Monsanto Bolsters Its Defense of Weed Killer
08 November 2017 - 09:59PM
Dow Jones News
By Jacob Bunge
A fight over one of the most powerful new weapons against
hard-to-kill weeds, developed by agricultural giant Monsanto Co.,
is spilling into the courts.
Monsanto's new version of the herbicide, called dicamba, is part
of a more than $1 billion investment that pairs it with new,
genetically engineered seeds that are resistant to the spray. But
some farmers say their nonresistant crops suffered after neighbors'
dicamba drifted onto their land.
The agricultural giant in October sued the Arkansas State Plant
Board following the board's decision to bar Monsanto's new
herbicide and propose tougher restrictions on similar weed killers
ahead of the 2018 growing season. Monsanto claims its herbicide is
being held to an unfair standard.
Arkansas has been a flashpoint in the dispute: About 900,000
acres of crops were reported damaged there, more than in any other
state.
Arkansas agriculture officials have scheduled a hearing
Wednesday to discuss stiffer dicamba controls, which Monsanto and
some farmers are fighting. The new controls are subject to the
approval of a subcommittee of state legislators.
Scott Partridge, Monsanto's head of strategy, is expected to
testify, as are proponents of tighter restrictions. Monsanto has
criticized some Arkansas state agricultural officials and academics
involved in researching and regulating dicamba, accusing them of
bias and overstepping their authority. "The process they used in
Arkansas is broken," Mr. Partridge said. "Growers need access to
this tool," he said.
An Arkansas State Plant Board spokeswoman declined to
comment.
Farmers in 25 states submitted more than 2,700 claims to state
agricultural agencies that neighbors' dicamba spraying shriveled
3.6 million acres of soybeans -- and damaged other crops, such as
cantaloupe and pumpkins, according to the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency.
The complaints have farmers and agricultural researchers racing
to figure out how to avoid more collateral damage ahead of next
summer, when Monsanto projects the herbicide will be used on twice
the U.S. farm acreage as this year.
In addition to Arkansas, states including Minnesota, South
Dakota, North Dakota, Tennessee and Indiana are discussing
additional limits and training requirements for farmers spraying
dicamba, state officials say.
Monsanto had pitched dicamba, along with soybean and cotton
seeds engineered to survive it, to farmers struggling to kill weeds
such as palmer amaranth that can grow so fast and so big --
developing stalks as thick as baseball bats -- that they choke out
crops.
Jonas Oxgaard, an analyst with Bernstein, estimated that the
chemical and related seed sales could generate as much as $350
million in annual profits for Monsanto. "It's their big
money-maker," he said.
German chemical maker BASF SA is also marketing a new version of
dicamba to pair with the Monsanto-developed crops.
While dicamba has proven able to knock down tough weeds, its
past versions also have been known for evaporating from plants
after they are applied, which can create a mist prone to floating
into nearby fields. Monsanto and BASF's new formulations are
designed to minimize that effect, the companies have said.
About 25 million acres of dicamba-tolerant crops were planted
this year. Following the damage complaints, the companies in
October agreed with the EPA on tighter controls for those products,
including training farmers on how to manage the chemical and
barring use on windy days.
Arkansas's Plant Board has proposed going further by potentially
prohibiting dicamba use from mid-April through the end of October
to safeguard growing plants. The state has also refused to approve
Monsanto's dicamba product for use in Arkansas, saying it needs
further analysis by University of Arkansas researchers. Monsanto
argues that other herbicides haven't been subjected to the sort of
further analysis the state wants to apply to Monsanto's dicamba
product.
Even with the reports of widespread damage, farmers and crop
researchers say many affected fields recovered, thanks to good
weather over the latter half of the growing season. The USDA is
projecting a record U.S. soybean crop. The outcome could have been
worse with drier weather, researchers said.
Farmers are exploring their own legal options. Some have joined
class action lawsuits against Monsanto and BASF, seeking
compensation for damaged crops. The companies are contesting those
lawsuits.
Tom Burnham, who farms 11,000 acres near Blytheville, Ark., said
he hired a lawyer to advise him on how to handle a neighbor whose
errant dicamba spraying, Mr. Burnham said, reduced some fields'
harvest by 5% to 20%. Mr. Burnham said he didn't expect to make
money on any lawsuit he may file. "I'm doing it just to make a
point."
Write to Jacob Bunge at jacob.bunge@wsj.com
(END) Dow Jones Newswires
November 08, 2017 05:44 ET (10:44 GMT)
Copyright (c) 2017 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.