ADXN Addex Therapeutics Ltd

Table of Contents

​

​

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 20-F

(Mark One)

☐       REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR (g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

OR

☒        ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022

OR

☐       TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

OR

☐       SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Date of event requiring this shell company report

​

Commission File Number 001-39179

Addex Therapeutics Ltd

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter and translation of registrant’s name into English)

​

Switzerland

(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

​

Chemin des Mines 9, CH- 1202 Geneva, Switzerland

(Address of principal executive offices)

​

Tim Dyer

Chief Executive Officer, Addex Therapeutics Ltd, Chemin des Mines 9,

CH- 1202 Geneva, Switzerland

Tel: + 41 22 884 1555

(Name, Telephone, E-mail and/or Facsimile number and Address of Company Contact Person)

​

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act.

​

* Not for trading, but only in connection with the registration of the American Depositary Shares.

​

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act. None

Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act. None

Table of Contents

Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer’s classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report.

​

Shares, par value CHF 0.01 per share: 77,134,020 shares outstanding as of December 31, 2022

​

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. ☐ Yes ☒ No

​

If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. ☐ Yes ☒ No

​

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. ☒ Yes ☐ No

​

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). ☒ Yes ☐ No

​

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

​

​

If an emerging growth company that prepares its financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

​

†                The term “new or revised financial accounting standard” refers to any update issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board to its Accounting Standards Codification after April 5, 2012.

​

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☐

If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b). ☐

​

Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing:

​

​

If “Other” has been checked in response to the previous question, indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow. ☐ Item 17 ☐ Item 18

​

If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). ☐ Yes ☒ No

​

​

​

​

Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

​

1

Table of Contents

​

​

​

2

Table of Contents

INTRODUCTION

Unless otherwise indicated or the context otherwise requires, all references in this Annual Report on Form 20-F to the terms “Addex,” “Addex Therapeutics,” “Addex Therapeutics Ltd,” “the company,” “we,” “us” and “our” refer to Addex Therapeutics Ltd together with its subsidiaries.

We own trademarks for Addex Therapeutics in Switzerland. All other trade names, trademarks and service marks of other companies appearing in this Annual Report on Form 20-F are the property of their respective holders. Solely for convenience, the trademarks and trade names in this Annual Report on Form 20-F may be referred to without the ^® and ™ symbols, but such references should not be construed as any indicator that their respective owners will not assert, to the fullest extent under applicable law, their rights thereto. We do not intend to use or display other companies’ trademarks and trade names to imply a relationship with, or endorsement or sponsorship of us by, any other companies.

Our reporting currency is the Swiss franc. The exchange rate between the Swiss franc and the U.S. dollar as of March 24, 2023 was $1.087 per CHF 1.0. We present our consolidated financial statements in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards, or IFRS, as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board, or IASB. Readers of this Annual Report on Form 20-F should note that there may be certain differences between the presentation of our financial position, results of operations and cash flows under IFRS and U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

The terms “dollar,” “USD” or “$” refer to U.S. dollars and the terms “Swiss francs” or “CHF” refer to the legal currency of Switzerland.

​

3

Table of Contents

SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Annual Report on Form 20-F contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, that are based on our management’s beliefs and assumptions and on information currently available to our management. All statements other than present and historical facts and conditions contained in this Annual Report on Form 20-F, including statements regarding our future results of operations and financial positions, business strategy, plans and our objectives for future operations, are forward-looking statements. When used in this Annual Report on Form 20-F, the words “anticipate,” “believe,” “continue” “could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “might,” “ongoing,” “objective,” “plan,” “potential,” “predict,” “should,” “will” and “would,” or the negative of these and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements about:

4

Table of Contents

You should refer to the section of this Annual Report on Form 20-F titled “Item 3.D—Risk Factors” for a discussion of important factors that may cause our actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by our forward-looking statements. As a result of these factors, we cannot assure you that the forward-looking statements in this Annual Report on Form 20-F will prove to be accurate. Furthermore, if our forward- looking statements prove to be inaccurate, the inaccuracy may be material. In light of the significant uncertainties in these forward-looking statements, you should not regard these statements as a representation or warranty by us or any other person that we will achieve our objectives and plans in any specified time frame or at all. We undertake no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law.

You should read this Annual Report on Form 20-F and the documents that we reference in this Annual Report on Form 20-F and have filed as exhibits to this Annual Report on Form 20-F completely and with the understanding that our actual future results may be materially different from what we expect. We qualify all of our forward-looking statements by these cautionary statements.

This Annual Report on Form 20-F contains market data and industry forecasts that were obtained from industry publications. These data involve a number of assumptions and limitations, and you are cautioned not to give undue weight to such estimates. We have not independently verified any third-party information. While we believe the market position, market opportunity and market size information included in this Annual Report on Form 20-F is generally reliable, such information is inherently imprecise.

This Annual Report on Form 20-F contains estimates, projections and other information concerning our industry, our business and the markets for our drug candidates. Information that is based on estimates, forecasts, projections, market research or similar methodologies is inherently subject to uncertainties, and actual events or circumstances may differ materially from events and circumstances that are assumed in this information. Unless otherwise expressly stated, we obtained this industry, business, market and other data from our own internal estimates and research as well as from reports, research surveys, studies and similar data prepared by market research firms and other third parties such as investment banking analysts, industry, medical and general publications, government data and similar sources. In addition, assumptions and estimates of our and our industry’s future performance are necessarily subject to a high degree of uncertainty and risk due to a variety of factors, including those described in the section titled “Item 3.D—Risk Factors.” These and other factors could cause our future performance to differ materially from our assumptions and estimates.

​

5

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Risks Related to Our Business

Our recurring losses, negative cash flows and significant accumulated deficit have raised substantial doubt regarding our ability to continue as a going concern.

We have incurred recurring losses since inception. We expect to continue to generate operating losses for the foreseeable future. These losses have resulted principally from costs incurred in research and development of our drug candidates and general and administrative expense. We expect to continue to incur significant operating losses in the foreseeable future, primarily due to the cost of our research and development programs, preclinical studies and clinical trials and the regulatory approval process for drug candidates. The amount of future losses is uncertain and our ability to achieve profitability, if ever, will depend on, among other things, us or partners successfully developing drug candidates, obtaining regulatory approval to market and commercialize drug candidates, manufacturing any approved products on commercially reasonable terms, establishing a sales and marketing organization or suitable third party alternatives for any approved product and raising sufficient funds to finance our activities.

We will need significant amounts of additional new capital to fund our continued development activities, and we cannot guarantee that we will have sufficient funds available in the future to develop and commercialize our current or future drug candidates. As of December 31, 2022, we had cash and cash equivalents of CHF7.0 million and we raised a total of CHF 1.2 million under our sale agency agreement with Kepler Cheuvreux between the closing date and the issuance date of our annual report on Form 20-F. To date, we have funded our operations through equity offerings and through payments from licensors. We have limited sources of revenue and will need substantial additional capital to develop and commercialize our drug candidates. We may be unable to raise additional capital when needed, or at all, which could force us to reduce or discontinue operations.

7

Table of Contents

We believe that our current cash and cash equivalents are sufficient to fund our operating expenses through the end of the third quarter of 2023 and this raises substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. These factors individually and collectively indicate that a material uncertainty exists that may cast significant doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern for one year from the date of the issuance of the Annual Report on Form 20-F. Our future viability is dependent on our ability to raise additional capital to finance our future operations. We have an at-the-market offering program through Cantor Fitzgerald in addition to our sale agency agreement with Kepler Cheuvreux. The sale of additional equity may dilute existing shareholders and newly issued shares may contain senior rights and preferences compared to currently outstanding common shares. We may receive future milestone payments from licensors but that is dependent on achieving certain regulatory or commercial milestones that may never happen. We may seek additional funding through public or private financings, debt financing or collaboration agreements. The inability to obtain funding, as and when needed, would have a negative impact on our financial condition and ability to pursue our business strategies. If we are unable to obtain the required funding to run our operations and to develop and commercialize our candidates, we could be forced to delay, reduce or eliminate some or all of our research and development programs, drug portfolio expansion or commercialization efforts, which could adversely affect our business prospects, or we may be unable to continue operations. Management continues to explore options to obtain additional funding, including through collaborations with third parties related to the future potential development and/or commercialization of our drug candidates. However, there is no assurance that we will be successful in raising funds, closing a collaboration agreement, obtaining sufficient funding on terms acceptable to us, or if at all, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial conditions

We are a development-stage company working with novel approaches to therapeutics, which may not be successful.

We have devoted our resources to the discovery and development of allosteric modulators for neurological diseases. Since inception, we have focused on building a drug discovery platform, including a knowledge-based chemical library and proprietary biological screening tools as well as a portfolio of drug candidates. Discovery and development of allosteric modulators involves novel approaches to therapeutics. We are subject to the risks of failure inherent in the development of drug candidates based on new technologies. There is little precedent for the successful commercialization of products based on our technologies, and there are a number of technological challenges that we must overcome to complete most of our development efforts. If we are not successful in development, it will have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

We have no products on the market and we may never generate revenue from the sale or licensing of drug candidates.

Our ability to achieve and sustain profitability depends on obtaining regulatory approvals for and successfully commercializing our drug candidates, either alone or with third parties, such as our partner for ADX71149, Janssen, and our partner for GABAB PAM, Indivior. Currently, none of our drug candidates have been approved for marketing and commercialization or is in Phase 3 trials. We cannot guarantee that any of our drug candidates will be successfully tested, approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the European Medicines Agency (EMA), Swissmedic, Swiss Agency for Therapeutic Products, or any other regulatory agency or marketed and commercialized at any time in the foreseeable future or at all. If approval is obtained for a drug candidate, we cannot assure you that we will be able to generate or sustain revenue from any sales due to factors such as whether the product is manufactured at a competitive cost or accepted in the market, as well as general and industry-specific local and international economic pressures. With our strategy to focus on allosteric modulator development, these risks continue to be significant and may increase to the extent the space becomes more competitive or less favored in the commercial marketplace. Our focus on rare disease indications with the potential for orphan drug designation limits the size of the patient population for even an approved product, unless approval is expanded for use beyond a particular rare disease. Because of the inherently small patient population for treatment of a rare disease, an approved product with orphan drug designation for which pricing is not approved or accepted in the market at an appropriate level may not generate enough revenue to offset costs of development, manufacturing, marketing and commercialization despite any benefits received from the designation, such as market exclusivity, assistance in clinical trial design, a reduction in user fees or tax credits related to development expense, and our business may be adversely affected.

​

8

Table of Contents

The global pandemic caused by COVID-19 could materially and adversely impact our business.

Our business could be adversely affected by health epidemics in regions where we have concentrations of clinical trial sites or other business operations and could cause significant disruption in the operations of third party manufacturers and CROs upon whom we rely. The COVID-19 pandemic had a significant impact on our business operations. While it is not possible at this time to predict the duration and extent of the impact that COVID-19 will continue to have on worldwide economic activity and our business in particular, COVID-19 could adversely impact our business and ongoing and planning clinical trials, including as a result of delays or difficulties in clinical site initiation, difficulties in recruiting and retaining clinical site investigators and clinical site staff and interruption of our clinical supply chain or key clinical trial activities, such as clinical trial site monitoring, and supply chain interruptions caused by ongoing restrictions for the supply of materials for drug candidates or other materials necessary to manufacture product to conduct preclinical tests.

In addition, the trading price for our ADSs as well as trading price for the publicly traded securities of other biopharmaceutical companies, as well as the broader global financial markets, have been highly volatile as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic and the resulting impact on global economic activities. As a result, we may face difficulties raising capital when needed, and any such sales may be on unfavourable terms to us. Further, to the extent we raise additional capital through the sale of equity or convertible debt securities, the ownership interest of existing shareholders will be diluted.

Depending on the duration of the COVID-19 crisis and continued negative impact on global economic activity, we may have to take additional measures that will have a negative impact on our business continuity and may experience certain liquidity restraints as well as incur impairments on its assets. The exact impact on our activities in 2023 and thereafter cannot be reasonably predicted. However, based on the risk mitigation measures undertaken, we concluded that there is no material uncertainty that may cast a significant doubt upon our ability to continue as a going concern due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

We have been granted U.S. Orphan Drug Designation for dipraglurant for PD-LID and may seek Orphan Drug Designation for other drug candidates, and we may be unable to maintain the benefits associated with Orphan Drug Designation, including the potential for market exclusivity.

Regulatory authorities in some jurisdictions, including the United States and Europe, may designate drugs and therapeutic biologics for relatively small patient populations as orphan drugs. Under the Orphan Drug Act, the FDA may designate a drug as an orphan drug if it is intended to treat a rare disease or condition, which is generally defined as a patient population of fewer than 200,000 individuals annually in the United States, or a patient population greater than 200,000 in the United States where there is no reasonable expectation that the cost of developing the drug will be recovered from sales in the United States. In the United States, Orphan Drug Designation entitles a party to financial incentives such as opportunities for grant funding toward clinical trial costs, tax advantages and user-fee waivers. In addition, if a product that has Orphan Drug Designation subsequently receives the first FDA approval for the disease for which it has such designation, the product is entitled to orphan drug exclusivity, which means that the FDA may not approve any other applications, including a full NDA, to market the same product for the same indication for seven years, except in limited circumstances, such as a showing of clinical superiority to the product with orphan drug exclusivity or where the manufacturer is unable to assure sufficient product quantity.

We have obtained Orphan Drug Designation for dipraglurant and if we may be able to obtain Orphan Drug Designation for any of our future drug candidates in specific indications, we may not be the first to obtain marketing approval for dipraglurant or any other such drug candidates for the orphan-designated indication due to the uncertainties associated with developing pharmaceutical products. In addition, exclusive marketing rights in the United States may be limited if we seek approval for an indication broader than the orphan-designated indication or may be lost if the FDA later determines that the request for designation was materially defective or if the manufacturer is unable to assure sufficient quantities of the product to meet the needs of patients with the rare disease or condition.

​

9

Table of Contents

Further, even if we obtain orphan drug exclusivity in the U.S. for a product, that exclusivity may not effectively protect the product from competition because different drugs or therapeutic biologics with different active moieties can be approved for the same condition. Even after an orphan product is approved, the FDA can subsequently approve the same drug or therapeutic biologic with the same active moiety for the same condition if the FDA concludes that the later drug or therapeutic biologic is safer, more effective or makes a major contribution to patient care. In Europe, we could be prevented from marketing our products if a similar medicinal product is granted orphan drug designation for the same indications that we are pursuing and obtains a marketing authorization for the same indication before we do. Once authorized, with a limited number of exceptions, neither the competent authorities of the EU member states, the EMA, or the European Commission are permitted to accept applications or grant marketing authorization for other similar medicinal products with the same therapeutic indication. Marketing authorization could also be granted to a similar medicinal product with the same orphan indication if the latter product is safer, more effective or otherwise clinically superior to the original orphan medicinal product. Orphan Drug Designation neither shortens the development time or regulatory review time of a drug or therapeutic biologic nor gives the drug or therapeutic biologic any advantage in the regulatory review or approval process. In addition, while we may seek Orphan Drug Designation for our future drug candidates, we may never receive such designations.

The discontinuation of our dipraglurant program for PD-LID may have a material adverse effect on our financial position and business.

In June 2022, we announced that we terminated the Phase 2b/3 study evaluating dipraglurant as a potential treatment for dyskinesia associated with Parkinson’s disease (PD-LID) due to the slow recruitment of patients. The discontinuation was attributed to the consequences of COVID-19 related patient concerns about participation in clinical studies as well as staffing shortages and turnover within study sites. We are no longer pursuing our own clinical development and rely solely on the strategic development collaborations with our partner firms. The discontinuation of the dipraglurant program for PD-LID could have a material adverse effect on our financial position and business, as a whole.

Our dependence on Janssen to develop and commercialize ADX71149 and Indivior to develop and commercialize GABAB PAM exposes us to significant risks.

Our collaboration with Janssen, Indivior and any future partner, may not be scientifically, clinically or commercially successful. We are dependent upon Janssen and Indivior, and may be dependent upon any other partners with which we may collaborate in the future, to perform and fund development activities, including clinical testing, regulatory filings and the manufacture and marketing of products. Under our collaboration and license agreements with our partners, our partners have sole responsibility for the financing and development of selected compounds through preclinical and clinical trials, as well as registration procedures and commercialization, if any, in the United States, Japan, the United Kingdom, Germany, France, Spain and Italy. Our partners have authority over all aspects of the development of selected compounds and may develop or commercialize third-party compounds with a different mechanism of action for identical use. Our role on the joint development committee formed under the collaboration and license agreement is advisory and we do not have authority to determine or veto actions. Our partners may take independent action concerning product development, marketing strategies, manufacturing and supply issues and rights relating to intellectual property. Thus, the success of ADX71149 and GABAB PAM for the treatment of CNS and related diseases currently depends entirely upon the efforts of Janssen and Indivior, respectively. Janssen and Indivior each have significant discretion in determining the efforts and resources it applies to the development and, if approval is obtained, commercialization and marketing of ADX71149 and GABAB PAM, respectively. Janssen and Indivior may not be effective in obtaining approvals in their respective fields of use, marketing any approved products or arranging for any necessary sublicense, supply, manufacturing or distribution relationships, or our partners may change their strategic focus or pursue alternative technologies in a manner that results in reduced or delayed revenue to us. Our partners have a variety of marketed products and their own corporate objectives may not be consistent with our best interests. Changes of this nature might also occur if our partners are acquired or experience changes in management. In any future disagreement with us, our partners will have significantly greater financial and managerial resources on which to draw. Any disagreement could lead to lengthy and expensive litigation or other dispute resolution proceedings as well as extensive financial and operational consequences to us and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial conditions, results of operations and prospects.

​

10

Table of Contents

Our failure to collaborate successfully with partners may delay, impair or prevent the development or commercialization of our drug candidates.

Our business strategy requires us to enter into various forms of collaboration arrangements with other companies, licensors or licensees to research, develop and commercialize our drug candidates. We are unlikely to be able to enter into new collaborative arrangements with respect to the drug candidates we are currently developing internally until we complete at least the next stage of their respective development activities. We cannot assure you that we will be able to maintain our existing collaborations with Janssen and Indivior, negotiate collaboration arrangements in the future on acceptable terms with first choice partners, if at all, or that any such collaboration arrangements will be successful. To the extent that we are not able to maintain or establish such arrangements, we would be forced to seek alternatives, including undertaking drug development and commercialization activities on our own, which would increase our capital requirements and could require us to limit the scope of some or all of our other research and development activities. Under a collaboration agreement, we are likely to have limited influence over the future development or commercialization of the relevant drug candidates. Such development or commercialization may depend significantly on the efforts and activities of the collaborator. Under the terms of an agreement, a collaborator may have significant discretion in determining the efforts and resources it dedicates to the collaboration, which may change over time depending on the collaborator’s overall strategic priorities. The suspension or termination of our collaboration arrangements, the failure of our collaboration arrangements to be successful or the delay in the development or commercialization of drug candidates pursuant to collaborations could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Our future success depends on our ability to retain key employees, consultants and advisors and to attract, retain and motivate qualified personnel.

We are highly dependent on members of our executive team. The loss of the services of any of them may adversely impact the achievement of our objectives.

Recruiting and retaining qualified employees, consultants and advisors for our business, including scientific and technical personnel, is also critical to our success. Competition for skilled personnel is intense and the turnover rate can be high. We may not be able to attract and retain personnel on acceptable terms given the competition among numerous pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies and academic institutions for skilled individuals. In addition, failure to succeed in preclinical studies, clinical trials or applications for marketing approval may make it more challenging to recruit and retain qualified personnel. The inability to recruit, or loss of services of certain executives, key employees, consultants or advisors, may impede the progress of our research, development and commercialization objectives and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

If third parties on which we depend to conduct our preclinical studies and clinical trials do not perform as contractually required, fail to satisfy regulatory or legal requirements or miss expected deadlines, our preclinical studies and clinical development programs could be delayed and otherwise adversely affected.

We rely on third party clinical investigators, contract research organizations, or CROs, clinical data management organizations, medical institutions and consultants to design, conduct, supervise and monitor preclinical studies and clinical trials in relation to our drug candidates. Because we rely on third parties and do not have the ability to conduct clinical and preclinical trials independently, we have less control over the timing, quality and other aspects of clinical trials than we would if we conducted them on our own. These investigators, CROs and consultants are not our employees and we have limited control over the amount of time and resources that they dedicate to our programs. These third parties may have contractual relationships with other entities, some of which may be our competitors, which may draw time and resources from our programs. If we cannot contract with acceptable third parties on commercially reasonable terms, or at all, or if these third parties do not carry out their contractual duties, satisfy legal and regulatory requirements for the conduct of clinical trials or meet expected deadlines, our clinical development program could be delayed or otherwise adversely affected. In all events, we are responsible for ensuring that each of our clinical trials is conducted in accordance with the general investigational plan and protocols for the trial. The FDA requires us to comply with good clinical practices for conducting, recording and reporting the results of clinical trials to assure that data and reported results are credible and accurate and that the rights, integrity and confidentiality of trial participants are protected. Our reliance on third parties that we do not control does not relieve us of these responsibilities and requirements. The third parties with which we contract might not be diligent, careful or timely in conducting our clinical trials, as a result of which the clinical trials could be delayed or unsuccessful. Any such event could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

11

Table of Contents

Because we rely on third party manufacturing and supply partners, our clinical development supplies and other materials may become limited or interrupted or may not be of satisfactory quantity.

We rely on third party manufacturing and supply partners for our research and development, preclinical studies and clinical trials. We currently do not have in-house facilities to manufacture our research and development, preclinical and clinical drug supplies. In the event that any of our suppliers, for research and development, or preclinical studies or clinical trials, fail to perform their respective obligations in terms of quality, timing or otherwise, or if our supply of such components or other materials become limited or interrupted for other reasons, we may not be able to develop or market our drug candidates on a timely and cost-competitive basis, if at all, which may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects. There can be no assurance that our supply of research and development, preclinical and clinical development drugs and other materials will not be limited, interrupted, restricted in certain geographic regions or of satisfactory quality. If the suppliers that currently manufacture our clinical drug supplies cannot continue to do so, we can provide no assurance that we will be able to obtain alternative components and materials from other manufacturers of acceptable quality, or on terms or in quantities acceptable to us, or that we will not require additional components and other materials to manufacture or use our drug candidates. In addition, suppliers need to meet applicable manufacturing requirements and undergo rigorous facility and process validation tests required by regulatory authorities in order to comply with applicable regulatory standards, such as current Good Manufacturing Practices, or cGMP. We cannot provide assurance that our suppliers will comply with such requirements.

Our drug candidates may not successfully obtain regulatory approval.

Even if we are able to initiate Phase 3 clinical trials and they are completed, there can be no assurance that we will receive approval from the FDA, the EMA, Swissmedic, Swiss Agency for Therapeutic Products, or any other relevant government agencies. Any approval, if any, may be delayed or may be obtained on restrictive terms. This may occur if a drug candidate does not show acceptable safety and efficacy in preclinical studies and clinical trials or otherwise does not meet applicable regulatory standards for approval or the drug candidate does not prove as effective as, or does not offer therapeutic or other improvements over, existing or future drugs used to treat the same or similar illness or conditions. Failure by us or a partner to obtain approval for drug candidates could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Our drug candidates must prove their efficacy and safety in rigorous clinical testing that is expensive, time-consuming and may be delayed, suspended or terminated at any time.

Drug approval requires extensive, time consuming and expensive clinical testing to demonstrate safety, tolerability and efficacy of a drug and meet other regulatory standards for authorization to market and commercialize. The development of innovative drugs is inherently risky and the utility and success of a drug will depend on its efficacy and side effect profile for the target patient population. Preclinical studies and clinical trials are long, expensive and uncertain processes. Successful results obtained in preclinical studies and early clinical trials may not be predictive of results in later clinical trials and do not ensure that later preclinical studies or clinical trials will be successful. Clinical trials may be delayed, suspended or terminated as a result of many factors, many of which are or may be beyond our control, such as:

12

Table of Contents

We or a partner may be required to conduct clinical trials or other testing of drug candidates beyond those currently contemplated, in particular, if the currently contemplated trials fail to complete successfully or if the results of those trials or tests are negative or inconclusive. It may take us several years to complete this testing, if at all, and failure can occur at any stage of the process, which could delay, increase costs associated with or prevent approval or commercialization of a drug candidate. Even after approval, if any, a drug may be shown to be unsafe or not have its purported effect. As a result, we or a partner may be required to conduct additional trials or studies, be subject to fines, suspension or withdrawal of approval, drug recalls, product seizures, operating restrictions or criminal prosecution. In all such cases, our anticipated development or commercialization timelines may not be met, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

We face competition from entities that have developed or may develop similar or different drug candidates aimed at the indications on which we are focusing.

The development and commercialization of drugs is highly competitive. We compete with a variety of multinational pharmaceutical companies and specialized pharmaceutical companies, including products approved for marketing and/or drug candidates under development, for each of the drug candidates and each of the indications for which we are developing our drug candidates, as well as technology being developed at universities and other research institutions. Many of our competitors have significantly greater financial, technical, manufacturing, marketing, sales and supply resources or experience than we have. Our competitors have developed, are developing or will develop drug candidates and processes that will compete with our drug candidates. Competitors may enjoy a significant competitive advantage if they are able to achieve patent protection, obtain marketing authorizations and commence commercial sales of their drugs before us. Competing drugs could present superior treatment alternatives for our targeted indications, including by being more effective, safer or convenient, and even make our drug candidates or know-how obsolete before we reach the market. In addition, competitors may sell drugs below the price level at which appropriate return for our investment in drug development is possible. As a result of these factors, we may be unable to successfully develop commercially feasible drugs and our commercial opportunities may be reduced or eliminated, and we may not be able to successfully compete. This would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

We may fail to obtain, maintain or enforce licenses, patents and proprietary technology.

Our success depends in part on our ability to obtain patent protection for our drug candidates and processes, preserve our trade secrets and other proprietary rights and to defend and enforce our rights against infringement in Europe, the United States and other countries. If we are unable to do so, our drugs, technologies and know-how may not provide us with a competitive advantage. The validity and breadth of claims in patent applications involve complex legal and factual questions and, therefore, involve uncertainty. We owned 12 U.S. and at least 179 foreign patents and a number of pending patent applications that cover various aspects of our technologies as of December 31, 2022. No assurance can be given that patents based on pending patent applications or any future patent applications will be issued. We may need to refine or narrow our claims. Due to their broad scope, some of our generic compound claims may not be patentable. Other of our patent applications may not be granted if third parties have earlier filed applications for inventions covered by our pending patent applications. The scope of any patent protection we are able to obtain may not provide us with sufficient protection against competing drugs or provide competitive advantages to us. Any of the patents that have been or may be issued to us may be held invalid or unenforceable if subsequently challenged by competitors or other third parties. Furthermore, there can be no assurance that others have not developed or will not develop similar drugs, duplicate any of our drugs or design around any patents that have been or may be issued to us. Any of our granted, valid and enforceable patents will provide protection for only a limited period of time. We cannot assure that we will obtain any extensions of patent protection that are sometimes offered if certain clinical development extension application deadlines are met or that we will be successful in seeking any method of use patent. If a method of use patent is granted but product patents are not granted or expire, third parties would be able to develop products using the method in indications not covered by the method of use patent.

