false2022FY0001517022http://fasb.org/us-gaap/2022#PrepaidExpenseAndOtherAssetsCurrenthttp://fasb.org/us-gaap/2022#PrepaidExpenseAndOtherAssetsCurrenthttp://fasb.org/us-gaap/2022#PrepaidExpenseAndOtherAssetsCurrenthttp://fasb.org/us-gaap/2022#OtherAssetsNoncurrenthttp://fasb.org/us-gaap/2022#OtherAssetsNoncurrenthttp://fasb.org/us-gaap/2022#OtherAssetsNoncurrenthttp://fasb.org/us-gaap/2022#AccruedLiabilitiesCurrenthttp://fasb.org/us-gaap/2022#AccruedLiabilitiesCurrent5P1Y0.33330.33330.3333P1YP2YP3YP1Y0.3333P1Y0.6667P2Yhttp://fasb.org/us-gaap/2022#AccruedLiabilitiesCurrent00015170222022-01-012022-12-3100015170222022-06-30iso4217:USD00015170222023-02-28xbrli:shares00015170222022-12-3100015170222021-12-31iso4217:USDxbrli:shares0001517022us-gaap:ProductMember2022-01-012022-12-310001517022us-gaap:ProductMember2021-01-012021-12-310001517022us-gaap:ProductMember2020-01-012020-12-310001517022akba:LicenseCollaborationAndOtherRevenueMember2022-01-012022-12-310001517022akba:LicenseCollaborationAndOtherRevenueMember2021-01-012021-12-310001517022akba:LicenseCollaborationAndOtherRevenueMember2020-01-012020-12-3100015170222021-01-012021-12-3100015170222020-01-012020-12-310001517022us-gaap:CommonStockMember2019-12-310001517022us-gaap:AdditionalPaidInCapitalMember2019-12-310001517022us-gaap:AccumulatedNetUnrealizedInvestmentGainLossMember2019-12-310001517022us-gaap:RetainedEarningsMember2019-12-3100015170222019-12-310001517022us-gaap:CommonStockMember2020-01-012020-12-310001517022us-gaap:AdditionalPaidInCapitalMember2020-01-012020-12-310001517022us-gaap:AccumulatedNetUnrealizedInvestmentGainLossMember2020-01-012020-12-310001517022us-gaap:RetainedEarningsMember2020-01-012020-12-310001517022us-gaap:CommonStockMember2020-12-310001517022us-gaap:AdditionalPaidInCapitalMember2020-12-310001517022us-gaap:AccumulatedNetUnrealizedInvestmentGainLossMember2020-12-310001517022us-gaap:RetainedEarningsMember2020-12-3100015170222020-12-310001517022us-gaap:CommonStockMember2021-01-012021-12-310001517022us-gaap:AdditionalPaidInCapitalMember2021-01-012021-12-310001517022us-gaap:AccumulatedNetUnrealizedInvestmentGainLossMember2021-01-012021-12-310001517022us-gaap:RetainedEarningsMember2021-01-012021-12-310001517022us-gaap:CommonStockMember2021-12-310001517022us-gaap:AdditionalPaidInCapitalMember2021-12-310001517022us-gaap:AccumulatedNetUnrealizedInvestmentGainLossMember2021-12-310001517022us-gaap:RetainedEarningsMember2021-12-310001517022us-gaap:CommonStockMember2022-01-012022-12-310001517022us-gaap:AdditionalPaidInCapitalMember2022-01-012022-12-310001517022us-gaap:RetainedEarningsMember2022-01-012022-12-310001517022us-gaap:CommonStockMember2022-12-310001517022us-gaap:AdditionalPaidInCapitalMember2022-12-310001517022us-gaap:AccumulatedNetUnrealizedInvestmentGainLossMember2022-12-310001517022us-gaap:RetainedEarningsMember2022-12-31akba:commercial_product0001517022akba:BioVectraIncMember2022-12-220001517022akba:BioVectraIncMember2022-12-222022-12-22akba:quarter_period0001517022akba:RestructuringPlanNovember2022Member2022-11-012022-11-30xbrli:pureakba:segment0001517022us-gaap:CustomerConcentrationRiskMemberakba:FreseniusMedicalCareRxMemberakba:SalesAndCollaborationRevenueGrossMember2022-01-012022-12-310001517022us-gaap:CustomerConcentrationRiskMemberakba:FreseniusMedicalCareRxMemberakba:SalesAndCollaborationRevenueGrossMember2021-01-012021-12-310001517022us-gaap:CustomerConcentrationRiskMemberakba:FreseniusMedicalCareRxMemberakba:SalesAndCollaborationRevenueGrossMember2020-01-012020-12-310001517022akba:OtsukaPharmaceuticalCompanyLimitedMemberus-gaap:CustomerConcentrationRiskMemberakba:SalesAndCollaborationRevenueGrossMember2022-01-012022-12-310001517022akba:OtsukaPharmaceuticalCompanyLimitedMemberus-gaap:CustomerConcentrationRiskMemberakba:SalesAndCollaborationRevenueGrossMember2021-01-012021-12-310001517022akba:OtsukaPharmaceuticalCompanyLimitedMemberus-gaap:CustomerConcentrationRiskMemberakba:SalesAndCollaborationRevenueGrossMember2020-01-012020-12-310001517022us-gaap:CustomerConcentrationRiskMemberakba:AmerisourceBergenDrugCorporationMemberakba:SalesAndCollaborationRevenueGrossMember2022-01-012022-12-310001517022us-gaap:CustomerConcentrationRiskMemberakba:AmerisourceBergenDrugCorporationMemberakba:SalesAndCollaborationRevenueGrossMember2021-01-012021-12-310001517022us-gaap:CustomerConcentrationRiskMemberakba:AmerisourceBergenDrugCorporationMemberakba:SalesAndCollaborationRevenueGrossMember2020-01-012020-12-310001517022us-gaap:CustomerConcentrationRiskMemberakba:McKessonCorporationMemberakba:SalesAndCollaborationRevenueGrossMember2022-01-012022-12-310001517022us-gaap:CustomerConcentrationRiskMemberakba:McKessonCorporationMemberakba:SalesAndCollaborationRevenueGrossMember2021-01-012021-12-310001517022us-gaap:CustomerConcentrationRiskMemberakba:McKessonCorporationMemberakba:SalesAndCollaborationRevenueGrossMember2020-01-012020-12-310001517022us-gaap:CustomerConcentrationRiskMemberakba:CardinalHealthIncMemberakba:SalesAndCollaborationRevenueGrossMember2022-01-012022-12-310001517022us-gaap:CustomerConcentrationRiskMemberakba:CardinalHealthIncMemberakba:SalesAndCollaborationRevenueGrossMember2021-01-012021-12-310001517022us-gaap:CustomerConcentrationRiskMemberakba:CardinalHealthIncMemberakba:SalesAndCollaborationRevenueGrossMember2020-01-012020-12-310001517022us-gaap:CustomerConcentrationRiskMemberakba:FreseniusMedicalCareRxMemberus-gaap:AccountsReceivableMember2022-01-012022-12-310001517022us-gaap:CustomerConcentrationRiskMemberakba:FreseniusMedicalCareRxMemberus-gaap:AccountsReceivableMember2021-01-012021-12-310001517022us-gaap:CustomerConcentrationRiskMemberakba:AmerisourceBergenDrugCorporationMemberus-gaap:AccountsReceivableMember2022-01-012022-12-310001517022us-gaap:CustomerConcentrationRiskMemberakba:AmerisourceBergenDrugCorporationMemberus-gaap:AccountsReceivableMember2021-01-012021-12-310001517022us-gaap:CustomerConcentrationRiskMemberakba:CardinalHealthIncMemberus-gaap:AccountsReceivableMember2022-01-012022-12-310001517022us-gaap:CustomerConcentrationRiskMemberakba:CardinalHealthIncMemberus-gaap:AccountsReceivableMember2021-01-012021-12-310001517022us-gaap:CustomerConcentrationRiskMemberus-gaap:AccountsReceivableMemberakba:McKessonCorporationMember2022-01-012022-12-310001517022us-gaap:CustomerConcentrationRiskMemberus-gaap:AccountsReceivableMemberakba:McKessonCorporationMember2021-01-012021-12-310001517022akba:OtsukaPharmaceuticalCompanyLimitedMemberus-gaap:CustomerConcentrationRiskMemberus-gaap:AccountsReceivableMember2022-01-012022-12-310001517022akba:OtsukaPharmaceuticalCompanyLimitedMemberus-gaap:CustomerConcentrationRiskMemberus-gaap:AccountsReceivableMember2021-01-012021-12-310001517022us-gaap:CustomerConcentrationRiskMemberus-gaap:AccountsReceivableMemberakba:MitsubishiTanabePharmaCorporationMember2022-01-012022-12-310001517022us-gaap:CustomerConcentrationRiskMemberus-gaap:AccountsReceivableMemberakba:MitsubishiTanabePharmaCorporationMember2021-01-012021-12-310001517022srt:MinimumMember2022-01-012022-12-310001517022srt:MaximumMember2022-01-012022-12-310001517022akba:ComputerEquipmentAndSoftwareMember2022-01-012022-12-310001517022akba:ComputerEquipmentAndSoftwareMember2022-12-310001517022akba:ComputerEquipmentAndSoftwareMember2021-12-310001517022us-gaap:FurnitureAndFixturesMembersrt:MinimumMember2022-01-012022-12-310001517022us-gaap:FurnitureAndFixturesMembersrt:MaximumMember2022-01-012022-12-310001517022us-gaap:FurnitureAndFixturesMember2022-12-310001517022us-gaap:FurnitureAndFixturesMember2021-12-310001517022us-gaap:EquipmentMember2022-01-012022-12-310001517022us-gaap:EquipmentMember2022-12-310001517022us-gaap:EquipmentMember2021-12-310001517022us-gaap:LeaseholdImprovementsMember2022-12-310001517022us-gaap:LeaseholdImprovementsMember2021-12-3100015170222022-10-012022-12-3100015170222020-04-012020-06-300001517022us-gaap:SellingGeneralAndAdministrativeExpensesMember2022-01-012022-12-310001517022us-gaap:SellingGeneralAndAdministrativeExpensesMember2021-01-012021-12-310001517022us-gaap:SellingGeneralAndAdministrativeExpensesMember2020-01-012020-12-310001517022akba:ChargebacksAndDiscountsMember2019-12-310001517022akba:RebatesFeesAndOtherDeductionsMember2019-12-310001517022akba:ReturnsMember2019-12-310001517022akba:ChargebacksAndDiscountsMember2020-01-012020-12-310001517022akba:RebatesFeesAndOtherDeductionsMember2020-01-012020-12-310001517022akba:ReturnsMember2020-01-012020-12-310001517022akba:ChargebacksAndDiscountsMember2020-12-310001517022akba:RebatesFeesAndOtherDeductionsMember2020-12-310001517022akba:ReturnsMember2020-12-310001517022akba:ChargebacksAndDiscountsMember2021-01-012021-12-310001517022akba:RebatesFeesAndOtherDeductionsMember2021-01-012021-12-310001517022akba:ReturnsMember2021-01-012021-12-310001517022akba:ChargebacksAndDiscountsMember2021-12-310001517022akba:RebatesFeesAndOtherDeductionsMember2021-12-310001517022akba:ReturnsMember2021-12-310001517022akba:ChargebacksAndDiscountsMember2022-01-012022-12-310001517022akba:RebatesFeesAndOtherDeductionsMember2022-01-012022-12-310001517022akba:ReturnsMember2022-01-012022-12-310001517022akba:ChargebacksAndDiscountsMember2022-12-310001517022akba:RebatesFeesAndOtherDeductionsMember2022-12-310001517022akba:ReturnsMember2022-12-310001517022us-gaap:ProductMember2022-12-310001517022us-gaap:ProductMember2021-12-310001517022akba:LicenseCollaborationAndOtherRevenueMemberakba:MitsubishiTanabePharmaCorporationMember2022-01-012022-12-310001517022akba:LicenseCollaborationAndOtherRevenueMemberakba:MitsubishiTanabePharmaCorporationMember2021-01-012021-12-310001517022akba:LicenseCollaborationAndOtherRevenueMemberakba:MitsubishiTanabePharmaCorporationMember2020-01-012020-12-310001517022akba:LicenseCollaborationAndOtherRevenueMemberakba:DevelopmentAndCommercializeUnitedStatesCollaborationAndLicenseAgreementMemberakba:OtsukaPharmaceuticalCompanyLimitedMember2022-01-012022-12-310001517022akba:LicenseCollaborationAndOtherRevenueMemberakba:DevelopmentAndCommercializeUnitedStatesCollaborationAndLicenseAgreementMemberakba:OtsukaPharmaceuticalCompanyLimitedMember2021-01-012021-12-310001517022akba:LicenseCollaborationAndOtherRevenueMemberakba:DevelopmentAndCommercializeUnitedStatesCollaborationAndLicenseAgreementMemberakba:OtsukaPharmaceuticalCompanyLimitedMember2020-01-012020-12-310001517022akba:LicenseCollaborationAndOtherRevenueMemberakba:DevelopmentAndCommercializeInternationalCollaborationAndLicenseAgreementMemberakba:OtsukaPharmaceuticalCompanyLimitedMember2022-01-012022-12-310001517022akba:LicenseCollaborationAndOtherRevenueMemberakba:DevelopmentAndCommercializeInternationalCollaborationAndLicenseAgreementMemberakba:OtsukaPharmaceuticalCompanyLimitedMember2021-01-012021-12-310001517022akba:LicenseCollaborationAndOtherRevenueMemberakba:DevelopmentAndCommercializeInternationalCollaborationAndLicenseAgreementMemberakba:OtsukaPharmaceuticalCompanyLimitedMember2020-01-012020-12-310001517022akba:LicenseCollaborationAndOtherRevenueMemberakba:MitsubishiTanabePharmaCorporationAndOtsukaPharmaceuticalCompanyLimitedMember2022-01-012022-12-310001517022akba:LicenseCollaborationAndOtherRevenueMemberakba:MitsubishiTanabePharmaCorporationAndOtsukaPharmaceuticalCompanyLimitedMember2021-01-012021-12-310001517022akba:LicenseCollaborationAndOtherRevenueMemberakba:MitsubishiTanabePharmaCorporationAndOtsukaPharmaceuticalCompanyLimitedMember2020-01-012020-12-310001517022akba:LicenseCollaborationAndOtherRevenueMemberakba:JapanTobaccoIncorporationAndToriiPharmaceuticalCompanyLimitedMember2022-01-012022-12-310001517022akba:LicenseCollaborationAndOtherRevenueMemberakba:JapanTobaccoIncorporationAndToriiPharmaceuticalCompanyLimitedMember2021-01-012021-12-310001517022akba:LicenseCollaborationAndOtherRevenueMemberakba:JapanTobaccoIncorporationAndToriiPharmaceuticalCompanyLimitedMember2020-01-012020-12-310001517022akba:LicenseCollaborationAndOtherRevenueMemberakba:MitsubishiTanabePharmaCorporationMemberus-gaap:OtherIncomeMember2022-01-012022-12-310001517022akba:LicenseCollaborationAndOtherRevenueMemberakba:MitsubishiTanabePharmaCorporationMemberus-gaap:OtherIncomeMember2021-01-012021-12-310001517022akba:LicenseCollaborationAndOtherRevenueMemberakba:MitsubishiTanabePharmaCorporationMemberus-gaap:OtherIncomeMember2020-01-012020-12-310001517022akba:MitsubishiTanabePharmaCorporationMemberakba:DevelopmentAndCommercializeCollaborationAgreementMember2022-12-310001517022akba:ViforPharmaMember2022-12-310001517022us-gaap:AccountsReceivableMember2021-12-310001517022us-gaap:AccountsReceivableMember2022-01-012022-12-310001517022us-gaap:AccountsReceivableMember2022-12-310001517022us-gaap:PrepaidExpensesAndOtherCurrentAssetsMember2021-12-310001517022us-gaap:PrepaidExpensesAndOtherCurrentAssetsMember2022-01-012022-12-310001517022us-gaap:PrepaidExpensesAndOtherCurrentAssetsMember2022-12-310001517022akba:DeferredRevenueMember2021-12-310001517022akba:DeferredRevenueMember2022-01-012022-12-310001517022akba:DeferredRevenueMember2022-12-310001517022us-gaap:AccountsPayableMember2021-12-310001517022us-gaap:AccountsPayableMember2022-01-012022-12-310001517022us-gaap:AccountsPayableMember2022-12-310001517022us-gaap:AccountsReceivableMember2020-12-310001517022us-gaap:AccountsReceivableMember2021-01-012021-12-310001517022us-gaap:PrepaidExpensesAndOtherCurrentAssetsMember2020-12-310001517022us-gaap:PrepaidExpensesAndOtherCurrentAssetsMember2021-01-012021-12-310001517022akba:DeferredRevenueMember2020-12-310001517022akba:DeferredRevenueMember2021-01-012021-12-310001517022us-gaap:AccountsPayableMember2020-12-310001517022us-gaap:AccountsPayableMember2021-01-012021-12-310001517022akba:AccruedExpensesAndOtherCurrentLiabilitiesMember2020-12-310001517022akba:AccruedExpensesAndOtherCurrentLiabilitiesMember2021-01-012021-12-310001517022akba:AccruedExpensesAndOtherCurrentLiabilitiesMember2021-12-310001517022akba:MitsubishiTanabePharmaCorporationMemberakba:MitsubishiTanabePharmaCorporationCollaborationAgreementGlobalPhase3ProgramMember2015-12-112015-12-110001517022akba:MitsubishiTanabePharmaCorporationMemberakba:DevelopmentAndCommercializeCollaborationAgreementMemberakba:RegulatoryMilestonePaymentsMember2020-07-012020-09-300001517022akba:MitsubishiTanabePharmaCorporationMemberakba:DevelopmentAndCommercializeCollaborationAgreementMember2022-01-012022-12-310001517022akba:MitsubishiTanabePharmaCorporationMemberakba:DevelopmentAndCommercializeCollaborationAgreementMemberakba:DevelopmentRegulatoryAndCommercialEventsMilestonesPaymentMembersrt:MaximumMember2022-01-012022-12-310001517022akba:MitsubishiTanabePharmaCorporationMemberakba:DevelopmentMilestonesPaymentMemberakba:DevelopmentAndCommercializeCollaborationAgreementMember2022-01-012022-12-310001517022akba:MitsubishiTanabePharmaCorporationMemberakba:DevelopmentAndCommercializeCollaborationAgreementMembersrt:MaximumMemberakba:RegulatoryMilestonePaymentsMember2022-01-012022-12-310001517022akba:MitsubishiTanabePharmaCorporationMemberakba:RegulatoryMilestonePaymentsMember2019-07-012019-09-300001517022akba:CommercialMilestonePaymentsMemberakba:MitsubishiTanabePharmaCorporationMemberakba:DevelopmentAndCommercializeCollaborationAgreementMembersrt:MaximumMember2022-01-012022-12-310001517022akba:MitsubishiTanabePharmaCorporationMemberakba:DevelopmentAndCommercializeResearchAndLicenseAgreementMember2022-01-012022-12-310001517022akba:MitsubishiTanabePharmaCorporationMembersrt:MinimumMemberakba:DevelopmentAndCommercializeCollaborationAgreementMember2022-01-012022-12-310001517022akba:MitsubishiTanabePharmaCorporationMemberakba:DevelopmentAndCommercializeCollaborationAgreementMembersrt:MaximumMember2022-01-012022-12-310001517022akba:MitsubishiTanabePharmaCorporationMemberakba:DevelopmentAndCommercializeCollaborationAgreementMemberakba:RegulatoryMilestonePaymentsMember2022-01-012022-12-31akba:performance_obligation0001517022akba:MitsubishiTanabePharmaCorporationMember2020-01-012022-12-310001517022akba:MitsubishiTanabePharmaCorporationMemberakba:RegulatoryMilestonePaymentsMember2022-01-012022-12-310001517022akba:MitsubishiTanabePharmaCorporationMemberakba:RegulatoryMilestoneApprovalOfVadadustatInJapanMember2020-01-012020-12-310001517022akba:LicenseCollaborationAndOtherRevenueMemberakba:MitsubishiTanabePharmaCorporationMember2019-01-012019-12-310001517022akba:MitsubishiTanabePharmaCorporationMember2022-01-012022-12-310001517022akba:MitsubishiTanabePharmaCorporationMember2021-01-012021-12-310001517022akba:MitsubishiTanabePharmaCorporationMember2020-01-012020-12-310001517022akba:MitsubishiTanabePharmaCorporationMemberus-gaap:AccountsReceivableMemberakba:DevelopmentAndCommercializeResearchAndLicenseAgreementMember2022-12-310001517022akba:MitsubishiTanabePharmaCorporationMemberakba:DevelopmentAndCommercializeResearchAndLicenseAgreementMember2022-12-310001517022akba:MitsubishiTanabePharmaCorporationMemberakba:MitsubishiTanabePharmaCorporationAndOtsukaPharmaceuticalCompanyLimitedMember2020-04-012020-06-300001517022akba:MitsubishiTanabePharmaCorporationMemberakba:MitsubishiTanabePharmaCorporationAndOtsukaPharmaceuticalCompanyLimitedMember2022-01-012022-12-310001517022akba:MitsubishiTanabePharmaCorporationMemberakba:MitsubishiTanabePharmaCorporationAndOtsukaPharmaceuticalCompanyLimitedMember2021-01-012021-12-310001517022akba:MitsubishiTanabePharmaCorporationMemberakba:MitsubishiTanabePharmaCorporationAndOtsukaPharmaceuticalCompanyLimitedMember2020-01-012020-12-310001517022akba:MitsubishiTanabePharmaCorporationMemberus-gaap:AccountsReceivableMemberakba:MitsubishiTanabePharmaCorporationAndOtsukaPharmaceuticalCompanyLimitedMember2022-12-310001517022akba:MitsubishiTanabePharmaCorporationMemberakba:MitsubishiTanabePharmaCorporationAndOtsukaPharmaceuticalCompanyLimitedMember2022-12-310001517022akba:MitsubishiTanabePharmaCorporationMemberus-gaap:OtherCurrentLiabilitiesMemberakba:MitsubishiTanabePharmaCorporationAndOtsukaPharmaceuticalCompanyLimitedMember2022-12-310001517022akba:MitsubishiTanabePharmaCorporationMemberus-gaap:OtherNoncurrentLiabilitiesMemberakba:MitsubishiTanabePharmaCorporationAndOtsukaPharmaceuticalCompanyLimitedMember2022-12-310001517022akba:MitsubishiTanabePharmaCorporationMemberakba:MitsubishiTanabePharmaCorporationSupplyAgreementMember2022-01-012022-12-310001517022akba:MitsubishiTanabePharmaCorporationMemberakba:MitsubishiTanabePharmaCorporationSupplyAgreementMember2021-01-012021-12-310001517022akba:MitsubishiTanabePharmaCorporationMemberakba:MitsubishiTanabePharmaCorporationSupplyAgreementMember2020-01-012020-12-310001517022akba:MitsubishiTanabePharmaCorporationMemberus-gaap:AccountsReceivableMemberakba:MitsubishiTanabePharmaCorporationSupplyAgreementMember2022-12-310001517022akba:MitsubishiTanabePharmaCorporationMemberakba:MitsubishiTanabePharmaCorporationSupplyAgreementMember2022-12-310001517022akba:DevelopmentAndCommercializeUnitedStatesCollaborationAndLicenseAgreementMemberakba:OtsukaPharmaceuticalCompanyLimitedMember2022-01-012022-12-310001517022akba:DevelopmentAndCommercializeUnitedStatesCollaborationAndLicenseAgreementMemberakba:OtsukaPharmaceuticalCompanyLimitedMember2019-03-310001517022akba:DevelopmentAndCommercializeUnitedStatesCollaborationAndLicenseAgreementMemberakba:OtsukaPharmaceuticalCompanyLimitedMember2019-04-010001517022akba:DevelopmentAndCommercializeUnitedStatesCollaborationAndLicenseAgreementMemberakba:UpFrontNonRefundableAndNonCreditableMemberakba:OtsukaPharmaceuticalCompanyLimitedMember2022-01-012022-12-310001517022akba:DevelopmentAndCommercializeUnitedStatesCollaborationAndLicenseAgreementMemberakba:OtsukaPharmaceuticalCompanyLimitedMember2016-12-182016-12-310001517022akba:DevelopmentAndCommercializeUnitedStatesCollaborationAndLicenseAgreementMemberakba:OtsukaPharmaceuticalCompanyLimitedMember2022-07-012022-07-310001517022akba:LicenseCollaborationAndOtherRevenueMemberakba:DevelopmentAndCommercializeUnitedStatesAndInternationalCollaborationAndLicenseAgreementMemberakba:OtsukaPharmaceuticalCompanyLimitedMember2022-01-012022-12-310001517022akba:DevelopmentAndCommercializeUnitedStatesCollaborationAndLicenseAgreementMemberakba:OtsukaPharmaceuticalCompanyLimitedMember2021-01-012021-12-310001517022akba:DevelopmentAndCommercializeUnitedStatesCollaborationAndLicenseAgreementMemberakba:OtsukaPharmaceuticalCompanyLimitedMember2020-01-012020-12-310001517022akba:DevelopmentAndCommercializeInternationalCollaborationAndLicenseAgreementMemberakba:OtsukaPharmaceuticalCompanyLimitedMember2022-01-012022-12-310001517022akba:DevelopmentAndCommercializeInternationalCollaborationAndLicenseAgreementMemberakba:UpFrontNonRefundableAndNonCreditableMemberakba:OtsukaPharmaceuticalCompanyLimitedMember2022-01-012022-12-310001517022akba:DevelopmentAndCommercializeInternationalCollaborationAndLicenseAgreementMemberakba:OtsukaPharmaceuticalCompanyLimitedMember2017-04-012022-12-310001517022us-gaap:AccountsPayableMemberakba:DevelopmentAndCommercializeInternationalCollaborationAndLicenseAgreementMemberakba:OtsukaPharmaceuticalCompanyLimitedMember2021-12-310001517022akba:DevelopmentAndCommercializeInternationalCollaborationAndLicenseAgreementMemberus-gaap:PrepaidExpensesAndOtherCurrentAssetsMemberakba:OtsukaPharmaceuticalCompanyLimitedMember2021-12-310001517022akba:JanssenPharmaceuticaNVMemberakba:DevelopmentAndCommercializeResearchAndLicenseAgreementMember2017-02-090001517022akba:CyclerionTherapeuticsLicenseAgreementMember2021-06-042021-06-040001517022akba:CyclerionTherapeuticsLicenseAgreementMember2021-06-012021-06-300001517022akba:ViforInternationalLimitedMemberus-gaap:LicenseMember2022-02-180001517022akba:LicenseAgreementMemberakba:ViforInternationalLimitedMember2019-04-082019-04-080001517022akba:ViforInternationalLimitedMember2022-02-182022-02-180001517022akba:ViforInternationalLimitedMember2022-01-012022-12-310001517022akba:LicenseAgreementMemberakba:ViforInternationalLimitedMember2017-05-310001517022akba:LicenseAgreementMemberakba:ViforInternationalLimitedMember2017-05-012017-05-310001517022us-gaap:PrivatePlacementMember2022-02-222022-02-220001517022akba:ViforInternationalLimitedMemberus-gaap:LicenseMember2022-01-012022-12-310001517022akba:LicenseAgreementMemberakba:ViforInternationalLimitedMember2017-05-120001517022akba:ViforInternationalLimitedMember2022-12-310001517022akba:ViforInternationalLimitedMemberus-gaap:LicenseMember2022-12-310001517022akba:ViforInternationalLimitedMemberakba:PriorityReviewVoucherLetterAgreementMember2020-02-142020-02-140001517022akba:ViforInternationalLimitedMemberus-gaap:ResearchAndDevelopmentExpenseMember2020-01-012020-12-310001517022akba:ViforInternationalLimitedMemberakba:PriorityReviewVoucherLetterAgreementMember2021-10-012021-12-310001517022akba:LicenseAgreementMemberakba:PanionAndBFBiotechIncorporationMemberakba:JapanTobaccoIncorporationAndToriiPharmaceuticalCompanyLimitedMember2019-04-172019-04-170001517022akba:LicenseAgreementMemberakba:PanionAndBFBiotechIncorporationMemberakba:JapanTobaccoIncorporationAndToriiPharmaceuticalCompanyLimitedMember2022-01-012022-12-310001517022akba:LicenseAgreementMemberakba:PanionAndBFBiotechIncorporationMemberakba:JapanTobaccoIncorporationAndToriiPharmaceuticalCompanyLimitedMember2021-01-012021-12-310001517022akba:LicenseAgreementMemberakba:PanionAndBFBiotechIncorporationMemberakba:JapanTobaccoIncorporationAndToriiPharmaceuticalCompanyLimitedMember2020-01-012020-12-310001517022akba:JapanTobaccoIncorporationAndToriiPharmaceuticalCompanyLimitedMemberakba:SublicenseAgreementMember2022-01-012022-12-310001517022akba:JapanTobaccoIncorporationAndToriiPharmaceuticalCompanyLimitedMemberakba:SublicenseAgreementMember2021-01-012021-12-310001517022akba:JapanTobaccoIncorporationAndToriiPharmaceuticalCompanyLimitedMemberakba:SublicenseAgreementMember2020-01-012020-12-310001517022akba:AveroaSASMemberus-gaap:LicenseMember2022-12-222022-12-220001517022akba:AveroaSASMember2022-12-222022-12-220001517022akba:RestructuringPlanApril2022Member2022-04-040001517022akba:RestructuringPlanApril2022Member2022-01-012022-12-310001517022akba:RestructuringPlanNovember2022Member2022-11-072022-11-070001517022akba:RestructuringPlanNovember2022Member2022-01-012022-12-3100015170222021-02-2500015170222021-02-252021-02-250001517022us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel1Memberus-gaap:FairValueMeasurementsRecurringMember2022-12-310001517022us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel2Memberus-gaap:FairValueMeasurementsRecurringMember2022-12-310001517022us-gaap:FairValueMeasurementsRecurringMemberus-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel3Member2022-12-310001517022us-gaap:FairValueMeasurementsRecurringMember2022-12-310001517022us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel1Memberus-gaap:FairValueMeasurementsRecurringMember2021-12-310001517022us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel2Memberus-gaap:FairValueMeasurementsRecurringMember2021-12-310001517022us-gaap:FairValueMeasurementsRecurringMemberus-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel3Member2021-12-310001517022us-gaap:FairValueMeasurementsRecurringMember2021-12-310001517022akba:CollateralAgentPharmakonMember2022-12-310001517022akba:CollateralAgentPharmakonMember2021-12-310001517022akba:MeasurementInputClinicalDevelopmentSuccessMemberus-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel3Memberakba:ValuationTechniqueScenarioBasedAndDiscountedCashFlowMember2022-12-310001517022akba:MeasurementInputClinicalDevelopmentSuccessMemberus-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel3Memberakba:ValuationTechniqueScenarioBasedAndDiscountedCashFlowMember2021-12-310001517022us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel3Memberakba:OtherThanDerivativeLiabilitiesMember2022-12-310001517022us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel3Memberakba:OtherThanDerivativeLiabilitiesMember2021-12-310001517022us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel3Member2022-12-310001517022us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel3Member2021-12-310001517022akba:KeryxBiopharmaceuticalsIncMember2022-01-012022-12-310001517022akba:KeryxBiopharmaceuticalsIncMember2021-01-012021-12-310001517022akba:KeryxBiopharmaceuticalsIncMember2020-01-012020-12-310001517022akba:DevelopedProductRightsForAuryxiaMember2022-12-310001517022akba:DevelopedProductRightsForAuryxiaMember2021-12-310001517022akba:DevelopedProductRightsForAuryxiaMember2022-01-012022-12-310001517022akba:DevelopedProductRightsForAuryxiaMember2021-01-012021-12-310001517022akba:DevelopedProductRightsForAuryxiaMember2020-01-012020-12-310001517022us-gaap:MeasurementInputDiscountRateMemberus-gaap:ValuationTechniqueDiscountedCashFlowMember2022-12-310001517022akba:DevelopedProductRightsForAuryxiaMember2021-01-012021-03-310001517022akba:DevelopedProductRightsForAuryxiaMember2020-04-012020-09-300001517022akba:DevelopedProductRightsForAuryxiaMember2020-10-012020-12-310001517022akba:TermLoanMemberakba:BiopharmaCreditInvestmentsVMasterLimitedPartnerMemberakba:KeryxMemberakba:CollateralAgentPharmakonMember2019-11-11akba:tranche0001517022akba:TermLoanMemberakba:BiopharmaCreditInvestmentsVMasterLimitedPartnerMemberakba:KeryxMemberakba:CollateralAgentPharmakonMemberakba:TrancheAMember2019-11-110001517022akba:TermLoanMemberakba:BiopharmaCreditInvestmentsVMasterLimitedPartnerMemberakba:TrancheBMemberakba:KeryxMemberakba:CollateralAgentPharmakonMember2019-11-110001517022akba:TermLoanMemberakba:BiopharmaCreditInvestmentsVMasterLimitedPartnerMemberakba:KeryxMemberakba:CollateralAgentPharmakonMemberakba:ThreeMonthLondonInterbankOfferedRateMember2019-11-112019-11-110001517022akba:TermLoanMemberakba:BiopharmaCreditInvestmentsVMasterLimitedPartnerMemberus-gaap:LondonInterbankOfferedRateLIBORMemberakba:KeryxMemberakba:CollateralAgentPharmakonMember2019-11-112019-11-110001517022akba:TermLoanMemberakba:BiopharmaCreditInvestmentsVMasterLimitedPartnerMemberakba:DebtInstrumentFirstQuarterlyPeriodicPaymentPeriodOneMemberakba:KeryxMemberakba:CollateralAgentPharmakonMember2019-11-112019-11-110001517022akba:TermLoanMemberakba:BiopharmaCreditInvestmentsVMasterLimitedPartnerMemberakba:KeryxMemberakba:CollateralAgentPharmakonMemberakba:DebtInstrumentFirstQuarterlyPeriodicPaymentPeriodTwoMember2019-11-112019-11-110001517022akba:TermLoanMemberakba:BiopharmaCreditInvestmentsVMasterLimitedPartnerMemberakba:KeryxMemberakba:CollateralAgentPharmakonMember2022-01-012022-12-310001517022akba:TermLoanMemberakba:BiopharmaCreditInvestmentsVMasterLimitedPartnerMemberakba:KeryxMemberakba:CollateralAgentPharmakonMember2019-11-112019-11-110001517022akba:TermLoanMemberakba:BiopharmaCreditInvestmentsVMasterLimitedPartnerMemberakba:KeryxMemberakba:CollateralAgentPharmakonMemberakba:TrancheAMember2019-11-250001517022akba:TermLoanMemberakba:BiopharmaCreditInvestmentsVMasterLimitedPartnerMemberakba:TrancheBMemberakba:KeryxMemberakba:CollateralAgentPharmakonMember2020-12-102020-12-100001517022akba:TermLoanMemberakba:CollateralAgentPharmakonMemberakba:TrancheAMember2022-07-152022-07-150001517022akba:TermLoanMemberakba:TrancheBMemberakba:CollateralAgentPharmakonMember2022-07-152022-07-150001517022akba:TermLoanMemberakba:CollateralAgentPharmakonMemberakba:TrancheAAndBMember2022-07-152022-07-150001517022akba:TermLoanMemberakba:CollateralAgentPharmakonMemberakba:TrancheAAndBMember2022-01-012022-12-310001517022akba:TermLoanMemberakba:BiopharmaCreditInvestmentsVMasterLimitedPartnerMemberakba:KeryxMemberakba:CollateralAgentPharmakonMember2021-01-012021-12-310001517022akba:TermLoanMemberakba:BiopharmaCreditInvestmentsVMasterLimitedPartnerMemberakba:KeryxMemberakba:CollateralAgentPharmakonMember2020-01-012020-12-3100015170222020-06-0400015170222020-06-050001517022akba:AtTheMarketEquityOfferingProgramMembersrt:MaximumMember2020-03-122020-03-120001517022us-gaap:CommonStockMemberakba:AtTheMarketEquityOfferingProgramMember2021-01-012021-12-310001517022us-gaap:CommonStockMemberakba:AtTheMarketEquityOfferingProgramMember2020-01-012020-12-310001517022us-gaap:CommonStockMemberakba:AtTheMarketEquityOfferingProgramMember2021-01-012021-03-310001517022us-gaap:CommonStockMemberakba:AtTheMarketEquityOfferingProgramMember2022-01-012022-03-310001517022akba:AtTheMarketEquityOfferingProgramAuthorizedFebruary2021Membersrt:MaximumMember2021-02-252021-02-250001517022us-gaap:CommonStockMemberakba:AtTheMarketEquityOfferingProgramAuthorizedFebruary2021Member2021-01-012021-12-310001517022akba:AtTheMarketEquityOfferingProgramAuthorizedMarch2022Membersrt:MaximumMember2022-03-012022-03-010001517022us-gaap:CommonStockMemberakba:AtTheMarketEquityOfferingProgramAuthorizedMarch2022Member2022-01-012022-03-310001517022akba:OpenMarketSaleAgreementAuthorizedApril2022Membersrt:MaximumMember2022-04-072022-04-07akba:stock_incentive_plan0001517022akba:InducementAwardProgramMember2022-01-012022-12-310001517022akba:InducementAwardProgramMember2022-12-310001517022akba:TwoThousandAndFourteenPlansMember2014-02-280001517022akba:TwoThousandAndFourteenPlansMember2022-01-012022-12-310001517022us-gaap:EmployeeStockOptionMemberakba:EmployeesMemberakba:TwoThousandAndFourteenPlansMember2022-01-012022-12-310001517022akba:EmployeesMemberakba:InducementAwardProgramMember2022-01-012022-12-310001517022akba:EmployeesMemberus-gaap:RestrictedStockUnitsRSUMemberakba:TwoThousandAndFourteenPlansMember2022-01-012022-12-310001517022akba:PerformanceBasedRestrictedStockUnitMemberakba:EmployeesMemberakba:TwoThousandAndFourteenPlansMember2022-01-012022-12-310001517022srt:DirectorMemberus-gaap:EmployeeStockOptionMemberakba:TwoThousandAndFourteenPlansMember2022-01-012022-12-310001517022srt:DirectorMemberus-gaap:RestrictedStockUnitsRSUMemberakba:TwoThousandAndFourteenPlansMember2022-01-012022-12-310001517022akba:TwoThousandAndFourteenEmployeeStockPurchasePlanMember2022-12-310001517022akba:TwoThousandAndFourteenEmployeeStockPurchasePlanMember2022-01-012022-12-310001517022akba:OptionRestrictedStockUnitsRSUsAndPerformanceBasedRestrictedStockUnitsPSUsMember2022-12-310001517022akba:OptionRestrictedStockUnitsRSUsAndPerformanceBasedRestrictedStockUnitsPSUsMember2021-12-310001517022akba:AkebiaEquityPlansMember2022-12-310001517022akba:AkebiaEquityPlansMember2021-12-310001517022us-gaap:WarrantMember2022-12-310001517022us-gaap:WarrantMember2021-12-310001517022us-gaap:EmployeeStockMember2022-12-310001517022us-gaap:EmployeeStockMember2021-12-310001517022akba:TwoThousandAndFourteenPlansMember2022-01-012022-01-010001517022akba:TwoThousandAndFourteenPlansMember2021-01-012021-01-010001517022akba:TwoThousandAndFourteenPlansMember2020-01-012020-01-010001517022us-gaap:EmployeeStockOptionMember2021-02-282021-02-280001517022us-gaap:EmployeeStockOptionMembersrt:MinimumMember2022-01-012022-12-310001517022us-gaap:EmployeeStockOptionMembersrt:MaximumMember2022-01-012022-12-310001517022us-gaap:EmployeeStockOptionMemberakba:ShareBasedCompensationAwardTrancheFirstAnniversaryOfGrantDateMember2022-01-012022-12-310001517022us-gaap:ShareBasedCompensationAwardTrancheOneMemberus-gaap:EmployeeStockOptionMember2022-01-012022-12-310001517022us-gaap:EmployeeStockOptionMemberus-gaap:ShareBasedCompensationAwardTrancheTwoMember2022-01-012022-12-31akba:installment0001517022us-gaap:EmployeeStockOptionMember2022-01-012022-12-310001517022us-gaap:EmployeeStockOptionMember2021-01-012021-12-310001517022us-gaap:EmployeeStockOptionMember2020-01-012020-12-310001517022akba:TwoThousandAndFourteenPlansMember2021-01-012021-12-310001517022akba:TwoThousandAndFourteenPlansMember2020-01-012020-12-310001517022srt:MinimumMemberakba:TwoThousandAndFourteenPlansMember2022-01-012022-12-310001517022srt:MaximumMemberakba:TwoThousandAndFourteenPlansMember2022-01-012022-12-310001517022srt:MinimumMemberakba:TwoThousandAndFourteenPlansMember2021-01-012021-12-310001517022srt:MaximumMemberakba:TwoThousandAndFourteenPlansMember2021-01-012021-12-310001517022srt:MinimumMemberakba:TwoThousandAndFourteenPlansMember2020-01-012020-12-310001517022srt:MaximumMemberakba:TwoThousandAndFourteenPlansMember2020-01-012020-12-310001517022us-gaap:EmployeeStockOptionMember2021-12-310001517022us-gaap:EmployeeStockOptionMember2022-12-310001517022akba:InducementAwardProgramMemberakba:TwoThousandAndFourteenPlansMember2022-12-310001517022akba:InducementAwardProgramMemberakba:TwoThousandAndFourteenPlansMember2022-01-012022-12-310001517022akba:PerformanceBasedStockOptionsMember2022-01-012022-12-310001517022akba:PerformanceBasedStockOptionsMember2021-01-012021-12-310001517022akba:PerformanceBasedStockOptionsMember2022-12-310001517022akba:PerformanceBasedStockOptionsMember2021-12-310001517022akba:PerformanceBasedStockOptionsMember2020-01-012020-12-310001517022akba:PerformanceBasedStockOptionsMemberakba:TwoThousandAndFourteenPlansMember2022-12-310001517022us-gaap:RestrictedStockUnitsRSUMember2021-02-282021-02-280001517022akba:ShareBasedCompensationAwardTrancheFirstAnniversaryOfGrantDateMemberakba:ServiceBasedRestrictedStockUnitsMember2022-01-012022-12-310001517022us-gaap:ShareBasedCompensationAwardTrancheOneMemberakba:ServiceBasedRestrictedStockUnitsMember2022-01-012022-12-310001517022us-gaap:ShareBasedCompensationAwardTrancheTwoMemberakba:ServiceBasedRestrictedStockUnitsMember2022-01-012022-12-310001517022akba:ShareBasedPaymentArrangementTrancheTwoFollowingFirstAnniversaryAfterGrantDateMemberakba:ServiceBasedRestrictedStockUnitsMember2022-01-012022-12-310001517022akba:EmployeesMemberus-gaap:RestrictedStockUnitsRSUMember2022-01-012022-12-310001517022akba:EmployeesMemberus-gaap:RestrictedStockUnitsRSUMember2021-01-012021-12-310001517022akba:EmployeesMemberus-gaap:RestrictedStockUnitsRSUMember2020-01-012020-12-310001517022akba:PerformanceBasedRestrictedStockUnitMember2022-01-012022-12-310001517022akba:PerformanceBasedRestrictedStockUnitMember2021-01-012021-12-310001517022akba:PerformanceBasedRestrictedStockUnitMember2020-01-012020-12-310001517022akba:RestrictedStockUnitsRSUsAndPerformanceBasedRestrictedStockUnitsPSUsMember2021-12-310001517022akba:RestrictedStockUnitsRSUsAndPerformanceBasedRestrictedStockUnitsPSUsMember2022-01-012022-12-310001517022akba:RestrictedStockUnitsRSUsAndPerformanceBasedRestrictedStockUnitsPSUsMember2022-12-310001517022akba:RestrictedStockUnitsRSUsAndPerformanceBasedRestrictedStockUnitsPSUsMember2021-01-012021-12-310001517022akba:RestrictedStockUnitsRSUsAndPerformanceBasedRestrictedStockUnitsPSUsMember2020-01-012020-12-310001517022akba:TwoThousandAndFourteenEmployeeStockPurchasePlanMember2021-01-012021-12-310001517022akba:TwoThousandAndFourteenEmployeeStockPurchasePlanMember2020-01-012020-12-310001517022us-gaap:ResearchAndDevelopmentExpenseMember2022-01-012022-12-310001517022us-gaap:ResearchAndDevelopmentExpenseMember2021-01-012021-12-310001517022us-gaap:ResearchAndDevelopmentExpenseMember2020-01-012020-12-310001517022us-gaap:RestrictedStockUnitsRSUMember2022-01-012022-12-310001517022us-gaap:RestrictedStockUnitsRSUMember2021-01-012021-12-310001517022us-gaap:RestrictedStockUnitsRSUMember2020-01-012020-12-310001517022srt:MinimumMemberakba:ShareBasedCompensationAwardTrancheFirstAnniversaryOfGrantDateMemberakba:ServiceBasedRestrictedStockUnitsMember2022-01-012022-12-310001517022us-gaap:RestrictedStockUnitsRSUMemberakba:ShareBasedPaymentArrangementTrancheOneFirstAnniversaryAfterGrantDateSubjectedToIndividualContinuedServiceMember2022-01-012022-12-310001517022akba:ShareBasedPaymentArrangementTrancheThreeThirdAnniversaryAfterGrantDateSubjectedToIndividualContinuedServiceMemberus-gaap:RestrictedStockUnitsRSUMember2022-01-012022-12-310001517022us-gaap:RestrictedStockUnitsRSUMemberakba:ShareBasedPaymentArrangementTrancheTwoSecondAnniversaryAfterGrantDateSubjectedToIndividualContinuedServiceMember2022-01-012022-12-310001517022us-gaap:ShareBasedCompensationAwardTrancheOneMemberus-gaap:RestrictedStockUnitsRSUMember2022-01-012022-12-310001517022akba:ShareBasedPaymentArrangementTrancheOneFirstAnniversaryAfterGrantDateMemberakba:ServiceBasedRestrictedStockUnitsMember2022-01-012022-12-310001517022us-gaap:DomesticCountryMember2022-12-310001517022us-gaap:DomesticCountryMember2021-12-310001517022us-gaap:StateAndLocalJurisdictionMember2022-12-310001517022us-gaap:StateAndLocalJurisdictionMember2021-12-31akba:age0001517022akba:CambridgeMember2020-11-30utr:sqft0001517022akba:CambridgeMember2016-07-012016-07-310001517022akba:CambridgeMember2017-01-012017-01-010001517022akba:CambridgeMemberakba:OfficeSpaceMember2018-04-300001517022akba:CambridgeMember2016-07-310001517022akba:CambridgeMemberakba:OfficeSpaceMember2019-02-012019-02-280001517022akba:CambridgeMemberakba:OfficeSpaceMember2020-12-012020-12-310001517022akba:CambridgeMemberakba:OfficeSpaceMember2021-12-012021-12-310001517022akba:BostonMemberakba:OfficeSpaceMember2022-12-310001517022akba:BostonMemberakba:OfficeSpaceMember2022-01-012022-12-310001517022akba:BostonMemberakba:OfficeSpaceMember2022-02-012022-02-280001517022akba:BostonMemberakba:OfficeSpaceMember2022-02-280001517022akba:CambridgeMemberakba:OfficeSpaceMember2022-12-31akba:extensionOption0001517022akba:BostonMemberakba:KeryxBiopharmaceuticalsIncMemberakba:OfficeSpaceMember2022-12-310001517022akba:CambridgeMemberakba:LabSpaceMember2022-12-310001517022akba:BostonMemberakba:KeryxBiopharmaceuticalsIncMemberakba:OfficeSpaceMember2020-01-012020-12-310001517022akba:BostonMemberakba:KeryxBiopharmaceuticalsIncMemberakba:OfficeSpaceMember2022-01-012022-12-310001517022akba:BostonMemberakba:KeryxBiopharmaceuticalsIncMemberakba:OfficeSpaceMember2021-01-012021-12-310001517022us-gaap:LetterOfCreditMemberakba:CambridgeMemberus-gaap:OtherCurrentAssetsMember2022-12-310001517022us-gaap:LetterOfCreditMemberakba:KeryxBiopharmaceuticalsIncMemberus-gaap:OtherCurrentAssetsMember2022-12-310001517022srt:MinimumMember2022-12-310001517022srt:MaximumMember2022-12-310001517022akba:BioVectraIncMember2022-10-012022-12-310001517022akba:SiegfriedEvionnazSAMember2022-12-310001517022akba:KeryxBiopharmaceuticalsIncMember2022-12-310001517022akba:KeryxBiopharmaceuticalsIncMember2021-12-310001517022akba:SupplyAgreementPatheonIncMember2022-01-012022-12-310001517022akba:SupplyAgreementPatheonIncMember2022-12-310001517022akba:STAPharmaceuticalHongKongLimitedMember2020-04-022020-04-020001517022akba:STAPharmaceuticalHongKongLimitedMember2022-01-012022-12-310001517022akba:WuXiSTAMember2021-02-102021-02-100001517022us-gaap:WarrantMember2022-01-012022-12-310001517022us-gaap:WarrantMember2021-01-012021-12-310001517022us-gaap:WarrantMember2020-01-012020-12-310001517022us-gaap:EmployeeStockOptionMember2022-01-012022-12-310001517022us-gaap:EmployeeStockOptionMember2021-01-012021-12-310001517022us-gaap:EmployeeStockOptionMember2020-01-012020-12-310001517022us-gaap:RestrictedStockUnitsRSUMember2022-01-012022-12-310001517022us-gaap:RestrictedStockUnitsRSUMember2021-01-012021-12-310001517022us-gaap:RestrictedStockUnitsRSUMember2020-01-012020-12-310001517022us-gaap:SubsequentEventMemberakba:SiegfriedEvionnazSAMember2023-02-282023-02-28
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
|
|
|
|
|
|
☒ |
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022
OR
|
|
|
|
|
|
☐ |
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from _to_
Commission File Number 001-36352
AKEBIA THERAPEUTICS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Delaware |
|
20-8756903 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization) |
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
245 First Street, Cambridge, MA
|
|
02142 |
(Address of principal executive offices) |
|
(Zip Code) |
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:
(617) 871-2098
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the
Act:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title of each class |
Trading Symbol(s) |
Name of each exchange on which registered |
Common Stock, par value $0.00001 per share |
AKBA |
The Nasdaq Capital Market
|
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned
issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act. Yes ☐
No ☒
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file
reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Act. Yes ☐
No ☒
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to
file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past
90 days. Yes ☒
No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this
chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter
period that the registrant was required to submit such
files). Yes ☒
No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a
smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the
definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,”
“smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in
Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer |
☐ |
Accelerated filer |
☒ |
Non-accelerated filer |
☐ |
Smaller reporting company |
☐ |
|
|
Emerging growth company |
☐ |
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the
registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period
for complying with any new or revised financial accounting
standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange
Act.
☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on
and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness
of its internal control over financial reporting under Section
404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the
registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit
report.
☒
If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act,
indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the
registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an
error to previously issued financial statements.
☐
Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are
restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based
compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers
during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §
240.10D-1(b).
☐
Indicate by check mark whether registrant is a shell company (as
defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act). Yes ☐ No ☒
The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common
equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant, based on the
closing price of the registrant’s Common Stock on The Nasdaq Global
Market on June 30, 2022, was $64,134,957.
The number of shares of registrant’s Common Stock outstanding as of
February 28, 2023 was 184,248,045.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
The registrant intends to file a definitive proxy statement
pursuant to Regulation 14A in connection with its 2023 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders within 120 days after the end of the
registrant’s fiscal year ended December 31, 2022.
Portions of the proxy statement are incorporated by reference into
Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements
that are being made pursuant to the provisions of the U.S. Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 with the intention of
obtaining the benefits of the “safe harbor” provisions of that Act.
All statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K other
than statements of historical fact are forward-looking statements.
These forward-looking statements may be accompanied by words such
as “anticipate,” “believe,” “build,” “can,” “contemplate,”
“continue,” “could,” “should,” “designed,” “estimate,” “project,”
“expect,” “forecast,” “future,” “goal,” “intend,” “likely,” “may,”
“plan,” “possible,” “potential,” “predict,” “strategy,” “seek,”
“target,” “will,” “would,” and other words and terms of similar
meaning, but the absence of these words does not necessarily mean
that a statement is not forward-looking. These forward-looking
statements include, but are not limited to, statements
about:
•the
potential therapeutic benefits, safety profile, and effectiveness
of vadadustat;
•our
expectations with respect to the development of vadadustat, if any,
following our receipt of a complete response letter to our new drug
application for vadadustat for the treatment of anemia due to
chronic kidney disease in adult patients, including the timing of a
potential response to the Formal Dispute Resolution Request from
the U.S. Food and Drug Administration;
•that
delivering value broadly to the kidney community, as well as others
who may benefit from our medicines, will result in delivering value
for stockholders;
•our
pipeline and portfolio, including its potential, and our related
research and development activities;
•the
timing of or likelihood of regulatory filings and approvals,
including with respect to labeling or other restrictions, the
potential approval of vadadustat and our outlook related thereto,
and potential indications for vadadustat;
•the
timing, investment and associated activities involved in continued
commercialization of Auryxia®
(ferric citrate), its growth opportunities and our ability to
execute thereon;
•the
potential indications, demand and market opportunity, potential and
acceptance of Auryxia and vadadustat, if approved, including the
size of eligible patient populations;
•the
potential therapeutic applications of the hypoxia inducible factor
pathway;
•our
competitive position, including estimates, developments and
projections relating to our competitors and their products and
product candidates, and our industry;
•our
expectations, projections and estimates regarding our capital
requirements, need for additional capital, financing our future
cash needs, costs, expenses, revenues, capital resources, cash
flows, financial performance, profitability, tax obligations,
liquidity, growth, contractual obligations, the period of time our
cash resources and collaboration funding will fund our current
operating plan, estimates with respect to our ability to operate as
a going concern, our internal control over financial reporting and
disclosure controls and procedures, and any future deficiencies or
material weaknesses in our internal controls and
procedures;
•the
direct or indirect impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on our
business, operations and the markets and communities in which we
and our partners, collaborators, vendors, and customers
operate;
•our
manufacturing, supply and quality matters and any recalls,
write-downs, impairments or other related consequences or potential
consequences;
•estimates,
beliefs and judgments related to the valuation of intangible
assets, goodwill, debt and other assets and liabilities, including
our impairment analysis and our methodology and assumptions
regarding fair value measurements;
•the timing
of the availability and disclosure of clinical trial data and
results;
•our
and our collaborators’ strategy, plans and expectations with
respect to the development, manufacturing, supply,
commercialization, launch, marketing and sale of Auryxia and
vadadustat, if approved, and the associated timing
thereof;
•the
designs of our studies, and the type of information and data
expected from our studies and the expected benefits
thereof;
•our
ability to maintain any marketing authorizations we currently hold
or will obtain, including our marketing authorizations for Auryxia
and our ability to complete post-marketing requirements with
respect thereto;
•our
ability to negotiate, secure and maintain adequate pricing,
coverage and reimbursement terms and processes on a timely basis,
or at all, with third-party payors for Auryxia and vadadustat, if
approved;
•the timing
of initiation of our clinical trials and plans to conduct
preclinical studies and clinical trials in the
future;
•the
timing and amounts of payments from or to our collaborators and
licensees, and the anticipated arrangements and benefits under our
collaboration and license agreements, including with respect to
milestones and royalties;
•our
intellectual property position, including obtaining and maintaining
patents, and the timing, outcome and impact of administrative,
regulatory, legal and other proceedings relating to our patents and
other proprietary and intellectual property rights, patent
infringement suits that we have filed or may file, or other actions
that we may take against companies, and the timing and resolution
thereof;
•expected
ongoing reliance on third parties, including with respect to the
development, manufacturing, supply and commercialization of Auryxia
and vadadustat, if approved;
•accounting
standards and estimates, their impact, and their expected timing of
completion;
•estimated
periods of performance of key contracts;
•our
facilities, lease commitments, and future availability of
facilities;
•cybersecurity;
•insurance
coverage;
•management
of personnel, including our management team, and our employees,
including employee compensation, employee relations, and our
ability to attract, train and retain high quality
employees;
•the
implementation of our business model, current operating plan, and
strategic plans for our business, product candidates and
technology, and business development opportunities including
potential collaborations, alliances, mergers, acquisitions or
licensing of assets;
•our
workforce reductions, future charges expected to be incurred in
connection therewith and estimated reductions in net cash required
for operating activities in connection therewith; and
•the
timing, outcome and impact of current and any future legal
proceedings.
Any or all of these forward-looking statements in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K may turn out to be inaccurate. These
forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties,
including those that are discussed below under the heading "Risk
Factor Summary," and the risk factors detailed further in Part I,
Item 1A. "Risk Factors" included in this Annual Report on Form
10-K and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and in our
Securities and Exchange Commission reports filed after this report,
that could cause our actual results, financial condition,
performance or achievements to be materially different from those
indicated in these forward-looking statements. Given these risks
and uncertainties, you should not place undue reliance on these
forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements speak only
as of the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Except as
required by law, we assume no obligation to publicly update or
revise these forward-looking statements for any reason. Unless
otherwise stated, our forward-looking statements do not reflect the
potential impact of any future acquisitions, mergers, dispositions,
joint ventures or investments we may make.
This Annual Report on Form 10-K also contains estimates and other
information concerning our industry and the markets for certain
diseases, including data regarding the estimated size of those
markets, and the incidence and prevalence of certain medical
conditions. Unless otherwise expressly stated, we obtained this
industry, market and other data from reports, research surveys,
studies and similar data prepared by market research firms and
other third parties, industry, medical and general publications,
government data and similar sources.
In this Annual Report on Form 10-K, unless otherwise stated or the
context otherwise requires, references to “Akebia,” “we,” “us,”
“our,” “the Company,” and similar references refer to Akebia
Therapeutics, Inc. and, where appropriate, its subsidiaries,
including Keryx Biopharmaceuticals, Inc., or Keryx.
AURYXIA®,
AKEBIA Therapeutics®,
VafseoTM
and their associated logos are trademarks of Akebia and/or its
affiliates. All other trademarks, trade names and service marks
appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are the property of
their respective owners. All website addresses given in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K are for information only and are not intended
to be an active link or to incorporate any website information into
this document.
