This prospectus relates
to the offer of 1,000,000 of shares of our common stock to East Hill Investments, Ltd. (“East Hill”) pursuant to a
Securities Purchase Agreement (“Purchase Agreement”). Under the Purchase Agreement, we will agree to issue, and East
Hill will agree to purchase, 1,000,000 shares of our common stock for $4.25 per share. Under the Purchase Agreement, 50,000 shares
will be issued immediately in consideration for a promissory note from East Hill for the purchase price. The promissory note will
be due in full 14 days after issuance, will not bear interest before the maturity date, and will bear interest at the rate of
15% after the maturity date. Until sixty days after the initial purchase, East Hill will have the right to request the
purchase of additional shares of common stock on the same basis, which purchases must be in amounts of not less than 20,000 shares
and not more than 50,000 shares. East Hill will purchase the balance of any shares which remain unsold for cash sixty days
after the initial purchase.
RISK
FACTORS
An
investment in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider the risks described below and the
other information before deciding to invest in our common stock. The risks described below are not the only ones facing us. Additional
risks not presently known to us or that we currently consider immaterial may also adversely affect our business. We have attempted
to identify below the major factors that could cause differences between actual and planned or expected results, but we cannot
assure you that we have identified all of those factors. If any of such risks actually occur, our business, financial condition
and operating results could be materially adversely affected. In such case you may lose part or all of your investment.
Risks
Related to Our Business
A
substantial or extended decline in coal prices within the coal industry or increase in the costs of mining could adversely affect
our operating results and the value of our coal reserves.
Our
operating results will largely depend on the margins that we earn on our coal sales. We expect to enter into coal sales contracts
that are “forward sales contracts” under which customers agree to pay a specified price under their contracts for
coal to be delivered in future years. The profitability of these contracts depends on our ability to adequately control the costs
of the coal production underlying the contracts. Our margins reflect the price we receive for our coal over our cost of producing
and transporting our coal and are impacted by many factors, including:
|
●
|
The
market price for coal;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
The
supply of, and demand for, domestic and foreign coal;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Competition
from other coal suppliers;
|
|
●
|
The
cost of using, and the availability of, other fuels, including the effects of technological developments;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Advances
in power technologies;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
The
efficiency of our mines;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
The
amount of coal we are able to produce from our properties, which could be adversely affected by, among other things, operating
difficulties and unfavorable geologic conditions;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
The
pricing terms contained in our long-term contracts;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Cancellation
or renegotiation of contracts;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Legislative,
regulatory and judicial developments, including those related to the release of GHGs;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
The
strength of the U.S. dollar;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Air
emission, wastewater discharge and other environmental standards for coal-fired power plants or coal mines;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Delays
in the receipt of, failure to receive, or revocation of necessary government permits;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Inclement
or hazardous weather conditions and natural disasters;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Availability
and cost or interruption of fuel, equipment and other supplies;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Transportation
costs;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Availability
of transportation infrastructure, including flooding and railroad derailments;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Cost
and availability of our contract miners;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Availability
of skilled employees; and
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Work
stoppages or other labor difficulties.
|
Substantial
or extended declines in the price that we receive for our coal or increases in the costs of mining our coal could have a material
adverse effect on our operating results and our ability to generate the cash flows we require to invest in our operations, satisfy
our obligations and pay distributions to shareholders. To the extent our costs increase but pricing under these coal sales contracts
remains fixed or declines, we will be unable to pass increasing costs on to our customers. If we are unable to control our costs,
our profitability under our forward sales contracts may be impaired and our results of operations, business and financial condition,
and our ability to make distributions to our shareholders could be materially and adversely affected.
A
decrease in the use of coal by electric utilities could affect our ability to sell the coal we produce.
According
to the World Coal Association, in 2013, coal was used to generate over 40% of the world’s electricity needs. According to
the Energy Information Administration (“EIA”), in the United States, the domestic electricity generation industry
accounts for approximately 95% of domestic thermal coal consumption. The amount of coal consumed by the electricity generation
industry is affected primarily by the overall demand for electricity, and environmental and other governmental regulations as
well as the price and availability of renewable energy sources, including biomass, hydroelectric, wind and solar power and other
non-renewable fuel sources, including natural gas and nuclear power. For example, the relatively recent low price of natural gas
has resulted, in some instances, in domestic generators increasing natural gas consumption while decreasing coal consumption.
Additionally, in June 2014, the EPA proposed new regulations limiting carbon dioxide emissions from existing power generation
facilities. Under this proposal, nationwide carbon dioxide emissions would be reduced by 30% from 2005 levels by 2030 with a flexible
interim goal. The final rule is expected to be issued in June 2015, and the emission reductions are scheduled to commence in 2020
although expected procedural delays and anticipated litigation create uncertainty regarding if and when these new regulations
will take effect. Future environmental regulation of GHG emissions could accelerate the use by utilities of fuels other than coal.
Domestically, state and federal mandates for increased use of electricity derived from renewable energy sources could affect demand
for our coal. A number of states have enacted mandates that require electricity suppliers to rely on renewable energy sources
to generate a certain percentage of their power. Such mandates, combined with other incentives to use renewable energy sources,
such as tax credits, could make alternative fuel sources more competitive with coal. A decrease in coal consumption by the electricity
generation industry could adversely affect the price of coal, which could negatively affect our results of operations, business
and financial condition, as well as our ability to pay distributions to our shareholders.
Our
mining operations will be extensively regulated which imposes significant costs on us and changes to existing and potential future
regulations or violations of regulations could increase those costs or limit our ability to produce coal.
The
coal mining industry is subject to increasingly strict regulations by federal, state and local authorities on matters such as:
|
●
|
Permits
and other licensing requirements;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Surface
subsidence from underground mining;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Contract
miner health and safety;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Remediation
of contaminated soil, surface water and groundwater;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Air
emissions;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Water
quality standards;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
The
discharge of materials into the environment, including wastewater;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Storage,
treatment and disposal of petroleum products and substances which are regarded as hazardous under applicable laws or which,
if spilled, could reach waterways or wetlands;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Storage,
treatment and disposal of petroleum products and substances which are regarded as hazardous under applicable laws or which,
if spilled, could reach waterways or wetlands;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Storage
and disposal of coal wastes including coal slurry under applicable laws;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Protection
of human health, plant life and wildlife, including endangered and threatened species;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Reclamation
and restoration of mining properties after mining is completed;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Wetlands
protection;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Dam
permitting; and
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
The
effects, if any, that mining has on groundwater quality and availability.
|
To
the extent we engage in longwall mining, subsidence issues will be particularly important to our operations. Failure to timely
secure subsidence rights or any associated mitigation agreements, could materially affect our results by causing delays or changes
in our mining plan through stoppages or increased costs because of the necessity of obtaining such rights.
Because
of the extensive and detailed nature of these regulatory requirements, it is extremely difficult for us and other underground
coal mining companies in particular, as well as the coal industry in general, to comply with all requirements at all times. We
expect to be cited for violations in the future. Future violations may have a material adverse impact on our business, result
of operations or financial condition. While it is not possible to quantify all of the costs of compliance with applicable federal
and state laws and associated regulations, those costs are expected to continue to be significant. Compliance with these laws
and regulations, and delays in the receipt of, or failure to receive or revocation of necessary government permits, could substantially
increase the cost of coal mining or have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, cash flows and financial condition
as well as our ability to pay distributions to our shareholders.
Extensive
environmental regulations, including existing and potential future regulatory requirements relating to air emissions, affect our
customers and could reduce the demand for coal as a fuel source and cause coal prices and sales of our coal to materially decline.
The
utility industry is subject to extensive regulation regarding the environmental impact of its power generation activities, particularly
with respect to air emissions, which could affect demand for our coal. For example, the federal Clean Air Act and similar state
and local laws extensively regulate the amount of sulfur dioxide, particulate matter, nitrogen oxides, mercury, and other compounds
emitted into the air from electric power plants, which are the largest end-users of our coal. A series of more stringent requirements
relating to particulate matter, ozone, haze, mercury, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxide and other air pollutants will, or are expected
to become effective in coming years. In addition, concerted conservation efforts that result in reduced electricity consumption
could cause coal prices and sales of our coal to materially decline.
More
stringent air emissions limitations may require significant emissions control expenditures for many coal-fired power plants and
could have the effect of making coal-fired plants less profitable. As a result, some power plants may switch to other fuels that
generate less of these emissions or they may close. Any switching of fuel sources away from coal, closure of existing coal-fired
plants, or reduced construction of new plants could have a material adverse effect on demand for and prices received for our coal.
It
is possible that new environmental legislation or regulations may be adopted, or that existing laws or regulations may be differently
interpreted or more stringently enforced, any of which could have a significant impact on our mining operations or our customers’
ability to use coal.
Recent
developments in the regulation of GHG emissions and coal ash could materially adversely affect our customers’ demand for
coal and our results of operations, cash flows and financial condition.
Coal-fired
power plants produce carbon dioxide and other GHGs as a by-product of their operations. GHG emissions have received increased
scrutiny from local, state, federal and international government bodies. Future regulation of GHGs could occur pursuant to U.S.
treaty obligations or statutory or regulatory change. The EPA and other regulators are using existing laws, including the federal
Clean Air Act, to limit emissions of carbon dioxide and other GHGs from major sources, including coal-fired power plants that
may require the use of “best available control technology.” For example, in 2011, the EPA issued regulations, including
permitting requirements, restricting GHG emissions from any new U.S. power plants, and from any existing U.S. power plants that
undergo major modifications that increase their GHG emissions. In response to a recent Supreme Court decision, the EPA is scaling
back its GHG permitting program in part and plans to finalize a rule by the end of 2015 to rescind certain permits issued under
the Clean Air Act triggered solely because of GHG emissions. In addition, the EPA, in September 2013, also proposed new source
performance standards for GHG emissions for new coal and oil-fired power plants, which could require partial carbon capture and
sequestration. The EPA is expected to issue a final regulation by mid-summer 2015. In addition, in June 2013, President Obama
announced additional initiatives intended to reduce greenhouse gas emissions globally, including curtailing U.S. government support
for public financing of new coal-fired power plants overseas and promoting fuel switching from coal to natural gas or renewable
energy sources. Global treaties are also being considered that place restrictions on carbon dioxide and other GHG emissions. On
June 2, 2014, the EPA further proposed new regulations limiting carbon dioxide emissions from existing power generation facilities.
Under this proposal, nationwide carbon dioxide emissions would be reduced by 30% from 2005 levels by 2030 with a flexible interim
goal. The final rule is expected to be issued by mid-summer 2015 and the emission reductions are scheduled to commence in 2020.
In addition, state and regional climate change initiatives to regulate GHG emissions, such as the RGGI of certain northeastern
and mid-Atlantic states, the Western Climate Initiative, the Midwestern Greenhouse Gas Reduction Accord and the California Global
Warming Solutions Act, either have already taken effect or may take effect before federal action. Further, governmental agencies
have been providing grants or other financial incentives to entities developing or selling alternative energy sources with lower
levels of GHG emissions, which may lead to more competition from those entities. There have also been several public nuisance
lawsuits brought against power, coal, oil and gas companies alleging that their operations are contributing to climate change.
The plaintiffs are seeking various remedies, including punitive and compensatory damages and injunctive relief. While the U.S.
Supreme Court recently determined that such claims cannot be pursued under federal law, plaintiffs may seek to proceed under state
common law.
In
December 2014, the EPA announced that it had determined to regulate coal combustion wastes, sometimes referred to as coal ash,
as a nonhazardous substance under Subtitle D of the RCRA. While classifying coal combustion waste as a hazardous waste under Subtitle
C of the RCRA would have led to more stringent requirements, the new rule could still increase customers’ operating costs
and may make coal less attractive for electric utilities.
The
enactment of these and other laws or regulations regarding emissions from the combustion of coal or other actions to limit such
emissions, could result in electricity generators switching from coal to other fuel sources thereby reducing demand for our coal.
Significant public opposition has also been raised with respect to the proposed construction of certain new coal-fueled electricity
generating plants and certain new export transloading facilities due to the potential for increased air emissions. Such opposition,
as well as any corporate or investor policies against coal-fired generation plants could also reduce the demand for our coal.
Further, policies limiting available financing for the development of new coal-fueled power plants could adversely impact the
global demand for coal in the future. The potential impact on us of future laws, regulations or other policies or circumstances
will depend upon the degree to which any such laws, regulations or other policies or circumstances force electricity generators
to diminish their reliance on coal as a fuel source. In view of the significant uncertainty surrounding each of these factors,
it is not possible for us to reasonably predict the impact that any such laws, regulations or other policies may have on our results
of operations, cash flows and financial condition as well as our ability to pay distributions to our shareholders. However, such
impacts could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, cash flows and financial condition as well as our ability
to pay distributions to our shareholders.
Extensive
governmental regulation pertaining to employee safety and health imposes significant costs on our mining operations and could
materially and adversely affect our results of operations.
Federal
and state safety and health regulations in the coal mining industry are among the most comprehensive and pervasive systems for
protection of employee safety and health affecting any U.S. industry. Compliance with these requirements will impose significant
costs on us and can result in reduced productivity. New health and safety legislation, regulations and orders may be adopted that
may materially and adversely affect our mining operations.
Federal
and state health and safety authorities have the right to inspect our operations. In recent years, federal authorities have also
conducted special inspections of coal mines for, among other safety concerns, the accumulation of coal dust and the proper ventilation
of gases such as methane. In addition, the federal government has announced that it is considering changes to mine safety rules
and regulations, which could potentially result in or require additional safety training and planning, enhanced safety equipment,
more frequent mine inspections, stricter enforcement practices and enhanced reporting requirements.
In
addition, in March 2013, MSHA implemented a revised POV standard. Under the revised standard, mine operators are no longer entitled
to a ninety day notice of potential POV. In addition, MSHA began screening for POV by using issued citations and orders, prior
to their final adjudication. If a mine is designated as having a POV, MSHA will issue an order withdrawing miners from any areas
affected by violations which pose a significant and substantial hazard to the health and/or safety of miners. Once a mine is in
POV status, it can be removed from that status only upon (i) a complete inspection of the entire mine with no S&S enforcement
actions issued by MSHA or (ii) no POV-related withdrawal orders being issued by MSHA within ninety (90) days following the mine
operator being placed on POV status. Litigation testing the validity of the standard and its application by MSHA is ongoing. However,
from time to time one or more of our operations may meet the POV screening criteria, and we cannot make assurances that one or
more of our operations will not be placed into POV status, which could materially and adversely affect our results of operations.
