0001501697False2022FYDelaware61 North
Beacon Street4th
FloorMassachusettsBoston0213410-Khttp://fasb.org/us-gaap/2022#OtherAssetsNoncurrenthttp://fasb.org/us-gaap/2022#OtherAssetsNoncurrent1http://fasb.org/us-gaap/2022#OtherLiabilitiesNoncurrenthttp://fasb.org/us-gaap/2022#OtherLiabilitiesNoncurrentP5YP3Y00015016972022-01-012022-12-3100015016972022-06-30iso4217:USD00015016972023-03-15xbrli:shares00015016972022-12-3100015016972021-12-31iso4217:USDxbrli:shares00015016972021-01-012021-12-3100015016972020-01-012020-12-310001501697xfor:RedeemableCommonStockMember2019-12-310001501697us-gaap:CommonStockMember2019-12-310001501697us-gaap:AdditionalPaidInCapitalMember2019-12-310001501697us-gaap:AccumulatedOtherComprehensiveIncomeMember2019-12-310001501697us-gaap:RetainedEarningsMember2019-12-3100015016972019-12-310001501697us-gaap:CommonStockMember2020-01-012020-12-310001501697us-gaap:AdditionalPaidInCapitalMember2020-01-012020-12-310001501697us-gaap:RetainedEarningsMember2020-01-012020-12-310001501697xfor:RedeemableCommonStockMember2020-12-310001501697us-gaap:CommonStockMember2020-12-310001501697us-gaap:AdditionalPaidInCapitalMember2020-12-310001501697us-gaap:AccumulatedOtherComprehensiveIncomeMember2020-12-310001501697us-gaap:RetainedEarningsMember2020-12-3100015016972020-12-310001501697xfor:RedeemableCommonStockMember2021-01-012021-12-310001501697us-gaap:CommonStockMember2021-01-012021-12-310001501697us-gaap:AdditionalPaidInCapitalMember2021-01-012021-12-310001501697us-gaap:RetainedEarningsMember2021-01-012021-12-310001501697xfor:RedeemableCommonStockMember2021-12-310001501697us-gaap:CommonStockMember2021-12-310001501697us-gaap:AdditionalPaidInCapitalMember2021-12-310001501697us-gaap:AccumulatedOtherComprehensiveIncomeMember2021-12-310001501697us-gaap:RetainedEarningsMember2021-12-310001501697us-gaap:CommonStockMember2022-01-012022-12-310001501697us-gaap:AdditionalPaidInCapitalMember2022-01-012022-12-310001501697us-gaap:RetainedEarningsMember2022-01-012022-12-310001501697xfor:RedeemableCommonStockMember2022-12-310001501697us-gaap:CommonStockMember2022-12-310001501697us-gaap:AdditionalPaidInCapitalMember2022-12-310001501697us-gaap:AccumulatedOtherComprehensiveIncomeMember2022-12-310001501697us-gaap:RetainedEarningsMember2022-12-310001501697xfor:WalthamLeaseMemberus-gaap:LetterOfCreditMember2022-12-310001501697xfor:WalthamLeaseMemberus-gaap:LetterOfCreditMember2021-12-310001501697us-gaap:LetterOfCreditMemberxfor:ViennaLeaseArrangementMember2022-12-310001501697us-gaap:LetterOfCreditMemberxfor:ViennaLeaseArrangementMember2021-12-310001501697us-gaap:LetterOfCreditMemberxfor:AllstonLeaseMember2022-12-310001501697us-gaap:LetterOfCreditMemberxfor:AllstonLeaseMember2021-12-310001501697xfor:HerculesFirstAmendedLoanAgreementMember2022-01-012022-12-310001501697srt:MinimumMemberus-gaap:FurnitureAndFixturesMember2022-01-012022-12-310001501697srt:MaximumMemberus-gaap:FurnitureAndFixturesMember2022-01-012022-12-310001501697us-gaap:ComputerEquipmentMember2022-01-012022-12-310001501697srt:MinimumMemberus-gaap:EquipmentMember2022-01-012022-12-310001501697srt:MaximumMemberus-gaap:EquipmentMember2022-01-012022-12-310001501697us-gaap:LeaseholdImprovementsMembersrt:MaximumMember2022-01-012022-12-31xfor:reporting_unit0001501697xfor:GenzymeAgreementMember2022-01-012022-12-310001501697xfor:GenzymeAgreementMember2020-01-012020-12-310001501697xfor:GeorgetownMember2016-12-012016-12-310001501697xfor:GeorgetownMember2021-01-012021-12-310001501697xfor:GeorgetownMember2020-01-012020-12-310001501697xfor:GeorgetownMember2022-01-012022-12-310001501697xfor:GeorgetownMember2022-12-310001501697xfor:GeorgetownMember2020-12-310001501697xfor:GeorgetownMember2021-12-310001501697xfor:BidmcAgreementMember2016-12-012016-12-310001501697xfor:BidmcAgreementMember2022-01-012022-12-310001501697xfor:BidmcAgreementMember2020-01-012020-12-310001501697xfor:BidmcAgreementMember2021-01-012021-12-310001501697xfor:DFCIMember2020-11-012020-11-300001501697xfor:DFCIMember2022-01-012022-12-31xbrli:pure0001501697xfor:MTSAustriaMember2022-01-012022-12-310001501697xfor:ResearchAndDevelopmentIncentiveProgramMember2022-12-310001501697xfor:ResearchAndDevelopmentIncentiveProgramMember2021-12-310001501697xfor:ResearchAndDevelopmentIncentiveProgramMember2022-01-012022-12-310001501697xfor:ResearchAndDevelopmentIncentiveProgramMember2021-01-012021-12-310001501697xfor:ResearchAndDevelopmentIncentiveProgramMember2020-01-012020-12-310001501697xfor:AbbiskoAgreementMember2022-12-310001501697xfor:AbbiskoAgreementMember2022-01-012022-12-310001501697us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel1Memberus-gaap:FairValueMeasurementsRecurringMember2022-12-310001501697us-gaap:FairValueMeasurementsRecurringMemberus-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel2Member2022-12-310001501697us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel3Memberus-gaap:FairValueMeasurementsRecurringMember2022-12-310001501697us-gaap:FairValueMeasurementsRecurringMember2022-12-310001501697us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel1Memberus-gaap:FairValueMeasurementsRecurringMemberus-gaap:DerivativeFinancialInstrumentsLiabilitiesMember2022-12-310001501697us-gaap:FairValueMeasurementsRecurringMemberus-gaap:DerivativeFinancialInstrumentsLiabilitiesMemberus-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel2Member2022-12-310001501697us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel3Memberus-gaap:FairValueMeasurementsRecurringMemberus-gaap:DerivativeFinancialInstrumentsLiabilitiesMember2022-12-310001501697us-gaap:FairValueMeasurementsRecurringMemberus-gaap:DerivativeFinancialInstrumentsLiabilitiesMember2022-12-310001501697us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel1Memberus-gaap:WarrantMemberus-gaap:FairValueMeasurementsRecurringMember2022-12-310001501697us-gaap:WarrantMemberus-gaap:FairValueMeasurementsRecurringMemberus-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel2Member2022-12-310001501697us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel3Memberus-gaap:WarrantMemberus-gaap:FairValueMeasurementsRecurringMember2022-12-310001501697us-gaap:WarrantMemberus-gaap:FairValueMeasurementsRecurringMember2022-12-310001501697us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel1Memberus-gaap:FairValueMeasurementsRecurringMember2021-12-310001501697us-gaap:FairValueMeasurementsRecurringMemberus-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel2Member2021-12-310001501697us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel3Memberus-gaap:FairValueMeasurementsRecurringMember2021-12-310001501697us-gaap:FairValueMeasurementsRecurringMember2021-12-310001501697us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel1Memberus-gaap:FairValueMeasurementsRecurringMemberus-gaap:DerivativeFinancialInstrumentsLiabilitiesMember2021-12-310001501697us-gaap:FairValueMeasurementsRecurringMemberus-gaap:DerivativeFinancialInstrumentsLiabilitiesMemberus-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel2Member2021-12-310001501697us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel3Memberus-gaap:FairValueMeasurementsRecurringMemberus-gaap:DerivativeFinancialInstrumentsLiabilitiesMember2021-12-310001501697us-gaap:FairValueMeasurementsRecurringMemberus-gaap:DerivativeFinancialInstrumentsLiabilitiesMember2021-12-310001501697us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel3Memberus-gaap:DerivativeFinancialInstrumentsLiabilitiesMember2020-12-310001501697us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel3Memberxfor:PIPEWarrantsMemberus-gaap:WarrantMember2020-12-310001501697xfor:ClassCWarrantsMemberus-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel3Memberus-gaap:WarrantMember2020-12-310001501697us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel3Memberus-gaap:DerivativeFinancialInstrumentsLiabilitiesMember2021-01-012021-12-310001501697us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel3Memberxfor:PIPEWarrantsMemberus-gaap:WarrantMember2021-01-012021-12-310001501697xfor:ClassCWarrantsMemberus-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel3Memberus-gaap:WarrantMember2021-01-012021-12-310001501697us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel3Memberus-gaap:DerivativeFinancialInstrumentsLiabilitiesMember2021-12-310001501697us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel3Memberxfor:PIPEWarrantsMemberus-gaap:WarrantMember2021-12-310001501697xfor:ClassCWarrantsMemberus-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel3Memberus-gaap:WarrantMember2021-12-310001501697us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel3Memberus-gaap:DerivativeFinancialInstrumentsLiabilitiesMember2022-01-012022-12-310001501697us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel3Memberxfor:PIPEWarrantsMemberus-gaap:WarrantMember2022-01-012022-12-310001501697xfor:ClassCWarrantsMemberus-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel3Memberus-gaap:WarrantMember2022-01-012022-12-310001501697us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel3Memberus-gaap:DerivativeFinancialInstrumentsLiabilitiesMember2022-12-310001501697us-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel3Memberxfor:PIPEWarrantsMemberus-gaap:WarrantMember2022-12-310001501697xfor:ClassCWarrantsMemberus-gaap:FairValueInputsLevel3Memberus-gaap:WarrantMember2022-12-310001501697us-gaap:WarrantMember2022-12-070001501697us-gaap:WarrantMember2022-12-310001501697us-gaap:WarrantMember2022-12-072022-12-070001501697us-gaap:WarrantMember2022-01-012022-12-310001501697us-gaap:LeaseholdImprovementsMember2022-12-310001501697us-gaap:LeaseholdImprovementsMember2021-12-310001501697us-gaap:FurnitureAndFixturesMember2022-12-310001501697us-gaap:FurnitureAndFixturesMember2021-12-310001501697us-gaap:ComputerEquipmentMember2022-12-310001501697us-gaap:ComputerEquipmentMember2021-12-310001501697xfor:SoftwareMember2022-12-310001501697xfor:SoftwareMember2021-12-310001501697xfor:LabEquipmentMember2022-12-310001501697xfor:LabEquipmentMember2021-12-310001501697xfor:HerculesLoanAgreementMember2018-10-012021-03-310001501697xfor:HerculesFirstAmendedLoanAgreementMember2020-12-210001501697xfor:HerculesFirstAmendedLoanAgreementMemberxfor:DiscretionaryBorrowingsMember2020-12-210001501697xfor:HerculesAmendedAndRestatedLoanAgreementMember2019-06-012019-06-300001501697xfor:HerculesAmendedAndRestatedLoanAgreementMembersrt:MinimumMember2019-06-012019-06-300001501697xfor:HerculesSecondAmendedLoanAgreementMemberxfor:MinCashTestDate1Member2022-12-310001501697xfor:HerculesSecondAmendedLoanAgreementMemberxfor:MinCashTestDate2Member2022-12-310001501697xfor:HerculesLoanAgreementMember2022-01-012022-12-310001501697xfor:HerculesLoanAgreementMember2021-01-012021-12-310001501697xfor:HerculesLoanAgreementMember2020-01-012020-12-310001501697xfor:HerculesSecondAmendedLoanAgreementMember2022-12-310001501697xfor:HerculesSecondAmendedLoanAgreementMember2022-01-012022-12-310001501697xfor:SecondARLoanAgreementMember2020-12-210001501697xfor:SecondARLoanAgreementMember2019-06-012019-06-300001501697xfor:SecondARLoanAgreementMembersrt:MinimumMember2019-06-012019-06-300001501697xfor:SecondARLoanAgreementMember2022-01-012022-12-310001501697xfor:SecondARLoanAgreementMember2022-12-310001501697xfor:HerculesSecondAmendedLoanAgreementMembersrt:ScenarioForecastMember2023-07-012023-07-010001501697xfor:HerculesSecondAmendedLoanAgreementMembersrt:ScenarioForecastMember2024-07-012024-07-010001501697xfor:HerculesSecondAmendedLoanAgreementMembersrt:ScenarioForecastMember2026-04-012026-04-010001501697xfor:AllstonLeaseMember2019-11-112019-11-11utr:sqft0001501697xfor:AllstonLeaseMember2019-11-110001501697xfor:WalthamLeaseMember2019-03-132019-03-130001501697xfor:WalthamLeaseMember2019-03-1300015016972019-03-132019-03-130001501697xfor:NewViennaLeaseMember2020-09-012020-09-010001501697xfor:NewViennaLeaseMember2020-09-010001501697us-gaap:CommonStockMemberxfor:SalesAgentsMember2020-08-072020-08-070001501697us-gaap:CommonStockMemberxfor:SalesAgentsMember2022-12-310001501697xfor:IssuanceOnMarch232021Member2021-03-182021-03-180001501697xfor:IssuanceOnMarch232021Memberus-gaap:RedeemablePreferredStockMember2021-03-182021-03-180001501697xfor:IssuanceOnMarch232021Memberxfor:PreFundedWarrantMember2022-12-310001501697xfor:IssuanceOnMarch232021Member2022-12-310001501697xfor:FundedMember2021-03-2300015016972021-03-182021-03-180001501697xfor:RedeemableCommonStockMember2021-03-182021-03-180001501697xfor:LincolnParkCapitalFundLLCMember2022-01-142022-01-140001501697us-gaap:EquityUnitPurchaseAgreementsMember2020-10-142020-10-1400015016972022-01-1400015016972022-01-142022-01-140001501697xfor:Q12022PIPEMember2022-03-032022-03-030001501697xfor:Q12022PIPEMember2022-03-030001501697xfor:PreFundedWarrantMember2022-03-0300015016972022-03-030001501697xfor:Q22022PrivatePlacementMember2022-01-012022-12-310001501697xfor:PreFundedWarrantMemberxfor:Q22022PrivatePlacementMember2022-12-310001501697xfor:Q22022PrivatePlacementMember2021-03-230001501697xfor:PreFundedWarrantMemberxfor:Q22022PrivatePlacementMember2019-11-260001501697xfor:Q22022PrivatePlacementMember2022-12-310001501697xfor:Q22022PrivatePlacementMember2021-03-232021-03-2300015016972022-09-010001501697us-gaap:WarrantMember2022-07-060001501697xfor:PreFundedWarrantMember2022-07-0600015016972022-04-012022-06-300001501697us-gaap:WarrantMember2022-01-012022-12-310001501697xfor:Q42022PublicOfferingMember2022-12-072022-12-070001501697xfor:PreFundedWarrantMemberxfor:Q42022PublicOfferingMember2022-12-070001501697xfor:Q42022PublicOfferingMember2022-12-070001501697xfor:ClassCWarrantsMemberxfor:Q42022PublicOfferingMember2022-12-0700015016972022-12-070001501697xfor:ClassAWarrantMember2019-04-162019-04-160001501697xfor:ClassAWarrantMember2019-04-160001501697xfor:ClassBWarrantsMember2019-11-260001501697xfor:ClassBWarrantsMember2019-11-2900015016972019-11-262019-11-260001501697xfor:ClassCWarrantsMember2022-12-090001501697srt:MinimumMember2021-03-230001501697srt:MaximumMember2021-03-230001501697xfor:IssuanceOnOctoberTwentyFiveTwoThousandSixteenMember2022-12-310001501697xfor:IssuanceOnDecemberTwentyEightTwoThousandSeventeenOneMember2022-12-310001501697xfor:IssuanceOnSeptemberTwelveTwoThousandEighteenOneMember2022-12-310001501697xfor:IssuanceOnOctoberNineteenTwoThousandEighteenMember2022-12-310001501697xfor:IssuanceOnMarchThirteenTwoThousandNineteenMember2022-12-310001501697xfor:IssuanceOnAprilSixteenTwoThousandNineteenMember2022-12-310001501697xfor:IssuanceOnNovemberTwentyNineTwoThousandNineteenOneMember2022-12-310001501697xfor:IssuanceOnNovemberNineTwoThousandTwentyOneMember2022-12-310001501697xfor:IssuanceOnMarch32022Member2022-12-310001501697xfor:IssuanceOnJuly20221Member2022-12-310001501697xfor:IssuanceOnJuly620222Member2022-12-310001501697xfor:IssuanceOnDecember92022Member2022-12-090001501697xfor:IssuanceOnDecember92022Member2022-12-310001501697xfor:IssuanceOnDecember920222Member2022-12-090001501697xfor:IssuanceOnDecember920222Member2022-12-310001501697xfor:PreFundedWarrantMember2019-11-2900015016972019-11-2900015016972021-03-230001501697xfor:FundedMember2021-11-0900015016972021-11-3000015016972021-11-090001501697xfor:FundedMember2022-03-030001501697xfor:FundedMember2022-07-0600015016972022-07-060001501697xfor:FundedMember2022-12-0900015016972022-12-090001501697srt:MaximumMemberus-gaap:EmployeeStockOptionMember2022-01-012022-12-310001501697xfor:IncentiveStockOptionsAndRestrictedStockAwardsMember2022-01-012022-12-310001501697xfor:NonStatutoryOptionsMembersrt:MinimumMember2022-01-012022-12-310001501697srt:MaximumMemberxfor:NonStatutoryOptionsMember2022-01-012022-12-310001501697xfor:A2015EquityIncentivePlanMember2022-12-310001501697xfor:TwoThousandSeventeenEquityIncentivePlanMember2022-01-012022-12-310001501697xfor:TwoThousandSeventeenEquityIncentivePlanMember2022-12-310001501697xfor:TwoThousandSeventeenEquityIncentivePlanMember2021-01-010001501697xfor:EmployeeStockPurchasePlansMemberxfor:TwoThousandSeventeenEquityIncentivePlanMember2022-01-012022-12-310001501697xfor:EmployeeStockPurchasePlansMemberxfor:TwoThousandSeventeenEquityIncentivePlanMember2022-12-310001501697xfor:EmployeeStockPurchasePlansMemberxfor:TwoThousandSeventeenEquityIncentivePlanMember2021-01-012021-01-010001501697xfor:TwoThousandNineteenEquityIncentivePlanMember2022-12-310001501697us-gaap:RestrictedStockUnitsRSUMember2022-01-012022-12-310001501697us-gaap:RestrictedStockUnitsRSUMember2021-12-310001501697us-gaap:RestrictedStockUnitsRSUMember2022-12-310001501697us-gaap:ResearchAndDevelopmentExpenseMember2022-01-012022-12-310001501697us-gaap:ResearchAndDevelopmentExpenseMember2021-01-012021-12-310001501697us-gaap:ResearchAndDevelopmentExpenseMember2020-01-012020-12-310001501697us-gaap:GeneralAndAdministrativeExpenseMember2022-01-012022-12-310001501697us-gaap:GeneralAndAdministrativeExpenseMember2021-01-012021-12-310001501697us-gaap:GeneralAndAdministrativeExpenseMember2020-01-012020-12-310001501697us-gaap:WarrantMember2022-07-062022-07-060001501697us-gaap:StockAppreciationRightsSARSMember2022-01-012022-12-310001501697us-gaap:DomesticCountryMember2022-12-310001501697us-gaap:StateAndLocalJurisdictionMember2022-12-310001501697us-gaap:ForeignCountryMember2022-12-310001501697us-gaap:ResearchMemberus-gaap:DomesticCountryMember2022-12-310001501697us-gaap:ResearchMemberus-gaap:StateAndLocalJurisdictionMember2022-12-310001501697us-gaap:ValuationAllowanceOfDeferredTaxAssetsMember2021-12-310001501697us-gaap:ValuationAllowanceOfDeferredTaxAssetsMember2020-12-310001501697us-gaap:ValuationAllowanceOfDeferredTaxAssetsMember2019-12-310001501697us-gaap:ValuationAllowanceOfDeferredTaxAssetsMember2022-01-012022-12-310001501697us-gaap:ValuationAllowanceOfDeferredTaxAssetsMember2021-01-012021-12-310001501697us-gaap:ValuationAllowanceOfDeferredTaxAssetsMember2020-01-012020-12-310001501697us-gaap:ValuationAllowanceOfDeferredTaxAssetsMember2022-12-310001501697xfor:PreFundedWarrantMember2019-04-162019-04-160001501697srt:MinimumMemberxfor:PreFundedWarrantMember2022-12-310001501697us-gaap:StockOptionMember2022-01-012022-12-310001501697us-gaap:StockOptionMember2021-01-012021-12-310001501697us-gaap:StockOptionMember2020-01-012020-12-310001501697us-gaap:RestrictedStockUnitsRSUMember2022-01-012022-12-310001501697us-gaap:RestrictedStockUnitsRSUMember2021-01-012021-12-310001501697us-gaap:RestrictedStockUnitsRSUMember2020-01-012020-12-310001501697us-gaap:WarrantMember2022-01-012022-12-310001501697us-gaap:WarrantMember2021-01-012021-12-310001501697us-gaap:WarrantMember2020-01-012020-12-310001501697xfor:SecondARLoanAgreementMemberus-gaap:SubsequentEventMember2023-01-06
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
(Mark One)
|
|
|
|
|
|
x |
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022
or
|
|
|
|
|
|
o |
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 001-38295
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
X4 PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or
organization)
|
27-3181608
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
|
|
|
61 North Beacon Street, 4th Floor
Boston, Massachusetts
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
02134
(Zip Code)
|
(857) 529-8300
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the
Act:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Title of each class |
|
Trading Symbol(s) |
|
Name of each exchange on which registered |
Common Stock |
|
XFOR |
|
The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC |
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
none
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned
issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
Yes ☐ No ☒
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file
reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.
Yes ☐ No
☒
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all
reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file
such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements
for the past 90 days
Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (of this chapter) during the
preceding 12 months (of for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to submit such files).
Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a
smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the
definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,”
“smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in
Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large Accelerated Filer |
☐ |
|
Accelerated Filer |
☐ |
Non-accelerated filer |
☒ |
|
Smaller reporting company |
☒ |
|
|
|
Emerging growth company |
☐ |
If
an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the
registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period
for complying with any new or revised financial accounting
standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the
Exchange Act. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on
an attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness
of its internal control over financial reporting under Section
404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the
registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit
report. Yes ☐ No ☒
If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act,
indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the
registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an
error to previously issued financial statements.
☐
Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are
restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based
compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers
during the relevant recovery period pursuant to § 240.10D-1(b).
☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act). ☐
On June 30, 2022, the aggregate market value of the registrant’s
voting common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was
approximately $29.6 million based upon the closing sale price on
the Nasdaq Capital Market reported on June 30, 2022.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm |
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |
Boston, Massachusetts, US |
Firm ID |
238 |
As of March 15, 2023, there were 122,207,488 shares of the
registrant’s common stock, $0.001 par value per share
outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the registrant’s definitive proxy statement, (the “2023
Proxy Statement”) for its 2023 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders, which the registrant intends to file pursuant to
Regulation 14A with the Securities and Exchange Commission not
later than 120 days after the registrant's fiscal year
ended December 31, 2022, are incorporated by
reference into Part III of this Annual Report on Form
10-K.
CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Annual Report contains forward-looking statements within the
meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”),
that relate to future events or to our future operations or
financial performance. These statements may be identified by
such forward-looking terminology as “may,” “should,” “expects,”
“intends,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,”
“predicts,” “potential,” “continue” or the negative of these terms
or other comparable terminology. Our forward-looking statements are
based on a series of expectations, assumptions, estimates and
projections about our company, are not guarantees of future results
or performance and involve substantial risks and uncertainty. We
may not actually achieve the plans, intentions or expectations
disclosed in these forward-looking statements. Actual results or
events could differ materially from the plans, intentions and
expectations disclosed in these forward-looking statements. These
forward-looking statements are subject to a number of known and
unknown risks, uncertainties and assumptions, including risks
described in the section titled “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in
this report, regarding, among other things:
•the
initiation, timing, progress and results of our current and future
preclinical studies and clinical trials and related preparatory
work and the period during which the results of the trials will
become available, as well as our research and development
programs;
•the
potential benefits, including clinical utility, that may be derived
from any of our product candidates;
•the
timing of and our ability to obtain and maintain regulatory
approval of our existing product candidates or any product
candidates that we may develop in the future, and any related
restrictions, limitations, or warnings in the label of any approved
product candidates;
•our
plans to research, develop, manufacture and commercialize our
product candidates;
•the
timing of our regulatory filings for our product candidates, along
with regulatory developments in the United States and other foreign
countries;
•the
size and growth potential of the markets for our product
candidates, if approved, and the rate and degree of market
acceptance of our product candidates, including reimbursement that
may be received from payors;
•the
benefits of U.S. Food and Drug Administration and European
Commission designations, including, without limitation, Fast Track,
Orphan Drug and Breakthrough Therapy;
•our
commercialization, marketing and manufacturing capabilities and
strategy;
•our
ability to attract and retain qualified employees and key
personnel;
•our
competitive position and the development of and projections
relating to our competitors or our industry;
•our
expectations regarding our ability to obtain and maintain
intellectual property protection;
•the
success of competing therapies that are or may become
available;
•our
estimates and expectations regarding future operations, financial
position, revenues, costs, expenses, uses of cash, capital
requirements or our need for additional financing;
•our
ability to continue as a going concern;
•our
plans to in-license, acquire, develop and commercialize additional
product candidates;
•the
impact of laws and regulations;
•our
plans to identify additional product candidates with significant
commercial potential that are consistent with our commercial
objectives;
•our
ability to raise additional capital;
•our
strategies, prospects, plans, expectations or objectives;
and
•other
risks and uncertainties, including those listed under the section
titled “Risk Factors” in this Annual Report.
You should refer to the section titled “Risk Factors” in this
Annual Report for a discussion of important factors that may cause
our actual results to differ materially from those expressed or
implied by our forward-looking statements. As a result of these
factors, we cannot assure you that the forward-looking statements
in this Annual Report will prove to be accurate. Furthermore, if
our forward-looking statements prove to be inaccurate, the
inaccuracy may be material. In light of the significant
uncertainties in these forward-looking statements, you should not
regard these statements as a representation or warranty by us or
any other person that we will achieve our objectives and plans in
any specified time frame, or at all. We undertake no obligation to
publicly update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result
of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required
by law. You should, therefore, not rely on these forward-looking
statements as representing our views as of any date subsequent to
the date of this Annual Report.
Unless the context requires otherwise, references in this Annual
Report to “X4”, “we”, “us” and “our” refer to X4 Pharmaceuticals,
Inc. and its subsidiaries.
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
Overview
We are a late clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company discovering
and developing novel therapeutics for the treatment of rare
diseases and those with limited treatment options, with a focus on
conditions resulting from dysfunction of the immune
system.
Our lead clinical candidate is mavorixafor, a small molecule
antagonist of chemokine receptor CXCR4, that is being developed as
an oral, once-daily therapy. Due to its ability to increase the
mobilization of mature, functional white blood cells from the bone
marrow into the bloodstream, we believe that mavorixafor has the
potential to provide therapeutic benefit across a variety of
chronic neutropenic disorders, including WHIM (Warts,
Hypogammaglobulinemia, Infections, and Myelokathexis) syndrome, a
rare, primary immunodeficiency.
Following announcement of positive top-line data from our global,
pivotal, Phase 3 clinical trial, we are currently preparing a
United States regulatory submission seeking approval of oral,
once-daily mavorixafor in the treatment of people aged 12 years and
older with WHIM syndrome. We are also currently advancing
mavorixafor in a Phase 2 clinical trial in people with certain
chronic neutropenic disorders following positive results from a
Phase 1b clinical trial of mavorixafor in people with idiopathic,
cyclic or congenital neutropenia.
We believe that successfully developing mavorixafor and providing
new therapeutic options to individuals in the United States
diagnosed with certain chronic neutropenic disorders has the
potential to revolutionize the treatment landscape, which is
principally served by injectable therapies that are frequently
associated with treatment-limiting adverse events.
Our Focus
We have developed a pipeline of small-molecule, oral antagonists of
the chemokine receptor CXCR4. CXCR4, or C-X-C receptor type 4, is a
cell receptor that helps regulate the movement of immune cells
within the body. CXCR4 receptor stimulation by its cognate ligand,
CXCL12, has been shown to play a key role in the maturation and
mobilization of white blood cells such as neutrophils, lymphocytes
(including both B cells and T cells), and monocytes, into the
bloodstream. Because antagonism of the CXCR4 receptor has been
shown to increase the trafficking of white blood cells, we believe
that therapeutic inhibition of the CXCR4/CXCL12 axis holds the
potential to benefit people with a wide variety of diseases where
there remain significant unmet needs, including chronic neutropenic
disorders and certain types of cancer.
Chronic neutropenic disorders are rare blood conditions where
people of all ages experience low levels of neutrophils and tend to
be at greater risk of developing infections and certain types of
cancer. Depending on the levels of circulating neutrophils in the
blood, neutropenia can be categorized as mild, moderate, or
severe.
We are currently focused on advancing our lead clinical candidate,
mavorixafor, for the treatment of a number of chronic neutropenia
indications, including WHIM syndrome, while also pursuing
partnership opportunities to further advance our previous work in
oncology indications.
Our Pipeline
Our deep understanding of the biology of the CXCR4 pathway has
enabled us to discover and develop multiple small-molecule CXCR4
antagonists. To date, we have advanced our lead candidate,
mavorixafor, into late-stage clinical development. Mavorixafor is
an orally available, small-molecule CXCR4 antagonist designed to
facilitate the mobilization of white blood cells from the bone
marrow into the blood, to increase levels of circulating
neutrophils, lymphocytes, and monocytes, and to improve immune
system function.
To date, more than 200 patients in clinical trials have been dosed
with mavorixafor, which has demonstrated a favorable tolerability
profile. In these trials, we have observed drug exposure in
patients, a 22-hour half-life, and bioavailability of mavorixafor
to support once-daily oral dosing, which we believe would provide
convenient dosing and better patient compliance for chronic or
life-long use, if approved. The manufacturing process for
mavorixafor utilizes well established, small-molecule chemistry,
creating the potential for a commercial product that can be
supported by specialty pharmacy distribution.
We have successfully advanced mavorixafor through a pivotal, Phase
3 clinical trial, referred to as the 4WHIM trial, in people with
WHIM (Warts, Hypogammaglobulinemia, Infections, and Myelokathexis)
syndrome, a rare, primary immunodeficiency, through a Phase 1b
clinical trial in people with congenital, idiopathic, or cyclic
neutropenia, and through a Phase 1b clinical trial of mavorixafor
in combination with the Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor ibrutinib
in people with a rare B-cell lymphoma called Waldenström’s
macroglobulinemia (“Waldenström’s”).
We have also developed two pre-clinical candidates: X4P-003, a
second-generation CXCR4 antagonist designed to have enhanced
properties relative to mavorixafor, potentially enabling broader
opportunities in CXCR4-dependent disorders and primary
immunodeficiencies; and X4P-002, a CXCR4 antagonist with a unique
distribution profile and a demonstrated ability to cross the
blood-brain barrier.
* Programs only being advanced through partnership
Following our July 2022 announced strategic re-prioritization, we
are now advancing mavorixafor solely in chronic neutropenic
disorder indications, including WHIM syndrome, while pausing our
pre-clinical programs and only progressing our oncology programs
upon completion of strategic partnership(s).
About WHIM Syndrome
WHIM syndrome is both a rare combined immunodeficiency and a
congenital neutropenic disorder in which the body’s immune system
does not function properly and has trouble fighting infections. In
many patients, WHIM is caused by “gain of function” variations in
the single gene that encodes for the CXCR4 receptor. In healthy
individuals, the CXCR4 receptor is typically internalized into the
cell after CXCL12 binds to it, enabling the receptor to be
appropriately “recycled” and the signaling to be diminished. In
most WHIM patients, however, a genetic variation in the receptor
gene prevents the post-binding internalization (“normal recycling”)
of the receptor. As a result, the CXCR4 receptor is maintained on
the surface of the cell and is exposed to the ligand, which creates
a perpetual “on” signal and retention of white blood cells in the
bone marrow where they are produced, leading to the chronic
peripheral neutropenia, lymphopenia, and monocytopenia that are the
clinical hallmarks of WHIM syndrome.
Genetic testing is typically used to diagnose WHIM syndrome to
confirm the presence of a genetic variation in the CXCR4 receptor.
The diagnosis of WHIM syndrome may occur at any age: about one-half
of reported patients are diagnosed as children, primarily before of
at the age of 18 years, with the other half diagnosed as adults,
mostly between 18 and 40 years of age.
WHIM syndrome is named for its four common clinical findings,
although not all patients experience all symptoms, and not all
symptoms are required for a diagnosis:
Warts,
related to infection with the Human Papilloma Virus (HPV),
Hypogammaglobulinemia,
a condition of low immunoglobulin (“IG”) levels,
Infections,
including both bacterial and fungal infections, and
Myelokathexis,
a hyper-dense population of immune cells in the bone marrow. These
conditions reduce the body’s ability to achieve a healthy immune
response. Approximately 30-40% of people with WHIM syndrome develop
HPV-associated cancers as they age.
The incidence and prevalence of WHIM syndrome are not well
established. We believe that this is due to the relatively recent
elucidation of the genetics underlying WHIM syndrome, lack of
universal or accessible genetic testing, and limited medical
education and awareness of the disease, which is in part driven by
the lack of available disease-modifying treatments. Based on a
preliminary U.S market research study sponsored by us and conducted
by a third-party research firm, we believe that the prevalence of
WHIM syndrome worldwide is significantly higher than previous
registries suggest.
•The
study solicited input from community-based physicians of different
specialties, including physicians focused on non-malignant
hematology, immunology, dermatology, pulmonology, and infectious
diseases, who are known to manage and/or treat patients with WHIM
syndrome.
•The
212 physicians across these specialties identified to participate
in this study reported more than 1,700 patients in the United
States with genetically confirmed or highly probable WHIM
syndrome.
In addition, we have also completed a study using artificial
intelligence, interrogating a database of approximately 300 million
American lives that included up to 10 years of insurance claims on
diagnoses, drug treatments, procedures, and treatment pathways.
This study suggests that there may be as many as 3,700 WHIM
patients in the United States based on the WHIM-like phenotypes
described.
The first CXCR4 genetic variation determined to cause WHIM syndrome
was identified in 2003. Since then, several CXCR4 variations have
been identified as “gain of function” variations causing WHIM
syndrome. Our research has subsequently identified a number of new
genetic variations, among them a new missense variation, called
D84H, that is relatively frequent in the general population. The
D84H mutation is the first mutation to be identified outside of the
C-terminus of the CXCR4 receptor showing gain-of-function signaling
and WHIM disease phenotype. We believe that the frequency of the
D84H variation, as derived from broad population genomic databases,
further supports our current WHIM prevalence estimate. Our research
into additional WHIM-causing genetic variations is ongoing and we
are continuing to identify novel pathogenic variants, further
expanding our understanding of the clinical phenotype of people
with WHIM syndrome.
In partnership with Invitae, a genetic information company, we
sponsor a no-charge genetic testing and counseling program called
PATH4WARD for individuals who may carry a genetic variation known
to be associated with chronic neutropenia or primary
immunodeficiency disorders (“PIDs”), including WHIM syndrome. The
genetic panel looks at more than 550 genes known to be associated
with PIDs; to date, the program has proven helpful not only in
identifying WHIM patients, but also providing a better
understanding of novel genetic variants causing PIDs and assisting
participant enrollment in X4-sponsored clinical
trials.
We plan to continue to increase awareness of WHIM syndrome among
patients, physicians, and their support systems through our
partnerships with key patient foundations and registries, including
the Jeffrey Modell Foundation, University of Washington, Immune
Deficiency Foundation, and Hopitaux Universitaires Est Parisien
(Trousseau La Roche-Guyon).
We have also deployed of a field force of Medical Science Liaisons
(“MSLs”) and Patient Diagnostic Liaisons (“PDLs”) in the United
States to further drive education and awareness of WHIM syndrome
and to assist in identifying WHIM patients.
Limited Current Treatment Landscape for WHIM Syndrome
Currently, there are no approved therapies for the treatment of
WHIM syndrome and care is limited to the treatment of the
syndrome’s different symptoms, mainly the prevention and management
of infections. None of these symptomatic treatments, however,
address the underlying cause of this multi-faceted disease. Current
symptoms and their treatment limitations are as
follows:
•Warts:
The presence of warts in WHIM syndrome is driven by an underlying
HPV infection. Standard treatments, such as topical therapies (for
example, imiquimod and salicylic acid), cryotherapy and laser
therapy, as well as more aggressive approaches, such as
cauterization or surgical removal, have been ineffective in
providing durable treatment of warts associated with chronic HPV
infections. As WHIM patients generally have limited response to
vaccines, the HPV vaccine appears to have limited effectiveness.
The number, size, and severity of visible warts in WHIM patients
can have a significant negative impact on the patient’s quality of
life and result in social anxiety issues. Left untreated, chronic
HPV-infections are also known to increase the risk of
cancer.
•Hypogammaglobulinemia:
Intravenous or subcutaneous IG administration, referred to as IVIG
or SCIG, respectively, can be administered to patients with low IG
levels. In WHIM patients, the administration of IG therapies raises
IG levels, but has shown no impact on circulating white blood cells
and limited or no impact on immune responses. IG treatment of
patients with WHIM syndrome is based on empirical and anecdotal
evidence, and there are no clinical data demonstrating the efficacy
of IG treatment for WHIM syndrome. IG treatment also does not treat
or protect against HPV-associated symptoms and diseases, such as
warts and certain cancers. Furthermore, IG administration is costly
and time consuming.
•Infections:
Bacterial infections are managed with antibiotics. Acute infections
usually resolve, although we are aware of reports from clinicians
citing death due to pneumonia or sepsis in young WHIM patients.
Importantly, even with antibiotic use, infections are known to
recur more frequently and persist longer in patients with WHIM
syndrome. Further, the toll of multiple, chronic infections in WHIM
patients has been known to lead to devastating irreversible
pathologies such as hearing loss, due to chronic ear infections and
bronchiectasis, or damaged lung airways. Patients are sometimes
given granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (“G-CSF”) to increase
neutrophil counts, but G-CSF has demonstrated little, if any,
impact on lymphopenia or the incidence of infections in WHIM
patients. Side effects of G-CSF have been reported to include
disabling bone pain, which can be more severe in certain age
groups. Additional, less common, treatment-limiting complications
of chronic G-CSF administration include myelofibrosis and
leukemia.