RISK FACTORS SUMMARY
Investing in our common stock involves numerous risks, including
the risks summarized below and described in further detail in “Part
I, Item 1A. Risk Factors” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, any
one of which could materially adversely affect our business,
financial condition, results of operations, and prospects. These
risks include, but are not limited to, the risks noted
below.
•We
have incurred significant losses since our inception, and
anticipate that we will continue to incur significant losses and
cannot guarantee when, if ever, we will become profitable or attain
positive cash flows.
•We
will require substantial additional financing to achieve our goals.
A failure to obtain this necessary capital when needed, or on
acceptable terms, could force us to delay, limit, reduce or
terminate our product development or commercialization
efforts.
•Raising
additional capital may cause dilution to our existing stockholders,
restrict our operations or require us to relinquish rights to our
product and product candidates on unfavorable terms to
us.
•If
we fail to regain compliance with the continued listing
requirements of Nasdaq, our common stock may be delisted and the
price of our common stock and our ability to access the capital
markets could be negatively impacted.
•We
may not be successful in our efforts to identify, acquire,
in-license, discover, develop and commercialize additional products
or product candidates
or our decisions to prioritize the development of certain product
candidates over others may not be successful,
which could impair our ability to grow.
•We
may engage in strategic transactions to acquire assets, businesses,
or rights to products, product candidates or technologies or form
collaborations or make investments in other companies or
technologies that could harm our operating results, dilute our
stockholders’ ownership, increase our debt, or cause us to incur
significant expense.
•Our
business has been and may continue to be, directly or indirectly,
adversely affected by the COVID-19 pandemic.
•Our
obligations in connection with the loan agreement with Pharmakon
and requirements and restrictions in the loan agreement could
adversely affect our financial condition and restrict our
operations.
•Our
Royalty Interest Acquisition Agreement with HealthCare Royalty
Partners IV, L.P. contains various covenants and other provisions,
which, if violated, could materially adversely affect our financial
condition.
•Our
business is substantially dependent on the commercial success of
Auryxia. If we are unable to continue to successfully commercialize
Auryxia, our results or operations and financial condition will be
materially harmed.
•If
we are unable to maintain or expand, or, if vadadustat is approved,
initiate, sales and marketing capabilities or enter into additional
agreements with third parties, we may not be successful in
commercializing Auryxia, vadadustat, if approved, or any other
product candidates that may be approved.
•Our,
or our partners', failure to obtain or maintain adequate coverage,
pricing and reimbursement for Auryxia, vadadustat, if approved, or
any other future approved products, could have a material adverse
effect on our or our collaboration partners’ ability to sell such
approved products profitably and otherwise have a material adverse
impact on our business.
•We
face substantial competition, which may result in others
discovering, developing or commercializing products before, or more
successfully than, we do.
•The
commercialization of RionaTM
and VafseoTM
in Japan and our current and potential future efforts with respect
to the development and commercialization of our products and
product candidates outside of the United States subject us to a
variety of risks associated with international operations, which
could materially adversely affect our business.
•Clinical
drug development involves a lengthy and expensive process with an
uncertain outcome, and we will incur additional costs in connection
with, and may experience delays in completing, or ultimately be
unable to complete, the development and, if approved,
commercialization of vadadustat and any other product
candidates.
•We
may find it difficult to enroll patients in our clinical trials,
which could delay or prevent clinical trials of Auryxia, vadadustat
or any other product or product candidate, including those that may
be in-licensed or acquired.
•Conducting
clinical trials outside of the United States, as we have done
historically and as we may decide to do in the future, presents
additional risks and complexities and, if we decide to conduct a
clinical trial outside of the United States in the future, we may
not complete such trials successfully, in a timely manner, or at
all, which could affect our ability to obtain regulatory
approvals.
•Auryxia,
vadadustat or any other product or product candidate, including
those that may be in-licensed or acquired, may cause undesirable
side effects or have other properties that may delay or prevent
marketing approval or limit their commercial
potential.
•We
may not be able to obtain marketing approval for, or successfully
commercialize, vadadustat or any other product candidate, or we may
experience significant delays in doing so, any of which would
materially harm our business.
•Products
approved for marketing are subject to extensive post-marketing
regulatory requirements and could be subject to post-marketing
restrictions or withdrawal from the market, and we may be subject
to penalties, including withdrawal of marketing approval, if we
fail to comply with regulatory requirements or if we experience
unanticipated problems with our products, or product candidates,
when and if any of them is approved.
•We
are subject to a complex regulatory scheme that requires
significant resources to ensure compliance and our failure to
comply with applicable laws could subject us to government scrutiny
or enforcement, potentially resulting in costly investigations,
fines, penalties or sanctions, contractual damages, reputational
harm, administrative burdens and diminished profits and future
earnings.
•We
will incur significant liability if it is determined that we are
promoting any “off-label” use of Auryxia or any other product we
may develop, in-license or acquire or if it is determined that any
of our activities violates the federal Anti-Kickback
Statute.
•Disruptions
in the FDA, regulatory authorities outside the U.S. and other
government agencies caused by global health concerns or funding
shortages could prevent new products and services from being
developed or commercialized in a timely manner, which could
negatively impact our business.
•Compliance
with privacy and data security requirements could result in
additional costs and liabilities to us or inhibit our ability to
collect and process data globally, and the failure to comply with
such requirements could subject us to significant fines and
penalties, which may have a material adverse effect on our
business, financial condition or results of
operations.
•Legislative
and regulatory healthcare reform may increase the difficulty and
cost for us to obtain marketing approval of and commercialize our
product candidates and affect the prices we may obtain for any
products that are approved in the United States or foreign
jurisdictions.
•We
depend on collaborations with third parties for the development and
commercialization of Auryxia, Riona, Vafseo and vadadustat and if
these collaborations are not successful or if our collaborators
terminate their agreements with us, we may not be able to
capitalize on the market potential of Auryxia, Riona, Vafseo and
vadadustat, and our business could be materially
harmed.
•We
may seek to establish additional collaborations and, if we are not
able to establish them on commercially reasonable terms, or at all,
we may have to alter our development and commercialization
plans.
•We
rely upon third parties to conduct all aspects of our product
manufacturing, and in many instances only have a single supplier,
and the loss of these manufacturers, their failure to supply us on
a timely basis, or at all, or their failure to successfully carry
out their contractual duties or comply with regulatory
requirements, cGMP requirements, or guidance could cause delays in
or disruptions to our supply chain and substantially harm our
business.
•We
rely upon third parties to conduct our clinical trials and certain
of our preclinical studies. If they do not successfully carry out
their contractual duties, comply with regulatory requirements or
meet expected deadlines, we may not be able to obtain or maintain
marketing approval for Auryxia, vadadustat or any of our product
candidates, and our business could be substantially
harmed.
•If
the licensor of certain intellectual property relating to Auryxia
terminates, modifies or threatens to terminate existing contracts
or relationships with us, our business may be materially
harmed.
•If
we are unable to adequately protect our intellectual property,
third parties may be able to use our intellectual property, which
could adversely affect our ability to compete in the
market.
•We
may not be able to protect our intellectual property rights
throughout the world.
•The
intellectual property that we own or have licensed and related
non-patent exclusivity relating to our current and future products
is, and may be, limited, which could adversely affect our ability
to compete in the market and adversely affect the value of
Auryxia.
•The
market entry of one or more generic competitors or any third
party’s attempt to challenge our intellectual property rights will
likely limit Auryxia sales and have an adverse impact on our
business and results of operation.
•Litigation
and administrative proceedings, including third party claims of
intellectual property infringement and opposition/invalidation
proceedings against third party patents, may be costly and time
consuming and may delay or harm our drug discovery, development and
commercialization efforts.
•We
may be subject to claims that our employees, consultants or
independent contractors have wrongfully used or disclosed
confidential information of third parties.
•If
we fail to attract, retain and motivate senior management and
qualified personnel, we may be unable to successfully develop,
obtain and/or maintain marketing approval of and commercialize
vadadustat or commercialize Auryxia.
•Our
cost savings plan and the associated workforce reductions
implemented in April, May and November 2022 may not result in
anticipated savings, could result in total costs and expenses that
are greater than expected and could disrupt our
business.
•We
may encounter difficulties in managing our growth, including with
respect to our employee base, and managing our operations
successfully.
•We
are currently subject to legal proceedings that could result in
substantial costs and divert management's attention, and we could
be subject to additional legal proceedings.
•Our
stock price has been and may continue to be volatile, which could
result in substantial losses for holders or future purchasers of
our common stock and lawsuits against us and our officers and
directors.
PART I
Item 1. Business
Overview
We are a fully integrated biopharmaceutical company committed to
addressing patients’ unmet needs. Since our initial public offering
in 2014, we have built a business focused on developing and
commercializing innovative therapeutics that we believe serves as a
foundation for future growth. Our purpose is to better the life of
each person impacted by kidney disease, and we have established
ourselves as a leader in the kidney community. We believe our
demonstrated ability to deliver value broadly to the kidney
community has enabled us to build a sustainable company. While our
current focus centers on people living with kidney disease, we
believe our continued commitment to our products and pipeline
assets, focusing on all patients who can realize a meaningful
benefit from our medicines, will result in delivering value for
shareholders.
Our current portfolio includes:
•Auryxia®
(ferric citrate),
a medicine approved and marketed in the United States for two
indications: (1) the control of serum phosphorus levels in adult
patients with dialysis dependent chronic kidney disease, or DD-CKD,
or the Hyperphosphatemia Indication, and (2) the treatment of iron
deficiency anemia, or IDA, in adult patients with
non-dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease, or NDD-CKD. The
product is also available in Japan and Taiwan.
•Vafseo™
(vadadustat),
an oral hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase, or HIF-PH,
inhibitor, is approved in Japan for the treatment of anemia due to
chronic kidney disease, or CKD, in adult patients. Vadadustat is
under regulatory review for the treatment of anemia due to CKD in
Europe, where it has received a positive opinion from the Committee
for Medicinal Products for Human Use, or CHMP, of the European
Medicines Agency, or EMA, in adult patients on dialysis. Vadadustat
is also under regulatory review for the treatment of anemia due to
CKD in Australia, Korea, Taiwan and other countries. We continue to
pursue a path to potentially gain approval for vadadustat in the
U.S. Further, we have several lifecycle management and indication
expansion opportunities currently under evaluation or in
development for vadadustat.
•HIF-PH
inhibitors
in preclinical development. The discovery of hypoxia-inducible
factor, or HIF, laid the foundation to explore the central role of
oxygen sensing in many diseases. As we have seen through the
development of vadadustat as a treatment for anemia due to CKD,
when stabilized, HIF triggers wide-ranging adaptive, protective
responses during hypoxic or ischemic conditions. Our clinical team
and research scientists are eager to further develop HIF-PH
inhibitors for various indications including acute kidney injury,
or AKI, and retinopathy of prematurity, or ROP.
We continue to explore additional commercial and development
opportunities to expand our pipeline and portfolio of novel
therapeutics through both internal research and external innovation
to leverage our fully integrated team.
Auryxia
Today we market Auryxia in the United States with our
well-established, nephrology-focused commercial organization.
Auryxia is a non-calcium, non-chewable, orally administered tablet
that was approved for marketing by the U.S. Food and Drug
Administration, or FDA, in September 2014 as a phosphate binder for
the Hyperphosphatemia Indication and was commercially launched in
the United States shortly thereafter. In November 2017, Auryxia
received marketing approval from the FDA for a second indication,
the treatment of iron deficiency anemia, and was commercially
launched for this indication in the United States shortly
thereafter. Our Japanese sublicensee, Japan Tobacco, Inc., or JT,
and its subsidiary, Torii Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., or Torii,
commercialize ferric citrate hydrate as Riona® in Japan. Averoa
SAS, or Averoa, has an exclusive license to develop and
commercialize ferric citrate in the European Economic Area, or EEA,
Turkey, Switzerland and the United Kingdom.
In 2022, Auryxia product revenue increased approximately 24.5% over
2021 due to the company’s focus on implementing a new contracting
strategy in late 2021. Since 2018, Auryxia product revenue has
grown at a compounded annual growth rate of approximately 17% due
to market share gains and improved net price per pill, despite a
13% decline in total prescriptions for phosphate binders in the
United States since 2018.
Vadadustat
We are seeking regulatory approval in the European Union and the
United States for vadadustat as an oral treatment of anemia in
adult DD-CKD patients. We and Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Corporation,
or MTPC, are also seeking regulatory approval for vadadustat as a
treatment for anemia in adult DD-CKD and NDD-CKD patients in the
United Kingdom, Switzerland and Australia, and Korea and Taiwan,
respectively.
Vadadustat is currently pending an European Commission, or EC,
approval decision. On February 23, 2023, the CHMP of the EMA
adopted a positive opinion recommending the EC approve Vafseo™ for
the treatment of symptomatic anemia associated with CKD in adults
on chronic maintenance dialysis. We anticipate that the EC will
grant marketing authorization for Vafseo in May 2023, which would
be applicable to all 27 European Union member states and Iceland,
Norway and Liechtenstein. Following the termination of our U.S. and
international collaboration agreements with Otsuka in June 2022, we
regained full rights to vadadustat in Europe, Australia, China,
Canada, Latin America, the Middle East and Russia. As we do not
have a commercial presence in Europe, we are seeking a partner in
Europe and will support the partner’s launch of vadadustat, if
approved. We are seeking to identify and secure a partner that can
effectively facilitate treatment of as many people as would benefit
from vadadustat, if approved, thus maximizing the value of the
asset.
We submitted a New Drug Application, or NDA, to the FDA for
vadadustat in March of 2021. On March 29, 2022, the FDA issued a
complete response letter, or CRL, to our NDA for vadadustat. The
FDA concluded that the data in the NDA do not support a favorable
benefit-risk assessment of vadadustat for dialysis and non-dialysis
patients. The FDA expressed safety concerns noting failure to meet
non-inferiority in MACE in the non-dialysis patient population, the
increased risk of thromboembolic events, driven by vascular access
thrombosis in dialysis patients, and the risk of drug-induced liver
injury. We believe there are compelling data supporting a positive
benefit-risk profile for the use of vadadustat broadly in patients
with CKD, including non-dialysis patients though we have always
remained cautious about receiving a broad label for vadadustat that
would extend to non-dialysis patients with anemia due to CKD. As
such, we began the process to dispute the FDA ruling, and in
October 2022, we submitted a Formal Dispute Resolution Request, or
FDRR, with the FDA regarding the CRL, specifically related to
DD-CKD adult patients. The appeal focused on the favorable balance
of the benefits and risks of vadadustat for the treatment of adult
DD-CKD patients in light of safety concerns expressed by the FDA in
the CRL related to the rate of adjudicated thromboembolic events
driven by vascular access thrombosis for vadadustat compared to the
active comparator and the risk of drug-induced liver injury. In
February 2023, we received a second interim response from the FDA
to our FDRR, which is still under consideration by the FDA at the
time of this filing.
Following the termination of our collaboration agreement with
Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., or Otsuka, we own full rights to
vadadustat in the U.S., subject to our licensing agreement with
Vifor (International) Ltd. (now a part of CSL Limited), or CSL
Vifor. If we obtain FDA approval of vadadustat for DD-CKD adult
patients, we plan to commercialize vadadustat in the United States
with CSL Vifor.
Leveraging our learnings from the research and development of
vadadustat, and a breadth of scientific expertise on the HIF
pathway, we believe there is potential to leverage HIFs to treat
other hypoxic conditions and to explore the use of HIFs in acute
settings. We believe this potential applies to vadadustat as well
as other preclinical assets we are internally
developing.
Regarding broader uses of vadadustat, in July 2020 we partially
funded an investigator-sponsored clinical study conducted by The
University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, or UTHealth,
in Houston, Texas, evaluating the use of vadadustat as a potential
therapy to prevent and treat acute respiratory distress syndrome,
or ARDS, in adult patients who have been hospitalized due to
COVID-19 and hypoxemia (O2 saturation ≤94%). The study was a phase
2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial that measured
the proportion of patients who had scores of 6, 7, or 8 on the
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease Ordinal Scale,
or NIAID-OS, at Day 7 and Day 14, with Day 14 being the primary
endpoint. While the study missed the primary endpoint, the data,
detailed in the Clinical Development Program section, were
encouraging. For reference, subjects receiving vadadustat
demonstrated 94% probability for conferring benefit on the NIAID-OS
at Day 14, slightly below the primary superiority threshold of
>95% probability. We believe vadadustat has the potential to
prevent the worsening of ARDS more broadly since the mechanism
underlying the benefits are not specific to COVID-19, and we will
further explore vadadustat in an acute care setting.
Strategy
Our strategic focus and business operations are driven by our
commitment to patients. We understand the unmet needs of kidney
patients and others impacted by chronic and debilitating illness.
Our strategy is to execute initiatives aligned with our three
pillars to maximize value while advancing innovation to address
patients’ unmet needs.
•Maximize
the Value of Auryxia:
We continue to use our nephrology-focused commercial organization
to increase awareness, demand for and adoption of Auryxia for its
approved indications with key stakeholders including nephrologists,
third-party payors, dialysis organizations and
patients.
•Support
Vadadustat Globally:
We believe vadadustat as a treatment for anemia due to CKD
represents a significant opportunity to drive shareholder value. We
own full rights to vadadustat in Europe, China, Latin America and
certain other territories and U.S. rights subject to our license
agreement with CSL Vifor. We received a positive opinion from the
CHMP for vadadustat for adult DD-CKD patients, and anticipate that
the EC will grant marketing authorization for Vafseo in May 2023.
In addition, we are engaged with regulatory bodies in the United
Kingdom, Switzerland and Australia, which are part of the ACCESS
Consortium, that could lead to approval of vadadustat in these
countries. We continue to pursue a path for potential approval for
vadadustat as a treatment for anemia in adult DD-CKD patients in
the U.S. and remain actively engaged in a process to dispute the
CRL issued for vadadustat. We believe in the benefits vadadustat
can deliver to patients, if approved.
•Invest
in Pipeline and Explore Strategic Growth:
We aim to thoughtfully invest in our pipeline by developing
internal assets and exploring other strategic growth
opportunities.
◦Advance
vadadustat clinical development for additional therapeutic
indications:
We intend to advance development of vadadustat for the treatment of
ARDS. We intend to work with UTHealth on an adequate,
well-controlled study in a broad patient population, beyond COVID
related ARDS.
◦Continue
to drive our internal pipeline and portfolio of novel
therapeutics.
We aim to continue to add to our pipeline and portfolio of novel
therapeutics through internal research, discovery and
development.
We plan to continue to develop early-stage assets and explore
opportunities that align with our strategic vision. As a leader in
HIF biology, we have invested resources to build out a preclinical
portfolio of several potential development candidates which may
enter the clinic in the next few years.
Areas of interest for pursuit of clinical development include AKI,
ARDS and ROP.
◦Explore
opportunities for growth:
As a fully integrated biopharmaceutical company, we have an
established commercial organization and expertise in research and
development. We believe there may be opportunities to leverage our
assets through strategic transactions, including establishing
mutually beneficial relationships with other companies that are
looking to advance assets potentially through regulatory processes
or commercial launch.
We strive to execute our strategy from a strong financial position.
We plan to continue to invest in prioritized drug research and
development activities, funded by revenue from Auryxia and existing
cash on hand. To do so, we are focused on maximizing Auryxia net
product revenue, prioritizing the highest value development
opportunities, and aggressively reducing discretionary
spending.
Our management team has extensive experience in developing and
commercializing innovation medications, a deep understanding of the
renal space and biological pathways involved in kidney disease
including HIF biology and iron metabolism, and broad business
development expertise. We believe we are well positioned to execute
on our strategy.
Background on Kidney Disease
Kidney disease is an area of major unmet need globally, driving
massive healthcare costs and with a generally poor prognosis:
eventually many patients will progress to a stage where they are
dependent on dialysis, with high morbidity and a significant
increase in mortality rate.
Kidney disease can be caused by a number of distinct and
concomitant factors, including cardiometabolic disorders (primarily
diabetes and hypertension), genetic diseases, autoimmune disorders,
and aging. Given the prevalence and growth rates of these various
underlying conditions, kidney disease prevalence is expected to
continue to increase globally. In the United States, CKD
significantly impacts the U.S. healthcare system, potentially
affecting about 37 million patients and costing Medicare nearly
$120 billion annually for treating Medicare beneficiaries with CKD
of end-stage renal disease, or ESRD, or end-stage kidney disease,
or ESKD, according to the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services has
recognized this national pandemic and partnered with ASN to found
the KidneyX Innovation Accelerator,
a public-private partnership to improve the lives of the 850
million people worldwide currently affected by kidney diseases by
accelerating innovation in the prevention, diagnosis and treatment
of kidney diseases.
Most of the conditions covered by the term “kidney disease” may
lead to renal failure and dependence on dialysis or kidney
transplant for survival. Dependence on dialysis is associated with
a significant increase in mortality and hospitalizations, and a
significant reduction in quality of life for patients. There is a
clear need to improve the clinical and quality of life outcomes for
people living with kidney disease. We are driven by our purpose, to
provide or contribute to better alternatives that improve the lives
of people impacted by kidney disease.
CKD is a condition in which the kidneys are progressively damaged
to the point that they cannot properly filter the blood circulating
in the body. This damage causes waste products to build up in the
patient’s blood leading to other health problems, including anemia,
cardiovascular disease and bone disease.
The prevalence and incidence of CKD is increasing in all segments
of the United States population. Risk factors for the development
of CKD include concomitant diseases such as hypertension, diabetes
mellitus and cardiovascular disease, lifestyle factors such as
tobacco use and inactivity, family history, aging and prenatal
factors such as maternal diabetes mellitus, low birth weight and
small-for-gestational-age status. The progression of CKD towards
renal failure is complicated by multiple conditions which further
deteriorate kidney function and the general health of patients if
left untreated. Typically the prevalence of these conditions
increases as CKD progresses. For instance, patients with CKD often
experience high phosphorus and develop hyperphosphatemia, which can
result in symptoms including nausea and muscle or bone pain.
Additionally, anemia, characterized by low hemoglobin levels, is
typically associated with a worsening quality of life, increased
hospitalizations and increased mortality.
Anemia, or low hemoglobin/red blood count, in patients with CKD
most commonly arises from two etiologies:
1.Anemia
due to CKD: results from inadequate levels of EPO, a protein
hormone synthesized by specialized cells in the kidney that
stimulates red blood cell, or RBC, production in the bone marrow.
As renal function declines, the body progressively loses the
ability to produce endogenous EPO; and
2.IDA:
results from low levels of iron due to abnormal iron absorption and
utilization in patients with CKD.
Auryxia
Auryxia is a non-calcium, non-chewable, orally-administered tablet
marketed in the United States, Japan and Taiwan for the
Hyperphosphatemia Indication, and the treatment of IDA in adult
NDD-CKD patients.
Market Opportunity – Hyperphosphatemia and Iron Deficiency
Anemia
Hyperphosphatemia is a metabolic disorder characterized by elevated
serum phosphorus levels. Phosphorus is a vital element required for
most cellular processes and, in individuals with normal kidney
function, excess dietary phosphorus is removed by the kidneys and
excreted in urine. In adults with functioning kidneys, normal serum
phosphorus levels are 2.5 to 4.5 mg/dL. In adults with DD-CKD,
elevated phosphorus levels, or hyperphosphatemia, can be associated
with adverse effects, including increased risk for cardiovascular
disease, bone disease and death.
Phosphate binders are the only interventions marketed for the
treatment of hyperphosphatemia. According to the U.S. Renal Data
System, or USRDS, 2022 Annual Data Report, there were nearly
558,000 patients in the United States on dialysis in 2020, of which
approximately 80% were treated with a phosphate binder. Phosphate
binders need to be taken with meals and snacks, and it is not
uncommon for DD-CKD patients to be prescribed as many as 12 or more
phosphate binder pills per day, among other medications. Patients
taking phosphate binders also experience gastrointestinal
tolerability issues. As a result of the pill burden and
tolerability issues associated phosphate binders, prescribed
phosphate binders are often intolerable for many patients, leading
to lack of treatment adherence and compliance.
In addition, in 2020 approximately 44% of patients treated with a
phosphate binder were treated solely with a calcium-based binder,
which can lead to side effects such as increased cardiovascular
risk, hypercalcemia and gastrointestinal-related adverse events.
Due to the risks associated with calcium-based binders, in 2017
Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes, or KDIGO, recommended
that clinicians limit the use of calcium-based
binders.
Sevelamer and lanthanum-based phosphate binders are other
alternatives. Lanthanum is a rare earth element and is minimally
absorbed in the gastrointestinal tract. Lower level tissue
deposition, particularly in bone and liver, has been observed in
animals, however, the long-term, potentially harmful, effects due
to the accumulation of lanthanum in these tissues have not been
clearly
determined. Alternatively, sucroferric oxyhydroxide, sold under the
brand name Velphoro, is a non-calcium, iron-based phosphate binder
that is a chewable tablet used for the control of serum phosphorus
levels.
Aluminum-type phosphate binders were widely used in the past.
However, the systemic absorption of aluminum from these agents and
the potential toxicity associated with their use no longer make
this type of binder a viable long-term treatment
option.
In addition, other agents are in development, including OPKO Health
Inc.’s Alpharen™ Tablets (fermagate tablets) and Unicycive’s
Renazorb (lanthanum dioxycarbonate) or could otherwise enter the
market, including
Ardelyx, Inc.’s tenapanor (which is approved in the United States
for the treatment of adults with irritable bowel syndrome with
constipation, and for which the FDA granted an appeal in the fourth
quarter of 2022 that will allow Ardelyx to resubmit a new drug
application in 2023 with respect to the control of serum phosphorus
in adult patients with CKD on dialysis),
that may impact the market for Auryxia.
Anemia is a condition characterized by abnormally low levels of
hemoglobin. Hemoglobin is contained within RBCs and carries oxygen
to other parts of the body. If there are too few RBCs or if
hemoglobin levels are low, the cells in the body will not get
enough oxygen. IDA is a common form of anemia that is caused
by patients not having enough iron to manufacture healthy RBCs.
Although anyone can develop IDA, IDA is particularly common in
patients with NDD-CKD. IDA is associated with fatigue, lethargy,
decrease quality of life, cardiovascular complications,
hospitalizations and increased mortality.
We estimate that there are more than 500,000 adult patients in the
United States with NDD-CKD diagnosed with IDA and managed by a
nephrologist. Currently, there are two forms of iron therapy used
to treat IDA: oral iron supplements and iron delivered via
intravenous infusion, or IV iron. Oral iron is currently the
first-line iron replacement therapy for most physicians; however,
oral iron supplements are poorly absorbed by many patients, which
may adversely impact their effectiveness, and are associated with
certain side effects, such as constipation, diarrhea and cramping,
that may adversely affect patient compliance. IV iron is viewed as
an effective treatment; however, like other intravenous medicines,
it is logistically difficult to administer in an office setting,
where NDD-CKD patients are more often treated.
Commercialization
We market Auryxia in the United States through our
well-established, nephrology-focused sales force and commercial
organization.
Auryxia,
as an oral drug, is covered by Medicare only under Part D. We have
gained access for Auryxia in the United States in both Medicare
Part D and commercial channels. Auryxia is currently covered for
the Hyperphosphatemia Indication in nine of the ten largest
Medicare Part D plans, which provide coverage for approximately
35.8 million people, and the ten largest commercial plans and
pharmacy benefit managers in the United States, which provide
coverage for approximately 131.0 million people. In September 2018,
the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, or CMS, decided
that Auryxia would no longer be covered by Medicare for the IDA
Indication. While this decision does not impact CMS coverage of the
Hyperphosphatemia Indication, it requires all Auryxia prescriptions
for Medicare patients to undergo a prior authorization to ensure
their use in the Hyperphosphatemia Indication. While we believe
that the vast majority of the Medicare prescriptions written for
Auryxia today are for the Hyperphosphatemia Indication and
therefore will continue to be covered by Medicare with prior
authorization, the CMS Decision has had and will continue to have
an adverse impact on the sales of Auryxia for the Hyperphosphatemia
Indication and the IDA Indication.
In recognition of the evolution of chronic kidney care to
value-based reimbursement and care delivery, in late 2022 we
shifted our commercial model to align to customer objectives. The
team of key account managers are focused on high value individual
prescribers that represent approximately 70% of Auryxia prescribing
and 40% of the overall binder market potential. The team also
focuses on large group practices that are part of the Comprehensive
Kidney Care Contracting, or CKCC. These entities are focused on
delivering coordinated, cost-effective care for advanced CKD
patients, including those receiving dialysis. This customer group
requires different clinical and economic rationale for supporting
product use in protocols and formularies. Therefore, we have
aligned key account managers to these high-volume, value-based care
organizations. We believe this model will be more aligned to our
customers’ needs and recognition of our product’s value
proposition.
JT, and its subsidiary, Torii, market Riona in Japan. We receive
tiered double-digit royalties from JT and Torii
based
on their sales in Japan.
Vadadustat
Market Opportunity
Anemia is common in patients with CKD, and its prevalence increases
with disease progression. Anemia due to CKD results from
inadequate EPO levels, which negatively affect RBC production. Left
untreated, anemia accelerates overall deterioration of patient
health with increased morbidity and mortality. Based on third party
prevalence data and company estimates, approximately 5.7 million
people in the United States with CKD suffer from anemia. According
to the USRDS 2022 Annual Data Report, there were nearly 558,000
patients in the United States on dialysis in 2020, of which 86%
were on in-center hemodialysis and the remainder on home dialysis,
which includes both peritoneal dialysis and home
hemodialysis.
The current standard of care for anemia due to CKD is treatment by
injectable recombinant human erythropoiesis-stimulating agents, or
ESAs, such as Epogen® (epoetin alfa), Aranesp® (darbepoetin alfa)
and Mircera® (methoxy polyethylene glycol-epoetin beta), or blood
transfusion. Based on publicly available information on ESA sales
and market data compiled by a third-party vendor, global sales of
injectable ESAs for all uses were estimated to be approximately $10
billion in 2022. The vast majority of these sales are believed to
have been for the treatment of anemia due to CKD. In Europe, within
the EU5, which refers to the five largest markets in Europe or
France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and England, more than 200,000
dialysis patients are diagnosed with anemia due to CKD and are
treated with ESAs.
When administered to a patient, injectable ESAs provide
supraphysiological levels of exogenous EPO to stimulate production
of RBCs. While injectable ESAs can be effective in raising
hemoglobin levels, they have the potential to cause significant
side effects, and need to be injected subcutaneously or
intravenously. In particular, injectable ESAs may lead to
thrombosis, stroke, myocardial infarction and death. Also, several
randomized clinical trials have demonstrated that higher hemoglobin
targets (≥13.0 g/dL) with ESA use are associated with increased
cardiovascular risk, leading to changes in regulatory and clinical
practice guidance. While these safety concerns, which became
evident starting in 2006, have led to a significant reduction in
the use of injectable ESAs, and an increase in the use of
injectable iron, injectable ESAs remain the current standard of
care for both DD-CKD and NDD-CKD patients with anemia.
We believe there is a significant opportunity for vadadustat to
address limitations of injectable ESAs and become a new oral option
for the treatment of anemia due to CKD in DD-CKD adult patients, if
approved. In addition to clinical data from our Phase 3
INNO2VATE
program that showed vadadustat was non-inferior to darbepoetin alfa
with respect to hematological efficacy (change in hemoglobin
concentration) and cardiovascular safety (MACE) in DD-CKD adult
patients, we believe the potential opportunity for vadadustat
within the DD-CKD market is supported by a number of factors
including vadadustat's convenient oral dosing and unique dialysis
market dynamics. Further, in February 2023 the FDA approved
daprodustat, an oral HIF-PH inhibitor marketed as Jesduvroq by
GlaxoSmithKline plc, or GSK, as a once-a-day treatment of anemia
due to CKD in adult patients who have been receiving dialysis for
at least four months.
Injectable ESAs are administered by dialysis center staff to
approximately 90% of in-center hemodialysis patients and 75% of
home dialysis patients. Although the significant majority of
dialysis patients are cared for in-center, recently, several
factors including the COVID-19 pandemic, changing patient
preferences, government initiatives, and reimbursement changes are
supporting a shift toward home dialysis. We believe as an oral
therapeutic, vadadustat has potential to be a convenient treatment
alternative to injectable ESAs not only for in-center dialysis
patients, but also for the growing number of home dialysis patients
and patients transitioning to home dialysis.
Given the concentration of dialysis clinics in large networks, with
DaVita, Inc., or DaVita, and Fresenius Kidney Care Group accounting
for a vast majority of the dialysis population in the United
States, treatment is usually driven by medical protocols that are
implemented across the entire network of clinics. These protocols
are informed by very large data sets and when updated, result in
rapid change applicable to large segments of the patient
population. This is particularly true of medications covered under
the ESRD Prospective Payment System, or PPS, in Medicare, or the
ESRD Bundle, a payment structure with a flat base rate per dialysis
session adjusted for individual patient and facility
characteristics. Dialysis-related drugs are included in the ESRD
Bundle if they fall into functional categories such as anemia
management and bone and mineral metabolism, except that oral-only
drugs are exempted from inclusion until 2025. In a final ESRD PPS
rule published in November 2018, CMS confirmed that it will expand
the Transitional Drug Add-on Payment Adjustment, or TDAPA, to all
new dialysis drugs approved by the FDA after January 1, 2020. The
TDAPA will provide separate payment for new drugs for two years
based on the drug’s Average Sales Price, or ASP, that will be in
addition to the base rate in order to facilitate the adoption of
innovative therapies. Although there are several details that need
further clarification, and the precise timing of when we could
receive codes to allow for reimbursement under TDAPA is not known,
the codes are assigned on a quarterly basis, and the rule provides
support for our assumption that new anemia treatments, including
those in the HIF-PH inhibitor class, will be included in the ESRD
Bundle and will be eligible for separate payment initially under
TDAPA.
Commercialization
We are supporting MTPC's commercialization of vadadustat in Japan
and are preparing for a potential commercial launch of vadadustat
in the United States, if approved. Our intention is to secure a
partner to commercialize vadadustat in the EU and certain other
countries.
If we obtain FDA approval of vadadustat for DD-CKD adult patients,
we plan to commercialize vadadustat in the United States. In
February 2022, we entered into a Second Amended and Restated
License Agreement, or the Vifor Second Amended Agreement, with CSL
Vifor. Pursuant to the Vifor Second Amended Agreement, we granted
CSL Vifor an exclusive license to sell vadadustat to Fresenius
Medical Care North America and its affiliates, including Fresenius
Kidney Care Group LLC, to certain third-party dialysis
organizations approved by us, to independent dialysis organizations
that are members of group purchase organizations, and to certain
non-retail specialty pharmacies in the United States, or the
Territory. We refer to Fresenius Medical Care North America and its
affiliates, these organizations and specialty pharmacies
collectively as the “Supply Group.” During the term of the Vifor
Second Amended Agreement, CSL Vifor is not permitted to sell any
HIF product that competes with vadadustat in the Territory to the
Supply Group. We plan to commercialize vadadustat directly with
organizations outside the Supply Group.
Clinical Development Program
Below is a summary of the clinical development work undertaken for
vadadustat.
Vadadustat Global Phase 3 Clinical Program in Anemia Due To
CKD
We conducted a global Phase 3 clinical development program for
vadadustat, which included two programs, INNO2VATE
and PRO2TECT.
INNO2VATE
evaluated vadadustat in adult DD-CKD patients with anemia due to
CKD in two studies, and PRO2TECT
evaluated vadadustat in adult NDD-CKD patients with anemia due to
CKD in two studies. Combined, we enrolled approximately 7,500
patients in these studies and evaluated a once daily oral dosing of
vadadustat against an injectable ESA active comparator, darbepoetin
alfa.
Both the INNO2VATE
and
PRO2TECT
Phase 3 programs were global, multicenter, open-label,
sponsor-blind, active-controlled non-inferiority programs. In both
programs, patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either oral
vadadustat or injectable darbepoetin alfa.
The primary efficacy endpoint for each study in the
INNO2VATE
and PRO2TECT
programs was the mean change in hemoglobin between baseline and the
primary evaluation period. Non-inferiority, or NI, for the primary
efficacy endpoint was achieved if the lower bound of the 95%
confidence interval for the between-group difference of the mean
hemoglobin change did not fall below the pre-specified NI margin.
Both the INNO2VATE
and PRO2TECT
programs included the primary safety endpoint of the assessment of
MACE, with a comparison of vadadustat to darbepoetin alfa. MACE is
defined as the composite endpoint of all-cause mortality, non-fatal
myocardial infarction, or non-fatal stroke. The primary safety
analysis for each program was based on the combined MACE events
from the two studies in each of INNO2VATE
and PRO2TECT.
NI for the primary safety analysis was achieved if the upper bound
of the 95% confidence interval for the hazard ratio of vadadustat
to darbepoetin alfa did not exceed the pre-specified NI margin. We
prospectively defined and agreed to non-inferiority margins with
the United States and European regulatory authorities and agreed
with the United States regulatory authorities on the key components
of our statistical analysis plan.
Top-line Results from Global Phase 3 INNO2VATE
Program within DD-CKD Adult Patients
The two INNO2VATE
studies (Correction/Conversion
and
Conversion),
which collectively enrolled 3,923 patients, evaluated the efficacy
and safety of vadadustat versus darbepoetin alfa for the treatment
of anemia due to CKD in DD-CKD adult patients.
Vadadustat achieved the primary and key secondary efficacy endpoint
in each of the two INNO2VATE
studies, demonstrating non-inferiority to darbepoetin alfa as
measured by a mean change in hemoglobin, or Hb, between baseline
and the primary evaluation period (weeks 24 to 36) and secondary
evaluation period (weeks 40 to 52). Vadadustat also achieved the
primary safety endpoint of the INNO2VATE
program, defined as non-inferiority of vadadustat versus
darbepoetin alfa in time to first occurrence of MACE across both
INNO2VATE
studies.
Primary and Key Secondary Efficacy Endpoint Results
Vadadustat achieved each of the INNO2VATE
studies’ primary efficacy endpoints of mean change in Hb between
baseline and the primary evaluation period compared to darbepoetin
alfa, in DD-CKD adult patients, demonstrating non-inferiority to
darbepoetin alfa based on using a non-inferiority margin of -0.75
g/dL.
In INNO2VATE’s
Correction/Conversion
study of incident dialysis patients (n=369):
•Primary
Efficacy Endpoint Result:
Vadadustat was
non-inferior
to darbepoetin alfa. The least square mean difference in Hb was
-0.31 g/dL (95% CI: -0.53, -0.10), achieving the pre-specified
non-inferiority criterion of -0.75 g/dL. The mean (SD) Hb level at
week 24 to week 36 was 10.36 (1.13) g/dL for vadadustat-treated
patients compared to 10.61 (0.94) g/dL for darbepoetin alfa-treated
patients.
•Key
Secondary Efficacy Endpoint Result:
Vadadustat sustained the target Hb efficacy response at weeks 40 to
52 achieving non-inferiority compared to darbepoetin alfa. The
least square mean difference in Hb was -0.07 g/dL (95% CI: -0.34,
0.19). The mean (SD) Hb level at week 40 to week 52 was 10.51
(1.19) g/dL for vadadustat treated-patients compared to 10.55
(1.14) g/dL for darbepoetin alfa-treated patients.
In INNO2VATE’s
Conversion
study of prevalent dialysis patients (n=3,554):
•Primary
Efficacy Endpoint Result:
Vadadustat was
non-inferior
to darbepoetin alfa. The least square mean difference in Hb was
-0.17 g/dL (95% CI: -0.23, -0.10), achieving the pre-specified
non-inferiority criterion of -0.75 g/dL. The mean (SD) Hb level at
week 24 to week 36 was 10.36 (1.01) g/dL for vadadustat-treated
patients compared to 10.53 (0.96) g/dL for darbepoetin alfa-treated
patients.
•Key
Secondary Efficacy Endpoint Result:
Vadadustat sustained efficacy in the
Conversion
study demonstrating non-inferiority to darbepoetin with a least
square mean difference in Hb of -0.18 g/dL (95% CI: -0.25, -0.12).
The mean (SD) Hb level at week 40 to week 52 was 10.40 (1.04) g/dL
in the vadadustat-treated patients compared to 10.58 (0.98) g/dL
for darbepoetin treated patients.
Primary Safety Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE) Endpoint
Result
Vadadustat achieved the INNO2VATE
program’s primary safety endpoint of non-inferiority for MACE. In
the primary analysis of time to first MACE event, vadadustat
demonstrated non-inferiority to darbepoetin alfa using a
non-inferiority margin of 1.25 based on discussion with the FDA and
a non-inferiority margin of 1.3 based on discussion with the
EMA.
The INNO2VATE
program (Correction/Conversion
and
Conversion
studies) of dialysis patients (n=3,902):
•Vadadustat
was
non-inferior
to darbepoetin alfa. The upper bound of the 95% confidence interval
(CI) of the Hazard Ratio (HR) was below the pre-specified
non-inferiority margin of 1.25 for primary MACE analysis (HR 0.96,
95% CI: 0.83, 1.11.).
The incidence of treatment emergent adverse events during
the
Correction/Conversion
study in vadadustat treated patients was 83.8% and 85.5 % in
darbepoetin alfa treated patients. During the study, the most
common treatment emergent adverse events reported in
vadadustat/darbepoetin alfa treated patients were hypertension
(16.2%/ 12.9%) and diarrhea (10.1%/ 9.7%). Serious treatment
emergent adverse events were lower in vadadustat treated patients
at 49.7% compared to 56.5% for darbepoetin alfa treated patients.
The incidence of treatment emergent adverse events during
the
Conversion
study in the vadadustat treated patients was 88.3%, and 89.3% in
darbepoetin alfa treated patients. During the study, the most
common treatment emergent adverse events reported in
vadadustat/darbepoetin alfa treated patients were diarrhea (13.0%/
10.1%), pneumonia (11.0%/ 9.7%), hypertension (10.6%/ 13.8%), and
hyperkalemia (9.0%/ 10.8%). Serious treatment emergent adverse
events were slightly lower for vadadustat treated patients at 55.0%
and 58.3% for darbepoetin alfa-treated patients. Patients with
DD-CKD experienced an increased risk of thromboembolic events
compared to darbepoetin alfa with a time to first event HR of 1.20
(95% CI 0.96 - 1.50) driven by thrombosis of vascular
access.
INNO2VATE
results on key secondary safety endpoints showed that vadadustat
also demonstrated non-inferiority to darbepoetin alfa in analyses
of expanded MACE, cardiovascular MACE, cardiovascular mortality,
and all-cause mortality.
Top-line Results from Global Phase 3 PRO2TECT
Program within NDD-CKD Adult Patients
The two PRO2TECT
studies (Correction
and
Conversion),
which collectively enrolled 3,476 patients, evaluated the efficacy
and safety of vadadustat for the treatment of anemia due to CKD in
NDD-CKD adult patients.
Vadadustat achieved the primary and key secondary efficacy endpoint
in each of the two PRO2TECT
studies, demonstrating non-inferiority to darbepoetin alfa as
measured by a mean change in Hb between baseline and the primary
evaluation period (weeks 24 to 36) and secondary evaluation period
(weeks 40 to 52). Vadadustat did not meet the primary safety
endpoint of the PRO2TECT
program, defined as non-inferiority of vadadustat versus
darbepoetin alfa in time to first occurrence of MACE, across both
PRO2TECT
studies.
Primary and Key Secondary Efficacy Endpoint Results
Vadadustat achieved each of the PRO2TECT
studies' primary efficacy endpoints of mean change in Hb between
baseline and the primary evaluation period compared to darbepoetin
alfa, in adult patients on dialysis, demonstrating non-inferiority
to darbepoetin alfa using an NI margin of -0.75 g/dL.
In PRO2TECT's
Correction
study (n=1,751):
•Primary
Efficacy Endpoint Result:
Vadadustat was non-inferior to darbepoetin alfa. The least square
mean difference in Hb was 0.05 g/dL (95% CI: -0.04, 0.15),
achieving the pre-specified NI criterion of -0.75 g/dL. The mean
(SD) Hb level at week 24 to week 36 was 10.39 (0.99) g/dL for
vadadustat-treated patients compared to 10.35 (1.03) g/dL for
darbepoetin alfa-treated patients.
•Key
Secondary Efficacy Endpoint Result:
Vadadustat sustained the target Hb efficacy response at weeks 40 to
52 achieving non-inferiority compared to darbepoetin alfa. The
least square mean difference in Hb was 0.04 g/dL (95% CI: -0.06,
0.14). The mean (SD) Hb level at week 40 to week 52 was 10.48
(1.05) g/dL for vadadustat-treated patients compared to 10.45
(1.01) g/dL for darbepoetin alfa-treated patients.
In PRO2TECT's
Conversion
study (n=1,725):
•Primary
Efficacy Endpoint Result:
Vadadustat was non-inferior to darbepoetin alfa. The least square
mean difference in Hb was -0.01 g/dL (95% CI: -0.09, 0.07),
achieving the pre-specified NI criterion of -0.75 g/dL. The mean
(SD) Hb level at week 24 to week 36 was 10.77 (0.98) g/dL for
vadadustat-treated patients compared to 10.77 (0.99) g/dL for
darbepoetin alfa-treated patients.
•Key
Secondary Efficacy Endpoint Result:
Vadadustat sustained efficacy in the
Conversion
study demonstrating non-inferiority to darbepoetin with a least
square mean difference in Hb of 0.00 g/dL (95% CI: -0.10, 0.09).
The mean (SD) Hb level at week 40 to week 52 was 10.80 (1.04) g/dL
in the vadadustat-treated patients compared to 10.79 (1.05) g/dL
for darbepoetin alpha-treated patients.
Primary Safety Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE) Endpoint
Result
The PRO2TECT
program (Correction
and
Conversion
studies) (n=3,471):
•Primary
Safety MACE Endpoint Result:
Vadadustat did not meet the PRO2TECT
program's primary safety endpoint of non-inferiority for MACE. The
upper bound of the 95% confidence interval of the Hazard Ratio (HR)
was above the pre-specified NI margin of 1.25 for primary MACE
analysis (HR 1.17, 95% CI: 1.01, 1.36).
Analysis of MACE events conducted by Akebia in the
PRO2TECT
program revealed that the greater number of MACE events observed
among vadadustat patients as compared to the active comparator was
primarily related to an excess of non-cardiovascular death and
death-of-unknown-cause in regions outside of the United States
where significant differences in treatment patterns for NDD-CKD
patients were observed.
The PRO2TECT
analysis plan was prospectively designed to analyze the effect of
regional differences, most notably, well-known differences in Hb
treatment targets. Within PRO2TECT,
U.S. patients were treated to a target Hb range of 10 to 11 g/dL
and non-U.S. patients were treated to a target Hb range of 10 to 12
g/dL. In October of 2020, we presented a pre-specified regional
analysis that showed vadadustat was not associated with a
clinically meaningful increase in cardiovascular risk compared to
darbepoetin alfa in U.S. patients treated to a target Hb range of
10 to 11 g/dL, in an analysis of MACE (HR 1.06, 95% CI: 0.87,
1.29).
The incidence of treatment emergent adverse events during
the
Correction
study in the vadadustat-treated patients was 90.9%, and 91.6% in
darbepoetin alfa-treated patients. During the study, the most
common treatment emergent adverse events reported in
vadadustat/darbepoetin alfa-treated patients were end-stage renal
disease (34.7%/ 35.2%), hypertension (17.7%/ 22.1.%), hyperkalemia
(12.3.%/ 15.6%), urinary tract infection (12.9%/ 12.0%), diarrhea
(13.9%/ 10.0%), peripheral oedema (12.5%/ 10.5%), fall (9.6%/ 10%)
and nausea (10%/ 8.2%). Serious treatment emergent adverse events
were 65.3% for vadadustat-treated patients and 64.5% for
darbepoetin alfa-treated patients. The incidence of treatment
emergent adverse events during the
Conversion
study in vadadustat treated patients was 89.1% and 87.7% in
darbepoetin alfa-treated patients. During the study, the
most common treatment emergent adverse events reported in
vadadustat/darbepoetin alfa-treated patients were end-stage renal
disease (27.5%/ 28.4%), hypertension (14.4%/ 14.8%), urinary tract
infection (12.2%/ 14.5%), diarrhea (13.8.%/ 8.8.%), peripheral
oedema (9.9%/ 10.1%) and pneumonia (10.0%/ 9.7%). Serious treatment
emergent adverse events were 58.5% for vadadustat-treated patients
and 56.6% for darbepoetin alfa-treated patients.
We are also conducting additional studies of vadadustat evaluating
a modified approach to once-daily and three-times weekly dosing,
including assessment of a vadadustat starting dose based on an
individual’s pre-conversion ESA dose prior to study entry and
higher titration doses of vadadustat (up to 1200 mg). We expect to
share topline data from these studies at an appropriate medical
conference or in a peer-reviewed journal.
Hepatic Safety Profile of Vadadustat in Clinical
Studies
During the conduct of our Phase 3 program our team and hepatic
experts analyzed hepatic cases (unblinded to treatment) and,
following the completion of our global Phase 3 clinical program for
vadadustat, there was a review of hepatic safety across the
vadadustat clinical program, which included eight completed Phase 2
and 3 studies in NDD-CKD patients, 10 completed Phase 1, 2, and 3
studies, and two then-ongoing Phase 3b studies in DD-CKD patients,
and 18 completed studies in healthy subjects (17 Phase 1 and one
Phase 3). This review consisted of a blinded re-assessment of
hepatic events conducted by a separate panel of hepatic experts.
While hepatocellular injury attributed to vadadustat was reported
in less than 1% of patients, there was one case of severe
hepatocellular injury with jaundice, and we cannot guarantee that
similar events will not happen in the future.
Additionally, the FDA expressed safety concerns related to the risk
of drug-induced liver injury in the CRL that it issued in March
2022.
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
We have supported an investigator-sponsored study evaluating
vadadustat for the prevention and treatment of ARDS in clinical
trial subjects with COVID-19 and intend to develop vadadustat for
the treatment of ARDS.
Market Opportunity
Acute respiratory distress syndrome, or ARDS, is a life-threatening
acute form of lung disease characterized by acute bilateral
pulmonary edema, severe hypoxia. Despite improvement in treatment
strategies, a third-party study indicated high hospital mortality
rates for patients with ARDS admitted to participating ICUs. The
mortality rate among patients with ARDS was: 34.9% with mild ARDS;
40.3% with moderate ARDS and 46.1% with severe ARDS.
Clinical Development Program
Vadadustat for the Prevention and Treatment of ARDS in Hospitalized
Patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019, or the VSTAT trial, was an
investigator-sponsored clinical trial by UTHealth in Houston,
Texas, evaluating the use of vadadustat as a potential therapy to
prevent and treat ARDS in adult patients who have been hospitalized
due to COVID-19 and hypoxemia (O2 saturation ≤94%). The VSTAT trial
was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, and
patients were dosed with vadadustat or a placebo starting within 24
hours of hospital admission and continuing for up to 14 days. In
addition to funds provided by Akebia for the VSTAT trial, UTHealth
was awarded $5.1 million in funding from the U.S. Department of
Defense, or DOD, to expand this clinical trial at UTHealth’s
facilities.
The VSTAT trial enrolled 449 adult subjects at five hospitals who
were randomized 1:1 to vadadustat 900 mg or placebo once per day
orally for up to 14 days while hospitalized. The VSTAT trial
measured the proportion of subjects with either 6 (non-invasive
ventilation or high flow oxygen devices), 7 (invasive mechanical
ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation), or 8 (death)
on the NIAID-OS at Day 7 and Day 14 (primary). While a smaller
proportion of subjects in the vadadustat group had a score of 6, 7,
or 8 on the NIAID-OS than in the placebo group at Day 14, the trial
failed to meet its primary superiority threshold of >95%
probability. Those receiving vadadustat, however, did demonstrate
94% probability of conferring benefit on the NIAID-OS at Day
14.
At Day 14, the proportions of subjects who had a 6, 7 or 8 on the
NIAID-OS were 13.3% (9.6%, 17.7%; 2.5, 97.5 percentiles from
Bayesian simulations) for vadadustat versus 16.9% (12.6%, 22.0%)
for placebo with a relative risk of 0.79 and 94% probability that
vadadustat was superior to placebo. In a pre-specified analysis at
Day 7, the proportions of subjects who had a 6, 7 or 8 on the
NIAID-OS were 25.4% (20.7%, 30.5%) for vadadustat versus 29.7%
(24.5%, 35.3%) for placebo with a relative risk of 0.86 and 97%
probability that vadadustat was superior to placebo.
The incidence of treatment emergent adverse events was 78.6% in the
vadadustat group and 76.2% in the placebo group. The most common
treatment emergent adverse events reported in vadadustat/placebo
subjects were alanine aminotransferase increase (34.4%/28.7%),
COVID-19 pneumonia (19.5%/27.4%), anemia (14.0%/17.0%), aspartate
aminotransferase increase (14.0%/14.8%), hyponatremia
(10.7%/15.7%), septic shock (11.6%/10.8%), hyperkalemia
(10.2%/10.8%), and hypermagnesemia (7.0%/13.9%). The incidence of
serious treatment emergent adverse events was 27.9% in the
vadadustat
group and 32.7% in the placebo group. The most common serious
treatment emergent adverse events reported in vadadustat/placebo
subjects were COVID-19 pneumonia (19.5%/27.4%) and septic shock
(11.6%/10.8%).
While the VSTAT trial missed the primary endpoint, we are
encouraged by the data and believe the data supports further
development of vadadustat as a potential treatment for ARDS due to
COVID-19 or other causes.
Manufacturing and Supply
Overview
We neither own nor operate, and currently have no plans to own or
operate, any manufacturing or distribution facilities. We currently
rely on third-party contract manufacturing organizations, or CMOs,
to produce all of our preclinical and clinical material and
commercial supply and third-party distributors to distribute
Auryxia. We expect to continue to rely on either existing or
alternative distributors and CMOs to distribute our products and
supply our ongoing and planned preclinical studies and clinical
trials and for commercial production. Our CMOs have other clients
and may have other priorities that could affect their ability to
perform the work satisfactorily and/or on a timely basis. Both of
these occurrences would be beyond our control.
We have established relationships with several CMOs under which the
CMOs manufacture preclinical, clinical and commercial supply of
vadadustat drug substance and drug product, and clinical and
commercial supply of Auryxia drug substance and drug product. All
clinical and commercial supplies are manufactured under current
Good Manufacturing Practices, or cGMPs, which is a regulatory
standard for the production of pharmaceuticals that will be used in
humans.
Vadadustat
We currently rely on a single source supplier for our drug
substance and drug product for preclinical, clinical and commercial
supply of vadadustat. We have entered into a supply agreement with
STA Pharmaceutical Hong Kong Limited, or STA, for the manufacture
of vadadustat drug substance for commercial use and for the
manufacture of vadadustat drug product for commercial use. We plan
to mitigate potential commercial supply risks for vadadustat, if
any, through inventory management and we may enter redundant
manufacturing arrangements for both drug substance and drug product
if vadadustat is approved in the United States.
Vadadustat is a small molecule. The synthesis of vadadustat is
reliable and reproducible from starting materials available from
multiple sources at commercially relevant scale using no unusual
manufacturing equipment. Vadadustat can be formulated into
compressed tablets using proprietary processes. As with any supply
program, obtaining raw materials and finished drug product of the
required quality and quantity cannot be guaranteed, and we cannot
ensure that we will be successful in this endeavor.
Auryxia
We currently rely on a single source supplier for our drug
substance and drug product for preclinical, clinical and commercial
supply of Auryxia. We have established CMO relationships for the
supply of Auryxia to help ensure that we will have sufficient
material for ongoing commercial sales and clinical trials. The drug
substance for Auryxia is supplied by Siegfried Evionnaz SA,
pursuant to a supply agreement, as amended, with pricing structured
on a per-kilogram basis.
Auryxia
drug product is supplied by Patheon Manufacturing Services LLC
(Thermo Fisher) pursuant to a Master Manufacturing Service
Agreement with per-bottle pricing structured on a tiered basis,
with the price reduced as the product volume increases. These
agreements require that we satisfy certain minimum purchase
requirements, but we are not obligated to use them as our sole
suppliers. For more information about our manufacturing agreements
for Auryxia, see Part II, Item 7. Management’s Discussion and
Analysis and Note 15 to our consolidated financial statements in
Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary
Data.
The active pharmaceutical ingredient of Auryxia, ferric citrate, is
a small molecule. The synthesis of ferric citrate is reliable and
reproducible from starting materials available from multiple
sources at commercially relevant scale. Ferric citrate can be
formulated into compressed tablets using proprietary manufacturing
processes. As with any supply program, obtaining raw materials and
finished drug product of the required quality and quantity cannot
be guaranteed, and we cannot ensure that we will be successful in
this endeavor.
We utilize third parties for the commercial distribution of
Auryxia, including wholesale distributors and certain specialty
pharmacy providers. We have also engaged Cardinal Health as the
exclusive third-party logistics distribution agent for commercial
sales of Auryxia.
License, Collaboration and Other Strategic Agreements
Vadadustat
U.S. and International Collaboration with Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co.
Ltd.
On December 18, 2016, we entered into a collaboration and
license agreement with Otsuka, or the Otsuka U.S. Agreement. The
collaboration was focused on the development and commercialization
of vadadustat in the United States. We were responsible for leading
the development of vadadustat, for which we submitted an NDA to the
FDA in March 2021, and for which we received the CRL in March 2022.
On April 25, 2017, we entered into a collaboration and license
agreement with Otsuka, or the Otsuka International Agreement,
pursuant to which we granted Otsuka an exclusive license for the
development and commercialization of vadadustat in certain
territory outside the United States. The territory covered by the
Otsuka International Agreement included the European Union, Russia,
China, Australia, Canada, the Middle East and certain other
countries, or the Otsuka International Territory, but excluded
Latin America and previously licensed jurisdictions.
Under the terms of the Otsuka U.S. Agreement, Otsuka paid us an
upfront payment of $125.0 million and additional funding of
$353.0 million, based on the actual costs incurred, toward the
vadadustat global Phase 3 development program. Under the terms of
the Otsuka International Agreement, Otsuka paid us $289.9 million,
comprised of $73.0 million that was paid upon execution of the
Otsuka International Agreement and $216.9 million, based on
actual costs incurred, of development funding.