We
must compensate employees for work-related injuries. If adequate provisions for workers’ compensation liabilities were not
made, our future operating results could be harmed. Also, federal law requires we contribute to a trust fund for the payment of
benefits and medical expenses to certain claimants. Currently, the trust fund is funded by an excise tax on coal production of
$1.10 per ton for underground coal sold domestically, not to exceed 4.4% of the gross sales price. If this tax increases, or if
we could no longer pass it on to the purchasers of our coal under our coal sales agreements, our operating costs could be increased
and our results could be materially and adversely affected. If new laws or regulations increase the number and award size of claims,
it could materially and adversely harm our business. In addition, the erosion through tort liability of the protections we are
currently provided by workers’ compensation laws could increase our liability for work-related injuries and have a material
adverse effect on our results of operations, cash flows and financial condition as well as our ability to pay distributions to
our shareholders.
Extensive
environmental regulations, including existing and potential future regulatory requirements, pertaining to discharge of materials
into the environment, including wastewater, imposes significant costs to our mining operations and could materially and adversely
affect our production, cash flow and profitability.
Our
mining operations will be subject to numerous complex regulatory, compliance, and enforcement programs. Our operations, from time
to time, may be issued violation notices from various agencies that result in fines, penalties, or suspension of mining activities.
Such a suspension could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, cash flows and financial condition, as well
as our ability to make distributions to our shareholders.
Additionally,
regulatory agencies may, from time to time, add more stringent compliance requirements to our environmental permits either by
rule, or regulation or during the permit renewal process. More stringent requirements could lead to increases in costs and could
materially and adversely affect our production, cash flow and profitability. For example, on April 30, 2013, citing lack of resources
and the priority of other matters, the EPA denied a petition brought by environmental groups seeking to add coal mines to the
Clean Air Act section 111 list of stationary source categories, which would have had the effect of regulating methane emissions
from coal mines in some manner. Following the environmental groups’ challenge to EPA’s denial, the United States Court
of Appeals for the District of Columbia upheld the EPA’s action in May 2014. However, the EPA could, in the future, determine
to add coal mines to the list of regulated sources and impose emission limits on coal mines, which could have a significant impact
on our mining operations.
We
may be unable to obtain, maintain or renew permits necessary for our operations and to mine all of our coal reserves, which would
materially and adversely affect our production, cash flow and profitability.
In
order to develop economically recoverable coal reserves, we must regularly obtain, maintain or renew a number of permits that
impose strict requirements on various environmental and operational matters in connection with coal mining. These include permits
issued by various federal, state and local agencies and regulatory bodies. Permitting rules, and the interpretations of these
rules, are complex, change frequently, and are often subject to discretionary interpretations by regulators, all of which may
make compliance more difficult or impractical and could result in the discontinuance of mine development or the development of
future mining operations. The public, including non-governmental organizations, anti-mining groups and individuals, have certain
statutory rights to comment upon and submit objections to requested permits and environmental impact statements prepared in connection
with applicable regulatory processes, and otherwise engage in the permitting process, including bringing citizens’ claims
to challenge the issuance or renewal of permits, the validity of environmental impact statements or performance of mining activities.
Our mining operations may become subject to legal challenges before administrative or judicial bodies contesting the validity
of our environmental permits under SMCRA and the CWA, among other statutory provisions. Accordingly, required permits may not
be issued in a timely fashion or renewed at all, or permits issued or renewed may not be maintained, may be challenged or may
be conditioned in a manner that may restrict our ability to efficiently and economically conduct our mining activities, any of
which would materially reduce our production, cash flow, and profitability as well as our ability to pay distributions to our
shareholders.
We
make no assurances that we will be able to obtain, maintain or renew any of the governmental permits that we need to continue
developing our proven and probable coal reserves. Further, new legislation or administrative regulations or new judicial interpretations
or administrative enforcement of existing laws and regulations, including proposals related to the protection of the environment
and to human health and safety that would further regulate and tax the coal industry may also require us to change operations
significantly or incur increased costs. For example, in March 2014, the EPA announced a proposed rule expanding the definition
of “Waters of the United States” that would expand the jurisdiction of the EPA and the United States Army Corps of
Engineers to regulate waters not previously regulated. This rule, if it becomes final, could impact our ability to timely obtain
necessary permits. Such changes could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations as well
as our ability to pay distributions to our shareholders.
Substantially
all of our coal may be shipped through arrangements with, and are subject to minimum volume requirements that are due regardless
of whether coal is actually shipped or mined.
Some
or all of the coal that we will ship may be through contractual arrangements that have minimum volume requirements. Failure to
meet those requirements could result in liquidated damages. If our operations do not meet the minimum volume requirements then
we could suffer from a shortage of cash due to the ongoing requirement to pay minimum payments despite a lack of shipping and
the associated sales revenue. As a result, our results of operations, business and financial condition, as well as our ability
to pay distributions to our shareholders may be materially adversely affected.
Competition
within the coal industry may adversely affect our ability to sell coal and excess production capacity in the industry could put
downward pressure on coal prices.
We
compete with other producers primarily on the basis of price, coal quality, transportation cost and reliability of delivery. We
cannot assure you that competition from other producers will not adversely affect us in the future. The coal industry has experienced
consolidation in recent years, including consolidation among some of our major competitors. We cannot assure you that the result
of current or further consolidation in the industry will not adversely affect us. In addition, potential changes to international
trade agreements, trade concessions or other political and economic arrangements may benefit coal producers operating in countries
other than the U.S., where our mining operations are currently located. We cannot assure you that we will be able to compete on
the basis of price or other factors with companies that in the future may benefit from favorable trading or other arrangements.
We will compete directly for domestic and international coal sales with numerous other coal producers located in the U.S. and
internationally, in countries such as Australia, China, India, South Africa, Indonesia, Russia and Colombia. The price of coal
in the markets into which we sell our coal is also influenced by the price of coal in the markets in which we do not sell our
coal because significant oversupply of coal from other markets could materially reduce the prices we receive for our coal. Increases
in coal prices could encourage the development of expanded capacity by new or existing coal producers, which could result in lower
coal prices. As a result, our results of operations, business and financial condition, as well as our ability to pay distributions
to our shareholders may be materially adversely affected.
Global
economic conditions, or economic conditions in any of the industries in which our customers operate, and continued uncertainty
in financial markets may have material adverse impacts on our business and financial condition that we cannot predict.
If
economic conditions or factors that negatively affect the economic health of the U.S., Europe or Asia worsen, our revenues could
be reduced and thus adversely affect our results of operations. These markets have historically experienced disruptions, relating
to volatility in security prices, diminished liquidity and credit availability, rating downgrades of certain investments and declining
valuations of others, failure and potential failures of major financial institutions, high unemployment rates and increasing interest
rates. If these developments continue or worsen it may adversely affect the ability of our customers and suppliers to obtain financing
to perform their obligations to us. If the economic impact of the current downturn continues to impact foreign markets disproportionately,
global currencies will continue to weaken against the U.S. dollar. This would impact our ability to continue exporting our coal
by making it more expensive for foreign buyers. We believe that deterioration or a prolonged period of economic weakness could
have an adverse impact on our results of operations, business and financial condition, as well as our ability to pay distributions
to our shareholders.
We
may be involved in legal proceedings that if determined adversely to us, could significantly impact our profitability, financial
position or liquidity.
We
may be, and from time to time may become, involved in various legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of business.
Some lawsuits will seek fines or penalties and damages in very large amounts, or seek to restrict our business activities. Any
such proceedings could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, cash flows and financial condition as well
as our ability to make distributions to our shareholders.
Federal
or state regulatory agencies have the authority to order certain of our mines to be temporarily or permanently closed under certain
circumstances, which could materially and adversely affect our ability to meet our customers’ demands.
Federal
or state regulatory agencies, including MSHA, have the authority under certain circumstances following significant health, safety
or environmental incidents or pursuant to permitting authority to temporarily or permanently close one or more of our mines. If
this occurred, we may be required to incur capital expenditures and/or additional expenses to re-open the mine. In the event that
these agencies cause us to close one or more of our mines, our coal sales contracts will generally permit us to issue force majeure
notices which suspend our obligations to deliver coal under such contracts. However, our customers may challenge our issuances
of force majeure notices in connection with these closures. If these challenges are successful, we may have to purchase coal from
third-party sources, if available, to fulfill these obligations, incur capital expenditures to re-open the mine or negotiate settlements
with the customers, which may include price reductions, the reduction of commitments or the extension of time for delivery or
termination of such customers’ contracts. Any of these actions could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations,
cash flows and financial condition as well as our ability to pay distributions to our shareholders.
Our
operations may impact the environment or cause exposure to hazardous substances, and our properties may have environmental contamination,
which could result in material liabilities to us.
Certain
of our coal mining operations use or have used hazardous and other regulated materials and have generated hazardous wastes, including
in some case prior to our involvement with, or operation of, such location. We may be subject to claims under federal and state
statutes or common law doctrines for penalties, toxic torts and other damages, as well as for natural resource damages and for
the investigation and remediation of soil, surface water, groundwater, and other media under laws such as the CERCLA, commonly
known as Superfund, or the Clean Water Act. Such claims may arise, for example, out of current, former or threatened conditions
at sites that we currently own or operate as well as at sites that we and companies we acquired owned or operated in the past,
or sent waste to for treatment or disposal, and at contaminated sites that have always been owned or operated by third parties.
Failure
to meet certain provisions in our coal supply agreements could result in economic penalties.
Most
of our coal supply agreements will contain provisions requiring us to deliver coal meeting quality thresholds for certain characteristics
such as heat value, sulfur content, ash content, hardness and ash fusion temperature. Failure to meet these specifications could
result in economic penalties, including price adjustments, purchasing replacement coal in a higher-priced open market, rejection
of deliveries or termination of the contracts. In some of the contract price adjustment provisions, failure of the parties to
agree on price adjustments may allow either party to terminate the contract.
Many
agreements also contain provisions that permit the parties to adjust the contract price upward or downward for specific events,
including changes in the laws regulating the timing, production, sale or use of coal. Moreover, a limited number of these agreements
permit the customer to terminate the agreement if transportation costs increase substantially or, in the event of changes in regulations
affecting the coal industry, such changes increase the price of coal beyond specified amounts. Additionally, a number of agreements
provide that customers may terminate the agreement in the event a new or amended environmental law or regulation prevents or restricts
the customer from utilizing coal supplied by us and/or requires material.
Certain
of our customers may seek to defer contracted shipments of coal which could affect our results of operations and liquidity.
From
time to time, certain customers may seek to delay shipments or request deferrals under existing agreements. There is no assurance
that we will be able to resolve existing and potential deferrals on favorable terms, or at all. Any such deferrals may have an
adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition, as well as our ability to pay distributions to
our shareholders.
We
may not be able to obtain equipment, parts and raw materials in a timely manner, in sufficient quantities or at reasonable costs
to support our coal mining and transportation operations.
We
will use equipment in our coal mining and transportation operations such as continuous miners, conveyors, shuttle cars, rail cars,
locomotives, roof bolters, shearers and shields. This equipment is procured from a concentrated group of suppliers, and obtaining
this equipment often involves long lead times. Occasionally, demand for such equipment by mining companies can be high and some
types of equipment may be in short supply. Delays in receiving or shortages of this equipment, as well as the raw materials used
in the manufacturing of supplies and mining equipment, which, in some cases, do not have ready substitutes, or the cancellation
of our supply contracts under which we obtain equipment and other consumables, could limit our ability to obtain these supplies
or equipment. In addition, if any of our suppliers experiences an adverse event, or decides to no longer do business with us,
we may be unable to obtain sufficient equipment and raw materials in a timely manner or at a reasonable price to allow us to meet
our production goals and our revenues may be adversely impacted. The mining process involves the use of considerable quantities
of steel. If the price of steel or other materials increases substantially or if the value of the U.S. dollar declines relative
to foreign currencies with respect to certain imported supplies or other products, our operating expenses could increase. Any
of the foregoing events could materially and adversely impact our results of operations, business and financial condition as well
as our profitability and our ability to pay distributions to our shareholders.
The
development of coal mines is a challenging process that may take longer and cost more than estimated, or not be completed at all.
The
full development of our mineral rights may not be achieved. We may encounter adverse geological conditions or delays in obtaining,
maintaining or renewing required construction, environmental or operating or mine design permits. Construction delays cause reduced
production and cash flow while certain fixed costs, such as minimum royalties and debt payments, must still be paid on a predetermined
schedule.
Our
business requires substantial capital expenditures and we may not have access to the capital required to reach full development
of our mines.
Maintaining
and expanding mines and infrastructure is capital intensive. Specifically, the exploration, permitting and development of coal
reserves, mining costs, the maintenance of machinery and equipment and compliance with applicable laws and regulations require
substantial capital expenditures. While a significant amount of capital expenditures required to build-out our mines has been
spent, we must continue to invest capital to maintain or to increase our production. Decisions to increase our production levels
could also affect our capital needs. We cannot assure you that we will be able to maintain our production levels or generate sufficient
cash flow, or that we will have access to sufficient financing to continue our production, exploration, permitting and development
activities at or above our present levels and we may be required to defer all or a portion of our capital expenditures. Our results
of operations, business and financial condition, as well as our ability to pay distributions to our shareholders may be materially
adversely affected if we cannot make such capital expenditures.
Major
equipment and plant failures could reduce our ability to produce and ship coal and materially and adversely affect our results
of operations.
Once
we acquire mining properties, we may be dependent on several major pieces of mining equipment and preparation plants to produce
and ship our coal, including, but not limited to, continuous mining systems, preparation plants, and transloading facilities.
If any of these pieces of equipment or facilities suffered major damage or were destroyed by fire, abnormal wear, flooding, incorrect
operation, or otherwise, we may be unable to replace or repair them in a timely manner or at a reasonable cost which would impact
our ability to produce and ship coal and materially and adversely affect our results of operations, business and financial condition
and our ability to pay distributions to our shareholders.
We
face numerous uncertainties in estimating our economically recoverable coal reserves.
