Quarterly Report (10-q)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

NOTE 1. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Entergy Corporation, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, Entergy Texas, and System Energy)

Entergy and the Registrant Subsidiaries are involved in a number of legal, regulatory, and tax proceedings before various courts, regulatory commissions, and governmental agencies in the ordinary course of business. While management is unable to predict the outcome of such proceedings, management does not believe that the ultimate resolution of these matters will have a material adverse effect on Entergy’s results of operations, cash flows, or financial condition, except as otherwise discussed in the Form 10-K or in this report. Entergy discusses regulatory proceedings in Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K and herein, discusses tax proceedings in Note 3 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K and Note 10 to the financial statements herein, and discusses a judicial proceeding involving Vermont Yankee in Note 1 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K and in Note 11 to the financial statements herein.

Nuclear Insurance

See Note 8 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for information on nuclear liability and property insurance associated with Entergy’s nuclear power plants.

Conventional Property Insurance

See Note 8 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for information on Entergy’s non-nuclear property insurance program.

Employment Litigation

The Registrant Subsidiaries and other Entergy subsidiaries are responding to various lawsuits in both state and federal courts and to other labor-related proceedings filed by current and former employees and third parties not selected for open positions. These actions include, but are not limited to, allegations of wrongful employment actions; wage disputes and other claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act or its state counterparts; claims of race, gender and disability discrimination; disputes arising under collective bargaining agreements; unfair labor practice proceedings and other administrative proceedings before the National Labor Relations Board; claims of retaliation; and claims for or regarding benefits under various Entergy Corporation sponsored plans. Entergy and the Registrant Subsidiaries are responding to these lawsuits and proceedings and deny liability to the claimants.

Asbestos Litigation (Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, and Entergy Texas)

See Note 8 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for information regarding asbestos litigation at Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, and Entergy Texas.

Table of Contents

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Financial Statements

NOTE 2. RATE AND REGULATORY MATTERS (Entergy Corporation, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, Entergy Texas, and System Energy)

Regulatory Assets

See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for information regarding regulatory assets in the Utility business presented on the balance sheets of Entergy and the Registrant Subsidiaries. Following are updates to that information.

Correction of Regulatory Asset for Income Taxes

In the first quarter 2012, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana determined that its regulatory asset for income taxes was overstated because of a difference between the regulatory treatment of the income taxes associated with certain items (primarily pension expense) and the financial accounting treatment of those taxes. Beginning with Louisiana retail rate filings using the 1994 test year, retail rates were developed using the normalization method of accounting for income taxes. With respect to these items, however, the financial accounting for income taxes was computed using the flow-through method of accounting. As a result, over the years Entergy Gulf States Louisiana accumulated a regulatory asset representing the expected future recovery of tax expense for the affected items even though the tax expense was being collected currently in rates from customers and would not be recovered in the future.

The effect was immaterial to the consolidated balance sheets, results of operations, and cash flows of Entergy for all prior reporting periods and on a cumulative basis. Therefore, a cumulative adjustment was recorded in the first quarter 2012 to remove the regulatory asset previously recorded. This adjustment increased 2012 income tax expense by $46.3 million, decreased the regulatory asset for income taxes by $75.3 million, and decreased accumulated deferred income taxes by $29 million.

The effect was also immaterial to the balance sheets, results of operations, and cash flows of Entergy Gulf States Louisiana for all prior reporting periods. Correcting the cumulative effect of the error in the first quarter 2012 could have been material to the 2012 results of operations of Entergy Gulf States Louisiana and, therefore, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana is revising its prior period financial statements to correct the errors. The corrections affect the prior period financial statements as shown in the tables below:

	Three Months Ended September 30, 2011
	As previously reported	As corrected
	(In Thousands)

Income Statement
Income taxes	$38,429	$37,205
Net income	$51,946	$53,170
Earnings applicable to common equity	$51,740	$52,964

Table of Contents

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Financial Statements

	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011
	As previously reported	As corrected
	(In Thousands)

Income Statement
Income taxes	$95,352	$92,083
Net income	$146,928	$150,197
Earnings applicable to common equity	$146,309	$149,578

Statement of Cash Flows
Net income	$146,928	$150,197
Deferred income taxes, investment tax credits, and non-current taxes accrued	($21,223)	($24,492)
Changes in other regulatory assets	$27,171	$21,858
Other operating activities	$1,814	$7,127

	December 31, 2011
	As previously reported	As corrected
	(In Thousands)

Balance Sheet
Regulatory asset for income taxes - net	$249,058	$173,724
Accumulated deferred income taxes - current	$5,427	$5,107
Accumulated deferred income taxes and taxes accrued	$1,397,230	$1,368,563
Member’s equity	$1,439,733	$1,393,386

	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011
	Member’s Equity		Total Equity
	As previously reported	As corrected	As previously reported	As corrected
	(In Thousands)

Statement of Changes in Equity
Balance at December 31, 2010	$1,539,517	$1,494,593	$1,509,213	$1,464,289
Net income	$146,928	$150,197	$146,928	$150,197
Balance at September 30, 2011	$1,403,857	$1,362,202	$1,375,268	$1,333,613

Hurricane Isaac

In August 2012, Hurricane Isaac caused extensive damage to portions of Entergy's service area in Louisiana, and to a lesser extent in Mississippi and Arkansas. The storm resulted in widespread power outages, significant damage primarily to distribution infrastructure, and the loss of sales during the power outages. Total restoration costs for the repair and/or replacement of Entergy's electric facilities in areas with damage from Hurricane Isaac are currently estimated to be in the range of $400 million to $500 million, as follows:

Table of Contents

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Financial Statements

Company		Hurricane Isaac Restoration Costs
		(In Millions)

Entergy Arkansas		$10
Entergy Gulf States Louisiana		70-90
Entergy Louisiana		240-300
Entergy Mississippi		30-40
Entergy New Orleans		50-60
Total		$400-500

The Utility operating companies are considering all reasonable avenues to recover storm-related costs from Hurricane Isaac, including, but not limited to, accessing funded storm reserves; securitization or other alternative financing; and traditional retail recovery on an interim and permanent basis. Each Utility operating company is responsible for its restoration cost obligations and for recovering or financing its storm-related costs. Storm cost recovery or financing may be subject to review by applicable regulatory authorities.

Entergy has recorded accounts payable for the estimated costs incurred that were necessary to return customers to service. Entergy recorded corresponding regulatory assets of approximately $130 million and construction work in progress of approximately $270 million. Entergy recorded the regulatory assets in accordance with its accounting policies and based on the historic treatment of such costs in its service area because management believes that recovery through some form of regulatory mechanism is probable. Because Entergy has not gone through the regulatory process regarding these storm costs, however, there is an element of risk, and Entergy is unable to predict with certainty the degree of success it may have in its recovery initiatives, the amount of restoration costs that it may ultimately recover, or the timing of such recovery.

Fuel and Purchased Power Cost Recovery

Entergy Texas

In December 2011, Entergy Texas filed with the PUCT a request to refund approximately $43 million, including interest, of fuel cost recovery over-collections through October 2011. Entergy Texas and the parties to the proceeding reached an agreement that Entergy Texas would refund $67 million, including interest and additional over-recoveries through December 2011, over a three-month period. Entergy Texas and the parties requested that interim rates consistent with the settlement be approved effective with the March 2012 billing month, and the PUCT approved the application in March 2012. Entergy Texas completed this refund to customers in May 2012.

In October 2012, Entergy Texas filed with the PUCT a request to refund approximately $78 million, including interest, of fuel cost recovery over-collections through September 2012. Entergy Texas requested that the refund be implemented over a six-month period effective with the January 2013 billing month.

In July 2012, Entergy Texas filed with the PUCT an application to credit its customers approximately $37.5 million, including interest, resulting from the FERC’s October 2011 order in the System Agreement rough production cost equalization proceeding. See the Form 10-K for a discussion of the FERC’s October 2011 order. In September 2012 the parties submitted a stipulation resolving the proceeding. The stipulation provides that Entergy Texas customers will be credited over a four-month period beginning October 2012. The credits were initiated with the October 2012 billing month on an interim basis, and the PUCT subsequently approved the stipulation, also in October 2012.

Table of Contents

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Financial Statements

Retail Rate Proceedings

See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for detailed information regarding retail rate proceedings involving the Utility operating companies. The following are updates to the Form 10-K.

Filings with the LPSC

(Entergy Gulf States Louisiana)

In January 2012, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana filed with the LPSC its gas rate stabilization plan for the test year ended September 30, 2011. The filing showed an earned return on common equity of 10.48%, which is within the earnings bandwidth of 10.5%, plus or minus fifty basis points. In April 2012, the LPSC Staff filed its findings, suggesting adjustments that produced an 11.54% earned return on common equity for the test year and a $0.1 million rate reduction. Entergy Gulf States Louisiana accepted the LPSC Staff’s recommendations, and the rate reduction was effective with the first billing cycle of May 2012. Related to the annual gas rate stabilization plan proceedings, the LPSC directed its staff to initiate an evaluation of the 10.5% allowed return on common equity for the Entergy Gulf States Louisiana gas rate stabilization plan. The LPSC directed that its staff should provide an analysis of the current return on equity and justification for any proposed changes to the return on equity. In August 2012 the LPSC staff filed direct testimony recommending a midpoint return on equity of 9.3%. Entergy Gulf States Louisiana filed responsive testimony recommending that the 10.5% return on equity remain unchanged. The hearing in this proceeding is currently scheduled for November 8-9, 2012.

In May 2012, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana made its formula rate plan filing with the LPSC for the 2011 test year. The filing reflected an 11.94% earned return on common equity, which is above the earnings bandwidth and would indicate a $6.5 million cost of service rate change was necessary under the formula rate plan. The filing also reflected a $22.9 million rate decrease for incremental capacity costs. Subsequently, in August 2012, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana submitted a revised filing that reflects an earned return on common equity of 11.86% indicating a $5.7 million cost of service rate decrease is necessary under the formula rate plan. The revised filing also indicates that a reduction of $20.3 million should be reflected in the incremental capacity rider. The rate reductions were implemented, subject to refund, effective for bills rendered the first billing cycle of September 2012. The filing remains subject to LPSC review. The September 2012 rate change reduced Entergy Gulf States Louisiana’s revenues by approximately $2.2 million in the third quarter 2012.

(Entergy Louisiana)

In May 2012, Entergy Louisiana made its formula rate plan filing with the LPSC for the 2011 test year. The filing reflected a 9.63% earned return on common equity, which is within the earnings bandwidth and results in no cost of service rate change under the formula rate plan. The filing also reflected an $18.1 million rate increase for incremental capacity costs. Subsequently, in June 2012, Entergy Louisiana supplemented the filing to estimate at $101 million the first-year revenue requirement associated with the Waterford 3 replacement steam generator project when it is placed into service. In August 2012, Entergy Louisiana submitted a revised filing that reflects an earned return on common equity of 10.38%, which is still within the earnings bandwidth, resulting in no cost of service rate change. The revised filing also indicates that an increase of $15.9 million should be reflected in the incremental capacity rider. The rate change was implemented, subject to refund, effective for bills rendered the first billing cycle of September 2012. The filing remains subject to LPSC review. The September 2012 rate change contributed approximately $1.3 million to Entergy Louisiana’s revenues in the third quarter 2012.

Filings with the MPSC

In March 2012, Entergy Mississippi submitted its formula rate plan filing for the 2011 test year. The filing shows an earned return on common equity of 10.92% for the test year, which is within the earnings bandwidth and results in no change in rates. The filing is currently subject to MPSC review.

Table of Contents

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Financial Statements

Filings with the City Council

In May 2012, Entergy New Orleans filed its electric and gas formula rate plan evaluation reports for the 2011 test year. Subsequent adjustments agreed upon with the City Council Advisors indicate a $4.9 million electric base revenue increase and a $0.05 million gas base revenue increase as necessary under the formula rate plan. As part of the original filing, Entergy New Orleans is also requesting to increase annual funding for its storm reserve by approximately $5.7 million for the next five years. On September 26, 2012, Entergy New Orleans made a filing with the City Council that implemented the $4.9 million electric formula rate plan rate increase and the $0.05 million gas formula rate plan rate increase. The new rates were effective with the first billing cycle in October 2012. In October 2012 the City Council approved a procedural schedule to resolve disputed items that includes a hearing in April 2013. The rates implemented in October 2012 are subject to retroactive adjustments depending on the outcome of the proceeding. The City Council has not yet acted on Entergy New Orleans’s request for an increase in storm reserve funding.

Filings with the PUCT and Texas Cities

See the Form 10-K for a discussion of the rate case that Entergy Texas filed in November 2011 requesting a $112 million base rate increase reflecting a 10.6% return on common equity based on an adjusted June 2011 test year. In April 2012 the PUCT Staff filed direct testimony recommending a base rate increase of $66 million and a 9.6% return on common equity. The PUCT Staff, however, subsequently filed a statement of position in the proceeding indicating that it was still evaluating the position it would ultimately take in the case regarding Entergy Texas’s recovery of purchased power capacity costs and Entergy Texas’s proposal to defer its MISO transition expenses. In April 2012, Entergy Texas filed rebuttal testimony indicating a revised request for a $105 million base rate increase. A hearing was held in late-April through early-May 2012. During the hearing and in its post-hearing brief the PUCT Staff revised its recommendation to a base rate increase of $27 million.

In September 2012 the PUCT issued an order approving a $28 million rate increase, effective July 2012. The order includes a finding that “a return on common equity (ROE) of 9.80 percent will allow [Entergy Texas] a reasonable opportunity to earn a reasonable return on invested capital.” The order also provides for increases in depreciation rates and the annual storm reserve accrual. The order also reduced Entergy Texas’s proposed purchased power capacity costs, stating that they are not known and measureable; reduced Entergy Texas’s regulatory assets associated with Hurricane Rita; excluded from rate recovery capitalized financially-based incentive compensation; included $1.6 million of MISO transition expense in base rates, and reduced Entergy’s Texas’s fuel reconciliation recovery by $4.0 million because it disagreed with the line-loss factor used in the calculation. After considering the progress of the proceeding in light of the PUCT order, Entergy Texas recorded in the third quarter 2012 an approximate $24 million charge to recognize that assets associated with Hurricane Rita, financially-based incentive compensation, and fuel recovery are no longer probable of recovery. Entergy Texas continues to believe that it is entitled to recover these prudently incurred costs, however, and it filed a motion for rehearing regarding these and several other issues in the PUCT’s order on October 4, 2012. Several other parties have also filed motions for rehearing of the PUCT’s order. The PUCT subsequently denied rehearing of substantive issues.

System Agreement Cost Equalization Proceedings

See the Form 10-K for a discussion of the proceedings regarding the System Agreement, including the FERC’s October 2011 order, Entergy’s December 2011 compliance filing in response to that order, and Entergy Arkansas’s February 2012 filing for an interim adjustment to its production cost allocation rider requesting that the $156 million payment be collected from customers over the 22-month period from March 2012 through December 2013. In March 2012 the APSC issued an order stating that the payment can be recovered from retail customers through the production cost allocation rider, subject to refund. The LPSC and the APSC have requested rehearing of the FERC’s October 2011 order. The APSC, the LPSC, the PUCT, and other parties intervened in the December 2011 compliance filing proceeding, and the APSC and the LPSC also filed protests.

Table of Contents

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Financial Statements

On May 7, 2012, the FERC issued orders in several System Agreement proceedings, including an order on rehearing in the 2007 rate filing based on 2006 production costs proceeding, an order on the ALJ’s initial decision in the 2009 rate filing based on 2008 production costs proceeding, and orders in other proceedings regarding the method of calculating the production costs used in the determination of the rough production cost equalization payments and receipts. The May 7, 2012 FERC orders may result in the reallocation of costs among the Utility operating companies, although there are still FERC decisions pending in other System Agreement proceedings that could affect the rough production cost equalization payments and receipts, including for the 2007 rate filing. The FERC directed Entergy, within 45 days of the issuance of a pending FERC order on rehearing regarding the functionalization of costs in the 2007 rate filing, to file a comprehensive bandwidth recalculation report showing updated payments and receipts in the 2007 rate filing proceeding. In the order in the 2007 rate filing proceeding, the FERC also denied Entergy’s request for rehearing regarding the AmerenUE contract and ordered Entergy Arkansas to refund to AmerenUE the rough production cost equalization payments collected from AmerenUE. Under the terms of the FERC’s order the refund of $30.6 million, including interest, was made in June 2012. Entergy Arkansas had previously recorded a regulatory provision for the potential refund to AmerenUE. Entergy has appealed the FERC’s decision to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit.

Rough Production Cost Equalization Rates

2012 Rate Filing Based on Calendar Year 2011 Production Costs

In May 2012, Entergy filed with the FERC the 2012 rates in accordance with the FERC’s orders in the System Agreement proceeding. The filing shows the following payments/receipts among the Utility operating companies for 2012, based on calendar year 2011 production costs, commencing for service in June 2012, are necessary to achieve rough production cost equalization under the FERC’s orders:

	Payments or (Receipts)
	(In Millions)

Entergy Arkansas	$41
Entergy Gulf States Louisiana	$-
Entergy Louisiana	($41)
Entergy Mississippi	$-
Entergy New Orleans	$-
Entergy Texas	$-

Several parties intervened in the proceeding at the FERC, including the LPSC, which filed a protest as well. In August 2012, the FERC accepted Entergy's proposed rates for filing, effective June 2012, subject to refund, set the proceeding for hearing procedures, and then held those procedures in abeyance pending FERC decisions in prior production cost proceedings currently before the FERC on review.

Interruptible Load Proceeding

See the Form 10-K for a discussion of the proceeding regarding the treatment under the System Agreement of the Utility operating companies’ interruptible loads. Entergy Arkansas filed an application in November 2010 with the APSC for recovery of the refund that it paid. The APSC denied Entergy Arkansas’s application, and also denied Entergy Arkansas’s petition for rehearing. If the FERC were to order Entergy Arkansas to pay refunds on rehearing in the interruptible load proceeding the APSC’s decision would trap FERC-approved costs at Entergy Arkansas with no regulatory-approved mechanism to recover them. In August 2011, Entergy Arkansas filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas asking for a declaratory judgment that the rejection of Entergy Arkansas’s application by the APSC is preempted by the Federal Power Act. The APSC filed a motion to dismiss the complaint. In April 2012 the United States district court dismissed Entergy Arkansas’s complaint without prejudice stating that Entergy Arkansas’s claim is not ripe for adjudication and that Entergy Arkansas did not have standing to bring suit at this time.

Table of Contents

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Financial Statements

Entergy Arkansas Opportunity Sales Proceeding

In June 2009, the LPSC filed a complaint requesting that the FERC determine that certain of Entergy Arkansas’s sales of electric energy to third parties: (a) violated the provisions of the System Agreement that allocate the energy generated by Entergy System resources, (b) imprudently denied the Entergy System and its ultimate consumers the benefits of low-cost Entergy System generating capacity, and (c) violated the provision of the System Agreement that prohibits sales to third parties by individual companies absent an offer of a right-of-first-refusal to other Utility operating companies. The LPSC’s complaint challenged sales made beginning in 2002 and requested refunds. In their response to the complaint, the Utility operating companies explained that the System Agreement clearly contemplates that the Utility operating companies may make sales to third parties for their own account, subject to the requirement that those sales be included in the load (or load shape) for the applicable Utility operating company. The response further explained that the FERC already has determined that Entergy Arkansas’s short-term wholesale sales did not trigger the “right-of-first-refusal” provision of the System Agreement. In addition the response argued that while the D.C. Circuit had determined that the “right-of-first-refusal” issue was not properly before the FERC at the time of its earlier decision on the issue, the LPSC raised no additional claims or facts that would warrant the FERC reaching a different conclusion.

In December 2010 the ALJ issued an initial decision. The ALJ found that the System Agreement allowed for Entergy Arkansas to make the sales to third parties but concluded that the sales should be accounted for in the same manner as joint account sales. The ALJ concluded that “shareholders” should make refunds of the damages to the Utility operating companies, along with interest. Entergy disagreed with several aspects of the ALJ’s initial decision and in January 2011 filed with the FERC exceptions to the decision.

The FERC issued a decision in June 2012 and held that, while the System Agreement is ambiguous, it does provide authority for individual Utility operating companies to make opportunity sales for their own account and Entergy Arkansas made and priced these sales in good faith. The FERC found, however, that the System Agreement does not provide authority for an individual Utility operating company to allocate the energy associated with such opportunity sales as part of its load, but provides a different allocation authority. The FERC further found that the after-the-fact accounting methodology used to allocate the energy used to supply the sales was inconsistent with the System Agreement. Quantifying the effect of the FERC’s decision will require re-running intra-system bills for a ten-year period, and the FERC in its decision established further hearing procedures to determine the calculation of the effects.

As required by the procedural schedule established in the calculation proceeding, Entergy filed its direct testimony that included a proposed illustrative re-run, consistent with the directives in FERC’s order, of intra-system bills for 2003, 2004, and 2006, the three years with the highest volume of opportunity sales. Entergy’s proposed illustrative re-run of intra-system bills shows that the potential cost for Entergy Arkansas would be up to $12 million for the years 2003, 2004, and 2006, and the potential benefit would be significantly less than that for each of the other Utility operating companies. Entergy’s proposed illustrative rerun of the intra-system bills also shows an offsetting potential benefit to Entergy Arkansas for the years 2003, 2004, and 2006 resulting from the effects of the FERC’s order on System Agreement Service Schedules MSS-1, MSS-2, and MSS-3, and the potential offsetting cost would be significantly less than that for each of the other Utility operating companies. The LPSC had previously filed direct testimony in the proceeding alleging that over the period 2000 - 2009 the sales caused harm to the Utility operating companies’ customers of $144 million. In subsequent testimony, however, the LPSC modified its original damages claim in favor of quantifying damages by re-running intra-system bills. Entergy provided to the LPSC an illustrative intra-system bill recalculation as specified by the LPSC for the years 2003, 2004, and 2006, and the LPSC’s answering testimony is due in December 2012. The FERC staff’s and intervenors’ direct and answering testimony is due in February 2013, a hearing is scheduled for May 2013, and the ALJ’s initial decision on the calculation of the effects is due by August 28, 2013.

On July 23, 2012, Entergy and the LPSC filed requests for rehearing of the FERC’s June 2012 decision, which are pending with the FERC.

Table of Contents

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Financial Statements

Storm Cost Recovery Filings with Retail Regulators

Entergy Gulf States Louisiana

Hurricane Katrina and Hurricane Rita

See the Form 10-K for a discussion of Entergy Gulf States Louisiana’s Act 55 financing of its Hurricane Katrina and Hurricane Rita storm costs. In February 2012, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana sold 500,000 of its Class A preferred membership units in Entergy Holdings Company LLC, a wholly-owned Entergy subsidiary, to a third party in exchange for $51 million plus accrued but unpaid distributions on the units. The 500,000 preferred membership units are mandatorily redeemable in January 2112.