•Myelokathexis:
G-CSF is also sometimes used to treat the myelokathexis
characteristic of WHIM syndrome to try to increase the number of
neutrophils outside of the bone marrow, but G-CSF has no effect on
lymphocytes and other types of white blood cells.
While the costs of managing the chronic impact of WHIM syndrome are
unknown, the per-patient cost of treating primary
immunodeficiencies that are similar to WHIM syndrome, based on drug
costs alone, exceeds $100,000 per year in the United States for
therapies such as antibiotics, IVIG, SCIG and/or G-CSF, despite the
limited effectiveness of these treatments. Beyond these estimated
direct costs, other costs associated with direct and indirect
management of the disease, such as repeated immunization, physician
visits, or hospitalizations, have not been quantified but are
likely to be significant. We believe that there is a significant
need for a treatment targeting the underlying excessive signaling
caused by genetic variations to the CXCR4 receptor, which is the
established cause of WHIM syndrome.
Our approach to treating WHIM syndrome involves addressing the
underlying cause of the disease by blocking CXCR4 signaling using
mavorixafor, which has been shown to bind to the CXCR4 receptor in
a manner that inhibits the receptor from being stimulated by
CXCL12, enabling white blood cells to properly mature and release
into the bloodstream and improving immune cell numbers and
function.
Clinical Development of Mavorixafor in WHIM Syndrome
In January 2017, we initiated a Phase 2 clinical trial of
mavorixafor for the treatment of people with WHIM syndrome. This
trial was an open-label, dose-escalation trial in eight WHIM
patients conducted at two sites in the United States and Australia
pursuant to an Investigational New Drug (“IND”) application that we
submitted to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) in June
2016.
The primary objective of the Phase 2 clinical trial was to
determine the safety and tolerability of mavorixafor and to
determine the dose of mavorixafor for exploration in a pivotal
Phase 3 clinical trial. The secondary objective of the Phase 2
trial was to evaluate the potential efficacy of mavorixafor in
people with WHIM syndrome by measuring biomarkers, specifically
absolute neutrophil (“ANC”) and lymphocyte (“ALC”) counts, over
24-hour dosing cycles. The frequency of infections, antibiotic use,
hospitalizations, severity of warts lesions, and vaccine titer
levels, among other metrics, were also examined. To be included in
the trial, participants must have had a confirmed genetic diagnosis
of WHIM syndrome, be at least 18 years of age, and have a
neutrophil count equal to or less than 400 cells per microliter or
a lymphocyte count equal to or less than 650 cells per
microliter.
In the trial, participants received escalating doses of mavorixafor
starting at 50 mg once daily to up to 400 mg once daily.
Participants were dose-escalated from their starting dose based on
an in-hospital 24-hour measurement of ANC and ALC above or below
the pre-defined target thresholds of 600 cells per microliter and
1,000 cells per microliter, respectively.
We completed the dose-titration portion of the Phase 2 clinical
trial in March 2018 and, based on the reported results, the Data
Review Committee recommended the Phase 3 dose of 400 mg
administered orally once daily. The choice of time above threshold
for absolute neutrophil count (“TAT-ANC”), defined as the number of
hours during which the absolute neutrophil count is raised above a
500 cells per microliter threshold, was selected as the primary
endpoint of the Phase 3 clinical trial.
Following completion of the dose-titration portion of the Phase 2
clinical trial, participants were allowed to continue on study drug
in a Phase 2 open-label extension trial. In June 2020, we announced
the following positive data from the open-label extension portion
of the Phase 2 clinical trial:
•Sustained,
dose-dependent increases in white blood cells, ANC, and ALC were
achieved; higher doses of mavorixafor were shown to increase the
TAT-ANC at least 4.5-fold versus the TAT-ANC at lower
doses.
•These
long-term hematological improvements correlated with fewer
infections and reduced numbers of cutaneous warts.
•A
decreased yearly infection rate from 4.63 [95%CI 3.3,6.3] events in
the 12 months prior to the trial, to 2.27 [95%CI 1.4, 3.5] events
when treated with mavorixafor at higher doses once daily; notably,
deeper reductions in yearly infection rates correlated with
increased time on treatment.
•The
participants with cutaneous warts on hands and/or feet at baseline
achieved an average 75% reduction in the number of
warts.
•Mavorixafor
was well tolerated for the extended duration of up to more than two
years without any attributable serious adverse
effects.
In December 2021, we announced the following additional data from
the Phase 2 open-label extension trial of mavorixafor in people
with WHIM syndrome:
•Mavorixafor
continued to show durable increases in neutrophils, lymphocytes,
and monocytes, sustained improvements in infections and warts, and
was well tolerated (median treatment duration = 148.4
weeks).
•Decreases
in mean annualized infection rates correlated well with
TAT-ANC.
•Standardized
participant interviews revealed that long-term treatment with
mavorixafor was well tolerated and continued to demonstrate
beneficial treatment effects, including decreased frequency,
severity, and duration of infections and fewer hospital/doctor
visits.
In June 2019, we initiated 4WHIM, a pivotal, global, randomized,
double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter Phase 3 clinical
trial designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of mavorixafor
in people with genetically confirmed WHIM syndrome. Originally
designed to enroll 18-28 patients, the trial achieved full
enrollment in September 2021, with 31 participants aged 12 and
older receiving either 200-400 mg mavorixafor or placebo orally
once daily for 52 weeks; all participants then became eligible to
receive treatment with mavorixafor in an open-label trial
extension.
The primary endpoint of the 4WHIM trial is a clinically relevant
reduction of duration of severe neutropenia as measured by the
increase in TAT-ANC (500 cells per microliter) in peripheral blood.
Secondary endpoints include time above threshold-absolute
lymphocyte count (TAT-ALC) of ≥ 1,000 cells per microliter over a
24-hour period, a composite clinical efficacy endpoint for
mavorixafor based on total infection score and total wart change
score, total wart change score for mavorixafor based on central
blinded, independent review of 3 target skin regions, total
infection score for mavorixafor based on number and severity of
infections adjudicated by a blinded, independent adjudication
committee; and a number of quality-of-life measurements and other
exploratory endpoints.
In November 2022, we reported positive top-line results from the
Phase 3 4WHIM trial:
•4WHIM
met its primary endpoint, with mavorixafor achieving clinical and
statistical superiority over placebo (P<0.0001) when measuring
the length of time that participants’ ANC remained above a
clinically meaningful threshold of 500 cells per microliter (severe
neutropenia), over 24-hour periods at 4 time points throughout the
52-week trial.
•4WHIM
also met a key secondary endpoint, with mavorixafor achieving
clinical and statistical superiority over placebo (P<0.0001)
when measuring the length of time that participants’ ALC remained
above a clinically meaningful threshold of 1,000 cells per
microliter (lymphopenia), over 24-hour periods at 4 time points
throughout the 52-week trial.
•Mavorixafor
was generally well tolerated in the trial, with no
treatment-related serious adverse events reported and no
discontinuations for safety events.
Additional data review and analysis of the secondary and
exploratory endpoints of the 4WHIM trial are ongoing, with plans to
present detailed results at a medical meeting in the second quarter
of 2023. Given these positive results to date, we are targeting
submission to the FDA of a New Drug Application (“NDA”) early in
the second half of 2023, with the goal of obtaining approval for
mavorixafor for the treatment of people in the United States, aged
12 and older, with WHIM syndrome.
Mavorixafor has received multiple special designations from global
regulatory authorities in WHIM syndrome, including Breakthrough
Therapy Designation, Fast Track Designation, and Rare Pediatric
Designation in the United States, and Orphan Drug Status in both
the United States and European Union. In addition, upon approval of
an NDA, we are eligible to receive a Priority Review Voucher
(“PRV”) as a result of mavorixafor’s Rare Pediatric Designation in
the United States.
About Chronic Neutropenic Disorders
Due to its demonstrated ability to durably elevate levels of
circulating white blood cells across multiple clinical trials, we
believe that mavorixafor may be useful in the treatment of people
with a variety of chronic neutropenic disorders.
Chronic neutropenia is defined as periods lasting more than three
months persistently or intermittently where there are abnormally
low levels of neutrophils circulating in the blood, and may be
idiopathic (of unknown origin), cyclic (episodes typically
occurring every three weeks), or congenital (of genetic causation).
Similar to WHIM syndrome, chronic neutropenia disorders are rare
blood conditions similarly characterized by increased risks of
infections and cancer due to abnormally low levels of neutrophils
in the body. In all cases, the CXCL12/CXCR4 pathway is the key
regulator of neutrophil release from the bone marrow.
The incidence and prevalence of chronic neutropenic disorders are
not well established. In December 2022, we presented results from
what we believe was the first study examining the prevalence of
chronic neutropenia disorders (including idiopathic, cyclic, and
congenital neutropenia) in the United States; we believe that
determining the estimated projected prevalence of chronic
neutropenic disorders is a key step to understanding the extent of
existing unmet medical needs in this patient
population.
•Using
a retrospective analysis of a large U.S. claims database, the
analysis included people with a diagnosis code for neutropenia
during the calendar years 2018, 2019, and 2021 (the year 2020 was
excluded from this analysis owing to anticipated reduced claims
during the COVID-19 pandemic).
•People
with a diagnostic, procedural, or product code for neutropenia
resulting from secondary causes including chemotherapy, drug
exposure, infection, solid organ transplantation, myelodysplastic
syndrome, and end-stage renal disease within 24-month period prior
to selection were excluded.
•A
13- to 24-month lookback period prior to index date was used to
confirm chronic status.
•The
analysis used longitudinal prescription data and office-based
claims data from an IQVIA claims database that included 93% of
retail prescription claims, 77% of mail-in prescription claims, and
had more than 1.5 billion office-based claims per
year.
•This
retrospective analysis projected that in 2021, up to 48,000 people
in the United States were living with a diagnosis of chronic
neutropenia, with the most common type of chronic neutropenic
disorder being idiopathic (~40,000), followed by cyclic (~5,000),
and congenital (~3,000), and with the majority of affected people
being female adults.
In 2022, we also completed an electronic medical records study to
better understand the risk of serious or severe infection in people
with chronic neutropenia in the United States, analyzing the
medical records of 44 healthcare organizations treating
approximately 66 million patients. The analysis examined patients
who had experienced at least two Serious Infections Events (“SIEs”)
following documentation of chronic neutropenia in each calendar
year compared with those who did not have neutropenia. SIEs are
defined as infections requiring hospitalization or intravenous
antibiotics or that result in disability or death.
•The
results of this analysis indicated that the incidence rate of SIEs
per 100,000 person days was increased for all levels of chronic
neutropenia: it was two times greater for patients with any chronic
neutropenia (ANC less than 1,500 cells per microliter) and four
times greater for patients with severe congenital neutropenia (ANC
less than 500 cells per microliter).
•The
risk of serious infection increased with the worsening of
neutropenia.
•Approximately
25% of patients with chronic neutropenia had at least 2 SIEs in the
latest calendar year examined, which was 2019.
People living with chronic neutropenia have few treatment options
and may be treated with G-CSF, an injectable therapy approved in
the United States for the treatment of severe, chronic neutropenia.
G-CSF is used to stimulate the bone marrow to produce neutrophils.
Side effects of G-CSF include disabling bone pain, which can be
more severe in certain age groups. Additional, less common,
treatment-limiting complications of chronic G-CSF administration
include myelofibrosis and leukemia. In chronic neutropenia cases
that are unresponsive to G-CSF, or if leukemia has developed, bone
marrow transplants have been made with varying degrees of success.
Bone marrow transplantation is often applied to severe neutropenia
from bone marrow failure. Bone marrow transplants bring additional
risks into the management of the disorders.
Clinical Development of Mavorixafor in Chronic Neutropenic
Disorders
In 2022, we conducted a proof-of-concept Phase 1b open-label,
multicenter study designed to assess the safety and tolerability of
oral mavorixafor, with or without injectable G-CSF, in participants
with chronic neutropenic disorders, including idiopathic, cyclic,
and congenital neutropenia. Participants received a single dose of
400 mg oral mavorixafor to assess the magnitude of treatment
response.
In September 2022, we announced positive results from the Phase 1b
clinical trial:
•A
total of 25 participants were enrolled in the study.
•100%
of study participants responded to treatment with a single dose of
400 mg of mavorixafor, alone or dosed concurrently with
G-CSF:
◦Participants
achieved a mean ANC increase at peak of >3,000 cells per
microliter.
◦Consistent
responses were seen across all of the chronic neutropenic disorders
studied – idiopathic, cyclic, and congenital
neutropenia.
•All
neutropenic participants (n=14) reached normalized ANC levels
(>1,500 cells per microliter):
◦When
assessed as a monotherapy in participants with severe chronic
neutropenia who were not being treated with G-CSF (n=6), a single
dose of mavorixafor led to normalized ANC levels in all
participants within 2 hours, with a mean ANC increase at peak of
~2,500 cells per microliter.
◦When
assessed in participants with moderate or severe neutropenia,
despite being treated with G-CSF (n=8), 100% reached normalized ANC
levels, suggesting the potential of mavorixafor to both normalize
the neutrophil counts in patients with partial response to G-CSF
and also to potentially enable the reduction or elimination of
G-CSF dosing.
•When
assessed in participants with chronic neutropenia with normalized
ANC counts on chronic G-CSF (n=11), all participants experienced a
consistent and sustained increase in ANC, suggesting mavorixafor’s
potential to reduce or possibly eliminate G-CSF treatment in these
patients.
•Mavorixafor
was well tolerated in the study; all treatment-related adverse
events were deemed to be low grade, consistent with previous
clinical studies in WHIM syndrome, and no treatment-related serious
adverse events were reported.
Following these positive results, an amendment to the Phase 1b
clinical trial was initiated aiming to evaluate the use of daily
oral mavorixafor with or without injectable G-CSF for up to 6
months in participants with chronic neutropenic disorders as a
Phase 2 clinical trial. The Phase 2 trial is expected to assess the
durability of ANC responses, the potential of mavorixafor to enable
patients to taper down dosing with G-CSF, and to evaluate the
tolerability of mavorixafor in combination with G-CSF in chronic
use. Participants are now being enrolled in this Phase 2 clinical
trial and we expect to provide an update on clinical results in
the
second or third quarter of 2023.
Concurrent with this Phase 2 trial execution, we are advancing our
plans to conduct a Phase 3 program of mavorixafor in people with
certain chronic neutropenic disorders in the event the Phase 2
results are positive. We expect this trial will be a randomized,
placebo-controlled trial assessing the safety and efficacy of
mavorixafor, with or without concomitant G-CSF, in people with
idiopathic, cyclic, or congenital neutropenia. We expect to provide
more clarity on the scope and timing of this potential clinical
program in the second or third quarter of 2023.
Oncology Programs
In previous clinical and research studies, CXCR4 antagonism has
been proven to increase the maturation and mobilization of white
blood cells in all those dosed, including healthy volunteers,
increase circulating neutrophils, lymphocytes, and monocytes,
reduce bacterial and viral infections, and reduce lymphoma burden
in combination with approved oncology therapeutics.
As a result of these previous studies, we conducted several
clinical programs exploring the potential utility of mavorixafor in
the treatment of certain cancers. Any further development of
mavorixafor or other pipeline candidate(s) for any oncology
indication will be subject to completion of a strategic
partnership.
Mavorixafor in Waldenström's macroglobulinemia
Waldenström’s is a rare form of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and B-cell
lymphoproliferative disorder most often caused by genetic
variations in an immune-signaling gene called MYD88. Approximately
30-40% of people with Waldenström’s have been shown to have a
second genetic variation, a somatic WHIM-like activating variation
in the CXCR4 gene in the cancer cells that define this rare form of
lymphoma. Patients with the CXCR4 genetic variation have higher
serum immunoglobulin M (“IgM”) levels and greater incidence of
symptomatic hyperviscosity. These patients also have a worse
prognosis and weaker responses to treatment with Bruton tyrosine
kinase (“BTK”) inhibitors.
In December 2022, we completed a Phase 1b, open-label, multicenter,
single-arm study evaluating the safety and efficacy of mavorixafor
in combination with the BTK inhibitor ibrutinib in adult
participants (either treatment naïve or relapsed/refractory) with
Waldenström’s and confirmed MYD88 and CXCR4 genetic variations. The
Phase 1b clinical trial examined intra-patient dose escalation,
safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of mavorixafor plus
ibrutinib in participants aged 18 years or older.
Interim results of the clinical trial were announced in August
2022; full clinical trial results are expected to be submitted to
an appropriate medical journal for publication in the future. As of
June 2022:
•A
total of 16 participants were enrolled; all were dosed with oral,
once-daily doses of ibrutinib (420 mg) and escalating doses (200
mg, 400 mg, 600 mg) of oral mavorixafor, also once
daily.
•Ten
of the 11 evaluable participants (91%) had achieved a major
response (“MR”) to therapy, or a greater than 50% reduction in
serum IgM from baseline:
◦In
relapsed/refractory participants, 7 of 7 (100%) achieved a
MR.
◦In
treatment-naïve patients, 3 of 4 (75%) achieved a MR.
•Adding
mavorixafor to ibrutinib was associated with a higher MR rate at 3,
6, 9, 12, and 24 months compared to previously reported MR rates
achieved with ibrutinib monotherapy.
•In
addition, patients achieved elevations in ANC, with no neutropenic
events reported; patients also experienced fewer infections over
time with chronic dosing.
•No
major safety signals had been identified in the trial as of the
data cut-off; mavorixafor in combination with ibrutinib showed a
safety profile similar to ibrutinib monotherapy (N=16, including 8
patients escalated to the 600 mg dose of mavorixafor).
The Phase 1b clinical trial of mavorixafor in Waldenström’s
macroglobulinemia trial was conducted as part of a collaboration
with The Leukemia & Lymphoma Society (“LLS”) to accelerate the
development of mavorixafor for the treatment of Waldenström’s.
Mavorixafor was selected for LLS’s Therapy Acceleration Program®, a
strategic initiative where LLS builds business alliances and
collaborations with biotechnology companies and academic
researchers to speed the development of new therapies for blood
cancers.
In June 2022, mavorixafor was granted Orphan Drug Designation by
the FDA for the treatment of patients with Waldenström’s
macroglobulinemia, regardless of CXCR4 genetic variant
status.
Mavorixafor in Immuno-Oncology Indications
In solid tumors, the tumor micro-environment (“TME”) consists of
the tumor cells and cancer associated fibroblasts (“CAFs”), each of
which overproduce growth factors and chemokines to support
immune-suppression and malignant cell proliferation and growth.
Evidence suggests that the pro-tumor signals between tumor cells
and CAFs occur, in part, through chemokine signaling, including
through the over-production of CXCL12.
The CXCL12/CXCR4 pathway has been shown to be overstimulated in
more than 20 solid and blood-derived tumor types. Excessive
stimulation of CXCR4 due to high concentrations of CXCL12
influences the trafficking of immune cells, including
myeloid-derived suppressor cells (“MDSCs”), CD4+ regulatory T cells
(“Tregs”), CD8+ T cells (“killer T cells”), and mature dendritic
cells. We believe that blocking CXCR4 overstimulation can lead to
improved immune-cell trafficking and increase the absolute number
of CD8+ T-cells, thereby also increasing the ratio of CD8+ T-cells
to Tregs in the TME, turning the TME from an immunosuppressive
environment to an immunostimulatory one.
Previously, we completed three clinical trials in solid tumors (two
in clear cell renal cell carcinoma, one in melanoma) to explore the
impact of mavorixafor on relevant tumor biomarkers and clinical
responses. In all studies, combination of mavorixafor with standard
of care proved to be well tolerated and showed favorable impact on
key immune-response biomarkers (e.g. increased proliferation of
CD8+ T-cells and CD8+ T-cells to Treg ratios in the TME) and
improvement in clinical metrics (response rates) vs. historical
controls of single-agent standards of care.
Ongoing trials in triple-negative breast cancer are being
undertaken by Abbisko, our strategic partner for development and
commercialization in greater China. Future development and
potential commercialization of mavorixafor in potential
immuno-oncology indications in markets outside of greater China
will be pursued only as part of additional potential strategic
collaboration(s).
Competition
The pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries are characterized
by rapidly advancing technologies, intense competition, and a
strong emphasis on proprietary products. We face potential
competition from many different sources, including major
pharmaceutical, specialty pharmaceutical and biotechnology
companies, academic institutions, governmental agencies, and public
and private research institutions. Any product candidates that we
successfully develop and commercialize will compete with existing
therapies and new therapies that may become available in the
future.
Many of our competitors may have significantly greater financial
resources and expertise in research and development, manufacturing,
preclinical testing, conducting clinical trials, obtaining
regulatory approvals, and marketing approved products than we do.
Other firms also compete with us in recruiting and retaining
qualified scientific and management personnel and establishing
clinical trial sites and patient enrollment for clinical trials, as
well as in acquiring technologies complementary to, or necessary
for, our programs. Mergers and acquisitions in the pharmaceutical,
biotechnology, and diagnostic industries may result in even more
resources being concentrated among a smaller number of our
competitors. Smaller or early stage companies may also prove to be
significant competitors with us, particularly through collaborative
arrangements with large and established companies.
Our commercial opportunities could be reduced or eliminated if our
competitors develop and commercialize therapeutics that are safer,
more effective, have fewer or less severe side effects, are more
convenient or are less expensive than any products that we may
develop. Our competitors also may obtain marketing approvals for
their products more rapidly than we may obtain approval for our
products, which could result in our competitors establishing a
strong market position before we are able to enter the market. In
addition, our ability to compete may be affected because in some
cases insurers or other third-party payors, including government
programs, seek to encourage the use of generic products. This may
have the effect of making branded products less attractive to
buyers from a cost perspective.
We are aware of other companies that are developing CXCR4
inhibitors that are in a similar stage of development as
mavorixafor, including BioLineRx (motixafortide), Noxxon (NOXA12),
Upsher-Smith, Polyphor (Balixafortide), and Glycomimetics
(GMI1359). To our knowledge, there do not appear to be any
competitors with programs in development for WHIM syndrome or
chronic neutropenia. With respect to chronic neutropenia,
filgrastim injections (human G-CSF) and two biosimilars (Zarxio and
Nivestym) are FDA approved to reduce the incidence and duration of
after-effects of severe neutropenia (e.g. fever‚ infections‚
oropharyngeal ulcers) in symptomatic patients with severe
neutropenia.
In Waldenström’s, there are several treatment approaches currently
being developed, including targeted therapies and immunotherapies
(as monotherapies and combination therapies), chemotherapy, stem
cell transplantation, and cancer vaccines. To our knowledge, only
mavorixafor is targeting the CXCR4 pathway. Development of a
Bristol Myers’ anti-CXCR4 antibody was discontinued.
Manufacturing
We do not own or operate, and currently have no plans to establish,
manufacturing facilities for the production of clinical or
commercial quantities of mavorixafor or any of our other product
candidates. We currently rely, and expect to continue to rely, on
third parties for the manufacture of any of our product or product
candidates.
We currently have a master services agreement (“the Aptuit
Agreement”) in place with Aptuit (Oxford) Ltd (“Aptuit”), pursuant
to which Aptuit develops and manufactures the active pharmaceutical
ingredient (“API”) for mavorixafor. The term of the Aptuit
Agreement expires in
February
2024
unless terminated by us and/or Aptuit. Aptuit is our sole supplier
for mavorixafor drug substance and is currently manufacturing
mavorixafor drug substance at a commercially relevant scale to
support our ongoing and anticipated future supply
needs.
We also have a master services agreement in place with Catalent
Inc., formerly Mayne Pharma Inc. (“Catalent”), which is our sole
manufacturer for the final capsule drug product formulation of
mavorixafor. The term of the master services agreement with
Catalent expires on September 10, 2023, and may be terminated by
(1) us upon 30 days-notice to Catalent or (2) by either party
following a material breach by the other party that remains uncured
for 30 days.
We obtain the supplies of our drug products from Aptuit and
Catalent pursuant to typical industry standard clinical supply
agreements. We believe that both manufacturers have the capability
and capacity to manufacture currently projected clinical trial
supply and commercial volumes of mavorixafor. We expect to extend
both of these manufacturing agreements beyond their current
expiration dates.
Sales and Marketing
We intend to build a commercial infrastructure to support sales of
any of our approved products. We expect to manage sales, marketing
and distribution through internal resources and third-party
relationships. While we may commit significant financial and
management resources to commercial activities, we will also
consider collaborating with one or more pharmaceutical companies to
enhance our commercial capabilities.
License Agreements
License Agreement with Genzyme
In July 2014, we entered into a license agreement with Genzyme, a
wholly owned subsidiary of Sanofi, pursuant to which we were
granted an exclusive license to certain patent applications and
other intellectual property owned or controlled by Genzyme related
to the CXCR4 receptor to develop and commercialize products
containing licensed compounds, including but not limited to
mavorixafor. Genzyme has retained the non-exclusive right to
conduct preclinical research involving compounds in any field,
including any fields licensed to us, but has not retained rights to
conduct any clinical development or commercialization of those
compounds identified in the agreement in any of the fields licensed
to us. We are primarily responsible for the preparation, filing,
prosecution and maintenance of all patent applications and patents
covering the intellectual property licensed to us under the
agreement at our sole expense.
We are obligated to use commercially reasonable efforts to develop
and commercialize licensed products for use in the field in the
United States and at least one other major market country. We have
the right to grant sublicenses of the licensed rights that cover
mavorixafor to third parties.
If we wish to grant a sublicense to any licensed product other than
mavorixafor, we are obligated to first offer the sublicense to
Genzyme. If Genzyme expresses written interest for the sublicense,
then we will negotiate exclusively with Genzyme for a certain
stated period to obtain a license to such rights, after which
Genzyme shall have no further rights with respect to such licensed
product and we will be free to negotiate a sublicense with respect
to such licensed product with any third party.
We are obligated to pay Genzyme milestone payments in the aggregate
amount of up to $25 million, contingent upon our achievement of
certain late-stage regulatory and sales milestones with respect to
licensed products, and tiered royalties based on net sales of
licensed products that we commercialize under the Genzyme
agreement. Our obligation to pay royalties for each licensed
product expires on a country-by-country basis on the latest of (i)
the expiration of licensed patent rights that cover that licensed
product in that country, (ii) the expiration of regulatory
exclusivity in that country and (iii) ten years after the first
commercial sale of such licensed product in that country. Royalty
rates are subject to reduction under the agreement in specified
circumstances, including in any country if we are required to
obtain a license from any third party to the extent our patent
rights might infringe the third party’s patent rights, if a
licensed product is not covered by a valid claim in that country or
if sales of generic products reach certain thresholds in that
country. Sublicenses that we enter into under the Genzyme
agreement, including our license agreement with
Abbisko
obligate us to pay Genzyme a percentage of certain upfront,
maintenance fees, milestone payments and royalty payments paid to
us by the sublicensee.
The term of the Genzyme Agreement will continue until the later of
the expiration of the last to expire valid claim of the patents
licensed under the agreement that cover any licensed product, the
expiration of regulatory exclusivity applicable to any licensed
product and 10 years from the date of first commercial sale of any
licensed product. Either we or Genzyme may terminate the Genzyme
Agreement in the event of the bankruptcy or uncured material breach
by the other party. Genzyme may terminate the Genzyme Agreement if
we or our affiliates initiate a patent challenge of the patents
licensed under the agreement. We may terminate the Genzyme
Agreement immediately upon notice to Genzyme if we reasonably
believe that the development or commercialization of a licensed
compound or product under the Genzyme agreement would result in a
material safety issue for
patients.
License Agreement with Georgetown University
In December 2016, we entered into a license agreement with the
Georgetown University (“Georgetown”) pursuant to which we obtained
an exclusive, worldwide license to practice certain methods, and to
make, have made, use, sell, offer for sale and import products,
covered by licensed patent rights co-owned by Georgetown.
The rights licensed to us are for all therapeutic, prophylactic and
diagnostic uses in all disease indications in humans and animals.
We have the right to grant sublicenses of the licensed rights to
third parties to the extent consistent with the terms of the
Georgetown agreement.
Under the terms of the Georgetown agreement we paid
a one-time only, upfront fee of $50 thousand, and we may
be required to pay milestone payments of up to an aggregate of $800
thousand related to commercial sales of a licensed product. We are
responsible for all patent prosecution costs incurred with respect
to the licensed patents. We are obligated under the agreement to
use commercially reasonable efforts to develop and commercialize
licensed product, to make licensed product reasonably available to
the public, to obtain government approvals for licensed product and
to market licensed product in quantities sufficient to meet the
market demand.
The term of the Georgetown agreement will continue until the
expiration of the last valid claim within the patent rights
covering the licensed products. Georgetown may terminate the
Georgetown agreement or convert our license to non-exclusive in the
event (i) we fail to pay any amount and fail to cure such
failure within 30 days after receipt of notice, (ii) we
default in our obligation to obtain and maintain insurance and fail
to remedy such breach within 45 days after receipt of notice,
(iii) we declare insolvency or bankruptcy or (iv) we
materially default in the performance of any material obligations
under the Georgetown agreement which is not cured within a certain
period from the date of written notice of such default. We may
terminate the Georgetown agreement at any time upon at least 60
days’ written notice.
License Agreement with Beth Israel Deaconess Medical
Center
In December 2016, we entered into a license agreement with Beth
Israel Deaconess Medical Center (“BIDMC”) pursuant to which we
obtained an exclusive, worldwide license to make, have made, use,
sell, offer for sale and import of licensed products and certain
processes covered by licensed patent rights co-owned by
BIDMC and a nonexclusive royalty-free right to use certain
information pertaining to any invention claimed in the licensed
patents that is owned by BIDMC to develop, make, have made, use,
have used, sell, have sold and commercialize such licensed products
and processes. The rights licensed to us are for all fields of use.
We have the right to grant sublicenses of the licensed rights to
third parties to the extent consistent with the terms of the BIDMC
agreement.
Under the terms of the BIDMC agreement we paid
a one-time only, upfront fee of $20 thousand and we are
responsible for all future patent prosecution costs.
The term of the BIDMC agreement will continue until the expiration
of the last valid claim within the patent rights covering the
licensed product. BIDMC may terminate the agreement in the event
(i) we fail to pay any amount and fail to cure such failure
within 15 days after receipt of notice, (ii) the insurance coverage
that we are obligated to maintain under the agreement is terminated
and we fail to obtain replacement insurance within a certain period
of time following notice to BIDMC, or (iii) we declare
insolvency or bankruptcy. In addition, if we are in material breach
of any material provisions of the BIDMC agreement and fail to
remedy such breach within 60 days after receipt of notice, BIDMC
may terminate the BIDMC agreement or terminate any licenses granted
under the BIDMC agreement with respect to the country or countries
in which such material breach has occurred. We may terminate the
BIDMC agreement at any time upon at least 90 days’ written
notice.
License Agreement with Dana Farber Cancer Institute
In November 2020, we entered into a license agreement with Dana
Farber Cancer Institute (“DFCI”) pursuant to which we obtained a
non-exclusive, worldwide license to
use, make, have made, develop, market, import, distribute, sell and
have sold
licensed products and certain processes covered by licensed patent
rights owned by DFCI. The rights licensed to us are for
the therapeutic use of our CXCR4 antagonists for the treatment
of
Waldenström’s
in combination with BTK inhibitors, including ibrutinib. We have
the right to grant sublicenses of the licensed rights to third
parties to the extent consistent with the terms of the DFCI
agreement.
Under the terms of the DFCI agreement we paid a one-time,
upfront fee of $25 thousand and we are responsible for the
reimbursement of certain future patent prosecution cost and the
payment of an annual maintenance fee. We are obligated to pay DFCI
milestone payments in the aggregate amount of up to approximately
$32 million, contingent upon our achievement of certain regulatory
and sales milestones with respect to licensed products, and a flat
royalty based on net sales of licensed products that we
commercialize under the DFCI agreement.
The term of the DFCI agreement will continue until the expiration
of the last valid claim within the patent rights covering the
licensed product. DFCI may terminate the DFCI agreement in the
event (i) we fail to pay any amount and fail to cure such
failure within 30 days after receipt of notice, (ii) we cease to
carry on our business with respect to the licensed products or
process, (iii) the insurance coverage that we are obligated to
maintain under the DCFI agreement is terminated and we fail to
obtain replacement insurance within a certain period of time
following notice to DFCI, (iv) we
fail to comply with certain diligence obligations and cure any such
default within 60 days after receipt of written notice, (v) we have
granted a sublicense without notifying DFCI or on terms
inconsistent with the terms required of sublicenses under the DCFI
agreement, (vi) an officer of our company, an affiliate or
sublicensee is convicted of a felony relating to the manufacture,
use, sale or importation of a licensed product, (vii) we or any of
our affiliates, sublicensees or sublicensees’ affiliates
initiate a patent challenge of the patents licensed under the DFCI
agreement
or assists others in doing so
or (viii) we declare insolvency or bankruptcy. In addition, if
we are in material breach of any material obligations under the
DFCI agreement and fail to remedy such breach within 90 days after
receipt of notice, DFCI may terminate the DFCI agreement or
terminate any licenses granted under the agreement. We may
terminate the DFCI agreement at any time upon at least 90 days’
written notice.
Abbisko Agreement
In July 2019, we entered into a license agreement with Abbisko.
Under the terms of the agreement, we granted Abbisko the exclusive
right to develop, manufacture and commercialize mavorixafor in
mainland China, Taiwan, Hong Kong and Macau. The agreement provides
Abbisko with the exclusive rights in this territory to develop and
commercialize mavorixafor in combination with checkpoint inhibitors
or other agents in oncology indications. Pancreatic cancer, ovarian
cancer and triple negative breast cancer will be explored
initially. We retain the full rest-of-world rights to develop and
commercialize mavorixafor outside of Greater China for all
indications and the ability to utilize data generated pursuant to
the Abbisko collaboration for rest-of-world development. In
addition, Abbisko has the right of first refusal if we determine to
pursue additional products in the Abbisko Territory, as defined in
the agreement. We entered into a separate agreement in April 2020
whereby we will provide Abbisko with a clinical supply and, if the
product is commercialized in the territory licensed by Abbisko, we
intend to enter into a commercial supply of the licensed
compound.
Pursuant to the agreement with Abbisko, upon the closing of a
qualified financing of Abbisko, as defined in the agreement, which
occurred in March 2020, Abbisko made a one-time, non-refundable,
non-creditable financial milestone payment of $3 million to us. We
are also eligible to receive potential development, regulatory and
commercial milestone payments of up to $214 million, which
will vary based on the ultimate sales, if any, of the approved
licensed products. Upon commercialization of mavorixafor in the
Abbisko Territory, we are eligible to receive a tiered royalty,
with a percentage range in the low double-digits, on net sales of
approved licensed products. Abbisko is obligated to use
commercially reasonable efforts to develop and commercialize
mavorixafor in the Abbisko Territory. Abbisko has responsibility
for all activities and costs associated with the further
development, manufacture and commercialization of mavorixafor in
the Abbisko Territory.
Intellectual Property
Our ability to commercialize our product candidates depends in
large part on our ability to obtain and maintain intellectual
property protection for our product candidates, including
mavorixafor, and our preclinical compounds and core technologies.
Our policy is to seek to protect our intellectual property position
by, among other methods, filing U.S. and foreign patent
applications related to the technology, inventions and improvements
that are important to the development and implementation of our
business strategy. We also rely on trade
secrets, know-how and continuing technological innovation
to develop and maintain our proprietary position.
We file patent applications directed to our product candidates,
preclinical compounds and related technologies to establish
intellectual property positions on these compounds and their uses
in disease. As of December 31, 2022, we owned or exclusively
licensed 18 issued U.S. patents,
14 pending U.S. non-provisional patent applications, eight pending
U.S. provisional patent application, and approximately
175 PCT and foreign patents and patent applications in the
following foreign jurisdictions: Belgium, Brazil, Canada, China,
European Patent Office, France, Germany, Great Britain, Hong Kong,
India, Ireland, Italy, Israel, Japan, Lichtenstein, Mexico,
Netherlands, New Zealand, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Sweden
and Switzerland.
As of December 31, 2022, our in-licensed intellectual
property portfolio for mavorixafor included three issued U.S.
patents and one pending U.S. patent application directed to
mavorixafor, including one issued U.S. patent with claims directed
to a crystalline salt form of mavorixafor, one issued U.S. patent
directed to pharmaceutical compositions of mavorixafor in unit
dosage form, and one issued U.S. patents directed to methods of
making mavorixafor and key intermediates. These in-licensed patents
are expected to expire between 2024 and 2027. We also had four
issued U.S. patents directed to compositions and methods of making
chemical compounds related to the X4P-001 program. Approximately
61
corresponding foreign patents directed to compositions of matter
and related chemical compounds as well as methods of making and
methods of use were issued or pending. All of the above patents and
patent applications were exclusively licensed to us pursuant to the
terms of the Genzyme agreement.
Additionally, we have filed our own patent applications with
respect to the mavorixafor and X4P-002 product
candidates. Some of these patent applications are co-owned with
Genzyme, BIDMC or Georgetown, with their rights exclusively
licensed to us. As of December 31, 2022, our independently
generated intellectual property portfolio included seven granted
U.S. patents, ten pending U.S. non-provisional patent applications,
four pending U.S. provisional patent applications, and
approximately 72 pending PCT and foreign patent applications
related to our mavorixafor clinical programs in cancer and primary
immunodeficiencies. In addition, we have four granted U.S. patents,
four pending U.S. non-provisional patent applications,
four pending provisional applications and approximately 38 pending
PCT and foreign patent applications related to our preclinical
compounds and X4P-002 in glioblastoma. Patents issuing
from these applications, if any, are expected to expire between
2036 and 2043.
The term of individual patents depends upon the legal term of the
patents in the countries in which they are obtained. In most
countries, including the United States, the patent term is 20 years
from the earliest filing date of a non-provisional patent
application. In the United States, a patent’s term may be
lengthened by patent term adjustment, which compensates a patentee
for administrative delays by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office,
(the “USPTO”), in examining and granting a patent, or may be
shortened if a patent is terminally disclaimed over an earlier
filed patent. The term of a U.S. patent that covers a drug or
biological product may also be eligible for patent term extension
when approval from the FDA is granted, provided statutory and
regulatory requirements are met. In the future, if our product
candidates receive approval from the FDA or foreign regulatory
authorities, we expect to apply for patent term extensions on
issued patents covering those products, depending upon the length
of the clinical trials for each drug and other factors. There can
be no assurance that any of our pending patent applications will
issue or that we will benefit from any patent term extension or
other favorable adjustment to the term of any of our
patents.