Coal
is economically recoverable when the price at which coal can be sold exceeds the costs and expenses of mining and selling the
coal. Forecasts of our future performance are based on, among other things, estimates of our recoverable coal reserves. We will
base our reserve information on engineering, economic and geological data assembled and analyzed by third parties and our staff,
which includes various engineers. The reserve estimates as to both quantity and quality are updated from time to time to reflect
production of coal from the reserves and new drilling or other data received. There are numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating
quantities and qualities of coal and costs to mine recoverable reserves, including many factors beyond our control. Estimates
of economically recoverable coal reserves necessarily depend upon a number of variable factors and assumptions, any one of which
may, if inaccurate, result in an estimate that varies considerably from actual results. These factors and assumptions include:
|
●
|
Geologic
and mining conditions, which may not be fully identified by available exploration data and may differ from our experience
in areas we currently mine;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Future
coal prices, operating costs and capital expenditures;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Excise
taxes, royalties and development and reclamation costs;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Future
mining technology improvements;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
The
effects of regulation by governmental agencies;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Ability
to obtain, maintain and renew all required permits;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Employee
health and safety needs; and
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Historical
production from the area compared with production from other producing areas.
|
As
a result, actual coal tonnage recovered from identified reserve areas or properties and revenues and expenditures with respect
to our production from reserves may vary materially from estimates. These estimates thus may not accurately reflect our actual
reserves. Any material inaccuracy in our estimates related to our reserves could result in lower than expected revenues, higher
than expected costs or decreased profitability which could materially adversely affect our results of operations, business and
financial condition as well as our ability to pay distributions to our shareholders.
Some
of our customers may blend our coal with coal from other sources, making our sales dependent upon our customers locating additional
sources of coal.
Our
coal’s characteristics, particularly the sulfur or chlorine content, may cause many of our customers blend our coal with
other purchased supplies of coal before burning it in their boilers. Some of our current or future coal sales may therefore be
dependent in part on those customers’ ability to locate additional sources of coal with offsetting characteristics which
may not be available in the future on terms that render the customers’ overall cost of blended coal economic. A loss of
business from such customers may materially adversely affect our results of operations, business and financial condition, as well
as our ability to pay distributions to our shareholders.
Our
operations are subject to risks, some of which are not insurable, and we cannot assure you that our existing
insurance would be adequate in the event of a loss.
We
expect to maintain insurance to protect against risk of loss but our coverage is subject to deductibles and specific terms and
conditions. We cannot assure you that we will have adequate coverage or that we will be able to obtain insurance against certain
risks, including certain liabilities for environmental pollution or hazards. We cannot assure you that insurance coverage will
be available in the future at commercially reasonable costs, or at all, or that the amounts for which we are insured or that we
may receive, or the timing of any such receipt, will be adequate to cover all of our losses. Uninsured events may adversely affect
our results of operations, business and financial condition, as well as our ability to pay distributions to our shareholders.
We
will have future mine closure and reclamation obligations the timing of and amount for which are uncertain. In addition, our failure
to maintain required financial assurances could affect our ability to secure reclamation and coal lease obligations, which could
adversely affect our ability to mine or lease the coal.
Once
we acquire mining properties, we will be required to estimate our asset retirement obligations for final reclamation and mine
closure, which will be based upon detailed engineering calculations of the amount and timing of the future cash for a third party
to perform the required work. Spending estimates are escalated for inflation and market risk premium, and then discounted at the
credit-adjusted, risk-free rate. In view of the uncertainties concerning future mine closure and reclamation costs on our properties,
the ultimate timing and future costs of these obligations could differ materially from our current estimates. Our estimates for
this future liability are subject to change based on new or amendments to existing applicable laws and regulations, the nature
of ongoing operations and technological innovations. Although we accrue for future costs in our consolidated balance sheets, we
do not reserve cash in respect of these obligations or otherwise fund these obligations in advance. As a result, we will have
significant cash outlays when we are required to close and restore mine sites that may, among other things, affect our ability
to satisfy our obligations under our indebtedness and other contractual commitments and pay distributions to shareholders. We
cannot assure you that we will be able to obtain financing on satisfactory terms to fund these costs, or at all.
In
addition, regulatory authorities require us to provide financial assurance to secure, in whole or in part, our future reclamation
projects. The amount and nature of the financial assurances are dependent upon a number of factors, including our financial condition
and reclamation cost estimates. Changes to these amounts, as well as the nature of the collateral to be provided, could significantly
increase our costs, making the maintenance and development of existing and new mines less economically feasible. Currently, the
security we provide consists of surety bonds. The premium rates and terms of the surety bonds are subject to annual renewals.
Our failure to maintain, or inability to acquire, surety bonds or other forms of financial assurance that are required by applicable
law, contract or permit could adversely affect our ability to operate. That failure could result from a variety of factors including
the lack of availability, higher expense or unfavorable market terms of new surety bonds or other forms of financial assurance.
There can be no guarantee that we will be able to maintain or add to our current level of financial assurance. Additionally, any
capital resources that we do utilize for this purpose will reduce our resources available for our operations and commitments as
well as our ability to pay distributions to our shareholders.
Defects
in title or loss of any leasehold interests in our properties could limit our ability to conduct mining operations on these properties
or result in significant unanticipated costs.
Our
coal reserves may be leased. A title defect or the loss of any lease upon expiration of its term, upon a default or otherwise,
could adversely affect our ability to mine the associated reserves or process the coal that we mine. Title to our owned or leased
properties and mineral rights is not usually verified until we make a commitment to mine a property, which may not occur until
after we have obtained necessary permits and completed exploration of the property. In some cases, we rely on title information
or representations and warranties provided by our lessors or grantors. Our right to mine our reserves may again be adversely affected
if defects in title, boundaries or other rights necessary for mining exist or if a lease expires. Any challenge to our title or
leasehold interests could delay the mining of the property and could ultimately result in the loss of some or all of our interest
in the property. From time to time we also may be in default with respect to leases for properties on which we have mining operations.
In such events, we may have to close down or significantly alter the sequence of such mining operations which may adversely affect
our future coal production and future revenues. If we mine on property that we do not own or lease, we could incur liability for
such mining and be subject to regulatory sanction and penalties.
In
order to obtain, maintain or renew leases or mining contracts to conduct our mining operations on property where these defects
exist, we may in the future have to incur unanticipated costs. In addition, we may not be able to successfully negotiate new leases
or mining contracts for properties containing additional reserves, or maintain our leasehold interests in properties where we
have not commenced mining operations during the term of the lease. Some leases have minimum production requirements. As a result,
our results of operations, business and financial condition, as well as our ability to pay distributions to our shareholders may
be materially adversely affected.
Our
coal reserves could be subject to minimum royalty payments that are due regardless of whether coal is actually mined.
The
coal reserves that we acquire may be subject to minimum royalty payments. Failure to meet minimum production requirements could
result in losses of prepaid royalties and, in some rare cases, could result in a loss of the lease itself. If certain operations
do not meet production goals then we could suffer from a shortage of cash due to the ongoing requirement to pay minimum royalty
payments despite a lack of production and the associated sales revenue. As a result, our results of operations, business and financial
condition, as well as our ability to pay distributions to our shareholders may be materially adversely affected.
Significant
increases in, or the imposition of new, taxes we pay on the coal we produce could materially and adversely affect our results
of operations.
If
state in which we operate was to impose a state severance tax or any other tax applicable solely to our operations in that state,
we may be significantly impacted and our results of operations, business and financial condition, as well as the ability to pay
distributions to our shareholders could be materially and adversely affected. Any imposition of a state severance tax or any county
tax could disproportionately impact us relative to our competitors that are more geographically diverse.
A
shortage of skilled mining labor in the U.S. could decrease our labor productivity and increase our labor costs, which would adversely
affect our profitability.
Efficient
coal mining using complex and sophisticated techniques and equipment requires skilled laborers proficient in multiple mining tasks,
including mining equipment maintenance. Any shortage of skilled mining labor reduces the productivity of experienced employees
who must assist in training unskilled employees. If a shortage of experienced labor occurs, it could have an adverse impact on
our labor productivity and costs and our ability to expand production in the event there is an increase in the demand for our
coal, which could adversely affect our results of operations, business and financial condition, as well as our ability to pay
distributions to our shareholders.
Our
ability to operate our mines efficiently and profitably could be impaired if we lose, or fail to continue to attract, key qualified
operators.
We
manage our business with a key mining operator at each location. As our business develops and expands, we believe that our future
success will depend greatly on our continued ability to attract and retain highly skilled and qualified operators and contractors.
We cannot be certain that we will be able to find and retain qualified operators or that they will be able to attract and retain
qualified contractors in the future. Failure to retain or attract key operators could have a material adverse effect on our results
of operations, business and financial condition, as well as our ability to pay distributions to our shareholders.
Our
workforce may not remain non-union in the future.
We
do not expect to acquire any mining properties where the workforce is represented under collective bargaining agreements. However,
that workforce may not remain non-union in the future, and proposed legislation, could, if enacted, make union organization more
likely. If some or all of our current operations were to become unionized, it could adversely affect our productivity, increase
our labor costs and increase the risk of work stoppages at our mining complexes. In addition, even if we remain non-union, our
operations may still be adversely affected by work stoppages at our facilities or at unionized companies, particularly if union
workers were to orchestrate boycotts against our contractors.
Our
ability to operate our business effectively could be impaired if we fail to attract and retain key personnel.
Our
ability to operate our business and implement our strategies depends, in part, on the continued contributions of our executive
officers and other key employees. The loss of any of our key senior executives could have a material adverse effect on our business
unless and until we find a replacement. A limited number of persons exist with the requisite experience and skills to serve in
our senior management positions. We may not be able to locate or employ qualified executives on acceptable terms. In addition,
we believe that our future success will depend on our continued ability to attract and retain highly skilled personnel with coal
industry experience. Competition for these persons in the coal industry is intense and we may not be able to successfully recruit,
train or retain qualified managerial personnel. We may not be able to continue to employ key personnel or attract and retain qualified
personnel in the future. Our failure to retain or attract key personnel could have a material adverse effect on our ability to
effectively operate our business.
Coal
mining operations are subject to inherent risks and are dependent on many factors and conditions beyond our control, any of which
may adversely affect our productivity and our financial condition.
Our
mining operations, including our transportation infrastructure, will be influenced by changing conditions that can affect the
safety of our workforce, production levels, delivery of our coal and costs for varying lengths of time and, as a result, can diminish
our revenues and profitability. In particular, underground mining and related processing activities present inherent risks of
injury to persons and damage to property and equipment. A shutdown of any of our mines or prolonged disruption of production at
any of our mines or transportation of our coal to customers would result in a decrease in our revenues and profitability, which
could be material. Certain factors affecting the production and sale of our coal that could result in decreases in our revenues
and profitability include:
|
●
|
Adverse geologic
conditions including floor and roof conditions, variations in seam height, washouts and faults;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Fire or explosions
from methane, coal or coal dust or explosive materials;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Industrial accidents;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Seismic activities,
ground failures, rock bursts, or structural cave-ins or slides;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Delays in the receipt
of, or failure to receive, or revocation of necessary government permits;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Changes in laws
or regulations, including permitting requirements and the imposition of additional regulations, taxes or fees;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Accidental or unexpected
mine water inflows;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Delays in moving
mining equipment;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Railroad derailments;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Inclement or hazardous
weather conditions and natural disasters, such as heavy rain, high winds and flooding;
|
|
●
|
Environmental hazards;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Interruption or loss of power, fuel, or parts;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Increased or unexpected reclamation costs;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Equipment availability, replacement or repair
costs; and
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Mining and processing equipment failures and
unexpected maintenance problems.
|
These
risks, conditions and events could (1) result in: (a) damage to, or destruction of value of, our coal properties, our coal production
or transportation facilities, (b) personal injury or death, (c) environmental damage to our properties or the properties of others,
(d) delays or prohibitions on mining our coal or in the transportation of coal, (e) monetary losses and (f) potential legal liability;
and (2) could have a material adverse effect on our operating results and our ability to generate the cash flows we require to
invest in our operations and satisfy our debt obligations. Our insurance policies only provide limited coverage for some of these
risks and will not fully cover these risks. A significant mine accident could potentially cause a mine shutdown, and could have
a substantial adverse impact on our results of operations, financial condition or cash flows, as well as our ability to pay distributions
to our shareholders.
The
availability or reliability of current transportation facilities could affect the demand for our coal or temporarily impair our
ability to supply coal to our customers. In addition, our inability to expand our transportation capabilities and options could
further impair our ability to deliver coal efficiently to our customers.
We
will depend upon rail, barge, ocean-going vessels and port facilities to deliver coal to customers. Disruption of these transportation
services because of weather-related problems, infrastructure damage, strikes, lock-outs, lack of fuel or maintenance items, transportation
delays, lack of rail or port capacity or other events could temporarily impair our ability to supply coal to customers and thus
could adversely affect our results of operations, cash flows and financial condition, as well as our ability to pay distributions
to our shareholders.
Additionally,
if there are disruptions of the transportation services provided by the railroad and we are unable to find alternative transportation
providers to ship our coal, our business and profitability could be adversely affected. If there is a disruption in available
transportation options, there is no assurance that we will be able to develop alternative transportation options on terms that
are favorable to us. Any failure to do so could have a material adverse impact on our financial position and results of operations
as well as our ability to pay distributions to our shareholders.
Significant
increases in transportation costs could make our coal less competitive when compared to other fuels or coal produced from other
regions.
Transportation
costs represent a significant portion of the total cost of coal for our customers and the cost of transportation is an important
factor in a customer’s purchasing decision. Increases in transportation costs, including increases resulting from emission
control requirements and fluctuations in the price of diesel fuel, could make coal a less competitive source of energy when compared
to other fuels such as natural gas or could make our coal less competitive than coal produced in other regions of the U.S. or
abroad.
Significant
decreases in transportation costs could result in increased competition from coal producers in other parts of the country and
from abroad, including coal imported into the U.S. Coordination of the many eastern loading facilities, the large number of small
shipments, terrain and labor issues all combine to make shipments originating in the eastern U.S. inherently more expensive on
a per ton-mile basis than shipments originating in the western U.S. Historically, high coal transportation rates and transportation
constraints from the western coal producing areas into eastern U.S. markets limited the use of western coal in those markets.
However, a decrease in rail rates or an increase in rail capacity from the western coal producing areas to markets served by Eastern
U.S. producers could create major competitive challenges for eastern producers. Increased competition due to changing transportation
costs could have an adverse effect on our results of operations, business and financial condition, as well as our ability to pay
distributions to our shareholders.
Our
ability to mine and ship coal may be affected by adverse weather conditions, which could have an adverse effect on our revenues.
Adverse
weather conditions can impact our ability to mine and ship our coal and our customers’ ability to take delivery of our coal.
Lower than expected shipments by us during any period could have an adverse effect on our revenues. In addition, severe weather
may affect our ability to conduct our mining operations and severe rain, ice or snowfall may affect our ability to load and transport
coal. If we are unable to conduct our operations due to severe weather, it could have an adverse effect on our results of operations,
business and financial condition, as well as our ability to pay distributions to our shareholders.
