TIDMAAU
RNS Number : 1920U
Ariana Resources PLC
01 December 2021
Click on, or paste the following link into your web browser, to
view the associated PDF document.
http://www.rns-pdf.londonstockexchange.com/rns/1920U_1-2021-12-1.pdf
1 December 2021
AIM: AAU
APLIKI PROJECT REVISED MINERAL RESOURCE ESTIMATE
Ariana Resources plc ("Ariana" or "the Company"), the AIM-listed
mineral exploration and development company with interests in gold
mining operations in Europe, is pleased to announce a Mineral
Resource Estimate ("MRE") for the Apliki Project for which Venus
Minerals Ltd ("Venus") has entered into a Heads of Terms for a
50:50 JV agreement with Hellenic Copper Mines Ltd ("HCM"). Venus is
focused on the exploration and development of copper and gold
assets in Cyprus and is 50% owned by Ariana.
Highlights:
-- JORC 2012 MRE updated internally by Ariana and Venus using
due-diligence and historical drilling data.
-- Total Indicated and Inferred Resource of c. 11 Mt at a grade
of 0.25 to 0.69% Cu across the Apliki Project.
-- Inclusive of 800,000t @ 0.34% Cu of Probable Reserves in the
Apliki Stockpiles as defined by HCM and verified by Venus.
-- Processing plant currently undergoing due diligence and pre-installation checks.
-- Joint UK and Cypriot partnership designed to unlock the value
of such copper mining opportunities in Cyprus.
Dr. Kerim Sener, Managing Director, commented:
"This MRE represents an important part of the ongoing due
diligence of the Apliki Copper Project in Cyprus by Venus
Minerals.
"Following the positive results of the due diligence drilling,
which was announced in early November, we have now integrated these
new data with the historical drilling to produce a more robust and
independently assessed resource.
"Apliki represents a significant European opportunity for the
production of high-purity cathode copper using a tried-and-tested
hydrometallurgical processing route with a low environmental
impact. Beyond the resource areas identified here, there are
clearly areas of potential resource upside, particularly in the
Apliki Mine area and specifically its related stockpiles. Further
work by the Venus team will be undertaken in these areas in order
to continue building on the Resources and Reserves.
"In addition, Venus has engaged consultants to assess the
condition and capacity of the processing plant which is on standby
for re-installation at the Apliki site. Based on an initial review
it is clear that some additional processing upside exists, which
will complement any growth in the resource base."
* Further information about Venus Minerals and its projects is
available on the Company's website, www.venusminerals.co .
The information contained within this announcement is deemed by
the Company to constitute inside information as stipulated under
the Market Abuse Regulations (EU) No. 596/2014 as it forms part of
UK Domestic Law by virtue of the European Union (Withdrawal) Act
2018 ("UK MAR").
Introduction
Between June and October 2021, Ariana worked alongside Venus to
assess the Hellenic Copper Mines (HCM)-owned Apliki Project in the
northern Troodos region of Cyprus. This work included the planning
and completion of three due-diligence diamond drill holes, and a
full MRE of all near-term resources held within the Apliki
tenements. The positive results of the due-diligence drilling were
announced on 8 November 2021. This subsequent announcement outlines
the results of the MRE and reflects the progress of the Venus team
on the Joint Venture opportunity with HCM.
The Apliki Project is located in the western part of the Solea
Graben, which is interpreted as a tectonic feature hosting some of
the largest massive sulphide deposits in Cyprus. Mineralisation
occurring at West Apliki and the Apliki Mine is controlled by a
primary north-northeast trending normal fault. While independent
structures control the mineralisation locally within the separate
deposit areas, it appears that the highest grades of copper occur
on the hanging wall side of this normal fault, with lower-grade
mineralisation occurring on the footwall side.
Mineralisation at Apliki is characterised as a classic Volcanic
Massive Sulphide (VMS) system. However, ME-ICP multi-element
analysis of the 2021 due-diligence drilling determined that Apliki
does not contain associated gold, zinc or lead as with several
other VMS related projects within Cyprus. The mineralogical
characteristics of the ore at West Apliki comprise secondary copper
minerals (including chalcocite, covellite, delafossite,
chrysocolla) at higher levels, and occurrence of chalcopyrite at
depth, which is also seen in association with secondary minerals.
In the Apliki Mine area the mineralisation is dominantly
chalcopyrite with some associated secondary minerals.