New Nuclear Generation Development Costs (Entergy Gulf States and Entergy Louisiana)

Entergy Gulf States Louisiana and Entergy Louisiana are developing a project option for new nuclear generation at River Bend. In March 2010, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana and Entergy Louisiana filed with the LPSC seeking approval to continue the limited development activities necessary to preserve an option to construct a new unit at River Bend. The testimony and legal briefs of the LPSC staff generally support the request of Entergy Gulf States Louisiana and Entergy Louisiana, although other parties filed briefs, without supporting testimony, in opposition to the request. At an evidentiary hearing in October 2011, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, Entergy Louisiana, and the LPSC staff presented testimony in support of certification of activities to preserve an option for a new nuclear plant at River Bend. The ALJ recommended, however, that the LPSC decline the request of Entergy Gulf States Louisiana and Entergy Louisiana on the basis that the LPSC’s rule on new nuclear development does not apply to activities to preserve an option to develop and on the further grounds that the companies improperly engaged in advanced preparation activities prior to certification. There has been no suggestion that the planning activities or costs incurred were imprudent. At its June 28, 2012 meeting the LPSC voted to uphold the ALJ’s decision and directed that Entergy Gulf States Louisiana and Entergy Louisiana be permitted to seek recovery of these costs in the rate case filings that are anticipated in January 2013, fully reserving the LPSC’s right to determine the recoverability of such costs in rates. On September 10, 2012, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana and Entergy Louisiana filed a petition for appeal and judicial review of the LPSC’s order with the Louisiana Nineteenth Judicial District Court. A schedule for the appeal has not been established.

Texas Power Price Lawsuit

In August 2003, a lawsuit was filed in the district court of Chambers County, Texas by Texas residents on behalf of a purported class of the Texas retail customers of Entergy Gulf States, Inc. who were billed and paid for electric power from January 1, 1994 to the present. The named defendants include Entergy Corporation, Entergy Services, Entergy Power, Entergy Power Marketing Corp., and Entergy Arkansas. Entergy Gulf States, Inc. was not a named defendant, but was alleged to be a co-conspirator. The court granted the request of Entergy Gulf States, Inc. to intervene in the lawsuit to protect its interests.

Plaintiffs allege that the defendants implemented a “price gouging accounting scheme” to sell to plaintiffs and similarly situated utility customers higher priced power generated by the defendants while rejecting less expensive power offered from off-system suppliers. In particular, plaintiffs allege that the defendants manipulated and continue to manipulate the dispatch of generation so that power is purchased from affiliated expensive resources instead of buying cheaper off-system power.

Plaintiffs stated in their pleadings that customers in Texas were charged at least $57 million above prevailing market prices for power. Plaintiffs seek actual, consequential and exemplary damages, costs and attorneys’ fees, and disgorgement of profits. The plaintiffs’ experts have tendered a report calculating damages in a large range, from $153 million to $972 million in present value, under various scenarios. The Entergy defendants have tendered expert reports challenging the assumptions, methodologies, and conclusions of the plaintiffs’ expert reports.

Table of Contents

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Financial Statements

The case is pending in state district court, and in March 2012 the court found that the case met the requirements to be maintained as a class action under Texas law. On April 30, 2012, the court entered an order certifying the class. The defendants have appealed the order to the Texas Court of Appeals – First District. The appeal is pending and proceedings in district court are stayed until the appeal is resolved.

NOTE 3. EQUITY (Entergy Corporation, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, and Entergy Louisiana)

Common Stock

Earnings per Share

The following tables present Entergy’s basic and diluted earnings per share calculations included on the consolidated income statements:

	For the Three Months Ended September 30,
	2012			2011
	(In Millions, Except Per Share Data)

Basic earnings per share	Income	Shares	$/share	Income	Shares	$/share

Net income attributable to Entergy Corporation	$337.1	177.5	$1.90	$628.1	177.0	$3.55
Average dilutive effect of:
Stock options		0.4	(0.01)		0.7	(0.02)
Other equity plans		0.1	-		-	-

Diluted earnings per share	$337.1	178.0	$1.89	$628.1	177.7	$3.53

	For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2012			2011
	(In Millions, Except Per Share Data)

Basic earnings per share	Income	Shares	$/share	Income	Shares	$/share

Net income attributable to Entergy Corporation	$550.4	177.2	$3.11	$1,192.3	177.9	$6.70
Average dilutive effect of:
Stock options		0.3	(0.01)		0.9	(0.03)
Other equity plans		0.1	-		-	-

Diluted earnings per share	$550.4	177.6	$3.10	$1,192.3	178.8	$6.67

Entergy’s stock options and other equity compensation plans are discussed in Note 5 herein and in Note 12 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K.

Table of Contents

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Financial Statements

Treasury Stock

During the nine months ended September 30, 2012, Entergy Corporation issued 1,316,691 shares of its previously repurchased common stock to satisfy stock option exercises and other stock-based awards. Entergy Corporation did not repurchase any of its common stock during the nine months ended September 30, 2012.

Retained Earnings

On October 26, 2012, Entergy Corporation’s Board of Directors declared a common stock dividend of $0.83 per share, payable on December 3, 2012 to holders of record as of November 8, 2012.

Comprehensive Income

Accumulated other comprehensive loss is included in the equity section of the balance sheets of Entergy, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, and Entergy Louisiana. Accumulated other comprehensive loss in the balance sheets included the following components:

	Entergy		Entergy Gulf States Louisiana		Entergy Louisiana
	September 30, 2012	December 31, 2011	September 30, 2012	December 31, 2011	September 30, 2012	December 31, 2011
	(In Thousands)

Cash flow hedges net unrealized gain	$108,704	$177,497	$-	$-	$-	$-
Pension and other postretirement liabilities	(470,032)	(499,556)	(57,213)	(69,610)	(37,617)	(39,507)
Net unrealized investment gains	221,450	150,939	-	-	-	-
Foreign currency translation	3,085	2,668	-	-	-	-
Total	($136,793)	($168,452)	($57,213)	($69,610)	($37,617)	($39,507)

Other comprehensive income (loss) and total comprehensive income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 are presented in Entergy’s, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana’s, and Entergy Louisiana’s Statements of Comprehensive Income.

Table of Contents

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Financial Statements

NOTE 4. REVOLVING CREDIT FACILITIES, LINES OF CREDIT, SHORT-TERM BORROWINGS, AND LONG-TERM DEBT (Entergy Corporation, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, Entergy Texas, and System Energy)

Entergy Corporation has in place a credit facility that has a borrowing capacity of $3.5 billion and expires in March 2017. Entergy Corporation also has the ability to issue letters of credit against 50% of the total borrowing capacity of the credit facility. The commitment fee is currently 0.275% of the commitment amount. Commitment fees and interest rates on loans under the credit facility can fluctuate depending on the senior unsecured debt ratings of Entergy Corporation. The weighted average interest rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 was 2.07% on the drawn portion of the facility. Following is a summary of the borrowings outstanding and capacity available under the facility as of September 30, 2012.

Capacity	Borrowings	Letters of Credit	Capacity Available
(In Millions)

$3,500	$1,315	$8	$2,177

Entergy Corporation’s facility requires it to maintain a consolidated debt ratio of 65% or less of its total capitalization. Entergy is in compliance with this covenant. If Entergy fails to meet this ratio, or if Entergy Corporation or one of the Utility operating companies (except Entergy New Orleans) defaults on other indebtedness or is in bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings, an acceleration of the facility maturity date may occur.

In September 2012, Entergy Corporation implemented a commercial paper program with a program limit of up to $500 million. At September 30, 2012, Entergy Corporation had $154.3 million of commercial paper outstanding. The weighted-average interest rate for the period ended September 30, 2012 was 0.80%. In October 2012 the Board approved increasing the limit for the commercial paper program to $1 billion.

Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, and Entergy Texas each had credit facilities available as of September 30, 2012 as follows:

Company	Expiration Date	Amount of Facility	Interest Rate (a)	Amount Drawn as of September 30, 2012

Entergy Arkansas	April 2013	$20 million (b)	1.86%	-
Entergy Arkansas	March 2017	$150 million (c)	1.72%	-
Entergy Gulf States Louisiana	March 2017	$150 million (d)	1.72%	-
Entergy Louisiana	March 2017	$200 million (e)	1.72%	-
Entergy Mississippi	May 2013	$35 million (f)	1.97%	-
Entergy Mississippi	May 2013	$25 million (f)	1.97%	-
Entergy Mississippi	May 2013	$10 million (f)	1.97%	-
Entergy Texas	March 2017	$150 million (g)	1.97%	-

(a)	The interest rate is the rate as of September 30, 2012 that would be applied to outstanding borrowings under the facility.
(b)	The credit facility requires Entergy Arkansas to maintain a debt ratio of 65% or less of its total capitalization. Borrowings under the Entergy Arkansas credit facility may be secured by a security interest in its accounts receivable.
(c)	The credit facility allows Entergy Arkansas to issue letters of credit against 50% of the borrowing capacity of the facility. As of September 30, 2012, no letters of credit were outstanding. The credit facility requires Entergy Arkansas to maintain a consolidated debt ratio of 65% or less of its total capitalization.
(d)	The credit facility allows Entergy Gulf States Louisiana to issue letters of credit against 50% of the borrowing capacity of the facility. As of September 30, 2012, no letters of credit were outstanding. The credit facility requires Entergy Gulf States Louisiana to maintain a consolidated debt ratio of 65% or less of its total capitalization.

Table of Contents

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Financial Statements

(e)	The credit facility allows Entergy Louisiana to issue letters of credit against 50% of the borrowing capacity of the facility. As of September 30, 2012, no letters of credit were outstanding. The credit facility requires Entergy Louisiana to maintain a consolidated debt ratio of 65% or less of its total capitalization.
(f)	Borrowings under the Entergy Mississippi credit facilities may be secured by a security interest in its accounts receivable. Entergy Mississippi is required to maintain a consolidated debt ratio of 65% or less of its total capitalization.
(g)	The credit facility allows Entergy Texas to issue letters of credit against 50% of the borrowing capacity of the facility. As of September 30, 2012, no letters of credit were outstanding. The credit facility requires Entergy Texas to maintain a consolidated debt ratio of 65% or less of its total capitalization.

The facility fees on the credit facilities range from 0.125% to 0.275% of the commitment amount.

The short-term borrowings of the Registrant Subsidiaries are limited to amounts authorized by the FERC. The current FERC-authorized limits are effective through October 31, 2013. In addition to borrowings from commercial banks, these companies are authorized under a FERC order to borrow from the Entergy System money pool. The money pool is an inter-company borrowing arrangement designed to reduce the Utility subsidiaries’ dependence on external short-term borrowings. Borrowings from the money pool and external borrowings combined may not exceed the FERC-authorized limits. The following are the FERC-authorized limits for short-term borrowings and the outstanding short-term borrowings as of September 30, 2012 (aggregating both money pool and external short-term borrowings) for the Registrant Subsidiaries:

	Authorized	Borrowings
	(In Millions)

Entergy Arkansas	$250	-
Entergy Gulf States Louisiana	$200	-
Entergy Louisiana	$250	-
Entergy Mississippi	$175	-
Entergy New Orleans	$100	$16
Entergy Texas	$200	-
System Energy	$200	-

Variable Interest Entities (Entergy Corporation, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, Entergy Louisiana, and System Energy)

See Note 18 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the consolidation of the nuclear fuel company variable interest entities (VIE). The nuclear fuel company variable interest entities have credit facilities and also issue commercial paper to finance the acquisition and ownership of nuclear fuel as follows as of September 30, 2012:

Company	Expiration Date	Amount of Facility	Weighted Average Interest Rate on Borrowings (a)	Amount Outstanding as of September 30, 2012
	(Dollars in Millions)

Entergy Arkansas VIE	July 2013	$85	2.30%	$52.7
Entergy Gulf States Louisiana VIE	July 2013	$85	n/a	$-
Entergy Louisiana VIE	July 2013	$90	2.32%	$56.5
System Energy VIE	July 2013	$100	2.36%	$62.8

Table of Contents

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Financial Statements

(a)

Includes letter of credit fees and bank fronting fees on commercial paper issuances by the nuclear fuel company variable interest entities for Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, and System Energy. The nuclear fuel company variable interest entity for Entergy Gulf States Louisiana does not issue commercial paper, but borrows directly on its bank credit facility.

Amounts outstanding on the Entergy Gulf States Louisiana nuclear fuel company variable interest entity’s credit facility are included in long-term debt on its balance sheet and commercial paper outstanding for the other nuclear fuel company variable interest entities is classified as a current liability on the respective balance sheets. The commitment fees on the credit facilities are 0.20% of the undrawn commitment amount. Each credit facility requires the respective lessee of nuclear fuel (Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, Entergy Louisiana, or Entergy Corporation as guarantor for System Energy) to maintain a consolidated debt ratio of 70% or less of its total capitalization.

The nuclear fuel company variable interest entities had notes payable that are included in debt on the respective balance sheets as of September 30, 2012 as follows:

Company	Description	Amount

Entergy Arkansas VIE	9% Series H due June 2013	$30 million
Entergy Arkansas VIE	5.69% Series I due July 2014	$70 million
Entergy Arkansas VIE	3.23% Series J due July 2016	$55 million
Entergy Gulf States Louisiana VIE	5.56% Series N due May 2013	$75 million
Entergy Gulf States Louisiana VIE	3.25% Series Q due July 2017	$75 million
Entergy Louisiana VIE	5.69% Series E due July 2014	$50 million
Entergy Louisiana VIE	3.30% Series F due March 2016	$20 million
Entergy Louisiana VIE	3.25% Series G due July 2017	$25 million
System Energy VIE	6.29% Series F due September 2013	$70 million
System Energy VIE	5.33% Series G due April 2015	$60 million
System Energy VIE	4.02% Series H due February 2017	$50 million

In accordance with regulatory treatment, interest on the nuclear fuel company variable interest entities’ credit facilities, commercial paper, and long-term notes payable is reported in fuel expense.

Debt Issuances and Redemptions

(Entergy Corporation)

In January 2012, Entergy Corporation issued $500 million of 4.70% senior notes due January 2017. Entergy Corporation used the proceeds to repay borrowings under its $3.5 billion credit facility. The net repayment of Entergy’s credit facility during the first quarter 2012 was $455 million.

(Entergy Gulf States)

In April 2012, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana redeemed, prior to maturity, its $10.84 million 5.8% Series pollution control revenue bonds due April 2016.

In July 2012 the Entergy Gulf States Louisiana nuclear fuel company variable interest entity issued $75 million of 3.25% Series Q notes due July 2017. The Entergy Gulf States Louisiana nuclear fuel company variable interest entity used the proceeds to pay, at maturity, its $60 million 5.41% Series O notes due July 2012 and to repay borrowings of $3.5 million under its $85 million nuclear fuel company variable interest entity credit facility.

Table of Contents

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Financial Statements

(Entergy Louisiana)

In January 2012, Entergy Louisiana issued $250 million of 1.875% Series first mortgage bonds due December 2014. Entergy Louisiana used a portion of the proceeds to repay short-term borrowings under the Entergy System money pool.

In July 2012, Entergy Louisiana issued $200 million of 5.25% Series first mortgage bonds due July 2052. Entergy Louisiana used the proceeds for general corporate purposes.

In August 2012 the Entergy Louisiana nuclear fuel company variable interest entity issued $25 million of 3.25% Series G notes due July 2017. The Entergy Louisiana nuclear fuel company variable interest entity used the proceeds to purchase additional nuclear fuel.

(System Energy)

In February 2012 the System Energy nuclear fuel company variable interest entity issued $50 million of 4.02% Series H notes due February 2017. The System Energy nuclear fuel company variable interest entity used the proceeds to purchase additional nuclear fuel.

In September 2012, System Energy issued $250 million of 4.10% Series first mortgage bonds due April 2023. System Energy used a portion of the proceeds to pay, at maturity, its $70 million 6.2% Series first mortgage bonds due October 2012 and to pay, prior to maturity, its $102.975 million 5.9% Series pollution control revenue bonds due May 2022 and its $50 million 6.2% Series pollution control revenue bonds due February 2026.

Fair Value

The book value and the fair value of long-term debt for Entergy Corporation and the Registrant Subsidiaries as of September 30, 2012 are as follows:

	Book Value of Long-Term Debt	Fair Value of Long-Term Debt (a) (b)
	(In Thousands)

Entergy	$12,535,864	$12,946,166
Entergy Arkansas	$1,870,076	$1,776,893
Entergy Gulf States Louisiana	$1,517,369	$1,670,740
Entergy Louisiana	$2,639,714	$2,781,584
Entergy Mississippi	$920,484	$998,493
Entergy New Orleans	$166,322	$172,182
Entergy Texas	$1,628,270	$1,887,539
System Energy	$853,771	$735,626

(a)	The values exclude lease obligations of $163 million at Entergy Louisiana and $139 million at System Energy, long-term DOE obligations of $181 million at Entergy Arkansas, and the note payable to NYPA of $126 million at Entergy, and include debt due within one year.
(b)	Fair values are classified as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy discussed in Note 8 to the financial statements and are based on prices derived from inputs such as benchmark yields and reported trades.

Table of Contents

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Financial Statements

The book value and the fair value of long-term debt for Entergy Corporation and the Registrant Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2011 were as follows:

	Book Value of Long-Term Debt	Fair Value of Long-Term Debt (a) (b)
	(In Thousands)

Entergy	$12,236,446	$12,176,251
Entergy Arkansas	$1,875,921	$1,756,361
Entergy Gulf States Louisiana	$1,542,430	$1,642,388
Entergy Louisiana	$2,252,312	$2,211,355
Entergy Mississippi	$920,439	$985,600
Entergy New Orleans	$166,537	$169,270
Entergy Texas	$1,677,127	$1,906,081
System Energy	$747,048	$582,952

(a)	The values exclude lease obligations of $188 million at Entergy Louisiana and $179 million at System Energy, long-term DOE obligations of $181 million at Entergy Arkansas, and the note payable to NYPA of $133 million at Entergy, and include debt due within one year.
(b)	Fair values are classified as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy discussed in Note 8 to the financial statements and are based on prices derived from inputs such as benchmark yields and reported trades.

NOTE 5. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION (Entergy Corporation)

Entergy grants stock awards, which are described more fully in Note 12 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K. Awards under Entergy’s plans generally vest over three years.

Stock Options

Entergy granted 552,400 stock options during the first quarter 2012 with a weighted-average fair value of $9.42 per option. At September 30, 2012, there are 9,639,169 stock options outstanding with a weighted-average exercise price of $79.16. The intrinsic value, which has no effect on net income, of the outstanding stock options is calculated by the difference in the weighted average exercise price of the stock options granted and Entergy Corporation’s common stock price as of September 30, 2012. Because Entergy’s stock price at September 30, 2012 is less than the weighted average exercise price, the aggregate intrinsic value of the stock options outstanding as of September 30, 2012 is zero. The intrinsic value of “in the money” stock options is $17.2 million as of September 30, 2012.

The following table includes financial information for stock options for the third quarters of 2012 and 2011:

	2012	2011
	(In Millions)

Compensation expense included in Entergy’s net income	$1.9	$2.5
Tax benefit recognized in Entergy’s net income	$0.7	$0.9
Compensation cost capitalized as part of fixed assets and inventory	$0.3	$0.5

Table of Contents

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Financial Statements

The following table includes financial information for stock options for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011:

	2012	2011
	(In Millions)


Compensation expense included in Entergy’s net income	$5.8	$8.0
Tax benefit recognized in Entergy’s net income	$2.2	$3.1
Compensation cost capitalized as part of fixed assets and inventory	$1.1	$1.5

Other Equity Plans

In January 2012, the Board approved and Entergy granted 339,700 restricted stock awards and 176,742 Long-term Incentive Plan (LTIP) awards under the 2011 Equity Ownership and Long-term Cash Incentive Plan. The restricted stock awards were made effective as of January 26, 2012 and were valued at $71.30 per share, which was the closing price of Entergy’s common stock on that date. One-third of the restricted stock awards will vest upon each anniversary of the grant date. Beginning with the 2012 – 2014 performance period, upon vesting, the performance units granted under the LTIP will be settled in shares of Entergy common stock rather than cash. The LTIP stock awards were made effective as of January 27, 2012 and were valued at $67.11 per share. Entergy considers various factors, primarily market conditions, in determining the value of the LTIP stock awards. Shares of the stock awards have the same dividend and voting rights as other common stock, are considered issued and outstanding shares of Entergy upon vesting, and are expensed ratably over the three-year vesting period.