We
sell a portion of our uncommitted tons in the spot market which is subject to volatility.
We
expect to derive some or all of our revenue from coal sales in the spot market, typically defined as contracts with terms of less
than one year. The pricing in spot contracts is significantly more volatile than pricing through long-term coal supply agreements
because it is subject to short-term demand swings. If spot market pricing for coal is unfavorable, this volatility could materially
adversely affect our results of operations, business and financial condition, as well as our ability to pay distributions to our
shareholders.
We
do not currently use forward sale or other significant hedging arrangements to protect against coal prices or commodity prices
and, as a result, our operating results are exposed to the impact of any significant decrease in the price of coal or any significant
increase in commodity prices.
We
do not currently enter into forward sales or other significant hedging arrangements to reduce the risk of exposure to volatility
in commodity prices. Accordingly, our future operations are exposed to the impact of any significant decrease in coal prices and
any significant increase in commodity prices. If such prices change significantly, we will realize reduced revenues and increased
costs. We may enter into forward sale and hedging arrangements at a future date.
Our
ability to collect payments from our customers could be impaired if their creditworthiness deteriorates.
Our
ability to receive payment for coal sold and delivered depends on the continued creditworthiness of our customers. Many utilities
have sold their power plants to non-regulated affiliates or third parties that may be less creditworthy, thereby increasing the
risk we bear on payment default. These new power plant owners may have credit ratings that are below investment grade. In addition,
some of our customers have been adversely affected by the current economic downturn, which may impact their ability to fulfill
their contractual obligations. Competition with other coal suppliers could force us to extend credit to customers and on terms
that could increase the risk we bear on payment default. We also have contracts to supply coal to energy trading and brokering
customers under which those customers sell coal to end users. If the creditworthiness of any of our energy trading and brokering
customers declines, we may not be able to collect payment for all coal sold and delivered to or on behalf of these customers.
An inability to collect payment from these counterparties may materially adversely affect our results of operations, business
and financial condition, as well as our ability to pay distributions to our shareholders.
Terrorist
attacks and threats, escalation of military activity in response to such attacks or acts of war may negatively affect our business,
financial condition and results of operations.
Terrorist
attacks and threats, escalation of military activity in response to such attacks or acts of war may negatively affect our business,
financial condition and results of operations. Our business is affected by general economic conditions, fluctuations in consumer
confidence and spending, and market liquidity, which can decline as a result of numerous factors outside of our control, such
as terrorist attacks and acts of war. Future terrorist attacks against U.S. targets, rumors or threats of war, actual conflicts
involving the U.S. or its allies, or military or trade disruptions affecting our customers could cause delays or losses in transportation
and deliveries of coal to our customers, decreased sales of our coal and extension of time for payment of accounts receivable
from our customers. Strategic targets such as energy-related assets may be at greater risk of future terrorist attacks than other
targets in the U.S. It is possible that any, or a combination, of these occurrences could have a material adverse effect on our
business, financial condition and results of operations, as well as our ability to pay distributions to our shareholders.
A
cyber incident could result in information theft, data corruption, operational disruption and/or financial loss.
We
have become increasingly dependent upon digital technologies, including information systems, infrastructure and cloud applications
and services, to operate our businesses, process and record financial and operating data, communicate with our contractors and
employees, analyze mining information, and estimate quantities of coal reserves, as well as other activities related to our businesses.
We expect to implement cyber security protocols and systems with the intent of maintaining the security of our operations and
protecting our and our counterparties’ confidential information against unauthorized access. Despite such efforts, we may
be subject to cyber security breaches which could result in unauthorized access to our information systems or infrastructure.
Strategic
targets, such as energy-related assets, may be at greater risk of future cyber attacks than other targets in the United States.
Deliberate cyber attacks on, or security breaches in, our digital systems or information technology infrastructure, or that of
third parties, could lead to corruption or loss of our proprietary data and potentially sensitive data, delays in production or
delivery, difficulty in completing and settling transactions, challenges in maintaining our books and records, environmental damage,
communication interruptions, other operational disruptions and third party liability. Our insurance may not protect us against
such occurrences. Consequently, it is possible that any of these occurrences, or a combination of them, could have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Further, as cyber incidents continue to evolve,
we may be required to expend additional resources to continue to modify or enhance our protective measures or to investigate and
remediate any vulnerability to cyber incidents.
Risks
Related to Rhino
The
following discussion of risk factors relating to Rhino are derived from the risk factors that Rhino disclosed about its business
in its Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015, and subsequent reports filed on Forms 10-Q and 8-K. Rhino’s common
units are registered under Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and are traded on the OTC under the symbol “RHNO.”
Unless
the context otherwise requires, all references to “we,” “us,” “our,” “company,”
or “Company” in this section “Risk Factors – Risks Related to Rhino” refer to Rhino Resource Partners,
LP, a Delaware limited partnership, and its subsidiaries, and their respective predecessor entities for the applicable periods,
considered as a single enterprise.
Prior
to the amendment of our amended and restated credit agreement in May 2016 to extend its expiration date to July 31, 2017, we were
unable to demonstrate that we had sufficient liquidity to operate our business over the next twelve months and thus substantial
doubt was raised about our ability to continue as a going concern. Accordingly, our independent registered public accounting firm
included an emphasis paragraph with respect to our ability to continue as a going concern in its report on our consolidated financial
statements for the year ended December 31, 2015.
Prior
to the amendment of our amended and restated credit agreement in May 2016 to extend its expiration date to July 31, 2017, we were
unable to demonstrate that we had sufficient liquidity to operate our business over the next twelve months and thus substantial
doubt was raised about our ability to continue as a going concern. Accordingly, our independent registered public accounting firm
included an emphasis paragraph with respect to our ability to continue as a going concern in its report on our consolidated financial
statements for the year ended December 31, 2015. The presence of the going concern emphasis paragraph in our auditors’ report
may have an adverse impact on our relationship with third parties with whom we do business, including our customers, vendors,
lenders and employees, making it difficult to raise additional debt or equity financing to the extent needed and conduct normal
operations. As a result, our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects could be materially adversely
affected.
There
are other uncertainties as to our ability to access funding under our amended and restated credit agreement. In order to borrow
under our amended and restated credit facility, we must make certain representations and warranties to our lenders at the time
of each borrowing. If we are unable to make these representations and warranties, we would be unable to borrow under our amended
and restated credit facility, absent a waiver. Furthermore, if we violate any of the covenants or restrictions in our amended
and restated credit agreement, including the maximum leverage ratio, some or all of our indebtedness may become immediately due
and payable, and our lenders’ commitment to make further loans to us may terminate. Given the continued weak demand and
low prices for met and steam coal, we may not be able to continue to give the required representations or meet all of the covenants
and restrictions included in our credit facility. If we are unable to give a required representation or we violate a covenant
or restriction, then we will need a waiver from our lenders in order to continue to borrow under our amended and restated credit
agreement.
Our
principal liquidity requirements are to finance current operations, fund capital expenditures and service our debt. Our principal
sources of liquidity are cash generated by our operations and borrowings under our credit facility. If we are unable to extend
the expiration date of our amended and restated credit facility or secure a replacement facility or borrow under our existing
credit facility, we will lose a primary source of liquidity, and we may not be able to generate adequate cash flow from operations
to fund our business, including amounts that may become due under our credit facility. Failure to obtain financing or to generate
sufficient cash flow from operations could cause us to further curtail our operations and reduce our spending and to alter our
business plan. We may also be required to consider other options, such as selling additional assets or merger opportunities, and
depending on the urgency of our liquidity constraints, we may be required to pursue such an option at an inopportune time. If
we are not able to fund our liquidity requirements for the next twelve months, we may not be able to continue as a going concern.
Our
common units are currently traded on the OTCQB as a result of the NYSE’s delisting of our common units from the NYSE, which
could adversely affect the market liquidity of our common units and harm our business.
On
December 17, 2015, the NYSE notified us that it had determined to commence proceedings to delist our common units from the NYSE
as a result of our failure to comply with the continued listing standard set forth in Section 802.01B of the NYSE Listed Company
Manual to maintain an average global market capitalization over a consecutive 30 trading-day period of at least $15 million for
its common units. The NYSE also suspended the trading of the common units at the close of trading on December 17, 2015. Following
the suspension, our common units began trading on the OTCQB under the symbol “RHNO” on December 18, 2015. The NYSE
informed us that it will apply to the Securities and Exchange Commission to delist our common units upon completion of all applicable
procedures, including any appeal by us of the NYSE’s decision. On January 4, 2016, we filed an appeal with the NYSE to review
the suspension and delisting determination of our common units. The NYSE held a hearing regarding our appeal on April 20, 2016
and affirmed its prior decision to delist our common units.
On
April 27, 2016, the NYSE filed with the SEC a notification of removal from listing and registration on Form 25 to delist our common
units and terminate the registration of our common units under Section 12(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The delisting
became effective on May 9, 2016. The Partnership’s common units continued to trade on the OTCQB Marketplace under the ticker
symbol “RHNOD” until May 16, 2016, at which time the OTCQB ticker symbol reverted to “RHNO.”
The
delisting of our common units from the NYSE could negatively impact us by, among other things, reducing the liquidity and market
price of our common units; reducing the number of investors willing to hold or acquire our common units; and limiting our ability
to issue additional securities or obtain additional financing. Further, since our common units were delisted from the NYSE, we
are no longer subject to the NYSE rules including rules requiring us to meet certain corporate governance standards. Without required
compliance of these corporate governance standards, investor interest in our common units may decrease.
Trading
on the OTCQB or one of the other over-the-counter markets may result in a reduction in some or all of the following, each of which
could have a material adverse effect on our unitholders:
|
●
|
the liquidity of
our common units;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
the market price
of our common units;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
our ability to issue
additional securities or obtain financing;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
the number of institutional
and other investors that will consider investing in our common units;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
the number of market
makers in our common units;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
the availability
of information concerning the trading prices and volume of our common units; and
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
the number of broker-dealers
willing to execute trades in our common units.
|
We
may not have sufficient cash to enable us to pay the minimum quarterly distribution on our common units following establishment
of cash reserves and payment of costs and expenses, including reimbursement of expenses to our general partner.
We
may not have sufficient cash each quarter to pay the full amount of our minimum quarterly distribution of $0.445 per unit, or
$1.78 per unit per year, which will require us to have available cash of approximately $13.3 million per quarter, or $53.2 million
per year, based on the number of common and subordinated units outstanding as of December 31, 2015 and the general partner interest.
The amount of cash we can distribute on our common and subordinated units principally depends upon the amount of cash we generate
from our operations, which will fluctuate from quarter to quarter based on, among other things:
|
●
|
the amount of coal
we are able to produce from our properties, which could be adversely affected by, among other things, operating difficulties
and unfavorable geologic conditions;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
the price at which
we are able to sell coal, which is affected by the supply of and demand for domestic and foreign coal;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
the level of our
operating costs, including reimbursement of expenses to our general partner and its affiliates. Our partnership agreement
does not set a limit on the amount of expenses for which our general partner and its affiliates may be reimbursed;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
the proximity to
and capacity of transportation facilities;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
the price and availability
of alternative fuels;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
the impact of future
environmental and climate change regulations, including those impacting coal-fired power plants;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
the level of worldwide
energy and steel consumption;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
prevailing economic
and market conditions;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
difficulties in
collecting our receivables because of credit or financial problems of customers;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
the effects of new
or expanded health and safety regulations;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
domestic and foreign
governmental regulation, including changes in governmental regulation of the mining industry, the electric utility industry
or the steel industry;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
changes in tax laws;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
weather conditions;
and
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
force majeure.
|
We
may reduce or eliminate distributions at any time we determine that our cash reserves are insufficient or are otherwise required
to fund current or anticipated future operations, capital expenditures, acquisitions, growth or expansion projects, debt repayment
or other business needs. Beginning with the quarter ended September 30, 2014, distributions on our common units were below the
minimum level and, beginning with the quarter ended June 30, 2015, we suspended the quarterly distribution on our common units
altogether. Pursuant to our partnership agreement, our common units accrue arrearages every quarter when the distribution level
is below the minimum quarterly distribution level and our subordinated units do not accrue such arrearages. In the future, if
and as distributions are made for any quarter, the first priority is to pay the then minimum quarterly distribution to common
unitholders. Any additional distribution amounts paid at that time are then paid to common unitholders until previously unpaid
accumulated arrearage amounts have been paid in full. Thus, we have arrearages accumulating on our common units since the distribution
level has been below our minimum quarterly level of $0.445 per unit. In addition, we have not paid any distributions on our subordinated
units for any quarter after the quarter ended March 31, 2012. We may not have sufficient cash available for distributions on our
common or subordinated units in the future. Any further reduction in the amount of cash available for distributions could impact
our ability to pay any quarterly distribution on our common units. Moreover, we may not be able to increase distributions on our
common units if we are unable to pay the accumulated arrearages on our common units as well as the full minimum quarterly distribution
on our subordinated units.
A
decline in coal prices could adversely affect our results of operations and cash available for distribution to our unitholders.
Our
results of operations and the value of our coal reserves are significantly dependent upon the prices we receive for our coal as
well as our ability to improve productivity and control costs. Prices for coal tend to be cyclical; however, prices have become
more volatile and depressed as a result of oversupply in the marketplace. The prices we receive for coal depend upon factors beyond
our control, including:
|
●
|
the supply of domestic
and foreign coal;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
the demand for domestic
and foreign coal, which is significantly affected by the level of consumption of steam coal by electric utilities and the
level of consumption of metallurgical coal by steel producers;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
the price and availability
of alternative fuels for electricity generation;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
the proximity to,
and capacity of, transportation facilities;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
domestic and foreign
governmental regulations, particularly those relating to the environment, climate change, health and safety;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
the level of domestic
and foreign taxes;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
weather conditions;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
terrorist attacks
and the global and domestic repercussions from terrorist activities; and
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
prevailing economic
conditions.
|
Any
adverse change in these factors could result in weaker demand and lower prices for our products. In addition, the recent global
economic downturn, coupled with the global financial and credit market disruptions, has had an impact on the coal industry generally
and may continue to do so. The demand for electricity and steel may remain at low levels or further decline if economic conditions
remain weak. If these trends continue, we may not be able to sell all of the coal we are capable of producing or sell our coal
at prices comparable to recent years.