As with other biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies, our
ability to maintain and solidify our proprietary and intellectual
property position for our product candidates, including
mavorixafor, and our preclinical compounds, and our core
technologies will depend on our success in obtaining effective
patent claims and enforcing those claims if granted. However,
patent applications that we may file or license from third parties
may not result in the issuance of patents. We also cannot predict
the breadth of claims that may be allowed or enforced in our
patents. Any issued patents that we may receive in the future may
be challenged, invalidated or circumvented. For example, prior to
March 16, 2013, in the United States, patent applications were
subject to a “first to invent” rule of law. Applications filed
after March 16, 2013 (except for certain applications claiming
the benefit of earlier-filed applications) are subject to a “first
to file” rule of law.
Discoveries reported in the scientific literature often lag the
actual discoveries, and patent applications in the United States
and other jurisdictions are typically not published until 18 months
after filing, or in some cases not at all. We cannot be certain
that any existing or future application will be subject to the
“first to file” or “first to invent” rule of law, that we were the
first to make the inventions claimed in our existing patents or
pending patent applications subject to the prior laws, or that we
were the first to file for patent protection of such inventions
subject to the new laws. If third parties prepare and file patent
applications in the United States that also claim technology we
have claimed in our patents or patent applications, we may have to
participate in interference proceedings in the USPTO to determine
priority of invention, which could result in substantial costs to
us, even if the eventual outcome is favorable to us. In addition,
because of the extensive time required for clinical development and
regulatory review of a product candidate we may develop, it is
possible that, before any of our product candidates can be
commercialized, any related patent may expire or remain in force
for only a short period following commercialization, thereby
reducing any advantage of any such patent.
In addition to patents, we rely upon unpatented trade
secrets, know-how, and continuing technological
innovation to develop and maintain our competitive position. We
seek to protect our proprietary information, in part, by using
confidentiality agreements with our collaborators, scientific
advisors, employees and consultants, and invention assignment
agreements with our employees. We also have agreements requiring
assignment of inventions with selected consultants, scientific
advisors and collaborators. The confidentiality agreements are
designed to protect our proprietary information and, in the case of
agreements or clauses requiring invention assignment, to grant us
ownership of technologies that are developed under those
agreements.
Government Regulation and Product Approval
The FDA Approval Process
In the United States, pharmaceutical products are subject to
extensive regulation by the FDA. The Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act, (the “FDCA”), and other federal and state statutes
and regulations, govern, among other things, the research,
development, testing, manufacture, storage, recordkeeping,
approval, labeling, promotion and marketing, distribution,
post-approval monitoring and reporting, sampling, and import and
export of pharmaceutical products. Failure to comply with
applicable U.S. requirements may subject a company to a variety of
administrative or judicial sanctions, such as imposition of
clinical holds, refusal by the FDA to approve pending NDAs, warning
letters, product recalls, product seizures, total or partial
suspension of production or distribution, injunctions, fines,
refusals of government contracts, restitution, disgorgement, civil
penalties and criminal prosecution.
Pharmaceutical product development in the United States typically
involves preclinical or other nonclinical laboratory and animal
tests and the submission to the FDA of an IND, which must become
effective before clinical testing may commence. For commercial
approval, the sponsor must submit adequate tests by all methods
reasonably applicable to show that the drug is safe for use under
the conditions prescribed, recommended or suggested in the proposed
labeling. The sponsor must also submit substantial evidence,
generally consisting of adequate, well-controlled clinical trials
to establish that the drug will have the effect it purports or is
represented to have under the conditions of use prescribed,
recommended or suggested in the proposed labeling. In certain
cases, the FDA may determine that a drug is effective based on one
clinical study plus confirmatory evidence.
Nonclinical tests include laboratory evaluation of product
chemistry, formulation and toxicity, as well as animal studies to
assess the characteristics and potential safety and efficacy of the
product. The conduct of the nonclinical tests must comply with
federal requirements, including the FDA’s good laboratory practices
regulations and the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (“USDA’s”),
regulations implementing the Animal Welfare Act. The results of
nonclinical testing are submitted to the FDA as part of an IND
along with other information, including information about product
chemistry, manufacturing and controls, and a proposed clinical
trial protocol. Long-term nonclinical tests, such as animal studies
of reproductive toxicity and carcinogenicity, may continue after
the IND is submitted.
A 30-day waiting period after the submission of each IND
is required prior to the commencement of clinical testing in
humans. If the FDA has not imposed a clinical hold on the IND or
otherwise commented or questioned the IND within
this 30-day period, the clinical trial proposed in the
IND may begin.
Clinical trials involve the administration of the investigational
new drug to healthy volunteers or patients under the supervision of
a qualified investigator. Clinical trials must be conducted:
(i) in compliance with federal regulations, (ii) in
compliance with GCP, an international standard meant to protect the
rights and health of patients and to define the roles of clinical
trial sponsors, administrators and monitors, and (iii) under
protocols detailing the objectives of the trial, the parameters to
be used in monitoring safety and the effectiveness criteria to be
evaluated. Each protocol involving testing on U.S. patients and
subsequent protocol amendments must be submitted to the FDA as part
of the IND.
The FDA may order the temporary, or permanent, discontinuation of a
clinical trial at any time or impose other sanctions if it believes
that the clinical trial either is not being conducted in accordance
with the FDA requirements or presents an unacceptable risk to the
clinical trial patients. The trial protocol and informed consent
information for patients in clinical trials must also be submitted
to an institutional review board (“IRB”) at each site where a trial
will be conducted for approval. An IRB may also require the
clinical trial at the site to be halted, either temporarily or
permanently, for failure to comply with the IRB’s requirements or
may impose other conditions.
Clinical trials to support NDAs for marketing approval are
typically conducted in three sequential phases, but the phases may
overlap. In general, in Phase 1, the initial introduction of the
drug into healthy human volunteers or, in some cases, patients, the
drug is tested to assess metabolism, pharmacokinetics,
pharmacological actions, side effects associated with increasing
doses and, if possible, early evidence of effectiveness. Phase 2
usually involves trials in a limited patient population to
determine the effectiveness of the drug for a particular
indication, dosage tolerance and optimum dosage, and to identify
common adverse effects and safety risks. If a compound demonstrates
evidence of effectiveness and an acceptable safety profile in Phase
2 evaluations, Phase 3 trials are undertaken to obtain the
additional information about clinical efficacy and safety in a
larger number of patients, typically at geographically dispersed
clinical trial sites, to permit the FDA to evaluate the overall
benefit-risk relationship of the drug and to provide adequate
information for the labeling of the drug. In most cases, the FDA
requires two adequate and well-controlled Phase 3 clinical trials
to demonstrate the efficacy of the drug. The FDA may, however,
determine that a drug is effective based on one clinical trial plus
confirmatory evidence. In some cases, the FDA may require
post-market studies, known as Phase 4 studies, to be conducted as a
condition of approval to gather additional information on the
drug’s effect in various populations and any side effects
associated with long-term use. Depending on the risks posed by the
drugs, other post-market requirements may be imposed.
After completion of the required clinical testing, an NDA is
prepared and submitted to the FDA. FDA approval of the NDA is
required before marketing of the product may begin in the United
States. The NDA must include the results of all preclinical,
clinical, and other testing and a compilation of data relating to
the product’s pharmacology, chemistry, manufacture, and controls.
Under federal law, the submission of most NDAs is additionally
subject to a substantial application user fee, subject to certain
exceptions and waivers, such as for orphan-designated
drugs.
The FDA has 60 days from its receipt of an NDA to determine whether
the application will be accepted for filing based on the agency’s
threshold determination that it is sufficiently complete to permit
substantive review. Once the submission is accepted for filing, the
FDA begins an in-depth review. Under the performance
goals established pursuant to the Prescription Drug User Fee Act
the FDA aims to complete review of 90% of
standard (non-priority) NDAs within 10 months filing and
within six months for priority NDAs.
The FDA may also refer applications for novel drug products, or
drug products that present difficult questions of safety or
efficacy, to an advisory committee, which is typically a panel that
includes clinicians and other experts, for review, evaluation and a
recommendation as to whether the application should be approved.
The FDA is not bound by the recommendation of an advisory
committee, but it generally follows such recommendations. Before
approving an NDA, the FDA will typically inspect one or more
clinical sites to assure compliance with GCP. Additionally, the FDA
will inspect the facility or the facilities at which the drug is
manufactured. The FDA will not approve the product unless
compliance with current GMP is satisfactory and the NDA contains
data that provide substantial evidence that the drug is safe and
effective in the indication studied.
After the FDA evaluates the NDA and the manufacturing facilities,
it issues either an approval letter or a complete response letter.
A complete response letter generally outlines the deficiencies in
the submission and may require substantial additional testing, or
information, in order for the FDA to reconsider the application.
If, or when, those deficiencies have been addressed to the FDA’s
satisfaction in a resubmission of the NDA, the FDA will issue an
approval letter.
An approval letter authorizes commercial marketing of the drug with
specific prescribing information for specific indications. As a
condition of NDA approval, the FDA may require a risk evaluation
and mitigation strategy (“REMS”) to help ensure that the benefits
of the drug outweigh the potential risks. REMS can include
medication guides, communication plans for health care
professionals, and elements to assure safe use (“ETASU”). ETASU can
include, but are not limited to, special training or certification
for prescribing or dispensing, dispensing only under certain
circumstances, special monitoring, and the use of patient
registries. The requirement for a REMS can materially affect the
potential market and profitability of the drug. Moreover, product
approval may require substantial post-approval testing and
surveillance to monitor the drug’s safety or efficacy. Once
granted, product approvals may be withdrawn if compliance with
regulatory standards is not maintained or problems are identified
following initial marketing.
The Hatch-Waxman Act
Orange Book Listing
In seeking approval for a drug through an NDA, applicants are
required to list with the FDA each patent whose claims cover the
applicant’s product. Upon approval of a drug, each of the patents
listed in the application for the drug is then published in the
FDA’s Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence
Evaluations, commonly known as the Orange Book. Drugs listed in the
Orange Book can, in turn, be cited by potential generic competitors
in support of approval of an abbreviated new drug application, or
ANDA. An ANDA provides for marketing of a drug product that has the
same active ingredients in the same strengths and dosage form as
the listed drug and has been shown through bioequivalence testing
to be bioequivalent to the listed drug. Other than the requirement
for bioequivalence testing, ANDA applicants are not required to
conduct, or submit results of, pre-clinical or clinical
tests to prove the safety or effectiveness of their drug product.
Drugs approved in this way are considered to be therapeutically
equivalent to the listed drug, are commonly referred to as “generic
equivalents” to the listed drug, and can often be substituted by
pharmacists under prescriptions written for the original listed
drug in accordance with state law.
The ANDA applicant is required to certify to the FDA concerning any
patents listed for the approved product in the FDA’s Orange Book.
Specifically, the applicant must certify that: (i) the
required patent information has not been filed; (ii) the
listed patent has expired; (iii) the listed patent has not
expired, but will expire on a particular date and approval is
sought after patent expiration; or (iv) the listed patent is
invalid or will not be infringed by the new product. The ANDA
applicant may also elect to submit a section viii statement,
certifying that its proposed ANDA labeling does not contain (or
carves out) any language regarding the
patented method-of-use, rather than certify to a
listed method-of-use patent.
If the applicant does not challenge the listed patents, the ANDA
application will not be approved until all the listed patents
claiming the referenced product have expired.
A certification that the new product will not infringe the already
approved product’s listed patents, or that such patents are
invalid, is called a Paragraph IV certification. If the ANDA
applicant has provided a Paragraph IV certification to the FDA, the
applicant must also send notice of the Paragraph IV certification
to the NDA and patent holders once the ANDA has been accepted for
filing by the FDA. The NDA and patent holders may then initiate a
patent infringement lawsuit in response to the notice of the
Paragraph IV certification. The filing of a patent infringement
lawsuit within 45 days of the receipt of a Paragraph IV
certification automatically prevents the FDA from approving the
ANDA until the earlier of 30 months, expiration of the patent,
settlement of the lawsuit, or a decision in the infringement case
that is favorable to the ANDA applicant.
The ANDA application also will not be approved until any
applicable non-patent exclusivity listed in the Orange
Book for the referenced product has expired.
Exclusivity
Upon NDA approval of a new chemical entity, or NCE, which is a drug
that contains no active moiety that has been approved by the FDA in
any other NDA, that drug receives five years of marketing
exclusivity during which time the FDA cannot receive any ANDA or
505(b)(2) application seeking approval of a drug that references a
version of the NCE drug. Certain changes to a drug, such as the
addition of a new indication to the package insert, are associated
with a three-year period of exclusivity during which the FDA cannot
approve an ANDA or 505(b)(2) application that includes the
change.
An ANDA or 505(b)(2) application may be submitted one year before
NCE exclusivity expires if a Paragraph IV certification is filed.
If there is no listed patent in the Orange Book, there may not be a
Paragraph IV certification and thus no ANDA or 505(b)(2)
application may be filed before the expiration of the exclusivity
period.
Five-year and three-year exclusivities do not preclude FDA approval
of a 505(b)(1) application for a duplicate version of the drug
during the period of exclusivity, provided that the 505(b)(1)
applicant conducts or obtains a right of reference to all of the
preclinical studies and adequate and well controlled clinical
trials necessary to demonstrate safety and
effectiveness.
Patent Term Extension
After NDA approval, owners of relevant drug patents may apply for
up to a five-year patent extension. The allowable patent term
extension is calculated as half of the drug’s testing phase—the
time between IND submission and NDA submission—and all of the
review phase—the time between NDA submission and approval up to a
maximum of five years. The time can be shortened if the FDA
determines that the applicant did not pursue approval with due
diligence. The total patent term after the extension may not exceed
14 years.
For patents that might expire during the application phase, the
patent owner may request an interim patent extension. An interim
patent extension increases the patent term by one year and may be
renewed up to four times. For each interim patent extension
granted, the post-approval patent extension is reduced by one year.
The director of the USPTO must determine that approval of the drug
covered by the patent for which a patent extension is being sought
is likely. Interim patent extensions are not available for a drug
for which an NDA has not been submitted.
Advertising and Promotion
Once an NDA is approved, a product will be subject to certain
post-approval requirements. For instance, the FDA closely regulates
the post-approval marketing and promotion of drugs.
Drugs may be marketed only for the approved indications and in
accordance with the provisions of the approved labeling. Changes to
some of the conditions established in an approved application,
including changes in indications, labeling, or manufacturing
processes or facilities, require submission and FDA approval of a
new NDA or NDA supplement before the change can be implemented. An
NDA supplement for a new indication typically requires clinical
data similar to that in the original application, and the FDA uses
the same procedures and actions in reviewing NDA supplements as it
does in reviewing NDAs.
Adverse Event Reporting and GMP Compliance
Adverse event reporting and submission of periodic reports is
required following FDA approval of an NDA. The FDA also may require
post-marketing testing, known as Phase 4 testing, require a REMS
special communications regarding the safety of the drug or
heightened surveillance to monitor the effects of an approved
product, or may place conditions on an approval that could restrict
the distribution or use of the product. In addition, quality
control, drug manufacture, packaging, and labeling procedures must
continue to conform to GMP after approval. Drug manufacturers and
certain of their subcontractors are required to register their
establishments with the FDA and certain state agencies.
Registration with the FDA subjects entities to periodic unannounced
inspections by the FDA, during which the agency inspects
manufacturing facilities to assess compliance with GMP.
Accordingly, manufacturers must continue to expend time, money and
effort in the areas of production and quality control to maintain
compliance with GMP. Regulatory authorities may withdraw product
approvals or request product recalls if a company fails to comply
with regulatory standards, if it encounters problems following
initial marketing or if previously unrecognized problems are
subsequently discovered.
Pediatric Exclusivity and Pediatric Use
The Best Pharmaceuticals for Children Act, or BPCA, provides NDA
holders a six-month period of exclusivity attached to any
other exclusivity listed with FDA—patent
or non-patent—for a drug if certain conditions are met.
Conditions for pediatric exclusivity include a determination by the
FDA that information relating to the use of a new drug in the
pediatric population may produce health benefits in that
population; a written request by the FDA for pediatric studies; and
agreement by the applicant to perform the requested studies and the
submission to the FDA, completion of the studies in accordance with
the written request, and the acceptance by the FDA of the reports
of the requested studies within the statutory
timeframe.
In addition, under the Pediatric Research Equity Act, or PREA, NDAs
or supplements to NDAs must contain data to assess the safety and
effectiveness of the drug for the claimed indications in all
relevant pediatric subpopulations and to support dosing and
administration for each pediatric subpopulation for which the drug
is safe and effective, unless the sponsor has received a deferral
or waiver from the FDA. Unless otherwise required by regulation,
PREA does not apply to any drug for an indication for which orphan
designation has been granted. The sponsor or the FDA may request a
deferral of pediatric studies for some or all of the pediatric
subpopulations. A deferral may be granted for several reasons,
including a finding that the drug is ready for approval for use in
adults before pediatric studies are complete or that additional
safety or effectiveness data need to be collected before the
pediatric studies begin.
Orphan Drugs
Under the Orphan Drug Act, the FDA may grant orphan drug
designation to drugs intended to treat a rare disease or
condition—generally a disease or condition that affects fewer than
200,000 individuals in the United States (or affects more than
200,000 in the United States and for which there is no reasonable
expectation that the cost of developing and making available in the
United States a drug for such disease or condition will be
recovered from sales of such drug in the United States). Orphan
drug designation must be requested before submitting an NDA. After
the FDA grants orphan drug designation, the generic identity of the
drug and its potential orphan use are disclosed publicly by the
FDA. Orphan drug designation does not convey any advantage in, or
shorten the duration of, the regulatory review and approval
process. The first NDA applicant to receive FDA approval for a
particular active ingredient to treat a particular disease with FDA
orphan drug designation is entitled to a seven-year exclusive
marketing period in the United States for that product, for that
indication. During the seven-year exclusivity period, the FDA may
not approve any other applications to market the same drug for the
same disease, except in limited circumstances, such as a showing of
clinical superiority to the product with orphan drug exclusivity.
If the FDA designates an orphan drug based on a finding of clinical
superiority, the FDA must provide a written notification to the
sponsor that states the basis for orphan designation, including
“any plausible hypothesis” relied upon by the FDA. The FDA must
also publish a summary of its clinical superiority findings upon
granting orphan drug exclusivity based on clinical
superiority.
Orphan drug exclusivity does not prevent the FDA from approving a
different drug for the same disease or condition, or the same drug
for a different disease or condition. Among the other benefits of
orphan drug designation are tax credits for certain research and a
waiver of the NDA application user fee.
Breakthrough Designation
A product can be designated as a breakthrough therapy by FDA if it
is intended to treat a serious or life-threatening condition and
preliminary clinical evidence indicates that it may demonstrate
substantial improvement over existing therapies on one or more
clinically significant endpoints. A sponsor may request that a
product candidate be designated as a breakthrough therapy
concurrently with the submission of an IND or any time before an
end-of-Phase-2 meeting, and the FDA must determine if the product
candidate qualifies for breakthrough therapy designation within 60
days of receipt of the sponsor’s
request. If so designated, the FDA shall act to expedite the
development and review of the product’s
marketing application, including by meeting with the sponsor
throughout the product’s
development, providing timely advice to the sponsor to ensure that
the development program to gather pre-clinical and clinical data is
as efficient as practicable, involving senior managers and
experienced review staff in a cross-disciplinary review, assigning
a cross-disciplinary project lead for the FDA review team to
facilitate an efficient review of the development program and to
serve as a scientific liaison between the review team and the
sponsor, and taking steps to ensure that the design of the clinical
trials is as efficient as practicable.
Rest of World Government Regulation
In addition to regulations in the United States, we are and will be
subject, either directly or through our distribution partners, to a
variety of regulations in other jurisdictions governing, among
other things, clinical trials and any commercial sales and
distribution of our products, if approved.
Whether or not we obtain FDA approval for a product, we must obtain
the requisite approvals from regulatory authorities
in non-U.S. countries prior to the commencement of
clinical trials or marketing of the product in those
countries.
Pharmaceutical Coverage, Pricing and Reimbursement
Sales of pharmaceutical products in the United States will depend,
in part, on the extent to which the costs of the products will be
covered by third-party payors, such as government health programs,
and commercial insurance and managed health care organizations.
These third-party payors are increasingly challenging the prices
charged for medical products and services.
Significant uncertainty exists as to the coverage and reimbursement
status of any drug products for which we obtain regulatory
approval. In the United States, sales of any products for which we
receive regulatory approval for commercial sale will depend in part
on the availability of coverage and reimbursement from third-party
payors. Third-party payors include government authorities, managed
care providers, private health insurers and other organizations.
Coverage and reimbursement policies for drug products can differ
significantly from payor to payor as there is no uniform policy of
coverage and reimbursement for drug products among third party
payors in the United States. Third-party payors often rely upon
Medicare coverage policy and payment limitations in setting their
own reimbursement rates, but also have their own methods and
approval process apart from Medicare determinations. The process
for determining whether a payor will provide coverage for a drug
product may be separate from the process for setting the
reimbursement rate that the payor will pay for the drug product.
Third-party payors may limit coverage to specific drug products on
an approved list, or formulary, which might not include all of
the FDA-approved drugs for a particular indication.
Moreover, a payor’s decision to provide coverage for a drug product
does not imply that an adequate reimbursement rate will be
approved. Adequate third-party reimbursement may not be available
to enable us to maintain price levels sufficient to realize an
appropriate return on our investment in product
development.
Additionally, the containment of health care costs has become a
priority of federal and state governments, and the prices of drugs
have been a focus in this effort. The U.S. government, state
legislatures and foreign governments have shown significant
interest in implementing cost-containment programs, including price
controls, utilization management and requirements for substitution
of generic products. Adoption of price controls and
cost-containment measures, and adoption of more restrictive
policies in jurisdictions with existing controls and measures,
could further limit our net revenue and results. If these
third-party payors do not consider our products to be
cost-effective compared to other available therapies, they may not
cover our products after approval as a benefit under their plans
or, if they do, the level of payment may not be sufficient to allow
us to sell our products on a profitable basis.
The Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act
of 2003, or the MMA, imposed requirements for the distribution and
pricing of prescription drugs for Medicare beneficiaries and
included a major expansion of the prescription drug benefit under
Medicare Part D. Under Part D, Medicare beneficiaries may enroll in
prescription drug plans offered by private entities that provide
coverage of outpatient prescription drugs. Part D is available
through both stand-alone prescription drug benefit plans and
prescription drug coverage as a supplement to Medicare Advantage
plans. Unlike Medicare Parts A and B, Part D coverage is not
standardized. Part D prescription drug plan sponsors are not
required to pay for all covered Part D drugs, and each drug plan
can develop its own drug formulary that identifies which drugs it
will cover and at what tier or level. However, Part D prescription
drug formularies must include drugs within each therapeutic
category and class of covered Part D drugs, though not necessarily
all the drugs in each category or class. Any formulary used by a
Part D prescription drug plan must be developed and reviewed by a
pharmacy and therapeutic committee.
Government payment for some of the costs of prescription drugs may
increase demand for products for which we receive marketing
approval. However, any negotiated prices for our products covered
by a Part D prescription drug plan will likely be lower than the
prices we might otherwise obtain. Moreover, while the MMA applies
only to drug benefits for Medicare beneficiaries, private payors
often follow Medicare coverage policy and payment limitations in
setting their own payment rates. Any reduction in payment that
results from the MMA may result in a similar reduction in payments
from non-governmental payors.
Third-party payors are increasingly challenging the price and
examining the medical necessity and cost-effectiveness of medical
products and services, in addition to their safety and efficacy. In
order to obtain coverage and reimbursement for any product that
might be approved for sale, we may need to conduct expensive
pharmacoeconomic studies in order to demonstrate the medical
necessity and cost-effectiveness of our products, in addition to
the costs required to obtain regulatory approvals. Our product
candidates may not be considered medically necessary or
cost-effective. If third-party payors do not consider a product to
be cost-effective compared to other available therapies, they may
not cover the product after approval as a benefit under their plans
or, if they do, the level of payment may not be sufficient to allow
a company to sell its products at a profit.
Healthcare Reform
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as amended by the
Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010, collectively,
the ACA, was enacted with the goal of expanding coverage for the
uninsured while at the same time containing overall health care
costs. With regard to pharmaceutical products, among other things,
the ACA expanded and increased industry rebates for drugs covered
under Medicaid programs and made changes to the coverage
requirements under the Medicare D program. There have been
challenges to certain aspects of the ACA. For example,
on June 17, 2021, the U.S. Supreme Court dismissed a challenge on
procedural grounds that argued the ACA is unconstitutional in its
entirety because the “individual mandate” was repealed by Congress.
Prior to the U.S. Supreme Court ruling,
on January 28, 2021, President Biden issued an executive order to
initiate a special enrollment for purposes of obtaining health
insurance coverage through the ACA marketplace. The executive order
also instructed certain governmental agencies to review and
reconsider their existing policies and rules that limit access to
healthcare, including among others, reexamining Medicaid
demonstration projects and waiver programs that
include work requirements, and policies that create unnecessary
barriers to obtaining access to health insurance coverage through
Medicaid or the ACA. In addition, on August 16, 2022, President
Biden signed the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (“IRA”) into law,
which among other things, extends enhanced subsidies for
individuals purchasing health insurance coverage in ACA
marketplaces through plan year 2025. The IRA also eliminates the
“donut hole” under the Medicare Part D program beginning in 2025 by
significantly lowering the beneficiary maximum out-of-pocket cost
and creating a new manufacturer discount program. It is possible
that the ACA will be subject to judicial or Congressional
challenges in the future. It is unclear how any such challenges and
the healthcare reform measures of the Biden administration will
impact the ACA.
Also, there has been heightened governmental scrutiny recently over
pharmaceutical pricing practices in light of the rising cost of
prescription drugs and biologics. Such scrutiny has resulted in
several Presidential executive orders, Congressional hearings and
proposed and enacted federal and state legislation designed to,
among other things, bring more transparency to product pricing,
review the relationship between pricing and manufacturer patient
programs, and reform government program reimbursement methodologies
for products. For example,
in July 2021, the Biden administration released an executive order,
“Promoting Competition in the American Economy,” with multiple
provisions aimed at prescription drugs. In response to Biden’s
executive order, on September 9, 2021, HHS released a Comprehensive
Plan for Addressing High Drug Prices that outlines principles for
drug pricing reform and sets out a variety of potential legislative
policies that Congress could pursue as well as potential
administrative actions HHS can take to advance these principles. In
addition, the IRA, among other things, (i) directs HHS to negotiate
the price of certain high-expenditure, single-source drugs and
biologics covered under Medicare, and subject drug manufacturers to
civil monetary penalties and a potential excise tax by offering a
price that is not equal to or less than the negotiated “maximum
fair price” for such drugs and biologics under the law, and (ii)
imposes rebates with respect to certain drugs and biologics covered
under Medicare Part B or Medicare Part D to penalize price
increases that outpace inflation. The IRA permits HHS to implement
many of these provisions through guidance, as opposed to
regulation, for the initial years. These provisions will take
effect progressively starting in fiscal year 2023, although they
may be subject to legal challenges. It is currently unclear how the
IRA will be implemented but is likely to have a significant impact
on the pharmaceutical industry. Further, the Biden administration
released an additional executive order on October 14, 2022,
directing HHS to submit a report on how the Center for Medicare and
Medicaid Innovation can be further leveraged to test new models for
lowering drug costs for Medicare and Medicaid beneficiaries. It is
unclear whether this executive order or similar policy initiatives
will be implemented in the future. Further, Congress is considering
additional health reform measures.
At the state level, legislatures have increasingly passed
legislation and implemented regulations designed to control
pharmaceutical and biological product pricing, including price or
patient reimbursement constraints, discounts, restrictions on
certain product access and marketing cost disclosure and
transparency measures, and, in some cases, designed to encourage
importation from other countries and bulk purchasing.
In addition, in some foreign countries, the proposed pricing for a
drug must be approved before it may be lawfully marketed. The
requirements governing drug pricing vary widely from country to
country. For example, some E.U. jurisdictions operate positive and
negative list systems under which products may only be marketed
once a reimbursement price has been agreed. To obtain reimbursement
or pricing approval, some of these countries may require the
completion of clinical trials that compare the cost-effectiveness
of a particular product candidate to currently available therapies.
Other member states allow companies to fix their own prices for
medicines but monitor and control company profits. Such differences
in national pricing regimes may create price differentials between
E.U. member states. There can be no assurance that any country that
has price controls or reimbursement limitations for pharmaceutical
products will allow favorable reimbursement and pricing
arrangements for any of our products. Historically, products
launched in the European Union do not follow price structures of
the United States. In the European Union, the downward pressure on
healthcare costs in general, particularly prescription medicines,
has become intense. As a result, barriers to entry of new products
are becoming increasingly high and patients are unlikely to use a
drug product that is not reimbursed by their
government.
Other Healthcare Laws and Compliance Requirements
Our current and future operations may subject us to various federal
and state laws targeting fraud and abuse in the healthcare
industry. These laws may impact, among other things, our research
and proposed sales, marketing and education programs. In addition,
we may be subject to patient privacy regulation by both the federal
government and the states and foreign jurisdictions in which we
conduct our business. The laws that may affect our ability to
operate include:
•the
federal Anti-Kickback Statute, which prohibits, among other things,
persons from knowingly and willfully soliciting, receiving,
offering or paying remuneration, directly or indirectly, to induce,
or in return for, the purchase or recommendation of an item or
service reimbursable under a federal healthcare program, such as
the Medicare and Medicaid programs;
•federal
civil and criminal false claims laws and civil monetary penalty
laws, which prohibit, among other things, individuals or entities
from knowingly presenting, or causing to be presented, claims for
payment from Medicare, Medicaid, or other third-party payors that
are false or fraudulent;
•the
federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of
1996, or HIPAA, which created additional federal criminal statutes
that prohibit, among other things, executing a scheme to defraud
any healthcare benefit program and making false statements relating
to healthcare matters;
•the
federal transparency laws, including the federal Physician Payments
Sunshine Act, that require drug manufacturers to disclose payments
and other transfers of value provided to physicians, (currently
defined to include doctors, dentists, optometrists, podiatrists and
chiropractors), certain other healthcare professionals (such as
physician assistants and nurse practitioners) and teaching
hospitals, as well as ownership and investment interests held by
physicians and their immediate family members;
•HIPAA,
as amended by the Health Information Technology and Clinical Health
Act, or HITECH, and its implementing regulations, which imposes
certain requirements on “covered entities,” including certain
healthcare providers, health plans, and healthcare clearinghouses,
as well as their respective “business associates” that create,
receive, maintain or transmit individually identifiable health
information for or on behalf of a covered entity, and their covered
subcontractors, with respect to safeguarding the privacy, security
and transmission of individually identifiable health information;
and
•Foreign
and state law equivalents of each of the above federal laws, such
as anti-kickback and false claims laws which may apply to items or
services reimbursed by any third-party payor, including commercial
insurers, state and local laws governing the disclosure of payments
to health care professionals, state laws that require
pharmaceutical companies to comply with the pharmaceutical
industry’s voluntary compliance guidelines and the relevant
compliance guidance promulgated by the federal government, state
laws that require the reporting of information related to drug
pricing, state and local laws requiring the registration of
pharmaceutical sales representatives and state laws governing the
privacy and security of health information in certain
circumstances, many of which differ from each other in significant
ways and may not have the same effect, thus complicating compliance
efforts.
If our operations are found to be in violation of any of these laws
or any other governmental regulations that may apply to it, we may
be subject to significant civil, criminal and administrative
penalties, damages, fines, imprisonment, exclusion from government
funded healthcare programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid, and the
curtailment or restructuring of our operations.
Human Capital Policies and Procedures
As of December 31, 2022, we had 70 full-time employees. Of these
employees, 47 were engaged in research and development and 23 were
engaged in selling, general and administrative functions. All of
our employees are located in the United States or Vienna, Austria.
We have no collective bargaining agreements with our employees and
have not experienced any work stoppages. We consider our
relationship with our employees to be good.
Human capital is critical to our success. Our overarching human
capital resource strategy is to recruit, hire, incentivize and
retain employees consistent with our stage of operations and
strategic objectives. We believe we offer our employees
compensation that is competitive and consistent with the markets in
which we operate, namely the Greater Boston and the Vienna, Austria
metropolitan areas. We supplement base cash employee compensation
with awards of stock options and/or restricted stock units under
our equity incentive plans. We review employee performance annually
and our Compensation Committee approves associated merit increases
and annual incentive bonus payments during the first quarter of the
year annually. When needed, we augment our employee base with
outside consultants who specialize in various fields.
Corporate Information
We were incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware in
2010 under the name Arsanis Inc. Following the Merger with X4
Therapeutics Inc. (formerly X4 Pharmaceuticals Inc.) on March 13,
2019, we changed our name to X4 Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Our principal
executive offices are located at 61 North Beacon Street, 4th Floor,
Boston, Massachusetts 02134 and our telephone number is (857)
529-8300.
Available Information
We maintain a website at http://www.x4pharma.com. Our annual
reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, proxy
statements, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those
reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Exchange Act are available free of charge on our website as
soon as reasonably practicable after electronically filing such
reports with the SEC. Such reports and other information may be
accessed through the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. Information
contained in our website is not part of this or any other report
that we file with or furnish to the SEC.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
An investment in our securities involves a high degree of risk. You
should carefully consider the following information about these
risks, together with the other information appearing elsewhere in
this Annual Report, including our audited consolidated financial
statements and related notes hereto, before deciding to invest in
our common stock. The occurrence of any of the following risks
could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition, results of operations and future growth prospects, or
cause our actual results to differ materially from those contained
in forward-looking statements we have made in this report and those
we may make from time to time. In these circumstances, the market
price of our common stock could decline, and you may lose all or
part of your investment. We cannot assure you that any of the
events discussed below will not occur.
Summary of Selected Risks Associated with Our Business
Our business faces significant risks and uncertainties. If any of
the following risks are realized, our business, financial condition
and results of operations could be materially and adversely
affected. You should carefully review and consider the full
discussion of our risk factors in the section titled “Risk Factors”
in Part I, Item 1A of this Annual Report. Some of the more
significant risks include the following:
•We
have incurred significant losses and have not generated revenue
from product sales since our inception. We expect to continue to
incur losses for the foreseeable future, and we may never achieve
or maintain profitability.
•Our
liquidity position raises substantial doubt about our ability to
continue as a going concern and we will require substantial
additional funding. If we are unable to raise capital when needed,
we could be forced to delay, reduce or eliminate any product
development programs or commercialization efforts.
•Raising
additional capital may cause dilution to our investors, restrict
our operations or require us to relinquish rights to our
technologies or product candidates. Future debt obligations may
expose us to risks that could adversely affect our business,
operating results and financial condition and may result in further
dilution to our stockholders.
•We
depend almost entirely on the success of our lead product
candidate, mavorixafor, which we are developing for the potential
treatment of chronic neutropenic disorders, including WHIM (Warts,
Hypogammaglobulinemia, Infections, and Myelokathexis) syndrome and,
contingent on a potential strategic partnerships, for the treatment
of Waldenström’s. We cannot be certain that we will be able to
obtain regulatory approval for, or successfully commercialize,
mavorixafor or any other product candidate.
•The
regulatory review and approval processes of the FDA and comparable
foreign regulatory authorities are lengthy, time-consuming and
inherently unpredictable, and if we are ultimately unable to obtain
regulatory approval for our product candidates, including
mavorixafor, our business will be substantially
harmed.
•We
depend on license agreements with Genzyme, Beth Israel Deaconess
Medical Center, Georgetown University and Dana-Farber Cancer
Institute to permit us to use patents and patent applications.
Termination of these rights or the failure to comply with
obligations under these agreements could materially harm our
business and prevent us from developing or commercializing our
product candidates.
•The
results of clinical trials may not support our product candidate
claims.
•We
may fail to enroll a sufficient number of patients in our clinical
trials in a timely manner, which could delay or prevent clinical
trials of our product candidates.
•If
the commercial opportunity for mavorixafor in chronic neutropenic
disorders, including WHIM syndrome, is smaller than we anticipate,
our potential future revenue from mavorixafor for the treatment of
any of the diseases may be adversely affected and our business may
suffer.
•Interim
top-line and preliminary data from our clinical trials that we
announce or publish from time to time may change as more patient
data become available and are subject to audit and verification
procedures that could result in material changes in the final
data.
•A
breakthrough therapy designation or Fast Track designation by the
FDA for our product candidates may not lead to a faster development
or regulatory review or approval process, and neither of these
designations increases the likelihood that our product candidates
will receive marketing approval.
•Product
candidates may cause undesirable side effects that could delay or
prevent their marketing approval, limit the commercial profile of
an approved label, or result in significant negative consequences
following marketing approval, if any, including marketing
withdrawal.
•If,
in the future, we are unable to establish sales and marketing
capabilities or to selectively enter into agreements with third
parties to sell and market our product candidates, we may not be
successful in commercializing our product candidates if and when
they are approved.
•We
face substantial competition that may result in others discovering,
developing or commercializing products before or more successfully
than we do.
•Even
if we obtain and maintain approval for our product candidates from
the FDA, we may never obtain approval for our product candidates
outside of the United States, which would limit our market
opportunities and could harm our business.
•Even
if we are able to commercialize mavorixafor or any other product
candidate that we develop, the product may become subject to
unfavorable pricing regulations, third-party reimbursement
practices or healthcare reform initiatives, which would harm our
business.
•We
have no experience manufacturing our product candidates on a large
clinical or commercial scale and have no manufacturing facility. We
are currently dependent on a single third party manufacturer for
the manufacture of mavorixafor, the active pharmaceutical
ingredient (“API”) and a single manufacturer of mavorixafor
finished drug product capsules. If we experience problems with
these third parties, the manufacturing of mavorixafor could be
delayed, which could harm our results of operations.
•We
rely on third-party CROs to conduct our preclinical studies and
clinical trials. If these CROs do not successfully carry out their
contractual duties or meet expected deadlines, we may not be able
to obtain regulatory approval for or commercialize our product
candidates and our business could be substantially
harmed.
•Disruptions
in our supply chain could delay the commercial launch of our
product candidates.
•Our
employees, principal investigators, CROs and consultants may engage
in misconduct or other improper activities, including noncompliance
with regulatory standards and requirements, which could have a
material adverse effect on our business.
•We
may depend on such collaborations for the development and
commercialization of our product candidates. If those
collaborations are not successful, we may not be able to capitalize
on the market potential of our product candidates.
•If
we are unable to protect our intellectual property rights, our
competitive position could be harmed.
•Third
parties may initiate legal proceedings alleging that we are
infringing their intellectual property rights, the outcome of which
would be uncertain and could have a material adverse effect on the
success of our business.