On May 12, 2022, we received notice from Otsuka that it had elected
to terminate the Otsuka U.S. Agreement and the Otsuka International
Agreement (as defined below). On June 30, 2022, we and Otsuka
entered into the Termination Agreement (as defined below), pursuant
to which, among other things, we and Otsuka agreed to terminate, as
of June 30, 2022, the Otsuka U.S. Agreement and the Otsuka
International Agreement. In July 2022, we received a nonrefundable
and non-creditable payment of $55.0 million in consideration for
the covenants and agreements set forth in the Termination
Agreement, including the settlement and release of all disputes and
claims as provided therein. Also pursuant to the Termination
Agreement, Otsuka has transferred the MAAs for vadadustat with the
EMA, and in the United Kingdom, Switzerland and Australia to
us.
Collaboration with Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma
Corporation
On December 11, 2015, we entered into a collaboration
agreement with MTPC, or the MTPC Agreement, providing MTPC with
exclusive development and commercialization rights to vadadustat in
Japan and certain other Asian countries, or the MTPC Territory,
which was amended effective as of December 2, 2022. In addition, we
will supply vadadustat to MTPC for both clinical and commercial use
in the MTPC Territory, subject to MTPC’s option to manufacture
commercial drug product in the MTPC Territory. On July 15, 2020, we
entered into a supply agreement with MTPC for the commercial supply
of vadadustat for use in Japan and certain other Asian countries,
as contemplated by the MTPC Agreement, which was amended effective
as of December 5, 2022.
We and MTPC agreed that, instead of including Japanese patients in
our global Phase 3 program for vadadustat, MTPC would be the
sponsor of a Phase 3 program for vadadustat in Japan. MTPC reported
top-line data for the two Phase 3 pivotal trials and data from the
two supportive Phase 3 studies in March 2019 and 52-week data for
the two Phase 3 pivotal trials in November 2019. In June 2020,
vadadustat was approved in Japan for the treatment of anemia due to
CKD by the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare. In August 2020,
MTPC launched vadadustat commercially in Japan
under the trade name, VafseoTM,
as a treatment of anemia due to CKD for adult patients on dialysis
and not on dialysis.
MTPC filed a new drug application for vadadustat for the treatment
of anemia due to CKD in adult patients in Taiwan in January 2022
and in Korea in March 2022.
Unless earlier terminated, the MTPC Agreement will continue in
effect on a country-by-country basis until the later of the
following: expiration of the last-to-expire patent covering
vadadustat in such country in the MTPC Territory; expiration of
marketing or regulatory exclusivity in such country in the MTPC
Territory; or ten years after the first commercial sale of
vadadustat in such country in the MTPC Territory. MTPC may
terminate the MTPC Agreement upon twelve months’ notice at any time
after the second anniversary of the effective date of the MTPC
Agreement. Either party may terminate the MTPC Agreement upon the
material breach of the other party that is not cured within a
specified time period or upon the insolvency of the other
party.
Under the terms of the MTPC Agreement, MTPC will make payments to
us of up to approximately $225.0 million in the aggregate based on
the achievement of certain development, regulatory and sales
milestones, as well as tiered royalty payments ranging from 13% to
20% on annual net sales of vadadustat in the MTPC Territory,
subject to reduction upon launch of a generic product on a
country-by-country basis. MTPC was responsible for the costs of the
Phase 3 program for vadadustat in Japan and other studies required
in Japan and made no funding payments for our global Phase 3
program. Additionally, the development costs of approximately $20.5
million for our Phase 2 studies in Japan were reimbursed to us by
MTPC. In February 2021, we entered into a royalty interest
acquisition agreement with HealthCare Royalty Partners IV, L.P., or
HCR, whereby we sold our right to receive royalties and sales
milestones for vadadustat in Japan and certain other Asian
countries in the MTPC territory under the MTPC Agreement. For more
information on our royalty interest acquisition agreement with HCR,
see Note 6 to our consolidated financial statements in Part II,
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Annual
Report on Form 10-K.
CSL Vifor License Agreement
On February 18, 2022, we entered into the Vifor Second Amended
Agreement with CSL Vifor, which amended and restated the Vifor
First Amended Agreement. Pursuant to the Vifor Second Amended
Agreement, we granted CSL Vifor an exclusive license to sell
vadadustat to the Supply Group in the Territory. We currently
retain rights to commercialize vadadustat for use in the
non-dialysis dependent CKD market and to sell to dialysis
organizations outside of the Supply Group. During the term of the
Vifor Second Amended Agreement, CSL Vifor is not permitted to sell
any HIF product that competes with vadadustat in the Territory to
the Supply Group.
Like the Vifor First Amended Agreement, the Vifor Second Amended
Agreement is structured as a profit share arrangement between us
and CSL Vifor in which we will receive approximately 66% of the
profit, net of certain pre-specified costs. Under the Vifor First
Amended Agreement, CSL Vifor made an upfront payment to us of $25
million in lieu of the previously disclosed milestone payment of
$25 million that CSL Vifor was to pay to us following approval of
vadadustat by the FDA. In addition, CSL Vifor made an equity
investment in us, as further described below. We currently retain
rights to commercialize vadadustat for use in the non-dialysis
dependent CKD market and to sell to dialysis organizations outside
of the Supply Group. As under the Vifor First Amended Agreement,
during the term of the Vifor Second Amended Agreement, CSL Vifor is
not permitted to sell any HIF product that competes with vadadustat
in the Territory to the Supply Group.
As under the Vifor First Amended Agreement, the Vifor Second
Amended Agreement provides that Akebia and CSL Vifor will enter
into a commercial supply agreement for vadadustat pursuant to which
we will supply all of CSL Vifor’s requirements for vadadustat in
the Territory. Under the Vifor Second Amended Agreement, CSL Vifor
contributed $40 million to a working capital facility established
to partially fund our costs of purchasing vadadustat from our
contract manufacturers, which amount of funding will fluctuate, and
which funding we are required to repay to CSL Vifor over
time.
Unless earlier terminated, the Vifor Second Amended Agreement will
expire upon the later of the expiration of all patents that claim
or cover vadadustat or the expiration of marketing or regulatory
exclusivity for vadadustat in the Territory. CSL Vifor may
terminate the Vifor Second Amended Agreement in its entirety upon
30 months’ prior written notice after the first anniversary of the
receipt of regulatory approval, if approved, from the FDA for
vadadustat for dialysis-dependent CKD patients. We may terminate
the Vifor Second Amended Agreement in its entirety for convenience,
following the earlier of a certain period of time elapsing or
following certain specified regulatory events, and upon six months’
prior written notice. If we so terminate for convenience, subject
to a specified exception, we will pay a termination fee to CSL
Vifor. In addition, either party may, subject to a cure period,
terminate the Vifor Second Amended Agreement in the event of the
other party’s uncured material breach or bankruptcy. We may also
terminate the Vifor Second Amended Agreement upon the occurrence of
certain other events. The Vifor Second Amended Agreement also
continues to include a standstill provision and customary
representations and warranties.
Also in connection with entering into the Vifor Second Amended
Agreement, on February 18, 2022, we and CSL Vifor entered into an
Investment Agreement, or the Investment Agreement, pursuant to
which we sold an aggregate of 4,000,000 shares of our common stock
to CSL Vifor for a total of $20.0 million dollars.
Janssen Pharmaceutica NV Research and License
Agreement
On February 9, 2017, we entered into a Research and License
Agreement, the Janssen Agreement, with Janssen Pharmaceutica NV, or
Janssen, a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson, pursuant to which
Janssen granted us an exclusive license under certain intellectual
property rights to develop and commercialize worldwide certain HIF
prolyl hydroxylase targeted compounds.
Under the terms of the Janssen Agreement, we paid an upfront
payment of $1.0 million in cash to Janssen and issued a warrant to
purchase 509,611 shares of our common stock, which expired on
February 9, 2022. On August 1, 2022, we notified Janssen that we
were exercising our right to terminate the Janssen Agreement in its
entirety, and Janssen agreed to the termination which became
effective on August 2, 2022.
Cyclerion Therapeutics License Agreement
On June 4, 2021, we entered into the Cyclerion Agreement with
Cyclerion Therapeutics, Inc., or Cyclerion, pursuant to which
Cyclerion granted us an exclusive global license under certain
intellectual property rights to research, develop and commercialize
praliciguat, an investigational oral soluble guanylate cyclase, or
sGC, stimulator.
Under the terms of the Cyclerion Agreement, we made an upfront
payment of $3.0 million in cash to Cyclerion, which was paid during
the second quarter of 2021. In addition, Cyclerion is eligible to
receive up to an aggregate of $222.0 million from us in specified
development and regulatory milestone payments on a
product-by-product basis. Cyclerion will also be eligible to
receive specified commercial milestones as well as tiered royalties
ranging from a mid-single-digit to mid-teen percentage
of
net sales, on a product-by-product basis, and subject to reduction
upon expiration of patent rights or the launch of a generic product
in the territory. We recorded the upfront payment in the amount of
$3.0 million to research and development expense in June
2021.
Unless earlier terminated, the Cyclerion Agreement will expire on a
product-by-product and country-by-country basis upon the expiration
of the last royalty term, which ends upon the longest of (i) the
expiration of the patents licensed under the Cyclerion Agreement,
(ii) the expiration of regulatory exclusivity for such product, and
(iii) 10 years from first commercial sale of such product. We may
terminate the Cyclerion Agreement in its entirety or only with
respect to a particular licensed compound or product upon 180 days'
prior written notice to Cyclerion. We and Cyclerion also have
customary termination rights, subject to a cure period, in the
event of the other party’s material breach of the Cyclerion
Agreement or in the event of certain additional
circumstances.
Auryxia
License Agreement with Panion & BF Biotech, Inc.
Prior to the merger, or the Merger, whereby Keryx
Biopharmaceuticals, Inc., or Keryx, became our wholly owned
subsidiary, Keryx entered into a license agreement, or the Panion
License Agreement, which was amended from time to time, with Panion
& BF Biotech, Inc., or Panion, under which Keryx in-licensed
the exclusive worldwide rights, excluding certain Asian-Pacific
countries, or the Licensor Territory, for the development and
commercialization of ferric citrate.
On April 17, 2019, we and Panion entered into a second
amended and restated license agreement, or the Panion Amended
License Agreement, which amends and restates in full the Panion
License Agreement. The Panion Amended License Agreement provides
Keryx with an exclusive license under
Panion-owned know-how and patents covering the rights to
sublicense, develop, make, use, sell, offer for sale, import and
export ferric citrate worldwide, excluding the Licensor Territory.
The Panion Amended License Agreement also provides Panion with an
exclusive license under Keryx-owned patents covering the rights to
sublicense (with our written consent), develop, make, use, sell,
offer for sale, import and export ferric citrate in certain
countries in the Licensor Territory. Consistent with the Panion
License Agreement, under the Panion Amended License Agreement,
Panion is eligible to receive from us or any sublicensee royalty
payments based on a mid-single digit percentage of sales
of ferric citrate in our licensed territories. We are eligible to
receive from Panion or any sublicensee royalty payments based on
a mid-single digit percentage of net sales of ferric
citrate in Panion’s licensed territories.
The Panion Amended License Agreement terminates upon the expiration
of each of our and Panion’s obligations to pay royalties
thereunder. In addition, we may terminate the Panion Amended
License Agreement (i) in its entirety or (ii) with respect to one
or more countries in our licensed territory, in either case upon 90
days’ notice. We and Panion also each have the right to terminate
the Panion Amended License Agreement upon the occurrence of a
material breach of the Panion Amended License Agreement by the
other party, subject to certain cure provisions, or certain
insolvency events. The Panion Amended License Agreement also
provides that, on a country-by-country basis, during the term and
until the second anniversary of the expiration of our or Panion’s
obligation, as applicable, to pay royalties in a country in which
such party has ferric citrate for sale on the date of such
expiration, neither the other party nor its affiliates will,
directly or indirectly, sell, distribute or otherwise commercialize
or supply or cause to supply ferric citrate to a third party for
sale or distribution in such country. In addition, the Panion
Amended License Agreement provides that each of us and Panion has
the right, but not the obligation, to conduct litigation against
any infringer of certain patent rights under the Panion Amended
License Agreement in certain territories.
During the year-ended December 31, 2022, Panion earned $13.8
million in royalty payments relating to the sales of Auryxia in the
United States and JT and Torii net sales of Riona in Japan, as we
are required to pay a mid-single digit percent of JT and Torii’s
net sales of Riona in Japan to Panion under the terms of the Panion
Amended License Agreement.
Sublicense Agreement with Japan Tobacco Inc. and Torii
Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
In September 2007, Keryx entered into a Sublicense Agreement with
JT and Torii, under which JT and Torii obtained the exclusive
sublicense rights for the development and commercialization of
ferric citrate in Japan. Effective June 8, 2009, Keryx entered into
an Amended and Restated Sublicense Agreement, which was amended in
June 2013, or the Revised Agreement, with JT and
Torii.
In January 2014, JT and Torii received manufacturing and marketing
approval of ferric citrate from the Japanese Ministry of Health,
Labour and Welfare. Ferric citrate hydrate, which launched in May
2014 and is being marketed in Japan by Torii under the brand name
Riona, is indicated as an oral treatment for the improvement of
hyperphosphatemia in patients with CKD, including NDD-CKD and
DD-CKD. In July 2019, JT and Torii, reported positive top-line
results from a pivotal Phase 3 comparative study evaluating
Riona for the treatment of IDA in adult patients
in Japan, which was approved in March 2021. In May 2020, JT
and Torii filed an application for approval of IDA as an additional
indication for Riona in Japan. Under the terms
of the Revised Agreement with JT and Torii, we are eligible to
receive royalty payments based on a tiered low double-digit
percentage of net sales of Riona in Japan inclusive of amounts that
we must pay to Panion on JT and Torii’s net sales of Riona under
the Panion Amended License Agreement, subject to certain reductions
upon expiration or termination of the Panion Amended License
Agreement, and may also receive up to an additional $55.0 million
upon the achievement of certain annual net sales milestones. We
recorded $5.3 million in license revenue related to royalties
earned on net sales of Riona in Japan during the twelve months
ended December 31, 2022.
The sublicense under the Revised Agreement terminates upon the
expiration of all underlying patent rights. Also, JT and Torii may
terminate the Revised Agreement with or without cause upon at least
six months prior written notice to us. Additionally, either party
may terminate the Revised Agreement for cause upon 60 days’ prior
written notice after the breach of any uncured material provision
of the Revised Agreement, or after certain insolvency
events.
Intellectual Property
The proprietary nature of, and protection for, our products,
product candidates and our discovery programs, processes and
know-how are important to our business. Our policy is to seek to
protect our proprietary position by, among other methods, filing
patent applications related to our proprietary technology,
inventions and improvements that are important to the development
and implementation of our business. We also rely on know-how,
continuing technological innovation and potential in-licensing
opportunities to develop and maintain our proprietary position.
Additionally, we may benefit from a variety of statutory frameworks
in the United States, Europe and other countries that provide
periods of non-patent-based exclusivity for qualifying molecules.
See “—Regulatory Matters.”
Our commercial success will depend in part on obtaining and
maintaining patent protection of our current products as well as
current and future product candidates, methods of their use and the
methods used to develop and manufacture them, as well as
successfully defending these patents against third-party
challenges. Our ability to stop third parties from making, using,
selling, offering to sell or importing our products depends on the
extent to which we have rights under valid and enforceable patents
that cover these activities. We cannot be sure that patents will be
granted with respect to any of our pending patent applications or
with respect to any patent applications filed by us in the future,
nor can we be sure that any of our existing patents or any patents
that may be granted to us in the future will be commercially useful
in protecting our product candidates, discovery programs and
processes. Even once patents successfully issue, third parties may
challenge the validity, enforceability, inventorship, or scope
thereof, which may result in such patents being narrowed,
invalidated or held not infringed or unenforceable. For this and
more comprehensive risks related to our intellectual property,
please see “Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Intellectual
Property” in Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors.
Individual patents extend for varying periods of time depending on
the date of filing of the patent application or the date of patent
issuance and the legal term of patents in the countries in which
they are obtained. Generally, patents issued from applications
filed in the United States are effective for 20 years from the
earliest filing date of a United States non-provisional application
or an international application filed under the Patent Cooperation
Treaty. In addition, in certain instances, a patent term can be
extended to recapture a portion of the term effectively lost as a
result of the FDA regulatory review period, however, the
restoration period cannot be longer than five years and the total
patent term including the restoration period must not exceed 14
years following FDA approval. The duration of foreign patents
varies in accordance with provisions of applicable local law, but
typically is also 20 years from the earliest international filing
date. Patent term recapture for loss of term as a result of the
regulatory review period is available in some foreign
jurisdictions. In the United States, a patent’s term may also be
lengthened by patent term adjustment, which compensates a patentee
for administrative delays by the United States Patent and Trademark
Office, or USPTO, in granting a patent, or may be shortened if a
patent is terminally disclaimed over an earlier‑filed
patent.
Changes in either the patent laws or interpretations of patent laws
in the United States and other countries can diminish our ability
to protect our inventions and enforce our intellectual property
rights. Accordingly, we cannot predict the breadth or
enforceability of claims that may be granted in our patents or in
third-party patents. The biotechnology and pharmaceutical
industries are characterized by extensive litigation regarding
patents and other intellectual property rights. Our ability to
maintain and solidify our proprietary position for our drugs and
technology will depend on our success in obtaining effective claims
and enforcing those claims once granted. We do not know whether any
of the patent applications that we may file or license from third
parties will result in the issuance of any patents. The issued
patents that we own or license or may receive or acquire in the
future may be challenged, invalidated or circumvented, and the
rights granted under any issued patents may not provide us with
sufficient protection or competitive advantages against competitors
with similar technology. Furthermore, our competitors may be able
to independently develop and commercialize similar drugs or
duplicate our technology, business model or strategy without
infringing our patents. Because of the extensive time required for
clinical development and regulatory review of a drug we may
develop, it is possible that, before any of our drugs can be
commercialized, any related patent may
expire or remain in force for only a short period following
commercialization, thereby reducing any advantage of any such
patent. The patent positions for vadadustat and Auryxia are
summarized below.
Vadadustat Patent Portfolio
We hold 12 issued patents covering the composition of matter,
polymorph, method of treating anemia, pharmaceutical compositions
of vadadustat, and processes for manufacturing vadadustat in the
United States and additional patents issued or pending in many
other major jurisdictions worldwide, including Europe, Japan,
China, South Korea, Brazil, Mexico, Russia, Israel and India. The
expected expiration dates for these patents are between 2027 and
2034 plus any extensions or adjustments of term available under
national law.
We also hold patents and patent applications directed to starting
materials and intermediates in the processes for manufacturing
vadadustat, dosing regimens, formulations, and various other
aspects relating to the treatment of anemia using vadadustat that
are expected to expire between 2032 and 2042 exclusive of possible
patent term extensions or adjustments.
We have ongoing opposition and invalidity proceedings relating to
vadadustat. See Part I, Item 3. Legal Proceedings for further
information relating to these matters.
Auryxia Patent Portfolio
Pursuant to Keryx’s license with Panion, we have the exclusive
rights under a series of patents and patent applications to
commercialize Auryxia worldwide, excluding certain Asian-Pacific
countries. These patents and patent applications include claims
directed to compositions of matter, pharmaceutical compositions,
methods of treatment, as well as methods for the manufacture of
Auryxia.
Keryx’s patent rights include 14 issued U.S. patents listed in the
Orange Book covering the composition of matter, method of treating
hyperphosphatemia, and pharmaceutical compositions of Auryxia. The
expected expiration dates for these patents are between 2024 and
2030 plus any additional patent term extensions that may be
available.
Pursuant to the sublicense with our Japanese partner, Japan Tobacco
Inc., or JT, and its subsidiary, Torii Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., or
Torii, we have exclusively sublicensed certain Japanese patent
rights to JT and Torii. These sublicensed rights include several
Japanese patents and pending patent applications with composition
of matter claims, methods of synthesizing claims, and methods of
use claims covering Riona, the trade name under which JT and Torii
market ferric citrate in Japan. The expected expiration dates for
these patents and pending patent applications are between 2025 and
2027. To date, to our knowledge, no contested proceedings or
third-party claims have been lodged against any of these Japanese
patents.
Pursuant to the sublicense with our European partner, Averoa, we
have exclusively sublicensed certain European patent rights to
Averoa. These sublicensed rights include several European patents
and pending patent applications with composition of matter claims
and methods of use claims covering ferric citrate. The expected
expiration dates for these patents and pending patent applications
are between 2024 and 2036. To date, to our knowledge, no contested
proceedings or third-party claims have been lodged against any of
these European patents.
We received Paragraph IV certification notice letters regarding
ANDAs submitted to the FDA by third parties requesting approval for
generic versions of Auryxia tablets (210 mg ferric iron per
tablet). In response we filed certain complaints for patent
infringement against five third parties, and have entered into
settlement and license agreements with each of the five ANDA
filers. Each settlement agreement granted the defendants a
license to market a generic version of Auryxia in the United States
beginning on March 20, 2025 (subject to FDA approval), or earlier
under certain circumstances customary for settlement agreements of
this nature.
Other Intellectual Property Rights
We depend upon trademarks, trade secrets, know-how and continuing
technological advances to develop and maintain our competitive
position. To maintain the confidentiality of trade secrets and
proprietary information, we require our employees, scientific
advisors, consultants and collaborators, upon commencement of a
relationship with us, to execute confidentiality agreements and, in
the case of parties other than our research and development
collaborators, to agree to assign their inventions to us. These
agreements are designed to protect our proprietary information and
to grant us ownership of technologies that are developed in
connection with their relationship with us. These agreements may
not, however, provide protection for our trade secrets in the event
of unauthorized disclosure of such information.
In addition to patent protection, we may utilize orphan drug
regulations, pediatric exclusivity or other provisions of the Food,
Drug and Cosmetic Act of 1938, as amended, or FDCA, such as new
chemical entity exclusivity or new formulation exclusivity, to
provide market exclusivity for a drug candidate. In the United
States, the FDA has the authority to grant additional data
protection for approved drugs where the sponsor conducts specified
testing in pediatric or adolescent populations. If granted, this
pediatric exclusivity may provide an additional six months which
are added to the term of data protection as well as to the term of
a relevant patent, to the extent these protections have not already
expired. We may also seek to utilize market exclusivities in other
territories. We cannot assure you that our drug products or any
drug candidates we may acquire or in-license, will obtain such
orphan drug designation, pediatric exclusivity, new chemical entity
exclusivity or any other market exclusivity in the United States,
European Union or any other territory, or that we will be the first
to receive the respective regulatory approval for such drugs so as
to be eligible for any market exclusivity protection.
Know-How
In addition to patents, we rely upon unpatented know-how and
continuing technological innovation to develop and maintain our
competitive position. We seek to protect our proprietary
information, in part, using confidentiality agreements with our
collaborators, employees and consultants and invention assignment
provisions in the confidentiality agreements with our employees.
These agreements are designed to protect our proprietary
information and, in the case of the invention assignment
provisions, to grant us ownership of technologies that are
developed by our employees. These agreements may be breached, and
we may not have adequate remedies for any breach.
To the extent that our commercial partners, collaborators,
employees and consultants use intellectual property owned by others
in their work for us, disputes may arise as to the rights in
related or resulting know-how and inventions.
The Hatch-Waxman Act
Orange Book Listing
In seeking approval for a drug through an NDA, sponsors are
required to list with the FDA each patent whose claims cover the
sponsor’s product. Upon approval of a drug, each of the patents
listed in the application for the drug is then published in the
FDA’s Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence
Evaluations, commonly known as the Orange Book. Drugs listed in the
Orange Book can, in turn, be cited by potential generic competitors
in support of approval of an ANDA. An ANDA provides for marketing
of a drug product that has the same active ingredients in the same
strengths and dosage form as the listed drug and has been shown
through bioequivalence testing to be therapeutically equivalent to
the listed drug. Other than the requirement for bioequivalence
testing, ANDA sponsors are usually not required to conduct, or
submit results of, nonclinical or clinical tests to prove the
safety or effectiveness of their drug product. Drugs approved in
this way are commonly referred to as “generic equivalents” to the
listed drug and can often be substituted by pharmacists under
prescriptions written for the original listed drug.
The ANDA sponsor is required to make certain certifications to the
FDA concerning any patents listed for the approved product in the
FDA’s Orange Book. Specifically, the sponsor must certify that: (i)
the required patent information has not been filed; (ii) the listed
patent has expired; (iii) the listed patent has not expired but
will expire on a particular date and approval is sought after
patent expiration; or (iv) the listed patent is invalid or will not
be infringed by the new product. The ANDA sponsor may also elect to
submit a Section viii statement, certifying that its proposed ANDA
label does not contain or carve out any language regarding the
patented method-of-use, rather than certify to a listed
method-of-use patent.
If the sponsor does not challenge the listed patents, the ANDA will
not be approved until all the listed patents claiming the
referenced product have expired. A certification that the new
product will not infringe the already approved product’s listed
patents, or that such patents are invalid, is called a Paragraph IV
certification. If the ANDA sponsor has provided a Paragraph IV
certification to the FDA, the sponsor must also send notice of the
Paragraph IV certification to the NDA and patent holders once the
ANDA has been accepted for filing by the FDA. The NDA and patent
holders may then initiate a patent infringement lawsuit in response
to the notice of the Paragraph IV certification. The filing of a
patent infringement lawsuit within 45 days of the receipt of a
Paragraph IV certification automatically prevents the FDA from
approving the ANDA until the earlier of 30 months from receiving
the Paragraph IV certification, expiration of the patent,
settlement of the lawsuit, or a decision in the infringement case
that is favorable to the ANDA sponsor. Also, the ANDA will not be
approved until any applicable non-patent exclusivity listed in the
Orange Book for the referenced product has expired.
Exclusivity
Upon NDA approval of a new chemical entity, or NCE, which is a drug
that contains an active moiety that has not been approved by the
FDA in any other NDA, that drug receives five years of marketing
exclusivity during which time the FDA cannot accept any ANDA
seeking approval of a generic version of that drug. Certain changes
to a drug, such as the addition of a new indication to the package
insert, are associated with a three-year period of exclusivity
during which the FDA cannot approve an ANDA for a generic drug that
includes such changes.
An ANDA may be submitted one year before NCE exclusivity expires if
a Paragraph IV certification is filed. If there is no listed patent
in the Orange Book, there may not be a Paragraph IV certification,
and, thus, no ANDA may be filed before the expiration of the
exclusivity period.
Patent Term Extension
After NDA approval, owners of relevant drug patents or their agents
may apply for up to a five-year patent extension for delays caused
by FDA regulatory review. The allowable patent term extension is
calculated as half of the drug’s testing phase which is the time
between Investigational New Drug application, or IND submission and
NDA submission, and all of the review phase, which is the time
between NDA submission and approval, up to a maximum of five years.
The time can be shortened if the FDA determines that the sponsor
did not pursue approval with due diligence. The total patent term
after the extension may not exceed 14 years from the date of
approval by virtue of the patent term extension.
We have filed applications under the patent term extension
provisions of 35 U.S.C. § 156 for U.S. Patent Nos. 8,299,298,
8,093,423, 7,767,851 and 8,338,642 each of which covers Auryxia for
delays caused by FDA regulatory review. If granted, we can utilize
the patent term extension on one of these patents, however, we
cannot assure you that we can obtain any extension of the term of
these patents. Upon expiration of these patents, competitors who
obtain the requisite regulatory approval may potentially offer
products with the same composition and/or method of use as our
product, so long as the competitors do not infringe any other
patents that we may own or license.
For patents that might expire before a determination regarding
patent term extension, the patent owner or its agent may request an
interim patent term extension. An interim patent extension
increases the patent term by one year and may be renewed up to four
times. For each interim patent extension granted, the post-approval
patent extension is reduced by one year. The director of the USPTO
must determine that approval of the drug covered by the patent for
which a patent extension is being sought is likely.
In addition, certain jurisdictions outside of the U.S., including
Japan, have provisions that provide for patent term extension. In
October 2014, following the regulatory approval of Riona in Japan,
the Japan Patent office granted the patent term extensions filed by
our sublicensee, JT, for Japanese Patents Nos. 4964585 and 4173553.
As a result of the extension of patent term, Japanese Patent No.
4173553 expired in November 2022 and Japanese Patent No. 4964585
will expire in November 2025.
In the future, if and when our product candidates, including
vadadustat, receive approval by the FDA or foreign regulatory
authorities, we expect to apply for patent term extensions on
issued patents covering those drugs, depending upon the length of
the clinical trials for each product candidate and other factors.
There can be no assurance that any of our pending patent
applications will issue or that we will benefit from any patent
term extension or favorable adjustment to the term of any of our
patents.
Competition
The pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries are highly
competitive. Our competitors include pharmaceutical companies and
biotechnology companies, as well as universities and public and
private research institutions. In addition, companies that are
active in different but related fields represent substantial
competition for us. Many of our competitors have significantly
greater capital resources, larger research and development staffs
and facilities and greater experience in drug development,
regulation, manufacturing and marketing than we do. These
organizations also compete with us to recruit qualified personnel,
attract partners for joint ventures or other collaborations, and
license technologies that are competitive with ours. To compete
successfully in this industry, we must identify novel and unique
drugs or methods of treatment and then complete the development of
those drugs as treatments in advance of our
competitors.
Vadadustat
Drugs that may compete with vadadustat, if approved, include
Epogen® (epoetin alfa) and Aranesp® (darbepoetin alfa), both
commercialized by Amgen, Procrit® (epoetin alfa) and Eprex®
(epoetin alfa), commercialized by Johnson & Johnson in the
United States and Europe, respectively, and Mircera® (methoxy
PEG-epoetin beta), commercialized by CSL Vifor in the United States
and Roche Holding Ltd. outside of the United States.
In addition, in the United States, the FDA approved Jesduvroq
(daprodustat), an oral HIF-PHI from GSK for the once-a-day
treatment of anemia due to CKD in adults who have been receiving
dialysis for at least four months. FibroGen filed an NDA for its
product candidate, roxadustat, with the FDA, but the FDA issued a
complete response letter indicating the FDA will not approve the
NDA in its present form. In Europe however, roxadustat is approved
for the treatment of anemia in patients with CKD.
We and our partners may also face competition from potential new
anemia therapies. There are several other HIF-PH inhibitor product
candidates in various stages of development for anemia indications
that may be in direct competition with vadadustat if and when they
are approved and launched commercially. These candidates are being
developed by companies such as FibroGen Inc., or FibroGen, together
with its collaboration partners, Astellas Pharma Inc. and
AstraZeneca PLC, JT, GSK, and Bayer HealthCare AG, or
Bayer.
Furthermore, certain companies are developing potential new
therapies for renal-related diseases that could potentially reduce
injectable ESA utilization and thus limit the market potential for
vadadustat if they are approved and launched commercially. Other
new therapies are in development for the treatment of conditions
inclusive of renal anemia that may impact the market for
anemia-targeted treatment.
In Japan, Vafseo, which is approved for patients with CKD,
including both DD-CKD and NDD-CKD, competes with roxadustat,
daprodustat and enarodustat. Roxadustat is approved for the
treatment of anemia due to CKD, including DD-CKD and NDD-CKD
patients. In addition, daprodustat, GSK’s product candidate, and
enarodustat, JT’s product candidate, are approved in Japan for the
treatment of anemia due to CKD. In addition, Bayer HealthCare AG
has submitted a new drug application for its product candidate for
the treatment of renal anemia in Japan. In China, FibroGen launched
roxadustat for the treatment of anemia due to CKD in DD-CKD
patients and for the treatment of anemia due to CKD in NDD-CKD
patients.
A biosimilar is a biologic product that is approved based on
demonstrating that it is highly similar to an existing,
FDA-approved branded biologic product. The patents for the
existing, branded biologic product must expire in a given market
before biosimilars may enter that market without risk of being sued
for patent infringement. In addition, an application for a
biosimilar product cannot be approved by the FDA until 12 years
after the existing, branded product was approved under a Biologics
License Application, or BLA. The patents for epoetin alfa, an
injectable ESA, expired in 2004 in the EU, and the remaining
patents expired between 2012 and 2016 in the United States. Because
injectable ESAs are biologic products, the introduction of
biosimilars into the injectable ESA market in the United States
will constitute additional competition for vadadustat if we are
able to obtain approval for and commercially launch vadadustat. In
the United States, Pfizer’s biosimilar version of injectable ESAs,
Retacrit® (epoetin alfa-epbx), was approved by the FDA in May 2018
and launched in November 2018 and several biosimilar versions of
injectable ESAs are available for sale in the EU.
Furthermore, vadadustat’s commercial opportunities, if approved,
may be reduced or eliminated if our competitors develop and market
products that are less expensive, more effective, safer or offer
greater patient convenience than vadadustat.
Auryxia
Hyperphosphatemia Competition
Auryxia is competing in the hyperphosphatemia market in the United
States with other FDA-approved phosphate binders such as Renagel®
(sevelamer hydrochloride) and Renvela® (sevelamer carbonate), both
marketed by Sanofi, PhosLo® and Phoslyra® (calcium acetate),
marketed by Fresenius Medical Care North America, Fosrenol®
(lanthanum carbonate), marketed by Shire Pharmaceuticals Group plc,
and Velphoro® (sucroferric oxyhydroxide), marketed by Fresenius
Medical Care North America, as well as over-the-counter calcium
carbonate products such as TUMS® and metal-based options such as
aluminum, lanthanum and magnesium. Most of the phosphate binders
listed above are now also available in generic forms. In addition,
other agents are in development, including OPKO Health Inc.’s
Alpharen™ Tablets (fermagate tablets) and Unicycive’s RENAZORB™
(lanthanum dioxycarbonate) or could otherwise enter the market,
including Ardelyx, Inc.’s tenapanor (which is approved in the U.S.
for the treatment of adults with irritable bowel syndrome with
constipation, and which the FDA granted
Ardelyx’s appeal to the FDA’s CRL in December 2022 that will allow
Ardelyx to resubmit a new drug application in 2023 with respect to
the control of serum phosphorus in adult patients with CKD on
dialysis), that may impact the market for Auryxia.
Iron Deficiency Anemia Competition
Auryxia is competing in the IDA market in the United States with
over-the-counter oral iron, ferrous sulfate, other prescription
oral iron formulations, including ferrous gluconate, ferrous
fumerate, and polysaccharide iron complex, and intravenous iron
formulations, including Feraheme® (ferumoxytol injection), Venofer®
(iron sucrose injection), Ferrlicit® (sodium ferric gluconate
complex in sucrose injection), Injectafer® (ferric carboxymaltose
injection), and Triferic® (ferric pyrophosphate citrate). In
addition, other new therapies for the treatment of IDA may impact
the market for Auryxia, such as Shield Therapeutic’ plc's Feraccru®
(ferric maltol), which is available in Europe for the treatment of
IDA, and Accrufer® (ferric maltol), which was launched in the
United States for the treatment of IDA in July 2021.
Furthermore, Auryxia’s commercial opportunities may be reduced or
eliminated if our competitors develop and market products that are
less expensive, more effective, safer or offer greater patient
convenience than Auryxia. Other companies have product candidates
in various stages of preclinical or clinical development to treat
diseases and complications of the diseases for which we are
marketing Auryxia.
In addition, we entered into settlement agreements with each of our
ANDA filers pursuant to which we granted licenses to market a
generic version of Auryxia in the United States beginning in March
2025 (subject to FDA approval), or earlier under certain
circumstances customary for settlement agreements of this nature,
which may impact our business and results of
operation.
Government Regulation and Product Approvals
Government authorities in the United States, at the federal, state
and local level, and in other countries and jurisdictions,
including the European Union, extensively regulate, among other
things, the research, development, testing, manufacture, quality
control, approval, packaging, storage, recordkeeping, labeling,
advertising, promotion, distribution, marketing, sales, pricing,
reimbursement, post-approval monitoring and reporting, and import
and export of pharmaceutical products. The processes for obtaining
regulatory approvals in the United States and in foreign countries
and jurisdictions, along with subsequent compliance with applicable
statutes and regulations and other regulatory requirements, require
the expenditure of substantial time and financial
resources.
Review and Approval of Drug Products in the United
States
In the United States, the FDA approves and regulates drugs under
the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, or FDCA, and implementing
regulations.
Our product candidates must be approved by the FDA for therapeutic
indications before we or our partners are able to market them in
the United States. A company, institution, or organization which
takes responsibility for the initiation and management of a
clinical development program for such products is referred to as a
sponsor. A sponsor seeking approval to market and distribute a new
drug product in the United States must typically undertake the
following:
•completion
of preclinical laboratory tests, animal studies and formulation
studies in compliance with the FDA’s good laboratory practice, or
GLP, regulations and consistent with International Council for
Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for
Human Use, or ICH, requirements;
•design
of a clinical protocol and submission to the FDA of an IND, which
must be reviewed and active by the FDA before human clinical trials
may begin;
•approval
by an independent local or central institutional review board, or
IRB, representing each clinical site before each clinical trial may
be initiated;
•performance
of adequate and well-controlled human clinical trials in accordance
with good clinical practices, or GCP, to establish the safety and
efficacy of the proposed product candidate for each
indication;
•preparation
and submission to the FDA of an NDA requesting marketing for one or
more proposed indications;
•review
of the product candidate by an FDA advisory committee, where
appropriate or if applicable;
•satisfactory
completion of one or more FDA inspections of the manufacturing
facility or facilities at which the product candidate, or
components thereof, are produced to assess compliance with current
Good Manufacturing Practices, or cGMP, requirements and to assure
that the facilities, methods and controls are adequate to preserve
the product candidate’s identity, strength, quality and
purity;
•satisfactory
completion of FDA audits of clinical trial sites and records to
assure compliance with GCPs and good practices, or GxPs, the
integrity of the clinical data and that adequate controls and
oversight are in place regarding manufacturing, clinical trials,
pharmacovigilance, safety, data management, vendor oversight,
collection and reporting of serious adverse events and other
activities;
•payment
of user fees and securing FDA approval of an NDA; and
•compliance
with any post-approval requirements and/or commitments, including
the potential requirement to implement a risk evaluation and
mitigation strategy, or REMS, and potentially post-market
requirement, or PMR, and post-market commitment, or PMC,
studies.
Preclinical Tests
Before a sponsor begins testing a product candidate with potential
therapeutic value in humans, the product candidate enters the
preclinical testing stage. Preclinical tests include laboratory
evaluations of product chemistry, formulation and stability, as
well as other studies to evaluate, among other things, the toxicity
of the product candidate. The conduct of the preclinical tests and
formulation of the compounds for testing must comply with federal
regulations and requirements, including GLP regulations and
standards and the United States Department of Agriculture’s Animal
Welfare Act, if applicable.
The results of
the
preclinical tests, together with manufacturing information and
analytical data, are submitted to the FDA as part of an IND and are
generally referred to as IND-enabling studies. Some long-term
preclinical testing, such as animal tests of reproductive adverse
events and carcinogenicity, and long-term toxicity studies, may
continue after the IND is submitted.
The IND and IRB Processes
Clinical trials involve the administration of the investigational
product to human patients under the supervision of qualified
investigators in accordance with GCP requirements, which include,
among other things, the requirement that all research patients
provide their voluntary informed consent in writing before their
participation in any clinical trial. Clinical trials are conducted
under written study protocols detailing, among other things, the
inclusion and exclusion criteria, the objectives of the study, the
parameters to be used in monitoring safety and the effectiveness
criteria to be evaluated. A protocol for each clinical trial and
any subsequent protocol amendments must be submitted to the FDA as
part of the IND.
An IND is an exemption from the FDCA that allows an unapproved drug
to be shipped through interstate commerce for use in an
investigational clinical trial and a request for FDA authorization
to administer an investigational drug to humans. Such authorization
must be obtained prior to interstate shipment and administration of
any new drug that is not the subject of an approved NDA. The
results of the preclinical tests, together with manufacturing
information, analytical data, any available clinical data or
literature and plans for clinical trials, among other things, are
submitted to the FDA as part of an IND. The FDA requires a 30-day
waiting period after the submission of each IND before clinical
trials may begin. This waiting period is designed to allow the FDA
to review the IND to determine whether human research patients will
be exposed to unreasonable health risks. At any time during this
30-day period, or thereafter, the FDA may raise concerns or
questions about the conduct of the trials as outlined in the IND
and impose a clinical hold or partial clinical hold or require that
the sponsor amend the clinical protocol to include additional
safety measurements. In this case, the IND sponsor and the FDA must
resolve any outstanding concerns before clinical trials can begin
(or resume if the clinical trial had been ongoing at the time a
clinical hold was imposed).
In addition to the foregoing requirements related to the IND
submission, an IRB representing each institution participating in
the clinical trial must review and approve the plan for any
clinical trial before it commences at that institution, and the IRB
must conduct a continuing review and reapprove the trial at least
annually. The IRB must review and approve, among other things, the
trial protocol and informed consent information to be provided to
study patients. An IRB must operate in compliance with FDA
regulations. An IRB can suspend or terminate approval of a clinical
trial at its institution, or an institution it represents, if the
clinical trial is not being conducted in accordance with the IRB’s
requirements or if the product candidate has been associated with
unexpected serious harm to patients.
A sponsor may choose, but is not required, to conduct a foreign
clinical study under an IND. When a foreign clinical study is
conducted under an IND, all IND requirements must be met unless
waived by the FDA. When a foreign clinical study is not conducted
under an IND, the sponsor must ensure that the study complies with
certain regulatory requirements of the FDA in order to use the
study as support for an IND or application for marketing approval.
Specifically, the studies must be conducted in accordance with GCP,
including undergoing review and receiving approval by an
independent ethics committee and seeking and receiving informed
consent from subjects. GCP requirements encompass both ethical and
data integrity standards for clinical trials. The FDA’s regulations
are intended to help ensure the protection of human subjects
enrolled in non-IND foreign clinical trials, as well as the quality
and integrity of the resulting data.
Reporting Clinical Trial Results
Under the Public Health Service Act, or PHSA, sponsors of certain
clinical trials of certain FDA-regulated products, including
prescription drugs and biologics, are required to register and
disclose certain clinical trial information on a public registry
(clinicaltrials.gov) maintained by the U.S. National Institutes of
Health, or NIH.
In particular, information related to the product, patient
population, phase of investigation, study sites and investigators
and other aspects of the clinical trial is made public as part of
the registration of the clinical trial. Although sponsors are also
obligated to disclose the results of their clinical trials after
completion, disclosure of the results can be delayed in some cases
for up to two years after the date of completion of the trial. The
NIH’s Final Rule on registration and reporting requirements for
clinical trials became effective in 2017, and both NIH and the FDA
have signaled the government’s willingness to begin enforcing those
requirements against non-compliant clinical trial
sponsors.
Specifically, the PHSA grants the Secretary of the U.S. Department
of Health and Human Services, or HHS, the authority to issue a
notice of noncompliance to a responsible party for failure to
submit clinical trial information as required.
The responsible party, however, is allowed 30 days to correct the
noncompliance and submit the required information. The failure to
submit clinical trial information to clinicaltrials.gov, as
required, is also a prohibited act under the FDCA with violations
subject to potential civil monetary penalties of up to $10,000 for
each day the violation continues. In addition to civil monetary
penalties, violations may also result in other regulatory action,
such as injunction and/or criminal prosecution or disqualification
from federal grants. Although the FDA has historically not enforced
these reporting requirements due to HHS’s long delay in issuing
final implementing regulations, those regulations have now been
issued and the FDA has issued several Notices of Noncompliance to
manufacturers since April 2021.
Expanded Access to an Investigational Drug for Treatment
Use
Expanded access, sometimes called “compassionate use,” is the use
of investigational new drug products outside of clinical trials to
treat patients with serious or immediately life-threatening
diseases or conditions when there are no comparable or satisfactory
alternative treatment options. The rules and regulations related to
expanded access are intended to improve access to investigational
drugs for patients who may benefit from investigational therapies.
FDA regulations allow access to investigational drugs under an IND
by the company or the treating physician for treatment purposes on
a case-by-case basis for: individual patients (single-patient IND
applications for treatment in emergency settings and non-emergency
settings); intermediate-size patient populations; and larger
populations for use of the drug under a treatment protocol or
Treatment IND Application.
There is no obligation for a sponsor to make its investigational
products available for expanded access; however, as required by
amendments to the FDCA included in the 21st Century Cures Act
passed in 2016, if a sponsor has a policy regarding how it responds
to expanded access requests with respect to product candidates in
development to treat serious diseases or conditions, it must make
that policy publicly available. Sponsors are required to make such
policies publicly available upon the earlier of initiation of a
Phase 2 or Phase 3 study for a covered investigational product; or
15 days after the investigational product receives designation from
the FDA as a breakthrough therapy, fast track product, or
regenerative medicine advanced therapy.
On May 30, 2018, the Right to Try Act was signed into law. The law,
among other things, provides a federal framework for certain
patients to access certain investigational new drug products that
have completed a Phase I clinical trial and that are undergoing
investigation for FDA approval. Under certain circumstances,
eligible patients can seek treatment without enrolling in clinical
trials and without obtaining FDA permission under the FDA expanded
access program. There is no obligation for a drug manufacturer to
make its product candidates available to eligible patients as a
result of the Right to Try Act, but the manufacturer must develop
an internal policy and respond to patient requests according to
that policy.
Human Clinical Trials in Support of an NDA
Clinical trials involve the administration of the investigational
product to human patients under the supervision of qualified
investigators in accordance with GCP requirements, which include,
among other things, the requirement that all research patients
provide their informed consent in writing before their
participation in any clinical trial. Clinical trials are conducted
under written study protocols detailing, among other things, the
inclusion and exclusion criteria, the objectives of the study, the
parameters to be used in monitoring safety and the effectiveness
criteria to be evaluated.
Human clinical trials are typically conducted in four sequential
phases, which may overlap or be combined:
•Phase
1.
The product candidate is initially introduced into a small number
of healthy human patients or, in certain indications such as
cancer, patients with the target disease or condition (e.g.,
cancer) and tested for
safety, dosage tolerance, absorption, metabolism, distribution,
excretion and, if possible, to gain an early indication of its
effectiveness and to determine optimal dosage.
•Phase
2.
The product candidate is administered to a limited patient
population to identify possible adverse effects and safety risks,
to preliminarily evaluate the efficacy of the product candidate for
specific targeted diseases and to determine dosage tolerance and
optimal dosage.
•Phase
3.
These clinical trials are commonly referred to as “pivotal”
studies, which denote a study that presents the data that the FDA
or other relevant regulatory agency will use to determine whether
or not to approve a product candidate. The product candidate is
administered to an expanded patient population, generally at
geographically dispersed clinical trial sites, in well-controlled
clinical trials to generate enough data to statistically evaluate
the efficacy and safety of the product candidate for approval,
identify adverse effects, establish the overall risk-benefit
profile of the product candidate and to provide adequate
information for the labeling of the product candidate.
•Phase
4.
Post-approval studies may be conducted after initial marketing
approval. These studies are used to gain additional experience from
the treatment of patients in the intended therapeutic
indication.
A clinical trial may combine the elements of more than one phase
and the FDA often requires more than one Phase 3 trial to support
marketing approval of a product candidate. A company’s designation
of a clinical trial as being of a particular phase is not
necessarily indicative that the study will be sufficient to satisfy
the FDA requirements of that phase because this determination
cannot be made until the protocol and data have been submitted to
and reviewed by the FDA. Moreover, as noted above, a pivotal trial
is a clinical trial that is believed to satisfy FDA requirements
for the evaluation of a product candidate’s safety and efficacy
such that it can be used, alone or with other pivotal or
non-pivotal trials, to support regulatory approval. Generally,
pivotal trials are Phase 3 trials, but they may be Phase 2 trials
if the design provides a well-controlled and reliable assessment of
clinical benefit, particularly in an area of unmet medical
need.
In December 2022, with the passage of Food and Drug Omnibus Reform
Act, or FDORA, Congress required sponsors to develop and submit a
diversity action plan for each phase 3 clinical trial or any other
“pivotal study” of a new drug or biological product. These plans
are meant to encourage the enrollment of more diverse patient
populations in late-stage clinical trials of FDA-regulated
products. Specifically, actions plans must include the sponsor’s
goals for enrollment, the underlying rationale for those goals, and
an explanation of how the sponsor intends to meet them. In addition
to these requirements, the legislation directs the FDA to issue new
guidance on diversity action plans. Progress reports detailing the
results of the clinical trials conducted under the IND must be
submitted at least annually to the FDA and, more frequently, if
serious adverse events occur. In addition, IND safety reports must
be submitted to the FDA for any of the following: serious and
unexpected suspected adverse reactions; findings from other studies
or animal or in vitro testing that suggest a significant risk in
humans exposed to the drug; and any clinically important increase
in the case of a serious suspected adverse reaction over that
listed in the protocol or investigator brochure. The FDA, IRB or
the sponsor or the data monitoring committee may suspend or
terminate a clinical trial at any time on various grounds,
including a finding that the research patients are being exposed to
an unacceptable health risk. The FDA will typically inspect one or
more clinical sites to assure compliance with GCP and the integrity
of the clinical data submitted.
In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the FDA issued guidance on
March 18, 2020, and has updated it periodically since that time to
address the conduct of clinical trials during the pandemic. The
guidance sets out a number of considerations for sponsors of
clinical trials impacted by the pandemic, including the requirement
to include in the clinical study report (or as a separate document)
contingency measures implemented to manage the study, and any
disruption of the study as a result of COVID-19. On January 30,
2023, the Biden Administration announced that it will end the
public health emergency declarations related to COVID-19 on May 11,
2023. On January 31, 2023, the FDA indicated that it would soon
issue a Federal Register notice describing how the termination of
the public health emergency will impact the agency’s COVID-19
related guidance, including the clinical trial guidance and updates
thereto. At this point, it is unclear how, if at all, these
developments will impact our efforts to develop and commercialize
our product candidates.
Pediatric Studies
Under the Pediatric Research Equity Act, or PREA, applications and
certain types of supplements to applications must contain data that
are adequate to assess the safety and effectiveness of the product
for the claimed indications in all relevant pediatric
subpopulations, and to support dosing and administration for each
pediatric subpopulation for which the product is safe and
effective. The sponsor must submit an initial Pediatric Study Plan,
or PSP, within 60 days of an end-of-phase 2 meeting or as may be
agreed between the sponsor and the FDA. Those plans must contain an
outline of the proposed pediatric study or studies the sponsor
plans to conduct, including study objectives and design, age
groups, relevant endpoints and statistical approach, or a
justification for not including such detailed information, and any
request for a deferral of pediatric assessments or a full or
partial waiver of the requirement to provide data from pediatric
studies along with supporting information. The sponsor and
the
FDA must reach agreement on a final plan. A sponsor can submit
amendments to an agreed-upon initial PSP at any time if changes to
the pediatric plan need to be considered based on data collected
from nonclinical trials, early phase clinical trials, and/or other
clinical development programs.
For investigational products intended to treat a serious or
life-threatening disease or condition, the FDA must, upon the
request of a sponsor, meet to discuss preparation of the initial
pediatric study plan or to discuss deferral or waiver of pediatric
assessments. In addition, the FDA will meet early in the
development process to discuss pediatric study plans with sponsors,
and the FDA must meet with sponsors by no later than the
end-of-phase 1 meeting for serious or life-threatening diseases and
by no later than ninety days after the FDA’s receipt of the study
plan.
The FDA may, on its own initiative or at the request of the
sponsor, grant deferrals for submission of some or all pediatric
data until after approval of the product for use in adults, or full
or partial waivers from the pediatric data requirements. A deferral
may be granted for several reasons, including a finding that the
product or therapeutic candidate is ready for approval for use in
adults before pediatric trials are complete or that additional
safety or effectiveness data needs to be collected before the
pediatric trials begin.
Pursuant to the Food and Drug Administration Safety and Innovation
Act of 2012, or FDASIA, the FDA must send a PREA Non-Compliance
letter to sponsors who have failed to submit their pediatric
assessments required under PREA, have failed to seek or obtain a
deferral or deferral extension or have failed to request approval
for a required pediatric formulation. FDASIA further requires the
FDA to publicly post the PREA Non-Compliance letter and sponsor’s
response.
Unless otherwise required by regulation, the pediatric data
requirements do not apply to products with orphan designation,
although FDA has recently taken steps to limit what it considers
abuse of this statutory exemption in PREA by announcing that it
does not intend to grant any additional orphan drug designations
for rare pediatric subpopulations of what is otherwise a common
disease. The FDA also maintains a list of diseases that are exempt
from PREA requirements due to low prevalence of disease in the
pediatric population.
Acceptance and Review of an NDA
Assuming successful completion of required clinical testing and
other requirements, the results of the preclinical studies and
clinical trials, together with detailed information relating to the
product’s chemistry, manufacture, controls and proposed labeling,
among other things are submitted to the FDA as part of an NDA
requesting approval to market the product candidate for one or more
indications. The fee required for the submission and review of an
application under the Prescription Drug User Fee Act, or PDUFA, is
substantial (for example, for fiscal year 2023 this application fee
is approximately $3.2 million), and the sponsor of an approved
application is also subject to an annual program fee, currently
more than $393,000 per eligible prescription product. These fees
are typically adjusted annually, and exemptions and waivers may be
available under certain circumstances, such as where a waiver is
necessary to protect the public health, where the fee would present
a significant barrier to innovation, or where the sponsor is a
small business submitting its first human therapeutic application
for review.
The FDA conducts a preliminary review of all applications within 60
days of receipt and must inform the sponsor at that time or before
whether an application is sufficiently complete to permit
substantive review.
This is known as the filing decision. In the event that FDA
determines that an application does not satisfy this standard, it
will issue a Refuse to File determination to the sponsor. The FDA
may request additional information rather than accept an NDA for
filing. In this event, the application must be resubmitted with the
additional information. The resubmitted application is also subject
to review before the FDA accepts it for filing. Once the submission
is accepted for filing, the FDA begins an in-depth substantive
review. The FDA has agreed to certain performance goals in the
review process of NDAs. Most such applications are meant to be
reviewed within ten months from the date of filing, and most
applications for “priority review” products are meant to be
reviewed within six months of filing. A product that has been
designated as a breakthrough therapy may also be eligible for
review within six months if supported by clinical data at the time
of submission of the NDA. The review process may be extended by the
FDA for three additional months to consider new information or
clarification provided by the sponsor to address an outstanding
deficiency identified by the FDA following the original
submission.
Before approving an NDA, the FDA typically will inspect the
facility or facilities where the product is or will be
manufactured. These pre-approval inspections may cover all
facilities associated with an NDA submission, including drug
component manufacturing such as active pharmaceutical ingredients,
finished drug product manufacturing, control testing laboratories,
as well as packaging and labeling facilities. The FDA will not
approve an application unless it determines that the manufacturing
processes and facilities are in compliance with cGMP requirements
and adequate to assure consistent production of the product within
required specifications. The PREVENT Pandemics Act, which was
enacted in December 2022, clarifies that foreign drug manufacturing
establishments are subject to registration and listing requirements
even if a drug or biologic undergoes further manufacture,
preparation, propagation, compounding, or processing at a separate
establishment outside the United States prior to being imported or
offered for import into the United States.
Additionally, before approving an NDA, the FDA will typically
inspect one or more clinical sites to assure compliance with
GCP. The sponsor of the NDA may also have their records,
processes, procedures, training, and other aspects reviewed during
an inspection. The FDA must implement a protocol to expedite
review of responses to inspection reports pertaining to certain
drug applications, including applications for drugs in a shortage
or drugs for which approval is dependent on remediation of
conditions identified in the inspection report.
In addition, as a condition of approval, the FDA may require a
sponsor to develop a REMS. REMS use risk minimization strategies
beyond the professional labeling to ensure that the benefits of the
product outweigh the potential risks.
Finally, the FDA may refer an application for a novel drug to an
advisory committee or explain why such referral was not made.
Typically, an advisory committee is a panel of independent experts,
including clinicians and other scientific experts, that reviews,
evaluates and provides a recommendation as to whether the
application should be approved and under what conditions. The FDA
is not bound by the recommendations of an advisory committee, but
it considers such recommendations carefully when making
decisions.
Fast Track, Breakthrough Therapy, Priority Review
The FDA is authorized to designate certain products for expedited
review if they are intended to address an unmet medical need in the
treatment of a serious or life-threatening disease or condition.
These programs are referred to as fast track designation,
breakthrough therapy designation, priority review
designation.
Specifically, the FDA may designate a product for fast track review
if it is intended, whether alone or in combination with one or more
other drugs, for the treatment of a serious or life-threatening
disease or condition, and it demonstrates the potential to address
unmet medical needs for such a disease or condition. The fast track
designation may be withdrawn by the FDA if the FDA believes that
the designation is no longer supported by data emerging in the
clinical trial process.
Second, in 2012, Congress enacted the Food and Drug Administration
Safety and Improvement Act. This law established a new regulatory
scheme allowing for expedited review of products designated as
“breakthrough therapies.” A product may be designated as a
breakthrough therapy if it is intended, either alone or in
combination with one or more other drugs, to treat a serious or
life-threatening disease or condition and preliminary clinical
evidence indicates that the product may demonstrate substantial
improvement over existing therapies on one or more clinically
significant endpoints, such as substantial treatment effects
observed early in clinical development. The FDA may take certain
actions with respect to breakthrough therapies, including holding
meetings with the sponsor throughout the development process;
providing timely advice to the product sponsor regarding
development and approval; involving more senior staff in the review
process; assigning a cross-disciplinary project lead for the review
team; and taking other steps to design the clinical trials in an
efficient manner.
Third, the FDA may designate a product for priority review if it is
a drug that treats a serious condition and, if approved, would
provide a significant improvement in safety or effectiveness. The
FDA determines, on a case-by-case basis, whether the proposed drug
represents a significant improvement when compared with other
available therapies. A priority designation is intended to direct
overall attention and resources to the evaluation of such
applications, and to shorten the FDA’s review clock goal for taking
action on a marketing application from ten months to six
months.
Priority Review Vouchers
A PRV is a voucher that the FDA issues to a sponsor of a rare
pediatric disease or tropical disease product application at the
time of the marketing application approval. Vouchers are
transferable to other sponsors that may apply it to their NDAs or
BLAs. A PRV entitles the holder to designate a single human drug
application submitted under Section 505(b)(1) of the U.S. Federal
Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act or Section 351 of the Public Health
Service Act as qualifying for a priority review. An FDA priority
review may expedite the review process of a marketing application
reducing the review time from ten months after formal acceptance of
the file to six months after formal acceptance of the file.
Applying the PRV to a marketing application does not ensure the
FDA’s approval of the marketing application and all requirements
supporting the safety and efficacy of the product must be
met.