In
addition to competing with other coal producers, we compete generally with producers of other fuels, such as natural gas. A decline
in the price of natural gas has made natural gas more competitive against coal and resulted in utilities switching from coal to
natural gas. Sustained low natural gas prices may also cause utilities to phase out or close existing coal-fired power plants
or reduce or eliminate construction of any new coal-fired power plants, which could have a material adverse effect on demand and
prices received for our coal. A substantial or extended decline in the prices we receive for our coal supply contracts could materially
and adversely affect our results of operations.
As
the prolonged weakness in the U.S. coal markets continued during 2015, we performed a comprehensive review during the fourth quarter
of 2015 of our current coal mining operations as well as potential future development projects to ascertain any potential impairment
losses. We identified various properties, projects and operations that were potentially impaired based upon changes in its strategic
plans, market conditions or other factors, specifically in Northern Appalachia where market conditions related to our operations
deteriorated in the fourth quarter of 2015. We believe that an oversupply of coal being produced in Northern Appalachia has contributed
to depressed coal prices from this region. We believe the oversupply of coal has been created due to historically low natural
gas prices in this region, which competes with coal as a source of electricity generation. Utilities have chosen cheap natural
gas for electricity generation over coal and, additionally, we believe the amount that the utilities’ power plants have
been dispatched for electricity generation has fallen due to low electricity demand. The production of natural gas from the Utica
Shale and Marcellus Shale regions that are located within the Northern Appalachian region have kept natural gas prices low and
larger coal producers have low-cost long-wall mines in Northern Appalachia that can compete to sell lower priced coal to utilities
that still require coal supplies in this region. We believe this combination of factors have decreased coal prices in Northern
Appalachia to levels where certain current operations as well as future plans for the development of the Leesville Field will
be unprofitable in the near term. In addition to impairment charges related to certain Northern Appalachia operations, we also
recorded asset impairment and related charges for the sale of the Deane mining complex, the sale of our Cana Woodford oil and
natural gas investment and an impairment charge for intangible assets. We recorded approximately $31.6 million of total asset
impairment and related charges for the year ended December 31, 2015.
In
addition, the prices of oil and natural gas may fluctuate widely in response to relatively minor changes in the supply and demand
for oil and natural gas, market uncertainty and a variety of additional factors that are beyond our control.
We
could be negatively impacted by the competitiveness of the global markets in which we compete and declines in the market demand
for coal.
We
compete with coal producers in various regions of the United States and overseas for domestic and international sales. The domestic
demand for, and prices of, our coal primarily depend on coal consumption patterns of the domestic electric utility industry and
the domestic steel industry. Consumption by the domestic electric utility industry is affected by the demand for electricity,
environmental and other governmental regulations, technological developments and the price of competing coal and alternative fuel
sources, such as natural gas, nuclear, hydroelectric and wind power and other renewable energy sources. Consumption by the domestic
steel industry is primarily affected by economic growth and the demand for steel used in construction as well as appliances and
automobiles. The competitive environment for coal is impacted by a number of the largest markets in the world, including the United
States, China, Japan and India, where demand for both electricity and steel has supported prices for steam and metallurgical coal.
The economic stability of these markets has a significant effect on the demand for coal and the level of competition in supplying
these markets. The cost of ocean transportation and the value of the U.S. dollar in relation to foreign currencies significantly
impact the relative attractiveness of our coal as we compete on price with foreign coal producing sources. During the last several
years, the U.S. coal industry has experienced increased consolidation, which has contributed to the industry becoming more competitive.
Increased competition by coal producers or producers of alternate fuels could decrease the demand for, or pricing of, or both,
for our coal, adversely impacting our results of operations and cash available for distribution.
Portions
of our coal reserves possess quality characteristics that enable us to mine, process and market them as either metallurgical coal
or high quality steam coal, depending on prevailing market conditions. A decline in the metallurgical market relative to the steam
market could cause us to shift coal from the metallurgical market to the steam market, potentially reducing the price we could
obtain for this coal and adversely impacting our cash flows, results of operations and cash available for distribution.
Any
change in consumption patterns by utilities away from the use of coal, such as resulting from current low natural gas prices,
could affect our ability to sell the coal we produce, which could adversely affect our results of operations and cash available
for distribution to our unitholders.
Steam
coal accounted for approximately 95% of our coal sales volume for the year ended December 31, 2015. The majority of our sales
of steam coal during this period were to electric utilities for use primarily as fuel for domestic electricity consumption. The
amount of coal consumed by the domestic electric utility industry is affected primarily by the overall demand for electricity,
environmental and other governmental regulations, and the price and availability of competing fuels for power plants such as nuclear,
natural gas and oil as well as alternative sources of energy. We compete generally with producers of other fuels, such as natural
gas and oil. A decline in price for these fuels could cause demand for coal to decrease and adversely affect the price of our
coal. For example, sustained low natural gas prices have led, in some instances, to decreased coal consumption by electricity-generating
utilities. If alternative energy sources, such as nuclear, hydroelectric, wind or solar, become more cost-competitive on an overall
basis, demand for coal could decrease and the price of coal could be materially and adversely affected. Further, legislation requiring,
subsidizing or providing tax benefit for the use of alternative energy sources and fuels, or legislation providing financing or
incentives to encourage continuing technological advances in this area, could further enable alternative energy sources to become
more competitive with coal. A decrease in coal consumption by the domestic electric utility industry could adversely affect the
price of coal, which could materially adversely affect our results of operations and cash available for distribution to our unitholders.
Our
mining operations are subject to extensive and costly environmental laws and regulations, and such current and future laws and
regulations could materially increase our operating costs or limit our ability to produce and sell coal.
The
coal mining industry is subject to numerous and extensive federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations, including
laws and regulations pertaining to permitting and licensing requirements, air quality standards, plant and wildlife protection,
reclamation and restoration of mining properties, the discharge of materials into the environment, the storage, treatment and
disposal of wastes, protection of wetlands, surface subsidence from underground mining and the effects that mining has on groundwater
quality and availability. The costs, liabilities and requirements associated with these laws and regulations are significant and
time-consuming and may delay commencement or continuation of our operations. Moreover, the possibility exists that new laws or
regulations (or new judicial interpretations or enforcement policies of existing laws and regulations) could materially affect
our mining operations, results of operations and cash available for distribution to our unitholders, either through direct impacts
such as those regulating our existing mining operations, or indirect impacts such as those that discourage or limit our customers’
use of coal. Violations of applicable laws and regulations would subject us to administrative, civil and criminal penalties and
a range of other possible sanctions. The enforcement of laws and regulations governing the coal mining industry has increased
substantially. As a result, the consequences for any noncompliance may become more significant in the future.
Our
operations use petroleum products, coal processing chemicals and other materials that may be considered “hazardous materials”
under applicable environmental laws and have the potential to generate other materials, all of which may affect runoff or drainage
water. In the event of environmental contamination or a release of these materials, we could become subject to claims for toxic
torts, natural resource damages and other damages and for the investigation and cleanup of soil, surface water, groundwater, and
other media, as well as abandoned and closed mines located on property we operate. Such claims may arise out of conditions at
sites that we currently own or operate, as well as at sites that we previously owned or operated, or may acquire.
The
government extensively regulates mining operations, especially with respect to mine safety and health, which imposes significant
actual and potential costs on us, and future regulation could increase those costs or limit our ability to produce coal.
Coal
mining is subject to inherent risks to safety and health. As a result, the coal mining industry is subject to stringent safety
and health standards. Fatal mining accidents in the United States in recent years have received national attention and have led
to responses at the state and federal levels that have resulted in increased regulatory scrutiny of coal mining operations, particularly
underground mining operations. More stringent state and federal mine safety laws and regulations have included increased sanctions
for non-compliance. Moreover, future workplace accidents are likely to result in more stringent enforcement and possibly the passage
of new laws and regulations.
Within
the last few years, the industry has seen enactment of the Federal Mine Improvement and New Emergency Response Act of 2006 (the
“MINER Act”), subsequent additional legislation and regulation imposing significant new safety initiatives and the
Dodd-Frank Act, which, among other things, imposes new mine safety information reporting requirements. The MINER Act significantly
amended the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 (the “Mine Act”), imposing more extensive and stringent compliance
standards, increasing criminal penalties and establishing a maximum civil penalty for non-compliance, and expanding the scope
of federal oversight, inspection, and enforcement activities. Following the passage of the MINER Act, the U.S. Mine Safety and
Health Administration (“MSHA”) issued new or more stringent rules and policies on a variety of topics, including:
|
●
|
sealing off abandoned areas of underground coal
mines;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
mine safety equipment, training and emergency
reporting requirements;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
substantially increased civil penalties for
regulatory violations;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
training and availability of mine rescue teams;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
underground “refuge alternatives”
capable of sustaining trapped miners in the event of an emergency;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
flame-resistant conveyor belt, fire prevention
and detection, and use of air from the belt entry; and
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
post-accident two-way communications and electronic
tracking systems.
|
For
example, in 2014, MSHA adopted a final rule that reduces the permissible concentration of respirable dust in underground coal
mines from the current standard of 2.0 milligrams per cubic meter of air to 1.5 milligram per cubic meter. The rule has a phased
implementation schedule, the final phase required to be implemented by August 2016. Under the phased approach, operators will
be required to adopt new measures and procedures for dust sampling, record keeping, and medical surveillance. More recently, in
September 2015, MSHA issued a proposed rule requiring the installation of proximity detection systems on underground coal hauling
systems used on the mining section. Proximity detection is a technology that uses electronic sensors to detect motion and the
distance between a miner and a machine. These systems provide audible and visual warnings, and automatically stop moving machines
when miners are in the machines’ path. These and other new safety rules could result in increased compliance costs on our
operations. Subsequent to passage of the MINER Act, various coal producing states, including West Virginia, Ohio and Kentucky,
have enacted legislation addressing issues such as mine safety and accident reporting, increased civil and criminal penalties,
and increased inspections and oversight. Other states may pass similar legislation in the future. Additional federal and state
legislation that would further increase mine safety regulation, inspection and enforcement, particularly with respect to underground
mining operations, has also been considered.
Although
we are unable to quantify the full impact, implementing and complying with these new laws and regulations could have an adverse
impact on our results of operations and cash available for distribution to our unitholders and could result in harsher sanctions
in the event of any violations.
Penalties,
fines or sanctions levied by MSHA could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and cash available
for distribution.
Surface
and underground mines like ours and those of our competitors are continuously inspected by MSHA, which often leads to notices
of violation. Recently, MSHA has been conducting more frequent and more comprehensive inspections. In addition, in July 2014,
MSHA proposed a rule that revises its civil penalty assessment provisions and how regulators should approach calculating penalties,
which, in some instances, could resulted in increased civil penalty assessments for medium and larger mine operators and contractors
by 300 to 1,000 percent. MSHA issued a revised proposed rule in February 2015, but, to date, has not taken any further action.
However, increased scrutiny by MSHA and enforcement against mining operations are likely to continue.
On
June 24, 2011, our subsidiary, CAM Mining LLC received notice that on June 23, 2011, MSHA commenced an action in the U.S. District
Court of the Eastern District of Kentucky seeking injunctive relief as a result of alleged violations of Sections 103, 104, and
108 of the Mine Act occurring at Mine 28 in connection with an inspection on June 17, 2011 by MSHA inspectors. The complaint alleged
that when MSHA inspectors arrived at Mine 28 to inspect the mine with respect to the allegations that employees had been smoking
underground, CAM Mining LLC employees gave advance notice of the inspection to miners working underground and that this advance
notice hindered, interfered with and delayed the inspection by MSHA. The complaint asserts that the MSHA inspectors did not find
any evidence of smoking paraphernalia during the inspection, which was allegedly the result of this advance notice. On June 30,
2011, MSHA obtained a temporary restraining order prohibiting any advance notice of inspections in the future. That became a Permanent
Injunction on July 14, 2011. The Permanent Injunction is for three years and expired on July 14, 2014. On June 17, 2011, MSHA
also issued a 104(a) citation in this matter to the Mine for allegedly giving advance notice of the inspection. The citation was
assessed at $10,000 and was settled for $8,000 in 2014 upon approval by the administrative law judge.
As
a result of these and future inspections and alleged violations and potential violations, we could be subject to material fines,
penalties or sanctions. Any of our mines could be subject to a temporary or extended shut down as a result of an alleged MSHA
violation. Any such penalties, fines or sanctions could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations
and cash available for distribution.
We
may be unable to obtain and/or renew permits necessary for our operations, which could prevent us from mining certain reserves.
Numerous
governmental permits and approvals are required for mining operations, and we can face delays, challenges to, and difficulties
in acquiring, maintaining or renewing necessary permits and approvals, including environmental permits. The permitting rules,
and the interpretations of these rules, are complex, change frequently, and are often subject to discretionary interpretations
by regulators, all of which may make compliance more difficult or impractical, and may possibly preclude the continuance of ongoing
mining operations or the development of future mining operations. In addition, the public has certain statutory rights to comment
upon and otherwise impact the permitting process, including through court intervention. Over the past few years, the length of
time needed to bring a new surface mine into production has increased because of the increased time required to obtain necessary
permits. The slowing pace at which permits are issued or renewed for new and existing mines has materially impacted production
in Appalachia, but could also affect other regions in the future.
Section
402 National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permits and Section 404 CWA permits are required to discharge wastewater and
discharge dredged or fill material into waters of the United States. Expansion of EPA jurisdiction over these areas has the potential
to adversely impact our operations. For example, the EPA released a final rule in May 2015 that attempted to clarify federal jurisdiction
under the CWA over waters of the United States, but a number of legal challenges to this rule are pending, and implementation
of the rule has been stayed nationwide. To the extent the rule expands the scope of the CWA’s jurisdiction, we could face
increased costs and delays with respect to obtaining permits for dredge and fill activities in wetland areas. Our surface coal
mining operations typically require such permits to authorize such activities as the creation of slurry ponds, stream impoundments,
and valley fills. Although the CWA gives the EPA a limited oversight role in the Section 404 permitting program, the EPA has recently
asserted its authorities more forcefully to question, delay, and prevent issuance of some Section 404 permits for surface coal
mining in Appalachia. Currently, significant uncertainty exists regarding the obtaining of permits under the CWA for coal mining
operations in Appalachia due to various initiatives launched by the EPA regarding these permits.
Our
mining operations are subject to operating risks that could adversely affect production levels and operating costs.
Our
mining operations are subject to conditions and events beyond our control that could disrupt operations, resulting in decreased
production levels and increased costs.
