UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ
|
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010
or
|
|
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF HE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the transition period from
to
Commission File Number: 001-13735
MIDWEST BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
36-3252484
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
|
|
|
|
501 W. North Ave.
Melrose Park, Illinois
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
60160
(Zip code)
|
(708) 865-1053
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
N/A
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes
þ
No
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
o
No
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer
o
|
|
Accelerated filer
o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer
þ
|
|
Smaller reporting company
o
|
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). Yes
o
No
þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as
of the latest practicable date.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Class
|
|
|
Outstanding at May 12, 2010
|
|
|
Common, par value $0.01
|
|
|
|
38,176,225
|
|
|
|
MIDWEST BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
Form 10-Q
Table of Contents
PART I
Item 1. Financial Statements
MIDWEST BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Unaudited)
(In thousands, except for share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks
|
|
$
|
24,040
|
|
|
$
|
27,644
|
|
Federal funds sold and other short-term investments
|
|
|
356,345
|
|
|
|
414,466
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
380,385
|
|
|
|
442,110
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities available-for-sale (securities pledged to creditors:
$487,446 at March 31, 2010 and $481,241 at December 31, 2009)
|
|
|
567,619
|
|
|
|
581,474
|
|
Federal Reserve Bank and Federal Home Loan Bank stock, at cost
|
|
|
27,652
|
|
|
|
27,652
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
2,184,440
|
|
|
|
2,320,319
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
(142,284
|
)
|
|
|
(128,800
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loans
|
|
|
2,042,156
|
|
|
|
2,191,519
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premises and equipment, net
|
|
|
38,962
|
|
|
|
39,769
|
|
Foreclosed properties
|
|
|
26,715
|
|
|
|
26,917
|
|
Core deposit intangibles, net
|
|
|
11,836
|
|
|
|
12,391
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
43,862
|
|
|
|
64,862
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
43,276
|
|
|
|
48,851
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
3,182,463
|
|
|
$
|
3,435,545
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS (DEFICIT) EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing
|
|
$
|
347,483
|
|
|
$
|
349,796
|
|
Interest-bearing
|
|
|
2,072,709
|
|
|
|
2,220,315
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits
|
|
|
2,420,192
|
|
|
|
2,570,111
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving note payable
|
|
|
8,600
|
|
|
|
8,600
|
|
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
|
|
|
297,650
|
|
|
|
297,650
|
|
Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank
|
|
|
340,000
|
|
|
|
340,000
|
|
Junior subordinated debentures
|
|
|
60,828
|
|
|
|
60,828
|
|
Subordinated debt
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
Term note payable
|
|
|
55,000
|
|
|
|
55,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total borrowings
|
|
|
777,078
|
|
|
|
777,078
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
34,678
|
|
|
|
31,880
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
3,231,948
|
|
|
|
3,379,069
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (see note 10)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders (Deficit) Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 1,000,000 shares authorized;
Series A, $2,500 liquidation preference, 3,101 and 17,250 shares
issued and outstanding at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009,
respectively, Series G, $1,000 liquidation preference, 89,388
shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2010, Series T, $1,000
liquidation preference, 84,784 shares issued and outstanding at
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 64,000,000 shares authorized;
39,885,303 shares issued and 38,176,225 outstanding at March 31,
2010 and 29,847,921 shares issued and 28,121,279 outstanding at
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
401
|
|
|
|
301
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
315,672
|
|
|
|
385,616
|
|
Warrant
|
|
|
295
|
|
|
|
5,229
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(347,257
|
)
|
|
|
(311,620
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(3,844
|
)
|
|
|
(8,298
|
)
|
Treasury stock, at cost (1,709,078 and 1,726,642 shares at March
31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively)
|
|
|
(14,753
|
)
|
|
|
(14,753
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders (deficit) equity
|
|
|
(49,485
|
)
|
|
|
56,476
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders (deficit) equity
|
|
$
|
3,182,463
|
|
|
$
|
3,435,545
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.
1
MIDWEST BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited)
For the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Interest Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
$
|
27,928
|
|
|
$
|
34,549
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable
|
|
|
2,361
|
|
|
|
6,940
|
|
Exempt from federal income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
550
|
|
Dividend income from Federal Reserve Bank and Federal
Home Loan Bank stock
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
190
|
|
Federal funds sold and other short-term investments
|
|
|
228
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income
|
|
|
30,677
|
|
|
|
42,266
|
|
Interest Expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
8,604
|
|
|
|
13,685
|
|
Federal funds purchased and FRB discount window advances
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
Revolving note payable
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
|
|
|
3,193
|
|
|
|
3,205
|
|
Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank
|
|
|
2,999
|
|
|
|
3,029
|
|
Junior subordinated debentures
|
|
|
423
|
|
|
|
739
|
|
Subordinated debt
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
152
|
|
Term note payable
|
|
|
657
|
|
|
|
282
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense
|
|
|
16,172
|
|
|
|
21,164
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
14,505
|
|
|
|
21,102
|
|
Provision for credit losses
|
|
|
77,050
|
|
|
|
13,253
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income after provision for credit losses
|
|
|
(62,545
|
)
|
|
|
7,849
|
|
Noninterest Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service charges on deposit accounts
|
|
|
1,639
|
|
|
|
1,894
|
|
Insurance and brokerage commissions
|
|
|
233
|
|
|
|
320
|
|
Trust fees
|
|
|
295
|
|
|
|
282
|
|
Increase in cash surrender value of life insurance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
842
|
|
Other
|
|
|
323
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest income
|
|
|
2,490
|
|
|
|
3,343
|
|
Noninterest Expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and employee benefits
|
|
|
8,888
|
|
|
|
11,083
|
|
Occupancy and equipment
|
|
|
2,901
|
|
|
|
3,245
|
|
Professional services
|
|
|
3,333
|
|
|
|
2,102
|
|
Goodwill impairment
|
|
|
21,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketing
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
688
|
|
Foreclosed properties
|
|
|
788
|
|
|
|
345
|
|
Amortization of core deposit intangible
|
|
|
555
|
|
|
|
573
|
|
FDIC insurance
|
|
|
3,200
|
|
|
|
1,175
|
|
Other
|
|
|
3,212
|
|
|
|
2,297
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest expense
|
|
|
43,992
|
|
|
|
21,508
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes
|
|
|
(104,047
|
)
|
|
|
(10,316
|
)
|
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes
|
|
|
3,834
|
|
|
|
(4,996
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Loss
|
|
|
(107,881
|
)
|
|
|
(5,320
|
)
|
Preferred stock dividends and premium accretion
|
|
|
4,320
|
|
|
|
2,123
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss available to common stockholders
|
|
$
|
(112,201
|
)
|
|
$
|
(7,443
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic loss per share
|
|
$
|
(3.16
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.27
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted loss per share
|
|
$
|
(3.16
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.27
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends declared per common share
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.
2
MIDWEST BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS (DEFICIT) EQUITY (Unaudited)
For the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Preferred
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
Paid in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Treasury
|
|
|
Stockholders
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Warrant
|
|
|
Deficit
|
|
|
Loss
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
(Deficit) Equity
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
296
|
|
|
$
|
383,491
|
|
|
$
|
5,229
|
|
|
$
|
(66,325
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,122
|
)
|
|
$
|
(14,736
|
)
|
|
$
|
305,834
|
|
Cash dividends declared ($48.4375
per share) on Series A preferred
stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(836
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(836
|
)
|
Cash dividends declared ($9.72
per share) on Series T preferred
stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(824
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(824
|
)
|
Issuance of 128,970 shares
restricted stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accreted discount on Series T
preferred stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
228
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(228
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
379
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
379
|
|
Repurchase of 10,695 shares of
common stock under benefit plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
Comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,320
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,320
|
)
|
Prior service cost, net of
income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
Net increase in fair value of
securities classified as
available- for-sale, net of income
taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,839
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,839
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,466
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, March 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
297
|
|
|
$
|
384,097
|
|
|
$
|
5,229
|
|
|
$
|
(73,533
|
)
|
|
$
|
(268
|
)
|
|
$
|
(14,753
|
)
|
|
$
|
301,070
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
301
|
|
|
$
|
385,616
|
|
|
$
|
5,229
|
|
|
$
|
(311,620
|
)
|
|
$
|
(8,298
|
)
|
|
$
|
(14,753
|
)
|
|
$
|
56,476
|
|
Exchange of 14,149 shares of
Series A preferred stock for
10,029,946 shares of common stock,
net of issuance costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
(2,429
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,329
|
)
|
Exchange of 84,784 shares of
Series T preferred stock for 89,388
shares of Series G preferred stock,
net of issuance costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(67,834
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67,492
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(342
|
)
|
Amendment of warrant to purchase
4,282,020 shares of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,934
|
)
|
|
|
4,934
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of 25,000 shares of
restricted stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accreted discount on Series T
preferred stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(182
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
137
|
|
Comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(107,881
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(107,881
|
)
|
Prior service cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
Net increase in fair value of
securities classified as
available-for-sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,430
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,430
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(103,427
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, March 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
401
|
|
|
$
|
315,672
|
|
|
$
|
295
|
|
|
$
|
(347,257
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,844
|
)
|
|
$
|
(14,753
|
)
|
|
$
|
(49,485
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.
3
MIDWEST BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)
For the three Months Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(107,881
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,320
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
1,074
|
|
|
|
1,023
|
|
Provision for credit losses
|
|
|
77,050
|
|
|
|
13,253
|
|
Amortization of core deposit and other intangibles
|
|
|
417
|
|
|
|
356
|
|
Goodwill impairment charge
|
|
|
21,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of premiums and discounts on securities, net
|
|
|
323
|
|
|
|
211
|
|
Increase in cash surrender value of life insurance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(842
|
)
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
4,310
|
|
|
|
(9,427
|
)
|
(Gain) loss on disposition of foreclosed properties, net
|
|
|
(170
|
)
|
|
|
196
|
|
Impairment loss on foreclosed properties
|
|
|
356
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of deferred stock based compensation
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
379
|
|
Change in other assets
|
|
|
1,263
|
|
|
|
3,696
|
|
Change in other liabilities
|
|
|
2,105
|
|
|
|
529
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
4,054
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturities of securities available-for-sale
|
|
|
260,000
|
|
|
|
47,000
|
|
Principal payments on securities available-for-sale
|
|
|
16,258
|
|
|
|
17,000
|
|
Principal payments on securities held-to-maturity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,154
|
|
Purchases of securities available-for-sale
|
|
|
(258,295
|
)
|
|
|
(125,084
|
)
|
Loan originations and principal collections, net
|
|
|
68,269
|
|
|
|
(92,505
|
)
|
Proceeds from disposition of foreclosed properties
|
|
|
4,835
|
|
|
|
244
|
|
Additions to property and equipment
|
|
|
(266
|
)
|
|
|
(1,237
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
90,801
|
|
|
|
(153,428
|
)
|
Cash flows from financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in deposits
|
|
|
(149,839
|
)
|
|
|
131,264
|
|
Capitalized issuance costs of Series A exchange
|
|
|
(2,329
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Capitalized issuance costs of Series T exchange
|
|
|
(342
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of borrowings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(40,000
|
)
|
Preferred stock cash dividends paid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,660
|
)
|
Change in federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,000
|
|
Repurchase of common shares under stock and incentive option plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
|
|
|
(152,510
|
)
|
|
|
144,587
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(61,725
|
)
|
|
|
(4,787
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
|
|
442,110
|
|
|
|
63,065
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
|
$
|
380,385
|
|
|
$
|
58,278
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during period for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
$
|
15,281
|
|
|
$
|
23,169
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
582
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.
4
MIDWEST BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 1 REGULATORY ACTIONS
As of March 31, 2010, the most recent Federal Reserve Bank notification categorized the Bank
as critically undercapitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action.
Effective on March 30, 2010, as a result of its significantly undercapitalized status, Midwest
Banc Holdings, Inc.s (the Company) wholly owned subsidiary, Midwest Bank and Trust Company (the
Bank) consented to the issuance of a Prompt Corrective Action Directive (PCA) by the Board of
Governors of the Federal Reserve System. The PCA provides that the Bank, in conjunction with the
Company, must within 45 days of March 30, 2010, i.e., by May 13, 2010 (the PCA Deadline), either:
(i) increase the Banks capital so that it becomes adequately capitalized; (ii) enter into and
close on an agreement to sell the Bank subject to regulatory approval and customary closing
conditions; or (iii) take other necessary measures to make the Bank adequately capitalized. The Company does not expect that it will be able to satisfy the capital requirement set
forth in the PCA by the PCA Deadline. If the Company is unable to satisfy such requirement by the
PCA Deadline, the Company believes it is likely its bank regulators would place the Bank into Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporations (FDIC) receivership.
The PCA
also prohibits the Bank from making any capital distributions, including dividends and from
soliciting and accepting new deposits bearing an interest rate that exceeds the prevailing
effective rates on deposits of comparable amounts and maturities in the Banks market area. On
April 30, 2010, the Bank submitted to the Federal Reserve Bank a plan and timetable for conforming
the rates of interest paid on existing non-time deposit accounts to these levels as required under
the PCA.
The PCA also subjects the Bank to other operating restrictions, including payment of bonuses
to senior executive officers and increasing their compensation, restrictions on asset growth and
branching, and ensuring that all transactions between the Bank and any affiliates comply with
Section 23A of the Federal Reserve Act. The Bank was already in compliance with certain of these
guidelines as the Bank was significantly undercapitalized for regulatory purposes at the time of
the PCA. For example, the Bank has been complying with the FDIC rules relating to the payment of
interest on deposits. The Company and the Bank continue to be subject to the written agreement, as
described below.
Prior to the receipt of the PCA, as a result of a safety and soundness examination of the Bank
by the Federal Reserve Bank and the Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation,
Division of Banking (the Illinois Division of Banking), the Company and the Bank entered into a
written agreement (the Written Agreement) with the Federal Reserve Bank and the Illinois Division
of Banking on December 18, 2009, intended to strengthen the Bank and improve the Companys overall
financial condition. As disclosed in previous documents filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, the Company had anticipated entering into a formal supervisory action following the
completion of the examination and had already taken many of the steps referenced in the Written
Agreement.
The Written Agreement establishes timeframes for the completion of measures which have been
previously identified by the Company and the regulators as important to improve the Companys
financial performance. Under the Written Agreement, the Company was required to prepare and file
with the regulators, within specified timeframes, various specific plans designed to improve (i)
board oversight over the management and operations of the Bank, (ii) credit risk management
practices, (iii) management of problem loans, (iv) the allowance for loan losses, (v) the Banks
earnings and budget, (vi) liquidity and funds management and (vii) interest rate risk management.
The Written Agreement requires, among other things, that the Company and the Bank obtain prior
approval in order to pay dividends. In addition, the Company must obtain prior approval of the
Federal Reserve Bank to (i) take any other form of payment from the Bank representing a reduction
in capital of the Bank; (ii) make any distributions of interest, principal or other sums on
subordinated debentures or trust preferred securities; (iii) incur, increase or guarantee any debt;
or (iv) purchase or redeem any shares of the Companys stock. Pursuant to the terms of the Written
Agreement, the Company and the Bank were also required, within 60 days of the date of the Written
Agreement, to submit an acceptable written plan to the regulators to maintain sufficient capital at
the Company, on a consolidated basis, and at the Bank on a standalone basis. The Company submitted
its written plan in February 2010.
5
MIDWEST BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The Company and the Bank were notified on March 25, 2010, by the Federal Reserve Bank, that
the Banks capital plan was not accepted. According to the Federal Reserve Bank, the plan was not
accepted because, among other things, the Company had not yet raised $125 million of new equity,
which is a condition to the Companys ability to convert to common stock, the new series of fixed
rate cumulative mandatorily convertible preferred stock (Series G), that the Company issued to
the U.S. Department of the Treasury (the U.S. Treasury) in March 2010 in exchange for all of the
Companys outstanding Series T fixed rate cumulative perpetual preferred stock (Series T) and
cumulative dividends not declared or paid, previously held by the U.S. Treasury.
The Company does not expect that it will be able to satisfy the capital-related requirements
set forth in the Written Agreement and the PCA by the PCA Deadline. The Company believes that the
successful completion of all or a significant portion of its capital plan, which includes executing
transactions that seek to improve the Companys and the Banks capital position, increase its
common equity and Tier 1 capital and raise additional capital (Capital Plan), would help the Bank
and the Company to meet the requirements of the Written Agreement and the PCA. The Company has
completed a number of significant steps as part of the Capital Plan. The steps completed in 2009
and the beginning of 2010 include the exchange of 82% of the Companys outstanding shares of Series
A noncumulative redeemable convertible perpetual preferred stock for common stock, the exchange of
all of the Companys outstanding Series T preferred stock for the Series G preferred stock, cost
reduction initiatives, and refined cumulative credit loss projections. The Company believes that an
equity raise of approximately $250 million together with an agreement by its primary lender to
convert the amount outstanding under its credit agreements to equity capital is now required for
the Company and Bank to become and remain well capitalized and continue to operate as a going
concern. The Company has not received any commitment for a new capital investment, and presently
does not expect to raise sufficient capital prior to the PCA Deadline. If the Company does not
promptly raise a sufficient amount of new equity capital, or, alternatively, execute another
strategic initiative, the Company may become subject to a voluntary or involuntary bankruptcy
filing and the Company believes it is likely that the Bank would be placed into receivership by bank regulators.
NOTE 2 REGULATORY CAPITAL
As noted above, the Bank was categorized as critically undercapitalized under the regulatory
framework for prompt corrective action as of March 31, 2010. In addition to the restrictions
already placed on the Bank under the PCA, the Bank is no longer able to engage in the following
activities without prior approval:
|
|
|
enter into an material transactions outside the usual course of business;
|
|
|
|
|
extend any credit for highly leveraged transactions;
|
|
|
|
|
amend its charter or by-laws;
|
|
|
|
|
make any material changes in its accounting methods;
|
|
|
|
|
engage in any covered transactions as defined in Section 23A(b) of the Federal Reserve
Act;
|
|
|
|
|
pay excessive compensation or bonuses; or
|
|
|
|
|
pay interest on new or renewed liabilities at a rate that would increase the Banks weighted
average cost of funds to a level significantly exceeding the prevailing rates of interest on
insured deposits in the Banks normal market area.
|
6
MIDWEST BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The Bank is no longer able to accept or renew brokered deposits or secure deposits at rates
that are higher than the prevailing effective rates on insured deposits of comparable amounts or
maturities in the Banks normal market area or 75 basis points higher than the national rates
published weekly by the FDIC, pay dividends or make other capital distributions, obtain funds
through Federal funds lines, or obtain advances from the Federal Reserve Bank.
In addition, the agreements with one of the Banks repurchase agreement counterparties could
permit that counterparty to terminate the repurchase agreements as a result of the Bank being
categorized as less than well capitalized. At March 31, 2010, the Banks repurchase agreements with
those provisions totaled $262.7 million with fixed interest rates ranging from 2.76% to 4.65%,
maturities ranging from approximately seven to eight years, and quarterly call provisions (at the
counterpartys option). Due to the relatively high fixed rates on these borrowings as compared to
currently low market rates of interest, the Bank would incur substantial costs to unwind these
repurchase agreements if terminated prior to their maturities. These associated unwind costs could
have a material adverse effect on the Companys results of operations and financial condition in
the period of payment. The associated unwind costs would be the difference between the fair value
and carrying value of the repurchase agreements on the date of termination. Because the repurchase
agreements are collateralized at an amount sufficient to cover any such unwind costs which may be
incurred, any such costs would result in a charge in the statement of operations but would not
expect to have an adverse effect on the Banks liquidity. See Note 4 Basis of Presentation,
Going Concern
of the notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.
NOTE 3 FORBEARANCE AGREEMENT
The Companys credit agreements with a correspondent bank at March 31, 2010 included a
revolving line of credit, term note, and subordinated debt. At September 30, 2009, the Company was
in violation of the financial, regulatory capital, and nonperforming loan covenants contained in
the revolving line of credit and term note. The Company also did not make a required principal
payment on the term note due on July 1, 2009 and did not pay all of the aggregate outstanding
principal on the revolving line of credit that matured July 3, 2009. On July 8, 2009, the lender
advised the Company that the non-compliance and failure to make the principal payments constitute
events of default. See Note 16 Credit Agreements of the notes to the unaudited consolidated
financial statements.
On October 22, 2009, the Company entered into a forbearance agreement (Forbearance
Agreement) with its lender that provided for a forbearance period that expired on March 31, 2010.
During the forbearance period, the Company was not obligated to make interest and principal
payments in excess of funds held in a deposit security account (which was initially funded with
$325,000), and while retaining all rights and remedies under the credit agreements, the lender
agreed not to demand payment of amounts due or begin foreclosure proceedings in respect of the
collateral, which consists of all the stock of the Companys principal subsidiary, the Bank, and
agreed to forbear from exercising the rights and remedies available to it in respect of existing
defaults and future compliance with certain covenants through March 31, 2010. As part of the
Forbearance Agreement, the Company entered into a tax refund security agreement under which it
agreed to deliver to the lender the expected proceeds to be received in connection with an
outstanding Federal income tax refund in the approximate amount of $2.1 million. No proceeds from
this tax refund have been received as of March 31, 2010. Although, the Forbearance Agreement
terminated on March 31, 2010, management continues in its efforts on restructuring the Companys
outstanding credit agreements with its primary lender. The lender has not waived or committed to
waive any default or event of default.
Upon the expiration of the forbearance period, the principal and interest payments that were
due under the revolving line of credit and the term note became due and payable, along with such
other amounts as may have become due during the forbearance period. The Company is not able to meet
any demands for payment of amounts due. If the Company is unable to renegotiate, renew, replace or
expand its sources of financing on acceptable terms, it will have a material adverse effect on the
Companys business and results of operations. See Note 4 Basis of Presentation,
Going Concern
of
the notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.
7
MIDWEST BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 4 BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The consolidated financial statements of the Company included herein are unaudited; however,
such statements reflect all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) which
are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation for the interim periods. The
financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form
10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X.
The annualized results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2010 are not
necessarily indicative of the results expected for the full year ending December 31, 2010. Certain
items in the prior year financial statements were reclassified to conform to the current years
presentation. Such reclassifications had no effect on net loss.
Going Concern:
The consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared
assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. The Company incurred net losses of
$107.9 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and $242.7 million for the year ended
December 31, 2009. The losses are primarily due to provisions for credit losses, goodwill
impairment charges, and tax charges related to a valuation allowance on deferred tax assets. Due to
the resulting deterioration in capital levels of the Company and the Bank, combined with (i) the
uncertainty as to the Companys ability to raise sufficient amounts of new equity capital, (ii)
recent regulatory actions with respect to the Company and the Bank, and (iii) the Companys
inability to repay amounts owed under its loan agreements with its primary lender if the primary
lender were to declare the amounts outstanding thereunder immediately due and payable, (as
discussed in Notes 1, 2, and 3 of the notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements),
there is substantial doubt about the Companys ability to continue as a going concern. The
consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome
of this uncertainty.
Managements plans in regard to these matters are described in detail in Note 1 Regulatory
Actions of the notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements. The Company continues to
pursue transactions that could improve the Companys and the Banks capital ratios, restructure its
obligations under the Companys loan agreements with its primary lender (as described in Note 3
Forbearance Agreement and Note 16 Credit Agreements of the notes to the unaudited consolidated
financial statements) and raise additional equity capital to permit the Bank and the Company to
meet and maintain minimum regulatory capital levels as required under the Written Agreement and
PCA, and provide the necessary liquidity to provide for future operating needs. If the Company does
not promptly raise a sufficient amount of new equity capital, or alternatively, execute another
strategic initiative, the Company may become subject to a voluntary or involuntary bankruptcy
filing and the Company believes it is likely that the Bank would be placed into receivership by bank regulators.