Our NDA submission for vadadustat did not include a
PRV.
The FDA’s Decision on an NDA
The FDA reviews an application to determine, among other things,
whether the product is safe and whether it is effective for its
intended use(s), with the latter determination being made on the
basis of substantial evidence.
The term “substantial evidence” is defined under the FDCA as
“evidence consisting of adequate and well-controlled
investigations, including clinical
investigations, by experts qualified by scientific training and
experience to evaluate the effectiveness of the product involved,
on the basis of which it could fairly and responsibly be concluded
by such experts that the product will have the effect it purports
or is represented to have under the conditions of use prescribed,
recommended, or suggested in the labeling or proposed labeling
thereof.”
The FDA has interpreted this evidentiary standard to require at
least two adequate and well-controlled clinical investigations to
establish effectiveness of a new product. Under certain
circumstances, however, FDA has indicated that a single trial with
certain characteristics and additional information may satisfy this
standard. This approach was subsequently endorsed by Congress in
1998 with legislation providing, in pertinent part, that “If [FDA]
determines, based on relevant science, that data from one adequate
and well-controlled clinical investigation and confirmatory
evidence (obtained prior to or after such investigation) are
sufficient to establish effectiveness, FDA may consider such data
and evidence to constitute substantial evidence.” This modification
to the law recognized the potential for FDA to find that one
adequate and well controlled clinical investigation with
confirmatory evidence, including supportive data outside of a
controlled trial, is sufficient to establish effectiveness.
In December 2019, FDA issued draft guidance further explaining the
studies that are needed to establish substantial evidence of
effectiveness. It has not yet finalized that guidance.
After evaluating the application and all related information,
including the advisory committee recommendations, if any, and
inspection reports of manufacturing facilities and clinical trial
sites, the FDA will issue either a CRL or an approval
letter.
To reach this determination, the FDA must determine that the drug
is effective and that its expected benefits outweigh its potential
risks to patients. This “benefit-risk” assessment is informed by
the extensive body of evidence about the product’s safety and
efficacy in the NDA or BLA. This assessment is also informed by
other factors, including: the severity of the underlying condition
and how well patients’ medical needs are addressed by currently
available therapies; uncertainty about how the premarket clinical
trial evidence will extrapolate to real-world use of the product in
the post-market setting; and whether risk management tools are
necessary to manage specific risks.
In connection with this assessment, the FDA review team will
assemble all individual reviews and other documents into an “action
package,” which becomes the record for FDA review. The review team
then issues a recommendation, and a senior FDA official makes a
decision.
A CRL indicates that the review cycle of the application is
complete, and the application will not be approved in its present
form. A CRL generally outlines the deficiencies in the submission
and may require substantial additional testing or information in
order for the FDA to reconsider the application. The CRL may
require additional clinical or other data, additional pivotal Phase
3 clinical trial(s) and/or other significant and time- consuming
requirements related to clinical trials, preclinical studies or
manufacturing. If a CRL is issued, the sponsor will have one year
to respond to the deficiencies identified by the FDA, at which time
the FDA can deem the application withdrawn or, in its discretion,
grant the sponsor an additional six month extension to respond. The
FDA has committed to reviewing resubmissions in response to an
issued CRL in either two or six months depending on the type of
information included. Even with the submission of this additional
information, however, the FDA ultimately may decide that the
application does not satisfy the regulatory criteria for approval.
The FDA has taken the position that a CRL is not final agency
action making the determination subject to judicial review. Rather,
for those seeking to challenge FDA’s CRL decision, the agency has
indicated that sponsors may request a formal hearing on the CRL or
they may file a request for reconsideration or a request for a
formal dispute resolution.
An approval letter, on the other hand, authorizes commercial
marketing of the product with specific prescribing information for
specific indications.
That is, the approval will be limited to the conditions of use
(e.g., patient population, indication) described in the
FDA-approved labeling. Further, depending on the specific risk(s)
to be addressed, the FDA may require that contraindications,
warnings or precautions be included in the product labeling,
require that post-approval trials, including Phase 4 clinical
trials, be conducted to further assess a product’s safety after
approval, require testing and surveillance programs to monitor the
product after commercialization or impose other conditions,
including distribution and use restrictions or other risk
management mechanisms under a REMS which can materially affect the
potential market and profitability of the product. The FDA may
prevent or limit further marketing of a product based on the
results of post-marketing trials or surveillance programs. After
approval, some types of changes to the approved product, such as
adding new indications, manufacturing changes and additional
labeling claims, are subject to further testing requirements and
FDA review and approval.
Under the Ensuring Innovation Act, which was signed into law in
April 2021, the FDA must publish action packages summarizing its
decisions to approve new drugs and biologics within 30 days of
approval of such products.
To date, CRLs are not publicly available documents.
Post-Approval Requirements and Commitments
If a product receives regulatory approval, the approval may be
significantly limited to specific diseases and dosages or the
indications for use may otherwise be limited, which could restrict
the commercial value of the product. Further, the FDA may require
that certain contraindications, warnings or precautions be included
in the product labeling. In addition, conditions of NDA approval
may include sponsor agreement to PMR or PMC studies, which are
designed to further assess drug safety and effectiveness and may
require testing and surveillance programs to monitor the safety of
approved products that have been commercialized. These may
include additional studies, registries, data collection, analyses,
and/or information.
Drugs manufactured or distributed pursuant to FDA approvals are
subject to pervasive and continuing regulation by the FDA,
including, among other things, requirements relating to
recordkeeping, periodic reporting, product sampling and
distribution, advertising and promotion and reporting of adverse
experiences with the product. After approval, most changes to the
approved product, such as adding new indications or other labeling
claims, are subject to prior FDA review and approval. There also
are continuing, annual user fee requirements for any marketed
products and the establishments at which such products are
manufactured, as well as new application fees for supplemental
applications with clinical data.
In addition, drug manufacturers and other entities involved in the
manufacture and distribution of approved drugs are required to
register their establishments with the FDA and state agencies and
are subject to periodic unannounced inspections by the FDA and
these state agencies for compliance with cGMP requirements. Changes
to the manufacturing process are strictly regulated and often
require prior FDA approval before being implemented. FDA
regulations also require investigation and correction of any
deviations from cGMP and impose reporting and documentation
requirements upon the sponsor and any third-party manufacturers
that the sponsor may decide to use. Accordingly, manufacturers must
continue to expend time, money, and effort in the area of
production and quality control to maintain cGMP
compliance.
Once an approval is granted, the FDA may withdraw the approval if
compliance with regulatory requirements and standards is not
maintained or if problems occur after the product reaches the
market. Later discovery of previously unknown problems with a
product, including adverse events of unanticipated severity or
frequency, or with manufacturing processes, or failure to comply
with regulatory requirements, may result in revisions to the
approved labeling to add new safety information; imposition of
post-market studies or clinical trials to assess new safety risks;
or imposition of distribution or other restrictions under a REMS
program. Other potential consequences include, among other
things:
•restrictions
on the marketing or manufacturing of the product, suspension of the
approval, or complete withdrawal of the product from the market or
product recalls;
•fines,
warning letters or holds on post-approval clinical
trials;
•refusal
of the FDA to approve pending NDAs or supplements to approved NDAs,
or suspension or revocation of product license
approvals;
•product
seizure or detention, or refusal to permit the import or export of
products; or
•injunctions
or the imposition of civil or criminal penalties.
The FDA strictly regulates the marketing, labeling, advertising and
promotion of prescription drug products placed on the market. This
regulation includes, among other things, standards and regulations
for direct-to-consumer advertising, communications regarding
unapproved uses, industry-sponsored scientific and educational
activities, and promotional activities involving the Internet and
social media. Promotional claims about a product candidate’s safety
or effectiveness are prohibited before the product candidate is
approved. After approval, a drug product generally may not be
promoted for uses that are not approved by the FDA or in a manner
that is inconsistent with the product’s prescribing information. In
September 2021, the FDA published final regulations which describe
the types of evidence that the agency will consider in determining
the intended use of a drug product.
In the United States, healthcare professionals are generally
permitted to prescribe drugs for such uses not described in the
drug’s labeling, known as off-label uses, because the FDA does not
regulate the practice of medicine. However, FDA regulations impose
rigorous restrictions on manufacturers’ communications, prohibiting
the promotion of off-label uses. It may be permissible, under very
specific conditions, for a manufacturer to engage in
nonpromotional, truthful and non-misleading communication regarding
off-label information, such as distributing scientific or medical
journal information. In addition, companies may also promote
information that it consistent with the prescribing information and
have the ability to proactively speak to formulary committee
members of payors regarding data for an unapproved drug or
unapproved uses of an approved drug under some relatively recent
guidance from the FDA. Moreover, with passage of the
Pre-Approval Information Exchange Act, or PIE Act, in December
2022, sponsors of products that have not been approved may
proactively communicate to payors certain information about
products in development to help expedite patient access upon
product approval. Previously, such communications were permitted
under FDA guidance but the new legislation explicitly provides
protection to sponsors who convey certain information about
products in development to payors, including unapproved uses of
approved products.
However, if a company is found to have promoted off-label uses, it
may become subject to adverse public relations and administrative
and judicial enforcement by the FDA, the Department of Justice, or
the Office of the Inspector General of the Department of Health and
Human Services, as well as state authorities. This could subject a
company to a range of penalties that could have a significant
commercial impact, including civil and criminal fines and
agreements that materially restrict the manner in which a company
promotes or distributes drug products. The federal government has
levied large civil and criminal fines against companies for alleged
improper promotion and has also requested that companies enter into
consent decrees or permanent injunctions under which specified
promotional conduct is changed or curtailed.
In addition, the distribution of prescription pharmaceutical
products is subject to a variety of federal and state laws, the
most recent of which is still in the process of being phased into
the U.S. supply chain and regulatory framework. The Prescription
Drug Marketing Act, or PDMA, was the first federal law to set
minimum standards for the registration and regulation of drug
distributors by the states and to regulate the distribution of drug
samples. Today, both the PDMA and state laws limit the distribution
of prescription pharmaceutical product samples and impose
requirements to ensure accountability in distribution. Congress
more recently enacted the Drug Supply Chain Security Act, or DSCSA,
which made significant amendments to the FDCA, including by
replacing certain provisions from the PDMA pertaining to wholesale
distribution of prescription drugs with a more comprehensive
statutory scheme. The DSCSA now requires uniform national standards
for wholesale distribution and, for the first time, for third-party
logistics providers; it also provides for preemption of certain
state laws in the areas of licensure and prescription drug
traceability.
Section 505(b)(2) NDAs
NDAs for most new drug products are based on two full clinical
trials which must contain substantial evidence of the safety and
efficacy of the proposed new product for the proposed use. These
applications are submitted under Section 505(b)(1) of the FDCA. The
FDA is, however, authorized to approve an alternative type of NDA
under Section 505(b)(2) of the FDCA. This type of application
allows the sponsor to rely, in part, on the FDA’s previous findings
of safety and efficacy for a similar product, or published
literature. Specifically, Section 505(b)(2) applies to NDAs for a
drug for which the investigations made to show whether or not the
drug is safe for use and effective in use and relied upon by the
sponsor for approval of the application “were not conducted by or
for the sponsor and for which the sponsor has not obtained a right
of reference or use from the person by or for whom the
investigations were conducted.”
Section 505(b)(2) authorizes the FDA to approve an NDA based on
safety and effectiveness data that were not developed by the
sponsor. NDAs filed under Section 505(b)(2) may provide an
alternate and potentially more expeditious pathway to FDA approval
for new or improved formulations or new uses of previously approved
products. If the 505(b)(2) sponsor can establish that reliance on
the FDA’s previous approval is scientifically appropriate, the
sponsor may eliminate the need to conduct certain preclinical
studies or clinical trials of the new product. The FDA may also
require companies to perform additional studies or measurements to
support the change from the approved product. The FDA may then
approve the new drug candidate for all or some of the label
indications for which the referenced product has been approved, as
well as for any new indication sought by the Section 505(b)(2)
sponsor.
Products approved under Section 505(b)(2) are often referred to as
follow-on products.
Abbreviated New Drug Applications for Generic Drugs
In 1984, with passage of the Hatch-Waxman Amendments to the FDCA,
Congress established an abbreviated regulatory scheme authorizing
the FDA to approve generic drugs that are shown to contain the same
active ingredients as, and to be bioequivalent to, drugs previously
approved by the FDA pursuant to NDAs. To obtain approval of a
generic drug, a sponsor must submit an abbreviated new drug
application, or ANDA, to the agency. An ANDA is a comprehensive
submission that contains, among other things, data and information
pertaining to the active pharmaceutical ingredient, bioequivalence,
drug product formulation, specifications and stability of the
generic drug, as well as analytical methods, manufacturing process
validation data and quality control procedures. ANDAs are
“abbreviated” because they generally do not include preclinical and
clinical data to demonstrate safety and effectiveness. Instead, in
support of such applications, a generic manufacturer may rely on
the preclinical and clinical testing previously conducted for a
drug product previously approved under an NDA, known as the
reference-listed drug, or RLD.
Under the Hatch-Waxman Act, the FDA may not approve an ANDA or
505(b)(2) application until any applicable period of non-patent
exclusivity for the RLD has expired. The FDCA provides a period of
five years of non-patent data exclusivity for a new drug containing
a NCE. For the purposes of this provision, the FDA has consistently
taken the position that an NCE is a drug that contains no active
moiety that has previously been approved by the FDA in any other
NDA. This interpretation was confirmed with enactment of the
Ensuring Innovation Act in April 2021. An active moiety is the
molecule or ion responsible for the physiological or
pharmacological action of the drug substance. In cases where such
NCE exclusivity has been granted, a
generic or follow-on drug application may not be filed with the FDA
until the expiration of five years unless the submission is
accompanied by a Paragraph IV certification, in which case the
sponsor may submit its application four years following the
original product approval.
The FDCA also provides for a period of three years of exclusivity
if the NDA includes reports of one or more new clinical
investigations, other than bioavailability or bioequivalence
studies, that were conducted by or for the sponsor and are
essential to the approval of the application. This three-year
exclusivity period often protects changes to a previously approved
drug product, such as a new dosage form, route of administration,
combination or indication. Three-year exclusivity would be
available for a drug product that contains a previously approved
active moiety, provided the statutory requirement for a new
clinical investigation is satisfied. Unlike five-year NCE
exclusivity, an award of three-year exclusivity does not block the
FDA from accepting ANDAs or 505(b)(2) applications seeking approval
for generic versions of the drug as of the date of approval of the
original drug product. The FDA typically makes decisions about
awards of data exclusivity shortly before a product is
approved.
The FDA must establish a priority review track for certain generic
drugs, requiring the FDA to review a drug application within eight
months for a drug that has three or fewer approved
drugs listed in the Orange Book
and is no longer protected by any patent or regulatory
exclusivities, or is on the FDA’s drug shortage list. The new
legislation also authorizes FDA to expedite review of ‘‘competitor
generic therapies’’ or drugs with inadequate generic competition,
including holding meetings with or providing advice to the drug
sponsor prior to submission of the application.
Hatch-Waxman Patent Certification and the 30-Month
Stay
As part of the submission of an NDA or certain supplemental
applications, NDA sponsors are required to list with the FDA each
patent with claims that cover the sponsor’s product or an approved
method of using the product. Upon approval of a new drug, each of
the patents listed in the application for the drug is then
published in the Orange Book.
The FDA’s regulations governing patent listings were largely
codified into law with enactment of the Orange Book Modernization
Act in January 2021. When an ANDA sponsor files its application
with the FDA, the sponsor is required to certify to the FDA
concerning any patents listed for the reference product in the
Orange Book.
Specifically, the ANDA sponsor must certify that: (i) the required
patent information has not been filed; (ii) the listed patent has
expired; (iii) the listed patent has not expired, but will expire
on a particular date and approval is sought after patent
expiration; or (iv) the listed patent is invalid or will not be
infringed by the new product. Moreover, to the extent that the
Section 505(b)(2) NDA sponsor is relying on studies conducted for
an already approved product, the sponsor also is required to
certify to the FDA concerning any patents listed for the
NDA-approved product in the Orange Book to the same extent that an
ANDA sponsor would.
If the generic drug or follow-on drug sponsor does not challenge
the innovator’s listed patents, FDA will not approve the ANDA or
505(b)(2) application until all the listed patents claiming the
referenced product have expired. A certification that the new
generic product will not infringe the already approved product’s
listed patents or that such patents are invalid or unenforceable is
called a Paragraph IV certification. If the ANDA sponsor has
provided a Paragraph IV certification to the FDA, the sponsor must
also send notice of the Paragraph IV certification to the NDA owner
and patent holders once the ANDA has been accepted for filing by
the FDA. The NDA owner and patent holders may then initiate a
patent infringement lawsuit in response to the notice of the
Paragraph IV certification. The filing of a patent infringement
lawsuit within 45 days after the receipt of a Paragraph IV
certification automatically prevents the FDA from approving the
ANDA or 505(b)(2) NDA until the earliest of 30 months after the
receipt of the Paragraph IV notice, expiration of the patent or a
decision in the infringement case that is favorable to the ANDA or
505(b)(2) NDA application.
Pediatric Studies and Exclusivity
Pediatric exclusivity is another type of non-patent marketing
exclusivity in the United States and, if granted, for drug
products, provides for the attachment of an additional six months
of marketing protection to the term of any existing patent or
regulatory exclusivity, including the non-patent and orphan
exclusivity. This six-month exclusivity may be granted if an NDA
sponsor submits pediatric data that fairly respond to a written
request from the FDA for such data. The data do not need to show
the product is effective in the pediatric population studied,
rather, if the clinical trial is deemed to fairly respond to the
FDA’s request, the additional protection is granted. If reports of
requested pediatric studies are submitted to and accepted by the
FDA within the statutory time limits, whatever statutory or
regulatory periods of exclusivity or patent protection cover the
product are extended by six months. This is not a patent term
extension, but it effectively extends the regulatory period during
which the FDA cannot approve another application. With regard to
patents, the six-month pediatric exclusivity period will not attach
to
any patents for which an ANDA or 505(b)(2) sponsor submitted a
Paragraph IV patent certification, unless the NDA sponsor or patent
owner first obtains a court determination that the patent is valid
and infringed by the proposed product.
Patent Term Restoration and Extension
A patent claiming a new drug product may be eligible for a limited
patent term extension under the Hatch-Waxman Act, which permits a
patent restoration of up to five years for patent term lost during
product development and the FDA regulatory review. The restoration
period granted is typically one-half the time between the effective
date of an IND and the submission date of an NDA, plus the time
between the submission date of an NDA and the ultimate approval
date. Patent term restoration cannot be used to extend the
remaining term of a patent past a total of 14 years from the
product’s approval date. Only one patent applicable to an approved
drug product is eligible for the extension, and the application for
the extension must be submitted prior to the expiration of the
patent in question. A patent that covers multiple drugs for which
approval is sought can only be extended in connection with one of
the approvals. The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office reviews and
approves the application for any patent term extension or
restoration in consultation with the FDA.
Federal and State Data Privacy Laws
There are multiple privacy and data security laws that may impact
our business activities, in the United States and in other
countries where we conduct trials or where we may do business in
the future. These laws are evolving and may increase both our
obligations and our regulatory risks in the future. In the health
care industry generally, under the federal Health Insurance
Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, as amended by the
Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act,
or HIPAA, the HHS has issued regulations to protect the privacy and
security of protected health information, or PHI, used or disclosed
by covered entities including certain healthcare providers, health
plans and healthcare clearinghouses. HIPAA also regulates
standardization of data content, codes and formats used in
healthcare transactions and standardization of identifiers for
health plans and providers. HIPAA also imposes certain obligations
on the business associates of covered entities that obtain
protected health information in providing services to or on behalf
of covered entities. While we are not a covered entity, as a
business associate, we could be subject to penalties, including
criminal penalties, and contractual damages if we knowingly obtain
or further disclose PHI from a covered entity, such as a health
care provider or clinical research site, and therefore we must
ensure the proper authorizations are in place before we, or our
vendors or business partners, obtain access to any PHI. In addition
to federal privacy regulations, there are a number of state laws
governing confidentiality and security of health information that
may be applicable to our business. In addition to possible federal
civil and criminal penalties for HIPAA violations, state attorneys
general are authorized to file civil actions for damages or
injunctions in federal courts to enforce HIPAA and seek attorney’s
fees and costs associated with pursuing federal civil actions. In
addition, state attorneys general (along with private plaintiffs)
have brought civil actions seeking injunctions and damages
resulting from alleged violations of HIPAA’s privacy and security
rules. State attorneys general also have authority to enforce state
privacy and security laws. New laws and regulations governing
privacy and security may be adopted in the future as
well.
At the state level, California recently enacted legislation that
has been dubbed the first “GDPR-like” law in the United States.
Known as the California Consumer Privacy Act, or CCPA, it creates
new individual privacy rights for consumers (as that word is
broadly defined in the law) and places increased privacy and
security obligations on entities handling personal data of
consumers or households. The CCPA went into effect on January 1,
2020 and requires covered companies to provide new disclosures to
California consumers, provide such consumers rights as it relates
to their personal information, and allow for a new cause of action
for data breaches. Additionally, starting on January 1, 2023, the
California Privacy Rights Act, or CPRA, significantly modified the
CCPA, including by expanding consumers’ rights, particularly with
respect to certain sensitive personal information and creating new
principles, such as data minimization, purpose limitation, and
storage limitation. The CPRA also created a new state agency that
will be vested with authority to implement and enforce the CCPA and
the CPRA. The CCPA and CPRA could impact our business activities
depending on how it is interpreted and exemplifies the
vulnerability of our business to not only cyber threats but also
the evolving regulatory environment related to personal data and
individually identifiable health information. These provisions may
apply to some of our business activities. In addition, other
states, including Virginia, Colorado, Utah, and Connecticut already
have passed state privacy laws. Virginia’s privacy law also went
into effect on January 1, 2023, and the laws in the other three
states will go into effect later in 2023. Other states will be
considering these laws in the future, and Congress has also been
debating a proposed federal privacy law. These laws may impact our
business activities, including our identification of research
subjects, relationships with business partners and ultimately the
marketing and distribution of our products, if and once
approved.
Because of the breadth of these laws and the narrowness of the
statutory exceptions and regulatory safe harbors available under
such laws, it is possible that some of our current or future
business activities, including certain clinical research, sales and
marketing practices and the provision of certain items and services
to our customers, could be subject to challenge under one or more
of such privacy and data security laws. The heightening compliance
environment and the need to build and maintain robust and secure
systems to comply with different privacy compliance and/or
reporting requirements in multiple jurisdictions could increase the
possibility that a healthcare company may fail to comply fully with
one or more of these requirements. If our
operations are found to be in violation of any of the privacy or
data security laws or regulations described above that are
applicable to us, or any other laws that apply to us, we may be
subject to penalties, including potentially significant criminal,
civil and administrative penalties, damages, fines, imprisonment,
contractual damages, reputational harm, diminished profits and
future earnings, additional reporting requirements and/or oversight
if we become subject to a consent decree or similar agreement to
resolve allegations of non-compliance with these laws, and the
curtailment or restructuring of our operations, any of which could
adversely affect our ability to operate our business and our
results of operations. To the extent that any product candidates we
may develop, once approved, are sold in a foreign country, we may
be subject to similar foreign laws.
Review and Approval of Drug Products Outside the United
States
In order to market any product outside of the United States, a
company must also comply with numerous and varying regulatory
requirements of other countries and jurisdictions regarding
quality, safety and efficacy and governing, among other things,
clinical trials, marketing authorization, commercial sales and
distribution of drug products. Whether or not it obtains FDA
approval for a product, the company would need to obtain the
necessary approvals by the comparable foreign regulatory
authorities before it can commence clinical trials or marketing of
the product in those countries or jurisdictions. The approval
process ultimately varies between countries and jurisdictions and
can involve additional product testing and additional
administrative review periods. The time required to obtain approval
in other countries and jurisdictions might differ from and be
longer than that required to obtain FDA approval. Regulatory
approval in one country or jurisdiction does not ensure regulatory
approval in another, but a failure or delay in obtaining regulatory
approval in one country or jurisdiction may negatively impact the
regulatory process in others.
Clinical Trial Approval in the European Union
Before the new Clinical Trials Regulation, (EU) No 536/2014, or the
Clinical Trials Regulation, came into
application in January 2022, requirements for the conduct of
clinical trials in the European Union including GCP were set forth
in the Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC, or the Clinical Trials
Directive, and the GCP Directive 2005/28/EC, or the GCP Directive.
Pursuant to the Clinical Trials Directive and the GCP Directive, as
amended, a system for the approval of clinical trials in the
European Union has been implemented through national legislation of
the EU member states. Under this system, approval must be obtained
from the competent national authority of each EU member state in
which a study is planned to be conducted. To this end, a clinical
trial application, or CTA, is submitted to the local competent
authority in each country, or Member State, where the clinical
trial is being conducted, which must be supported by an
investigational medicinal product dossier, or IMPD, and further
supporting information prescribed by Clinical Trials Directive and
the GCP Directive and other applicable guidance
documents. These documents may be amended and/or updated by
the European Commission at any time. Furthermore, a clinical trial
may only be started after a competent ethics committee has issued a
favorable opinion on the clinical trial application in that
country.
In April 2014, the Clinical Trials Regulation was adopted.
The Clinical Trials Regulation aims to simplify and streamline the
approval of clinical trials in the EU. The main characteristics of
the regulation include: a streamlined application procedure via a
single entry point, the “EU portal”; a single set of documents to
be prepared and submitted for the application as well as simplified
reporting procedures for clinical trial sponsors; and a harmonized
procedure for the assessment of applications for clinical trials,
which is divided in two parts. Part I is assessed by the competent
authorities of all EU Member States in which an application for
authorization of a clinical trial has been submitted (Member States
concerned). Part II is assessed separately by each Member State
concerned. Strict deadlines have been established for the
assessment of clinical trial applications. The role of the relevant
ethics committees in the assessment procedure will continue to be
governed by the national law of the concerned EU Member State.
However, overall related timelines will be defined by the Clinical
Trials Regulation.
The Clinical Trials Regulation came into application on January 31,
2022, following confirmation of full functionality of the Clinical
Trials Information System through an independent audit by the
European Commission in mid-2020. The Clinical Trials Regulation
came into application in all the EU Member States and repealed the
previous Clinical Trials Directive.
According to the transitional provisions, if a clinical trial
continues for more than three years from the day on which the
Clinical Trials Regulation became applicable, the Clinical Trials
Regulation will at that time begin to apply to the clinical
trial.
Parties conducting certain clinical trials must, as in the United
States, post clinical trial information in the European Union at
the EudraCT website: https://eudract.ema.europa.eu.
PRIME Designation in the European Union
In March 2016, the EMA launched an initiative, the PRIority
MEdicines, or PRIME, scheme, to facilitate development of product
candidates in indications, often rare, for which few or no
therapies currently exist. The PRIME scheme is intended to
encourage drug development in areas of unmet medical need and
provides accelerated assessment of products representing
substantial innovation reviewed under the centralized procedure.
Products from small- and medium-sized enterprises, or SMEs, may
qualify for earlier entry into the PRIME scheme than larger
companies. Many benefits accrue to sponsors of product candidates
with PRIME designation, including but not limited to, early and
proactive regulatory dialogue with the EMA, frequent discussions on
clinical trial designs and other development program elements, and
accelerated marketing authorization application assessment once a
dossier has been submitted. Importantly, a dedicated agency contact
and rapporteur from the Committee for Human Medicinal Products, or
CHMP, or Committee for Advanced Therapies are appointed early in
the PRIME scheme, facilitating increased understanding of the
product at the EMA’s committee level. A kick-off meeting initiates
these relationships and includes a team of multidisciplinary
experts at the EMA to provide guidance on the overall development
and regulatory strategies.
Pediatric Studies
Prior to obtaining a marketing authorization in the EU, sponsors
have to demonstrate compliance with all measures included in an
EMA-approved Pediatric Investigation Plan, or PIP, covering all
subsets of the pediatric population, unless the EMA has granted a
product-specific waiver, a class waiver or a deferral for one or
more of the measures included in the PIP. The respective
requirements for all marketing authorization procedures are set
forth in Regulation (EC) No 1901/2006, which is referred to as the
Pediatric Regulation. This requirement also applies when a company
wants to add a new indication, pharmaceutical form or route of
administration for a medicine that is already authorized. The
Pediatric Committee of the EMA, or PDCO, may grant deferrals for
some medicines, allowing a company to delay development of the
medicine in children until there is enough information to
demonstrate its effectiveness and safety in adults. The PDCO may
also grant waivers when development of a medicine in children is
not needed or is not appropriate because (a) the product is likely
to be ineffective or unsafe in part or all of the pediatric
population; (b) the disease or condition occurs only in adult
population; or (c) the product does not represent a significant
therapeutic benefit over existing treatments for pediatric
population.
Before a marketing authorization application can be filed, or an
existing marketing authorization can be amended, the EMA determines
that companies actually comply with the agreed studies and measures
listed in each relevant PIP.
Marketing Authorization
To obtain marketing approval of a product under EU regulatory
systems, a sponsor must submit a marketing authorization
application, or MAA, either under a centralized or decentralized
procedure. The centralized procedure provides for the grant of a
single marketing authorization by the European Commission that is
valid for all EU member states. The centralized procedure is
compulsory for specific products, including for medicines produced
by certain biotechnological processes, products designated as
orphan medicinal products, advanced therapy products and products
with a new active substance indicated for the treatment of certain
diseases. For products with a new active substance indicated for
the treatment of other diseases and products that are highly
innovative or for which a centralized process is in the interest of
patients, the centralized procedure may be optional.
Under the centralized procedure, the CHMP established at the EMA is
responsible for conducting the initial assessment of a product. The
CHMP is also responsible for several post-authorization and
maintenance activities, such as the assessment of modifications or
extensions to an existing marketing authorization. Under the
centralized procedure in the European Union, the maximum timeframe
for the evaluation of an MAA is 210 days, excluding clock
stops, when additional information or written or oral explanation
is to be provided by the sponsor in response to questions of the
CHMP. Accelerated evaluation might be granted by the CHMP in
exceptional cases, when a medicinal product is of major interest
from the point of view of public health and in particular from the
viewpoint of therapeutic innovation. In this circumstance, the EMA
ensures that the opinion of the CHMP is given within
150 days.
The decentralized procedure is available to sponsors who wish to
market a product in various EU member states where such product has
not received marketing approval in any EU member state before. The
decentralized procedure provides for approval by one or more other,
or concerned, member states of an assessment of an application
performed by one member state designated by the sponsor, known as
the reference member state. Under this procedure, a sponsor submits
an application based on identical dossiers and related materials,
including a draft summary of product characteristics, and draft
labeling and package leaflet, to the reference member state and
concerned member states. The reference member state prepares a
draft assessment report and drafts of the related materials within
210 days after receipt of a valid application. Within
90 days of receiving the reference member state’s assessment
report and related materials, each concerned member state must
decide whether to approve the assessment report and related
materials.
If a member state cannot approve the assessment report and related
materials on the grounds of potential serious risk to public
health, the disputed points are subject to a dispute resolution
mechanism and may eventually be referred to the European
Commission, whose decision is binding on all member
states.
A marketing authorization may be granted only to a sponsor
established in the European Union. Once the marketing authorization
is obtained in all member states of the European Union and study
results are included in the product information, even when
negative, the product is eligible for six months’ supplementary
protection certificate extension. For orphan-designated medicinal
products, the 10-year period of market exclusivity is extended to
12 years.
Conditional Approval
In particular circumstances, E.U. legislation (Article 14–a
Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 (as amended by Regulation (EU) 2019/5)
and Regulation (EC) No 507/2006 on Conditional Marketing
Authorizations for Medicinal Products for Human Use) enables
sponsors to obtain a conditional marketing authorization prior to
obtaining the comprehensive clinical data required for an
application for a full marketing authorization. Such conditional
approvals may be granted for product candidates (including
medicines designated as orphan medicinal products) if (1) the
product candidate is intended for the treatment, prevention or
medical diagnosis of seriously debilitating or life-threatening
diseases; (2) the product candidate is intended to meet unmet
medical needs of patients; (3)
a marketing authorization may be granted prior to submission of
comprehensive clinical data provided that the benefit of the
immediate availability on the market of the medicinal product
concerned outweighs the risk inherent in the fact that additional
data are still required; (4) the risk-benefit balance of the
product candidate is positive, and (5) it is likely that the
sponsor will be in a position to provide the required comprehensive
clinical trial data. A conditional marketing authorization may
contain specific obligations to be fulfilled by the marketing
authorization holder, including obligations with respect to the
completion of ongoing or new clinical studies and with respect to
the collection of pharmacovigilance data. Conditional marketing
authorizations are valid for one year, and may be renewed annually,
if the risk-benefit balance remains positive, and after an
assessment of the need for additional or modified conditions or
specific obligations. The timelines for the centralized procedure
described above also apply with respect to the review by the CHMP
of applications for a conditional marketing authorization, but
sponsors can also request EMA to conduct an
accelerated
assessment, for instance in cases of unmet medical
needs.
Periods of Authorization and Renewals in the European
Union
A marketing authorization is valid for five years, in principle,
and it may be renewed after five years on the basis of a
reevaluation of the risk-benefit balance by the EMA or by the
competent authority of the relevant EU member state. To that end,
the marketing authorization holder must provide the EMA or the
relevant competent authority of the EU member state with a
consolidated version of the file in respect of quality, safety and
efficacy, including all variations introduced since the marketing
authorization was granted, at least six months before the marketing
authorization ceases to be valid. Once renewed, the marketing
authorization is valid for an unlimited period, unless the European
Commission or the relevant competent authority of the EU member
state decides, on justified grounds relating to pharmacovigilance,
to proceed with one additional five-year renewal period. Any
marketing authorization that is not followed by the marketing of
the medicinal product on the EU market (in the case of the
centralized procedure) or on the market of the EU member state
which delivered the marketing authorization within three years
after authorization ceases to be valid.
Regulatory Data Exclusivity in the European Union
In the European Union, innovative medicinal products authorized in
the European Union on the basis of a full marketing authorization
application (as opposed to an application for marketing
authorization that relies on data available in the marketing
authorization dossier for another, previously approved, medicinal
product) are entitled to eight years of data exclusivity. During
this period, sponsors for authorization of generics of these
innovative products cannot rely on data contained in the marketing
authorization dossier submitted for the innovative medicinal
product. Innovative medicinal products are also entitled to a total
of ten years’ market exclusivity. During this ten-year period no
generic of this medicinal product can be placed on the EU market.
The overall ten-year period will be extended to a maximum of eleven
years if, during the first eight years of those ten years, the
marketing authorization holder obtains an authorization for one or
more new therapeutic indications which, during the scientific
evaluation prior to authorization, is held to bring a significant
clinical benefit in comparison with existing therapies. Even if a
compound is considered to be a NCE so that the innovator gains the
prescribed period of data exclusivity, another company may market
another version of the product if such company obtained marketing
authorization based on an MAA with a complete independent data
package of pharmaceutical tests, preclinical tests and clinical
trials.
Pediatric Exclusivity
If a sponsor obtains a marketing authorization in all EU Member
States, or a marketing authorization granted in the centralized
procedure by the European Commission, and the study results for the
pediatric population are included in the product information, even
when negative, the medicine is then eligible for an additional
six-month period of qualifying patent protection through extension
of the term of the Supplementary Protection Certificate, or SPC, or
alternatively a one year extension of the regulatory market
exclusivity from ten to eleven years, as selected by the marketing
authorization holder.
Brexit and the Regulatory Framework in the United
Kingdom
The U.K.'s withdrawal from the EU took place on January 31, 2020.
The EU and the U.K. reached an agreement on their new partnership
in the Trade and Cooperation Agreement, or the Agreement, which was
applied provisionally beginning on January 1, 2021 and which
entered into force on May 1, 2021. The Agreement focuses primarily
on free trade by ensuring no tariffs or quotas on trade in goods,
including healthcare products such as medicinal products.
Thereafter, the EU and the U.K. will form two separate markets
governed by two distinct regulatory and legal regimes. As such, the
Agreement seeks to minimize barriers to trade in goods while
accepting that border checks will become inevitable as a
consequence that the U.K. is no longer part of the single market.
As of January 1, 2021, the Medicines and Healthcare products
Regulatory Agency, or the MHRA, became responsible for supervising
medicines and medical devices in Great Britain, comprising England,
Scotland and Wales under domestic law whereas Northern Ireland
continues to be subject to EU rules under the Northern Ireland
Protocol. The MHRA will rely on the Human Medicines Regulations
2012 (SI 2012/1916) (as amended), or the HMR, as the basis for
regulating medicines. The HMR has incorporated into the domestic
law, the body of EU law instruments governing medicinal products
that pre-existed prior to the U.K.’s withdrawal from the EU. Since
a significant proportion of the regulatory framework for
pharmaceutical products in the U.K. covering the quality, safety,
and efficacy of pharmaceutical products, clinical
trials,
marketing authorization, commercial sales, and distribution of
pharmaceutical products is derived from EU directives
and
regulations, Brexit may have a material impact upon the regulatory
regime with respect to the development, manufacture,
importation, approval and commercialization of our product
candidates in the U.K. For example, the U.K. is no longer
covered
by the centralized procedures for obtaining EU-wide marketing
authorization from the EMA, and a separate marketing
authorization will be required to market our product candidates,
including vadadustat, in the U.K.
Access Consortium
In October 2020, the MHRA joined the Access Consortium along with
the Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration of Australia,
Health Canada, Health Sciences Authority of Singapore and
Swissmedic. The consortium is a coalition of these regulatory
authorities that work together to promote greater regulatory
collaboration and alignment of regulatory requirements. The
consortium’s goal is to maximize international co-operation between
partners in the consortium, reduce duplication, and increase each
agency’s capacity to ensure patients have timely access to high
quality, safe and effective therapeutic products. The MHRA
commenced work-sharing applications with Access partners on January
1, 2021. Access Consortium working group members have regular
meetings to exchange information on regulatory issues and
challenges faced by the participating regulatory agencies,
including issues on clinical trials, marketing authorizations,
product manufacturing site inspections, post-marketing
surveillance, joint development of technical guidelines or
regulatory standards, and collaboration on information platforms.
The Access consortium has developed three authorization procedures:
the New Active Substance and Biosimilar Work Sharing Initiatives
and the Generic Medicine Work Sharing Initiative.
General Data Protection Regulation
Many countries outside of the United States maintain rigorous laws
governing the privacy and security of personal information. The
collection, use, disclosure, transfer, or other processing of
personal data, including personal health data, regarding
individuals who are located in the EEA, and the processing of
personal data that takes place in the EEA, is subject to the
European Union General Data Protection Regulation, or GDPR, which
became effective on May 25, 2018. The GDPR is wide-ranging in scope
and imposes numerous requirements on companies that process
personal data, and it imposes heightened requirements on companies
that process health and other sensitive data, such as requiring in
many situations that a company obtain the consent of the
individuals to whom the sensitive personal data relate before
processing such data. Examples of obligations imposed by the GDPR
on companies processing personal data that fall within the scope of
the GDPR include providing information to individuals regarding
data processing activities, implementing safeguards to protect the
security and confidentiality of personal data, appointing a data
protection officer, providing notification of data breaches and
taking certain measures when engaging third-party
processors.
The GDPR also imposes strict rules on the transfer of personal data
to countries outside the EEA, including the United States, and
permits data protection authorities to impose large penalties for
violations of the GDPR, including potential fines of up to €20
million or 4% of annual global revenues, whichever is greater. The
GDPR also confers a private right of action on data subjects and
consumer associations to lodge complaints with supervisory
authorities, seek judicial remedies, and obtain
compensation for damages resulting from violations of the GDPR.
Compliance with the GDPR is a rigorous and time-intensive process
that may increase the cost of doing business or require companies
to change their business practices to ensure full
compliance.
There are ongoing concerns about the ability of companies to
transfer personal data from the EU to other countries. In July
2020, the Court of Justice of the European Union, or the CJEU,
invalidated the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield framework, one of the
mechanisms used to legitimize the transfer of personal data from
the EEA to the United States. The CJEU decision also drew into
question the long-term viability of an alternative means of data
transfer, the standard contractual clauses, for transfers of
personal data from the EEA to the United States. This CJEU decision
may lead to increased scrutiny on data transfers from the EU to the
U.S. generally and increase our costs of compliance with data
privacy legislation as well as our costs of negotiating appropriate
privacy and security agreements with our vendors and business
partners.
Additionally, in October 2022, U.S. President Biden signed an
executive order to implement a new EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework,
which would serve as a replacement to the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield.
The EU initiated the process to adopt the EU-U.S. Data Privacy
Framework in December 2022. It is unclear if and when the framework
will be finalized and whether it will be challenged in court. The
uncertainty around this issue may further impact our business
operations in the EU.
As with other issues related to Brexit, there are open questions
about how personal data will be protected in the U.K. and whether
personal information can transfer from the EU to the U.K. Following
the withdrawal of the U.K. from the EU, the U.K. Data Protection
Act 2018 applies to the processing of personal data that takes
place in the U.K. and includes parallel obligations to those set
forth by GDPR. While the Data Protection Act 2018 in the U.K. that
“implements” and complements the GDPR has achieved Royal Assent on
May 23, 2018 and is now effective in the U.K., it is still unclear
whether transfer of data from the EEA to the U.K. will remain
lawful under GDPR. The U.K. government has already determined that
it considers all European Union and EEA member states to be
adequate for the purposes of data protection, ensuring that data
flows from the U.K. to the European Union/EEA remain unaffected. In
addition, a recent decision from the European Commission appears to
deem the U.K. as being “essentially adequate” for purposes of data
transfer from the EU to the U.K., although this decision may be
re-evaluated in the future.
Beyond GDPR, there are privacy and data security laws in a growing
number of countries around the world. While many loosely follow
GDPR as a model, other laws contain different or conflicting
provisions. These laws will impact our ability to conduct our
business activities, including both our clinical trials and any
eventual sale and distribution of commercial products.
Pharmaceutical Coverage, Pricing and Reimbursement
In the United States and markets in other countries, patients who
are prescribed treatments for their conditions and providers
performing the prescribed services generally rely on third-party
payors to reimburse all or part of the associated healthcare costs.
Significant uncertainty exists as to the coverage and reimbursement
status of products approved by the FDA and other government
authorities. Thus, even if a product candidate is approved, sales
of the product will depend, in part, on the extent to which
third-party payors, including government health programs in the
United States such as Medicare and Medicaid, commercial health
insurers and managed care organizations, provide coverage, and
establish adequate reimbursement levels for, the product. The
process for determining whether a payor will provide coverage for a
product may be separate from the process for setting the price or
reimbursement rate that the payor will pay for the product once
coverage is approved. Third-party payors are increasingly
challenging the prices charged, examining the medical necessity,
and reviewing the cost-effectiveness of medical products and
services and imposing controls to manage costs. Third-party payors
may limit coverage to specific products on an approved list, also
known as a formulary, which might not include all of the approved
products for a particular indication. In addition, third-party
payors may impose prior authorization or step edit requirements
requiring patients to have tried other therapies prior to our
products for coverage.
Payors may also decline to include our products or product
candidates on their formulary, which means that unless healthcare
providers seek a medical exception for coverage, the payors will
not pay for the product.
In order to secure coverage and reimbursement for any product that
might be approved for sale, a company may need to conduct expensive
pharmacoeconomic studies in order to demonstrate the medical
necessity and cost-effectiveness of the product, in addition to the
costs required to obtain FDA or other comparable marketing
approvals. Nonetheless, product candidates may not be considered
medically necessary or cost effective. A decision by a third-party
payor not to cover a product candidate could reduce physician
utilization once the product is approved and have a material
adverse effect on sales, results of operations and financial
condition. Additionally, a payor’s decision to provide coverage for
a product does not imply that an adequate reimbursement rate will
be approved. Further, one payor’s determination to provide coverage
for a drug product does not assure that other payors will also
provide coverage and reimbursement for the product, and the level
of coverage and reimbursement can differ significantly from payor
to payor.
Dialysis-related drugs are included in the ESRD prospective payment
system (PPS) bundled payment and are grouped into functional
categories such as anemia management and bone and mineral
metabolism, except that oral-only drugs are exempted from inclusion
until 2025. In a final ESRD PPS rule published in October 2019, CMS
confirmed that it will expand the TDAPA to most new dialysis drugs
approved by the FDA after January 1, 2020. The TDAPA provides
separate payment for eligible new drugs for two years based on the
drug’s Average Sales Price, or ASP, that will be in addition to the
base rate in order to facilitate the adoption of innovative
therapies. Although there are several details that need
further clarification, including precise timing related to
receiving codes to allow for reimbursement under TDAPA, which are
assigned on a quarterly basis, the rule provides support for our
assumption that new anemia treatments, including those in the
HIF-PH inhibitor class, will be included in the ESRD PPS bundle and
will be eligible for separate payment initially under
TDAPA.
The containment of healthcare costs also has become a priority of
federal, state and foreign governments and the prices of drugs have
been a focus in this effort. Governments have shown significant
interest in implementing cost-containment programs, including price
controls, restrictions on reimbursement and requirements for
substitution of generic products. Adoption of price controls and
cost-containment measures, and adoption of more restrictive
policies in jurisdictions with existing controls and measures,
could further limit a company’s revenue generated from the sale of
any approved products. Coverage policies and third-party
reimbursement rates may change at any time. Even if favorable
coverage and reimbursement status is attained for one or more
products for which a company or its collaborators receive marketing
approval, less favorable coverage policies and reimbursement rates
may be implemented in the future.
Outside the United States, ensuring adequate coverage and payment
for a product also involves challenges. Pricing of prescription
pharmaceuticals is subject to governmental control in many
countries. Pricing negotiations with governmental authorities can
extend well beyond the receipt of regulatory marketing approval for
a product and may require a clinical trial that compares the cost
effectiveness of a product to other available therapies. The
conduct of such a clinical trial could be expensive and result in
delays in commercialization.
In the European Union, pricing and reimbursement schemes vary
widely from country to country. Some countries provide that
products may be marketed only after a reimbursement price has been
agreed. Some countries may require the completion of additional
studies that compare the cost-effectiveness of a particular drug
candidate to currently available therapies or so-called health
technology assessments, in order to obtain reimbursement or pricing
approval. For example, the European Union provides options for its
member states to restrict the range of products for which their
national health insurance systems provide reimbursement and to
control the prices of medicinal products for human use. EU member
states may approve a specific price for a product or it may instead
adopt a system of direct or indirect controls on the profitability
of the company placing the product on the market. Other member
states allow companies to fix their own prices for products but
monitor and control prescription volumes and issue guidance to
physicians to limit prescriptions. Recently, many countries in the
European Union have increased the amount of discounts required on
pharmaceuticals and these efforts could continue as countries
attempt to manage healthcare expenditures, especially in light of
the severe fiscal and debt crises experienced by many countries in
the European Union. The downward pressure on health care costs in
general, particularly prescription drugs, has become intense. As a
result, increasingly high barriers are being erected to the entry
of new products. Political, economic and regulatory developments
may further complicate pricing negotiations, and pricing
negotiations may continue after reimbursement has been obtained.
Reference pricing used by various EU member states, and parallel
trade, i.e., arbitrage between low-priced and high-priced member
states, can further reduce prices. There can be no assurance that
any country that has price controls or reimbursement limitations
for pharmaceutical products will allow favorable reimbursement and
pricing arrangements for any products, if approved in those
countries.
Dialysis Organizations Protocols
Dialysis organizations have their own formularies that list primary
or preferred therapeutic options based on contracting status with
drug manufacturers. While a prescriber may make their own
independent decision to prescribe what they determine most
appropriate for a given patient, any non-formulary therapeutic
options are only available through an exception process based on
clinical need. Similar to how payor coverage may affect the sales
of a product, formulary status within dialysis organizations may
affect what products are prescribed within that specific
organization. Therefore, if a product is not on a formulary, the
prescribers within that organization may be less likely to
prescribe that product or may have a difficult time prescribing
that product, resulting in less sales. Further, one dialysis
organization’s determination to add a product to their formulary
does not assure that other dialysis organizations will also add the
product to theirs. There is always a risk a dialysis organization
will not contract with a drug manufacturer for a specific product,
resulting in that product not
being on that organization’s formulary. Additionally, dialysis
organizations typically assess a product’s efficacy before adding
it to their formulary. Their process for assessing a product may
differ among organizations and the timing of such assessment could
delay adding such treatment to formulary, further affecting product
sales.
Healthcare Law and Regulation
Healthcare providers and third-party payors play a primary role in
the recommendation and prescription of drug products that are
granted marketing approval. Arrangements with providers,
consultants, third-party payors and customers are subject to
broadly applicable fraud and abuse, anti-kickback, false claims
laws, reporting of payments to physicians, teaching hospitals and
other healthcare providers, patient privacy laws and regulations,
and other healthcare laws and regulations that may constrain
business and/or financial arrangements. Restrictions under
applicable federal and state healthcare laws and regulations
include the following:
•the
federal Anti-Kickback Statute, which prohibits, among other things,
persons and entities from knowingly and willfully soliciting,
offering, paying, receiving or providing remuneration, directly or
indirectly, in cash or in kind, to induce or reward either the
referral of an individual for, or the purchase, order or
recommendation of, any good or service, for which payment may be
made, in whole or in part, under a federal healthcare program such
as Medicare and Medicaid;
•the
federal civil and criminal false claims laws, including the civil
False Claims Act, and civil monetary penalties laws, which prohibit
individuals or entities from, among other things, knowingly
presenting, or causing to be presented, to the federal government,
claims for payment that are false, fictitious or fraudulent or
knowingly making, using or causing to be made or used a false
record or statement to avoid, decrease or conceal an obligation to
pay money to the federal government
•HIPAA,
which created additional federal criminal laws that prohibit, among
other things, knowingly and willfully executing, or attempting to
execute, a scheme to defraud any healthcare benefit program or
making false statements relating to healthcare
matters;
•HIPAA,
as amended by the Health Information Technology for Economic and
Clinical Health Act, and their respective implementing regulations,
including the Final Omnibus Rule published in January 2013, which
impose obligations, including mandatory contractual terms, with
respect to safeguarding the privacy, security and transmission of
individually identifiable health information;
•the
federal false statements statute, which prohibits knowingly and
willfully falsifying, concealing or covering up a material fact or
making any materially false statement in connection with the
delivery of or payment for healthcare benefits, items or
services;
•the
U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, or FCPA, which prohibits
companies and their intermediaries from making, or offering or
promising to make improper payments to non-U.S. officials for the
purpose of obtaining or retaining business or otherwise seeking
favorable treatment;
•the
federal transparency requirements, known as the federal Physician
Payments Sunshine Act (renamed the Open Payments Act), under the
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as amended by the
Health Care Education Reconciliation Act, or ACA, which requires
certain manufacturers of drugs, devices, biologics and medical
supplies to report annually to the Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services, or CMS, within the United States Department of
Health and Human Services, information related to payments and
other transfers of value made by that entity to physicians, other
healthcare providers and teaching hospitals, as well as ownership
and investment interests held by physicians and their immediate
family members;
•the
PDMA and its implementation regulations, as well as the DSCSA,
which regulate the distribution and tracing of prescription drugs
and prescription drug samples at the federal level, and set minimum
standards for the regulation of drug distributors by the states;
and
•analogous
state and foreign laws and regulations, such as state anti-kickback
and false claims laws, which may apply to healthcare items or
services that are reimbursed by third-party payors, including
private insurers, and state gift ban and disclosure law
requirements that differ from the federal Physician Payments
Sunshine Act in terms of the nature and type of transfers of value
that are reportable and the types of covered
recipients.
Violations of these laws are punishable by criminal and/or civil
sanctions, including, in some instances, exclusion from
participation in federal and state health care programs, such as
Medicare and Medicaid.
Ensuring compliance is time consuming and costly.
Similar healthcare laws and regulations exist in the EU and other
jurisdictions, including reporting requirements detailing
interactions with and payments to healthcare providers and laws
governing the privacy and security of personal
information.
Some state laws require pharmaceutical companies to comply with the
pharmaceutical industry’s voluntary compliance guidelines, such as
the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America Code on
Interactions with Health Care Professionals, known as the PhRMA
Code. State and foreign laws also govern the privacy and security
of health information in
some circumstances, many of which differ from each other in
significant ways and often are not preempted by HIPAA, thus
complicating compliance efforts.
Healthcare Reform
A primary trend in the United States healthcare industry and
elsewhere is cost containment. There have been a number of federal
and state proposals during the last few years regarding the pricing
of pharmaceutical and biopharmaceutical products, limiting coverage
and reimbursement for drugs and other medical products, government
control and other changes to the healthcare system in the United
States.
By way of example, the United States and state governments continue
to propose and pass legislation designed to reduce the cost of
healthcare.
In March 2010, the United States Congress enacted the ACA, which,
among other things, includes changes to the coverage and payment
for products under government health care programs. Other
legislative changes have been proposed and adopted since the ACA
was enacted. In August 2011, the Budget Control Act of 2011, among
other things, created measures for spending reductions by Congress.
A Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction, tasked with
recommending a targeted deficit reduction of at least $1.2 trillion
for the years 2013 through 2021, was unable to reach required
goals, thereby triggering the legislation’s automatic reduction to
several government programs. These changes included aggregate
reductions to Medicare payments to providers of up to 2% per fiscal
year, which went into effect in April 2013 and will remain in
effect through 203.
Pursuant to the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act,
or CARES Act, and subsequent legislation, these Medicare sequester
reductions were suspended and reduced through the end of June 2022
but the full 2% cut has resumed as of July 2022. Under current
legislation, the actual reductions in Medicare payments may vary up
to 4%.
Since enactment of the ACA, there have been, and continue to be,
numerous legal challenges and Congressional actions to repeal and
replace provisions of the law. For example, with enactment of the
Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, or the Tax Act, which was signed by
the prior administration on December 22, 2017, Congress repealed
the “individual mandate.” The repeal of this provision, which
requires most Americans to carry a minimal level of health
insurance, became effective in 2019.
On December 14, 2018, a U.S. District Court judge in the Northern
District of Texas ruled that the individual mandate portion of the
ACA is an essential and inseverable feature of the ACA, and
therefore because the mandate was repealed as part of the Tax Act,
the remaining provisions of the ACA are invalid as well. The U.S.
Supreme Court heard this case on November 10, 2020 and, on June 17,
2021, dismissed this action after finding that the plaintiffs do
not have standing to challenge the constitutionality of the
ACA.
Litigation and legislation over the ACA are likely to continue,
with unpredictable and uncertain results.
The prior administration also took executive actions to undermine
or delay implementation of the ACA, including directing federal
agencies with authorities and responsibilities under the ACA to
waive, defer, grant exemptions from, or delay the implementation of
any provision of the ACA that would impose a fiscal or regulatory
burden on states, individuals, healthcare providers, health
insurers, or manufacturers of pharmaceuticals or medical devices.
On January 28, 2021, however, President Biden rescinded those
orders and issued a new executive order that directs federal
agencies to reconsider rules and other policies that limit access
to healthcare, and consider actions that will protect and
strengthen that access. Under this order, federal agencies are
directed to re-examine: policies that undermine protections for
people with pre-existing conditions, including complications
related to COVID-19; demonstrations and waivers under Medicaid and
the ACA that may reduce coverage or undermine the programs,
including work requirements; policies that undermine the Health
Insurance Marketplace or other markets for health insurance;
policies that make it more difficult to enroll in Medicaid and
under the ACA; and policies that reduce affordability of coverage
or financial assistance, including for dependents.
Pharmaceutical Prices
The prices of prescription pharmaceuticals have also been the
subject of considerable discussion in the United States. There have
been several recent U.S. congressional inquiries, as well as
proposed and enacted state and federal legislation designed to,
among other things, bring more transparency to pharmaceutical
pricing, review the relationship between pricing and manufacturer
patient programs, and reduce the costs of pharmaceuticals under
Medicare and Medicaid.
In 2020, the prior administration issued several executive orders
intended to lower the costs of prescription products and certain
provisions in these orders have been incorporated into
regulations.
These regulations include an interim final rule implementing a most
favored nation model for prices that would tie Medicare Part B
payments for certain physician-administered pharmaceuticals to the
lowest price paid in other economically advanced countries,
effective January 1, 2021. That rule, however, has been subject to
a nationwide preliminary injunction and, on December 29, 2021, CMS
issued a final rule to rescind it. With issuance of
this
rule, CMS stated that it will explore all options to incorporate
value into payments for Medicare Part B pharmaceuticals and improve
beneficiaries' access to evidence-based care.
In addition, in October 2020, HHS and the FDA published a final
rule allowing states and other entities to develop a Section 804
Importation Program, or SIP, to import certain prescription drugs
from Canada into the United States. The final rule is currently the
subject of ongoing litigation, but at least six states (Vermont,
Colorado, Florida, Maine, New Mexico, and New Hampshire) have
passed laws allowing for the importation of drugs from Canada with
the intent of developing SIPs for review and approval by the
FDA.
Further, on November 20, 2020, HHS finalized a regulation removing
safe harbor protection for price reductions from pharmaceutical
manufacturers to plan sponsors under Part D, either directly or
through pharmacy benefit managers, unless the price reduction is
required by law. The final rule would eliminate the current safe
harbor drug rebates and create new safe harbors for beneficiary
point-of-sale discounts and pharmacy benefit manager service fees.
It originally was set to go into effect on January 1, 2022, but
with passage Inflation Reduction Act has been delayed by Congress
to January 1, 2032.
On July 9, 2021, President Biden signed Executive Order 14063,
which focuses on, among other things, the price of pharmaceuticals.
The Order directs HHS to create a plan within 45 days to combat
“excessive pricing of prescription pharmaceuticals and enhance
domestic pharmaceutical supply chains, to reduce the prices paid by
the federal government for such pharmaceuticals, and to address the
recurrent problem of price gouging.” On September 9, 2021, HHS
released its plan to reduce pharmaceutical prices. The key features
of that plan are to: (a) make pharmaceutical prices more affordable
and equitable for all consumers and throughout the health care
system by supporting pharmaceutical price negotiations with
manufacturers; (b) improve and promote competition throughout the
prescription pharmaceutical industry by supporting market changes
that strengthen supply chains, promote biosimilars and generic
drugs, and increase transparency; and (c) foster scientific
innovation to promote better healthcare and improve health by
supporting public and private research and making sure that market
incentives promote discovery of valuable and accessible new
treatments.