•Our
future success depends on our ability to retain executives and to
attract, retain and motivate key personnel in a competitive
environment for skilled biotechnology personnel.
•We
will need to grow the size of our organization, and we may
experience difficulties in managing this growth.
•Our
term load contains restrictions that limit our flexibility in
operating our business.
•Our
business could be adversely affected by economic downturns,
inflation, increases in interest rates, natural disasters, public
health crises such as the COVID-19 pandemic, political crises,
geopolitical events, such a the war in Ukraine, or other
macroeconomic conditions, which have in the past and may in the
future negatively impact our business and financial
performance.
•Our
stock price has been and is likely to continue to be volatile and
fluctuate substantially.
Risks Related to Our Financial Position and Need for Additional
Capital
We have incurred significant losses and have not generated revenue
from product sales since our inception. We expect to continue to
incur losses for the foreseeable future and we may never achieve or
maintain profitability.
We are a late clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company. Investment
in biopharmaceutical product development is highly speculative
because it entails substantial upfront capital expenditures and
significant risk that any potential product candidate will fail to
demonstrate adequate effect or an acceptable safety profile, gain
regulatory approval or become commercially viable.
Since inception, we have incurred significant operating losses. Our
net losses were $93.9 million, $88.7 million and $62.1 million for
the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020 respectively, and
we had an accumulated deficit of $376.7 million as of December 31,
2022. We have funded our operations to date primarily with proceeds
from sales of common stock, warrants and prefunded warrants for the
purchase of our preferred stock and our common stock, sales of
preferred stock, proceeds from the issuance of convertible debt and
borrowings under loan and security agreements. We have no products
approved for commercial sale and have not generated any revenue
from product sales to date, and we may never generate product
revenue or achieve profitability.
We expect to continue to incur significant expenses and increasing
operating losses for at least the next several years as we conduct
additional clinical trials for our product candidates; continue to
discover and develop additional product candidates; acquire or
in-license other product candidates and technologies; maintain,
expand and protect our intellectual property portfolio; hire
additional clinical, scientific and commercial personnel; establish
a commercial manufacturing source and secure supply chain capacity
sufficient to provide commercial quantities of any product
candidates for which we may obtain regulatory approval; seek
regulatory approvals for any product candidates that successfully
complete clinical trials; establish a sales, marketing and
distribution infrastructure to commercialize any products for which
we may obtain regulatory approval; and add operational, financial
and management information systems and personnel, including
personnel to support our product development and planned future
commercialization efforts. We may encounter unforeseen expenses,
difficulties, complications, delays and other unknown factors that
may adversely affect our business. The size of our future net
losses will depend, in part, on the rate of future growth of our
expenses and our ability to generate revenues.
Our ability to generate profits from operations and thereafter to
remain profitable depends heavily on:
•the
scope, number, progress, duration, endpoints, cost, results and
timing of clinical trials and nonclinical studies of our current or
potential future product candidates, including in particular the
scope, progress, duration, endpoints, cost, results and timing for
completion of our Phase 2 clinical trial of mavorixafor for the
treatment of chronic neutropenic disorders;
•our
ability to raise sufficient funds to support the development and
potential commercialization of our product candidates;
•the
outcomes and timing of regulatory reviews, approvals or other
actions;
•our
ability to obtain marketing approval for our product
candidates;
•our
ability to establish and maintain licensing, collaboration or
similar arrangements on favorable terms and whether and to what
extent we retain development or commercialization responsibilities
under any new licensing, collaboration or similar
arrangement;
•the
success of any other business, product or technology that we
acquire or in which we invest;
•our
ability to maintain, expand and defend the scope of our
intellectual property portfolio;
•our
ability to manufacture any approved products on commercially
reasonable terms;
•our
ability to establish a sales and marketing organization or suitable
third-party alternatives for any approved product;
•the
number and characteristics of product candidates and programs that
we pursue;
•hire
additional clinical, regulatory and scientific personnel;
and
•incur
additional legal, accounting and other expenses associated with
operating as a public company.
Based on our current plans, we do not expect to generate
significant revenue from product sales unless and until we (or a
potential future licensee or collaborator) obtain marketing
approval for, and commercialize, one or more of our current or
potential future product candidates. Neither we nor a licensee may
ever succeed in obtaining marketing approval for, or
commercializing, our product candidates and, even if we do, we may
never generate revenues that are significant enough to generate
profits from operations. Even if we do generate profits from
operations, we may not be able to sustain or increase profitability
on a quarterly or annual basis. Our failure to generate profits
from operations and remain profitable would decrease our value and
could impair our ability to raise capital, expand our business,
maintain our research and development efforts, diversify our
product offerings or continue our operations. A decline in our
value could also cause you to lose all or part of your
investment.
We may encounter unforeseen expenses, difficulties, complications,
delays and other known and unknown factors that may alter or delay
our plans. For example, we experienced delays in clinical trial
site activation and slower patient enrollment in some of our
clinical trials as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, which delayed
our expectations regarding our ability to report data from those
trials, and we may encounter additional delays, disruptions and
other direct and indirect negative effects of the ongoing COVID-19
pandemic on our clinical trials. Assuming that we complete the
development of and obtain marketing approval for any of our product
candidates, we will need to transition from a company with a
research and development focus to a company capable of supporting
commercial activities. We may encounter unforeseen expenses,
difficulties, complications and delays, and may not be successful
in such a transition.
Our liquidity position raises substantial doubt about our ability
to continue as a going concern and we will require substantial
additional funding. If we are unable to raise capital when needed,
we could be forced to delay, reduce or eliminate any product
development programs or commercialization efforts.
We may be forced to delay or reduce the scope of our development
programs and/or limit or cease our operations if we are unable to
obtain additional funding to support our current operating plan. We
have identified conditions and events that raise substantial doubt
about our ability to continue as a going concern.
Our operations have consumed a large amount of cash since
inception. To date, we have funded our operations primarily with
proceeds from sales of common stock, warrants and prefunded
warrants for the purchase of our preferred stock and our common
stock, sales of preferred stock, proceeds from the issuance of
convertible debt and borrowings under loan and security agreements.
We expect our research and development expenses to increase in
future periods as we continue to advance the clinical development
of our product candidates and prepare for the launch and
commercialization of any product candidates for which we receive
regulatory approval, including potentially building our own
commercial organization to address the U.S. and certain other
markets. In addition, if we obtain marketing approval for any of
our product candidates that are not then subject to licensing,
collaboration or similar arrangements with third parties, we expect
to incur significant commercialization expenses related to product
sales, marketing, distribution and manufacturing. Furthermore, we
expect to incur additional costs associated with operating as a
public company.
As of December 31, 2022, we have cash and cash equivalents of
$121.7 million. We will require additional capital to sustain our
operations, and to carry out our business plans, which may include
raising funds through public or private equity or debt financings,
third-party funding, marketing and distribution arrangements, as
well as other collaborations, strategic alliances and licensing
arrangements, or any combination of these approaches. While we have
successfully raised capital in the past, our ability to raise
capital in future periods is not assured. We will also require
additional capital to satisfy the covenant under our existing debt
facility with Hercules Capital, Inc. and certain affiliated
entities (“Hercules”) that requires that we maintain a minimum
level of cash of $20.0 million, subject to reduction to $10.0
million upon the achievement of certain conditions. Based on our
current cash flow projections and assuming no additional funding,
we will fail to maintain the minimum cash required to satisfy this
covenant as soon as the first quarter of 2024. In such event,
Hercules could require the repayment of all outstanding debt. Based
on the foregoing, we have concluded that substantial doubt exists
about our ability to continue as a going concern for a period of at
least 12 months from the date of issuance of the financial
statements appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report. Our financial
statements have been prepared assuming that we will continue as a
going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and the
settlement of liabilities and commitments in the normal course of
business. The financial statements do not include any adjustments
relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset
amounts or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might
result from the outcome of the uncertainty described above. See
also the risk factor titled “Our
term loan contains restrictions that limit our flexibility in
operating our business”
below.
We cannot be certain that additional funding will be available on
acceptable terms, or at all. If we are unable to raise additional
capital when needed or in sufficient amounts or on terms acceptable
to us, we could be forced to delay, reduce or eliminate our
research and development programs or any
future commercialization efforts of one or more of our product
candidates or one or more of our other research and development
initiatives. In addition, when we need to secure additional
financing, such additional fundraising efforts may divert our
management from our day-to-day activities, which may adversely
affect our ability to develop and commercialize our product
candidates. Any of these events could significantly harm our
business, financial condition and prospects, and our stockholders
could lose all or part of their investment in our
company.
We also could be required to:
•seek
new or additional collaborators for one or more of our current or
future product candidates at an earlier stage than otherwise would
be desirable or on terms that are less favorable than might
otherwise be available; or
•relinquish
or license on unfavorable terms our rights to technologies or
product candidates that we otherwise would seek to develop or
commercialize ourselves.
Our future funding requirements, both near and long-term, will
depend on many factors, including, but not limited to:
•the
scope, number, initiation, progress, timing, costs, design,
duration, any potential delays, and results of clinical trials and
nonclinical studies for our current or future product
candidates;
•the
clinical development plans that we establish for these product
candidates;
•the
number and characteristics of product candidates and programs that
we develop or may in-license;
•the
outcome, timing and cost of regulatory reviews, approvals or other
actions to meet regulatory requirements established by the U.S.
Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) and comparable foreign
regulatory authorities, including the potential for the FDA or
comparable foreign regulatory authorities to require that we
perform more studies for our product candidates than those that we
currently expect;
•our
ability to obtain marketing approval for our product
candidates;
•the
cost of filing, prosecuting, defending and enforcing our patent
claims and other intellectual property rights covering our product
candidates, including any such patent claims and intellectual
property rights that we have licensed from Genzyme pursuant to the
terms of our license agreement with Genzyme or from other third
parties;
•our
ability to maintain, expand and defend the scope of our
intellectual property portfolio, including the cost of defending
intellectual property disputes, including patent infringement
actions brought by third parties against us or our product
candidates;
•the
cost and timing of completion of commercial-scale manufacturing
activities with respect to our product candidates;
•our
ability to establish and maintain licensing, collaboration or
similar arrangements on favorable terms and whether and to what
extent we retain development or commercialization responsibilities
under any new licensing, collaboration or similar
arrangement;
•the
cost of establishing sales, marketing and distribution capabilities
for any product candidates for which we may receive regulatory
approval in regions where we choose to commercialize our products
on our own;
•the
success of any other business, product or technology that we
acquire or in which we invest;
•the
costs of acquiring, licensing or investing in businesses, product
candidates and technologies;
•our
need and ability to hire additional management and scientific and
medical personnel;
•market
acceptance of our product candidates, to the extent any are
approved for commercial sale;
•the
effect of competing technological and market
developments;
•the
costs to operate as a public company; and
•business
interruptions resulting from pandemics and public health
emergencies, including those related to the ongoing COVID-19
pandemic, geopolitical actions, including war and terrorism or
natural disasters including earthquakes, typhoons, floods and
fires.
Raising additional capital may cause dilution to our investors,
restrict our operations or require us to relinquish rights to our
technologies or product candidates. Future debt obligations may
expose us to risks that could adversely affect our business,
operating results and financial condition and may result in further
dilution to our stockholders.
Until such time, if ever, as we can generate substantial product
revenues, we expect to finance our cash needs through public or
private equity or debt financings, third-party funding, marketing
and distribution arrangements, as well as other collaborations,
strategic alliances and licensing arrangements, or any combination
of these approaches. Other than our common stock purchase agreement
with Lincoln Park Capital Fund LLC (“Lincoln Park”), pursuant to
which Lincoln Park is obligated, subject to certain limitations and
conditions, to purchase up to $50.0 million in the aggregate of
shares of our common stock, we do not have any committed external
sources of funds and may seek to raise additional capital at any
time. To the extent that we raise additional capital through the
sale of equity or convertible debt securities, your ownership
interest will be diluted, and the terms of these securities may
include liquidation or other preferences that adversely affect your
rights as a holder of our common stock. Debt financing, if
available, may involve agreements that include covenants limiting
or restricting our ability to take specific actions, such as
incurring additional debt, making capital expenditures, declaring
dividends or other distributions, acquiring or licensing
intellectual property rights and other operating restrictions that
could adversely impact our ability to conduct our business and may
result in liens being placed on additional assets such as
intellectual property. For example, our debt facility with Hercules
contains a minimum cash financial covenant that we project we would
be in violation of in the first quarter of 2024 based on our
current cash flow projections, assuming we do not raise additional
funding. If we default on such indebtedness, with Hercules or a
future lender, we could be required to pledge additional assets, or
the lenders could enforce remedies on the current
collateral.
If we raise additional funds through licensing, collaboration or
similar arrangements with third parties, we may have to relinquish
valuable rights to our technologies, future revenue streams,
research and development programs or product candidates or grant
licenses on terms that are not favorable to us. If we are unable to
raise additional funds through equity or debt financings or through
licensing, collaboration or similar arrangements when needed, we
may be required to delay, limit, reduce or terminate our product
development or future commercialization efforts or grant rights to
develop and market product candidates that we would otherwise
prefer to develop and market ourselves.
We have not generated revenues from any product sales since
inception and may never become profitable.
To date, we have not generated revenues from any product sales. Our
ability to generate revenue and become profitable depends upon our
ability to successfully obtain marketing approval and commercialize
our product candidates, including mavorixafor, or other product
candidates that we may develop, in-license or acquire in the
future. Even if we are able to successfully achieve regulatory
approval for these product candidates, we are unable to predict the
extent of any future losses and do not know when any of these
product candidates will generate revenue for us, if at all. Our
ability to generate revenue from mavorixafor or any of our current
or future product candidates also depends on a number of additional
factors, including our ability to:
•successfully
complete development activities, including all necessary
nonclinical studies and clinical trials;
•complete
and submit New Drug Applications to the FDA and obtain regulatory
approval for indications for which there is a commercial
market;
•complete
and submit marketing applications to, and obtain regulatory
approval from, foreign regulatory authorities;
•set
and obtain a commercially viable price for our
products;
•obtain
commercial quantities of our products at acceptable cost
levels;
•develop
a commercial organization capable of sales, marketing and
distribution for the products we intend to sell ourselves in the
markets in which we have retained commercialization
rights;
•find
suitable collaborators to help us market, sell and distribute our
approved products in other markets; and
•obtain
coverage and adequate reimbursement from third-party, including
government, payors.
In addition, because of the numerous risks and uncertainties
associated with product development, including the possibility that
our product candidates may not advance through development or
demonstrate safety and efficacy for their intended uses, the FDA or
any other regulatory agency may require additional clinical trials
or nonclinical studies. We are unable to predict the timing or
amount of increased expenses, or when or if we will be able to
achieve or maintain profitability, and such expense could increase
beyond our expectations if the FDA or any other regulatory agency
requires such additional clinical trials or nonclinical studies as
part of the application and approval process or post-approval
process if we are successful at achieving regulatory approval. Even
if we are able to successfully complete the development and
regulatory reviews described above, we anticipate incurring
significant costs associated with commercializing these products,
if they are approved.
Even if we are able to generate revenues from the sale of our
product candidates, we may not become profitable and may need to
obtain additional funding to continue operations. If we fail to
become profitable or are unable to sustain profitability on a
continuing basis, then we may be unable to continue our operations
at planned levels and be forced to reduce our operations. If we do
achieve profitability, we may not be able to sustain or increase
profitability on a quarterly or annual basis. Our failure to become
and remain profitable would decrease the value of the company and
could impair our ability to raise capital, maintain our discovery
and preclinical development efforts, expand our business or
continue our operations and may require us to raise additional
capital that may dilute your ownership interest. A decline in our
value could also cause you to lose all or part of your
investment.
Changes in estimates regarding fair value of intangible assets may
result in an adverse impact on our results of
operations.
We test goodwill for impairment annually or more frequently if
changes in circumstances or the occurrence of events suggest
impairment exists. Any significant change in market conditions,
including a sustained decline in our stock price, that indicate a
reduction in carrying value may give rise to impairment in the
period that the change becomes known. For example, as of December
31, 2021, our market capitalization, measured as the price of our
common stock multiplied by shares of common stock outstanding,
declined to below the value of our net assets, including goodwill.
As a result of the sustained decline in the market price of our
common stock, the fair value of our single reporting unit, measured
based on our market capitalization as of December 31, 2021, was
lower than its carrying value and we concluded that goodwill was
impaired. Accordingly, we recorded an impairment charge of $9.8
million to reduce the carrying amount of goodwill to $17.4 million
as of December 31, 2021. While we determined that goodwill was not
impaired based on its quantitative test as of December 31, 2022,
future declines in the market value of our common stock may result
in additional impairment charges being recorded.
Risks Related to Development of Our Product Candidates
We depend almost entirely on the success of our lead product
candidate, mavorixafor, which we are developing for the potential
treatment of chronic neutropenic disorders, including WHIM
syndrome, and, contingent on a potential strategic partnership, for
the treatment of Waldenström’s. We cannot be certain that we will
be able to obtain regulatory approval for, or successfully
commercialize, mavorixafor or any other product
candidate.
Our business depends almost entirely on the successful clinical
development, regulatory approval and commercialization of
mavorixafor. We currently have no products for sale and may never
be able to develop marketable drug products. The clinical trials of
our product candidates are, and the manufacturing and marketing of
our product candidates will be, subject to extensive and rigorous
review and regulation by government authorities in the United
States and in other countries where we intend to test and, if
approved, market any product candidate. Before obtaining regulatory
approvals for the commercial sale of any product candidate, we must
successfully meet a number of critical developmental milestones,
including:
•developing
dosages that will be well-tolerated, safe and
effective;
•completing
the development and scale-up to permit manufacture of our product
candidates in commercial quantities and at acceptable
costs;
•demonstrating
through pivotal clinical trials that each product candidate is safe
and effective in patients for the intended indication;
•establishing
commercial manufacturing capabilities or making arrangements with
third-party manufacturers; and
•obtaining
and maintaining patent and trade secret protection and non-patent
exclusivity for our product candidates.
The time necessary to achieve these developmental milestones for
any individual product candidate is long and uncertain, and we may
not successfully complete these milestones for mavorixafor or any
other product candidates that we may develop. We have not yet
completed development of any product candidate. We also may not be
able to finalize the design or formulation for our other programs.
We may not be able to complete development of any product
candidates that demonstrate safety and efficacy and that will have
a commercially reasonable treatment and storage period. If we are
unable to complete development of mavorixafor or any other product
candidates that we may develop, we will not be able to
commercialize and earn revenue from them.
We may develop mavorixafor, and potentially future product
candidates, in combination with other therapies, which could expose
us to additional risks.
We may develop mavorixafor, and may develop future product
candidates, in combination with one or more currently approved
therapies. Even if any product candidate we develop were to receive
marketing approval or be commercialized for use in combination with
other existing therapies, we would continue to be subject to the
risks that the FDA or similar regulatory authorities outside of the
United States could revoke approval of the therapy used in
combination with our product candidate or that safety, efficacy,
manufacturing or supply issues could arise with these existing
therapies. Combination therapies are commonly used for the
treatment of diseases, and we would be subject to similar risks if
we develop any of our product candidates for use in combination
with other drugs. This could result in our own products being
removed from the market or being less successful
commercially.
We may also evaluate mavorixafor or any other future product
candidates in combination with one or more other cancer therapies
that have not yet been approved for marketing by the FDA or similar
regulatory authorities outside of the United States. We will not be
able to market and sell mavorixafor or any product candidate we
develop in combination with any such unapproved therapies that do
not ultimately obtain marketing approval.
If the FDA or similar regulatory authorities outside of the United
States do not approve these other drugs or revoke their approval
of, or if safety, efficacy, manufacturing or supply issues arise
with, the drugs that we choose to evaluate in combination with
mavorixafor or any product candidate we develop, we may be unable
to obtain approval of or market mavorixafor or any product
candidate we develop.
The regulatory review and approval processes of the FDA and
comparable foreign regulatory authorities are lengthy,
time-consuming and inherently unpredictable, and if we are
ultimately unable to obtain regulatory approval for our product
candidates, including mavorixafor, our business will be
substantially harmed.
We are not permitted to market mavorixafor or any other product
candidate in the United States until we receive approval of an New
Drug Application (“NDA”) from the FDA, or in any foreign countries
until we receive the requisite approval from such countries or
jurisdictions, such as the marketing authorization application
(“MAA”) in the European Union from the European Medicines Agency
(“EMA”). Prior to submitting an NDA to the FDA for approval of
mavorixafor for the treatment of WHIM syndrome, we will need to
complete the analysis of the data collected in our Phase 3 pivotal
clinical trial of mavorixafor in patients with WHIM syndrome. Our
NDA submission may receive a refusal to file response from the FDA,
and even if filed by the FDA, we may receive a Complete Response
Letter rather than approval for commercial marketing. In addition,
we may be required by the FDA to conduct additional clinical trials
and/or nonclinical studies to support potential approval.
Successfully completing clinical trials and obtaining approval of
an NDA is a complex, lengthy, expensive and uncertain process, and
the FDA, or a comparable foreign regulatory authority, may delay,
limit or deny approval of mavorixafor for the treatment of WHIM
syndrome or other indications for many reasons, including, among
others:
•disagreement
with the design or implementation of our clinical
trials;
•disagreement
with the sufficiency of our clinical trials;
•failure
to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of mavorixafor or any other
product candidate for its proposed indications;
•failure
to demonstrate that any clinical and other benefits of mavorixafor
or any other product candidate outweigh its safety
risks;
•a
negative interpretation of the data from our nonclinical studies or
clinical trials;
•deficiencies
in the manufacturing or control processes or failure of third-party
manufacturing facilities with which we contract for clinical and
commercial supplies to comply with current Good Manufacturing
Practice requirements, or cGMPs;
•insufficient
data collected from clinical trials of mavorixafor or changes in
the approval requirements that render its nonclinical and clinical
data insufficient to support the filing of an NDA or to obtain
regulatory approval; or
•changes
in clinical practice in or approved products available for the
treatment of the target patient population that could have an
impact on the indications that we are pursuing for mavorixafor or
our other product candidates.
The FDA or a comparable foreign regulatory authority may also
require more information, including additional nonclinical or
clinical data to support approval, which may delay or prevent
approval of our commercialization plans, or cause us to abandon the
development program. Even if we obtain regulatory approval, our
product candidates may be approved for fewer or more limited
indications than we request, such approval may be contingent on the
performance of costly post-marketing clinical trials, or we may not
be allowed to include the labeling claims necessary or desirable
for the successful commercialization of such product candidate. For
instance, it is possible that mavorixafor could be approved for an
indication but fail to be used for treating patients in that
indication due to the availability of other available treatments or
then-accepted clinical practice.
We depend on license agreements with Genzyme, Beth Israel Deaconess
Medical Center, Georgetown University and Dana-Farber Cancer
Institute to permit us to use patents and patent applications.
Termination of these rights or the failure to comply with
obligations under these agreements could materially harm our
business and prevent us from developing or commercializing our
product candidates.
We are party to license agreements with Genzyme, Beth Israel
Deaconess Medical Center, Georgetown University and Dana-Farber
Cancer Institute under which we were granted rights to patents and
patent applications that are important to our business. We rely on
these license agreements in order to be able to use various
proprietary technologies that are material to our business,
including certain patents and patent applications that cover our
product candidates, including mavorixafor. Our rights to use these
patents and patent applications and employ the inventions claimed
in these licensed patents are subject to the continuation of and
our compliance with the terms of our license
agreements.
Our license agreement with Genzyme imposes upon us various
diligence, payment and other obligations, including the
following:
•our
obligation to pay Genzyme milestone payments in the aggregate
amount of up to $25.0 million, contingent upon our achievement of
certain late-stage regulatory and sales milestones with respect to
licensed products.
•our
obligation to pay Genzyme tiered royalties based on net sales of
licensed products that we commercialize under the
agreement.
•our
obligation to pay Genzyme a certain percentage of cash payments
received by us or our affiliates in consideration for the grant of
a sublicense under the license granted to us by
Genzyme.
If we fail to comply with any of our obligations under the Genzyme
license agreement, or we are subject to a bankruptcy, Genzyme may
have the right to terminate the license agreement, in which event
we would not be able to market any product candidates covered by
the license.
Prior to July 2014, we did not control the prosecution,
maintenance, or filing of the patents and patent applications that
are licensed to us under the Genzyme license agreement, or the
enforcement of these patents and patent applications against
infringement by third parties. Thus, these patents and patent
applications were not drafted by us or our attorneys, and we did
not control or have any input into the prosecution of these patents
and patent applications prior to our execution of the Genzyme
license agreement in July 2014. Under the terms of the license
agreement with Genzyme, since July 2014, we have controlled the
right to control the prosecution, maintenance, and filing of the
patents and patent applications that are licensed to us, and the
enforcement of these patents and patent applications against
infringement by third parties. However, we cannot be certain that
the same level of attention was given to the drafting and
prosecution of these patents and patent applications as we may have
used if we had control over the drafting and prosecution of such
patents and patent applications. We also cannot be certain that
drafting or prosecution of the patents and patent applications
licensed to us has been conducted in compliance with applicable
laws and regulations or will result in valid and enforceable
patents.
Pursuant to our license agreement with Beth Israel Deaconess
Medical Center, we paid an upfront, one-time fee for the rights
granted by the license agreement. This license agreement imposes
upon us various obligations, including the requirement to provide
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center with progress reports at
regular intervals and to maintain specified levels of insurance.
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center may terminate the agreement
for our non-payment, insolvency or default of material obligations.
We have the right to terminate the agreement for any reason upon 90
days’ advance written notice.
Our license agreement with Georgetown imposes upon us various
diligence, payment and other obligations, including our obligations
to pay Georgetown milestone payments in the aggregate amount of up
to $0.8 million, contingent upon our achievement of certain sales
milestones with respect to licensed products, to deliver reports
upon certain events and at regular intervals and to maintain
customary levels of insurance. Georgetown may terminate the
agreement for our non-payment, insolvency, failure to maintain
insurance or default of material obligations. We have the right to
terminate the agreement for any reason upon 60 days advance written
notice.
Our license agreement with the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
(“DFCI”) imposes upon us various diligence, payment and other
obligations, including our obligations to pay DFCI milestone
payments in the aggregate amount of up to
approximately $32 million,
contingent upon our achievement of certain regulatory and sales
milestones with respect to licensed products, to deliver reports at
regular intervals and to maintain certain minimum levels of
insurance. DFCI may terminate the agreement if (i) we cease to
carry on our business with respect to the licensed products, (ii)
we default on diligence, insurance, payment or any other material
obligations, (iii) one of our officers or that of a sublicensee is
convicted of a felony relating to the manufacture, use, sale or
importation of one or more licensed product, (iv) we become
insolvent, (v) we grant a sublicense without notifying DFCI or on
terms inconsistent with the terms required of sublicenses under the
agreement or (vi) we bring a patent challenge against the licensed
products. We have the right to terminate the agreement for any
reason upon 90 days advance written notice.
Disputes may arise under any of our license agreements with
Genzyme, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Georgetown
University and/or Dana-Farber Cancer Institute regarding the
intellectual property that is subject to such license agreement,
including:
•the
scope of rights granted under the applicable license agreement and
other interpretation-related issues;
•whether
and the extent to which our technology and processes infringe on
intellectual property that is not subject to the applicable license
agreement;
•our
diligence obligations with respect to the use of the licensed
technology under the applicable license agreement to develop and
commercialize products and technologies, including the level of
effort and specific activities that will satisfy those diligence
obligations; and
•the
ownership of inventions and know-how resulting from the joint
creation or use of intellectual property by us and our
collaborators.
If disputes over intellectual property that we have licensed
prevent or impair our ability to maintain any of our license
agreements on acceptable terms, we may be unable to successfully
develop and commercialize the affected product candidates and
technologies.
The results of clinical trials may not support our product
candidate claims.
Even if our clinical trials are completed as planned, we cannot be
certain that their results will support the proposed product
candidates, that the FDA or foreign government authorities will
agree with our conclusions regarding such results, or that the FDA
or foreign governmental authorities will not require additional
clinical trials. Success in preclinical testing and early clinical
trials does not ensure that later clinical trials will be
successful and the results of later clinical trials often do not
replicate the results of prior clinical trials and preclinical
testing. The clinical trial results may fail to demonstrate that
our product candidates are safe for humans and effective for the
intended indications. This failure could cause us to abandon a
product candidate and may delay development of other product
candidates. Any delay in, or termination of, our clinical trials
will delay or prevent the submission of our marketing applications
(NDA and/or MAA) and, ultimately, our ability to obtain approval
and commercialize our product candidates and generate product
revenues. Information about certain clinical trials, including
results (positive or negative) will be made public according to
each country’s clinical trial register policies. Competitors may
use this publicly available information to gain knowledge regarding
the progress of development programs.
Delays in our clinical trials may lead to a delay in the submission
of our marketing approval application and jeopardize our ability to
potentially receive approvals and generate revenues from the sale
of our products.
We may experience delays in our current or future clinical trials,
including our Phase 2 clinical trial of mavorixafor for the
treatment of chronic neutropenic disorders. As a result of the
ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, we experienced delays in clinical trial
site activation and slower patient enrollment in our clinical
trials of mavorixafor for the treatment of WHIM syndrome,
Waldenström’s and chronic neutropenia disorders. Clinical trials
may be delayed, suspended or terminated for a variety of reasons,
including the following:
•delay
or failure in reaching agreement with the FDA or a comparable
foreign regulatory authority on a trial design that we are able to
execute;
•delay
or failure in obtaining authorization to commence a trial or
inability to comply with conditions imposed by a regulatory
authority regarding the scope or design of a clinical
trial;
•inability,
delay or failure in identifying and maintaining a sufficient number
of trial sites, many of which may already be engaged in competing
clinical trial programs;
•delay
or failure in recruiting and enrolling suitable subjects to
participate in a trial;
•delay
or failure in having subjects complete a trial or return for
post-treatment follow-up;
•clinical
sites and investigators deviating from trial protocol, failing to
conduct the trial in accordance with regulatory requirements, or
dropping out of a trial;
•delay
or failure in reaching agreement on acceptable terms with
prospective clinical research organizations (“CROs”) and clinical
trial sites, the terms of which can be subject to extensive
negotiation and may vary significantly among different CROs and
trial sites;
•delay
or failure in obtaining institutional review board (“IRB”) approval
to conduct a clinical trial at each site;
•delays
resulting from negative or equivocal findings of the Data Safety
Monitoring Board (“DSMB”) if any;
•ambiguous
or negative results;
•decision
by the FDA, a comparable foreign regulatory authority, or
recommendation by a DSMB to suspend or terminate clinical trials at
any time for safety issues or for any other reason;
•inadequate
drug product for use in nonclinical studies or clinical
trials;
•lack
of adequate funding to continue the product development
program;
•external
business disruptions affecting the initiation, patient enrollment,
development and operation of our clinical trials, including a
public health emergency, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, and
unforeseen events such as the war in Ukraine; or
•changes
in governmental regulations or requirements.
Any delays in completing our clinical trials will increase our
costs, slow down our product candidate development and approval
process and jeopardize our ability to commence product sales and
generate revenues. Any of these occurrences may significantly harm
our business, financial condition and prospects. In addition, many
of the factors that cause, or lead to, a delay in the commencement
or completion of clinical trials may also ultimately lead to the
denial of regulatory approval of our product
candidates.
We may fail to enroll a sufficient number of patients in our
clinical trials in a timely manner, which could delay or prevent
clinical trials of our product candidates.
Identifying and qualifying patients to participate in clinical
trials of our product candidates is critical to our success. The
timing of our clinical trials depends on the rate at which we can
recruit, enroll and retain patients in testing our product
candidates, and we have made certain assumptions about the rate at
which we can enroll patients in our clinical trials. The timing of
our clinical trials depends in part on the speed at which we can
recruit patients to participate in testing mavorixafor and any
other current or future product candidates that we may develop as
well as completion of required follow-up periods. For example, as a
result of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, we have experienced, and
expect to continue to experience, a slower enrollment
pace.
If we cannot identify patients to participate in our clinical
trials or if patients are unwilling to participate in our clinical
trials for any reason, including if patients choose to enroll in
competitive clinical trials for similar patient populations, the
timeline for recruiting patients, conducting studies and obtaining
regulatory approval of mavorixafor and any other current or future
product candidates that we may develop may be delayed. These delays
could result in increased costs, delays in advancing our current or
future product candidates, delays in testing the effectiveness of
our product candidates or termination of the clinical trials
altogether.
We may not be able to identify, recruit and enroll a sufficient
number of patients, or those with required or desired
characteristics to achieve diversity in a trial, to complete our
current and future clinical trials in a timely manner. In
particular, we are currently evaluating mavorixafor for the
treatment of WHIM syndrome and chronic neutropenic disorders, rare
diseases with limited patient pools from which to draw for clinical
trials. The eligibility criteria of our clinical trials will
further limit the pool of available trial participants. If we
experience difficulty enrolling a sufficient number of patients to
conduct our clinical trials as planned, we may be forced to delay,
limit or terminate ongoing or planned clinical trials of our
product candidates, which would delay our ability to obtain
approvals and generate product revenues from any of these product
candidates.
If the commercial opportunity for mavorixafor in chronic
neutropenic disorders, including WHIM syndrome, is smaller than we
anticipate, our potential future revenue from mavorixafor for the
treatment of any of the diseases may be adversely affected and our
business may suffer.
If the size of the commercial opportunities in any of our target
indications is smaller than we anticipate, we may not be able to
achieve profitability and growth. Our lead clinical candidate,
mavorixafor, is being developed as an oral, once-daily therapy for
the potential treatment of a variety of chronic neutropenic
disorders, including WHIM syndrome. We have advanced mavorixafor
through a pivotal, Phase 3 clinical trial (the “4WHIM trial”) in
people with WHIM syndrome, and are currently advancing mavorixafor
in a Phase 2 clinical trial in people with certain chronic
neutropenic disorders. We are currently aware of only a few small
available patient registries for WHIM syndrome, and we rely on
various estimates and assumptions to estimate the addressable WHIM
syndrome population. Based on a broad online survey of physicians
to validate current prevalence estimates and additional research
using artificial intelligence, which interrogated a database of
more than 300 million anonymized patient records that spanned 10
years of insurance claims, we estimate there are up to 3,700
diagnosed and undiagnosed WHIM patients in the United States, many
of whom were previously undiagnosed. If the commercial opportunity
in any of our target indications, including WHIM syndrome is
smaller than we anticipate, whether because our estimates of the
addressable patient population prove to be incorrect or for other
reasons, our potential future revenue from mavorixafor may be
adversely affected and our business may suffer.
It is critical to our ability to grow and become profitable that we
successfully identify patients with WHIM syndrome and other chronic
neutropenic disorders. Our projections of the number of people who
have WHIM syndrome (or its other potential primary
immunodeficiencies) and chronic neutropenic disorders are based on
a variety of sources, including third-party estimates and analyses
in the scientific literature, and may prove to be incorrect.
Further, new information may emerge that changes our estimate of
the prevalence of these diseases or the number of patient
candidates for each disease. The effort to identify patients for
treatment is at an early stage, and we cannot accurately predict
the number of patients for whom treatment might be possible.
Additionally, the addressable patient population for our
indications may be limited or may not be amenable to treatment with
mavorixafor, and new patients may become increasingly difficult to
identify or gain access to, which would adversely affect our
results of operations and our business.
Results of earlier clinical trials may not be predictive of the
results of later-stage clinical trials.
The results of pre-clinical studies and early clinical trials of
our product candidates may not be predictive of the results of
later-stage clinical trials. Interpretation of results from early,
usually smaller, trials that suggest positive trends in some
subjects, require caution. Results from later stages of clinical
trials enrolling more subjects may fail to show the desired safety
and efficacy results or otherwise fail to be consistent with the
results of earlier trials of the same product candidate.
Inconsistencies may occur for a variety of reasons, including
differences in trial design, trial endpoints (or lack of trial
endpoints in exploratory studies), subject population, number of
subjects, subject selection criteria, trial duration, drug dosage
and formulation or due to the lack of statistical power in the
earlier trials.
Data obtained from preclinical and clinical activities are subject
to varying interpretations, which may delay, limit, or prevent
regulatory approval. In addition, we may experience regulatory
delays or rejections as a result of many factors, including due to
changes in regulatory policy during the period of our product
candidate development. Any such delays could negatively impact our
business, financial condition, results of operations and
prospects.
Interim top-line and preliminary data from our clinical trials that
we announce or publish from time to time may change as more patient
data become available and are subject to audit and verification
procedures that could result in material changes in the final
data.
From time to time, we may publish interim top-line or preliminary
data from our clinical trials. Interim data from clinical trials
that we may complete are subject to the risk that one or more of
the clinical outcomes may materially change as patient enrollment
continues and more patient data become available. Preliminary or
top-line data also remain subject to audit and verification
procedures that may result in the final data being materially
different from the preliminary data we previously published.
Preliminary or top-line data may include, for example, data
regarding a small percentage of the patients enrolled in a clinical
trial, and such preliminary data should not be viewed as an
indication, belief or guarantee that other patients enrolled in
such clinical trial will achieve similar results or that the
preliminary results from such patients will be maintained. As a
result, interim and preliminary data should be viewed with caution
until the final data are available. Differences between preliminary
or interim data and final data could significantly harm our
business prospects and may cause the trading price of our common
stock to fluctuate significantly.
Risks Related to the Marketing and Commercialization of Our Product
Candidates
Even if our product candidates receive regulatory approval, they
may still face future development and regulatory difficulties and
any approved products will be subject to extensive post-approval
regulatory requirements.
If we obtain regulatory approval for a product candidate, it would
be subject to extensive ongoing requirements by the FDA and
comparable foreign regulatory authorities governing the
manufacture, quality control, further development, labeling,
packaging, storage, distribution, safety surveillance, import,
export, advertising, promotion, recordkeeping and reporting of
safety and other post-market information. The safety profile and
efficacy of any product will continue to be closely monitored by
the FDA and comparable foreign regulatory authorities after
approval. If the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities
become aware of new safety information after approval of any of our
product candidates, these regulatory authorities may require
labeling changes or the FDA may require establishment of a Risk
Evaluation Mitigation Strategy (“REMS”), or similar strategy,
impose significant restrictions on a product’s indicated uses or
marketing, impose ongoing requirements for potentially costly
post-approval studies or post-market surveillance. Progress reports
are required at quarterly intervals, every six months and at annual
intervals depending upon the country, and more frequently if
serious adverse events occur.
In addition, manufacturers of drugs and their facilities are
subject to continual review and periodic inspections by the FDA and
other regulatory authorities for compliance with cGMP regulations.