These
risks include:
|
●
|
unfavorable geologic
conditions, such as the thickness of the coal deposits and the amount of rock embedded in or overlying the coal deposit;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
inability to acquire
or maintain necessary permits or mining or surface rights;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
changes in governmental
regulation of the mining industry or the electric utility industry;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
adverse weather
conditions and natural disasters;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
accidental mine
water flooding;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
labor-related interruptions;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
transportation delays;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
mining and processing
equipment unavailability and failures and unexpected maintenance problems; and
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
accidents, including
fire and explosions from methane.
|
Any
of these conditions may increase the cost of mining and delay or halt production at particular mines for varying lengths of time,
which in turn could adversely affect our results of operations and cash available for distribution to our unitholders.
In
general, mining accidents present a risk of various potential liabilities depending on the nature of the accident, the location,
the proximity of employees or other persons to the accident scene and a range of other factors. Possible liabilities arising from
a mining accident include workmen’s compensation claims or civil lawsuits for workplace injuries, claims for personal injury
or property damage by people living or working nearby and fines and penalties including possible criminal enforcement against
us and certain of our employees. In addition, a significant accident that results in a mine shut-down could give rise to liabilities
for failure to meet the requirements of coal supply agreements especially if the counterparties dispute our invocation of the
force majeure provisions of those agreements. We maintain insurance coverage to mitigate the risks of certain of these liabilities,
including business interruption insurance, but those policies are subject to various exclusions and limitations and we cannot
assure you that we will receive coverage under those policies for any personal injury, property damage or business interruption
claims that may arise out of such an accident. Moreover, certain potential liabilities such as fines and penalties are not insurable
risks. Thus, a serious mine accident may result in material liabilities that adversely affect our results of operations and cash
available for distribution.
Fluctuations
in transportation costs or disruptions in transportation services could increase competition or impair our ability to supply coal
to our customers, which could adversely affect our results of operations and cash available for distribution to our unitholders.
Transportation
costs represent a significant portion of the total cost of coal for our customers and, as a result, the cost of transportation
is a critical factor in a customer’s purchasing decision. Increases in transportation costs could make coal a less competitive
energy source or could make our coal production less competitive than coal produced from other sources.
Significant
decreases in transportation costs could result in increased competition from coal producers in other regions. For instance, coordination
of the many eastern U.S. coal loading facilities, the large number of small shipments, the steeper average grades of the terrain
and a more unionized workforce are all issues that combine to make shipments originating in the eastern United States inherently
more expensive on a per-mile basis than shipments originating in the western United States. Historically, high coal transportation
rates from the western coal producing regions limited the use of western coal in certain eastern markets. The increased competition
could have an adverse effect on our results of operations and cash available for distribution to our unitholders.
We
depend primarily upon railroads, barges and trucks to deliver coal to our customers. Disruption of any of these services due to
weather-related problems, strikes, lockouts, accidents, mechanical difficulties and other events could temporarily impair our
ability to supply coal to our customers, which could adversely affect our results of operations and cash available for distribution
to our unitholders.
In
recent years, the states of Kentucky and West Virginia have increased enforcement of weight limits on coal trucks on their public
roads. It is possible that other states may modify their laws to limit truck weight limits. Such legislation and enforcement efforts
could result in shipment delays and increased costs. An increase in transportation costs could have an adverse effect on our ability
to increase or to maintain production and could adversely affect our results of operations and cash available for distribution.
A
shortage of skilled labor in the mining industry could reduce productivity and increase operating costs, which could adversely
affect our results of operations and cash available for distribution to our unitholders.
Efficient
coal mining using modern techniques and equipment requires skilled laborers. During periods of high demand for coal, the coal
industry has experienced a shortage of skilled labor as well as rising labor and benefit costs, due in large part to demographic
changes as existing miners retire at a faster rate than new miners are entering the workforce. If a shortage of experienced labor
should occur or coal producers are unable to train enough skilled laborers, there could be an adverse impact on labor productivity,
an increase in our costs and our ability to expand production may be limited. If coal prices decrease or our labor prices increase,
our results of operations and cash available for distribution to our unitholders could be adversely affected.
Unexpected
increases in raw material costs, such as steel, diesel fuel and explosives could adversely affect our results of operations.
Our
coal mining operations are affected by commodity prices. We use significant amounts of steel, diesel fuel, explosives and other
raw materials in our mining operations, and volatility in the prices for these raw materials could have a material adverse effect
on our operations. Steel prices and the prices of scrap steel, natural gas and coking coal consumed in the production of iron
and steel fluctuate significantly and may change unexpectedly. Additionally, a limited number of suppliers exist for explosives,
and any of these suppliers may divert their products to other industries. Shortages in raw materials used in the manufacturing
of explosives, which, in some cases, do not have ready substitutes, or the cancellation of supply contracts under which these
raw materials are obtained, could increase the prices and limit the ability of us or our contractors to obtain these supplies.
Future volatility in the price of steel, diesel fuel, explosives or other raw materials will impact our operating expenses and
could adversely affect our results of operations and cash available for distribution.
If
we are not able to acquire replacement coal reserves that are economically recoverable, our results of operations and cash available
for distribution to our unitholders could be adversely affected.
Our
results of operations and cash available for distribution to our unitholders depend substantially on obtaining coal reserves that
have geological characteristics that enable them to be mined at competitive costs and to meet the coal quality needed by our customers.
Because we deplete our reserves as we mine coal, our future success and growth will depend, in part, upon our ability to acquire
additional coal reserves that are economically recoverable. If we fail to acquire or develop additional reserves, our existing
reserves will eventually be depleted. Replacement reserves may not be available when required or, if available, may not be capable
of being mined at costs comparable to those characteristic of the depleting mines. We may not be able to accurately assess the
geological characteristics of any reserves that we acquire, which may adversely affect our results of operations and cash available
for distribution to our unitholders. Exhaustion of reserves at particular mines with certain valuable coal characteristics also
may have an adverse effect on our operating results that is disproportionate to the percentage of overall production represented
by such mines. Our ability to obtain other reserves in the future could be limited by restrictions under our existing or future
debt agreements, competition from other coal companies for attractive properties, the lack of suitable acquisition candidates
or the inability to acquire coal properties on commercially reasonable terms.
Inaccuracies
in our estimates of coal reserves and non-reserve coal deposits could result in lower than expected revenues and higher than expected
costs.
We
base our coal reserve and non-reserve coal deposit estimates on engineering, economic and geological data assembled and analyzed
by our staff, which is periodically audited by independent engineering firms. These estimates are also based on the expected cost
of production and projected sale prices and assumptions concerning the permitability and advances in mining technology. The estimates
of coal reserves and non-reserve coal deposits as to both quantity and quality are periodically updated to reflect the production
of coal from the reserves, updated geologic models and mining recovery data, recently acquired coal reserves and estimated costs
of production and sales prices. There are numerous factors and assumptions inherent in estimating quantities and qualities of
coal reserves and non-reserve coal deposits and costs to mine recoverable reserves, including many factors beyond our control.
Estimates of economically recoverable coal reserves necessarily depend upon a number of variable factors and assumptions, all
of which may vary considerably from actual results. These factors and assumptions relate to:
|
●
|
quality of coal;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
geological and mining
conditions and/or effects from prior mining that may not be fully identified by available exploration data or which may differ
from our experience in areas where we currently mine;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
the percentage of
coal in the ground ultimately recoverable;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
the assumed effects
of regulation, including the issuance of required permits, taxes, including severance and excise taxes and royalties, and
other payments to governmental agencies;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
historical production
from the area compared with production from other similar producing areas;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
the timing for the
development of reserves; and
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
assumptions concerning
equipment and productivity, future coal prices, operating costs, capital expenditures and development and reclamation costs.
|
For
these reasons, estimates of the quantities and qualities of the economically recoverable coal attributable to any particular group
of properties, classifications of coal reserves and non-reserve coal deposits based on risk of recovery, estimated cost of production
and estimates of net cash flows expected from particular reserves as prepared by different engineers or by the same engineers
at different times may vary materially due to changes in the above factors and assumptions. Actual production from identified
coal reserve and non-reserve coal deposit areas or properties and revenues and expenditures associated with our mining operations
may vary materially from estimates. Accordingly, these estimates may not reflect our actual coal reserves or non-reserve coal
deposits. Any inaccuracy in our estimates related to our coal reserves and non-reserve coal deposits could result in lower than
expected revenues and higher than expected costs, which could have a material adverse effect on our ability to make cash distributions.
We
invest in non-coal natural resource assets, which could result in a material adverse effect on our results of operations and cash
available for distribution to our unitholders.
Part
of our business strategy is to expand our operations through strategic acquisitions, which includes investing in non-coal natural
resources assets. Our executive officers do not have experience investing in or operating non-coal natural resources assets and
we may be unable to hire additional management with relevant expertise in operating such assets. Acquisitions of non-coal natural
resource assets could expose us to new and additional operating and regulatory risks, including commodity price risk, which could
result in a material adverse effect on our results of operations and cash available for distribution to our unitholders.
The
amount of estimated maintenance capital expenditures our general partner is required to deduct from operating surplus each quarter
could increase in the future, resulting in a decrease in available cash from operating surplus that could be distributed to our
unitholders.
Our
partnership agreement requires our general partner to deduct from operating surplus each quarter estimated maintenance capital
expenditures as opposed to actual maintenance capital expenditures in order to reduce disparities in operating surplus caused
by fluctuating maintenance capital expenditures, such as reserve replacement costs or refurbishment or replacement of mine equipment.
Our annual estimated maintenance capital expenditures for purposes of calculating operating surplus is based on our estimates
of the amounts of expenditures we will be required to make in the future to maintain our long-term operating capacity. Our partnership
agreement does not cap the amount of maintenance capital expenditures that our general partner may estimate. The amount of our
estimated maintenance capital expenditures may be more than our actual maintenance capital expenditures, which will reduce the
amount of available cash from operating surplus that we would otherwise have available for distribution to unitholders. The amount
of estimated maintenance capital expenditures deducted from operating surplus is subject to review and change by the board of
directors of our general partner at least once a year, with any change approved by the conflicts committee. In addition to estimated
maintenance capital expenditures, reimbursement of expenses incurred by our general partner and its affiliates will reduce the
amount of available cash from operating surplus that we would otherwise have available for distribution to our unitholders.
Existing
and future laws and regulations regulating the emission of sulfur dioxide and other compounds could affect coal consumers and
as a result reduce the demand for our coal. A reduction in demand for our coal could adversely affect our results of operations
and cash available for distribution to our unitholders.
Federal,
state and local laws and regulations extensively regulate the amount of sulfur dioxide, particulate matter, nitrogen oxides, mercury
and other compounds emitted into the air from electric power plants and other consumers of our coal. These laws and regulations
can require significant emission control expenditures, and various new and proposed laws and regulations may require further emission
reductions and associated emission control expenditures. A certain portion of our coal has a medium to high sulfur content, which
results in increased sulfur dioxide emissions when combusted and therefore the use of our coal imposes certain additional costs
on customers. Accordingly, these laws and regulations may affect demand and prices for our higher sulfur coal.
Federal
and state laws restricting the emissions of greenhouse gases in areas where we conduct our business or sell our coal could adversely
affect our operations and demand for our coal.
One
by-product of burning coal is carbon dioxide, which EPA considers a GHG, and a major source of concern with respect to climate
change and global warming.
Future
regulation of GHG in the United States could occur pursuant to future U.S. treaty commitments, new domestic legislation that may
impose a carbon emissions tax or establish a cap-and-trade program or regulation by the EPA. For example, on the international
level, the United States is one of almost 200 nations that agreed on December 12, 2015 to an international climate change agreement
in Paris, France, that calls for countries to set their own GHG emission targets and be transparent about the measures each country
will use to achieve its GHG emission targets; however, the agreement does not set binding GHG emission reduction targets.
In
August 2015, the EPA issued its final Clean Power Plan (the “CPP”), rules that establish carbon pollution standards
for power plants, called CO
2
emission performance rates. The EPA expects each state to develop implementation plans
for power plants in its state to meet the individual state targets established in the CPP. The EPA has given states the option
to develop compliance plans for annual rate-based reductions (pounds per megawatt hour) or mass-based tonnage limits for CO
2
.
The state plans are due in September 2016, subject to potential extensions of up to two years for final plan submission. The compliance
period begins in 2022, and emission reductions will be phased in up to 2030. The EPA also proposed a federal compliance plan to
implement the CPP in the event that an approvable state plan is not submitted to the EPA. Judicial challenges have been filed.
On February 9, 2016, the U.S. Supreme Court granted a stay of the implementation of the CPP before the United States Court of
Appeals for the District of Columbia (“Circuit Court”) even issued a decision. By its terms, this stay will remain
in effect throughout the pendency of the appeals process including at the Circuit Court and the Supreme Court through any certiorari
petition that may be granted. The stay suspends the rule, including the requirement that states submit their initial plans by
September 2016. The Supreme Court’s stay applies only to EPA’s regulations for CO
2
emissions from existing
power plants and will not affect EPA’s standards for new power plants. It is not yet clear how the either the Circuit Court
or the Supreme Court will rule on the legality of the CPP. If the rules were upheld at the conclusion of this appellate process
and were implemented in their current form, demand for coal will likely be further decreased. The EPA also issued a final rule
for new coal-fired power plants in August 2015, which essentially set performance standards for coal-fired power plants that requires
partial carbon capture and sequestration. Additional legal challenges have been filed against the EPA’s rules for new power
plants. The EPA’s GHG rules for new and existing power plants, taken together, have the potential to severely reduce demand
for coal. In addition, passage of any comprehensive federal climate change and energy legislation could impact the demand for
coal. Any reduction in the amount of coal consumed by North American electric power generators could reduce the price of coal
that we mine and sell, thereby reducing our revenues and materially and adversely affecting our business and results of operations.
Many
states and regions have adopted greenhouse gas initiatives and certain governmental bodies have or are considering the imposition
of fees or taxes based on the emission of greenhouse gases by certain facilities, including coal-fired electric generating facilities.
For example, in 2005, ten northeastern states entered into the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative agreement (the “RGGI”),
calling for implementation of a cap and trade program aimed at reducing carbon dioxide emissions from power plants in the participating
states. The members of RGGI have established in statute and/or regulation a carbon dioxide trading program. Auctions for carbon
dioxide allowances under the program began in September 2008. Though New Jersey withdrew from RGGI in 2011, since its inception,
several additional northeastern states and Canadian provinces have joined as participants or observers.
Following
the RGGI model, five western states launched the Western Regional Climate Action Initiative to identify, evaluate and implement
collective and cooperative methods of reducing greenhouse gases in the region to 15% below 2005 levels by 2020. These states were
joined by two additional states and four Canadian provinces and became collectively known as the Western Climate Initiative Partners.