The following table includes financial information for other equity plans for the third quarters of 2012 and 2011:

	2012	2011
	(In Millions)

Compensation expense included in Entergy’s net income	$3.7	$1.0
Tax benefit recognized in Entergy’s net income	$1.4	$0.4
Compensation cost capitalized as part of fixed assets and inventory	$0.6	$0.2

The following table includes financial information for other equity plans for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011:

	2012	2011
	(In Millions)

Compensation expense included in Entergy’s net income	$11.0	$2.9
Tax benefit recognized in Entergy’s net income	$4.2	$1.1
Compensation cost capitalized as part of fixed assets and inventory	$1.9	$0.5

Table of Contents

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Financial Statements

NOTE 6. RETIREMENT AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS (Entergy Corporation, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, Entergy Texas, and System Energy)

Components of Net Pension Cost

Entergy’s qualified pension cost, including amounts capitalized, for the third quarters of 2012 and 2011, included the following components:

	2012	2011
	(In Thousands)

Service cost - benefits earned during the period	$37,691	$30,490
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation	65,232	59,248
Expected return on assets	(79,356)	(75,319)
Amortization of prior service cost	683	838
Amortization of loss	41,820	23,244
Net pension costs	$66,070	$38,501

Entergy’s qualified pension cost, including amounts capitalized, for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, included the following components:

	2012	2011
	(In Thousands)

Service cost - benefits earned during the period	$113,073	$91,470
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation	195,696	177,744
Expected return on assets	(238,068)	(225,957)
Amortization of prior service cost	2,049	2,514
Amortization of loss	125,460	69,732
Net pension costs	$198,210	$115,503

The Registrant Subsidiaries’ qualified pension cost, including amounts capitalized, for the third quarters of 2012 and 2011, included the following components:

2012	Entergy Arkansas	Entergy Gulf States Louisiana	Entergy Louisiana	Entergy Mississippi	Entergy New Orleans	Entergy Texas	System Energy
	(In Thousands)
Service cost - benefits earned
during the period	$5,542	$3,068	$3,669	$1,602	$706	$1,421	$1,480
Interest cost on projected
benefit obligation	13,922	6,420	8,800	4,070	1,902	4,206	3,247
Expected return on assets	(16,441)	(8,593)	(10,209)	(5,236)	(2,215)	(5,581)	(4,109)
Amortization of prior service
cost	50	5	52	7	2	4	3
Amortization of loss	10,193	4,043	7,050	2,633	1,719	2,544	2,251
Net pension cost	$13,266	$4,943	$9,362	$3,076	$2,114	$2,594	$2,872

Table of Contents

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Financial Statements

2011	Entergy Arkansas	Entergy Gulf States Louisiana	Entergy Louisiana	Entergy Mississippi	Entergy New Orleans	Entergy Texas	System Energy
	(In Thousands)
Service cost - benefits earned
during the period	$4,518	$2,462	$2,886	$1,327	$561	$1,197	$1,235
Interest cost on projected
benefit obligation	12,991	5,928	8,159	3,909	1,762	3,993	2,939
Expected return on assets	(15,609)	(8,339)	(9,716)	(5,038)	(2,114)	(5,501)	(3,784)
Amortization of prior service
cost	115	20	70	38	9	16	4
Amortization of loss	6,421	2,279	4,497	1,680	1,166	1,394	1,321
Net pension cost	$8,436	$2,350	$5,896	$1,916	$1,384	$1,099	$1,715

The Registrant Subsidiaries’ qualified pension cost, including amounts capitalized, for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, included the following components:

2012	Entergy Arkansas	Entergy Gulf States Louisiana	Entergy Louisiana	Entergy Mississippi	Entergy New Orleans	Entergy Texas	System Energy
	(In Thousands)
Service cost - benefits earned
during the period	$16,626	$9,204	$11,007	$4,806	$2,118	$4,263	$4,440
Interest cost on projected
benefit obligation	41,766	19,260	26,400	12,210	5,706	12,618	9,741
Expected return on assets	(49,323)	(25,779)	(30,627)	(15,708)	(6,645)	(16,743)	(12,327)
Amortization of prior service
cost	150	15	156	21	6	12	9
Amortization of loss	30,579	12,129	21,150	7,899	5,157	7,632	6,753
Net pension cost	$39,798	$14,829	$28,086	$9,228	$6,342	$7,782	$8,616

2011	Entergy Arkansas	Entergy Gulf States Louisiana	Entergy Louisiana	Entergy Mississippi	Entergy New Orleans	Entergy Texas	System Energy
	(In Thousands)
Service cost - benefits earned
during the period	$13,554	$7,386	$8,658	$3,981	$1,683	$3,591	$3,705
Interest cost on projected
benefit obligation	38,973	17,784	24,477	11,727	5,286	11,979	8,817
Expected return on assets	(46,827)	(25,017)	(29,148)	(15,114)	(6,342)	(16,503)	(11,352)
Amortization of prior service
cost	345	60	210	114	27	48	12
Amortization of loss	19,263	6,837	13,491	5,040	3,498	4,182	3,963
Net pension cost	$25,308	$7,050	$17,688	$5,748	$4,152	$3,297	$5,145

Table of Contents

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Financial Statements

Entergy recognized $5.1 million and $4.9 million in pension cost for its non-qualified pension plans in the third quarters of 2012 and 2011, respectively. Entergy recognized $15.3 million and $14.6 million in pension cost for its non-qualified pension plans for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

The Registrant Subsidiaries recognized the following pension cost for their non-qualified pension plans in the third quarters of 2012 and 2011:

	Entergy Arkansas	Entergy Gulf States Louisiana	Entergy Louisiana	Entergy Mississippi	Entergy New Orleans	Entergy Texas
	(In Thousands)
Non-qualified pension cost third quarter 2012	$107	$39	$3	$46	$19	$163
Non-qualified pension cost third quarter 2011	$115	$42	$4	$48	$16	$192

The Registrant Subsidiaries recognized the following pension cost for their non-qualified pension plans for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011:

	Entergy Arkansas	Entergy Gulf States Louisiana	Entergy Louisiana	Entergy Mississippi	Entergy New Orleans	Entergy Texas
	(In Thousands)
Non-qualified pension cost nine months ended September 30, 2012	$321	$117	$9	$138	$57	$489
Non-qualified pension cost nine months ended September 30, 2011	$345	$126	$12	$144	$48	$576

Components of Net Other Postretirement Benefit Cost

Entergy’s other postretirement benefit cost, including amounts capitalized, for the third quarters of 2012 and 2011, included the following components:

	2012	2011
	(In Thousands)

Service cost - benefits earned during the period	$17,221	$14,835
Interest cost on accumulated postretirement benefit obligation (APBO)	20,640	18,631
Expected return on assets	(8,626)	(7,369)
Amortization of transition obligation	794	796
Amortization of prior service cost	(4,541)	(3,518)
Amortization of loss	9,113	5,298
Net other postretirement benefit cost	$34,601	$28,673

Table of Contents

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Financial Statements

Entergy’s other postretirement benefit cost, including amounts capitalized, for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, included the following components:

	2012	2011
	(In Thousands)

Service cost - benefits earned during the period	$51,663	$44,505
Interest cost on APBO	61,920	55,893
Expected return on assets	(25,878)	(22,107)
Amortization of transition obligation	2,382	2,388
Amortization of prior service cost	(13,623)	(10,554)
Amortization of loss	27,339	15,894
Net other postretirement benefit cost	$103,803	$86,019

The Registrant Subsidiaries’ other postretirement benefit cost, including amounts capitalized, for the third quarters of 2012 and 2011, included the following components:

2012	Entergy Arkansas	Entergy Gulf States Louisiana	Entergy Louisiana	Entergy Mississippi	Entergy New Orleans	Entergy Texas	System Energy
	(In Thousands)
Service cost - benefits earned
during the period	$2,272	$1,880	$1,949	$773	$422	$913	$823
Interest cost on APBO	3,613	2,398	2,445	1,179	856	1,663	757
Expected return on assets	(3,507)	-	-	(1,130)	(928)	(2,104)	(650)
Amortization of transition
obligation	205	60	96	88	297	47	2
Amortization of prior service
cost	(133)	(206)	(62)	(35)	10	(107)	(16)
Amortization of loss	2,077	1,184	1,090	730	390	1,079	493
Net other postretirement
benefit cost	$4,527	$5,316	$5,518	$1,605	$1,047	$1,491	$1,409

2011	Entergy Arkansas	Entergy Gulf States Louisiana	Entergy Louisiana	Entergy Mississippi	Entergy New Orleans	Entergy Texas	System Energy
	(In Thousands)
Service cost - benefits earned
during the period	$2,013	$1,540	$1,635	$658	$362	$769	$661
Interest cost on APBO	3,436	2,075	2,192	1,093	806	1,486	667
Expected return on assets	(2,882)	-	-	(977)	(800)	(1,874)	(529)
Amortization of transition
obligation	205	60	96	88	298	47	2
Amortization of prior service
cost	(133)	(206)	(62)	(35)	10	(107)	(147)
Amortization of loss	1,610	723	698	540	241	700	369
Net other postretirement
benefit cost	$4,249	$4,192	$4,559	$1,367	$917	$1,021	$1,023

Table of Contents

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Financial Statements

The Registrant Subsidiaries’ other postretirement benefit cost, including amounts capitalized, for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, included the following components:

2012	Entergy Arkansas	Entergy Gulf States Louisiana	Entergy Louisiana	Entergy Mississippi	Entergy New Orleans	Entergy Texas	System Energy
	(In Thousands)
Service cost - benefits earned
during the period	$6,816	$5,640	$5,847	$2,319	$1,266	$2,739	$2,469
Interest cost on APBO	10,839	7,194	7,335	3,537	2,568	4,989	2,271
Expected return on assets	(10,521)	-	-	(3,390)	(2,784)	(6,312)	(1,950)
Amortization of transition
obligation	615	180	288	264	891	141	6
Amortization of prior service
cost	(399)	(618)	(186)	(105)	30	(321)	(48)
Amortization of loss	6,231	3,552	3,270	2,190	1,170	3,237	1,479
Net other postretirement
benefit cost	$13,581	$15,948	$16,554	$4,815	$3,141	$4,473	$4,227

2011	Entergy Arkansas	Entergy Gulf States Louisiana	Entergy Louisiana	Entergy Mississippi	Entergy New Orleans	Entergy Texas	System Energy
	(In Thousands)
Service cost - benefits earned
during the period	$6,039	$4,620	$4,905	$1,974	$1,086	$2,307	$1,983
Interest cost on APBO	10,308	6,225	6,576	3,279	2,418	4,458	2,001
Expected return on assets	(8,646)	-	-	(2,931)	(2,400)	(5,622)	(1,587)
Amortization of transition
obligation	615	180	288	264	894	141	6
Amortization of prior service
cost	(399)	(618)	(186)	(105)	30	(321)	(441)
Amortization of loss	4,830	2,169	2,094	1,620	723	2,100	1,107
Net other postretirement
benefit cost	$12,747	$12,576	$13,677	$4,101	$2,751	$3,063	$3,069

Employer Contributions

Based on current assumptions, Entergy expects to contribute $170.5 million to its qualified pension plans in 2012. As of the end of September 2012, Entergy had contributed $170.5 million to its pension plans. Currently, Entergy does not anticipate making additional contributions to fund its qualified pension plans in 2012.

Table of Contents

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Financial Statements

Based on current assumptions, the Registrant Subsidiaries expect to contribute the following to qualified pension plans in 2012:

	Entergy Arkansas	Entergy Gulf States Louisiana	Entergy Louisiana	Entergy Mississippi	Entergy New Orleans	Entergy Texas	System Energy
	(In Thousands)
Expected 2012 pension contributions	$37,163	$13,569	$28,816	$9,665	$5,811	$9,091	$9,771
Pension contributions made through September 2012	$37,163	$13,569	$28,816	$9,665	$5,811	$9,091	$9,771
Remaining estimated pension contributions to be made in 2012	$ -	$ -	$ -	$ -	$ -	$ -	$ -

NOTE 7. BUSINESS SEGMENT INFORMATION (Entergy Corporation, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, Entergy Texas, and System Energy)

Entergy Corporation

Entergy’s reportable segments as of September 30, 2012 are Utility and Entergy Wholesale Commodities. Utility includes the generation, transmission, distribution, and sale of electric power in portions of Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, and Texas, and natural gas utility service in portions of Louisiana. Entergy Wholesale Commodities includes the ownership and operation of six nuclear power plants located in the northern United States and the sale of the electric power produced by those plants to wholesale customers. Entergy Wholesale Commodities also includes the ownership of interests in non-nuclear power plants that sell the electric power produced by those plants to wholesale customers. “All Other” includes the parent company, Entergy Corporation, and other business activity, including the earnings on the proceeds of sales of previously-owned businesses.

Entergy’s segment financial information for the third quarters of 2012 and 2011 is as follows:

	Utility	Entergy Wholesale Commodities*	All Other	Eliminations	Entergy
	(In Thousands)
2012
Operating revenues	$2,344,885	$626,849	$1,060	($9,234)	$2,963,560
Income taxes	$187,668	$34,153	$10,682	$-	$232,503
Consolidated net income (loss)	$300,506	$118,766	($50,207)	($26,395)	$342,670

2011
Operating revenues	$2,760,631	$641,216	$1,015	($7,309)	$3,395,553
Income taxes	($158,673)	$64,079	($24,537)	$-	($119,131)
Consolidated net income	$528,459	$130,862	$1,393	($27,645)	$633,069

Table of Contents

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Financial Statements

Entergy’s segment financial information for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 is as follows:

	Utility	Entergy Wholesale Commodities*	All Other	Eliminations	Consolidated
	(In Thousands)
2012
Operating revenues	$6,136,101	$1,754,774	$3,027	($28,082)	$7,865,820
Income taxes	$162,914	($10,036)	($42,738)	$-	$110,140
Consolidated net income (loss)	$676,244	$31,570	($61,477)	($79,824)	$566,513

2011
Operating revenues	$6,939,724	$1,819,439	$3,153	($22,275)	$8,740,041
Income taxes	$70,567	$213,344	($87,839)	$-	$196,072
Consolidated net income	$949,854	$319,651	$20,776	($82,935)	$1,207,346

Businesses marked with * are sometimes referred to as the “competitive businesses.” Eliminations are primarily intersegment activity.

Registrant Subsidiaries

Each of the Registrant Subsidiaries has one reportable segment, which is an integrated utility business, except for System Energy, which is an electricity generation business. Each of the Registrant Subsidiaries’ operations is managed on an integrated basis by that company because of the substantial effect of cost-based rates and regulatory oversight on the business process, cost structures, and operating results.

NOTE 8. RISK MANAGEMENT AND FAIR VALUES (Entergy Corporation, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, Entergy Texas, and System Energy)

Market and Commodity Risks

In the normal course of business, Entergy is exposed to a number of market and commodity risks. Market risk is the potential loss that Entergy may incur as a result of changes in the market or fair value of a particular instrument or commodity. All financial and commodity-related instruments, including derivatives, are subject to market risk. Entergy is subject to a number of commodity and market risks, including:

Type of Risk		Affected Businesses

Power price risk		Utility, Entergy Wholesale Commodities
Fuel price risk		Utility, Entergy Wholesale Commodities
Equity price and interest rate risk - investments		Utility, Entergy Wholesale Commodities

Table of Contents

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Financial Statements

Entergy manages a portion of these risks using derivative instruments, some of which are classified as cash flow hedges due to their financial settlement provisions while others are classified as normal purchase/normal sale transactions due to their physical settlement provisions. Normal purchase/normal sale risk management tools include power purchase and sales agreements, fuel purchase agreements, capacity contracts, and tolling agreements. Financially-settled cash flow hedges can include natural gas and electricity swaps and options, and interest rate swaps. Entergy will occasionally enter into financially settled swap and option contracts to manage market risk under certain hedging transactions which may or may not be designated as hedging instruments. Entergy enters into derivatives only to manage natural risks inherent in its physical or financial assets or liabilities.

Entergy manages fuel price volatility for its Louisiana jurisdictions (Entergy Gulf States Louisiana and Entergy Louisiana) and Entergy Mississippi primarily through the purchase of short-term natural gas swaps. These swaps are marked-to-market with offsetting regulatory assets or liabilities. The notional volumes of these swaps are based on a portion of projected annual exposure to gas for electric generation and projected winter purchases for gas distribution at Entergy Gulf States Louisiana.

Entergy’s exposure to market risk is determined by a number of factors, including the size, term, composition, and diversification of positions held, as well as market volatility and liquidity. For instruments such as options, the time period during which the option may be exercised and the relationship between the current market price of the underlying instrument and the option’s contractual strike or exercise price also affects the level of market risk. A significant factor influencing the overall level of market risk to which Entergy is exposed is its use of hedging techniques to mitigate such risk. Entergy manages market risk by actively monitoring compliance with stated risk management policies as well as monitoring the effectiveness of its hedging policies and strategies. Entergy’s risk management policies limit the amount of total net exposure and rolling net exposure during the stated periods. These policies, including related risk limits, are regularly assessed to ensure their appropriateness given Entergy’s objectives.

Derivatives

The fair values of Entergy’s derivative instruments in the consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2012 are as follows:

Instrument	Balance Sheet Location	Fair Value (a)	Offset (a)	Business

Derivatives designated as hedging instruments

Assets:
Electricity swaps and options	Prepayments and other (current portion)	$140 million	($9) million	Entergy Wholesale Commodities
Electricity swaps and options	Other deferred debits and other assets (non-current portion)	$69 million	($13) million	Entergy Wholesale Commodities

Liabilities:
Electricity swaps and options	Other non-current liabilities (non-current portion)	$12 million	($10) million	Entergy Wholesale Commodities

Table of Contents

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Financial Statements

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments

Assets:
Electricity swaps and options	Prepayments and other (current portion)	$25 million	($2) million	Entergy Wholesale Commodities
Electricity swaps and options	Other deferred debits and other assets (non-current portion)	$23 million	($11) million	Entergy Wholesale Commodities
Natural gas swaps	Prepayments and other (current portion)	$10 million	($-)	Utility

Liabilities:
Electricity swaps and options	Other current liabilities (current portion)	$11 million	($11) million	Entergy Wholesale Commodities
Electricity swaps and options	Other non-current liabilities (non-current portion)	$15 million	($13) million	Entergy Wholesale Commodities

The fair values of Entergy’s derivative instruments in the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2011 are as follows:

Instrument	Balance Sheet Location	Fair Value (a)	Offset (a)	Business

Derivatives designated as hedging instruments

Assets:
Electricity swaps and options	Prepayments and other (current portion)	$197 million	($25) million	Entergy Wholesale Commodities
Electricity swaps and options	Other deferred debits and other assets (non-current portion)	$112 million	($1) million	Entergy Wholesale Commodities

Liabilities:
Electricity swaps and options	Other non-current liabilities (non-current portion)	$1 million	($1) million	Entergy Wholesale Commodities

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments

Assets:
Electricity swaps and options	Prepayments and other (current portion)	$37 million	($8) million	Entergy Wholesale Commodities

Liabilities:
Electricity swaps and options	Other current liabilities (current portion)	$33 million	($33) million	Entergy Wholesale Commodities
Natural gas swaps	Other current liabilities	$30 million	($-)	Utility

(a)

The balances of derivative assets and liabilities in these tables are presented gross. Certain investments, including those not designated as hedging instruments, are subject to master netting agreements and are presented on the Entergy Consolidated Balance Sheets on a net basis in accordance with accounting guidance for Derivatives and Hedging.

Table of Contents

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Financial Statements

The effect of Entergy’s derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges on the consolidated income statements for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 are as follows:

Instrument	Amount of gain (loss) recognized in other comprehensive income (effective portion)	Income Statement location	Amount of gain reclassified from AOCI into income (effective portion)

2012
Electricity swaps and options	($108) million	Competitive businesses operating revenues	$61 million

2011
Electricity swaps and options	$40 million	Competitive businesses operating revenues	$48 million

The effect of Entergy’s derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges on the consolidated income statements for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 are as follows:

Instrument	Amount of gain (loss) recognized in other comprehensive income (effective portion)	Income Statement location	Amount of gain reclassified from AOCI into income (effective portion)

2012
Electricity swaps and options	$120 million	Competitive businesses operating revenues	$232 million

2011
Electricity swaps and options	($14) million	Competitive businesses operating revenues	$109 million

Electricity over-the-counter instruments that financially settle against day-ahead power pool prices are used to manage price exposure for Entergy Wholesale Commodities generation. Based on market prices as of September 30, 2012, cash flow hedges relating to power sales totaled $196 million of net unrealized gains. Approximately $140 million is expected to be reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI) to operating revenues in the next twelve months. The actual amount reclassified from AOCI, however, could vary due to future changes in market prices. Gains totaling approximately $61 million and $48 million were realized on the maturity of cash flow hedges, before taxes of $21 million and $17 million, for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Gains totaling approximately $232 million and $109 million were realized on the maturity of cash flow hedges, before taxes of $81 million and $38 million, for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Unrealized gains or losses recorded in other comprehensive income result from hedging power output at the Entergy Wholesale Commodities power plants. The related gains or losses from hedging power are included in operating revenues when realized. The maximum length of time over which Entergy is currently hedging the variability in future cash flows with derivatives for forecasted power transactions at September 30, 2012 is approximately 2.25 years. Planned generation currently under contract from Entergy Wholesale Commodities nuclear power plants is 89% for the remaining one quarter of 2012, of which approximately 48% is sold under financial derivatives and the remainder under normal purchase/normal sale contracts. The change in fair value of Entergy’s cash flow hedges due to ineffectiveness was $4.5 million and $5.1 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, respectively. The change in fair value of Entergy’s cash flow hedges due to ineffectiveness was $6.2 million and $8.4 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively. The ineffective portion of cash flow hedges is recorded in competitive business operating revenues. Certain of the agreements to sell the power produced by Entergy Wholesale Commodities power plants contain provisions that require an Entergy subsidiary to provide collateral to secure its obligations when the current market prices exceed the contracted power prices. The primary form of collateral to satisfy these requirements is an Entergy Corporation guaranty. As of September 30, 2012, hedge contracts with one counterparty were in a liability position (approximately $2 million total), but were significantly below

Table of Contents

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Financial Statements

the amount of the guarantee provided under the contract and no cash collateral was required. If the Entergy Corporation credit rating falls below investment grade, the effect of the corporate guarantee is ignored and Entergy would have to post collateral equal to the estimated outstanding liability under the contract at the applicable date. Entergy may effectively liquidate a cash flow hedge instrument by entering into a contract offsetting the original hedge, and then de-designating the original hedge in this situation. Gains or losses accumulated in other comprehensive income prior to de-designation continue to be deferred in other comprehensive income until they are included in income as the original hedged transaction occurs. From the point of de-designation, the gains or losses on the original hedge and the offsetting contract are recorded as assets or liabilities on the balance sheet and offset as they flow through to earnings.

Natural gas over-the-counter swaps that financially settle against NYMEX futures are used to manage fuel price volatility for the Utility’s Louisiana and Mississippi customers. All benefits or costs of the program are recorded in fuel costs. The total volume of natural gas swaps outstanding as of September 30, 2012 is 30,900,000 MMBtu for Entergy, 9,140,000 MMBtu for Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, 14,800,000 MMBtu for Entergy Louisiana, and 6,960,000 MMBtu for Entergy Mississippi. Credit support for these natural gas swaps is covered by master agreements that do not require collateralization based on mark-to-market value, but do carry adequate assurance language that may lead to collateralization requests.

The effect of Entergy’s derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments on the consolidated income statements for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 is as follows:

Instrument	Amount of gain (loss) recognized in AOCI	Income Statement location	Amount of gain (loss) recorded in income

2012
Natural gas swaps	$-	Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale	$7 million
Electricity swaps and options de-designated as hedged items	$3 million	Competitive business operating revenues	($2) million

2011
Natural gas swaps	$-	Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale	($19) million
Electricity swaps and options de-designated as hedged items	($2) million	Competitive business operating revenues	$2 million

Table of Contents

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Financial Statements

The effect of Entergy’s derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments on the consolidated income statements for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 is as follows:

Instrument	Amount of gain recognized in AOCI	Income Statement location	Amount of gain (loss) recorded in income

2012
Natural gas swaps	$-	Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale	($28) million
Electricity swaps and options de-designated as hedged items	$2 million	Competitive business operating revenues	($1) million

2011
Natural gas swaps	$-	Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale	($31) million
Electricity swaps and options de-designated as hedged items	$4 million	Competitive business operating revenues	$8 million

Due to regulatory treatment, the natural gas swaps are marked-to-market through fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale and then such amounts are simultaneously reversed and recorded as an offsetting regulatory asset or liability. The gains or losses recorded as fuel expenses when the swaps are settled are recovered or refunded through fuel cost recovery mechanisms.

