By Valerie Bauerlein, Kate King and Cameron McWhirter
The collapse of Amazon.com Inc.'s plan to build a second
headquarters in New York City has the potential to damp some
states' willingness to offer tax breaks.
Spurred by Amazon's second-headquarters selection process,
politicians and groups long opposed to incentive packages have
launched legislative efforts to prohibit them in some states. In
New York, bills proposed in the State Assembly and Senate call for
compacts with other states promising to not provide any
company-specific subsidies.
Recent pivots by large companies, including Foxconn Technology
Group and General Electric Co., will likely lead to increased
attention to incentives tied to performance and timelines, with an
emphasis on long-term commitments, said Jeff Finkle, president of
the International Economic Development Council, a group that
represents economic-development officials across the U.S.
"Amazon said they were coming, Foxconn said they were coming,
communities did back flips to get them," Mr. Finkle said. "When is
a deal a deal? And how much effort do you put into these?"
Seattle-based Amazon said Thursday it would no longer invest
$2.5 billion and hire 25,000 people in Long Island City, Queens,
citing increased public opposition to the project. Apple Inc.
supplier Foxconn has sent mixed messages about its plans to invest
$10 billion in southeast Wisconsin, saying it wouldn't build a
factory as promised then reversing course after a conversation
between its chairman and President Trump.
Amazon's 14-month search for a 50,000-employee second
headquarters, or HQ2, along with Foxconn's 2017 competition for a
13,000-employee electronics plant, were the biggest
economic-development deals in the U.S. in recent history. Amazon
shared its planned expansion between New York City and a Northern
Virginia site, which was generally well-received.
Tax breaks designed for specific companies, as opposed to
broader programs that companies automatically qualify for if they
create a certain number of jobs, are the most vulnerable to misuse
and stand the best chance of being reined in following the collapse
of the Amazon deal, said John Kaehny, executive director of the New
York-based watchdog group Reinvent Albany.
But, he said, politicians love them. "To the politician it
doesn't really matter if that business would create jobs there with
or without subsidies," Mr. Kaehny said. "What matters is that
politician can get credit for it."
New York Mayor Bill de Blasio said Thursday at Harvard
University's Kennedy School that Amazon made a mistake in pulling
out of his city, but he accepted the competition as the way of the
world.
"I don't think it's really fair to pit city against city and
state against state, but that's the rules of the game right now,"
he said.
With the Amazon deal, however, some politicians took the
position that it was better to criticize major tax deals than to
support them.
Big-ticket incentive packages have been used for more than 20
years, predominantly to attract manufacturers with lots of
employees and capital investment, but the unraveling of big-name
deals draws attention to an imbalanced relationship between
corporations seeking to do business cheaply and communities
desperate to attract jobs.
"One thing is for sure: the Amazon HQ2 NYC fiasco is creating --
or should I say, elevating -- a really significant debate over
communities and corporations," Richard Florida, a University of
Toronto professor who studies urban economic development, said in a
tweet Friday morning.
Scholars and think tanks from across the political spectrum have
reached a consensus over the past five years that corporate tax
breaks don't achieve their objectives, Reinvent Albany's Mr. Kaehny
said.
Frank Manzo IV, policy director of the Illinois Economic Policy
Institute, a nonpartisan public-policy research group, recently
examined corporate incentives and concluded that often they are "an
inefficient way to spend taxpayer dollars."
"You could create even more jobs and even more economic growth
if tax dollars are instead invested in broad-based public
investments, such as education and infrastructure," Mr. Manzo
said.
New Jersey shows the difficulty of changing the status quo.
Democratic Gov. Phil Murphy has criticized the state's current
approach to subsidies and is calling for a new, pared-back program
that lowers the values of tax credits companies can earn and
establishes an annual cap on tax credits awarded.
But business leaders and some lawmakers, including from Mr.
Murphy's own party, are pushing back, and the fate of the state's
two main tax-incentive programs is unclear. They are set to expire
this summer and renewing or revamping them will require lawmakers
and the governor to agree on legislation.
At the same time, Gov. Murphy said he had called Amazon
officials to reiterate the state's HQ2 interest after the company
announced it would abandon its New York plans. In the competition,
the state had offered Amazon its biggest corporate subsidy offer
yet: $5 billion in incentives to open a corporate campus in
Newark.
New Jersey and Newark officials also sent a courier dressed in
red and toting a Valentine to an Amazon office in New York on
Thursday. The large cardboard heart said "NJ & NEWARK STILL
LOVE U, AMAZON" and was accompanied by helium-filled heart
balloons.
Big public-incentive packages aren't likely to go away because
not all states are apt to sign on to a disarmament pact, especially
aggressive states like Texas and Georgia, Mr. Finkle said.
"If they're not included in that legislation, then you're just
shooting yourself in the foot. The problem with incentives is as
long as somebody has them, a company is going to discount you" if
you don't ante up, he said.
Write to Valerie Bauerlein at valerie.bauerlein@wsj.com, Kate
King at Kate.King@wsj.com and Cameron McWhirter at
cameron.mcwhirter@wsj.com
(END) Dow Jones Newswires
February 15, 2019 14:46 ET (19:46 GMT)
Copyright (c) 2019 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.
Amazon.com (NASDAQ:AMZN)
Historical Stock Chart
From Mar 2024 to Apr 2024
Amazon.com (NASDAQ:AMZN)
Historical Stock Chart
From Apr 2023 to Apr 2024