However, in November 2011, six states withdrew, leaving California and the four Canadian provinces as members. At a January 12,
2012 stakeholder meeting, this group confirmed a commitment and timetable to create the largest carbon market in North America
and provide a model to guide future efforts to establish national approaches in both Canada and the U.S. to reduce GHG emissions.
It is likely that these regional efforts will continue.
Many
coal-fired plants have already closed or announced plans to close and proposed new construction projects have also come under
additional scrutiny with respect to GHG emissions. There have been an increasing number of protests and challenges to the permitting
of new coal-fired power plants by environmental organizations and state regulators for concerns related to greenhouse gas emissions.
Other state regulatory authorities have also rejected the construction of new coal-fueled power plants based on the uncertainty
surrounding the potential costs associated with GHG emissions from these plants under future laws limiting the emissions of carbon
dioxide. In addition, several permits issued to new coal-fired power plants without limits on GHG emissions have been appealed
to the EPA’s Environmental Appeals Board. In addition, over 30 states have adopted mandatory “renewable portfolio
standards,” which require electric utilities to obtain a certain percentage of their electric generation portfolio from
renewable resources by a certain date. These standards range generally from 10% to 30%, over time periods that generally extend
from the present until between 2020 and 2030. Other states may adopt similar requirements, and federal legislation is a possibility
in this area. To the extent these requirements affect our current and prospective customers; they may reduce the demand for coal-fired
power, and may affect long-term demand for our coal.
If
mandatory restrictions on carbon dioxide emissions are imposed, the ability to capture and store large volumes of carbon dioxide
emissions from coal-fired power plants may be a key mitigation technology to achieve emissions reductions while meeting projected
energy demands. A number of recent legislative and regulatory initiatives to encourage the development and use of carbon capture
and storage technology have been proposed or enacted. On February 3, 2010, President Obama sent a memorandum to the heads of fourteen
Executive Departments and Federal Agencies establishing an Interagency Task Force on Carbon Capture and Storage (“CCS”).
The goal was to develop a comprehensive and coordinated Federal strategy to speed the commercial development and deployment of
clean coal technologies. On August 12, 2010, the Task Force delivered a series of recommendations on overcoming the barriers to
the widespread, cost-effective deployment of CCS within ten years. The report concludes that CCS can play an important role in
domestic GHG emissions reductions while preserving the option of using abundant domestic fossil energy resources. The EPA also
recently finalized new source performance standards for GHG for new coal and oil-fired power plants, which requires partial carbon
capture and sequestration to comply. However, widespread cost-effective deployment of CCS will occur only if the technology is
commercially available at economically competitive prices and supportive national policy frameworks are in place.
In
the meantime, the EPA and other regulators are using existing laws, including the federal Clean Air Act, to limit emissions of
carbon dioxide and other GHGs from major sources, including coal-fired power plants that may require the use of “best available
control technology” or “BACT.” As state permitting authorities continue to consider GHG control requirements
as part of major source permitting BACT requirements, costs associated with new facility permitting and use of coal could increase
substantially. A growing concern is the possibility that BACT will be determined to be the use of an alternative fuel to coal.
As
a result of these current and proposed laws, regulations and trends, electricity generators may elect to switch to other fuels
that generate less GHG emissions, possibly further reducing demand for our coal, which could adversely affect our results of operations
and cash available for distribution to our unitholders.
Federal
and state laws require bonds to secure our obligations to reclaim mined property. Our inability to acquire or failure to maintain,
obtain or renew these surety bonds could have an adverse effect on our ability to produce coal, which could adversely affect our
results of operations and cash available for distribution to our unitholders.
We
are required under federal and state laws to place and maintain bonds to secure our obligations to repair and return property
to its approximate original state after it has been mined (often referred to as “reclamation”) and to satisfy other
miscellaneous obligations. Federal and state governments could increase bonding requirements in the future. Certain business transactions,
such as coal leases and other obligations, may also require bonding. We may have difficulty procuring or maintaining our surety
bonds. Our bond issuers may demand higher fees, additional collateral, including supporting letters of credit or posting cash
collateral or other terms less favorable to us upon those renewals. The failure to maintain or the inability to acquire sufficient
surety bonds, as required by state and federal laws, could subject us to fines and penalties as well as the loss of our mining
permits. Such failure could result from a variety of factors, including:
|
●
|
the lack of availability,
higher expense or unreasonable terms of new surety bonds;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
the ability of current
and future surety bond issuers to increase required collateral; and
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
the exercise by
third-party surety bond holders of their right to refuse to renew the surety bonds.
|
We
maintain surety bonds with third parties for reclamation expenses and other miscellaneous obligations. It is possible that we
may in the future have difficulty maintaining our surety bonds for mine reclamation. Due to adverse economic conditions and the
volatility of the financial markets, surety bond providers may be less willing to provide us with surety bonds or maintain existing
surety bonds or may demand terms that are less favorable to us than the terms we currently receive. We may have greater difficulty
satisfying the liquidity requirements under our existing surety bond contracts. As of December 31, 2015, we had $58.5 million
in reclamation surety bonds, secured by $22.4 million in letters of credit outstanding under our credit agreement. Based on the
May 2016 amendment, our credit agreement provides for a $75 million working capital revolving credit facility, of which up to
$30.0 million may be used for letters of credit. If we do not maintain sufficient borrowing capacity under our revolving credit
facility for additional letters of credit, we may be unable to obtain or renew surety bonds required for our mining operations.
If we do not maintain sufficient borrowing capacity or have other resources to satisfy our surety and bonding requirements, our
operations and cash available for distribution to our unitholders could be adversely affected.
We
depend on a few customers for a significant portion of our revenues. If a substantial portion of our supply contracts terminate
or if any of these customers were to significantly reduce their purchases of coal from us, and we are unable to successfully renegotiate
or replace these contracts on comparable terms, then our results of operations and cash available for distribution to our unitholders
could be adversely affected.
We
sell a material portion of our coal under supply contracts. As of December 31, 2015, we had sales commitments for approximately
92% of our estimated coal production (including purchased coal to supplement our production) for the year ending December 31,
2016. When our current contracts with customers expire, our customers may decide not to extend or enter into new contracts. Of
our total future committed tons, under the terms of the supply contracts, we will ship 60% in 2016, 35% in 2017, and 5% in 2018.
We derived approximately 83.9% of our total coal revenues from coal sales to our ten largest customers for the year ended December
31, 2015, with affiliates of our top three customers accounting for approximately 45.2% of our coal revenues during that period.
In
the absence of long-term contracts, our customers may decide to purchase fewer tons of coal than in the past or on different terms,
including different pricing terms. Negotiations to extend existing contracts or enter into new long-term contracts with those
and other customers may not be successful, and those customers may not continue to purchase coal from us under long-term coal
supply contracts or may significantly reduce their purchases of coal from us. In addition, interruption in the purchases by or
operations of our principal customers could significantly affect our results of operations and cash available for distribution.
Unscheduled maintenance outages at our customers’ power plants and unseasonably moderate weather are examples of conditions
that might cause our customers to reduce their purchases. Our mines may have difficulty identifying alternative purchasers of
their coal if their existing customers suspend or terminate their purchases.
Certain
provisions in our long-term coal supply contracts may provide limited protection during adverse economic conditions, may result
in economic penalties to us or permit the customer to terminate the contract.
Price
adjustment, “price re-opener” and other similar provisions in our supply contracts may reduce the protection from
short-term coal price volatility traditionally provided by such contracts. Price re-opener provisions typically require the parties
to agree on a new price. Failure of the parties to agree on a price under a price re-opener provision can lead to termination
of the contract. Any adjustment or renegotiations leading to a significantly lower contract price could adversely affect our results
of operations and cash available for distribution to our unitholders.
Coal
supply contracts also typically contain force majeure provisions allowing temporary suspension of performance by us or our customers
during the duration of specified events beyond the control of the affected party. Most of our coal supply contracts also contain
provisions requiring us to deliver coal meeting quality thresholds for certain characteristics such as Btu, sulfur content, ash
content, hardness and ash fusion temperature. Failure to meet these specifications could result in economic penalties, including
price adjustments, the rejection of deliveries or termination of the contracts. In addition, certain of our coal supply contracts
permit the customer to terminate the agreement in the event of changes in regulations affecting our industry that increase the
price of coal beyond a specified limit.
Our
coal lessees’ mining operations and their financial condition and results of operations are subject to some of the same
risks and uncertainties that we face as a mine operator.
The
mining operations and financial condition and results of operations of our coal lessees are subject to the same risks and uncertainties
that we face as a mine operator. If any such risks were to occur, the business, financial condition and results of operations
of the lessees could be adversely affected and as a result our coal royalty revenues and cash available for distribution could
be adversely affected.
If
our coal lessees do not manage their operations well, their production volumes and our royalty revenues could decrease.
We
depend on our coal lessees to effectively manage their operations on the leased properties. The lessees make their own business
decisions with respect to their operations within the constraints of their leases, including decisions relating to:
|
●
|
marketing of the
coal mined;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
mine plans, including
the amount to be mined and the method of mining;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
processing and blending
coal;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
expansion plans
and capital expenditures;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
credit risk of their
customers;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
permitting;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
insurance and surety
bonding;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
acquisition of surface
rights and other coal estates;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
employee wages;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
transportation arrangements;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
compliance with
applicable laws, including environmental laws; and
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
mine closure and
reclamation.
|
A
failure on the part of one of the coal lessees to make royalty payments could give us the right to terminate the lease, repossess
the property and enforce payment obligations under the lease. If we repossessed any of our properties, we might not be able to
find a replacement lessee or enter into a new lease on favorable terms within a reasonable period of time. In addition, the existing
lessee could be subject to bankruptcy proceedings that could further delay the execution of a new lease or the assignment of the
existing lease to another operator. If we enter into a new lease, the replacement operator might not achieve the same levels of
production or sell coal at the same price as the lessee it replaced. In addition, it may be difficult to secure new or replacement
lessees for small or isolated coal reserves, since industry trends toward consolidation favor larger-scale, higher-technology
mining operations in order to increase productivity.
Coal
lessees could satisfy obligations to their customers with coal from properties other than ours, depriving us of the ability to
receive amounts in excess of minimum royalty payments.
Coal
supply contracts often require operators to satisfy their obligations to their customers with resources mined from specific reserves
or may provide the operator flexibility to source the coal from various reserves. Several factors may influence a coal lessee’s
decision to supply its customers with coal mined from properties we do not own or lease, including the royalty rates under the
coal lessee’s lease with us, mining conditions, mine operating costs, cost and availability of transportation, and customer
specifications. If a coal lessee satisfies its obligations to its customers with coal from properties we do not own or lease,
production on our properties will decrease, and we will receive lower royalty revenues.
A
coal lessee may incorrectly report royalty revenues, which might not be identified by our lessee audit process or our mine inspection
process or, if identified, might be identified in a subsequent period.
We
depend on our lessees to correctly report production and royalty revenues on a monthly basis. Our regular lessee audits and mine
inspections may not discover any irregularities in these reports or, if we do discover errors, we might not identify them in the
reporting period in which they occurred. Any undiscovered reporting errors could result in a loss of royalty revenues and errors
identified in subsequent periods could lead to accounting disputes as well as disputes with the coal lessees, or internal control
deficiencies.
Defects
in title in the coal properties that we own or loss of any leasehold interests could limit our ability to mine these properties
or result in significant unanticipated costs.
We
conduct a significant part of our mining operations on leased properties. A title defect or the loss of any lease could adversely
affect our ability to mine the associated coal reserves. Title to most of our owned and leased properties and the associated mineral
rights is not usually verified until we make a commitment to develop a property, which may not occur until after we have obtained
necessary permits and completed exploration of the property. In some cases, we rely on title information or representations and
warranties provided by our grantors or lessors, as the case may be. Our right to mine some coal reserves would be adversely affected
by defects in title or boundaries or if a lease expires. Any challenge to our title or leasehold interest could delay the exploration
and development of the property and could ultimately result in the loss of some or all of our interest in the property. Mining
operations from time to time may rely on a lease that we are unable to renew on terms at least as favorable, if at all. In such
event, we may have to close down or significantly alter the sequence of mining operations or incur additional costs to obtain
or renew such leases, which could adversely affect our future coal production. If we mine on property that we do not control,
we could incur liability for such mining.
Our
work force could become unionized in the future, which could adversely affect our production and labor costs and increase the
risk of work stoppages.
Currently,
none of our employees are represented under collective bargaining agreements. However, all of our work force may not remain union-free
in the future. If some or all of our work force were to become unionized, it could adversely affect our productivity and labor
costs and increase the risk of work stoppages.
We
depend on key personnel for the success of our business.
We
depend on the services of our senior management team and other key personnel, including senior management of our general partner.
The loss of the services of any member of senior management or key employee could have an adverse effect on our business and reduce
our ability to make distributions to our unitholders. We may not be able to locate or employ on acceptable terms qualified replacements
for senior management or other key employees if their services were no longer available.
If
the assumptions underlying our reclamation and mine closure obligations are materially inaccurate, we could be required to expend
greater amounts than anticipated.
The
Federal Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 and counterpart state laws and regulations establish operational, reclamation
and closure standards for all aspects of surface mining as well as most aspects of underground mining. Estimates of our total
reclamation and mine closing liabilities are based upon permit requirements and our engineering expertise related to these requirements.
The estimate of ultimate reclamation liability is reviewed both periodically by our management and annually by independent third-party
engineers. The estimated liability can change significantly if actual costs vary from assumptions or if governmental regulations
change significantly.
Our
debt levels may limit our flexibility in obtaining additional financing and in pursuing other business opportunities.
Our
level of indebtedness could have important consequences to us, including the following:
|
●
|
our ability to obtain
additional financing, if necessary, for working capital, capital expenditures (including acquisitions) or other purposes may
be impaired or such financing may not be available on favorable terms;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
covenants contained
in our existing and future credit and debt arrangements will require us to meet financial tests that may affect our flexibility
in planning for and reacting to changes in our business, including possible acquisition opportunities;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
we will need a portion
of our cash flow to make principal and interest payments on our indebtedness, reducing the funds that would otherwise be available
for operations, distributions to unitholders and future business opportunities;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
we may be more vulnerable
to competitive pressures or a downturn in our business or the economy generally; and
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
our flexibility
in responding to changing business and economic conditions may be limited.
|
Increases
in our total indebtedness would increase our total interest expense, which would in turn reduce our forecasted cash available
for distribution. As of December 31, 2015 our current portion of long-term debt that will be funded from cash flows from operating
activities during 2016 was approximately $41.5 million. Our ability to service our indebtedness will depend upon, among other
things, our future financial and operating performance, which will be affected by prevailing economic conditions and financial,
business, regulatory and other factors, some of which are beyond our control. If our operating results are not sufficient to service
our current or future indebtedness, we will be forced to take actions such as reducing distributions, reducing or delaying our
business activities, acquisitions, investments and/or capital expenditures, selling assets, restructuring or refinancing our indebtedness,
or seeking additional equity capital or bankruptcy protection. We may not be able to effect any of these remedies on satisfactory
terms, or at all.