The HCM database provided contains 245 drill holes, totalling
24,154.45 meters. All holes are spread over three main areas
(Apliki Mine, West Apliki and the Apliki Stockpiles). The MRE
summary presented here provides an estimate of the resources
contained across the entire Apliki project area, which includes the
Apliki Stockpiles (where sufficient data are provided), the Apliki
Mine and its remaining in-situ resources, and the West Apliki
area.
Mining of the Apliki Mine started in the 1960s by Cyprus Mines
Corporation and ended prematurely following the events of 1974. To
date, some high-grade resources remain in-situ below and on the
north-east periphery of the main open pit. Low-grade material
excavated during the development of the Apliki Mine open-pit was
stockpiled separately and now represents an important resource for
hydrometallurgical exploitation. In recent years, 300,000 tonnes of
oxide ore were excavated from the stockpiles, trucked and processed
at the Skouriotissa solvent-extraction and electrowinning plant
(SX-EW); the same plant will be relocated to Apliki as part of the
Joint Venture. The Apliki Stockpiles have been reviewed in detail,
and are classified as reserves by HCM, based on their survey,
trenching, drilling and recent processing activities.
Further potential for other in-situ mineralisation and
stockpiles (highlighted in Figure 1), will remain a significant
near-future target for additional resources beyond this MRE.
http://www.rns-pdf.londonstockexchange.com/rns/1920U_1-2021-12-1.pdf
Figure 1: Plan view of the Apliki Project, showing the
due-diligence drill collar positions and historical collars. All
Apliki MRE domains are highlighted in red. Areas with further
potential, which require follow-up work are outlined in dashed
purple.
West Apliki
The West Apliki area contains secondary copper mineralisation
conducive to heap leaching and hydrometallurgical recovery
processes. As a primary objective of the detailed project
evaluation of Apliki, Venus completed due-diligence diamond
drilling in the West Apliki area. Results for this programme were
announced on the 8 November 2021, and included the following
significant intersections:
-- VMD006 44.5m @ 0.77% Cu from 51.5 m,
o including 8 m @ 1.40% Cu
-- VMD007 28.0m @ 0.86% Cu from 16.0 m
o including 6 m @ 1.59% Cu
-- VMD008 23.0m @ 0.39% Cu from 34.0 m
West Apliki is defined by 96 historic churn, rotary wet and
rotary air drill holes totalling 13,435.49 meters (1968-2011) at an
average depth of 140 m (min. 25m, max 355 m), and 3 due diligence
diamond holes totalling 383.8 meters (2021). All historic holes
were drilled vertically with an average collar spacing of
approximately 38 m, based on 38 collar-to-collar measurements
(min=2.35 m, max=69.18 m).
Apliki Mine
The Apliki Mine is defined by 100 historic holes totalling
9,902.24 meters (1968-2011) at an average depth of 96m (min. 3m,
max. 457m). The remaining resources of immediate interest occur at
the base of the historical pit, where approximately 340,000 cubic
meters of moderate (0.5% Cu) to high grade (>1% Cu)
mineralisation still remain. While much of this remaining
mineralisation is dominated by sulphide phases and is hence
unlikely to be amenable to the proposed extraction route, there is
some evidence of secondary sulphides at higher levels and
particularly to the north of the Apliki pit. Additionally, there is
further potential to expand the Apliki Mine resource to the north
and east of the current open pit walls, however, further work is
required to determine the full extent and nature of such remaining
resources, which will be a significant priority for future Venus
exploration.
Apliki Stockpiles
The Apliki Stockpiles contain significant amounts of low-grade
ore amenable for immediate hydrometallurgical processing. Multiple
sampling programmes in various forms have been completed by HCM to
define an understanding of grade continuity and variability within
the stockpiles. The most significant of these programmes includes
1,117m of churn drilling across 49 holes (average depth 22m), which
led to HCM's classification of the remaining stockpiles (where
tested) as reserves. Venus's independent verification has confirmed
this classification and the estimated tonnages and grades.
Significant additional potential exists in untested stockpiles to
the far north east of the Apliki Mine open pit (Figure 1)
representing a future development opportunity for Venus.
MRE
The MRE is based on a detailed review by Ariana and Venus of all
available drill data acquired between 1968-2011, as well as three
due-diligence drillholes drilled in 2021. These data comprise
churn, rotary wet, rotary air and diamond drill holes for a total
of 24,538 meters of drilling (all historic holes and the 2021 due
diligence drilling), and covers all major areas of the Apliki
project (West Apliki, Apliki Mine and Apliki Stockpiles). The use
of modern software with improved estimation methods and statistical
analysis enables the calculation of a MRE with sufficient
confidence to be classified as Indicated and Inferred. However, the
drill hole spacing density for the project is generally appropriate
to support higher classification of resources in some areas, but
this will require more confirmatory drilling to validate and
increase confidence in the historic data. JORC Table 1 for Apliki
provides more detail on sampling techniques and data used in this
estimation.
