratings has affirmed the foreign currency Issuer Default
Rating (FC IDR) of Empresa Nacional de Petroleo (ENAP) at 'A'.
Fitch has also affirmed ENAP's national scale rating at 'AAA(cl)'.
The Rating Outlook is 'Stable'.
KEY RATING DRIVERS
ENAP's ratings reflects its 100% ownership by the Chilean
government, the sound credit profile of its parent, the strong
legal, operational and strategic ties with the state, and strategic
importance to Chile given it assures a significant portion of the
country's energy supply. ENAP owns 100% of the refining capacity of
the country, meeting approximately 61% of the internal demand, and
representing around 40% of the country's energy matrix. As a
state-owned company, ENAP's FC IDR is strongly linked with the
credit profile of the Chilean sovereign (FC IDR 'A+'; Outlook
Stable by Fitch), although direct financial support provided by the
government has been limited.
Strong Government Support
ENAP's ratings reflect the historical support showed by the
Chilean State in different ways, and Fitch's analysis includes the
assumption that the State of Chile will continue to provide timely
and sufficient support to the company in the event of financial
distress. The Chilean government is strongly involved in ENAP's
business; the Ministry of Finance approves ENAP's budget and any
new debt assumed by the company. In 2014, government support
materialized with the payment of USD65 million as compensation for
subsidies granted by ENAP for natural gas consumption in the
Magallanes region. Positively, this compensation payment, included
in the Ministry of Energy's budget, is already approved for USD100
million for year 2015. Additionally, the government's energy agenda
announced in May 2014 considered a USD400 million capital increase
for ENAP, which will be made in conjunction with a Corporate
Governance law for the company that should be in Congress by 1Q
2016.
In the past, government support has been reflected in a
temporary capitalization of retained earnings at ENAP's
subsidiaries since 2009 and approved until 2016, suspension of
dividend payments over the past six years, and a USD250 million
equity injection in 2008. Although the Republic of Chile does not
explicitly guarantee any of ENAP's indebtedness, the all of the
financial debt has a Change of Control Clause.
Financial Metrics to Deteriorate
Although ENAP's financial performance has improved since 2013,
its leverage level continues to be high for the rating category and
Fitch does not foresee room for deleverage in next two years given
the current market conditions and the company's investment plan.
For 2015, Fitch estimates that ENAP's leverage measured as debt to
EBITDA will stand close to 8x, up from 6.3x as of YE14, while
interest coverage ratio should be in the range of 2.5x to 3.0x. In
spite of the company's weak credit metrics for the ratings
category, Fitch anticipates continued strong parent support, which
includes the assumption of the USD400 million capital injection
announced in the energy agenda in 2016 - 2017. Metrics are expected
to improve over the mid-term.
Based on Fitch's price deck for 2015, Fitch expects ENAP's
EBITDA for the next 12 months to be approximately USD500 million.
Meanwhile the company's financial debt is projected to grow mainly
due to the E&P investments that ENAP is committed to carry on
in the Magallanes Region to ensure gas supply in the area. Total
Capex estimated in USD500 million includes USD200 million in
maintenance capex and USD250 million in E&P investments.
Financing of these investments should imply additional debt for
USD100 million to USD200 million. ENAP's total debt as of December
2014 amounted for USD3.8 billion.
As of year-end 2014, ENAP's credit metrics have remained quite
in line with 2013. The company's leverage ratio (Debt to EBITDA)
stood at 6.3x, down from over 100x in 2012. Main driver for this
improvement was the recovery of the EBITDA generation, while
financial debt showed moderate reductions in the last two
years.
EBITDA Generation Expected to Decrease; Negative Free Cash
Flow
For 2015, and assuming an international oil price around
USD50/bbl, Fitch expects ENAP's EBITDA to stand at approximately
USD500 million, although more downward pressure on international
prices could further stress the scenario. Additionally, we expect
the company's free cash flow to remain negative for at least the
next 12 to 24 months, as the company will pursue an investment plan
aligned with the government's energy agenda, which targets ENAP
with the key role as a coordinator / facilitator of certain
investments for the development of the country's energetic
strategy.
In 2013 and 2014, ENAP's EBITDA generation showed a consistent
increase as a result of lower Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) import
costs resulting from the new contract with British Gas and a more
efficient hedging strategy, which allowed ENAP to ensure fuel
supply for its refining assets at a lower cost and also to provide
natural gas to electric generation companies and industrial clients
at higher margins. EBITDA for 2014 was USD604 million, down from
2013's USD634 million mainly due to the decline in the
international oil prices in 2014 last quarter, but maintained a
good margin on 6.1%.
Effects of Declining Oil Prices on ENAP
Although Chile should be the biggest beneficiary from the
decline in oil prices in the region, this scenario does not benefit
ENAP and Fitch projects that its profitability will suffer. For the
company's E&P business, which represents 51% of its
consolidated EBITDA as of 2014, Fitch estimates that its break-even
point stands at a crude oil price between USD45 and USD50/barrel.
This business segment will suffer from low oil prices mainly in
Chile and Egypt, which represent close to 60% of the ENAP's total
oil production. Higher pressure on international prices will
probably stress the scenario. In the refining and marketing
business, which represents 49% of ENAP's EBITDA as of 2014, the
effect of the decline in the oil prices is reflected in the
refining margins, as there is a correlation between the price of
refined products in the Gulf of Mexico, to which ENAP's prices are
linked, and the price of oil. In the last 12 months, overall
margins showed a declining trend, compensated by the reduction in
operational costs of the oil-fuelled refineries.