NOTE 5 NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In January 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued an Accounting
Standards Update (ASU) to authoritative guidance on improving disclosures about fair value
measurements (ASU 2010-6). This guidance requires new disclosures for transfers in and out of
Levels 1 and 2 and the reasons for the transfers as well as an additional breakout of asset and
liability categories. This guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning
after December 15, 2009. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material effect on the Companys
consolidated results of operations or consolidated financial
position. This guidance also requires purchases, sales, issuances and settlements to
be reported separately in the summary of changes in Level 3 fair value measurements. This
additional guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2010, and for interim periods within those fiscal years.
In February 2010, the FASB amended its Accounting Standards Codification
tm
(ASC) that establish principles and requirements for subsequent events (ASC 855) to
clarify that an SEC filer is not required to disclose the date through which subsequent events have
been evaluated in the financial statements (ASU 2010-09). The adoption of this guidance did not
have a material effect on the Companys consolidated results of operations or consolidated
financial position. See Note 19 Subsequent Events of the notes to the unaudited consolidated
financial statements for more information.
8
MIDWEST BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
In June 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance establishing accounting and reporting
standards for transfers and servicing of financial assets and also establishing the accounting for
transfers of servicing rights (ASC 860). This guidance eliminates the concept of a qualifying
special-purpose entity and introduces the concept of a participating interest, which will limit
the circumstances where the transfer of a portion of a financial asset will qualify as a sale,
assuming all other derecognition criteria are met. This guidance also clarifies and amends the
derecognition criteria for determining whether a transfer qualifies for sale accounting as well as
requires additional disclosures. These additional disclosures are intended to provide greater
transparency about a transferors continuing involvement with transferred assets. The adoption of
this guidance on January 1, 2010 did not have a material effect on the Companys consolidated
results of operations or consolidated financial position.
In June 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance which eliminates the quantitative
approach previously required for determining the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity
(ASC 810). If an enterprise is required to consolidate an entity as a result of the initial
application of this standard, it should describe the transition method(s) applied and shall
disclose the amount and classification in its statement of financial position of the consolidated
assets or liabilities by the transition method(s) applied. If an enterprise is required to
deconsolidate an entity as a result of the initial application of this standard, it should disclose
the amount of any cumulative effect adjustment related to deconsolidation separately from any
cumulative effect adjustment related to consolidation of entities. The adoption of this guidance on
January 1, 2010 did not have a material effect on the Companys consolidated results of operations
or consolidated financial position.
NOTE 6 SECURITIES
The amortized cost and fair value of securities available-for-sale are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Obligations of U.S. Treasury
|
|
$
|
293,974
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(9
|
)
|
|
$
|
293,965
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government agencies residential (1)
|
|
|
259,892
|
|
|
|
1,659
|
|
|
|
(1,051
|
)
|
|
|
260,500
|
|
Equity securities of U.S.
government-sponsored entities (2)
|
|
|
2,749
|
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
(703
|
)
|
|
|
2,184
|
|
Corporate and other debt securities
|
|
|
14,871
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,901
|
)
|
|
|
10,970
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities available-for-sale
|
|
$
|
571,486
|
|
|
$
|
1,797
|
|
|
$
|
(5,664
|
)
|
|
$
|
567,619
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Includes obligations of Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA).
|
|
(2)
|
|
Includes issues from Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA) and
of Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (FHLMC).
|
9
MIDWEST BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Obligations of U.S. Treasury
|
|
$
|
310,954
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
(13
|
)
|
|
$
|
310,947
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government agencies residential (1)
|
|
|
259,878
|
|
|
|
219
|
|
|
|
(3,822
|
)
|
|
|
256,275
|
|
U.S. government-sponsored entities
residential (2)
|
|
|
1,271
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
1,259
|
|
Equity securities of U.S.
government-sponsored entities (3)
|
|
|
2,749
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
(582
|
)
|
|
|
2,272
|
|
Corporate and other debt securities
|
|
|
14,920
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,199
|
)
|
|
|
10,721
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities available-for-sale
|
|
$
|
589,772
|
|
|
$
|
330
|
|
|
$
|
(8,628
|
)
|
|
$
|
581,474
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Includes obligations of GNMA.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Includes obligations of FHLMC.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Includes issues from FNMA and FHLMC.
|
The following is a summary of the fair value of securities available-for-sale with unrealized
losses and the time period of those unrealized losses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
Less Than 12 Months
|
|
|
12 Months or More
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Securities available-for-sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of U.S. Treasury
|
|
$
|
293,965
|
|
|
$
|
(9
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
293,965
|
|
|
$
|
(9
|
)
|
Mortgage-backed securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government agencies residential (1)
|
|
|
70,774
|
|
|
|
(1,051
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,774
|
|
|
|
(1,051
|
)
|
Equity securities of U.S.
government-sponsored entities (2)
|
|
|
1,054
|
|
|
|
(221
|
)
|
|
|
497
|
|
|
|
(482
|
)
|
|
|
1,551
|
|
|
|
(703
|
)
|
Corporate and other debt securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,970
|
|
|
|
(3,901
|
)
|
|
|
10,970
|
|
|
|
(3,901
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total temporarily impaired securities
|
|
$
|
365,793
|
|
|
$
|
(1,281
|
)
|
|
$
|
11,467
|
|
|
$
|
(4,383
|
)
|
|
$
|
377,260
|
|
|
$
|
(5,664
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Includes obligations of GNMA.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Includes issues from FNMA and FHLMC.
|
10
MIDWEST BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
Less Than 12 Months
|
|
|
12 Months or More
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Securities available-for-sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of U.S. Treasury
|
|
$
|
150,954
|
|
|
$
|
(13
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
150,954
|
|
|
$
|
(13
|
)
|
Mortgage-backed securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government agencies residential (1)
|
|
|
204,754
|
|
|
|
(3,822
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
204,754
|
|
|
|
(3,822
|
)
|
U.S. government-sponsored entities
residential (2)
|
|
|
1,259
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,259
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
Equity securities of U.S.
government-sponsored entities (3)
|
|
|
219
|
|
|
|
(64
|
)
|
|
|
461
|
|
|
|
(518
|
)
|
|
|
680
|
|
|
|
(582
|
)
|
Corporate and other debt securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,721
|
|
|
|
(4,199
|
)
|
|
|
10,721
|
|
|
|
(4,199
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total temporarily impaired securities
|
|
$
|
357,186
|
|
|
$
|
(3,911
|
)
|
|
$
|
11,182
|
|
|
$
|
(4,717
|
)
|
|
$
|
368,368
|
|
|
$
|
(8,628
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Includes obligations of GNMA.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Includes obligations of FHLMC.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Includes issues from FNMA and FHLMC.
|
The unrealized loss on available-for-sale securities is included in other comprehensive loss
on the consolidated balance sheets. Management has concluded that no individual unrealized loss as
of March 31, 2010, identified in the preceding table, represents other-than-temporary impairment.
These unrealized losses are primarily attributable to the general credit environment and turmoil in
the market for securities related to the housing industry and are not representative of the
associated collateral arrangements or repayment capability of the specific underlying securities.
Management expects to recover the entire amortized cost basis of these securities. The Company does
not intend to sell nor would it be required to sell the securities shown in the table with
unrealized losses before recovering their amortized cost.
NOTE 7 LOANS
Major classifications of loans, based on source of repayment, are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Gross
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Commercial
|
|
$
|
923,843
|
|
|
|
42.3
|
%
|
|
$
|
972,090
|
|
|
|
41.9
|
%
|
Construction
|
|
|
245,586
|
|
|
|
11.2
|
|
|
|
293,215
|
|
|
|
12.6
|
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
|
695,511
|
|
|
|
31.8
|
|
|
|
725,814
|
|
|
|
31.3
|
|
Home equity
|
|
|
209,993
|
|
|
|
9.7
|
|
|
|
219,183
|
|
|
|
9.5
|
|
Other consumer
|
|
|
4,877
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
5,454
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
Residential mortgage
|
|
|
105,186
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
|
|
105,147
|
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans, gross
|
|
|
2,184,996
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
2,320,903
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
Net deferred fees
|
|
|
(556
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(584
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans, net
|
|
$
|
2,184,440
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,320,319
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company reclassified $2.1 million and $441,000 in overdraft deposits to loans as of
March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.
11
MIDWEST BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 8 ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES
Following is a summary of activity in the allowance for loan losses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
128,800
|
|
|
$
|
44,432
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
76,300
|
|
|
|
13,000
|
|
Loans charged off
|
|
|
(63,810
|
)
|
|
|
(4,819
|
)
|
Recoveries on loans previously charged off
|
|
|
994
|
|
|
|
398
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loans charged off
|
|
|
(62,816
|
)
|
|
|
(4,421
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
$
|
142,284
|
|
|
$
|
53,011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The provision for credit losses reflected on the consolidated statements of operations
includes the provision for loan losses and the provision for unfunded commitment losses as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
$
|
76,300
|
|
|
$
|
13,000
|
|
Provision for unfunded commitment losses
|
|
|
750
|
|
|
|
253
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for credit losses
|
|
$
|
77,050
|
|
|
$
|
13,253
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A portion of the allowance for loan losses is allocated to impaired loans. Information with
respect to impaired loans and the related allowance for loan losses is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Impaired loans for which no allowance for loan losses is allocated
|
|
$
|
57,614
|
|
|
$
|
61,456
|
|
Impaired loans with an allocation of the allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
207,132
|
|
|
|
200,979
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total impaired loans
|
|
$
|
264,746
|
|
|
$
|
262,435
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses allocated to impaired loans
|
|
$
|
67,396
|
|
|
$
|
69,494
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average impaired loans and interest income recognized on impaired loans are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Average impaired loans
|
|
$
|
249,504
|
|
|
$
|
63,838
|
|
Interest income recognized on impaired loans
on a cash basis
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
102
|
|
Interest payments on impaired loans are generally applied to principal, unless the loan
principal is considered to be fully collectible, in which case interest is recognized on a cash
basis.
As of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, nonaccrual loans were
$278.1 million and $273.8 million,
respectively. There were no loans past due 90 days but still accruing at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009.
There were $11.5 million in accruing troubled-debt restructured loans and $51.7 million nonaccrual
troubled-debt restructured loans as of March 31, 2010. There were $11.6 million in accruing
troubled-debt restructured loans and $9.7 million in nonaccrual trouble-debt restructured loans as of December 31,
2009.
12
MIDWEST BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 9 GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLES
The following table presents the carrying amount and accumulated amortization of core deposit
intangible assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
Gross Carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Net Carrying
|
|
|
Gross Carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Net Carrying
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Amortized core
deposit intangibles
|
|
$
|
21,091
|
|
|
$
|
(9,255
|
)
|
|
$
|
11,836
|
|
|
$
|
21,091
|
|
|
$
|
(8,700
|
)
|
|
$
|
12,391
|
|
The amortization of core deposit intangible assets was $555,000 for the three months ended
March 31, 2010. At March 31, 2010, the projected amortization of core deposit intangible assets for
the years ending December 31, 2010 through 2014 and thereafter is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
$
|
2,222
|
|
2011
|
|
|
1,918
|
|
2012
|
|
|
1,803
|
|
2013
|
|
|
1,696
|
|
2014
|
|
|
1,626
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
3,126
|
|
The weighted average amortization period for the core deposit intangibles is approximately
seven years as of March 31, 2010.
The following table presents the changes in the carrying amount of goodwill and core deposit
intangibles during the periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core Deposit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Core Deposit
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
Intangibles
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
Intangibles
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Balance before impairment losses
|
|
$
|
158,862
|
|
|
$
|
12,391
|
|
|
$
|
158,862
|
|
|
$
|
14,683
|
|
Accumulated impairment losses
|
|
|
(94,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(80,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
64,862
|
|
|
$
|
12,391
|
|
|
$
|
78,862
|
|
|
$
|
14,683
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment
|
|
$
|
(21,000
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(14,000
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(555
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,292
|
)
|
Balance before impairment losses
|
|
$
|
158,862
|
|
|
$
|
11,836
|
|
|
$
|
158,862
|
|
|
$
|
12,391
|
|
Accumulated impairment losses
|
|
|
(115,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(94,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
$
|
43,862
|
|
|
$
|
11,836
|
|
|
$
|
64,862
|
|
|
$
|
12,391
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill is not amortized but assessed at least annually for impairment, and any impairment is
recognized in the period in which it is identified. In accordance with guidelines under the
authoritative guidance for intangibles goodwill and other (ASC 350), and consistent with
established Company policy, an annual review for goodwill impairment as of September 30th is
conducted. However, the Company determined that activities in the first quarter of 2010 including
the PCA received from its regulators, the expiration of the Forbearance Agreement, and the decline
in the Banks regulatory capital position to critically undercapitalized constituted triggering
events requiring an interim goodwill impairment test. As a result of that test, the Company
recorded a $21.0 million goodwill impairment for the three months ended March 31, 2010. The Company
may be required to take goodwill impairment charges in the future.
13
MIDWEST BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 10 OFF-BALANCE-SHEET RISK
In the normal course of business and to meet financing needs of customers, the Company is a
party to financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk. Since many commitments to extend credit
expire without being used, the amounts below do not necessarily represent future cash commitments.
These financial instruments include lines of credit, letters of credit, and commitments to extend
credit. These are summarized as follows as of March 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Commitment Expiration Per Period
|
|
|
|
Within
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 Year
|
|
|
1-3 Years
|
|
|
4-5 Years
|
|
|
5 Years
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Lines of Credit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
$
|
55,586
|
|
|
$
|
7,701
|
|
|
$
|
2,637
|
|
|
$
|
3,916
|
|
|
$
|
69,840
|
|
Home equity
|
|
|
24,686
|
|
|
|
23,085
|
|
|
|
34,098
|
|
|
|
21,675
|
|
|
|
103,544
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,003
|
|
|
|
2,003
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
139,235
|
|
|
|
714
|
|
|
|
2,142
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
142,101
|
|
Letters of credit
|
|
|
32,447
|
|
|
|
4,079
|
|
|
|
2,410
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,936
|
|
Commitments to extend credit
|
|
|
8,587
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,587
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commitments
|
|
$
|
260,541
|
|
|
$
|
35,579
|
|
|
$
|
41,287
|
|
|
$
|
27,604
|
|
|
$
|
365,011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, 2010, commitments to extend credit included $6.2 million of fixed rate loan
commitments. These commitments are due to expire within 30 to 90 days of issuance and have rates
ranging from 5.00% to 6.75%. Substantially all of the unused lines of credit are at adjustable
rates of interest.
The Company had a reserve for losses on unfunded commitments of $2.4 million at March 31,
2010, up from $2.2 million at December 31, 2009.
During the second quarter of 2009, the Company began deferring payment of dividends on the
$84.8 million of Series T cumulative preferred stock. The dividends on the Series T cumulative
preferred stock are recorded only when declared. On March 8, 2010, the U.S. Treasury exchanged the
84,784 shares of Series T preferred stock, having an aggregate approximate liquidation preference
of $84.8 million, plus approximately $4.6 million in cumulative dividends not declared or paid on
such preferred stock, for a new series of fixed rate cumulative mandatorily convertible preferred
stock, Series G, with the same liquidation preference. The Series G cumulative amount of dividends
not declared or paid totaled $286,000 as of March 31, 2010. See Note 17 Preferred Stock and
Warrant of the notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements for more information.
In the normal course of business, the Company is involved in various legal proceedings. In the
opinion of management, any liability resulting from such proceedings would not have a material
adverse effect on the Companys financial position or results of operations.
14
MIDWEST BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 11 FAIR VALUE
The authoritative guidance for fair value measurement (ASC 820) defines fair value as the
exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price)
in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction
between willing market participants on the measurement date. This guidance also establishes a fair
value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the
use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The guidance describes three levels of inputs
that may be used to measure fair value:
Level 1:
Quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active
markets that the entity has the ability to access as of the measurement date.
Level 2:
Significant other observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted
prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in markets that are not active, and
other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.
Level 3:
Significant unobservable inputs that reflect a companys own assumptions about
the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability.
The Companys available-for-sale investment securities are the only financial assets that are
measured at fair value on a recurring basis; it does not hold any financial liabilities that are
measured at fair value on a recurring basis. The fair values of available-for-sale securities are
determined by obtaining either quoted prices on nationally recognized securities exchanges or
matrix pricing, which is a mathematical technique used widely in the industry to value debt
securities without relying exclusively on quoted prices for the specific securities but rather by
relying on these securities relationship to other benchmark quoted securities. If quoted prices or
matrix pricing are not available, the fair value is determined by an adjusted price for similar
securities including unobservable inputs. The significant unobservable inputs include the
underlying collaterals ability to generate cash flows, incorporating the risks of default and loss of the underlying collateral. The
cash flows are then discounted to arrive at fair value. The Company did not make any transfers
of available-for-sale securities into or out of Level 1 or Level 2 during the three months ended
March 31, 2010 and 2009.
The fair values of the available-for-sale securities were measured using the following for the
periods shown:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices or
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identical Assets in
|
|
|
Other Observable
|
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Active Markets
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets at March 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of U.S. Treasury
|
|
$
|
293,965
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
293,965
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government agencies residential (1)
|
|
|
260,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
260,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities of U.S. government-sponsored entities (2)
|
|
|
2,184
|
|
|
|
2,184
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate and other debt securities
|
|
|
10,970
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,010
|
|
|
|
6,960
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale securities
|
|
$
|
567,619
|
|
|
$
|
2,184
|
|
|
$
|
558,475
|
|
|
$
|
6,960
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets at December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations of U.S. Treasury
|
|
$
|
310,947
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
310,947
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government agencies residential (1)
|
|
|
256,275
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
256,275
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government-sponsored entities residential (3)
|
|
|
1,259
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,259
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities of U.S. government-sponsored entities (2)
|
|
|
2,272
|
|
|
|
2,272
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate and other debt securities
|
|
|
10,721
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,700
|
|
|
|
7,021
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale securities
|
|
$
|
581,474
|
|
|
$
|
2,272
|
|
|
$
|
572,181
|
|
|
$
|
7,021
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Includes obligations of GNMA.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Includes issues from FNMA and FHLMC.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Includes obligations of FHLMC.
|
15
MIDWEST BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The following is a summary of changes in the fair value of the corporate available-for-sale
securities that were measured using significant unobservable inputs for the quarters ended March
31, 2010 and 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
$
|
7,021
|
|
|
$
|
8,433
|
|
Paydowns received
|
|
|
(51
|
)
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
Total gains or losses (realized/unrealized):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
(1,375
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
$
|
6,960
|
|
|
$
|
7,019
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys impaired loans that are measured using the fair value of the underlying
collateral are measured on a non-recurring basis. Once a loan is identified as individually
impaired, management measures impairment in accordance with the authoritative guidance for loan
impairments (ASC 310-10-35). At March 31, 2010, $207.1 million of the total impaired loans were
evaluated based on the fair value of the collateral compared to $201.0 million at December 31,
2009. The fair value of the collateral is determined by obtaining an observable market price or by
obtaining an appraised value with management applying selling and other discounts to the underlying
collateral value. If an appraised value is not available, the fair value of the impaired loan is
determined by an adjusted appraised value including unobservable cash flows.
Loans which are measured for impairment using the fair value of collateral, had a gross
carrying amount of $207.1 million, with an associated valuation allowance of $67.4 million for a
fair value of $139.7 million at March 31, 2010, and $201.0 million, with an associated valuation
allowance of $69.5 million for a fair value of $131.5 million at December 31, 2009. The provision
for credit losses for the three months ended March 31, 2010 included $61.0 million of specific
allowance allocations for impaired loans.
The Companys goodwill is assessed at least annually, at September 30, for impairment, and any
such impairment is recognized in the period it is identified. A goodwill impairment test also could
be triggered between annual testing dates if an event occurs or circumstances change that would
more likely than not reduce the fair value of goodwill below the carrying amount. In accordance
with guidelines under the authoritative guidance for intangibles goodwill and other (ASC 350),
and consistent with established Company policy, a review for goodwill impairment as of March 31,
2010 was conducted with the assistance of a nationally recognized third party valuation specialist.
As a result of that test, the Company recorded a $21.0 million goodwill impairment as of March 31,
2010.
Assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis include impaired loans based on the
fair value of the underlying collateral and goodwill as summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices or
|
|
Significant
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identical Assets in
|
|
Other Observable
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Active Markets
|
|
Inputs
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
Assets at March 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans
|
|
$
|
139,736
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
139,736
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
43,862
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,862
|
|
Assets at December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans
|
|
$
|
131,485
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
131,485
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
64,862
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64,862
|
|
16
MIDWEST BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The estimated fair values of the Companys financial instruments were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
Estimated
|
|
Carrying
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Amount
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
Financial assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
380,385
|
|
|
$
|
380,385
|
|
|
$
|
442,110
|
|
|
$
|
442,110
|
|
Securities available-for-sale
|
|
|
567,619
|
|
|
|
567,619
|
|
|
|
581,474
|
|
|
|
581,474
|
|
Federal Reserve Bank and Federal Home Loan Bank stock
|
|
|
27,652
|
|
|
|
27,652
|
|
|
|
27,652
|
|
|
|
27,652
|
|
Loans, net of allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
2,042,156
|
|
|
|
2,037,805
|
|
|
|
2,191,519
|
|
|
|
2,137,263
|
|
Accrued interest receivable
|
|
|
8,399
|
|
|
|
8,399
|
|
|
|
8,584
|
|
|
|
8,584
|
|
Financial liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing
|
|
|
347,483
|
|
|
|
347,483
|
|
|
|
349,796
|
|
|
|
349,796
|
|
Interest-bearing
|
|
|
2,072,709
|
|
|
|
2,084,512
|
|
|
|
2,220,315
|
|
|
|
2,231,823
|
|
Revolving note payable
|
|
|
8,600
|
|
|
|
401
|
|
|
|
8,600
|
|
|
|
3,947
|
|
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
|
|
|
297,650
|
|
|
|
333,411
|
|
|
|
297,650
|
|
|
|
329,298
|
|
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank
|
|
|
340,000
|
|
|
|
367,265
|
|
|
|
340,000
|
|
|
|
366,277
|
|
Junior subordinated debentures
|
|
|
60,828
|
|
|
|
2,169
|
|
|
|
60,828
|
|
|
|
19,064
|
|
Subordinated debt
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
6,883
|
|
Term note payable
|
|
|
55,000
|
|
|
|
2,566
|
|
|
|
55,000
|
|
|
|
25,238
|
|
Accrued interest payable
|
|
|
8,610
|
|
|
|
5,139
|
|
|
|
7,798
|
|
|
|
7,798
|
|
The remaining other assets and liabilities of the Company are not considered financial
instruments and are not included in the above disclosures.
The methods and assumptions used to determine fair values for each class of financial
instrument are presented below.
A test for goodwill impairment was conducted as of December 31, 2009, and March 31, 2010 with
the assistance of a nationally recognized third party valuation specialist. In Step 2 of that test,
the Company estimated the fair value of assets and liabilities in the same manner as if a purchase
of the reporting unit was taking place from a market participant perspective. Management worked
closely with the third party valuation specialist throughout the valuation process, provided
necessary information and reviewed and approved the methodologies, assumptions and conclusions.