The fair values of the Registrant Subsidiaries’ derivative instruments on their balance sheets as of September 30, 2012 are as follows:

Instrument	Balance Sheet Location	Fair Value	Registrant

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments

Assets:
Natural gas swaps	Gas hedge contracts	$3.0 million	Entergy Gulf States Louisiana
Natural gas swaps	Prepayments and other	$4.8 million	Entergy Louisiana
Natural gas swaps	Prepayments and other	$2.3 million	Entergy Mississippi

The fair values of the Registrant Subsidiaries’ derivative instruments on their balance sheets as of December 31, 2011 are as follows:

Instrument	Balance Sheet Location	Fair Value	Registrant

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments

Liabilities:
Natural gas swaps	Gas hedge contracts	$8.6 million	Entergy Gulf States Louisiana
Natural gas swaps	Gas hedge contracts	$12.4 million	Entergy Louisiana
Natural gas swaps	Other current liabilities	$7.8 million	Entergy Mississippi
Natural gas swaps	Other current liabilities	$1.5 million	Entergy New Orleans

Table of Contents

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Financial Statements

The effects of the Registrant Subsidiaries’ derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments on their income statements for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 are as follows:

Instrument	Statement of Income Location	Amount of gain (loss) recorded in income	Registrant

2012
Natural gas swaps	Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale	$2.0 million	Entergy Gulf States Louisiana
Natural gas swaps	Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale	$3.8 million	Entergy Louisiana
Natural gas swaps	Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale	$1.4 million	Entergy Mississippi

2011
Natural gas swaps	Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale	($5.0) million	Entergy Gulf States Louisiana
Natural gas swaps	Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale	($7.5) million	Entergy Louisiana
Natural gas swaps	Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale	($4.4) million	Entergy Mississippi
Natural gas swaps	Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale	($1.1) million	Entergy New Orleans

The effects of the Registrant Subsidiaries’ derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments on their income statements for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 are as follows:

Instrument	Statement of Income Location	Amount of loss recorded in income	Registrant

2012
Natural gas swaps	Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale	($8.3) million	Entergy Gulf States Louisiana
Natural gas swaps	Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale	($10.4) million	Entergy Louisiana
Natural gas swaps	Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale	($7.5) million	Entergy Mississippi
Natural gas swaps	Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale	($1.5) million	Entergy New Orleans

2011
Natural gas swaps	Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale	($9.2) million	Entergy Gulf States Louisiana
Natural gas swaps	Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale	($12.5) million	Entergy Louisiana
Natural gas swaps	Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale	($6.9) million	Entergy Mississippi
Natural gas swaps	Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale	($2.0) million	Entergy New Orleans

Table of Contents

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Financial Statements

Fair Values

The estimated fair values of Entergy’s financial instruments and derivatives are determined using bid prices, market quotes, and financial modeling. Considerable judgment is required in developing the estimates of fair value. Therefore, estimates are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that Entergy could realize in a current market exchange. Gains or losses realized on financial instruments other than those instruments held by the Entergy Wholesale Commodities business are reflected in future rates and therefore do not accrue to the benefit or detriment of shareholders. Entergy considers the carrying amounts of most financial instruments classified as current assets and liabilities to be a reasonable estimate of their fair value because of the short maturity of these instruments.

Accounting standards define fair value as an exit price, or the price that would be received to sell an asset or the amount that would be paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between knowledgeable market participants at the date of measurement. Entergy and the Registrant Subsidiaries use assumptions or market input data that market participants would use in pricing assets or liabilities at fair value. The inputs can be readily observable, corroborated by market data, or generally unobservable. Entergy and the Registrant Subsidiaries endeavor to use the best available information to determine fair value.

Accounting standards establish a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value. The hierarchy establishes the highest priority for unadjusted market quotes in an active market for the identical asset or liability and the lowest priority for unobservable inputs. The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are:

Level 1 - Level 1 inputs are unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the entity has the ability to access at the measurement date. Active markets are those in which transactions for the asset or liability occur in sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis. Level 1 primarily consists of individually owned common stocks, cash equivalents, debt instruments, and gas hedge contracts.

Level 2 - Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are, either directly or indirectly, observable for the asset or liability at the measurement date. Assets are valued based on prices derived by independent third parties that use inputs such as benchmark yields, reported trades, broker/dealer quotes, and issuer spreads. Prices are reviewed and can be challenged with the independent parties and/or overridden by Entergy if it is believed such would be more reflective of fair value. Level 2 inputs include the following:

-	quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets;

-	quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in inactive markets;

-	inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability; or

-	inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means.

Level 2 consists primarily of individually owned debt instruments or shares in common trusts. Common trust funds are stated at estimated fair value based on the fair market value of the underlying investments.

Level 3 - Level 3 inputs are pricing inputs that are generally less observable or unobservable from objective sources. These inputs are used with internally developed methodologies to produce management’s best estimate of fair value for the asset or liability. Level 3 consists primarily of derivative power contracts used as cash flow hedges of power sales at merchant power plants.

The values for power contract assets or liabilities are based on both observable inputs including public market prices and interest rates, and unobservable inputs such as implied volatilities, unit contingent discounts, expected basis differences, and credit adjusted counterparty interest rates. They are classified as Level 3 assets and liabilities. The valuations of these assets and liabilities are performed by the Entergy Wholesale Commodities Risk Control group and sent to the Entergy Wholesale Commodities Back Office and Entergy Nuclear Finance groups for evaluation. The primary functions of the Entergy Wholesale Commodities Risk Control Group include: gathering, validating and reporting market data, providing market and credit risk analyses and valuations in support of Entergy Wholesale Commodities’ commercial transactions, developing and administering protocols for the management of market and credit risks, implementing and maintaining controls around changes to market data in the energy trading and risk management system, reviewing creditworthiness of counterparties, supporting contract negotiations with

Table of Contents

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Financial Statements

new counterparties, administering credit support for contracts, and managing the daily margining process. The primary functions of the Entergy Wholesale Commodities Back Office are managing the energy trading and risk management system, forecasting revenues, forward positions and analysis, performing contract administration, market and counterparty settlements and revenue reporting and analysis along with maintaining related controls for Entergy Wholesale Commodities. Both Entergy Wholesale Commodities Risk Control and Entergy Wholesale Commodities Back Office report to the Entergy Wholesale Commodities VP, Finance & Risk Group. Entergy Nuclear Finance is primarily responsible for the financial planning of Entergy’s utility and non-utility nuclear businesses and has a significant role in accounting for the activities and transactions of the associated companies. The VP, Chief Financial Officer – Nuclear Operations within Entergy Nuclear Finance reports to the Chief Accounting Officer.

The amounts reflected as the fair value of electricity swaps are based on the estimated amount that the contracts are in-the-money at the balance sheet date (treated as an asset) or out-of-the-money at the balance sheet date (treated as a liability) and would equal the estimated amount receivable or payable by Entergy if the contracts were settled at that date. These derivative contracts include cash flow hedges that swap fixed for floating cash flows for sales of the output from the Entergy Wholesale Commodities business. The fair values are based on the mark-to-market comparison between the fixed contract prices and the floating prices determined each period from quoted forward power market prices. The differences between the fixed price in the swap contract and these market-related prices multiplied by the volume specified in the contract and discounted at the counterparties’ credit adjusted risk free rate are recorded as derivative contract assets or liabilities. For contracts that have unit contingent terms, a further discount is applied based on the historical relationship between contract and market prices for similar contract terms.

The amounts reflected as the fair values of electricity options are valued based on a Black Scholes model, and are calculated at the end of each month for accounting purposes. Inputs to the valuation include end of day forward market prices for the period when the transactions will settle, implied volatilities based on market volatilities provided by a third party data aggregator, and US Treasury rates for a risk-free return rate. As described further below, prices and implied volatilities are reviewed and can be adjusted if it is determined that there is a better representation of fair value. As of September 30, 2012, Entergy had in-the-money derivative contracts with a fair value of $218 million with counterparties or their guarantor who are all currently investment grade. $2 million of the derivative contracts as of September 30, 2012 are out-of-the-money contracts supported by corporate guarantees, which would require additional cash or letters of credit in the event of a decrease in Entergy Corporation’s credit rating to below investment grade.

On a daily basis, Entergy Wholesale Commodities calculates the mark-to-market for all derivative transactions. Entergy Wholesale Commodities Risk Control Group also validates forward market prices by comparing them to settlement prices of actual market transactions. Significant differences are analyzed and potentially adjusted based on actual transaction clearing prices, or a methodology that considers natural gas prices and market heat rates. Implied volatilities used to value options are also validated using actual counterparty quotes for Entergy Wholesale Commodities transactions. Moreover, on at least a monthly basis the Office of Corporate Risk Oversight confirms the mark to market calculations and prepares price scenarios and credit downgrade scenario analysis. The scenario analysis is communicated to senior management within Entergy and within Entergy Wholesale Commodities. Finally, for all proposed derivative transactions an analysis is completed to assess the risk of adding the proposed derivative to Entergy Wholesale Commodities’ portfolio. In particular, the credit, liquidity and financial metrics impacts are calculated for this analysis. This analysis is communicated to senior management within Entergy and Entergy Wholesale Commodities.

The following tables set forth, by level within the fair value hierarchy, Entergy’s assets and liabilities that are accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011. The assessment of the significance of a particular input to a fair value measurement requires judgment and may affect their placement within the fair value hierarchy levels.

Table of Contents

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Financial Statements

2012	Level 1	Level 2	Level 3	Total
	(In Millions)
Assets:
Temporary cash investments	$653	$-	$-	$653
Decommissioning trust funds (a):
Equity securities	421	2,032	-	2,453
Debt securities	707	1,016	-	1,723
Power contracts	-	-	218	218
Securitization recovery trust account	52	-	-	52
Storm reserve escrow account	324	-	-	324
Gas hedge contracts	10	-	-	10
	$2,167	$3,048	$218	$5,433

2011	Level 1	Level 2	Level 3	Total
	(In Millions)
Assets:
Temporary cash investments	$613	$-	$-	$613
Decommissioning trust funds (a):
Equity securities	397	1,732	-	2,129
Debt securities	639	1,020	-	1,659
Power contracts	-	-	312	312
Securitization recovery trust account	50	-	-	50
Storm reserve escrow account	335	-	-	335
	$2,034	$2,752	$312	$5,098

Liabilities:
Gas hedge contracts	$30	$-	$-	$30

(a)

The decommissioning trust funds hold equity and fixed income securities. Equity securities are invested to approximate the returns of major market indexes. Fixed income securities are held in various governmental and corporate securities. See Note 9 for additional information on the investment portfolios.

The following table sets forth a reconciliation of changes in the net assets for the fair value of derivatives classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011:

	2012	2011
	(In Millions)

Balance as of beginning of period,	$375	$98

Unrealized gains/(losses) from price changes	(96)	3
Unrealized gains on originations	-	17
Realized gains on settlements	(61)	(48)

Balance as of September 30,	$218	$70

Table of Contents

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Financial Statements

The following table sets forth a reconciliation of changes in the net assets for the fair value of derivatives classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011:

	2012	2011
	(In Millions)

Balance as of January 1,	$312	$197

Unrealized gains/(losses) from price changes	131	(33)
Unrealized gains on originations	7	15
Realized gains on settlements	(232)	(109)

Balance as of September 30,	$218	$70

The following table sets forth a description of the types of transactions classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy, and the valuation techniques and significant unobservable inputs to each which cause that classification, as of September 30, 2012:

Transaction Type	Fair Value as of September 30, 2012	Significant Unobservable Inputs	Range from Average %	Effect on Fair Value

Electricity swaps	$140 million	Unit contingent discount	+/-3%	$7 million
Electricity options	$78 million	Implied volatility	+/-9%	$39 million

The following table sets forth an analysis of each of the types of unobservable inputs impacting the fair value of items classified as Level 3 within the fair value hierarchy, and the sensitivity to changes to those inputs:

Significant Unobservable Input	Transaction Type	Position	Change to Input	Effect on Fair Value

Unit contingent discount	Electricity swaps	Sell	Increase (Decrease)	Decrease (Increase)
Implied volatility	Electricity options	Sell	Increase (Decrease)	Increase (Decrease)
Implied volatility	Electricity options	Buy	Increase (Decrease)	Increase (Decrease)

The following table sets forth, by level within the fair value hierarchy, the Registrant Subsidiaries’ assets that are accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011. The assessment of the significance of a particular input to a fair value measurement requires judgment and may affect its placement within the fair value hierarchy levels.

Table of Contents

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Financial Statements

Entergy Arkansas

2012	Level 1	Level 2	Level 3	Total
	(In Millions)
Assets:
Temporary cash investments	$36.2	$-	$-	$36.2
Decommissioning trust funds (a):
Equity securities	5.0	373.8	-	378.8
Debt securities	95.6	125.5	-	221.1
Securitization recovery trust account	8.4	-	-	8.4
	$145.2	$499.3	$-	$644.5

2011	Level 1	Level 2	Level 3	Total
	(In Millions)
Assets:
Temporary cash investments	$17.9	$-	$-	$17.9
Decommissioning trust funds (a):
Equity securities	6.3	323.1	-	329.4
Debt securities	82.8	129.5	-	212.3
Securitization recovery trust account	3.9	-	-	3.9
	$110.9	$452.6	$-	$563.5

Entergy Gulf States Louisiana

2012	Level 1	Level 2	Level 3	Total
	(In Millions)
Assets:
Temporary cash investments	$156.3	$-	$-	$156.3
Decommissioning trust funds (a):
Equity securities	7.8	281.6	-	289.4
Debt securities	39.7	145.9	-	185.6
Storm reserve escrow account	87.0	-	-	87.0
Gas hedge contracts	3.0	-	-	3.0
	$293.8	$427.5	$-	$721.3

2011	Level 1	Level 2	Level 3	Total
	(In Millions)
Assets:
Temporary cash investments	$24.6	$-	$-	$24.6
Decommissioning trust funds (a):
Equity securities	5.1	233.6	-	238.7
Debt securities	39.5	142.7	-	182.2
Storm reserve escrow account	90.2	-	-	90.2
	$159.4	$376.3	$-	$535.7

Liabilities:
Gas hedge contracts	$8.6	$-	$-	$8.6

Table of Contents

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Financial Statements

Entergy Louisiana

2012	Level 1	Level 2	Level 3	Total
	(In Millions)
Assets:
Temporary cash investments	$148.5	$-	$-	$148.5
Decommissioning trust funds (a):
Equity securities	1.3	172.7	-	174.0
Debt securities	52.9	58.6	-	111.5
Securitization recovery trust account	11.8	-	-	11.8
Storm reserve escrow account	186.9	-	-	186.9
Gas hedge contracts	4.8	-	-	4.8
	$406.2	$231.3	$-	$637.5

2011	Level 1	Level 2	Level 3	Total
	(In Millions)
Assets:
Decommissioning trust funds (a):
Equity securities	$2.9	$146.3	$-	$149.2
Debt securities	51.6	53.2	-	104.8
Securitization recovery trust account	5.2	-	-	5.2
Storm reserve escrow account	201.2	-	-	201.2
	$260.9	$199.5	$-	$460.4

Liabilities:
Gas hedge contracts	$12.4	$-	$-	$12.4

Entergy Mississippi

2012	Level 1	Level 2	Level 3	Total
	(In Millions)
Assets:
Temporary cash investments	$26.6	$-	$-	$26.6
Storm reserve escrow account	31.8	-	-	31.8
Gas hedge contracts	2.3	-	-	2.3
	$60.7	$-	$-	$60.7

2011	Level 1	Level 2	Level 3	Total
	(In Millions)
Assets:
Storm reserve escrow account	$31.8	$-	$-	$31.8

Liabilities:
Gas hedge contracts	$7.8	$-	$-	$7.8

Table of Contents

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Financial Statements

Entergy New Orleans

2012	Level 1	Level 2	Level 3	Total
	(In Millions)
Assets:
Storm reserve escrow account	$18.8	$-	$-	$18.8

2011	Level 1	Level 2	Level 3	Total
	(In Millions)
Assets:
Temporary cash investments	$9.3	$-	$-	$9.3
Storm reserve escrow account	12.0	-	-	12.0
	$21.3	$-	$-	$21.3

Liabilities:
Gas hedge contracts	$1.5	$-	$-	$1.5

Entergy Texas

2012	Level 1	Level 2	Level 3	Total
	(In Millions)
Assets :
Temporary cash investments	$62.8	$-	$-	$62.8
Securitization recovery trust account	32.1	-	-	32.1
	$94.9	$-	$-	$94.9

2011	Level 1	Level 2	Level 3	Total
	(In Millions)
Assets :
Temporary cash investments	$65.1	$-	$-	$65.1
Securitization recovery trust account	41.2	-	-	41.2
	$106.3	$-	$-	$106.3

System Energy

2012	Level 1	Level 2	Level 3	Total
	(In Millions)
Assets:
Temporary cash investments	$19.8	$-	$-	$19.8
Decommissioning trust funds (a):
Equity securities	0.5	279.5	-	280.0
Debt securities	138.5	65.7	-	204.2
	$158.8	$345.2	$-	$504.0

Table of Contents

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Financial Statements

2011	Level 1	Level 2	Level 3	Total
	(In Millions)
Assets:
Temporary cash investments	$154.2	$-	$-	$154.2
Decommissioning trust funds (a):
Equity securities	2.7	234.5	-	237.2
Debt securities	123.2	63.0	-	186.2
	$280.1	$297.5	$-	$577.6

(a)

The decommissioning trust funds hold equity and fixed income securities. Equity securities are invested to approximate the returns of major market indices. Fixed income securities are held in various governmental and corporate securities. See Note 9 for additional information on the investment portfolios.

NOTE 9. DECOMMISSIONING TRUST FUNDS (Entergy Corporation, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, Entergy Louisiana, and System Energy)

Entergy holds debt and equity securities, classified as available-for-sale, in nuclear decommissioning trust accounts. The NRC requires Entergy subsidiaries to maintain trusts to fund the costs of decommissioning ANO 1, ANO 2, River Bend, Waterford 3, Grand Gulf, Pilgrim, Indian Point 1 and 2, Vermont Yankee, and Palisades (NYPA currently retains the decommissioning trusts and liabilities for Indian Point 3 and FitzPatrick). The funds are invested primarily in equity securities, fixed-rate fixed-income securities, and cash and cash equivalents.

Entergy records decommissioning trust funds on the balance sheet at their fair value. Because of the ability of the Registrant Subsidiaries to recover decommissioning costs in rates and in accordance with the regulatory treatment for decommissioning trust funds, the Registrant Subsidiaries have recorded an offsetting amount of unrealized gains/(losses) on investment securities in other regulatory liabilities/assets. For the nonregulated portion of River Bend, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana has recorded an offsetting amount of unrealized gains/(losses) in other deferred credits. Decommissioning trust funds for Pilgrim, Indian Point 1 and 2, Vermont Yankee, and Palisades do not meet the criteria for regulatory accounting treatment. Accordingly, unrealized gains recorded on the assets in these trust funds are recognized in the accumulated other comprehensive income component of shareholders’ equity because these assets are classified as available for sale. Unrealized losses (where cost exceeds fair market value) on the assets in these trust funds are also recorded in the accumulated other comprehensive income component of shareholders’ equity unless the unrealized loss is other than temporary and therefore recorded in earnings. Generally, Entergy records realized gains and losses on its debt and equity securities using the specific identification method to determine the cost basis of its securities.

The securities held as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 is summarized as follows:

	Fair Value	Total Unrealized Gains	Total Unrealized Losses
	(In Millions)
2012
Equity Securities	$2,453	$673	$2
Debt Securities	1,723	126	4
Total	$4,176	$799	$6

2011
Equity Securities	$2,129	$423	$14
Debt Securities	1,659	115	5
Total	$3,788	$538	$19

Table of Contents

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Financial Statements

Deferred taxes on unrealized gains/(losses) are recorded in other comprehensive income for the decommissioning trusts which do not meet the criteria for regulatory accounting treatment as described above. Unrealized gains/(losses) above are reported before deferred taxes of $217 million and $149 million as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. The amortized cost of debt securities was $1,612 million as of September 30, 2012 and $1,530 million as of December 31, 2011. As of September 30, 2012, the debt securities have an average coupon rate of approximately 3.88%, an average duration of approximately 5.53 years, and an average maturity of approximately 8.55 years. The equity securities are generally held in funds that are designed to approximate or somewhat exceed the return of the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index. A relatively small percentage of the securities are held in funds intended to replicate the return of the Wilshire 4500 Index or the Russell 3000 Index.

The fair value and gross unrealized losses of available-for-sale equity and debt securities, summarized by investment type and length of time that the securities have been in a continuous loss position, are as follows as of September 30, 2012:

	Equity Securities		Debt Securities
	Fair Value	Gross Unrealized Losses	Fair Value	Gross Unrealized Losses
	(In Millions)

Less than 12 months	$24	$2	$81	$1
More than 12 months	13	-	50	3
Total	$37	$2	$131	$4

	Equity Securities		Debt Securities
	Fair Value	Gross Unrealized Losses	Fair Value	Gross Unrealized Losses
	(In Millions)

Less than 12 months	$130	$9	$123	$3
More than 12 months	43	5	60	2
Total	$173	$14	$183	$5

The unrealized losses in excess of twelve months on equity securities above relate to Entergy’s Utility operating companies and System Energy.

Table of Contents

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Financial Statements

The fair value of debt securities, summarized by contractual maturities, as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 are as follows:

	2012	2011
	(In Millions)
Less than 1 year	$46	$69
1 year - 5 years	666	566
5 years - 10 years	557	583
10 years - 15 years	188	187
15 years - 20 years	53	42
20 years+	213	212
Total	$1,723	$1,659

During the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, proceeds from the dispositions of securities amounted to $472 million and $417 million, respectively. During the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, gross gains of $8 million and $12 million, respectively, and gross losses of $212 thousand and $3 million, respectively, were reclassified out of other comprehensive income into earnings.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, proceeds from the dispositions of securities amounted to $1,417 million and $1,053 million, respectively. During the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, gross gains of $32 million and $21 million, respectively, and gross losses of $5 million and $9 million, respectively, were reclassified out of other comprehensive income into earnings.

Entergy Arkansas

Entergy Arkansas holds debt and equity securities, classified as available-for-sale, in nuclear decommissioning trust accounts. The securities held as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 is summarized as follows:

	Fair Value	Total Unrealized Gains	Total Unrealized Losses
	(In Millions)
2012
Equity Securities	$378.8	$117.2	$-
Debt Securities	221.1	16.2	0.1
Total	$599.9	$133.4	$0.1

2011
Equity Securities	$329.4	$70.9	$0.4
Debt Securities	212.3	15.2	0.4
Total	$541.7	$86.1	$0.8

The amortized cost of debt securities was $205 million as of September 30, 2012 and $197.5 million as of December 31, 2011. As of September 30, 2012, the debt securities have an average coupon rate of approximately 3.35%, an average duration of approximately 5.12 years, and an average maturity of approximately 5.82 years. The equity securities are generally held in funds that are designed to approximate the return of the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index. A relatively small percentage of the securities are held in funds intended to replicate the return of the Wilshire 4500 Index.