​

13

Table of Contents

We may be restricted in our development and any commercialization activities by third-party patents and patent applications.

Our commercial success depends on our ability to operate without infringing third-party patents and other intellectual property or market exclusivity rights. If we are not able to do so, we may be subject to infringement actions. We may not be aware of all patents and patent applications that may impact our ability to make, use or sell our drug candidates. Other parties may have filed, or may file in the future, patent applications covering compounds or drug candidates that are similar to ours. Any such event could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects. In addition, because patent applications can take many years to issue and are not published for a period of time ranging on the jurisdictions in which we applied for registration, there may be applications currently pending, unknown to us, which may later result in patents that our drug candidates or technology may infringe. Any conflicts arising from the patent rights of others could significantly reduce the scope of our patents and limit our ability to obtain meaningful patent protection. We may be required to obtain licenses to those patents or to develop or obtain alternative technology. We may not be able to obtain any such licenses on acceptable terms, or at all. Any failure to obtain such licenses could delay or prevent us from pursuing the development or commercialization, if any, of our drug candidates.

We may fail to protect our intellectual property rights, including trade secrets and know-how.

Our success depends on our ability to obtain and enforce intellectual property rights, including trade secrets and non-patentable know-how related to our allosteric modulator platform. We seek to protect or secure this intellectual property, in part, by entering confidentiality agreements with and receiving assignments from our employees, consultants, suppliers, licensees, funding partners and other contractual partners and advisers. We may not always be able to obtain these agreements or assignments. Even if we obtain these agreements or assignments, there can be no assurance that they will effectively protect our intellectual property rights or prevent improper use or disclosure of confidential information or that they will not be breached. We may not have adequate remedies for any breach of these agreements or assignments, or our trade secrets or non-patentable know-how may otherwise become known or be independently developed by competitors. In addition, these agreements or assignments may conflict with, or be subject to, the rights of third parties with which our employees, consultants, suppliers, licensees, funding partners or other contractual partners or advisers had previous employment, consulting or other relationships. Any such event could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

We may have to defend against or initiate lawsuits to protect our intellectual property rights.

In the future, third parties with patent claims that overlap with our intended activities may decide to sue us for monetary damages or to prevent us from manufacturing, selling or developing our drug candidates. We could also become subject to claims that we or our employees have inadvertently or otherwise used or disclosed intellectual property, trade secrets or other proprietary information of an employee’s former employer, particularly if such employer is a university or pharmaceutical company. Additionally, to protect our patent rights, we may decide to initiate lawsuits against third parties. Defending against or initiating such claims, which typically go on for years before a legal judgment or settlement is obtained, would involve significant effort and expense and could divert management’s attention from the operation of our business. Any such proceedings could involve prior art and put our patents at risk of being invalidated or interpreted narrowly and our pending patent applications at risk of not being issued. In addition, there is a risk that some of our confidential information could be compromised by disclosure in such proceedings and provide competitors with access to our proprietary information. Further, the outcome of any such proceedings may be unfavorable to us. If the manufacture, use or sale of any of our drug candidates infringes the patents, or violates other proprietary rights, of third parties, a court or settlement agreement may require us to pay actual damages and, potentially, penalties, including the other party’s attorney’s fees, which may be substantial. We could also be required to cease the development, manufacture, use and sale of drugs that infringe the patent rights of others, to expend significant resources to redesign our technology so that it does not infringe the patent rights of others, to develop or acquire non-infringing technology, which may not be possible, or to obtain licenses to the infringed intellectual property, which may not be available to us on acceptable terms or at all. We cannot guarantee that we will have sufficient financial or other resources to protect intellectual property significant to the development of our drug candidates.

​

14

Table of Contents

Even if a product candidate receives regulatory approval, lack of market acceptance may prevent us from generating revenue from commercialization of the product.

Even if a drug candidate is approved, if we or a partner are not successful in commercializing the product, we will not generate revenue from sales. Revenue generated from an approved product depends on its successful commercialization. Many factors may impede successful commercialization, many of which are or may be beyond our or a partner’s control. These factors include the proprietary rights of third parties, including our competitors, the failure of a product to prove effective as, or offer therapeutic or other improvements over, existing or future drugs used to treat the same or similar conditions or the inability of a product to gain acceptance by patients, the medical community or third-party payors, such as insurance companies or government reimbursement programs, or the inability of produce a product in commercial quantities at an acceptable cost, or at all. Even if our drug development is successful and marketing authorization has been obtained, our ability, or our partners’ ability, to generate significant revenue will depend on the acceptance of our drugs by physicians, patients, third-party payors and the medical community. We cannot assure you that we or our partners will achieve market acceptance of our drug candidates or generate revenue once we or our partners obtain marketing authorization. The market acceptance of any of our drug candidates depends on a number of factors, including the continued demonstration of efficacy and safety in commercial use, cost-effectiveness, convenience and ease of administration, competition, marketing and distribution support, the scope of the approved uses and labeling requirements, prevalence and severity of any side effects, and adequate government or other third-party coverage or reimbursement for the cost of the drug. To the extent competitors are able to commercialize competing drugs before our drugs have achieved market approval and acceptance, we may have difficulty gaining market acceptance if physicians, patients, third- party payors and the medical community have grown accustomed to use of the competing drugs, whether or not such competing drugs are more effective or have other advantages over our drug.

Any commercialization efforts by us will require us to develop sales, marketing, and distribution capabilities internally or through arrangements with third parties.

Sales, marketing and distribution capabilities are key elements of a successful commercialization strategy, none of which we currently have internally. If any of our product candidates are approved, we intend to market the product either directly or through other strategic alliances and distribution arrangements with third parties. To commercialize our drugs, we will need to enter into new collaborations with third parties or develop our own marketing and sales force with technical expertise and supporting distribution capability. If we decide to market our products directly, we will need to commit significant financial and managerial resources to develop a marketing and sales force with technical expertise and with supporting distribution, administration and compliance capabilities. If we rely on third parties with such capabilities to market our products, we will need to establish and maintain partnership arrangements, and there can be no assurance that we will be able to enter into third-party marketing or distribution arrangements on acceptable terms or at all. To the extent that we do enter into such arrangements, we will be dependent on our marketing and distribution partners. In entering into third-party marketing or distribution arrangements, we expect to incur significant additional expense and there can be no assurance that such third parties will establish adequate sales and distribution capabilities or be successful in gaining market acceptance for our products and services. Any factors preventing or limiting the market acceptance of our drug candidates could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects. There can be no assurance that we will be able to build up our own marketing and sales organization, to attract and maintain established collaboration partners for the third-party commercialization of our drug candidates, to enter into agreements on acceptable terms for sales and marketing, if at all, or that any such collaboration arrangements will be successful. As a consequence, we would be forced to seek alternatives, redirect our resources or have to limit the scope of our research and development activities in other fields and thereby delay the launch and sales of any or all of our drug candidates, or raise new funds. Accordingly, this could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

​

15

Table of Contents

We may become exposed to costly and damaging liability claims and may not be able to maintain sufficient liability insurance to cover these claims.

Our business with pharmaceutical drugs entails a potential risk of substantial liability for damages, including drug liability and environmental liability, which are inherent in the development, testing and manufacturing of our drug candidates. It is always possible that a drug, even after marketing authorization, may exhibit unforeseen failures or adverse side effects. We can provide no assurance that sufficient insurance coverage will be available to us at acceptable terms, or at all, for any damages or costs in connection with any liability claims. Liability lawsuits are costly and time consuming and may divert management’s attention from their normal responsibilities. If any of our drugs were to fail or produce adverse side effects, substantial uninsured losses could result, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects. Even where drug failures or side effects are not so serious as to warrant withdrawing the drug from the market or liability in damages, they may reduce the drug’s competitiveness or adversely affect our reputation, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

We and our partners are subject to significant government regulation, including marketing authorization requirements, which could increase the cost of developing our drug candidates or delay, prevent or limit the commercialization of our drug candidates.

We and our partners are subject to extensive and rigorous governmental regulation and the applicable regulatory requirements are subject to change. Our and our partners’ research and development, preclinical studies and clinical trials, manufacturing, safety, efficacy, record-keeping, labeling, marketing, sales and distribution of our drug candidates are regulated by the EMA, the FDA, Swissmedic, Swiss Agency for Therapeutic Products, and other government agencies in countries where we are testing or intend to test and market our drug candidates. Before a clinical trial can begin, we and our partners must obtain approval from the competent national authority in the country where the trial is planned to be conducted. A favorable opinion from a competent ethics committee or an independent institutional review board on the clinical trial application is also needed. We cannot assure we or our partners will obtain authorization for further testing of drug candidates already in clinical trials or for human clinical trials of any or all of our other candidates currently in research or pre-clinical development. We, and our partners or regulatory authorities may suspend or terminate clinical trials at any time if it is thought that the participants are being exposed to unacceptable health risks. It may take us or our collaborators several years to complete this testing, and failure can occur at any stage of the process.

The governmental regulation of development of drug candidates extends beyond clinical trials to approvals required for their sale and monitoring after sale, including safety reporting requirements, regulatory oversight of drug promotion and marketing and cGMP. A failure by us or our partners to obtain marketing authorization or a delay in obtaining and maintaining approval could damage our reputation and adversely affect the marketing of our drugs and our ability to generate revenue, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects. In addition, marketing authorizations, if granted, may not include all uses for which we may seek to market a drug, thereby limiting the potential market for the drug. Moreover, even after marketing authorization is obtained, a marketed drug, its manufacturer and its manufacturing facilities are subject to continual review and periodic inspections by the relevant authorities. Consequently, any discovery of previously unknown problems with an approved drug, manufacturer or manufacturing facilities may result in restrictions on the drug or manufacturer, including a requirement to withdraw the drug from the market. In addition, regulatory requirements are evolving in a manner that cannot be predicted. Changes in existing regulations of EMA, FDA, Swissmedic, Swiss Agency for Therapeutic Products or other regulations or the adoption of new regulations could prevent us from obtaining or maintaining, or affect the timing of, future marketing authorizations. Changes in regulatory policy during the period of development of a drug or regulatory review may result in delays or rejections of approvals of the drug candidates. Any change in the regulations governing us could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

​

16

Table of Contents

Our relationships with customers, physicians and third-party payors are subject, directly or indirectly, to United States federal and state healthcare fraud and abuse laws, privacy and security laws (including health information privacy and security laws), and other healthcare laws and regulations. If we or our employees, independent contractors, consultants, commercial partners and vendors violate these laws, we could face substantial penalties.

Our current and future arrangements with healthcare professionals, principal investigators, consultants, customers (including governmental bodies) and third-party payors subject us to various federal and state fraud and abuse laws and other healthcare laws. These laws may impact, among other things, our current and future business operations, including our clinical research activities, and proposed sales, marketing and education programs and constrain the business or financial arrangements and relationships with healthcare providers and other parties through which we market, sell and distribute our products for which we obtain marketing approval. These laws include, without limitation, anti-kickback and false claims laws and regulations, data privacy and security laws, and transparency laws and regulations. Because of the breadth of these laws and the narrowness of the statutory exceptions and regulatory safe harbors available, it is possible that some of our business activities could be subject to challenge under one or more of such laws. It is possible that governmental authorities will conclude that our business practices may not comply with current or future statutes, regulations or case law involving applicable fraud and abuse or other healthcare laws and regulations. If our operations are found to be in violation of any of these laws or any other governmental regulations that may apply to us, we may be subject to substantial civil, criminal and administrative penalties, damages, fines, disgorgement, imprisonment, exclusion from participating in government funded healthcare programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid, additional reporting requirements and oversight if we become subject to a corporate integrity agreement or similar agreement to resolve allegations of non compliance with these laws, contractual damages, reputational harm and the curtailment or restructuring of our operations. To the extent that any of our products are sold in a foreign country, we may be subject to similar foreign laws and regulations, which may include, for instance, applicable post marketing requirements, including safety surveillance, anti fraud and abuse laws and implementation of corporate compliance programs and reporting of payments or transfers of value to healthcare professionals.

Current healthcare laws and regulations and future legislative or regulatory changes to the healthcare system may affect our ability to sell any drugs we may develop.

Healthcare laws are subject to change, which may affect our ability to sell any product candidates for which we receive marketing and commercialization approval. In the U.S., an important potential market for our drug candidates, there have been a number of legislative and regulatory changes to the healthcare system that could affect our future results of operations. In particular, there have been and continue to be a number of initiatives at the U.S. federal and state levels that seek to reduce healthcare costs.

Individual states in the United States have become increasingly aggressive in passing legislation and implementing regulations designed to control pharmaceutical and biological product pricing, including price or patient reimbursement constraints, discounts, restrictions on certain product access, and marketing cost disclosure and transparency measures, and designed to encourage importation from other countries and bulk purchasing. Legally-mandated price controls on payment amounts by third-party payors or other restrictions could harm our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects. In addition, regional healthcare authorities and individual hospitals in the United States are increasingly using bidding procedures to determine what pharmaceutical products and which suppliers will be included in their prescription drug and other healthcare programs. This could reduce ultimate demand for our products or put pressure on our product pricing, which could negatively affect our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects.

​

17

Table of Contents

In addition, given recent federal and state government initiatives directed at lowering the total cost of healthcare, Congress and state legislatures will likely continue to focus on healthcare reform, the cost of prescription drugs and biologics and the reform of the Medicare and Medicaid programs. While we cannot predict the full outcome of any such legislation, it may result in decreased reimbursement for drugs and biologics, which may further exacerbate industry-wide pressure to reduce prescription drug prices. This could harm our ability to generate revenue. At the federal level, in July 2021, the Biden administration released an executive order, “Promoting Competition in the American Economy,” with multiple provisions aimed at prescription drugs. In response to Biden’s executive order, on September 9, 2021, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, or HHS, released a Comprehensive Plan for Addressing High Drug Prices that outlines principles for drug pricing reform and sets out a variety of potential legislative policies that Congress could pursue as well as potential administrative actions HHS can take to advance these principles. In addition, on August 16, 2022, President Biden signed the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022, or IRA, into law, which, among other things (i) directs HHS to negotiate the price of certain high-expenditure, single-source drugs and biologics covered under Medicare and (ii) imposes rebates under Medicare Part B and Medicare Part D to penalize price increases that outpace inflation. These provisions will take effect progressively starting in fiscal year 2023, although they may be subject to legal challenges. Further, the Biden administration released an additional executed order on October 14, 2022, directing HHS to report on how the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation can be further leveraged to test new models for lowering drug costs for Medicare and Medicaid beneficiaries. No legislation or administrative actions have been finalized to implement these principles. It is unclear whether these similar policy initiatives will be implemented in the future. We expect that additional state and federal healthcare reform measures may be adopted in the future, any of which could limit the amounts that federal and state governments will pay for healthcare therapies. Additionally, such legislation, or similar regulatory changes, could put competitive pressure on our ability to profitably price our products, which, in turn, could adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects. It is also possible that other legislative proposals having similar effects will be adopted.

Further, we cannot predict the likelihood, nature, or extent of healthcare reform initiatives that may arise from future legislation or administrative action. If we or any third parties we may engage are slow or unable to adapt to changes in existing requirements or the adoption of new requirements or policies, or if we or such third parties are not able to maintain regulatory compliance, our drug candidates may lose any regulatory approval that may have been obtained and we may not achieve or sustain profitability. Additionally, it is possible that additional government actions is taken in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and geopolitical tensions may have an adverse effect on our business.

On February 24, 2022, Russia invaded Ukraine. The resulting conflict and retaliatory measures by the global community have created global security concerns, including the possibility of expanded regional or global conflict, which have had, are likely to continue to have, short-term and more likely longer-term adverse impacts on Ukraine and Europe and around the globe. Potential ramifications include disruption of the supply chain including research and development activities being conducted by us and our strategic partners. Our partners and we rely on global networks of contract research organizations to engage clinical study sites and enrol patients, certain of which are in Russia and Ukraine. Delays in research and development activities led by us or our partners could increase associated costs and, depending upon the duration of any delays, require us and our partners to find alternative suppliers at additional expense. In addition, the conflict in Eastern Europe has had significant ramifications on global financial markets, which may adversely impact our ability to raise capital on favourable terms or at all.

Certain European countries utilize reference pricing to control the prices of drugs. Use of reference pricing may increase, which could restrict the sales potential for many new drugs unless the drug can be significantly differentiated from existing drugs.

Additional governmental and regulatory proposals and health care reforms are possible. However, we are unable to forecast what additional legislation or regulation relating to the health care industry or third-party reimbursement may be enacted in the future, or what effect such legislation or regulation would have on our business. Our business could be harmed by other health care reforms that may be erected or adopted in the future, and in particular this could have a material adverse effect on the amounts that private payors will pay for drugs. As a consequence, we may not be able to realize an appropriate return on our investment in research and development and generate revenue sufficient to attain profitability, even if our drugs are approved for marketing. This could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

18

Table of Contents

The availability and level of third-party coverage and reimbursement for our potential drugs will be uncertain, and it may be difficult to obtain or maintain expected price levels.

Our or a partner’s ability successfully to commercialize our drug candidates and to attract strategic partners for our drug candidates or future drugs will depend in part on price levels and on the extent to which reimbursement for the costs of treatment with these drug candidates will be available from government health administration authorities, private health insurers and other third-party payors, as well as government health care programs. There is significant uncertainty related to third-party payor coverage and reimbursement of newly approved products. In the United States, for example, principal decisions about reimbursement for new products are typically made by CMS and private third-party payors often follow CMS’s decisions regarding coverage and reimbursement to a substantial degree. However, one third-party payor’s determination to provide coverage for a product candidate does not assure that other payors will also provide coverage for the drug candidate. Further, no uniform policy for coverage and reimbursement exists in the United States, and coverage and reimbursement can differ significantly from payor to payor. Further, coverage policies and third-party payor reimbursement rates may change at any time. Even if favorable coverage and reimbursement status is attained, less favorable coverage policies and reimbursement rates may be implemented in the future. Governments and other third-party payors are increasingly attempting to contain health care costs, in part by challenging the price of medical drugs and services or by restricting the eligibility for reimbursement. Health care cost pressure could lead to pricing pressure which could adversely affect pricing of dipraglurant, ADX71149, GABAB PAM and our other potential drugs. Seeking third-party reimbursement is a time-consuming and costly process, which will require us and our partners to provide scientific and clinical support for the use of each of our drug candidates to each third-party payor separately. Significant uncertainty exists as to the payment status of newly approved medical drugs. The unavailability or inadequacy of third-party reimbursement, or legislation controlling treatments or prices, could have an adverse effect on the price level and consequently the market acceptance of our drug candidates and may have a material adverse effect on our results or operations, financial condition and prospects.

Any non-compliance by us with the environmental, health and safety laws and regulations that we are subject to could result in fines, suspension of drugs research and development or cessation of our operations or civil liability.

We are subject to a variety of health, safety and environmental laws and regulations in the jurisdictions in which we operate, particularly in our research and development activities, as well as in our pre-clinical studies. These laws and regulations govern, among other things, the use, storage, handling and discharge or disposal of hazardous materials, chemicals and compounds, including wastewater discharge, air emissions and waste management, where we operate. Our research and development programs involve the controlled use of hazardous materials, chemical and biological materials and controlled pre-clinical animal studies. Although we believe that we hold all permits currently required to operate our business and otherwise comply with current laws and regulations, any failure by us to comply with present or future laws and regulations could result in fines, suspension of research and development or cessation of our operations. We, like many of our competitors, have incurred, and will continue to incur, capital and operating expenditures and other costs in the ordinary course of our business in complying with such laws and regulations in most of the jurisdictions in which we operate. We do not currently anticipate any material additional capital expenditures in respect of such regulations outside of the ordinary course of our business. However, the risk of environmental liability is inherent in our business and there can be no assurance that additional material costs of complying with environmental regulations will not arise in the future. Our research and manufacturing activities involve the use of hazardous materials. Although we believe that our safety procedures for handling and disposing of hazardous materials (including medical and biological waste) comply with relevant laws and regulations, we cannot eliminate the risk of accidental or manmade contamination, injury or damage from these materials. In the event of an accident or environmental discharge, we may be held liable for any resulting damages. We cannot assure you that the amount of our insurance coverage will be sufficient to satisfy any such damages. As a result, any such accident could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operation and prospects. In addition, changes to existing or future laws and regulations may result in the imposition on us of significant additional environmental, health and safety compliance costs.

​

19

Table of Contents

We are exposed to currency fluctuation risks and other financial risks.

For the year ended December 31, 2022, approximately 54% and 3% of our costs and revenue, respectively, were denominated in currencies other than the Swiss franc. As a result, our business is affected by fluctuations in foreign exchange rates between the Swiss franc and other currencies, particularly U.S. dollars, the Euro and the British pound. A significant amount of our costs are denominated in currencies other than Swiss francs as we source supplies, research and development, consulting and other services in several countries other than Switzerland. On the revenue side, a significant amount relates to currencies other than Swiss francs. Under our agreement with Janssen, all milestone payments and royalties payable by Janssen to us are denominated in Euros. Furthermore, under our agreement with Indivior, all milestones payments and royalties payable by Indivior to us are denominated in U.S dollars whilst research funding may be denominated either in Swiss franc or U.S dollars. Since our reporting currency is the Swiss franc, we convert financial line items into Swiss francs at the applicable foreign exchange rates. We expect that a significant part of our revenue, including milestone payments and royalties, and of our costs, including costs for future clinical trials, will continue to be denominated in U.S. dollars, the Euro or the British pound. Unfavorable fluctuations in the value of the Swiss franc compared to these other currencies could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Our current operations are concentrated in one location and any events affecting this location may have material adverse consequences.

Our current operations are located in our facilities situated in Geneva, Switzerland. Any unplanned event, such as flood, fire, explosion, earthquake or other accidents that result in us being unable to fully utilize the facilities, may have a material adverse effect on our ability to operate our business, particularly on a daily basis, and have significant negative consequences on our financial and operating conditions. Loss of access to these facilities may result in increased costs, delays in the development of our drug candidates or interruption of our business operations. As part of our risk management policy, we maintain insurance coverage at levels we believe are appropriate for our business. However, in the event of an accident at these facilities, we cannot assure you that the amounts of insurance will be sufficient to satisfy any damages and losses. If our facilities are unable to operate because of an accident or for any other reason, even for a short period of time, any or all of our research and development programs may be harmed. Any business interruption may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position, results of operations and prospects.

We are subject to risks related to data privacy concerns, cyber security breaches and failure to comply with privacy regulations and security requirements relating to data.

In the ordinary course of our business we come to possess sensitive personal data, including information from clinical trials, and health data obtained in connection with reporting of adverse events. We are subject to data protection laws, privacy requirements and other regulatory restrictions in the various jurisdictions in which we operate.

Our failure to keep apprised of, and comply with, privacy, data use and security laws, standards and regulations, including, for instance, unauthorized disclosure of, or access to, data, could result in the suspension or revocation of our approvals or registrations, the limitation, suspension or termination of services or the imposition of administrative, civil or criminal penalties, including fines which may be as high as €20 million or 4% of our annual worldwide revenue (whichever is greater) for serious infringements of the EU General Data Protection Regulation that became effective in May 2018. In addition, we may obtain health information from third parties in the United States (including research institutions from which we may obtain clinical trial data) that are subject to privacy and security requirements under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, as amended, or HIPAA. Depending on the facts and circumstances, we could be subject criminal penalties, including if we knowingly obtain, use, or disclose individually identifiable health information maintained by a HIPAA covered entity in a manner that is not authorized or permitted by, HIPAA. In addition, such failure or non-compliance may cause existing or potential partners, including hospitals, physicians and patients to cease interacting with us, and could damage our reputation and brand. In addition, to the extent more restrictive laws, rules or security requirements relating to business and personal data are adopted in the future in the various jurisdictions in which we operate, such changes could have an adverse impact on our business by increasing our costs or imposing restrictions on our business processes. Accordingly, our failure to keep apprised of, and comply with, privacy, data use and security laws, standards and regulations could have a material adverse effect on our reputation, business, financial condition, results and prospects. Our financial exposure to any actual or alleged breach of such regulations or standards may either not be insured against or not fully covered through our current insurance.

20

Table of Contents

Cyber security attacks on our servers, information systems and databases, or the third party servers, information systems and databases on which our information is stored, could compromise the security of our data or could cause interruptions in the operations of our businesses. Notwithstanding safeguards, cyber security breaches, internal security breaches, physical security breaches or other unauthorized or accidental access to our servers, other information systems or databases could result in tampering with, or the theft or publication of, sensitive information or the deletion or modification of data, or could otherwise cause interruptions in our operations.

The tampering with, disruption to, or the theft or publication of, sensitive information or the deletion or modification of records held either in our systems or the systems of others to which we have access, could subject us to increased costs and exposure to litigation. The loss of confidential information could result in the payment of damages and reputational harm and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results and prospects.

Our financial exposure from the items referenced above could either not be insured against or not fully covered through any insurance that we maintain and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results and prospects.

Risks Related to our ADSs and Shares

An investment in our securities is speculative, and there can be no assurance of any return on any such investment.

An investment in our securities is highly speculative, and there is no assurance that investors will obtain any return on their investment. Investors will be subject to substantial risks involved in their investment, including the risk of losing their entire investment.

The market price for our shares and ADSs may be highly volatile and could decline significantly.

Our securities have a relatively small public float and may be less liquid and more volatile than securities of companies with broader public ownership. Factors affecting the market price of the securities, many of which are beyond our control, include:

21

Table of Contents

In addition, securities markets in general have from time to time, and in particular in recent years, experienced significant price and volume fluctuations. Such fluctuations, as well as the economic environment as a whole, can have a substantial negative effect on the market price of our securities, regardless of our operating results or our financial position. Any such broad market fluctuations may adversely affect the trading price of our securities.

We expect to continue to incur significant costs as a result of operating as a company with securities listed in the United States in addition to Switzerland, and our senior management is required to devote substantial time to new compliance initiatives and corporate governance practices.

As a company with securities listed in the United States in addition to Switzerland, and particularly after we no longer qualify as an emerging growth company, we expect to continue to incur significant legal, accounting, and other expenses. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, the listing requirements of Nasdaq and other applicable securities rules and regulations impose various requirements on non-U.S. reporting public companies, including the establishment and maintenance of effective disclosure and financial controls and corporate governance practices. Our senior management and other personnel will need to continue to devote a substantial amount of time to these compliance initiatives. Moreover, these rules and regulations increase our legal and financial compliance costs and make some activities more time-consuming and costly.

Pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or Section 404, we are required to furnish a report by our senior management on our internal control over financial reporting with our annual report to be filed with the SEC. However, while we remain an emerging growth company, we will not be required to include an attestation report on internal control over financial reporting issued by our independent registered public accounting firm. To ensure compliance with Section 404, we will need to continue to dedicate internal resources, potentially engage outside consultants and adopt a detailed work plan to assess and document the adequacy of internal control over financial reporting, continue steps to improve control processes as appropriate, validate through testing that controls are functioning as documented, and implement a continuous reporting and improvement process for internal control over financial reporting. We anticipate that the process to document and evaluate our internal control over financial reporting will be both costly and challenging.

An active market may not develop or be sustained in which investors can resell ADSs.

Although our shares have traded on SIX since 2007 and ADSs representing our shares have traded on Nasdaq since January 29, 2020, we cannot predict the extent to which an active market for ADSs representing our shares will develop or be sustained on Nasdaq, or how the development of such a market might affect the market price for our shares on SIX and on Nasdaq. The price at which ADSs representing our shares trade on Nasdaq may or may not be correlated with the price at which our shares trade on SIX.

Fluctuations in the exchange rate between the U.S. dollar and the Swiss franc may increase the risk of holding the ADSs.

Our share price is quoted on SIX in Swiss francs, while the ADSs trade on Nasdaq in U.S. dollars. Fluctuations in the exchange rate between the U.S. dollar and the Swiss franc may result in temporary differences between the value of the ADSs and the value of our shares, which may result in heavy trading by investors seeking to exploit such differences. In addition, as a result of fluctuations in the exchange rate between the U.S. dollar and the Swiss franc, the U.S. dollar equivalent of the proceeds that a holder of the ADSs would receive upon the sale in Switzerland of any shares withdrawn from the depositary receipts facility, and the U.S. dollar equivalent of any cash dividends paid in Swiss francs on our shares represented by the ADSs, could also decline.

​

22

Table of Contents

Future sales, or the possibility of future sales, of a substantial number of ADSs representing our shares or our shares could adversely affect the price of such securities.

Future sales of a substantial number of ADSs representing our shares or our shares, or the perception that such sales will occur, could cause a decline in the market price of ADSs representing our shares and our shares. As of December 31, 2022, we had 115,348,311 shares, including 38,214,291 treasury shares indirectly held through our wholly-owned subsidiary Addex Pharma SA, and 3,901,584 ADSs representing our shares issued and outstanding. All of our outstanding shares and ADSs representing our shares are freely tradeable on SIX and Nasdaq respectively. In addition, other than shares held by our affiliates, all such shares are able to be deposited with the depositary in exchange for ADSs representing such shares at the ratio referred to on the cover page of this Annual Report on Form 20-F, which ADSs will be freely tradeable. If holders sell substantial amounts of ADSs or shares in the respective public markets therefor, or if the market perceives that such sales may occur, the market price of ADSs representing our shares and our shares and our ability to raise capital through an issue of equity securities in the future could be adversely affected.

We have never paid dividends on our share capital, and we do not anticipate paying cash dividends in the foreseeable future.

We have never declared or paid cash dividends on our share capital. We do not anticipate paying cash dividends on our registered shares in the foreseeable future. We currently intend to retain all available funds and any future earnings to fund the development and growth of our business. Any future determination to declare cash dividends will be made at the discretion of our board of directors, subject to compliance with applicable laws and covenants under current or future credit facilities, which may restrict or limit our ability to pay dividends and will depend on our financial condition, operating results, capital requirements, distributable profits and/or distributable reserves from capital contributions, general business conditions and other factors that our board of directors may deem relevant. As a result, capital appreciation, if any, of our securities will be your sole source of gain for the foreseeable future.

The exercise of equity incentive instruments granted under our equity incentive plan could dilute our share capital.

Pursuant to our existing equity incentive plan, employee stock option plan, or ESOP, and warrants may be exercisable at prices below the market price of our shares at the time of exercise. To the extent that these instruments are exercised in the future, holders of our registered shares will be diluted. As of December 31, 2022, there were 30,874,670 shares reserved for issuance pursuant to subscription rights outstanding under our existing equity incentive plan, including primarily 30,097,670 warrants and 777,000 shares reserved for the ESOP.

Holders of ADSs may not have the same voting rights as the holders of our shares and may not receive voting materials in time to be able to exercise their right to vote.

Except as described in “Item 12.B.—Description of Securities Other than Equity Securities—American Depositary Shares”, holders of ADSs representing our shares are not able to exercise voting rights attaching to the underlying shares on an individual basis. Holders of ADSs representing our shares have appointed the depositary or its nominee as their representative to exercise the voting rights attaching to the shares underlying such ADSs. Holders of ADSs representing our shares may not receive voting materials in time to instruct the depositary to vote. The depositary may not be liable for any failure to carry out any instructions to vote, for the manner in which any vote is cast or for the effect of any such vote. As a result, holders of ADSs representing our shares may not be able to exercise voting rights and may lack recourse if such ADSs are not voted as requested. In addition, holders of ADSs representing our shares will not be able to call a shareholders’ meeting.

​

23

Table of Contents

Holders of ADSs representing our shares may not receive distributions on our shares underlying our ADSs or any value for them if it is illegal or impractical to make them available to such holders.

The depositary for ADSs representing our shares has agreed to pay to holders of such ADSs cash dividends or other distributions that it or the custodian receives on our shares after deducting its fees and expenses. Holders of ADSs representing our shares will receive these distributions in proportion to the number of our shares underlying their ADSs. However, in accordance with the limitations set forth in the deposit agreement, it may be unlawful or impractical for the depositary to make a distribution available to holders of ADSs representing our shares. We have no obligation to take any other action to permit the distribution of ADSs representing our shares, shares themselves, rights or anything else to holders of ADSs representing our shares. This means that holders of ADSs representing our shares may not receive any distributions that we make on our shares or any value from them if it is unlawful or impractical to make such distributions available to holders. These restrictions may negatively impact the trading value of ADSs representing our shares.

Holders of ADSs may be subject to limitations on transfer of their ADSs.

ADSs are transferable on the books of the depositary. However, the depositary may close its transfer books at any time or from time to time when it deems expedient in connection with the performance of its duties. In addition, the depositary may refuse to deliver, transfer, or register transfers of ADSs generally when our books or the books of the depositary are closed, or at any time if we or the depositary deems it advisable to do so because of any requirement of law or of any government or governmental body, or under any provision of the deposit agreement, or for any other reason in accordance with the terms of the deposit agreement.

ADSs holders may not be entitled to a jury trial with respect to claims arising under the deposit agreement, which could augur less favorable results to the plaintiff(s) in any such action.

The deposit agreement governing the ADSs representing our shares provides that holders and beneficial owners of ADSs irrevocably waive the right to a trial by jury in any legal proceeding arising out of or relating to the deposit agreement or the ADSs, including claims under federal securities laws, against us or the depositary to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law. If this jury trial waiver provision is prohibited by applicable law, an action could nevertheless proceed under the terms of the deposit agreement with a jury trial. To our knowledge, the enforceability of a jury trial waiver under the federal securities laws has not been finally adjudicated by a federal court. However, we believe that a jury trial waiver provision is generally enforceable under the laws of the State of New York, which govern the deposit agreement, by a court of the State of New York or a federal court, which have non-exclusive jurisdiction over matters arising under the deposit agreement, applying such law. In determining whether to enforce a jury trial waiver provision, New York courts and federal courts will consider whether the visibility of the jury trial waiver provision within the agreement is sufficiently prominent such that a party has knowingly waived any right to trial by jury. We believe that this is the case with respect to the deposit agreement and the ADSs. In addition, New York courts will not enforce a jury trial waiver provision in order to bar a viable setoff or counterclaim sounding in fraud or one which is based upon a creditor’s negligence in failing to liquidate collateral upon a guarantor’s demand, or in the case of an intentional tort claim (as opposed to a contract dispute), none of which we believe are applicable in the case of the deposit agreement or the ADSs. No condition, stipulation or provision of the deposit agreement or ADSs serves as a waiver by any holder or beneficial owner of ADSs or by us or the depositary of compliance with any provision of the federal securities laws. If you or any other holder or beneficial owner of ADSs brings a claim against us or the depositary in connection with matters arising under the deposit agreement or the ADSs, you or such other holder or beneficial owner may not be entitled to a jury trial with respect to such claims, which may have the effect of limiting and discouraging lawsuits against us and / or the depositary. If a lawsuit is brought against us and / or the depositary under the deposit agreement, it may be heard only by a judge or justice of the applicable trial court, which would be conducted according to different civil procedures and may augur different results than a trial by jury would have had, including results that could be less favorable to the plaintiff(s) in any such action, depending on, among other things, the nature of the claims, the judge or justice hearing such claims, and the venue of the hearing.

The rights accruing to holders of our shares may differ from the rights typically accruing to shareholders of a U.S. corporation.

We are organized under the law of Switzerland. The rights of holders of shares are governed by the laws of Switzerland and by our Articles of Association. These rights differ in certain respects from the rights of shareholders in typical U.S. corporations. See Exhibit 2.4 “Description of Ordinary Shares”, which is incorporated by reference herein for a description of the principal differences between the provisions of Swiss law applicable to us and, for example, the Delaware General Corporation Law relating to shareholders’ rights and protections.

24

Table of Contents

Claims of U.S. civil liabilities may not be enforceable against us.

We are incorporated under the law of Switzerland. Certain of our directors reside outside the United States. As a result, it may not be possible for investors to effect service of process within the United States upon such persons or to enforce judgments obtained in U.S. courts against them or us, including judgments predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the U.S. federal securities laws. The United States and Switzerland do not currently have a treaty providing for recognition and enforcement of judgments (other than arbitration awards) in civil and commercial matters. Consequently, a final judgment for payment given by a court in the United States, whether or not predicated solely upon U.S. securities laws, would not automatically be recognized or enforceable in Switzerland. In addition, uncertainty exists as to whether Swiss courts would entertain original actions brought in Switzerland against us or our directors predicated upon the securities laws of the United States or any state in the United States. Any final and conclusive monetary judgment for a definite sum obtained against us in U.S. courts would be treated by the courts of Switzerland. Whether these requirements are met in respect of a judgment based upon the civil liability provisions of the U.S. securities laws, including whether the award of monetary damages under such laws would constitute a penalty, is an issue for the court making such decision. If a Swiss court gives judgment for the sum payable under a U.S. judgment, the Swiss judgment will be enforceable by methods generally available for this purpose. These methods generally permit the Swiss court discretion to prescribe the manner of enforcement. As a result, U.S. investors may not be able to enforce against us or certain of our directors, or certain experts named herein who are residents of Switzerland or countries other than the United States, any judgments obtained in U.S. courts in civil and commercial matters, including judgments under the U.S. federal securities laws.

We are organized under the laws of Switzerland and our jurisdiction of incorporation is Plan-les-Ouates, Geneva, Switzerland. Moreover, a number of our directors and executive officers and a number of directors of each of our subsidiaries are not residents of the United States, and all or a substantial portion of the assets of such persons are located outside the United States. As a result, it may not be possible for investors to effect service of process within the United States upon us or upon such persons or to enforce against them judgments obtained in U.S. courts, including judgments in actions predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the federal securities laws of the United States. We have been advised by our Swiss counsel that there is doubt as to the enforceability in Switzerland of original actions, or in actions for enforcement of judgments of U.S. courts, of civil liabilities to the extent predicated upon the federal and state securities laws of the United States. Original actions against persons in Switzerland based solely upon the U.S. federal or state securities laws are governed, among other things, by the principles set forth in the Swiss Federal Act on International Private Law of 1987, as amended, or PILA. This statute provides that the application of provisions of non-Swiss law by the courts in Switzerland shall be precluded if the result was incompatible with Swiss public policy. Also, mandatory provisions of Swiss law may be applicable regardless of any other law that would otherwise apply.

Switzerland and the United States do not have a treaty providing for reciprocal recognition of and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters. The recognition and enforcement of a judgment of the courts of the United States in Switzerland is governed by the principles set forth in the PILA. This statute provides in principle that a judgment rendered by a non-Swiss court may be enforced in Switzerland only if:

25

Table of Contents

We currently qualify as a foreign private issuer and, as a result, we are not subject to U.S. proxy rules and are subject to reporting obligations under the Exchange Act, that, to some extent, are more lenient and less frequent than those of a U.S. domestic public company.

We report under the Exchange Act as a non-U.S. company with foreign private issuer status. Because we qualify as a foreign private issuer under the Exchange Act, we are exempt from certain provisions of the Exchange Act that are applicable to U.S. domestic public companies, including (i) the sections of the Exchange Act regulating the solicitation of proxies, consents, or authorizations in respect of a security registered under the Exchange Act; (ii) the sections of the Exchange Act requiring insiders to file public reports of their stock ownership and trading activities and liability for insiders who profit from trades made in a short period of time; and (iii) the rules under the Exchange Act requiring the filing with the SEC of quarterly reports on Form 10-Q containing unaudited financial and other specified information or current reports on Form 8-K, upon the occurrence of specified significant events. In addition, foreign private issuers are not required to file their annual report on Form 20-F until 120 days after the end of each fiscal year, while U.S. domestic issuers that are accelerated filers are required to file their annual report on Form 10-K within 75 days after the end of each fiscal year. Foreign private issuers also are exempt from Regulation Fair Disclosure, aimed at preventing issuers from making selective disclosures of material information. As a result of the above, you may not have the same protections afforded to shareholders of companies that are not foreign private issuers.

As a foreign private issuer and as permitted by the listing requirements of Nasdaq, we follow certain Swiss corporate governance rules instead of certain corporate governance requirements of Nasdaq.

As a foreign private issuer, we follow certain of our home country corporate governance rules instead of certain corporate governance requirements of Nasdaq. For example, we are exempt from Nasdaq regulations that require a listed U.S. company to:

For an overview of our corporate governance principles, including those which comply with certain of the requirements above, see the section titled “Description of Share Capital and Articles of Association

In accordance with our Nasdaq listing, our Audit Committee is required to comply with the provisions of Section 301 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and Rule 10A-3 of the Exchange Act, both of which also are applicable to Nasdaq-listed U.S. companies. To the extent we determine to follow Swiss corporate governance practices instead of Nasdaq governance requirements applicable to domestic issuers, you may not have the same protections afforded to shareholders of companies that are subject to these Nasdaq requirements.

​

26

Table of Contents

We may lose our foreign private issuer status, which would then require us to comply with the Exchange Act’s domestic reporting regime and Nasdaq’s corporate governance requirements applicable to a domestic issuer, and cause us to incur significant incremental legal, accounting and other expenses.

Although we currently qualify as a foreign private issuer, in order to maintain this status, as of each June either (a) a majority of our shares, including shares represented by ADSs, must be either directly or indirectly owned of record by non-residents of the United States or (b)(i) a majority of our executive officers or directors must not be U.S. citizens or residents, (ii) more than 50 percent of our assets must be located outside of the United States and (iii) our business must be administered principally outside of the United States. If we lose our status as a foreign private issuer, we would be required to comply with the Exchange Act reporting and other requirements applicable to U.S. domestic issuers, on January 1 of the succeeding year which are more detailed and extensive than the requirements for foreign private issuers. We would also be required to make changes in our corporate governance practices in accordance with various SEC and Nasdaq rules. The regulatory and compliance costs to us under U.S. securities laws if we are required to comply with the reporting requirements applicable to a U.S. domestic issuer will be significantly higher than the costs that we would incur as a foreign private issuer. As a result, we expect that the loss of foreign private issuer status would increase our legal and financial compliance costs and would make some activities highly time consuming and costly.

We are an “emerging growth company,” and we cannot be certain if the reduced reporting requirements applicable to “emerging growth companies” will make ADSs representing our shares or our shares less attractive to investors.

We are an “emerging growth company” as defined in the JOBS Act. For as long as we continue to be an emerging growth company, we may take advantage of exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not emerging growth companies, including not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404, and, to the extent that we no longer qualify as a foreign private issuer, reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports and proxy statements and exemptions from the requirements of holding a nonbinding advisory vote on executive compensation including golden parachute compensation. We may take advantage of these exemptions until we are no longer an emerging growth company. We will remain an emerging growth company until the earlier to occur of (1) the last day of the fiscal year (a) December 31, 2025, (b) in which we have total annual gross revenues of at least $1.235 billion or (c) in which we are deemed to be a “large accelerated filer” under the rules of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, which means the market value of our common shares that is held by non-affiliates exceeds $700 million as of the prior June 30, and (2) the date on which we have issued more than $1.0 billion in non-convertible debt during the prior three-year period. We cannot predict if investors will find ADSs representing our shares or our shares less attractive because we may rely on these exemptions. If some investors find such securities less attractive as a result, there may be a less active trading market for ADSs representing our shares or our shares and the price of such securities may be more volatile.

If we fail to maintain an effective system of internal control over financial reporting, we may not be able to accurately report our financial results or prevent fraud. As a result, shareholders could lose confidence in our financial and other public reporting, which would harm our business and the trading price of ADSs representing our shares or our shares.

Effective internal controls over financial reporting are necessary for us to provide reliable financial reports and, together with adequate disclosure controls and procedures, are designed to prevent fraud. Any failure to implement required new or improved controls, or difficulties encountered in their implementation could cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations. In addition, any testing by us conducted in connection with Section 404, or any subsequent testing by our independent registered public accounting firm, may reveal deficiencies in our internal controls over financial reporting that are deemed to be material weaknesses or that may require prospective or retroactive changes to our financial statements or identify other areas for further attention or improvement. Inadequate internal controls could also cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information, which could have a negative effect on the trading price of ADSs representing our shares or our shares.

Management has been required to assess the effectiveness of our internal controls annually beginning with our annual report filed in 2021. However, for as long as we are an “emerging growth company” under the JOBS Act, our independent registered public accounting firm will not be required to attest to the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting pursuant to Section 404. An independent assessment of the effectiveness of our internal controls could detect problems that our management’s assessment might not. Undetected material weaknesses in our internal controls could lead to financial statement restatements requiring us to incur the expense of remediation and could also result in an adverse reaction in the financial markets due to a loss of confidence in the reliability of our financial statements.

27

Table of Contents

If securities or industry analysts do not publish research, or publish inaccurate or unfavorable research, about our business, the price of ADSs representing our shares or our shares and the trading volume thereof could decline.

The trading market for ADSs representing our shares and our shares will depend in part on the research and reports that securities or industry analysts publish about us or our business. Since we did not undertake a primary offering of ADSs representing our shares in connection with the listing of ADSs on Nasdaq, we do not anticipate that many or any industry analysts in the United States will publish such research and reports in the United States about our shares or ADSs. If no or too few securities or industry analysts commence or continue coverage on us, the trading price for ADSs representing our shares and our shares could be affected. If one or more of the analysts who may eventually cover us downgrade such ADSs or shares or publish inaccurate or unfavorable research about our business, the trading price of ADSs representing our shares or our shares would likely decline. If one or more of these analysts cease coverage of us or fail to publish reports on us regularly, demand for ADSs representing our shares or our shares could decrease, which might cause the price of such securities and the trading volume thereof to decline.

We have determined that we are a “passive foreign investment company,” or PFIC, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, for which the consequences to U.S. holders of our shares or ADSs representing our shares may be adverse.

Based on the nature and composition of our income, assets and activities for our taxable year ended December 31, 2022, and certain assumptions with respect to the characterization of our income and assets as active or passive, we believe that we were classified as a PFIC for our taxable year ended December 31, 2022 and may be a PFIC in future taxable years. U.S. Holders should consult with their tax advisors regarding the implications of owning stock in a PFIC. However, because our PFIC status is subject to a number of uncertainties and the applicable law is subject to varying interpretations, neither we nor our tax advisors can provide any assurances with respect to our PFIC status for any prior, the current, or any future taxable year. Moreover, because the calculation of the value of our assets may be based in part on the value of our shares or ADSs, the value of which may fluctuate considerably, our PFIC status may change from year to year and is difficult to predict. A separate determination must be made after the close of each taxable year as to whether we are a PFIC for that year. As a result, our PFIC status may change from year to year and we have not yet made any determination as to our expected PFIC status for the current year. In addition, our U.S. counsel expresses no opinion with respect to our PFIC status for our taxable year ended December 31, 2022, our current or any other past or future taxable year. As we determine that we are a PFIC for our taxable year ending December 31, 2022, we intend to annually provide U.S. Holders, (as defined below under the section titled “Taxation—Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations for U.S. Holders” under Item 10.E.), upon request, a “PFIC Annual Information Statement”, with the information required to allow U.S. Holders to make a “qualified electing fund” election, or “QEF Election” for United States federal income tax purposes.

Under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, a non-U.S. company will be considered a PFIC for any taxable year in which (1) 75% or more of its gross income consists of passive income or (2) 50% or more of the quarterly weighted average value of its assets consists of assets that produce, or are held for the production of, passive income. For purposes of these tests, passive income includes dividends, interest, gains from the sale or exchange of investment property and certain rents and royalties. In addition, for purposes of the above calculations, a non-U.S. corporation that directly or indirectly owns at least 25% by value of the shares of another corporation or partnership is treated as if it held its proportionate share of the assets and directly received its proportionate share of the income of such other corporation or partnership. If we are a PFIC for any taxable year during which a U.S. Holder holds our shares or ADSs representing our shares, we will continue to be treated as a PFIC with respect to such U.S. Holder in all succeeding years during which the U.S. Holder owns the shares or ADSs representing our shares, regardless of whether we continue to meet the PFIC test described above, unless the U.S. Holder makes a specified election once we cease to be a PFIC. If we are classified as a PFIC for any taxable year during which a U.S. Holder holds our shares or ADSs representing our shares, the U.S. Holder may be subject to adverse tax consequences regardless of whether we continue to qualify as a PFIC, including ineligibility for any preferred tax rates on capital gains or on actual or deemed dividends, interest charges on certain taxes treated as deferred, and additional reporting requirements. For further discussion of the PFIC rules and the adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences in the event we are classified as a PFIC, see the section titled “Taxation—Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations for U.S. Holders.” under Item 10.E. Prospective U.S. Holders are strongly urged to consult their own tax advisors with respect to the impact of PFIC status on the purchase, ownership and disposition of our shares or ADSs, the consequences to them of an investment in a PFIC, any elections available with respect to our shares or ADSs and the IRS information reporting obligations with respect to the purchase, ownership and disposition of shares or ADSs of a PFIC.

28

Table of Contents

If a United States person is treated as owning at least 10% of our shares, such holder may be subject to adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences.

If a U.S. Holder is treated as owning, directly, indirectly or constructively, at least 10% of the value or voting power of our shares (directly or in the form of ADSs representing our shares), such U.S. Holder may be treated as a “United States shareholder” with respect to each “controlled foreign corporation” in our corporate group, if any. A controlled foreign corporation is any foreign corporation in which more than 50% of the total combined voting power of classes of voting stock or the total value of the corporation is owned (or treated as owned) by United States shareholders. If such group includes one or more U.S. subsidiaries, our non-U.S. subsidiaries will be treated as controlled foreign corporations, regardless of whether we are treated as a controlled foreign corporation. A United States shareholder of a controlled foreign corporation may be required to annually report and include in its U.S. taxable income its pro rata share of “Subpart F income,” “global intangible low-taxed income” and investments in U.S. property by controlled foreign corporations, regardless of whether we make any distributions. An individual that is a United States shareholder with respect to a controlled foreign corporation generally would not be allowed certain tax deductions or foreign tax credits that would be allowed to a United States shareholder that is a U.S. corporation. Failure to comply with these reporting obligations may subject a United States shareholder to significant monetary penalties and may prevent the statute of limitations with respect to such shareholder’s U.S. federal income tax return for the year for which reporting was due from starting. We cannot provide any assurances that we will assist our investors in determining whether any of our non-U.S. subsidiaries are treated as a controlled foreign corporation or whether such investor is treated as a United States shareholder with respect to any of such controlled foreign corporations. Further, we cannot provide any assurances that we will furnish to any United States shareholder information that may be necessary to comply with the reporting and tax paying obligations described in this risk factor. U.S. Holders should consult their tax advisors regarding the potential application of these rules to their investment in our shares or ADSs representing our shares.

Tax authorities may disagree with our positions and conclusions regarding certain tax positions, resulting in unanticipated costs, taxes or non-realization of expected benefits.

A tax authority may disagree with tax positions that we have taken, which could result in increased tax liabilities. A tax authority could assert that we are subject to tax in a jurisdiction where we believe we have not established a taxable connection, often referred to as a “permanent establishment” under international tax treaties, and such an assertion, if successful, could increase our expected tax liability in one or more jurisdictions. A tax authority may take the position that material income tax liabilities, interest and penalties are payable by us, in which case, we expect that we might contest such assessment. Contesting such an assessment may be lengthy and costly and if we were unsuccessful in disputing the assessment, the result could increase our anticipated effective tax rate.

​

29

Table of Contents

B.Business Overview

Overview

We are a clinical-stage pharmaceutical company focused on the development and commercialization of an emerging class of novel orally available small molecule drugs known as allosteric modulators. Allosteric modulators target a specific receptor or protein and alter the effect of the body’s own signaling molecules on their target through a novel mechanism of action. These innovative small molecule drug candidates offer several potential advantages over conventional non-allosteric molecules and may offer an improved therapeutic approach to existing drug treatments. To date, our research and development efforts have been primarily focused on building a portfolio of proprietary drug candidates based on our allosteric modulator development capability. We believe that the allosteric modulator principle has broad applicability across a wide range of biological targets and therapeutic areas, but our primary focus is on G-protein coupled receptors, or GPCR, targets implicated in neurological diseases, where we believe there is a clear medical need for new therapeutic approaches.

Using our allosteric modulator discovery capabilities, we have developed a pipeline of proprietary clinical and preclinical stage drug candidates. We or our partners are developing these clinical and preclinical stage proprietary drug candidates for diseases for which there are no approved therapies or where improved therapies are needed including epilepsy, levodopa induced dyskinesia associated with Parkinson’s disease, or PD-LID, substance use disorder, or, SUD, Charcot-Marie-Tooth type 1A neuropathy, or CMT1A, chronic cough, pain, stress related disorders including post-traumatic stress disorder, or PTSD, schizophrenia and other neuropsychiatric and neurodegenerative disease. Some of these indications are classified as rare diseases, that may allow for orphan drug designation by regulatory agencies in major commercial markets, such as the United States, Europe and Japan. Orphan drug designation may entitle the recipient to benefits, in the jurisdiction granting the designation, such as market exclusivity following approval and assistance in clinical trial design, a reduction in user fees or tax credits related to development expenses.

Our lead drug candidate, ADX71149 is a novel orally active metabotropic glutamate receptor subtype 2 positive allosteric modulator, or mGlu2 PAM for the treatment of epilepsy. Our partner, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., or Janssen, a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson is conducting a placebo-controlled Phase 2a proof of concept clinical trial of ADX71149 in epilepsy patients since June 2021, as well as an open label study since the third quarter of 2022. Part 1 of the study has been completed and an independant interim review committee, or IRC review to determine the next steps for the program is expected at the beginning of the second quarter of 2023. Under our agreement with Janssen, Janssen is responsible for financing the development and commercialization, if any, of ADX71149.