These results serve as the basis for the Companys fair value estimates noted in the table above.
The fair value estimation methodology selected for the Companys most significant assets and
liabilities was based on managements observations and knowledge of methodologies typically and
currently utilized by market participants, the structure and characteristics of the asset and
liability in terms of cash flows and collateral, and the availability and reliability of
significant inputs required for a selected methodology and comparative data to evaluate the
outcomes.
The carrying amount is equivalent to the estimated fair value for cash and cash equivalents,
Federal Reserve Bank and Federal Home Loan Bank stock, and accrued interest receivable and payable,
except for the accrued interest payable on the junior subordinated debentures and credit agreements
which are valued in the same manner as the related borrowings. The fair values of securities are
determined by obtaining either quoted prices on nationally recognized securities exchanges or
matrix pricing. The Company selected the income approach for performing loans, retail certificates
of deposit, and borrowings. The Company estimated discounted fair values separately for nonaccrual
loans and loans 60-89 days past due and accruing. The income approach was deemed appropriate for
the assets and liabilities noted above due to the limited current comparable market transaction
data available.
17
MIDWEST BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
In computing estimated fair value, performing loans were broken into fixed and variable
components, floors and collateral coverage ratios were considered, and appropriate comparable
market discount rates were used to compute fair values using a discounted cash flow approach. For
nonperforming loans, a 33% discount was applied to nonaccrual loans based upon recent Company loss
experience and a 10% discount was applied to loans 60-89 days past due and accruing.
The fair values of
the Companys liabilities were estimated using: price estimates from a nationally known dealer for securities
sold under repurchasing agreements, market price quotes from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Chicago
(FHLBC) on FHLBC advances, discounted cash flows for the time and brokered deposits, a weighted
combination of the fair value assuming conversion to common stock at a discount and a liquidation
scenario for all correspondent bank debt and a weighted combination of discounted cash flows reflecting
the effects of credit spreads and a liquidation scenario value estimate for the junior subordinated
debentures.
There is no readily available market for a significant portion of the Companys financial
instruments. Accordingly, fair values are based on various factors relative to expected loss
experience, current economic conditions, risk characteristics, and other factors. The assumptions
and estimates used in the fair value determination process are subjective in nature and involve
uncertainties and significant judgment and, therefore, fair values cannot be determined with
precision. Changes in assumptions could significantly affect these estimated values.
NOTE 12 STOCK COMPENSATION AND RESTRICTED STOCK AWARDS
Under the Companys Stock and Incentive Plan (the Plan), officers, directors, and key
employees may be granted incentive stock options to purchase the Companys common stock at no less
than 100% of the market price on the date the option is granted. Options can be granted to become
exercisable immediately or after a specified vesting period or may be issued subject to performance
targets. In all cases, the options have a maximum term of ten years. The Plan also permits the
issuance of nonqualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, and restricted
stock units. The Plan authorizes a total of 3,900,000 shares for issuance. There are 1,687,823
shares remaining for issuance under the Plan at March 31, 2010. It is the Companys policy to issue
new shares of its common stock in conjunction with the exercise of stock options or grants of
restricted stock.
No employee stock options were exercised during the first quarter of 2010. Total employee
stock options outstanding at March 31, 2010 were 496,388 with exercise prices ranging between $1.15
and $22.03, with a weighted average exercise price of $8.11, and expiration dates between 2010 and
2019. At March 31, 2010, 228,875 options were exercisable at a weighted average exercise price per
share of $15.00.
Information about option activity follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Grant- Date Fair
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
Value Per Share
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2009
|
|
|
540,626
|
|
|
$
|
8.02
|
|
|
$
|
2.89
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(44,238
|
)
|
|
|
6.99
|
|
|
|
2.65
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at March 31, 2010
|
|
|
496,388
|
|
|
|
8.11
|
|
|
|
2.91
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee compensation expense for stock options previously granted was recorded in the
consolidated statements of operations based on the grants vesting schedule. Forfeitures of stock
option grants are estimated for those stock options where the requisite service is not expected to
be rendered. The grant-date fair value for each grant was calculated using the Black-Scholes option
pricing model. No options have been granted in 2010.
18
MIDWEST BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Employee compensation expense related to stock options was $13,000 and $14,000 for the three
months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The total compensation cost related to
nonvested stock options not yet recognized was $95,000 at March 31, 2010 and the weighted average
period over which this cost is expected to be recognized is 22 months.
Under the Plan, officers, directors, and key employees may also be granted awards of
restricted shares of the Companys common stock. Holders of restricted shares are entitled to
receive cash dividends paid to the Companys common stockholders and have the right to vote the
restricted shares prior to vesting. The existing restricted share grants vest over various time
periods not exceeding five years and some may be accelerated subject to achieving certain
performance targets. Compensation expense for the restricted shares equals the market price of the
related stock at the date of grant and is amortized on a straight-line basis over the vesting
period. All restricted shares had a grant-date fair value equal to the market price of the
underlying common stock at date of grant.
For the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, the Company recognized $124,000 and
$366,000, respectively, in compensation expense related to the restricted stock grants. The total
compensation cost related to nonvested restricted shares not yet recognized was $966,000 at March
31, 2010 and the weighted average period over which this cost is expected to be recognized is 29
months.
Information about restricted share grants follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
|
Restricted
|
|
|
Grant-Date Fair Value
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2009
|
|
|
679,648
|
|
|
$
|
8.65
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
0.39
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(25,000
|
)
|
|
|
0.39
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(18,564
|
)
|
|
|
11.77
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at March 31, 2010
|
|
|
661,084
|
|
|
|
8.56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 13 SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN
The Company and various members of senior management have entered into a Supplemental
Executive Retirement Plan (SERP). The SERP is an unfunded plan that provides for guaranteed
payments, based on a percentage of the individuals final salary, for 15 years after age 65. The
benefit amount is reduced if the individual retires prior to age 65.
The SERP agreements with employees constituted a pension plan under the authoritative guidance
for compensation retirement plans (ASC 715). The objective of this guidance is to recognize the
compensation cost of pension benefits (including prior service cost) over that employees
approximate service period. Included in salaries and benefits expense in the statements of
operations was $317,000 and $319,000 of expense related to the SERP for the three months ended
March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
The following is a summary of changes in the benefit obligation on the consolidated balance
sheet for the three months ended March 31, 2010 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
$
|
6,455
|
|
Service cost
|
|
|
202
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
91
|
|
Distributions
|
|
|
(54
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance
|
|
$
|
6,694
|
|
|
|
|
|
The prior service cost amortization expense for the three months ended March 31, 2010 was
$24,000.
19
MIDWEST BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 14 INCOME TAXES
The difference between the provision for income taxes in the consolidated financial statements
and amounts computed by applying the current federal statutory income tax rate of 35% to income
before income taxes is reconciled as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes computed at the statutory rate
|
|
$
|
(36,416
|
)
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
(3,611
|
)
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
Tax-exempt interest income on securities and loans
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(229
|
)
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
General business credits
|
|
|
(147
|
)
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
(609
|
)
|
|
|
5.9
|
|
State income taxes, net of federal tax benefit due to state operating loss
|
|
|
(3,615
|
)
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
|
(523
|
)
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
Life insurance cash surrender value increase, net of premiums
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(293
|
)
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
Goodwill impairment
|
|
|
7,350
|
|
|
|
(7.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
36,885
|
|
|
|
(35.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nondeductible costs and other, net
|
|
|
(208
|
)
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
269
|
|
|
|
(2.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes
|
|
$
|
3,834
|
|
|
|
(3.7
|
)%
|
|
$
|
(4,996
|
)
|
|
|
48.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company recognizes interest related to unrecognized tax benefits and penalties, if any, in
income tax expense.
During the first quarter of 2010, the Company recorded a total tax expense of $3.8 million.
This expense relates primarily to an adjustment made to the previously established valuation
allowance against the net deferred tax asset as a result of the expected inability to determine it
was more likely than not deferred tax assets related to available tax planning strategies would
be utilized in the future. The effective tax rate utilized for the first quarter of 2010 was based
on actual year-to-date results. Where there is substantial uncertainty regarding the use of annual
effective tax rate, the year-to-date results may be used as the estimate of the annual rate.
The Company increased the total valuation allowance against its existing net deferred tax
assets to $155.0 million during the first quarter of 2010 from $119.8 million as of December 31,
2009. The valuation allowance includes $1.3 million recorded in accumulated other comprehensive
loss, fully offsetting deferred taxes which were established for securities available-for-sale and
for the SERP program. The Companys primary deferred tax assets relate to its allowance for loan
losses, net operating losses and impairment charges relating to FNMA and FHLMC preferred stock
holdings. Under generally accepted accounting principles, a valuation allowance is required to be
recognized if it is more likely than not that such deferred tax assets will not be realized. In
making that determination, management is required to evaluate both positive and negative evidence
including recent historical financial performance, forecasts of future income, tax planning
strategies and assessments of the current and future economic and business conditions. The Company
performs and updates this evaluation on a quarterly basis.
In conducting its regular quarterly evaluation, the Company made a determination to fully
offset its net deferred assets with a valuation allowance. The existing deferred tax benefits may
not be fully realized due to statutory limitations on their utilization based on the Companys
planned capital restructuring. Utilization of tax planning strategies can no longer serve to
ensure the benefits of the deferred tax assets are even partially realized.
The Internal Revenue Service and the Illinois Department of Revenue are currently auditing the
Company for various years. In addition, both are currently reviewing certain previously acquired
entities for pre-acquisition years. The Company is responsible for all income taxes related to
acquired entities including periods prior to their acquisition. The Company does not anticipate
any adjustments as a result of these audits that would result in significant change to its
financial position.
Years that remain subject to examination include 2006 to present for federal, Illinois, and
Indiana. For various acquired entities, years that remain subject to examination include 2006 to
present for federal and 2005 to present for Illinois.
20
MIDWEST BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 15 LOSS PER SHARE
The following is a summary of the loss per share computation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(107,881
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,320
|
)
|
Less:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series A preferred stock dividends (1)
|
|
|
3,030
|
|
|
|
836
|
|
Series T preferred stock dividends (2)
|
|
|
822
|
|
|
|
1,059
|
|
Series T discount accretion
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
228
|
|
Series G preferred stock dividends (3)
|
|
|
286
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total preferred stock dividends and premium accretion
|
|
|
4,320
|
|
|
|
2,123
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income allocated to participating securities (4)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss available to common stockholders
|
|
$
|
(112,201
|
)
|
|
$
|
(7,443
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
35,484
|
|
|
|
27,925
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic loss per share
|
|
$
|
(3.16
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.27
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted (5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
35,484
|
|
|
|
27,925
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted loss per share
|
|
$
|
(3.16
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.27
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Represents the inducement premium for the exchange of 14,149 shares in the first quarter of
2010.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Includes $542 and $822 in cumulative dividends not declared or paid in first quarter of 2010
and 2009, respectively.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Represents cumulative dividends not declared or paid.
|
|
(4)
|
|
No adjustment for unvested restricted shares was included in the computation of net loss
available to common stockholders for any period there was a loss.
|
|
(5)
|
|
No dilutive shares from stock options, restricted stock, or warrant were included in the
computation of diluted loss per share as a result of the net loss both in 2010 and 2009.
|
Options to purchase 496,388 shares at a weighted average exercise price of $8.11 and 649,477
shares at a weighted average exercise price of $8.55 were not included in the computation of
diluted loss per share for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, because
the option exercise prices were greater than the average market price of the common stock and the
options were, therefore, anti-dilutive. At March 31, 2010 and 2009, the warrant to purchase
4,282,020 shares at an exercise price of $0.3074 and $2.97, respectively, was not included in the
computation of diluted loss per share because the warrants exercise price was greater than the
average market price of common stock and was, therefore, anti-dilutive. The computation of diluted
loss per share did not include 661,084 and 627,139 shares of restricted stock because of the
anti-dilutive effect for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Because of
their anti-dilutive effect, the shares that would be issued if the Series A noncumulative
redeemable convertible perpetual preferred stock were converted are not included in the computation
of diluted earnings per share for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009.
21
MIDWEST BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 16 CREDIT AGREEMENTS
The Companys credit agreements with a correspondent bank at March 31, 2010 and December 31,
2009 consisted of a revolving line of credit, a term note loan, and a subordinated debenture in the
amounts of $8.6 million, $55.0 million, and $15.0 million, respectively.
The revolving line of credit had a maximum availability of $8.6 million, an outstanding
balance of $8.6 million as of March 31, 2010, an interest rate of one-month LIBOR plus 455 basis
points with an interest rate floor of 7.25%, and matured on July 3, 2009. The term note had an
interest rate of one-month LIBOR plus 455 basis points at March 31, 2010 and matures on September
28, 2010. The subordinated debt had an interest rate of one-month LIBOR plus 350 basis points at
March 31, 2010, matures on March 31, 2018, and generally qualifies as a component of Tier 2
capital, although the amount of subordinated debt included in Tier 2 capital was restricted to $2.5
million as of December 31, 2009 and $0 as of March 31, 2010. See Note 18 Capital Requirements
of the notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements for further information.
At September 30, 2009, the Company was in violation of the financial, regulatory capital, and
nonperforming loan covenants contained in the revolving line of credit and term note. The Company
did not make a required $5.0 million principal payment on the term note due on July 1, 2009 under a
covenant waiver for the third quarter of 2008. On July 8, 2009, the lender advised the Company that
such non-compliance constituted a continuing event of default under the loan agreements. The
Companys decision not to make the $5.0 million principal payment, together with its previously
announced decision to suspend the dividends on its Series A preferred stock and defer the dividends
on its Series T preferred stock and interest payments on its trust preferred securities, were made
in order to retain cash and preserve liquidity and capital at the holding company.
The revolving line of credit matured on July 3, 2009, and the Company did not pay to the
lender all of the aggregate outstanding principal on such date. The failure to make such payment
constituted an additional event of default under the credit agreements.
As a result of the occurrence and the continuance of events of default, the lender notified
the Company that, as of July 8, 2009, the interest rate on the revolving line of credit increased
to the then current default interest rate of 7.25%, which represents the current interest rate
floor, and the interest rate under the term note increased to the default interest rate of 30 day
LIBOR plus 455 basis points. The Company also did not make required $5.0 million principal payments
on the term note due on October 1, 2009 and January 4, 2010 under the third quarter 2008 covenant
waiver.
As a result of not making the required payments and the continuance of the events of default,
the lender possesses certain rights and remedies, including the ability to demand immediate payment
of amounts due totaling $63.6 million plus accrued interest or foreclose on the collateral
supporting the credit agreements, being 100% of the stock of the Bank.
On October 22, 2009, the Company entered into a forbearance agreement with its lender that
provided for a forbearance period through March 31, 2010. The Forbearance Agreement has expired as of March 31, 2010,
and the lender can now demand payment at any time. See Note 3 Forbearance Agreement of the notes
to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.
22
MIDWEST BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 17 PREFERRED STOCK AND WARRANT
Exchange Transaction with the U.S. Treasury.
On March 8, 2010, the U.S.
Treasury exchanged the 84,784 shares of Series T preferred
stock, having an aggregate approximate liquidation preference of $84.8 million, plus approximately
$4.6 million in cumulative dividends not declared or paid on such preferred stock, for a new series
of fixed rate cumulative mandatorily convertible preferred stock, Series G, with the same
liquidation preference. The warrant dated December 5, 2008, to purchase 4,282,020 shares of common
stock was also amended to re-set the exercise price to $0.3074. The U.S. Treasury has the ability
to convert the new preferred stock into the Companys common stock at any time. In addition, the
Company can compel a conversion of the new preferred stock into common stock, subject to the
following conditions: (i) the Company receives appropriate approvals from the Federal Reserve; (ii)
approximately $78.6 million principal amount of the Companys revolving, senior, and subordinated
debt shall have previously been converted into common stock on terms acceptable to the U.S.
Treasury, in its sole discretion; (iii) the Company shall have completed a new cash equity raise of
not less than $125 million on terms acceptable to the U.S. Treasury, in its sole discretion; and
(iv) the Company has made the anti-dilution adjustments to the new preferred stock, if any, as
required by the terms thereof. Unless earlier converted, the new preferred stock converts
automatically into shares of the Companys common stock on March 8, 2017.
Series A Exchange Offer.
On January 25, 2010, the Company successfully completed its offer
(the Series A Exchange Offer) to exchange shares of its common stock for outstanding depositary
shares, $25.00 liquidation amount per share, each representing a 1/100th fractional interest in a
share of the Companys Series A preferred stock. The exchange ratio was 7.0886 shares of common
stock for each depositary share of the Series A preferred stock. The Company accepted for exchange
1,414,941 depositary shares, representing approximately 82% of the 1,725,000 depositary shares
outstanding prior to the Series A Exchange Offer. The Series A Exchange Offer generated
approximately $35.4 million of additional common equity. The Company issued 10,029,946 shares of
common stock for the 1,414,941 shares tendered in the exchange. The remaining 310,059 depositary
shares outstanding have an aggregate liquidation preference of approximately $7.8 million.
In addition, on January 21, 2010, the holders of the Companys depositary shares approved
proposals to amend the Companys charter to eliminate certain rights with respect to dividends on
the Series A preferred stock, dividends on preferred stock generally, and the election of directors
and the proposal to authorize the issuance of senior preferred stock to the U.S. Treasury, should
such transaction be consummated. The proposals to eliminate the Series A preferred stock rights
regarding dividends, dividends on preferred stock generally, and the election of directors were
approved by the Companys common stockholders at a special meeting of the holders of the Companys
common stock held on March 2, 2010. On April 6, 2010, the U.S. Treasury, as holder of the Series G
preferred stock, approved a charter amendment relating to the payment of dividends on preferred
stock.
23
MIDWEST BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE 18 CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS
The Company and the Bank are subject to regulatory capital requirements administered by the
federal banking agencies. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt
corrective action, banks must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures
of assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance-sheet items as calculated under regulatory
accounting practices. Prompt corrective action provisions are not applicable to bank holding
companies.
Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require banks and
bank holding companies to maintain minimum amounts and ratios of total capital to risk-weighted
assets, Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets and Tier 1 capital to average assets. If a bank does
not meet these minimum capital requirements, as defined, bank regulators can initiate certain
actions that could have a direct material adverse effect on the banks financial condition and
ongoing operations. As of March 31, 2010, the Company and the Bank did not meet all capital
adequacy requirements to which they were subject.
On December 18, 2009, the Company and the Bank entered into the Written Agreement with the
Federal Reserve Bank and the Illinois Division of Banking. Effective on March 30, 2010, the Bank
consented to the PCA issued by the Board of Governors of Federal Reserve System. See Note 1
Regulatory Actions of the notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.
As of March 31, 2010, the most recent Federal Reserve Bank notification categorized the Bank
as critically undercapitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. To be
categorized as adequately capitalized, banks must maintain minimum total risk-based, Tier 1
risk-based, and Tier 1 leverage ratios. See Note 1 Regulatory Actions of the notes to the
unaudited consolidated financial statements.
24
MIDWEST BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The risk-based capital information for the Company is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Risk-weighted assets
|
|
$
|
2,152,291
|
|
|
$
|
2,316,607
|
|
Average assets for leverage capital purposes
|
|
|
3,300,267
|
|
|
|
3,467,651
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital components:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders (deficit) equity
|
|
$
|
(49,485
|
)
|
|
$
|
56,476
|
|
Guaranteed trust preferred securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,432
|
|
Core deposit intangibles, net
|
|
|
(11,836
|
)
|
|
|
(12,391
|
)
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
(43,862
|
)
|
|
|
(64,862
|
)
|
Disallowed deferred tax assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,438
|
)
|
Prior service cost and decrease in projected benefit obligation
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
Unrealized losses on securities
|
|
|
3,867
|
|
|
|
8,297
|
|
Unrealized losses on equity securities
|
|
|
(565
|
)
|
|
|
(478
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier 1 capital
|
|
$
|
(101,904
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,037
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Includible allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
28,358
|
|
|
|
30,218
|
|
Guaranteed trust preferred securities
|
|
|
59,000
|
|
|
|
37,568
|
|
Qualifying subordinated debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,519
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier 2 capital
|
|
$
|
87,358
|
|
|
$
|
70,305
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowable Tier 2 capital
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,037
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total risk-based capital
|
|
$
|
(101,904
|
)
|
|
$
|
10,074
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
MIDWEST BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Capital levels and minimum required levels:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To Be Adequately
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capitalized Under
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For Capital
|
|
Prompt Corrective
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
Adequacy Purposes
|
|
Action Provisions
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
Ratio
|
|
Amount
|
|
Ratio
|
|
Amount
|
|
Ratio
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
Total Capital (to risk-weighted assets)
Company
|
|
$
|
(101,904
|
)
|
|
|
(4.7
|
)%
|
|
$
|
172,183
|
|
|
|
8.0
|
%
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
Bank
|
|
|
61,339
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
|
171,524
|
|
|
|
8.0
|
|
|
$
|
171,524
|
|
|
|
8.0
|
%
|
Tier 1 Capital (to risk-weighted assets)
Company
|
|
|
(101,904
|
)
|
|
|
(4.7
|
)
|
|
|
86,092
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
Bank
|
|
|
33,083
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
85,762
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
85,762
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
Tier 1 Capital (to average assets for leverage capital purposes)
Company
|
|
|
(101,904
|
)
|
|
|
(3.1
|
)
|
|
|
132,011
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
Bank
|
|
|
33,083
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
131,631
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
131,631
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To Be Adequately
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capitalized Under
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For Capital
|
|
Prompt Corrective
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
Adequacy Purposes
|
|
Action Provisions
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
Ratio
|
|
Amount
|
|
Ratio
|
|
Amount
|
|
Ratio
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
Total Capital (to risk-weighted assets)
Company
|
|
$
|
10,074
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
$
|
185,329
|
|
|
|
8.0
|
%
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
Bank
|
|
|
148,062
|
|
|
|
6.4
|
|
|
|
184,899
|
|
|
|
8.0
|
|
|
$
|
184,899
|
|
|
|
8.0
|
%
|
Tier 1 Capital (to risk-weighted assets)
Company
|
|
|
5,037
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
92,664
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
Bank
|
|
|
117,911
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
|
|
92,450
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
92,450
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
Tier 1 Capital (to average assets for leverage capital purposes)
Company
|
|
|
5,037
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
138,706
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
Bank
|
|
|
117,911
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
|
|
138,482
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
138,482
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
NOTE 19 SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
The Company has performed an evaluation of events that have occurred subsequent to March 31,
2010. There have been no subsequent events that occurred during such period that would require
disclosure in this Form 10-Q, other than those that are described in Note 1 Regulatory Actions and
Note 2 Regulatory Capital
or would be required to be recognized in the Consolidated Financial Statements as of or for the
three months ended March 31, 2010.
26
ITEM 2 MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion and analysis is intended as a review of significant factors affecting
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the periods indicated. The
discussion should be read in conjunction with the unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements and
the Notes thereto presented herein. In addition to historical information, the following
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contains
forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. The Companys actual results could
differ significantly from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of
certain factors discussed in this report.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and
expenses during the reporting period. By their nature, changes in these assumptions and estimates
could significantly affect the Companys financial position or results of operations. Actual
results could differ from those estimates. Those critical accounting policies that are of
particular significance to the Company are discussed in Item 7 of the Companys 2009 Annual Report
on Form 10-K.
Recent Developments
Regulatory Capital:
As of March 31, 2010, the most recent Federal Reserve Bank notification
categorized the Bank as critically undercapitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt
corrective action.