If a regulatory agency discovers previously unknown problems with a
product, such as adverse events of unanticipated severity or
frequency, or problems with the facility where the product is
manufactured, a regulatory agency may impose restrictions on that
product, the manufacturing facility or us, including requiring
recall or withdrawal of the product from the market or suspension
of manufacturing. If we, our product candidates or the
manufacturing facilities for our product candidates fail to comply
with cGMPs and other applicable regulatory requirements, the FDA
may, among other things:
•issue
warning letters;
•request
modifications to promotional materials or require us to provide
corrective information to healthcare practitioners;
•require
us to enter into a consent decree, which can include imposition of
various fines, reimbursements for inspection costs, required due
dates for specific actions and penalties for
noncompliance;
•seek
an injunction or impose civil or criminal penalties or monetary
fines;
•suspend
or withdraw regulatory approval;
•suspend
any ongoing clinical trials;
•refuse
to approve pending applications or supplements to applications
filed by us;
•suspend
or impose restrictions on operations, including costly new
manufacturing requirements; or
•seize
or detain products, refuse to permit the import or export of
products, or require us to initiate a product recall.
The occurrence of any event or penalty described above may inhibit
our ability to commercialize our products and generate
revenue.
The FDA and other regulatory agencies actively enforce the laws and
regulations prohibiting the promotion of off-label uses. If we are
found or alleged to have improperly promoted off-label uses, we may
become subject to significant liability.
The FDA and other regulatory agencies strictly regulate the
promotional claims that may be made about drug products. These
regulations include standards and restrictions for
direct-to-consumer advertising, industry-sponsored scientific and
educational activities, promotional activities involving the
internet and off-label promotion. For example, any regulatory
approval that the FDA grants is limited to those indications and
patient populations for which a drug is deemed to be safe and
effective by the FDA.
While physicians in the United States may choose, and are generally
permitted, to prescribe products for uses that are not described in
the product’s labeling and for uses that differ from those tested
in clinical trials and approved by the regulatory authorities, our
ability to promote any of our products candidates, if approved,
will be narrowly limited to those indications and populations that
are specifically approved by the FDA or such other regulatory
agencies, and if we are found to have promoted such off-label uses,
we may become subject to significant liability. For example, the
federal government has levied large civil and criminal fines
against companies for alleged improper promotion and has enjoined
several companies from engaging in off-label promotion. The
government has also required companies to enter into consent
decrees or imposed permanent injunctions under which specified
promotional conduct is changed or curtailed. If we cannot
successfully manage the promotion of our product candidates, if
approved, we could become subject to significant liability, which
would materially adversely affect our business and financial
condition.
A breakthrough therapy designation or Fast Track designation by the
FDA for our product candidates may not lead to a faster development
or regulatory review or approval process, and neither of these
designations increases the likelihood that our product candidates
will receive marketing approval.
We have obtained both breakthrough therapy and Fast Track
designations for mavorixafor for the treatment of adult patients
with WHIM and we may pursue those designations for other product
candidates as well. A breakthrough therapy is defined as a product
that is intended, alone or in combination with one or more other
drugs, to treat a serious or life-threatening condition, and
preliminary clinical evidence indicates that the product may
demonstrate substantial improvement over existing therapies on one
or more clinically significant endpoints. For product candidates
that have been designated as breakthrough therapies, interaction
and communication between the FDA and the sponsor of the trial can
help identify the most efficient path for clinical development
while minimizing the number of patients placed in ineffective
control regimens. A breakthrough therapy designation affords the
possibility of rolling review, enabling the FDA to review portions
of our marketing application before submission of a complete
application, and possibly, priority review.
If a drug or biologic candidate is intended for the treatment of a
serious or life-threatening condition or disease and the drug
demonstrates the potential to address unmet medical needs for the
condition, the sponsor may apply for Fast Track
designation.
Designation as a breakthrough therapy and Fast Track designation
are within the discretion of the FDA. Accordingly, even if we
believe that our product candidates meet the criteria for
designation as a breakthrough therapy or Fast Track designation,
the FDA may disagree and instead determine not to make such
designation. In any event, the receipt of either or both of a
breakthrough therapy designation or Fast Track designation for a
product candidate may not result in a faster development process,
review or approval compared to products considered for approval
under conventional FDA procedures and does not assure ultimate
approval by the FDA. In addition, even if one or more of our
product candidates qualify as breakthrough therapies or for Fast
Track designation, the FDA may later decide that the products no
longer meet the conditions for qualification.
It is possible that we may not be able to obtain or maintain orphan
drug designation or exclusivity for our drug candidates, which
could limit the potential profitability of our product
candidates.
Regulatory authorities in some jurisdictions, including the United
States and Europe, may designate drugs for the treatment or
prevention of rare diseases or conditions with relatively small
patient populations as orphan drugs. Under the Orphan Drug Act of
1983, the (“Orphan Drug Act”), the FDA may designate a product as
an orphan drug if it is a drug intended to treat a rare disease or
condition, which is defined as a patient population of fewer than
200,000 individuals in the United States. We received orphan drug
designation from the FDA for mavorixafor for the treatment of WHIM
syndrome in October 2018, and from the EMA in July 2019. We also
received orphan drug designation in the U.S. for mavorixafor for
the treatment of Waldenström’s macroglobulinemia in June 2022. If a
product with an orphan drug designation subsequently receives the
first marketing approval for the indication for which it has such
designation, the product is entitled to a seven-year period of
marketing exclusivity, which precludes the FDA from approving
another marketing application for the same drug for the same
indication during that time period with some exceptions. A similar
provision in the European Union allows 10 years of exclusivity in
Europe. The European exclusivity period can be reduced to six years
if a drug no longer meets the criteria for orphan drug designation
or if the drug is sufficiently profitable so that marketing
exclusivity is no longer justified. Orphan drug exclusivity may be
lost in both the United States and Europe under certain situations,
such as the inability of the holder of the orphan drug designation
to produce sufficient quantities of the drug to meet the needs of
patients with the rare disease or condition or for certain other
reasons.
The FDA has granted rare pediatric disease designation for
mavorixafor for the treatment of WHIM syndrome, however, there is
no guarantee that FDA approval of mavorixafor for WHIM will result
in a priority review voucher.
In 2012, Congress authorized the FDA to award priority review
vouchers to sponsors of certain rare pediatric disease product
applications. This program is designed to encourage development of
new drug and biological products for prevention and treatment of
certain rare pediatric diseases. Specifically, under this program,
a sponsor who receives an approval for a drug or biologic for a
“rare pediatric disease” that meets certain criteria may qualify
for a voucher that can be redeemed to receive a priority review of
a subsequent marketing application for a different product. The
sponsor of a rare pediatric disease drug product receiving a
priority review voucher may transfer (including by sale) the
voucher to another sponsor. The voucher may be further transferred
any number of times before the voucher is used, as long as the
sponsor making the transfer has not yet submitted the application.
The FDA may also revoke any priority review voucher if the rare
pediatric disease drug for which the voucher was awarded is not
marketed in the U.S. within one year following the date of
approval.
The FDA has granted rare pediatric disease designation for
mavorixafor for the treatment of WHIM syndrome, however, there is
no guarantee that we will be able to obtain a priority review
voucher, even if mavorixafor is approved by the FDA. Specifically,
FDA may not award the voucher to sponsors of marketing applications
unless either (i) the drug has received rare pediatric disease
designation as of September 30, 2024 and is then approved by the
FDA no later than September 30, 2026; or (ii) Congress reauthorizes
the program. Even though we received rare pediatric disease
designation by the current statutory deadline of September 30, 2024
we may not receive the voucher if we do not obtain approval by
September 2026. Even if legislation is enacted that extends the
date by which approval of the rare pediatric disease-designated
drug must obtain approval to receive a priority review voucher, we
may not obtain approval by that date, and even if we do, we may not
obtain a priority review voucher.
If we are unable to establish sales and marketing capabilities to
market and sell our product candidates, we may be unable to
generate any revenue.
Even if we are ultimately successful in obtaining regulatory
approval of mavorixafor for the treatment of WHIM syndrome or
another indication, in order to market and sell mavorixafor and our
other product candidates in development, we currently intend to
build and develop our own sales, marketing and distribution
operations. Although our management team has previous experience
with such efforts, there can be no assurance that we will be
successful in building these operations. If we are unable to
establish adequate sales, marketing and distribution capabilities,
we may not be able to generate product revenue and may not become
profitable. We will also be competing with many companies that
currently have extensive and well-funded sales and marketing
operations. If any of our product candidates are approved, we may
be unable to compete successfully against these more established
companies.
Our commercial success depends upon attaining significant market
acceptance of our product candidates, if approved, among hospitals,
physicians, patients and healthcare payors.
Even if we obtain regulatory approval for any of our product
candidates that we may develop or acquire in the future, the
product may not gain market acceptance among hospitals, physicians,
health care payors, patients and the medical community. Market
acceptance of any of our product candidates for which we receive
approval depends on a number of factors, including:
•the
efficacy and safety of such product candidates as demonstrated in
clinical trials;
•the
clinical indications for which the product candidate is
approved;
•acceptance
by major operators of hospitals, physicians and patients of the
product candidate as a safe and effective treatment, particularly
the ability of mavorixafor and our other product candidates to
establish themselves as a new standard of care in the treatment
paradigm for the indications that we are pursuing;
•the
potential and perceived advantages of our product candidates over
alternative treatments as compared to the relative costs of the
product candidates and alternative treatments;
•the
prevalence and severity of any side effects with respect to our
product candidates, including mavorixafor;
•our
ability to offer any approved products for sale at competitive
prices;
•the
timing of market introduction of our products as well as
competitive products;
•our
pricing, and the availability of coverage and adequate
reimbursement by third party payors and government
authorities;
•relative
convenience and ease of administration; and
•the
effectiveness of our sales and marketing efforts and those of our
potential future collaborators.
There may be delays in getting our product candidates, if approved,
on hospital or insurance formularies or limitations on coverages
that may be available in the early stages of commercialization for
newly approved drugs. If any of our product candidates are approved
but fail to achieve market acceptance among hospitals, physicians,
patients or health care payors, we will not be able to generate
significant revenues, which would have a material adverse effect on
our business, prospects, financial condition and results of
operations.
Product candidates may cause undesirable side effects that could
delay or prevent their marketing approval, limit the commercial
profile of an approved label, or result in significant negative
consequences following marketing approval, if any, including
marketing withdrawal.
Undesirable side effects caused by any of our product candidates
that we may develop or acquire could cause us or the FDA or other
regulatory authorities to interrupt, delay or halt our clinical
trials and could result in more restrictive labels or the delay or
denial of marketing approval by the FDA or other regulatory
authorities of such product candidates. Results of our clinical
trials could reveal a high and unacceptable severity and prevalence
of these or other side effects. In such an event, our trials could
be suspended or terminated and the FDA or comparable foreign
regulatory authorities could order us to cease further development
of or deny approval of our product candidates for any or all
targeted indications. In addition, any drug-related side effects
could affect patient recruitment or the ability of enrolled
patients to complete the trial or result in potential product
liability claims. Any of these occurrences may harm our business,
financial condition and prospects significantly.
Further, clinical trials by their nature utilize a sample of the
potential patient population. With a limited number of patients,
rare and severe side effects of our product candidates may only be
uncovered with a significantly larger number of patients exposed to
the product candidate. If our product candidates receive marketing
approval and we or others identify undesirable side effects caused
by such product candidates (or any other similar drugs) after such
approval, a number of potentially significant negative consequences
could result, including:
•regulatory
authorities may withdraw or limit their approval of such product
candidates;
•regulatory
authorities may require the addition of labeling statements, such
as a “boxed” warning or a contraindication;
•we
may be required to create a medication guide outlining the risks of
such side effects for distribution to patients;
•we
may be required to change the way such product candidates are
distributed or administered, conduct additional clinical trials or
change the labeling of the product candidates;
•regulatory
authorities may require a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy
plan to mitigate risks, which could include medication guides,
physician communication plans, or elements to assure safe use, such
as restricted distribution methods, patient registries and other
risk minimization tools;
•we
may be subject to regulatory investigations and government
enforcement actions;
•we
may decide to remove such product candidates from the marketplace
after they are approved;
•we
could be sued and held liable for injury caused to individuals
exposed to or taking our product candidates; and
•our
reputation may suffer.
We believe that any of these events could prevent us from achieving
or maintaining market acceptance of the affected product candidates
and could substantially increase the costs of commercializing our
product candidates, if approved, and significantly impact our
ability to successfully commercialize our product candidates and
generate revenues.
Any product candidate for which we obtain marketing approval could
be subject to marketing restrictions or withdrawal from the market,
and we may be subject to penalties if we fail to comply with
regulatory requirements or if we experience unanticipated problems
with our products.
Any product candidate for which we obtain marketing approval will
be subject to continual requirements of and review by the FDA and
other regulatory authorities. These requirements include
submissions of safety and other post-marketing information and
reports, registration and listing requirements, cGMP requirements,
quality assurance and corresponding maintenance of records and
documents and requirements regarding the distribution of samples to
physicians and recordkeeping. Even if marketing approval of a
product candidate is granted, the approval may be subject to
limitations on the indicated uses for which the product may be
marketed or to the conditions of approval, or contain requirements
for costly post-marketing testing and surveillance to monitor the
safety or efficacy of the medicine. The FDA closely regulates the
post-approval marketing and promotion of drugs to ensure that they
are marketed only for the approved indications and in accordance
with the provisions of the approved labeling.
In addition, later discovery of previously unknown problems with
our products, manufacturers or manufacturing processes, or failure
to comply with regulatory requirements, may result in, among other
things:
•restrictions
on such products, manufacturers or manufacturing
processes;
•restrictions
on the labeling, marketing, distribution or use of a
product;
•requirements
to conduct post-approval clinical trials;
•warning
or untitled letters;
•withdrawal
of the products from the market;
•refusal
to approve pending applications or supplements to approved
applications that we submit;
•recall
of products;
•fines,
restitution or disgorgement of profits or revenue;
•suspension
or withdrawal of marketing approvals;
•refusal
to permit the import or export of our products;
•product
seizure; and
•injunctions
or the imposition of civil or criminal penalties.
If, in the future, we are unable to establish sales and marketing
capabilities or to selectively enter into agreements with third
parties to sell and market our product candidates, we may not be
successful in commercializing our product candidates if and when
they are approved.
We do not have a sales or marketing infrastructure and have no
experience in the sale, marketing or distribution of pharmaceutical
products. To achieve commercial success for any approved product
for which we retain sales and marketing responsibilities, we must
either develop a sales and marketing organization or outsource
these functions to other third parties. In the future, we may
choose to build a focused sales and marketing infrastructure to
sell some of our product candidates if and when they are
approved.
There are risks involved both with establishing our own sales and
marketing capabilities and with entering into arrangements with
third parties to perform these services. For example, recruiting
and training a sales force is expensive and time consuming and
could delay any product launch. If the commercial launch of a
product candidate for which we recruit a sales force and establish
marketing capabilities is delayed or does not occur for any reason,
we would have prematurely or unnecessarily incurred these
commercialization expenses. This may be costly, and our investment
would be lost if we cannot retain or reposition our sales and
marketing personnel.
Factors that may inhibit our efforts to commercialize our product
candidates on our own include:
•our
inability to recruit and retain adequate numbers of effective sales
and marketing personnel;
•the
inability of sales personnel to obtain access to physicians or
educate adequate numbers of physicians on the benefits of
prescribing any future products; and
•unforeseen
costs and expenses associated with creating an independent sales
and marketing organization.
If we enter into arrangements with third parties to perform sales,
marketing and distribution services, our product revenue or the
profitability of these product revenue to us may be lower than if
we were to market and sell any products that we develop ourselves.
In addition, we may not be successful in entering into arrangements
with third parties to sell and market our product candidates or may
be unable to do so on terms that are favorable to us. We may have
little control over such third parties, and any of them may fail to
devote the necessary resources and attention to sell and market our
products effectively. If we do not establish sales and marketing
capabilities successfully, either on our own or in collaboration
with third parties, we will not be successful in commercializing
our product candidates.
We face substantial competition that may result in others
discovering, developing or commercializing products before or more
successfully than we do.
The development and commercialization of new drug products is
highly competitive. We face competition with respect to our current
product candidates, and will face competition with respect to any
product candidates that we may seek to develop or commercialize in
the future, from major pharmaceutical companies, specialty
pharmaceutical companies and biotechnology companies worldwide.
Some of these competitive products and therapies are based on
scientific approaches that are the same as or similar to our
approach and others are based on entirely different approaches.
Potential competitors also include academic institutions,
government agencies and other public and private research
organizations that conduct research, seek patent
protection
and establish collaborative arrangements for research, development,
manufacturing and commercialization.
We are developing our lead product candidate, mavorixafor, for the
treatment of chronic neutropenic disorders, including WHIM
syndrome. We are aware of other companies that are developing CXCR4
inhibitors that are in a similar stage of development as
mavorixafor, including BioLineRx, Noxxon, Upsher-Smith, Polyphor
and Glycomimetics. To our knowledge, there do not appear to be any
competitors with programs in development for WHIM syndrome or
chronic neutropenia disorders. With respect to chronic neutropenia,
filgrastim injections (human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor
(G-CSF)) and two biosimilars (Zarxio and Nivestym) are FDA-approved
to reduce the incidence and duration of after affects of severe
neutropenia (e.g.‚ fever‚ infections‚ oropharyngeal ulcers) in
symptomatic patients with congenital neutropenia‚ cyclic
neutropenia‚ or idiopathic neutropenia.
In many diseases, these drugs are administered in combination to
enhance efficacy. Some of the currently approved drug therapies are
branded and subject to patent protection, and others are available
on a generic basis. Many of these approved drugs are
well-established therapies and are widely accepted by physicians,
patients and third-party payors. Insurers and other third-party
payors may also encourage the use of generic products. We expect
that if any of our product candidates are approved, they will be
priced at a significant premium over competitive generic products.
This may make it difficult for us to achieve our business strategy
of using our product candidates in combination with existing
therapies or replacing existing therapies with our product
candidates.
Our competitors may develop products that are more effective, have
a better safety profile, are more convenient or less costly than
any that we are developing or that would render our product
candidates obsolete or non-competitive. Our competitors may also
obtain marketing approval from the FDA or other regulatory
authorities for their products sooner than we may obtain approval
for our product candidates, which could result in our competitors
establishing a strong market position before we are able to enter
the market.
Many of our competitors have significantly greater financial
resources and expertise in research and development, manufacturing,
preclinical testing, conducting clinical trials, obtaining
regulatory approvals and marketing approved products than we do.
Mergers and acquisitions in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology
industries may result in even more resources being concentrated
among a smaller number of our competitors. Smaller and other
early-stage companies may also prove to be significant competitors,
particularly through collaborative arrangements with large and
established companies. These third parties may compete with us in
recruiting and retaining qualified scientific and management
personnel, establishing clinical trial sites and patient
registration for clinical trials, as well as in acquiring
technologies complementary to, or necessary for, our
programs.
Even if we obtain and maintain approval for our product candidates
from the FDA, we may never obtain approval for our product
candidates outside of the United States, which would limit our
market opportunities and could harm our business.
Approval of a product candidate in the United States by the FDA
does not ensure approval of such product candidate by regulatory
authorities in other countries or jurisdictions, and approval by
one foreign regulatory authority does not ensure approval by
regulatory authorities in other foreign countries or by the FDA. If
regulatory approval is obtained, sales of any future product
candidates outside of the United States will be subject to foreign
regulatory requirements governing clinical trials and marketing
approval. Even if the FDA grants marketing approval for a product
candidate, comparable foreign regulatory authorities also must
approve the manufacturing and marketing of the product candidate in
those countries. Approval procedures vary among jurisdictions and
can involve requirements and administrative review periods
different from, and more onerous than, those in the United States,
including additional preclinical studies or clinical trials. In
many countries outside the United States, a product candidate must
be approved for reimbursement before it can be approved for sale in
that country. In some cases, the price that we intend to charge for
any product candidates, if approved, is also subject to approval.
Obtaining approval for any future product candidates in the
European Union from the European Commission following the opinion
of the European Medicines Agency, if we choose to submit a
marketing authorization application there, would be a lengthy and
expensive process. Even if a product candidate is approved, the FDA
or the European Commission, as the case may be, may limit the
indications for which the drug may be marketed, require extensive
warnings on the drug labeling or require expensive and
time-consuming additional clinical trials or reporting as
conditions of approval. Obtaining foreign regulatory approvals and
compliance with foreign regulatory requirements could result in
significant delays, difficulties and costs for us and could delay
or prevent the introduction of any future product candidates in
certain countries.
Further, clinical trials conducted in one country may not be
accepted by regulatory authorities in other countries. Also,
regulatory approval for our product candidates may be withdrawn. If
we fail to comply with the regulatory requirements, our target
market will be reduced and our ability to realize the full market
potential of our product candidates will be harmed and our
business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects
could be harmed.
If we seek approval to commercialize our product candidates outside
of the United States, a variety of risks associated with
international operations could harm our business.
If we seek approval of our product candidates outside of the United
States, we expect that we will be subject to additional risks in
commercialization including:
•different
regulatory requirements for approval of therapies in foreign
countries;
•reduced
protection for intellectual property rights;
•unexpected
changes in tariffs, trade barriers and regulatory
requirements;
•economic
weakness, including inflation, or political instability in
particular foreign economies and markets;
•compliance
with tax, employment, immigration and labor laws for employees
living or traveling abroad;
•foreign
currency fluctuations, which could result in increased operating
expenses and reduced revenues, and other obligations incident to
doing business in another country;
•foreign
reimbursement, pricing and insurance regimes;
•workforce
uncertainty in countries where labor unrest is more common than in
the United States;
•production
shortages resulting from any events affecting raw material supply
or manufacturing capabilities abroad; and
•business
interruptions resulting from geopolitical actions, including war
and terrorism, or natural disasters and public health epidemics,
such as the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.
We have no prior experience in these areas. In addition, there are
complex regulatory, tax, labor and other legal requirements imposed
by many of the individual countries in and outside of Europe with
which we will need to comply. Many biopharmaceutical companies have
found the process of marketing their own products in foreign
countries to be very challenging.
Even if we are able to commercialize mavorixafor or any other
product candidate that we develop, the product may become subject
to unfavorable pricing regulations, third-party reimbursement
practices or healthcare reform initiatives, which would harm our
business.
The laws and regulations that govern marketing approvals, pricing,
coverage and reimbursement for new drug products vary widely from
country to country. Current and future legislation may
significantly change the approval requirements in ways that could
involve additional costs and cause delays in obtaining approvals.
Some countries require approval of the sale price of a drug before
it can be marketed. In many countries, the pricing review period
begins after marketing or product licensing approval is granted
and, in some markets, prescription pharmaceutical pricing remains
subject to continuing governmental control even after initial
approval is granted. As a result, we might obtain marketing
approval for a product in a particular country, but then be subject
to price regulations that delay our commercial launch of the
product, possibly for lengthy time periods, and negatively impact
the revenues we are able to generate from the sale of the product
in that country. Adverse pricing limitations may hinder our ability
to recoup our investment in one or more product candidates, even if
our product candidates obtain marketing approval.
Our ability to commercialize mavorixafor or any other product
candidate successfully also will depend in part on the extent to
which coverage and adequate reimbursement for these products and
related treatments will be available from government health
administration authorities, private health insurers and other
organizations. Government authorities and other third-party payors,
such as private health insurers and health maintenance
organizations, decide which medications they will pay for and
establish reimbursement levels. A primary trend in the U.S. and
E.U. healthcare industries and elsewhere is cost
containment.
Government authorities and other third-party payors have attempted
to control costs by limiting coverage and the amount of
reimbursement for particular medications. Increasingly, third-party
payors are requiring that drug companies provide them with
predetermined discounts from list prices and are challenging the
prices charged for medical products. We cannot be sure that
coverage and reimbursement will be available for mavorixafor or any
other product that we commercialize and, if coverage and
reimbursement is available, the level of reimbursement.
Reimbursement may impact the demand for, or the price of, any
product candidate for which we obtain marketing approval. Obtaining
and maintaining adequate reimbursement for mavorixafor may be
particularly difficult because of the higher prices typically
associated with drugs directed at smaller populations of patients.
In addition, third-party payors are likely to impose strict
requirements for reimbursement of a higher priced drug, and any
launch of a competitive product is likely to create downward
pressure on the price initially charged. If reimbursement is not
available or is available only to a limited degree, we may not be
able to successfully commercialize any product candidate for which
we obtain marketing approval. Even if favorable coverage and
reimbursement status is attained for one or more products for which
we receive regulatory approval, less favorable coverage policies
and reimbursement rates may be implemented in the
future.
There may be significant delays in obtaining coverage and
reimbursement for newly approved drugs, and coverage may be more
limited than the purposes for which the drug is approved by the
applicable regulatory authority. Moreover, eligibility for coverage
and reimbursement does not imply that any drug will be paid for in
all cases or at a rate that covers our costs, including research,
development, intellectual property, manufacturing, sale and
distribution expenses. Interim reimbursement levels for new drugs,
if applicable, may also not be sufficient to cover our costs and
may not be made permanent.
Reimbursement rates may vary according to the use of the drug and
the clinical setting in which it is used, may be based on
reimbursement levels already set for lower cost drugs, and may be
incorporated into existing payments for other services. Net prices
for drugs may be reduced by mandatory discounts or rebates required
by government healthcare programs or private payors and by any
future relaxation of laws that presently restrict imports of drugs
from countries where they may be sold at lower prices than in the
United States. In the United States, third-party payors often rely
upon Medicare coverage policy and payment limitations in setting
their own reimbursement policies. In the European Union, reference
pricing systems and other measures may lead to cost containment and
reduced prices. Our inability to promptly obtain coverage and
adequate reimbursement rates from both government-funded and
private payors for any approved products that we develop could have
a material adverse effect on our operating results, our ability to
raise capital needed to develop product candidates and
commercialize products and our overall financial
condition.
Governments outside the United States tend to impose strict price
controls, which may adversely affect our revenues, if
any.
In some countries, particularly the countries of the European
Union, the pricing of prescription pharmaceuticals is subject to
governmental control. In these countries, pricing negotiations with
governmental authorities can take considerable time after the
receipt of marketing approval for a product. To obtain
reimbursement or pricing approval in some countries, we may be
required to conduct a clinical trial that compares the
cost-effectiveness of our product candidate to other available
therapies. If reimbursement of our products is unavailable or
limited in scope or amount, or if pricing is set at unsatisfactory
levels, our business could be harmed, possibly
materially.
Product liability lawsuits against us could cause us to incur
substantial liabilities and could limit the commercialization of
any product candidates we may develop.
We face an inherent risk of product liability exposure related to
the testing of our product candidates in human clinical trials and
will face an even greater risk with respect to commercial sales of
any products that we may develop. If we cannot successfully defend
ourselves against claims that our product candidates or products
caused injuries, we could incur substantial liabilities. Regardless
of merit or eventual outcome, liability claims may result
in:
•reduced
resources of our management to pursue our business
strategy;
•decreased
demand for any products that we may develop;
•injury
to our reputation and significant negative media
attention;
•withdrawal
of clinical trial participants;
•significant
costs to defend any related litigation;
•substantial
monetary awards to trial participants or patients;
•loss
of revenue;
•increased
insurance costs; and
•the
inability to commercialize any products that we may
develop.
Although we maintain clinical trial insurance coverage, it may not
be adequate to cover all liabilities that we may incur. We
anticipate that we will need to increase our insurance coverage as
we continue clinical trials or begin commercialization of any
products. Insurance coverage is increasingly expensive. We may not
be able to obtain or maintain insurance coverage at a reasonable
cost or in an amount adequate to satisfy any liability that may
arise.
Risks Related to Government Regulation
Our relationships with customers and third-party payors will be
subject to applicable anti-kickback, fraud and abuse and other
healthcare laws and regulations, which could expose us to
significant penalties, including administrative, civil and criminal
penalties, contractual damages, reputational harm and diminished
profits and future earnings.
Although we do not currently have any drugs on the market, we are,
and once we begin commercializing our product candidates, we will
be subject to additional healthcare statutory and regulatory
requirements and enforcement by the federal government and the
states and foreign governments in the jurisdictions in which we
conduct our business. Healthcare providers and third-party payors
will play a primary role in the recommendation and prescription of
any product candidates for which we obtain marketing
approval. Our current and future arrangements with third-party
payors and customers may expose us to broadly applicable fraud and
abuse and other healthcare laws and regulations that may constrain
the business or financial arrangements and relationships through
which we research, as well as market, sell and distribute any
products for which we obtain marketing approval. Restrictions under
applicable federal and state healthcare laws and regulations
include the following:
•the
federal Anti-Kickback Statute prohibits, among other things,
persons and entities from knowingly and willfully soliciting,
offering, receiving or paying remuneration, directly or indirectly,
in cash or in kind, to induce or reward, or in return for, either
the referral of an individual for, or the purchase, order or
recommendation of, any good or service, for which payment may be
made under a federal healthcare program such as Medicare and
Medicaid; a person or entity does not need to have actual knowledge
of the statute or specific intent to violate it in order to have
committed a violation;
•the
federal false claims laws impose criminal and civil penalties,
including civil whistleblower or qui tam actions, against
individuals or entities for, among other things, knowingly
presenting, or causing to be presented, to the federal government,
claims for payment that are false or fraudulent or making a false
statement to avoid, decrease or conceal an obligation to pay money
to the federal government; in addition, the government may assert
that a claim including items and services resulting from a
violation of the federal Anti-Kickback Statute constitutes a false
or fraudulent claim for purposes of the False Claims
Act;
•the
federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996
(“HIPAA”) imposes criminal and civil liability for, among other
things, executing a scheme to defraud any healthcare benefit
program, or knowingly and willfully falsifying, concealing or
covering up a material fact or making any materially false
statement in connection with the delivery of or payment for
healthcare benefits, items or services; similar to the federal
Anti-Kickback Statute, a person or entity does not need to have
actual knowledge of the statute or specific intent to violate it in
order to have committed a violation;
•the
federal physician payment transparency requirements, sometimes
referred to as the “Sunshine Act” under the Patient Protection and
Affordable Care Act, as amended by the Health Care and Education
Reconciliation Act of 2010 (collectively the “ACA”), require
certain manufacturers of drugs, devices, biologics and medical
supplies that are reimbursable under Medicare, Medicaid, or the
Children’s Health Insurance Program to report to the Centers for
Medicare & Medicaid Services (“CMS”), information related to
payments and other transfers of value to physicians, (defined to
include doctors, dentists, optometrists, podiatrists and
chiropractors), certain other healthcare professionals (such as
physician assistants and nurse practitioners), and teaching
hospitals and the ownership and investment interests of physicians
and their immediate family members in such
manufacturers;
•HIPAA,
as amended by the Health Information Technology for Economic and
Clinical Health Act and its implementing regulations, which also
imposes obligations on certain covered entity healthcare providers,
health plans, and healthcare clearinghouses as well as their
business associates that perform certain services involving the use
or disclosure of individually identifiable health information, and
their subcontractors that use, disclose, or otherwise process
individually identifiable health information, including mandatory
contractual terms, with respect to safeguarding the privacy,
security and transmission of individually identifiable health
information;
•analogous
state and foreign laws and regulations, such as state anti-kickback
and false claims laws, may apply to sales or marketing arrangements
and claims involving healthcare items or services reimbursed by
non-governmental third-party payors, including private
insurers;
•some
state laws require pharmaceutical companies to comply with the
pharmaceutical industry’s voluntary compliance guidelines and the
relevant compliance guidance promulgated by the federal government
and may require drug manufacturers to report information related to
payments and other transfers of value to physicians and other
healthcare providers, drug pricing or marketing
expenditures;
•state
and local laws that require the registration of pharmaceutical
sales representatives; and
•state
and foreign laws also govern the privacy and security of health
information in certain circumstances, many of which differ from
each other in significant ways and often are not preempted by
HIPAA, thus complicating compliance efforts.
Efforts to ensure that our business arrangements with third parties
will comply with applicable healthcare laws and regulations will
involve substantial costs. It is possible that governmental
authorities will conclude that our business practices may not
comply with current or future statutes, regulations or case law
involving applicable fraud and abuse or other healthcare laws and
regulations. If our operations are found to be in violation of any
of these laws or any other governmental regulations that may apply
to it, we may be subject to significant civil, criminal and
administrative penalties, damages, fines, imprisonment, exclusion
from government funded healthcare programs, such as Medicare and
Medicaid, additional reporting requirements and/or oversight if we
become subject to a corporate integrity agreement or similar
agreement to resolve allegations of non-compliance with these laws
and the curtailment or restructuring of our operations. If any of
the physicians or other healthcare providers or entities with whom
we expect to do business is found to be not in compliance with
applicable laws, they may be subject to significant criminal, civil
or administrative sanctions, including exclusions from government
funded healthcare programs.
Current and future legislation may increase the difficulty and cost
for us to obtain marketing approval of and commercialize our
product candidates and affect the prices we may
obtain.
In the United States and some foreign jurisdictions, there have
been a number of legislative and regulatory changes and proposed
changes regarding the healthcare system that could prevent or delay
marketing approval of our product candidates, restrict
post-approval activities and affect our ability to sell profitably
any product candidates for which we obtain marketing
approval.
In the United States, Medicare covers certain drug purchases by the
elderly and eligible disabled people and introduced a reimbursement
methodology based on average sales prices for
physician-administered drugs. In addition, Medicare may limit the
number of drugs that will be covered in any therapeutic class.
Ongoing cost reduction initiatives and future laws could decrease
the coverage and price that we will receive for any approved
products. While Medicare beneficiaries are limited to most elderly
and certain disabled individual, private payors often follow
Medicare coverage policy and payment limitations in setting their
own payment rates.
In March 2010, the ACA became law. The ACA is a sweeping law
intended to broaden access to health insurance, reduce or constrain
the growth of healthcare spending, enhance remedies against fraud
and abuse, add new transparency requirements for the healthcare and
health insurance industries, impose new taxes and fees on the
health industry and impose additional health policy reforms. Among
the provisions of the ACA of importance to our product candidates
are the following:
•an
annual, nondeductible fee on any entity that manufactures or
imports specified branded prescription drugs and biologic
products;
•an
increase in the statutory minimum rebates a manufacturer must pay
under the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program;
•expansion
of healthcare fraud and abuse laws, including the False Claims Act
and the Anti-Kickback Statute, new government investigative powers,
and enhanced penalties for noncompliance;
•a
new Medicare Part D coverage gap discount program, in which
manufacturers must agree to offer 70% point-of-sale discounts off
negotiated prices;
•extension
of manufacturers’ Medicaid rebate liability;
•expansion
of eligibility criteria for Medicaid programs;
•expansion
of the entities eligible for discounts under the Public Health
Service Act’s pharmaceutical pricing program;
•new
requirements to report to CMS financial arrangements with
physicians, as defined by such law, and teaching
hospitals;
•a
new requirement to annually report to FDA drug samples that
manufacturers and distributors provide to physicians;
and
•a
new Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute to oversee,
identify priorities in, and conduct comparative clinical
effectiveness research, along with funding for such
research.
There have been challenges to certain aspects of the ACA. In
addition, other legislative changes have been proposed and adopted
since the ACA was enacted. For example, on June 17, 2021, the U.S.
Supreme Court dismissed a challenge on procedural grounds that
argued the ACA is unconstitutional in its entirety because the
“individual mandate” was repealed by Congress. Prior to the U.S.
Supreme Court ruling, on January 28, 2021, President Biden issued
an executive order to initiate a special enrollment period for
purposes of obtaining health insurance coverage through the ACA
marketplace. The executive order also instructed certain
governmental agencies to review and reconsider their existing
policies and rules that limit access to healthcare, including among
others, reexamining Medicaid demonstration projects and waiver
programs that include work requirements, and policies that create
unnecessary barriers to obtaining access to health insurance
coverage through Medicaid or the ACA. In addition, on
August
16, 2022, President Biden signed the Inflation Reduction Act of
2022 into law, which among other things, extends enhanced subsidies
for individuals purchasing health insurance coverage in ACA
marketplaces through plan year 2025. The IRA also eliminates the
“donut hole” under the Medicare Part D program beginning in 2025 by
significantly lowering the beneficiary maximum out-of-pocket cost
and creating a new manufacturer discount program.It is possible
that the ACA will be subject to judicial or Congressional
challenges in the future. It is unclear how any such challenges and
the healthcare reform measures of the Biden administration will
impact the ACA and our business.
There has also been heightened governmental scrutiny over the
manner in which manufacturers set prices for their marketed
products, which has resulted in several Presidential executive
orders, Congressional inquiries and proposed bills designed to,
among other things, bring more transparency to product pricing,
review the relationship between pricing and manufacturer patient
programs, and reform government program reimbursement methodologies
for drug products. For example, in July 2021, the Biden
administration released an executive order, “Promoting Competition
in the American Economy,” with multiple provisions aimed at
prescription drugs. In response to Biden’s executive order, on
September 9, 2021, HHS released a Comprehensive Plan for Addressing
High Drug Prices that outlines principles for drug pricing reform
and sets out a variety of potential legislative policies that
Congress could pursue as well as potential administrative actions
HHS can take to advance these principles. In addition, the IRA,
among other things, (i) directs HHS to negotiate the price of
certain high-expenditure, single-source drugs and biologics covered
under Medicare, and subject drug manufacturers to civil monetary
penalties and a potential excise tax by offering a price that is
not equal to or less than the negotiated “maximum fair price” for
such drugs and biologics under the law, and (ii) imposes rebates
with respect to certain drugs and biologics covered under Medicare
Part B or Medicare Part D to penalize price increases that outpace
inflation. The IRA permits HHS to implement many of these
provisions through guidance, as opposed to regulation, for the
initial years. These provisions will take effect progressively
starting in fiscal year 2023, although they may be subject to legal
challenges. It is currently unclear how the IRA will be implemented
but is likely to have a significant impact on the pharmaceutical
industry. Further, the Biden administration released an additional
executive order on October 14, 2022, directing HHS to submit a
report on how the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation can
be further leveraged to test new models for lowering drug costs for
Medicare and Medicaid beneficiaries. It is unclear whether this
executive order or similar policy initiatives will be implemented
in the future. Further, Congress is considering additional health
reform measures. At the state level, legislatures have increasingly
passed legislation and implemented regulations designed to control
pharmaceutical and biological product pricing, including price or
patient reimbursement constraints, discounts, restrictions on
certain product access and marketing cost
disclosure and transparency measures, and, in some cases, designed
to encourage importation from other countries and bulk
purchasing.
We cannot predict what healthcare reform initiatives may be adopted
in the future. However, we expect that the ACA, as well as other
healthcare reform measures that may be adopted in the future, may
result in more rigorous coverage criteria and in additional
downward pressure on the price that we will receive for any
approved product. These new laws may result in additional
reductions in Medicare and other healthcare funding. Any reduction
in payments from Medicare or other government programs may result
in a similar reduction in payments from private payors. The
implementation of cost containment measures or other healthcare
reforms may prevent us from being able to generate revenue, attain
profitability, or commercialize our products.