Our second drug candidate, dipraglurant, a metabotropic glutamate receptor subtype 5 negative allosteric modulator, or mGlu5 NAM, is currently under evaluation for future development in a range of potential therapeutic indications including PD-LID, stroke recovery, SUD and pain. As part of this evaluation, we have initiated discussions with potential strategic partners with the objective of collaborating for future development. We received orphan drug designation from the United States Food and Drug Administration, or FDA, for dipraglurant in PD-LID and completed a Phase 2 proof of concept study. On June 17, 2022, we terminated our US registration program including a pivotal Phase 2B/3 study and an open label study in PD-LID due to slow recruitment of patients.

We are also conducting a research program under our strategic partnership with Indivior PLC, or Indivior, to discover novel orally available gamma-aminobutyric acid subtype B receptor positive allosteric modulators, or GABAB PAMs. We are currently in clinical candidate selection phase and expect IND enabling studies to be initiated in 2024. Under the terms of the agreement with Indivior, we have the right to select drug candidates for development in certain exclusive indications outside SUD. We plan to develop our selected drug candidates in CMT1a, chronic cough and pain, indications that have been clinically validated with baclofen, an orthosteric agonist of GABAB, and where we believe there is a significant unmet medical need and commercial opportunity.

Allosteric modulators have broad applicability for many clinically validated GPCR targets which are implicated in multiple therapeutic indications. We intend to continue to leverage our scientific expertise in allosteric modulation and our proprietary technology platform to discover novel drug candidates for the treatment of neurological diseases. Three of the most advanced programs include:

​

30

Table of Contents

MGlu7 NAM for stress related disorders including PTSD. We are developing mGlu7 NAM as a novel orally available treatment to reduce fear memory in PTSD, a disorder that can lead to intense fear and anxiety. Current medication is unspecific and ineffective, with a number of side effects. By selectively targeting mGlu7 with NAMs, the brain circuitries involved in fear and anxiety can be more precisely modulated, potentially resulting in a more focused response and fewer side effects than current therapeutic approaches. Subject to regulatory approval, we believe our mGlu7 NAM may offer an innovative and differentiated treatment approach from existing therapies. The program has completed clinical candidate selection phase and we expect to initiate IND enabling studies in the second half of 2023.

MGlu2 NAM for the treatment of mild neurocognitive disorders, or mNCD. We are developing mGlu2 NAM as a novel orally available treatment for mNCD associated with Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease and depressive disorders. The program has entered clinical candidate selection phase and we expect to enter IND enabling studies in 2024.

M4 PAM for the treatment of schizophrenia and other psychosis. We are developing M4 PAM as a novel orally available treatment for schizophrenia and other psychosis. We are currently optimizing multiple chemical series of highly selective M4 PAMs compounds and expect to enter into clinical candidate selection phase in late 2023.

Based on our expertise in allosteric modulation, our goal is to build a leading neuroscience company focused on conditions where current treatment options are limited and where unmet medical needs exist. Our business strategy includes the possibility of entering into collaborative arrangements with third parties to complete the development and commercialization of our proprietary drug candidates, such as our partnership with Janssen for ADX71149 and our strategic partnership with Indivior for GABAB PAM. We cannot forecast with any degree of certainty which proprietary products or indications, if any, will be subject to future collaborative arrangements, in whole or in part, and how such arrangements would affect our development plan or capital requirements. To date, we have secured grants and other funding from: The Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson’s Research, or MJFF, for the development of dipraglurant for the treatment of PD-LID; the National Institute of Drug Abuse, or NIDA, to generate important data on the role of GABAB in substance use disorder; the Swiss Innovation Agency, or Innosuisse, to advance our understanding of the role of our drug candidates in neurodegenerative and psychiatric diseases; the Eurostars Joint Programme, or Eurostars to identify novel drug candidates on mGlu7 NAM for PTSD; and the Charcot-Marie-Tooth Association, or CMTA to evaluate the role of GABAB PAM compounds in preclinical models of CMT1A. As we advance our clinical and preclinical programs, we will continue to apply for subsidies, grants and government or agency sponsored studies that could offset or reduce our development costs.The development and commercialization of drugs is highly competitive. We compete with a variety of multinational pharmaceutical companies and specialized pharmaceutical companies, including products approved for marketing and/or drug candidates under development, for each of the drug candidates and each of the indications for which we are developing.

Furthermore, Government authorities in the United States, at the federal, state and local levels, and in other countries, extensively regulate, among other things, the research, development, testing, manufacture, packaging, storage, recordkeeping, labeling, advertising, promotion, distribution, marketing, import and export of pharmaceutical products, such as those we are developing. The processes for obtaining regulatory approvals in the United States and in foreign countries, along with subsequent compliance with applicable statutes and regulations, require the expenditure of substantial time and financial resources.

Research and Development Portfolio

Using our allosteric modulator platform and drug discovery and development expertise, we have established a portfolio of clinical and preclinical programs, internally and with partners.

Externally Developed Out-licensed Drug Candidate

​

31

Table of Contents

ADX71149, mGlu2 PAM for the treatment of epilepsy. Our partnered drug candidate, ADX71149 is a novel orally active mGlu2 PAM. Our partner, Janssen, has completed Phase 1 and two Phase 2a clinical trials in schizophrenia and anxious depression, respectively. Janssen has conducted several preclinical studies in epilepsy and is conducting a placebo-controlled Phase 2a proof of concept clinical trial of ADX71149 in epilepsy patients since June 2021 and an open label study since the third quarter of 2022. Part 1 of the study has been completed and an IRC review to determine the next steps for the program is expected at the beginning of the second quarter of 2023. Under our agreement with Janssen, Janssen is responsible for financing the development and commercialization, if any, of ADX71149.

Internally Developed Drug Candidates

Dipraglurant, mGlu5 NAM under evaluation for future development. Our lead drug candidate, dipraglurant, is a novel orally active mGlu5 NAM currently under evaluation for future development in a range of potential therapeutic indications including PD-LID, post-stroke recovery, SUD and pain. As part of this evaluation, we have initiated discussions with potential partners with the objective of collaborating with a potential strategic partner for the future development of dipraglurant.

We received orphan drug designation from the United States Food and Drug Administration, or FDA, for dipraglurant in PD-LID and completed a Phase 2 proof of concept study. On June 17, 2022, we terminated our US registration program including a pivotal Phase 2B/3 study and an open label study in PD-LID due to slow recruitment of patients.

Material Internal Research Programs

​

​

32

Table of Contents

GABAB PAM for the treatment of substance use disorder. Our partner, Indivior, has licensed worldwide rights to our GABAB PAM program and is responsible for all development, manufacture and commercialization of any selected GABAB PAM drug candidates. Under the agreement, we are responsible for executing a research program funded by Indivior to discover novel drug candidates. Indivior has the right to select GABAB PAM drug candidates from our research program. We are in clinical candidate selection phase and expect IND enabling studies to be initiated in 2024. Indivior’s primary focus is substance use disorder. We believe that substance use disorder is an indication with a significant commercial opportunity. Existing therapies often do not provide effective control of symptoms or have side effects that discourage adherence. Subject to regulatory approval, we believe that GABAB PAM may offer an innovative and differentiated treatment approach from existing therapies and may provide benefit to patients.

GABAB PAM for the treatment of CMT1A, chronic cough and pain. Our license agreement with Indivior provides for a funded research program, under which we have the right to select drug candidates for exclusive development in certain indications outside of SUD. We plan to develop our selected drug candidates in CMT1a, chronic cough and pain. These indications have been validated with baclofen, an orthosteric agonist of GABAB and present a significant unmet medical need and commercial opportunity. We are in clinical candidate selection phase and expect IND enabling studies to be initiated in 2024.

mGlu7 NAM for the treatment of stress related disorders including PTSD. We are developing mGlu7 NAM as a novel orally available treatment to reduce fear memory in PTSD, a disorder that can lead to intense fear and anxiety. Current medication is unspecific and ineffective, with a number of side effects. By selectively targeting mGlu7 with NAMs, the brain circuitries involved in fear and anxiety can be more precisely modulated, potentially resulting in a more focused response and fewer side effects than current therapeutic approaches. Subject to regulatory approval, we believe our mGlu7 NAM may offer an innovative and differentiated treatment approach from existing therapies. We have selected a drug candidate and we expect to initiate IND enabling studies in the second half of 2023.

mGlu2 NAM for the treatment of mild neurocognitive disorders, or mNCD. We are developing mGlu2 NAM as a novel orally available treatment for mNCD associated with Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease and depressive disorders. The program has entered clinical candidate selection phase and we expect to enter IND enabling studies in 2024.

Early-Stage Internal Research Programs

​

M4 PAM for the treatment of Schizophrenia and Psychosis. We are developing M4 PAM as a novel orally available treatment for schizophrenia and other psychoses. We are currently optimizing multiple chemical series of highly selective M4 PAMs with compounds in late lead optimization.

mGlu4 PAM for the treatment of Parkinson’s disease. We are developing mGlu4 PAM as a novel orally available treatment for Parkinson’s disease. We are currently optimizing multiple chemical series of highly selective mGlu4 PAMs with compounds in early lead optimization.

33

Table of Contents

mGlu3 PAM for the treatment of neurodegenerative disorders. We are developing mGlu3 PAM as a novel orally available treatment for neurodegenerative disorders. We are currently optimizing multiple chemical series of highly selective mGlu3 PAMs, with compounds in early lead optimization.

Introduction to Allosteric Modulation

Disease and the Role of Proteins

Proteins are complex biological molecules that have many structural and functional roles in the body. They are critical components in the lines of communication between the cells of the body known as signaling pathways. It is now recognized that signaling pathways are altered in many disease states through changes in the function of essential proteins underlying the series of cellular events required for normal biological activity. Most drug treatments are focused on modifying these biological signaling pathways by altering the activity profile of selected proteins suspected to play a key role in the manifestation of a particular disease. The major proteins targeted in drug discovery include membrane-bound receptors, such as G-protein coupled receptors, or GPCRs, or ionotropic (ion channels) receptors and enzymes.

GPCRs as Drug Targets

GPCRs are the largest family of integral membrane receptors, accounting for approximately 3-4% of the human genome. GPCRs have evolved to recognize a range of endogenous stimuli and act to transmit messages encoded in stimuli from the exterior to the interior of the cell. The ubiquitous cell surface distribution of GPCRs and their involvement in virtually all biological processes have made GPCRs extremely attractive targets for drug development. In fact, most currently marketed drugs act on GPCRs, emphasizing their importance for drug development.

Conventional Approaches to GPCR Drug Discovery

The drug discovery process involves the design of molecules that interact with a target with high specificity and efficacy. Traditional approaches to drug discovery focus on mimicking or inhibiting the actions of the endogenous activator for a target receptor. Conventionally, this has been done by the design and chemical synthesis of small molecule agonists (activators) or antagonists (inhibitors) that act in a competitive manner through interaction with the same binding site as the endogenous activator.

Competitive agonists and antagonists must have a sufficiently high affinity for the target receptor to displace the endogenous activator and must be maintained at a sufficiently high concentration in the region of the receptor in order to exert an effect. Under these conditions, agonists will induce an activated state and antagonists will induce an inactivated state, and in both states, receptors will not be responsive to natural fluctuations in the levels of endogenous activator, thereby interfering with normal physiological signaling.

Although this approach has historically yielded a number of blockbuster drugs, such as Clopidogrel, or Plavix, Salmeterol, or Serevent, and Aripiprazole, or Abilify, significant challenges remain with respect to the continued development of therapeutically useful GPCR competitive agonists or antagonists due to either lack of receptor selectivity or undesirable side effects.

Allosteric Modulators as GPCR Drugs

In contrast to competitive orthosteric compounds, allosteric modulators of GPCRs interact with binding sites that are topographically distinct from the binding site of the endogenous activator, and therefore do not compete with the endogenous activator. This means that allosteric modulators do not activate or inhibit receptors on their own, but only in the presence of an endogenous activator do they enhance (positively modulate) or inhibit (negatively modulate) the natural physiological activity of the receptor. Consequently, allosteric modulators offer the possibility to preserve normal physiological receptor function while controlling pathologic activity caused by over- or under-activation of an endogenous receptor.

34

Table of Contents

We believe that by applying this non-competitive allosteric modulator approach, we may be able to produce efficacious drug candidates with potentially beneficial properties:

Orally available brain penetrant small molecule drug candidates that are highly selective for their therapeutic targets and interact with their target in a modulatory manner preserving natural physiological signaling are particularly suitable for neurological diseases.

Our Platform and Competitive Positioning in Allosteric Modulation

We believe that we have a recognized expertise in allosteric modulator R&D. Since our inception in 2002, we have focused exclusively on allosteric modulation drug discovery and development. We have engaged leading experts in the field of allosteric modulation who have years of experience in both industry and academia, including Robert Lutjens, our Head of Discovery Biology, Jean-Philippe Rocher, our Head of Discovery Chemistry and Mikhail Kalinichev, our Head of Translational Science.

We have established a unique chemical library of more than 70,000 allosteric modulator compounds, in addition to highly specialized biological systems that are required for the identification and screening of high affinity, orally active small molecule allosteric modulators. Combined with our allosteric modulator library, these high-throughput detection systems have enabled us to build what we believe to be the largest clinical and pre-clinical portfolio of proprietary allosteric modulator compounds.

​

35

Table of Contents

Our lead development compound has been licensed to Janssen, a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson, who is conducting a placebo- controlled Phase 2a proof of concept clinical trial of ADX71149, an mGlu2 PAM, in epilepsy patients since June 2021. Part 1 of the study has completed enrolment and an IRC review to determine the next steps for the program is expected at the beginning of the second first quarter of 2023.

Our second development compound, dipraglurant, an mGlu5 NAM, is under evaluation for future development in a range of potential therapeutic indications including PD-LID, post-stroke recovery, SUD and pain. As part of this evaluation, we have initiated discussions with potential strategic partners with the objective of collaborating for future development

Furthermore, we believe the depth of our in-house discovered portfolio further demonstrates our expertise in the allosteric modulation field.

Our Strategy

Based on our expertise in allosteric modulation, our goal is to build a leading neuroscience company focused on conditions where current treatment options are limited and where unmet medical needs exist. Since our inception, we have raised an aggregate of CHF 349.4 million in equity financing and generated an aggregate of CHF 64.8 million in revenue, which we have used to build our proprietary allosteric modulator technology platform and our pipeline of drug candidates. The key elements of our strategy include the following:

36

Table of Contents

Our Strengths

Our current strategic focus is the development of certain proprietary drug candidates in our existing portfolio. We believe that we have a number of competitive advantages that distinguish us from our competitors:

​

37

Table of Contents

Externally Developed Out-licensed Product Candidate

ADX71149 for the treatment of Epilepsy

Epilepsy is one of the most common serious neurological disorders affecting about 65 million people globally (Thurman et al. 2011). It affects 1% of the population by age 20 and 3% of the population by age 75 (Holmes et al. 2008). Epilepsy describes a condition in which a person has recurrent seizures due to a chronic, underlying process. Epilepsy refers to a clinical phenomenon rather than a single disease entity, since there are many forms and causes. Epilepsy is defined by any of the following conditions: (1) at least two unprovoked (or reflex) seizures occurring >24 hours apart; (2) one unprovoked (or reflex) seizure and a probability of further seizures similar to the general recurrence risk (at least 60)% after two unprovoked seizures, occurring over the next 10 years; (3) diagnosis of an epilepsy syndrome (Fisher et al. 2014). The synaptic vesicle protein 2A, or SV2A has been identified as a broad spectrum anti-convulsant target in models of partial and generalized epilepsy, and studies in animal models and human tissue suggest that changes in the expression of SV2A are implicated in epilepsy (Mendoza-Torreblanca et al. 2013; Kaminski et al. 2012). SV2A ligands include levetiracetam (Lynch et al. 2004), which is an anti-epileptic drug commercialized under trademark Keppra^®, is approved in Europe and the USA as a monotherapy or add-on therapy in patients diagnosed with epilepsy.

Our partnered drug candidate, ADX71149, is a novel orally active mGlu2 PAM. Our partner, Janssen, has completed Phase 1 and two Phase 2a clinical trials in schizophrenia and anxious depression, respectively. Janssen has announced that ADX71149 has been extensively profiled in preclinical models of epilepsy showing both standalone activity and in combination with SV2A ligands including Keppra. Janssen has patented the combination of mGlu2 PAM with SV2A ligands for the treatment of epilepsy and is conducting a placebo-controlled Phase 2a proof of concept clinical trial of ADX71149 in epilepsy patients since June 2021, as well as an open label study since the third quarter of 2022. Part 1 of the study has been completed and an IRC review to determine the next steps for the program is expected at the end of the secound quarter of 2023.

Epilepsy is an indication with a large commercial opportunity. Existing therapies frequently provide ineffective control of symptoms or have side effects that discourage adherence. We believe that, subject to regulatory approval, ADX71149 may provide a substantial benefit to patients. Under our agreement with Janssen, Janssen is responsible for, including the financing of, development and commercialization, if any, of ADX71149.

Our Internally Developed Product Candidates

Dipraglurant

Dipraglurant is a selective, orally active small molecule drug product which acts as an mGlu5 NAM. We discovered dipraglurant and hold composition of matter and polymorph patents granted in the United States, Europe and Japan. Dipraglurant is selective for mGlu5 and does not have significant activity or binding affinity to other mGlu or other CNS receptors, such as serotonin, GABA or dopamine receptors. There are currently no drugs of this class on the market.

Dipraglurant, mGlu5 NAM under evaluation for future development

Our lead drug candidate, dipraglurant, is a novel orally active mGlu5 NAM currently under evaluation for future development in a range of potential therapeutic indications including PD-LID, post-stroke recovery, SUD and pain. As part of this evaluation, we have initiated discussions with potential partners with the objective of collaborating with a potential strategic partner for the future development of dipraglurant and aim to select the lead indication and initiate a Phase 2 study in 2023. We received orphan drug designation from the United States Food and Drug Administration, or FDA, for dipraglurant in PD-LID and completed a Phase 2 proof of concept study. On June 17, 2022, we terminated our US registration program including a pivotal Phase 2B/3 study and an open label study in PD-LID due to slow recruitment.

Parkinson’s disease is a progressive neurodegenerative disease that results in the loss of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra, or SN. One consequence of the depletion of dopamine in this disease is a series of movement disorders, including bradykinesia, akinesia, tremor, gait disorders and problems with balance. Early in the course of the disease, these motor symptoms of Parkinson’s disease are effectively treated by dopamine replacement with the use of levodopa or dopamine D2 receptor agonists or monoamine oxidase B inhibitors. However, as the disease progresses, these agents become less effective in controlling motor symptoms and PD-LID often emerges.

38

Table of Contents

PD-LID is involuntary movement that may affect any body area, including the face, trunk or limbs. Oral levodopa is currently the most effective treatment available for motor symptoms associated with Parkinson’s disease. However, long term levodopa use is often associated with the development of dyskinesia, which may be as disabling as the symptoms of Parkinson’s disease.

Dyskinesias are comprised principally of two types of movement: chorea, which is a rapid uncontrolled movement, and dystonia, which is a slow, often painful, writhing movement.

Even though levodopa provides more effective motor symptom control than other currently available therapies, physicians tend to delay use of levodopa use for as long as possible, using dopamine agonists or monoamine oxidase B inhibitors in the early stages of the disease, due to the inexorable onset of dyskinesia onset with levodopa use. Dopamine agonists and monoamine oxidase B inhibitors become less effective as Parkinson’s disease progresses and are associated with dose limiting side effects, including Impulse Control Disorders, or ICDs, such as pathological addictions to gambling, shopping, eating or sex.

The occurrence of PD-LID is linked to the neurodegenerative process of PD and is not solely related to the duration of dopamine replacement therapy. For instance, in severe advanced stage Parkinson’s disease patients, dyskinesia can be provoked after a first high dose of levodopa. Chronic or high dose dopamine replacement treatments alone do not lead to dyskinesia, but may lower the threshold for dyskinesia occurrence following dosing, as neurodegeneration progresses. Efforts to reduce the use of high doses of levodopa or dopamine agonists, by using more frequent lower doses or extended release formulations, can improve dyskinesias but may be at the expense of optimal motor function. In the later stages of Parkinson’s disease, the patient and physician have to balance good motor symptom control against the occurrence of levodopa-induced dyskinesia.

If dyskinesia could be effectively treated, or even delayed or eliminated, it is likely that doctors would use levodopa earlier in the treatment of Parkinson’s disease. Currently available therapies, such as amantadine and Deep Brain Stimulation, or DBS surgery, often have limited effectiveness or tolerance in patients. The response of patients varies widely to amantadine, which in its generic form is commonly used off label to treat dyskinesia. Typically, amantadine only works for some, if any, dyskinesias suffered by a patient. Amantadine often has side effects which may limit its use, and some patients do not tolerate it at all. Some of the more common side effects of amantadine include blurred vision, digestive issues, postural hypotension, dizziness, falls, ankle oedema, drowsiness, trouble sleeping, depression and psychotic symptoms. DBS surgery, a non-pharmacological treatment strategy, is used primarily for patients whose symptoms cannot be satisfactorily controlled with medications. Patients experience varied results with DBS surgery, and even patients who experience better motor symptom control with DBS surgery may have continued symptoms of dyskinesia. Furthermore, many patients are unwilling to undergo DBS surgery, since it is a costly, invasive surgical procedure that could result in complications.

39

Table of Contents

Figure 1: Pharmacokinetic profile of Dipraglurant and L-Dopa in Humans

The rapid absorption and relatively short half-life of dipraglurant in the current immediate-release, or IR, formulation is thought to be well suited for use in PD-LID. The pharmacokinetic, or PK, profile of dipraglurant (IR) mirrors that of levodopa with peak plasma concentration occurring around the same time as that of levodopa and the duration of plasma exposure covering that of the “On” period (the time when levodopa is having its effect, Figure 1). Dyskinesia occurs predominantly during the period immediately following levodopa dosing; troublesome peak-dose dyskinesia (dyskinesia which severely interferes with the patient’s daily activity) usually appears as levodopa reaches C_max and parallels the period of maximal clinical benefit. Based on its similar PK profile, dipraglurant is expected to optimally inhibit the abnormal glutamate stimulation during peak levodopa dose, while releasing the receptor during normal activity. Furthermore, dipraglurant will wash out between doses, releasing the mGlu5 receptor when not required, i.e: when levodopa has worn off.

Dipraglurant completed Phase 2a PD-LID clinical trial

We evaluated the efficacy, safety and tolerability of dipraglurant at 50 and 100 mg in a Phase 2a proof-of-concept four weeks, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group out-patient clinical trial in 76 patients with Parkinson’s disease (dipraglurant n = 52, placebo n = 24) with moderate or severe LID. The study was conducted in 25 centers in the United States, France, Germany and Austria. The severity of LID was evaluated by both clinicians and the patients using the modified Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale, or mAIMS, patient diaries and the patient global impression of change, or PGIC, and the clinician global impression of change, or CGIC, for both dyskinesia and motor symptoms of Parkinson’s disease. Motor symptoms of Parkinson’s disease were assessed using the Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale, or UPDRS.

The Phase 2a proof of concept clinical trial of dipraglurant in PD-LID met its primary end point, was generally well tolerated and no clinically significant abnormalities of safety monitoring parameters occurred. In addition, dipraglurant showed statistically significant effects on PD-LID as measured using mAIMS at Day 1 and Day 14. However, an increasing placebo response resulted in the effect of dipraglurant on PD-LID symptoms not showing statistical significance at Day 28.

40

Table of Contents

Figure 2: Dipraglurant Phase 2a PD-LID clinical trial design

Figure 3: Dipraglurant Phase 2a PD-LID clinical trial dosing schedule

Patients were randomized to receive either active or placebo treatment at a 2:1 ratio. A blinded dose-titration regimen was employed over the first 3 weeks of treatment. Following the initial intake of a single capsule containing 50 mg or matching placebo, dose and dosing frequency were progressively escalated up to the target regimen of 100 mg tid (total daily dose of 300 mg) beginning on Day 22; the up-titration scheme was customizable based on tolerability. Dyskinesia was measured using the mAIMS at the mid-day does of dipraglurant and levodopa on Day 1, 14 and 28. Due to the short half-life of dipraglurant the acute effect of 50mg dose was measured on Day 1 and the acute effect of 100mg dose was measure on Day 14 and Day 28.

Outcome Measures

The primary objective of the study was safety and tolerability. This was assessed based on vital signs, physical and neurological examination, electrocardiogram, or ECG, laboratory tests, and AE monitoring.

Secondary efficacy outcome measures included the mAIMS, UPDRS Part III and patient diaries.

The main efficacy endpoint was severity of dyskinesia determined with mAIMS for dyskinesia in face, neck, trunk, and each of the upper and lower limbs. At screening, patients had to specify a dose of levodopa between 10.30 am and 3.30 pm that was regularly associated with moderate to severe dyskinesia. As severity of dyskinesia generally correlates with the plasma concentration of levodopa (peak dose dyskinesia) and as T_max of dipraglurant is comparable, study medication was to be taken within 15 minutes prior to levodopa. Dyskinesia following this midday dose was assessed by the mAIMS on Days 0, 1, 14 and 28.

41

Table of Contents

Figure 4: MMRM analysis of the effect of dipraglurant on the peak mAIMS score reported as reduction from baseline

The above figure shows the effect of dipraglurant on dyskinesia as measured using the mAIMS at Day 1, 14 and 28. Dipraglurant reduced dyskinesia compared to placebo at all visits over the 28 days and showed statistically significant effects at Day 1 and 14 as well as improvements of ≥30% at Day 14 which were sustained through Day 28. The level of improvement with dipraglurant at each time point and Day 28 was about twice that of placebo. However, an increasing placebo response resulted in the effect of dipraglurant on PD-LID symptoms not showing statistical significance at Day 28. We believe the dose titration technique employed along with the 2:1 randomization of active to placebo, as well as the fact that placebo-mitigating techniques were not deployed in the study, contributed to the placebo response.

Figure 5: Dipraglurant cumulative % of PD-LID patients showing > 30% change of peak mAIMS from baseline

42

Table of Contents

Responders were defined as those patients reaching at least 30% improvement in peak mAIMS scores compared to baseline. At all visits, the percentage of responders was higher in the dipraglurant-treated group than in the placebo group and, on Days 14 and 28, exceeded 50% and showed a statistically significant difference over placebo.

Figure 6: Clinician rated global impression of change in LID patients after administration of dipraglurant and placebo

There was a significant improvement in the CGI-C as determined by the investigators. Figure 6 summarizes the results across each score level and for each treatment group at Day 28. The CGIC for improvement of dyskinesia was assessed by the investigating physician at Day 28 compared to baseline. The dipraglurant group improved by 71.2% versus 49.9% for the placebo group at Day 28 (p < 0.05).