Effective on March 30, 2010, as a result of the Banks then significantly undercapitalized
status, the Bank consented to the issuance of a Prompt Corrective Action Directive (PCA) by the
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. The PCA provides that the Bank, in conjunction
with the Company, must within 45 days of March 30, 2010, i.e. by May 13, 2010 (the PCA Deadline)
either: (i) increase the Banks capital so that it becomes adequately capitalized; (ii) enter into
and close on an agreement to sell the Bank subject to regulatory approval and customary closing
conditions; or (iii) take other necessary measures to make the Bank adequately capitalized.
The Company does not expect that it will be able to satisfy the capital requirement set
forth in the PCA by the PCA Deadline. If the Company is unable to satisfy such requirement by the
PCA Deadline, the Company believes it is likely that its bank
regulators would place the Bank into Federal Deposit Insurance Corporations
(FDIC) receivership. The Bank represents substantially all of the Companys assets. If the Bank were to
be seized, the Company expects its remaining liabilities would exceed its assets.
The PCA
also prohibits the Bank from making any capital distributions, including dividends and from
soliciting and accepting new deposits bearing an interest rate that exceeds the prevailing
effective rates on deposits of comparable amounts and maturities in the Banks market area. On
April 30, 2010, the Bank submitted to the Federal Reserve Bank a plan and timetable for conforming
the rates of interest paid on existing non-time deposit accounts to these levels as required under
the PCA.
The PCA also subjects the Bank to other operating restrictions, including payment of bonuses
to senior executive officers and increasing their compensation, restrictions on asset growth and
branching, and ensuring that all transactions between the Bank and any affiliates comply with
Section 23A of the Federal Reserve Act. The Bank was already in compliance with certain of these
guidelines as the Bank was significantly undercapitalized at the time of the PCA. For example, the
Bank has been complying with the FDICs rules relating to the payment of interest on deposits. The
Company and the Bank continue to be subject to the Written Agreement entered into with the Federal
Reserve Bank and the Illinois Division of Banking in December 2009.
If the Company fails to promptly improve the Banks regulatory capital ratios, the Company
may become subject to a voluntary or involuntary bankruptcy filing. In addition, the Company believes it is likely that the Bank would
be placed into FDIC receivership by its regulators or acquired by a third party in a
transaction in which the Company receives no value for its interest in the Bank. Such a
transaction would not likely have an impact on the operations of the Bank or its customers, and
customer deposits would continue to be subject to FDIC insurance. Any of such events, however,
would be expected to result in a loss of all of the value of the Companys outstanding securities.
27
As disclosed in previous documents filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, the
Company and the Bank entered into a written agreement (the Written Agreement) with the Federal
Reserve Bank and the Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation, Division of
Banking (the Illinois Division of Banking) on December 18, 2009, that is intended to strengthen
the Bank and improve the Companys overall financial condition.
Pursuant to the terms of the Written Agreement, the Company and the Bank were required, within
60 days of the date of the Written Agreement, to submit an acceptable written plan to the
regulators to maintain sufficient capital at the Company, on a consolidated basis, and at the Bank
on a standalone basis. On March 25, 2010, the Company and the Bank were notified by the Federal
Reserve Bank that the Banks capital plan, was not accepted. According to the Federal Reserve
Bank, the plan was not accepted because, among other things, the Company has not yet raised $125
million of new equity, which is a condition to the Companys ability to convert to common stock the
new convertible preferred stock, Series G, that the Company issued to the U.S. Department of the
Treasury (the U.S. Treasury) in March 2010 in exchange for all outstanding preferred stock,
Series T, previously held by the U.S. Treasury.
Forbearance Agreement:
On October 22, 2009, the Company entered into a Forbearance Agreement
with its lender pursuant to which, among other things, the lender agreed to forbear from exercising
the rights and remedies available to it as a consequence of certain existing events of default
under the Companys loan agreements (the Loan Agreements) through March 31, 2010 (the
Forbearance Agreement). The Forbearance Agreement expired on March 31, 2010, and as a result, the
lender could declare all amounts owed under the Loan Agreements immediately due and payable. Should
the lender demand payment, the Company would be unable to repay the amounts due. As a result, the
lender could, among other remedies, foreclose on outstanding shares of the Banks capital stock,
which would have a material adverse effect on the Companys business, operations and ability to
continue as a going concern and could result in a loss of all or a substantial portion of the value
of the Companys outstanding securities. Management of the Company continues in its efforts to
restructure the Companys outstanding credit agreements with its primary lender.
Although the lender has the right to foreclose on the common stock of the Bank, the Company
has not received any indication from the lender through the date of this filing that it intends to
exercise its rights to foreclose. Should the lender exercise such rights, the Bank could become a
wholly-owned subsidiary of the lender or another potential buyer, through a sale of the collateral
by the lender. Such a transaction would not likely have a significant impact on the operations of
the Bank or its customers, and customer deposits would continue to be subject to FDIC insurance. If
such actions were taken by the lender to exercise its rights to the collateral, the Companys
ability to continue to generate sufficient cash flows to fund its operations and obligations would
be significantly limited, which may force the Company into bankruptcy. See Managements Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Borrowings. Upon the expiration
of the forbearance period on March 31, 2010, the principal and interest payments that were due
under the revolving line of credit and the term note became due and payable, along with such other
amounts as may have become due during the forbearance period. The Company is not currently able to
meet any demands for payment of amounts due. If the Company is unable to renegotiate, renew,
replace or expand its sources of financing on acceptable terms, it will have a material adverse
effect on the Companys business and results of operations. See Note 4 Basis of Presentation,
Going Concern
of the notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.
Capital Plan:
As previously announced in 2009, the Company developed a detailed capital plan
(the Capital Plan) in order to, among other things, increase the Companys common equity capital
and raise additional capital. During the first quarter of 2010, the Company exchanged approximately
82% of its outstanding depositary shares representing interests in the Companys Series A preferred
stock for newly issued shares of common stock, thereby increasing the Companys common equity
capital, and exchanged all outstanding shares of the U.S. Treasurys Series T preferred stock for
shares of a new class of convertible preferred stock, Series G, which improved the Companys common
equity capital and provides an opportunity to further increase the Companys common equity if
certain conditions are met. One of these conditions is the raising of $125 million of new equity
by the Company. See Note 17 Preferred Stock and Warrant of the notes to the unaudited
consolidated financial statements for more information.
Raising new equity capital is also required by the Companys and the Banks regulators
pursuant to recent actions taken by such regulators, as more fully described in Note 1
Regulatory Actions of the notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements. The Company has
not received any commitment for a new equity capital investment and presently believes it is
unlikely
28
that it will be able to raise a sufficient amount of new equity capital prior to the PCA
Deadline, on acceptable terms or at all. If the Company does not promptly raise a sufficient amount
of new equity capital or, alternatively, execute another strategic initiative, the Company may
become subject to a voluntary or involuntary bankruptcy filing, and the Company believes it is likely that the Bank would be placed
into FDIC receivership by its regulators, or would be acquired by a third party in a transaction in
which the Company receives no value for its interest in the Bank. Any such event could be expected
to result in a loss of all of the value of the Companys outstanding securities.
Going Concern:
The consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared
assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. The Company incurred net losses of
$107.9 million and $242.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and year ended December
31, 2009, respectively. The losses are primarily due to provisions for credit losses, goodwill
impairment charges, and tax charges related to a valuation allowance on deferred tax assets. Due to
the resulting deterioration in capital levels of the Company and the Bank, combined with (i) the
uncertainty as to the Companys ability to raise sufficient amounts of new equity capital, (ii)
recent regulatory actions with respect to the Company and the Bank, and (iii) the Companys
inability to repay amounts owed under its loan agreements with its primary lender if the primary
lender were to declare the amounts outstanding thereunder immediately due and payable, there is
substantial doubt about the Companys ability to continue as a going concern.
The Companys independent registered public accounting firm has included in its report on the
Companys consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2009 an explanatory
paragraph with respect to the substantial doubt as to the Companys ability to continue as a going
concern. Managements plans to address the Companys ability to continue as a going concern are
described in detail in Note 1 Regulatory Actions of the notes to the unaudited consolidated financial
statements. The Companys financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result
from the outcome of this uncertainty.
Existence of substantial doubt as to the Companys ability to continue as a going concern will
have a material adverse impact on the Company and the Banks business, financial condition and
results of operations and the ability to raise necessary new equity capital. Moreover,
relationships with third parties with whom the Company and the Bank do business or on whom they
rely, including depositors (particularly those with deposit accounts in excess of FDIC insurance
limits), customers and clients, vendors, employees and financial counter-parties could be
significantly adversely impacted because these individuals and entities may react adversely to
events leading to the conclusion that there is substantial doubt about the Companys ability to
continue as a going concern, making it more difficult for the Company to address the issues giving
rise to the substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern.
Liquidity Bank:
The Bank depends on deposits to provide sufficient liquidity to meet its
commitments and business needs and to accommodate the transaction and cash management needs of its
clients, including funding loans. The Bank also must have sufficient funds available to satisfy its
obligation to repay any wholesale borrowings it has outstanding, including brokered deposits and
other obligations, when they come due. Although management currently believes the Bank has the
ability and the available liquidity to meet its near-term potential and actual obligations, if in
the future additional cost-effective funding is not available on terms satisfactory to the Bank or
at all, the Bank may not be able to meet its funding obligations, which could adversely affect the
Companys results of operations. See Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations Liquidity.
Liquidity Company:
As a holding company without independent operations, the Companys
liquidity (on an unconsolidated basis) is primarily dependent upon the Companys ability to raise
debt or equity capital from third parties and the receipt of dividends from its operating
subsidiary. The Company is currently in default under its Loan Agreements with its primary lender,
and its revolving credit facility has matured and is no longer available. Despite its recent
efforts to obtain new equity capital, the Company has not yet obtained a commitment for new equity
capital. As a result of recent regulatory actions, the Companys principal operating subsidiary,
the Bank, is prohibited from paying any dividends or making any loans to the Company. At May 12,
2010, the Companys cash and cash equivalents, on an
unconsolidated basis amounted to approximately $3.4 million.
Presently, the Company does not have sufficient liquidity on an unconsolidated basis to meet its
short-term obligations, which include the approximately $63.6 million in outstanding debt upon
which its lender could demand immediate payment. Assuming continued receipt of management fees from
the Bank, which are subject to approval of the Banks regulators, the Company believes that, if the
lender does not exercise its right to demand payment of amounts owed under the Loan Agreements,
that it has the minimum level of liquidity needed to meet its near-term commitments. See
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Liquidity.
Goodwill Impairment; Deferred Tax Asset Valuation Allowance:
The events and changes in
circumstances noted above represent trigger events under the authoritative guidance, indicating
potential impairment of goodwill. During the first quarter ended March 31, 2010, the Company
assessed the carrying value of goodwill and, as a result of that assessment, recognized a $21.0
million impairment. As of March 31, 2010, the carrying amount of goodwill was $43.9 million. See
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Goodwill.
29
Also during the quarter ended March 31, 2010, the Company assessed its remaining deferred tax
assets and determined they were not more likely than not realizable. Thus, the Company recognized
an impairment of $36.9 million in the quarter ended March 31, 2010. See Note 14 Income Taxes of
the notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.
Repurchase Agreements:
The agreements with one of the Banks repurchase agreement
counterparties could permit that counterparty to terminate the repurchase agreements if the Bank
does not maintain its well-capitalized status. Because the Bank is currently not well-capitalized,
the counterparty could exercise its option to terminate one or more of these repurchase agreements
prior to maturity. See Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations Deposits and Borrowed Funds.
Accounting Pronouncements
In January 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued an Accounting
Standards Update (ASU) to authoritative guidance on improving disclosures about fair value
measurements (ASU 2010-6). This guidance requires new disclosures for transfers in and out of
Levels 1 and 2 and the reasons for the transfers as well as an additional breakout of asset and
liability categories. This guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning
after December 15, 2009. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material effect on the Companys
consolidated results of operations or consolidated financial
position. This guidance also requires purchases, sales, issuances and settlements to
be reported separately in the summary of changes in Level 3 fair value measurements. This
additional guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2010, and for interim periods within those fiscal years.
In February 2010, the FASB amended its Accounting Standards Codification
tm
(ASC) that establish principles and requirements for subsequent events (ASC 855) to
clarify that an SEC filer is not required to disclose the date through which subsequent events have
been evaluated in the financial statements (ASU 2010-09). The adoption of this guidance did not
have a material effect on the Companys consolidated results of operations or consolidated
financial position. See Note 19 Subsequent Events of the notes to the unaudited consolidated
financial statements for more information.
In June 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance establishing accounting and reporting
standards for transfers and servicing of financial assets and also establishing the accounting for
transfers of servicing rights (ASC 860). This guidance eliminates the concept of a qualifying
special-purpose entity and introduces the concept of a participating interest, which will limit
the circumstances where the transfer of a portion of a financial asset will qualify as a sale,
assuming all other derecognition criteria are met. This guidance also clarifies and amends the
derecognition criteria for determining whether a transfer qualifies for sale accounting as well as
requires additional disclosures. These additional disclosures are intended to provide greater
transparency about a transferors continuing involvement with transferred assets. The adoption of
this guidance on January 1, 2010 did not have a material effect on the Companys consolidated
results of operations or consolidated financial position .
In June 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance which eliminates the quantitative
approach previously required for determining the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity
(ASC 810). If an enterprise is required to consolidate an entity as a result of the initial
application of this standard, it should describe the transition method(s) applied and shall
disclose the amount and classification in its statement of financial position of the consolidated
assets or liabilities by the transition method(s) applied. If an enterprise is required to
deconsolidate an entity as a result of the initial application of this standard, it should disclose
the amount of any cumulative effect adjustment related to deconsolidation separately from any
cumulative effect adjustment related to consolidation of entities. The adoption of this guidance on
January 1, 2010 did not have a material effect on the Companys consolidated results of operations
or consolidated financial position.
30
Selected Consolidated Financial Data
The following table sets forth certain selected consolidated financial data.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At or For the Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
Statement of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income
|
|
$
|
30,677
|
|
|
$
|
42,266
|
|
|
$
|
32,445
|
|
Total interest expense
|
|
|
16,172
|
|
|
|
21,164
|
|
|
|
17,673
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
14,505
|
|
|
|
21,102
|
|
|
|
14,772
|
|
Provision for credit losses (1)
|
|
|
77,050
|
|
|
|
13,253
|
|
|
|
98,750
|
|
Noninterest income
|
|
|
2,490
|
|
|
|
3,343
|
|
|
|
2,835
|
|
Noninterest expense
|
|
|
43,992
|
|
|
|
21,508
|
|
|
|
38,537
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes
|
|
|
(104,047
|
)
|
|
|
(10,316
|
)
|
|
|
(119,680
|
)
|
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes
|
|
|
3,834
|
|
|
|
(4,996
|
)
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(107,881
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,320
|
)
|
|
$
|
(119,659
|
)
|
Preferred stock dividends and premium accretion
|
|
|
4,320
|
|
|
|
2,123
|
|
|
|
1,355
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss available to common stockholders
|
|
$
|
(112,201
|
)
|
|
$
|
(7,443
|
)
|
|
$
|
(121,014
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per Common Share Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss per share (basic)
|
|
$
|
(3.16
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.27
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4.30
|
)
|
Loss per share (diluted)
|
|
|
(3.16
|
)
|
|
|
(0.27
|
)
|
|
|
(4.30
|
)
|
Cash dividends declared on common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Book value at end of period
|
|
|
(1.84
|
)
|
|
|
6.38
|
|
|
|
(2.39
|
)
|
Tangible book value at end of period (non-GAAP measure) (2)
|
|
|
(3.30
|
)
|
|
|
3.05
|
|
|
|
(5.14
|
)
|
Selected Financial Ratios:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on average assets (3)
|
|
|
(13.05
|
)%
|
|
|
(0.59
|
)%
|
|
|
(13.39
|
)%
|
Return on average equity (4)
|
|
NM
|
|
|
|
(7.12
|
)
|
|
|
(301.80
|
)
|
Dividend payout ratio
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average equity to average assets
|
|
|
0.94
|
|
|
|
8.30
|
|
|
|
4.44
|
|
Tier 1 risk-based capital
|
|
|
(4.73
|
)
|
|
|
7.39
|
|
|
|
0.22
|
|
Total risk-based capital
|
|
|
(4.73
|
)
|
|
|
9.16
|
|
|
|
0.43
|
|
Net interest margin (taxable-equivalent basis) (5)(6)
|
|
|
1.78
|
|
|
|
2.63
|
|
|
|
1.74
|
|
Loan to deposit ratio
|
|
|
90.26
|
|
|
|
101.85
|
|
|
|
90.28
|
|
Net overhead expense to average assets (7)
|
|
|
5.02
|
|
|
|
2.02
|
|
|
|
4.01
|
|
Efficiency ratio (8)
|
|
|
250.95
|
|
|
|
83.02
|
|
|
|
198.01
|
|
Loan Quality Ratios:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses to total loans
|
|
|
6.51
|
|
|
|
2.05
|
|
|
|
5.55
|
|
Provision for loan losses to total loans
|
|
|
14.17
|
|
|
|
2.03
|
|
|
|
16.76
|
|
Net loans charged off to average total loans
|
|
|
11.28
|
|
|
|
0.70
|
|
|
|
8.73
|
|
Nonaccrual loans to total loans (9)
|
|
|
12.73
|
|
|
|
3.10
|
|
|
|
11.80
|
|
Nonperforming assets to total assets (10)
|
|
|
9.94
|
|
|
|
2.96
|
|
|
|
9.09
|
|
Allowance for loan losses to nonaccrual loans
|
|
|
0.51
|
x
|
|
|
0.66
|
x
|
|
|
0.47
|
x
|
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
3,182,463
|
|
|
$
|
3,713,064
|
|
|
$
|
3,435,545
|
|
Total earning assets
|
|
|
3,136,056
|
|
|
|
3,339,448
|
|
|
|
3,343,911
|
|
Average assets
|
|
|
3,351,831
|
|
|
|
3,648,873
|
|
|
|
3,544,702
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
2,184,440
|
|
|
|
2,591,048
|
|
|
|
2,320,319
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
142,284
|
|
|
|
53,011
|
|
|
|
128,800
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
2,420,192
|
|
|
|
2,544,005
|
|
|
|
2,570,111
|
|
Borrowings
|
|
|
777,078
|
|
|
|
832,057
|
|
|
|
777,078
|
|
Stockholders (deficit) equity
|
|
|
(49,485
|
)
|
|
|
301,070
|
|
|
|
56,476
|
|
Tangible stockholders (deficit) equity (non-GAAP measure) (2)
|
|
|
(105,183
|
)
|
|
|
208,098
|
|
|
|
(20,777
|
)
|
31
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
The provision for credit losses includes the provision for loan losses and the provision for
unfunded commitments losses as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31,
|
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
$
|
76,300
|
|
|
$
|
13,000
|
|
|
$
|
98,000
|
|
Provision for unfunded commitments losses
|
|
|
750
|
|
|
|
253
|
|
|
|
750
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for credit losses
|
|
$
|
77,050
|
|
|
$
|
13,253
|
|
|
$
|
98,750
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
|
Stockholders equity less core deposit intangibles, net, and goodwill. Management believes
that tangible stockholders equity (non-GAAP measure) is a useful measure since it excludes
the balances of core deposit intangible assets and goodwill which are subjective components of
valuation. The following table reconciles reported stockholders equity to tangible
stockholders equity for the periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31,
|
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders (deficit) equity
|
|
$
|
(49,485
|
)
|
|
$
|
301,070
|
|
|
$
|
56,476
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
(43,862
|
)
|
|
|
(78,862
|
)
|
|
|
(64,862
|
)
|
Core deposit intangibles, net
|
|
|
(11,836
|
)
|
|
|
(14,110
|
)
|
|
|
(12,391
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tangible stockholders (deficit) equity
|
|
$
|
(105,183
|
)
|
|
$
|
208,098
|
|
|
$
|
(20,777
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
Net income divided by average assets.
|
|
(4)
|
|
Net income divided by average equity. Not meaningful for March 31, 2010.
|
|
(5)
|
|
Net interest income, on a fully taxable-equivalent basis, divided by average earning assets.
|
|
(6)
|
|
The following table reconciles reported net interest income on a fully taxable-equivalent
basis for the periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
$
|
14,505
|
|
|
$
|
21,102
|
|
|
$
|
14,772
|
|
Taxable-equivalent adjustment to net interest income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
357
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income, fully tax-equivalent basis
|
|
$
|
14,505
|
|
|
$
|
21,459
|
|
|
$
|
14,772
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No taxable-equivalent adjustment is included for the three months ended March 31, 2010 or
December 31, 2009 as a result of the Companys tax position as of both of those periods.
|
|
(7)
|
|
Noninterest expense less noninterest income, excluding security gains/losses and impairments,
divided by average assets.
|
|
(8)
|
|
Noninterest expense excluding amortization of core deposit intangible assets and foreclosed
properties expense divided by noninterest income, excluding security gains/losses and
impairments, plus net interest income on a fully taxable-equivalent basis.
|
|
(9)
|
|
Includes total nonaccrual, impaired and all other loans 90 days or more past due.
|
|
(10)
|
|
Includes total nonaccrual and all other loans 90 days or more past due, troubled-debt
restructured loans and foreclosed properties.
|
32
Results of Operations Three Months Ended
March 31, 2010 and 2009
The Company incurred net losses for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009. Due to the
resulting deterioration in capital levels of the Bank and the Company, combined with the current
uncertainty as to the Companys ability to raise sufficient amounts of new equity capital, recent
regulatory actions with respect to the Company and the Bank, and the current inability of the
Company to repay amounts owed under its loan agreements with its primary lender if its primary
lender were to declare the amounts outstanding thereunder immediately due and payable, there is
substantial doubt about the Companys ability to continue as a going concern. See Recent
Developments
Going Concern
.
Results of operations for the first three months ended March 31, 2010 reflect the economys
recessionary environment. While the Company provides a full line of financial services to corporate
and individual customers located in the greater Chicago metropolitan area, it is primarily a lender
to many middle market and small businesses within the community banking segment. The length and
breadth of the economic downturn, including record high unemployment and vacancy rates, is
continuing to put pressure on the Banks borrowers, reducing both their ability to support their
borrowings from a cash flow perspective and the value of property pledged as collateral for those
borrowings in the case of default. With a large concentration of the loan portfolio in commercial
real estate, the Company experienced accelerated deterioration in its portfolio during 2009, and
significant deterioration continued into 2010, as both delinquencies on commercial real estate
loans increased and declines in related collateral values continued. Unfortunately, the Companys
capital base has eroded as a result of significant charges relating to impairment charges and
realized losses on the preferred stock of FNMA and FHLMC in 2008, as well as the impairment charges
on goodwill, and the provision for credit losses in 2009 and 2010.
Set forth below are highlights of first quarter 2010 results compared to the first quarter of
2009 and the fourth quarter of 2009.
Basic and diluted loss per share for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 was $3.16
and $0.27 per share, respectively, and $4.30 per share for the three months ended December 31,
2009. Net loss for the first quarter of 2010 was $107.9 million compared to $5.3 million and
$119.7 million for the first and fourth quarters of 2009, respectively.