Legislative and regulatory proposals have been made to expand
post-approval requirements and restrict sales and promotional
activities for pharmaceutical products. We cannot be sure whether
additional legislative changes will be enacted, or whether FDA
regulations, guidance or interpretations will be changed, or what
the impact of such changes on the marketing approvals, if any, of
our product candidates may be. In addition, increased scrutiny by
the U.S. Congress of the FDA’s approval process may significantly
delay or prevent marketing approval, as well as subject us to more
stringent product labeling and post-marketing conditions and other
requirements.
We are subject to anti-corruption laws, as well as export control
laws, customs laws, sanctions laws and other laws governing our
operations. If we fail to comply with these laws, we could be
subject to civil or criminal penalties, other remedial measures and
legal expenses, which could adversely affect its business, results
of operations and financial condition.
Our operations are subject to anti-corruption laws, including the
Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (“FCPA”) and other anti-corruption
laws that apply in countries where we do business and may do
business in the future. The FCPA and these other laws generally
prohibit us, our officers and employees and intermediaries from
bribing, being bribed or making other prohibited payments to
government officials or other persons to obtain or retain business
or gain some other business advantage. We may in the future operate
in jurisdictions that pose a high risk of potential FCPA
violations, and may participate in collaborations and relationships
with third parties whose actions could potentially subject us to
liability under the FCPA or local anti-corruption laws. In
addition, we cannot predict the nature, scope or effect of future
regulatory requirements to which its international operations might
be subject or the manner in which existing laws might be
administered or interpreted.
We are also subject to other laws and regulations governing our
international operations, including regulations administered by the
U.S. government and authorities in the European Union or the United
Kingdom, including applicable export control regulations, economic
sanctions on countries and persons, customs requirements and
currency exchange regulations, which we collectively refer to as
Trade Control Laws.
There is no assurance that we will be completely effective in
ensuring our compliance with all applicable anti-corruption laws,
including the FCPA or other legal requirements, including Trade
Control Laws. If we are not in compliance with the FCPA and other
anti-corruption laws or Trade Control Laws, we may be subject to
criminal and civil penalties, disgorgement and other sanctions and
remedial measures, and legal expenses, which could have an adverse
impact on our business, financial condition, results of operations
and liquidity. Likewise, any investigation of any potential
violations of the FCPA, other anti-corruption laws or Trade Control
Laws by U.S. or other authorities could also have an adverse impact
on our reputation, business, results of operations and financial
condition.
Inadequate funding for the FDA, the SEC and other government
agencies could hinder their ability to hire and retain key
leadership and other personnel, prevent new products and services
from being developed or commercialized in a timely manner or
otherwise prevent those agencies from performing normal business
functions on which the operation of our business may rely, which
could negatively impact our business.
The ability of the FDA to review and approve new products can be
affected by a variety of factors, including government budget and
funding levels, the ability to hire and retain key personnel and
accept the payment of user fees, and statutory, regulatory and
policy changes. Average review times at the agency have fluctuated
in recent years as a result. In addition, government funding of the
SEC and other government agencies on which our operations may rely,
including those that fund research and development activities is
subject to the political process, which is inherently fluid and
unpredictable.
Disruptions at the FDA and other agencies may also slow the time
necessary for new drugs to be reviewed and/or approved by necessary
government agencies, which would adversely affect our business. For
example, over the last several years the U.S. government has shut
down several times and certain regulatory agencies, such as the FDA
and the SEC, have had to furlough critical FDA, SEC and other
government employees and stop critical activities. If a prolonged
government shutdown occurs, it could significantly impact the
ability of the FDA to timely review and process our regulatory
submissions, which could have a material adverse effect on our
business. Further, in our operations as a public company, future
government shutdowns could impact our ability to access the public
markets and obtain necessary capital in order to properly
capitalize and continue our operations.
Risks Related to Our Dependence on Third Parties
We have no experience manufacturing our product candidates on a
large clinical or commercial scale and have no manufacturing
facility. We are currently dependent on a single third party
manufacturer for the manufacture of mavorixafor, the active
pharmaceutical ingredient (“API”), and a single manufacturer of
mavorixafor finished drug product capsules. If we experience
problems with these third parties, the manufacturing of mavorixafor
could be delayed, which could harm our results of
operations.
To meet our projected needs for clinical supplies to support our
activities through regulatory approval and commercial
manufacturing, the manufacturer with whom we currently work will
need to increase its frequency and/or scale of production or we
will need to find additional or alternative manufacturers. We have
not yet secured alternate suppliers in the event the current
manufacturer we utilize is unable to meet demand, or if otherwise
we experience any problems with them. If such problems arise and we
are unable to arrange for alternative third-party manufacturing
sources, we are unable to find an alternative third party capable
of reproducing the existing manufacturing method or we are unable
to do so on commercially reasonable terms or in a timely manner, we
may not be able to complete development of our product candidates,
or market or distribute them.
Reliance on third-party manufacturers entails risks to which we
would not be subject if we manufactured our product candidates
ourselves, including reliance on the third party for regulatory
compliance and quality assurance, the possibility of breach of the
manufacturing agreement by the third party because of factors
beyond our control (including a failure to synthesize and
manufacture our product candidates or any products that we may
eventually commercialize in accordance with our specifications),
and the possibility of termination or nonrenewal of the agreement
by the third party, based on its own business priorities, at a time
that is costly or damaging to us. In addition, the FDA and other
regulatory authorities require that our product candidates and any
products that we may eventually commercialize be manufactured
according to cGMP and similar foreign standards. Drug manufacturers
and other entities involved in the manufacture and distribution of
approved drugs are required to register their establishments with
the FDA and some state agencies, and are subject to periodic
unannounced inspections for compliance with cGMP requirements.
Changes to the manufacturing process are strictly regulated and
often require prior FDA or other regulatory authority approval
before being implemented. FDA requirements also require
investigation and correction of any deviations from cGMP and impose
reporting and documentation requirements upon us and any
third-party manufacturers that we may decide to use. Accordingly,
the manufacturers must continue to expend time, money and effort in
the areas of production and quality
control to maintain cGMP compliance. Any failure by our third-party
manufacturers to comply with cGMP or failure to scale up
manufacturing processes, including any failure to deliver
sufficient quantities of product candidates or products if they are
approved in a timely manner, could lead to a delay in, or failure
to obtain, regulatory approval of any of our product candidates. In
addition, such failure could be the basis for the FDA to issue a
warning letter, withdraw approvals for product candidates
previously granted to us, or take other regulatory or legal action,
including recall or seizure, total or partial suspension of
production, suspension of ongoing clinical trials, refusal to
approve pending applications or supplemental applications,
detention of product, refusal to permit the import or export of
products, injunction, or imposing civil and criminal
penalties.
Our current manufacturer and any future manufacturers may not be
able to manufacture our product candidates at a cost or in
quantities or in a timely manner necessary to make commercially
successful products. If we successfully commercialize any of our
product candidates, we may be required to establish large-scale
commercial manufacturing capabilities. In addition, as our drug
development pipeline increases and matures, we will have a greater
need for clinical study and commercial manufacturing capacity. We
have no experience manufacturing pharmaceutical products on a
commercial scale and some of these manufacturers will need to
increase their scale of production to meet our projected needs for
commercial manufacturing, the satisfaction of which may not be met
on a timely basis.
We rely on third-party CROs to conduct our preclinical studies and
clinical trials. If these CROs do not successfully carry out their
contractual duties or meet expected deadlines, we may not be able
to obtain regulatory approval for or commercialize our product
candidates and our business could be substantially
harmed.
We have relied upon and plan to continue to rely upon third-party
contract research organizations, or CROs, and clinical data
management organizations to monitor and manage data for our ongoing
preclinical and clinical programs. Although we control only certain
aspects of their activities, we are responsible for ensuring that
each of our studies is conducted in accordance with the applicable
protocol and legal, regulatory and scientific standards, and our
reliance on the CROs does not relieve us of our regulatory
responsibilities. We also rely on third parties to conduct our
preclinical studies in accordance with Good Laboratory Practice, or
GLP, requirements and the Laboratory Animal Welfare Act of 1966
requirements. We, our CROs and our clinical trial sites are
required to comply with regulations and current Good Clinical
Practices, or GCP, and comparable foreign requirements to ensure
that the health, safety and rights of patients are protected in
clinical trials, and that data integrity is assured. Regulatory
authorities ensure compliance with GCP requirements through
periodic inspections of trial sponsors and trial sites. If we, any
of our CROs or our clinical trial sites fail to comply with
applicable GCP requirements, the clinical data generated in our
clinical trials or a specific site may be deemed unreliable and the
FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities may require us to
perform additional clinical trials before approving our marketing
applications.
Our CROs are not our employees, and except for remedies available
to us under our agreements with such CROs, we cannot control
whether or not they devote sufficient time and resources to our
ongoing clinical and preclinical programs. If CROs do not
successfully carry out their contractual obligations or meet
expected timelines or if the quality or accuracy of the clinical
data they obtain is compromised due to the failure to adhere to our
clinical protocols, regulatory requirements or for other reasons,
our clinical trials may be extended, delayed or terminated and we
may not be able to obtain regulatory approval for or successfully
commercialize our product candidates. As a result, our results of
operations and the commercial prospects for our product candidates
would be harmed, our costs could increase and our ability to
generate revenues could be delayed.
Disruptions in our supply chain could delay the commercial launch
of our product candidates.
Any significant disruption in our supplier relationships could harm
our business. We currently rely on a single source supplier of
mavorixafor, as well a single supplier for the finished product
capsules for mavorixafor. If either of these single source
suppliers suffers a major natural or man-made disaster at its
manufacturing facility, we would not be able to manufacture
mavorixafor on a commercial scale until a qualified alternative
supplier is identified. Although alternative sources of supply
exist, the number of third party suppliers with the necessary
manufacturing and regulatory expertise and facilities is limited,
and it could be expensive and take a significant amount of time to
arrange for alternative suppliers. Any significant delay in the
supply of a product candidate or its key materials for an ongoing
clinical study could considerably delay completion of our clinical
studies, product testing and potential regulatory approval of our
product candidates. If we or our manufacturers are unable to
purchase these key materials after regulatory approval has been
obtained for our product candidates, the commercial launch of our
product candidates would be delayed, which would impair our ability
to generate revenues from the sale of our product
candidates.
Our employees, principal investigators, CROs and consultants may
engage in misconduct or other improper activities, including
noncompliance with regulatory standards and requirements, which
could have a material adverse effect on our business.
We are exposed to the risk that our employees, principal
investigators, CROs and consultants may engage in fraudulent
conduct or other illegal activity. Misconduct by these parties
could include intentional failures to comply with FDA regulations
or similar regulations of comparable foreign regulatory
authorities, to provide accurate information to the FDA or
comparable foreign regulatory authorities, to comply with
manufacturing standards we have established, to comply with federal
and state healthcare fraud and abuse laws and regulations and
similar laws and regulations established and enforced by comparable
foreign regulatory
authorities, to report financial information or data accurately or
to disclose unauthorized activities to us. In particular, sales,
marketing and business arrangements in the healthcare industry are
subject to extensive laws and regulations intended to prevent
fraud, kickbacks, self-dealing and other abusive practices. These
laws and regulations may restrict or prohibit a wide range of
pricing, discounting, marketing and promotion, sales commission,
customer incentive programs and other business arrangements.
Employee or third party misconduct could also involve the improper
use of information obtained in the course of clinical trials, which
could result in regulatory sanctions and serious harm to our
reputation. It is not always possible to identify and deter
employee misconduct and the precautions we take to detect and
prevent this activity, such as employee training, may not be
effective in controlling unknown or unmanaged risks or losses or in
protecting us from governmental investigations or other actions or
lawsuits stemming from a failure to be in compliance with such laws
or regulations. If any such actions are instituted against us, and
we are not successful in defending ourselves or asserting our
rights, those actions could have a significant impact on our
business and results of operations, including the imposition of
significant fines or other sanctions.
We have established, and may seek to selectively establish in the
future, collaborations, and, if we are unable to establish them on
commercially reasonable terms, we may have to alter our development
and commercialization plans.
Our drug development programs and the potential commercialization
of our product candidates will require substantial additional cash
to fund expenses. For some of our product candidates, we may decide
to collaborate with pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies for
the development and potential commercialization of those product
candidates.
We face significant competition in seeking appropriate
collaborators. Whether we reach a definitive agreement for a
collaboration will depend, among other things, upon our assessment
of the collaborator’s resources and expertise, the terms and
conditions of the proposed collaboration and the proposed
collaborator’s evaluation of a number of factors. Those factors may
include the design or results of clinical trials, the likelihood of
approval by the FDA or similar regulatory authorities outside the
United States, the potential market for the subject product
candidate, the costs and complexities of manufacturing and
delivering such product candidate to patients, the potential of
competing products, the existence of uncertainty with respect to
our ownership of technology, which can exist if there is a
challenge to such ownership without regard to the merits of the
challenge and industry and market conditions generally. The
collaborator may also consider alternative product candidates for
similar indications that may be available to collaborate on and
whether such a collaboration could be more attractive than the one
with us for our product candidates.
We may depend on such collaborations for the development and
commercialization of our product candidates. If those
collaborations are not successful, we may not be able to capitalize
on the market potential of our product candidates.
We have, and may selectively seek in the future, third-party
collaborators for the development and commercialization of our
product candidates. Our likely collaborators for any collaboration
arrangements include large and mid-size pharmaceutical companies,
regional and national pharmaceutical companies and biotechnology
companies. If we enter into any such arrangements with any third
parties, we will likely have limited control over the amount and
timing of resources that our collaborators dedicate to the
development or commercialization of our product candidates. Our
ability to generate revenue from these arrangements will depend on
our collaborators’ abilities to successfully perform the functions
assigned to them in these arrangements.
Collaborations involving our product candidates pose many risks to
us, including that:
•collaborators
have significant discretion in determining the efforts and
resources that they will apply to these
collaborations;
•collaborators
may not pursue development and commercialization of our product
candidates or may elect not to continue or renew development or
commercialization programs based on clinical trial results, changes
in the collaborator’s strategic focus or available funding or
external factors such as an acquisition that diverts resources or
creates competing priorities;
•collaborators
may delay clinical trials, provide insufficient funding for a
clinical trial program, stop a clinical trial or abandon a product
candidate, repeat or conduct new clinical trials or require a new
formulation of a product candidate for clinical
testing;
•collaborators
could independently develop, or develop with third parties,
products that compete directly or indirectly with our product
candidates or products if the collaborators believe that
competitive products are more likely to be successfully developed
or can be commercialized under terms that are more economically
attractive than ours;
•collaborators
with marketing and distribution rights to one or more product
candidates or products may not commit sufficient resources to the
marketing and distribution of such drugs;
•collaborators
may not properly maintain or defend our intellectual property
rights or may use our proprietary information in such a way as to
invite litigation that could jeopardize or invalidate our
proprietary information or expose us to potential
litigation;
•disputes
may arise between the collaborators and us that result in the delay
or termination of the research, development or commercialization of
our product candidates or products or that result in costly
litigation or arbitration that diverts management attention and
resources;
•we
may lose certain valuable rights under circumstances identified in
our collaborations if we undergo a change of control;
•collaborations
may be terminated and, if terminated, may result in a need for
additional capital to pursue further development or
commercialization of the applicable product candidates;
and
•collaboration
agreements may not lead to development or commercialization of
product candidates in the most efficient manner or at all. In
addition, if a future collaborator of ours were to be involved in a
business combination, the continued pursuit and emphasis on our
product development or commercialization program under such
collaboration could be delayed, diminished or
terminated.
Risks Related to Our Intellectual Property
Recent laws and rulings by U.S. courts make it difficult to predict
how patents will be issued or enforced in our
industry.
Changes in either the patent laws or interpretation of the patent
laws in the United States and other countries may have a
significant impact on our ability to protect our technology and
enforce our intellectual property rights.
There have been numerous changes over the past ten years to the
patent laws and to the rules of the United States Patent and
Trademark Office (“USPTO”), which may have a significant impact on
our ability to protect our technology and enforce our intellectual
property rights. For example, the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act
(“AIA”), which was signed into law in 2011, includes a transition
from a “first-to-invent” system to a “first-to-file” system, and
changes the way issued patents are challenged. Certain changes,
such as the institution of inter partes review proceedings, that
allow third parties to challenge newly issued patents, came into
effect on September 16, 2012. The burden of proof required for
challenging a patent in these proceedings is lower than in district
court litigation, and patents in the biologics and pharmaceuticals
industry have been successfully challenged using these new
post-grant challenges. In addition, the U.S. Supreme Court has
ruled on several patent cases in recent years, either narrowing the
scope of patent protection available in specified circumstances or
weakening the rights of patent owners in specified situations.
Depending on decisions by the U.S. Congress, the federal courts,
and the USPTO, these substantive changes to patent law associated
with the AIA may further weaken our ability to obtain new patents
or to enforce our existing patents and patents that we might obtain
in the future, all of which could harm our business.
Furthermore, the patent positions of companies engaged in the
development and commercialization of biologics and pharmaceuticals
are particularly uncertain. We cannot assure you that our efforts
to seek patent protection for our technology and products will not
be negatively impacted by the changes described above, future
rulings in district court cases or changes in guidance or
procedures issued by the USPTO. We cannot fully predict what impact
the Supreme Court’s decisions may have on the ability of life
science companies to obtain or enforce patents relating to their
products and technologies in the future.
Moreover, although the Supreme Court has held in Myriad that
isolated segments of naturally occurring DNA are not
patent-eligible subject matter, certain third parties could allege
that activities that we may undertake infringe other gene-related
patent claims, and we may deem it necessary to defend ourselves
against these claims by asserting non-infringement and/or
invalidity positions, or pay to obtain a license to these claims.
In any of the foregoing or in other situations involving
third-party intellectual property rights, if we are unsuccessful in
defending against claims of patent infringement, we could be forced
to pay damages or be subjected to an injunction that would prevent
us from utilizing the patented subject matter. Such outcomes could
harm our business.
If we are unable to protect our intellectual property rights, our
competitive position could be harmed.
We depend on our ability to protect our proprietary technology. We
rely on trade secret, patent, copyright and trademark laws, and
confidentiality, licensing and other agreements with employees and
third parties, all of which offer only limited protection. Our
success depends in large part on our ability to obtain and maintain
patent protection in the United States and other countries with
respect to our proprietary technology and products. Where we have
the right to do so under our license agreements, we seek to protect
our proprietary position by filing patent applications in the
United States and abroad related to our novel technologies and
products that are important to our business.
The patent positions of biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies
generally are highly uncertain, involve complex legal and factual
questions and have in recent years been the subject of much
litigation. As a result, the issuance, scope, validity,
enforceability and commercial value of our patents, including those
patent rights licensed to us by third parties, are highly
uncertain.
The steps we have taken to police and protect our proprietary
rights may not be adequate to preclude misappropriation of our
proprietary information or infringement of our intellectual
property rights, both inside and outside the United States. The
rights already granted under any of our currently issued patents
and those that may be granted under future issued patents may not
provide us with the proprietary protection or competitive
advantages that we are seeking. If we are unable to obtain and
maintain patent protection for our technology and products, or if
the scope of the patent protection obtained is not sufficient, our
competitors could develop and commercialize technology and products
similar or superior to ours, and our ability to successfully
commercialize our technology and products may be adversely
affected.
With respect to patent rights, we do not know whether any of the
pending patent applications for any of our product candidates will
result in the issuance of patents that protect our technology or
products, or which will effectively prevent others from
commercializing competitive technologies and products. Our pending
applications cannot be enforced against third parties practicing
the technology claimed in such applications unless and until a
patent issues from such applications. Further, the examination
process may require us or our licensors to narrow the claims, which
may limit the scope of patent protection that may be obtained.
Although our license agreement with Genzyme includes a number of
issued patents that are exclusively licensed to us, the issuance of
a patent is not conclusive as to its inventorship, scope, validity
or enforceability, issued patents that we own or have licensed from
third parties may be challenged in the courts or patent offices in
the United States and abroad. Such challenges may result in the
loss of patent protection, the narrowing of claims in such patents,
or the invalidity or unenforceability of such patents, which could
limit our ability to stop others from using or commercializing
similar or identical technology and products, or limit the duration
of the patent protection for our technology and products.
Protecting against the unauthorized use of our patented technology,
trademarks and other intellectual property rights is expensive,
difficult and may, in some cases, not be possible. In some cases,
it may be difficult or impossible to detect third party
infringement or misappropriation of our intellectual property
rights, even in relation to issued patent claims, and proving any
such infringement may be even more difficult.
We could be required to incur significant expenses to obtain our
intellectual property rights, and we cannot ensure that we will
obtain meaningful patent protection for our product
candidates.
The patent prosecution process is expensive and time-consuming, and
we may not be able to file and prosecute all necessary or desirable
patent applications at a reasonable cost or in a timely manner. In
addition, it is also possible that we will fail to identify
patentable aspects of further inventions made in the course of our
development and commercialization activities before they are
publicly disclosed, making it too late to obtain patent protection
on them. Further, given the amount of time required for the
development, testing and regulatory review of new product
candidates, patents protecting such candidates might expire before
or shortly after such candidates are commercialized. We expect to
seek extensions of patent terms where these are available in any
countries where we are prosecuting patents. This includes in the
United States under the Drug Price Competition and Patent Term
Restoration Act of 1984, which permits a patent term extension of
up to five years beyond the expiration of a patent that covers an
approved product where the permission for the commercial marketing
or use of the product is the first permitted commercial marketing
or use, and as long as the remaining term of the patent does not
exceed 14 years. However, the applicable authorities, including the
FDA in the United States, and any equivalent regulatory authority
in other countries, may not agree with our assessment of whether
such extensions are available, and may refuse to grant extensions
to our patents, or may grant more limited extensions than we
request. If this occurs, our competitors may be able to take
advantage of our investment in development and clinical trials by
referencing our clinical and preclinical data and launch their
product earlier than might otherwise be the case. Changes in either
the patent laws or interpretation of the patent laws in the United
States and other countries may diminish the value of our patents or
narrow the scope of our patent protection. The laws of foreign
countries may not protect our rights to the same extent as the laws
of the United States, and these foreign laws may also be subject to
change. Publications of discoveries in the scientific literature
often lag behind the actual discoveries, and patent applications in
the United States and other jurisdictions are typically not
published until 18 months after filing or in some cases not at all.
Therefore, we cannot be certain that we or our licensors were the
first to make the inventions claimed in our owned or licensed
patents or pending patent applications, or that we or our licensors
were the first to file for patent protection of such
inventions.
Obtaining and maintaining our patent protection depends on
compliance with various procedural, documentary, fee payment and
other requirements imposed by governmental patent agencies, and our
patent protection could be reduced or eliminated for non-compliance
with these requirements.
Periodic maintenance fees on any issued patent are due to be paid
to the USPTO, and foreign patent agencies in several stages over
the lifetime of the patent. The USPTO and various foreign
governmental patent agencies require compliance with a number of
procedural, documentary, fee payment and other requirements during
the patent application process. While an inadvertent lapse can in
many cases be cured by payment of a late fee or by other means in
accordance with the applicable rules, there are situations in which
noncompliance can result in abandonment or lapse of the patent or
patent application, resulting in partial or complete loss of patent
rights in the relevant jurisdiction. Non-compliance events that
could result in abandonment or lapse of a patent or
patent application include, but are not limited to, failure to
respond to official actions within prescribed time limits,
non-payment of fees and failure to properly legalize and submit
formal documents. If we or our licensors fail to maintain the
patents and patent applications covering our product candidates,
our competitors might be able to enter the market, which would have
a material adverse effect on our business.
Patent terms may be inadequate to protect our competitive position
on our product candidates for an adequate amount of
time.
Patents have a limited lifespan. In the United States, if all
maintenance fees are timely paid, the natural expiration of a
patent is generally 20 years from its earliest U.S. non-provisional
filing date. Various extensions may be available, but the life of a
patent, and the protection it affords, is limited. Even if patents
covering our product candidates are obtained, once the patent life
has expired, we may be open to competition from competitive
products, including generics or biosimilars. Given the amount of
time required for the development, testing and regulatory review of
new product candidates, patents protecting such candidates might
expire before or shortly after such candidates are commercialized.
As a result, our owned and licensed patent portfolio may not
provide us with sufficient rights to exclude others from
commercializing products similar or identical to ours.
We may become involved in lawsuits to protect or enforce our
intellectual property, which could be expensive, time consuming and
unsuccessful.
In addition to the possibility of litigation relating to
infringement claims asserted against it, we may become a party to
other patent litigation and other proceedings, including inter
partes review proceedings, post-grant review proceedings,
derivation proceedings declared by the USPTO and similar
proceedings in foreign countries, regarding intellectual property
rights with respect to our current or future technologies or
product candidates or products. The cost to us of any patent
litigation or other proceeding, even if resolved in our favor,
could be substantial. Some of our competitors may be able to
sustain the costs of such litigation or proceedings more
effectively than we can because of their substantially greater
financial resources. Patent litigation and other proceedings may
also absorb significant management time. Uncertainties resulting
from the initiation and continuation of patent litigation or other
proceedings could impair our ability to compete in the
marketplace.
Competitors may infringe or otherwise violate our intellectual
property, including patents that may issue to or be licensed by us.
As a result, we may be required to file claims in an effort to stop
third-party infringement or unauthorized use. Any such claims could
provoke these parties to assert counterclaims against us, including
claims alleging that we infringe their patents or other
intellectual property rights. This can be prohibitively expensive,
particularly for a company of our size, and time-consuming, and
even if we are successful, any award of monetary damages or other
remedy we may receive may not be commercially valuable. In
addition, in an infringement proceeding, a court may decide that
our asserted intellectual property is not valid or is
unenforceable, or may refuse to stop the other party from using the
technology at issue on the grounds that our intellectual property
does not cover its technology. An adverse determination in any
litigation or defense proceedings could put our intellectual
property at risk of being invalidated or interpreted narrowly and
could put our patent applications at risk of not
issuing.
If the breadth or strength of our patent or other intellectual
property rights is compromised or threatened, it could allow third
parties to commercialize our technology or products or result in
our inability to commercialize our technology and products without
infringing third-party intellectual property rights. Further, third
parties may be dissuaded from collaborating with us.
Interference or derivation proceedings brought by the USPTO or its
foreign counterparts may be necessary to determine the priority of
inventions with respect to our patent applications, and we may also
become involved in other proceedings, such as re-examination
proceedings, before the USPTO or its foreign counterparts. Due to
the substantial competition in the pharmaceutical space, the number
of such proceedings may increase. This could delay the prosecution
of our pending patent applications or impact the validity and
enforceability of any future patents that we may obtain. In
addition, any such litigation, submission or proceeding may be
resolved adversely to us and, even if successful, may result in
substantial costs and distraction to our management.
Furthermore, because of the substantial amount of discovery
required in connection with intellectual property litigation, there
is a risk that some of our confidential information could be
compromised by disclosure during this type of litigation. Moreover,
intellectual property law relating to the fields in which we
operate is still evolving and, consequently, patent and other
intellectual property positions in our industry are subject to
change and are often uncertain. We may not prevail in any of these
suits or other efforts to protect our technology, and the damages
or other remedies awarded, if any, may not be commercially
valuable. During the course of this type of litigation, there could
be public announcements of the results of hearings, motions or
other interim proceedings or developments. If securities analysts
or investors perceive these results to be negative, the market
price for our common stock could be significantly
harmed.
If we fail to comply with our obligations in the agreements under
which we license intellectual property rights from third parties or
otherwise experience disruptions to our business relationships with
our licensors, we could lose intellectual property rights that are
important to our business.
We are a party to several license agreements and may need to obtain
additional licenses from others to advance our research
and
development activities or allow the commercialization of our
current product candidates and any that we may identify and pursue
in the future. Our currently license agreements impose, and we
expect that future license agreements will impose, various
development, diligence, commercialization, and other obligations on
us. In spite of our efforts, our licensors might conclude that we
have materially breached our obligations under such license
agreements and might therefore terminate the license agreements,
thereby removing or limiting our ability to develop and
commercialize products and technology covered by these license
agreements. If these in-licenses are terminated, or if the
underlying patents fail to provide the intended exclusivity,
competitors or other third parties may gain the freedom to seek
regulatory approval of, and to market, products identical to ours
and we may be required to cease our development and
commercialization of our product candidates. Any of the foregoing
could have a material adverse effect on our competitive position,
business, financial conditions, results of operations, and
prospects.
Moreover, disputes may arise regarding intellectual property
subject to a licensing agreement, including:
•the
scope of rights granted under the license agreement and other
interpretation-related issues;
•the
extent to which our product candidates, technology and processes
infringe on intellectual property of the licensor that is not
subject to the licensing agreement;
•the
sublicensing of patent and other rights under our collaborative
development relationships;
•our
diligence obligations under the license agreement and what
activities satisfy those diligence obligations;
•the
inventorship and ownership of inventions and know-how resulting
from the joint creation or use of intellectual property by our
licensors and us and our partners; and
•the
priority of invention of patented technology.
In addition, the agreements under which we currently license
intellectual property or technology from third parties are complex,
and certain provisions in such agreements may be susceptible to
multiple interpretations. The resolution of any contract
interpretation disagreement that may arise could narrow what we
believe to be the scope of our rights to the relevant intellectual
property or technology, or increase what we believe to be our
financial or other obligations under the relevant agreement, either
of which could have a material adverse effect on our business,
financial condition, results of operations, and prospects.
Moreover, if disputes over intellectual property that we have
licensed prevent or impair our ability to maintain our current
licensing arrangements on commercially acceptable terms, we may be
unable to successfully develop and commercialize the affected
product candidates, which could have a material adverse effect on
our business, financial conditions, results of operations, and
prospects.
From time to time, we may need to rely on licenses to proprietary
technologies, which may be difficult or expensive to obtain or we
may lose certain licenses which may be difficult to
replace.
We may need to obtain licenses to patents and other proprietary
rights held by third parties to develop, manufacture and market our
product candidates. If we are unable to timely obtain these
licenses on commercially reasonable terms and maintain these
licenses, our ability to commercially market our product candidates
may be inhibited or prevented, which could have a material adverse
effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition
and cash flows.
Third parties may initiate legal proceedings alleging that we are
infringing their intellectual property rights, the outcome of which
would be uncertain and could have a material adverse effect on the
success of our business.
Our commercial success depends upon our ability to develop,
manufacture, market and sell our product candidates, and to use our
proprietary technologies without infringing the proprietary rights
of third parties. We may become party to, or threatened with,
future adversarial proceedings or litigation regarding intellectual
property rights with respect to our products and technology,
including interference and various post grant proceedings before
the USPTO, non-U.S. opposition proceedings, and German nullity
proceedings. Third parties may assert infringement claims against
us based on existing patents or patents that may be granted in the
future.
As a result of any such infringement claims, or to avoid potential
claims, we may choose or be compelled to seek intellectual property
licenses from third parties. These licenses may not be available on
acceptable terms, or at all. Even if we are able to obtain a
license, the license would likely obligate us to pay license fees
or royalties or both, and the rights granted to us likely would be
nonexclusive, which would mean that our competitors also could
obtain licenses to the same intellectual property. Ultimately, we
could be prevented from commercializing a product candidate or
technology or be forced to cease some aspect of our business
operations if, as a result of actual or threatened infringement
claims, we are unable to enter into licenses of the relevant
intellectual property on acceptable terms. Further, if we attempt
to modify a product candidate or technology or to develop
alternative methods or products in response to infringement claims
or to avoid potential claims, we could incur substantial costs,
encounter delays in product introductions or interruptions in
sales. Ultimately, such efforts could be unsuccessful.
Parties making claims against us may obtain injunctive or other
equitable relief, which could effectively block our ability to
further develop and commercialize our product candidates that we
may identify. Defense of these claims, regardless of their merit,
would involve substantial litigation expense and would be a
substantial diversion of employee resources from our business. In
the event of a successful claim of infringement against us, we may
have to pay substantial damages, including treble damages and
attorneys’ fees for willful infringement, pay royalties, redesign
our infringing products or obtain one or more licenses from third
parties, which may be impossible or require substantial time and
monetary expenditure.
Parties making claims against us may be able to sustain the costs
of complex patent litigation more effectively than we can because
they have substantially greater resources. Furthermore, because of
the substantial amount of discovery required in connection with
intellectual property litigation or administrative proceedings,
there is a risk that some of our confidential information could be
compromised by disclosure. In addition, any uncertainties resulting
from the initiation and continuation of any litigation could have
material adverse effect on our ability to raise additional funds or
otherwise have a material adverse effect on our business, results
of operations, financial condition and prospects.
Intellectual property litigation could cause us to spend
substantial resources and distract our personnel from their normal
responsibilities.
Litigation or other legal proceedings relating to intellectual
property claims, with or without merit, is unpredictable and
generally expensive and time consuming and is likely to divert
significant resources from our core business, including distracting
our technical and management personnel from their normal
responsibilities. Furthermore, because of the substantial amount of
discovery required in connection with intellectual property
litigation, there is a risk that some of our confidential
information could be compromised by disclosure during this type of
litigation. In addition, there could be public announcements of the
results of hearings, motions or other interim proceedings or
developments and if securities analysts or investors perceive these
results to be negative, it could have a substantial adverse effect
on the price of our common stock and negatively impact our ability
to raise additional funds. Such litigation or proceedings could
substantially increase our operating losses and reduce the
resources available for development activities or any future sales,
marketing or distribution activities.
We may not have sufficient financial or other resources to
adequately conduct such litigation or proceedings. Some of our
competitors may be able to sustain the costs of such litigation or
proceedings more effectively than we can because of their greater
financial resources and more mature and developed intellectual
property portfolios. Accordingly, despite our efforts, we may not
be able to prevent third parties from infringing upon or
misappropriating or from successfully challenging our intellectual
property rights. Uncertainties resulting from the initiation and
continuation of patent litigation or other proceedings could have a
material adverse effect on our ability to compete in the
marketplace.
Our trade secrets are difficult to protect and if we are unable to
protect the confidentiality of our trade secrets, our business and
competitive position would be harmed.
In addition to seeking patents for some of our technologies and
product candidates, we also rely on trade secrets, including
unpatented know-how, technology and other proprietary information,
to maintain our competitive position. We seek to protect these
trade secrets, in part, by entering into non-disclosure and
confidentiality agreements with parties who have access to them,
such as our employees, corporate collaborators, outside scientific
collaborators, contract manufacturers, consultants, advisors and
other third parties. We also enter into confidentiality,
non-competition, non-solicitation, and invention assignment
agreements with our employees and consultants that obligate them to
assign to us any inventions developed in the course of their work
for us. However, we cannot guarantee that we have executed these
agreements with each party that may have or have had access to our
trade secrets or that the agreements we have executed will provide
adequate protection. Despite these efforts, any of these parties
may breach the agreements and disclose our proprietary information,
including our trade secrets, and we may not be able to obtain
adequate remedies for such breaches. As a result, we may be forced
to bring claims against third parties, or defend claims that they
bring against us, to determine ownership of what we regard as our
intellectual property. Monitoring unauthorized disclosure is
difficult and we do not know whether the procedures that we have
followed to prevent such disclosure are or will be adequate.
Enforcing a claim that a party illegally disclosed or
misappropriated a trade secret is difficult, expensive and
time-consuming, and the outcome is unpredictable. In addition, some
courts inside and outside the United States may be less willing or
unwilling to protect trade secrets. If any of the technology or
information that we protect as trade secrets were to be lawfully
obtained or independently developed by a competitor, we would have
no right to prevent them from using that technology or information
to compete with us. If any of our trade secrets were to be
disclosed to, or independently developed by, a competitor, our
competitive position would be harmed.
We may be subject to claims that our employees have wrongfully used
or disclosed alleged trade secrets of their former
employers.
Our employees, including members of our senior management, were
previously employed at other biotechnology or pharmaceutical
companies, including our competitors or potential competitors. All
such individuals, including each member of our senior management,
executed proprietary rights, non-disclosure and non-competition
agreements in connection with such previous employment. Although we
try to ensure that our employees do not use the proprietary
information or know-how of others in their work for us, we may be
subject to claims that we or these employees have used or disclosed
intellectual property, including trade secrets or other proprietary
information, of any such employee’s former employer. We are not
aware of any threatened or pending claims related to these matters
or concerning the agreements with our senior management, but in the
future litigation may be necessary to defend against such claims.
If we fail in defending any such claims, in addition to paying
monetary damages, we may lose valuable intellectual property rights
or personnel. Even if we are successful in defending against such
claims, litigation could result in substantial costs and be a
distraction to management.
We may not be able to protect our intellectual property rights
throughout the world.
Filing, prosecuting and defending patents on all of our product
candidates throughout the world would be prohibitively expensive.
In general, we have sought patent protection of our intellectual
property in the following jurisdictions: US, Canada, China, Japan
and in countries within Europe via the European Patent Office.
Competitors may use our technologies in jurisdictions where we have
not obtained patent protection to develop their own products and
further, may export otherwise infringing products to territories
where we have patent protection, but where enforcement is not as
strong as that in the United States. These products may compete
with our products in jurisdictions where we do not have any issued
patents and our patent claims or other intellectual property rights
may not be effective or sufficient to prevent them from so
competing.
Many companies have encountered significant problems in protecting
and defending intellectual property rights in foreign
jurisdictions. The legal systems of certain countries, particularly
certain developing countries, do not favor the enforcement of
patents and other intellectual property protection, particularly
those relating to biopharmaceuticals, which could make it difficult
for us to stop the infringement of our patents or marketing of
competing products in violation of our proprietary rights
generally. Proceedings to enforce our patent rights in foreign
jurisdictions could result in substantial cost and divert our
efforts and attention from other aspects of our
business.
As another example, the complexity and uncertainty of European
patent laws have increased in recent years. In Europe, a new
unitary patent system will likely be introduced by the end of 2023,
which would significantly impact European patents, including those
granted before the introduction of such a system. Under the unitary
patent system, European applications will soon have the option,
upon grant of a patent, of becoming a Unitary Patent which will be
subject to the jurisdiction of the Unitary Patent Court (“UPC”). As
the UPC is a new court system, there is no precedent for the court,
increasing the uncertainty of any litigation. Patents granted
before the implementation of the UPC will have the option of opting
out of the jurisdiction of the UPC and remaining as national
patents in the UPC countries. Patents that remain under the
jurisdiction of the UPC will be potentially vulnerable to a single
UPC-based revocation challenge that, if successful, could
invalidate the patent in all countries who are signatories to the
UPC. We cannot predict with certainty the long-term effects of any
potential changes.
Risks Related to Our Business Operations, Employee Matters and
Managing Growth
Our future success depends on our ability to retain executives and
to attract, retain and motivate key personnel in a competitive
environment for skilled biotechnology personnel.