Other Secondary Measures of Efficacy

Dipraglurant did not worsen motor control

UPDRS Part III scores in the post-levodopa dosing period did not differ between treatment groups. There was no evidence that dipraglurant led to increased parkinsonism or “Off” periods. This was an expected result given the mechanism of action, but was important to establish, as it confirms that the anti-dyskinetic benefits observed with treatment did not come at the cost of worsened motor control.

Patient reported effects on PD motor symptoms and dyskinesia—diary data

Mean daily “Off” time tended to decrease in each treatment group in weeks 1, 2 and 3, but at week 4, “Off” time decreased by about 50 minutes per day in the dipraglurant group versus an increase of about 9 minutes in the placebo group. Although, the week 4 difference was not statistically significant, or NSS (the study was not powered to detect such changes), it remains interesting and suggests the potential for additional benefits of treatment in this patient population.

43

Table of Contents

Figure 7. Pattern of motor complications of dipraglurant group patients over the course of a day, as reported in patients’ diaries—baseline versus week 4

Baseline

​

Week 4

The mean daily percentage of time in “On” with no dyskinesia increased in both treatment groups. At week 4, the dipraglurant group showed a 2.28 hours increase compared to 1.78 hours for the placebo group (NSS).

44

Table of Contents

Overall, there were more patients in the dipraglurant group who reported “On” time without (w/o) dyskinesia and fewer patients reporting “On” time with dyskinesia (Figure 7). In this analysis, dipraglurant treatment improved the percentage of patients in “On” time without LID from morning to late afternoon.

Safety and Tolerability Data

This first study in PD patients met its primary objective and generally demonstrated tolerability for dipraglurant taken at doses of up to 100 mg tid for 4 weeks. The types of adverse events, or AEs, observed in PD patients up to 75 years of age were generally similar to those seen in healthy normal subjects. Fifty-two patients were exposed to the study drug vs. 24 patients on placebo.

The overall incidence of treatment emergent adverse events, or TEAEs, for the 4-week treatment period was 88.5% for the dipraglurant group compared to 75% for placebo. As doses increased over the titration period, an increase in AE incidence was observed. In Weeks 1 and 2, AE incidence was 53.8% for patients receiving dipraglurant 50 mg vs. 58.3% for placebo and, in Weeks 3 and 4, it was 73.1% for dipraglurant 100 mg vs. 62.5% for placebo. In both treatment groups, AEs occurred most commonly in the central nervous system (51.9% dipraglurant vs. 45.8% placebo).

The only significantly increased event compared to placebo was nausea. Although dyskinesia or worsening of dyskinesia was reported more frequently for dipraglurant than for placebo (n=11 vs. 3; 21.2% vs. 12.5)%, there was no pattern to these reports and most were transient. In addition, 3 of the 11 patients who reported worsening dyskinesia in the treated group did so only in the follow-up period (i.e. when not taking the drug), thus the dyskinesia recurred only after therapy had stopped. Therefore, the adjusted AE% was similar, 15.3% for dipraglurant vs. 12.5% for placebo.

Two patients withdrew due to TEAEs. Both were in the dipraglurant group at the 100 mg dose level.

Only one severe AE occurred in the dipraglurant group, and, as it occurred 2 days after the end of treatment, it was considered unrelated to study medication.

Clinical laboratory tests in the study (biochemistry, hematology and urinalysis) did not show any relevant differences, neither over time nor between groups. There were no clinically significant ECG changes that occurred in the study in patients receiving dipraglurant.

​

45

Table of Contents

Dipraglurant in PD motor symptoms

There is an increasing body of literature that suggests that inhibiting mGlu5 in the striatopallidal pathway may also improve the motor symptoms of PD and may also prevent excitotoxic damage to the substantia nigra. Dipraglurant was investigated in the haloperidol induced catalepsy (HIC) model, an animal model of Parkinson’s disease. Haloperidol is an antagonist of the dopamine D2 receptor and overcoming the catalepsy (immobility) induced by haloperidol administration is suggestive of antiparkinsonian activity and may also have relevance for other movement disorders, such as tardive dyskinesia and dystonia, where reduced activity of dopamine D2 receptors is implicated. In the rat HIC model, dipraglurant reduced the amount of time rats were immobile, in a dose dependent manner. The effective plasma concentration was similar to that for the treatment of dyskinesia in the MPTP macaque and that which was seen to be effective in PD-LID patients. The suggestion of antiparkinsonian activity was also supported by observations in the Phase 2a clinical trial. In week 4 of treatment, patients reported an average “Off” time reduction of 50 minutes per day. Also, both patients and clinicians reported improvements in PD symptoms compared to placebo. Although none of these results were statistically significant, the observations were interesting and were noted by the PD experts who took part in the trials. PD motor symptom effects will continue to be evaluated in the larger pivotal clinical trials.

Dipraglurant in PD non-motor symptoms

As well as suffering from difficulty with poor and uncontrolled motor symptoms, PD patients also suffer from a wide variety of non-motor symptoms. Among these are affective disorders (e.g., anxiety, depression and anhedonia) and compulsive behavioral disorders (e.g., sex, alcohol, gambling, and shopping addiction). These compulsive behaviors are particularly linked to treatment with dopamine agonists and more specifically to those which act on the dopamine D3 receptor as well as D2 (e.g. pramipexole). Inhibition of mGlu5 is pre-clinically and clinically validated for the treatment of anxiety and depression, although no mGlu5 inhibitors are yet marketed for these indications. Also, inhibition of mGlu5 has been shown to have anti-addictive properties in a number of animal models, including cocaine self-administration in rats. These data suggest that mGlu5 inhibition may potentially have utility in treating certain non-motor symptoms of PD.

Material Internal Research Programs

GABAB PAM

Activation of the GABAB, receptor, a Family C class of GPCR, is clinically and commercially validated. Generic GABAB receptor agonist, baclofen, also known as chlorophenibut, is marketed for spasticity and some spinal cord injuries, and used for overactive bladder, or OAB, but is not commonly used due to a variety of side effects of the drug and its rapid clearance. Researchers have shown that baclofen is effective in reducing drug self-administration, cravings, and anxiety, and thus promotes abstinence.

Our GABAB PAM drug candidates are novel, orally available, small molecules that have demonstrated positive effects and tolerability in several preclinical rodent models of pain, anxiety, addiction and OAB and have also shown activity in a genetic model of CMT1A. GABAB PAMs differ from the generic drug baclofen in that they are PAMs rather than orthosteric agonists at the GABAB receptor. The GABAB PAM only acts when the natural ligand (GABA) activates the receptor, and therefore respects the physiological cycle of activation. It has been proposed that PAMs produce fewer adverse effects and lead to less tolerance to effect than direct agonists (May and Christopoulos 2003; Langmead and Christopoulos 2006; Perdona et al. 2011; Urwyler 2011; Gjoni et al., 2008; Ahnaou et al).

GABAB PAM for the treatment of substance use disorders, including alcohol use disorder

Our partner, Indivior, has licensed worldwide rights to our GABAB PAM program and is responsible for all development, manufacture and commercialization of any selected GABAB PAM drug candidates. Under the agreement, we are responsible for executing a research program funded by Indivior to discover novel drug candidates. Indivior has the right to select GABAB PAM drug candidates from our research program. We are in clinical candidate selection phase and expect IND enabling studies to be initiated in 2024. Indivior’s primary focus is substance use disorder, including alcohol use disorder. We believe that substance use disorder is an indication with a significant commercial opportunity. Existing therapies often do not provide effective control of symptoms or have side effects that discourage adherence. Subject to regulatory approval, we believe that GABAB PAM may offer an innovative and differentiated treatment approach from existing therapies and may provide benefit to patients.

46

Table of Contents

Scientific advances have revolutionized our understanding of addiction as a chronic, relapsing disease and not a moral failure. Drug addiction is a complex illness which is characterized by intense and, at times, uncontrollable drug craving, along with compulsive drug seeking and use that persist even in the face of devastating consequences. Addiction affects multiple brain circuits, including those involved in reward and motivation, learning and memory, and inhibitory control over behavior. While a person initially chooses to take drugs, over time the effects of prolonged exposure on brain functioning compromise the ability to choose, and seeking and consuming the drug become compulsive, often eluding a person’s self-control or willpower. Because drug abuse and addiction have so many dimensions and disrupt so many aspects of an individual’s life, treatment is not simple. Addiction treatment must help the individual stop using drugs, maintain a drug-free lifestyle, and achieve productive functioning in the family, at work and in society. Patients typically require long-term or repeated episodes of care to achieve the ultimate goal of sustained abstinence and recovery of their lives.

Alcohol Use Disorder, or AUD is a broad term for problems with alcohol, and is generally indicative of compulsive and uncontrolled consumption of alcoholic beverages. It is medically considered a disease, specifically an addictive illness. The World Health Organization estimates that about 140 million people throughout the world suffer from alcohol dependence. Patients with AUD suffer major changes to the brain structure and chemistry. Excessive alcohol consumption damages almost every organ in the body and the cumulative toxic effects can cause both medical (cirrhosis of the liver, pancreatitis, heart disease, peptic ulcers, sexual dysfunction) and psychiatric (epilepsy, dementia, psychosis, anxiety & depression) problems. Treatment of alcoholism is complex with current standard of care typically being prescribed to patients with heavy drinking but largely being unable to prevent them from relapsing. Approximately 5.8 percent or 14.4 million adults in the United States ages 18 and older had AUD in 2018. This includes 9.2 million men and 5.3 million women. In addition, an estimated 401,000 adolescents ages 12-17, in the United States, had AUD in 2018.

GABAB PAM for the treatment of CMT1A

Our license agreement with Indivior provides for a funded research program, under which we have the right to select drug candidates for exclusive development in certain indications outside of substance use disorders, including CMT1A, a rare disease indication. We plan to pursue orphan drug designation for a selected drug candidate in CMT1A. Subject to regulatory approval, we believe an oral small molecule GABAB PAM with a once-a-day dosing and without the adherence-limiting side effects of baclofen, which is currently used off label, could bring benefit to patients and consequently present a strong commercial opportunity for us. Our GABAB PAM compounds have demonstrated the potential role of this mechanism in CMT1A.

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease, previously classified as a subtype of muscular dystrophy, is a rare hereditary motor and sensory neuropathy, or HMSN, which causes demyelination of the peripheral nerves. The disease leads to damage or destruction to the myelin sheath covering nerve fibers. The nerve fibers most severely affected are those that stimulate movement, with the nerves in the legs being affected first and most severely. Similar symptoms may appear in the arms and hands, which may include a claw- like hand.

The disease is very impactful for patients due to the neurological pain and muscular disability. A combination of lower motor neuron-type motor deficits and sensory symptoms are observed, and paresis and muscle atrophy develop with areflexia. The chronic nature of the motor neuropathy commonly results in foot deformity, hammertoes, very high-arched feet, loss of lower leg musculature, resulting in skinny calves, numbness of the foot or leg, “slapping” gait (feet hit the floor hard when walking), foot drop (inability to hold foot horizontal) and weakness of the hips, legs or feet. Involvement of the hands may follow as the disease progresses. Signs of sensory system dysfunction are common and include loss of vibration and joint position sense followed by decreased pain and temperature sensation. Onset of CMT1A occurs between age 5 and 25 years, with a prevalence of 1 in 5,000. There are no known cures for this debilitating condition. Current therapies are primarily symptomatic, such as physiotherapy.

The program is in clinical candidate selection phase and we expect to initiate IND enabling studies in 2024.

mGlu7 NAM

The mGlu7 receptor is a class C GPCR and is the most highly conserved of all mGlu subtypes, exhibiting the widest distribution in the brain. It is localized pre-synaptically at a broad range of glutamatergic and GABAergic synapses and is thought to be one of the most important mGlu subtypes in regulating CNS function.

47

Table of Contents

mGlu7 NAM for the treatment of PTSD

Preclinical data suggest that mGlu7 antagonism could alleviate stress-related anxiety and depressive symptoms and deficits in amygdala-dependent behaviors (fear response and conditioned taste aversion). These data are consistent with the abundant localization of mGlu7 in brain regions involved in the control of fear and emotion supporting the potential use of mGlu7 NAM for the treatment of PTSD.

PTSD is a serious anxiety disorder that can occur in people who have experienced or witnessed a traumatic event such as a natural disaster, a serious accident, a terrorist act, war/combat, rape or other violent personal assault. PTSD can occur in all people, in people of any ethnicity, nationality or culture, and any age. PTSD affects approximately 3.5 percent of U.S. adults, and an estimated one in 11 people will be diagnosed with PTSD in their lifetime. Women are twice as likely as men to have PTSD. People with PTSD have intense, disturbing thoughts and feelings related to their experience that last long after the traumatic event has ended. They may relive the event through flashbacks or nightmares; they may feel sadness, fear or anger; and they may feel detached or estranged from other people. People with PTSD may avoid situations or people that remind them of the traumatic event, and they may have strong negative reactions to something as ordinary as a loud noise or an accidental touch.

Current treatments are primarily based on psychotherapy, as medication is nonspecific and usually ineffective, often with a number of side effects.

We are developing mGlu7 NAM as a novel orally available treatment to reduce fear memory in PTSD. By selectively targeting mGlu7 with NAMs, the brain circuitries involved in fear and anxiety can be more precisely modulated, potentially resulting in higher efficacy and fewer side effects. Subject to regulatory approval, we believe the mGlu7 NAM may offer an innovative and differentiated treatment approach from existing therapies. We have selected our candidate and we expect to initiate IND enabling studies in the second half of 2023.

mGlu2 NAM

The mGlu2 receptor, is a class C GPCR and is broadly distributed throughout the cortex as well as highly expressed in the hippocampus and perforant path. Activation of mGlu2 leads to inhibition of glutamate release in the synapse and therefore mGlu2 NAM has the potential to treat medical conditions linked to lowered glutamate levels in the brain via restoration of a normalized glutamatergic tone such as cognitive impairment in Alzheimer’s disease and depression.

mGlu2 NAM for the treatment of mild neurocognitive disorders

mGlu2 NAM is one of the most promising experimental therapeutic strategies for the treatment of mNCD. Our mGlu2 NAM has been tested in the beta amyloid-induced memory impairment model in rodents which mimics aspects of pathophysiology and progressive memory impairment observed in Alzheimer’s disease or, AD. In this study, our mGlu2 NAM dose-dependently reversed working memory impairment in the novel object recognition test, without affecting locomotor activity. Donepezil, a marketed drug currently used to treat symptoms of AD, was used as the positive control and the magnitude of the effect induced by the mGlu2 NAM was similar to that of donepezil. Preclinical research from other groups suggest not only that mGlu2 NAM might slow the progression of AD, an effect not seen with any marketed drug, but also that it may have a synergistic effect on cognition when combined with donepezil.

We are currently optimizing multiple chemical series of highly selective, orally active mGlu2 NAMs, The program is in clinical candidate selection phase, and we expect to initiate IND enabling studies in 2024.

Internal Early-Stage Research Programs

M4 PAM

M4 receptors are members of the G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) family which are found mostly bound to Gi proteins, generally leading to inhibitory effects. They are one of five muscarinic receptors that act to control the metabotropic functions of acetylcholine in the CNS.

48

Table of Contents

M4 PAM for the treatment of Schizophrenia and other psychosis

Schizophrenia affects approximately 24 million people worldwide, requiring lifelong treatment to reduce severe impact on their everyday life. The market for antipsychotics represents over $7B annual sales in the main markets, growing approximately 3.5% per year. There is a significant need for new treatment options, as currently available antipsychotics, that largely act via direct blockade of dopaminergic neurotransmission, fail to reduce negative symptoms and alleviate cognitive abnormalities, while also being linked to poor tolerability which leads to discontinuation of treatment.

M4 PAM represents a novel therapeutic approach for the treatment of schizophrenia based on indirect modulation of the dopaminergic neurotransmission. Therapeutic utility of targeting muscarinic acetylcholine receptors in schizophrenia has been demonstrated in the clinic with the non-selective M1/M4 agonist, xanomeline, which reduced positive and negative symptoms and alleviated cognitive abnormalities in patients with schizophrenia. Genetic deletion studies in mice demonstrates that the antipsychotic effect of xanomeline is driven exclusively by the M4 receptor subtype.

The allosteric modulation approach allows identification of highly subtype-selective small molecule compounds. Addex used its proprietary allosteric modulation discovery platform to identify highly selective M4 PAMs. Several structurally differentiated chemical series are currently being optimized to deliver lead compounds demonstrating robust antipsychotic-like effects in multiple rodent models of schizophrenia.

Subject to regulatory approval, we believe our M4 PAM may offer an advantageous antipsychotic treatment option for schizophrenia with a novel mechanism of action. The program is in lead optimization stage, and we expect to initiate IND enabling studies in 2024.

mGlu4 PAM

The mGlu4 receptor, is a class C GPCR and is expressed primarily on presynaptic terminals, functioning as an autoreceptor or heteroreceptor with its activation leading to decreases in neurotransmitter release from presynaptic terminals. The mGlu4 is uniquely distributed in key brain regions involved in multiple CNS disorders. In particular, mGlu4 is abundant in striato-pallidal synapses and on the subthalamo-nigral projections within the basal ganglia circuitry, a key area implicated in movement disorders, like Parkinson’s disease.

mGlu4 PAM for the treatment of Parkinson’s disease

Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder that is caused by loss of dopaminergic neurons in the basal ganglia, the brain center for movement initiation and coordination. mGlu4 receptors are strategically localized to counteract neurotransmitter imbalance and restore motor behavior in patients.

Parkinson’s disease is characterized by motor symptoms such as slowness in initiating and executing movements (akinesia and bradykinesia, respectively), muscular rigidity, resting tremor, postural instability, gait dysfunction and freezing. These symptoms are caused by the degeneration of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra and depletion of dopamine in the striatum. Actually, in a healthy brain, there is a balance between the direct and indirect pathways of the basal ganglia. The direct pathway stimulates the initiation of movements through an activation of the thalamocortical neurons. By contrast, the indirect pathway leads to the inhibition of the thalamocortical neurons, and subsequently inhibition of movements. These two pathways are modulated by the dopaminergic neurons from the substantia nigra, that activate the direct pathway and inhibit the indirect pathway. In PD, these dopaminergic neurons degenerate, and dopamine loss in the striatum leads to an over-stimulation of glutamate transmission at the subthalamo-nigral synapses, and then an over-inhibition of the thalamocortical neurons. The ability to carry out voluntary movements is impaired, and this leads to the motor symptoms of PD.

Current treatments are aimed at replacing dopamine or mimicking its effects by chronically administering patients with the dopamine precursor levodopa, inhibitors of dopamine catabolic enzymes or direct dopamine receptor agonists. Although these treatments provide good symptomatic relief in the early to middle stages of PD, they lose their efficacy as the disease progresses and their chronic administration is associated with disabling side effects (dyskinesia, motor fluctuations, behavior disturbances). Finally, no PD therapies have demonstrated neuroprotection and delaying disease progression. Therefore, new treatments are required for PD that target the neurochemical systems downstream dopamine itself in the basal ganglia.

49

Table of Contents

By decreasing GABAergic and glutamatergic transmission in the indirect pathway, mGlu4 activation is expected to restore the equilibrium between the direct and indirect pathways, and then to restore motor behaviors in PD. This has been demonstrated in animal models, including the MPTP monkey model. Several studies in animal models have demonstrated that this strategy is promising for the treatment of motor and non-motor symptoms of PD, as well as for disease modification. In the immune system mGlu4 has been found on dendritic cells. Emerging data implicate mGlu4 in several indications such as multiple sclerosis, Parkinson’s disease, anxiety, neuropathic and inflammatory pain, schizophrenia, autism and diabetes.

We are currently optimizing multiple chemical series of highly selective, orally active mGlu4 PAMs, with compounds at the early lead optimization stage.

mGlu3 PAM

The mGlu3 receptor, is a class C GPCR involved in modulation of glutamatergic neurotransmission. Expression of mGlu3 receptors is high in pyramidal cells in the prefrontal cortex and neocortical regions, as well as in astrocytes and oligodendrocytes. So far, industry has only found orthosteric compounds that act as mGlu3 receptor agonists or antagonists. All of these compounds suffer from poor selectivity and have activity on other mGlu receptors, and in particular the mGlu2 receptor. Targeting the allosteric site of the mGlu3 receptor provides a unique approach to find subtype selective compounds and will allow a focused strategy to modulate specifically those pathways involving the mGlu3 receptor.

mGlu3 PAM for the treatment of neurodegeneration

Scientific evidence suggests astroglial mGlu3 receptor activation leads to neuroprotection, through modulation of glutamate excitotoxicity and glutamate transport, neurotrophin production and reduction of oxidative damage. This points to the potential utility of mGlu3 PAMs for neurodegenerative disease such as Alzheimer’s or Parkinson’s diseases.

We are currently optimizing multiple chemical series of highly selective, orally active mGlu3 PAMs, with compounds at the early lead optimization stage.

Material agreements

Collaboration Agreement with Indivior for Development of novel GABAB PAM Compounds, including for the Treatment of Addiction and Other CNS Diseases

In January 2018, we entered into an agreement with Indivior for the discovery, development and commercialization of novel GABAB PAM compounds for the treatment of addiction and other CNS diseases. This agreement included the selected clinical candidate, ADX71441. In addition, Indivior agreed to fund a research program at Addex to discover novel GABAB PAM compounds.

Indivior has sole responsibility, including funding liability, for development of selected compounds under the agreement through preclinical and clinical trials, as well as registration procedures and commercialization, if any, worldwide. Indivior has the right to design development programs for selected compounds under the agreement. Through our participation in a joint development committee, we review, in an advisory capacity, any development programs designed by Indivior. However, Indivior has authority over all aspects of the development of such selected compounds.

Under terms of the agreement, we have granted Indivior an exclusive license to use relevant patents and know-how in relation to the development and commercialization of drug candidates selected by Indivior. Subject to agreed conditions, Addex and Indivior jointly own all intellectual property rights that are jointly developed, and Addex or Indivior individually own all intellectual property rights that Addex or Indivior develop individually. Addex has retained the right to select compounds from the research program for further development in areas outside the interest of Indivior including Charcot-Marie-Tooth type 1A neuropathy, or CMT1A. Under certain conditions, but subject to certain consequences, Indivior may terminate the agreement.

​

50

Table of Contents

In January 2018, under terms of the agreement, we received a non-refundable upfront fee of $5.0 million for the right to use the clinical candidate, ADX71441, including all materials and know-how related to this clinical candidate. In addition, we are eligible for payments on successful achievement of pre-specified clinical, regulatory and commercial milestones totaling $330 million. In addition, we are eligible for tiered royalties from high single digits to low double digits on net sales of applicable products on a country-by country-basis. The term of the royalty for each licensed product in any particular country commences on such product’s launch and ends on the latest of ten -year anniversary of launch, expiration of certain applicable patent rights, and expiration of certain applicable marketing or data exclusivity periods. On February 14, 2019, Indivior terminated the development of their selected compound, ADX71441.

Separately, Indivior funds research at Addex, based on a research plan to be mutually agreed between the parties, to discover novel GABAB PAM compounds. These future novel GABAB PAM compounds, if selected by Indivior, become licensed compounds. We agreed with Indivior to an initial research term and duration of two years, that can be extended by twelvemonth increments and a minimum annual funding of $2 million for the Addex R&D costs incurred. Following Indivior’s selection of one newly identified compound, Addex has the right to also select one additional newly identified compound. Addex is responsible for the funding of all development and commercialization costs of its selected compounds and Indivior has no rights to the Addex selected compounds. The initial two year research term was expected to run from May 2018 to April 2020. In 2019, Indivior agreed an additional research funding of $1.6 million, for the research period. In October 2020, the research term was extended until June 30, 2021 and Indivior agreed an additional research funding of $2.8 million. Effective May 1, 2021, the research term was extended until July 31, 2022 and Indivior agreed an additional research funding of CHF 3.7 million, of which CHF 2.7 million has been paid to the Group and CHF 1.0 million paid directly by Indivior to third party suppliers that are supporting the funded research program. In August 2022, the research agreement was extended until March 31, 2023 and Indivior agreed to additional research funding of CHF 0.85 million. The reserved indications, where Addex retains exclusive rights to develop its own independent GABAB PAM program, have also been expanded to include chronic cough. Effective November 1, 2022 the research term was extended until June 30, 2023and Indivior agreed to additional research funding of CHF 0.95 million. Indivior may terminate the Agreement in its entirety or with respect to one or more countries or products upon 90 days’ prior written notice prior to receipt of marketing approval for product candidates or twelve months’ prior written notice after the receipt of marketing approval.

Addex may terminate the agreement if Indivior commits a material breach of the agreement and fails to cure such breach within 90 days of Addex’s written notification to Indivior or fails to cure breaches to any payment obligations breach within 30 days, subject to certain conditions.

Collaboration Agreement with Janssen for Development of Novel mGlu2 PAM Compounds, including ADX71149, for the Treatment of CNS and Related Diseases

On December 31, 2004, we entered into a collaboration and license agreement with Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., or Janssen, for the discovery, development and commercialization of novel mGlu2 PAM compounds for the treatment of CNS and related diseases. We agreed with Janssen to an initial research term and duration of two years that could have been extended if parties mutually agreed thereto in writing. The agreement was not extended beyond 2007. ADX71149 is one of the drug candidates discovered and selected for development by Janssen under the agreement. In 2012, Janssen announced completion of a Phase 2a clinical trial in Europe with ADX71149 for the treatment of schizophrenia demonstrating proof of principal in patients with negative symptoms of schizophrenia, such as apathy, social withdrawal, loss of emotional expression or sleep disorders. Janssen also conducted a Phase 2a clinical trial with ADX71149 for the treatment of patients with anxious depression, which failed to show statistically significant effects. In 2015 and 2018, Janssen scientists published studies demonstrating synergies with Keppra (a globally commercialized antiepileptic drug) in preclinical models of epilepsy. Janssen is conducting a placebo-controlled Phase 2a proof of concept clinical trial of ADX71149 in epilepsy patients since June 2021, as well as an open label study since the third quarter of 2022. Part 1 of the study has completed enrolment and an IRC review to determine the next steps for the program is expected pat the beginning of the second.

Under our agreement with Janssen, we have granted Janssen an exclusive license to use relevant patents and know-how in relation to the development and commercialization of drug candidates selected by Janssen under the agreement and a non-exclusive worldwide license to conduct research on the collaboration compounds using relevant patents and know-how. Subject to certain conditions, we and Janssen own, jointly, all intellectual property rights that we and Janssen develop jointly, and we or Janssen own all intellectual property rights that we or Janssen develop individually. Under certain conditions, but subject to certain consequences, Janssen may terminate the agreement for any reason, subject to a 90-day notice period.