Net interest income decreased to $14.5 million in the first quarter of 2010 compared to $21.1
million in the first quarter of 2009 and $14.8 million in the fourth quarter of 2009. Similarly,
the net interest margin continues to be under pressure at 1.78% for the three months ended March
31, 2010 compared to 2.63% for the similar period of 2009. The decreased margin reflected an
ongoing regulatory capital preservation strategy initiated in the second quarter of 2009 that
included repositioning the securities portfolio into shorter term, lower yielding U.S. Treasury and
U.S. government agency securities with lower capital requirements and a decrease in loan
originations both of which contributed to decreased interest income. Additionally, interest income
was reduced by the increase in nonaccrual loans. The net interest income was further depressed
because the Bank maintained a relatively high level of cash and low yielding cash equivalents as
part of its liquidity management strategy. The net interest margin was 1.74% for the three months
ended December 31, 2009.
The provision for credit losses increased by $63.8 million, to $77.1 million, in the first
quarter of 2010 compared to $13.3 million for the comparable period in 2009. The increased
provision for credit losses reflects managements current assessments of impaired loans, the
elevated level of charge-offs, and concerns about continued weak economic conditions. The
provision for credit losses decreased by $21.7 million in the first quarter of 2010 from $98.8
million for the three months ended December 31, 2009.
Noninterest income was $2.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared to $3.3
million over the comparable period in 2009 and $2.8 million during the three months ended December
31, 2009. Noninterest expense was $44.0 million during the first quarter of 2010 compared to $21.5
million for the similar period in 2009 and $38.5 million during the three months ended December 31,
2009. The increase in noninterest expense over the same quarter in the prior year was attributed to
the $21.0 million goodwill impairment charge, the $2.0 million increase in FDIC insurance expense,
and increased professional services expense related to the management of nonperforming assets and
the efforts associated with the Capital Plan. These increases were offset in part by the reduction
in salaries and benefits expense and significant curtailment in discretionary spending as part of
the cost reduction program implemented in the third quarter of 2009. The increase in noninterest
expense over the prior quarter was attributed to the $7.0 million increase in goodwill impairment
charge partially offset by the $2.6 million decrease in foreclosed properties expense.
33
Net Interest Income
The following table sets forth the average balances, net interest income on a
taxable-equivalent basis and average yields and rates for the Companys interest-earning assets and
interest-bearing liabilities for the indicated periods.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Interest-Earning Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal funds sold and other short-term investments
|
|
$
|
384,770
|
|
|
$
|
228
|
|
|
|
0.24
|
%
|
|
$
|
4,787
|
|
|
$
|
37
|
|
|
|
3.09
|
%
|
|
$
|
368,424
|
|
|
$
|
196
|
|
|
|
0.21
|
%
|
Securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable (1)
|
|
|
586,947
|
|
|
|
2,361
|
|
|
|
1.61
|
|
|
|
629,783
|
|
|
|
6,940
|
|
|
|
4.41
|
|
|
|
603,533
|
|
|
|
2,099
|
|
|
|
1.39
|
|
Exempt from federal income taxes (1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,551
|
|
|
|
846
|
|
|
|
5.78
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
5.41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities
|
|
|
586,947
|
|
|
|
2,361
|
|
|
|
1.61
|
|
|
|
688,334
|
|
|
|
7,786
|
|
|
|
4.52
|
|
|
|
603,607
|
|
|
|
2,100
|
|
|
|
1.39
|
|
FRB and FHLB stock
|
|
|
27,652
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
2.31
|
|
|
|
31,698
|
|
|
|
190
|
|
|
|
2.40
|
|
|
|
27,652
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
2.31
|
|
Loans (collateral-based classification):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial loans (1) (2) (3)
|
|
|
431,527
|
|
|
|
5,654
|
|
|
|
5.24
|
|
|
|
530,467
|
|
|
|
6,588
|
|
|
|
4.97
|
|
|
|
476,861
|
|
|
|
6,385
|
|
|
|
5.36
|
|
Commercial real estate loans (1) (2) (3) (4)
|
|
|
1,491,422
|
|
|
|
18,692
|
|
|
|
5.01
|
|
|
|
1,663,760
|
|
|
|
24,230
|
|
|
|
5.83
|
|
|
|
1,572,050
|
|
|
|
19,957
|
|
|
|
5.08
|
|
Agricultural loans (1) (2) (3)
|
|
|
6,509
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
6.51
|
|
|
|
7,516
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
6.33
|
|
|
|
5,808
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
6.54
|
|
Consumer real estate loans (2) (3) (4)
|
|
|
323,195
|
|
|
|
3,389
|
|
|
|
4.19
|
|
|
|
335,768
|
|
|
|
3,566
|
|
|
|
4.25
|
|
|
|
336,230
|
|
|
|
3,465
|
|
|
|
4.12
|
|
Consumer installment loans (2) (3)
|
|
|
5,323
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
6.54
|
|
|
|
6,259
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
6.84
|
|
|
|
5,284
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
6.59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans
|
|
|
2,257,976
|
|
|
|
27,928
|
|
|
|
4.95
|
|
|
|
2,543,770
|
|
|
|
34,610
|
|
|
|
5.44
|
|
|
|
2,396,233
|
|
|
|
29,989
|
|
|
|
5.01
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-earning assets
|
|
$
|
3,257,345
|
|
|
$
|
30,677
|
|
|
|
3.77
|
%
|
|
$
|
3,268,589
|
|
|
$
|
42,623
|
|
|
|
5.22
|
%
|
|
$
|
3,395,916
|
|
|
$
|
32,445
|
|
|
|
3.82
|
%
|
Noninterest-Earning Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
29,356
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
69,006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
35,439
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premises and equipment, net
|
|
|
39,307
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,166
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,412
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
(125,783
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(46,503
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(88,657
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
151,606
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
319,615
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
161,592
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest-earning assets
|
|
|
94,486
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
380,284
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
148,786
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
3,351,831
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,648,873
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,544,702
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-Bearing Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demand deposits
|
|
$
|
169,099
|
|
|
$
|
119
|
|
|
|
0.28
|
%
|
|
$
|
173,291
|
|
|
$
|
256
|
|
|
|
0.59
|
%
|
|
$
|
177,039
|
|
|
$
|
179
|
|
|
|
0.40
|
%
|
Money-market demand and savings accounts
|
|
|
329,926
|
|
|
|
598
|
|
|
|
0.73
|
|
|
|
351,778
|
|
|
|
753
|
|
|
|
0.86
|
|
|
|
342,499
|
|
|
|
703
|
|
|
|
0.82
|
|
Time deposits
|
|
|
1,672,098
|
|
|
|
7,887
|
|
|
|
1.89
|
|
|
|
1,618,236
|
|
|
|
12,676
|
|
|
|
3.13
|
|
|
|
1,717,023
|
|
|
|
9,046
|
|
|
|
2.11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing deposits
|
|
|
2,171,123
|
|
|
|
8,604
|
|
|
|
1.59
|
|
|
|
2,143,305
|
|
|
|
13,685
|
|
|
|
2.55
|
|
|
|
2,236,561
|
|
|
|
9,928
|
|
|
|
1.78
|
|
Borrowings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal funds purchased and repurchase agreements
|
|
|
297,683
|
|
|
|
3,193
|
|
|
|
4.29
|
|
|
|
333,990
|
|
|
|
3,234
|
|
|
|
3.87
|
|
|
|
297,687
|
|
|
|
3,264
|
|
|
|
4.39
|
|
FHLB advances
|
|
|
340,000
|
|
|
|
2,999
|
|
|
|
3.53
|
|
|
|
363,000
|
|
|
|
3,029
|
|
|
|
3.34
|
|
|
|
340,000
|
|
|
|
3,066
|
|
|
|
3.61
|
|
Junior subordinated debentures
|
|
|
60,828
|
|
|
|
423
|
|
|
|
2.78
|
|
|
|
60,799
|
|
|
|
739
|
|
|
|
4.86
|
|
|
|
60,828
|
|
|
|
439
|
|
|
|
2.89
|
|
Revolving note payable
|
|
|
8,600
|
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
|
7.26
|
|
|
|
8,600
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
2.00
|
|
|
|
8,600
|
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
|
7.40
|
|
Term note payable
|
|
|
55,000
|
|
|
|
657
|
|
|
|
4.78
|
|
|
|
55,000
|
|
|
|
282
|
|
|
|
2.05
|
|
|
|
55,000
|
|
|
|
673
|
|
|
|
4.89
|
|
Subordinated note payable
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
3.73
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
|
4.05
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
3.84
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total borrowings
|
|
|
777,111
|
|
|
|
7,568
|
|
|
|
3.90
|
|
|
|
836,389
|
|
|
|
7,479
|
|
|
|
3.58
|
|
|
|
777,115
|
|
|
|
7,745
|
|
|
|
3.99
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities
|
|
$
|
2,948,234
|
|
|
$
|
16,172
|
|
|
|
2.19
|
%
|
|
$
|
2,979,694
|
|
|
$
|
21,164
|
|
|
|
2.84
|
%
|
|
$
|
3,013,676
|
|
|
$
|
17,673
|
|
|
|
2.35
|
%
|
Noninterest-Bearing Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demand deposits
|
|
$
|
339,016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
330,957
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
343,055
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
32,915
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,203
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,670
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest-bearing liabilities
|
|
|
371,931
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
366,160
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
373,725
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity
|
|
|
31,666
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
303,019
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
157,301
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
3,351,831
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,648,873
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,544,702
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income (taxable- equivalent basis) (1) (5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
14,505
|
|
|
|
1.58
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
21,459
|
|
|
|
2.38
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
14,772
|
|
|
|
1.47
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest margin (taxable- equivalent basis) (1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.78
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.63
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.74
|
%
|
Net interest income (5) (6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
14,505
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
21,102
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
14,772
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest margin (6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.78
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.58
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.74
|
%
|
Average interest-earning assets to Interest-bearing
liabilities
|
|
|
110.48
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
109.70
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
112.68
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Adjusted for 35% tax rate and the dividends-received deduction where applicable.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Nonaccrual loans are included in the average balance; however, these loans are not earning
any interest.
|
|
(3)
|
|
Includes loan fees of $461, $476, and $554 for the three months ended March 31, 2010, March
31, 2009, and December 31, 2009, respectively.
|
|
(4)
|
|
Includes construction loans.
|
|
(5)
|
|
The following table reconciles reported net interest income on a taxable-equivalent basis for
the periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended,
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
$
|
14,505
|
|
|
$
|
21,102
|
|
|
$
|
14,772
|
|
Taxable-equivalent adjustment to net interest income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
357
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income, fully taxable-equivalent basis
|
|
$
|
14,505
|
|
|
$
|
21,459
|
|
|
$
|
14,772
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6)
|
|
Not adjusted for 35% tax rate or for the dividends-received deduction.
|
Net interest income is the difference between interest income and fees on earning assets and
interest expense on deposits and borrowings. Net interest margin represents net interest income on
a taxable-equivalent basis as a percentage of average earning assets during the period.
Net interest income on a fully taxable-equivalent basis decreased by $7.0 million, or 32.4%,
to $14.5 million in the first quarter of 2010 compared to the same period in 2009 and decreased by
$267,000 compared to the previous quarter. The net interest margin, on a taxable-equivalent
basis, increased to 1.78% in the first quarter of 2010 compared to 1.74% for the prior quarter,
mainly due to the decrease in average rates paid on interest-bearing liabilities. Compared to the
first quarter of 2009, the net interest margin decreased to 1.78% during the first quarter 2010
from 2.63%, largely as a result of an ongoing regulatory capital preservation strategy initiated in
the second quarter of 2009 that included repositioning the securities portfolio into shorter term,
lower yielding U.S. Treasury and U.S. government agency securities with lower capital requirements
and a decrease in loan originations both of which contributed to decreased interest income. The
net interest income was further depressed by the increase in nonaccrual loans and the relatively
high level of cash and low yielding cash equivalents maintained by the Bank as part of its
liquidity management strategy. Due to the Companys tax position at March 31, 2010 and December
31, 2009, the net interest margin does not reflect a fully taxable-equivalent adjustment in the
first quarter of 2010 and fourth quarter of 2009.
Trends in Fully Taxable-Equivalent Interest Income and Average Interest-Earning Assets
.
Interest income decreased by $11.9 million to $30.7 million in the first quarter of 2010 compared
to $42.6 million in the same period of 2009 and $1.8 million compared to $32.4 million in the
fourth quarter of 2009. Yields on average interest-earning assets decreased by 145 basis points in
the first quarter of 2010 compared to the first quarter of 2009, while average balances on
interest-earning assets decreased by $11.2 million. The decrease in yields was primarily due to
repositioning the securities portfolio into shorter term lower yielding securities in the second
quarter of 2009, interest income lost on nonaccrual loans, and the decrease in average loan
balances. Yields on average interest-earning assets decreased slightly by 5 basis points compared
to the fourth quarter of 2009.
Interest income on loans decreased $6.7 million to $27.9 million in the first quarter of 2010
from $34.6 million in the first quarter of 2009 due to a 49 basis point drop in yield, an increase
in nonaccrual loans, and a decrease in average loans of $285.8 million. Interest income on loans
decreased $2.1 million to $27.9 million in the first quarter of 2010 from $30.0 million in the
fourth quarter of 2009. The decline in loan yield was primarily due to the increase in nonaccrual
loans. Average loans decreased by $138.3 million compared to the fourth quarter of 2009.
Interest income on securities decreased $5.4 million to $2.4 million in the first quarter of
2010 from $7.8 million in the same period of 2009 but increased slightly by $261,000 compared to
$2.1 million in the fourth quarter of 2009. Yields on average securities decreased by 291 basis
points in the first quarter of 2010 compared to the same period in 2009 due largely to the
repositioning of the securities portfolio into shorter term, lower yielding securities in order to
preserve regulatory capital, but increased by 22 basis points
35
compared to the prior quarter.
Average securities decreased by $101.4 million in the first quarter of 2010 compared to the similar
period in 2009 and decreased by $16.7 million compared to the fourth quarter of 2009, mainly due to
maturities.
Trends in Interest Expense and Average Interest-Bearing Liabilities.
Interest
expense decreased $5.0 million to $16.2 million in the first quarter of 2010 from $21.2 million in
the same period of 2009 and decreased by $1.5 million from $17.7 million in the fourth quarter of
2009. Average balances of interest-bearing liabilities decreased by $31.5 million in the first
quarter of 2010 to $2.9
billion compared to $3.0 billion in the same period of 2009, and average rates paid decreased
65 basis points to 2.19% compared to 2.84% in the first quarter of 2009. Compared to the fourth
quarter of 2009, average balances of interest-bearing liabilities decreased by $65.4 million from
$3.0 billion, and average rates paid decreased by 16 basis points. The decrease in average rates
paid over both historical periods was due to the decrease in average rates paid on deposits.
Interest expense on deposits decreased by $5.1 million to $8.6 million in the first quarter of
2010 from $13.7 million in the same period of 2009. Average interest-bearing deposits increased by
$27.8 million, while average rates decreased 96 basis points in the first quarter of 2010 compared
to the similar period of 2009, mainly due to certificates of deposit that matured and did not renew
or renewed and re-priced at lower rates. Average rates paid on interest-bearing deposits decreased
by 19 basis points to 1.59% for the first quarter of 2010 compared to the fourth quarter of 2009,
and average balances decreased by $65.4 million. Average interest-bearing demand deposit, money
market, and savings accounts decreased by $26.0 million for the first quarter of 2010 compared to
the first quarter of 2009 and decreased by $20.5 million compared to the fourth quarter of 2009.
Interest expense on borrowings increased slightly to $7.6 million in the first quarter of 2010
from the same period in 2009. Interest expense on borrowings decreased by $177,000 in the first
quarter of 2010 compared to the fourth quarter of 2009 as a result of the decrease in short-term
LIBOR rates. The average costs of borrowings increased by 32 basis points in the first quarter of
2010 compared to the same period in 2009, mainly due to the increase to the default rates on the
revolving and term notes payable, while average balances decreased by $59.3 million. The average
cost of borrowings slightly decreased by 9 basis points in the first quarter of 2010 compared to
the fourth quarter of 2009, largely due to decreases in short-term LIBOR rates, while average
balances remained flat.
Noninterest Income
Set forth below is a summary of the first quarter 2010 noninterest income activity compared to
the first quarter and fourth quarter of 2009.
The annualized noninterest income to average assets ratio was 0.30% for the three months ended
March 31, 2010 compared to 0.37% for the same period in 2009 and 0.32% for the three months ended
December 31, 2009, as a result of the changes in noninterest income discussed below. Noninterest
income was $2.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010, a decrease of $853,000 over the
comparable period in 2009. This decrease was primarily attributable to the income lost due to the
liquidation of the bank owned life insurance during the second quarter of 2009. Noninterest income
for the first quarter of 2010 was $345,000 lower than the fourth quarter of 2009.
Service charges on deposits in the first quarter of 2010 decreased $255,000 to $1.6 million
when compared to the same period in 2009. Service charges on deposits decreased $202,000 when
compared to the fourth quarter of 2009 due to the decrease in the number of accounts and balances.
Insurance and brokerage commissions for the three months ended March 31, 2010 decreased by $87,000,
or 27.2%, to $233,000 when compared to the first quarter of 2009, but slightly increased by $13,000
when compared to the fourth quarter of 2009. The decrease compared to the prior-year period was
primarily due to the difficult economy resulting in a lower volume of transactions. Trust income
increased slightly by $13,000 in the first quarter of 2010 compared to the first quarter of 2009
and decreased by $11,000 compared to the fourth quarter of 2009.
36
Noninterest Expense
Set forth below is a summary of the first quarter 2010 noninterest expense compared to the
first quarter and fourth quarter of 2009.
The annualized noninterest expense to average assets ratio was 5.32% for the three months
ended March 31, 2010 compared to 2.39% for the same period in 2009 and 4.31% for the three months
ended December 31, 2009, as a result of the changes in noninterest expense discussed below. Total
noninterest expense increased by $22.5 million, to $44.0 million during the first quarter of 2010
compared to $21.5 million for the similar period in 2009. Noninterest expense for first quarter of
2010 included a goodwill impairment charge of $21.0 million and FDIC insurance expense increased by
$2.0 million when compared to the first quarter of 2009. The increase in noninterest expense of
$5.5 million in the first quarter of 2010 compared to the fourth quarter of 2009 was due to the
increase in the goodwill impairment charge of $7.0 million which was partly offset by the decrease
in foreclosed properties expense of $2.6 million.
Salaries and benefits expense decreased by $2.2 million, or 19.8%, during the first quarter of
2010 compared to the first quarter of 2009, due to cost reduction initiatives as well as the
decrease in incentive and stock based compensation expense but increased slightly by $272,000
compared to the fourth quarter of 2009. Occupancy and equipment expense decreased during the first
quarter of 2010 to $2.9 million or by $344,000 and $374,000 when compared to the similar period in
2009 and the fourth quarter of 2009, respectively. Professional services expense rose by $1.2
million to $3.3 million in the first quarter of 2010 compared to the first quarter of 2009.
Professional services expense increased by $653,000 compared to the fourth quarter of 2009. This
increase was due to the increased legal and consulting fees related to Capital Plan activities and
the goodwill study. Marketing expenses in the first quarter of 2010 were $573,000 lower than in the
first quarter of 2009 and flat compared to the fourth quarter of 2009, as certain programs were
scaled back or put on hold in order to control costs. Foreclosed properties expense increased in
the first quarter of 2010 by $443,000 compared to the first quarter of 2009 but decreased by $2.6
million compared to the fourth quarter of 2009. The decrease from the prior quarter was due to the
write-down of certain properties to current fair value less costs to sell in the first quarter of
2009. FDIC insurance expense increased $2.0 million to $3.2 million in the first quarter of 2010
compared to the same period in 2009 due to increased regular quarterly FDIC premiums but decreased
by $110,000 compared to the prior quarter.
Income Taxes
The Company recorded a provision for income taxes of $3.8 million, or 3.7% of loss before
income taxes, and an income tax benefit of $5.0 million, or 48.4% of loss before income taxes, for
the quarters ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The change in the effective tax rate is
attributable to the establishment and addition to the deferred tax asset valuation allowance due to
the inability to conclude it was more likely than not the Company could execute certain tax
strategies in the future. Although it increased tax expense for the
first quarter of 2010 and similarly reduced tangible book value, the
increase in the valuation allowance did not have an
effect on the Companys cash flows. The Companys marginal tax rate is approximately 40%.
The difference between the provision for income taxes in the consolidated financial statements
and amounts computed by applying the current federal statutory income tax rate of 35% to income
before income taxes is reconciled as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes computed at the statutory rate
|
|
$
|
(36,416
|
)
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
(3,611
|
)
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
Tax-exempt interest income on securities and loans
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(229
|
)
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
General business credits
|
|
|
(147
|
)
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
(609
|
)
|
|
|
5.9
|
|
State income taxes, net of federal tax benefit due to state operating loss
|
|
|
(3,615
|
)
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
|
(523
|
)
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
Life insurance cash surrender value increase, net of premiums
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(293
|
)
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
Goodwill impairment
|
|
|
7,350
|
|
|
|
(7.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
36,885
|
|
|
|
(35.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nondeductible costs and other, net
|
|
|
(208
|
)
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
269
|
|
|
|
(2.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes
|
|
$
|
3,834
|
|
|
|
(3.7
|
)%
|
|
$
|
(4,996
|
)
|
|
|
48.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37
Financial Condition
Balance Sheet.
Total assets decreased by $253.1 million, or 7.4%, during the first quarter of
2010 compared to year end 2009, mainly as a result of the decline in loans and cash and cash
equivalents and the $21.0 million goodwill impairment charge. Loans decreased by $135.9 million, or
5.9%, during the first three months ended March 31, 2010
compared to year end 2009, partly due to charge-offs of $63.8 million and stricter underwriting standards which decreased the number
of new originations. Deposits decreased by $149.9 million, or 5.8% mainly as a result of the
decrease in certificates of deposit and money market accounts. Cash and cash equivalents decreased
to $380.4 million at March 31, 2010 compared to $442.1 million at December 31, 2009 as a result of
increased funding needs due to the decrease in deposits.
Asset Quality.
The downturn in the commercial and residential real estate markets continued
to have a material negative impact on the Companys loan portfolio, resulting in the continued
deterioration in credit quality and an increase in nonaccrual loans, loan losses, and the allowance
for loan losses. Nonaccrual loans increased to 12.73% of total loans at March 31, 2010 from 11.80%
at December 31, 2009. Foreclosed properties decreased slightly from $26.9 million at year end 2009
to $26.7 million at March 31, 2010. Loan delinquencies of 30-89 days were 2.29% of loans at March
31, 2010, down from 2.71% at December 31, 2009. Nonperforming assets were 9.94% of total assets at
March 31, 2010, up from 9.09% at December 31, 2009, mostly as a result of the decrease in assets
while nonaccrual loans increased $4.2 million. The allowance for loan losses was $142.3 million, or
6.51% of total loans, as of March 31, 2010 compared to $128.8 million, or 5.55% of total loans, as
of December 31, 2009. The provision for loan losses was $76.3 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2010 and net charge-offs were $62.8 million. The allowance for loan losses to nonaccrual
loans ratio was 51.17% at March 31, 2010 and 47.04% at December 31, 2009.