Positively, the company has hedged most of its exposure to crude
oil price volatility between the moment the crude oil is bought and
the time it is sold through time spread swaps and other hedging
instruments, protecting the business' margins. As from 2013, and
after the losses suffered in 2012 as a result of the sharp decline
in international oil process over high stocks and with an
insufficient hedging policy, ENAP introduced relevant changes in
its overall policies, which included new inventory management
procedures, a more efficient and flexible commodity price hedging
policy, the re-negotiation of sales contracts and the sale of
non-core assets among others. These modifications had positive
effects in different areas, and are allowing the company to show
more stability, have a better control over its costs, respond more
quickly to changes in market conditions and cover its exposure to
crude oil price volatility, besides shortening the inventory
cycle.
Liquidity Remains Weak; Access to Refinancing is expected to
Remain Strong
ENAP's liquidity remains relatively weak, although it has showed
an important improvement over the past two years, as the company
refinanced a large portion of its short term debt and improved its
debt maturity profile. Fitch expects access to local and
international markets to remain strong and based on a strong
government support. Cash and equivalents as of December 31, 2014,
amounted to USD153 million, while current maturities for 2015 were
USD403 million (including revolving short-term debt for USD300.)
Additionally, some 20% of such cash is located in Argentina,
reducing its availability.
During 2014, ENAP carried out refinancing activities for a
USD600 million through an international bond issuance (10-year
bullet maturity) entirely used for refinancing purposes, reflecting
good access to both local and international financial markets.
Financial maturities for the next four years (2015 -2018) are
manageable and range between USD110 and USD365 million per year,
which are likely to be refinanced. Fitch does not see this as a
major risk due to the company's proven access to the financial
markets.
KEY ASSUMPTIONS
Fitch's key assumptions within the rating case for the issuer
include:
--Fitch price deck (WTI) of USD50/bbl in 2015, USD60/bbl in
2016, and USD75/bbl long term
--2015 consolidated capex of USD500 million
--USD400 million capital injection for 2016-2017
--Subsidy for gas consumption in the Magallanes Region in
place
--Continuous State support
RATING SENSITIVITIES
ENAP's ratings could be negatively affected by a downgrade of
the Chilean Sovereign rating. In addition, any weakening of legal,
operational and/or strategic ties with the government could put
downward pressure on ENAP's ratings.
A positive rating action is not envisioned due to the company's
weak capital structure and financial profile for its rating
category.
Fitch affirms ENAP's debt instruments as follows:
--Senior unsecured notes USD 300 million due 2019 at 'A';
--Senior unsecured notes USD 500 million due 2020 at 'A';
--Senior unsecured notes USD 500 million due 2021 at 'A';
--Senior unsecured notes USD 600 million due 2024 at 'A';
--Senior unsecured notes CHF 215 million due 2018 at 'A';
--Senior unsecured notes CLF 9.75 million due 2019 at
'AAA(cl)';
--Senior unsecured notes CLF 2 million due 2017 at AAA(cl)';
--Senior unsecured notes CLF 4 million due 2033 at AAA(cl)
-- Bond Program 303 at AAA(cl)
-- Bond Program 585 at AAA(cl)
Additional information is available at
'www.fitchratings.com'.
Applicable Criteria and Related Research:
--'Corporate Rating Methodology', dated May 28, 2014.
Applicable Criteria and Related Research:
Corporate Rating Methodology - Including Short-Term Ratings and
Parent and Subsidiary Linkage
http://www.fitchratings.com/creditdesk/reports/report_frame.cfm?rpt_id=749393
Additional Disclosure
Solicitation Status
http://www.fitchratings.com/gws/en/disclosure/solicitation?pr_id=982079
ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND
DISCLAIMERS. PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS BY
FOLLOWING THIS LINK:
HTTP://FITCHRATINGS.COM/UNDERSTANDINGCREDITRATINGS. IN ADDITION,
RATING DEFINITIONS AND THE TERMS OF USE OF SUCH RATINGS ARE
AVAILABLE ON THE AGENCY'S PUBLIC WEBSITE 'WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM'.
PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA AND METHODOLOGIES ARE AVAILABLE FROM
THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH'S CODE OF CONDUCT, CONFIDENTIALITY,
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE AND OTHER
RELEVANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE 'CODE
OF CONDUCT' SECTION OF THIS SITE. FITCH MAY HAVE PROVIDED ANOTHER
PERMISSIBLE SERVICE TO THE RATED ENTITY OR ITS RELATED THIRD
PARTIES. DETAILS OF THIS SERVICE FOR RATINGS FOR WHICH THE LEAD
ANALYST IS BASED IN AN EU-REGISTERED ENTITY CAN BE FOUND ON THE
ENTITY SUMMARY PAGE FOR THIS ISSUER ON THE FITCH WEBSITE.
Fitch RatingsPrimary Analyst:Xavier Olave,
+1-212-612-7895Associate DirectorFitch Ratings, Inc.33 Whitehall
St.New York, NY 1004orSecondary Analyst:Paula Garcia-Uriburu,
+562-2499-3316DirectororCommittee ChairpersonLucas Aristizabal,
+1-312-368-3260Senior DirectororMedia Relations:Elizabeth Fogerty,
New York, +1 212-908-0526elizabeth.fogerty@fitchratings.com