Our
credit agreement contains operating and financial restrictions that may restrict our business and financing activities and limit
our ability to pay distributions upon the occurrence of certain events.
The
operating and financial restrictions and covenants in our credit agreement and any future financing agreements could restrict
our ability to finance future operations or capital needs or to engage, expand or pursue our business activities. For example,
our credit agreement restricts our ability to:
|
●
|
incur additional
indebtedness or guarantee other indebtedness;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
grant liens;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
make certain loans
or investments;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
dispose of assets
outside the ordinary course of business, including the issuance and sale of capital stock of our subsidiaries;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
change the line
of business conducted by us or our subsidiaries;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
enter into a merger,
consolidation or make acquisitions; or
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
make distributions
if an event of default occurs.
|
In
addition, our payment of principal and interest on our debt will reduce cash available for distribution on our units. Our credit
agreement limits our ability to pay distributions upon the occurrence of the following events, among others, which would apply
to us and our subsidiaries:
|
●
|
failure to pay principal,
interest or any other amount when due;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
breach of the representations
or warranties in the credit agreement;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
failure to comply
with the covenants in the credit agreement;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
cross-default to
other indebtedness;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
bankruptcy or insolvency;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
failure to have
adequate resources to maintain, and obtain, operating permits as necessary to conduct our operations substantially as contemplated
by the mining plans used in preparing the financial projections; and
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
a change of control.
|
Any
subsequent refinancing of our current debt or any new debt could have similar restrictions. Our ability to comply with the covenants
and restrictions contained in our credit agreement may be affected by events beyond our control, including prevailing economic,
financial and industry conditions. If market or other economic conditions deteriorate, our ability to comply with these covenants
may be impaired. If we violate any of the restrictions, covenants, ratios or tests in our credit agreement, a significant portion
of our indebtedness may become immediately due and payable, and our lenders’ commitment to make further loans to us may
terminate. We might not have, or be able to obtain, sufficient funds to make these accelerated payments. In addition, our obligations
under our credit agreement will be secured by substantially all of our assets, and if we are unable to repay our indebtedness
under our credit agreement, the lenders could seek to foreclose on such assets.
Risks
Related to an Investment in Our Common Stock
There
Is A Limited Market For Our Common Stock.
The
trading market for our common stock is limited. Our common stock is eligible for trading on the OTCQB, but is not eligible for
trading on any national or regional securities exchange or the Nasdaq National Market. A more active trading market for our common
stock may never develop, or if such a market develops, it may not be sustained.
No
Operating History in Coal Mining Industry.
We
only recently changed its business plan to involve the purchase of coal mines and related assets. We have no operating history
in the coal mining industry upon which prospective investors can evaluate our likely performance. There can be no assurance that
we will achieve its investment objective.
We
do not intend to pay dividends for the foreseeable future.
We
have never declared or paid any dividends on our common stock. We intend to retain all of our earnings for the foreseeable future
to finance the operation and expansion of our business, and we do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the future. As a
result, you may only receive a return on your investment in our common stock if the market price of our common stock increases.
Our board of directors retains the discretion to change this policy.
An
increase in interest rates may cause the market price of our common shares to decline.
Like
all equity investments, an investment in our common shares is subject to certain risks. In exchange for accepting these risks,
investors may expect to receive a higher rate of return than would otherwise be obtainable from lower-risk investments. Accordingly,
as interest rates rise, the ability of investors to obtain higher risk-adjusted rates of return by purchasing government-backed
debt securities may cause a corresponding decline in demand for riskier investments generally. Reduced demand for our common shares
resulting from investors seeking other more favorable investment opportunities may cause the trading price of our common shares
to decline.
Concentration
of ownership among our existing directors, executive officers and principal stockholders may prevent new investors from influencing
significant corporate decisions.
Our
current directors, executive officers, holders of more than 5% of our total shares of common stock outstanding and their respective
affiliates will, in the aggregate, beneficially own approximately 51.1% of our outstanding common stock and 100% of our outstanding
Series A Preferred Stock. Because of the special voting rights of our Series A Preferred Stock (which is entitled to 54% of the
total votes on any matter on which shareholders have a right to vote), William L. Tuorto currently controls 76 % of the votes
on any matter requiring a shareholder vote. As a result, these stockholders will be able to exercise a controlling influence over
matters requiring stockholder approval, including the election of directors and approval of significant corporate transactions,
and will have significant influence over our management and policies for the foreseeable future. Some of these persons or entities
may have interests that are different from yours. For example, these stockholders may support proposals and actions with which
you may disagree or which are not in your interests. The concentration of ownership could delay or prevent a change in control
of our company or otherwise discourage a potential acquirer from attempting to obtain control of our company, which in turn could
reduce the price of our common stock. In addition, these stockholders, some of which have representatives sitting on our board
of directors, could use their voting control to maintain our existing management and directors in office, delay or prevent changes
of control of our company, or support or reject other management and board of director proposals that are subject to stockholder
approval, such as amendments to our employee stock plans and approvals of significant financing transactions.
Additional
equity or debt financing may be dilutive to existing stockholders or impose terms that are unfavorable to us or our existing stockholders.
We
will need to raise substantial capital in order to finance the acquisition of coal properties, provide working capital, and create
reserves against the many contingencies that are inherent in the mining industry. If we raise additional funds by issuing equity
securities, our stockholders will experience dilution. Debt financing, if available, may involve arrangements that include covenants
limiting or restricting our ability to take specific actions, such as incurring additional debt, making capital expenditures or
declaring dividends. Any debt financing or additional equity that we raise may contain terms, such as liquidation and other preferences
that are not favorable to us or our current stockholders.
We
depend on key personnel and could be harmed by the loss of their services because of the limited number of qualified people in
our industry.
Because
of our small size, we require the continued service and performance of our management team, all of whom we consider to be key
employees. Competition for highly qualified employees in the mining industry is intense. Our success will depend to a significant
degree upon our ability to attract, train, and retain highly skilled directors, officers, management, business, financial, legal,
marketing, sales, and technical personnel and upon the continued contributions of such people. In addition, we may not be able
to retain our current key employees. The loss of the services of one or more of our key personnel and our failure to attract additional
highly qualified personnel could impair our ability to expand our operations and provide service to our customers.
Under
the terms of our Certificate of Incorporation, our Board of Directors is authorized to issue shares of preferred stock with rights
and privileges superior to common stockholders without common stockholder approval.
Under
the terms of our Certificate of Incorporation, our board of directors is authorized to issue shares of preferred stock in one
or more classes or series without stockholder approval. The board has discretion to set the terms, preferences, conversion or
other rights, voting powers, restrictions, limitations as to dividends or other distributions, qualifications and terms or conditions
of redemption for each class or series of preferred stock. Accordingly, we may designate and issue additional shares or series
of preferred stock that would rank senior to the shares of common stock as to dividend rights or rights upon our liquidation,
winding-up, or dissolution.
Provisions
in Our Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws and Delaware law May Inhibit a Takeover of Us, Which Could Limit the Price Investors
Might Be Willing to Pay in the Future for our Common Stock and Could Entrench Management.
Our
certificate of incorporation and bylaws contain provisions that may discourage unsolicited takeover proposals that stockholders
may consider to be in their best interests. Our board has authorized the issuance of 100,000 shares of one class of preferred
stock, known as “Series A Preferred Stock.” The Series A Preferred Stock has voting rights entitling it to 54% of
the total votes on any matter on which stockholders are entitled to vote. In addition, we cannot authorize or issue any class
of capital stock or bonds, debentures, notes or other securities or other obligations ranking senior to or on a parity with the
Series A Preferred Stock without the approval of the Series A Preferred Stock voting as a separate class. Mr. Tuorto holds all
of the outstanding shares of Series A Preferred Stock. As a result, at any meeting of shareholders Mr. Tuorto has a disproportionate
voting power.
Mr.
Tuorto’s control of our Series A Preferred Stock may prevent our stockholders from replacing a majority of our board of
directors at any shareholder meeting, which may entrench management and discourage unsolicited stockholder proposals that may
be in the best interests of stockholders. Moreover, our board of directors has the ability to designate the terms of and issue
new series of preferred stock without stockholder approval.
In
addition, as a Delaware corporation, we are subject to Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, which generally prohibits
a Delaware corporation from engaging in any business combination with any interested stockholder for a period of three years following
the date that the stockholder became an interested stockholder, unless certain specific requirements are met as set forth in Section
203. Collectively, these provisions may make more difficult the removal of management and may discourage transactions that otherwise
could involve payment of a premium over prevailing market prices for our securities.
We
Will Incur Significant Costs As A Result Of Operating As A Public Company. We May Not Have Sufficient Personnel For Our Financial
Reporting Responsibilities, Which May Result In The Untimely Close Of Our Books And Record And Delays In The Preparation Of Financial
Statements And Related Disclosures.
As
a registered public company, we experienced an increase in legal, accounting and other expenses. In addition, the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (the “Sarbanes-Oxley Act”), as well as new rules subsequently implemented by the SEC, has imposed various
requirements on public companies, including requiring changes in corporate governance practices. Our management and other personnel
need to devote a substantial amount of time to these compliance initiatives. Moreover, these rules and regulations will increase
our legal and financial compliance costs and make some activities more time-consuming and costly.
If
we are not able to comply with the requirements of Sarbanes-Oxley Act, or if we or our independent registered public accounting
firm identifies additional deficiencies in our internal control over financial reporting that are deemed to be material weaknesses,
the market price of our stock could decline and we could be subject to sanctions or investigations by the SEC and other regulatory
authorities.
If
we fail to remain current on our reporting requirements, we could be removed from the OTCQB which would limit the ability of broker-dealers
to sell our securities and the ability of stockholders to sell their securities in the secondary market.
Companies
trading on the OTCQB, such as us, must be reporting issuers under Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
and must be current in their reports under Section 13, in order to maintain price quotation privileges on the OTCQB. More specifically,
the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) has enacted Rule 6530, which determines eligibility of issuers
quoted on the OTCQB by requiring an issuer to be current in its filings with the Commission. Pursuant to Rule 6530(e), if we file
our reports late with the Commission three times our securities will be removed from the OTCQB for failure to timely file. As
a result, the market liquidity for our securities could be severely adversely affected by limiting the ability of broker-dealers
to sell our securities and the ability of stockholders to sell their securities in the secondary market.
Because
the market may respond to our business operations and that of our competitors, our stock price will likely be volatile.
Our
common stock is currently quoted on the OTCQB. The OTCQB is a network of security dealers who buy and sell stock. The dealers
are connected by a computer network that provides information on current “bids” and “asks”, as well as
volume information. Our shares are quoted on the OTCQB under the symbol “ROYE.” We anticipate that the market price
of our Common Stock will be subject to wide fluctuations in response to several factors, including: our ability to economically
exploit our properties successfully; increased competition from competitors; and our financial condition and results of our operations.
We
may issue additional common stock, which might dilute the net tangible book value per share of our common stock.
Our
board of directors has the authority, without action or vote of our stockholders, to issue all or a part of our authorized but
unissued shares. Such stock issuances could be made at a price that reflects a discount to, or a premium from, the then-current
market price of our common stock. In addition, in order to raise capital, we may need to issue securities that are convertible
into or exchangeable for a significant amount of our common stock. We are currently contemplating additional capital raising transactions
within the next twelve months, which would likely result in issuances of additional shares which would be dilutive to current
shareholders. These issuances would dilute the percentage ownership interest, which would have the effect of reducing your influence
on matters on which our stockholders vote, and might dilute the net tangible book value per share of our common stock. You may
incur additional dilution if holders of stock options, whether currently outstanding or subsequently granted, exercise their options,
or if warrant holders exercise their warrants to purchase shares of our common stock.
A
sale of a substantial number of shares of the common stock may cause the price of our common stock to decline.
Our
common stock is currently traded on OTCQB and, despite certain increases of trading volume from time to time, there have been
periods when it could be considered “thinly-traded,” meaning that the number of persons interested in purchasing our
common stock at or near bid prices at any given time may be relatively small or non-existent. Finance transactions resulting in
a large amount of newly issued shares that become readily tradable, or other events that cause current stockholders to sell shares,
could place downward pressure on the trading price of our stock. We may consider additional capital raising transactions within
the next twelve months, which would likely result in issuances of additional shares which would be dilutive to current shareholders.
In addition, the lack of a robust resale market may require a stockholder who desires to sell a large number of shares of common
stock to sell the shares in increments over time to mitigate any adverse impact of the sales on the market price of our stock.
If
our stockholders sell, or the market perceives that our stockholders intend to sell for various reasons, including the ending
of restriction on resale or the expiration of lock-up agreements such as those entered into in connection with this offering,
substantial amounts of our common stock in the public market, including shares issued upon the exercise of outstanding options
or warrants, the market price of our common stock could fall. Sales of a substantial number of shares of our common stock may
make it more difficult for us to sell equity or equity-related securities in the future at a time and price that we deem reasonable
or appropriate. We may become involved in securities class action litigation that could divert management’s attention and
harm our business.
At
times, our shares of common stock have been thinly traded, so you may be unable to sell at or near ask prices or even at all if
you need to sell your shares to raise money or otherwise desire to liquidate your shares.
We
cannot predict the extent to which an active public market for our common stock will develop
or
be sustained. Our
common stock is currently traded on OTCQB and experiences periods when it could be considered “thinly-traded.” This
situation may be attributable to a number of factors, including the fact that we are a small company which is relatively unknown
to stock analysts, stock brokers, institutional investors and others in the investment community that generate or influence sales
volume, and that even if we came to the attention of such persons, they tend to be risk averse and would be reluctant to follow
an unproven company such as ours or purchase or recommend the purchase of our shares until such time as we became more seasoned
and viable. As a consequence, there may be periods of several days, weeks or months when trading activity in our shares is minimal,
as compared to a seasoned issuer which has a large and steady volume of trading activity that will generally support continuous
sales without an adverse effect on share price. We cannot give you any assurance that a broader or more active public trading
market for our common stock will be sustained, or that current trading levels will be sustained or not diminish.