Because of the specialized scientific and managerial nature of our
business, we rely heavily on our ability to attract and retain
qualified scientific, technical and managerial personnel. We are
also highly dependent upon members of our current management team,
including Paula Ragan, Ph.D., our Chief Executive Officer. The loss
of the services provided by these individuals will adversely impact
the achievement of our objectives. These individuals could leave
our employment at any time, as they are “at will” employees.
Effective succession planning is also important to our long-term
success. Failure to ensure effective transfer of knowledge and
smooth transitions involving key employees could hinder our
strategic planning and execution. For example, our former Chief
Medical Officer resigned in November 2022 and we have engaged an
interim Chief Medical Officer while we complete a search for a
permanent Chief Medical Officer. While we expect to engage in an
orderly transition process if and when we integrate newly appointed
officers and managers, we face a variety of risks and uncertainties
relating to management transition, including diversion of
management attention from business concerns, failure to retain
other key personnel, or loss of institutional knowledge. In
addition, the loss of the services of any of our executive
officers, other key employees, and other scientific and medical
advisors, and an inability to find suitable replacements could
result in delays in product development, and harm our
business.
Our success will depend on our ability to retain our management
team and other key employees, and to attract and retain qualified
personnel in the future. The loss of the services of certain
members of our senior management or key employees could prevent or
delay the implementation and completion of our strategic
objectives, or divert management’s attention to seeking qualified
replacements. The competition for qualified personnel in the
pharmaceutical field is intense and we cannot guarantee that we
will be able to retain our current personnel or attract and retain
new qualified personnel necessary for the development of our
business or to recruit suitable replacement personnel.
We will need to grow the size of our organization, and we may
experience difficulties in managing this growth.
As of December 31, 2022, we had 70 full-time employees. Although we
announced a reduction in workforce of approximately 20% in July
2022 as part of our streamlining of resources to focus on advancing
our lead clinical candidate, mavorixafor, as our development and
commercialization plans and strategies develop, or as a result of
any future acquisitions, we will need additional managerial,
operational, development, sales, marketing, financial and other
resources. Our management, personnel and systems currently in place
will not be adequate to support this future growth. Future growth
would impose significant added responsibilities on our employees,
including:
•managing
our clinical trials effectively;
•identifying,
recruiting, maintaining, motivating and integrating additional
employees;
•managing
our internal development efforts effectively while complying with
our contractual obligations to licensors, contractors and other
third parties;
•improving
our managerial, development, operational and finance systems;
and
•expanding
our facilities.
As our operations expand, we will need to manage additional
relationships with various strategic collaborators, suppliers and
other third parties. Our future financial performance and our
ability to commercialize our product candidates and to compete
effectively will depend, in part, on our ability to manage any
future growth effectively. To that end, we must be able to manage
our development efforts and clinical trials effectively and hire,
train and integrate additional management, administrative, research
and development, and sales and marketing personnel. We may not be
able to accomplish these tasks, and our failure to accomplish any
of them could prevent us from successfully growing the
company.
The pharmaceutical industry is highly competitive and is subject to
rapid and significant technological change, which could render our
technologies and products obsolete or uncompetitive.
The pharmaceutical industry is highly competitive and is subject to
rapid and significant technological change, which could render
certain of our products obsolete or uncompetitive. This is
particularly true in the development of therapeutics for oncology
indications where new products and combinations of products are
rapidly being developed that change the treatment paradigm for
patients. There is no assurance that our product candidates will be
the best, have the best safety profile, be the first to market, or
be the most economical to make or use. The introduction of
competitive therapies as alternatives to our product candidates
could dramatically reduce the value of those development projects
or chances of successfully commercializing those product
candidates, which could have a material adverse effect on our
long-term financial success.
We will compete with companies in the United States and
internationally, including major pharmaceutical and chemical
companies, specialized CROs, research and development firms,
universities and other research institutions. Many of our
competitors have greater financial resources and selling and
marketing capabilities, greater experience in clinical testing and
human clinical trials of pharmaceutical products and greater
experience in obtaining FDA and other regulatory approvals than we
do. In addition, some of our competitors may have lower development
and manufacturing costs.
We rely significantly on information technology and any failure,
inadequacy, interruption or security lapse of that technology or
loss of data, including any cyber security incidents, could
compromise sensitive information related to our business, prevent
us from accessing critical information or expose us to liability
which could harm our ability to operate our business effectively
and adversely affect our business and reputation.
In the ordinary course of our business, we, our contract research
organizations and other third parties on which we rely collect and
store sensitive data, including legally protected patient health
information, personally identifiable information about our
employees, intellectual property, and proprietary business
information. We manage and maintain our applications and data
utilizing on-site systems. These applications and data encompass a
wide variety of business-critical information including research
and development information and business and financial
information.
The secure processing, storage, maintenance and transmission of
this critical information is vital to our operations and business
strategy. Additionally, despite the implementation of security
measures, our internal computer systems and those of third parties
with which we contract are vulnerable to damage from cyber-attacks,
computer viruses, breaches, unauthorized access, interruptions due
to employee error or malfeasance or other disruptions, or damage
from natural disasters, terrorism, war and telecommunication and
electrical failures.
In addition, we have implemented a work model that has enabled
substantially all of our employees to periodically work remotely,
which may make us more vulnerable to cyberattacks. Any such event
could compromise our networks and the information stored there
could be accessed by unauthorized parties, publicly disclosed, lost
or stolen. We have measures in place that are designed to detect
and respond to such security incidents and breaches of privacy and
security mandates. Any such access, disclosure or other loss of
information could result in legal claims or proceedings, liability
under laws that protect the privacy of personal information,
government enforcement actions and regulatory penalties.
Unauthorized access, loss or dissemination could also disrupt our
operations, including our ability to conduct research, development
and commercialization activities, process and prepare company
financial information, manage various selling, general and
administrative aspects of our business and damage our reputation,
in addition to possibly requiring substantial expenditures of
resources to remedy, any of which could adversely affect our
business. The loss of clinical trial data could result in delays in
our regulatory approval efforts and significantly increase our
costs to recover or reproduce the data. In addition, there can be
no assurance that we will promptly detect any such disruption or
security breach, if at all. To the extent that any disruption or
security breach were to result in a loss of, or damage to, our data
or applications, or inappropriate disclosure of confidential or
proprietary information, we could incur liability and our research,
development and commercialization efforts could be
delayed.
Our ability to use our net operating losses to offset future
taxable income may be subject to certain limitations.
Our net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforwards could expire unused
and be unavailable to offset future tax liabilities because of
their limited duration or because of restrictions under U.S. tax
law. As of December 31, 2022, we had U.S. federal and state NOLs of
$342.9 million and $336.5 million, respectively. Our NOLs generated
in tax years ending on or prior to December 31, 2017 are only
permitted to be carried forward for 20 years under applicable U.S.
tax law. Under the Tax Act, as modified by the CARES Act, our
federal NOLs generated in tax years ending after December 31, 2017
may be carried forward indefinitely, but the deductibility of
federal NOLs, particularly for tax years beginning after December
31, 2020, may be limited. It is uncertain if and to what extent
various states will conform to the Tax Act and the CARES
Act.
Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or
Section 382, contains rules that limit the ability of a company
that undergoes an ownership change to utilize its net operating
losses, or NOLs, and tax credits existing as of the date of such
ownership change. Under the rules, such an ownership change is
generally any change in ownership of more than 50% of a company’s
stock within a rolling three-year period. The rules generally
operate by focusing on changes in ownership among stockholders
considered by the rules as owning, directly or indirectly, 5% or
more of the stock of a company and any change in ownership arising
from new issuances of stock by the company. We have experienced
multiple ownership changes since our inception and are conducting a
study to assess whether an ownership change has occurred and
whether these ownership changes will limit the future use of our
NOL carryforwards. Future ownership changes as defined by Section
382 may further limit the amount of NOL carryforwards that could be
utilized annually to offset future taxable income.
Our term loan contains restrictions that limit our flexibility in
operating our business.
In October 2018, we entered into a loan and security agreement, as
most recently amended and restated in January 2023, with Hercules,
secured by a lien on substantially all of our assets, excluding
intellectual property. This loan contains various covenants that
limit our ability to engage in specified types of transactions.
These covenants limit our ability to, among other
things:
•sell,
transfer, lease or dispose of certain assets;
•incur
indebtedness;
•encumber
or permit liens on certain assets;
•make
certain investments;
•make
certain restricted payments, including paying dividends on, or
repurchasing or making distributions with respect to, our common
stock; and
•enter
into certain transactions with affiliates.
The covenants also include a requirement that we maintain cash in
an aggregate amount greater than or equal to $20 million; provided,
however, that following the FDA approval of the sale and marketing
of mavorixafor for the treatment to patients with WHIM syndrome,
the required level shall be reduced to $10 million. Based on our
current cash and cash equivalents and our current operating plan,
we believe that if we fail to raise additional capital, we would be
in violation of the minimum cash described above in the first
quarter of 2024. A breach of any of the covenants under the loan
and security agreement could result in a default under the loan.
Upon the occurrence of an event of default under the loan, the
lenders could elect to declare all amounts outstanding, if any, to
be immediately due and payable and terminate all commitments to
extend further credit. If there are any amounts outstanding that we
are unable to repay, the lenders could proceed against the
collateral granted to them to secure such
indebtedness.
Our business could be adversely affected by economic downturns,
inflation, increases in interest rates, natural disasters, public
health crises such as the COVID-19 pandemic, political crises,
geopolitical events, such as the war in Ukraine, or other
macroeconomic conditions, which have in the past and may in the
future negatively impact our business and financial
performance.
The global economy, including credit and financial markets, has
experienced extreme volatility and disruptions, including, among
other things, severely diminished liquidity and credit
availability, declines in consumer confidence, declines in economic
growth, supply chain shortages, increases in inflation rates,
higher interest rates and uncertainty about economic stability. For
example, the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in widespread unemployment,
economic slowdown and extreme volatility in the capital markets.
The U.S. Federal Reserve recently raised interest rates multiple
times in response to concerns about inflation and it may raise them
again. Higher interest rates, coupled with reduced government
spending and volatility in financial markets may increase economic
uncertainty. If the equity and credit markets deteriorate,
including as a result of political unrest or war, such as the war
in Ukraine, it may make any necessary debt or equity financing more
difficult to obtain in a timely manner or on favorable terms, more
costly or more dilutive. Increased inflation rates can adversely
affect us by increasing our costs, including labor and employee
benefit costs.
Risks Related to Ownership of Our Common Stock
Our stock price has been and is likely to continue to be volatile
and fluctuate substantially.
The market price of our common stock has been and could continue to
be subject to significant fluctuations. Market prices for
securities of pharmaceutical, biotechnology and other life sciences
companies have historically been particularly volatile. Some of the
factors that may cause the market price of our common stock to
fluctuate include:
•our
ability or the ability of our collaborators to develop product
candidates and conduct clinical trials that demonstrate such
product candidates are safe and effective;
•our
ability or the ability of our collaborators to obtain regulatory
approvals for product candidates, and delays or failures to obtain
such approvals;
•failure
of any our product candidates to demonstrate safety and efficacy,
receive regulatory approval and achieve commercial
success;
•failure
to maintain our existing third-party license, manufacturing and
supply agreements;
•failure
by us or our licensors to prosecute, maintain or enforce our
intellectual property rights;
•changes
in laws or regulations applicable to our current or future product
candidates;
•any
inability to obtain adequate supply of product candidates or the
inability to do so at acceptable prices;
•adverse
decisions by regulatory authorities;
•introduction
of new or competing products by our competitors;
•failure
to meet or exceed financial and development projections that we may
provide to the public;
•the
perception of the pharmaceutical industry by the public,
legislatures, regulators and the investment community;
•announcements
of significant acquisitions, strategic collaborations, joint
ventures or capital commitments by us or our
competitors;
•disputes
or other developments relating to proprietary rights, including
patents, litigation matters and our ability to obtain intellectual
property protection for our technologies;
•additions
or departures of key personnel;
•significant
lawsuits, including intellectual property or stockholder
litigation;
•announcements
by us of material developments in our business, financial condition
and/or operations;
•if
securities or industry analysts do not publish research or reports
about us, or if they issue an adverse or misleading opinions
regarding our business and stock;
•changes
in the market valuations of similar companies;
•general
macroeconomic, political and market conditions and overall
fluctuations in the financial markets in the United States and
abroad;
•sales
of our common stock or our stockholders in the future;
•trading
volume of our common stock;
•adverse
publicity relating to our markets generally, including with respect
to other products and potential products in such
markets;
•changes
in the structure of health care payment systems;
•period-to-period
fluctuations in our financial results; and
•the
other factors described in this “Risk Factors” section and
elsewhere in this Annual Report
In addition, companies trading in the stock market in general have
experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have often
been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of
these companies, including in connection with the ongoing COVID-19
pandemic, which has resulted in decreased stock prices for many
companies notwithstanding the lack of a fundamental change in their
underlying business models or prospects. Broad market and industry
factors, including potentially worsening economic conditions and
other adverse effects or developments relating to the ongoing
COVID-19 pandemic, may negatively affect the market price of our
common stock, regardless of our actual operating performance. In
the past, following periods of volatility in the market price of a
company’s securities, stockholders have often instituted class
action securities litigation against those companies. Such
litigation, if instituted, could result in substantial costs and
diversion of management attention and resources, which could
significantly harm our business, financial condition, results of
operations and reputation.
“Penny stock” rules may make buying or selling our securities
difficult which may make our stock less liquid and make it harder
for investors to buy and sell our securities.
Trading in our securities is subject to the SEC’s “penny stock”
rules and it is anticipated that trading in our securities will
continue to be subject to the penny stock rules for the foreseeable
future. The SEC has adopted regulations that generally define a
penny stock to be any equity security that has a market price of
less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions. These
rules require that any broker-dealer who recommends our securities
to persons other than prior customers and accredited investors
must, prior to the sale, make a special written suitability
determination for the purchaser and receive the purchaser’s written
agreement to execute the transaction. Unless an exception is
available, the regulations require the delivery, prior to any
transaction involving a penny stock, of a disclosure schedule
explaining the penny stock market and the risks associated with
trading in the penny stock market. In addition, broker-dealers must
disclose commissions payable to both the broker-dealer and the
registered representative and current quotations for the securities
they offer. The additional burdens imposed upon broker-dealers by
these requirements may discourage broker-dealers from recommending
transactions in our securities, which could severely limit the
liquidity of our securities and consequently adversely affect the
market price for our securities.
If securities analysts do not publish research or reports about our
business or if they publish negative evaluations of our stock, the
price of our stock could decline.
The trading market for our common stock will be influenced, in
part, on the research and reports that industry or financial
analysts publish about us or our business. Equity research analysts
may elect not to provide research coverage of our common stock, and
such lack of research coverage may adversely affect the market
price of our common stock. In the event we do have equity research
analyst coverage, we will not have any control over the analysts or
the content and opinions included in their reports. The price of
our common stock could decline if one or more equity research
analysts downgrade our stock or issue other unfavorable commentary
or research. If one or more equity research analysts ceases
coverage of us or fails to publish reports on us regularly, demand
for our common stock could decrease, which in turn could cause our
stock price or trading volume to decline.
We do not anticipate that we will pay any cash dividends in the
foreseeable future.
The current expectation is that we will retain our future earnings
to fund the development and growth of our business. In addition,
the terms of our debt agreements may preclude us from paying
dividends. As a result, capital appreciation, if any, of our common
stock will be your sole source of gain, if any, for the foreseeable
future. We are prohibited from declaring or paying any cash
dividends under our existing loan and security agreement with
Hercules.
Sales of a substantial number of shares of our common stock in the
public market could cause our stock price to decline.
Sales of a substantial number of shares of our common stock in the
public market, or the perception that these sales might occur,
could depress the market price of our common stock and could impair
our ability to raise capital through the sale of additional equity
securities.
We are unable to predict the effect that sales, particularly sales
by our directors, executive officers, and significant stockholders,
may have on the prevailing market price of our common
stock.
In addition, we have filed registration statements on Form S-8
registering the issuance of shares of common stock subject to
options or other equity awards issued or reserved for future
issuance under our equity incentive plans. Shares registered under
these registration statements are available for sale in the public
market subject to vesting arrangements and exercise of options, as
well as Rule 144 in the case of our affiliates.
If we fail to maintain an effective system of internal control over
financial reporting, we may not be able to accurately report our
financial results or prevent fraud. As a result, stockholders could
lose confidence in our financial and other public reporting, which
would harm our business and the trading price of our common
stock.
We are subject to the reporting requirements of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the rules and regulations of The
Nasdaq Stock Market (“Nasdaq”). Pursuant to Section 404 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Section 404”), we are required to
perform system and process evaluation and testing of our internal
control over financial reporting to allow our management to report
on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial
reporting in this Annual Report.
Effective internal control over financial reporting is necessary
for us to provide reliable financial reports and, together with
adequate disclosure controls and procedures, is designed to prevent
fraud. Any failure to implement required new or improved controls,
or difficulties encountered in their implementation, could cause us
to fail to meet our reporting obligations. In addition, any testing
by us, as and when required, conducted in connection with Section
404, or any subsequent testing by our independent registered public
accounting firm, as and when required, may reveal deficiencies in
our internal control over financial reporting that are deemed to be
significant deficiencies or material weaknesses or that may require
prospective or retroactive changes to our consolidated financial
statements or identify other areas for further attention or
improvement. Inferior internal controls could also cause investors
to lose confidence in our reported financial information, which
could have a negative effect on the trading price of our common
stock.
Pursuant to Section 404, we are required to furnish a report by our
management on our internal control over financial reporting
beginning with this Annual Report. However, while we remain a
non-accelerated filer, we will not be required to include an
attestation report on internal control over financial reporting
issued by our independent registered public accounting firm. When
we cease to be a smaller reporting company and no longer qualify as
a non-accelerated filer, we will be required to incur substantial
additional professional fees and internal costs to expand our
accounting and finance functions in order to include such
attestation report.
We may in the future discover weaknesses in our system of internal
financial and accounting controls and procedures that could result
in a material misstatement of our consolidated financial
statements. Our internal control over financial reporting will not
prevent or detect all error and all fraud. A control system, no
matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable,
not absolute, assurance that the control system’s objectives will
be met. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems,
no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that
misstatements due to error or fraud will not occur or that all
control issues and instances of fraud will be detected. If we
identify one or more material weaknesses in our internal controls,
investors could lose confidence in the reliability of our
consolidated financial statements, the market price of our stock
could decline and we could be subject to sanctions or
investigations by Nasdaq, the SEC or other regulatory
authorities.
We are a “smaller reporting company” and cannot predict if the
reduced reporting requirements applicable to smaller reporting
companies will make our securities less attractive to
investors.
We are a “smaller reporting company” under the Exchange Act as of
June 30, 2022. We may continue to be a smaller reporting company if
either (i) the market value of our common stock held by
non-affiliates is less than $250 million or (ii) our annual revenue
was less than $100.0 million during the most recently completed
fiscal year and the market value of our common stock held by
non-affiliates is less than $700.0 million. As a smaller reporting
company, we may rely on exemptions from certain disclosure
requirements that are available to smaller reporting companies,
including not being required to comply with the auditor attestation
requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and reduced
disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our
periodic reports and proxy statements. For so long as we remain a
smaller reporting company, we are permitted and intend to rely on
such exemptions from certain disclosure and other requirements that
are applicable to other public companies that are not smaller
reporting companies.
We cannot predict if investors will find our securities less
attractive because we may rely on the exemptions and reduced
disclosure obligations applicable to smaller reporting companies.
If some investors find our securities less attractive as a result,
there may be a less active trading market for our common stock and
our stock price may be more volatile.
We may become involved in securities class action litigation or
shareholder derivative litigation that could divert management’s
attention and harm our business and insurance coverage may not be
sufficient to cover all costs and damages.
In the past, securities class action or shareholder derivative
litigation has often followed certain significant business
transactions, such as the sale of a business division or
announcement of a merger. This risk is especially relevant for us
because biopharmaceutical companies have experienced significant
stock price volatility in recent years. We may become involved in
this type of litigation in the future.The outcome of litigation is
necessarily uncertain, and we could be forced to expend significant
resources in the defense of such suits, and we may not prevail.
Monitoring and defending against legal actions is time-consuming
for our management and detracts from management’s ability to fully
focus our internal resources on our business activities. In
addition, we may incur substantial legal fees and costs in
connection with any such litigation. We have not established any
reserves for any potential liability relating to any such potential
lawsuits. It is possible that we could, in the future, incur
judgments or enter into settlements of claims for monetary damages.
We currently maintain insurance coverage for some of these
potential liabilities. Other potential liabilities may not be
covered by insurance, insurers may dispute coverage or the amount
of insurance may not be enough to cover damages awarded. In
addition, certain types of damages may not be covered by insurance,
and insurance coverage for all or certain forms of liability may
become unavailable or prohibitively expensive in the future. A
decision adverse to our interests on one or more legal matters or
litigation could result in the payment of substantial damages, or
possibly fines, and could have a material adverse effect on our
reputation, financial condition and results of
operations.
Provisions in our corporate charter documents and under Delaware
law could make an acquisition of our company, which may be
beneficial to our stockholders, more difficult and may prevent
attempts by our stockholders to replace or remove our current
management.
Provisions in our corporate charter and by-laws may discourage,
delay or prevent a merger, acquisition or other change in control
of our Company that stockholders may consider favorable, including
transactions in which you might otherwise receive a premium for
your shares. These provisions also could limit the price that
investors might be willing to pay in the future for shares of our
common stock, thereby depressing the market price of our common
stock. In addition, because our board of directors is responsible
for appointing the members of our management team, these provisions
may frustrate or prevent any attempts by our stockholders to
replace or remove our current management by making it more
difficult for stockholders to replace members of our board of
directors. Among other things, these provisions:
•establish
a classified board of directors such that not all members of the
board are elected at one time;
•allow
the authorized number of our directors to be changed only by
resolution of the board of directors;
•limit
the manner in which stockholders can remove directors from the
board;
•establish
advance notice requirements for stockholder proposals that can be
acted on at stockholder meetings and nominations to the board of
directors;
•require
that stockholder actions must be effected at a duly called
stockholder meeting and prohibit actions by our stockholders by
written consent;
•limit
who may call stockholder meetings;
•authorize
the board of directors to issue preferred stock without stockholder
approval, which could be used to institute a shareholder rights
plan, or so-called “poison pill,” that would work to dilute the
stock ownership of a potential hostile acquirer, effectively
preventing acquisitions that have not been approved by the board of
directors; and
•require
the approval of the holders of at least 75% of the votes that all
our stockholders would be entitled to cast to amend or repeal
certain provisions of our charter or by-laws.
Moreover, because we are incorporated in Delaware, we are governed
by the provisions of Section 203 of the Delaware General
Corporation Law, which prohibits a person who owns in excess of 15%
of our outstanding voting stock from merging or combining with the
Company for a period of three years after the date of the
transaction in which the person acquired in excess of 15% of our
outstanding voting stock, unless the merger or combination is
approved in a prescribed manner.
Our certificate of incorporation provides that the Court of
Chancery of the State of Delaware will be the exclusive forum for
substantially all disputes between the Company and our
stockholders, which could limit our stockholders’ ability to obtain
a favorable judicial forum for disputes with the Company or our
directors, officers, employees or stockholders.
Our certificate of incorporation provides that the Court of
Chancery of the State of Delaware is the exclusive forum for any
derivative action or proceeding brought on the Company’s behalf,
any action asserting a breach of fiduciary duty owed by our
directors, officers, other employees or stockholders to the Company
or our stockholders, any action asserting a claim against the
Company arising pursuant to the Delaware General Corporation Law or
as to which the Delaware General Corporation Law confers
jurisdiction on the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware, or
any action asserting a claim arising pursuant to our certificate of
incorporation or by-laws or governed by the internal affairs
doctrine. This provision may limit a stockholder’s ability to bring
a claim in a judicial forum that it finds favorable for disputes
with the Company or our directors, officers, employees or
stockholders, which may discourage such lawsuits against the
Company and our directors, officers, employees or
stockholders.
Alternatively, if a court were to find this provision in our
certificate of incorporation to be inapplicable or unenforceable in
an action, we may incur additional costs associated with resolving
such action in other jurisdictions, which could adversely affect
our business and financial condition.
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF
COMMENTS
None.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
We lease approximately 28,000 square feet of office space at 61
North Beacon Street, 4th Floor, Boston, Massachusetts, which serves
as our corporate headquarters. The lease expires on November 30,
2026. The base monthly payment on the lease is approximately $88.7
thousand as of December 31, 2022, subject to specified annual
increases of approximately 3% during the term of the lease and not
including operating expenses, certain utilities, taxes and
insurance for which we are responsible. We have the right to
sublease the premises, subject to landlord consent and we have the
right to renew the lease for an additional five years at the
then-prevailing effective market rental rate.
We lease approximately 1,200 square meters of laboratory and office
space in Vienna, Austria under a lease that will expire in March
2028, with a monthly payment of approximately $23.2
thousand.
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
From time to time, we may become involved in legal proceedings
arising in the ordinary course of our business. We are not
currently subject to any material legal proceedings.
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY
DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON
EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY
SECURITIES
Market Information
Our common stock commenced trading on the Nasdaq Global Market
under the symbol “ASNS” on November 16, 2017. Prior to that date,
there was no public trading market for our common stock. On March
13, 2019, we completed a business combination in accordance with
the terms of the Merger Agreement, by and among us, X4
Therapeutics, Inc. (formerly X4 Pharmaceuticals, Inc.) and the
Merger Sub, pursuant to which, among other matters, Merger Sub
merged with and into X4 Therapeutics, Inc., with X4 Therapeutics,
Inc. continuing as our wholly-owned subsidiary and the surviving
corporation of the merger. Following the Merger, on March 14, 2019,
we effected a 1-for-6 reverse stock split of our common stock and
changed our name to “X4 Pharmaceuticals, Inc.” On March 13, 2019,
following the completion of the Merger, our common stock began
trading on the Nasdaq Capital Market under the symbol
“XFOR”.
Holders of Our Common Stock
As of March 1, 2023, there were 66 holders of record of our common
stock, one of which is Cede & Co., a nominee for Depository
Trust Company (“DTC”). All of the shares of common stock held by
brokerage firms, banks and other financial institutions as nominees
for beneficial owners are deposited into participant accounts at
DTC, and are considered to be held of record by Cede & Co. as
one stockholder.
Dividend Policy
We have never declared or paid cash dividends on our common stock.
We currently intend to retain all available funds and any future
earnings to fund the development and expansion of our business and
we do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable
future. Any future determination to declare and pay dividends will
be made at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend
on then-existing conditions, including our results of operations,
financial condition, contractual restrictions, capital
requirements, business prospects and other factors our board of
directors may deem relevant.
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
None.
Purchase of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated
Purchasers
None.
ITEM 6. [RESERVED]
ITEM 7.
MANAGEMENT’S
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
You should read the following discussion and analysis of our
financial condition and results of operations together with our
consolidated financial statements and the related notes and the
other financial information included elsewhere in this Annual
Report. Some of the information contained in this discussion and
analysis or set forth elsewhere in this Annual Report, including
information with respect to our plans and strategy for our business
and related financing, includes forward-looking statements that
involve risks and uncertainties. As a result of many factors,
including those factors set forth in the “Risk Factors” section of
this Annual Report, our actual results could differ materially from
the results described in or implied by these forward-looking
statements.
For the discussion of the financial condition and results of
operations for the year ended December 31, 2021 compared to the
year ended December 31, 2020, refer to “Management’s Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” to our
Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 17,
2022.
Overview
We are a late clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company discovering
and developing novel therapeutics for the treatment of rare
diseases and those with limited treatment options, with a focus on
conditions resulting from dysfunction of the immune
system.
Our lead clinical candidate is mavorixafor, a small molecule
antagonist of chemokine receptor CXCR4 that is being developed as
an oral, once-daily therapy. Due to its ability to increase the
mobilization of mature, functional white blood cells from the bone
marrow into the bloodstream, we believe that mavorixafor has the
potential to provide therapeutic benefit across a variety of
chronic neutropenic disorders, including WHIM (Warts,
Hypogammaglobulinemia, Infections, and Myelokathexis) syndrome, a
rare, primary immunodeficiency.
Following announcement of positive top-line data from our global,
pivotal, Phase 3 clinical trial, we are currently preparing a U.S.
regulatory submission seeking approval of oral, once-daily
mavorixafor in the treatment of people aged 12 years and older with
WHIM syndrome. Submission is expected early in the second half of
2023.
We are also currently advancing mavorixafor in a Phase 2 clinical
trial in people with certain chronic neutropenic disorders
following positive results from a Phase 1b clinical trial of
mavorixafor in people with idiopathic, cyclic or congenital
neutropenia. Participants are now being enrolled in this Phase 2
clinical trial and we expect to provide an update on clinical
results in the second or third quarter of 2023. We also expect to
provide clarity on the scope and timing of our planned Phase 3
chronic neutropenia clinical program in the second or third quarter
of 2023.
We believe that successfully developing mavorixafor and providing
new therapeutic options to individuals in the U.S. diagnosed with
certain chronic neutropenic disorders has the potential to
revolutionize the treatment landscape, which is principally served
by injectable therapies that are frequently associated with
treatment-limiting adverse events.
To date, we have not generated revenue from product sales and do
not expect to generate significant revenue from the sale of our
products in the foreseeable future. If our development efforts for
our product candidates are successful and result in regulatory
approval, we may generate revenue in the future from product sales.
We cannot predict if, when, or to what extent we will generate
revenue from the commercialization and sale of our product
candidates. We may never succeed in obtaining regulatory approval
for any of our product candidates.
Our Pipeline
* Programs only being advanced through partnership
Macroeconomic Considerations
Unfavorable conditions in the economy in the United States and
abroad may negatively affect the growth of our business and our
results of operations. For example, macroeconomic events, including
the COVID-19 pandemic, rising inflation, the U.S. Federal Reserve
raising interest rates and the Russia-Ukraine war, have led to
economic uncertainty globally. The effect of macroeconomic
conditions may not be fully reflected in our results of operations
until future periods. If, however, economic uncertainty increases
or the global economy worsens, our business, financial condition
and results of operations may be harmed. For further discussion of
the potential impacts of macroeconomic events on our business,
financial condition, and operating results, see the section titled
“Risk Factors.”
Results of Operations
Comparison of the Years Ended December 31, 2022 and
2021
The following table summarizes the results of our operations for
the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
2022 |
|
2021 |
|
Change |
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development |
$ |
61,058 |
|
|
$ |
50,647 |
|
|
$ |
10,411 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
27,020 |
|
|
24,702 |
|
|
2,318 |
|
Gain on sale of non-financial asset |
(509) |
|
|
— |
|
|
(509) |
|
Impairment of goodwill |
— |
|
|
9,758 |
|
|
(9,758) |
|
Total operating expenses |
87,569 |
|
|
85,107 |
|
|
2,462 |
|
Loss from operations |
(87,569) |
|
|
(85,107) |
|
|
(2,462) |
|
Total other expense, net |
(6,270) |
|
|
(3,572) |
|
|
(2,698) |
|
Loss before provision for income taxes |
(93,839) |
|
|
(88,679) |
|
|
(5,160) |
|
Provision for income taxes |
28 |
|
|
17 |
|
|
11 |
|
Net loss |
$ |
(93,867) |
|
|
$ |
(88,696) |
|
|
$ |
(5,171) |
|
Research and Development Expenses
Research and development expenses consist primarily of costs
incurred in connection with the discovery and development of our
product candidates, including employee salaries and related
expenses, expenses incurred in connection with the preclinical and
clinical development of our product candidates, including under
agreements with third parties, such as consultants and contract
research organizations (“CROs”); the cost of manufacturing drug
products for use in our preclinical studies and clinical trials,
including under agreements with third parties, such as consultants
and contract manufacturing organizations (“CMOs”); facilities,
depreciation and other expenses, which include direct or allocated
expenses for rent and maintenance of facilities and insurance;
costs related to compliance with regulatory requirements; and
payments made under third-party licensing agreements. We expense
research and development costs as incurred.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
December 31, |
|
2022 |
|
2021 |
|
Change |
|
(in thousands) |
Direct research and development expenses by product
candidate: |
|
|
|
|
|
Mavorixafor (X4P-001) |
$ |
30,041 |
|
|
$ |
25,400 |
|
|
$ |
4,641 |
|
X4P-002 |
2,338 |
|
|
1,130 |
|
|
1,208 |
|
X4P-003 |
206 |
|
|
1,370 |
|
|
(1,164) |
|
Unallocated expense |
28,473 |
|
|
22,747 |
|
|
5,726 |
|
Total research and development expenses |
$ |
61,058 |
|
|
$ |
50,647 |
|
|
$ |
10,411 |
|
Research and development expenses were $61.1 million for the year
ended December 31, 2022, as compared to $50.6 million for the year
ended December 31, 2021, reflecting an increase of $10.4
million. The increase in research and development expenses in 2022
as compared to 2021 was primarily due to higher clinical trial
expenses and third-party manufacturing costs related to mavorixafor
to support our ongoing clinical trials and increased consulting and
professional services expenses related to these clinical trials.
Research and development expenses also increased in 2022 due to an
increase in unallocated expenses, primarily due to an increase in
head count within our manufacturing, regulatory and clinical
operations functions, resulting in higher compensation expenses,
including stock-based compensation. In addition, unallocated
research and development expense increased due to higher external
regulatory compliance and information technology
costs.
We expect that our research and development expenses,
particularly for our mavorixafor
programs, will increase over the next several years as we
continue to conduct our clinical trials of mavorixafor in chronic
neutropenic disorders. Research and development expenses related to
our X4P-002 and X4P-003 programs were not significant in 2022
relative to our overall research and development
expenses.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses consist primarily of
salaries and related costs, including stock-based compensation for
personnel in sale and marketing, executive, finance and
administrative functions. Selling, general and administrative
expenses also include direct and allocated facility-related costs,
as well as professional fees for legal, patent, consulting,
investor and public relations, accounting, and audit
services.
Selling, general and administrative expenses were $27.0 million in
2022, as compared to $24.7 million in 2021, reflecting an increase
of $2.3 million. The increase in selling, general and
administrative expenses in 2022 as compared to 2021 was primarily
due to an increase in compensation, including stock-based
compensation costs, primarily resulting from severance payments
incurred during 2022 and increases in salaries. We expect selling,
general and administrative expenses will grow in the future as we
continue to build out our selling, general and administrative
functions.
Goodwill Impairment
Goodwill is tested quantitatively for impairment at the reporting
unit level annually in the fourth quarter, or more frequently when
events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset might be
impaired. Examples of such events or circumstances include, but are
not limited to, a significant adverse change in legal or business
climate, an adverse regulatory action or unanticipated
competition.
We have determined that our company operates in a single operating
segment and has a single reporting unit. To perform the
quantitative test, we compare the fair value of the reporting unit
to its carrying value. As we have one reporting unit, we determine
its fair value based on the market approach taking into
consideration the market value of the company as a whole and any
control premium that might be realized upon the sale of the
reporting unit. If the fair value of the reporting unit exceeds the
carrying value of its net assets, goodwill is not impaired, and no
further testing is required. If the fair value of the reporting
unit is less than the
carrying value, we measure the amount of impairment loss, if any,
as the excess of the carrying value over the fair value of the
reporting unit.
As of December 31, 2022 we determined that goodwill was not
impaired based on its quantitative test. As of December 31, 2021,
our market capitalization, measured as the price of our common
stock multiplied by shares of common stock outstanding, dropped
below the value of our net assets, including goodwill. As a result
of the sustained decline in the market price of our common stock,
the fair value of our single reporting unit, measured based on our
market capitalization as of December 31, 2021, was lower than its
carrying value and we concluded that goodwill was impaired.
Accordingly, we recorded an impairment charge of $9.8 million to
reduce the carrying amount of goodwill to $17.4 million as of
December 31, 2021. Future declines in the market value of our
common stock may result in additional impairment charges being
recorded.
Gain on Sale of Non-Financial Asset
During the year ended December 31, 2022, a third party, who had
previously acquired rights to certain intellectual property from
us, terminated the arrangement and transferred these rights back us
and we transferred these rights to another third party in return
for $0.5 million. We have no continuing involvement in any ongoing
research and development activities associated with the
intellectual property. We concluded that these third parties are
"non-customers" as the underlying intellectual property transferred
to and from these third parties supports potential drug candidates
that are not aligned with our strategic focus and, therefore, are
not an output of our ordinary activities. Accordingly, we
classified this transaction as a “gain on sale of non-financial
asset” for the year ended December 31, 2022. There was no such
transaction in year ended December 31, 2021.
Other Expense, Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
December 31,
|
|
2022 |
|
2021 |
|
Change |
|
(in thousands) |
Interest income |
$ |
219 |
|
|
$ |
10 |
|
|
$ |
209 |
|
Interest expense |
(3,993) |
|
|
(3,642) |
|
|
(351) |
|
Change in fair value of warrant and derivative
liabilities |
1,701 |
|
|
(366) |
|
|
2,067 |
|
Research and development incentive program |
534 |
|
|
789 |
|
|
(255) |
|
Foreign currency losses, issuance costs related to warrants and
other |
(4,731) |
|
|
(363) |
|
|
(4,368) |
|
Total other expense, net |
$ |
(6,270) |
|
|
$ |
(3,572) |
|
|
$ |
(2,698) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in other expense, net, of $2.7 million for the year
ended December 31, 2022 as compared to 2021 was primarily due to an
increase in transaction fees associated with the issuance of
warrants that are accounted for as liabilities, partially offset by
a decrease in the fair value of the embedded derivative liability
associated with the Hercules Loan agreement, as defined below, and
the net change in the fair value of warrants accounted for as
liabilities, as further described in Note 10 to the consolidated
financial statements included herein.
Income Taxes
For the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, we recorded
an immaterial income tax provision related to our Austrian
subsidiary. In addition, in 2020 we recorded tax expense related to
a withholding tax related to a milestone payment received from a
foreign jurisdiction. We
do not expect to record a significant income tax benefit or expense
for several years as we have significant net operating loss
carryforwards that are fully reserved until such time as we begin
to generate meaningful taxable income in our U.S. jurisdiction. We
expect this will occur when and if we are able to commercialize our
drug products in the future.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Sources of Liquidity
To date, we have funded our operations primarily with proceeds from
sales of common stock, warrants and prefunded
warrants for the purchase of our preferred stock and our common
stock, sales of preferred stock, proceeds from the issuance
of
convertible debt and borrowings under loan and security
agreements.