51

Table of Contents

Janssen has sole responsibility, including funding liability, for development of selected compounds under the agreement through preclinical and clinical trials, as well as registration procedures and commercialization, if any, in the United States, Japan, the United Kingdom, Germany, France, Spain and Italy. Janssen has the right to design development programs for selected compounds under the agreement. Through our participation in a joint development committee, we review, in an advisory capacity, any development programs designed by Janssen. However, Janssen has authority over all aspects of the development of selected compounds and may develop or commercialize third-party compounds with a different mechanism of action for identical use.

Under the terms of the Janssen agreement, we received an upfront fee of € 4.6 million and research funding of € 6.4 million during the research period, which ran from 2005 to 2007. In addition, we are eligible for payments on successful achievement of pre-specified clinical and regulatory milestones. We are also eligible for low double digit royalties on net sales of applicable products on a country-by country-basis and on a product by product basis, for a period commencing on the date of first sale and ending upon the latest of the expiration of twelve years from the date of first sale of a product in a given country or the last to expire of our patents containing a claim covering composition of compound comprised in a product sold by Janssen, its affiliates or sublicensees in such country. We received a € 1.5 million milestone payment in relation to the entry of ADX71149 into Phase 1 in July 2009 and a € 2.6 million milestone payment in relation to the entry of ADX71149 into Phase 2 in June 2011. We are eligible for a further €109 million in success-based development and regulatory milestones and low double-digit royalties on net sales.

In the event that no compounds are discovered or identified during the research period, the agreement shall terminate.

Intellectual Property

Patents and Proprietary Rights

As at December 31, 2022, we owned 12 U.S. and 179 foreign patents and a number of pending patent applications that cover various aspects of our allosteric modulator technologies and discovery platform, including several classes of compounds which are potentially useful as modulators of mGlu5, mGlu2, mGlu4, mGlu7 and GABAB. More specifically, our patents and patent applications cover compounds, pharmaceutical compositions, polymorphs and uses of compounds for medical treatment.

Our patent strategy is to file patent applications on innovations and improvements to cover a majority of the major pharmaceutical markets in the world. We typically file priority applications at the United Kingdom Patent Office to establish a priority date for the generic subject matter and examples which are available at the filing date of each invention. Subsequently, we file international applications under the Patent Cooperation Treaty or PCT, with extra examples to support the scope of the claims (International Phase). After the International Phase, we file patent applications in selected countries representing potential major markets for our drug candidates (National/Regional Phase).

Generally, patents have a term of twenty years from the filing date, assuming all maintenance fees are paid. In some instances, patent terms can be increased or decreased, depending on the laws and regulations of the country or jurisdiction that issued the patent. Wherever appropriate and legally possible, we aim at obtaining patent protection for novel molecules, composition of matter and uses for drugs and inventions originating from our research and development efforts, as well as new manufacturing and other processes and formulations. In each case, we carefully balance the value of patent protection against the advantage of keeping the know-how regarding the invention confidential. We aim to position the claims of our applications to exploit gaps in prior art.

We have two patent families covering dipraglurant as a composition of matter and its polymorphs which are useful as mGlu5 NAMs: 111 patents have been granted to us, including 4 in the United States and 97 in other international jurisdictions (Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Great Britain, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Macedonia, Monaco, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland/Liechtenstein, Turkey, Armenia, Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Israel, Japan, South Korea, Mexico, New Zealand, Philippines, Russia, Singapore, South Africa and Ukraine). We also have 4 patent applications pending.

We have one patent family covering compounds which are useful as GABAB PAMs, of which 24 patents have been granted, including 2 in the United States and 22 in other international jurisdictions (Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Great Britain, Ireland, Italy, Netherlands, Norway, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland/Liechtenstein, Australia, Canada, China, India, Israel, Japan, and New Zealand).

52

Table of Contents

Jointly with Janssen, we have 69 patents in three patent families covering compounds which are useful as mGlu2 PAMs, including ADX71149, which is explicitly exemplified and claimed as a compound and as a pharmaceutical composition, we have 4 patents in the United States and 65 in other international jurisdictions (Albania, Austria, Belgium, Bosnia & Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, North Macedonia, Malta, Monaco, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland/Liechtenstein, Turkey, Ukraine, United Kingdom, Algeria, Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, Chile, Gulf Cooperation Council, Hong Kong, Israel, India, Indonesia, Japan, Republic of Korea, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Philippines, Russia, Singapore, South Africa, Thailand, Vietnam, and Taiwan).

Furthermore, we have 9 patents in two patent families covering compounds that have potential utility as mGlu4 PAMs, which include 2 patents granted in the United States and 7 in Europe (Belgium, France, Germany, Great Britain, Italy, Spain and Switzerland/Liechtenstein). One family is owned by us and a second family is jointly owned by us and Merck & Co Inc. pursuant to our collaboration agreement for the development of mGlu4 PAM, which we entered into in 2007.

In November 2022, 2 PCT applications for mGlu7 NAM project were published.

Our portfolio of granted patents have expiry dates ranging from 2025 - 2034 without extension. Patent term extension of up to 5 years is available in some jurisdictions. For example, in the US following the enactment of Title II of the Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act (Public Law 98-417) it is generally possible to extend patent life by a maximum of 5 years.

The patent positions of pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies are uncertain and involve complex legal and factual issues. There can be no assurance that patents that have been issued will be held valid and enforceable in a court of law. Even for patents that are held valid and enforceable, the legal process associated with obtaining such a judgment is time consuming and costly. Additionally, issued patents can be subject to opposition or other proceedings that can result in the revocation of the patent or maintenance of the patent in amended form, and potentially in a form that renders the patent without commercially relevant or broad coverage. Further, our competitors may be able to circumvent and otherwise design around our patents. Even if a patent is issued and enforceable, because development and commercialization of pharmaceutical products can be subject to substantial delays, patents may expire early and provide only a short period of protection, if any, following the commercialization of a product covered by any of our patents. We may have to participate in interference proceedings declared by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, which could result in a loss of the patent or substantial cost to us.

U.S. and foreign patent rights and other proprietary rights exist that are owned by third parties and relate to pharmaceutical compositions and reagents, medical devices and equipment and methods for preparation, packaging and delivery of pharmaceutical compositions. We cannot predict with any certainty which, if any, of these rights will be considered relevant to our technology by authorities in the various jurisdictions where such rights exist, nor can we predict with certainty which, if any, of these rights will or may be asserted against us by third parties. We could incur substantial costs in defending ourselves and our partners against any such claims. Furthermore, parties making such claims may be able to obtain injunctive or other equitable relief, which could effectively block our ability to develop or commercialize some or all of our products in the U.S. and abroad and could result in the award of substantial damages. In the event of a claim of infringement, we or our partners may be required to obtain one or more licenses from third parties. There can be no assurance that we can obtain a license to any technology that we determine we need on reasonable terms, if at all, or that we could develop or otherwise obtain alternative technology. The failure to obtain licenses if needed may have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

We also rely on trade secret protection for our confidential and proprietary information. No assurance can be given that we can meaningfully protect our trade secrets. Others may independently develop substantially equivalent confidential and proprietary information or otherwise gain access to, or disclose, our trade secrets. Our success will depend in part on our ability to obtain and maintain patent protection for our drugs, preserve trade secrets, prevent third parties from infringing upon our proprietary rights and operate without infringing upon the proprietary rights of others, both in Switzerland and in other territories worldwide.

​

53

Table of Contents

It is our policy to require our employees and consultants, outside scientific collaborators, sponsored researchers and other advisors who receive confidential information from us to execute confidentiality agreements upon the commencement of employment or consulting relationships with us. These agreements provide that all confidential information developed or made known to the individual during the course of the individual’s relationship with us is to be kept confidential and not disclosed to third parties except in specific circumstances. The agreements provide that all inventions conceived by an employee shall be our property. There can be no assurance, however, that these agreements will provide meaningful protection or adequate remedies for our trade secrets in the event of unauthorized use or disclosure of such information.

Trademarks

We own trademarks for Addex Pharmaceuticals in Switzerland.

Competition

The development and commercialization of drugs is highly competitive. We compete with a variety of multinational pharmaceutical companies and specialized pharmaceutical companies, including products approved for marketing and/or drug candidates under development, for each of the drug candidates and each of the indications for which we are developing our product candidates, as follows:

Dipraglurant for the treatment of PD-LID

Amantadine, GOCOVRI^® (extended release amantadine) and Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) surgery are currently available therapies for the treatment of PD-LID. In addition, several drug candidates currently in clinical development could compete with dipraglurant for the treatment of PD-LID. Avanir Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is developing AVP-923 (NMDA antagonist), Neuraltus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is developing NP002 (nicotine receptor agonist), Newron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is developing safinamide (MAO-B inhibitor), Novartis Pharma AG is developing AQW051 (alpha 7 nAChR inhibitor). Integrative Research Laboratories Therapeutics AB is developing Mesdopetam (Dopamine 3 receptor antagonist), VistaGen Therapeutics Inc. is developing AV101 (NMDA antagonist), and Prilenia Therapeutics Inc. is developing pridopidine (D2 receptor agonist).

GABAB PAM for the treatment of substance use disorders, including alcohol use disorder

Currently available treatments of addiction include Buprenorphine (Suboxone^®, Subutex^®, Probuphine^®, Sublocade™), naltrexone (Vivitrol^®) to treat opioid addiction; bupropion (Zyban^®) and varenicline (Chantix^®) to treat nicotine addiction; and naltrexone (Vivitrol^®), Acamprosate (Campral^®), Disulfiram (Antabuse^®) to treat alcohol addiction. Baclofen (a GABAB agonist) has been largely used off-label to treat alcohol abuse, and its approval is under review in France. In addition, several novel derivatives of baclofen are in clinical development and Astellas is in Phase I with ASP8062 as a novel GABAB PAM for substance-related disorders.

GABAB PAM for the treatment of CMT1A

Currently, there is no disease-modifying treatment available for CMT1A. Currently approved therapies for relief from certain symptoms of CMT1A, including musculoskeletal and neuropathic pain, include anti-inflammatory drugs, tricyclic antidepressants and anticonvulsants. In addition, Pharnext is seeking approval in the US and Europe of PXT3003, a novel oral fixed-dose combination of baclofen, naltrexone and sorbitol.

ADX71149 for the treatment of epilepsy

Currently available therapies treatment of epilepsy includes racetams such as Brivaracetam (Briviact^®) or Levetiracetam (Keppra^®); benzodiazepines such as diazepam (Valium^®), clonazepam (Klonopin^®), lorazepam (Ativan^®); carboxamides such as Carbamazepine (Carbatrol^® or Tegretol^®) and Eslicarbazepine (Aptiom^®); GABA analogs such as Gabapentin (Neurotin^®) or Pregabalin (Lyrica^®); Perampanel (Fycompa^®). Late stage drug candidates in development which could compete with ADX71449 include Ganaxolone, Cannabidiol (Epidiolex), Everolimus (Afinitor / Votubia), ZX008.

54

Table of Contents

United States Government Regulation and Product Approval

Government authorities in the United States, at the federal, state and local levels, and in other countries, extensively regulate, among other things, the research, development, testing, manufacture, packaging, storage, recordkeeping, labeling, advertising, promotion, distribution, marketing, import and export of pharmaceutical products, such as those we are developing. The processes for obtaining regulatory approvals in the United States and in foreign countries, along with subsequent compliance with applicable statutes and regulations, require the expenditure of substantial time and financial resources.

Marketing

In the United States, the FDA regulates drugs under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, (FDCA), and its implementing regulations. The process of obtaining regulatory approvals and the subsequent compliance with appropriate federal, state, local and foreign statutes and regulations requires the expenditure of substantial time and financial resources. Failure to comply with the applicable United States requirements at any time during the drug development process, approval process or after approval, may subject an applicant to a variety of administrative or judicial sanctions, such as the FDA’s refusal to approve pending new drug applications, or NDAs, withdrawal of an approval, imposition of a clinical hold, issuance of warning or untitled letters, product recalls, product seizures, total or partial suspension of production or distribution, injunctions, fines, refusals of government contracts, restitution, disgorgement or civil or criminal penalties.

The process required by the FDA before a drug may be marketed in the United States generally involves:

​

55

Table of Contents

Clinical Trials

Prior to the initiation of clinical testing, a sponsor must submit to the FDA an IND, application to the FDA, including the results of pre-clinical studies, manufacturing information, analytical data and any available clinical data or literature. Some pre-clinical testing may continue even after the IND is submitted. An IND automatically becomes effective 30 days after receipt by the FDA, unless before that time the FDA raises concerns or questions related to one or more proposed clinical trials and places the clinical trial on a clinical hold. In such a case, the IND sponsor and the FDA must resolve any outstanding concerns before the clinical trial can begin. As a result, submission of an IND may not result in the FDA allowing clinical trials to commence.

Clinical trials involve the administration of the investigational new drug to human subjects under the supervision of qualified investigators in accordance with GCP requirements, which include the requirement that all research subjects provide their informed consent in writing for their participation in any clinical trial. Clinical trials are conducted under protocols detailing, among other things, the objectives of the trial, the parameters to be used in monitoring safety and the effectiveness criteria to be evaluated. A protocol for each clinical trial and any subsequent protocol amendments must be submitted to the FDA as part of the IND. In addition, an IRB at each institution participating in the clinical trial must review and approve the plan for any clinical trial before it commences at that institution, and the IRB must continue to oversee the clinical trial while it is being conducted. Information about certain clinical trials must be submitted within specific timeframes to the National Institutes of Health, or NIH, for public dissemination on their ClinicalTrials.gov website.

Human clinical trials are typically conducted in three sequential phases, which may overlap or be combined. In Phase 1, the drug is initially introduced into healthy human subjects or patients with the target disease or condition and tested for safety, dosage tolerance, absorption, metabolism, distribution, excretion and, if possible, to gain an initial indication of its effectiveness. In Phase 2, the drug typically is administered to a limited patient population to identify possible adverse effects and safety risks, to preliminarily evaluate the efficacy of the product for specific targeted diseases and to determine dosage tolerance and optimal dosage. In Phase 3, the drug is administered to an expanded patient population, generally at geographically dispersed clinical trial sites, in well-controlled clinical trials to generate enough data to statistically evaluate the safety and efficacy of the product for approval, to establish the overall risk-benefit profile of the product and to provide adequate information for the labeling of the product.

Progress reports detailing the results of the clinical trials must be submitted, at least annually, to the FDA, and more frequently if certain serious adverse events occur. Phase 1, Phase 2 and Phase 3 clinical trials may not be completed successfully within any specified period, or at all. Furthermore, the FDA or the sponsor may suspend or terminate a clinical trial at any time on various grounds, including a finding that the research subjects are being exposed to an unacceptable health risk. Similarly, an IRB can suspend or terminate approval of a clinical trial at its institution if the clinical trial is not being conducted in accordance with the IRB’s requirements, or if the drug has been associated with unexpected serious harm to patients.

Marketing Approval

Assuming successful completion of the required clinical testing, the results of the pre-clinical and clinical studies, together with detailed information relating to the product’s chemistry, manufacture, controls and proposed labeling, among other things, are submitted to the FDA as part of an NDA requesting approval to market the product for one or more indications. In most cases, the submission of an NDA is subject to a substantial application user fee. Under the Prescription Drug User Fee Act, or PDUFA, guidelines that are currently in effect, the FDA has a goal of ten months from the date of “filing” of a standard NDA for a new molecular entity to review and act on the submission. This review typically takes twelve months from the date the NDA is submitted to the FDA because the FDA has sixty days from submission to make a “filing” decision.

In addition, under the Pediatric Research Equity Act, certain NDAs or supplements to an NDA must contain data that are adequate to assess the safety and effectiveness of the drug for the claimed indications in all relevant pediatric subpopulations, and to support dosing and administration for each pediatric subpopulation for which the product is safe and effective. The FDA may, on its own initiative or at the request of the applicant, grant deferrals for submission of some or all pediatric data until after approval of the product for use in adults, or full or partial waivers from the pediatric data requirements. Unless otherwise required by regulation, the pediatric data requirements do not apply to products with orphan designation.

56

Table of Contents

The FDA also may require submission of a risk evaluation and mitigation strategy, or REMS, plan to ensure that the benefits of the drug outweigh its risks. The REMS plan could include medication guides, physician communication plans, assessment plans, and / or elements to assure safe use, such as restricted distribution methods, patient registries or other risk minimization tools.

The FDA conducts a preliminary review of all NDAs within the first 60 days after submission, before accepting them for filing, to determine whether they are sufficiently complete to permit substantive review. The FDA may request additional information rather than accept an NDA for filing. In this event, the application must be resubmitted with the additional information. The resubmitted application is also subject to review before the FDA accepts it for filing. Once the submission is accepted for filing, the FDA begins an in-depth substantive review. The FDA reviews an NDA to determine, among other things, whether the drug is safe and effective and whether the facility in which it is manufactured, processed, packaged or held meets standards designed to assure the product’s continued safety, quality and purity.

The FDA may refer an application for a novel drug to an advisory committee. An advisory committee is a panel of independent experts, including clinicians and other scientific experts, that reviews, evaluates and provides a recommendation as to whether the application should be approved and under what conditions. The FDA is not bound by the recommendations of an advisory committee, but it considers such recommendations carefully when making decisions.

Before approving an NDA, the FDA typically will inspect the facility or facilities where the product is manufactured. The FDA will not approve an application unless it determines that the manufacturing processes and facilities are in compliance with cGMP requirements and adequate to assure consistent production of the product within required specifications. Additionally, before approving an NDA, the FDA will typically inspect one or more clinical trial sites to assure compliance with GCP requirements.

The testing and approval process for an NDA requires substantial time, effort and financial resources, and takes several years to complete. Data obtained from pre-clinical and clinical testing are not always conclusive and may be susceptible to varying interpretations, which could delay, limit or prevent regulatory approval. The FDA may not grant approval of an NDA on a timely basis, or at all.

After evaluating the NDA and all related information, including the advisory committee recommendation, if any, and inspection reports regarding the manufacturing facilities and clinical trial sites, the FDA may issue an approval letter, or, in some cases, a complete response letter. A complete response letter generally contains a statement of specific conditions that must be met in order to secure final approval of the NDA and may require additional clinical or pre-clinical testing in order for FDA to reconsider the application. Even with submission of this additional information, the FDA ultimately may decide that the application does not satisfy the regulatory criteria for approval. If and when those conditions have been met to the FDA’s satisfaction, the FDA will typically issue an approval letter. An approval letter authorizes commercial marketing of the drug with specific prescribing information for specific indications.

Even if the FDA approves a product, it may limit the approved indications for use of the product, require that contraindications, warnings or precautions be included in the product labeling, require that post-approval studies, including Phase 4 clinical trials, be conducted to further assess a drug’s safety after approval, require testing and surveillance programs to monitor the product after commercialization, or impose other conditions, including distribution and use restrictions or other risk management mechanisms under a REMS, which can materially affect the potential market and profitability of the product. The FDA may prevent or limit further marketing of a product based on the results of post-marketing studies or surveillance programs. After approval, some types of changes to the approved product, such as adding new indications, manufacturing changes, and additional labeling claims, are subject to further testing requirements and FDA review and approval.

​

57

Table of Contents

Orange Book Listing

In seeking approval for a drug through an NDA, applicants are required to list with the FDA certain patents whose claims cover the applicant’s product. Upon approval of an NDA, each of the patents listed in the application for the drug is then published in the FDA’s Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations, known as the Orange Book. Any applicant who files an Abbreviated New Drug Application, or ANDA, seeking approval of a generic equivalent version of a drug listed in the Orange Book referencing a drug listed in the Orange Book must certify, for each patent listed in the Orange Book for the referenced drug, to the FDA that (1) no patent information on the drug product that is the subject of the application has been submitted to the FDA, (2) such patent has expired, (3) the date on which such patent expires or (4) such patent is invalid or will not be infringed upon by the manufacture, use or sale of the drug product for which the application is submitted. The fourth certification described above is known as a paragraph IV certification. A notice of the paragraph IV certification must be provided to each owner of the patent that is the subject of the certification and to the holder of the approved NDA to which the ANDA. The applicant may also elect to submit a “section viii” statement certifying that its proposed label does not contain (or carves out) any language regarding the patented method-of-use rather than certify to a listed method-of-use patent. This section viii statement does not require notice to the patent holder or NDA owner. There might also be no relevant patent certification.

If the reference NDA holder and patent owners assert a patent challenge directed to one of the Orange Book listed patents within 45 days of the receipt of the paragraph IV certification notice, the FDA is prohibited from approving the application until the earlier of 30 months from the receipt of the paragraph IV certification expiration of the patent, settlement of the lawsuit, or a decision in the infringement case that is favorable to the applicant. Even if the 45 days expire, a patent infringement lawsuit can be brought and could delay market entry, but it would not extend the FDA-related 30-month stay of approval.

Post-Approval Requirements

Drugs manufactured or distributed pursuant to FDA approvals are subject to pervasive and continuing regulation by the FDA, including, among other things, requirements relating to recordkeeping, periodic reporting, product sampling and distribution, advertising and promotion and reporting of adverse experiences with the product. After approval, most changes to the approved product, such as adding new indications, manufacturing changes or other labeling claims, are subject to further testing requirements and prior FDA review and approval. There also are continuing annual user fee requirements for any marketed products and the establishments at which such products are manufactured, as well as application fees for supplemental applications with clinical data.

Even if the FDA approves a product, it may limit the approved indications for use of the product, require that contraindications, warnings or precautions be included in the product labeling, including a boxed warning, require that post-approval studies, including Phase 4 clinical trials, be conducted to further assess a drug’s safety after approval, require testing and surveillance programs to monitor the product after commercialization, or impose other conditions, including distribution restrictions or other risk management mechanisms under a REMS, which can materially affect the potential market and profitability of the product. The FDA may prevent or limit further marketing of a product based on the results of post-marketing studies or surveillance programs.

In addition, drug manufacturers and other entities involved in the manufacture and distribution of approved drugs are required to register their establishments with the FDA and state agencies, and are subject to periodic unannounced inspections by the FDA and these state agencies for compliance with cGMP requirements. Changes to the manufacturing process are strictly regulated and often require prior FDA approval before being implemented. FDA regulations also require investigation and correction of any deviations from cGMP and impose reporting and documentation requirements upon the sponsor and any third party manufacturers that the sponsor may decide to use. Accordingly, manufacturers must continue to expend time, money and effort in the area of production and quality control to maintain cGMP compliance.

58

Table of Contents

Once an approval is granted, the FDA may withdraw the approval if compliance with regulatory requirements and standards is not maintained or if problems occur after the product reaches the market. Later discovery of previously unknown problems with a product, including adverse events of unanticipated severity or frequency, or with manufacturing processes, or failure to comply with regulatory requirements, may result in mandatory revisions to the approved labeling to add new safety information; imposition of post-market studies or clinical trials to assess new safety risks; or imposition of distribution or other restrictions under a REMS program. Other potential consequences include, among other things:

The FDA strictly regulates marketing, labeling, advertising and promotion of products that are placed on the market. Drugs may be promoted only for the approved indications and in accordance with the provisions of the approved label, although physicians, in the practice of medicine, may prescribe approved drugs for unapproved indications. The FDA and other agencies actively enforce the laws and regulations prohibiting the promotion of off-label uses, and a company that is found to have improperly promoted off-label uses may be subject to liability.

In addition, the distribution of prescription pharmaceutical products is subject to the Prescription Drug Marketing Act, or PDMA, which regulates the distribution of drugs and drug samples at the federal level, and sets minimum standards for the registration and regulation of drug distributors by the states. Both the PDMA and state laws limit the distribution of prescription pharmaceutical product samples and impose requirements to ensure accountability in distribution.

Federal and State Fraud and Abuse, Data Privacy and Security, and Transparency Laws and Regulations

In addition to FDA restrictions on marketing of pharmaceutical products, federal and state healthcare laws and regulations restrict business practices in the biopharmaceutical industry. These laws may impact, among other things, our current and future business operations, including our clinical research activities, and proposed sales, marketing and education programs and constrain the business or financial arrangements and relationships with healthcare providers and other parties through which we market, sell and distribute our products for which we obtain marketing approval. These laws include anti-kickback and false claims laws and regulations, data privacy and security, and transparency laws and regulations, including, without limitation, those laws described below.

The federal Anti-Kickback Statute prohibits, among other things, individuals or entities from knowingly and willfully offering, paying, soliciting or receiving remuneration, directly or indirectly, overtly or covertly, in cash or in kind to induce or in return for purchasing, leasing, ordering or arranging for or recommending the purchase, lease or order of any item or service reimbursable under Medicare, Medicaid or other federal healthcare programs. The term “remuneration” has been broadly interpreted to include anything of value. The federal Anti-Kickback Statute has been interpreted to apply to arrangements between pharmaceutical manufacturers on one hand and prescribers, purchasers and formulary managers on the other hand. Although there are a number of statutory exceptions and regulatory safe harbors protecting some common activities from prosecution, the exceptions and safe harbors are drawn narrowly. Practices that involve remuneration that may be alleged to be intended to induce prescribing, purchases or recommendations may be subject to scrutiny if they do not qualify for an exception or safe harbor.

59

Table of Contents

The reach of the federal Anti-Kickback Statute was also broadened by the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010, as amended by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010, or collectively the ACA, which, among other things, amended the intent requirement of the federal Anti-Kickback Statute such that a person or entity no longer needs to have actual knowledge of this statute or specific intent to violate it in order to have committed a violation. In addition, the ACA provides that the government may assert that a claim including items or services resulting from a violation of the federal Anti-Kickback Statute constitutes a false or fraudulent claim for purposes of the False Claims Act and the civil monetary penalties statute.

The federal civil and criminal false claims laws, including the False Claims Act, which prohibit, among other things, any individual or entity from knowingly presenting, or causing to be presented, a false claim for payment to the federal government or knowingly making, using or causing to be made or used a false record or statement material to a false or fraudulent claim to the federal government. A claim includes “any request or demand” for money or property presented to the U.S. government. Numerous pharmaceutical and other healthcare companies have been prosecuted under these laws for, among other things, allegedly providing free product to customers with the expectation that the customers would bill federal programs for the product and for causing false claims to be submitted because of the companies’ marketing of products for unapproved, and thus non-reimbursable, uses.

The federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, or HIPAA, created additional federal criminal statutes that prohibit, among other things, knowingly and willfully executing a scheme to defraud any healthcare benefit program, including private third party payors and knowingly and willfully falsifying, concealing or covering up a material fact or making any materially false, fictitious or fraudulent statement in connection with the delivery of or payment for healthcare benefits, items or services. Similar to the federal Anti-Kickback Statute, a person or entity does not need to have actual knowledge of the statute or specific intent to violate it in order to have committed a violation.