More recently, on August 16, 2022, the Inflation Reduction Act of
2022, or IRA, was signed into law by President Biden.
The new legislation has implications for Medicare Part D, which is
a program available to individuals who are entitled to Medicare
Part A or enrolled in Medicare Part B to give them the option of
paying a monthly premium for outpatient prescription drug coverage.
Among other things, the IRA requires manufacturers of certain drugs
to engage in price negotiations with Medicare (beginning in 2026),
with prices that can be negotiated subject to a cap; imposes
rebates under Medicare Part B and Medicare Part D to penalize price
increases that outpace inflation (first due in 2023); and replaces
the Part D coverage gap discount program with a new discounting
program (beginning in 2025).
The IRA permits the Secretary of HHS to implement many of these
provisions through guidance, as opposed to regulation, for the
initial years.
Specifically, with respect to price negotiations, Congress
authorized Medicare to negotiate lower prices for certain costly
single-source drug and biologic products that do not have competing
generics or biosimilars and are reimbursed under Medicare Part B
and Part D.
CMS may negotiate prices for ten high-cost drugs paid for by
Medicare Part D starting in 2026, followed by 15 Part D drugs in
2027, 15 Part B or Part D drugs in 2028, and 20 Part B or Part D
drugs in 2029 and beyond.
This provision applies to drug products that have been approved for
at least 9 years and biologics that have been licensed for 13
years, but it does not apply to drugs and biologics that have been
approved for a single rare disease or condition.
Further, the legislation subjects drug manufacturers to civil
monetary penalties and a potential excise tax for failing to comply
with the legislation by offering a price that is not equal to or
less than the negotiated “maximum fair price” under the law or for
taking price increases that exceed inflation. The legislation also
requires manufacturers to pay rebates for drugs in Medicare Part D
whose price increases exceed inflation. The new law also caps
Medicare out-of-pocket drug costs at an estimated $4,000 a year in
2024 and, thereafter beginning in 2025, at $2,000 a
year.
At the state level, individual states are increasingly aggressive
in passing legislation and implementing regulations designed to
control pharmaceutical and biological product pricing, including
price or patient reimbursement constraints, discounts, restrictions
on certain product access and marketing cost disclosure and
transparency measures, and, in some cases, designed to encourage
importation from other countries and bulk purchasing.
A number of states, for example, require drug manufacturers and
other entities in the drug supply chain, including health carriers,
pharmacy benefit managers, wholesale distributors, to disclose
information about pricing of pharmaceuticals.
In addition, regional healthcare organizations and individual
hospitals are increasingly using bidding procedures to determine
what pharmaceutical products and which suppliers will be included
in their prescription pharmaceutical and other healthcare programs.
These measures could reduce the ultimate demand for our products,
once approved, or put pressure on our product pricing. We expect
that additional state and federal healthcare reform measures will
be adopted in the future, any of which could limit the amounts that
federal and state governments will pay for healthcare products and
services, which could result in reduced demand for our product
candidates or additional pricing pressures.
Laws Relating to Foreign Trade
We are subject to various federal and foreign laws that govern our
international business practices. These laws include the FCPA,
which prohibits U.S. companies and their representatives from
paying, offering to pay, promising, or authorizing the payment of
anything of value to any foreign government official, government
staff member, political party, or political candidate for the
purposes of obtaining or retaining business, or to otherwise obtain
favorable treatment or influence a person working in an official
capacity. In many countries, the health care professionals we
regularly interact with may meet the FCPA’s definition of a foreign
government official. Additionally, interactions with or on the part
of our partners, collaborators, contract research organizations,
vendors or other agents may also implicate the FCPA. The FCPA also
requires public companies to make and keep books and records that
accurately and fairly reflect their transactions and to devise and
maintain an adequate system of internal accounting controls.
Compliance with the FCPA is expensive and difficult, particularly
in countries in which corruption is a recognized problem. In
addition, the FCPA presents unique challenges in the pharmaceutical
industry because, in many countries, hospitals are operated by the
government, and doctors and other hospital employees are considered
foreign officials. Certain payments made by pharmaceutical
companies to hospitals in connection with clinical trials and other
work have been deemed to be improper payments to government
officials and have led to FCPA enforcement actions.
Our international operations could also be subject to compliance
with national laws of other countries, such as the United Kingdom
Bribery Act. of 2010, or U.K. Bribery Act. The U.K. Bribery Act
applies to any company “carrying on business” in the U.K.,
irrespective of where the offending conduct occurs. The U.K.
Bribery Act applies to bribery activities both in the public and
private sector and prohibits the provision of an “advantage”
intended to induce or reward “improper performance” of the
recipient’s function. The failure by a company to prevent third
parties from providing a bribe on its behalf could also constitute
an offense. Penalties under the U.K. Bribery Act include
potentially unlimited fines for companies and criminal sanctions
for corporate officers under certain circumstances.
There are local antibribery and anticorruption laws in countries
where we are conducting clinical trials, such as Brazil and Russia,
and many of these also carry the risk of significant financial or
criminal penalties. Our clinical trial operations could also result
in enforcement actions by U.S., U.K., or other governmental
authorities. There are also trade laws within the United States and
in other regions that regulate the sale, purchase, import, export,
reexport, transfer and shipment of goods, currency, products,
materials, services and technology. Violations of these laws can
lead to serious consequences, including substantial
fines.
Other Regulations
We are also subject to numerous federal, state and local laws
relating to such matters as safe working conditions, manufacturing
practices, environmental protection, fire hazard control, and
disposal of hazardous or potentially hazardous substances. We may
incur significant costs to comply with such laws and regulations
now or in the future.
Employees and Human Capital Resources
As of December 31, 2022, we had 205 employees, all but one of
whom were full-time. None of our employees are represented by any
collective bargaining unit. We believe that we maintain good
relations with our employees.
Retention, growth, training and development of our employees are
integral to our success. We offer competitive compensation
(including base salary, incentive bonus, and long-term equity
awards tied to the value of our stock price) as well as benefits
packages designed to attract, motivate and reward talented
individuals who possess the skills necessary to support our
business objectives, assist in the achievement of our strategic
goals and create value for our stockholders. Our compensation
program is designed to differentiate us from our competition and
incentivize achievement of corporate goals, individual performance
and demonstrate our corporate values. In addition, we provide
development and leadership opportunities to our employees to
cultivate talent throughout the Company.
We are committed to our employees’ health, safety and well-being.
In March 2020, in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, we adjusted
our workplace policies to allow employees to work from home and in
2021 we remodeled our work paradigm to one that is flexible and
designed to accommodate a range of work profiles from office based,
to hybrid to fully remote, to field-based, allowing us to maximize
productivity and performance. Recognizing the pandemic had an
impact on well-being as well as the availability of support
services, we launched Modern Health, a platform focused on services
to support employees’ and their dependents in areas such as mental,
physical, financial, social and professional health, making it
easier for them to get personalized care faster.
We are also committed to diversity, equality and inclusion, and
this is reflected in Akebia’s leadership. Two members of our Board
of Directors, Cynthia Smith and LeAnne M. Zumwalt, are women, and
women comprise approximately 45% of our senior management team. In
addition, Ron Frieson has served on our Board of Directors since
November 2021, increasing the diversity of our Board of
Directors.
With the goal of ensuring every employee is included, supported,
and treated equitably, we developed a team (IDEA – Inclusion,
Diversity & Equity Alliance) to support and guide Akebia as a
diverse, inclusive, and culturally intelligent workplace. Over the
past two and a half years this team has worked with executive
leadership to identify areas for growth and education and move
forward several initiatives that will enable us to continue to
build an inclusive workplace and a diverse workforce. We also
provide access to LinkedIn Learning, an online learning platform
that recommends expert-led courses for relevant skill development
for all of our employees.
In addition, we support kidney patient communities where we live
and work.
In the United States, we have a patient services program, Akebia
Cares, designed to provide one-on-one support to help communicate
individual benefits and available resources for patients today
facing financial obstacles that keep them from accessing important
medications. In 2022, we provided over $5.3 million worth of
Auryxia for free to approximately 14,000 patients needing
assistance. We also support and work closely with multiple kidney
patient advocacy organizations, including the National Kidney
Foundation, the American Kidney Fund, the Renal Support Network,
Dialysis Patient Citizens and
American Association of Kidney Patients.
We believe our involvement with these organizations shows our
commitment to our purpose of bettering the life of each person
impacted by kidney disease.
Available Information
Our principal executive offices are located at 245 First Street,
Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142. Our telephone number is
(617) 871-2098. Our website address is www.akebia.com. The
information on our website or that may be accessed by links on our
website is not incorporated by reference into this Form 10-K.
We make available, free of charge and through our website, our
Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q,
Current Reports on Form 8-K, and any amendments to any such reports
filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as soon as reasonably
practicable after they are electronically filed with or furnished
to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
We face a variety of risks and uncertainties in our business.
Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or
that we currently believe to be immaterial may also become
important factors that affect our business. If any of the following
risks occurs, our business, financial condition, financial
statements, results of operations and future growth prospects could
be materially and adversely affected.
Risks Related to our Financial Position, Need for Additional
Capital and Growth Strategy
We have incurred significant losses since our inception, and
anticipate that we will continue to incur significant losses and
cannot guarantee when, if ever, we will become profitable or attain
positive cash flows.
Investment in pharmaceutical product development and
commercialization is highly speculative because it requires upfront
capital expenditures and there is significant risk that a product
candidate will fail to gain marketing approval or that an approved
product will not be commercially viable. Since our inception, we
have devoted most of our resources to research and development,
including our preclinical and clinical development activities and
commercialization of Auryxia. We have financed our operations
primarily through sales of equity securities, our strategic
collaborations and product revenues, a royalty monetization
transaction and debt. Prior to the merger, or the Merger, whereby
Keryx Biopharmaceuticals, Inc., or Keryx, became our wholly owned
subsidiary, we had no products approved for commercial sale and had
not generated any revenue from the sale of products. We are not
currently profitable, and we have incurred net losses each year
since our inception, including a net loss of $92.6 million for the
year ended December 31, 2022. As of December 31, 2022, we had an
accumulated deficit of $1.6 billion. We cannot guarantee when, if
ever, we will become profitable.
In March 2022, we received a complete response letter, or CRL, from
the FDA regarding our NDA for vadadustat, our lead investigational
product candidate, for the treatment of anemia associated with CKD.
The FDA concluded that the data in the NDA do not support a
favorable benefit-risk assessment of vadadustat for dialysis and
non-dialysis patients. In October 2022, we submitted a Formal
Dispute Resolution Request, or FDRR, to the FDA. The FDRR focuses
on the favorable balance between the benefits and risks of
vadadustat for the treatment of anemia due to CKD in adult patients
on dialysis in light of safety concerns expressed by the FDA in the
CRL for dialysis patients related to the rate of adjudicated
thromboembolic events driven by vascular access thrombosis for
vadadustat compared to the active comparator and the risk of
drug-induced liver injury.
In February 2023, we received a second interim response from the
FDA to our FDRR, and there can be no assurances that we will be
successful in our appeal and obtain approval for vadadustat in a
timely manner, on favorable terms, or at all. As a result, the
regulatory approval process for vadadustat in the U.S. is highly
uncertain. We may not obtain approval at all, and if we are able to
obtain approval, the expense and time to do so could adversely
impact our ability to successfully commercialize vadadustat or
conduct our other business operations, and our
financial condition could be materially harmed.
Our ability to generate product revenue and achieve profitability
depends on the overall success of Auryxia(R),
vadadustat, if approved, and any current or future product
candidates, including those that may be in-licensed or acquired,
which depends on several factors, including:
•obtaining
adequate or favorable pricing and reimbursement from private and
governmental payors for Auryxia, vadadustat, if approved, and any
other product or product candidate, including those that may be
in-licensed or acquired;
•obtaining
and maintaining market acceptance of Auryxia, vadadustat, if
approved, and any other product candidate, including those that may
be in-licensed or acquired;
•the
size of any market in which Auryxia, vadadustat and any other
product or product candidate, including those that may be
in-licensed or acquired, receives approval and obtaining adequate
market share in those markets;
•addressing
the issues identified in the CRL for vadadustat that we received
from the FDA and the outcome of our appeal;
•the
timing and scope of marketing approvals for vadadustat, if
approved, and any other product candidate, if approved, including
those that may be in-licensed or acquired; maintaining marketing
approvals for Auryxia, vadadustat, if approved, and any other
product, including those that may be in-licensed or
acquired;
•actual
or perceived advantages or disadvantages of our products or product
candidates as compared to alternative treatments, including their
respective safety, tolerability and efficacy profiles, the
potential convenience and ease of administration and
cost;
•maintaining
an acceptable safety and tolerability profile of our approved
products, including the frequency and severity of any side
effects;
•the
willingness of the target patient population to try new therapies
and of physicians to prescribe these therapies, based, in part, on
their perception of our clinical trial data and/or the actual or
perceived safety, tolerability and efficacy profile;
•establishing
and maintaining supply and manufacturing relationships with third
parties that can provide adequate supplies of products that are
compliant with good manufacturing practices, or GMPs, to support
the clinical development and the market demand for Auryxia,
vadadustat, if approved, and any other product and product
candidate, including those that may be in-licensed or
acquired;
•current
and future restrictions or limitations on our approved or future
indications and patient populations or other adverse regulatory
actions or in the event that the FDA requires Risk Evaluation and
Mitigation Strategies, or REMS, or risk management plans that use
restrictive risk minimization strategies;
•the
effectiveness of our sales, marketing, manufacturing and
distribution strategies and operations;
•competing
effectively with any products for the same or similar indications
as our products;
•maintaining,
protecting and expanding our portfolio of intellectual property
rights, including patents and trade secrets; and
•the
impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the above factors, including the
disproportionate impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on CKD patients,
the adverse impact on the phosphate binder market in which we
compete, and the limitation of our sales professionals to meet in
person with healthcare professionals as the result of travel
restrictions or limitations on access for
non-patients.
Our ability to achieve profitability also depends on our ability to
manage our expenses. Following receipt of the CRL, in April and May
2022, we implemented a reduction of our workforce, by approximately
42% across all areas of the Company (47% inclusive of
the closing of the majority of open positions), including several
members of management.
In November 2022, we also implemented a reduction of our workforce,
by approximately 14% consisting of individuals within our
commercial organization as a result of our decision to shift to a
strategic account management focused model for our commercial
efforts.
We recorded a restructuring charge of $15.9 million in the
aggregate primarily related to contractual termination benefits
including severance, non-cash stock-based compensation expense,
healthcare and related benefits in the year ended December 31,
2022. However, we may incur additional costs not currently
contemplated due to events associated with or resulting from the
workforce reductions. Additionally, the reductions in workforce
could impact our operations, including our commercialization of
Auryxia, which could affect our ability to generate
revenue.
We expect to continue to incur additional operating expenses,
including additional research and development expenses to our
pipeline, additional costs related to vadadustat, and research and
development and selling, general and administrative expenses for
ongoing development and commercialization of Auryxia, which could
lead to operating losses for the foreseeable future. In addition to
any additional costs not currently contemplated due to events
associated with or resulting from the workforce reductions noted
above, our ability to achieve profitability and our financial
position will depend, in part, on the rate of our future
expenditures, on product revenue, collaboration revenue, and our
ability to obtain additional funding. On June 30, 2022, we entered
into a Termination and Settlement Agreement, or the Termination
Agreement, with Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., or Otsuka, pursuant
to which we agreed to the immediate termination of the December 18,
2016 collaboration and license agreement with Otsuka, or the Otsuka
U.S. Agreement, and the April 25, 2017 collaboration and license
agreement with Otsuka, or the Otsuka International Agreement, in
exchange for the payment of $55.0 million to us and the agreement
between the parties with respect to the conduct of certain
activities. Unless and until we are able to find a new partner for
vadadustat in Europe and other countries previously licensed to
Otsuka, we will incur additional expenses in connection with the
development of vadadustat and will receive less collaboration
revenue and, if approved, product revenue than originally
anticipated. In addition, we expect to continue to incur
significant expenses if and as we:
•continue
our commercialization activities for Auryxia and vadadustat, if we
are able to obtain marketing approval for vadadustat following
receipt of the CRL from the FDA in March 2022, and any other
product or product candidate, including those that may be
in-licensed or acquired;
•address
the issues identified in the CRL for vadadustat that we received
from the FDA and pursue our appeal of the CRL for vadadustat with
the FDA;
•conduct
and enroll patients in any clinical trials, including
post-marketing studies or any other clinical trials for Auryxia,
vadadustat or any other product or product candidate, including
those that may be in-licensed or acquired;
•seek
marketing approvals for vadadustat and any other product candidate,
including those that may be in-licensed or acquired;
•maintain
marketing approvals for Auryxia and vadadustat, if we are able to
obtain marketing approval for vadadustat following receipt of the
CRL from the FDA in March 2022, and any other product, including
those that may be in-licensed or acquired;
•manufacture
Auryxia, vadadustat and any other product or product candidate,
including those that may be in-licensed or acquired, for commercial
sale and clinical trials;
•conduct
discovery and development activities for additional product
candidates or platforms that may lead to the discovery of
additional product candidates;
•engage
in transactions, including strategic, merger, collaboration,
acquisition and licensing transactions, pursuant to which we would
market and develop commercial products, or develop and
commercialize other product candidates and
technologies;
•continue
to repay, and pay any associated pre-payment penalties, if
applicable, the senior secured term loans in an aggregate principal
amount of $67.0 million as of December 31, 2022, or the Term Loans,
that were made available to us pursuant to the Loan
Agreement;
•make
royalty, milestone or other payments under our license agreements
and any future license agreements;
•maintain,
protect and expand our intellectual property
portfolio;
•make
decisions with respect to our personnel, including the retention of
key employees;
•make
decisions with respect to our infrastructure, including to support
our operations as a fully integrated, publicly traded
biopharmaceutical company; and
•experience
any additional delays or encounter issues with any of the
above.
We have and will continue to expend significant resources on our
legal proceedings, as described below under Part I, Item 3. Legal
Proceedings, or any other legal proceedings brought by or against
us in the future.
Because of the numerous risks and uncertainties associated with
pharmaceutical product development and commercialization, we are
unable to accurately predict the timing or amount of increased
expenses. The net losses we incur may fluctuate significantly from
quarter to quarter and year to year, such that a period-to-period
comparison of our results of operations may not be a good
indication of our future performance. In any particular quarter,
the progress of our clinical development and our operating results
could be below the expectations of securities analysts or
investors, which could cause our stock price to
decline.
We will continue to incur substantial expenditures relating to
continued commercialization and post-marketing requirements for
Auryxia and vadadustat, if we are able to obtain marketing approval
for vadadustat following receipt of the CRL from the FDA in March
2022, and any other products, including those that may be
in-licensed or acquired, as well as costs relating to the research
and development of any other product candidate, including those
that may be in-licensed or acquired. Our prior losses and expected
future losses have had and will continue to have an adverse effect
on our stockholders’ equity and working capital.
Our expenses could increase beyond expectations if we are required
by the FDA, the European Medicines Agency, or the EMA, or other
regulatory authorities, or if we otherwise believe it is necessary,
to change our manufacturing processes or assays, to amend or
replace our study protocols, to conduct any additional clinical
trials, whether in order to obtain approval or as a post-approval
study, including any additional clinical trial that we decide to
conduct for vadadustat, to perform studies in addition to,
different from or larger than those currently planned, if there are
any delays in completing our clinical trials or if there are
further delays in or issues with obtaining marketing approval for
vadadustat in the United States, the European Union, or EU, or
other jurisdictions. In addition, our ability to generate revenue
would be negatively affected if the size of our addressable patient
population is not as significant as we estimate, the indication
approved by regulatory authorities is narrower than we sought or
the patient population for treatment is narrowed by competition,
physician choice, coverage or reimbursement, or payor or treatment
guidelines. Even though we generate product revenue from Auryxia
and royalties from RionaTM
and VafseoTM
in Japan and may generate revenue and royalties from the sale of
any products that may be approved in the future, including those
that may be in-licensed or acquired, we may never generate revenue
and royalties that are significant enough for us to become and
remain profitable, and we will need to obtain additional funding to
continue to fund our operating plan beyond Auryxia and certain
development activities, and achieve strategic growth.
We will require substantial additional financing to achieve our
goals. A failure to obtain this necessary capital when needed, or
on acceptable terms, could force us to delay, limit, reduce or
terminate our product development or commercialization
efforts.
As of December 31, 2022, our cash and cash equivalents were $90.5
million. We expect to continue to expend substantial amounts of
cash for the foreseeable future as we continue to commercialize
Auryxia; pursue our appeal for vadadustat in the U.S. with the FDA;
support the regulatory process with respect to vadadustat with the
EMA and ACCESS Consortium; and develop and commercialize any other
product or product candidate, including those
that may be in-licensed or acquired. These expenditures will
include costs associated with research and development,
manufacturing, potentially obtaining marketing approvals and
marketing products approved for sale. In addition, other
unanticipated costs may arise. Because the outcomes of our current
and anticipated clinical trials are highly uncertain, we cannot
reasonably estimate the actual amount of funding necessary to
successfully complete clinical development for any current or
future product candidates, including vadadustat
depending on what is required to address the issues identified in
the CRL for vadadustat, including the outcome of our appeal
and if additional clinical trials are required in order to obtain
marketing approval, or to complete post-marketing studies for
Auryxia and vadadustat, if approved. Our future capital
requirements depend on many factors, including:
•the
scope, progress, results and costs of conducting
clinical trials or any
post-marketing requirements or any other clinical trials for
Auryxia, vadadustat and any other product or product candidate,
including those that may be in-licensed or acquired;
•the
cost and timing of commercialization activities, including product
manufacturing, marketing, sales and distribution costs, for
Auryxia, vadadustat, if approved, and any other product or product
candidate, including those that may be in-licensed or
acquired;
•the
results of our meetings with the FDA, the EMA and other regulatory
authorities and any consequential effects, including on timing of
and ability to obtain and maintain marketing approval, study
design, study size and resulting operating costs;
•any
difficulties or delays in conducting our clinical trials, or
enrolling patients in our clinical trials, for Auryxia, vadadustat
or any other product candidates;
•the
outcome of our efforts to obtain marketing approval for vadadustat
in the United States, Europe and in other jurisdictions and any
other product candidates, including those that may be in-licensed
or acquired, including any additional clinical trials or
post-approval commitments imposed by regulatory
authorities;
•the
timing of, and the costs involved in obtaining, marketing approvals
for vadadustat, including in the United States, Europe and certain
other markets, and any other product candidate, including those
that may be in-licensed or acquired, including to fund the
preparation, filing and prosecution of regulatory
submissions;
•the
costs of maintaining marketing approvals for Auryxia or any other
product, including those that may be in-licensed or
acquired;
•the
number of generic versions of Auryxia that enter the market
following loss of exclusivity for Auryxia in March 2025, and the
timing of, and the magnitude of, the impact on the price of
Auryxia;
•the
cost of securing and validating commercial manufacturing for any of
our product candidates, including those that may be in-licensed or
acquired, and maintaining our manufacturing arrangements for
Auryxia and vadadustat or any other product, including those that
may be in-licensed or acquired, or securing and validating
additional arrangements;
•the
costs involved in preparing, filing and prosecuting patent
applications and maintaining, defending and enforcing our
intellectual property rights, including litigation costs, and the
outcome of such litigation;
•the
costs involved in any legal proceedings to which we are a
party;
•our
status as a publicly traded company on the Nasdaq Capital
Market;
•our
decisions with respect to personnel;
•our
decisions with respect to infrastructure; and
•the
extent to which we engage in transactions, including strategic,
merger, collaboration, acquisition and licensing transactions,
pursuant to which we could develop and market commercial products,
or develop other product candidates and technologies.
We will need to obtain substantial additional funding to fund our
operating plan beyond Auryxia and certain development activities,
and achieve strategic growth.
If we are unable to raise capital when needed or on attractive
terms, we could be forced to delay, reduce or eliminate our
research and development programs or any future commercialization
efforts.
We expect our cash resources to fund our current operating plan
through at least the next twelve months from the filing of this
Annual Report on Form 10-K.
However,
if our operating performance deteriorates significantly from the
levels achieved in 2022, it could have an effect on our liquidity
and our ability to continue as a going concern in the future. Our
forecast of the period of time through which our financial
resources will be adequate to support our operations is a
forward-looking statement and involves numerous risks and
uncertainties, and actual results could vary as a result of a
number of factors, many of which are outside our control. We have
based this estimate on assumptions that may be substantially
different than actual results, and we could utilize our available
capital resources sooner than we currently expect. In addition, if
we fail to satisfy any of the covenants under our Loan Agreement
with Pharmakon, including the covenant that our Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2023 not be
qualified as to going concern, and the loan is accelerated, we may
not have sufficient resources to fund our operating plan through
the next twelve months. There can be no assurance that the current
operating plan will be achieved in the time frame anticipated by
us, or that our cash resources will fund our operating plan for the
period anticipated by us, or that additional funding will be
available on terms acceptable to us, or at all.
Any additional fundraising efforts may divert our management’s
attention away from their day-to-day activities, which may
adversely affect our ability to develop and commercialize Auryxia
and any other products or product candidates, including those that
may be in-licensed or acquired, or
to continue to seek regulatory approval for
vadadustat.
Also, additional funds may not be available to us in sufficient
amounts or on acceptable terms or at all. If we are unable to raise
additional capital in sufficient amounts when needed or on terms
acceptable to us, we may have to significantly delay, scale back or
discontinue the development and/or commercialization of Auryxia and
any other products or product candidates, including those that may
be in-licensed or acquired, or
to take any actions with respect to vadadustat
depending on future decisions with respect to vadadustat in the
U.S. Any of these events could significantly harm our business,
financial condition and prospects.
Raising additional capital may cause dilution to our existing
stockholders, restrict our operations or require us to relinquish
rights to our product and product candidates on unfavorable terms
to us.
We expect to finance future cash needs through product revenue,
royalty transactions, strategic transactions, public or private
equity or debt transactions, or a combination of these approaches.
To the extent that we raise additional capital through the sale of
equity or convertible debt securities, the ownership interests of
our common stockholders will be diluted, our fixed
payment
obligations may increase, any such securities may have rights
senior to those of our common stock, and the terms may include
liquidation or other preferences and anti-dilution protections that
adversely affect the rights of our common stockholders. Additional
debt financing, if available, may involve agreements that would
restrict our operations and potentially impair our competitiveness,
such as limitations on our ability to incur additional debt, make
capital expenditures, declare dividends, acquire, sell or license
intellectual property rights, and other operating restrictions that
could adversely impact our ability to conduct our business. If we
raise additional funds through royalty transactions, we may have to
relinquish valuable rights to our portfolio and future revenue
streams, and enter into agreements that would restrict our
operations and strategic flexibility. If we raise additional funds
through strategic transactions with third parties, we may have to
do so at an earlier stage than otherwise would be desirable. In
connection with any such strategic transactions, we may be required
to relinquish valuable rights to our product and product
candidates, future revenue streams or research programs or grant
licenses on terms that are not favorable to us. If we are unable to
raise additional funds when needed, we may not be able to pursue
planned development and commercialization activities and we may
need to grant rights to develop and market product candidates that
we would otherwise prefer to develop and market
ourselves.
If we fail to regain compliance with the continued listing
requirements of Nasdaq, our common stock may be delisted and the
price of our common stock and our ability to access the capital
markets could be negatively impacted.
On May 12, 2022, we received a deficiency letter from the Listing
Qualifications Department of the Nasdaq Stock Market, or Nasdaq,
notifying us that, for the last 30 consecutive business days, the
bid price for our common stock had closed below the minimum $1.00
per share requirement for continued inclusion on the Nasdaq Global
Market, referred to as the minimum bid price rule. In accordance
with Nasdaq Listing Rules, we were provided an initial period of
180 calendar days, or until November 8, 2022, to regain compliance
with the minimum bid price rule. We did not regain compliance with
the minimum bid price rule by the initial compliance
date.
On November 9, 2022, Nasdaq notified us that we were eligible for
an additional 180 calendar day period, or until May 8, 2023, to
regain compliance with the minimum bid price rule. Nasdaq’s
determination was based on our meeting the continued listing
requirement for market value of publicly held shares and all other
applicable requirements for initial listing on the Nasdaq Capital
Market with the exception of bid price requirement, and our written
notice of our intention to cure the deficiency during the second
compliance period by effecting a reverse stock split, if necessary.
On November 9, 2022, Nasdaq approved our transfer from the Nasdaq
Global Market to the Nasdaq Capital Market, a continuous trading
market that operates in substantially the same manner as the Nasdaq
Global Market. The transfer became effective at the opening of
business on November 11, 2022.
To date, we have not regained compliance with the minimum bid price
rule. If, at any time during the additional compliance period the
bid price for our common stock closes at $1.00 or more per share
for a minimum of 10 consecutive business days, the Nasdaq Listing
Qualifications Department staff will provide written notification
to us that we are in compliance with the minimum bid price rule,
unless the staff exercises its discretion to extend this 10-day
period pursuant to the Nasdaq Listing Rules.
If we do not regain compliance with the minimum bid price rule by
the required date and we are not eligible for any additional
compliance period at that time, the Nasdaq Listing Qualifications
Department staff will provide us written notification that our
common stock may be delisted. At that time, we may appeal the
staff’s delisting determination to a Nasdaq Listing Qualifications
Panel. We expect that our common stock would remain listed pending
the panel’s decision. However, there can be no assurance that, even
if we appeal the staff’s delisting determination to the Nasdaq
Listing Qualifications Panel, such appeal would be
successful.
On March 1, 2023, we filed a definitive proxy statement for a
Special Meeting of Stockholders to be held on April 11, 2023 at
which meeting we are seeking stockholder approval of a reverse
stock split with the primary intent of increasing the price of our
common stock to meet the price criteria for continued listing on
Nasdaq. We intend to continue to monitor the closing bid price of
our common stock and may, if appropriate, consider available
options to regain compliance with the minimum bid price rule, which
could include seeking to effect a reverse stock split. However,
there can be no assurance that our stockholders will approve a
reverse stock split or that we will be able to regain compliance
with the minimum bid price rule.
There are many factors that may adversely affect our minimum bid
price, including those described throughout this section titled
“Risk Factors.” Many of these factors are outside of our control.
As a result, we may not be able to sustain compliance with the
minimum bid price rule in the long term. Any potential delisting of
our common stock from the Nasdaq Capital Market would likely result
in decreased liquidity and increased volatility for our common
stock and would adversely affect our ability to raise additional
capital or to enter into strategic transactions. Any potential
delisting of our common stock from the Nasdaq Capital Market would
also make it more difficult for our stockholders to sell our common
stock in the public market.
We may not be successful in our efforts to identify, acquire,
in-license, discover, develop and commercialize additional products
or product candidates
or our decisions to prioritize the development of certain product
candidates over others may not be successful,
which could impair our ability to grow.
Although we continue to focus a substantial amount of our efforts
on the commercialization of Auryxia and to pursue our appeal for
vadadustat in the U.S. with the FDA and to seek regulatory approval
for vadadustat in Europe and other territories, a key element of
our long-term growth strategy is to develop additional product
candidates and acquire, in-license, develop
and/or market additional products and product
candidates.
Research programs to identify product candidates
require substantial technical, financial and human resources,
regardless of whether product candidates are ultimately identified.
Our research and development programs may initially show promise,
yet fail to yield product candidates for clinical development or
commercialization for many reasons, including the
following:
•the
research methodology used may not be successful in identifying
potential indications and/or product candidates;
•we
may not be able or willing to assemble sufficient resources to
acquire or discover additional product candidates;
•a
product candidate may be shown to have harmful side effects, a lack
of efficacy or
other characteristics that indicate that they are unlikely to be
drugs that will receive marketing approval and/or achieve market
acceptance;
•a
product candidate we develop and seek regulatory approval for,
including vadadustat, may not be approved by the FDA on a timely
basis, or at all;
•product
candidates we develop may nevertheless be covered by third party
patents or other exclusive rights;
•the
market for a product candidate may change during our program so
that the continued development of that product candidate is no
longer commercially reasonable;
•a
product candidate may not be capable of being produced in
commercial quantities at an acceptable cost, or at all;
or
•a
product candidate may not be accepted as safe and effective by
patients, the medical community, or third party payors, if
applicable.
If any of these events occur, we may be forced to abandon our
research and development efforts for one or more of our programs,
or we may not be able to identify, discover, develop or
commercialize additional product candidates, which may have a
material adverse effect on our business.
Because we have limited financial and managerial resources,
especially as a result of the CRL for vadadustat that we received
in March 2022 and the reductions in workforce that we implemented
in 2022, we focus on products, research programs and product
candidates for specific indications. As a result, we may forgo or
delay pursuit of opportunities with other product candidates or for
other indications, or out license rights to product candidates,
that later prove to have greater commercial potential. For example,
as a result of receipt of the CRL and implementation of the
reductions in workforce, we delayed certain research activities.
Our resource allocation decisions may cause us to fail to
capitalize on viable commercial products or profitable market
opportunities on a timely basis, or at all. Our spending on current
and future research and development programs and product candidates
for specific indications may not yield any commercially viable
products.
Because our internal research capabilities are limited, we may be
dependent upon other pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies,
academic scientists and institutions, and other researchers to sell
or license product candidates, products or technology to us. The
success of this strategy depends partly upon our ability to
identify, select, and acquire promising product candidates and
products. The process of identifying, selecting, negotiating and
implementing a license or acquisition of a product candidate or an
approved product is lengthy and complex. Other companies, including
some with substantially greater financial, marketing and sales
resources, may compete with us for the license or acquisition of a
product candidate or an approved product. We have limited resources
to identify and execute the acquisition or in-licensing of third
party products, businesses, and technologies and integrate them
into our current infrastructure.
Moreover, we may devote resources to potential acquisitions or
in-licensing opportunities that are never completed, or we may fail
to realize the anticipated benefits of such efforts. Any product
candidate that we acquire may require additional development
efforts prior to commercial sale, including extensive clinical
testing and approval by the FDA, the EMA, the Japanese
Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency, or PMDA, or other
regulatory authorities, or post-approval testing or other
requirements if approved. All product candidates are prone to risks
of failure typical of pharmaceutical product development, including
the possibility that a product candidate will not be shown to be
sufficiently safe and effective for approval by regulatory
authorities. In addition, we cannot provide assurance that any of
our products will be manufactured in a cost effective manner,
achieve market acceptance or not require substantial post-marketing
clinical trials.
Accordingly, there can be no assurance that we will ever be able to
identify,
acquire, in-license or develop suitable additional products or
product candidates, which could materially adversely affect our
future
growth and prospects. We may focus our efforts and resources on
potential products, product candidates or other programs that
ultimately prove to be unsuccessful.
We may engage in strategic transactions to acquire assets,
businesses, or rights to products, product candidates or
technologies or form collaborations or make investments in other
companies or technologies that could harm our operating results,
dilute our stockholders’ ownership, increase our debt, or cause us
to incur significant expense.
As part of our business strategy, we may engage in additional
strategic transactions to expand and diversify our portfolio,
including through the merger, acquisition or in-license of assets,
businesses, or rights to products, product candidates or
technologies or through strategic alliances or collaborations,
similar to the Merger and our existing and prior collaboration and
license arrangements. We may not identify suitable strategic
transactions, or complete such transactions in a timely manner, on
favorable terms, on a cost-effective basis, or at all. Moreover, we
may devote resources to potential opportunities that are never
completed or we may incorrectly judge the value or worth of such
opportunities. Even if we successfully execute a strategic
transaction, we may not be able to realize the anticipated benefits
of such transaction and may experience losses related to our
investments in such transactions. Integration of an acquired
company or assets into our existing business may not be successful
and may disrupt ongoing operations, require the hiring of
additional personnel and the implementation and integration of
additional internal systems and infrastructure, and require
management resources that would otherwise focus on developing our
existing business. Even if we are able to achieve the long-term
benefits of a strategic transaction, our expenses and short-term
costs may increase materially and adversely affect our liquidity.
Any of the foregoing could have a detrimental effect on our
business, results of operations and financial condition. For
example,
on June 4, 2021, we entered into a license agreement, the Cyclerion
Agreement, with Cyclerion Therapeutics Inc., or Cyclerion, pursuant
to which Cyclerion granted us an exclusive global license under
certain intellectual property rights to research, develop and
commercialize praliciguat, an investigational oral
soluble guanylate cyclase, or
sGC, stimulator. Although we have progressed preclinical studies
for praliciguat, we need to do additional work to manufacture
product for clinical trials before we can initiate the trials, and
when started, we may be unsuccessful in developing praliciguat. If
any of the assumptions that we made in valuing the transaction,
including the costs or timing of development of, or the potential
benefits of, praliciguat, were incorrect, we may not recognize the
anticipated benefits of the transaction and our business could be
harmed.
In addition, future transactions may entail numerous operational,
financial and legal risks, including:
•incurring
substantial debt, dilutive issuances of securities or depletion of
cash to pay for acquisitions;
•exposure
to known and unknown liabilities, including contingent liabilities,
possible intellectual property infringement claims, violations of
laws, tax liabilities and commercial disputes;
•higher
than expected acquisition and integration costs;
•difficulty
in integrating operations, processes, systems and personnel of any
acquired business;
•increased
amortization expenses or, in the case of a write-down of the value
of acquired assets, impairment losses, such as the Auryxia
intangible asset impairment in the second quarter of 2020 and
corresponding adjustments to the estimated useful life of the
developed product rights for Auryxia;
•impairment
of relationships with key suppliers or customers of any acquired
business due to changes in management and ownership;
•inability
to retain personnel, customers, distributors, vendors and other
business partners integral to an in-licensed or acquired product,
product candidate or technology;
•potential
failure of the due diligence processes to identify significant
problems, liabilities or other shortcomings or
challenges;
•entry
into indications or markets in which we have no or limited
development or commercial experience and where competitors in such
markets have stronger market positions; and
•other
challenges associated with managing an increasingly diversified
business.
If we are unable to successfully manage any transaction in which we
may engage, our ability to develop new products and continue to
expand and diversify our portfolio may be limited.
Our business has been and may continue to be, directly or
indirectly, adversely affected by the COVID-19
pandemic.
The COVID-19 pandemic has presented a substantial public health and
economic challenge around the world and continues to affect our
patients, healthcare providers with whom we interact, customers,
our contract manufacturing organizations, or CMOs, and other
vendors. The full extent to which the COVID-19 pandemic and the
lasting effects of the pandemic will directly or indirectly impact
our business,
results of operations and financial condition continues to depend
on future developments that are highly uncertain and cannot be
accurately predicted, including any resurgences or variants of
COVID-19, the actions taken to contain it or treat its impact and
the economic and other impacts on local, regional, national and
international markets where the healthcare providers with whom we
interact, our CMOs, and our other vendors operate. On January 30,
2023, the Biden Administration announced that it will end the
public health emergency declarations related to
COVID-19 on May 11, 2023. On January 31, 2023, the FDA indicated
that it would soon issue a Federal Register notice describing how
the termination of the public health emergency will impact the
agency’s COVID-19 related guidance, including the clinical trial
guidance and updates thereto. At this point, it is unclear how, if
at all, these developments will impact our efforts to develop and
commercialize our product candidates.
We believe our revenue growth was negatively impacted by the
COVID-19 pandemic in 2021 and 2022 primarily as the CKD patient
populations that we serve experienced both high hospitalization and
mortality rates due to COVID-19, and the pandemic had an adverse
impact on the phosphate binder market in which Auryxia competes.
Labor shortages and costs have adversely impacted dialysis
providers. These impacts have refocused clinical efforts in
addressing bone and mineral disorders like hyperphosphatemia to
more acute operational issues to ensure patients receive dialysis
treatments and still some patients have been rescheduled or missed
treatments due to labor shortages. We believe, this and potentially
other factors, has led to the reduction in the phosphate binder
market, which has not experienced growth since early 2020. While we
are unable to quantify the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on
future revenues and revenue growth, the COVID-19 pandemic and the
ongoing impacts from the COVID-19 pandemic continue to adversely
and disproportionately impact CKD patients and the phosphate binder
market; therefore, we expect the ongoing impacts from the pandemic
to continue to have a negative impact on our revenue growth for the
foreseeable future.
In addition, several healthcare facilities have previously
restricted access for non-patients, including the members of our
sales force. For example, DaVita, Inc., or DaVita, and Fresenius
Medical Care, or Fresenius, which account for a vast majority of
the dialysis population in the United States, have previously
restricted access to their clinics. As a result, we continue to
engage with some healthcare providers and other customers
virtually, where possible. The restrictions on our customer-facing
employees’ in-person interactions with healthcare providers have,
and could continue to, negatively impact our access to healthcare
providers and, ultimately, our sales, including with respect to
vadadustat, if approved. Recently, such precautionary measures have
been relaxed at certain healthcare facilities and, as a result,
members of our sales force have resumed in person interactions with
certain customers. Nevertheless, some restrictions remain, and more
restrictions may be put in place again due to a resurgence in
COVID-19 cases, including those involving new variants of COVID-19,
which may be more contagious and more severe than prior strains of
the virus. Given this uncertain environment and the
disproportionate impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on CKD patients,
we are actively monitoring the demand in the United States for
Auryxia and will be for vadadustat, if approved, including the
potential for further declines or changes in prescription trends
and customer orders, which could have a material adverse effect on
our business, results of operations, and financial
condition.
In addition, the direct and indirect impacts of the pandemic or the
response efforts to the pandemic, including, among others,
competition for labor and resources and increases in labor,
sourcing, manufacturing and shipping costs, may cause disruptions
to, closures of or other impacts on our CMOs and other vendors in
our supply chain on which we rely for the supply of our products
and product candidates. For example, areas of China have recently
continued to implement lockdowns for COVID-19, which could impact
the global supply chain. At this time, our CMOs continue to operate
at or near normal levels. However, it is possible that the COVID-19
pandemic and response efforts may have an impact in the future on
our contract manufacturers’ ability to manufacture and deliver
Auryxia and vadadustat (if approved in the United States or EMA and
which is currently marketed under the trade name
VafseoTM
by MTPC in Japan), which may result in increased costs and delays,
or disruptions to the manufacturing and supply of our products.
These impacts could have a negative effect on our inventory
reserves, which could result in an increase in inventory write-offs
due to expiry.
If we or any of the third parties with whom we engage, including
our collaboration partners, vendors, or any of our customers were
to experience further shutdowns, delays or other business
disruptions, our ability to conduct our business in the manner and
on the timelines presently planned, and our revenue expectations,
could be materially and negatively impacted, which could have a
material adverse effect on our business and our financial
results.
While we are working to mitigate the impacts on our business, we
are mindful that many of these risks and the impact to the larger
healthcare market are outside of our control. The COVID-19 pandemic
has, and may continue to, significantly impact the phosphate binder
market in which we compete and economies and financial markets
worldwide, which could result in adverse effects on our business
and operations, impact our ability to raise additional funds and
impact the volatility of our stock price and trading in our stock.
Even after the COVID-19 pandemic has been contained or mitigated,
we may continue to experience adverse impacts to our business as a
result of the adverse impact on the patient population for Auryxia,
the decline in the phosphate binder market and any economic
recession or depression that has occurred or may occur in the
future.
Risks Related to our Financial Arrangements
Our obligations in connection with the loan agreement with
Pharmakon and requirements and restrictions in the loan agreement
could adversely affect our financial condition and restrict our
operations.
We entered into the Loan Agreement with Pharmakon, pursuant to
which the Term Loans were made available to us in two tranches. The
first tranche of $80.0 million closed on November 25, 2019, and the
second tranche of $20.0 million closed on December 10, 2020. See
Note 11 to our audited consolidated financial statements in Part
II, Item 8. Financial Statements of this Annual Report on Form 10-K
for additional information regarding our obligations under the Loan
Agreement.
The Loan Agreement contains affirmative and negative covenants
applicable to us and our subsidiaries, including maintaining, on an
annual basis, a minimum liquidity threshold, which started in 2021,
and on a quarterly basis, a minimum net sales threshold for
Auryxia, which started in the fourth quarter of 2020. In addition,
the Loan Agreement contains covenants that our Annual Reports on
Form 10-K, must not be subject to any qualification as to going
concern. Failure to maintain compliance with these or other
covenants would result in an event of default under the Loan
Agreement, which could result in enforcement action, including
acceleration of amounts due under the Loan Agreement. Additionally,
the liabilities under the Loan Agreement will be accelerated,
subject to certain exceptions, if we are required to repay to CSL
Vifor all or a part of the working capital facility established in
connection with the Second Amended and Restated License Agreement
that we entered into with CSL Vifor, in February 2022, or the Vifor
Second Amended Agreement, as a result of certain terminations of
the Vifor Second Amended Agreement or due to a reduction in the
balance of the working capital facility by more than a prespecified
amount.
In the event there is an acceleration of our and certain of our
subsidiaries’ liabilities under the Loan Agreement as a result of
an event of default or otherwise, we may not have sufficient funds
or may be unable to arrange for additional financing to repay the
liabilities or to make any accelerated payments, and Pharmakon
could seek to enforce security interests in the collateral securing
the Loan Agreement and our guarantee of the Term Loans, which would
have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition
and results of operations.
The Loan Agreement permits voluntary prepayment at any time in
whole or in part, subject to prepayment premiums and make-whole
premiums prior to certain dates. We made a voluntary prepayment of
$25.0 million, including $0.5 million of prepayment penalties on
July 15, 2022, pursuant to the Second Amendment and Waiver. This
represented the repayment of $5.0 million of the first tranche and
the full $20.0 million of the second tranche. Upon a change of
control, mandatory prepayment provisions require us to prepay the
principal amount outstanding, the applicable prepayment premium and
make-whole premium and accrued and unpaid interest. In addition,
our obligations in connection with the Loan Agreement could have
additional significant adverse consequences, including, among other
things:
•restricting
our activities, including limitations on transferring certain of
our assets, engaging in certain transactions, terminating certain
agreements, including the Vifor Second Amended Agreement, incurring
certain additional indebtedness, creating certain liens, paying
dividends or making certain other distributions and
investments;
•limiting
our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our
business and our industry;
•placing
us at a possible competitive disadvantage compared to our
competitors who have a smaller amount of debt or competitors with
comparable debt at more favorable interest rates; and
•limiting
our ability to borrow additional amounts for working capital,
capital expenditures, research and development efforts,
acquisitions, debt service requirements, execution of our business
strategy and other purposes.
Any of these factors could materially and adversely affect our
business, financial condition and results of
operations.
Our Royalty Interest Acquisition Agreement with HealthCare Royalty
Partners IV, L.P. contains various covenants and other provisions,
which, if violated, could materially adversely affect our financial
condition.
On February 25, 2021, we entered into a royalty interest
acquisition agreement, or the Royalty Agreement, with HealthCare
Royalty Partners IV, L.P., or HCR, pursuant to which we sold to HCR
our right to the to receive royalties and sales milestones for
vadadustat, collectively the Royalty Interest Payments, in each
case, payable to us under our Collaboration Agreement dated
December 11, 2015, or the MTPC Agreement, with Mitsubishi Tanabe
Pharma Corporation, or MTPC, subject to an annual maximum “cap” of
$13.0 million, or the Annual Cap, and an aggregate maximum “cap” of
$150.0 million, or the Aggregate Cap. Under the Royalty Agreement,
we are required to comply with various covenants, including
obligations to take certain actions, such as actions with respect
to the Royalty Interest Payments, the MTPC Agreement, our agreement
with MTPC for the commercial supply of vadadustat drug product, and
our intellectual property. In addition, the Royalty Agreement
includes customary events of default upon the occurrence of
enumerated events, including failure to perform certain covenants
and the occurrence of insolvency events. In the event we violate
certain covenants and other provisions, we may not receive sales
milestones from HCR even if the applicable sales thresholds are
met. Upon the occurrence of an event of default, HCR would have the
ability to exercise all available remedies in law and equity, which
could have a material adverse effect on our financial
condition.
Risks Related to Commercialization
Our business is substantially dependent on the commercial success
of Auryxia.
If we are unable to continue to successfully commercialize Auryxia,
our results or operations and financial condition will be
materially harmed.
Our business and our ability to generate product revenue largely
depend on our, and our collaborators’, ability to successfully
commercialize Auryxia. Our ability to generate revenue depends on
our ability to execute on our commercialization plans, and the size
of the market for, and the level of market acceptance of, Auryxia
and any other product or product candidate, including those that
may be in-licensed or acquired. If the size of any market for which
a product or product candidate is approved decreases or is smaller
than we anticipate, our revenue and results of operations could be
materially adversely affected. For example, the phosphate binder
market has declined since 2020, which we believe was partially a
result of the COVID-19 pandemic. If the phosphate market does not
recover or continues to decline, our revenue from Auryxia
could be materially adversely affected.
Market acceptance is also critical to our ability to generate
significant product revenue. Any product may achieve only limited
market acceptance or none at all. If Auryxia, or any of our product
candidates that is approved, is not accepted by the market to the
extent that we expect or market acceptance decreases, we may not be
able to generate significant product revenue and our business would
be materially harmed. Market acceptance of Auryxia or any other
approved product depends on a number of factors,
including:
•the
availability of adequate coverage and reimbursement by and the
availability of discounts, rebates and price concessions from third
party payors, pharmacy benefit managers, or PBMs, and governmental
authorities;
•the
safety and efficacy of the product, as demonstrated in clinical
trials and in the post-marketing setting;
•the
prevalence and complications of the disease treated by the
product;
•the
clinical indications for which the product is approved and the
product label approved by regulatory authorities, including any
warnings or limitations that may be required on the label as a
consequence of potential safety risks associated with the
product;
•the
countries in which marketing approvals are obtained;
•the
claims we and our collaborators are able to make regarding the
safety and efficacy of the product;
•the
success of our physician and patient communications and education
programs;
•acceptance
by physicians and patients of the product as a safe and effective
treatment and the willingness of the target patient population to
try new therapies and of physicians to prescribe new
therapies;
•the
cost, safety and efficacy of the product in relation to alternative
treatments;
•the
timing of receipt of marketing approvals and product launch
relative to competing products and potential generic
entrants;
•relative
convenience and ease of administration;
•the
frequency and severity of adverse side effects;
•favorable
or adverse publicity about our products or favorable or adverse
publicity about competing products;
•the
effectiveness of our and our collaborators’ sales, marketing and
distribution efforts; and
•the
restrictions on the use of the product together with other
medications, if any.
If we are unable to maintain or expand, or, if vadadustat is
approved, initiate, sales and marketing capabilities or enter into
additional agreements with third parties, we may not be successful
in commercializing Auryxia, vadadustat, if approved, or any other
product candidates that may be approved.
In order to market Auryxia and any other approved product, we
intend to continue to invest in sales and marketing, which will
require substantial effort and significant management and financial
resources.
We have built a commercial infrastructure and sales force in the
United States for Auryxia, our only commercial product. However,
following
receipt of the CRL, in April and May 2022, we implemented a
reduction of our workforce by approximately 42% across all areas of
the Company (47% inclusive of
the closing of the majority of open positions), including several
members of management. In November 2022, we also implemented a
reduction of our workforce, by approximately 14% consisting of
individuals within our commercial organization as a result of our
decision to shift to a strategic account management focused model
for our commercial efforts. If the remaining sales and marketing
team cannot successfully commercialize Auryxia, or if additional
sales and marketing employees decide to leave as a result of the
reduction in workforce or otherwise, it could have a material
adverse effect on Auryxia revenue and our financial
condition.
If we obtain regulatory approval to market vadadustat in the U.S.,
we believe that we can leverage the current commercial foundation
for vadadustat in the U.S., but if we are unable to do so
successfully this would materially harm our business. Additionally,
training
a sales force to successfully sell and market a new commercial
product is expensive and time-consuming
and could delay any commercial launch of such product candidate or
distract the sales force from promoting Auryxia. We may
underestimate the size of the sales force required for a successful
product launch and we may need to expand our sales force earlier
and at a higher cost than we anticipated. In 2021 and early 2022,
we incurred commercialization expenses for vadadustat that were
premature or unnecessary as a result of the receipt of the CRL for
vadadustat, and may in the future incur additional
commercialization expenses prematurely or unnecessarily if we do
not receive marketing approval in the timeframe we expect, or at
all.
We devote significant effort, in particular, to recruiting
individuals with experience in the sales and marketing of
pharmaceutical products. Competition for personnel with these
skills is significant and retaining qualified personnel with
experience in our industry is difficult. Further, our recent
reductions in workforce may further exacerbate these conditions and
interfere with our ability to find and retain qualified personnel.
As a result, we may not be able to retain our existing employees or
hire new employees quickly enough to meet our needs. At the same
time, we may face high turnover, requiring us to expend time and
resources to source, train and integrate new
employees.
There are risks involved with maintaining our own sales and
marketing capabilities, including the following:
•potential
inability to recruit, train and retain adequate numbers of
effective sales and marketing personnel;
•potential
lack of complementary products to be offered by sales personnel,
which may put us at a competitive disadvantage relative to
companies with more extensive product lines, especially as a result
of the receipt of the CRL for vadadustat; and
•costs
and expenses associated with maintaining our own sales and
marketing organization.
If we are unable to maintain our own sales and marketing
capabilities, we will not be successful in commercializing Auryxia,
vadadustat, if approved, and any other product candidate that may
be approved.
Furthermore, if we are unable to maintain our arrangements with
third parties with respect to sales and marketing, if we are
unsuccessful in entering into additional arrangements with third
parties to sell and market our products or we are unable to do so
on terms that are favorable to us, or if such third parties are
unable to carry out their obligations under such arrangements, it
will be difficult to successfully commercialize our product and
product candidates, including vadadustat, if approved. For example,
if in connection with the Vifor Second Amended Agreement, we
experience difficulties with CSL Vifor, or if CSL Vifor experiences
difficulties with other parties to whom it expects to sell
vadadustat, if approved, our ability to commercialize vadadustat,
if approved, will be severely hindered and our business operations
will be materially harmed.
Our, or our partners', failure to obtain or maintain adequate
coverage, pricing and reimbursement for Auryxia, vadadustat, if
approved, or any other future approved products, could have a
material adverse effect on our or our collaboration partners’
ability to sell such approved products profitably and otherwise
have a material adverse impact on our business.
Market acceptance and sales of any approved products, including
Auryxia and, if approved, vadadustat, depends significantly on the
availability of adequate coverage and reimbursement from third
party payors and may be affected by existing and future healthcare
reform measures. Governmental authorities,
third party payors, and PBMs decide which drugs they will cover, as
well as establish formularies or implement other mechanisms to
manage utilization of products
and determine reimbursement levels. We cannot be sure that coverage
or adequate reimbursement will be available for Auryxia,
vadadustat, if approved, or any of our potential future products.
Even if we obtain coverage for an approved product, third party
payors may not establish adequate reimbursement amounts, which may
reduce the demand for our product and prompt us to have to reduce
pricing for the product. If reimbursement is not available or is
limited, we may not be able to commercialize certain of our
products. Coverage and reimbursement by a governmental authority,
third-party payor or PBM may depend upon a number of factors,
including the determination that use of a product is:
•a
covered benefit under the health plan;
•safe,
effective and medically necessary;
•appropriate
for the specific patient; and
•cost
effective.
Obtaining coverage and reimbursement approval for a product from a
governmental authority, PBM or a third-party payor is a time
consuming and costly process that could require us to provide
supporting scientific, clinical and cost-effectiveness data for the
use of our products to the payor. In the United States, there are
multiple governmental authorities, PBMs and third-party payors with
varying coverage and reimbursement levels for pharmaceutical
products, and the timing of commencement of reimbursement by a
governmental payor can be dependent on the assignment of codes via
the Healthcare Common Procedural Coding System, which codes are
assigned on a quarterly basis. Within Medicare, for oral drugs
dispensed by pharmacies and also administered in facilities,
coverage and reimbursement may vary depending on the setting. CMS,
local Medicare
administrative contractors, Medicare Part D plans and/or PBMs
operating on behalf of Medicare Part D plans, may have some
responsibility for determining the medical necessity of such drugs,
and therefore coverage, for different patients. Different
reimbursement methodologies may apply, and CMS may have some
discretion in interpreting their application in certain
settings.
As an oral drug, Auryxia is covered by Medicare under Part D.
However, in September 2018, CMS decided that Auryxia would no
longer be covered by Medicare for the treatment of iron deficiency
anemia, or IDA, in adult patients with NDD-CKD, or the CMS
Decision. While this decision does not impact CMS coverage for the
control of serum phosphorus levels in adult patients with DD-CKD,
or the Hyperphosphatemia Indication, it requires Part D plan
sponsors to impose prior authorization or other steps to ensure
that Auryxia is reimbursed only for the Hyperphosphatemia
Indication. While we believe that the vast majority of the Medicare
prescriptions written for Auryxia today are for the
Hyperphosphatemia Indication and therefore will continue to be
covered by Medicare with prior authorization, the CMS Decision has
had and will continue to have an adverse impact on the sales and
future growth of Auryxia for the Hyperphosphatemia Indication and
the IDA Indication. For example, in the second quarter of 2020, we
reduced our short-term and long-term Auryxia revenue forecast,
primarily driven by the compounding impact of the CMS Decision. As
a result, we recorded an impairment charge of $115.5 million to the
Auryxia intangible asset associated with the developed product
rights for Auryxia during the three months ended June 30,
2020.
Medicaid reimbursement of drugs varies by state. Private
third-party payor reimbursement policies also vary and may or may
not be consistent with Medicare reimbursement methodologies.
Manufacturers of outpatient prescription drugs may be required to
provide discounts or rebates under government healthcare programs
or to certain third-party payors in order to obtain coverage of
such products.
Additionally, we may be required to enter into contracts with third
party payors and/or PBMs offering rebates or discounts on our
products in order to obtain favorable formulary status and we may
not be able to agree upon commercially reasonable terms with such
third party payors or PBMs, or provide data sufficient to obtain
favorable coverage and reimbursement for many reasons, including
that we may be at a competitive disadvantage relative to companies
with more extensive product lines. In addition, third party payors,
PBMs and other entities that purchase our products may impose
restrictions on our ability to raise prices for our products over
time without incurring additional costs. Four distributors,
Fresenius Medical Care Rx, McKesson Corporation, Cardinal Health,
Inc. and Amerisource Bergen Drug Corporation, in the aggregate,
accounted for a significant percentage of our gross revenue during
2022. If we are not able to maintain our arrangements with these
key distributors on favorable terms, on a timely basis or at all,
or if there is any adverse change in one or more of these
distributors’ business practices or financial condition, it would
adversely impact the market opportunity for Auryxia, our product
revenues and operating results.