Loans
The following table sets forth the composition of the Companys loan portfolio on a source of
repayment basis as of the indicated dates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Gross
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
$
|
923,843
|
|
|
|
42.3
|
%
|
|
$
|
972,090
|
|
|
|
41.9
|
%
|
Construction
|
|
|
245,586
|
|
|
|
11.2
|
|
|
|
293,215
|
|
|
|
12.6
|
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
|
695,511
|
|
|
|
31.8
|
|
|
|
725,814
|
|
|
|
31.3
|
|
Home equity
|
|
|
209,993
|
|
|
|
9.7
|
|
|
|
219,183
|
|
|
|
9.5
|
|
Other consumer
|
|
|
4,877
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
5,454
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
Residential mortgage
|
|
|
105,186
|
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
|
|
105,147
|
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans, gross
|
|
|
2,184,996
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
2,320,903
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
Net deferred fees
|
|
|
(556
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(584
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans, net
|
|
$
|
2,184,440
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,320,319
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans, net of deferred fess, decreased by $135.9 million at March 31, 2010 from year end
2009. The Company expects to see continued portfolio declines in the near term due to its focus on
underwriting and pricing discipline begun in 2009.
Allowance for Loan Losses
The allowance for loan losses has been established to provide for those loans that may not be
repaid in their entirety. The allowance is maintained at a level considered by management to be
adequate to provide for probable incurred losses. The allowance is increased by provisions charged
to earnings and is reduced by charge-offs, net of recoveries. The provision for loan losses is
based upon past loan loss experience and managements evaluation of the loan portfolio under
current economic conditions. Loans are charged to the allowance for loan losses when, and to the
extent, they are deemed by management to be uncollectible. The allowance for loan losses is
comprised of allocations for specific loans and a historical loss based portion for all other
loans.
38
Following is a summary of activity in the allowance for loan losses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
128,800
|
|
|
$
|
44,432
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
76,300
|
|
|
|
13,000
|
|
Loans charged off
|
|
|
(63,810
|
)
|
|
|
(4,819
|
)
|
Recoveries
|
|
|
994
|
|
|
|
398
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loans charged off
|
|
|
(62,816
|
)
|
|
|
(4,421
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
$
|
142,284
|
|
|
$
|
53,011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A provision for loan losses of $76.3 million was taken for the first quarter of 2010 compared
to $13.0 million for the similar period in 2009, reflecting managements updated assessments of
impaired loans, above-standard discounts applied to collateral values of certain loans individually
assessed for impairment, migration of unimpaired loans into higher credit risk rating categories,
elevated level of charge-offs, and concerns about the continued deterioration of economic
conditions. The Company had net charge-offs of $62.8 million for the first quarter of 2010 compared
to $4.4 million for the same period in 2009. During the three months ended March 31, 2010, the
Company charged off $63.8 million on loans compared to $4.8 million for the same period in 2009.
The Company had a reserve for losses on unfunded commitments of $2.4 million at March 31,
2010, up from $2.2 million at December 31, 2009 and $1.3 million at March 31, 2009.
The following table sets forth certain asset quality ratios related to the allowance for loan
losses on a quarter-to-date basis as of the indicated dates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
Net loans charged off to average loans during quarter
|
|
|
11.28
|
%
|
|
|
8.73
|
%
|
|
|
0.70
|
%
|
Provision for loan losses to total loans
|
|
|
14.17
|
|
|
|
16.76
|
|
|
|
2.03
|
|
Allowance for loan losses to total loans
|
|
|
6.51
|
|
|
|
5.55
|
|
|
|
2.05
|
|
Allowance to nonaccrual loans
|
|
|
0.51x
|
|
|
|
0.47x
|
|
|
|
0.66x
|
|
The Company recognizes that credit losses will be experienced and the risk of loss will vary
with, among other things; general economic conditions; the type of loan being made; the
creditworthiness of the borrower over the term of the loan; and in the case of a collateralized
loan, the quality of the collateral and personal guarantees. The allowance for loan losses
represents the Companys estimate of the amount deemed necessary to provide for probable losses
existing in the portfolio at a point in time. In making this determination, the Company analyzes
the ultimate collectibility of the loans in its portfolio by incorporating feedback provided by
internal loan staff. Each loan officer grades his or her individual commercial credits and the
Companys loan review personnel independently review the officers grades.
In the event that the loan is downgraded during this review, the loan is included in the
allowance analysis at the lower grade. On a monthly basis, management of the Bank meets to review
the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses.
Estimating the amount of the allowance for loan losses requires significant judgment and the
use of estimates related to the value of the collateral on impaired loans, estimated losses on
pools of homogeneous loans based on historical loss experience, and consideration of current
economic trends and conditions, all of which may be susceptible to significant change. The loan
portfolio also represents the largest asset type on the consolidated balance sheet. Loan losses are
charged off against the allowance, while recoveries of amounts previously charged off are credited
to the allowance. A provision for loan losses is charged to operations based on managements
periodic evaluation of the factors previously mentioned, as well as other pertinent factors.
39
The Companys methodology for determining the allowance for loan losses represents an
estimation pursuant to the authoritative guidance for contingencies (ASC 450) and loan impairments
(ASC 310-10-35). The allowance reflects expected losses resulting from analyses developed through
specific credit allocations for individual loans and historical loss experience for each loan
category. The specific credit allocations are based on regular analyses of all loans over $300,000
where the internal credit rating is at or below a predetermined classification. These analyses
involve a high degree of judgment in estimating the amount of loss associated with specific loans,
including estimating the amount and timing of future cash flows and collateral values. The
allowance for loan losses also includes consideration of concentrations and changes in portfolio
mix and volume and other qualitative factors.
During the third quarter of 2009, steps were taken to improve the credit review function. The
Company strengthened its portfolio review process, tracking of credit trends and documentation of
exceptions. The Company devoted additional resources to its loan workout unit and engaged an
independent firm to actively manage problem loans.
With the additional resources devoted to the loan workout area, management has sharpened its
understanding of the factors impacting the primary and secondary sources of repayment and
collateral support, and has used this information in the risk ratings and other classifications
utilized in the computation of the allowance for loan losses. In determining loan specific reserves
in the allowance for loan losses, the Company generally assigns average discounts of 25-30% to
independent appraisal values, dependent upon loan and collateral type. These discount rates have
been adjusted periodically based upon changes in the Chicago commercial real estate market and can
be higher depending upon the risk characteristics of the property. The Companys allowance for loan
losses to nonperforming loans ratio increased to 49.14% as of March 31, 2010 from 45.12% at
December 31, 2009 and specific reserves to loans analyzed for possible impairment decreased
slightly to 25.46% as of March 31, 2010, from 26.48% as of December 31, 2009.
During the three months ended March 31, 2010, the Company recorded a provision for loan losses
of $76.3 million and recognized net loan charge-offs totaling $62.8 million. Nonaccrual loans
increased by $4.2 million compared to December 31, 2009, to $278.1 million, or 12.73% of loans at
March 31, 2010. While nonaccrual loans increased in the first quarter of 2010, the provision for
loan losses was greater than net charge-offs for the three months ended March 31, 2010. The ratio
of allowance for loan losses to loans increased to 6.51% at March 31, 2010 from 5.55% at December
31, 2009.
Management computes and provides to the Board of Directors various allowance for loan loss and
other credit quality ratios as one tool to assist in comparing and understanding changes from
previous periods and to the relative performance of its peers. These reviews are performed to
better understand changes in credit quality over time and to determine the reasonableness of the
level of the allowance for loan losses. Although these ratios provide useful benchmarks, this
analysis is just one tool used to determine that the level of the allowance for loan losses is
adequate.
There are many factors affecting the allowance for loan losses; some are quantitative while
others require qualitative judgment. The process for determining the allowance (which management
believes adequately considers all of the factors which potentially result in credit losses)
includes subjective elements and, therefore, the allowance may be susceptible to significant
change. To the extent actual outcomes differ from management estimates, additional provisions for
loan losses could be required that could adversely affect the Companys earnings or financial
position in future periods.
Nonaccrual Loans and Nonperforming Assets
Nonaccrual loans increased by $4.2 million to $278.1 million at March 31, 2010 from December
31, 2009. Nonperforming assets were $316.3 million at March 31, 2010 compared to $312.4 million at
December 31, 2009. Interest payments on impaired loans are generally applied to principal, unless
the loan principal is considered to be fully collectible, in which case interest is recognized on a
cash basis. During the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, the Company recognized interest
income on impaired loans of $117,000, and $102,000, respectively. The interest income that would
have been recorded in the first quarter of 2010 if the nonaccrual loans had been current in
accordance with their original terms was approximately $4.2 million.
40
The following table sets forth information on the Companys nonaccrual loans and nonperforming
assets as of the indicated dates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Impaired and other loans 90 days past due and accruing
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonaccrual loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial
|
|
$
|
28,239
|
|
|
$
|
20,719
|
|
Commercial real estate non-owner occupied
|
|
|
104,279
|
|
|
|
110,504
|
|
Commercial real estate owner occupied
|
|
|
22,073
|
|
|
|
19,573
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
68,446
|
|
|
|
73,124
|
|
Vacant land
|
|
|
37,849
|
|
|
|
37,021
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial and commercial real estate
|
|
|
260,886
|
|
|
|
260,941
|
|
Other consumer
|
|
|
17,168
|
|
|
|
12,588
|
|
Home equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
294
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consumer
|
|
|
17,168
|
|
|
|
12,882
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total nonaccrual loans
|
|
|
278,054
|
|
|
|
273,823
|
|
Troubled-debt restructured loans accruing
|
|
|
11,485
|
|
|
|
11,635
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total nonperforming loans
|
|
|
289,539
|
|
|
|
285,458
|
|
Foreclosed properties
|
|
|
26,715
|
|
|
|
26,917
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total nonperforming assets
|
|
$
|
316,254
|
|
|
$
|
312,375
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonaccrual loans to loans
|
|
|
12.73
|
%
|
|
|
11.80
|
%
|
Nonperforming assets to loans and foreclosed properties
|
|
|
14.30
|
|
|
|
13.31
|
|
Nonperforming assets to assets
|
|
|
9.94
|
|
|
|
9.09
|
|
Nonaccrual commercial and industrial loans increased by $7.5 million from December 31, 2009 to
March 31, 2010 (net of $6.8 million gross charge-offs). Of the 51 loan relationships comprising
the $28.2 million of nonaccrual loans with an average balance of $554,000, the largest increase
came from an $11.0 million loan relationship to a road/highway contractor secured by business
assets, a single family residence, and vacant land. The Company has $3.5 million in a specific
loan loss reserve for this loan relationship as of March 31, 2010. The Companys total credit
exposure to this customer is $16.1 million.
Overall the nonaccrual commercial real estate (owner and non-owner occupied), construction,
and vacant land loans decreased by $7.6 million, or 3.2%, from December 31, 2009 to March 31, 2010
(net of $54.7 million gross charge-offs).
Nonaccrual other consumer loans increased by $4.6 million from December 31, 2009 to March 31,
2010 (net of $1.9 million gross charge-offs). Of the 90 loan relationships, comprising the balance
at quarter end, the average balance was $191,000.
As of March 31, 2010, there is $51.7 million in nonaccrual troubled-debt restructurings to 12
borrowers and $11.5 million in accruing troubled-debt restructurings to four borrowers. The Company
had $9.7 million in nonaccrual troubled-debt restructurings to two borrowers and $11.6 million in
accruing troubled-debt restructurings to five borrowers as of December 31, 2009. In order to
improve the collectibility of the troubled-debt restructured loans, the Company restructured the
terms of the loans by lifting a forbearance agreement, lowering interest rates, or changing payment
terms. No additional commitments were outstanding on the troubled-debt restructured loans as of
March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009. No specific allowance was allocated to the accruing
troubled-debt restructured loans at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009. As of March 31, 2010,
based upon estimated collateral values the Company held $15.1 million in specific loan loss
reserves for the nonaccrual troubled-debt restructurings.
Foreclosed properties were $26.7 million at March 31, 2010, a decrease of $202,000 compared to
December 31, 2009. The $26.7 million in foreclosed properties as of March 31, 2010 includes $12.0
million in construction, $7.7 million in commercial real estate, and $7.0 million in residential
properties. Foreclosed properties were written down to current fair value less costs to sell
during the first quarter of 2010 and a corresponding charge of
$356,000 was recorded in
foreclosed properties expense.
41
In addition to the loans summarized above, on March 31, 2010, the Company had $744.2 million
of loans currently performing that have been internally assigned higher credit risk ratings. The
higher risk ratings are primarily due to internally identified specific or collective credit
characteristics including decreased capacity to repay loan obligations due to adverse market
conditions, a lack of borrower or guarantors capital capacity and reduced collateral valuations
securing the loans as a secondary source of repayment. These loans continue to accrue interest.
Management recognizes that a higher level of scrutiny of these loans is prudent under the
circumstances. Similarly rated loans were $608.7 million as of December 31, 2009.
Securities
The Company manages its securities portfolio to provide a source of both liquidity and
earnings. The investment policy is developed in conjunction with established asset/liability
committee directives. The investment policy is reviewed by senior management of the Company in
terms of its objectives, investment guidelines and consistency with overall Company performance and
risk management goals. The asset/liability committee of the Board of Directors is responsible for
reporting and monitoring compliance with the investment policy as well as approving the investment
policy. Reports are provided to the asset/liability committee of the Board of Directors and the
Board of Directors of the Company on a regular basis.
The following tables set forth the composition of the Companys securities portfolio by major
category as of March 31, 2010. No securities classified as held-to-maturity were held at March 31,
2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Obligations of U.S. Treasury
|
|
$
|
293,974
|
|
|
$
|
293,965
|
|
|
|
51.4
|
%
|
Mortgage-backed securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government agencies residential (1)
|
|
|
259,892
|
|
|
|
260,500
|
|
|
|
45.5
|
|
Equity securities of U.S. government-sponsored entities (2)
|
|
|
2,749
|
|
|
|
2,184
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
Corporate and other debt securities
|
|
|
14,871
|
|
|
|
10,970
|
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities available-for-sale
|
|
$
|
571,486
|
|
|
$
|
567,619
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Includes obligations of Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA).
|
|
(2)
|
|
Includes issues from Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA) and
of Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (FHLMC).
|
As of March 31, 2010, the Company held one security with a book value exceeding 10% of
stockholders equity other than those of the U.S. government or government-sponsored entities. This
investment grade security was a collateralized debt obligation issued by PreTSL XXVII, Ltd. with an
amortized cost of $10.8 million and fair value of $7.0 million at March 31, 2010. The Company holds
the highest tranche of the issue, which entitles the Company to receive interest and principal
payments before other lower tranches. The underlying securities for this security are trust
preferred securities issued mainly by depositary institution holding companies and, to a lesser
extent, insurance companies in diverse geographic regions.
Securities available-for-sale are carried at fair value, with related unrealized net gains or
losses, net of any deferred income taxes, recorded as an adjustment to other comprehensive loss. At
March 31, 2010, net unrealized losses on securities available-for-sale were $3.9 million compared
to net unrealized losses of $8.3 million at December 31, 2009. A deferred income tax adjustment to
the carrying value was not recorded as a result of the Companys tax position at March 31, 2010 and
December 31, 2009.
The Companys securities available-for-sale portfolio decreased $13.9 million, or 2.4%, to
$567.6 million as of March 31, 2010 compared to December 31, 2009. Set forth below are other
highlights of the securities portfolio.
Obligations of U.S. Treasury decreased by $17.0 million to $294.0 million, or 51.4% of
the portfolio in terms of amortized cost, at March 31, 2010 compared to $310.9 million at the
end of 2009. At March 31, 2010, the Companys holdings in this category consisted only of
U.S. Treasury bills with maturities of less than three months.
42
U.S. government agency mortgage-backed securities increased 1.6%, or $4.2 million, from
$256.3 million at December 31, 2009 to $260.5 million at March 31, 2010.
Equity securities decreased $88,000 to $2.2 million at March 31, 2010 from December 31,
2009 as a result of the decrease in fair market value.
Corporate and other debt securities increased by $249,000 to $11.0 million at March 31,
2010 from $10.7 million at December 31, 2009 mainly as a result of an increase in market
value.
The securities portfolio does not contain any sub-prime or Alt-A mortgage-backed securities.
Certain available-for-sale securities were temporarily impaired at March 31, 2010. The
unrealized loss on available-for-sale securities is included in other comprehensive loss on the
consolidated balance sheets. Management has concluded that no individual unrealized loss as of
March 31, 2010 represents other-than-temporary impairment. The Company does not intend to sell nor
would it be required to sell the temporarily impaired securities before recovering their amortized
cost. See Note 6 Securities of the notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements for
more details.
Cash Surrender Value of Life Insurance
During the second quarter of 2009, the Company liquidated its entire $85.8 million investment
in bank owned life insurance in order to reduce the Companys investment risk and risk-weighted
assets, which favorably impacted the Banks regulatory capital ratios and liquidity.
Goodwill
Goodwill was $43.9 million at March 31, 2010 compared to $64.9 million at December 31, 2009
due to an impairment of $21.0 million recorded in the first quarter of 2010.
It has been the established policy of the Company to perform its annual review for goodwill
impairment as of September 30th of each year. Under the authoritative guidance for intangibles
goodwill and other (ASC 350), a goodwill impairment test is required between annual testing dates
if an event occurred or circumstances changed that would more likely than not reduce the fair value
of goodwill below the carrying amount. During the quarter ended March 31, 2010, management
considered whether events and circumstances would require an interim test of goodwill impairment.
Management concluded that it was more likely than not that events and changes in circumstances,
both individually and in the aggregate, reduced the fair value of the Companys single reporting
unit below its carrying amount. Managements analysis was based on and considered changes in the
key indicators and inputs consistent with those included in its previous goodwill impairment
reviews such as stock price, estimated control premium, future available cash flows, business
strategy, credit quality metrics, loan growth, core deposits and regulatory capital requirements
along with interest rates, credit spreads and collateral values.
The Company determined that activities in the first quarter of 2010, including the PCA with
its regulators, the expiration of the Forbearance Agreement and the decline in the Banks
regulatory capital position to critically undercapitalized constituted triggering events during
that period that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of goodwill below the carrying
amount and would, therefore, require that an interim goodwill impairment test be performed. As a
result of that test, a $21.0 million goodwill impairment was recorded as of March 31, 2010. It was
determined that the decline in the fair value was partially attributable to a decline in the fair
values of the net assets of the single reporting unit and partially to a decline in the value of
the goodwill. Management concluded the decrease in the fair value was primarily attributable to
prolonged weak economic conditions and the impact these conditions have had on the fair value of
the Companys loan portfolio and decreases in market interest rates. However, since the net result
of the fair value estimates of all other assets and liabilities was less than the fair value of
stockholders equity, goodwill was determined to be impaired.
Following is a summary of the methodologies employed to conduct the Companys testing at March
31, 2010, the underlying assumptions and related rationale in the context of current facts and
circumstances, and how the methodologies employed compared with those used in prior tests.
Management worked closely with a third party valuation specialist throughout the valuation
process. Management provided necessary information to this third party and reviewed the
methodologies and assumptions used including loan and deposit growth, regulatory capital
requirements, and the Companys business strategy.
43
The Company operates in one operating segment, community banking, as defined in the
authoritative guidance for segment reporting (ASC 280) and currently does not internally report its
operating income below that level or provide such information to its chief executive officer, the
Companys chief operating decision maker. For this reason, the Company performs its goodwill
impairment test as one reporting unit at the consolidated company level.
A variation of the market approach was utilized to estimate the fair value of the Company. The
fair value estimate of the Companys publicly traded market capitalization was computed utilizing
March 31, 2010 closing prices for the two publicly traded components of equity, the Companys
common stock and Series A preferred stock. No implied control premium was assumed. The fair value
of the Series G mandatorily convertible preferred stock was determined, due to its mandatory
conversion feature, based upon the value of the Companys common stock. The valuation assumed the
Series G Preferred and accrued dividends would be converted into common stock at a conversion rate
of 527 shares of common stock per Series G Preferred share. A 20% discount was applied for lack of
marketability.
Based on the further decline in the observable equity value of the Company in the first
quarter of 2010, and the material adverse events occurring in the first quarter of 2010, the
Company concluded that Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test should be performed. A discussion of
the Step 2 test assumptions, methods, and results is presented below.
In Step 2 of the test, the Company estimated the fair value of assets and liabilities in the
same manner as if a purchase of the reporting unit was taking place from a market participant
perspective, which includes estimating the fair value of other intangibles. The fair value
estimation methodology selected for the Companys most significant assets and liabilities was based
on the Companys observations and knowledge of methodologies typically and currently utilized by
market participants, the structure and characteristics of the asset and liability in terms of cash
flows and collateral, and the availability and reliability of significant inputs required for a
selected methodology and comparative data to evaluate the outcomes. Specifically, the Company
selected the income approach for performing loans, retail certificates of deposit, core deposit
intangibles, the market approach for branch properties, and
a weighted combination of the fair value assuming conversion to common stock at a discount
and a liquidation scenario for all correspondent bank debt and a weighted combination of
discounted cash flows reflecting the effects of credit spreads and a liquidation scenario
value estimate for the junior subordinated debentures.
The Company estimated fair values separately for
nonaccrual loans and loans 60-89 days past due and accruing. The income approach was deemed
appropriate for the assets and liabilities noted above due to the limited current comparable market
transaction data available. The market approach was deemed appropriate for the branch properties
due to the nature of the underlying real and personal property.
The value of loans net of the allowance for loan losses was $2.0 billion or 64.2% of Company
assets as of March 31, 2010. The estimated fair value of loans net of the allowance was
$4.4 million, or 0.2%, below book value. In computing this estimated fair value, performing loans
were separated into fixed and variable components, floors and collateral coverage ratios were
considered, and appropriate comparable market discount rates were used to compute fair values using
a discounted cash flow approach. A 33% discount was applied to nonaccrual loans based upon recent
Company loss experience and a 10% discount was applied to loans 60-89 days past due and accruing.
The core deposit intangible asset fair value was estimated by computing the expected future
cost savings from holding low cost deposits and resulted in a fair value estimate $4.8 million
above book value. Estimated fair value for the Companys branch facilities was $6.3 million above
book value based upon appraisals received in December 2009 adjusted for estimated changes in the
quarter based upon changes in a published Chicago real estate market index.
The fair values of
the Companys liabilities were estimated using: price estimates from a nationally known dealer for securities
sold under repurchasing agreements, market price quotes from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Chicago
(FHLBC) on FHLBC advances, discounted cash flows for the time and brokered deposits, a weighted
combination of the fair value assuming conversion to common stock at a discount and a liquidation
scenario for all correspondent bank debt and a weighted combination of discounted cash flows reflecting
the effects of credit spreads and a liquidation scenario value estimate for the junior subordinated
debentures.
The fair value estimate for all liabilities was $62.8 million below carrying value.
Time and brokered deposits were determined to have a net fair value $11.8 million over carrying
value, but borrowings including related accrued interest receivables were determined to have a net
fair value $74.6 million below their carrying value.
Material assumptions used in the fair value estimate include effective tax rates, market
discount rates, terminal residual values, and composition of market comparables. Changes in any of
these assumptions can have a material effect on the fair value used in the goodwill impairment
evaluation. In particular, changes in the prices of the Companys publicly traded stocks affect the
estimated fair values determined in Step 1. As a financial institution, the fair value estimates in
Step 2 are extremely sensitive to changes in market interest rates and credit spreads, especially
on the values of longer term fixed rate assets and liabilities. As noted above, net loans
represented 64.2% of total assets as of March 31, 2010. Using the March 31, 2010 impairment study
values, a 1% change in loan fair values up or down due to market interest rates or changes in
credit spreads would change the net loan fair value by $20.4 million. Core deposit intangible fair
values increase with higher market interest rates. The fair value of long term borrowings with
fixed interest
44
rates generally increase as market rates decline and decrease as market rates increase. Loan
and borrowing fair values are also affected by changes in market credit spreads.