Table of Contents

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Financial Statements

	Equity Securities		Debt Securities
	Fair Value	Gross Unrealized Losses	Fair Value	Gross Unrealized Losses
	(In Millions)

Less than 12 months	$0.1	$-	$10.1	$0.1
More than 12 months	-	-	1.0	-
Total	$0.1	$-	$11.1	$0.1

	Equity Securities		Debt Securities
	Fair Value	Gross Unrealized Losses	Fair Value	Gross Unrealized Losses
	(In Millions)

Less than 12 months	$13.7	$0.4	$14.3	$0.4
More than 12 months	-	-	1.0	-
Total	$13.7	$0.4	$15.3	$0.4

The fair value of debt securities, summarized by contractual maturities, as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 are as follows:

	2012	2011
	(In Millions)

Less than 1 year	$12.6	$7.8
1 year - 5 years	101.0	86.5
5 years - 10 years	95.7	109.1
10 years - 15 years	4.8	2.7
20 years+	7.0	6.2
Total	$221.1	$212.3

During the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, proceeds from the dispositions of securities amounted to $15 million and $36.5 million, respectively. During the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, gross gains of $0.1 million and $2.2 million, respectively, and gross losses of $0.01 million and $0.1 million, respectively, were reclassified out of other comprehensive income into earnings.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, proceeds from the dispositions of securities amounted to $103.4 million and $82.7 million, respectively. During the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, gross gains of $2.8 million and $3.5 million, respectively, and gross losses of $0.05 million and $0.1 million, respectively, were reclassified out of other comprehensive income into earnings.

Table of Contents

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Financial Statements

Entergy Gulf States Louisiana

Entergy Gulf States Louisiana holds debt and equity securities, classified as available-for-sale, in nuclear decommissioning trust accounts. The securities held as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 is summarized as follows:

	Fair Value	Total Unrealized Gains	Total Unrealized Losses
	(In Millions)
2012
Equity Securities	$289.4	$71.4	$-
Debt Securities	185.6	16.8	-
Total	$475.0	$88.2	$-

2011
Equity Securities	$238.7	$40.9	$0.8
Debt Securities	182.2	15.2	0.3
Total	$420.9	$56.1	$1.1

The amortized cost of debt securities was $169.1 million as of September 30, 2012 and $166.9 million as of December 31, 2011. As of September 30, 2012, the debt securities have an average coupon rate of approximately 4.68%, an average duration of approximately 5.59 years, and an average maturity of approximately 8.64 years. The equity securities are generally held in funds that are designed to approximate the return of the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index. A relatively small percentage of the securities are held in funds intended to replicate the return of the Wilshire 4500 Index.

	Equity Securities		Debt Securities
	Fair Value	Gross Unrealized Losses	Fair Value	Gross Unrealized Losses
	(In Millions)

Less than 12 months	$0.1	$-	$1.8	$-
More than 12 months	0.5	-	-	-
Total	$0.6	$-	$1.8	$-

Table of Contents

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Financial Statements

	Equity Securities		Debt Securities
	Fair Value	Gross Unrealized Losses	Fair Value	Gross Unrealized Losses
	(In Millions)

Less than 12 months	$14.0	$0.5	$9.3	$0.2
More than 12 months	2.7	0.3	1.1	0.1
Total	$16.7	$0.8	$10.4	$0.3

The fair value of debt securities, summarized by contractual maturities, as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 are as follows:

	2012	2011
	(In Millions)

Less than 1 year	$6.3	$7.1
1 year - 5 years	42.1	40.8
5 years - 10 years	56.3	53.5
10 years - 15 years	65.6	62.9
15 years - 20 years	6.0	3.2
20 years+	9.3	14.7
Total	$185.6	$182.2

During the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, proceeds from the dispositions of securities amounted to $35.9 million and $35.9 million, respectively. During the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, gross gains of $3.9 million and $0.8 million, respectively, and gross losses of $0.7 thousand and $0.4 million, respectively, were reclassified out of other comprehensive income into earnings.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, proceeds from the dispositions of securities amounted to $96.7 million and $56.5 million, respectively. During the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, gross gains of $6.4 million and $1.3 million, respectively, and gross losses of $0.03 million and $0.5 million, respectively, were reclassified out of other comprehensive income into earnings.

Table of Contents

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Financial Statements

Entergy Louisiana

Entergy Louisiana holds debt and equity securities, classified as available-for-sale, in nuclear decommissioning trust accounts. The securities held as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 is summarized as follows:

	Fair Value	Total Unrealized Gains	Total Unrealized Losses
	(In Millions)
2012
Equity Securities	$174.0	$49.3	$-
Debt Securities	111.5	10.1	0.1
Total	$285.5	$59.4	$0.1

2011
Equity Securities	$149.2	$29.7	$1.6
Debt Securities	104.8	8.8	0.2
Total	$254.0	$38.5	$1.8

The amortized cost of debt securities was $101.6 million as of September 30, 2012 and $91.9 million as of December 31, 2011. As of September 30, 2012, the debt securities have an average coupon rate of approximately 3.74%, an average duration of approximately 5.45 years, and an average maturity of approximately 9.69 years. The equity securities are generally held in funds that are designed to approximate the return of the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index. A relatively small percentage of the securities are held in funds intended to replicate the return of the Wilshire 4500 Index.

	Equity Securities		Debt Securities
	Fair Value	Gross Unrealized Losses	Fair Value	Gross Unrealized Losses
	(In Millions)

Less than 12 months	$0.1	$-	$1.4	$-
More than 12 months	2.8	-	0.6	0.1
Total	$2.9	$-	$2.0	$0.1

Table of Contents

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Financial Statements

	Equity Securities		Debt Securities
	Fair Value	Gross Unrealized Losses	Fair Value	Gross Unrealized Losses
	(In Millions)

Less than 12 months	$11.6	$0.3	$5.5	$0.2
More than 12 months	10.0	1.3	0.2	-
Total	$21.6	$1.6	$5.7	$0.2

The fair value of debt securities, summarized by contractual maturities, as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 are as follows:

	2012	2011
	(In Millions)

Less than 1 year	$2.6	$3.9
1 year - 5 years	40.6	39.8
5 years - 10 years	24.9	22.2
10 years - 15 years	19.7	18.9
15 years - 20 years	1.0	2.2
20 years+	22.7	17.8
Total	$111.5	$104.8

During the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, proceeds from the dispositions of securities amounted to $9.5 million and $3.7 million, respectively. During the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, gross gains of $0.1 million and $0 million, respectively, and gross losses of $0.5 thousand and $0.04 million, respectively, were reclassified out of other comprehensive income into earnings.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, proceeds from the dispositions of securities amounted to $19.8 million and $11.5 million, respectively. During the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, gross gains of $0.2 million and $0.09 million, respectively, and gross losses of $0.03 million and $0.07 million, respectively, were reclassified out of other comprehensive income into earnings.

Table of Contents

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Financial Statements

System Energy

System Energy holds debt and equity securities, classified as available-for-sale, in nuclear decommissioning trust accounts. The securities held as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 is summarized as follows:

	Fair Value	Total Unrealized Gains	Total Unrealized Losses
	(In Millions)
2012
Equity Securities	$280.0	$64.5	$0.1
Debt Securities	204.2	9.9	-
Total	$484.2	$74.4	$0.1

2011
Equity Securities	$237.2	$35.4	$5.4
Debt Securities	186.2	9.5	0.1
Total	$423.4	$44.9	$5.5

The amortized cost of debt securities was $194.3 million as of September 30, 2012 and $175.1 million as of December 31, 2011. As of September 30, 2012, the debt securities have an average coupon rate of approximately 2.67%, an average duration of approximately 4.74 years, and an average maturity of approximately 6.35 years. The equity securities are generally held in funds that are designed to approximate the return of the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index. A relatively small percentage of the securities are held in funds intended to replicate the return of the Wilshire 4500 Index.

	Equity Securities		Debt Securities
	Fair Value	Gross Unrealized Losses	Fair Value	Gross Unrealized Losses
	(In Millions)

Less than 12 months	$0.7	$-	$11.6	$-
More than 12 months	8.3	0.1	-	-
Total	$9.0	$0.1	$11.6	$-

Table of Contents

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Financial Statements

	Equity Securities		Debt Securities
	Fair Value	Gross Unrealized Losses	Fair Value	Gross Unrealized Losses
	(In Millions)

Less than 12 months	$41.3	$1.8	$10.5	$0.1
More than 12 months	30.0	3.6	-	-
Total	$71.3	$5.4	$10.5	$0.1

The fair value of debt securities, summarized by contractual maturities, as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 are as follows:

	2012	2011
	(In Millions)

Less than 1 year	$5.5	$10.2
1 year - 5 years	121.0	94.6
5 years - 10 years	53.8	57.9
10 years - 15 years	1.6	2.6
15 years - 20 years	2.2	2.9
20 years+	20.1	18.0
Total	$204.2	$186.2

During the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, proceeds from the dispositions of securities amounted to $91.8 million and $60.4 million, respectively. During the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, gross gains of $0.5 million and $1.6 million, respectively, and gross losses of $0.05 million and $0.04 million, respectively, were reclassified out of other comprehensive income into earnings.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, proceeds from the dispositions of securities amounted to $315.0 million and $166.9 million, respectively. During the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, gross gains of $3.5 million and $2.1 million, respectively, and gross losses of $0.2 million and $1 million, respectively, were reclassified out of other comprehensive income into earnings.

Other-than-temporary impairments and unrealized gains and losses

Entergy, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, Entergy Louisiana, and System Energy evaluate unrealized losses at the end of each period to determine whether an other-than-temporary impairment has occurred. The assessment of whether an investment in a debt security has suffered an other-than-temporary impairment is based on whether Entergy has the intent to sell or more likely than not will be required to sell the debt security before recovery of its amortized costs. Further, if Entergy does not expect to recover the entire amortized cost basis of the debt security, an other-than-temporary impairment is considered to have occurred and it is measured by the present value of cash flows expected to be collected less the amortized cost basis (credit loss). Entergy did not have any material other-than-temporary impairments relating to credit losses on debt securities for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011. The assessment of whether an investment in an equity security has suffered an other-than-temporary impairment continues to be based on a number of factors including, first, whether Entergy has the ability and intent to hold the investment to recover its value, the duration and severity of any losses, and, then, whether it is expected that the investment will recover its value within a reasonable period of time. Entergy’s trusts are managed by third parties who operate in accordance with agreements that define investment guidelines and place restrictions on the purchases and sales of investments. Entergy did not record material

Table of Contents

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Financial Statements

charges to other income in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively, resulting from the recognition of the other-than-temporary impairment of certain equity securities held in its decommissioning trust funds.

NOTE 10. INCOME TAXES (Entergy Corporation, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, Entergy Texas, and System Energy)

See Income Tax Litigation , Income Tax Audits , and Other Tax Matters in Note 3 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a discussion of income tax proceedings, income tax audits, and other income tax matters involving Entergy. Following are updates to that discussion.

Income Tax Litigation

As discussed in the Form 10-K, in October 2010 the United States Tax Court entered a decision in favor of Entergy for tax years 1997 and 1998 regarding Entergy's entitlement to a tax credit for its U.K. Windfall Taxes paid in those years. In June 2012, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit unanimously affirmed the U.S. Tax Court decision. As a result of this decision, Entergy reversed its liability for uncertain tax positions associated with this issue. On September 4, 2012, the U.S. Solicitor General, on behalf of the Commissioner of Internal Revenue, petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari to review the Fifth Circuit judgment. PPL Corp. had previously petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari to review the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit decision in PPL Corp. v. Commissioner , in which the Third Circuit held that the same U.K. tax was not a creditable tax. On October 29, 2012, the U.S. Supreme Court granted PPL Corp.’s petition for certiorari. The outcome in Entergy's case will be determined by the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in the PPL Corp. proceeding.

Income Tax Audits

2008-2009 IRS Audit

In the third quarter 2008, Entergy Louisiana and Entergy Gulf States Louisiana received $679 million and $274.7 million, respectively, from the Louisiana Utilities Restoration Corporation (“LURC”). These receipts from LURC were from the proceeds of a Louisiana Act 55 financing of the costs incurred to restore service following Hurricane Katrina and Hurricane Rita. See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for further details regarding the financings.

In June 2012, Entergy effectively settled the tax treatment of the receipt of these funds, which resulted in an income tax benefit of $172 million for Entergy, including $143 million for Entergy Louisiana and $20 million for Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, which includes the effect of reversing liabilities for uncertain tax positions. Under the terms of an LPSC-approved settlement related to the benefits associated with Louisiana Act 55 financings, Entergy Louisiana and Entergy Gulf States Louisiana recorded, respectively, a $137 million ($84 million net-of-tax) and a $28 million ($17 million net-of-tax) regulatory charge and a corresponding regulatory liability to reflect their obligations to share the benefits with customers.

NOTE 11. PROPERTY, PLANT, AND EQUIPMENT (Entergy Corporation, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, Entergy Texas, and System Energy)

Construction Expenditures in Accounts Payable

Construction expenditures included in accounts payable at September 30, 2012 are $315.1 million for Entergy, $12.4 million for Entergy Arkansas, $47.2 million for Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, $159.5 million for Entergy Louisiana, $15 million for Entergy Mississippi, $15.3 million for Entergy New Orleans, $3.5 million for Entergy Texas, and $24.8 million for System Energy. Construction expenditures included in accounts payable at December 31, 2011 are $171.2 million for Entergy, $14.1 million for Entergy Arkansas, $13.7 million for Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, $27 million for Entergy Louisiana, $4.3 million for Entergy Mississippi, $3.6 million for Entergy New Orleans, $4.3 million for Entergy Texas, and $32.9 million for System Energy.

Table of Contents

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Financial Statements

Vermont Yankee

In March 2011 the NRC renewed Vermont Yankee’s operating license for an additional 20 years. The renewed operating license expires in March 2032. In May 2011 the Vermont Department of Public Service and the New England Coalition petitioned the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit seeking judicial review of the NRC’s issuance of the renewed operating license, alleging that the license had been issued without a valid and effective water quality certification under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act. Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee and Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc. intervened in the proceeding. In June 2012 the Court of Appeals denied the appeal on the ground that the petitioners had failed to exhaust their administrative remedies before the NRC. The time for seeking further judicial review of the NRC’s issuance of Vermont Yankee’s renewed operating license has expired.

Vermont Yankee also is operating under a Certificate of Public Good from the State of Vermont that was scheduled to expire in March 2012, but has an application pending before the Vermont Public Service Board (VPSB) for a new Certificate of Public Good for operation until March 2032. In April 2011, Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee and Entergy Nuclear Operations, the owner and operator respectively of Vermont Yankee, filed suit in the United States District Court for the District of Vermont. The suit challenged certain conditions imposed by Vermont upon Vermont Yankee’s continued operation and storage of spent nuclear fuel, including the requirement to obtain not only a new Certificate of Public Good, but also approval by Vermont’s General Assembly. In January 2012 the court entered judgment in Entergy’s favor and specifically:

·	Declared that Vermont’s laws requiring Vermont Yankee to cease operation in March 2012 and prohibiting the storage of spent nuclear fuel from operation after that date, absent approval by the General Assembly, were based on radiological safety concerns and are preempted by the Atomic Energy Act;

·	Permanently enjoined Vermont from enforcing these preempted requirements of the state’s laws; and

Permanently enjoined Vermont under the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution from conditioning the issuance of a new Certificate of Public Good upon the existence of a below wholesale market power sale agreement with Vermont utilities or Vermont Yankee’s selling power to Vermont utilities at rates below those available to wholesale customers in other states.

In February 2012 the Vermont defendants appealed the decision to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. Vermont Yankee cross-appealed on two grounds: (1) the Federal Power Act alternatively preempts conditioning the issuance of a new Certificate of Public Good upon the existence of a below wholesale market power sale agreement with Vermont utilities or Vermont Yankee’s selling power to Vermont utilities at rates below those available to wholesale customers in other states (an issue the District Court found unnecessary to decide in light of its ruling under the Commerce Clause); and (2) a request to make permanent the injunction pending appeal that the District Court entered on March 19, 2012 which prohibits Vermont from enforcing a statutory provision to compel Vermont Yankee to shut down because the cumulative total amount of spent fuel stored at the site exceeds the amount derived from the operation of the facility up to, but not beyond, March 21, 2012 (a provision the enforcement of which the January 2012 decision had not enjoined). The appeal and cross-appeal remain pending.

In January 2012, Entergy filed a motion requesting that the VPSB grant, based on the existing record in its proceeding, Vermont Yankee’s pending application for a new Certificate of Public Good. Entergy subsequently filed another motion asking the VPSB to declare that title 3, section 814(b) of the Vermont statutes (3 V.S.A. § 814(b)) authorized Vermont Yankee to operate while the Certificate of Public Good proceeding was pending because Entergy had timely filed a petition for a new Certificate of Public Good that had not yet been decided. In March 2012, the VPSB issued orders denying Entergy’s motion with respect to 3 V.S.A. § 814(b) but stating that the order did not require Vermont Yankee to cease operations, denying Entergy’s motion to issue a new Certificate of Public Good based on the existing record, determining to open a new docket and to create a new record to decide Vermont Yankee’s request

for a new Certificate of Public Good (without prejudice to any rights that Entergy might have under 3 V.S.A. § 814(b)), and directing Entergy to file an amended Certificate of Public Good petition that identified the specific approvals it was seeking in light of the district court’s decision. In April 2012, Entergy filed its amended Certificate of Public Good petition and in June 2012 filed its initial testimony in support of that petition. The VPSB’s current schedule provides for proceedings concerning that petition to continue until August 2013.

Table of Contents

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Financial Statements

In September 2012, Entergy filed a petition asking the VPSB to issue a Certificate of Public Good allowing construction at Vermont Yankee for a diesel generator to provide power in the event of a station blackout. Vermont Yankee currently can obtain such power from the Vernon Dam. Due to changes instituted by ISO-New England, Vermont Yankee will no longer be able to rely upon the Vernon Dam in the event of a station blackout after August 31, 2013 and therefore plans to install a new diesel generator as a replacement power source. The VPSB requested and received comments on Entergy’s September 2012 petition and its relationship to Entergy’s other petition for a Certificate of Public Good, but has not yet provided a schedule for its consideration of the September 2012 petition.

Impairment

Because of the uncertainty regarding the continued operation of Vermont Yankee, Entergy has tested the recoverability of the plant and related assets each quarter since the first quarter 2010. The determination of recoverability is based on the probability-weighted undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated by the plant and related assets. Projected net cash flows primarily depend on the status of the pending legal and state regulatory matters, as well as projections of future revenues and expenses over the remaining life of the plant. Prior to the first quarter 2012, the probability-weighted undiscounted net cash flows exceeded the carrying value of the Vermont Yankee plant and related assets. The decline, however, in the overall energy market and the projected forward prices of power as of March 31, 2012, which are significant inputs in the determination of net cash flows, resulted in the probability-weighted undiscounted future cash flows being less than the asset group’s carrying value. Entergy performed a fair value analysis based on the income approach, a discounted cash flow method, to determine the amount of impairment. The estimated fair value of the plant and related assets at March 31, 2012 was $162.0 million, while the carrying value was $517.5 million. Therefore, the assets were written down to their fair value and an impairment charge of $355.5 million ($223.5 million after-tax) was recognized. The impairment charge is recorded as a separate line item in Entergy’s consolidated statement of income for the nine months ended September 30, 2012, and is included within the results of the Entergy Wholesale Commodities segment.

The estimate of fair value was based on the price that Entergy would expect to receive in a hypothetical sale of the Vermont Yankee plant and related assets to a market participant on March 31, 2012. In order to determine this price, Entergy used significant observable inputs, including quoted forward power and gas prices, where available. Significant unobservable inputs, such as projected long-term pre-tax operating margins (cash basis), and estimated weighted average costs of capital were also used in the estimation of fair value. In addition, Entergy made certain assumptions regarding future tax deductions associated with the plant and related assets. Based on the use of significant unobservable inputs, the fair value measurement for the entirety of the asset group, and for each type of asset within the asset group, is classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy discussed in Note 8 to the financial statements.

The following table sets forth a description of significant unobservable inputs used in the valuation of the Vermont Yankee plant and related assets as of March 31, 2012:

Significant Unobservable Inputs	Range	Weighted Average

Weighted average cost of capital	7.5%-8.0%	7.8%
Long-term pre-tax operating margin (cash basis)	6.1%-7.8%	7.2%

Entergy’s Accounting Policy group, which reports to the Chief Accounting Officer, was primarily responsible for determining the valuation of the Vermont Yankee plant and related assets, in consultation with external advisors. Accounting Policy obtained and reviewed information from other Entergy departments with expertise on the various inputs and assumptions that were necessary to calculate the fair value of the asset group.

Table of Contents

Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Financial Statements

NOTE 12. VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES (Entergy Corporation, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, Entergy Texas, System Energy)

See Note 18 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a discussion of variable interest entities. See Note 4 to the financial statements herein for details of the nuclear fuel companies’ credit facility and commercial paper borrowings and long-term debt.

Entergy Louisiana and System Energy are each considered to hold a variable interest in the lessors from which they lease, respectively, undivided interests representing approximately 9.3% of the Waterford 3 and 11.5% of the Grand Gulf nuclear plants. Entergy Louisiana and System Energy are the lessees under these arrangements, which are described in more detail in Note 10 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K. Entergy Louisiana made payments on its lease, including interest, of $12.3 million and $12.8 million in the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Entergy Louisiana made payments on its lease, including interest, of $39.1 million and $50.4 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. System Energy made payments on its lease, including interest, of $1.8 million and $2.0 million in the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively. System Energy made payments on its lease, including interest, of $50.0 million and $49.4 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

NOTE 13. ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATIONS (Entergy Corporation, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, Entergy Texas, System Energy)

See Note 9 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a discussion of asset retirement obligations. Following is an update to that discussion.

In the second quarter 2012, Entergy Louisiana recorded a revision to its estimated decommissioning cost liability for Waterford 3 as a result of a revised decommissioning cost study. The revised estimate resulted in a $48.9 million increase in its decommissioning cost liability, along with a corresponding increase in the related asset retirement costs asset that will be depreciated over the remaining life of the unit.

In the second quarter 2012, Entergy Wholesale Commodities recorded a reduction of $60.6 million in the estimated decommissioning cost liability for a plant as a result of a revised decommissioning cost study. The revised estimate resulted in a credit to decommissioning expense of $49 million, reflecting the excess of the reduction in the liability over the amount of the undepreciated asset retirement costs asset.

__________________________________

In the opinion of the management of Entergy Corporation, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, Entergy Texas and System Energy, the accompanying unaudited financial statements contain all adjustments (consisting primarily of normal recurring accruals and reclassification of previously reported amounts to conform to current classifications) necessary for a fair statement of the results for the interim periods presented. The business of the Registrant Subsidiaries is subject to seasonal fluctuations, however, with the peak periods occurring during the third quarter. The results for the interim periods presented should not be used as a basis for estimating results of operations for a full year.