Furthermore, vadadustat was approved in Japan for the treatment of
adult patients with anemia due to CKD and is being marketed by MTPC
in Japan under the trade name VafseoTM.
Pricing and reimbursement strategy is a key component of MTPC’s
commercialization plans for Vafseo in Japan. If coverage and
reimbursement terms change, MTPC may not be able to, or may decide
not to, continue commercialization of Vafseo in Japan.
We currently believe it is likely that vadadustat, if approved,
will be reimbursed using the Transitional Drug Add-on Payment
Adjustment, or TDAPA, followed by inclusion in the bundled
reimbursement model for Medicare beneficiaries. For those that
obtain dialysis through commercial insurance during the 30-month
coordination period or through Medicaid prior to Medicare becoming
primary payer after 90 days, patients may access vadadustat through
contracts we negotiate with third party payors for reimbursement of
vadadustat, which would be subject to the risks and uncertainties
described above. Additionally, applying for and obtaining
reimbursement under the TDAPA is expected to take at least six
months following approval, which will affect adoption, uptake and
product revenue for vadadustat during that time, and if there are
updates to the TDAPA rule that decrease the basis for reimbursement
or eligibility criteria during the transition period or if the
TDAPA is eliminated, then our profitability may be adversely
affected. For example, the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission, or
MedPAC, an independent legislative branch advisory body to Congress
on issues related to the Medicare program, has recommended that
TDAPA not be provided to newly approved drug products considered to
fall within “functional categories” for which costs are already
accounted for in the bundled reimbursement model, such as for
anemia management drugs.
Further, if vadadustat is approved in the United States and
included in the fixed reimbursement model for a bundle of dialysis
services, or the bundle, we would be required to enter into
contracts to supply vadadustat to specific dialysis providers,
instead of through distributors, which we believe could be
challenging. The dialysis market is unique and is dominated by two
providers: DaVita and Fresenius, which account for a vast majority
of the dialysis population in the United States. Under the Vifor
Second Amended Agreement, we granted CSL Vifor an exclusive license
to sell vadadustat to Fresenius Medical Care North America and its
affiliates, including Fresenius Kidney Care Group LLC, to certain
third-party dialysis organizations approved by us, to independent
dialysis organizations that are members of group purchase
organizations, and to certain non-retail specialty pharmacies in
the United States. We refer to Fresenius Medical Care North America
and its affiliates, these organizations and specialty pharmacies
collectively as the “Supply Group". See Note 4 to our consolidated
financial statements in Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and
Supplementary Data of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for
additional information
regarding the Vifor Second Amended Agreement.
If vadadustat is approved and we are not able to maintain the Vifor
Second Amended Agreement or enter into a supply agreement with
DaVita or other dialysis clinics, our business may be materially
harmed.
Similar to how payor coverage may affect the sales of a product,
formulary status within dialysis organizations may affect what
products are prescribed within that specific organization.
Therefore, if a product is not on a formulary, the prescribers
within that organization may be less likely to prescribe that
product or may have a difficult time prescribing that product,
resulting in less sales. Further, one dialysis organization’s
determination to add a product to their formulary does not assure
that other dialysis organizations will also add the product to
theirs. There is always a risk a dialysis organization will not
contract with a drug manufacturer for a specific product, resulting
in that product not
being on that organization’s formulary. If any dialysis
organization does not add vadadustat, if approved, to the
formulary, our business may be materially harmed.
In addition, we may be unable to sell Auryxia or vadadustat, if
approved, to dialysis providers on a profitable basis if CMS
significantly reduces the level of reimbursement for dialysis
services and providers choose to use alternative therapies or look
to re-negotiate their contracts with us. Our profitability may also
be affected if our costs of production increase faster than
increases in reimbursement levels. Adequate coverage and
reimbursement of our products by government and private insurance
plans are central to patient and provider acceptance of any
products for which we receive marketing approval.
Further, in many countries outside the United States, a drug must
be approved for reimbursement before it can be marketed or sold in
that country. In some cases, the prices that we intend to charge
for our products are also subject to approval. Approval by the EMA
or another regulatory authority does not ensure approval by
reimbursement authorities in that jurisdiction, and approval by one
reimbursement authority outside the United States does not ensure
approval by any other reimbursement authorities. However, the
failure to obtain reimbursement in one jurisdiction may negatively
impact our ability to obtain reimbursement in another jurisdiction.
We may not be able to obtain such reimbursement approvals on a
timely basis, if at all, and
favorable pricing in certain countries depends on a number of
factors, some of which are outside of our control. In addition, if
vadadustat is approved outside of the United States, we plan to
rely on a partner to obtain approval by reimbursement authorities
outside the United States. If we are unsuccessful or delayed in
entering into an agreement with a new partner, the launch of
vadadustat following approval outside the United States may be
delayed, which could have an adverse effect on our results of
operations.
We face substantial competition, which may result in others
discovering, developing or commercializing products before, or more
successfully than, we do.
The development and commercialization of new drugs is highly
competitive and subject to rapid and significant technological
change. Our future success depends on our ability to demonstrate
and maintain a competitive advantage with respect to the
development and commercialization of Auryxia, vadadustat, if
approved, and any other product or product candidate, including
those that may be in-licensed or acquired. Our objective is to
continue to commercialize Auryxia and develop and commercialize new
products with clinically proven efficacy, convenience, tolerability
and/or safety. In many cases, any approved products that we
commercialize will compete with existing, market-leading
products.
Auryxia is competing in the hyperphosphatemia market in the United
States with other FDA-approved phosphate binders such as Renagel®
(sevelamer hydrochloride) and Renvela® (sevelamer carbonate), both
marketed by Sanofi, PhosLo® and Phoslyra® (calcium acetate),
marketed by Fresenius Medical Care North America, Fosrenol®
(lanthanum carbonate), marketed by Shire Pharmaceuticals Group plc,
and Velphoro® (sucroferric oxyhydroxide), marketed by Fresenius
Medical Care North America, as well as over-the-counter calcium
carbonate products such as TUMS® and metal-based options such as
aluminum, lanthanum and magnesium. Most of the phosphate binders
listed above are now also available in generic forms. In addition,
other agents are in development, including OPKO Health Inc.’s
Alpharen™ Tablets (fermagate tablets) and Unicycive’s Renazorb
(lanthanum dioxycarbonate) or could otherwise enter the market,
including
Ardelyx, Inc.’s tenapanor (which is approved in the United States
for the treatment of adults with irritable bowel syndrome with
constipation, and for which the FDA granted an appeal in the fourth
quarter of 2022 that will allow Ardelyx to resubmit a new drug
application in 2023 with respect to the control of serum phosphorus
in adult patients with CKD on dialysis),
that may impact the market for Auryxia.
Auryxia is competing in the IDA market in the United States with
over-the-counter oral iron, ferrous sulfate, other prescription
oral iron formulations, including ferrous gluconate, ferrous
fumerate, and polysaccharide iron complex, and intravenous iron
formulations, including Feraheme® (ferumoxytol injection), Venofer®
(iron sucrose injection), Ferrlicit® (sodium ferric gluconate
complex in sucrose injection), Injectafer® (ferric carboxymaltose
injection), and Triferic® (ferric pyrophosphate citrate). In
addition, other new therapies for the treatment of IDA may impact
the market for Auryxia, such as Shield Therapeutics plc's Feraccru®
(ferric maltol), which is available in Europe for the treatment of
IDA and Accrufer® (ferric maltol), which was launched in the United
States for the treatment of IDA in July 2021.
Furthermore, Auryxia’s commercial opportunities may be reduced or
eliminated if our competitors develop and market products that are
less expensive, more effective, safer or offer greater patient
convenience than Auryxia. Other companies have
product candidates in various stages of preclinical or clinical
development to treat diseases and complications of the diseases for
which we are marketing Auryxia.
In addition, we and Keryx’s licensors,
Panion & BF Biotech, Inc., or Panion, and, as applicable, Dr.
Hsu,
entered into settlement agreements with each of the third parties
who submitted Paragraph IV
certification notice letters regarding Abbreviated New Drug
Applications, or ANDAs, submitted to the FDA,
pursuant to which we granted licenses to market a generic version
of Auryxia in the United States beginning in March 2025 (subject to
FDA approval), or earlier under certain circumstances customary for
settlement agreements of this nature, which may impact our business
and results of operation.
Drugs that may compete with vadadustat include Epogen® (epoetin
alfa) and Aranesp® (darbepoetin alfa), both commercialized by
Amgen, Procrit® (epoetin alfa) and Eprex® (epoetin alfa),
commercialized by Johnson & Johnson in the United States and
Europe, respectively, and Mircera® (methoxy PEG-epoetin beta),
commercialized by CSL Vifor in the United States and Roche Holding
Ltd. outside of the United States.
We and our partners may also face competition from potential new
anemia therapies. There are several other hypoxia-inducible factor
prolyl hydroxylase, or HIF-PH, inhibitor product candidates in
various stages of development for anemia indications that may be in
direct competition with vadadustat if and when they are approved
and launched commercially. These candidates are being developed by
companies such as FibroGen Inc., or FibroGen, together with its
collaboration partners, Astellas Pharma Inc. and AstraZeneca PLC,
Japan Tobacco International, or JT, GlaxoSmithKline plc, or GSK,
and Bayer HealthCare AG, or Bayer.
Furthermore, certain companies are developing potential new
therapies for renal-related diseases that could potentially reduce
injectable erythropoiesis stimulating agent, or ESA, utilization
and thus limit the market potential for vadadustat if they are
approved and launched commercially. Other new therapies are in
development for the treatment of conditions inclusive of renal
anemia that may impact the market for anemia-targeted
treatment.
In addition, in the United States, FibroGen filed an NDA for its
product candidate, roxadustat, with the FDA, but the FDA issued a
complete response letter indicating the FDA will not approve the
NDA in its present form and requested that an additional clinical
trial for roxadustat be conducted prior to resubmission of the NDA
or additional response to the FDA's complete response letter. In
Europe however, roxadustat is approved for the treatment of anemia
in patients with CKD. Further, in February 2023 the FDA approved
daprodustat, an oral HIF-PH inhibitor marketed as Jesduvroq by GSK,
as a once-a-day treatment of anemia due to CKD in adult patients
who have been receiving dialysis for at least four months. If we
obtain approval for vadadustat in the U.S., and roxadustat is also
approved by the FDA, then both daprodustat and roxadustat will
compete with vadadustat.
In Japan, Vafseo, which is approved for both the DD and NDD
indications, competes with roxadustat, daprodustat and enarodustat.
Roxadustat is approved for the treatment of anemia due to CKD in
patients on dialysis, or DD-CKD, and patients not on dialysis, or
NDD-CKD. In addition, daprodustat, GSK’s product, and enarodustat,
JT’s product candidate, are approved in Japan for the treatment of
anemia due to CKD. In addition. Bayer HealthCare AG has submitted
an NDA for its product candidate for the treatment of renal anemia
in Japan. In China, roxadustat has launched for the treatment of
anemia of DD-CKD and for the treatment of anemia due to CKD in
NDD-CKD patients.
A biosimilar is a biologic product that is approved based on
demonstrating that it is highly similar to an existing,
FDA-approved branded biologic product. The patents for the
existing, branded biologic product must expire in a given market
before biosimilars may enter that market without risk of being sued
for patent infringement. In addition, an application for a
biosimilar product cannot be approved by the FDA until 12 years
after the existing, branded product was approved under a Biologics
License Application, or BLA. The patents for epoetin alfa, an
injectable ESA, expired in 2004 in the EU, and the remaining
patents expired between 2012 and 2016 in the United States. Because
injectable ESAs are biologic products, the introduction of
biosimilars into the injectable ESA market in the United States
will constitute additional competition for vadadustat if we are
able to obtain approval for and commercially launch vadadustat. In
the United States, Pfizer’s biosimilar version of injectable ESAs,
Retacrit® (epoetin alfa-epbx), was approved by the FDA in May 2018
and launched in November 2018 and several biosimilar versions of
injectable ESAs are available for sale in the EU.
Many of our potential competitors have significantly greater
financial, manufacturing, marketing, drug development, technical
and human resources than we do. Large pharmaceutical companies, in
particular, have extensive experience in clinical testing,
obtaining marketing approvals, recruiting patients and
manufacturing pharmaceutical products. Large and established
companies such as Amgen, Roche and GSK, among others, compete in
the market for drug products to treat kidney disease. In
particular, these companies have greater experience and expertise
in conducting preclinical testing and clinical trials, obtaining
marketing approvals, manufacturing such products on a broad scale
and marketing approved products. These companies also have
significantly greater research and marketing capabilities than we
do and may also have products that have been approved or are in
late stages of development and have collaborative arrangements in
our target markets with leading companies and research
institutions. Established pharmaceutical companies may also invest
heavily to accelerate discovery and development of novel compounds
or to in-license novel compounds that could make the product
candidates that we are developing obsolete.
Smaller and other early-stage companies may also prove to be
significant competitors. As a result of all of these factors, our
competitors may succeed in obtaining patent protection and/or
marketing approval, or discovering, developing and commercializing
competitive products, before, or more effectively than, we do. If
we are not able to compete effectively against potential
competitors, our business will not grow and our financial condition
and operations will suffer.
The commercialization of RionaTM
and VafseoTM
in Japan and our current and potential future efforts with respect
to the development and commercialization of our products and
product candidates outside of the United States subject us to a
variety of risks associated with international operations, which
could materially adversely affect our business.
Our Japanese sublicensee, JT, and its subsidiary, Torii
Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., or Torii, commercialize Riona, the trade
name for ferric citrate hydrate in Japan, as an oral treatment for
the improvement of hyperphosphatemia in patients with CKD,
including DD-CKD and NDD-CKD, and for the treatment of adult
patients with IDA in Japan. In Japan and certain other countries in
Asia, we granted MTPC exclusive rights to commercialize vadadustat,
which has been approved and is being marketed by MTPC in Japan
under the trade name VafseoTM.
We also granted Averoa SAS, or Averoa, an exclusive license to
develop and commercialize ferric citrate in the EEA, Turkey,
Switzerland and the United Kingdom.
Pursuant to the terms of the Termination Agreement with Otsuka,
Otsuka has transferred to us the marketing authorization
application, or MAA, for vadadustat with the EMA, and in the United
Kingdom, Switzerland and Australia. In addition, we have conducted
and in the future plan to conduct clinical trials outside of the
United States for Auryxia, vadadustat and any other product or
product candidate that may be in-licensed or acquired. As a result
of these and other activities, we are or may become subject to
additional risks in developing and commercializing Auryxia and
vadadustat outside the United States, including, among
others:
•political,
regulatory, compliance and economic developments, weakness or
instability that could restrict our ability to manufacture, market
and sell our products;
•changes
in international medical reimbursement policies and
programs;
•changes
in healthcare policies of foreign jurisdictions;
•trade
protection measures, including import or export licensing
requirements and tariffs and our compliance therewith;
•our
ability to develop or manage relationships with qualified local
distributors and trading companies;
•diminished
protection of intellectual property in some countries outside of
the United States;
•differing
labor regulations and business practices;
•compliance
with laws, including the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, or
FCPA, the UK Bribery Act or similar local regulation, the EU
General Data Protection Regulation, or GDPR, and similar data
protection laws, and tax, employment, immigration and labor
laws;
•economic
weakness, including inflation, or political instability in
particular foreign economies and markets;
•foreign
currency fluctuations, which could result in increased operating
expenses and reduced revenues, and other obligations incident to
doing business in another country;
•production
shortages resulting from any events affecting raw material supply
or manufacturing capabilities abroad, including as a result of the
COVID-19 pandemic; and
•business
interruptions resulting from geopolitical actions, including war
and terrorism, global pandemics, or natural disasters including
earthquakes, typhoons, floods and fires.
In addition, we receive revenues from royalty payments converted to
U.S. dollars based on net sales of Riona and
VafseoTM
in Japanese yen. The exchange rates between the Japanese yen on the
one hand, and the U.S. dollar, on the other hand, have changed
substantially in recent years and may fluctuate substantially in
the future. Our results of operations could be adversely affected
over time by certain movements in exchange rates, particularly if
the Japanese yen depreciates against the U.S. dollar.
Any of these factors may, individually or as a group, have a
material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
As and if we continue to expand our commercialization efforts, we
may encounter new risks.
Risks Related to Product Development
Clinical drug development involves a lengthy and expensive process
with an uncertain outcome, and we will incur additional costs in
connection with, and may experience delays in completing, or
ultimately be unable to complete, the development and, if approved,
commercialization of vadadustat and any other product
candidates.
The risk of failure in drug development is high. Before obtaining
marketing approval from regulatory authorities for the sale of any
product candidate, we must complete preclinical development and
conduct extensive clinical trials to demonstrate the
safety
and efficacy of our product candidates in humans. Preclinical
studies and clinical trials are expensive, difficult to design and
implement, can take several years to complete, and their outcomes
are inherently uncertain. Failure can occur at any time during the
process. For example, we are currently conducting a clinical trial
to evaluate three times per week oral dosing of vadadustat for
dialysis dependent patients with anemia due to chronic kidney
disease, or CKD. If we experience delays in the conduct of this
clinical trial or the results are not positive, it could affect the
market potential of vadadustat, if approved.
We may be unable to successfully complete clinical trials of
Auryxia, vadadustat and other product candidates or to successfully
obtain approval of vadadustat or other product candidates, if the
results of those trials and studies are not positive or are only
modestly positive, or if there are concerns with the profile due to
efficacy or safety. Further, the results of preclinical studies and
early clinical trials of our product candidates may not be
predictive of the results of later-stage clinical trials, interim
results of a clinical trial do not necessarily predict final
results, and results of Phase 3 clinical trials for one indication
may not be predictive of results of Phase 3 clinical trials for
another indication. For example, we announced positive top-line
results from INNO2VATE
and vadadustat achieved the primary and key secondary efficacy
endpoint in each of the two PRO2TECT
studies, but the PRO2TECT
program did not meet the primary major adverse cardiovascular
event, or MACE, safety endpoint. Many companies in the
biopharmaceutical industry have suffered significant setbacks in
late-stage clinical trials after achieving positive results in
early-stage development, and we may face similar setbacks.
Moreover, preclinical and clinical data are often susceptible to
varying interpretations and analyses, and many companies that have
believed their product candidates performed satisfactorily in
preclinical studies and clinical trials have nonetheless failed to
obtain marketing approval of their product candidates. In addition,
in March 2022, we received the CRL for vadadustat indicating that
the FDA had determined that it could not approve the NDA in its
present form, thus delaying any potential approval of vadadustat.
In October 2022, we submitted the FDRR to the FDA and
in
February 2023, we received a second interim response from the FDA
to our FDRR.
However, it is impossible to predict when or if vadadustat or any
of our other product candidates will prove effective or safe in
humans or will receive marketing approval or on what terms. In
February 2023, the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use,
or CHMP, of the EMA adopted a positive opinion recommending the
European Commission, or EC, to approve Vafseo™ (vadadustat), an
oral HIF-PH inhibitor for the treatment of symptomatic anemia
associated with CKD in adults on chronic maintenance dialysis.
However, before we can market and sell vadadustat in Europe, the EC
must approve vadadustat, and there can be no assurances that we
will receive such approval in a timely manner, or at
all.
We may experience numerous unforeseen events during, or as a result
of, preclinical development or clinical trials that could delay,
prevent or make more challenging our ability to receive or maintain
marketing approval or commercialize our product candidates. We may
be required to complete additional clinical trials for Auryxia,
vadadustat and any other product or product candidate, including
those that may be in-licensed or acquired, in order to obtain or
maintain required regulatory approvals. Our preclinical studies and
clinical trials may take longer to complete than currently
anticipated, or may be delayed, suspended, required to be repeated,
prematurely terminated or may not successfully demonstrate safety
and/or efficacy needed to obtain or maintain regulatory approval
for a variety of other reasons, such as:
•the
costs may be greater than we anticipate;
•the
number of patients required for clinical trials may be larger than
we anticipate;
•enrollment
in our clinical trials may be slower than we anticipate, or
participants may drop out of these clinical trials at a higher rate
than we anticipate;
•our
third party contractors, such as our CROs, may fail to comply with
regulatory requirements, perform effectively, or meet their
contractual obligations to us in a timely manner, or at all, or we
may fail to communicate effectively or provide the appropriate
level of oversight of such third party contractors;
•the
supply or quality of our starting materials, drug substance and
drug product necessary to conduct clinical trials of our product
candidates may be insufficient or inadequate;
•regulators,
independent data monitoring committees, or IDMCs, institutional
review boards, or IRBs, safety committees, or ethics committees,
may require that we suspend or terminate our clinical trials for
various reasons, including noncompliance with regulatory
requirements, unforeseen safety issues or adverse side effects,
failure to demonstrate a benefit from using our product candidate,
or a finding that the participants are being exposed to
unacceptable health risks;
•clinical
trials of our product candidates may produce negative or
inconclusive results or results that may be interpreted in a manner
different than we interpret them, and we may decide, or regulators
may require us, to conduct additional clinical trials, repeat a
clinical trial or abandon product development
programs;
•lack
of adequate funding to continue a clinical trial, including
unforeseen costs due to enrollment delays, requirements to conduct
additional clinical trials or repeat a clinical trial and increased
expenses associated with the services of our CROs and other third
parties;
•we
may fail to initiate, delay of or failure to complete a clinical
trial as a result of an Investigational New Drug application, or
IND, being placed on clinical hold by the FDA, the EMA, the PMDA,
or other regulatory authorities, or for other reasons, such as
failure to recruit or enroll suitable patients or patients' failure
to return for post-treatment follow up;
•we
may determine to change or expand a clinical trial, including after
it has begun;
•clinical
trial sites and investigators deviating from the clinical protocol,
failing to conduct the trial in accordance with regulatory
requirements, or dropping out of a trial, or failure by us or our
CROs to communicate effectively or provide the appropriate level of
oversight of such clinical sites and investigators;
•there
may be an inability, delay, or failure in identifying and
maintaining a sufficient number of clinical trial sites, many of
which may already be engaged in other clinical
programs;
•there
may be a delay or failure in reaching agreement with the FDA, the
EMA, the PMDA or other regulatory authorities on a clinical trial
design upon which we are able to execute;
•there
may be a delay or failure in obtaining authorization to commence a
clinical trial or inability to comply with conditions imposed by a
regulatory authority regarding the scope or design of a clinical
trial;
•there
may be delays in reaching, or failure to reach, agreement on
acceptable terms with prospective clinical trial sites and
prospective CROs, the terms of which can be subject to extensive
negotiation and may vary significantly among different CROs and
clinical trial sites;
•the
FDA, the EMA, the PMDA or other regulatory authorities may require
us to submit additional data or impose further requirements before
permitting us to initiate a clinical trial or during an ongoing
clinical trial;
•the
FDA, the EMA, the PMDA or other regulatory authorities may disagree
with our clinical trial design and our interpretation of data from
clinical trials, or may change the requirements for approval even
after it has reviewed and commented on the design for our clinical
trials;
•third
parties with which we work may fail to comply with good practice
quality guidelines and regulations, or GXP, including good
laboratory practice, good clinical practice, or GCP, and current
good manufacturing practice, or cGMP; or
•there
may be changes in governmental regulations or administrative
actions.
If any of the foregoing occurs, the following may
occur:
•regulators
may require that we conduct additional clinical trials, repeat
clinical trials or conduct other studies beyond those that we
currently contemplate;
•we
may be delayed in obtaining marketing approval for vadadustat or
other product candidates;
•we
may not obtain marketing approval for vadadustat or other product
candidates at all;
•we
may obtain approval for indications or patient populations that are
not as broad as intended or desired;
•we
may obtain approval with labeling that includes significant use or
distribution restrictions or safety warnings that would reduce the
potential market for any approved product or inhibit our ability to
successfully commercialize any approved product;
•a
REMS or FDA-imposed risk management plan that use risk minimization
strategies to ensure that the benefits of certain prescription
drugs outweigh their risks, may be required;
•we
may be subject to additional post-marketing restrictions and/or
requirements; or
•the
product may be removed from the market after obtaining marketing
approval.
Our product development costs may also increase if we experience
development delays or delays in receiving the requisite marketing
approvals. Our preclinical studies or clinical trials may need to
be restructured or may not be completed on schedule, or at all.
Significant preclinical or clinical trial delays also could shorten
any periods during which we may have the exclusive right to
commercialize vadadustat, if approved, or any other product
candidate, including those that may be in-licensed or acquired, or
allow our competitors to bring products to market before we do.
This could impair our ability to successfully commercialize our
product candidates and may harm our business and results of
operations.
We may find it difficult to enroll patients in our clinical trials,
which could delay or prevent clinical trials of Auryxia, vadadustat
or any other product or product candidate, including those that may
be in-licensed or acquired.
Identifying and qualifying patients to participate in clinical
trials is critical to our success. The timing of our clinical
trials depends, in part, on the speed at which we can recruit
patients to participate in our clinical trials. Patients may be
unwilling to participate in our clinical trials because of concerns
about investigational research studies, the time and commitment
needed to participate in a study, adverse events observed with the
product candidate under study, the current standard of care,
competitor products and/or other investigational agents, in each
case for the same indications and/or similar patient populations.
In addition, in the case of clinical trials of any product
candidate, patients currently receiving treatment with the current
standard of care or a competitor product may be reluctant to
participate in a clinical trial with an investigational drug.
Additionally, it is often more difficult to enroll special or
particular subpopulations of patients, such as pediatric or elderly
patients, due to a number of factors including parental or other
caregiver considerations, concerns and burdens. For example, we
enrolled sites in a post-approval pediatric study for the
Hypophosphatemia Indication of Auryxia in the second quarter of
2022, which began patient recruitment in the third quarter of 2022,
but study sites have not yet enrolled any eligible pediatric
patients despite efforts to do so. Furthermore, the COVID-19
pandemic resulted in temporary closures of, and may continue to
impact, clinical
trial sites on which we rely for the conduct of clinical trials and
COVID-19 pandemic precautions and staffing shortages have caused
moderate delays in enrolling new clinical trials and may cause
delays in enrolling other new clinical trials.
Finally, competition for clinical study sites may limit our access
to patients appropriate for our clinical trials. As a result, the
timeline for recruiting patients and conducting studies may be
delayed. These delays could result in increased costs, delays in
advancing our development of any product or product candidate, or
termination of the clinical trial altogether.
We may not be able to identify, recruit and enroll a sufficient
number of patients, or those with required or desired
characteristics, to complete our clinical trials in a timely
manner. Patient enrollment is affected by many factors,
including:
•severity
of the disease under investigation;
•design
of the study protocol;
•size
and nature of the patient population;
•eligibility
criteria for, and design of, the study in question, including study
complexity;
•perceived
risks and benefits of the product or product candidate under study,
including as a result of adverse effects observed in similar or
competing therapies;
•proximity
and availability of clinical study sites for prospective
patients;
•availability
of competing therapies and clinical trials and clinicians’ and
patients’ perceptions as to the potential advantages of the product
or product candidate being studied in relation to available
therapies or other product candidates in development;
•efforts
to facilitate timely enrollment in clinical trials;
•participation
length and demands on patients and caregivers;
•site
staffing shortages and turnover;
•clinical
trial sites and investigators failing to perform effectively;
and
•patient
referral practices of physicians.
We may not be able to initiate or complete clinical trials in a
timely manner, or at all, if we cannot enroll a sufficient number
of eligible patients to participate in the clinical trials required
by regulatory agencies. If we have difficulty enrolling a
sufficient number of patients to conduct our clinical trials as
planned, we may need to delay, limit or terminate ongoing or
planned clinical trials, any of which may delay approval, or result
in failure to maintain or obtain approval, of our products or
product candidates, which would have a material adverse effect on
our business.
Conducting clinical trials outside of the United States, as we have
done historically and as we may decide to do in the future,
presents
additional risks and complexities and, if we decide to conduct a
clinical trial outside of the United States in the future, we may
not complete such trials successfully, in a timely manner, or at
all, which could affect our ability to obtain regulatory
approvals.
Our ability to successfully initiate, enroll and complete a
clinical study in any country outside of the United States is
subject to numerous additional risks unique to conducting business
in jurisdictions outside the United States, including:
•difficulty
in establishing or managing relationships with qualified CROs,
physicians and clinical trial sites;
•difficulty
in complying with different local standards for the conduct of
clinical trials;
•difficulty
in complying with various and complex import laws and regulations
when shipping drug to certain countries; and
•the
potential burden of complying with a variety of laws, medical
standards and regulatory requirements, including the regulation of
pharmaceutical and biotechnology products and
treatments.
Data obtained from studies conducted in the United States may not
be accepted by the EMA, the PMDA and other regulatory authorities
outside of the United States. Also, certain jurisdictions require
data from studies conducted in their country in order to obtain
approval in that country. Further, when a foreign clinical study is
not conducted under an IND, the sponsor must ensure that the study
complies with certain regulatory requirements of the FDA in order
to use the study as support for an IND or application for marketing
approval. Specifically, the studies must be conducted in accordance
with GCP, including undergoing review and receiving approval by an
independent ethics committee, and seeking and receiving informed
consent from subjects.
Thus, to the extent that we rely on data from foreign clinical
studies that are not the subject of an IND but are used to support
of an NDA, there is a risk that FDA may not review such data in
connection with its review of the NDA.
If we or our collaboration partners have difficulty conducting
future clinical trials in jurisdictions outside the United States
as planned, we may need to delay, limit or terminate such clinical
trials, any of which could have an adverse effect on our
business.
Auryxia, vadadustat or any other product or product candidate,
including those that may be in-licensed or acquired, may cause
undesirable side effects or have other properties that may delay or
prevent marketing approval or limit their commercial
potential.
Undesirable effects caused by, or other undesirable properties of,
Auryxia, vadadustat or any other product or product candidate,
including those that may be in-licensed or acquired, or competing
commercial products or product candidates in development that
utilize a common mechanism of action could cause us or regulatory
authorities to interrupt, delay or halt clinical trials, could
result in a more restrictive label or the delay, denial or
withdrawal of marketing approval by the FDA or other regulatory
authorities, and could lead to potential product liability claims.
In addition, results of our clinical trials could reveal a high
frequency of undesirable effects or unexpected characteristics. For
example, in March 2022, we received the CRL from the FDA for our
NDA for vadadustat in which the FDA
concluded that the data in the NDA do not support a favorable
benefit-risk assessment of vadadustat for dialysis and non-dialysis
patients. The FDA expressed safety concerns noting failure to meet
non-inferiority in MACE in the non-dialysis patient population, the
increased risk of thromboembolic events, driven by vascular access
thrombosis in dialysis patients, and the risk of drug-induced liver
injury. In October 2022, we submitted the FDRR to the FDA. The FDRR
focuses on the
favorable balance between the benefits and risks of
vadadustat for the treatment of anemia due to CKD in adult patients
on dialysis in light of safety concerns expressed by the FDA in the
CRL for dialysis patients related to the rate of adjudicated
thromboembolic events driven by vascular access thrombosis for
vadadustat compared to the active comparator and the risk of
drug-induced liver injury.
In February 2023, we received a second interim response from the
FDA to our FDRR, and there can be no assurances that
we will be successful in our appeal.
If we are unable to overcome these concerns,
vadadustat may not be approved by the FDA on favorable terms, or at
all, and our financial condition could be materially harmed. In
February 2023, the CHMP of the EMA adopted a positive opinion
recommending the EC to approve Vafseo™ for the treatment of
symptomatic anemia associated with CKD in adults on chronic
maintenance dialysis. However, before we can market and sell
vadadustat in Europe, the EC must approve vadadustat, and there can
be no assurances that we will receive such approval in a timely
manner, or at all.
If we or others identify undesirable effects caused by, or other
undesirable properties of, Auryxia, vadadustat, or any other
product or product candidate, including those that may be
in-licensed or acquired, or if known undesirable effects are more
frequent or severe than in the past, or if any of the foregoing are
perceived to have occurred, either before or after receipt of
marketing approval, a number of potentially significant negative
consequences could result, including:
•our
product candidates may not be approved by regulatory
authorities;
•our
clinical trials may be put on hold;
•patient
recruitment could be slowed, and enrolled patients may not want to
complete the clinical trial;
•regulatory
authorities may require warnings on the label, such as the warning
on Auryxia’s label regarding iron overload;
•REMS
or FDA-imposed risk management plans that use restrictive risk
minimization strategies may be required;
•we
may decide to, or be required to, send drug warnings or safety
alerts to physicians, pharmacists and hospitals (or the FDA or
other regulatory authorities may choose to issue such alerts), or
we may decide to conduct a product recall or be requested to do so
by the FDA or other regulatory authority;
•reformulation
of the product, additional non-clinical or clinical trials,
restrictive changes in labeling or changes to or re-approvals of
manufacturing facilities may be required;
•we
may be precluded from pursuing additional development opportunities
to enhance the clinical profile of a product within its indicated
populations, or studying the product or product candidate in
additional indications and populations or in new formulations;
and
•we
could be investigated by the government or sued and held liable for
harm caused to patients, including in class action lawsuits;
and
•our
reputation may suffer.
Any of these events could prevent us from achieving or maintaining,
whether on a restricted basis or at all, marketing approval and,
ultimately, market acceptance or penetration of Auryxia, vadadustat
or any other product or product candidate, including those that may
be in-licensed or acquired. In addition, any of these events could
substantially increase our costs, and could significantly impact
our ability to successfully commercialize Auryxia, vadadustat or
any other product and product candidate, including those that may
be in-licensed or acquired, and generate product
revenue.
The patient populations treated with Auryxia and potential patient
populations for vadadustat, if approved, have CKD, a serious
disease that increases the risk of cardiovascular disease including
heart attacks and stroke and, in its most severe form, results in,
kidney failure and the need for dialysis or kidney transplant. Many
patients with CKD are elderly with comorbidities making them
susceptible to significant health risks. Therefore, the likelihood
of these patients having adverse events, including serious adverse
events is high.
With respect to the global INNO2VATE
Phase 3 program, the incidence of treatment emergent adverse events
during the
Correction and Conversion
study in vadadustat treated patients was 83.8% and 85.5% in
darbepoetin alfa treated patients. During the study, the most
common treatment emergent adverse events reported in
vadadustat/darbepoetin alfa treated patients were hypertension
(16.2%/ 12.9%) and diarrhea (10.1%/ 9.7%). Serious treatment
emergent adverse events were lower in vadadustat treated patients
at 49.7% compared to 56.5% for darbepoetin alfa treated patients.
The incidence of treatment emergent adverse events during the
prevalent dialysis patient study (Conversion)
in the vadadustat treated patients was 88.3%, and 89.3% in
darbepoetin alfa treated patients. During the study, the most
common treatment emergent adverse events reported in
vadadustat/darbepoetin alfa treated patients were diarrhea (13.0%/
10.1%), pneumonia (11.0%/ 9.7%), hypertension (10.6%/ 13.8%), and
hyperkalemia (9.0%/ 10.8%). Serious treatment emergent adverse
events were slightly lower for vadadustat treated patients at 55.0%
and 58.3% for darbepoetin alfa-treated patients. Patients with
DD-CKD experienced an increased risk of thromboembolic events
compared to darbepoetin alfa with a time to first event HR of 1.20
(95% CI 0.96 - 1.50) driven by thrombosis of vascular
access.
With respect to the global PRO2TECT
Phase 3 program, the incidence of treatment emergent adverse events
during the ESA untreated patients study (Correction)
in the vadadustat-treated patients was 90.9%, and 91.6% in
darbepoetin alfa-treated patients. During the study, the most
common treatment emergent adverse events reported in
vadadustat/darbepoetin alfa-treated patients were end-stage renal
disease (34.7%/ 35.2%), hypertension (17.7%/ 22.1.%), hyperkalemia
(12.3.%/ 15.6%), urinary tract infection (12.9%/ 12.0%), diarrhea
(13.9%/ 10.0%), peripheral oedema (12.5%/ 10.5%), fall (9.6%/ 10%)
and nausea (10%/ 8.2%). Serious treatment emergent adverse events
were 65.3% for vadadustat-treated patients and 64.5% for
darbepoetin alfa-treated patients. The incidence of treatment
emergent adverse events during the ESA-treated patients study
(Conversion)
in vadadustat treated patients was 89.1% and 87.7% in darbepoetin
alfa-treated patients. During the study, the most common treatment
emergent adverse events reported in vadadustat/darbepoetin
alfa-treated patients were end-stage renal disease (27.5%/ 28.4%),
hypertension (14.4%/ 14.8%), urinary tract infection (12.2%/
14.5%), diarrhea (13.8.%/ 8.8.%), peripheral oedema (9.9%/ 10.1%)
and pneumonia (10.0%/ 9.7%). Serious treatment emergent adverse
events were 58.5% for vadadustat-treated patients and 56.6% for
darbepoetin alfa-treated patients.
For example, during the conduct of our Phase 3 program our team and
hepatic experts analyzed hepatic cases (unblinded to treatment)
and, following the completion of our global Phase 3 clinical
program for vadadustat, there was a review of hepatic safety across
the vadadustat clinical program, which included eight completed
Phase 2 and 3 studies in NDD-CKD patients, 10 completed Phase 1, 2,
and 3 studies, and two then-ongoing Phase 3b studies in DD-CKD
patients, and 18 completed studies in healthy subjects (17 Phase 1
and one Phase 3). This review consisted of a blinded re-assessment
of hepatic events conducted by a separate panel of hepatic experts.
While hepatocellular injury attributed to vadadustat was reported
in less than 1% of patients, there was one case of severe
hepatocellular injury with jaundice, and we cannot guarantee that
similar events will not happen in the future. Additionally, the FDA
expressed safety concerns related to the risk of drug-induced liver
injury in the CRL that it issued in March 2022.
Serious adverse events considered related to vadadustat, including
those noted in the CRL, and any other product candidates could have
material adverse consequences on the development and potential
approval of vadadustat or our other product candidates and our
business as a whole. Our understanding of adverse events in prior
clinical trials of our product candidates may change as we gather
more information, the FDA may not agree with our assessment of
adverse events and additional unexpected adverse events may be
observed in future clinical trials or in the market.
Any of the above safety data or other occurrences could delay or
prevent us from achieving or maintaining marketing approval, harm
or prevent sales of Auryxia or, if approved, vadadustat or any
other product or product candidate, including those that may be
in-licensed or acquired, increase our expenses and impair or
prevent our ability to successfully commercialize Auryxia,
vadadustat or any other products or product
candidates.
In addition, any post-marketing clinical trials conducted, if
successful, may expand the patient populations treated with
Auryxia, vadadustat or any other product we acquire or for which we
receive marketing approval, within or outside of their current
indications or patient populations, which could result in the
identification of previously unknown undesirable effects, increased
frequency or severity of known undesirable effects, or result in
the identification of unexpected safety signals. In addition, as
vadadustat, if approved, and any other products are commercialized,
they will be used in significantly larger patient populations, in
less rigorously controlled environments and, in some cases, by less
experienced and less expert treating practitioners, than in
clinical trials, which could result in increased or more serious
adverse effects being reported. As a result, regulatory
authorities, healthcare practitioners, third party payors or
patients may perceive or conclude that the use of
Auryxia,
vadadustat, if approved, or any other products are associated with
serious adverse effects, undermining our commercialization
efforts.
Risks Related to Regulatory Approval
We may not be able to obtain marketing approval for, or
successfully commercialize, vadadustat or any other product
candidate, or we may experience significant delays in doing so, any
of which would materially harm our business.
Clinical trials, manufacturing and marketing of any product or
product candidate are subject to extensive and rigorous review and
regulation by numerous governmental authorities in the United
States and other jurisdictions. Before obtaining marketing approval
for the commercial sale of any product candidate, we must
demonstrate through extensive preclinical testing and clinical
trials that the product candidate is safe and effective for use in
each target indication. This process can take many years and
marketing approval may never be achieved. Of the large number of
drugs in development in the United States and in other
jurisdictions, only a small percentage successfully complete the
FDA’s and other jurisdictions’ marketing approval processes and are
commercialized. Accordingly, even if we are able to obtain the
requisite capital to continue to fund our development and
commercialization efforts, we may be unable to successfully obtain
regulatory approval for or commercialize vadadustat or any other
product or product candidate, including those that may be
in-licensed or acquired.
We are not permitted to market vadadustat in the United States
until we receive approval from the FDA, in the EU until we receive
approval from the EMA, or in any other jurisdiction until the
requisite approval from regulatory authorities in such jurisdiction
is received. As a condition to receiving marketing approval for
vadadustat, we may be required by the FDA, the EMA or other
regulatory authorities to conduct additional preclinical studies or
clinical trials.
In March 2022, we received the CRL from the FDA regarding our NDA
for vadadustat for the treatment of anemia due to CKD. The FDA
concluded that the data in the NDA do not support a favorable
benefit-risk assessment of vadadustat for dialysis and non-dialysis
patients.
In October 2022, we submitted a Formal Dispute Resolution Request,
or FDRR, to the FDA. The FDRR focuses on the
favorable balance between the benefits and risks of
vadadustat for the treatment of anemia due to CKD in adult patients
on dialysis in light of safety concerns expressed by the FDA in the
CRL for dialysis patients related to the rate of adjudicated
thromboembolic events driven by vascular access thrombosis for
vadadustat compared to the active comparator and the risk of
drug-induced liver injury.
In February 2023, we received a second interim response from the
FDA to our FDRR, and there can be no assurances that
we will be successful in our appeal and obtain approval for
vadadustat in a timely manner, on favorable terms, or at all. As a
result, the regulatory approval process for vadadustat in the U.S.
is highly uncertain. We may not
obtain approval at all, and if we are able to obtain approval, it
may only be for patients with DD-CKD and, in any event, the expense
and time to do so could adversely impact our ability to
successfully commercialize vadadustat, and our
financial condition could be materially harmed.
Further, vadadustat and any other product candidate may not receive
marketing approval in the United States or the EU even if it is
approved in other countries. For example, although vadadustat is
approved in Japan for the treatment of anemia due to CKD in DD-CKD
and NDD-CKD adult patients, such approval does not guarantee
approval in the United States by the FDA or in the EU by the EMA
for these indications or at all. In addition, while each regulatory
authority makes their own assessment as to the safety and efficacy
of a drug, FDA’s concern about the safety or efficacy of vadadustat
or any other product candidate could impact the regulatory
authority’s decision in another country.
Obtaining marketing approval in the United States and other
jurisdictions for any product candidate depends upon numerous
factors, many of which are subject to the substantial discretion of
the regulatory authorities, including that regulatory agencies may
not complete their review processes in a timely manner and,
following completion of the review process, may not grant marketing
approval or such marketing approval may be limited. Furthermore,
approval of a drug does not ensure successful commercialization.
For example, on September 23, 2015, the European Commission, or EC,
approved Fexeric for the control of hyperphosphatemia in adult
patients with CKD. Pursuant to the sunset clause under EU law, the
EC’s approval of Fexeric in the EU was contingent on, among other
things, our commencing marketing of Fexeric within three years;
although we successfully negotiated an extension to December 23,
2019, we did not commence marketing Fexeric by such date and
therefore the Fexeric approval in the EU has ceased to be
valid.
We could face heightened risks with respect to seeking marketing
approval in the United Kingdom, or UK, as a result of the recent
withdrawal of the UK from the EU, commonly referred to as Brexit.
Pursuant to the formal withdrawal arrangements agreed between the
UK and the EU, the UK withdrew from the EU, effective December 31,
2020. On December 24, 2020, the UK and the EU entered into a Trade
and Cooperation Agreement. The agreement sets out certain
procedures for approval and recognition of medical products in each
jurisdiction. Any delay in obtaining, or an inability to obtain,
any marketing approvals, as a result of the Trade and Cooperation
Agreement would prevent us from commercializing vadadustat or any
other product candidate, including those that may be in-licensed or
acquired, in the UK and/or the EU and restrict our ability to
generate revenue and achieve and sustain profitability. If any of
these outcomes occur, we may be forced to restrict or delay efforts
to
seek regulatory approval in the UK and/or the EU for vadadustat or
any other product candidate, which could significantly and
materially harm our business.
As of January 1, 2021, the Medicines and Healthcare Products
Regulatory Agency, or the MHRA, became responsible for supervising
medicines and medical devices in Great Britain, comprising England,
Scotland and Wales under domestic law, whereas Northern Ireland
will continue to be subject to European Union rules under the
Northern Ireland Protocol. The MHRA will rely on the Human
Medicines Regulations 2012 (SI 2012/1916) (as amended) as the basis
for regulating medicines.
In addition, the safety concerns associated with the current
standard of care for the indications for which we are seeking
marketing approval for vadadustat may affect the FDA’s, the EMA’s
or other regulatory authorities’ review of the safety results of
vadadustat. Additionally, these regulatory authorities may not
agree with our assessment of adverse events. Further, the policies
or regulations, or the type and amount of clinical data necessary
to gain approval, may change during the course of a product
candidate’s clinical development and may vary among jurisdictions.
It is possible that vadadustat will never obtain marketing approval
in the United States or certain other jurisdictions or for some or
all of the indications for which we seek approval. The FDA, the EMA
or other regulatory authorities may delay, limit or deny approval
of vadadustat for many reasons including, among
others:
•we
may not be able to demonstrate that vadadustat is safe and
effective in treating adult patients with anemia due to CKD to the
satisfaction of the relevant regulatory authority;
•the
results of our clinical trials may only be modestly positive, or
there may be concerns with the profile due to efficacy or
safety;
•the
results of our clinical trials may not meet the level of
statistical or clinical significance required by the relevant
regulatory authority for review and/or marketing
approval;
•the
relevant regulatory authority
may disagree with our interpretation of data from our preclinical
studies and clinical trials;
•the
relevant regulatory authority may disagree with the number, design,
size, conduct or implementation of our clinical
trials;
•the
relevant regulatory authority may not approve the formulation,
labeling or specifications we request for vadadustat;
•the
relevant regulatory authority may approve vadadustat or any other
product candidate for use only in a small patient population or for
fewer or more limited indications than we request;
•the
relevant regulatory authority
may require that we conduct additional clinical trials or repeat
one or more clinical trials;
•the
FDA or other relevant regulatory authority may require development
of a REMS as a condition of approval or post-approval;
•the
relevant regulatory authority
may grant approval contingent on the performance of costly
post-marketing clinical trials;
•the
relevant regulatory authority's
onsite inspections may be delayed due to the COVID-19 pandemic or
otherwise;
•we,
or our CROs or other vendors, may fail to comply with GXP or fail
to pass any regulatory inspections or audits;
•we
or our third party manufacturers may fail to perform in accordance
with the FDA’s or other
relevant regulatory authority's
cGMP requirements and guidance;
•the
FDA may disagree with inclusion of data obtained from certain
regions outside the United States to support the NDA for potential
reasons such as differences in clinical practice from United States
standards;
•the
relevant regulatory authority
could deem that our financial relationships with certain
principal
investigators constitute a conflict of interest, such that the data
from those principal investigators may not be used to support our
applications;
•as
part of any future regulatory process,
the FDA may ask an Advisory Committee to review portions of the
NDA, the FDA may have
difficulty scheduling an Advisory Committee meeting in a timely
manner or, if convened, an FDA Advisory Committee could recommend
non-approval, conditions of approval or restrictions on approval,
and the FDA may ultimately agree with the
recommendations;
•the
relevant regulatory authority’s review process and decision-making
regarding vadadustat and any other product candidate may be
impacted by the results of our and our competitors’ clinical trials
and safety concerns of marketed products used to treat the same
indications as the indications for which vadadustat and any other
product candidate are being developed;
•the
relevant regulatory authority may not approve the manufacturing
processes or facilities of third party manufacturers with whom we
contract; or
•the
policies or regulations of the relevant regulatory authority may
significantly change in a manner that renders our clinical data
insufficient for approval or requires us to amend or submit new
clinical protocols.
If we experience further delays in obtaining approval, or if we
fail to obtain approval of vadadustat for some or all of the
indications for which we have sought approval, the commercial
prospects for vadadustat may be harmed and our ability to generate
revenues will be materially impaired, which could have a material
adverse effect on our business. For example, the FDRR we submitted
to the FDA in October 2022 focuses on the favorable balance between
the benefits and risks of vadadustat for the treatment of anemia
due to CKD in adult patients on dialysis.
Products approved for marketing are subject to extensive
post-marketing regulatory requirements and could be subject to
post-marketing restrictions or withdrawal from the market, and we
may be subject to penalties, including withdrawal of marketing
approval, if we fail to comply with regulatory requirements or if
we experience unanticipated problems with our products, or product
candidates, when and if any of them is approved.
Marketing approvals may be subject to limitations on the approved
indicated uses for which the product may be marketed or other
conditions of approval, or contain requirements or commitments for
potentially costly post-marketing studies and surveillance to
monitor the safety and efficacy of the product, including REMS, or
registries or observational studies. For example, in connection
with the FDA approvals of Auryxia, we initially committed to the
FDA to conduct certain post-approval pediatric studies of Auryxia
under the Pediatric Research Equity Act of 2003, or PREA. With
regard to the Hyperphosphatemia Indication for Auryxia, we
committed to completing the post-approval pediatric study and
submitting a final report to the FDA by December 31, 2019. However,
we did not complete the study and therefore did not submit the
post-marketing requirement pediatric clinical study report by
December 31, 2019. Consequently, we received a notification of
noncompliance with PREA. Our request to extend this deadline was
denied, and the study is considered delayed although we have
initiated sites in the study and are recruiting for one patient
cohort. Recruitment of the other patients is pending receipt of
further data regarding the manufacturing of the smaller size
tablets and the FDA’s concurrence before proceeding with the use of
such formulation. With regard to our IDA Indication, we initially
committed to completing the post-approval pediatric study and
submitting a final report to the FDA by January 2023. We did not
meet a milestone relating to this post-approval pediatric study of
Auryxia in a timely manner and received a notification from the
FDA. Subsequently, the FDA agreed to extend the pediatric clinical
study timelines for the IDA Indication. We subsequently
communicated to the FDA that we would be delaying the start of the
clinical trial in the IDA Indication while we work to produce
smaller size tablets. In response, the FDA issued a partial
clinical hold until we manufacture the smaller tablets and provide
the FDA with relevant information regarding the smaller sized
tablets for review.
The FDA lifted the partial clinical hold in June 2022, however, we
have not commenced start up of this study pending resolution of the
manufacturing of the smaller size tablets. If we are unable to
complete these studies successfully, or have further delays in
completing these studies, we will need to inform the FDA, have
further discussions and, if the FDA finds that we failed to comply
with pediatric study requirements, in violation of applicable law,
it could institute enforcement proceedings to seize or enjoin the
sale of Auryxia or seek civil penalties, which would have a
material adverse impact on our ability to commercialize Auryxia and
our ability to generate revenues from Auryxia.
In addition, the manufacturing processes, labeling, packaging,
distribution, adverse event reporting, storage, advertising,
promotion and recordkeeping for Auryxia, vadadustat, if approved,
and any other product for which we receive regulatory approval will
be subject to extensive and ongoing regulatory requirements and
guidance. These requirements and guidance include manufacturing
processes and procedures (including record keeping), the
implementation and operation of quality systems to control and
assure the quality of the product, submissions of safety and other
post-marketing information and reports, as well as continued
compliance with cGMPs and GCPs for any clinical trials that we
conduct post-approval. If we, our CMOs or other third parties we
engage fail to adhere to such regulatory requirements and guidance,
we could suffer significant consequences, including product
seizures or recalls, loss of product approval, fines and sanctions,
reputational damage, loss of customer confidence, shipment delays,
inventory shortages, inventory write-offs and other product-related
charges and increased manufacturing costs, and our development or
commercialization efforts may be materially harmed.
Moreover, the FDA and other regulatory authorities closely regulate
the post-approval marketing and promotion of drugs to ensure drugs
are marketed only for the approved indications and in accordance
with the provisions of the approved labeling. The FDA and other
regulatory authorities impose stringent restrictions on companies’
communications regarding use of their products, and if we promote
any approved product beyond its approved indications or
inconsistent with the approved label, we may be subject to
enforcement actions or prosecution arising from such activities.
Violations of the U.S. Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, or the
FDCA, relating to the promotion of prescription drugs may lead to
investigations alleging violations of federal and state healthcare
fraud and abuse and other laws, as well as state consumer
protection laws, insurance fraud laws, third party payor actions,
stockholder actions and other lawsuits.
Post-approval discovery of previously unknown problems with an
approved product, including adverse events of unanticipated
severity or frequency or relating to manufacturing operations or
processes, or failure to comply with regulatory requirements, may
result in, among other things:
•restrictions
on the marketing, distribution, use or manufacturing of the
product;
•withdrawal
of the product from the market, or product recalls;
•restrictions
on the labeling or marketing of a product;
•fines,
restitution or disgorgement of profits or revenues;
•warning
or untitled letters or clinical holds;
•refusal
by the FDA or other regulatory authorities to approve pending
applications or supplements to approved applications filed by us,
or suspension or revocation of product approvals;
•product
seizure or detention, or refusal to permit the import or export of
products;
•REMS;
and
•injunctions
or the imposition of civil or criminal penalties.
For example, we previously had three limited, voluntary recalls of
Auryxia. These and any other recalls or any supply, quality or
manufacturing issues in the future could result in significant
negative consequences, including reputational harm, loss of
customer confidence, and a negative impact on our financials, any
of which could have a material adverse effect on our business and
results of operations, and may impact our ability to supply
Auryxia, VafseoTM,
in Japan or vadadustat, if approved, for commercial and clinical
use.
Non-compliance with the FDA, the EMA, the PMDA and other regulatory
authorities’ requirements regarding safety monitoring or
pharmacovigilance can also result in significant financial
penalties.
The FDA’s policies and those of other regulatory authorities may
change, and additional government regulations may be enacted. We
cannot predict the likelihood, nature or extent of government
regulations that may arise from future legislation or
administrative action, either in the United States or in other
jurisdictions. If we are slow or unable to adapt to changes in
existing requirements or the adoption of new requirements or
policies, or are not able to maintain regulatory compliance, we may
lose any marketing approval that we may have obtained and we may
not achieve or sustain profitability, which would materially
adversely affect our business.
Risks Related to Governmental Regulation and
Compliance
We are subject to a complex regulatory scheme that requires
significant resources to ensure compliance and our failure to
comply with applicable laws could subject us to government scrutiny
or enforcement, potentially resulting in costly investigations,
fines, penalties or sanctions, contractual damages, reputational
harm, administrative burdens and diminished profits and future
earnings.
In general, a variety of laws apply to us or may otherwise restrict
our activities, including the following:
•laws
and regulations governing the conduct of preclinical studies and
clinical trials in the United States and other countries in which
we are conducting such studies;
•anti-corruption
and anti-bribery laws, including the FCPA, the UK Bribery Act and
various other anti-corruption laws in countries outside of the
United States;
•data
privacy laws existing in the United States, the EU, the UK and
other countries in which we operate, including the U.S. Health
Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, or HIPAA, as
amended by the Health Information Technology for Economic and
Clinical Health Act, or HITECH, state privacy and data protection
laws, such as the California Consumer Privacy Act, or CCPA, and the
California Privacy Rights Act of 2020, or CPRA, as well as state
consumer protection laws, GDPR, any additional applicable EU member
state data protection laws in force from time to time, the retained
EU law version of the General Data Protection Regulation as saved
into United Kingdom law by virtue of section 3 of the United
Kingdom's European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018, or the EU
GDPR;
•federal
and state laws requiring the submission of accurate product prices
and notifications of price increases;
•federal
and state securities laws;
•environmental,
health and safety laws and regulations; and
•international
trade laws, which are laws that regulate the sale, purchase,
import, export, re-export, transfer and shipment of goods,
products, materials, services and technology.
In addition, our relationships with healthcare providers,
physicians and third party payors expose us to broadly applicable
fraud and abuse laws that may constrain the business or financial
arrangements and relationships through which we market, sell and
distribute Auryxia and vadadustat, if approved, and any other
products for which we may obtain marketing approval. As such, these
arrangements are subject to applicable anti-kickback, fraud and
abuse, false claims, transparency, health information privacy and
security, and other healthcare laws and regulations at federal,
state and international levels. These restrictions include, but are
not limited to, the following:
•the
FDCA which among other things, strictly regulates drug product
marketing and promotion and prohibits manufacturers from marketing
such products for off-label use;
•federal
laws that require pharmaceutical manufacturers to report certain
calculated product prices to the government or provide certain
discounts or rebates to government authorities or private entities,
often as a condition of reimbursement under government healthcare
programs, and laws requiring notification of price
increases;
•the
federal Anti-Kickback Statute, which prohibits, among other things,
persons from knowingly and willfully soliciting, offering,
receiving or providing remuneration, directly or indirectly, in
cash or in kind, to induce or reward, or in return for, either the
referral of an individual for, or the purchase, order or
recommendation or arranging of, any good or
service, for which payment may be made under a federal healthcare
program such as Medicare and Medicaid;
•the
federal False Claims Act, which imposes criminal and civil
penalties, including through civil whistleblower or qui tam
actions, against individuals or entities for, among other things,
knowingly presenting, or causing to be presented, false or
fraudulent claims for payment by a federal healthcare program or
making a false statement or record material to payment of a false
claim or avoiding, decreasing or concealing an obligation to pay
money to the federal government, with potential liability including
mandatory treble damages and significant per-claim penalties, and
violations of the FDCA, the federal government pricing laws, and
the federal Anti-Kickback Statute trigger liability under the
federal False Claims Act;
•HIPAA,
which imposes criminal and civil liability for executing a scheme
to defraud any healthcare benefit program or making false
statements relating to healthcare matters;
•HIPAA,
as amended by the HITECH, and their respective implementing
regulations, also imposes obligations, including mandatory
contractual terms, with respect to safeguarding the privacy,
security and transmission of individually identifiable health
information;
•the
federal Physician Payments Sunshine Act (renamed the Open Payments
Act) requires applicable manufacturers of covered drugs to report
payments and other transfers of value to physicians, other
healthcare providers and teaching hospitals, as well as ownership
and investment interests held by physicians and their immediate
family members;
•analogous
state and foreign laws and regulations, such as state anti-kickback
and false claims laws and gift ban and transparency statutes, which
may apply to sales or marketing arrangements and claims involving
healthcare items or services reimbursed by state Medicaid or other
programs, or non-governmental third party payors, including private
insurers, and which are not preempted by federal laws and often
differ from state to state, thus complicating compliance efforts;
and
•U.S.
state laws restricting interactions with healthcare providers and
other members of the healthcare community or requiring
pharmaceutical manufacturers to implement certain compliance
standards, which vary from state to state.