The same
independent third party valuation specialist was used for the December 31, 2009 and March 31, 2010
studies. Other than as described below, the methodologies used in the goodwill impairment testing
for March 31, 2010 were similar to those used in the test completed as of December 31, 2009. In the
December 2009 fair value study, a weighted average of the income approach and a liquidation scenario
were used to estimate the fair value of the credit agreements with a correspondent bank and the
income approach was used for the junior subordinated debentures. In the March 31, 2010 study,
a weighted average of a conversion value to common stock and a liquidation value was used to estimate
the fair value of the credit agreements with a correspondent bank. A weighted average of the income
approach and a liquidation scenario were used to estimate the fair value of the junior subordinated
debentures. These changes were made due to the status of the capital raise and the receipt of the PCA.
Compared to the December 2009 test, interest rates were stable in 2010 and asset quality declined slightly.
Credit spreads narrowed by approximately 40 basis points, 50 basis points, 30 basis points, and 50 basis
points for BBB-rated, BB-rated, B-rated, and CCC-rated bond indices, respectively, between December 31,
2009 and March 31, 2010. In both studies no control premium was assumed in the fair value of stockholders
equity estimates.
The Company will
continue to assess any shortfall in its equity fair value relative to its total book value and tangible
book value, including what might be attributed to either industry-wide or company-specific factors, and
to evaluate whether any additional adjustments are required in the carrying value of goodwill.
Deposits and Borrowed Funds
The following table sets forth deposits by type as of the periods presented.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Noninterest-bearing demand
|
|
$
|
347,483
|
|
|
$
|
349,796
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing demand
|
|
|
163,285
|
|
|
|
178,172
|
|
Money-market
|
|
|
122,285
|
|
|
|
168,228
|
|
Savings
|
|
|
174,635
|
|
|
|
172,969
|
|
Certificates of deposit less than $100,000
|
|
|
803,863
|
|
|
|
833,187
|
|
Certificates of deposit of $100,000 or more
|
|
|
414,572
|
|
|
|
413,256
|
|
Brokered certificates of deposit
|
|
|
394,069
|
|
|
|
454,503
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing deposits
|
|
|
2,072,709
|
|
|
|
2,220,315
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
2,420,192
|
|
|
$
|
2,570,111
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total core deposits (1)
|
|
$
|
807,688
|
|
|
$
|
869,165
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Consists of noninterest-bearing and interest-bearing demand, money market, and savings.
|
Beginning with the first quarter of 2010, as a result of the Banks undercapitalized status
for regulatory capital purposes, the Bank is no longer able to accept or renew brokered deposits or
secure deposits at rates that are higher than the prevailing effective rates on insured deposits of
comparable amounts or maturities in the Banks normal market area or 75 basis points higher than
the national rates published weekly by the FDIC. See Note 2 Regulatory Capital of the notes to
the unaudited consolidated financial statements for further information.
Total deposits of $2.4 billion at March 31, 2010 represented a decrease of $149.9 million, or
5.8%, from December 31, 2009. Changes in the Companys deposits are noted below.
|
|
|
Interest-bearing deposits decreased 6.6%, or $147.6 million to $2.1 billion at
March 31, 2010 compared to December 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
Core deposits decreased $61.5 million to $807.7 million at March 31, 2010 from
$869.2 million at December 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
Certificates of deposit under $100,000 decreased $29.3 million, or 3.5%, from
December 31, 2009 to $803.9 million at March 31, 2010, as a result of maturities that
were not replaced.
|
|
|
|
|
Certificates of deposit through the CDARS and Internet networks were $132.9 million
at March 31, 2010 compared to $137.8 million at December 31, 2009. These networks allow
the Company to access other deposit funding sources.
|
45
|
|
|
Brokered certificates of deposit decreased $60.4 million, or 13.3%, to $394.1
million at March 31, 2010 compared to year end 2009 due to maturities and the Bank not
accepting or renewing brokered deposits. The brokered certificates of deposit are
comprised of underlying certificates of deposits in denominations of less than $100,000.
At March 31, 2010, the brokered deposits had a weighted average maturity of approximately
six months.
|
The Company continues to participate in the FDICs Transaction Account Guarantee Program. This
program consists of two components. The first is the Transaction Account Guarantee Program where
all noninterest-bearing transaction deposit accounts, including all personal and business checking
deposit accounts, and NOW accounts, which are capped at a rate no higher than 0.50% are fully
guaranteed by the FDIC through June 30, 2010 and at a rate no higher than 0.25% through December
31, 2010 regardless of dollar amount. All other deposit accounts continue to be covered by the
FDICs expanded deposit insurance limit of $250,000 through December 31, 2013.
In 2009, the FDIC increased premium assessments to maintain adequate funding of the Deposit
Insurance Fund (the DIF). Assessment rates set by the FDIC, effective April 1, 2009, generally
range from 12 to 45 basis points; however, these rates may be adjusted upward or downward if the
institution has unsecured debt or secured liabilities. As a result, assessment rates for
institutions may range from 7 basis points to 77.5 basis points. These increases in premium
assessments have increased the Companys expenses. In addition, on May 22, 2009, the FDIC board
agreed to impose an emergency special assessment of 5 basis points on all banks (based on June 30,
2009 assets) to restore the Deposit Insurance Fund to an acceptable level. The assessment was paid
on September 30, 2009 and was in addition to the increase in premiums discussed above. The cost of
this emergency special assessment to the Company was $1.7 million in 2009. On November 12, 2009,
the FDIC issued new assessment regulations that require FDIC-insured institutions to prepay on
December 30, 2009 their estimated quarterly risk-based assessments for the fourth quarter 2009 and
for all of 2010, 2011 and 2012; however certain financial institutions, including the Bank, were
exempted from the new prepayment regulations and will continue to pay their risk-based assessments
on a quarterly basis.
Borrowed funds are summarized below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Revolving note payable
|
|
$
|
8,600
|
|
|
$
|
8,600
|
|
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
|
|
|
297,650
|
|
|
|
297,650
|
|
Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank
|
|
|
340,000
|
|
|
|
340,000
|
|
Junior subordinated debentures
|
|
|
60,828
|
|
|
|
60,828
|
|
Subordinated debt
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
Term note payable
|
|
|
55,000
|
|
|
|
55,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
777,078
|
|
|
$
|
777,078
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company utilizes securities sold under repurchase agreements as a source of funds that do
not increase the Companys reserve requirements. The Company had $297.7 million in securities sold
under repurchase agreements at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009. These repurchase agreements
are with primary dealers and have maturities of approximately seven to eight years with call
provisions every three months. As a result of the Bank being less than well capitalized for
regulatory capital purposes, the agreements with one of the Banks repurchase agreement
counterparties could permit that counterparty to terminate the repurchase agreements. At March 31,
2010, the Banks repurchase agreements with those provisions totaled $262.7 million with fixed
interest rates ranging from 2.76% to 4.65%, maturities ranging from approximately seven to eight
years, and quarterly call provisions (at the counterpartys option). Due to the relatively high
fixed rates on these borrowings as compared to currently low market rates of interest, the Bank
would incur substantial costs to unwind these repurchase agreements if terminated prior to their
maturities. These associated unwind costs could have a material adverse effect on the Companys
results of operations and financial condition in the period of payment. The associated unwind costs
would be the difference between the fair value and carrying value of the repurchase agreements on
the date of termination. Because the repurchase agreements are collateralized at an amount
sufficient to cover any such unwind costs which may be incurred, any such costs would result in a
charge in the statement of operations but would not expect to have an adverse effect on the Banks
liquidity.
The Bank is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Chicago (FHLBC). Membership
requirements include common stock ownership in the FHLBC. The FHLBC advances have quarterly call
provisions. The Bank is currently in compliance with the
46
FHLBCs membership requirements. The Bank has collateralized the FHLB advances with various
securities totaling $127.0 million and multi-family, junior lien, and commercial real estate loans
totaling $893.8 million, as well as a blanket lien on multi-family and commercial real estate
loans. As a result of the Banks capital position, it increased the amount of collateral securing
the existing FHLBC advances during the first quarter of 2010.
At March 31, 2010, the Company had $60.8 million in junior subordinated debentures owed to
unconsolidated trusts that were formed to issue trust preferred securities. During the second
quarter of 2009, the Company began deferring interest payments on its junior subordinated
debentures as permitted by the terms of such debentures. The accrued interest deferred on junior
subordinated debentures was $1.9 million through March 31, 2010. The Written Agreement requires the
Company to obtain prior approval to resume interest payments in respect of its junior subordinated
debentures.
The Companys credit agreements with a correspondent bank at March 31, 2010 consisted of a
revolving line of credit, a term note loan, and a subordinated debenture in the amounts of $8.6
million, $55.0 million, and $15.0 million, respectively.
As of March 31, 2010, the revolving line of credit had a maximum availability and outstanding
balance of $8.6 million, an interest rate of one-month LIBOR plus 455 basis points with an interest
rate floor of 7.25%, and matured on July 3, 2009. The term note had an interest rate of one-month
LIBOR plus 455 basis points at March 31, 2010 and matures on September 28, 2010. The subordinated
debt had an interest rate of one-month LIBOR plus 350 basis points at March 31, 2010, matures on
March 31, 2018, and generally qualifies as a component of Tier 2 capital, although as of March 31,
2010 and December 31, 2009 the amount of subordinated debt included in Tier 2 capital was
restricted to $0 and $2.5 million, respectively.
At September 30, 2009, the Company was in violation of the financial, regulatory capital, and
nonperforming loan covenants contained in the revolving line of credit and term note. The Company
did not make a required $5.0 million principal payment on the term note due on July 1, 2009 under a
covenant waiver for the third quarter of 2008. On July 8, 2009, the lender advised the Company that
such non-compliance constituted a continuing event of default under the loan agreements. The
Companys decision not to make the $5.0 million principal payment, together with its previously
announced decision to suspend the dividends on its Series A preferred stock and defer the dividends
on its Series T preferred stock and interest payments on its trust preferred securities, were made
in order to retain cash and preserve liquidity and capital at the holding company.
The revolving line of credit matured on July 3, 2009, and the Company did not pay to the
lender all of the aggregate outstanding principal on such date. The failure to make such payment
constituted an additional event of default under the credit agreements.
As a result of the occurrence and the continuance of events of default, the lender notified
the Company that, as of July 8, 2009, the interest rate on the revolving line of credit increased
to the then current default interest rate of 7.25%, which represents the current interest rate
floor, and the interest rate under the term note increased to the default interest rate of 30 day
LIBOR plus 455 basis points. The Company also did not make required $5.0 million principal payments
on the term note due on October 1, 2009 and January 4, 2010 under the third quarter 2008 covenant
waiver.
As a result of not making the required payments and the continuance of the events of default,
the lender possesses certain rights and remedies, including the ability to demand immediate payment
of amounts due totaling $63.6 million plus accrued interest or foreclose on the collateral
supporting the credit agreements, being 100% of the stock of the Bank.
On October 22, 2009, the Company entered into a Forbearance Agreement with its lender that
provided for a forbearance period through March 31, 2010. Upon the expiration of the forbearance
period, on March 31, 2010, the principal and interest payments that were due under the revolving
line of credit and the term note, as modified by the covenant waivers, at the time the Forbearance
Agreement was entered into became due and payable, along with such other amounts as may have become
due during the forbearance period. The Company is not able to meet any demands for payment of
amounts due. If the Company is unable to renegotiate, renew, replace or expand its sources of
financing on acceptable terms, it will have a material adverse effect on the Companys business and
results of operations. The lender can now demand payment at any time. See Note 3 Forbearance
Agreement and Note 4 Basis of Presentation,
Going Concern
of the notes to the unaudited
consolidated financial statements.
47
Capital Resources
The Company and the Bank are subject to regulatory capital requirements administered by the
federal banking agencies. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt
corrective action, banks must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures
of assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance-sheet items as calculated under regulatory
accounting practices. Prompt corrective action provisions are not applicable to bank holding
companies.
Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require banks and
bank holding companies to maintain minimum amounts and ratios of total capital to risk-weighted
assets, Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets and Tier 1 capital to average assets. If a bank does
not meet these minimum capital requirements, as defined, bank regulators can initiate certain
actions that could have a direct material adverse effect on the banks financial condition and
ongoing operations. As of March 31, 2010, the Company and the Bank did not meet all capital
adequacy requirements to which they were subject.
On December 18, 2009, the Company and the Bank entered into the Written Agreement with the
Federal Reserve Bank and the Illinois Division of Banking. See Note 1 Regulatory Actions of the
notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.
As of March 31, 2010, the most recent Federal Reserve Bank notification categorized the Bank
as critically undercapitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action.
Effective on March 30, 2010, as a result of the Banks then significantly undercapitalized
status, the Bank consented to the issuance of a Prompt Corrective Action Directive (PCA) by the
Board of Governors of Federal Reserve System. The PCA provides that the Bank, in conjunction with
the Company, must within 45 days of March 30, 2010, i.e. by May 13, 2010 (the PCA Deadline)
either: (i) increase the Banks capital so that it becomes adequately capitalized; (ii) enter into
and close on an agreement to sell the Bank subject to regulatory approval and customary closing
conditions; or (iii) take other necessary measures to make the Bank adequately capitalized. The PCA
also prohibits the Bank from making any capital distributions, including dividends and from
soliciting and accepting new deposits bearing an interest rate that exceeds the prevailing
effective rates on deposits of comparable amounts and maturities in the Banks market area. On
April 30, 2010, the Bank submitted to the Federal Reserve Bank a plan and timetable for conforming
the rates of interest paid on existing non-time deposit accounts to these levels as required under
the PCA.
The Company does not expect that it will be able to satisfy the capital requirement set forth in the
PCA by the PCA Deadline. If the Company is unable to satisfy such requirement by the PCA Deadline, the
Company believes it is likely its bank regulators would place the Bank into FDIC receivership.
The PCA also subjects the Bank to other operating restrictions, including payment of bonuses
to senior executive officers and increasing their compensation, restrictions on asset growth and
branching, and ensuring that all transactions between the Bank and any affiliates comply with
Section 23A of the Federal Reserve Act. The Bank was already in compliance with certain of these
guidelines as the Bank was significantly undercapitalized at the time of the PCA. For example, the
Bank has been complying with the Federal FDIC rules relating to the payment of interest on
deposits. The Company and the Bank continue to be subject to the Written Agreement, as described in
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Recent
Developments,
Regulatory Capital
.
48
The risk-based capital information for the Company is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Risk-weighted assets
|
|
$
|
2,152,291
|
|
|
$
|
2,316,607
|
|
Average assets for leverage capital purposes
|
|
|
3,300,267
|
|
|
|
3,467,651
|
|
Capital components:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders (deficit) equity
|
|
$
|
(49,485
|
)
|
|
$
|
56,476
|
|
Guaranteed trust preferred securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,432
|
|
Core deposit intangibles, net
|
|
|
(11,836
|
)
|
|
|
(12,391
|
)
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
(43,862
|
)
|
|
|
(64,862
|
)
|
Disallowed deferred tax assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,438
|
)
|
Prior service cost and decrease in projected benefit obligation
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
Unrealized losses on securities
|
|
|
3,867
|
|
|
|
8,297
|
|
Unrealized losses on equity securities
|
|
|
(565
|
)
|
|
|
(478
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier 1 capital
|
|
$
|
(101,904
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,037
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Includible allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
28,358
|
|
|
|
30,218
|
|
Guaranteed trust preferred securities
|
|
|
59,000
|
|
|
|
37,568
|
|
Qualifying subordinated debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,519
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier 2 capital
|
|
$
|
87,358
|
|
|
$
|
70,305
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowable Tier 2 capital
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,037
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total risk-based capital
|
|
$
|
(101,904
|
)
|
|
$
|
10,074
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49
Capital levels and minimum required levels:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To Be Adequately
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capitalized Under
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For Capital
|
|
|
Prompt Corrective
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Adequacy Purposes
|
|
|
Action Provisions
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Ratio
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Ratio
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Ratio
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Capital
(to risk-weighted
assets) Company
|
|
$
|
(101,904
|
)
|
|
|
(4.7
|
)%
|
|
$
|
172,183
|
|
|
|
8.0
|
%
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
Bank
|
|
|
61,339
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
|
171,524
|
|
|
|
8.0
|
|
|
$
|
171,524
|
|
|
|
8.0
|
%
|
Tier 1 Capital (to
risk-weighted
assets) Company
|
|
|
(101,904
|
)
|
|
|
(4.7
|
)
|
|
|
86,092
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
Bank
|
|
|
33,083
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
85,762
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
85,762
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
Tier 1 Capital (to
average assets for
leverage capital
purposes)
Company
|
|
|
(101,904
|
)
|
|
|
(3.1
|
)
|
|
|
132,011
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
Bank
|
|
|
33,083
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
131,631
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
131,631
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To Be Adequately
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capitalized Under
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For Capital
|
|
|
Prompt Corrective
|
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Adequacy Purposes
|
|
|
Action Provisions
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Ratio
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Ratio
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Ratio
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Capital
(to risk-weighted
assets) Company
|
|
$
|
10,074
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
$
|
185,329
|
|
|
|
8.0
|
%
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
Bank
|
|
|
148,062
|
|
|
|
6.4
|
|
|
|
184,899
|
|
|
|
8.0
|
|
|
$
|
184,899
|
|
|
|
8.0
|
%
|
Tier 1 Capital (to
risk-weighted
assets) Company
|
|
|
5,037
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
92,664
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
Bank
|
|
|
117,911
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
|
|
92,450
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
92,450
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
Tier 1 Capital (to
average assets for
leverage capital
purposes)
Company
|
|
|
5,037
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
138,706
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
Bank
|
|
|
117,911
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
|
|
138,482
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
138,482
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
Liquidity
At March 31, 2010, on a consolidated basis, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of
$380.4 million compared to $442.1 million at December 31, 2009. The Company manages the liquidity
position of the Bank with the objective of maintaining access to sufficient funds to respond to the
needs of depositors and borrowers. Liquid assets, including cash held at the Federal Reserve Bank
and unencumbered securities, decreased from $419.5 million at December 31, 2009 to $374.7 million
at March 31, 2010 primarily as a result of maturing brokered certificates of deposit that were not
replaced.
In addition to the normal cash flows from its securities portfolio, and repayments and
maturities of loans and securities, the Bank short-term and intermediate-term deposits. As a
result of the Banks critically undercapitalized status for regulatory capital purposes, the Bank
is no longer able to accept or renew brokered deposits or secure deposits at rates that are higher
than the prevailing effective rates on insured deposits of comparable amounts or maturities in the
Banks normal market area or 75 basis points higher than the national rates published weekly by the
FDIC, pay dividends or make other capital distributions, obtain funds through Federal funds lines,
or obtain advances from the Federal Reserve Bank.
The FHLBC advances and repurchase agreements are subject to the availability of collateral.
The Bank has collateralized the FHLBC advances with various securities totaling $127.0 million and
multi-family, junior lien, and commercial real estate loans totaling $893.8 million, as well as a
blanket lien on multi-family and commercial real estate loans, and the repurchase agreements with
various securities totaling $360.5 million at March 31, 2010. As a result of the Banks capital
position, it increased the amount of
50
collateral securing the existing FHLBC advances. In addition, the Bank can no longer access
the wholesale funding market. The Company believes the Bank has sufficient liquidity to meet its
current and future near-term liquidity needs; however, no assurances can be made that the Banks
liquidity position will not be materially, adversely affected in the future.
In addition, as a result of the Bank being less than well capitalized for regulatory capital
purposes, the agreements with one of the Banks repurchase agreement counterparties could permit
that counterparty to terminate the repurchase agreements. At March 31, 2010, the Banks repurchase
agreements with those provisions totaled $262.7 million with fixed interest rates ranging from
2.76% to 4.65%, maturities ranging from approximately seven to eight years, and quarterly call
provisions (at the counterpartys option).
The Company monitors and manages its liquidity position on several levels, which include
estimated loan funding requirements, estimated loan payoffs, securities portfolio maturities or
calls, anticipated depository buildups or runoffs, and interest and principal payments on
borrowings.
Certain available-for-sale securities were temporarily impaired at March 31, 2010, primarily
due to changes in interest rates as well as current economic conditions that appear to be cyclical
in nature. The Company does not intend to sell nor would it be required to sell the temporarily
impaired securities before recovering their amortized cost. See Note 6 Securities of the notes
to the unaudited consolidated financial statements for more details. The Companys liquidity
position is further enhanced by monthly principal and interest payments received from a majority of
the loan portfolio.
The Company has developed analytical tools to help support the overall liquidity forecasting
and contingency planning. In addition, the Company has developed a more efficient collateral
management process which has strengthened the Banks liquidity.
Holding Company Liquidity.
The liquidity position at the holding company level is generally
affected by the amount of cash and other liquid assets on hand, payment of interest and dividends
on debt and equity issued by the holding company (all of which have been suspended or deferred as
discussed below), capital it injects into the Bank, any redemption of debt for cash issued by the
holding company, proceeds it raises through the issuance of debt and/or equity through the holding
company, if any, and dividends received from the Bank, to the extent permitted.
Since May 6, 2009, the Company has suspended the dividend on its Series A preferred stock;
deferred the dividend on the $84.8 million of Series T preferred stock; and deferred interest
payments on $60.8 million of its junior subordinated debentures as permitted by the terms of such
debentures. The accrued interest deferred on junior subordinated debentures was $1.9 million
through March 31, 2010. The Written Agreement requires the Company to obtain prior approval to
resume dividend payments in respect of the Series A preferred stock or interest payments in respect
of its junior subordinated debentures. On March 8, 2010, the U.S. Treasury exchanged the 84,784
shares of Series T preferred stock, having an aggregate approximate liquidation preference of $84.8
million, plus approximately $4.6 million in cumulative dividends not declared or paid on such
preferred stock, for a new series of fixed rate cumulative mandatorily convertible preferred stock,
Series G, with the same liquidation preference. The warrant dated December 5, 2008 to purchase
4,282,020 shares of common stock was also amended to re-set the exercise price. See Note 17
Preferred Stock and Warrant of the notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements for
additional detail regarding the exchange of the Series T preferred stock.
At May 12, 2010, the holding companys cash and cash equivalents on an unconsolidated basis
amounted to approximately $3.4 million. There are currently a
number of limitations on the Companys ability to manage its liquidity at the holding company
level. The Written Agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank and the Illinois Division of Banking
requires, among other things, that the Bank obtain prior approval in order to pay dividends. In
addition, the Company must obtain prior approval of the Federal Reserve Bank to, among other
things, take any other form of payment from the Bank representing a reduction in capital of the
Bank and incur, increase or guarantee any debt. Accordingly, the Companys present primary sources
of funds at the holding company level are access to the capital and debt markets and private equity
investments. Despite its efforts in 2009 and 2010, the Company has not received any commitment for
a new equity capital investment and presently believes it is unlikely that it will be able to raise
a sufficient amount of new equity capital in a timely manner, on acceptable terms or at all. If the
lender under its revolving and term loan facilities does not exercise its right to demand payment
of amounts presently owed following the expiration of a forbearance period further described below,
the Company believes that it has the minimal level of liquidity needed to meet its near-term
commitments.