Estimation Methodology
Ariana completed the geological modelling of all mineralised
zones at Apliki in Leapfrog Geo 6.0.5 (see JORC Table 1, Appendix
1). Four mineralisation domains were modelled from sectional
interpretations and associated interpolation, representing the most
current geological data and understanding. The MRE is separated
into three main areas: 1) West Apliki, 2) Apliki Mine, and 3)
Apliki Stockpiles (Figure 2).
http://www.rns-pdf.londonstockexchange.com/rns/1920U_1-2021-12-1.pdf
Figure 2: 2021 MRE block model domains of all major Apliki
mineralisation areas.
West Apliki contains a large part of the mineralisation within
the MRE and is exposed locally at surface, extending to a vertical
depth of approximately 150m. The grade through West Apliki is
fairly homogeneous (0.2%-1.0% Cu) with occasional narrow high-grade
zones containing 1-3% Cu. Overall, it was not considered necessary
to sub-domain the higher-grade copper zones at this stage. On the
eastern flank of West Apliki lies a smaller resource area
comprising lower grades (0.1-0.7% Cu). Mineralisation is more
widely exposed at surface and extending to a vertical depth of
approximately 120m.
Apliki Mine contains significant grades of copper (>0.5%)
however, historical mining has depleted much of the resource. Only
the material below the historical pit floor remains, which includes
a significant intercept of 33.1m @ 1.38% Cu, representing some
residual high-grade sulphide ore. The Apliki Stockpiles were
defined by DGPS topography data of the stockpile area compared to
the previous topographic surface, which provided an accurate volume
of stockpiled material. The final domain used in this MRE was
further restricted to only the areas tested by HCM's trenching and
drill hole sampling. No volumes were included in the resource
estimate for areas not sampled. Grades within the remaining
stockpiles range from 0.10-0.76% Cu, with an average grade of 0.2%
Cu. HCM have defined approximately 800,000t @ 0.34% Cu in Probable
Reserves and Venus estimates a further 1.7Mt of Inferred resources
in stockpiles.
Interpolation and wireframe modelling of the mineralised zones
in Leapfrog EDGE was completed using a 0.1% Cu modelling cut-off
grade (CoG), for all domains. Higher-grade mineralisation was not
sub-domained, as it was not deemed necessary to do so. All models
created were based upon interval selections that referenced the
copper grades, lithological descriptions and structural
interpretation, where appropriate. Where continuity was not
established between sections, the strike extrapolation was limited
both manually (wireframes) and statistically (interpolations). The
continuity of the various structures is reflected in the MRE
classification.
A specific gravity of 2.4g/cm(3) was applied to the deposit as a
whole. Further work is required to more appropriately define
density variations through the deposit. Previous studies completed
by Ariana for other deposits in the area utilised sulphur assays to
simulate pyrite intensity and create a density model. However, the
historic data for Apliki only contains copper values, and mostly
represents oxide mineralisation. Based on HCM's own internal work,
they have defined 2.4g/cm(3) to be the average density of most
remaining mineralisation encountered at Apliki.
Compositing was completed in Leapfrog EDGE using a 1m best-fit
routine with a hard domain boundary. This composite length was
increased to 3m for the estimation of Apliki Mine resources.
General mineralisation trends and continuity were identified within
Leapfrog Geo by use of trend planes and their associated
attributes. Variography analysis was not completed but is
recommended in future work to: 1) verify the current mineralisation
orientations and trends, and 2) to identify potentially more
accurate mineralisation trends.
A top-cut was not deemed necessary for Apliki Mine as the high
grades have been confirmed by historical production. Based on the
reporting of twin hole studies completed by HCM and peak grades
associated with the due diligence drilling, a top-cut of 3% Cu was
applied to all search passes within the West Apliki domains. This
was primarily to minimise high-grade smearing into the block model
as a result of historic holes (900 series drilling) overstating
copper grades (up to 5.76% Cu), which could not be verified by
either HCM or the due-diligence drilling. Such areas generally
returned check results of 2-3% Cu for these higher-grade zones.