Because of the breadth of these U.S. laws, and their non-U.S.
equivalents, and the narrowness of the statutory exceptions and
safe harbors available, it is possible that some of our business
activities could be subject to challenge under one or more of such
laws. In addition, recent healthcare reforms have strengthened
these laws. For example, the Health Care Reform Act, among other
things, amended the intent requirement of the federal Anti-Kickback
Statute. A person or entity no longer needs to have actual
knowledge of the statute or specific intent to violate the law. The
Health Care Reform Act also amended the False Claims Act, such that
violations of the Anti-Kickback Statute are now deemed violations
of the False Claims Act.
Some state laws require pharmaceutical companies to comply with the
pharmaceutical industry’s voluntary compliance guidelines, such as
the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America Code on
Interactions with Health Care Professionals, known as the PhRMA
Code. Additionally, some state and local laws require the
registration of pharmaceutical sales representatives in the
jurisdiction. State and foreign laws also govern the privacy and
security of health information in some circumstances, many of which
differ from each other in significant ways and often are not
preempted by HIPAA.
Efforts to ensure that our business complies with applicable
healthcare laws and regulations involves substantial costs and
requires us to expend significant resources. One of the potential
areas for governmental scrutiny involves federal and state
requirements for pharmaceutical manufacturers to submit accurate
price reports to the government. Because our processes for
calculating applicable government prices and the judgments involved
in making these calculations involve subjective decisions and
complex methodologies, these calculations are subject to risk of
errors and differing interpretations. In addition, they are subject
to review and challenge by the applicable governmental agencies, or
potential qui tam complaints, and it is possible that such reviews
could result in changes, recalculations, or defense costs that may
have adverse legal or financial consequences. It is possible that
governmental authorities will conclude that our business practices
may not comply with current or future statutes, regulations or case
law involving applicable fraud and abuse or other healthcare laws
and regulations. If our operations are found to be in violation of
any of these laws or any other governmental regulations that may
apply to us, we may be subject to significant civil, criminal and
administrative penalties, damages, fines, imprisonment, exclusion
of products from government funded healthcare programs, such as
Medicare and Medicaid, and the curtailment or restructuring of our
operations, any of which could materially adversely affect our
business and would result in increased costs and diversion of
management attention and could negatively impact the development,
regulatory approval and commercialization of Auryxia or vadadustat,
any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business.
Further, if any of the physicians or other healthcare providers or
entities with whom we expect to do business is found to be not in
compliance with applicable laws, they
may be subject to criminal, civil or administrative sanctions,
including exclusions from participation in government funded
healthcare programs.
We will incur significant liability if it is determined that we are
promoting any “off-label” use of Auryxia or any other product we
may develop, in-license or acquire or if it is determined that any
of our activities violates the federal Anti-Kickback
Statute.
Physicians are permitted to prescribe drug products for uses that
differ from those approved by the FDA or other applicable
regulatory agencies. Although the FDA and other regulatory agencies
do not regulate a physician’s choice of treatments, the FDA and
other regulatory agencies do restrict manufacturer communications
regarding unapproved uses of an approved drug. Companies are not
permitted to promote drugs for unapproved uses or in a manner that
is inconsistent with the FDA-approved labeling. There are also
restrictions about making comparative or superiority claims based
on safety or efficacy that are not supported by substantial
evidence. Accordingly, we may not promote Auryxia in the United
States for use in any indications other than the Hyperphosphatemia
Indication and the IDA Indication, and all promotional claims must
be consistent with the FDA-approved labeling for
Auryxia.
Promoting a drug off-label is a violation of the FDCA and can give
rise to liability under the federal False Claims Act, as well as
under additional federal and state laws and insurance statutes. The
FDA, the Department of Justice and other regulatory and enforcement
authorities enforce laws and regulations prohibiting promotion of
off-label uses and the promotion of products for which marketing
approval has not been obtained, as well as the false advertising or
misleading promotion of drugs. In September 2021, the FDA published
final regulations which describe the types of evidence that the
agency will consider in determining the intended use of a drug
product. In addition, laws and regulations govern the distribution
and tracing of prescription drugs and prescription drug samples,
including the Prescription Drug Marketing Act of 1976 and the Drug
Supply Chain Security Act, which regulate the distribution and
tracing of prescription drugs and prescription drug samples at the
federal level and set minimum standards for the regulation of drug
distributors by the states. A company that is found to have
improperly promoted off-label uses or to have otherwise engaged in
false or misleading promotion or improper distribution of drugs
will be subject to significant liability, potentially including
civil and administrative remedies as well as criminal sanctions. It
may also be subject to exclusion and debarment from federal
healthcare reimbursement programs.
Notwithstanding the regulatory restrictions on off-label promotion,
the FDA and other regulatory authorities allow companies to engage
in truthful, non-misleading, and non-promotional scientific
communications concerning their products in certain circumstances.
In addition, under some relatively recent guidance from the FDA,
companies may also promote information that is consistent with the
prescribing information and proactively speak to formulary
committee members of payors regarding data for an unapproved drug
or unapproved uses of an approved drug. We intend to engage in
these discussions and communicate with healthcare providers, payors
and other constituencies in compliance with all applicable laws,
regulatory guidance and industry best practices. Although we
believe we have put in place a robust compliance program and
processes designed to ensure that all such activities are performed
in a legal and compliant manner, such program and processes may not
be sufficient to deter or detect all violations.
In addition, if a company’s activities are determined to have
violated the federal Anti-Kickback Statute, this can also give rise
to liability under the federal False Claims Act and such violations
can result in significant fines, criminal and civil remedies, and
exclusion from Medicare and Medicaid. There is increased government
focus on relationships between the pharmaceutical industry and
physicians, pharmacies (especially specialty pharmacies), and other
sources of referrals. Common industry activities, such as speaker
programs, insurance assistance and support, relationships with
foundations providing copayment assistance, and relationships with
patient organizations and patients are receiving increased
governmental attention. If any of our relationships or activities
is determined to violate applicable federal and state anti-kickback
laws, false claims laws, or other laws or regulations, the company
and/or company executives, employees, and other representatives
could be subject to significant fines and criminal sanctions,
imprisonment, and potential exclusion from Medicare and Medicaid,
and could harm our reputation or result in significant legal
expenses and distraction of management.
Disruptions in the FDA, regulatory authorities outside the U.S. and
other government agencies caused by global health concerns or
funding shortages could prevent new products and services from
being developed or commercialized in a timely manner, which could
negatively impact our business.
The ability of the FDA and
regulatory authorities outside the U.S.
to review and approve new products can be affected by a variety of
factors, including global health concerns, government budget and
funding levels, staffing shortages, statutory, regulatory, and
policy changes and other events that may otherwise affect the FDA’s
or other regulatory authorities' ability to perform routine
functions. Average review times at the FDA have fluctuated in
recent years as a result of certain of these factors. In addition,
government funding of other government agencies that fund research
and development activities is subject to the political process,
which is inherently fluid and unpredictable. Disruptions at the FDA
and other agencies may increase the time necessary for new drugs to
be reviewed or approved by necessary government agencies, which
would adversely affect our
business. If a prolonged government shutdown occurs, it could
significantly impact the ability of the FDA or other regulatory
authorities to timely review and process our, or our collaboration
partners', regulatory submissions, which could have a material
adverse effect on our business.
In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, a number of companies in 2020
and 2021 announced receipt of complete response letters due to the
FDA’s inability to complete required inspections for their
applications. Following a period of false starts, and temporary
suspensions due to the omicron variant, the FDA announced on
February 2, 2022 that it would resume domestic inspections
beginning on February 7, 2022, and indicated that it would conduct
foreign inspections beginning in April 2022 on a prioritized basis.
However, the FDA may not be able to continue its current pace and
review timelines could be extended, including where a pre-approval
inspection or an inspection of clinical sites is required and due
to the COVID-19 pandemic and/or any travel restrictions, the FDA is
unable to complete such required inspections during the review
period. Regulatory authorities outside the United States may also
impose similar restrictions or other policy measures in response to
the COVID-19 pandemic or other travel restrictions. If a prolonged
government shutdown occurs, or if global health concerns prevent
the FDA or other regulatory authorities from conducting their
regular inspections, reviews, or other regulatory activities, it
could significantly impact the ability of the FDA or other
regulatory authorities to timely review and process our regulatory
submissions, which could have a material adverse effect on our
business.
Compliance with privacy and data security requirements could result
in additional costs and liabilities to us or inhibit our ability to
collect and process data globally, and the failure to comply with
such requirements could subject us to significant fines and
penalties, which may have a material adverse effect on our
business, financial condition or results of
operations.
The regulatory framework for the collection, use, safeguarding,
sharing, transfer and other processing of information worldwide is
rapidly evolving and is likely to remain uncertain for the
foreseeable future. Globally, virtually every jurisdiction in which
we operate has established its own data security and privacy
frameworks with which we must comply. For example, the collection,
use, disclosure, transfer, or other processing of personal data
regarding individuals in the EU, including personal health data, is
subject to the GDPR, which took effect across all member states of
the EEA, in May 2018. Following the withdrawal of the U.K. from the
EU, the U.K. Data Protection Act 2018 applies to the processing of
personal data that takes place in the U.K. and includes parallel
obligations to those set forth by GDPR. The GDPR is wide-ranging in
scope and imposes numerous requirements on companies that process
personal data when required, including requirements relating to
processing health and other sensitive data, obtaining consent of
the individuals to whom the personal data relates, when required,
providing information to individuals regarding data processing
activities, implementing safeguards to protect the security and
confidentiality of personal data, providing notification of data
breaches, and taking certain measures when engaging third party
processors. The GDPR increases our obligations as a sponsor in
clinical trials in the EEA by expanding the definition of personal
data to include coded data and requiring changes to informed
consent practices and more detailed notices for clinical trial
patients and investigators. The GDPR also permits data protection
authorities to require destruction of improperly gathered or used
personal information and/or impose substantial fines for violations
of the GDPR, which can be up to four percent of global revenues or
20 million Euros, whichever is greater, and it also confers a
private right of action on data subjects and consumer associations
to lodge complaints with supervisory authorities, seek judicial
remedies, and obtain compensation for damages resulting from
violations of the GDPR. In addition, the GDPR provides that EU
member states may make their own further laws and regulations
limiting the processing of personal data, including genetic,
biometric or health data and permits EU member states to adopt
further penalties for violations that are not subject to the
administrative fines outlined in the GDPR.
The GDPR also imposes strict rules on the transfer of personal data
to countries outside the EU, including the United States and, as a
result, increases the scrutiny that we should apply to transfers of
personal data from such sites to countries that are considered to
lack an adequate level of data protection, such as the United
States. There is ongoing uncertainty about the transfer mechanisms
that companies rely upon to enable the legal transfer of personal
data from the EU to other countries. For example, in July 2020, the
Court of Justice of the European Union, or the CJEU, invalidated
the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield, one of the mechanisms used to
legitimize the transfer of personal data from the EEA to the U.S.
As court decisions and regulatory guidance evolves, challenges
remain with respect to GDPR compliance. Companies must continue to
monitor the regulatory landscape and implement necessary changes,
all of which may be costly and may put the company out of
compliance while any changes are being implemented.
Given the breadth and depth of changes in data protection
obligations, complying with the GDPR’s requirements is rigorous and
time intensive and requires significant resources and a review of
our technologies, systems and practices, as well as those of any
third party collaborators, service providers, contractors or
consultants that process or transfer personal data collected in the
EU. The GDPR and other changes in laws or regulations associated
with the enhanced protection of certain types of sensitive data,
such as healthcare data or other personal information from our
clinical trials, could require us to change our business practices
and put in place additional compliance mechanisms, may interrupt or
delay our development, regulatory and commercialization activities
and increase our cost of doing business, and could lead to
government enforcement actions, private
litigation and significant fines and penalties against us and could
have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition
or results of operations.
Similar privacy and data security requirements are either in place
or underway in the United States. There are a broad variety of data
protection laws that may be applicable to our activities, and a
range of enforcement agencies at both the state and federal levels
that can review companies for privacy and data security concerns.
The Federal Trade Commission and state Attorneys General all are
aggressive in reviewing privacy and data security protections for
consumers. New laws also are being considered at both the state and
federal levels. For example, the CCPA, which went into effect on
January 1, 2020, and the CPRA, which amends CCPA by expanding the
scope and applicability, while also introducing new privacy
protections, is creating similar risks and obligations as those
created by GDPR. The CPRA also creates a new agency that is
specifically responsible for enforcing the new law. Because of
this, we may need to engage in additional activities (e.g., data
mapping) to identify the personal information we are collecting and
the purposes for which such information is collected. In addition,
we will need to ensure that our policies recognize the rights
granted to consumers (as that phrase is broadly defined in the CCPA
and can include business contact information). Other states have
also passed privacy laws that are similar to the CCPA/CPRA,
including Virginia, Colorado, Connecticut, and Utah. The laws in
the various states vary in terms of their exact requirements, but
they all provide regulators in these states with enforcement
authority. Many other states are considering similar legislation. A
broad range of legislative measures also have been introduced at
the federal level. Accordingly, failure to comply with current and
any future federal and state laws regarding privacy and security of
personal information could expose us to fines and penalties. We
also face a threat of potential consumer class actions related to
these laws and the overall protection of personal data. Even if we
are not determined to have violated these laws, investigations into
these issues typically require the expenditure of significant
resources and generate negative publicity, which could harm our
reputation and our business.
Legislative and regulatory healthcare reform
may increase the difficulty and cost for us to obtain marketing
approval of and commercialize our product candidates and affect the
prices we may obtain for any products that are approved in the
United States or foreign jurisdictions.
In the United States and some foreign jurisdictions, there have
been a number of legislative and regulatory changes and proposed
changes regarding the healthcare system that could prevent or delay
marketing approval of vadadustat, or any other product candidate,
restrict or regulate post-approval activities and affect our
ability to profitably sell Auryxia and vadadustat, if approved. The
pharmaceutical industry has been a particular focus of these
efforts and has been significantly affected by legislative
initiatives. Current laws, as well as other healthcare reform
measures that may be adopted in the future, may result in more
rigorous coverage criteria and in additional downward pressure on
the price that we receive for any FDA approved product, such as
Auryxia or vadadustat, if approved, or any reimbursement that
physicians receive for administering any approved
product.
In the United States, the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement,
and Modernization Act of 2003, or the MMA, changed the way Medicare
covers and pays for pharmaceutical products. The legislation
expanded Medicare coverage for drug purchases by the elderly and
introduced a new reimbursement methodology based on average sales
prices for physician-administered drugs. In addition, this
legislation provided authority for limiting the number of drugs
that will be covered in any therapeutic class. Cost reduction
initiatives and other provisions of this legislation could decrease
the coverage and price that we receive for Auryxia and any other
approved products. While the MMA applies only to drug benefits for
Medicare beneficiaries, private payors often follow Medicare
coverage policy and payment limitations in setting their own
reimbursement rates. Therefore, any reduction in reimbursement that
results from the MMA may result in a similar reduction in payments
from private payors.
In March 2010, President Obama signed into law the Patient
Protection and Affordable Care Act, as amended by the Health Care
and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010, or, collectively, the
ACA. In addition, other legislative changes and regulatory have
been proposed and adopted since the ACA was enacted. These changes
include the Budget Control Act of 2011, which, among other things,
led to aggregate reductions to Medicare payments to providers of up
to 2% per fiscal year, which will remain in effect through 2031.
However, pursuant to the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic
Security Act, or the CARES Act, and subsequent legislation, these
Medicare sequester reductions were suspended and reduced through
the end of June 2022 but with the full 2% cut resuming as of July
1, 2022. The American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012, which, among
other things, reduced Medicare payments to several types of
providers and increased the statute of limitations period for the
government to recover overpayments to providers from three to five
years. In addition, other legislative and regulatory changes have
been proposed, but not yet adopted. For example, in July 2019, HHS
proposed regulatory changes in kidney health policy and
reimbursement. Any new legislative or regulatory changes may result
in additional reductions in Medicare and other healthcare funding
and otherwise affect the prices we may obtain for Auryxia or
vadadustat, if approved, or the frequency with which Auryxia and
vadadustat, if approved, is prescribed or used.
The costs and prices of prescription pharmaceuticals have also been
the subject of considerable discussion in the United States. To
date, there have been several recent U.S. congressional inquiries
and proposed and enacted state and federal legislation designed to,
among other things, bring more transparency to drug pricing, review
the relationship between pricing and manufacturer patient programs,
reduce the costs of drugs under Medicare and reform government
program reimbursement
methodologies for drug products. At the federal level, Congress and
the current administration have each indicated that it will
continue to seek new legislative and/or administrative measures to
control drug costs.
For example, the former administration issued several executive
orders intended to lower the costs of prescription products and
certain provisions in these orders have been incorporated into
regulations. These regulations include an interim final rule
implementing a most favored nation model for prices that would tie
Medicare Part B payments for certain physician-administered
pharmaceuticals to the lowest price paid in other economically
advanced countries, effective January 1, 2021. That rule, however,
has been subject to a nationwide preliminary injunction and, on
December 29, 2021, CMS issued a final rule to rescind it. With
issuance of this rule, CMS stated that it will explore all options
to incorporate value into payments for Medicare Part B
pharmaceuticals and improve beneficiaries' access to evidence-based
care.
At the same time, the administration may seek to limit Medicare
Part D and public option drug prices through a tax penalty on
manufacturers for increases in the cost of drugs and biologics
above the general inflation rate. The American Rescue Plan Act of
2021, comprehensive COVID-19 pandemic relief legislation recently
enacted under the current administration, includes a number of
healthcare-related provisions, such as support to rural health care
providers, increased tax subsidies for health insurance purchased
through insurance exchange marketplaces, financial incentives to
states to expand Medicaid programs and elimination of the Medicaid
drug rebate cap effective in 2024.
Further, on July 9, 2021, President Biden signed Executive Order
14063, which focuses on, among other things, the price of
pharmaceuticals. The Order directs HHS to create a plan within 45
days to combat “excessive pricing of prescription pharmaceuticals
and enhance domestic pharmaceutical supply chains, to reduce the
prices paid by the federal government for such pharmaceuticals, and
to address the recurrent problem of price gouging.” On September 9,
2021, HHS released its plan to reduce pharmaceutical prices. The
key features of that plan are to: (a) make pharmaceutical prices
more affordable and equitable for all consumers and throughout the
health care system by supporting pharmaceutical price negotiations
with manufacturers; (b) improve and promote competition throughout
the prescription pharmaceutical industry by supporting market
changes that strengthen supply chains, promote biosimilars and
generic drugs, and increase transparency; and (c) foster scientific
innovation to promote better healthcare and improve health by
supporting public and private research and making sure that market
incentives promote discovery of valuable and accessible new
treatments.
More recently, on August 16, 2022, the Inflation Reduction Act of
2022, or IRA, was signed into law by President Biden. The new
legislation has implications for Medicare Part D, which is a
program available to individuals who are entitled to Medicare Part
A or enrolled in Medicare Part B to give them the option of paying
a monthly premium for outpatient prescription drug coverage. Among
other things, the IRA requires manufacturers of certain drugs to
engage in price negotiations with Medicare (beginning in 2026),
with prices that can be negotiated subject to a cap; imposes
rebates under Medicare Part B and Medicare Part D to penalize price
increases that outpace inflation (first due in 2023); and replaces
the Part D coverage gap discount program with a new discounting
program (beginning in 2025).
The IRA permits the Secretary of HHS to implement many of these
provisions through guidance, as opposed to regulation, for the
initial years.
Specifically, with respect to price negotiations, Congress
authorized Medicare to negotiate lower prices for certain costly
single-source drug and biologic products that do not have competing
generics or biosimilars and are reimbursed under Medicare Part B
and Part D.
CMS may negotiate prices for ten high-cost drugs paid for by
Medicare Part D starting in 2026, followed by 15 Part D drugs in
2027, 15 Part B or Part D drugs in 2028, and 20 Part B or Part D
drugs in 2029 and beyond.
This provision applies to drug products that have been approved for
at least 9 years and biologics that have been licensed for 13
years, but it does not apply to drugs and biologics that have been
approved for a single rare disease or condition.
Further, the legislation subjects drug manufacturers to civil
monetary penalties and a potential excise tax for failing to comply
with the legislation by offering a price that is not equal to or
less than the negotiated “maximum fair price” under the law or for
taking price increases that exceed inflation. The legislation also
requires manufacturers to pay rebates for drugs in Medicare Part D
whose price increases exceed inflation. The new law also caps
Medicare out-of-pocket drug costs at an estimated $4,000 a year in
2024 and, thereafter beginning in 2025, at $2,000 a
year.
At the state level, individual states are increasingly aggressive
in passing legislation and implementing regulations designed to
control pharmaceutical and biological product pricing, including
price or patient reimbursement constraints, discounts, restrictions
on certain product access, marketing cost disclosure and
transparency measures, and, in some cases, designed to encourage
importation from other countries and bulk purchasing. A number of
states, for example, require drug manufacturers and other entities
in the drug supply chain, including health carriers, pharmacy
benefit managers, wholesale distributors, to disclose information
about pricing of pharmaceuticals. In addition, regional healthcare
authorities and individual hospitals are increasingly using bidding
procedures to determine what pharmaceutical products and which
suppliers will be included in their prescription drug and other
healthcare programs. These measures could reduce the ultimate
demand for our products or put pressure on our product
pricing.
It is likely that federal and state legislatures within the United
States and foreign governments will continue to consider changes to
existing healthcare legislation. We expect that additional state
and federal healthcare reform measures will be adopted in the
future, any of which could limit the amounts that federal and state
governments will pay for healthcare products and services, which
could result in reduced demand for Auryxia and any product
candidates for which we receive marketing approval or additional
pricing pressures. We cannot predict the reform initiatives that
may be adopted in the future or whether initiatives that have been
adopted will be repealed or modified. The continuing efforts of the
government, insurance companies, managed care organizations and
other payors of healthcare services to contain or reduce costs of
healthcare may adversely affect:
•the
demand for Auryxia and any products candidates for which we receive
marketing approval;
•our
ability to set a price that we believe is fair for our
products;
•our
ability to obtain and maintain coverage and reimbursement approval
for Auryxia or any other approved product;
•our
ability to generate revenues and achieve or maintain profitability;
and
•the
level of taxes that we are required to pay.
In addition, in some countries, including member states of the EU
the pricing of prescription pharmaceuticals is subject to
governmental control. In these countries, pricing negotiations with
governmental authorities can take a significant amount of time
after receipt of marketing approval for a product. In addition,
there can be considerable pressure by governments and other
stakeholders on prices and reimbursement levels, including as part
of cost containment measures. Political, economic and regulatory
developments may further complicate pricing negotiations, and
pricing negotiations may continue after reimbursement has been
obtained. Reference pricing used by various EU member states and
parallel distribution, or arbitrage between low-priced and
high-priced member states, can further reduce prices, and in
certain instances render commercialization in certain markets
infeasible or disadvantageous from a financial perspective. In some
countries, we or our collaborators may be required to conduct a
clinical trial or other studies that compare the cost-effectiveness
of our product and/or our product candidates to other available
products in order to obtain or maintain reimbursement or pricing
approval. Publication of discounts by third party payors or
government authorities may lead to further pressure on the prices
or reimbursement levels. If reimbursement of our products is
unavailable or limited in scope or amount, or if pricing is set at
unsatisfactory levels, the commercial launch of our product and/or
product candidates could be delayed, possibly for lengthy periods
of time, we or our collaborators may not launch at all in a
particular country, we may not be able to recoup our investment in
one or more product candidates, and there could be a material
adverse effect on our business.
If we fail to comply with environmental, health and safety laws and
regulations, we could become subject to fines or penalties or incur
costs that could harm our business.
We are subject to numerous environmental, health and safety laws
and regulations, including those governing laboratory procedures
and the handling, use, storage, treatment and disposal of hazardous
materials and wastes. Our operations involve the use of hazardous
and flammable materials, including chemicals and biological
materials. Our operations also produce hazardous waste products. We
generally contract with third parties for the use and disposal of
these materials and wastes. We cannot eliminate the risk of
contamination or injury from these materials. In the event of
contamination or injury resulting from the use of hazardous
materials by our employees, contractors or consultants, we could be
held liable for any resulting damages, and any liability could
exceed our resources. We also could incur significant costs
associated with civil or criminal fines and penalties for failure
to comply with such laws and regulations.
Although we maintain workers’ compensation insurance to cover us
for costs and expenses, we may incur due to injuries to our
employees resulting from the use of hazardous materials, this
insurance may not provide adequate coverage against potential
liabilities. We do not maintain insurance for environmental
liability or toxic tort claims that may be asserted against us in
connection with our storage or disposal of biological, hazardous or
radioactive materials.
In addition, we may incur substantial costs in order to comply with
current or future environmental, health and safety laws and
regulations. These current or future laws and regulations may
impair our research, development or production efforts. Our failure
to comply with these laws and regulations also may result in
substantial fines, penalties or other sanctions.
Risks Related to our Reliance on Third Parties
We depend on collaborations with third parties for the development
and commercialization
of Auryxia, Riona, Vafseo and vadadustat and if these
collaborations are not successful or if our collaborators terminate
their agreements with us, we may not be able to capitalize on the
market potential of Auryxia, Riona, Vafseo and vadadustat, and our
business could be materially harmed.
We sublicensed the rights to commercialize Riona to JT and Torii in
Japan. We also entered into a collaboration agreement with MTPC to
develop and commercialize vadadustat in Japan and certain other
Asian countries. In addition, we entered into the Vifor Second
Amended Agreement pursuant to which we granted CSL Vifor an
exclusive license to sell vadadustat to the Supply Group in the
United States.
We also granted to Averoa an exclusive license to develop and
commercialize ferric citrate
in the EEA, Turkey, Switzerland and the United Kingdom. We may form
or seek other strategic alliances, joint ventures, or
collaborations, or enter into additional licensing arrangements
with third parties that we believe will complement or augment our
and our partners' commercialization efforts with respect to
Auryxia, Riona, Vafseo and our and our partners' development and,
if approved, commercialization efforts with respect to vadadustat
and any other product candidates. We may not be able to maintain
our collaborations for development and commercialization. For
example, on May 13, 2022, Otsuka elected to terminate our
collaboration agreements with them, and we subsequently negotiated
the Termination Agreement with Otsuka. This termination by Otsuka
may delay the approval or launch of vadadustat in Europe or other
territories or adversely affect how we are perceived in scientific
and financial communities. In addition, our current and any future
collaborations may not be successful due to a number of important
factors, including the following:
•collaborators
may have significant discretion in determining the efforts and
resources that they will apply to these
collaborations;
•collaborations
may be terminated in accordance with the terms of the collaboration
agreements and, if terminated, may make it difficult for us to
attract new collaborators or adversely affect how we are perceived
in scientific and financial communities, and may result in a need
for additional capital and expansion of our internal capabilities
to pursue further development or commercialization of the
applicable products and product candidates;
•if
permitted by the terms of the collaboration agreements,
collaborators may elect not to continue or renew development or
commercialization programs based on clinical trial results, changes
in their strategic focus, availability of funding or other external
factors such as a business combination that diverts resources or
creates competing priorities;
•if
permitted by the terms of the collaboration agreements,
collaborators may delay clinical trials, provide insufficient
funding for a clinical trial program, stop a clinical trial,
abandon a product candidate, repeat or conduct new clinical trials
or require a new formulation of a product candidate for clinical
testing;
•a
collaborator with marketing and distribution rights to our products
may not commit sufficient resources to their marketing and
distribution;
•if
permitted by the terms of the collaboration agreements, we and our
collaborator may have a difference of opinion regarding the
development or commercialization strategy for a particular product
or product candidate, and our collaborator may have ultimate
decision making authority;
•disputes
may arise between a collaborator and us that cause the delay or
termination of activities related to research, development, supply
or commercialization of Auryxia, Riona, Vafseo or vadadustat and
any other product candidate, or that result in costly litigation or
arbitration that diverts management attention and
resources;
•collaborations
may not lead to development or commercialization of products and
product candidates, if approved, in the most efficient manner or at
all;
•a
significant change in the senior management team, a change in the
financial condition or a change in the business operations,
including a change in control or internal corporate restructuring,
of any of our collaborators, could result in delayed timelines,
re-prioritization of our programs, decreasing resources or funding
allocated to support our programs, or termination of the
collaborations; and
•collaborators
may not comply with all applicable regulatory and legal
requirements.
If any of these events occurs, the market potential of Auryxia,
Riona, Vafseo or vadadustat, if and where approved, and any other
products or product candidates, could be reduced, and our business
could be materially harmed. Collaborations may also divert
resources, including the attention of management and other
employees, from other parts of our business, which could have an
adverse effect on other parts of our business, and we cannot be
certain that the benefits of the collaboration will outweigh the
potential risks.
We may seek to establish additional collaborations and, if we are
not able to establish them on commercially reasonable terms, or at
all, we may have to alter our development and commercialization
plans.
We will require substantial additional cash to fund the continued
commercialization of Auryxia and the development and potential
commercialization of any of our product candidates, including
vadadustat, if approved, especially following the termination of
our collaboration agreements with Otsuka. We may decide to enter
into additional collaborations for the development and
commercialization of vadadustat or Auryxia, both within and outside
of the United States. For example, we plan to pursue a new partner
to develop and commercialize vadadustat in Europe and other
territories previously licensed to Otsuka. If we are unsuccessful
in entering into a new agreement for the development and
commercialization of vadadustat in Europe and other territories in
a timely manner, or at all, it may result in a delay in the
approval or launch of vadadustat in Europe or other territories, a
need for additional capital and expansion of our internal
capabilities to pursue further development or commercialization of
the applicable products and product candidates, particularly the
development and commercialization of vadadustat in Europe and other
territories, and could have an adverse effect on our results of
operations. Any of these relationships may require us to incur
non-recurring and other charges, increase our near and long-term
expenditures, issue securities that dilute our existing
stockholders, divert management’s attention, or disrupt our
business.
We may not be successful in entering into additional collaborations
as a result of many factors, including the following:
•competition
in seeking appropriate collaborators;
•a
reduced number of potential collaborators due to recent business
combinations in the pharmaceutical industry;
•an
inability to negotiate collaborations on acceptable terms, on a
timely basis or at all;
•any
international rules, regulations, guidance, laws, risks or
uncertainties with respect to potential partners outside of the
United States;
•a
potential collaborator’s evaluation of Auryxia, vadadustat or any
other product or product candidate may differ substantially from
ours;
•a
potential collaborator’s evaluation of our financial stability and
resources;
•a
potential collaborator’s resources and expertise; and
•restrictions
due to an existing collaboration agreement.
If we are unable to enter into additional collaborations in a
timely manner, or at all, we may have to delay or curtail the
commercialization of Auryxia or vadadustat, if and where approved,
reduce or delay its development program or other of our other
development programs, or increase our expenditures and undertake
additional development or commercialization activities at our own
expense. If we elect to increase our expenditures to fund
development or commercialization activities on our own, we may need
to obtain additional capital, which may not be available to us on
acceptable terms or at all. If we do not have sufficient funds, we
may not be able to further develop or commercialize Auryxia or
vadadustat, if approved.
Even if we enter into additional collaboration agreements and
strategic partnerships or license our intellectual property, we may
not be able to maintain them or they may be unsuccessful, which
could delay our timelines or otherwise adversely affect our
business.
Royalties from commercial sales of vadadustat under our MTPC
Agreement will likely fluctuate and will impact our rights to
receive future payments under our Royalty Agreement with
HCR.
Pursuant to the Royalty Agreement with HCR, we sold to HCR our
right to receive the Royalty Interest Payments payable to us under
the MTPC Agreement, subject to the Annual Cap and the Aggregate
Cap. After HCR receives Royalty Interest Payments equal to the
Annual Cap in a given calendar year, we will receive 85% of the
Royalty Interest Payments for the remainder of that year. After HCR
receives Royalty Interest Payments equal to the Aggregate Cap, or
we pay the Aggregate Cap to HCR (net of the Royalty Interest
Payments already received by HCR), the Royalty Interest Payments
will revert back to us, and HCR would have no further right to any
Royalty Interest Payments. We received $44.8 million from HCR (net
of certain transaction expenses) under the Royalty Agreement, and
we are eligible to receive up to an additional $15.0 million under
the Royalty Agreement if specified sales milestones are achieved
for vadadustat in the territory covered by the MTPC Agreement,
subject to the satisfaction of certain customary
conditions.
The royalty revenues under the MTPC Agreement may fluctuate
considerably because they depend upon, among other things, the rate
of growth of sales of vadadustat in the territory covered by the
MTPC Agreement. Negative fluctuations in these royalty revenues
could delay, diminish or eliminate our right to receive up to the
additional $15.0 million under the Royalty Agreement upon
achievement of the specified sales milestones, our ability to
receive 85% of the Royalty Interest Payments after the Annual Cap
is achieved in a given calendar year, or our ability to receive
100% of the Royalty Interest Payments after the Aggregate Cap is
achieved.
We rely upon third parties to conduct all aspects of our product
manufacturing, and in many instances only have a single supplier,
and the loss of these manufacturers, their failure to supply us on
a timely basis, or at all, or their failure to successfully carry
out their contractual duties or comply with regulatory
requirements, cGMP requirements, or guidance could cause delays in
or disruptions to our supply chain and substantially harm our
business.
We do not have any manufacturing facilities and do not expect to
independently manufacture any product or product candidates. We
currently rely, and expect to continue to rely, on third party
manufacturers to produce all of our commercial, clinical and
preclinical supply. Our reliance on third party manufacturers, who
have control over the manufacturing process, increases the risk
that we will not have or be able to maintain sufficient quantities
of Auryxia and vadadustat or the ability to obtain such quantities
at an acceptable cost or quality, which could delay, prevent or
impair our and our partners' development or commercialization
efforts.
We currently rely on a single source supplier for each of Auryxia
drug substance and drug product and vadadustat drug substance and
drug product, and alternate sources of supply may not be readily
available. If any of the following occurs, we may not have
sufficient quantities of Auryxia and/or vadadustat to support our
clinical trials, development, commercialization,
or obtaining and maintaining marketing approvals, which could
materially and adversely impact our business and results of
operations:
•we
are unsuccessful in maintaining our current supply arrangements for
commercial quantities of Auryxia and vadadustat;
•we
are unsuccessful in validating new sites;
•our
commercial supply arrangements for Auryxia or vadadustat are
terminated;
•any
of our third party manufacturers are unable to fulfill the terms of
their agreements with us, including with respect to quality and
quantity, or are unable or unwilling to continue to manufacture on
the manufacturing lines included in our regulatory filings;
or
•any
of our third party manufacturers breach our supply agreements, do
not comply with quality or regulatory requirements and guidance,
including cGMP or are subject to regulatory review or ceases their
operations for any reason.
If any of our third party manufacturers cannot or do not perform as
agreed or expected, including as a result of catastrophic events,
including pandemics, including the COVID-19 pandemic, terrorist
attacks, wars or other armed conflicts, geopolitical tensions or
natural disasters, if they misappropriate our proprietary
information, if they terminate their engagements with us, if we
terminate our engagements with them, or if there is a significant
disagreement, we may be forced to manufacture the materials
ourselves, for which we currently do not have the capabilities or
resources, or enter into agreements with other third party
manufacturers, which we may not be able to do in a timely manner or
on favorable or reasonable terms, if at all. For example, one of
our manufacturers has notified us that it will be discontinuing
operations at one site at a future date. In some cases, there may
be a limited number of qualified replacement manufacturers, or the
technical skills or equipment required to manufacture a product or
product candidate may be unique or proprietary to the original
manufacturer and we may have difficulty transferring such skills or
technology to another third party, or a feasible alternative may
not exist. These factors would increase our reliance on our current
manufacturers or require us to obtain necessary regulatory
approvals and licenses in order to have another third party
manufacture Auryxia or vadadustat. If we are required to change
manufacturers for any reason, we will be required to verify that
the new manufacturer maintains facilities and procedures that
comply with quality standards and with all applicable regulations
and guidelines. The delays and costs associated with the
qualification of a new manufacturer and validation of manufacturing
processes would negatively affect our ability to supply clinical
trials, obtain and maintain marketing approval, or commercialize or
satisfy patient demand for Auryxia and vadadustat, where approved,
in a timely manner, within budget, or at all.
In addition, the cost of obtaining Auryxia and vadadustat is
subject to adjustment based on our third party manufacturers’ costs
of obtaining raw materials and producing the product. We have
limited control over the production costs of Auryxia and
vadadustat, including the costs of raw materials, and have seen
increases in the production costs of Auryxia and vadadustat, and
any significant increase in the cost of obtaining our products
could materially adversely affect our revenue for Auryxia and
vadadustat, if approved.
Moreover, issues that may arise in any scale-up and technology
transfer and continued commercial scale manufacture of our products
may lead to significant delays in our development, marketing
approval and commercial timelines and negatively impact our
financial performance. For example, a production-related issue
resulted in an interruption in the supply of Auryxia in the third
and fourth quarters of 2016. This supply interruption negatively
impacted Keryx’s revenues in 2016. This supply interruption was
resolved, and we have taken and continue to take actions designed
to prevent future interruptions in the supply of Auryxia. However,
we recently experienced issues in manufacturing Auryxia, and if we
continue to experience manufacturing issues or our actions to
prevent future interruptions are not successful, we may experience
additional supply issues. In addition, before we can manufacture
product at a new site, we must validate the process at that site.
If the process validation is unsuccessful, or takes longer than we
anticipate, we may have to expend additional resources and could
experience a supply interruption. Any future supply interruptions,
whether quality or quantity based, for Auryxia or vadadustat, if
and where approved, would negatively and materially impact our
reputation and financial condition.
There are a limited number of manufacturers that are capable of
manufacturing Auryxia and vadadustat for us and complying with cGMP
regulations and guidance and other stringent regulatory
requirements and guidance enforced by the FDA, EMA, PMDA and other
regulatory authorities. These requirements include, among other
things, quality control, quality assurance and the maintenance of
records and documentation, which occur in addition to our own
quality assurance releases. The facilities and processes used by
our third party manufacturers to manufacture Auryxia may be
inspected by the FDA and other regulatory authorities at any time,
and the facilities and processes used by our third party
manufacturers to manufacture vadadustat will be inspected by the
FDA, the EMA and other regulatory authorities prior to or after we
submit our marketing applications. Although we have general
visibility into the manufacturing processes of our third party
manufacturers, we do not ultimately control such manufacturing
processes of, and have little control over, our third party
manufacturers, including, without limitation, their compliance with
cGMP requirements and guidance for the manufacture of certain
starting materials, drug substance and finished drug product.
Similarly, although we review final production, we have little
control over the ability of
our third party manufacturers to maintain adequate quality control,
quality assurance and qualified personnel. Our third party
manufacturers may experience problems with their manufacturing and
distribution operations and processes, including, for example,
quality issues, such as product specification and stability
failures, procedural deviations, improper equipment installation or
operation, utility failures, contamination, natural disasters and
public health epidemics. We may also encounter difficulties
relating to our own quality processes and procedures, including
regulatory compliance, lot release, quality control and quality
assurance, as well as shortages of qualified personnel. If our
third party manufacturers cannot successfully manufacture material
that conforms to our specifications and regulatory requirements and
guidance, or if we or our third party manufacturers experience
manufacturing, operations and/or quality issues, including an
inability or unwillingness to continue manufacturing our products
at all, in accordance with agreed-upon processes or on currently
validated manufacturing lines, we may not be able to supply patient
demand or maintain marketing approval for Auryxia, secure and
maintain marketing approval for vadadustat, and we might be
required to expend additional resources to obtain material from
other manufacturers. If any of these events occur, our reputation
and financial condition would be negatively and materially
impacted. In addition, during the year ended December 31, 2022, we
had higher write-downs to inventory reserves related to Auryxia
drug substance that will not be forward processed into drug
product. If we have additional write-downs to inventory reserves in
the future, it could negatively impact our ability to supply
Auryxia, and our financial condition could be harmed.
If the FDA, the EMA or other regulatory authorities do not approve
the facilities being used to manufacture vadadustat, or if they
withdraw any approval of the facilities being used to manufacture
Auryxia or vadadustat, we may need to find alternative
manufacturing facilities, which would significantly impact our
ability to continue commercializing Auryxia or Vafseo in Japan, or
develop, obtain marketing approval for or market vadadustat or our
other product candidates, if approved.
Moreover, our failure or the failure of our third party
manufacturers to comply with applicable regulations or guidance, or
our failure to oversee or facilitate such compliance, could result
in sanctions being imposed on us or our third party manufacturers,
including, where applicable, clinical holds, fines, injunctions,
civil penalties, delays in, suspension of or withdrawal of
approvals, license revocation, seizures or recalls of Auryxia or
Vafseo in Japan, operating restrictions, receipt of a Form 483 or
warning letter, or criminal prosecutions, any of which could
significantly and adversely affect the supply of Auryxia or
vadadustat. For example, we previously conducted three limited,
voluntary recalls of Auryxia. These and any other recalls or any
supply, quality or manufacturing issues in the future and any
related write-downs of inventory or other consequences could result
in significant negative consequences, including reputational harm,
loss of customer confidence, and a negative impact on our
financials, any of which could have a material adverse effect on
our business and results of operations, and may impact our ability
to supply Auryxia, Vafseo in Japan or vadadustat for clinical and
commercial use. Also, if our starting materials, drug substance or
drug product are damaged or lost while in our or our third party
manufacturers’ control, it may adversely impact our ability to
supply Auryxia or vadadustat, and we may incur significant
financial harm.
In addition, Auryxia and vadadustat may compete with other products
and product candidates for access to third party manufacturing
facilities. A third party manufacturer may also encounter delays or
operational issues brought on by sudden internal resource
constraints, labor disputes, shifting priorities or shifting
regulatory protocols including, in each case, relating to the
COVID-19 pandemic. Certain of these third party manufacturing
facilities may be contractually prohibited from manufacturing
Auryxia or vadadustat due to exclusivity provisions in agreements
with our competitors. Any of the foregoing could negatively impact
our third party manufacturers' ability to meet our demand, which
could adversely impact our ability to supply Auryxia or vadadustat,
and we may incur significant financial harm.
Our current
and anticipated future dependence on third parties for the
manufacture of Auryxia and vadadustat may adversely affect our and
our partners' ability to commercialize Auryxia and vadadustat,
where approved, on a timely and competitive basis and may reduce
any future profit margins.
We rely upon third parties to conduct our clinical trials and
certain of our preclinical studies. If they do not successfully
carry out their contractual duties, comply with regulatory
requirements or meet expected deadlines, we may not be able to
obtain or maintain marketing approval for Auryxia, vadadustat or
any of our product candidates, and our business could be
substantially harmed.
We do not have the ability to independently conduct certain
preclinical studies and clinical trials. We are currently relying,
and expect to continue to rely, upon third parties, such as CROs,
clinical data management organizations, medical institutions and
clinical investigators, to conduct our current and future
preclinical studies and clinical trials. The third parties upon
whom we rely may fail to perform effectively, or terminate their
engagement with us, for a number of reasons, including the
following:
•if
they experience staffing difficulties;
•if
we fail to communicate effectively or provide the appropriate level
of oversight;
•if
they undergo changes in priorities or corporate structure including
as a result of a merger or acquisition or other transaction, or
become financially distressed; or
•if
they form relationships with other entities, some of which may be
our competitors.
If the third parties upon whom we rely to conduct our trials fail
to adhere to clinical trial protocols or to regulatory
requirements, the quantity, quality or accuracy of the data
obtained by the third parties may be compromised. We are exposed to
risk of fraud or other misconduct by such third
parties.
Any of these events could cause our preclinical studies and
clinical trials, including post-approval clinical trials, to be
extended, delayed, suspended, required to be repeated or
terminated, or we may receive untitled warning letters or be the
subject of an enforcement action, which could result in our failing
to obtain and maintain marketing approval of vadadustat or any
other product candidates on a timely basis, or at all, or fail to
maintain marketing approval of Auryxia, or any other products, any
of which would adversely affect our business operations. In
addition, if the third parties upon whom we rely fail to perform
effectively or terminate their engagement with us, we may need to
enter into alternative arrangements, which could delay, perhaps
significantly, the development and commercialization of vadadustat,
if approved, or any other product candidates.
Even though we do not directly control the third parties upon whom
we rely to conduct our preclinical studies and clinical trials and
therefore cannot guarantee the satisfactory and timely performance
of their obligations to us, we are nevertheless responsible for
ensuring that each of our clinical trials and preclinical studies
is conducted in accordance with the applicable protocol, legal and
regulatory requirements, including GXP requirements, and scientific
standards, and our reliance on these third parties, including CROs,
will not relieve us of our regulatory responsibilities. If we or
any of our CROs, their subcontractors, or clinical or preclinical
trial sites fail to comply with applicable GXP requirements, the
clinical data generated in our trials may be deemed unreliable or
insufficient, our clinical trials could be put on hold, and/or the
FDA, the EMA or other regulatory authorities may require us to
perform additional clinical trials before approving our marketing
applications. In addition, our clinical and preclinical trials must
be conducted with drug product that meets certain specifications
and is manufactured under applicable cGMP regulations. These
requirements include, among other things, quality control, quality
assurance, and the satisfactory maintenance of records and
documentation.
We also rely
upon
third parties to store and distribute drug product for our clinical
trials. For example, we use third parties to store product at
various sites in the United States to distribute to our clinical
trial sites. Any
performance failure on the part of our storage or distributor
partners could delay clinical development, marketing approval or
commercialization, resulting in additional costs and depriving us
of potential product revenue.
If the licensor of certain intellectual property relating to
Auryxia terminates, modifies or threatens to terminate existing
contracts or relationships with us, our business may be materially
harmed.
We do not own all of the rights to our product, Auryxia. We have
licensed and sublicensed certain rights, patent and otherwise, to
Auryxia from a third party, Panion & BF Biotech, Inc., or
Panion, who in turn licenses certain rights to Auryxia from one of
the inventors of Auryxia. The license agreement with Panion, or the
Panion License Agreement, requires us to meet development
milestones and imposes development and commercialization due
diligence requirements on us. In addition, under the Panion License
Agreement, we must pay royalties based on a mid-single digit
percentage of net sales of product resulting from the licensed
technologies, including Auryxia, and pay the patent filing,
prosecution and maintenance costs related to the license. If we do
not meet our obligations in a timely manner, or if we otherwise
breach the terms of the Panion License Agreement, Panion could
terminate the agreement, and we would lose the rights to Auryxia.
For example, following announcement of the Merger, Panion notified
Keryx in writing that Panion would terminate the Panion License
Agreement on November 21, 2018 if Keryx did not cure the breach
alleged by Panion, specifically, that Keryx failed to use
commercially reasonable best efforts to commercialize Auryxia
outside the United States. Keryx disagreed with Panion’s claims,
and the parties entered discussions to resolve this dispute. On
October 24, 2018, prior to the consummation of the Merger, we,
Keryx and Panion entered into a letter agreement, or the Panion
Letter Agreement, pursuant to which Panion agreed to rescind any
and all prior termination threats or notices relating to the Panion
License Agreement and waived its rights to terminate the license
agreement based on any breach by us of our obligation to use
commercially reasonable efforts to commercialize Auryxia outside
the United States until the parties executed an amendment to the
Panion License Agreement in accordance with the terms of the Panion
Letter Agreement, following consummation of the Merger. On April
17, 2019, we and Panion entered into an amendment and restatement
of the Panion License Agreement, or the Panion Amended License
Agreement, which reflects certain revisions consistent with the
terms of the Panion Letter Agreement. See Note 4 to our
consolidated financial statements in Part II, Item 8. Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data of this Annual Report on Form
10-K for additional information regarding the Panion Amended
License Agreement. Even though we entered into the Panion Amended
License Agreement, there are no assurances that Panion will not
allege other breaches of the Panion Amended License Agreement or
otherwise attempt to terminate the Panion Amended License Agreement
in the future. In addition, if Panion breaches its agreement with
the inventor from whom it licenses rights to Auryxia, Panion could
lose its license, which could impair or delay our ability to
develop and commercialize Auryxia.
From time to time, we may have disagreements with Panion, or Panion
may have disagreements with the inventor from whom it licenses
rights to Auryxia, regarding the terms of the agreements or
ownership of proprietary rights, which could impact
the
commercialization of Auryxia, could require or result in litigation
or arbitration, which would be time-consuming and expensive, could
lead to the termination of the Panion Amended License Agreement, or
force us to negotiate a revised or new license agreement on terms
less favorable than the original. In addition, in the event that
the owners and/or licensors of the rights we license were to enter
into bankruptcy or similar proceedings, we could potentially lose
our rights to Auryxia or our rights could otherwise be adversely
affected, which could prevent us from continuing to commercialize
Auryxia.
Risks Related to our Intellectual Property
If we are unable to adequately protect our intellectual property,
third parties may be able to use our intellectual property, which
could adversely affect our ability to compete in the
market.
Our commercial success will depend in part on our ability, and the
ability of our licensors, to obtain and maintain patent protection
on our drug product and technologies, and to successfully defend
these patents against third party challenges. We seek to protect
our proprietary products and technology by filing patent
applications in the United States and certain foreign
jurisdictions. The process for obtaining patent protection is
expensive and time consuming, and we may not be able to file and
prosecute all necessary or desirable patent applications in a cost
effective or timely manner. In addition, we may fail to identify
patentable subject matter early enough to obtain patent protection.
Further, license agreements with third parties may not allow us to
control the preparation, filing and prosecution of patent
applications, or the maintenance or enforcement of patents. Such
third parties may decide not to enforce such patents or enforce
such patents without our involvement. Thus, these patent
applications and patents may not, under these circumstances, be
prosecuted or enforced in a manner consistent with the best
interests of the company.
Our pending patent applications may not issue as patents and may
not issue in all countries in which we develop, manufacture or
potentially sell our product or in countries where others develop,
manufacture and potentially sell products using our technologies.
Moreover, our pending patent applications, if issued as patents,
may not provide additional protection for our product.
The patent positions of pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies
can be highly uncertain and involve complex legal and factual
questions. No consistent policy regarding the breadth of claims
allowed in pharmaceutical and biotechnology patents has emerged to
date. Changes in the patent laws or the interpretation of the
patent laws in the United States and other jurisdictions may
diminish the value of our patents or narrow the scope of our patent
protection. Accordingly, the patents we own or license may not be
sufficiently broad to prevent others from practicing our
technologies or from developing competing products. Furthermore,
others may independently develop similar or alternative drug
products or technologies or design around our patented drug product
and technologies which may have an adverse effect on our business.
If our competitors prepare and file patent applications in the
United States that claim technology also claimed by us, we may have
to participate in interference or derivation proceedings in front
of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, or USPTO, to determine
priority of invention, which could result in substantial cost, even
if the eventual outcome is favorable to us. Because of the
extensive time required for development, testing and regulatory
review of a potential product, it is possible that any related
patent may expire prior to, or remain in existence for only a short
period following, commercialization, which may significantly
diminish our ability to exclude others from commercializing
products that are similar or identical to ours. The patents we own
or license may be challenged or invalidated or may fail to provide
us with any competitive advantage. Since we have licensed or
sublicensed many patents from third parties, we may not be able to
enforce such licensed patents against third party infringers
without the cooperation of the patent owner and the licensor, which
may not be forthcoming. In addition, we may not be successful or
timely in obtaining any patents for which we submit
applications.
Generally, the first to file a patent application is entitled to
the patent if all other requirements of patentability are met.
However, prior to March 16, 2013, in the United States, the first
to invent was entitled to the patent. Since publications of
discoveries in the scientific literature often lag behind the
actual discoveries, and patent applications in the United States
and other jurisdictions are typically not published until 18 months
after filing, or in some cases not at all, we cannot know with
certainty whether we were the first to make the inventions claimed
in our patents or pending patent applications, or that we were the
first to file for patent protection of such inventions. Moreover,
the laws enacted by the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act of 2011,
which reformed certain patent laws in the United States, introduce
procedures that permit competitors to challenge our patents in the
USPTO after grant, including inter partes review and post grant
review. Similar laws exist outside of the United States. The laws
of the European Patent Convention, for example, provide for
post-grant opposition procedures that permit competitors to
challenge, or oppose, our European patents administratively at the
European Patent Office.
We may become involved in addressing patentability objections based
on third party submission of references, or we may become involved
in defending our patent rights in oppositions, derivation
proceedings, reexamination, inter partes review, post grant review,
interference proceedings or other patent office proceedings or
litigation, in the United States or elsewhere, challenging our
patent rights or the patent rights of others. An adverse result in
any such proceeding or litigation could reduce
the scope of, or invalidate, our patent rights, allow third parties
to commercialize our technology or products and compete directly
with us, without payment to us.
The issuance of a patent is not conclusive as to its inventorship,
scope, validity or enforceability, and our owned and licensed
patents may be challenged on such a basis in the courts or patent
offices in the United States and abroad. As a result of such
challenges, we may lose exclusivity or freedom-to-operate or patent
claims may be narrowed, invalidated or held unenforceable, in whole
or in part, which could limit our ability to prevent third parties
from using or commercializing similar or identical products, or
limit the duration of the patent protection for our
products.
Periodic maintenance fees on any issued patent are due to be paid
to the USPTO and foreign patent agencies in several stages over the
lifetime of the patent. The USPTO and governmental patent agencies
in other jurisdictions also require compliance with a number of
procedural, documentary, fee payment (such as annuities) and other
similar provisions during the patent application process. While an
inadvertent lapse in many cases can be cured by payment of a late
fee or by other means in accordance with the applicable rules,
there are situations in which non-compliance can result in
abandonment or lapse of the patent or patent application, resulting
in partial or complete loss of patent rights in the relevant
jurisdiction. Non-compliance events that could result in
abandonment or lapse of a patent or patent application include, but
are not limited to, failure to respond to official actions within
prescribed time limits, non-payment of fees, and failure to
properly legalize and submit formal documents. In such an event,
our competitors might be able to enter the market
sooner than we expect, which would have a material adverse effect
on our business.
In addition, patents protecting our product candidate might expire
before or shortly after such candidate is commercialized. Thus, our
patent portfolio may not provide sufficient rights to exclude
others from commercializing products similar or identical to
ours.
We also rely on trade secrets and know-how to protect our
intellectual property where we believe patent protection is not
appropriate or obtainable. Trade secrets are difficult to protect.
While we require our employees, licensees, collaborators and
consultants to enter into confidentiality agreements, this may not
be sufficient to adequately protect our trade secrets or other
proprietary information. In addition, in some cases, we share
certain ownership and publication rights to data relating to some
of our products and product candidates with research collaborators,
licensees and other third parties. If we cannot maintain the
confidentiality of this information, our ability to receive patent
protection or protect our trade secrets or other proprietary
information will be at risk.
We may not be able to protect our intellectual property rights
throughout the world.
Filing, prosecuting and defending patents on our products and
product candidates in all countries throughout the world would be
prohibitively expensive. Consequently, the breadth of our
intellectual property rights in some countries outside the United
States may be less extensive than those in the United States. In
addition, the laws of some countries do not protect intellectual
property rights to the same extent as laws in the United States. As
a result, we may not be able to prevent third parties from
practicing our inventions in all countries outside the United
States, or from selling or importing products made using our
inventions in and into the United States or other countries.
Competitors may use our technologies in countries where we have not
obtained patent protection to develop their own products and,
further, may infringe our patents in territories where we have
patent protection, but where enforcement is not as strong as in the
United States. These products may compete with our products and our
patents or other intellectual property rights may not be effective
or sufficient to prevent them from competing.
Many companies have encountered significant problems in protecting
and defending intellectual property rights in certain countries.
The legal systems of certain countries, particularly certain
developing countries, do not favor the enforcement of patents,
trade secrets and other intellectual property, particularly those
relating to pharmaceutical and biotechnology products, which could
make it difficult for us to stop the infringement of our patents or
the marketing of competing products in violation of our proprietary
rights generally. Proceedings to enforce our patent rights in
countries outside of the United States could result in substantial
costs and divert our efforts and attention from other aspects of
our business, could put our patents at risk of being invalidated or
interpreted narrowly and our patent applications at risk of not
issuing, and could provoke third parties to assert claims against
us. We may not prevail in any lawsuits that we initiate, and the
damages or other remedies awarded, if any, may not be commercially
meaningful. Accordingly, our efforts to enforce our intellectual
property rights around the world may be inadequate to obtain a
significant commercial advantage for our products and product
candidates from the intellectual property that we develop or
license.
The intellectual property that we own or have licensed and related
non-patent exclusivity relating to our current and future products
is, and may be, limited, which could adversely affect our ability
to compete in the market and adversely affect the value of
Auryxia.
The patent rights and related non-patent exclusivity that we own or
have licensed relating to Auryxia are limited in ways that may
affect our ability to exclude third parties from competing against
us. For example, a third party may design around our owned or
licensed composition of matter patent claims or market a product
for the methods of use not covered by our owned or licensed
patents.
Obtaining proof of direct infringement by a competitor for a method
of use patent requires us to demonstrate that the competitors make
and market a product for the patented use(s). Alternatively, we can
prove that our competitors induce or contribute to others in
engaging in direct infringement. Proving that a competitor
contributes to or induces infringement of a patented method by
another has additional proof requirements. For example, proving
inducement of infringement requires proof of intent by the
competitor. If we are required to defend ourselves against claims
or to protect our own proprietary rights against others, it could
result in substantial costs to us and the distraction of our
management. An adverse ruling in any litigation or administrative
proceeding could prevent us from marketing and selling Auryxia,
increase the risk that a generic or other similar version of
Auryxia could enter the market to compete with Auryxia, limit our
development and commercialization of Auryxia, or otherwise harm our
competitive position and result in additional significant
costs.
Moreover, physicians may prescribe a competitive identical product
for indications other than the one for which the product has been
approved, or “off-label” indications, that are covered by the
applicable patents. Although such off-label prescriptions may
directly infringe or contribute to or induce infringement of method
of use patents, such infringement is difficult to
prevent.
In addition, any limitations of our patent protection described
above may adversely affect the value of our drug product and may
inhibit our ability to obtain a collaboration partner at terms
acceptable to us, if at all.