HIPAA, as amended by the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act, or HITECH, and their respective implementing regulations, impose certain requirements relating to the privacy, security and transmission of individually identifiable health information without appropriate authorization on certain health plans, healthcare clearinghouses and certain healthcare providers, known as covered entities, and their respective business associates, independent contractors that perform certain services involving the use or disclosure of individually identifiable health information as well as their covered subcontractors. HITECH also created new tiers of civil monetary penalties, amended HIPAA to make civil and criminal penalties directly applicable to business associates, and gave state attorneys general new authority to file civil actions for damages or injunctions in federal courts to enforce HIPAA and seek attorneys’ fees and costs associated with pursuing federal civil actions.

The federal Physician Payments Sunshine Act requires certain manufacturers of drugs, devices, biologics and medical supplies for which payment is available under Medicare, Medicaid or the Children’s Health Insurance Program, with specific exceptions, to report annually to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, or CMS, information related to payments or other transfers of value made to physicians (defined to include doctors, dentists, optometrists, podiatrists and chiropractors), other healthcare professionals (such as physician assistants and nurse practitioners), and teaching hospitals, and applicable manufacturers and applicable group purchasing organizations to report annually to CMS ownership and investment interests held by physicians and their immediate family members.

We may also be subject to state and foreign law equivalents of each of the above federal laws; state laws that require manufacturers to report information related to payments and other transfers of value to physicians and other healthcare providers or marketing expenditures; state laws that require pharmaceutical companies to comply with the pharmaceutical industry’s voluntary compliance guidelines and the relevant compliance guidance promulgated by the federal government, or that otherwise restrict payments that may be made to healthcare providers; state and local laws that require the registration of pharmaceutical sales representatives; as well as state and foreign laws that govern the privacy and security of health information in some circumstances, many of which differ from each other in substantial ways and often are not preempted by HIPAA, thus complicating compliance efforts.

60

Table of Contents

Efforts to ensure that our business arrangements with third parties will comply with applicable healthcare laws and regulations will involve substantial costs. Because of the breadth of these laws and the narrowness of the statutory exceptions and regulatory safe harbors available, it is possible that some of our business activities could be subject to challenge under one or more of such laws. It is possible that governmental authorities will conclude that our business practices may not comply with current or future statutes, regulations or case law involving applicable fraud and abuse or other healthcare laws and regulations. If our operations are found to be in violation of any of these laws or any other governmental regulations that may apply to us, we may be subject to substantial civil, criminal and administrative penalties, damages, fines, disgorgement, imprisonment, exclusion from participating in government funded healthcare programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid, additional reporting requirements and oversight if we become subject to a corporate integrity agreement or similar agreement to resolve allegations of non-compliance with these laws, contractual damages, reputational harm and the curtailment or restructuring of our operations. To the extent that any of our products are sold in a foreign country, we may be subject to similar foreign laws and regulations, which may include, for instance, applicable post-marketing requirements, including safety surveillance, anti-fraud and abuse laws and implementation of corporate compliance programs and reporting of payments or transfers of value to healthcare professionals.

Coverage and Reimbursement

Market acceptance and sales of any drug products depend in part on the extent to which reimbursement for drug products will be available from third party payors, including government health administration authorities, managed care organizations and other private health insurers. third party payors decide which drug products they will pay for and establish reimbursement levels. third party payors often rely upon Medicare coverage policy and payment limitations in setting their own coverage and reimbursement policies. However, decisions regarding the extent of coverage and amount of reimbursement to be provided for drug products are made on a payor-by-payor basis. One payor’s determination to provide coverage for a drug product does not assure that other payors will also provide coverage, and adequate reimbursement, for the drug product. Additionally, a third party payor’s decision to provide coverage for a drug product does not imply that an adequate reimbursement rate will be approved. Each payor determines whether or not it will provide coverage for a drug product, what amount it will pay the manufacturer for the therapy, and on what tier of its formulary it will be placed. The position on a payor’s list of covered drugs, or formulary, generally determines the co-payment that a patient will need to make to obtain the drug product and can strongly influence the adoption of such drug product by patients and physicians. Patients who are prescribed drug products for their conditions and providers prescribing such drug products generally rely on third party payors to reimburse all or part of the associated costs. Patients are unlikely to use a drug product unless coverage is provided and reimbursement is adequate to cover a substantial portion of the cost of the drug product.

Reimbursement by a third party payor may depend upon a number of factors, including the third party payor’s determination that a drug product is neither experimental nor investigational, safe, effective, and medically necessary, appropriate for the specific patient, cost-effective, supported by peer-reviewed medical journals and included in clinical practice guidelines.

Third party payors have attempted to control costs by limiting coverage and the amount of reimbursement for particular drug products. Even if reimbursement is available, the level of reimbursement is unpredictable. Inadequate coverage and reimbursement can impact the demand for, or the price of, drug products. If coverage and adequate reimbursement are not available, or are available only to limited levels, drug products may not be successfully commercialized. Further, adequate third party payor reimbursement may not be available to enable price levels sufficient to realize appropriate returns on investment in drug product development.

In addition, the federal government and state legislatures have continued to implement cost containment programs, including price controls and restrictions on coverage and reimbursement. To contain costs, governmental healthcare programs and third party payors are increasingly challenging the price, scrutinizing the medical necessity and reviewing the cost-effectiveness of drug products.

Impact of Healthcare Reform on our Business

In the United States and some foreign jurisdictions, there have been, and continue to be, several legislative and regulatory changes and proposed changes regarding the healthcare system that could prevent or delay marketing approval of drug product candidates, restrict or regulate post-approval activities, and affect the profitable sale of drug candidates.

61

Table of Contents

Among policy makers and payors in the United States and elsewhere, there is substantial interest in promoting changes in healthcare systems with the stated goals of containing healthcare costs, improving quality and / or expanding access. In the United States, the pharmaceutical industry has been a particular focus of these efforts and has been affected by major legislative initiatives. In March 2010, the ACA was passed, which substantially changed the way healthcare is financed by both the government and private insurers, and continues to greatly impact the U.S. pharmaceutical industry. The ACA, among other things: (i) increased the minimum Medicaid rebates owed by manufacturers under the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program and extends the rebate program to individuals enrolled in Medicaid managed care organizations; (ii) established an annual, nondeductible fee on any entity that manufactures or imports certain specified branded prescription drugs and biologic agents apportioned among these entities according to their market share in some government healthcare programs; (iii) expanded the availability of lower pricing under the 340B drug pricing program by adding new entities to the program; (iv) increased the statutory minimum rebates a manufacturer must pay under the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program, to 23.1% and 13% of the average manufacturer price for most branded and generic drugs, respectively and capped the total rebate amount for innovator drugs at 100% of the Average Manufacturer Price, or AMP; (v) expanded the eligibility criteria for Medicaid programs by, among other things, allowing states to offer Medicaid coverage to additional individuals and by adding new mandatory eligibility categories for individuals with income at or below 133% of the federal poverty level, thereby potentially increasing manufacturers’ Medicaid rebate liability; (vi) established a new Medicare Part D coverage gap discount program, in which manufacturers must now agree to offer 70% point-of-sale discounts off negotiated prices of applicable brand drugs to eligible beneficiaries during their coverage gap period, as a condition for the manufacturer’s outpatient drugs to be covered under Medicare Part D; (vii) created a new Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute to oversee, identify priorities in, and conduct comparative clinical effectiveness research, along with funding for such research; and (viii) established a Center for Medicare Innovation at CMS to test innovative payment and service delivery models to lower Medicare and Medicaid spending, potentially including prescription drug.

There have been executive, judicial and Congressional challenges to certain aspects of the ACA. For example, on June 17, 2021 the U.S. Supreme Court dismissed a challenge on procedural grounds that argued the ACA is unconstitutional in its entirety because the “individual mandate” was repealed by Congress. Further, prior to the U.S. Supreme Court ruling, President Biden issued an executive order that initiated a special enrollment period for the purposes of obtaining health insurance coverage through the ACA marketplace, which began on February 15, 2021 and remained open through August 15, 2021. The executive order also instructed certain governmental agencies to review and reconsider their existing policies and rules that limit access to healthcare, including among others, reexamining Medicaid demonstration projects and waiver programs that include work requirements, and policies that create unnecessary barriers to obtaining access to health insurance coverage through Medicaid or the ACA. It is possible that the ACA will be subject to judicial or Congressional challenges in the future. Further, on August 16, 2022 President Biden signed the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022, or IRA, into law, which among other things, extends enhanced subsidies for individuals purchasing health insurance coverage in ACA marketplaces through plan year 2025. The IRA also eliminates the “donut hole” under the Medicare Part D program beginning in 2025 by significantly lowering the beneficiary maximum out-of-pocket cost and creating a new manufacturer discount program. It is possible that the ACA will be subject to judicial or Congressional challenges in the future. It is unclear how such challenges, and the healthcare reform measures of the Biden administration will impact the ACA and our business.

Other legislative changes have been proposed and adopted since the ACA was enacted. These changes include aggregate reductions to Medicare payments to providers of 2% per fiscal year pursuant to the Budget Control Act of 2011, which began in 2013, and due to subsequent legislative amendments to the statute, including the BBA, and the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, will remain in effect through 2031 unless additional Congressional action is taken.. Under current legislation, the actual reduction in Medicare payments will vary from 1% in 2022 to up to 3% in the final fiscal year of this sequester. The American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012, among other things, further reduced Medicare payments to several providers, including hospitals and cancer treatment centers, and increased the statute of limitations period for the government to recover overpayments to providers from three to five years. These new laws may result in additional reductions in Medicare and other healthcare funding, which could have an adverse effect on customers for our drug candidates, if approved, and, accordingly, our financial operations. Additionally, on March 11, 2021, President Biden signed the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 into law, which eliminates the statutory Medicaid drug rebate cap, currently set at 100% of a drug’s average manufacturer price, for single source and innovator multiple source drugs, beginning January 1, 2024.

​

62

Table of Contents

Additionally, there has been heightened governmental scrutiny in the United States of pharmaceutical pricing practices in light of the rising cost of prescription drugs and biologics. Such scrutiny has resulted in several recent congressional inquiries and proposed and enacted federal and state legislation designed to, among other things, bring more transparency to product pricing, review the relationship between pricing and manufacturer patient programs, and reform government program reimbursement methodologies for products. At the federal level, in July 2021, the Biden administration released an executive order, “Promoting Competition in the American Economy,” with multiple provisions aimed at prescription drugs. In response to Biden’s executive order, on September 9, 2021, the Department of Health and Human Services, or HHS released a Comprehensive Plan for Addressing High Drug Prices that outlines principles for drug pricing reform and sets out a variety of potential legislative policies that Congress could pursue as well as potential administrative actions HHS can take to advance these principles. No legislation or administrative actions have been finalized to implement these principles. In addition, the IRA, among other things, (i) directs HHS to negotiate the price of certain high-expenditure, single-source drugs and biologics covered under Medicare, and subjects drug manufacturers to civil monetary penalties and a potential excise tax by offering a price that is not equal to or less than the negotiated “maximum fair price” for such drugs and biologics under the law, and (ii) imposes rebates with respect to certain drugs and biologics covered under Medicare Part B or Medicare Part D to penalize price increases that outpace inflation. The IRA permits HHS to implement many of these provisions through guidance, as opposed to regulation, for the initial years. These provisions will take effect progressively starting in fiscal year 2023, although they may be subject to legal challenges. It is currently unclear how the IRA will be implemented but is likely to have a significant impact on the pharmaceutical industry. Further, the Biden administration released an additional executive order on October 14, 2022, directing HHS to submit a report on how the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation can be further leveraged to test new models for lowering drug costs for Medicare and Medicaid beneficiaries. It is unclear whether this executive order or similar policy initiatives will be implemented in the future. Additionally, on July 9, 2021, President Biden issued an executive order directing the FDA to, among other things, continue to clarify and improve the approval framework for biosimilars, including the standards for interchangeability of biological products, facilitate the development and approval of biosimilar and interchangeable products, clarify existing requirements and procedures related to the review and submission of BLAs, and identify and address any efforts to impede biosimilar competition. It is unclear whether these or similar policy initiatives will be implemented in the future.

At the state level, legislatures are increasingly passing legislation and implementing regulations designed to control pharmaceutical and biological product pricing, including price or patient reimbursement constraints, discounts, restrictions on certain product access and marketing cost disclosure and transparency measures, and, in some cases, designed to encourage importation from other countries and bulk purchasing.

Manufacturing and Supply

We rely on third party manufacturing and supply partners for our supply for, preclinical studies and clinical trials. We currently do not have in-house facilities to manufacture our research and development, preclinical and clinical drug supplies.

63

Table of Contents

C. Organizational Structure

The following diagram illustrates our corporate structure:

D. Property, Plants and Equipment.

Our registered office is located in 12, Chemin des Aulx, Plan-les-Ouates, Geneva, Switzerland. Our headquarters are located in Campus Biotech, Chemin des Mines 9, Geneva, Switzerland, and consist of approximately 500 square meters of office and lab space, which houses our in-house R&D function. We also have one office in San Francisco, California, United States for our subsidiary Addex Pharmaceuticals Inc. We may require additional space and facilities as our business expands.

64

Table of Contents

Using our allosteric modulator discovery capabilities, we have developed a pipeline of proprietary clinical and preclinical stage drug candidates. We or our partners are developing these clinical and preclinical stage proprietary drug candidates for diseases for which there are no approved therapies or where improved therapies are needed including epilepsy, levodopa induced dyskinesia associated with Parkinson’s disease, or PD-LID, substance use disorder, or, SUD, Charcot-Marie-Tooth type 1A neuropathy, or CMT1A, chronic cough, pain, stress related disorders including post-traumatic stress disorder, or PTSD, schizophrenia, other neuropsychiatric and neurodegenerative disease. Some of these indications are classified as rare diseases, that may allow for orphan drug designation by regulatory agencies in major commercial markets, such as the United States, Europe and Japan. Orphan drug designation may entitle the recipient to benefits, in the jurisdiction granting the designation, such as market exclusivity following approval and assistance in clinical trial design, a reduction in user fees or tax credits related to development expenses.

Our lead drug candidate, ADX71149 is a novel orally active metabotropic glutamate receptor subtype 2 positive allosteric modulator, or mGlu2 PAM for the treatment of epilepsy. Our partner, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., or Janssen, a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson is conducting a placebo-controlled Phase 2a proof of concept clinical trial of ADX71149 in epilepsy patients since June 2021, as well as an open label study since the third quarter of 2022. Part 1 of the study has completed enrolment and an IRC review to determine the next steps for the program is expected around the end the first quarter of 2023. Under our agreement with Janssen, Janssen is responsible for financing the development and commercialization, if any, of ADX71149.

Our second drug candidate, dipraglurant, a metabotropic glutamate receptor subtype 5 negative allosteric modulator, or mGlu5 NAM, is currently under evaluation for future development in a range of potential therapeutic indications including PD-LID, stroke recovery, SUD, pain, and neurodevelopmental disorders, or NDD. As part of this evaluation, we have initiated discussions with potential strategic partners with the objective of collaborating for future development. We received orphan drug designation from the United States Food and Drug Administration, or FDA, for dipraglurant in PD-LID and completed a Phase 2 proof of concept study. On June 17, 2022, we terminated our US registration program including a pivotal Phase 2B/3 study and an open label study in PD-LID due to slow recruitment of patients.

We are also conducting a research program under our strategic partnership with Indivior PLC, or Indivior, to discover novel orally available gamma-aminobutyric acid subtype B receptor positive allosteric modulators, or GABAB PAMs. We are currently in clinical candidate selection phase and expect IND enabling studies to be initiated in 2024. Under the terms of the agreement with Indivior, we have the right to select drug candidates for development in certain exclusive indications outside SUD. We plan to develop our selected drug candidates in CMT1a, chronic cough and pain, indications that have been clinically validated with baclofen, an orthosteric agonist of GABAB, and where we believe there is a significant unmet medical need and commercial opportunity.

Allosteric modulators have broad applicability for many clinically validated GPCR targets which are implicated in multiple therapeutic indications. We intend to continue to leverage our scientific expertise in allosteric modulation and our proprietary technology platform to discover novel drug candidates for the treatment of neurological diseases. Three of the most advanced programs include:

MGlu7 NAM for the treatment of stress related disorders including PTSD. We are developing mGlu7 NAM as a novel orally available treatment to reduce fear memory in PTSD, a disorder that can lead to intense fear and anxiety. Current medication is unspecific and ineffective, with a number of side effects. By selectively targeting mGlu7 with NAMs, the brain circuitries involved in fear and anxiety can be more precisely modulated, potentially resulting in a more focused response and fewer side effects than current therapeutic approaches. Subject to regulatory approval, we believe our mGlu7 NAM may offer an innovative and differentiated treatment approach from existing therapies. The program has completed clinical candidate selection phase and we expect to initiate IND enabling studies in the second half of 2023.

MGlu2 NAM for the treatment of mild neurocognitive disorders, or mNCD. We are developing mGlu2 NAM as a novel orally available treatment for mNCD associated with Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease and depressive disorders. The program has entered clinical candidate selection phase and we expect to enter IND enabling studies in 2024.

​

65

Table of Contents

M4 PAM for the treatment of schizophrenia and other psychosis. We are developing M4 PAM as a novel orally available treatment for schizophrenia and other psychosis. We are currently optimizing multiple chemical series of highly selective M4 PAMs compounds and expect to enter into clinical candidate selection phase in late 2023.Based on our expertise in allosteric modulation, our goal is to build a leading neuroscience company focused on conditions where current treatment options are limited and where unmet medical needs exist. Our business strategy includes the possibility of entering into collaborative arrangements with third parties to complete the development and commercialization of our proprietary drug candidates, such as our partnership with Janssen for ADX71149 and our strategic partnership with Indivior for GABAB PAM. We cannot forecast with any degree of certainty which proprietary products or indications, if any, will be subject to future collaborative arrangements, in whole or in part, and how such arrangements would affect our development plan or capital requirements. To date, we have secured grants and other funding from: The Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson’s Research, or MJFF, for the development of dipraglurant for the treatment of PD-LID; the National Institute of Drug Abuse, or NIDA, to generate important data on the role of GABAB in substance use disorder; the Swiss Innovation Agency, or Innosuisse, to advance our understanding of the role of our drug candidates in neurodegenerative and psychiatric diseases; the Eurostars Joint Programme, or Eurostars to identify novel drug candidates on mGlu7 NAM for PTSD; and the Charcot-Marie-Tooth Association, or CMTA to evaluate the role of GABAB PAM compounds in preclinical models of CMT1A. As we advance our clinical and preclinical programs, we will continue to apply for subsidies, grants and government or agency sponsored studies that could offset or reduce our development costs.

The development and commercialization of drugs is highly competitive. We compete with a variety of multinational pharmaceutical companies and specialized pharmaceutical companies, including products approved for marketing and/or drug candidates under development, for each of the drug candidates and each of the indications for which we are developing.

Furthermore, Government authorities in the United States, at the federal, state and local levels, and in other countries, extensively regulate, among other things, the research, development, testing, manufacture, packaging, storage, recordkeeping, labeling, advertising, promotion, distribution, marketing, import and export of pharmaceutical products, such as those we are developing. The processes for obtaining regulatory approvals in the United States and in foreign countries, along with subsequent compliance with applicable statutes and regulations, require the expenditure of substantial time and financial resources.

We were founded in May 2002 and completed our initial public offering of shares on the SIX Swiss Exchange in May 2007. On January 29, 2020, we listed American Depositary Shares (ADSs) representing our shares on the Nasdaq Stock Market following the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) having declared our registration statements on Forms F-1 and F-6 effective. Our operations to date have included organizing and staffing our company, raising capital, out-licensing rights to our research stage programs including our mGlu2 PAM and GABAB PAM programs and conducting preclinical studies and clinical trials.

To date, we have generated CHF 64.8 million of revenue from the sale of license rights and conducting funded research activities for certain of our research programs. We have historically financed our operations mainly through the sale of equity. Through December 31, 2022, we had raised an aggregate of CHF 349.4 million of gross proceeds from the sale of equity.

We have never been profitable and have incurred significant net losses in each period since our inception. Our net losses were CHF 20.8 million, CHF 15.4 million, and CHF 12.9 million for years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively. As of December 31, 2022, we had accumulated losses of CHF 349.9 million. We expect to continue to incur significant expenses and operating losses for the foreseeable future. We anticipate that our expenses will increase significantly in connection with our ongoing activities as we:

66

Table of Contents

We will need substantial additional funding to support our operating activities as we advance our research and drug candidates through clinical development, seek regulatory approval and prepare for commercialization, if any of our drug candidates are approved. Adequate funding may not be available to us on acceptable terms, or at all.

We have no manufacturing facilities, and all of our manufacturing activities are contracted out to third parties. Additionally, we currently utilize third-party clinical research organizations, or CROs, to carry out a significant proportion of our clinical development activities including clinical trials. Furthermore, we do not yet have a sales organization.

License Agreement with Indivior

In January 2018, we entered into an agreement with Indivior for the discovery, development and commercialization of novel GABAB PAM compounds for the treatment of addiction and other CNS diseases. This agreement included the selected clinical candidate, ADX71441. In addition, Indivior agreed to fund a research program at Addex to discover novel GABAB PAM compounds.

Indivior has sole responsibility, including funding liability, for development of selected compounds under the agreement through preclinical and clinical trials, as well as registration procedures and commercialization, if any, worldwide. Indivior has the right to design development programs for selected compounds under the agreement. Through our participation in a joint development committee, we review, in an advisory capacity, any development programs designed by Indivior. However, Indivior has authority over all aspects of the development of such selected compounds.

Under terms of the agreement, we have granted Indivior an exclusive license to use relevant patents and know-how in relation to the development and commercialization of drug candidates selected by Indivior. Subject to agreed conditions, Addex and Indivior jointly own all intellectual property rights that are jointly developed, and Addex or Indivior individually own all intellectual property rights that Addex or Indivior develop individually. Addex has retained the right to select compounds from the research program for further development in areas outside the interest of Indivior including Charcot-Marie-Tooth type 1A neuropathy, or CMT1A. Under certain conditions, but subject to certain consequences, Indivior may terminate the agreement.

In January 2018, under terms of the agreement, we received a non-refundable upfront fee of $5.0 million for the right to use the clinical candidate, ADX71441, including all materials and know-how related to this clinical candidate. In addition, we are eligible for payments on successful achievement of pre-specified clinical, regulatory and commercial milestones totaling $330 million, and royalties on net sales of mid-single digits to low double-digits. On February 14, 2019, Indivior terminated the development of their selected compound, ADX71441.

Separately, Indivior funds research at Addex, based on a research plan to be mutually agreed between the parties, to discover novel GABAB PAM compounds. These future novel GABAB PAM compounds, if selected by Indivior, become licensed compounds. We agreed with Indivior to an initial research term of two years, which can be extended by twelve-month increments and a minimum annual funding of $2 million for the Addex R&D costs incurred. Following Indivior’s selection of one newly identified compound, Addex has the right to also select one additional newly identified compound. Addex is responsible for the funding of all development and commercialization costs of its selected compounds and Indivior has no rights to the Addex selected compounds. The initial two-year research term was expected to run from May 2018 to April 2020. In 2019, Indivior agreed an additional research funding of $1.6 million, for the research period. On October 30, 2020, the research term was extended until June 30, 2021 and Indivior agreed an additional research funding of $2.8 million. Effective May 1, 2021, the research term was extended until July 31, 2022 and Indivior agreed additional research funding of CHF 3.7 million, of which CHF 2.7 million has been paid to the Group, and CHF 1.0 million paid directly by Indivior to third party suppliers that are supporting the funded research program. In August 2022, the research agreement was extended until March 31, 2023 with additional research funding of CHF 0.85 million. The reserved indications, where Addex retains exclusive rights to develop its own independent GABAB PAM program, have also been expanded to include chronic cough. Effective November 1, 2022 the research term was extended until June 30, 2023 and Indivior agreed to additional research funding of CHF 0.95 million.

The contract contains two distinct material promises and performance obligations: (1) the selected compound ADX71441 which falls within the definition of a licensed compound, whose rights of use and benefits thereon was transferred in January 2018 and, (2) the research services to be conducted by Addex and funded by Indivior to discover novel GABAB PAM compounds for clinical development that may be discovered over the research term of the agreement and selected by Indivior.

67

Table of Contents

License Agreement with Janssen

Under our agreement with Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc. (formerly known as Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc), or Janssen, we granted Janssen an exclusive license to use relevant patents and know-how in relation to the development and commercialization of drug candidates selected by Janssen under the agreement and a non-exclusive worldwide license to conduct research on the collaboration compounds using relevant patents and know-how. Subject to certain conditions, we and they agreed to own, jointly, all intellectual property rights that we develop jointly and, individually, all intellectual property rights that either party develops individually. Under certain conditions, but subject to certain consequences, Janssen may terminate the agreement for any reason, subject to a 90-day notice period.

Janssen has sole responsibility, including funding liability, for development of selected compounds under the agreement through preclinical and clinical trials, as well as registration procedures and commercialization, if any, in the United States, Japan, the United Kingdom, Germany, France, Spain and Italy. Janssen has the right to design development programs for selected compounds under the agreement. Through our participation in a joint development committee, we review, in an advisory capacity, any development programs designed by Janssen. However, Janssen has authority over all aspects of the development of selected compounds and may develop or commercialize third-party compounds.

Janssen initiated a Phase 2a proof of concept clinical trial of ADX71149 in epilepsy patients in June 2021. We are eligible for a further EUR 109 million in success-based development and regulatory milestones and low double digit royalties on net sales.

68

Table of Contents

Grants are recognized at their fair value where there is reasonable assurance that the grant will be received and that we will comply with all associated conditions. Grants relating to costs are recognized as other income in the statement of comprehensive loss over the period necessary to match them with the costs that they are intended to compensate.

Operating Expenses

Research and Development Costs

From the beginning of January 2017 through December 2022, we incurred CHF 57.9 million in research and development costs. They consist mainly of direct research costs, which include: costs associated with the use of contract research organizations, or CROs, and consultants hired to assist on our research and development activities, personnel costs, share-based compensation for our employees and consultants, costs related to regulatory affairs and intellectual property, as well as depreciation for assets used in research and development activities.

We typically use our employee, consultant and infrastructure resources across our research and development programs. We track by program the directly attributable costs from CROs and consultants.

The following table provides a breakdown of our outsourced research and development costs that are directly attributable to the specified programs for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020:

​

​

On June 17, 2022, we terminated our dipraglurant US registration program including pivotal Phase 2B/3 and open label clinical trials in PD-LID due to slow recruitment of patients. We therefore expect our R&D costs to decrease in the near-term as we focus our resources on advancing our pre-clinical portfolio toward the clinic. However, in the medium to long term we expect our research and development costs will increase for the foreseeable future as we seek to advance the development of our programs.

At this time, we cannot reasonably estimate or know the nature, timing and estimated costs of the efforts that will be necessary to complete the development of our drug candidates. We are also unable to predict when, if ever, material net cash inflows will commence from sales of our drug candidates. This is due to the numerous risks and uncertainties associated with developing such drug candidates, including:

In addition, the probability of success for any of our drug candidates will depend on numerous factors, including competition, manufacturing capabilities and commercial viability. A change in the outcome of any of these variables with respect to the development of any of our drug candidates would significantly change the costs, timing and viability associated with the development of that drug candidate.