Table of Contents

Part I, Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As of September 30, 2012, evaluations were performed under the supervision and with the participation of Entergy Corporation, Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, Entergy Texas, and System Energy (individually "Registrant" and collectively the "Registrants") management, including their respective Principal Executive Officers (PEO) and Principal Financial Officers (PFO). The evaluations assessed the effectiveness of the Registrants' disclosure controls and procedures. Based on the evaluations, each PEO and PFO has concluded that, as to the Registrant or Registrants for which they serve as PEO or PFO, the Registrant’s or Registrants’ disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by each Registrant in reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms; and that the Registrant’s or Registrants’ disclosure controls and procedures are also effective in reasonably assuring that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Registrant’s or Registrants’ management, including their respective PEOs and PFOs, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Changes in Internal Controls over Financial Reporting

Under the supervision and with the participation of the Registrants’ management, including their respective PEOs and PFOs, the Registrants evaluated changes in internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended September 30, 2012 and found no change that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, internal control over financial reporting.

Table of Contents

ENTERGY ARKANSAS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Plan to Spin Off the Utility’s Transmission Business

See the “Plan to Spin Off the Utility’s Transmission Business” section of Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries Management’s Financial Discussion and Analysis in the Form 10-K and herein for a discussion of Entergy’s plan to spin off its transmission business and merge it with a newly formed subsidiary of ITC Holdings Corp., including the planned retirement of debt and preferred securities.

Results of Operations

Net Income

Third Quarter 2012 Compared to Third Quarter 2011

Net income increased $1.6 million primarily due to a lower effective income tax rate, partially offset by higher other operation and maintenance expenses.

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011

Net income decreased $14.7 million primarily due to higher other operation and maintenance expenses, higher taxes other than income taxes, and higher nuclear refueling outage expenses, partially offset by a lower effective income tax rate.

Net Revenue

Third Quarter 2012 Compared to Third Quarter 2011

Net revenue consists of operating revenues net of: 1) fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale, 2) purchased power expenses, and 3) other regulatory credits. Following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing the third quarter 2012 to the third quarter 2011.

		Amount
		(In Millions)

2011 net revenue		$394.4
Retail electric price		8.9
Reserve equalization		(2.3)
Net wholesale revenue		(2.6)
Volume/weather		(6.3)
Other		5.3
2012 net revenue		$397.4

The retail electric price variance is primarily due to an increase in the energy efficiency rider, as approved by the APSC, effective July 2012. Energy efficiency revenues are offset by costs included in other operation and maintenance expenses and have no effect on net income.

Table of Contents

Entergy Arkansas, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

The net wholesale revenue variance is primarily due to lower margins on co-owner contracts, somewhat offset by lower wholesale energy costs.

The volume/weather variance is primarily due to the effects of milder weather, as compared to the prior period, primarily on residential and commercial sales.

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011

		Amount
		(In Millions)

2011 net revenue		$985.6
Volume/weather		(16.0)
Reserve equalization		(8.0)
Energy cost recovery		3.4
Retail electric price		15.7
Other		6.8
2012 net revenue		$987.5

The volume/weather variance is primarily due to the effect of milder weather, as compared to the prior period, primarily on residential sales.

The reserve equalization variance is primarily due to increased reserve equalization expenses as a result of changes in the Entergy Arkansas and Entergy System generation capacity mix as compared to the same period in 2011. The variance is also due to a one-time credit recorded in 2011 related to the interruptible load proceeding. See Note 2 to the financial statements herein and in the Form 10-K for further discussion of the interruptible load proceeding.

The energy cost recovery variance resulted primarily from the annual adjustment to deferred fuel costs provided for in the energy cost recovery rider.

The retail electric price variance is primarily due to an increase in the energy efficiency rider, as approved by the APSC, effective July 2012. The increase is also related to higher residential price due to the effect of block rates, and higher industrial average price due to the customer mix. The energy efficiency rider revenues are offset by costs included in other operation and maintenance expenses and have no effect on net income.

Gross operating revenues, fuel and purchased power expenses, and other regulatory credits

Gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase of $30.1 million in rider revenues related to higher System Agreement production cost equalization payments and an increase of $10.9 million in rider revenues due to an increase in the energy efficiency rider effective July 2012. The increase was partially offset by the June 2012 refund to AmerenUE of $30.6 million, including interest, of rough production cost equalization payments collected from AmerenUE. Entergy Arkansas had previously recorded a regulatory provision for the potential refund to AmerenUE. The result of the refund is a decrease in gross revenues with an offsetting increase in other regulatory credits. See Note 2 to the financial statements herein for a discussion of the FERC order in the System Agreement production cost equalization proceedings.

Table of Contents

Entergy Arkansas, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

Fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to an increase in the recovery from customers of deferred fuel costs, partially offset by a decrease in the average market price of purchased power.

Other regulatory credits increased primarily due to the June 2012 refund to AmerenUE, as discussed above.

Other Income Statement Variances

Third Quarter 2012 Compared to Third Quarter 2011

Other operation and maintenance expenses increased primarily due to:

·	an increase of $7.0 million in energy efficiency costs. These costs are recovered through the energy efficiency rider and have no effect on net income;

·	$3.8 million of costs incurred in 2012 related to the planned spin-off and merger of the Utility’s transmission business;

an increase of $2.4 million in compensation and benefits costs resulting from a decrease in the discount rate and changes in certain actuarial assumptions resulting from a recent experience study. See "MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS – Critical Accounting Estimates " in the Form 10-K and Note 6 to the financial statements herein for further discussion of benefits costs; and

·	an increase of $4.3 million in nuclear generation expenses primarily due to higher contract costs.

The increase was somewhat offset by a decrease of $1.5 million in fossil-fueled generation expenses primarily due to higher plant outage costs in 2011 due to a greater scope of work.

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011

Other operation and maintenance expenses increased primarily due to:

an increase of $11.4 million in compensation and benefits costs resulting from a decrease in the discount rate and changes in certain actuarial assumptions resulting from a recent experience study. See "MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS – Critical Accounting Estimates " in the Form 10-K and Note 6 to the financial statements herein for further discussion of benefits costs;

·	$9.5 million of costs incurred in 2012 related to the planned spin-off and merger of the Utility’s transmission business;

·	an increase of $9 million in energy efficiency costs. These costs are recovered through the energy efficiency rider and have no effect on net income;

·	an increase of $7.8 million in nuclear generation expenses primarily due to higher contract costs; and

·	nuclear insurance refunds of $2.4 million received in 2011.

The increase was somewhat offset by a decrease of $5.4 million in fossil-fueled generation expenses primarily due to higher plant outage costs in 2011 due to a greater scope of work.

Nuclear refueling outage expenses increased primarily due to higher costs associated with the most recent outage as compared to the previous outages.

Taxes other than income taxes increased primarily due to an increase in ad valorem taxes resulting from higher assessments and an increase in local franchise taxes resulting from higher commercial electric revenues, as compared with the same period in 2011. Franchise taxes have no effect on net income as these taxes are recovered through the franchise tax rider.

Table of Contents

Entergy Arkansas, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

Income Taxes

The effective income tax rates for the third quarter 2012 and the nine months ended September 30, 2012 were 40.4% and 39.5%, respectively. The difference in the effective income tax rate for the third quarter 2012 versus the federal statutory rate of 35% is due to state income taxes and certain book and tax differences related to utility plant items. The difference in the effective income tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 versus the federal statutory rate of 35% is due to state income taxes and certain book and tax differences related to utility plant items, partially offset by the provision for uncertain tax positions.

The effective income tax rates for the third quarter 2011 and the nine months ended September 30, 2011 were 45.9% and 43.8%, respectively. The differences in the effective income tax rates for the third quarter 2011 and the nine months ended September 30, 2011 versus the federal statutory rate of 35% were due to state income taxes, the provision for uncertain tax positions, and certain book and tax differences related to utility plant items.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Cash Flow

Cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 were as follows:

		2012	2011
		(In Thousands)

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		$22,599	$106,102

Cash flow provided by (used in):
	Operating activities	337,920	334,762
	Investing activities	(324,656)	(359,111)
	Financing activities	6,759	(78,971)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		20,023	(103,320)

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period		$42,622	$2,782

Operating Activities

Net cash flow provided by operating activities increased $3.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2011 primarily due to a decrease of $67.1 million in pension contributions and the increased recovery of fuel and purchased power costs, including partial recovery of the System Agreement bandwidth remedy payment made in January 2012. These increases were substantially offset by the $156 million System Agreement bandwidth remedy payment made in January 2012 as a result of the payment required to implement the FERC’s remedy for the period June – December 2005 and the $30.6 million refund, including interest, to AmerenUE as discussed above. See Note 2 to the financial statements herein and in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the System Agreement bandwidth remedy payment. See " MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS – Critical Accounting Estimates " in the Form 10-K and Note 6 to the financial statements herein for a discussion of qualified pension and other postretirement benefits funding.

Investing Activities

Net cash flow used in investing activities decreased $34.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2011 primarily due to fluctuations in nuclear fuel activity because of variations from year to year in the timing and pricing of fuel reload requirements in the Utility business, material and services deliveries, and the timing of cash payments during the nuclear fuel cycle. The decrease was partially offset by money pool activity and the repayment in 2011 by System Fuels of Entergy Arkansas’s $11 million investment in System Fuels.

Table of Contents

Entergy Arkansas, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

Decreases in Entergy Arkansas’s receivable from the money pool are a source of cash flow, and Entergy Arkansas’s receivable from the money pool decreased by $9.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012, compared to decreasing by $41.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011. The money pool is an inter-company borrowing arrangement designed to reduce the Utility subsidiaries’ need for external short-term borrowings.

Financing Activities

Entergy Arkansas’s financing activities provided $6.8 million of cash for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 compared to using $79 million of cash for the nine months ended September 30, 2011 primarily due to:

·	$117.1 million in dividends paid on common stock in 2011;

·	the repayment, at maturity, of a $35 million 5.60% Series G note by the nuclear fuel company variable interest entity in September 2011; and

·	an increase of borrowings of $16.8 million on the nuclear fuel company variable interest entity’s credit facility in 2012 compared to a decrease in borrowings of $2.5 million on the nuclear fuel company variable interest entity’s credit facility in 2011.

Partially offsetting the increases in cash from financing activities was the issuance in June 2011 of $55 million of Series J notes by the nuclear fuel company variable interest entity and money pool activity.

Increases in Entergy Arkansas’s payable to the money pool are a source of cash flow, and Entergy Arkansas’s payable to the money pool increased by $32.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011.

Capital Structure

Entergy Arkansas’s capitalization is balanced between equity and debt, as shown in the following table. The decrease in the debt to capital ratio is due to the increase in retained earnings in 2012, in part because Entergy Arkansas has not declared common dividends in 2012.

	September 30, 2012	December 31, 2011

Debt to capital	53.1%	55.0%
Effect of excluding the securitization bonds	(1.4)%	(1.5)%
Debt to capital, excluding securitization bonds (1)	51.7%	53.5%
Effect of subtracting cash	(0.6)%	(0.3)%
Net debt to net capital, excluding securitization bonds (1)	51.1%	53.2%

(1)	Calculation excludes the securitization bonds, which are non-recourse to Entergy Arkansas.

Net debt consists of debt less cash and cash equivalents. Debt consists of notes payable and long-term debt, including the currently maturing portion. Capital consists of debt, preferred stock without sinking fund, and shareholders’ equity. Net capital consists of capital less cash and cash equivalents. Entergy Arkansas uses the net debt to net capital ratio and the ratios excluding securitization bonds in analyzing its financial condition and believes they provide useful information to its investors and creditors in evaluating Entergy Arkansas’s financial condition.

Uses and Sources of Capital

See " MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Liquidity and Capital Resources " in the Form 10-K for a discussion of Entergy Arkansas’s uses and sources of capital. Entergy Arkansas is developing its capital investment plan for 2013 through 2015 and currently anticipates making $1.4 billion in capital investments during that period, including approximately $758 million for maintenance of existing assets. The remaining $593 million is associated with specific investments such as environmental compliance spending, transmission upgrades and system improvements, and other investments. Following are additional updates to the information provided in the Form 10-K.

Table of Contents

Entergy Arkansas, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

Entergy Arkansas’s receivables from or (payables to) the money pool were as follows:

September 30, 2012	December 31, 2011	September 30, 2011	December 31, 2010
(In Thousands)

$7,487	$17,362	($32,102)	$41,463

See Note 4 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a description of the money pool.

Entergy Arkansas has credit facilities in the amount of $20 million and $150 million scheduled to expire in April 2013 and March 2017, respectively. No borrowings were outstanding under the credit facilities as of September 30, 2012. See Note 4 to the financial statements herein for additional discussion of the credit facilities.

Hot Spring Energy Facility Purchase Agreement

See the Form 10-K for a discussion of Entergy Arkansas’s agreement to acquire the Hot Spring Energy Facility. In July 2011, Entergy Arkansas filed its application with the APSC requesting approval of the acquisition and full cost recovery. In July 2012 the APSC approved the acquisition and cost recovery through a capacity acquisition rider and set the level of return on equity at the level established in Entergy Arkansas’s June 2009 base rate proceeding. The parties have satisfied their obligations under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act. The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) review of the transaction is ongoing. Closing has been delayed while the DOJ continues its review. Entergy Arkansas does not know when the DOJ will conclude its review or the extent to which its review of the transaction will be affected by the ongoing civil investigation of competitive issues concerning the Utility operating companies that is discussed in the Form 10-K.

State and Local Rate Regulation

See " MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS – State and Local Rate Regulation " in the Form 10-K for a discussion of state and local rate regulation. See Note 2 to the financial statements herein for an update regarding the System Agreement proceedings and Entergy Arkansas’s production cost allocation rider.

Federal Regulation

See “ Entergy’s Proposal to Join the MISO RTO ” in the “ Rate, Cost-recovery, and Other Regulation – Federal Regulation ” section of Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries Management’s Financial Discussion and Analysis for updates to the Federal Regulation discussion in the Form 10-K.

Nuclear Matters

See " MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Nuclear Matters " in the Form 10-K for a discussion of nuclear matters.

Environmental Risks

See " MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Environmental Risks " in the Form 10-K for a discussion of environmental risks.

Critical Accounting Estimates

See " MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Critical Accounting Estimates " in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the estimates and judgments necessary in Entergy Arkansas’s accounting for nuclear decommissioning costs, unbilled revenue, and qualified pension and other postretirement benefits.

111

Table of Contents

ENTERGY LOUISIANA, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES

MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Plan to Spin Off the Utility’s Transmission Business

See the “ Plan to Spin Off the Utility’s Transmission Business ” section of Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries Management’s Financial Discussion and Analysis in the Form 10-K and herein for a discussion of Entergy’s plan to spin off its transmission business and merge it with a newly formed subsidiary of ITC Holdings Corp., including the planned retirement of debt and preferred securities.

Hurricane Isaac

In August 2012, Hurricane Isaac caused extensive damage to Entergy Louisiana’s service area. The storm resulted in widespread power outages, significant damage primarily to distribution infrastructure, and the loss of sales during the power outages. Total restoration costs for the repair and/or replacement of Entergy Louisiana’s electric facilities damaged by Hurricane Isaac are currently estimated to be in the range of $240 million to $300 million. Entergy Louisiana is considering all reasonable avenues to recover storm-related costs from Hurricane Isaac, including, but not limited to, accessing funded storm reserves; securitization or other alternative financing; and traditional retail recovery on an interim and permanent basis. Storm cost recovery or financing may be subject to review by applicable regulatory authorities.

Entergy Louisiana has recorded accounts payable for the estimated costs incurred that were necessary to return customers to service. Entergy Louisiana recorded corresponding regulatory assets of approximately $84 million and construction work in progress of approximately $161 million. Entergy Louisiana recorded the regulatory assets in accordance with its accounting policies and based on the historic treatment of such costs in its service area because management believes that recovery through some form of regulatory mechanism is probable. Because Entergy Louisiana has not gone through the regulatory process regarding these storm costs, however, there is an element of risk, and Entergy Louisiana is unable to predict with certainty the degree of success it may have in its recovery initiatives, the amount of restoration costs that it may ultimately recover, or the timing of such recovery.

Results of Operations

Net Income

Third Quarter 2012 Compared to Third Quarter 2011

Net income decreased $257.5 million primarily due to a prior year settlement with the IRS related to the mark-to-market income tax treatment of power purchase contracts, which resulted in a $422 million reduction in income tax expense in the third quarter 2011. The net income effect was partially offset by a $199 million regulatory charge, which reduced net revenue in the third quarter 2011, because Entergy Louisiana is sharing the benefits with customers. See Note 3 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for additional discussion of the settlement and benefit sharing.

112

Table of Contents

Entergy Louisiana, LLC and Subsidiaries

Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011

Net income decreased $208.9 million primarily due to a prior year settlement with the IRS related to the mark-to-market income tax treatment of power purchase contracts, which resulted in a $422 million reduction in income tax expense in the third quarter 2011. The net income effect was partially offset by a $199 million regulatory charge, which reduced net revenue in the nine months ended September 30, 2011, because Entergy Louisiana is sharing the benefit with customers. See Note 3 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for additional discussion of the settlement and benefit sharing. Partially offsetting the decrease in net income was the IRS tax settlement, in June 2012, related to the uncertain tax position regarding the Hurricane Katrina and Hurricane Rita Louisiana Act 55 financing, which resulted in a $142.7 million income tax benefit, partially offset by a $137.1 million ($84.3 million net-of-tax) regulatory charge, which reduced net revenue in the nine months ended September 30, 2012, because Entergy Louisiana is sharing the benefit with customers. See Note 10 to the financial statements herein for additional discussion of the settlement and benefit sharing.

Net Revenue

Third Quarter 2012 Compared to Third Quarter 2011

Net revenue consists of operating revenues net of: 1) fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale, 2) purchased power expenses, and 3) other regulatory charges (credits). Following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing the third quarter 2012 to the third quarter 2011.

		Amount
		(In Millions)

2011 net revenue		$130.3
Mark-to-market tax settlement sharing		199.6
Volume/weather		(16.7)
Other		(1.1)
2012 net revenue		$312.1

The mark-to-market tax settlement sharing variance results from a regulatory charge recorded in the third quarter 2011 because Entergy Louisiana is sharing the benefits of a settlement with the IRS related to mark-to-market income tax treatment of power purchase contracts with customers. See Note 3 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for additional discussion of the settlement and benefit sharing.

The volume/weather variance is primarily due to the effect of milder weather as compared to the previous year on residential and commercial sales, the effects of the power outages caused by Hurricane Isaac, and decreased usage in the industrial sector as a result of decreased consumption by a large industrial customer in the chemical industry as a result of an unplanned outage.

Gross operating revenues, fuel and purchased power expenses, and other regulatory charges (credits)

Gross operating revenues decreased primarily due to a decrease of $158.7 million in fuel cost recovery revenues primarily due to lower fuel rates and the decrease related to volume/weather, as discussed above. Entergy Louisiana’s fuel and purchased power recovery mechanism is discussed in Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K.

Fuel and purchased power expenses decreased primarily due to a decrease in the average market prices of natural gas and purchased power and decreased demand.

113

Table of Contents

Entergy Louisiana, LLC and Subsidiaries

Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011

Net revenue consists of operating revenues net of: 1) fuel, fuel-related expenses, and gas purchased for resale, 2) purchased power expenses, and 3) other regulatory charges. Following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing the nine months ended September 30, 2012 to the nine months ended September 30, 2011.

		Amount
		(In Millions)

2011 net revenue		$650.1
Mark-to-market tax settlement sharing		201.4
Retail electric price		13.7
Volume/weather		(25.5)
Louisiana Act 55 financing tax settlement sharing		(135.6)
Other		(1.6)
2012 net revenue		$702.5

The retail electric price variance is primarily due to a special formula rate plan rate increase effective May 2011 in accordance with a previous LPSC order relating to the acquisition of Unit 2 of the Acadia Energy Center. See Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the formula rate plan increase.

The volume/weather variance is primarily due to the effect of milder weather as compared to the previous year on residential and commercial sales and the effects of the power outages caused by Hurricane Isaac, partially offset by increased usage in the industrial sector as a result of increased consumption by a large industrial customer in the chemical industry as a result of plant expansion.

The Louisiana Act 55 financing tax settlement sharing variance results from a regulatory charge recorded in the second quarter 2012 because Entergy Louisiana is sharing the benefits of the settlement with the IRS related to the uncertain tax position regarding the Hurricane Katrina and Hurricane Rita Louisiana Act 55 financing with customers. See Note 10 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the settlement and benefit sharing.

Gross operating revenues, fuel and purchased power expenses, and other regulatory charges

Gross operating revenues decreased primarily due to:

·	a decrease of $270.2 million in fuel cost recovery revenues primarily due to lower fuel rates. Entergy Louisiana’s fuel and purchased power recovery mechanism is discussed in Note 2 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K;

·	the decrease related to volume/weather, as discussed above; and

·	a decrease of $15.9 million in gross wholesale revenues due to a decrease in sales to affiliated customers.

Fuel and purchased power expenses decreased primarily due to a decrease in the average market prices of natural gas and purchased power.

114

Table of Contents

Entergy Louisiana, LLC and Subsidiaries

Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

Other regulatory charges decreased primarily due to a regulatory charge recorded in the third quarter 2011 because Entergy Louisiana is sharing the benefits of a settlement with the IRS related to mark-to-market income tax treatment of power purchase contracts with customers, partially offset by a regulatory charge recorded in the second quarter 2012 because Entergy Louisiana is sharing the benefits of a settlement with the IRS related to the uncertain tax position regarding the Hurricane Katrina and Hurricane Rita Louisiana Act 55 financing with customers. See Note 10 to the financial statements herein and Note 3 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for additional discussion of the settlements.

Other Income Statement Variances

Third Quarter 2012 Compared to Third Quarter 2011

Interest expense increased primarily due to:

·	cessation in 2011 of interest on transmission credits per a FERC order relating to an interconnection and operating agreement between a power producer and Entergy Louisiana;

·	the issuance by Entergy Louisiana Investment Recovery Funding, L.L.C., a wholly owned subsidiary of Entergy Louisiana, of $207.2 million of senior secured investment recovery bonds with a coupon rate of 2.04% in September 2011;

·	the issuance of $250 million of 1.875% Series first mortgage bonds in January 2012; and

·	the issuance of $200 million of 5.25% Series first mortgage bonds in July 2012.

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011

Other operation and maintenance expenses increased primarily due to:

an increase of $8 million in compensation and benefits costs primarily due to decreasing discount rates and changes in certain actuarial assumptions resulting from a recent experience study. See "MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS – Critical Accounting Estimates " in the Form 10-K and Note 6 to the financial statements herein for further discussion of benefits costs;

·	an increase of $8.6 million in fossil-fueled generation expenses due to an overall higher scope of outages compared to prior year and the addition of Acadia Unit 2 in April 2011; and

·	$4.8 million of costs incurred in 2012 related to the planned spin-off and merger of the transmission business.

The increase was partially offset by the deferral, as approved by the LPSC and the FERC, of costs related to the transition and implementation of joining the MISO RTO, which reduced expenses by $5.2 million.

Depreciation and amortization expenses increased primarily due to additions to plant in service, including the acquisition of the Acadia Unit 2 in 2011.