51
On October 22, 2009, the Company entered into the Forbearance Agreement with the lender under
its revolving and term loan facilities, pursuant to which, among other things, the lender agreed to
forbear from exercising the rights and remedies available to it as a consequence of certain
continuing events of default, except for continuing to impose default rates of interest. This
Forbearance Agreement expired on March 31, 2010, and as a result, the lender could at any time
declare all amounts owed under the Loan Agreements immediately due and payable. Should the lender
demand payment, the Company would be unable to repay the amounts due. As a result, the lender
could, among other remedies, foreclose on outstanding shares of the Banks capital stock, which
would have a material adverse effect on the Companys business, operations and ability to continue
as a going concern and could result in a loss of all or a substantial portion of the value of the
Companys outstanding securities. Management of the Company continues in its efforts on
restructuring the Companys outstanding credit agreements with its primary lender. See Note 3
Forbearance Agreement of the notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.
52
ITEM 3 QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES
ABOUT MARKET RISK
Interest Rate Sensitivity Analysis
The Company performs a net interest income analysis as part of its asset/liability management
processes. Net interest income analysis measures the change in net interest income in the event of
hypothetical changes in interest rates. This analysis assesses the risk of change in net interest
income in the event of sudden and sustained 100 and 200 basis point increases in market interest
rates. The tables below present the Companys projected changes in net interest income for the
various rate shock levels at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. As result of
current market conditions, 100 and 200 basis point decreases in market interest rates are not
applicable for March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 as those decreases would result in some deposit
interest rate assumptions falling below zero. Nonetheless, the Companys net interest income could
decline in those scenarios as yields on earning assets could continue to adjust downward.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in Net Interest Income Over One Year Horizon
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guideline
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2010
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
Maximum
|
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
Dollar
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
+200 bp
|
|
$
|
8,262
|
|
|
|
14.41
|
%
|
|
$
|
11,109
|
|
|
|
18.12
|
%
|
|
|
(10.0
|
)%
|
+100 bp
|
|
|
3,864
|
|
|
|
6.74
|
|
|
|
5,084
|
|
|
|
8.29
|
|
|
|
|
|
-100 bp
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
-200 bp
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
(10.0
|
)
|
As shown above, at March 31, 2010, the effect of an immediate 200 basis point increase in
interest rates would increase the Companys net interest income by 14.41%, or $8.3 million. Overall
net interest income sensitivity remains within the Companys and recommended regulatory guidelines.
The changes in the Companys net interest income sensitivity were due, in large part, to the
optionality on both sides of the balance sheet. The changes in net interest income over the one
year horizon for March 31, 2010 under the 1.0% and 2.0% increases in market interest rates
scenarios are reflective of this optionality. In general, in a rising rate environment, yields on
floating rate loans and investment securities are expected to re-price upwards more quickly than
the cost of funds. This has been mitigated somewhat by the aggressive implementation of floors on
floating rate loans over the past year; the impact of a rise in interest rates for these assets is
less than if these loans had no floors, causing the positive net interest income sensitivity to be
less than previous reports.
The Company does not have any sub-prime or Alt-A mortgage-backed securities in its securities
portfolio nor does it have any sub- prime loans.
53
ITEM 4 CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this report, an evaluation was performed under the
supervision and with the participation of the Companys Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer of the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rule 240.13a-15(e)). Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the
Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the Companys disclosure controls and procedures were
effective as of March 31, 2010 to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company
in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded,
processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Securities and
Exchange Commissions rules and forms and is accumulated and communicated to the Companys
management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, on a timely
basis to allow for discussions regarding required disclosure.
Changes in Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in the Companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
54
SAFE HARBOR STATEMENT UNDER THE PRIVATE SECURITIES
LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995
This report contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended: Statement under the Safe Harbor Provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act
of 1995. The Company and its representatives may, from time to time, make written or oral
statements that are forward-looking and provide information other than historical information,
including statements contained in the Form 10-K, the Companys other filings with the Securities
and Exchange Commission or in communications to its stockholders. These statements involve known
and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results to be materially
different from any results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by
any forward-looking statement. These factors include, among other things, the factors listed below.
In some cases, the Company has identified forward-looking statements by such words or phrases
as will likely result, is confident that, expects, should, could, may, will continue
to, believes, anticipates, predicts, forecasts, estimates, projects, potential,
intends, or similar expressions identifying forward-looking statements within the meaning of
the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, including the negative of those words and
phrases. These forward-looking statements are based on managements current views and assumptions
regarding future events, future business conditions, and the outlook for the Company based on
currently available information. These forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks and
uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in, or
implied by, these statements. The Company wishes to caution readers not to place undue reliance on
any such forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date made.
In connection with the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act
of 1995, the Company is hereby identifying important factors that could affect the Companys
financial performance and could cause the Companys actual results for future periods to differ
materially from any opinions or statements expressed with respect to future periods in any
forward-looking statements.
Among the factors that could have an impact on the Companys ability to achieve operating
results, growth plan goals, and the beliefs expressed or implied in forward-looking statements are:
|
|
|
The Company and Banks ability to timely comply with the terms of the PCA and the Written
Agreement with their regulators pursuant to which the Company and Bank agreed to take
certain corrective actions to improve their capital positions and financial condition;
|
|
|
|
|
Possible administrative or enforcement actions of banking regulators in connection with
any material failure of the Company or the Bank to comply with banking laws, rules or
regulations, or terms of the PCA and the Written Agreement;
|
|
|
|
|
The potential call by the Banks repurchase agreement counterparty to terminate the
repurchase agreements since the Bank has not maintained its well-capitalized status and the
substantial costs the Bank would incur to unwind these repurchase agreements prior to their
maturities;
|
|
|
|
|
Uncertainties regarding the Companys ability to raise a sufficient amount of new equity
capital in a timely manner in order to increase its regulatory capital ratios as required by
the PCA, facilitate a possible restructuring or equity conversion of its senior and
subordinated debt, permit a conversion of the U.S. Treasurys preferred equity investment
into common stock and otherwise successfully implement and achieve the goals of the Capital
Plan;
|
|
|
|
|
The exercise by the lender of all its rights in full as a result of certain existing
events of default, including taking possession of all of the Banks capital stock held by
the Company and pledged to the lender as collateral following the expiration of the
Forbearance Agreement on March 31, 2010;
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys inability to meet, on an unconsolidated basis, its short-term obligations
and access sufficient sources of liquidity;
|
|
|
|
|
Managements ability to effectively manage interest rate risk and the impact of interest
rates in general on the volatility of the Companys net interest income;
|
55
|
|
|
The effect of the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008, the American Recovery and
Reinvestment Act of 2009, the implementation by the U.S. Department of the Treasury (the
U.S. Treasury) and federal banking regulators of a number of programs to address capital
and liquidity issues in the banking system and additional programs that will apply to us in
the future, all of which may have significant effects on us and the financial services
industry;
|
|
|
|
|
The effect on the Companys profitability if interest rates fluctuate as well as the
effect of the Banks customers changing use of deposit products;
|
|
|
|
|
The possibility that the Companys wholesale funding sources may prove insufficient to
replace deposits at maturity;
|
|
|
|
|
Inaccessibility of funding sources on the same terms on which the Company has
historically relied, due to its current capital ratings;
|
|
|
|
|
The decline in commercial and residential real estate sales volume and the likely
potential for continuing illiquidity in the real estate market, including within the Chicago
metropolitan area;
|
|
|
|
|
The risks associated with the high concentration of commercial real estate loans in the
Companys portfolio;
|
|
|
|
|
The uncertainties in estimating the fair value of developed real estate and undeveloped
land in light of declining demand for such assets and continuing illiquidity in the real
estate market;
|
|
|
|
|
Negative developments and disruptions in the credit and lending markets, including the
impact of the ongoing credit crisis on the Companys business and on the businesses of its
customers as well as other banks and lending institutions with which the Company has
commercial relationships;
|
|
|
|
|
A continuation of the recent unprecedented volatility in the capital markets;
|
|
|
|
|
The risks associated with implementing the Companys business strategy, including its
ability to preserve and access sufficient capital to execute on its strategy;
|
|
|
|
|
Rising unemployment and its impact on the Companys customers savings rates and their
ability to service debt obligations;
|
|
|
|
|
Fluctuations in the value of the Companys investment securities;
|
|
|
|
|
The ability to attract and retain senior management experienced in banking and financial
services;
|
|
|
|
|
The risks associated with management changes and employee turnover;
|
|
|
|
|
Credit risks and risks from concentrations (by geographic area and by industry) within
the Banks loan portfolio and individual large loans;
|
|
|
|
|
The risk that the allowance for loan losses may prove insufficient to absorb actual
losses in the loan portfolio;
|
|
|
|
|
Possible volatility in loan losses between periods;
|
|
|
|
|
The imprecision of assumptions underlying the establishment of the allowance for loan
losses and change in estimated values of collateral or cash flow projections and various
financial assets and liabilities;
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys ability to adapt successfully to technological changes to compete
effectively in the marketplace;
|
|
|
|
|
The effects of competition from other commercial banks, thrifts, mortgage banking firms,
consumer finance companies, credit unions, securities brokerage firms, insurance companies,
money market and other mutual funds, and other financial institutions operating in the
Companys market or elsewhere or providing similar services;
|
56
|
|
|
Volatility of rate sensitive deposits;
|
|
|
|
|
Operational risks, including data processing system failures or fraud;
|
|
|
|
|
Liquidity risks;
|
|
|
|
|
The possibility that the Bank would experience deposit erosion caused by the expiration
of the FDICs Transaction Account Guarantee Program;
|
|
|
|
|
The ability to successfully acquire low cost deposits or funding;
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in the economic environment, competition, or other factors that may influence
loan demand, deposit flows, and the quality of the loan portfolio and loan and deposit
pricing;
|
|
|
|
|
The impact from liabilities arising from legal or administrative proceedings on the
financial condition of the Company;
|
|
|
|
|
The inability of the Bank to pay dividends to the Company;
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys inability to pay cash dividends on its common and preferred stock and
interest on its junior subordinated debentures;
|
|
|
|
|
Governmental monetary and fiscal policies, as well as legislative and regulatory changes,
that may result in the imposition of costs and constraints on the Company through higher
FDIC insurance premiums, significant fluctuations in market interest rates, increases in
capital requirements, and operational limitations;
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in general economic or capital market conditions, interest rates, debt credit
ratings, deposit flows, loan demand, including loan syndication opportunities;
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in legislation or regulatory and accounting requirements, principles, policies,
or guidelines affecting the business conducted by the Company, including the results of
regulatory examinations;
|
|
|
|
|
The impact of possible future goodwill and other material impairment charges;
|
|
|
|
|
The effects of increased deposit insurance premiums;
|
|
|
|
|
The delisting of the Companys common stock from Nasdaq;
|
|
|
|
|
Acts of war or terrorism; and
|
|
|
|
|
Other economic, competitive, governmental, regulatory, and technological factors
affecting the Companys operations, products, services, and prices.
|
The Company wishes to caution that the foregoing list of important factors may not be
all-inclusive and specifically declines to undertake any obligation to publicly revise any
forward-looking statements that have been made to reflect events or circumstances after the date of
such statements or to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events.
With respect to forward-looking statements set forth in the notes to the unaudited
consolidated financial statements, including those relating to contingent liabilities and legal
proceedings, some of the factors that could affect the ultimate disposition of those contingencies
are changes in applicable laws, the development of facts in individual cases, settlement
opportunities, and the actions of plaintiffs, judges, and juries.
57
PART II
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
There are no material pending legal proceedings to which the Company or its subsidiaries are a
party other than ordinary routine litigation incidental to their respective business.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
The Company has updated, as set forth below, the descriptions of certain risks and
uncertainties that could affect the Companys business, future performance or financial condition
originally included in Part I, Item 1A of its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2009. The risks described in these risk factors, in addition to the other risks
described in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K, could materially adversely affect the
Companys business, financial condition, future results or trading price of the Companys common
stock. In addition to the other information contained in the reports the Company files with the
SEC, investors should consider these risk factors prior to making an investment decision with
respect to the Companys securities. The risks described in the risk factors below, and in the
Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K, however, are not the only risks facing the Company.
Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to the Company or those that are currently
considered to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect the Companys business, financial
condition and/or operating results.
The Bank was critically undercapitalized under regulatory guidelines at March 31, 2010, and
continued losses and deterioration in credit quality are likely to cause the Banks capital levels
to further decline in the near term.
Due to continued credit quality deterioration in 2010, the Bank was critically
undercapitalized for regulatory capital ratio purposes at March 31, 2010 as compared to
undercapitalized at December 31, 2009 and well-capitalized at September 30, 2009. A bank is
considered critically undercapitalized when it has a tangible equity to total assets ratio of equal
to or less than 2.00%. In addition, the Company was undercapitalized at March 31, 2010. If the
Company fails to improve the Banks regulatory capital ratios within the timeframe required under
the PCA discussed below, the Company believes it is likely that the Bank would be placed into FDIC receivership by its
regulators or would be acquired by a third party in a transaction in which the Company receives no
value for its interest in the Bank. Such an event could cause the Company to file for bankruptcy
or become subject to an involuntary bankruptcy filing. Any of the foregoing events would be
expected to result in a loss of all of the value of the Companys outstanding securities.
Due to the Banks significantly undercapitalized status, the Bank is subject to a Prompt Corrective
Action Directive (PCA) issued by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System pursuant to
which the Bank must either become adequately capitalized or be sold within 45 days of the PCA. Any
failure to comply with the terms of the PCA will have a material adverse effect on the business of
the Company.
The PCA consented to by the Bank provides that the Bank, in conjunction with the Company, must
within 45 days of March 30, 2010 (i.e., by May 13, 2010) either: (i) increase the Banks capital so
that it becomes adequately capitalized; (ii) enter into and close an agreement to sell the Bank
subject to regulatory approval and customary closing conditions; or (iii) take other necessary
measures to make the Bank adequately capitalized. The PCA also prohibits or restricts the Bank from
taking certain other actions and subjects the Bank to other operating restrictions. In addition,
the Company and the Bank continue to be subject to the written agreement (the Written Agreement)
with the Federal Reserve Bank and the Illinois Division of Banking that requires the Company and
the Bank to take certain steps intended to improve their overall condition, as further described
under Note 1Regulatory Actions in the notes to the unaudited consolidated financials statements
included in this report.
The Company does not expect that it will be able to satisfy the capital-related requirements
set forth in the PCA and the Written Agreement by the PCA Deadline. The Company does not expect that it will be able to satisfy the capital requirement set forth in the PCA by
the PCA Deadline. If the Company is unable to satisfy such requirement by the PCA Deadline, the
Company believes it is likely its bank regulators would place the Bank into FDIC receivership. The Company and the Bank were
notified on March 25, 2010 by the Federal Reserve Bank that the Banks capital plan previously
submitted as required under the Written Agreement was not accepted. Moreover, the PCA does not
prevent bank regulators from increasing the amount or composition of capital required to be raised,
denying any sale of the Bank or imposing other directives restricting the Companys or the Banks
business.
If the Company or the Bank is unable to comply with the terms of the PCA or the Written
Agreement, the Company and the Bank will become subject to further enforcement action by the
regulators that will likely result in the appointment of a receiver for the
58
Bank or the acquisition of the Bank in a transaction in which the Company receives no value.
The Bank represents substantially all of the Companys assets. If the Bank were to be seized, the
Company expects its remaining liabilities would exceed its assets. Any such appointment or sale of
the Bank could be expected to result in a loss of all of the value of the Companys outstanding
securities.
The Company does not have the ability to pay amounts that are presently due to the Companys
primary lender.
The Company has been in violation of certain financial covenants under its revolving line of
credit and term note and the related loan documents (collectively, the Loan Agreements) since
September 30, 2009. The lender under the Loan Agreements advised the Company that such
noncompliance constituted a continuing event of default. As a result, the lender possesses certain
rights and remedies, including the ability to demand immediate payment of amounts owed under the
Loan Agreements totaling approximately $63.6 million plus accrued interest or to foreclose on 100%
of the stock of the Bank which was pledged as collateral to support the Companys obligations under
the Loan Agreements. On October 22, 2009, the Company entered into a Forbearance Agreement with its
lender under the Loan Agreements, pursuant to which, among other things, the lender agreed to
forbear from exercising the rights and remedies available to it as a consequence of certain
existing events of default, other than continuing to impose default rates of interest (the
Forbearance Agreement). The Forbearance Agreement expired on March 31, 2010, and the lender could
declare immediately due and payable all amounts owed under the Loan Agreements. Should the lender
demand payment, the Company presently would be unable to repay the amounts due. As a result, the
lender could, among other remedies, foreclose on outstanding shares of the Banks capital stock,
which would have a material adverse effect on the Companys business, operations and ability to
continue as a going concern and could result in a loss of all or a substantial portion of the value
of the Companys outstanding securities. As of the date of this report, the lender has not made a
demand for payment.
If the Company fails to promptly raise additional capital, the Company may be forced to seek
bankruptcy protection and the Company believes it is likely that the
Bank would be placed under FDIC receivership.
A principal component of the Companys overall capital plan has been to raise new equity
capital necessary in order to improve the regulatory capital ratios of the Company and the Bank.
The timely raising of new equity capital is also critical in order to increase the Banks capital
as required by the PCA. To date, the Company has not received any commitment for a new equity
capital investment, and there can be no assurance that the Company will be able to raise a
sufficient amount of new equity capital in a timely manner, on acceptable terms or at all. If the
Company fails to promptly raise a sufficient amount of new equity capital or, alternatively,
execute another strategic initiative, the Company may become subject to a voluntary or involuntary
bankruptcy filing and the Company believes it is likely that the
Bank would be placed into FDIC receivership by its regulators or
acquired by a third party in a transaction in which the Company receives no value for its interest
in the Bank. Any such event could be expected to result in a loss of all of the value of the
Companys outstanding securities.
As a result of the above-described events and circumstances, the Company has determined that there
is substantial doubt as to the Companys ability to continue as a going concern.
Due to the deterioration in the capital ratios of the Bank and the Company, the uncertainty as
to the Companys ability to raise sufficient amounts of new equity capital, recent regulatory
actions with respect to the Company and the Bank, including the PCA, and the current inability of
the Company to repay amounts owed under the Loan Agreements if its lender were to declare the
amounts owed thereunder immediately due and payable, the Company has determined that there is
substantial doubt as to the Companys ability to continue as a going concern. Although the Company
believes that the raising of additional capital, if timely achieved, will alleviate the substantial
doubt about the Companys ability to continue as a going-concern, to date no commitments for new
capital investments have been secured. The Companys independent registered public accounting firm
has included in its report on the Companys consolidated financial statements for the year ended
December 31, 2009 included in the Companys Form 10-K an explanatory paragraph with respect to the
substantial doubt as to the Companys ability to continue as a going concern. The Company was
undercapitalized at December 31, 2009, as defined by the regulatory capital requirements
administered by the federal banking agencies, and does not have sufficient liquidity to meet the
potential demand for all amounts due under its lending arrangements. The Companys financial
statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
A substantial doubt as to the Companys ability to continue as a going concern may have a
material adverse impact on the Company and the Banks business, financial condition and results of
operations and the ability to raise necessary new equity capital. Moreover, relationships with
third parties with whom the Company and the Bank do business or on whom they rely, including
59
depositors (particularly those with deposit accounts in excess of FDIC insurance limits),
customers and clients, vendors, employees and financial counter-parties could be significantly
adversely impacted because these individuals and entities may react adversely to the going concern
issue, making it more difficult for the Company to address the issues giving rise to the going
concern. See Note 4 Basis of Presentation,
Going Concern
of the notes to the unaudited
consolidated financial statements.
Concern of the Companys customers over deposit insurance may cause a decrease in deposits.
With recent increased concerns about bank failures, customers increasingly are concerned about
the extent to which their deposits are insured by the FDIC. Customers may withdraw deposits in an
effort to ensure that the amount they have on deposit with their bank is fully insured. The Company
continues to participate in the FDICs Transaction Account Guarantee Program where all
noninterest-bearing transaction deposit accounts, including all personal and business checking
deposit accounts, and NOW accounts, which are capped at a rate no higher than 0.50%, are fully
guaranteed through June 30, 2010 and at a rate no higher than 0.25% through December 31, 2010
regardless of dollar amount. If this program is not extended beyond this date, the Company may
experience a decrease in deposits. Decreases in deposits may adversely affect the Companys funding
costs, net income, and liquidity.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
None
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None
Item 4.
Removed and Reserved
Item 5. Other Information
None
Item 6. Exhibits
The following exhibits are either filed as part of this report or are incorporated herein by
reference:
3.1
|
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended.
|
|
3.3
|
|
Certificate of Designation for the Series G Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to
Registrants Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, File No. 001-13735).
|
|
4.1.3
|
|
Form of Certificate for the Series G Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to
Registrants Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, File No. 001-13735).
|
|
4.1.4
|
|
Warrant for Purchase of Shares of Common Stock, Dated March 8, 2010(incorporated by
reference to Registrants Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, File No. 001-13735).
|
|
4.2
|
|
Certain instruments defining the rights of the holders of long-term debt of the Company and
certain of its subsidiaries, none of which authorize a total amount of indebtedness in excess
of 10% of the total assets of the Company and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis, have
not been filed as Exhibits. The Company hereby agrees to furnish a copy of any of these
agreements to the SEC upon request.
|
|
10.75
|
|
Exchange Agreement dated February 25, 2010 by and between the
Company and the United States Department of the Treasury
(incorporated by reference to Registrants Report on Form 8-K
filed March 3, 2010, File No. 001-13735).
|
60
10.77
|
|
Prompt Corrective Action Directive effective March 30, 2010 to the Bank by the Board of
Governors of the Federal Reserve System (incorporated by reference to Registrants Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009, File No. 001-13735).
|
|
31.1
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Principal Executive Officer.
|
|
31.2
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Principal Financial Officer.
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, from the Companys Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer.
|
61
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Date: May 12, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
MIDWEST BANC HOLDINGS, INC.
(Registrant)
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ Roberto R. Herencia
|
|
|
|
Roberto R. Herencia
|
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
/s/ JoAnn Sannasardo Lilek
|
|
|
|
JoAnn Sannasardo Lilek
|
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
|
|
62
Exhibit Index
3.1
|
|
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended.
|
|
3.3
|
|
Certificate of Designation for the Series G Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to
Registrants Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, File No. 001-13735).
|
|
4.1.3
|
|
Form of Certificate for the Series G Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to
Registrants Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, File No. 001-13735).
|
|
4.1.4
|
|
Warrant for Purchase of Shares of Common Stock, Dated March 8, 2010(incorporated by
reference to Registrants Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, File No. 001-13735).
|
|
4.2
|
|
Certain instruments defining the rights of the holders of long-term debt of the Company and
certain of its subsidiaries, none of which authorize a total amount of indebtedness in excess
of 10% of the total assets of the Company and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis, have
not been filed as Exhibits. The Company hereby agrees to furnish a copy of any of these
agreements to the SEC upon request.
|
|
10.75
|
|
Exchange Agreement dated February 25, 2010 by and between the
Company and the United States Department of the Treasury
(incorporated by reference to Registrants Report on Form 8-K
filed March 3, 2010, File No. 001-13735).
|
|
10.77
|
|
Prompt Corrective Action Directive effective March 30, 2010 to the Bank by the Board of
Governors of the Federal Reserve System (incorporated by reference to Registrants Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2009, File No. 001-13735).
|
|
31.1
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Principal Executive Officer.
|
|
31.2
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Principal Financial Officer.
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, from the Companys Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer.
|
63
Midwest Banc Hlds (MM) (NASDAQ:MBHI)
Historical Stock Chart
From Oct 2024 to Nov 2024
Midwest Banc Hlds (MM) (NASDAQ:MBHI)
Historical Stock Chart
From Nov 2023 to Nov 2024