​

69

Table of Contents

General and Administrative Costs

General and administrative costs consist primarily of personnel costs, including salaries, benefits and share-based compensation cost for our employees as well as corporate facility costs not otherwise included in research and development expenses, legal fees related to corporate matters and fees for accounting and financial or tax consulting services.

We expect our general and administrative costs to remain stable for the foreseeable future.

Finance Result, Net

Finance result, net consists mainly of currency exchange differences, interest expenses relating to lease liabilities, and to the negative interest rate on Swiss franc cash deposits, partially offset by positive interest income on USD bank deposits.

Taxation

We are subject to corporate taxation in Switzerland, United States and France. We are also entitled under Swiss laws to carry forward any losses incurred for a period of seven years and can offset our losses carried forward against future taxes. As of December 31, 2022, we had tax losses carried forward totaling CHF 275.2 million of which CHF 141.4 million will expire by the end of 2023. Deferred income taxes are not recognized as we do not believe it is probable that we will generate sufficient taxable profits to utilize these tax losses carried forward.

Revenue decreased by CHF 1.5 million in 2022 compared to 2021 due to amounts received under our license and research agreements with Indivior which are recognized as related costs are incurred.

70

Table of Contents

Other income, decreased by CHF 0.2 million in 2022 compared to 2021 as the Group did not recognized any income from the grant with Eurostars/Innosuisse in 2022, in accordance with the grant conditions. Other service income relates to IT consultancy agreements.

Research and development costs increased by CHF 1.8 million in 2022 compared to 2021 primarily due to higher outsourced R&D expenses of CHF 1.0 million including CHF 0.6 million for discovery activities and CHF 0.4 million for dipraglurant clinical development activities. During the same period, staff costs primarily driven by the evolution of higher share-based compensation costs, increased by CHF 0.8 million.

71

Table of Contents

General and administrative costs increased by CHF 1.5 million in 2022 compared to 2021. The increase primarily relates to staff costs for CHF 1.5 million driven by higher share-based compensation costs.

Finance result, net decreased by CHF 0.4 million in 2022 compared to 2021 mainly due to a net currency exchange loss of CHF 0.3 million in 2022 compared to a net currency exchange gain of CHF 0.2 million in 2021 primarily due to currency exchange differences on U.S dollar cash deposits due to the strengthening of the Swiss franc.

Revenue decreased by CHF 0.7 million in 2021 compared to 2020 due to amounts received under our license and research agreements with Indivior which are recognized as related costs are incurred.

72

Table of Contents

Other income, remained stable in 2021 compared to 2020 primarily due to amounts from our Eurostars/Innosuisse research grant award, which is being recognized in income as related costs are incurred. Other service income relates to IT consultancy agreements.

Research and development costs increased by CHF 2.5 million in 2021 compared to 2020. The increase primarily relates to outsourced R&D expenses for CHF 2.0 million, of which, CHF 0.6 million relate to our dipraglurant PD-LID program and CHF 0.6 million for our dipraglurant blepharospasm program. During the same period, staff costs increased by CHF 0.4 million primarily due to the strengthening of our R&D team in 2021.

73

Table of Contents

General and administrative costs increased by CHF 0.1 million in 2021 compared to 2020. The increase primarily relates to higher directors and officer’s liability insurance premiums as we strengthened our insurance coverage on January 29, 2020 following the Company’s listing on the Nasdaq Stock Market.

Finance result, net increased by CHF 0.8 million in 2021 compared to 2020 mainly due to a net currency exchange gain of CHF 0.2 million in 2021 compared to a net currency exchange loss of CHF 0.6 million in 2020 primarily to the impact of a strengthening U.S dollar on U.S dollar cash deposits.

74

Table of Contents

We expect our expenses to decrease in the near term as we have no ongoing clinical studies funded by us. In the medium and long term, our expenses may increase in connection with our ongoing activities, particularly as we continue to advance our portfolio of drug candidates, initiate further clinical trials and seek marketing approval for our drug candidates.

In addition, if we obtain marketing approval for any of our drug candidates, we expect to incur significant commercialization expenses related to program sales, marketing, manufacturing and distribution to the extent that such sales, marketing and distribution are not the responsibility of potential collaborators. Accordingly, we will need to obtain substantial additional funding in connection with our continuing operations. If we are unable to raise capital when needed or on attractive terms, we would be forced to delay, reduce or eliminate our research and development programs or future commercialization efforts.

We expect our existing cash and cash equivalents at the issuance date of annual report on Form 20-F will enable us to fund our operating expenses and capital expenditure requirements through end of the third quarter of 2023. This indicates that a material uncertainty exists that raise substantial doubt about the Group's ability to continue as a going concern for one year from the date of issuance of these unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements. Our future viability is dependent on our ability to monetize our intellectual property portfolio and /or raise additional capital though public or private financings that may dilute existing shareholders. We have based this estimate on assumptions that may prove to be wrong, and we could utilize our available capital resources sooner than we currently expect. Our future capital requirements will depend on many factors, including:

Identifying potential drug candidates and conducting preclinical studies and clinical trials is a time-consuming, expensive and uncertain process that takes many years to complete, and we may never generate the necessary data or results required to obtain marketing approval and achieve product sales. In addition, our drug candidates, if approved, may not achieve commercial success. Our revenue, if any, will be derived from sales of products that we do not expect to be commercially available for many years, if at all.

Until such time, if ever, as we can generate substantial product revenue, we may finance our cash needs through a combination of equity offerings, debt financings, collaborations, strategic alliances and licensing arrangements. To the extent that we raise additional capital through the sale of equity or convertible debt securities, your ownership interest will be diluted, and the terms of any additional securities may include liquidation or other preferences that adversely affect your rights as a shareholder. Debt financing, if available, may involve agreements that include covenants limiting or restricting our ability to take specific actions, such as incurring additional debt, making capital expenditures or declaring dividends.

If we raise funds through additional collaborations, strategic alliances or licensing arrangements with third parties, we may have to relinquish valuable rights to our technologies, future revenue streams, research programs or drug candidates or to grant licenses on terms that may not be favorable to us. If we are unable to raise additional funds through equity or debt financings when needed, we may be required to delay, limit, reduce or terminate our product development or future commercialization efforts or grant rights to develop and market drug candidates that we would otherwise prefer to develop and market ourselves.

75

Table of Contents

The following table shows a summary of our cash flows for the years indicated:

​

​

Operating Activities

Net cash flows from or used in operating activities consist of the net loss adjusted for changes in net working capital (current assets less current liabilities), and for non-cash items such as depreciation, the value of share-based services and changes in post-employment benefits.

During the year ended December 31, 2022, operating activities used CHF 16.4 million of cash primarily due to our net loss of CHF 20.8 million adjusted for CHF 0.2 million of decreased net working capital and CHF 0.2 million of net finance income, partially offset by non-cash items for CHF 4.0 million including CHF 3.7 million of share-based compensation costs and CHF 0.3 million of depreciation of the right-of-use assets for leases. Changes in net working capital mainly relate to decreased prepayments due to the termination of our dipraglurant clinical development activities.

During the year ended December 31, 2021, operating activities used CHF 14.7 million of cash primarily due to our net loss of CHF 15.4 million adjusted for CHF 0.6 million of increased net working capital and CHF 0.1 million of net finance income primarily relating to currency exchange gains on cash and cash equivalents, partially off-set by CHF 1.4 million of non-cash items mainly related to the value of share-based services and depreciation of the right-of-use assets for leases. Changes in net working capital mainly relate to increased prepayments on our dipraglurant PD-LID program.

During the year ended December 31, 2020, operating activities used CHF 12.2 million of cash primarily due to our net loss of CHF 12.9 million adjusted for CHF 0.7 million of finance costs and the net effect of increased net working capital of CHF 1.5 million off-set by CHF 1.5 million of non-cash items mainly related to the value of share-based services and depreciation of the right-of-use assets for leases. Changes in working capital mainly relate to decreased payables and accruals that are primarily due to delays in starting certain clinical development activities due to the global coronavirus pandemic.

Investing Activities

Net cash used in investing activities consist primarily of investments in computer and laboratory equipment, security rental deposits related to laboratory and office space.

During the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020 net cash used in investing activities was close to nil, primarily related to investments in laboratory equipment and to a lesser extent computer hardware and software.

Financing Activities

Net cash flows from financing activities consists of proceeds from the sale of equity securities, whilst net cash flows used in financing activities primarily relate to the principal element of lease payments and associated interest expenses, interest expenses on Swiss francs cash deposits and capital increase costs.

​

76

Table of Contents

During the year ended December 31, 2022, net cash flows from financing activities amounted to CHF 3.1 million and relate to an offering with Armistice Capital LLC executed on July 22, 2022 and sales of treasury shares through the sale agency agreement with Kepler Cheuvreux in July 2022 with gross proceed of CHF 4.1 million and CHF 0.4 million, respectively, partially offset by the costs associated with the offering executed on December 16, 2021 and July 22, 2022 and paid in 2022 for CHF 0.5 million and CHF 0.4 million, respectively. The other cash out flows primarily relate to the principal element of lease payments and associated interest expense for CHF 0.3 million and issuance cost of new treasury shares executed in 2022 for a total amount of CHF 0.2 million.

During the year ended December 31, 2021, net cash flows from financing activities amounted to CHF 16.4 million and primarily relate to offerings executed on January 8, 2021 and December 16, 2021 with a respective gross proceed of CHF 10.1 million and CHF 9.2 million partially offset by total offering costs of CHF 3.3 million of which CHF 0.2 million has been paid in December 2020 and CHF 0.5 million was still pending to be paid as of December 31, 2021. The other cash out flows primarily relate to the principal element of lease payments and associated interest expense for CHF 0.4 million.

During the year ended December 31, 2020, net cash flows from financing activities was close to nil. The sale of treasury shares of CHF 0.7 million has been offset by the principal of lease payments for CHF 0.4 million and offering costs of CHF 0.2 million paid in December 2020 for the preparation of the capital increase executed on January 8, 2021.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of the date of the discussion and analysis and during the period presented, we did not have, and we do not currently have, any off-balance sheet arrangements, as defined in the rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

Lease liabilities and commitments

The maturities for lease payments in relation to operating lease under IFRS 16 as of December 31, 2022 are as follows:

​

Lease liabilities relate to the rent of laboratories, equipment, offices and related spaces used by the Group. There are no cancellable operating lease commitments over 5 years.

We enter into contracts in the normal course of business with CROs for clinical trials, preclinical studies, manufacturing and other services and products for operating purposes. These contracts generally provide for termination upon notice, and therefore we believe that our non-cancelable obligations under these agreements are not material.

Outstanding Debt

We do not engage in trading activities involving non-exchange traded contracts nor do we currently have any debt outstanding. We therefore believe that we are not materially exposed to any financing, liquidity, market or credit risk that could arise if we had engaged in these relationships.

For a discussion of our research and development activities, see “Item 4.B—Business Overview” and “Item 5.A—Operating Results.”

For a discussion of trends, see “Item 5.A—Operating Results” and “Item 5.B—Liquidity and Capital Resources.”

77

Table of Contents

Not applicable

78

Table of Contents

Robert Lütjens, Head of Discovery—Biology: Dr. Lütjens is responsible for all biology activities and has extensive experience in drug discovery. He established the biology capabilities and built the Company’s small molecule allosteric modulator biology platform. He played a pivotal role in the success of both internal and partnered programs, including the discovery of dipraglurant and ADX71149, both of which progressed into Phase II clinical development. Prior to joining Addex at inception in 2002, Dr. Lütjens completed a postdoctoral fellowship in the Department of Neuropharmacology at the Scripps Research Institute, in La Jolla, CA, where he focused on understanding molecular changes involved in addiction disorders. Dr. Lütjens obtained his degrees in Biology from the University of Geneva, his master’s at the Swiss Institute for Experimental Cancer Research and his Ph.D. thesis at the Glaxo Institute for Molecular Biology in Geneva and the Institute for Cellular Biology and Morphology in Lausanne. Dr. Lütjens is co-author of over 30 peer-reviewed publications and patents.

Jean-Philippe Rocher, Head of Discovery—Chemistry: Dr. Rocher is responsible for IP and for all chemistry activities including CMC, scale-up and formulation, medicinal chemistry, computational chemistry, compound library management and activities linked to developability. He has extensive experience in drug discovery and returns to Addex from Pierre Fabre where he was Director of CNS Programs from March 2014 to May 2018. Joining Addex at its inception in 2002, Dr. Rocher established the Company’s chemistry capabilities and built its small molecule allosteric modulator chemistry platform. He played a pivotal role in the success of both internal and partnered programs, including the discovery of dipraglurant and ADX71149, both of which progressed into Phase 2 clinical development. Prior to joining Addex, Dr. Rocher was Director of Chemistry at Devgen NV (Gent, Belgium), Senior Research Scientist for GlaxoSmithKline KK (Tsukuba, Japan), Scientific Project Leader in CNS at Mitsubishi Tanabe (Yokohama, Japan) and Head of Drug Discovery Unit for Battelle (Geneva, Switzerland). He started his career as a Research Scientist in the Dermatology Research Center of Galderma (Sophia Antipolis, France) following a PhD in Medicinal Chemistry and Pharm D at the Faculty of Pharmacy of Lyon (France). He is a co author of more than 40 research publications and patents.

Mikhail Kalinichev, Head of Translational Science: This is the second time Dr. Kalinichev is a part of Addex team, as previously, he spent 4 years in the company in several positions, including Associate Director and Group Leader, Behavioral Neuroscience. Immediately before his second appointment at Addex, Dr. Kalinichev spent 6 years as Director of in vivo neurology at Ipsen, France. In this role, he helped define the neuroscience therapeutic strategy, led operational activities and initiated several industrial and academic collaborations in the area of neuromuscular disorders and pain. Before Ipsen, he was a section head at Lundbeck, Denmark where he helped drive translational studies in schizophrenia, cognitive impairment and pain. His first role in pharmaceutical industry was as a principal scientist at Psychiatry Center of Excellence of GlaxoSmithKline, UK. Dr. Kalinichev’s post-doctoral training was at the Department of Pharmacology, Emory University School of Medicine (USA). Dr. Kalinichev has been awarded several prestigious awards, including the Vernalis Prize of the British Association for Psychopharmacology and the GlaxoSmithKline Exceptional Science Award. He is inventor on several patents and co-authored more than 50 papers. Dr. Kalinichev earned his PhD in behavioural neuroscience at Rutgers University (USA).

Lénaic Teyssédou, Head of Finance: Mr. Teyssédou has served as our Head of Finance since June 2017 and is responsible for finances and administration at Addex. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Teyssédou worked for four years in the transaction support department of French audit company, where he was responsible for the acquisition due diligence of various clients, including major financial institutions. Mr. Teyssédou is a French Chartered Accountant and holds two Master degrees in Finance and Management from EM Strasbourg Business School, France.

Non-Employee Directors

Vincent Lawton, Chairman of the Board of Directors: Dr. Lawton was Vice President Merck Europe and Managing Director of MSD UK until he stepped down in 2006, after 26 years’ service internationally for Merck & Co Inc. He was appointed CBE (Commander of the British Empire) by the Queen of England for services to the Pharmaceutical Industry. During his tenure, MSD UK achieved sustained commercial success, launching many new medicines to the market in a wide range of therapeutic areas, becoming the fastest growing company in the market over a number of years. He worked in commercial, research and senior management roles in France, the US and Canada, Spain and throughout Europe. As President of the UK Industry Association, the ABPI, he negotiated industry pricing, worked with Government bodies to help establish the UK globally as a leading centre of clinical research. He served on the board of the UK regulatory authority (MHRA) from 2008 to 2015. He was a Senior Strategy Advisor for Imperial College Department of Medicine, University of London and serves as a consultant to a number of leading healthcare organizations. He studied Psychology at the University of London and holds an undergraduate degree and PhD.

79

Table of Contents

Raymond Hill, Director: Dr. Hill was previously a member of the Board of Directors from the Annual General Meetings of 2008 until 2012. Currently Visiting Professor of Pharmacology at Imperial College in London, and Chairman/Non Executive Director of Avilex (Denmark), Chair of SAB Asceneuron (Switzerland) and was NED of Orexo AB (Sweden) from 2008 to 2019. Prior to his retirement, he was Executive Director, Licensing and External Research at Merck/MSD in Europe (2002 2008); Executive Director, Pharmacology (1990 2002) at the Merck Neuroscience Research Centre and had oversight responsibility for Neuroscience research at the Banyu Research Labs in Tsukuba, Japan (1997 2002). At Merck, he chaired a number of discovery project teams including those responsible for the marketed products Maxalt® and Emend®. Dr. Hill received his academic training (BPharm PhD) at the University of London. He was awarded an Honorary DSc by the University of Bradford in 2004 and was elected to Fellowship of the Academy of Medical Sciences in 2005. He was a lecturer in Pharmacology at the University of Bristol School of Medicine from 1974 to 1983 and supervisor in Pharmacology at Downing College, University of Cambridge from 1983 to 1988. He joined the pharmaceutical industry in 1983 as Head of Biology and founder member of the Park Davis Research Unit at Cambridge. In 1988, he joined SK&F (United Kingdom) as Group Director of Pharmacology and in 1990 moved to Merck. He is a past Council Member of the UK Academy of Medical Sciences and President Emeritus of the British Pharmacological Society. He is a Visiting Professor at the University of Bristol and was a member of the UK Government Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs from 2010 to 2019. He continues to serve on the ACMD Working Group on the Medicinal Uses of Cannabis and is a member of the drug misuse WG of Royal Pharmaceutical Society Science Committee.

Isaac Manke, Director: Dr. Manke has more than 15 years of experience in the life science industry as an investor, research analyst, consultant and scientist. Isaac is currently a General Partner at Acorn Bioventures, where he focuses on investing in small cap public and private biotechnology companies. Prior to Acorn, Isaac spent 11 years at New Leaf Venture Partners (NLV). In addition to private venture investments, during his time at NLV, he also led the firm’s public investment activities initially with the public portfolio within NLV II, and from 2014 through 2019, had day to day management and oversight responsibility for the NLV Biopharma Opportunities Funds. Isaac has been a board member or observer for several companies, including the boards of True North Therapeutics (acquired by Bioverativ) and Karos Pharmaceuticals (acquired by an undisclosed company). Previously, Isaac was an Associate in the Global Biotechnology Equity Research group at Sanford C. Bernstein. Isaac was also an Associate in the Biotechnology Equity Research group at Deutsche Bank and was a Senior Analyst at Health Advances, a biopharmaceutical and medical device strategy consulting firm. Isaac received a B.A. in Biology and a B.A. in Chemistry at Minnesota State University (Moorhead), and a Ph.D. in Biophysical Chemistry and Molecular Structure at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, or MIT. Isaac’s discoveries led to several publications in top journals, including Science and Cell, and were selected by Science as one of the “2003: Signaling Breakthroughs of the Year”. These discoveries also resulted in four issued patents.

Jake Nunn, Director: Mr. Nunn has more than 25 years of experience in the life science industry as an investor, independent director, research analyst and investment banker. He is currently an independent advisor to life science companies and a venture partner at SR One Capital Management. Mr. Nunn was previously a venture advisor at New Enterprise Associates, or NEA, where he was a partner from 2006 to 2018, focusing on later-stage specialty pharmaceuticals, biotechnology and medical device investments and managing a number of NEA’s public investments in healthcare. Mr. Nunn is a Director of Hexima Ltd. (ASX: HXL), Regulus Therapeutics (Nasdaq: RGLS) and Trevena, Inc. (Nasdaq: TRVN). He previously was a Director of Dermira Inc. (acquired by Eli Lilly), Hyperion Therapeutics (acquired by Horizon Pharma PLC), TriVascular (acquired by Endologix), Aciex Therapeutics (acquired by Nicox SA), Transcept Pharmaceuticals (merged with Paratek) and a board observer at Vertiflex, Inc. (acquired by Boston Scientific). Prior to NEA, Mr. Nunn worked at MPM Capital as a Partner with the MPM BioEquities Fund, where he specialized in public, PIPE and mezzanine stage life sciences investing. Previously, he was a healthcare research analyst and portfolio manager at Franklin Templeton Investments. Mr. Nunn was also an investment banker with Alex. Brown & Sons. He received an MBA from the Stanford Graduate School of Business and an AB in Economics from Dartmouth College. Mr. Nunn holds the Chartered Financial Analyst designation, is a member of the CFA Society of San Francisco, and recently completed the Stanford GSB Directors’ Consortium executive education program.

80

Table of Contents

The table below provides certain highlights of the composition of our board members and nominees. Each of the categories listed in the below table has the meaning as it is used in Nasdaq Rule 5605(f).

​

Family Relationships

There are no family relationships among any of our executive officers or directors.

B.Compensation of Executive Officers and Directors

Board of Directors

The compensation of the non-executive board members mostly includes variable elements whilst executive board members are not remunerated as board member. The fixed element comprises a fixed annual monetary compensation per Board term from one general meeting of shareholders to the next. The variable element comprises a monetary compensation based on Board meeting attendance and the fair value of equity incentive units (share options and equity sharing certificates) and represents from 50% to 250% of fixed annual compensation. Nevertheless, in 2022, the variable compensation of the chairman of the Board of Directors and of the chairman of the compensation committee represented fourteen and thirteen time their fixed annual compensation respectively, primarily due to the increased fair value of their options granted as the exercise prices have been reduced (See note 13 of the audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 20-F). Social security contributions of the Company are accrued on the fixed and variable elements. Board member social security contributions are accrued on the fair value of equity incentive units. Equity incentive units are granted based on the discretion of the Board of Directors. Equity incentive units are granted to compensate for the dilutive effects of capital raising to ensure Board Members have sufficient unvested equity incentive units in accordance with external benchmarks. The most recent review of compensation for members of the Board took place in October 2022.

​

81

Table of Contents

Executive Management

The compensation of members of the Executive Management consists of fixed and variable elements. The fixed element may include a base salary or a cash retainer paid under a consulting contract. The variable element may include performance-related cash or share based bonuses, consulting fees based on chargeable hours and equity incentive units (equity sharing certificates and share options). Company contributions to pension plans, death and invalidity insurances and social security contributions are accrued on all fixed and variable element compensation that relates to an employment relationship. Company social security contributions are accrued for all shares or equity incentive unit compensation. The amount of the fixed element depends on the position, responsibilities, experience and skills, and takes into account individual performance. The fixed element is reviewed at the end of each year by the Board. Any changes in the fixed elements are made effective in January of the following year. The variable elements are based on individual and company goals. The potential variable cash bonus is determined in the employment contract and in general is a percentage of the base salary. Where the Executive Manager has been engaged under a consulting contract, the variable element is based on the time spent at the contractually defined rate of remuneration. Every year, the Board decides on the total amount of variable elements including the amount of cash and equity incentive units to be granted for the previous year based on the achievement of Company and Individual goals. Equity incentive units are granted based on the discretion of the Board of Directors. Variable cash compensation paid to Executive Managers includes bonus and equity incentive units. The variable compensation of CEO is determined 100% based on company goals and includes cash bonus representing from 0% to 50% of base salary and equity incentive units representing from 0% to 150% of base salary, exceptionally increased to seven times of base salary in 2022 primarily due to the higher fair value of his equity incentive units following the reduction of the exercise prices. Our Chief Medical Officer (“CMO”) is engaged through a consultancy agreement and invoices the company for hours worked on a monthly basis which are settled in cash. In addition, equity incentive units are granted from time to time at the discretion of the Board of Directors. The variable compensation of the other Executive Managers includes cash bonus representing from 0% to 25% of base salary and is determined based on 20% individual goals and 80% company goals, and equity incentive units representing 0% to 100% of base salary, exceptionally increased up to 182% of base salary in 2022 primarily due to the increased fair value of their equity incentive units granted following the reduction of the exercise prices. In addition, the Board of Directors grants equity incentive units to Executive Managers to compensate for the dilutive effects of capital raising to ensure Executive Managers have sufficient unvested equity incentive units in accordance with external benchmarks.

The company goals for 2022 were established at the beginning of the year as follows:

​

Following the termination of the dipraglurant clinical development in PD LID in June 2022, the company goals were realigned with the Group’s revised strategy which primarily resulted in the dipraglurant phase 2b/3 PD LID study execution goal being replaced by an objective to efficiently and effectively close down the PD LID development in a cost-effective manner with a weighting of 15%. In addition, the percentage weighting of 20% for “securing the Group’s financial situation” was increased to 35%. The individual goals of the Executive Managers for 2022 were as follows: 1) Deliver novel drug candidates weighted at 50%; 2) Develop collaborative arrangements to efficiently advance preclinical portfolio weighted at 25%; and 3) Develop novel tools to identify and characterize allosteric modulators weighted at 25%.

​

82

Table of Contents

Equity Incentive Plans

The purpose of the Group’s share purchase, share option and equity sharing certificate programs (refer to note 13 of the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 20-F) is to provide members of the Board of Directors, Executive Management, employees and certain consultants with an opportunity to benefit from the potential appreciation in the value of the Company’s shares, thus providing an increased incentive for participants to contribute to the future success and prosperity of the Group, enhancing the value of the shares for the benefit of the shareholders of the Group and increasing the ability of the Group to attract and retain individuals of exceptional skills. In addition, these plans provide the Group with a mechanism to engage services for non-cash consideration by settling them through a transfer of treasury shares under the share purchase plan based on predefined terms of the consulting contract. The grant of any share option or equity sharing certificate is at the discretion of the Board of Directors. Key factors considered by the Board of Directors in making grants of share options or equity sharing certificates are the amount of shareholder approved conditional capital, the benchmarking with other companies as well as individual performance (for further information on the detail and composition of the benchmark please refer to the paragraph review and approval process above). The strike price is determined by the Board of Directors and is primarily based on the closing price of the Company’s shares on the SIX Swiss Exchange on the grant date. In addition, the Group has implemented a staff retention plan which includes a deferred strike price payment plan (“DSPPP”) which encourages Board Members, Executive Managers and employees to exercise their share options or equity sharing certificates and become shareholders of the Company by allowing deferral of the obligation to pay the strike price on exercise. (“Deferred Strike Price Payment Obligations”).

Indirect benefits

We may contribute to the pension plan and maintain certain insurance for death and invalidity for the members of the Executive Management. New entrants may be eligible for reimbursement of relocation costs, compensation for lost benefits or stock granted by a previous employer, international school for children or language courses for a limited time period. No indirect benefits have been paid to Executive Management in 2022.

Special conditions in case of change of control

In the event of a change of control of the company, three Executive Managers are entitled to receive an amount equivalent to one time the annual gross salary and 1.5 times the targeted annual bonus 12 months after the change of control, unless they have given notice of termination or have received notice of termination for cause.

Measurement basis for compensation

The measurement basis for each component of compensation is described below:

83

Table of Contents

​

​