ATM Sales Agreement
—
We have entered into a Controlled Equity
OfferingSM
Sales Agreement (“ATM Sales Agreement”), with B. Riley Securities,
Inc., Cantor Fitzgerald & Co., and Stifel, Nicolaus &
Company, Incorporated (collectively the “Sales Agents”), pursuant
to which we may offer and sell, at our sole discretion through one
or more of the Sales Agents, shares of our common stock having an
aggregate offering price of up to $50 million. To date, we have
sold approximately $14.3 million of our common stock, net of
offering costs, under the ATM Sales Agreement.
LPC Agreement
—
In January 2022, we entered into an agreement, (the “LPC
Agreement”) with Lincoln Park Capital Fund LLC (“Lincoln
Park”),
pursuant to which we have the right to sell to Lincoln Park shares
of our common stock, having an aggregate value of up to $50.0
million, subject to certain limitations and conditions, at our
request during a 36-month period. The shares of common stock that
we may sell under the LPC Agreement are capped at 5.6 million,
which amount may be adjusted under certain conditions as defined in
the LPC Agreement. In January 2022, we raised $3.0 million from the
sale of shares of our common stock through the LPC
Agreement.
Public and Private Equity Offerings
—
Over the past several years we have funded our operations primarily
from sales of common stock, warrants and prefunded warrants through
both public offerings and private placements. In March 2021, we
sold shares of common stock, redeemable common stock, and, in lieu
of common stock, pre-funded warrants to purchase shares of common
stock in a private placement for gross proceeds of $55.0 million,
before offering expenses and $2 million paid for the subsequent
settlement of redeemable common stock in August 2021. In November
2021, we raised approximately $10.0 million through the sale of
pre-funded warrants to an investor in a private placement. In March
2022, we sold shares of common stock and, in lieu of common stock,
pre-funded warrants to purchase shares of common stock in a private
placement for gross proceeds of $3.0 million, before offering
expenses. In June 2022, we sold shares of common stock and, in lieu
of common stock, pre-funded warrants to purchase shares of common
stock in a private placement for gross proceeds of $55.7 million,
before offering expenses. In December 2022, we sold shares of
common stock and, in lieu of common stock, pre-funded warrants to
purchase shares of common stock in a public offering for gross
proceeds of $65.1 million, before offering expenses.
Hercules Loan Agreement
—
In January 2023, we entered into a Second Amended and Restated Loan
and Security Agreement (the “Hercules Loan Agreement”) with
Hercules Capital, Inc., as agent and lender, and Hercules Capital
Funding IV LLC and Hercules Capital Funding Trust 2022-1, as
lenders (collectively, “Hercules”), which agreement amended and
restated the Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement dated
as of June 27, 2019, as subsequently amended from time to time (the
“Previous Loan Agreement”). The Hercules Loan Agreement provides
for a term loan of $32.5 million and an interest-only payment
period through October 1, 2024, provided however, if certain
conditions are met, then the interest-only payment period will be
extended to January 1, 2026. To date, we have borrowed the full
$32.5 million under the Hercules Loan Agreement, and such amount
remains outstanding as of December 31, 2022.
Going Concern—
Since our inception, we have incurred significant operating losses
and negative cash flows from our operations. We have not yet
commercialized any products and we do not expect to generate
revenue from sales of any products for several years, if at all. As
of December 31, 2022, our cash and cash equivalents were $121.7
million and our restricted cash balance was $1.3 million. We have a
covenant under our Hercules Loan Agreement that currently requires
that we maintain a minimum level of cash of $20.0 million, subject
to reduction to $10 million upon the achievement of operational
milestones. Based on our current financial projections and with no
additional funding, we believe we will not be able to maintain the
minimum cash required to satisfy this covenant beginning in the
first quarter of 2024. In such event, the lenders could require the
repayment of all outstanding debt.
Management has concluded that substantial doubt exists about our
ability to continue as a going concern for the one-year period
following the issuance of our consolidated financial statements for
the year ended December 31, 2022. To finance our operations, we
will need to raise additional capital, which cannot be assured.
Unless and until we reach profitability in the future, we will
require additional capital to fund our operations, which could be
raised through a combination of equity offerings, debt financings,
other third-party funding, marketing and distribution arrangements
and other collaborations and strategic alliances. If we are unable
to obtain funding, we could be forced to delay, reduce or eliminate
some or all of our research and development programs, product
portfolio expansion or commercialization efforts, which would
adversely affect our business prospects, or we may be unable to
continue operations.
Cash Flows
The following table summarizes our cash flow activities for each of
the periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
2022 |
|
2021 |
|
|
(in thousands) |
Net loss |
$ |
(93,867) |
|
|
$ |
(88,696) |
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating
activities |
11,029 |
|
|
19,289 |
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities |
5,736 |
|
|
(1,498) |
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities |
(77,102) |
|
|
(70,905) |
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
(103) |
|
|
(615) |
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
117,230 |
|
|
74,245 |
|
|
Impact of foreign exchange on cash and restricted cash |
(105) |
|
|
(319) |
|
|
Net increase in cash, cash equivalents and restricted
cash |
39,920 |
|
|
2,406 |
|
|
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, beginning of
period |
83,108 |
|
|
80,702 |
|
|
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, end of
period |
$ |
123,028 |
|
|
$ |
83,108 |
|
|
Operating Activities:
During
the year ended December 31, 2022, net cash used in operating
activities was $77.1 million, primarily resulting from our net
losses of $93.9 million, adjusted for noncash expenses of $11.0
million and changes in our operating assets and liabilities of $5.7
million. Noncash expenses primarily includes stock-based
compensation expense of $5.2 million. The change in operating
assets and liabilities was primarily due to an increase in accounts
payable and accrued expenses due to the timing of payments related
to our CROs. Cash used in operating activities was higher for the
year ended December 31, 2022 as compared to the prior year
primarily due to higher net losses in the current
year.
Investing Activities: During
the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, cash used in investing
activities of $0.1 million, and $0.6 million, respectively,
primarily related to furniture and laboratory equipment purchases
related to our research and development center in Vienna,
Austria.
Financing Activities:
During the year ended December 31, 2022, net cash
provided by financing activities was $117.2 million, consisting
primarily of net proceeds from two private placements and a public
offering of our common stock, warrants, and pre-funded warrants.
During the year ended December 31, 2021, net cash provided by
financing activities was $74.2 million, consisting primarily of
proceeds from the sale of our common stock and pre-funded warrants
in a private placement.
Material Capital Requirements
Second Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement with
Hercules
In October 2018, we entered into a Loan and Security Agreement, as
subsequently amended from time to time, with Hercules. On January
6, 2023, we entered into the Hercules Loan Agreement, which amended
and restated the previous loan and security agreement. Under the
Hercules Loan Agreement, we have borrowed the maximum aggregate
principal of $32.5 million of the term loan. Borrowings under
the Hercules Loan Agreement accrue interest at a variable rate
equal to the greater of (i) 10.15%, or (ii)
The Wall Street Journal
prime rate plus 3.15%. In an event of default, and until
such event is no longer continuing, the interest rate applicable to
borrowings would be increased by 4.0%.
Borrowings under the Hercules Loan Agreement are repayable in
monthly interest-only payments through September 2024, and in equal
monthly payments of principal and accrued interest from
October 1, 2024 until the maturity date of the loan on April
1, 2026. After the interest only-period, assuming no prepayments
are made, principal payments of $5.07 million will be due in
2024, $21.6 million in 2025 and $5.8 million in 2026. If
certain conditions are met and we achieve certain operational and
financial milestones, the maturity date will be extended to July 1,
2027 and the interest-only period will be extended to January 1,
2026. At our option, we may prepay all, but not less than all, of
the outstanding borrowings, subject to a prepayment premium when
such repayment is made. In connection with entering into the
Hercules Loan Agreement on January 6, 2023, we settled
$1.3 million of end-of-term payment associated with the
Previous Loan Agreement and we are required to pay end-of-term
payments of
$0.8 million and $1.3 million on July 1, 2023 and April 1,
2026, respectively.
Borrowings under the Hercules Loan Agreement are secured by
substantially all of our personal property and other assets except
for our intellectual property (but including rights to payment an
proceeds from the sale, licensing or disposition of the
intellectual property). Our obligations under the agreement are
subject to acceleration upon occurrence of specified events of
default, including payment default, insolvency and a material
adverse change in our business, operations or financial or other
conditions. The Hercules Loan Agreement restricts our ability to
incur additional indebtedness, pay dividends, encumber intellectual
property, or engage in certain fundamental business transactions,
such as mergers or acquisitions of other businesses, with certain
exceptions.
Under the Hercules Loan Agreement, we have agreed to affirmative
and negative covenants. The covenants include a requirement that we
maintain cash in an account or accounts in which Hercules has a
first priority security interest, in an aggregate amount greater
than $20.0 million. Upon the FDA approval of the sale and marketing
of mavorixafor for the treatment to patients with WHIM syndrome
with a label claim that is generally consistent with that sought in
our NDA filing, the required level shall be reduced to $10.0
million. A breach of any of the covenants under the Hercules Loan
Agreement could result in a default under the loan. Upon the
occurrence of an event of default under the loan facility with
Hercules, the lenders could elect to declare all amounts
outstanding, if any, to be immediately due and payable and
terminate all commitments to extend further credit. If there are
any amounts outstanding that we are unable to repay, the lenders
could proceed against the collateral granted to them to secure such
indebtedness.
Lease Obligations
We have long-term lease obligations for office and laboratory
space. Non-cancellable lease obligations are $1.61 million in 2023,
$1.37 million in 2024, $1.40 million in 2025, and
$1.66 million thereafter.
Funding Requirements
We believe that our cash and cash equivalents will allow us to fund
operations into the second quarter of 2024. However, as noted
above, based on our current financial projections we believe we
would be in violation of a minimum cash covenant of the Hercules
Loan Agreement with Hercules in the first quarter of 2024. In order
to fund operations and satisfy the minimum cash covenant in the
Hercules Loan Agreement, we will be required to raise additional
capital, which may be through a combination of equity offerings,
debt financings, other third-party funding, marketing and
distribution arrangements and other collaborations and strategic
alliances. During 2023 and beyond, assuming no changes to our
current operational expectations, we expect our expenses to
continue to increase in connection with our ongoing activities,
particularly as we advance the current and anticipated clinical
trials of our product candidates in development. Because of the
numerous risks and uncertainties associated with research,
development and commercialization of pharmaceutical product
candidates, we are unable to estimate the exact amount of our
funding requirements. Our short term and long term funding
requirements will depend on and could increase significantly as a
result of many factors, including:
•the
scope, number, initiation, progress, timing, costs, design,
duration, any potential delays, and results of clinical trials and
nonclinical studies for our current or future product candidates,
particularly our Phase 2 clinical trial of mavorixafor for the
treatment of patients with chronic neutropenic
disorders;
•the
outcome, timing and cost of regulatory reviews, approvals or other
actions to meet regulatory requirements established by the FDA and
comparable foreign regulatory authorities, including the potential
for the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities to require
that we perform more studies for our product candidates than those
that we currently expect;
•our
ability to obtain marketing approval for our product
candidates;
•the
cost of filing, prosecuting, defending and enforcing our patent
claims and other intellectual property rights covering our product
candidates, including any such patent claims and intellectual
property rights that we have licensed from Genzyme pursuant to the
terms of our license agreement with Genzyme;
•our
ability to maintain, expand and defend the scope of our
intellectual property portfolio, including the cost of defending
intellectual property disputes, including patent infringement
actions brought by third parties against us or our product
candidates;
•the
cost and timing of completion of commercial-scale manufacturing
activities with respect to our product candidates;
•our
ability to establish and maintain licensing, collaboration or
similar arrangements on favorable terms and whether and to what
extent we retain development or commercialization responsibilities
under any new licensing, collaboration or similar
arrangement;
•the
cost of establishing sales, marketing and distribution capabilities
for any product candidates for which we may receive regulatory
approval in regions where we choose to commercialize our products
on our own;
•the
success of any other business, product or technology that we
acquire or in which we invest;
•the
costs of acquiring, licensing or investing in businesses, product
candidates and technologies;
•our
need and ability to hire additional management and scientific and
medical personnel;
•market
acceptance of our product candidates, to the extent any are
approved for commercial sale;
•the
effect of competing technological and market developments;
and
•the
costs to operate as a public company
Until such time, if ever, as we can generate substantial product
revenue, we expect to finance our cash needs through a combination
of equity offerings, debt financings, collaborations, strategic
alliances, and marketing, distribution or licensing arrangements
with third parties. We have effective universal shelf registration
statements on Form S-3 registering the sale
of our common stock, warrants to purchase our common stock and
other securities on terms that we may determine. We have an ATM
Sales Agreement with the Sales Agents, pursuant to which we have
offered to sell and continue to offer to sell, at our sole
discretion through one or more of the Sales Agents, shares of our
common stock. We have entered into a common stock purchase
agreement with Lincoln Park Capital, pursuant to which Lincoln Park
Capital has committed to purchase, at our request from time to time
over a 36-month period, shares of our common stock having an
aggregate offering price of up to $50.0 million, of which $3.0
million have been sold to date, subject to certain
limitations.
To the extent that we raise additional capital through future
equity offerings or debt financings, the ownership interest of our
stockholders may be materially diluted, and the terms of such
securities could include liquidation or other preferences that
adversely affect the rights of our stockholders. Debt financing and
preferred equity financing, if available, may involve agreements
that include restrictive covenants that limit our ability to take
specified actions, such as incurring additional debt, making
capital expenditures or declaring dividends. If we raise additional
funds through collaborations, strategic alliances or marketing,
distribution or licensing arrangements with third parties, we may
have to relinquish valuable rights to our technologies, future
revenue streams, research programs or product candidates or grant
licenses on terms that may not be favorable to us. If we are unable
to raise additional funds through equity or debt financings or
other arrangements when needed, we may be required to delay, reduce
or eliminate our product development efforts or future
commercialization efforts, or grant rights to develop and market
product candidates that we would otherwise prefer to develop and
market ourselves.
Critical Accounting Estimates
Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States.
The preparation of our consolidated financial statements and
related disclosures requires us to make estimates and judgments
that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, costs and
expenses, and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities
in our consolidated financial statements. We base our estimates on
historical experience, known trends and events and various other
factors that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances, the
results of which form the basis for making judgments about the
carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily
apparent from other sources. We evaluate our estimates and
assumptions on an ongoing basis. Our actual results may differ from
these estimates under different assumptions or
conditions.
While our significant accounting policies are described in more
detail in Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements
included elsewhere in this Annual Report, we believe that the
following accounting policies are those most critical to the
judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated
financial statements.
Accrued Research and Development Expenses.
As part of the process of preparing our consolidated
financial statements, we are required to estimate our accrued
research and development expenses. This process involves reviewing
open contracts and purchase orders, communicating with our
applicable personnel to identify services that have been performed
on our behalf and estimating the level of service performed and the
associated cost incurred for the service when we have not yet been
invoiced or otherwise notified of actual costs. The majority of our
service providers invoice us in arrears for services performed, on
a pre-determined schedule or when contractual milestones are met;
however, some require advance payments. We make estimates of our
accrued expenses as of each balance sheet date in the consolidated
financial statements based on facts and circumstances known to them
at that time.
For our significant vendors, we confirm the accuracy of these
estimates with the service providers and make
adjustments, if necessary. Examples of estimated accrued research
and development expenses include fees paid to:
•vendors
in connection with preclinical development activities;
•CROs
and investigative sites in connection with preclinical studies and
clinical trials; and
•CMOs
in connection with the production of preclinical and clinical trial
materials.
We base the expense recorded related to external research and
development on our estimates of the services received and efforts
expended pursuant to quotes and contracts with multiple CMOs and
CROs that supply, conduct and manage preclinical studies and
clinical trials on our behalf. The financial terms of these
agreements are subject to negotiation, vary from contract to
contract and may result in uneven payment flows. There may be
instances in which payments made to our vendors will exceed the
level of services provided and result in a prepayment of the
expense. Payments under some of these contracts depend on factors
such as the successful enrollment of patients and the completion of
clinical trial milestones. In accruing service fees, we estimate
the time period over which services will be performed and the level
of effort to be expended in each period. If the actual timing of
the performance of services or the level of effort varies from the
estimate, we adjust the accrual or the amount of prepaid expenses
accordingly.
Although we do not expect our estimates to be materially different
from amounts actually incurred, our understanding of the status and
timing of services performed relative to the actual status and
timing of services performed may vary and may result in reporting
amounts that are too high or too low in any particular period. To
date, there have not been any material adjustments to our prior
estimates of accrued research and development
expenses.
Stock-Based Compensation.
We measure all stock-based awards granted to employees,
directors and consultants based on the grant-date fair value of the
award and recognized compensation expense, net of estimated
forfeitures, over the requisite service period, which is generally
the vesting period of the respective award. The stock-based awards
that we have issued to date include a service-based vesting
condition and the expense for these awards is recognized using the
straight-line method. We have also issued stock-based awards with
performance-based vesting conditions that vest in part upon our
achievement of operational milestones and over time thereafter for
the subsequent two years as the employee continues to provide
services. We assess the probability of achievement of these
operational milestones and recognize stock-based compensation for
these awards using the accelerated attribution model based on the
fair value of the awards as of the date of grant and our best
estimate of the date each operational milestone will be achieved.
We update our estimates related to the probability and timing of
achievement of the operational milestones each period until the
award either vests or is forfeited.
The fair value of stock option grants is estimated on the date of
grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model, which uses as
inputs the fair value of our common stock and assumptions we make
for the volatility of our common stock, the expected term of the
stock options, the risk-free interest rate for a period that
approximates the expected term of our stock options and an expected
dividend yield. Prior to the closing of the Merger and the listing
of our common stock on the Nasdaq Capital Market, our board of
directors historically determined, as of the date of each option
grant and with input from our management, the assistance of a
third-party valuation specialist the estimated fair value of our
common stock on the date of grant based on a number of objectives
and subjective factors. Since the Merger and the listing of
our common stock on the Nasdaq Capital Market, we have relied on
the market price of our common stock to determine the fair value on
the date of grant. As our common stock does not have a sufficient
history of trading, we estimate our volatility based on the
historical volatility of publicly traded peer companies. We
estimate the expected term of our stock awards by utilizing the
“simplified” method, which calculates the expected term based on
weighted average midpoint of the award’s vesting and expiration
dates. We determine the risk-free interest rate by reference to the
U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant of the
award for time periods approximately equal to the expected term of
the award. We estimate that no dividends will be paid as we do not
expect to pay cash dividends in the foreseeable
future.
The assumptions underlying these valuations represent the best
estimates of our management, which involve inherent uncertainties
and the application of our judgment. As a result, if factors or
expected outcomes change and we use significantly different
assumptions or estimates, the resulting share-based compensation
expense could be materially different.
Goodwill.
Business combinations are accounted for under the acquisition
method. The total purchase price of an acquisition is allocated to
the underlying identifiable net assets, based on their respective
estimated fair values as of the acquisition date. Determining the
fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed requires
management’s judgment and often involves the use of significant
estimates and assumptions, including assumptions with respect to
future cash inflows and outflows, probabilities of success,
discount rates, and asset lives, among other items. Assets acquired
and liabilities assumed are recorded at their estimated fair
values. The excess of the purchase price over the estimated fair
values of the net assets acquired is recorded as
goodwill.
Goodwill is tested quantitatively for impairment at the reporting
unit level annually in the fourth quarter, or more frequently when
events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset might be
impaired. Examples of such events or circumstances include, but are
not limited to, a significant adverse change in legal or business
climate, an adverse regulatory action or unanticipated
competition.
We have determined that we operate in a single operating segment
and have a single reporting unit. To perform its quantitative test,
we compare the fair value of our single reporting unit to the
carrying value of its net assets, including goodwill. We use our
market capitalization (common shares outstanding multiplied by the
price per share of our common stock) to measure the fair value of
the reporting unit. If the fair value of the reporting unit exceeds
the carrying value of its net assets, goodwill is not impaired, and
no further testing is required. If the fair value of the reporting
unit is less than the carrying value, we measure the impairment
loss as the excess of the carrying value over the fair value of the
reporting unit. See Note 4 for more information on our goodwill
impairment test as of December 31, 2022.
Smaller Reporting Company Status
We are a smaller reporting company as defined in the Exchange Act.
We may take advantage of certain of the scaled disclosures
available to smaller reporting companies and will be able to take
advantage of these scaled disclosures for so long as (i) our voting
and non-voting common stock held by non-affiliates is less than
$250.0 million measured on the last business day of our second
fiscal quarter or (ii) our annual revenue is less than $100.0
million during the most recently completed fiscal year and our
voting and non-voting common stock held by non-affiliates is less
than $700.0 million measured on the last business day of our second
fiscal quarter.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
A description of recently issued accounting pronouncements that may
potentially impact our financial position and results of operations
is disclosed in Note 2 to our consolidated financial
statements appearing at the end of this Annual Report on Form
10-K.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE
DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
As a smaller reporting company, we are not required to provide
disclosure for this Item.
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND
SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
The financial statements required to be filed pursuant to this Item
8 are appended to this Annual Report.
The financial statements contain a Report of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, Boston,
Massachusetts, US (Firm ID 238).
An index of those financial statements is found in Item 15 of Part
IV of this Annual Report.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH
ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES
None.
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND
PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain “disclosure controls and procedures” as defined in
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act, that are
designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the
reports we file and submit under the Exchange Act is recorded,
processed, summarized and reported within the time periods
specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and
procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures
designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us
in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is
accumulated and communicated to our management, including our
principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as
appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure. In designing and evaluating our disclosure controls and
procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures,
no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only
reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives, and management
necessarily applies its judgment in evaluating the benefits of
possible controls and procedures relative to their
costs.
Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, who serve as our principal
executive officer and principal financial officer, respectively,
has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and
procedures as of December 31, 2022. Based on such evaluation, our
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded
that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the
reasonable assurance level.
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial
Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining
adequate internal control over financial reporting for the company.
Internal control over financial reporting is defined in Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) promulgated under the Exchange Act as a
process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company’s
principal executive and principal financial officers and effected
by the company’s board of directors, management and other
personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles and includes those policies and
procedures that:
•pertain
to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately
and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets
of the company;
•provide
reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to
permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and
expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with
authorizations of management and directors of the company;
and
•provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the company’s
assets that could have a material effect on the financial
statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods
are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because
of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the
policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Management conducted an assessment of our internal controls over
financial reporting based on the framework established by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
in
Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013).
Based on the assessment, management concluded that, as of December
31, 2022, our internal control over financial reporting was
effective.
This Annual Report does not include an attestation report of our
registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over
financial reporting due to an exemption provided to non-accelerated
filers.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There have been no significant changes in our internal control over
financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)
under the Exchange Act) during the quarter ended December 31, 2022
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
ITEM 9C. DISCLOSURE REGARDING FOREIGN
JURISDICTIONS THAT PREVENT INSPECTIONS
Not applicable.
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference
to the information set forth in the sections titled “Proposal 1-
Election of Directors,” “Information Regarding the Board of
Directors and Corporate Governance” and “Executive Officers” in our
2023 Proxy Statement.
Information regarding our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (the
“Code of Conduct”) required by this item will be contained in our
2023 Proxy Statement under the caption “Information Regarding the
Board of Directors and Corporate Governance – Code of Ethics,” and
is hereby incorporated by reference. If we make any substantive
amendments to the Code of Conduct or grant any waiver from a
provision of the Code of Conduct to any executive officer or
director, we will promptly disclose the nature of the amendment or
waiver on our website. The full text of our Code of Conduct is
available at the Investor Relations section of our website at
investors.x4pharma.com/investor-relations. The reference to our
website address does not constitute incorporation by reference of
the information contained at or available through our website, and
you should not consider it to be a part of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference
to the information set forth in the sections titled “Executive
Compensation” in our 2023 Proxy Statement.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN
BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER
MATTERS
The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference
to the information set forth in the section titled “Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” and “Equity
Compensation Plan Information” in our 2023 Proxy
Statement.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED
TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference
to the information set forth in the section titled “Transactions
with Related Persons and Indemnification” and “Information
regarding the Board of Directors and Corporate Governance” in our
2023 Proxy Statement.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND
SERVICES
The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference
to the information set forth in the section titled “Principal
Accountant Fees and Services” contained in our 2023 Proxy
Statement.
PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBIT AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT
SCHEDULES
(1) Financial Statements
The following documents are included on pages F-1 through F-36
attached hereto and are filed as part of this Annual
Report.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page |
|
|
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |
Boston, MA |
(Firm ID 238) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-5
|
|
|
|
|
(2) Financial Statement Schedules:
All financial statement schedules have been omitted because they
are not applicable, not required or the information required is
shown in the consolidated financial statements or the notes
thereto.
(3) Exhibits.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Exhibit Description |
|
Form |
Exhibit |
Date |
|
Se File/ Ref No. |
3.1 |
|
|
|
8-K |
3.1 |
9/1/2022 |
|
001-38295 |
3.2 |
|
|
|
8-K |
3.2 |
11/20/2017 |
|
001-38295 |
4.1 |
|
|
|
8-K |
4.1 |
3/13/2019 |
|
001-38295 |
4.2 |
|
|
|
8-K |
4.2 |
3/13/2019 |
|
001-38295 |
4.3 |
|
|
|
8-K |
4.3 |
3/13/2019 |
|
001-38295 |
4.4 |
|
|
|
8-K |
4.4 |
3/13/2019 |
|
001-38295 |
4.5 |
|
|
|
8-K |
4.5 |
3/13/2019 |
|
001-38295 |
4.6 |
|
|
|
8-K |
4.6 |
3/13/2019 |
|
001-38295 |
4.7 |
|
|
|
8-K |
4.1 |
04/12/2019 |
|
001-38295 |
4.8 |
|
|
|
8-K |
4.2 |
04/12/2019 |
|
001-38295 |
4.9 |
|
|
|
8-K |
4.1 |
11/29/2019 |
|
001-38295 |
4.10 |
|
|
|
8-K |
10.1 |
3/19/2019 |
|
001-38295 |
4.11 |
|
|
|
8-K |
10.2 |
3/19/2019 |
|
001-38295 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.12 |
|
|
|
8-K |
4.1 |
3/19/2019 |
|
001-38295 |
4.13 |
|
|
|
8-K |
10.1 |
11/5/2021 |
|
001-38295 |
4.14 |
|
|
|
8-K |
10.2 |
11/5/2021 |
|
001-38295 |
4.15 |
|
|
|
8-K |
4.1 |
11/5/2021 |
|
001-38295 |
4.16 |
|
|
|
S-3 |
1.2 |
8/7/2020 |
|
001-38295 |
4.17* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.18 |
|
|
|
8-K |
4.1 |
3/3/2022 |
|
001-38295 |
4.19 |
|
|
|
8-K |
10.1 |
3/3/2022 |
|
001-38295 |
4.20 |
|
|
|
8-K |
10.2 |
3/3/2022 |
|
001-38295 |
4.21 |
|
|
|
8-K |
10.1 |
1/14/2022 |
|
001-38295 |
4.22 |
|
|
|
8-K |
10.2 |
1/14/2022 |
|
001-38295 |
4.23 |
|
|
|
8-K |
10.1 |
7/1/2022 |
|
001-38295 |
4.24 |
|
|
|
8-K |
10.2 |
7/1/2022 |
|
001-38295 |
4.25 |
|
|
|
8-K |
4.1 |
7/1/2022 |
|
001-38295 |
4.26 |
|
|
|
8-K |
4.2 |
7/1/2022 |
|
001-38295 |
4.27 |
|
|
|
8-K |
4.1 |
12/9/2022 |
|
001-38295 |
4.28 |
|
|
|
8-K |
4.2 |
12/9/2022 |
|
001-38295 |
10.1@
|
|
|
|
8-K |
10.1.1 |
3/13/2019 |
|
001-38295 |
10.2@
|
|
|
|
8-K |
10.1.2 |
4/2/2019 |
|
001-38295 |
10.3@
|
|
|
|
8-K |
10.6 |
6/17/2019 |
|
001-38295 |
10.4@
|
|
|
|
S-8 |
99.1 |
6/10/2020 |
|
333-239082 |
10.5@
|
|
|
|
S-1 |
10.8 |
10/20/2017 |
|
001-38295 |
10.6@
|
|
|
|
S-1 |
10.9 |
10/20/2017 |
|
001-38295 |
10.7@
|
|
|
|
8-K |
10.6 |
11/27/2018 |
|
001-38295 |
10.8@
|
|
|
|
8-K |
10.5 |
6/19/2019 |
|
001-38295 |
10.9@ |
|
|
|
S-8 |
99.6 |
6/10/2020 |
|
333-239082 |
10.10@
|
|
|
|
S-1 |
10.10 |
10/20/2017 |
|
001-38295 |
10.11@
|
|
|
|
8-K |
10.1 |
12/23/2022 |
|
001-38295 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.12@ |
|
|
|
8-K |
10.2 |
6/17/2019 |
|
001-38295 |
10.13@ |
|
|
|
8-K |
10.3 |
6/17/2019 |
|
001-38295 |
10.14@ |
|
|
|
8-K |
10.4 |
6/17/2019 |
|
001-38295 |
10.15@ |
|
|
|
S-1/A |
10.36 |
11/06/2017 |
|
001-38295 |
10.16@* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.17@ |
|
|
|
8-K |
10.3 |
3/13/2019 |
|
001-38295 |
10.18@ |
|
|
|
10-Q |
10.1 |
3/31/2020 |
|
001-38295 |
10.19@ |
|
|
|
10-K |
10.19 |
3/17/2022 |
|
001-38295 |
10.20@ |
|
|
|
10-K |
10.23 |
3/17/2022 |
|
001-38295 |
10.21@* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.22# |
|
|
|
8-K |
10.5# |
3/13/2019 |
|
001-38295 |
10.23# |
|
|
|
8-K/A |
10.6# |
5/13/2019 |
|
001-38295 |
10.24# |
|
|
|
8-K/A |
10.7# |
5/13/2019 |
|
001-38295 |
10.25# |
|
|
|
8-K/A |
10.8# |
5/13/2019 |
|
001-38295 |
10.26 |
|
|
|
10-K |
10.33 |
3/19/2021 |
|
001-38295 |
10.27*+ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.28 |
|
|
|
10-K |
10.32 |
3/12/2020 |
|
001-38295 |
10.29 |
|
Settlement Agreement, dated as of March 8, 2019, by and among X4
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (formerly Arsanis, Inc.), Artemis AC Corp.,
X4 Therapeutics, Inc. (formerly X4 Pharmaceuticals, Inc.), Arsanis
Biosciences GmbH and Österreichische
Forschungsförderungsgesellschaft GmbH.
|
|
8-K |
10.1 |
4/11/2019 |
|
001-38295 |
10.30 |
|
|
|
10-K |
10.35 |
3/12/2020 |
|
001-38295 |
10.31 |
|
|
|
10-K |
10.36 |
3/12/2020 |
|
001-38295 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.32 |
|
|
|
10-K |
10.37 |
3/12/2020 |
|
001-38295 |
10.33 |
|
|
|
10-K |
10.38 |
3/12/2020 |
|
001-38295 |
10.34 |
|
|
|
10-K |
10.39 |
3/12/2020 |
|
001-38295 |
10.35 |
|
|
|
10-K |
10.48 |
3/19/2021 |
|
001-38295 |
10.36@ |
|
|
|
8-K |
10.1 |
11/9/2022 |
|
001-38295 |
21.1 |
|
|
|
10-K |
21.1 |
3/17/2022 |
|
001-38295 |
23.1* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101.INS |
|
XBRL Instance Document |
|
|
|
|
|
|
101.SCH |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document |
|
|
|
|
|
|
101.CAL |
|
SXRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document |
|
|
|
|
|
|
101.DEF |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document |
|
|
|
|
|
|
101.LAB |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document |
|
|
|
|
|
|
101.PRE |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document |
|
|
|
|
|
|
104 |
|
Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as Inline
XBRL) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
*Filed
herewith
** Furnished and not filed
herewith
# Certain confidential portions of this
Exhibit were omitted by means of marking such portions with
brackets (“[***]”) because the identified confidential portions (i)
are not material and (ii) is the type of information that the
Registrant treats as private or
confidential.
+
Certain schedules and exhibits have been omitted from this Exhibit
pursuant to Item 601(a)(5) of Regulation S-K. The Registrant will
furnish a copy of any omitted schedule or exhibit to the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
@ Indicates management contract or
compensatory plan
The agreements and other documents filed as exhibits to this Annual
Report on Form 10-K are not intended to provide factual information
or other disclosure other than with respect to the terms of the
agreements or other documents themselves, and you should not rely
on them for that purpose. In particular, any representations and
warranties made by us in these agreements or other documents were
made solely within the specific context of the relevant agreement
or document and may not describe the actual state of affairs as of
the date they were made or at any other time.
ITEM 16. FORM 10-K SUMMARY
None.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X4 PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. |
|
|
|
|
Date: March 21, 2023
|
By: |
|
/s/ Paula Ragan |
|
|
|
Paula Ragan, Ph D. |
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, this report has been signed by the following
persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on
the dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature |
|
Title |
|
Date |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Paula Ragan |
|
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director |
|
March 21, 2023
|
Paula Ragan, Ph.D. |
|
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Adam S. Mostafa |
|
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |
|
March 21, 2023
|
Adam S. Mostafa |
|
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting
Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Michael S. Wyzga |
|
Chairman of the Board of Directors |
|
March 21, 2023
|
Michael S. Wyzga |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ William Aliski |
|
Director |
|
March 21, 2023
|
William E. Aliski |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Gary J. Bridger |
|
Director |
|
March 21, 2023
|
Gary J. Bridger, Ph.D. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Francoise De Craecker |
|
Director |
|
March 21, 2023
|
Francoise De Craecker |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Alison Lawton |
|
Director |
|
March 21, 2023
|
Alison F. Lawton |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ David McGirr |
|
Director |
|
March 21, 2023
|
David McGirr |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Murray W. Stewart |
|
Director |
|
March 21, 2023
|
Murray W. Stewart, M.D. |
|
|
|
|
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting
Firm
To
the
Board of Directors and Stockholders of X4 Pharmaceuticals,
Inc.
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of X4
Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of
December 31, 2022 and 2021, and the related consolidated statements
of operations and comprehensive loss, of redeemable common stock
and stockholders’ equity and of cash flows for each of the three
years in the period ended December 31, 2022, including the related
notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial
statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements
present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of
the Company as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, and the results of
its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in
the period ended December 31, 2022 in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of
America.
Substantial Doubt about the Company’s Ability to Continue as a
Going Concern
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been
prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going
concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial
statements, the Company has incurred operating losses and negative
cash flows from operations since inception, that raise substantial
doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern.
Management's plans in regard to these matters are also described in
Note 1. The consolidated financial statements do not include any
adjustments that might result from the outcome of this
uncertainty.
Basis for Opinion
These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of
the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial statements based on
our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB)
and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in
accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable
rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and
the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits of these consolidated financial statements
in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards
require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are
free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The
Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an
audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of
our audits we are required to obtain an understanding of internal
control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of
expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's
internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express
no such opinion.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of
material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements,
whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that
respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a
test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the
consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included
evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation
of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our
audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical Audit Matters
The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising
from the current period audit of the consolidated financial
statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to
the audit committee and that (i) relates to accounts or disclosures
that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (ii)
involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex
judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not
alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial
statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the
critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the
critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it
relates.
External Research and Development Costs
As described in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements,
costs associated with internal research and development and
external research and development services, including drug
development and preclinical studies, are expensed as incurred. The
Company’s research and development expense for the year ended
December 31, 2022 was $61.1 million, a portion of which relates to
external research and development costs. Management recognizes
external research and development costs based on an evaluation of
the progress to completion of specific tasks using information
provided to the Company by its service providers. As disclosed by
management, this process involves reviewing open contracts and
purchase orders, communicating with applicable personnel to
identify services that have been performed, and estimating the
level of service performed and the associated cost incurred for the
service when the Company has not yet been invoiced or otherwise
notified of actual costs.
The principal consideration for our determination that performing
procedures relating to external research and development costs is a
critical audit matter is a high degree of auditor effort in
performing procedures related to the Company’s external research
and development costs.
Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating
audit evidence in connection with forming our overall opinion on
the consolidated financial statements. These procedures included,
among others, testing external research and development costs on a
sample basis, which included tracing relevant information to the
underlying contract research organization and contract
manufacturing organization agreements, purchase orders, invoices
received, and information received from certain third party service
providers, where applicable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP |
Boston, Massachusetts |
March 21, 2023 |
|
|
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2016. |
X4 PHARMACEUTICALS INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
2022 |
|
December 31,
2021 |
Assets |
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ |
121,718 |
|
|
$ |
81,787 |
|
Research and development incentive receivable |
1,152 |
|
|
747 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
5,807 |
|
|
5,344 |
|
Total current assets |
128,677 |
|
|
87,878 |
|
Property and equipment, net |
1,104 |
|
|
1,514 |
|
Goodwill |
17,351 |
|
|
17,351 |
|
Right-of-use assets |
7,229 |
|
|
8,710 |
|
Other assets |
1,225 |
|
|
1,723 |
|
Total assets |
$ |
155,586 |
|
|
$ |
117,176 |
|
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity |
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
$ |
7,777 |
|
|
$ |
4,283 |
|
Accrued expenses |
12,034 |
|
|
7,870 |
|
Current portion of lease liability |
1,198 |
|
|
1,075 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
1,315 |
|
|
795 |
|
Total current liabilities |
22,324 |
|
|
14,023 |
|
Long-term debt, including accretion, net of discount |
32,304 |
|
|
33,139 |
|
Lease liabilities |
3,603 |
|
|
4,776 |
|
Warrant liability (Note 4) |
23,131 |
|
|
— |
|
Other liabilities |
173 |
|
|
826 |
|
Total liabilities |
81,535 |
|
|
52,764 |
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 9) |
|
|
|
Stockholders’ equity: |
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.001 par value. 500,000,000 and 125,000,000 shares
authorized as of December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021,
respectively; 121,667,250 and 28,127,657 shares issued and
outstanding as of December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021,
respectively
|
122 |
|
|
28 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
450,786 |
|
|
347,374 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
(119) |
|
|
(119) |
|
Accumulated deficit |
(376,738) |
|
|
(282,871) |
|
Total stockholders’ equity |
74,051 |
|
|
64,412 |
|
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity |
$ |
155,586 |
|
|
$ |
117,176 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated
financial statements |
X4 PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE
LOSS
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
2022 |
|
2021 |
|
2020 |
License revenue |
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
— |
|
|
$ |
3,000 |
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development |
61,058 |
|
|
50,647 |
|
|
41,932 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
27,020 |
|
|
24,702 |
|
|
20,942 |
|
Goodwill impairment |
— |
|