In addition to patent rights in the United States, we may seek
non-patent exclusivity for vadadustat and other product candidates
under other provisions of the FDCA such as new chemical entity, or
NCE, exclusivity, or exclusivity for a new use or new formulation,
but there is no guarantee that vadadustat or any other product
candidates will receive such exclusivity. The FDCA provides a
five-year period of non-patent exclusivity within the United States
to the first sponsor to gain approval of an NDA for an NCE. A drug
is an NCE if the FDA has not previously approved any other new drug
containing the same active moiety, which consists of the
molecule(s) or ion(s) responsible for the action of the drug
substance (but not including those portions of the molecule that
cause it to be a salt or ester or which are not bound to the
molecule by covalent or similar bonds). During the exclusivity
period, the FDA may not accept for review an ANDA or a 505(b)(2)
NDA submitted by another company for another version of such drug
where the sponsor does not own or have a legal right of reference
to all the data required for approval.
An ANDA that references an NDA product with NCE exclusivity may be
submitted after four years if it contains a certification of patent
invalidity or non-infringement. The FDCA also provides three years
of exclusivity for an NDA, particularly a 505(b)(2) NDA or
supplement to an existing NDA, if new clinical investigations,
other than bioavailability studies, that were conducted or
sponsored by the sponsor are deemed by the FDA to be essential to
the approval of the application (for example, for new indications,
dosages, or strengths of an existing drug). This three-year
exclusivity covers only the conditions associated with the new
clinical investigations and does not prohibit the FDA from
approving ANDAs for drugs containing the original active agent. The
three-year exclusivity period, unlike five-year exclusivity, does
not prevent the submission of a competing ANDA or 505(b)(2) NDA.
Instead, it only prevents the FDA from granting final approval to
such a product until expiration of the exclusivity period.
Five-year and three-year exclusivity will not delay the submission
(in the case of five-year exclusivity) or the approval (in the case
of three-year exclusivity) of a full NDA submitted under section
505(b)(1) of the FDCA; however, a sponsor submitting a full NDA
would be required to conduct all of its own studies needed to
independently support a finding of safety and effectiveness for the
proposed product, or have a full right of reference to all studies
not conducted by the sponsor.
In cases where NCE exclusivity has been granted to a new drug
product, the 30-month stay triggered by such litigation is extended
by the amount of time such that seven years and six months will
elapse from the date of approval of the NDA for that product.
Without NCE exclusivity, the 30-month stay on FDA final approval of
an ANDA runs from the date on which the sponsor of the reference
listed drug receives notice of a Paragraph IV certification from
the ANDA sponsor.
In addition to NCE, in the United States, the FDA has the authority
to grant additional regulatory exclusivity protection for approved
drugs where the sponsor conducts specified testing in pediatric or
adolescent populations. If granted, this pediatric exclusivity may
provide an additional six months which are added to the term of any
non-patent exclusivity that has been awarded as well as to the
regulatory protection related to the term of a relevant patent, to
the extent these protections have not already expired.
We cannot assure you that Auryxia, vadadustat, if approved, or any
of our potential future products will obtain such pediatric
exclusivity, NCE exclusivity or any other market exclusivity in the
United States, EU or any other territory, or that we will be the
first to receive the respective regulatory approval for such drugs
so as to be eligible for any non-patent exclusivity
protection. We also cannot assure you that Auryxia, vadadustat, if
approved, or any of our potential future products will obtain
patent term extension.
The market entry of one or more generic competitors or any third
party’s attempt to challenge our intellectual property rights will
likely limit Auryxia
sales and have an adverse impact on our business and results of
operation.
Although the composition and use of Auryxia is currently claimed by
15 issued patents that are listed in the FDA’s Orange Book, we
cannot assure you that we will be successful in defending against
third parties attempting to invalidate or design around our patents
or asserting that our patents are invalid or otherwise
unenforceable or not infringed, or in competing against third
parties introducing generic equivalents of Auryxia or any of our
potential future products. If our Orange Book-listed patents are
successfully challenged by a third party and a generic version of
Auryxia is approved and launched sooner than we anticipate, revenue
from Auryxia could decline significantly, which would have a
material adverse effect on our sales, results of operations and
financial condition.
We previously received Paragraph IV certification notice letters
regarding ANDAs submitted to the FDA requesting approval for
generic versions of Auryxia tablets (210 mg ferric iron per
tablet). We filed complaints for patent infringement relating to
such ANDAs, and subsequently entered into settlement and license
agreements with all such ANDA filers that allow such ANDA filers
to
market a generic version of Auryxia in the United States beginning
on March 20, 2025.
It is possible that we may receive Paragraph IV certification
notice letters from additional ANDA filers and may not ultimately
be successful in an ANDA litigation. For example, in February 2023,
we received another Paragraph IV certification notice letter
regarding an ANDA submitted to the FDA. Generic competition for
Auryxia or any of our potential future products could have a
material adverse effect on our sales, results of operations and
financial condition.
Litigation and administrative proceedings, including third party
claims of intellectual property infringement and
opposition/invalidation proceedings against third party patents,
may be costly and time consuming and may delay or harm our drug
discovery, development and commercialization efforts.
We may be forced to initiate litigation to enforce our contractual
and intellectual property rights, or we may be sued by third
parties asserting claims based on contract, tort or intellectual
property infringement. Competitors may infringe our patents or
misappropriate our trade secrets or confidential information. We
may not be able to prevent infringement of our patents or
misappropriation of our trade secrets or confidential information,
particularly in countries where the laws may not protect those
rights as fully as in the United States. In addition, third parties
may have or may obtain patents in the future and claim that our
products or other technologies infringe their patents. If we are
required to defend against suits brought by third parties, or if we
sue third parties to protect our rights, we may be required to pay
substantial litigation costs, and our management’s attention may be
diverted from operating our business. In addition, any legal action
against our licensor, licensees or us that seeks damages or an
injunction of commercial activities relating to Auryxia, vadadustat
or any other product candidates or other technologies, including
those that may be in-licensed or acquired, could subject us to
monetary liability, a temporary or permanent injunction preventing
the development, marketing and sale of such products or such
technologies, and/or require our licensor, licensees or us to
obtain a license to continue to develop, market or sell such
products or other technologies. In addition, in an infringement
proceeding, a court may decide that a patent of ours is not valid
or is unenforceable, or may refuse to stop the other party from
using the technology at issue on the grounds that our patents do
not cover the technology in question. We cannot predict whether our
licensor, licensees or we would prevail in any of these types of
actions or that any required license would be made available on
commercially acceptable terms, if at all.
Our commercial success depends in part on our avoiding infringement
of the patents and proprietary rights of third parties. However,
there may be patents of third parties of which we are currently
unaware with claims to compounds, materials, formulations, methods
of manufacture or methods for treatment related to the use or
manufacture of our product candidates. Also, because patent
applications can take many years to issue, there may be currently
pending patent applications which may later result in issued
patents that our product candidates may infringe. The
pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries are characterized by
extensive litigation over patent and other intellectual property
rights. We have in the past and may in the future become a party
to, or be threatened with, future adversarial litigation or other
proceedings regarding intellectual property rights with respect to
our product and product candidates. As the pharmaceutical and
biotechnology industries expand and more patents are issued, the
risk increases that our drug candidates may give rise to claims of
infringement of the patent rights of others.
While our product candidates are in preclinical studies and
clinical trials, we believe that the use of our product candidates
in these preclinical studies and clinical trials in the United
States falls within the scope of the exemptions provided by 35
U.S.C. Section 271(e), which provides that it shall not be an act
of infringement to make, use, offer to sell, or sell within the
United States or import into the United States a patented invention
solely for uses reasonably related to the development and
submission of information to the FDA. There is an increased
possibility of a patent infringement claim against us with respect
to commercial products. Our portfolio includes one commercial
product, Auryxia. We received the CRL from the FDA regarding our
NDA for vadadustat in March 2022, and, if in the future vadadustat
is approved, vadadustat could be
commercialized. We attempt to ensure that our products and product
candidates and the methods we employ to manufacture them, as well
as the methods for their use which we intend to promote, do not
infringe other parties’ patents and other proprietary rights. There
can be no assurance they do not, however, and competitors or other
parties may assert that we infringe their proprietary rights in any
event.
FibroGen has filed patent applications in the United States and
other countries directed to purportedly new methods of using
previously known heterocyclic carboxamide compounds for purposes of
treating or affecting specified conditions, and some of these
applications have since issued as patents. To the extent any such
patents issue or have been issued, we may initiate opposition or
other legal proceedings with respect to such patents. We discuss
the status of the opposition and/or invalidation proceedings
against certain FibroGen patents in Part I, Item 3. Legal
Proceedings of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Third parties, including FibroGen, may in the future claim that our
product and product candidates and other technologies infringe upon
their patents and may challenge our ability to commercialize
Auryxia and vadadustat, if approved. Parties making claims against
us or our licensees may seek and obtain injunctive or other
equitable relief, which could effectively block our or their
ability to continue to commercialize Auryxia or further develop and
commercialize vadadustat or any other product candidates, including
those that may be in-licensed or acquired. If any third party
patents were held by a court of competent jurisdiction to cover the
manufacturing process of any of our products or product candidates,
any molecules formed during the manufacturing process or any final
product itself, the holders of any such patents may be able to
block our ability to commercialize such product or product
candidate unless we obtained a license under the applicable
patents, or until such patents expire or they are finally
determined to be held invalid or unenforceable. Similarly, if any
third party patent were held by a court of competent jurisdiction
to cover aspects of our formulations, processes for manufacture or
our intended methods of use, the holders of any such patent may be
able to block or impair our ability to develop and commercialize
the applicable product candidate unless we obtained a license or
until such patent expires or is finally determined to be held
invalid or unenforceable. We may also elect to enter into a license
in order to settle litigation or in order to resolve disputes prior
to litigation. Furthermore, even in the absence of litigation, we
may need to obtain licenses from third parties to advance our
research or allow commercialization of our products or product
candidates. Should a license to a third party patent become
necessary, we cannot predict whether we would be able to obtain a
license or, if a license were available, whether it would be
available on commercially reasonable terms. If such a license is
necessary and a license under the applicable patent is unavailable
on commercially reasonable terms, or at all, our ability to
commercialize our product or product candidate may be impaired or
delayed, which could in turn significantly harm our
business.
Further, defense of infringement claims, regardless of their merit,
would involve substantial litigation expense and would be a
substantial diversion of employee resources from our business. In
the event of a successful claim of infringement against us, we may
have to pay substantial damages, including treble damages and
attorneys’ fees for willful infringement, pay royalties or redesign
our products, which may be impossible or require substantial time
and monetary expenditure.
In addition, there may be a challenge or dispute regarding
inventorship or ownership of patents or applications currently
identified as being owned by or licensed to us. Defense of these
claims, regardless of their merit, would involve substantial
litigation expense and would be a substantial diversion of employee
resources from our business. Interference proceedings provoked by
third parties or brought by the USPTO may be necessary to determine
the priority of inventions with respect to our patents or patent
applications.
Various administrative proceedings are also available for
challenging patents, including interference, reexamination, inter
partes review, and post-grant review proceedings before the USPTO
or oppositions and other comparable proceedings in foreign
jurisdictions. Competitors may initiate an administrative
proceeding challenging our issued patents or pending patent
applications, which can be expensive and time-consuming to defend.
An adverse result in any current or future defense proceedings
could put one or more of our patents at risk of being invalidated,
held unenforceable, or interpreted narrowly and held not infringed
and could put our patent applications at risk of not issuing. In
addition, an unfavorable outcome in any current or future
proceeding in which we are challenging third party patents could
require us to cease using the patented technology or to attempt to
license rights to it from the prevailing party. Our business could
be harmed if the prevailing party does not offer us a license on
commercially reasonable terms or at all. Even if we are successful,
participation in interference or other administrative proceedings
before the USPTO or a foreign patent office may result in
substantial costs and distract our management and other
employees.
We are currently involved in opposition and invalidation
proceedings in the European Patent Office, Intellectual Property
High Court of Japan, and the Patents Court of the UK. These
proceedings may be ongoing for a number of years and may involve
substantial expense and diversion of employee resources from our
business. In addition, we may become involved in additional
opposition proceedings or other legal or administrative proceedings
in the future. For more information, see the other risk factors
under “Risks Related to our Intellectual Property”.
Furthermore, because of the substantial amount of discovery
required in connection with intellectual property litigation and
some administrative proceedings, there is a risk that some of our
confidential information could be compromised by disclosure during
discovery. In addition, there could be public announcements of the
results of hearings, motions or other interim proceedings or
developments. If securities analysts or investors perceive these
results to be negative, it could have a substantial adverse effect
on the price of our common stock.
We may be subject to claims that our employees, consultants or
independent contractors have wrongfully used or disclosed
confidential information of third parties.
We have received confidential and proprietary information from
potential collaborators, prospective licensees and other third
parties. In addition, we employ individuals who were previously
employed at other biotechnology or pharmaceutical companies. We may
be subject to claims that we or our employees, consultants or
independent contractors have inadvertently or otherwise used or
disclosed confidential information of these third parties or our
employees’ former employers. We may also be subject to claims that
former employees, collaborators or other third parties have an
ownership interest in our patents or other intellectual property.
We may be subject to ownership disputes in the future arising, for
example, from conflicting obligations of consultants or others who
are involved in developing our product candidates. Litigation may
be necessary to defend against these claims. If we fail in
defending any such claims, in addition to paying monetary damages,
we may lose valuable intellectual property rights, such as
exclusive ownership of, or right to use, valuable intellectual
property. Such an outcome could have a material adverse effect on
our business. Even if we are successful in defending against these
claims, litigation could result in substantial cost and be a
distraction to our management and employees.
Risks Related to our Business and Managing Growth
If we fail to attract, retain and motivate senior management and
qualified personnel, we may be unable to successfully develop,
obtain and/or maintain marketing approval of and commercialize
vadadustat or commercialize Auryxia.
Recruiting and retaining qualified personnel is critical to our
success. We are also highly dependent on our executives, certain
members of our senior management and certain members of our
commercial organization. The loss of the services of our
executives, senior managers or other employees could impede the
achievement of our research, development, regulatory and
commercialization objectives and seriously harm our ability to
successfully implement our business strategy. Specifically,
following receipt of the CRL, in April and May 2022, we implemented
a reduction of our workforce by approximately 42% across all areas
of our company (47% inclusive of the closing of the majority of
open positions), including several members of management. In
November 2022, we also implemented a reduction of our workforce, by
approximately 14% consisting of individuals within our commercial
organization as a result of our decision to shift to a strategic
account management focused model for our commercial efforts. In
addition, uncertainty related to the timing and outcome of
regulatory decisions, could increase attrition. Losing members of
management and other key personnel subjects us to a number of
risks, including the failure to coordinate responsibilities and
tasks, the necessity to create new management systems and
processes, the impact on corporate culture, and the retention of
historical knowledge.
Furthermore, replacing executives, senior managers and other key
employees may be difficult and may take an extended period of time
because of the limited number of individuals in our industry with
the breadth of skills and experience required to successfully
develop, obtain and/or maintain marketing approval of and
commercialize Auryxia, vadadustat and other product candidates. Our
future financial performance and our ability to develop, obtain
and/or maintain marketing approval of and commercialize Auryxia and
vadadustat and to compete effectively will depend, in part, on our
ability to manage any future growth effectively. To that end, we
must be able to hire, train, integrate, and retain additional
qualified personnel with sufficient experience. We may be unable to
hire, train, retain or motivate these personnel on acceptable terms
given the intense competition among numerous biopharmaceutical
companies for similar personnel, particularly in our geographic
region.
We also experience competition for the hiring of personnel from
universities and research institutions. In addition, we rely on
contractors, consultants and advisors, including scientific and
clinical advisors, to assist us in formulating and executing our
research and development and commercialization strategy. Our
contractors, consultants and advisors may become employed by
companies other than ours and may have commitments with other
entities that may limit their availability to us. If additional
members of management or other personnel leave, or we are unable to
continue to attract and retain high quality personnel, our ability
to grow and pursue our business strategy will be
limited.
Our cost savings plan and the associated workforce reductions
implemented in April, May and November 2022 may not result in
anticipated savings, could result in total costs and expenses that
are greater than expected and could disrupt our
business.
Following receipt of the CRL, in April and May 2022, we implemented
a reduction in workforce by approximately 42% across all areas of
our company (47% inclusive of the closing of the majority of open
positions), including several members of
management.
In November 2022, we also implemented a reduction of our workforce,
by approximately 14% consisting of individuals within our
commercial organization.
The reductions in workforce reflect our strategic pillars to drive
Auryxia revenue while also continuing to decrease operating costs.
We may not realize, in full or in part, the anticipated benefits,
savings and improvements in our cost structure from our
restructuring efforts due to unforeseen difficulties, delays or
unexpected costs. We recorded a restructuring charge of
approximately $15.9 million in the aggregate primarily related to
contractual termination benefits including severance, non-cash
stock-based compensation expense, healthcare and related benefits
in the year ended December 31, 2022. If we are unable to realize
the expected operational efficiencies and cost savings from the
restructuring, our operating results and financial condition would
be adversely affected. We also cannot guarantee that we will not
have to undertake additional workforce reductions or restructuring
activities in the future, including as a result of the FDA's
decision related to our appeal of the CRL for vadadustat.
Furthermore, our cost savings plan may be disruptive to our
operations, including our commercialization of Auryxia, which could
affect our ability to generate product revenue.
In addition, our workforce reductions could yield unanticipated
consequences, such as attrition beyond planned staff reductions, or
disruptions in our day-to-day operations. Our workforce reductions
could also harm our ability to attract and retain qualified
management, scientific, clinical, manufacturing and sales and
marketing personnel who are critical to our business. Any failure
to attract or retain qualified personnel could prevent us from
successfully commercializing Auryxia and from successfully
developing and commercializing our product candidates in the
future, including vadadustat, if approved.
If we are ultimately successful in obtaining approval of vadadustat
in the United States, we will need to hire additional employees to
support the commercialization of vadadustat in the United States,
and if we are unsuccessful or delayed in doing so, the potential
launch of vadadustat could be delayed.
We may encounter difficulties in managing our growth, including
with respect to our employee base, and managing our operations
successfully.
In our day-to-day operations, we may encounter difficulties in
managing the size of our operations as well as challenges
associated with managing our business. We have strategic
collaborations for the commercialization of Riona and the
development and commercialization of vadadustat, which is now being
marketed under the trade name VafseoTM
by our collaboration partner, MTPC, in Japan. Additionally, in the
United States, we have a strategic relationship with CSL Vifor
related to the commercialization of vadadustat, if
approved.
As our operations continue, we expect that we will need to manage
our current relationships and enter into new relationships,
especially in light of the termination of our collaboration
agreements with Otsuka, with various strategic collaborators,
consultants, vendors, suppliers and other third parties. These
relationships are complex and create numerous risks as we deal with
issues that arise.
Our future financial performance and our ability to commercialize
Auryxia and vadadustat, if and where approved, and to compete
effectively will depend, in part, on our ability to manage any
future growth effectively. This future growth will impose
significant added responsibilities on the business and members of
management. To manage any future growth, we must continue to
implement and improve our managerial, operational and financial
systems, procedures and processes. We may not be able to implement
these improvements in an efficient or timely manner and may
discover deficiencies in existing systems, procedures and
processes. Moreover, the systems, procedures and processes
currently in place or to be implemented may not be adequate for any
such growth. Any expansion of our operations may lead to
significant costs and may divert our management and business
development resources. Any inability to manage growth could delay
the execution of our business plans or disrupt our operations. We
may not be able to accomplish these tasks, and our failure to
accomplish any of them could prevent us from successfully managing
and, as applicable, growing our company.
In addition, we may need to further adjust the size of our
workforce as a result of changes to our expectations for our
business, which can result in management being required to divert a
disproportionate amount of its attention away from our day-to-day
activities and devote a substantial amount of time to managing
these growth-related activities and related expenses. Further, we
rely on independent third parties to provide certain services to
us. We structure our relationships with these outside service
providers in a manner that we believe results in an independent
contractor relationship, not an employee relationship. If any of
our service providers are later legally deemed to be employees, we
could be subject to employment and tax withholding liabilities and
other additional costs as well as other multiple damages and
attorneys’ fees.
If we fail to develop or maintain proper and effective internal
control over financial reporting, our ability to produce accurate
and timely financial statements could be impaired, investors may
lose confidence in us and the trading price of our common stock may
decline.
Effective internal control over financial reporting is necessary
for us to provide reliable financial reports and effectively
prevent fraud and operate successfully as a public company. Any
failure to maintain internal control over financial reporting could
severely inhibit our ability to accurately report our financial
condition, results of operations or cash flows. If our internal
control over financial reporting is not effective, investors may
lose confidence in the accuracy and completeness of our financial
reports, the market price of our common stock could decline, and we
could be subject to sanctions or investigations by Nasdaq, the SEC
or other regulatory authorities. Failure to remedy any material
weakness in our internal control over financial reporting could
also restrict our future access to the capital
markets.
A material weakness in internal control over financial reporting
has in the past and could in the future lead to deficiencies in the
preparation of financial statements. Deficiencies in the
preparation of financial statements, could lead to litigation
claims against us. The defense of any such claims may cause the
diversion of management’s attention and resources, and we may be
required to pay damages if any such claims or proceedings are not
resolved in our favor. Any litigation, even if resolved in our
favor, could cause us to incur significant legal and other
expenses. Such events could also affect our ability to raise
capital to fund future business initiatives.
Security breaches and unauthorized use of our information
technology systems and information, or the information technology
systems or information in the possession of our collaborators and
other third parties, could damage the integrity of our clinical
trials, impact our regulatory filings, compromise our ability to
protect our intellectual property, and subject us to regulatory
actions that could result in significant fines or other
penalties.
We, our collaborators, contractors and other third parties rely
significantly upon information technology, and any failure,
inadequacy, interruption or security lapse of that technology,
including any cybersecurity incidents, could harm our ability to
operate our business effectively. In addition, we and our
collaborators, contractors and other third parties rely on
information technology networks and systems, including the
Internet, to process, transmit and store clinical trial data,
patient information, and other electronic information, and manage
or support a variety of business processes, including operational
and financial transactions and records, personal identifying
information, payroll data and workforce scheduling information. We
purchase most of our information technology from vendors, on whom
our systems depend. We rely on commercially available systems,
software, tools and monitoring to provide security for the
processing, transmission and storage of company and customer
information.
In the ordinary course of our business, we and our third party
contractors maintain personal and other sensitive data on our and
their respective networks, including our intellectual property and
proprietary or confidential business information relating to our
business and that of our clinical trial patients and business
partners. In particular, we rely on CROs and other third parties to
store and manage information from our clinical trials. We also rely
on third parties to manage patient information for Auryxia. The
secure maintenance of this sensitive information is critical to our
business and reputation.
Companies and other entities and individuals have been increasingly
subject to a wide variety of security incidents, cyber-attacks and
other attempts to gain unauthorized access to systems and
information. These threats can come from a variety of sources,
ranging in sophistication from individual hackers to
state-sponsored attacks. Cyber threats may be broadly targeted, or
they may be custom-crafted against our information systems or those
of our vendors or third party service providers. A security breach,
cyberattack or unauthorized access of our clinical data or other
data could damage the integrity of our clinical trials, impact our
regulatory filings, cause significant risk to our business,
compromise our ability to protect our intellectual property, and
subject us to regulatory actions, including under the GDPR and CCPA
discussed elsewhere in these risk factors and the privacy or
security rules under federal, state, or other local laws outside of
the United States protecting confidential or personal information,
that could be expensive to defend and could result in significant
fines or other penalties. Cyberattacks can include malware,
computer viruses, hacking or other unauthorized access or other
significant compromise of our computer, communications and related
systems. Although we take steps to manage and avoid these risks and
to be prepared to respond to attacks, our preventive and any
remedial actions may not be successful and no such measures can
eliminate the possibility of the systems’ improper functioning or
the improper access or disclosure of confidential or personally
identifiable information such as in the event of cyberattacks.
Security breaches, whether through physical or electronic
break-ins, computer viruses, ransomware, impersonation of
authorized users, attacks by hackers or other means, can create
system disruptions or shutdowns or the unauthorized disclosure of
confidential information.
Although we believe our collaborators, vendors and service
providers, such as our CROs, take steps to manage and avoid
information security risks and respond to attacks, we may be
adversely affected by attacks against our collaborators, vendors or
service providers, and we may not have adequate contractual
remedies against such collaborators, vendors and service providers
to remedy any harm to our business caused by such event.
Additionally, outside parties may attempt to fraudulently induce
employees, collaborators, or other contractors to disclose
sensitive information or take other actions, including making
fraudulent payments or downloading malware, by using “spoofing” and
“phishing” emails or other types of attacks. Our employees may be
targeted by such fraudulent activities. Outside parties may also
subject us to distributed denial of services attacks or introduce
viruses or other malware through “trojan horse” programs to our
users’ computers in order to gain access to our systems and the
data stored therein. Cyber-attacks have become more prevalent and
much harder to detect and defend against and, because the
techniques used to obtain unauthorized access, disable or degrade
service, or sabotage systems change frequently and continuously
become more sophisticated, often are not recognized until launched
against a target and may be difficult to detect for a long time, we
may be unable to anticipate these techniques or to implement
adequate preventive or detective measures, and we might not
immediately detect such incidents and the damage caused by such
incidents.
Such attacks, whether successful or unsuccessful, or other
compromises with respect to our information security and the
measures we implement to prevent, detect and respond to them,
could:
•result
in our incurring significant costs related to, for example,
rebuilding internal systems, defending against litigation,
responding to regulatory inquiries or actions, paying damages or
fines, or taking other remedial steps with respect to third
parties;
•lead
to public exposure of personal information of participants in our
clinical trials, Auryxia patients and others;
•damage
the integrity of our studies or delay their completion, disrupt our
development programs, our business operations and commercialization
efforts;
•compromise
our ability to protect our trade secrets and proprietary
information;
•damage
our reputation and deter business partners from working with us;
or
•divert
the attention of our management and key information technology
resources.
Any failure to maintain proper functionality and security of our
internal computer and information systems could result in a loss
of, or damage to, our data or marketing applications or
inappropriate disclosure of confidential or proprietary
information, interrupt our operations, damage our reputation,
subject us to liability claims or regulatory penalties, under a
variety of federal, state or other applicable privacy laws, such as
HIPAA, the GDPR, or state data protection laws including the CCPA,
harm our competitive position and delay the further development and
commercialization of our products and product candidates, or impact
our relationships with customers and patients.
Our employees, independent contractors, principal investigators,
CROs, CMOs, consultants and vendors may engage in misconduct or
other improper activities, including non-compliance with regulatory
standards and requirements and insider trading. In addition,
laws
and regulations governing any international operations we have or
may have in the future may require us to develop and implement
costly compliance programs.
We are exposed to the risk that our employees, independent
contractors, principal investigators, CROs, CMOs, consultants and
vendors may engage in fraudulent conduct or other illegal activity.
Misconduct by these parties could include intentional, reckless
and/or negligent conduct or unauthorized activities that violate
applicable laws, including the following:
•FDA
and other healthcare authorities’ regulations, including those laws
that require the reporting of true, complete and accurate
information to regulatory authorities, and those prohibiting the
promotion of unapproved drugs or approved drugs for an unapproved
use;
•quality
standards, including GXP;
•federal
and state healthcare fraud and abuse laws and regulations and their
non-U.S. equivalents;
•anti-bribery
and anti-corruption laws, such as the FCPA and the UK Bribery Act
or country-specific anti-bribery or anti-corruption laws, as well
as various import and export laws and regulations;
•laws
that require the reporting of true and accurate financial
information and data; and
•U.S.
state and federal securities laws and regulations and their
non-U.S. equivalents, including those related to insider
trading.
We are seeking regulatory approval for vadadustat with the EMA and
countries in the ACCESS Consortium, and we conducted our global
clinical trials for vadadustat, and may in the future conduct
additional trials, in countries where corruption is prevalent, and
violations of any of these laws by our personnel or by any of our
vendors or agents, such as our CROs or CMOs, could have a material
adverse impact on our clinical trials and our business and could
result in criminal or civil fines and sanctions. We are subject to
complex laws that govern our international business practices.
These laws include the FCPA, which prohibits U.S. companies and
their intermediaries, such as CROs or CMOs, from making improper
payments to foreign government officials for the purpose of
obtaining or keeping business or obtaining any kind of advantage
for the company. The FCPA also requires companies to keep accurate
books and records and maintain adequate accounting controls. A
number of past and recent FCPA investigations by the Department of
Justice and the SEC have focused on the life sciences
sector.
Compliance with the FCPA is expensive and difficult, particularly
in countries in which corruption is a recognized problem. Some of
the countries in which we have conducted clinical trials and in
which we have CMOs have a history of corruption, which increases
our risks of FCPA violations. In addition, the FCPA presents unique
challenges in the pharmaceutical industry because in many
countries’ hospitals are operated by the government, and doctors
and other hospital employees are considered foreign government
officials. Certain payments made by pharmaceutical companies, or on
their behalf by CROs, to hospitals in connection with clinical
trials and other work have been deemed to be improper payments to
government officials and have led to FCPA enforcement
actions.
Additionally, the UK Bribery Act applies to our global activities
and prohibits bribery of private individuals as well as public
officials. The UK Bribery Act prohibits both the offering and
accepting of a bribe and imposes strict liability on companies for
failing to prevent bribery, unless the company can show that it had
“adequate procedures” in place to prevent bribery. There are also
local anti-bribery and anti-corruption laws in countries where we
have conducted clinical trials, and many of these also carry the
risk of significant financial or criminal penalties.
We are also subject to trade control regulations and trade sanction
laws that restrict the movement of certain goods, currency,
products, materials, services and technology to, and certain
operations in, various countries or with certain persons. Our
ability to transfer commercial and clinical product and other
clinical trial supplies, and for our employees, independent
contractors, principal investigators, CROs, CMOs, consultants and
vendors ability to travel, between certain countries is subject to
maintaining required licenses and complying with these laws and
regulations.
Employee misconduct could also involve the improper use of
information obtained in the course of clinical trials, which could
result in regulatory sanctions and serious harm to our reputation.
This could include violations of HIPAA, other U.S. federal and
state laws, and requirements of non-U.S. jurisdictions, including
the GDPR. We are also exposed to risks in connection with any
insider trading violations by employees or others affiliated with
us.
The internal controls, policies and procedures, and training and
compliance programs we have implemented to deter prohibited
practices may not be effective in preventing our employees,
contractors, consultants, agents or other representatives from
violating or circumventing such internal policies or violating
applicable laws and regulations. The failure to comply with laws
governing international business practices may impact any future
clinical trials, result in substantial civil or criminal penalties
for us and any such individuals, including imprisonment, suspension
or debarment from government contracting, withdrawal of our
products, if approved, from the market, or being delisted from The
Nasdaq Capital Market. In addition, we may incur significant costs
in implementing sufficient systems, controls and processes to
ensure compliance with the aforementioned laws. The laws and
regulations referenced above may restrict or prohibit a wide range
of pricing, discounting, marketing and promotion, sales commission,
customer incentive programs and other business arrangements that
could adversely affect our business.
Additionally, it is not always possible to identify and deter
misconduct by employees and third parties, and the precautions we
take to detect and prevent this activity may not be effective in
controlling known or unknown risks or preventing losses or in
protecting us from governmental investigations or other actions or
lawsuits stemming from a failure to be in compliance with such laws
or regulations. If any such actions are instituted against us, and
we are not successful in defending ourselves or asserting our
rights, or if any such action is instituted against our employees,
consultants, independent contractors, CROs, CMOs, vendors or
principal investigators, those actions could have a significant
impact on our business, including the imposition of civil, criminal
and administrative penalties, damages, monetary fines, possible
exclusion from participation in Medicare, Medicaid and other
federal healthcare programs, contractual damages, reputational
harm, diminished profits and future earnings, curtailment of our
operations, disclosure of our confidential information and
imprisonment, any of which could adversely
affect our ability to operate our business and our results of
operations.
Our financial statements include goodwill and an intangible asset
as a result of the Merger. The intangible asset has become impaired
and could become further impaired in the future under certain
conditions. In addition, goodwill could become impaired in the
future under certain conditions. Any potential future impairment of
goodwill or intangible assets may significantly impact our results
of operations and financial condition.
As of December 31, 2022, we had approximately $127.1 million in the
aggregate of goodwill and a definite lived intangible asset from
the Merger. In accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, or GAAP, we are required annually, or more frequently
upon certain indicators of impairment, to review our estimates and
assumptions underlying the fair value of our goodwill and our
definite lived intangible assets when indicators of impairment are
present. Events giving rise to impairment of goodwill or intangible
assets are an inherent risk in the pharmaceutical industry and
often cannot be predicted.
Conditions that could indicate impairment and necessitate such a
review include, but are not limited to, Auryxia’s commercial
performance, our inability to execute on our strategic initiatives,
the deterioration of our market capitalization such that it is
significantly below our net book value, a significant adverse
change in legal factors, unexpected adverse business conditions,
and an adverse action or assessment by a regulator. To the extent
we conclude that goodwill and/or definite lived intangible assets
have become impaired, we may be required to incur material
write-offs relating to such impairment and any such write-offs
could have a material impact on our future operating results and
financial position. For example, in the second quarter of 2020, in
connection with a routine business review, we reduced our
short-term and long-term Auryxia revenue forecast. This reduction
was primarily driven by the impact of the September 2018 CMS
decision that Auryxia would no longer be covered by Medicare for
the treatment of the IDA Indication. While this decision does not
impact CMS coverage for the use of Auryxia for the control of serum
phosphorus levels in adult patients with CKD on dialysis, or the
Hyperphosphatemia Indication, it requires
all Auryxia prescriptions for Medicare patients to undergo a prior
authorization to ensure their use of Auryxia for the
Hyperphosphatemia Indication. As a result, we recorded an
impairment charge of $115.5 million during the three months ended
June 30, 2020, which was entirely allocated to our only intangible
asset, the developed product rights for Auryxia, and made a
corresponding adjustment to the estimated useful life of the
developed product rights for Auryxia, which we again adjusted
during the three months ended December 31, 2020. The estimates,
judgments and assumptions used in our impairment testing, and the
results of our testing, are discussed in Note 9 to our consolidated
financial statements in Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and
Supplementary Data of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. If these
estimates, judgments and assumptions change in the future,
including if the Auryxia asset group does not meet its current
forecasted projections, additional impairment charges related to
goodwill or our intangible asset could be recorded in the future
and additional corresponding adjustments may need to be made to the
estimated useful life of the developed product rights for Auryxia,
which could materially impact our financial position, certain of
our material agreements, and our future operating
results.
If product liability lawsuits are brought against us, we may incur
substantial liabilities and may be required to limit
commercialization of Auryxia or vadadustat, if
approved.
We face an inherent risk of product liability as a result of the
clinical and commercial use of Auryxia and vadadustat. For example,
we may be sued if Auryxia or vadadustat allegedly causes injury or
is found to be otherwise unsuitable during clinical trials,
manufacturing, marketing or sale. Any such product liability claims
may include allegations of defects in manufacturing, defects in
design, a failure to warn of dangers inherent in the product or
product candidate, negligence, strict liability and breach of
warranties. Claims could also be asserted under state consumer
protection acts. If we cannot successfully defend ourselves against
product liability claims, we may incur substantial liabilities or
be required to limit commercialization of Auryxia or vadadustat, if
approved. Even a successful defense would require significant
financial and management resources. Regardless of the merits or
eventual outcome, product liability claims may result
in:
•decreased
demand for Auryxia or vadadustat, if approved;
•injury
to our reputation and significant negative media
attention;
•withdrawal
of clinical trial participants;
•delay
or termination of clinical trials;
•our
inability to continue to develop Auryxia or
vadadustat;
•significant
costs to defend the related litigation;
•a
diversion of management’s time and our resources;
•substantial
monetary awards to study subjects or patients;
•product
recalls or withdrawals, or labeling, marketing or promotional
restrictions;
•decreased
demand for Auryxia or vadadustat, if approved;
•loss
of revenue;
•the
inability to commercialize Auryxia or vadadustat, if approved;
and
•a
decline in our stock price.
Failure to obtain and retain sufficient product liability insurance
at an acceptable cost to protect against potential product
liability claims could prevent or inhibit the commercialization of
products we develop. We currently carry product liability insurance
that we believe is appropriate for our company. Although we
maintain product liability insurance, any claim that may be brought
against us could result in a court judgment or settlement in an
amount that is not covered, in whole or in part, by our insurance
or that is in excess of the limits of our insurance coverage. Our
insurance policies also have various exclusions, and we may be
subject to a product liability claim for which we have insufficient
or no coverage. If we have to pay any amounts awarded by a court or
negotiated in a settlement that exceed our coverage limitations or
that are not covered by our insurance, we may not have, or be able
to obtain, sufficient capital to pay such amounts. In addition,
insurance coverage is becoming increasingly expensive, and we may
not be able to maintain insurance coverage at a reasonable cost. We
also may not be able to obtain additional insurance coverage that
will be adequate to cover additional product liability risks that
may arise. Consequently, a product liability claim may result in
losses that could be material to our business.
We will continue to incur increased costs as a result of operating
as a public company, and our management will be required to devote
substantial time to compliance initiatives and corporate governance
practices.
As a public company, we
operate in a demanding regulatory environment, and
we have and will continue to incur significant legal, accounting
and other expenses. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer
Protection Act, the listing requirements of The Nasdaq Capital
Market and other applicable securities rules and regulations impose
various requirements on public companies, including establishment
and maintenance of effective disclosure and financial controls and
certain corporate governance practices.
In particular, our compliance with Section 404 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act has required and will continue to require that
we incur substantial accounting-related expenses and
expend significant management efforts. Our testing, or the testing
by our independent registered public accounting firm, may reveal
deficiencies in our internal controls that we would be required to
remediate in a timely manner. If we are not able to comply with the
requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, we could be subject to
sanctions or investigations by the SEC, the Nasdaq
Capital
Market or other regulatory authorities, which would require
additional financial and management resources and could adversely
affect the market price of our securities. Furthermore, if we
cannot provide reliable financial reports or prevent fraud,
including as a result of remote working by our employees, our
business and results of operations would likely be materially and
adversely affected.
We cannot predict or estimate the amount of additional costs we may
incur to continue to operate as a public company, nor can we
predict the timing of such costs. These rules and regulations are
often subject to varying interpretations, in many cases due to
their lack of specificity and, as a result, their application in
practice may evolve over time as new guidance is provided by
regulatory and governing bodies, which could result in continuing
uncertainty regarding compliance matters and higher costs
necessitated by ongoing revisions to disclosure and governance
practices.
Claims for indemnification by our directors and officers may reduce
our available funds to satisfy successful third-party claims
against us and may reduce the amount of money available to
us.
Our Ninth Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as
amended, or Charter, and our Amended and Restated By-Laws, or
Bylaws, as
amended to date, contain provisions that eliminate, to the maximum
extent permitted by the General Corporation Law of the State of
Delaware, or DGCL, the personal liability of our directors and
executive officers for monetary damages for breach of their
fiduciary duties as a director or officer. Our Charter and our
Bylaws also provide that we will indemnify our directors and
executive officers and may indemnify our employees and other agents
to the fullest extent permitted by the DGCL.
In addition, as permitted by Section 145 of the DGCL our Bylaws and
our indemnification agreements that we have entered into with our
directors and executive officers provide that:
•We
will indemnify our directors and officers, as defined in our
Bylaws, for serving us in those capacities or for serving other
related business enterprises at our request, to the fullest extent
permitted by Delaware law. Delaware law provides that a corporation
may indemnify such person if such person acted in good faith and in
a manner such person reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to
the best interests of Akebia and, with respect to any criminal
proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe such person’s
conduct was unlawful.
•We
may, in our discretion, indemnify employees and agents in those
circumstances where indemnification is permitted by applicable
law.
•We
are required to advance expenses, as incurred, to our directors and
officers in connection with defending a proceeding, except that
such directors or officers shall undertake to repay such advances
if it is ultimately determined that such person is not entitled to
indemnification.
•The
rights conferred in our Bylaws are not exclusive, and we are
authorized to enter into indemnification agreements with our
directors, officers, employees and agents and to obtain insurance
to indemnify such persons.
Any claims for indemnification made by our directors or officers
could impact our cash resources and our ability to fund the
business.
Our ability to use net operating losses to offset future taxable
income may be subject to certain limitations.
Under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code, or Section 382, a
corporation that undergoes an “ownership change” is subject to
limitations on its ability to utilize its pre-change net operating
losses, or NOLs, to offset future taxable income. On December 12,
2018, we completed the Merger, which we believe has resulted in an
ownership change under Section 382. In addition, the Tax Cuts and
Jobs Act, including amendments made by the CARES Act, includes
changes to U.S. federal tax rates and the rules governing net
operating loss carryforwards that may significantly impact our
ability to utilize our net operating losses to fully offset taxable
income in the future. Future changes in our stock ownership, many
of which are outside of our control, could result in an additional
ownership change under Section 382. As a result, if we generate
taxable income, our ability to use our pre-change NOL carryforwards
to offset federal taxable income may be subject to limitations,
which could potentially result in increased future tax liability to
us. At the state level, state net operating losses generated in one
state cannot be used to offset income generated in another state
and there may be periods during which the use of NOL carryforwards
is suspended or otherwise limited, which could accelerate or
permanently increase state taxes owed.
Furthermore, our ability to utilize our NOLs is conditioned upon
our attaining profitability and generating U.S. taxable income. As
described above under “—Risks Related to our Financial Position,
Need for Additional Capital and Growth Strategy,” we have incurred
significant net losses since our inception and anticipate that we
will continue to incur significant losses for the foreseeable
future; thus, we do not know whether or when we will generate the
U.S. taxable income necessary to utilize our NOLs.
Our Charter designates the Court of Chancery of the State of
Delaware as the sole and exclusive forum for certain types of
actions and proceedings that may be initiated by our stockholders,
which could limit our stockholders’ ability to obtain a favorable
judicial forum for disputes with us or our directors, officers or
employees.
Our Charter provides that, subject to limited exceptions, the Court
of Chancery of the State of Delaware will be the sole and exclusive
forum for (i) any derivative action or proceeding brought on our
behalf, (ii) any action asserting a claim of breach of a fiduciary
duty owed by any of our directors, officers or other employees to
us or our stockholders, (iii) any action asserting a claim against
us arising pursuant to any provision of the DGCL our Charter or our
Bylaws, or (iv) any other action asserting a claim against us, our
directors, officers or other employees that is governed by the
internal affairs doctrine. Under our Charter, this exclusive forum
provision will not apply to claims that are vested in the exclusive
jurisdiction of a court or forum other than the Court of Chancery
of the State of Delaware, or for which the Court of Chancery of the
State of Delaware does not have subject matter jurisdiction. For
instance, the provision would not apply to actions arising under
federal securities laws, including suits brought to enforce any
liability or duty created by the Exchange Act, or the rules and
regulations thereunder. Any person or entity purchasing or
otherwise acquiring any interest in shares of our capital stock
shall be deemed to have notice of and to have consented to the
provisions of our Charter described above. This choice of forum
provision may limit a stockholder’s ability to bring a claim in a
judicial forum that it finds favorable for disputes with us or our
directors, officers or other employees, which may discourage such
lawsuits against us and our directors, officers and employees.
Alternatively, if a court were to find these provisions of our
Charter inapplicable to, or unenforceable with respect to, one or
more of the specified types of actions or proceedings, we may incur
additional costs associated with resolving such matters in other
jurisdictions, which could adversely affect our business and
financial condition.
We are currently subject to legal proceedings that could result in
substantial costs and divert management's attention, and we could
be subject to additional legal proceedings.
We are currently subject to legal proceedings, including those
described in Part I, Item 3. Legal Proceedings in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K, and additional claims may arise in the future.
In addition, securities class action and derivative lawsuits and
other legal proceedings are often brought against companies for any
of the risks described in this Annual Report on Form 10-K following
a decline in the market price of their securities. For example, we
were party to a putative class action lawsuit in state court filed
by purported Keryx stockholders challenging the disclosures made in
connection with the Merger, including those that relate to
vadadustat’s safety, approvability and commercial viability. Oral
argument was held on October 7, 2022, and the Court dismissed the
complaint without prejudice on October 17, 2022, giving plaintiffs
thirty days to amend their complaint. On November 16, 2022,
plaintiffs filed an amended consolidated complaint, asserting the
same claims and seeking the same relief as the consolidated
complaint. On January 18, 2023, defendants moved to dismiss the
amended consolidated complaint in its entirety. Briefing on
defendants’ motion to dismiss is scheduled to be completed by April
5, 2023. In connection with any litigation or other legal
proceedings, we could incur substantial costs, and such costs and
any related settlements or judgments may not be covered by
insurance. Monetary damages or any other adverse judgment would
have a material adverse effect on our business and financial
position. In addition, if other resolution or actions taken as a
result of legal proceedings were to restrain our ability to operate
or market our products and services, our consolidated financial
position, results of operations or cash flows could be materially
adversely affected. We could also suffer an adverse impact on our
reputation, negative publicity and a diversion of management’s
attention and resources, which could have a material adverse effect
on our business.
Risks Related to our Common Stock
Our stock price has been and may continue to be volatile, which
could result in substantial losses for holders or future purchasers
of our common stock and lawsuits against us and our officers and
directors.
Our stock price has been and will likely continue to be volatile.
The stock market in general and the market for similarly situated
biopharmaceutical companies specifically have experienced extreme
volatility that has often been unrelated to the operating
performance of particular companies. Since our initial public
offering in March 2014, the price of our common stock as reported
on The Nasdaq Stock Market has ranged from a low of $0.24 on
October 24, 2022 to a high of $31.00 on June 20, 2014. The daily
closing market price for our common stock varied between a high
price of $2.93 on March 9, 2022 and a low price of $0.25 on
November 17, 2022 in the twelve-month period ending on December 31,
2022. During that time, the price of our common stock ranged from
an intra-day low of $0.24 per share to an intra-day high of $2.93
per share.
The market price of shares of our common stock could be subject to
wide fluctuations in response to many risk factors listed in this
section,
including, among others, developments related to and results of our
research or clinical trials, developments related to our regulatory
submissions and meetings with regulatory authorities, in particular
as it relates to vadadustat, commercialization of Auryxia,
vadadustat, if and as approved in the U.S. and foreign markets
including Europe, and any other product candidates, announcements
by us or our competitors of significant transactions or strategic
collaborations, negative publicity around Auryxia or vadadustat,
regulatory or legal developments in the United States and other
countries, developments or disputes concerning our intellectual
property, the recruitment or departure of key personnel including
as a result of our recent reduction in workforce, actual or
anticipated changes in estimates as to financial results, changes
in the structure of healthcare payment systems, market conditions
in the biopharmaceutical sector and other factors beyond our
control. As a result of this volatility, our stockholders may not
be able to sell their common stock at or above the price at which
they purchased it.
In addition, companies that have experienced volatility in the
market price of their stock have frequently been the subject of
securities class action and shareholder derivative litigation. See
Part I, Item 3. Legal Proceedings of this Annual Report on Form
10-K for information concerning securities class action initiated
against Keryx and certain current and former directors and officers
of ours and Keryx’s. In addition, we could be the target of other
such litigation in the future. Class action and shareholder
derivative lawsuits, whether successful or not, could result in
substantial costs, damage or settlement awards and a diversion of
our management’s resources and attention from running our business,
which could materially harm our reputation, financial condition and
results of operations.
The issuance of additional shares of our common stock or the sale
of shares of our common stock by any of our directors, officers or
significant stockholders will dilute our stockholders’ ownership
interest in Akebia and may cause the market price of our common
stock to decline.
Most of our outstanding common stock can be traded without
restriction at any time. As such, sales of a substantial number of
shares of our common stock in the public market could occur at any
time. These sales, or the perception in the market that the holders
of a large number of shares intend to sell such shares, could
reduce the market price of our common stock.
As of December 31, 2022 and based on the amounts reported in the
most recent filings made under Section 13(d) and 13(g) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act,
Satter Management Co., L.P., or Satter, beneficially owned
approximately 8.2% of our outstanding shares of common stock, the
Vanguard Group, or Vanguard, beneficially owned approximately 6.1%
of our outstanding shares of common stock, and CSL Vifor
beneficially owned approximately 4.1% of our outstanding shares of
common stock. By selling a large number of shares of common stock,
Satter or Vanguard could cause the price of our common stock to
decline. The shares beneficially owned by CSL Vifor have not been
registered pursuant to the Securities Act and were issued and sold
in reliance upon the exemption from registration contained in
Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act and Rule 506 promulgated
thereunder, but if they are registered in the future, those shares
would become freely tradable and, if a large portion of such shares
are sold, could cause the price of our common stock to
decline.
We have a significant number of shares that are subject to
outstanding options and restricted stock units, and in the future
we may issue additional options, restricted stock units, or other
derivative securities convertible into our common stock. The
exercise or vesting of any such options, restricted stock units, or
other derivative securities, and the subsequent sale of the
underlying common stock, could cause a further decline in our stock
price. These sales also might make it difficult for us to sell
equity securities in the future at a time and at a price that we
deem appropriate. Such sales of our common stock could result in
higher than average trading volume and may cause the market price
for our common stock to decline.
In addition, we currently have on file with the SEC a shelf
registration statement, which allows us to offer and sell up to
$300 million in registered securities, such as common stock,
preferred stock, debt securities, warrants and units, from time to
time pursuant to one or more offerings at prices and terms to be
determined at the time of sale, including a sales agreement
prospectus that covers the offering, issuance and sale by us of up
to a maximum aggregate offering price of up to $26 million of our
common stock that may be issued and sold from time to time under a
sales agreement with Jefferies LLC.
Sales of substantial amounts of shares of our common stock or other
securities by our employees or our other stockholders or by us
under
our shelf registration statement, pursuant to at-the-market
offerings or otherwise, could dilute our stockholders, lower the
market price of our common stock and impair our ability to raise
capital through the sale of equity securities.
Our executive officers, directors and principal stockholders
maintain the ability to significantly influence all matters
submitted to stockholders for approval.
As of December 31, 2022, our executive officers, directors and
principal stockholders, in the aggregate, beneficially owned shares
representing a significant percentage of our capital stock. As a
result, if these stockholders were to choose to act together, they
would be able to significantly influence all matters submitted to
our stockholders for approval, as well as our management and
affairs. For example, these persons could significantly influence
the election of directors and approval of any merger,
consolidation or sale of all or substantially all of our assets.
This concentration of voting power could delay or prevent an
acquisition of our company on terms that other stockholders may
desire.
Provisions in our organizational documents and Delaware law may
have anti-takeover effects that could discourage an acquisition of
us by others, even if an acquisition would be beneficial to our
stockholders, and may prevent attempts by our stockholders to
replace or remove our current management.
Provisions in our Charter and our Bylaws contain provisions that
may have the effect of discouraging, delaying or preventing a
change in control of us or changes in our management. These
provisions could also limit the price that investors might be
willing to pay in the future for shares of our common stock,
thereby depressing the market price of our common stock. In
addition, because our Board of Directors is responsible for
appointing certain members of our management team, these provisions
may frustrate or prevent any attempts by our stockholders to
replace or remove our current management by making it more
difficult for stockholders to replace members of our Board of
Directors. Among other things, these provisions:
•authorize
“blank check” preferred stock, which could be issued by our Board
of Directors without stockholder approval and may contain voting,
liquidation, dividend and other rights superior to our common
stock;
•create
a classified Board of Directors whose members serve staggered
three-year terms;
•specify
that special meetings of our stockholders can be called only by our
Board of Directors pursuant to a resolution adopted by a majority
of the total number of directors;
•prohibit
stockholder action by written consent;
•establish
an advance notice procedure for stockholder approvals to be brought
before an annual meeting of our stockholders, including proposed
nominations of persons for election to our Board of
Directors;
•provide
that our directors may be removed only for cause;
•provide
that vacancies on our Board of Directors may be filled only by a
majority of directors then in office, even though less than a
quorum;
•require
a supermajority vote of 75% of the holders of our capital stock
entitled to vote or the majority vote of our Board of Directors to
amend our Bylaws; and
•require
a supermajority vote of 85% of the holders of our capital stock
entitled to vote to amend the classification of our Board of
Directors and to amend certain other provisions of our
Charter.
These provisions, alone or together, could delay or prevent hostile
takeovers, changes in control or changes in our
management.
In addition, Section 203 of the DGCL prohibits a publicly-held
Delaware corporation from engaging in a business combination with
an interested stockholder, generally a person which together with
its affiliates owns, or within the last three years has owned, 15%
of our voting stock, for a period of three years after the date of
the transaction in which the person became an interested
stockholder, unless the business combination is approved in a
prescribed manner.
Because we do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our
capital in the foreseeable future, capital appreciation, if any,
will be our stockholders’ sole source of gain.
We have never declared or paid cash dividends on our capital stock
and we currently intend to retain all of our future earnings, if
any, to finance the development and growth of our business. Any
payment of cash dividends in the future would be at the discretion
of our Board of Directors and would depend on, among other things,
our earnings, financial condition, capital requirements, level of
indebtedness, statutory and contractual restrictions applying to
the payment of dividends and other considerations that the Board of
Directors deems relevant. In addition, the terms of the Loan
Agreement preclude us from paying cash dividends and future debt
agreements may preclude us from paying cash dividends. As a result,
capital appreciation, if any, of our common stock will be our
stockholders’ sole source of gain for the foreseeable
future.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
None.
Item 2. Properties
Our corporate headquarters are located in Cambridge, Massachusetts.
We currently lease approximately 65,167 square feet of office and
lab space in Cambridge, Massachusetts, and 27,300 square feet of
office space in Boston, Massachusetts. Excluding
renewal options, the lease for our Cambridge, Massachusetts office
space expires on September 11, 2026 and the lease for the
Cambridge, Massachusetts lab space expires on January 31, 2025. In
February 2022 we extended the term of the lease for our Boston,
Massachusetts office space, such that the lease expires on July 31,
2031. In September 2019, we entered into an agreement to sublease
the Boston office space to Foundation Medicine, Inc., which expired
on February 28, 2023. We believe that our existing facilities are
adequate to meet our current needs, and that suitable additional
alternative spaces will be available in the future on commercially
reasonable terms for our future growth.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
Legal Proceedings Relating to Vadadustat
Opposition Proceedings Against Akebia
In September 2018, Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories Limited filed an
opposition to our issued Indian Patent No. 287720 in the Indian
Patent Office.
On July 26, 2022, Sandoz AG filed an opposition against our issued
European Patent No. 3277270 in the European Patent
Office.
On February 13, 2023, FibroGen, Inc., or FibroGen, filed an
opposition against our issued European Patent No. 3357911 in the
European Patent Office.
Proceedings Filed by Akebia Against FibroGen, Inc.
Europe
We filed an opposition in the European Patent Office, or the EPO,
against FibroGen’s European Patent No. 1463823, or the ’823 EP
Patent on December 5, 2013, and an oral proceeding took place March
8 and 9, 2016. Following the oral proceeding, the Opposition
Division of EPO ruled that the patent as granted did not meet the
requirements for patentability under the European Patent Convention
and, therefore, revoked the patent in its entirety. FibroGen
appealed that decision. On February 27, 2023, FibroGen withdrew its
appeal, and the patent remains revoked.
On May 13, 2015, May 20, 2015 and July 6, 2015, we filed
oppositions to FibroGen’s European Patent Nos. 2322155, or the ’155
EP Patent, 1633333, or the ’333 EP Patent, and 2322153, or the ’153
EP Patent in the EPO, respectively, requesting the patents be
revoked in their entirety. These method of use patents do not
prevent persons from using the compound for other uses, including
any previously known use of the compound. In particular, these
patents do not claim methods of using any of our product candidates
for purposes of inhibiting HIF-PH for the treatment of anemia due
to chronic kidney disease, or CKD. While we do not believe these
patents will prevent us from commercializing vadadustat for the
treatment of anemia due to CKD, we filed these oppositions to
provide us with maximum flexibility for developing vadadustat and
our pipeline of investigational oral hypoxia-inducible factor
prolyl hydroxylase, or HIF-PH, inhibitor compounds.
With regard to the opposition that we filed in Europe against the
’333 EP Patent, an oral proceeding took place on December 8 and 9,
2016. Following the oral proceeding, the Opposition Division of the
EPO ruled that the patent as granted did not meet the requirements
for patentability under the European Patent Convention and,
therefore, revoked the patent in its entirety. On December 9, 2016,
FibroGen filed a notice to appeal the decision to revoke the ’333
EP Patent. The Board of Appeal held an oral proceeding on this
appeal on February 24 and 25, 2022, during which proceeding the
'333 EP Patent was maintained in restricted form. The ‘333 EP
patent was originally granted with four independent claims, one of
which was found obvious on appeal. The remaining claims are
directed to: treatment of anemia of chronic disease in subjects
having a percent transferrin saturation of less than 20% (claim 1),
treatment of anemia that is refractory to treatment with
exogenously administered erythropoietin (claim 6), and treatment of
iron deficiency (claim 15).
In oral proceedings held on May 29, 2017, regarding the ’155 EP
Patent, the European Opposition Division ruled that the ’155 EP
Patent as granted did not meet the requirements for patentability
under the European Patent Convention and, therefore,
revoked the patent in its entirety. FibroGen filed a notice to
appeal the decision to revoke the ’155 EP Patent on May 29, 2017.
An oral proceeding for the appeal was held on February 22, 2022,
during which proceeding the Board of Appeal maintained the
revocation of the ‘155 EP Patent in its entirety.
In related oral proceedings held on May 31, 2017 and June 1, 2017
for the ’153 EP Patent, the Opposition Division of the EPO
maintained the patent after FibroGen significantly narrowed the
claims to an indication for which vadadustat is not intended to be
developed. We and Glaxo separately filed notices to appeal the
decision to maintain the ’153 EP Patent on November 9, 2017. Bayer
filed a notice to appeal the decision on November 14, 2017. Glaxo
withdrew its appeal on March 2, 2020 and Bayer withdrew its appeal
on June 30, 2021. An oral proceeding for the appeal was held on
February 21, 2022, during which proceeding the Board of Appeal
revoked the ‘153 patent in its entirety.
On April 3, 2019, we filed oppositions to FibroGen’s European
Patent Nos. 2289531, or the ’531 EP Patent, and 2298301, or the
’301 EP Patent in the EPO, respectively, requesting the patents be
revoked in their entirety. Oral proceedings for oppositions to the
two patents were held on September 7-8 and 10, 2021. Following oral
proceedings, the Opposition Division of the EPO maintained certain
claims in amended form in the two patents. On January 26, 2022, we
filed notice to appeal the Opposition Division’s decision for ’531
EP Patent. On July 8, 2022, FibroGen filed notice to appeal the
Opposition Division’s decision for the ’301 EP Patent, which it
withdrew on August 17