Interest expense increased primarily due to:

·	cessation in 2011 of interest on transmission credits per a FERC order relating to an interconnection and operating agreement between a power producer and Entergy Louisiana;

·	the issuance of $200 million of 4.8% Series first mortgage bonds in March 2011;

·	the issuance by Entergy Louisiana Investment Recovery Funding, L.L.C., a wholly owned subsidiary of Entergy Louisiana, of $207.2 million of senior secured investment recovery bonds with a coupon rate of 2.04% in September 2011;

·	the issuance of $250 million of 1.875% Series first mortgage bonds in January 2012; and

·	the issuance of $200 million of 5.25% Series first mortgage bonds in July 2012.

115

Table of Contents

Entergy Louisiana, LLC and Subsidiaries

Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

Income Taxes

The effective income tax rate was 34.7% for the third quarter 2012 and (110.1%) for the nine months ended September 30, 2012. The difference in the effective income tax rate for the third quarter 2012 versus the federal statutory rate of 35% is due to a change in the regulatory treatment of state income taxes included in formula rate plan filings, partially offset by book and tax differences related to the non-taxable income distributions earned on preferred membership interests. The difference in the effective income tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 versus the federal statutory rate of 35% is due to the reversal of the provision for uncertain tax positions related to the IRS settlement on how to treat the Louisiana Act 55 financing of the Hurricane Katrina and Hurricane Rita storm costs, book and tax differences related to the non-taxable income distributions earned on preferred membership interests, and book and tax differences related to the allowance for equity funds used during construction, partially offset by a change to the regulatory treatment of state income taxes included in formula rate plan filings.

The effective income tax rate was 727.8% for the third quarter 2011 and (359.5%) for the nine months ended September 30, 2011. The differences in the effective income tax rates for the third quarter 2011 and the nine months ended September 30, 2011 versus the federal statutory rate of 35% were primarily due to the third quarter 2011 reversal of the provision for uncertain tax positions resulting from a settlement with the IRS related to the mark-to-market income tax treatment of power purchase contracts.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Cash Flow

Cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 were as follows:

		2012	2011
		(In Thousands)

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		$878	$123,254

Cash flow provided by (used in):
	Operating activities	401,672	248,173
	Investing activities	(519,816)	(699,523)
	Financing activities	266,171	381,593
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		148,027	(69,757)

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period		$148,905	$53,497

Operating Activities

Net cash flow provided by operating activities increased $153.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2011 primarily due to the purchase in 2011 of $28.1 million of fuel oil from System Fuels because System Fuels will no longer procure fuel oil for the Utility companies, a decrease of $22.6 million in pension contributions, and the timing of collections of customer receivables, partially offset by an increase of $18.6 million in interest paid, as discussed above. See “ MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS – Critical Accounting Estimates ” in the Form 10-K and Note 6 to the financial statements herein for a discussion of qualified pension and other postretirement benefits.

116

Table of Contents

Entergy Louisiana, LLC and Subsidiaries

Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

Investing Activities

Net cash flow used in investing activities decreased $179.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2011 primarily due to:

·	the purchase of the Acadia Unit 2 for approximately $300 million in April 2011;

·	a decrease in nuclear fuel activity because of variations from year to year in the timing and pricing of fuel reload requirements in the Utility business, material and services deliveries, and the timing of cash payments during the nuclear fuel cycle;

·	a decrease in transmission construction expenditures due to increased work performed in 2011; and

·	receipts of $13.7 million in 2012 from the storm reserve escrow account.

The decrease was partially offset by the following:

·	an increase in fossil construction expenditures due to spending on the Ninemile Unit 6 self-build project;

·	an increase in nuclear construction expenditures due to the Waterford 3 steam generator replacement project in 2012. The increase is partially offset by various nuclear projects in 2011; and

·	money pool activity.

Increases in Entergy Louisiana’s receivable from the money pool are a use of cash flow, and Entergy Louisiana’s receivable from the money pool increased by $30.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 compared to decreasing by $22.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011. The money pool is an inter-company borrowing arrangement designed to reduce the Utility subsidiaries’ need for external short-term borrowings.

Financing Activities

Net cash flow provided by financing activities decreased $115.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2011 primarily due to the following cash flow activity:

·	money pool activity;

·	the payment on credit borrowings of $50 million on Entergy Louisiana’s credit facility in 2012;

·	a principal payment of $12.3 million in 2012 for the Senior Secured Investment Recovery bonds;

·	the issuances of $250 million of 1.875% Series first mortgage bonds in January 2012 and $200 million of 5.25% Series first mortgage bonds in July 2012 compared to the issuance of $200 million of 4.8% Series first mortgage bonds in March 2011;

·	the issuance by Entergy Louisiana Investment Recovery Funding, L.L.C., a wholly owned subsidiary of Entergy Louisiana, of $207.2 million of senior secured investment recovery bonds with a coupon rate of 2.04% in September 2011;

·	an increase in borrowings of $12.1 million on the nuclear fuel company variable interest entity’s credit facility in 2012 compared to an increase in borrowings of $33.5 million on the nuclear fuel company variable interest entity’s credit facility in 2011;

·	the issuance of the $25 million 3.25% Series G note by the nuclear fuel company variable interest entity in August 2012;

·	the issuance of the $20 million 3.30% Series F note by the nuclear fuel company variable interest entity in March 2011;

·	a principal payment of $25.3 million in 2012 for the Waterford 3 sale-leaseback obligation compared to a principal payment of $35.5 million in 2011; and

·	a decrease of $30.6 million in common equity dividends in 2012.

Decreases in Entergy Louisiana’s payable to the money pool are a use of cash flow, and Entergy Louisiana’s payable to the money pool decreased by $118.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012.

117

Table of Contents

Entergy Louisiana, LLC and Subsidiaries

Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

Capital Structure

Entergy Louisiana’s capitalization is balanced between equity and debt, as shown in the following table.

	September 30, 2012	December 31, 2011

Debt to capital	49.0%	47.2%
Effect of excluding securitization bonds	(1.9)%	(2.3)%
Debt to capital, excluding securitization bonds (1)	47.1%	44.9%
Effect of subtracting cash	(1.5)%	-%
Net debt to net capital, excluding securitization bonds (1)	45.6%	44.9%

(1)	Calculation excludes the securitization bonds, which are non-recourse to Entergy Louisiana.

Net debt consists of debt less cash and cash equivalents. Debt consists of notes payable and long-term debt, including the currently maturing portion. Capital consists of debt and member’s equity. Net capital consists of capital less cash and cash equivalents. Entergy Louisiana uses the net debt to net capital ratio and the ratios excluding securitization bonds in analyzing its financial condition and believes they provide useful information to its investors and creditors in evaluating Entergy Louisiana’s financial condition.

Uses and Sources of Capital

See " MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Liquidity and Capital Resources " in the Form 10-K for a discussion of Entergy Louisiana’s uses and sources of capital. Entergy Louisiana is developing its capital investment plan for 2013 through 2015 and currently anticipates making $1.5 billion in capital investments during that period, including approximately $647 million for maintenance of existing assets. The remaining $867 million is associated with specific investments such as environmental compliance spending, transmission upgrades and system improvements, and other investments, such as the Ninemile Point Unit 6 self-build project and completion of the Waterford 3 steam generator replacement project. Following are additional updates to the information provided in the Form 10-K.

Entergy Louisiana’s receivables from or (payables to) the money pool were as follows:

September 30, 2012	December 31, 2011	September 30, 2011	December 31, 2010
(In Thousands)

$30,710	($118,415)	$27,107	$49,887

See Note 4 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K for a description of the money pool.

Entergy Louisiana has a credit facility in the amount of $200 million scheduled to expire in March 2017. No borrowings were outstanding under the facility as of September 30, 2012. See Note 4 to the financial statements herein for additional discussion of the credit facility.

In July 2012, Entergy Louisiana issued $200 million of 5.25% Series first mortgage bonds due July 2052. Entergy Louisiana used the proceeds for general corporate purposes.

118

Table of Contents

Entergy Louisiana, LLC and Subsidiaries

Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

Waterford 3 Steam Generator Replacement Project

See the Form 10-K for a discussion of Entergy Louisiana’s plan to replace the Waterford 3 steam generators, along with the reactor vessel closure head and control element drive mechanisms. Entergy Louisiana’s Fall 2012 refueling outage began in October 2012, which will include the steam generator, reactor vessel head, and control element drive mechanisms replacement project.

New Nuclear Development

See the Form 10-K for a discussion of the project option being developed by Entergy Gulf States Louisiana and Entergy Louisiana for new nuclear generation at River Bend. In March 2010, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana and Entergy Louisiana filed with the LPSC seeking approval to continue the limited development activities necessary to preserve an option to construct a new unit at River Bend. The testimony and legal briefs of the LPSC staff generally support the request of Entergy Gulf States Louisiana and Entergy Louisiana, although other parties filed briefs, without supporting testimony, in opposition to the request. At an evidentiary hearing in October 2011, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, Entergy Louisiana, and the LPSC staff presented testimony in support of certification of activities to preserve an option for a new nuclear plant at River Bend. The ALJ recommended, however, that the LPSC decline the request of Entergy Gulf States Louisiana and Entergy Louisiana on the basis that the LPSC’s rule on new nuclear development does not apply to activities to preserve an option to develop and on the further grounds that the companies improperly engaged in advanced preparation activities prior to certification. There has been no suggestion that the planning activities or costs incurred were imprudent. At its June 28, 2012 meeting the LPSC voted to uphold the ALJ’s decision and directed that Entergy Gulf States Louisiana and Entergy Louisiana be permitted to seek recovery of these costs in the rate case filings that are anticipated in January 2013, fully reserving the LPSC’s right to determine the recoverability of such costs in rates. On September 10, 2012, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana and Entergy Louisiana filed a petition for appeal and judicial review of the LPSC’s order with the Louisiana Nineteenth Judicial District Court. A schedule for the appeal has not been established.

Entergy Louisiana’s Ninemile Point Unit 6 Self-Build Project

See the Form 10-K for a discussion of Entergy Louisiana’s Ninemile Point Unit 6 self-build project. The Ninemile 6 capacity and energy is proposed to be allocated 55% to Entergy Louisiana, 25% to Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, and 20% to Entergy New Orleans. In June 2011, Entergy Louisiana filed with the LPSC an application seeking certification that the public necessity and convenience would be served by Entergy Louisiana’s construction of the facility. Entergy Gulf States Louisiana joined in the application, seeking certification of its purchase under a life-of-unit power purchase agreement of its allocated share of the capacity and energy generated by Ninemile 6. In February 2012 the City Council passed a resolution authorizing Entergy New Orleans to purchase 20% of the Ninemile 6 energy and capacity. In March 2012 the LPSC unanimously voted to grant the certifications requested by Entergy Louisiana and Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, and Entergy Louisiana has given the contractor a full notice to proceed with the construction. Under the terms approved by the LPSC, costs may be recovered through Entergy Louisiana’s formula rate plan, if one is in effect when the project is placed in service; alternatively, Entergy Louisiana must file a rate case approximately 12 months prior to the expected in-service date.

119

Table of Contents

Entergy Louisiana, LLC and Subsidiaries

Management's Financial Discussion and Analysis

State and Local Rate Regulation

See " MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS – State and Local Rate Regulation " in the Form 10-K for a discussion of state and local rate regulation. Following is an update to that discussion.

Federal Regulation

Nuclear Matters

See " MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Nuclear Matters " in the Form 10-K for a discussion of nuclear matters.

Environmental Risks

See " MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Environmental Risks " in the Form 10-K for a discussion of environmental risks.

Critical Accounting Estimates

See " MANAGEMENT’S FINANCIAL DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS - Critical Accounting Estimates " in the Form 10-K for a discussion of the estimates and judgments necessary in Entergy Louisiana’s accounting for nuclear decommissioning costs, unbilled revenue, and qualified pension and other postretirement benefits. Following is an update to that discussion.

Nuclear Decommissioning Costs

In the second quarter 2012, Entergy Louisiana recorded a revision to its estimated decommissioning cost liability for Waterford 3 as a result of a revised decommissioning cost study. The revised estimate resulted in a $48.9 million increase in its decommissioning cost liability, along with a corresponding increase in the related asset retirement obligation asset that will be depreciated over the remaining life of the unit.

120

Table of Contents

(Mark One)
X	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

	For the Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 2012
	OR
	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

	For the transition period from ____________ to ____________

Commission File Number	Registrant, State of Incorporation or Organization, Address of Principal Executive Offices, Telephone Number, and IRS Employer Identification No.	Commission File Number	Registrant, State of Incorporation or Organization, Address of Principal Executive Offices, Telephone Number, and IRS Employer Identification No.
1-11299	ENTERGY CORPORATION (a Delaware corporation) 639 Loyola Avenue New Orleans, Louisiana 70113 Telephone (504) 576-4000 72-1229752	1-31508	ENTERGY MISSISSIPPI, INC. (a Mississippi corporation) 308 East Pearl Street Jackson, Mississippi 39201 Telephone (601) 368-5000 64-0205830


1-10764	ENTERGY ARKANSAS, INC. (an Arkansas corporation) 425 West Capitol Avenue Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 Telephone (501) 377-4000 71-0005900	0-05807	ENTERGY NEW ORLEANS, INC. (a Louisiana corporation) 1600 Perdido Street New Orleans, Louisiana 70112 Telephone (504) 670-3700 72-0273040


0-20371	ENTERGY GULF STATES LOUISIANA, L.L.C. (a Louisiana limited liability company) 446 North Boulevard Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70802 Telephone (800) 368-3749 74-0662730	1-34360	ENTERGY TEXAS, INC. (a Texas corporation) 350 Pine Street Beaumont, Texas 77701 Telephone (409) 981-2000 61-1435798


1-32718	ENTERGY LOUISIANA, LLC (a Texas limited liability company) 446 North Boulevard Baton Rouge, Louisiana 70802 Telephone (800) 368-3749 75-3206126	1-09067	SYSTEM ENERGY RESOURCES, INC. (an Arkansas corporation) Echelon One 1340 Echelon Parkway Jackson, Mississippi 39213 Telephone (601) 368-5000 72-0752777

	Large accelerated filer	Accelerated filer	Non- accelerated filer	Smaller reporting company
Entergy Corporation	Ö
Entergy Arkansas, Inc.			Ö
Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, L.L.C.			Ö
Entergy Louisiana, LLC			Ö
Entergy Mississippi, Inc.			Ö
Entergy New Orleans, Inc.			Ö
Entergy Texas, Inc.			Ö
System Energy Resources, Inc.			Ö

Common Stock Outstanding		Outstanding at October 31, 2012
Entergy Corporation	($0.01 par value)	177,732,990

Abbreviation or Acronym	Term
AFUDC	Allowance for Funds Used During Construction
ALJ	Administrative Law Judge
ANO 1 and 2	Units 1 and 2 of Arkansas Nuclear One (nuclear), owned by Entergy Arkansas
APSC	Arkansas Public Service Commission
ASLB	Atomic Safety and Licensing Board, the board within the NRC that conducts hearings and performs other regulatory functions that the NRC authorizes
ASU	Accounting Standards Update issued by the FASB
Board	Board of Directors of Entergy Corporation
capacity factor	Actual plant output divided by maximum potential plant output for the period
City Council or Council	Council of the City of New Orleans, Louisiana
D.C. Circuit	U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit
Entergy	Entergy Corporation and its direct and indirect subsidiaries
Entergy Corporation	Entergy Corporation, a Delaware corporation
Entergy Gulf States, Inc.	Predecessor company for financial reporting purposes to Entergy Gulf States Louisiana that included the assets and business operations of both Entergy Gulf States Louisiana and Entergy Texas
Entergy Gulf States Louisiana	Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, L.L.C., a company created in connection with the jurisdictional separation of Entergy Gulf States, Inc. and the successor company to Entergy Gulf States, Inc. for financial reporting purposes. The term is also used to refer to the Louisiana jurisdictional business of Entergy Gulf States, Inc., as the context requires.
Entergy Texas	Entergy Texas, Inc., a company created in connection with the jurisdictional separation of Entergy Gulf States, Inc. The term is also used to refer to the Texas jurisdictional business of Entergy Gulf States, Inc., as the context requires.
Entergy Wholesale Commodities (EWC)	Entergy’s non-utility business segment primarily comprised of the ownership and operation of six nuclear power plants, the ownership of interests in non-nuclear power plants, and the sale of the electric power produced by those plants to wholesale customers
EPA	United States Environmental Protection Agency
ERCOT	Electric Reliability Council of Texas
FASB	Financial Accounting Standards Board
FERC	Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
FitzPatrick	James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant (nuclear), owned by an Entergy subsidiary in the Entergy Wholesale Commodities business segment
Form 10-K	Annual Report on Form 10-K for the calendar year ended December 31, 2011 filed with the SEC by Entergy Corporation and its Registrant Subsidiaries
Grand Gulf	Unit No. 1 of Grand Gulf Nuclear Station (nuclear), 90% owned or leased by System Energy
GWh	Gigawatt-hour(s), which equals one million kilowatt-hours
Independence	Independence Steam Electric Station (coal), owned 16% by Entergy Arkansas, 25% by Entergy Mississippi, and 7% by Entergy Power
Indian Point 2	Unit 2 of Indian Point Energy Center (nuclear), owned by an Entergy subsidiary in the Entergy Wholesale Commodities business segment
Indian Point 3	Unit 3 of Indian Point Energy Center (nuclear), owned by an Entergy subsidiary in the Entergy Wholesale Commodities business segment
IRS	Internal Revenue Service
ISO	Independent System Operator

	Page Number

Forward-looking information	iii
Definitions	v
Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries
Management’s Financial Discussion and Analysis	1
Consolidated Statements of Income	24
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income	25
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	26
Consolidated Balance Sheets	28
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity	30
Selected Operating Results	31
Notes to Financial Statements	32
Part 1. Item 4. Controls and Procedures	83
Entergy Arkansas, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Management’s Financial Discussion and Analysis	84
Consolidated Income Statements	90
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	91
Consolidated Balance Sheets	92
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Common Equity	94
Selected Operating Results	95
Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, L.L.C.
Management’s Financial Discussion and Analysis	96
Income Statements	105
Statements of Comprehensive Income	106
Statements of Cash Flows	107
Balance Sheets	108
Statements of Changes in Equity	110
Selected Operating Results	111
Entergy Louisiana, LLC and Subsidiaries
Management’s Financial Discussion and Analysis	112
Consolidated Income Statements	121
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income	122
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	123
Consolidated Balance Sheets	124
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity	126
Selected Operating Results	127
Entergy Mississippi, Inc.
Management’s Financial Discussion and Analysis	128
Income Statements	135
Statements of Cash Flows	137
Balance Sheets	138
Statements of Changes in Common Equity	140
Selected Operating Results	141

Abbreviation or Acronym	Term
kW	Kilowatt, which equals one thousand watts
kWh	Kilowatt-hour(s)
LPSC	Louisiana Public Service Commission
MISO	Midwest Independent Transmission System Operator, Inc., a regional transmission organization
MMBtu	One million British Thermal Units
MPSC	Mississippi Public Service Commission
MW	Megawatt(s), which equals one thousand kilowatts
MWh	Megawatt-hour(s)
Net MW in operation	Installed capacity owned and operated
NRC	Nuclear Regulatory Commission
NYPA	New York Power Authority
Palisades	Palisades Power Plant (nuclear), owned by an Entergy subsidiary in the Entergy Wholesale Commodities business segment
Pilgrim	Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station (nuclear), owned by an Entergy subsidiary in the Entergy Wholesale Commodities business segment
PPA	Purchased power agreement or power purchase agreement
PUCT	Public Utility Commission of Texas
Registrant Subsidiaries	Entergy Arkansas, Inc., Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, L.L.C., Entergy Louisiana, LLC, Entergy Mississippi, Inc., Entergy New Orleans, Inc., Entergy Texas, Inc., and System Energy Resources, Inc.
River Bend	River Bend Station (nuclear), owned by Entergy Gulf States Louisiana
RTO	Regional transmission organization
SEC	Securities and Exchange Commission
SPP	Southwest Power Pool
System Agreement	Agreement, effective January 1, 1983, as modified, among the Utility operating companies relating to the sharing of generating capacity and other power resources
System Energy	System Energy Resources, Inc.
TWh	Terawatt-hour(s), which equals one billion kilowatt-hours
Unit Power Sales Agreement	Agreement, dated as of June 10, 1982, as amended and approved by FERC, among Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, and System Energy, relating to the sale of capacity and energy from System Energy’s share of Grand Gulf
Utility	Entergy’s business segment that generates, transmits, distributes, and sells electric power, with a small amount of natural gas distribution
Utility operating companies	Entergy Arkansas, Entergy Gulf States Louisiana, Entergy Louisiana, Entergy Mississippi, Entergy New Orleans, and Entergy Texas
Vermont Yankee	Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Station (nuclear), owned by an Entergy subsidiary in the Entergy Wholesale Commodities business segment
Waterford 3	Unit No. 3 (nuclear) of the Waterford Steam Electric Station, 100% owned or leased by Entergy Louisiana
weather-adjusted usage	Electric usage excluding the effects of deviations from normal weather

Company		Hurricane Isaac Restoration Costs
		(In Millions)
Entergy Arkansas		$10
Entergy Gulf States Louisiana		70-90
Entergy Louisiana		240-300
Entergy Mississippi		30-40
Entergy New Orleans		50-60
Total		$400-500

	Utility	Entergy Wholesale Commodities	Parent & Other (1)	Entergy
	(In Thousands)

3rd Qtr 2011 Consolidated Net Income	$528,459	$130,862	($26,252)	$633,069

Net revenue (operating revenue less fuel expense, purchased power, and other regulatory charges/credits)	189,220	(46,721)	(2,626)	139,873
Other operation and maintenance expenses	40,964	16,059	(602)	56,421
Taxes other than income taxes	(2,248)	(617)	(130)	(2,995)
Depreciation and amortization	13,902	(15,664)	(79)	(1,841)
Other income	(5,287)	(2,847)	(365)	(8,499)
Interest expense	9,485	(2,227)	12,951	20,209
Other expenses	3,442	(5,097)	-	(1,655)
Income taxes	346,341	(29,926)	35,219	351,634

3rd Qtr 2012 Consolidated Net Income	$300,506	$118,766	($76,602)	$342,670

	2012	2011

Owned capacity	6,612	6,016
GWh billed	12,002	11,255
Average realized revenue per MWh	$51.88	$56.02

Entergy Wholesale Commodities Nuclear Fleet
Capacity factor	90%	98%
GWh billed	10,480	10,645
Average realized revenue per MWh	$52.27	$56.07
Refueling Outage Days:
FitzPatrick	15	-

	Utility	Entergy Wholesale Commodities	Parent & Other (1)	Entergy
	(In Thousands)

2011 Consolidated Net Income	$949,854	$319,651	($62,159)	$1,207,346

Net revenue (operating revenue less fuel expense, purchased power, and other regulatory charges/credits)	(6,473)	(149,942)	(4,871)	(161,286)
Other operation and maintenance expenses	120,313	56,486	5,893	182,692
Asset impairment	-	355,524	-	355,524
Taxes other than income taxes	3,684	14,297	(145)	17,836
Depreciation and amortization	28,061	(3,931)	(91)	24,039
Other income	1,102	8,098	(207)	8,993
Interest expense	17,546	1,346	23,306	42,198
Other expenses	6,288	(54,105)	-	(47,817)
Income taxes	92,347	(223,380)	45,101	(85,932)

2012 Consolidated Net Income	$676,244	$31,570	($141,301)	$566,513

	2012	2013	2014	2015	2016	2017

Energy
Percent of planned generation under contract (a):
Unit-contingent (b)	65%	41%	22%	12%	12%	13%
Unit-contingent with availability guarantees (c)	13%	19%	15%	13%	13%	13%
Firm LD (d)	24%	24%	55%	-%	-%	-%
Offsetting positions (e)	(13)%	-%	(19)%	-%	-%	-%
Total	89%	84%	73%	25%	25%	26%
Planned generation (TWh) (f) (g)	11	40	41	41	40	41
Average revenue per MWh on contracted volumes:
Minimum	$47	$45	$44	$48	$50	$51
Expected based on market prices as of September 30, 2012	$47	$45	$45	$49	$51	$52
Sensitivity: -/+ $10 per MWh market price change	$47	$45-$47	$44-$48	$48-$52	$50-$54	$51-$55

Capacity (n)
Percent of capacity sold forward (h):
Bundled capacity and energy contracts (i)	16%	16%	16%	16%	16%	16%
Capacity contracts (j)	59%	28%	13%	12%	5%	-%
Total	75%	44%	29%	28%	21%	16%
Planned net MW in operation (g) (k)	5,011	5,011	5,011	5,011	5,011	5,011
Average revenue under contract per kW per month (applies to Capacity contracts only)	$2.2	$2.3	$2.9	$3.3	$3.4	$-

Total Nuclear Energy and Capacity Revenues
Expected sold and market total revenue per MWh	$48	$47	$45	$45	$47	$48
Sensitivity: -/+ $10 per MWh market price change	$47-$49	$46-$51	$42-$51	$38-$53	$40-$55	$41-$56

(a)	Percent of planned generation output sold or purchased forward under contracts, forward physical contracts, forward financial contracts, or options that mitigate price uncertainty that may require regulatory approval or approval of transmission rights
(b)	Transaction under which power is supplied from a specific generation asset; if the asset is not operating, seller is generally not liable to buyer for any damages
(c)	A sale of power on a unit-contingent basis coupled with a guarantee of availability provides for the payment to the power purchaser of contract damages, if incurred, in the event the seller fails to deliver power as a result of the failure of the specified generation unit to generate power at or above a specified availability threshold. All of Entergy’s outstanding guarantees of availability provide for dollar limits on Entergy’s maximum liability under such guarantees.
(d)	Transaction that requires receipt or delivery of energy at a specified delivery point (usually at a market hub not associated with a specific asset) or settles financially on notional quantities; if a party fails to deliver or receive energy, defaulting party must compensate the other party as specified in the contract, a portion of which may be capped through the use of risk management products
(e)	Transactions for the purchase of energy, generally to offset a Firm LD transaction
(f)	Amount of output expected to be generated by Entergy Wholesale Commodities resources considering plant operating characteristics, outage schedules, and expected market conditions that effect dispatch
(g)	Assumes NRC license renewal for plants whose current licenses expire within five years and uninterrupted normal operation at all plants. NRC license renewal applications are in process for two units, as follows (with current license expirations in parentheses): Indian Point 2 (September 2013) and Indian Point 3 (December 2015). For a discussion regarding the continued operation of the Vermont Yankee plant, see “ Impairment of Long-Lived Assets ” in Note 1 to the financial statements in the Form 10-K and “ Vermont Yankee ” in Note 11 to the financial statements herein. For a discussion regarding the license renewals for Indian Point 2 and Indian Point 3, see “ Entergy Wholesale Commodities Authorizations to Operate Its Nuclear Power Plants ” above.
(h)	Percent of planned qualified capacity sold to mitigate price uncertainty under physical or financial transactions
(i)	A contract for the sale of installed capacity and related energy, priced per megawatt-hour sold
(j)	A contract for the sale of an installed capacity product in a regional market
(k)	Amount of capacity to be available to generate power and/or sell capacity considering uprates planned to be completed during the year. The increased capacity figure for the nuclear portfolio from the 10-K reflects the final testing and confirmation of a small incremental increase in output associated with equipment replacements at Palisades.

(l)	Contracts priced in accordance with cost-based rates, a ratemaking concept used for the design and development of rate schedules to ensure that the filed rate schedules recover only the cost of providing the service; these contracts are on owned non-utility resources located within Entergy’s Utility service area, which do not operate under market-based rate authority. The percentage sold assumes approval of long-term transmission rights. Includes sales to the Utility through 2013 of 121 MW of capacity and energy from Entergy Power sourced from Independence Steam Electric Station Unit 2.
(m)	Non-nuclear planned generation and net MW in operation include purchases from affiliated and non-affiliated counterparties under long-term contracts and exclude energy and capacity from Entergy Wholesale Commodities’ wind investment accounted for under the equity method of accounting and from the 544 MW Ritchie plant that is not planned to operate.
(n)	Reflects effect of ISO New England’s acceptance in the second quarter 2012 of Vermont Yankee’s bid to delist for the June 2015 through May 2016 forward capacity auction #6 and retroactively for the June 2013 through May 2014 forward capacity auction #4. ISO New England has until May 2013 to consider Vermont Yankee’s delist bid for forward capacity auction #5.

ENTERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012 and 2011
(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	2012			2011			2012			2011
	(In Thousands, Except Share Data)

OPERATING REVENUES
Electric	$	2,320,360		$	2,733,601		$	6,039,752		$	6,811,538
Natural gas		23,557			26,439			93,444			126,453
Competitive businesses		619,643			635,513			1,732,624			1,802,050
TOTAL		2,963,560			3,395,553			7,865,820			8,740,041

OPERATING EXPENSES
Operating and Maintenance:
Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and
gas purchased for resale		596,270			849,982			1,572,265			1,921,007
Purchased power		336,552			475,335			966,816			1,289,180
Nuclear refueling outage expenses		62,582			64,566			184,288			191,517
Asset impairment		-			-			355,524			-
Other operation and maintenance		765,242			708,821			2,259,758			2,077,066
Decommissioning		56,796			56,467			126,641			167,229
Taxes other than income taxes		149,049			152,044			424,329			406,493
Depreciation and amortization		281,740			283,581			836,711			812,672
Other regulatory charges		24,477			203,848			162,509			204,338
TOTAL		2,272,708			2,794,644			6,888,841			7,069,502

OPERATING INCOME		690,852			600,909			976,979			1,670,539

OTHER INCOME
Allowance for equity funds used during construction		18,396			21,516			70,986			59,558
Interest and investment income		24,490			33,238			94,767			95,906
Miscellaneous - net		(10,768	)		(14,137	)		(41,794	)		(40,498	)
TOTAL		32,118			40,617			123,959			114,966

INTEREST EXPENSE
Interest expense		155,800			137,301			452,162			409,484
Allowance for borrowed funds used during construction		(8,003	)		(9,713	)		(27,877	)		(27,397	)
TOTAL		147,797			127,588			424,285			382,087

INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES		575,173			513,938			676,653			1,403,418

Income taxes		232,503			(119,131	)		110,140			196,072

CONSOLIDATED NET INCOME		342,670			633,069			566,513			1,207,346

Preferred dividend requirements of subsidiaries		5,582			5,015			16,108			15,046

NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO ENTERGY CORPORATION	$	337,088		$	628,054		$	550,405		$	1,192,300


Earnings per average common share:
Basic	$	1.90		$	3.55		$	3.11		$	6.70
Diluted	$	1.89		$	3.53		$	3.10		$	6.67
Dividends declared per common share	$	0.83		$	0.83		$	2.49		$	2.49

Basic average number of common shares outstanding		177,517,846			176,950,469			177,184,464			177,857,667
Diluted average number of common shares outstanding		177,975,075			177,723,020			177,636,549			178,805,215

See Notes to Financial Statements.

ENTERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012 and 2011
(Unaudited)
	2012			2011
	(In Thousands)

OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Consolidated net income	$	566,513		$	1,207,346
Adjustments to reconcile consolidated net income to net cash flow
provided by operating activities:
Depreciation, amortization, and decommissioning, including nuclear fuel amortization		1,293,667			1,315,730
Deferred income taxes, investment tax credits, and non-current taxes accrued		111,228			(5,979	)
Asset impairment		355,524			-
Changes in working capital:
Receivables		(162,015	)		(213,524	)
Fuel inventory		(9,063	)		12,677
Accounts payable		143,596			(238,879	)
Prepaid taxes and taxes accrued		44,625			245,242
Interest accrued		(24,752	)		(53,307	)
Deferred fuel costs		(40,192	)		(119,481	)
Other working capital accounts		(131,374	)		(31,319	)
Changes in provisions for estimated losses		(17,479	)		(4,608	)
Changes in other regulatory assets		49,250			250,747
Changes in pensions and other postretirement liabilities		(75,104	)		(275,690	)
Other		115,364			40,801
Net cash flow provided by operating activities		2,219,788			2,129,756

INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Construction/capital expenditures		(1,868,690	)		(1,460,668	)
Allowance for equity funds used during construction		73,497			61,096
Nuclear fuel purchases		(412,912	)		(475,418	)
Payment for purchase of plant		(645	)		(299,590	)
Proceeds from sale of assets and businesses		-			6,531
Changes in securitization account		(2,036	)		(443	)
NYPA value sharing payment		(72,000	)		(72,000	)
Payments to storm reserve escrow account		(7,009	)		(5,043	)
Receipts from storm reserve escrow account		17,884			-
Decrease (increase) in other investments		(69,995	)		(60,693	)
Litigation proceeds for reimbursement of spent nuclear fuel storage costs		109,105			-
Proceeds from nuclear decommissioning trust fund sales		1,416,697			1,053,089
Investment in nuclear decommissioning trust funds		(1,507,123	)		(1,142,364	)
Net cash flow used in investing activities		(2,323,227	)		(2,395,503	)

See Notes to Financial Statements.

ENTERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
ASSETS
September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011
(Unaudited)

	2012			2011
	(In Thousands)

CURRENT ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents:
Cash	$	96,996		$	81,468
Temporary cash investments		652,723			612,970
Total cash and cash equivalents		749,719			694,438
Securitization recovery trust account		52,340			50,304
Accounts receivable:
Customer		693,022			568,558
Allowance for doubtful accounts		(31,525	)		(31,159	)
Other		155,039			166,186
Accrued unbilled revenues		330,744			298,283
Total accounts receivable		1,147,280			1,001,868
Deferred fuel costs		92,763			209,776
Accumulated deferred income taxes		4,533			9,856
Fuel inventory - at average cost		211,195			202,132
Materials and supplies - at average cost		925,201			894,756
Deferred nuclear refueling outage costs		235,344			231,031
System agreement cost equalization		17,689			36,800
Prepayments and other		371,686			291,742
TOTAL		3,807,750			3,622,703

OTHER PROPERTY AND INVESTMENTS
Investment in affiliates - at equity		47,758			44,876
Decommissioning trust funds		4,175,825			3,788,031
Non-utility property - at cost (less accumulated depreciation)		259,525			260,436
Other		409,025			416,423
TOTAL		4,892,133			4,509,766

PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
Electric		40,489,162			39,385,524
Property under capital lease		811,533			809,449
Natural gas		351,239			343,550
Construction work in progress		1,965,524			1,779,723
Nuclear fuel		1,545,263			1,546,167
TOTAL PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT		45,162,721			43,864,413
Less - accumulated depreciation and amortization		18,731,190			18,255,128
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT - NET		26,431,531			25,609,285

DEFERRED DEBITS AND OTHER ASSETS
Regulatory assets:
Regulatory asset for income taxes - net		730,526			799,006
Other regulatory assets (includes securitization property of
$935,517 as of September 30, 2012 and $1,009,103 as of
December 31, 2011)		4,587,122			4,636,871
Deferred fuel costs		201,118			172,202
Goodwill		377,172			377,172
Accumulated deferred income taxes		30,122			19,003
Other		966,206			955,691
TOTAL		6,892,266			6,959,945

TOTAL ASSETS	$	42,023,680		$	40,701,699

See Notes to Financial Statements.

ENTERGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011
(Unaudited)

	2012			2011
	(In Thousands)

CURRENT LIABILITIES
Currently maturing long-term debt	$	787,711		$	2,192,733
Notes payable		356,172			108,331
Accounts payable		1,362,702			1,069,096
Customer deposits		361,174			351,741
Taxes accrued		322,860			278,235
Accumulated deferred income taxes		73,690			99,929
Interest accrued		158,761			183,512
Deferred fuel costs		127,551			255,839
Obligations under capital leases		3,816			3,631
Pension and other postretirement liabilities		50,874			44,031
System agreement cost equalization		55,094			80,090
Other		263,863			283,531
TOTAL		3,924,268			4,950,699

NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accumulated deferred income taxes and taxes accrued		8,173,216			8,096,452
Accumulated deferred investment tax credits		276,413			284,747
Obligations under capital leases		35,531			38,421
Other regulatory liabilities		965,820			728,193
Decommissioning and asset retirement cost liabilities		3,456,685			3,296,570
Accumulated provisions		369,286			385,512
Pension and other postretirement liabilities		3,051,709			3,133,657
Long-term debt (includes securitization bonds of $1,003,081 as of
September 30, 2012 and $1,070,556 as of December 31, 2011)		11,748,153			10,043,713
Other		551,567			501,954
TOTAL		28,628,380			26,509,219

Commitments and Contingencies

Subsidiaries' preferred stock without sinking fund		186,510			186,511

EQUITY
Common Shareholders' Equity:
Common stock, $.01 par value, authorized 500,000,000 shares;
issued 254,752,788 shares in 2012 and in 2011		2,548			2,548
Paid-in capital		5,353,519			5,360,682
Retained earnings		9,555,859			9,446,960
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(136,793	)		(168,452	)
Less - treasury stock, at cost (77,080,297 shares in 2012 and
78,396,988 shares in 2011)		5,584,611			5,680,468
Total common shareholders' equity		9,190,522			8,961,270
Subsidiaries' preferred stock without sinking fund		94,000			94,000
TOTAL		9,284,522			9,055,270

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY	$	42,023,680		$	40,701,699

See Notes to Financial Statements.

ENTERGY TEXAS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENTS
For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012 and 2011
(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	2012			2011			2012			2011
	(In Thousands)						(In Thousands)

OPERATING REVENUES
Electric	$	489,078		$	556,955		$	1,174,069		$	1,350,262

OPERATING EXPENSES
Operation and Maintenance:
Fuel, fuel-related expenses, and
gas purchased for resale		103,542			127,745			178,473			247,568
Purchased power		200,483			222,283			523,208			613,794
Other operation and maintenance		58,343			52,455			170,791			149,373
Taxes other than income taxes		19,031			22,680			50,640			52,567
Depreciation and amortization		23,043			19,823			64,887			59,059
Other regulatory charges - net		23,402			25,159			50,791			37,816
TOTAL		427,844			470,145			1,038,790			1,160,177

OPERATING INCOME		61,234			86,810			135,279			190,085

OTHER INCOME
Allowance for equity funds used during construction		1,281			946			3,355			2,493
Interest and investment income		(5,566	)		1,374			(2,648	)		4,112
Miscellaneous - net		(1,520	)		(730	)		(3,164	)		(1,700	)
TOTAL		(5,805	)		1,590			(2,457	)		4,905

INTEREST EXPENSE
Interest expense		24,246			24,616			71,510			69,657
Allowance for borrowed funds used during construction		(1,033	)		(653	)		(2,417	)		(1,721	)
TOTAL		23,213			23,963			69,093			67,936

INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES		32,216			64,437			63,729			127,054

Income taxes		12,982			23,562			26,547			47,356

NET INCOME	$	19,234		$	40,875		$	37,182		$	79,698

See Notes to Financial Statements.

Period	Total Number of Shares Purchased	Average Price Paid per Share	Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of a Publicly Announced Plan	Maximum $ Amount of Shares that May Yet be Purchased Under a Plan (2)

7/01/2012-7/31/2012	-	$-	-	$350,052,918
8/01/2012-8/31/2012	-	$-	-	$350,052,918
9/01/2012-9/30/2012	-	$-	-	$350,052,918
Total	-	$-	-

	Years Ended December 31,
	2011		2010		2009
	As previously reported	As corrected	As previously reported	As corrected	As previously reported	As corrected
	(In Thousands)

Income Statement
Income taxes	$88,313	$89,736	$75,878	$92,297	$89,185	$88,951
Net income	$203,027	$201,604	$190,738	$174,319	$153,047	$153,281
Earnings applicable to common equity	$202,202	$200,779	$189,911	$173,492	$152,222	$152,456

Statement of Cash Flows
Net income	$203,027	$201,604	$190,738	$174,319	$153,047	$153,281
Deferred income taxes, investment tax credits, and non-current taxes accrued	($6,268)	($4,845)	$87,920	$104,339	$138,817	$138,583
Changes in other regulatory assets	($80,027)	($77,713)	$114,528	$141,216	($44,612)	($44,993)
Other operating activities	($35,248)	($37,562)	$30,717	$4,029	($86,474)	($86,093)

	December 31,
	2011		2010
	As previously reported	As corrected	As previously reported	As corrected
	(In Thousands)

Balance Sheet
Regulatory asset for income taxes - net	$249,058	$173,724	$234,406	$161,386
Accumulated deferred income taxes - current	$5,427	$5,107	$1,749	$1,255
Accumulated deferred income taxes and taxes accrued	$1,397,230	$1,368,563	$1,405,374	$1,377,772
Member’s equity	$1,439,733	$1,393,386	$1,539,517	$1,494,593

	Years Ended December 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009
	Member’s Equity		Total Equity
	As previously reported	As corrected	As previously reported	As corrected
	(In Thousands)

Statement of Changes in Equity
Balance at December 31, 2008	$1,352,408	$1,323,669	$1,332,143	$1,303,404
2009 Net income	$153,047	$153,281	$153,047	$153,281
Balance at December 31, 2009	$1,473,930	$1,445,425	$1,441,759	$1,413,254
2010 Net income	$190,738	$174,319	$190,738	$174,319
Balance at December 31, 2010	$1,539,517	$1,494,593	$1,509,213	$1,464,289
2011 Net income	$203,027	$201,604	$203,027	$201,604
Balance at December 31, 2011	$1,439,733	$1,393,386	$1,380,123	$1,333,776

	Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges
	Twelve Months Ended
	December 31,					September 30,
	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012

Entergy Arkansas	3.19	2.33	2.39	3.91	4.31	3.87
Entergy Gulf States Louisiana	2.84	2.44	2.99	3.58	4.36	3.57
Entergy Louisiana	3.44	3.14	3.52	3.41	1.86	1.88
Entergy Mississippi	3.22	2.92	3.31	3.35	3.55	2.88
Entergy New Orleans	2.74	3.71	3.61	4.43	5.37	2.28
Entergy Texas	2.07	2.04	1.92	2.10	2.34	1.67
System Energy	3.95	3.29	3.73	3.64	3.85	4.53

	Ratios of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Dividends/Distributions
	Twelve Months Ended
	December 31,					September 30,
	2007	2008	2009	2010	2011	2012

Entergy Arkansas	2.88	1.95	2.09	3.60	3.83	3.43
Entergy Gulf States Louisiana	2.73	2.42	2.95	3.54	4.30	3.51
Entergy Louisiana	3.08	2.87	3.27	3.19	1.70	1.74
Entergy Mississippi	2.97	2.67	3.06	3.16	3.27	2.67
Entergy New Orleans	2.54	3.45	3.33	4.08	4.74	2.01

*	4(a) -	Twenty-fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of September 1, 2012, to System Energy Resources, Inc. Mortgage and Deed of Trust, dated as of June 15, 1977 (4.42 to Form 8-K dated September 25, 2012 in 1-09067).

	10(a) -	Entergy Corporation Service Recognition Program for Non-Employee Outside Directors (As Amended and Restated effective June 1, 2012).

	10(b) -	First Amendment to The Entergy Corporation Outside Director Stock Program Established under the 2011 Equity Ownership and Long Term Cash Incentive Plan of Entergy Corporation and Subsidiaries.

	12(a) -	Entergy Arkansas’s Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges and of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Dividends, as defined.

	12(b) -	Entergy Gulf States Louisiana’s Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges and of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Distributions, as defined.

	12(c) -	Entergy Louisiana’s Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges and of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Distributions, as defined.

	12(d) -	Entergy Mississippi’s Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges and of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Dividends, as defined.

	12(e) -	Entergy New Orleans’s Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges and of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Dividends, as defined.

	12(f) -	Entergy Texas’s Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges, as defined.

	12(g) -	System Energy’s Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges, as defined.

	31(a) -	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for Entergy Corporation.

	31(b) -	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for Entergy Corporation.

	31(c) -	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for Entergy Arkansas.

	31(d) -	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for Entergy Arkansas.

	31(e) -	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for Entergy Gulf States Louisiana.

	31(f) -	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for Entergy Gulf States Louisiana.

	31(g) -	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for Entergy Louisiana.

	31(h) -	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for Entergy Louisiana.

	31(i) -	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for Entergy Mississippi.

	31(j) -	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for Entergy Mississippi.

	31(k) -	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for Entergy New Orleans.

	31(l) -	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for Entergy New Orleans.

	31(m) -	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for Entergy Texas.

	31(n) -	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for Entergy Texas.

	31(o) -	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for System Energy.

	31(p) -	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification for System Energy.

	32(a) -	Section 1350 Certification for Entergy Corporation.

	32(b) -	Section 1350 Certification for Entergy Corporation.

	32(c) -	Section 1350 Certification for Entergy Arkansas.

	32(d) -	Section 1350 Certification for Entergy Arkansas.

	32(e) -	Section 1350 Certification for Entergy Gulf States Louisiana.

	32(f) -	Section 1350 Certification for Entergy Gulf States Louisiana.

	32(g) -	Section 1350 Certification for Entergy Louisiana.

	32(h) -	Section 1350 Certification for Entergy Louisiana.

	32(i) -	Section 1350 Certification for Entergy Mississippi.

	32(j) -	Section 1350 Certification for Entergy Mississippi.

	32(k) -	Section 1350 Certification for Entergy New Orleans.

	32(l) -	Section 1350 Certification for Entergy New Orleans.

	32(m) -	Section 1350 Certification for Entergy Texas.

	32(n) -	Section 1350 Certification for Entergy Texas.

	32(o) -	Section 1350 Certification for System Energy.

	32(p) -	Section 1350 Certification for System Energy.

	101 INS -	XBRL Instance Document.

	101 SCH -	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.

	101 PRE -	XBRL Taxonomy Presentation Linkbase Document.

	101 LAB -	XBRL Taxonomy Label Linkbase Document.

	101 CAL -	XBRL Taxonomy Calculation Linkbase Document.

	101 DEF -	XBRL Definition Linkbase Document.