A non-rotated regular block model was established for West
Apliki, Apliki Mine and the Apliki Stockpiles (Figure 3). Block
sizes were determined by drill spacing within the dataset and
wireframe geometry. The optimal block sizes used within the
block-model were 10m x 10m x 3m (X, Y, Z). This is the same block
size as used by the HCM team in their internal estimations. Grades
for the block models were estimated using Inverse Distance Weighted
Squared (ID2), adopting a multi-pass methodology.
http://www.rns-pdf.londonstockexchange.com/rns/1920U_1-2021-12-1.pdf
Figure 3: Cross section with a wide (500m) swathe to highlight
all the 2021 MRE Apliki block models as illustrated.
Geochemical data for Apliki, with the exception of the three
2021 drill holes at West Apliki, only contain copper values.
Therefore, only copper was estimated for the defined extents of the
deposit. Multi-element data that does exist, suggests that other
trace metals within the West Apliki area would not be economic.
Resource Classification
The MRE is classified in accordance with the JORC Code (2012) as
Indicated and Inferred resources only (Table 1). The Apliki Mine
and West Apliki deposits have sufficient subsurface geological and
geochemical data for the resource to be classified with higher
confidence as Measured or Indicated. However, such a classification
is currently limited by the historic nature of the majority of the
drilling database and these data cannot be audited, as no reference
samples have been archived. Further validation will be required for
an upgrade in classification, using twin-holes where necessary.
The MRE for the Project uses a reporting cut-off of 0.2% Cu for
Apliki Mine and West Apliki and demonstrates that there are
reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction (Table 1).
Confidence in the MRE is sufficient to allow the results to be used
in further technical and economic studies. Additional confidence in
the data obtained from historic drilling is required in order to
advance further understanding of the Project.
Due-diligence drilling provides greater confidence across parts
of the West Apliki deposit, and in such areas the resources have
been classified as Indicated. However, all remaining resources have
been classified as Inferred until further drilling work is
completed. As well as significant classification upgrades, there is
potential for an increase in resource tonnage with further
drilling.
The styles of mineralisation have been identified, the controls
on mineralisation are sufficiently understood and measurements and
sampling completed to a reasonable degree of confidence for the
mineralisation present.
Table 1: Summary of 2021 Apliki MRE, in accordance with JORC
2012, based on 248 drill holes (24,538m) across the Apliki Sector
(29 October 2021). Reporting is based on 0.2% Cu cut-off grade for
in-situ domains, and 0.15% Cu for stockpile resources. Figures in
the table may not sum precisely due to rounding.
RESOURCES Classification Reporting Volume Density Mass Cu Cu
cut-off grade
---------------- --------------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----- -------
(% Cu) (m(3)) (g/cm(3)) (t) (%) (t)
---------------- --------------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----- -------
West Apliki Indicated 0.20 1,688,100 2.40 4,051,400 0.39 15,630
------------------- ---------------- --------------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----- -------
Inferred 0.20 1,479,900 2.40 3,551,800 0.29 10,300
------------------------------------ --------------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----- -------
Apliki Mine Inferred 0.20 339,300 2.40 814,300 0.69 5,600
------------------- ---------------- --------------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----- -------
Apliki Stockpiles Inferred 0.15 722,100 2.40 1,733,000 0.25 4,380
------------------- ---------------- --------------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----- -------
The Apliki stockpiles have been surveyed by DGPS to calculate
the potential tonnages available for processing. Trenching and
drilling have been completed to use in grade estimations for the
stockpiles. HCM have classified these stockpiles as reserves and
the numbers have been confirmed by Venus's internal estimates
(Table 2). These reserves are reported at a lower cut-off grade
than the in-situ resources due to their lower associated mining
costs.
Table 2: Probable Reserves for stockpiles at Apliki Mine with
reporting cut-off of 0.15% Cu. These Reserves are not included in
the Resources stated in Table 1. Figures in the table may not sum
precisely due to rounding.
RESERVES Reporting Volume Density Mass Cu Cu
cut-off
grade
---------- -------- ---------- -------- ----- ------
% Cu (m(3)) (g/cm(3)) (t) (%) (t)
---------- -------- ---------- -------- ----- ------
Apliki Stockpiles 0.15 332,700 2.40 800,000 0.34 2,500
------------------- ---------- -------- ---------- -------- ----- ------
Contacts:
Ariana Resources plc Tel: +44 (0) 20 3476
2080
Michael de Villiers, Chairman
Kerim Sener, Managing Director
Beaumont Cornish Limited Tel: +44 (0) 20 7628
3396
Roland Cornish / Felicity Geidt
Panmure Gordon (UK) Limited Tel: +44 (0) 20 7886
2500
John Prior / Hugh Rich / Atholl Tweedie
Yellow Jersey PR Limited Tel: +44 (0) 20 3004
9512
Dominic Barretto / Henry Wilkinson arianaresources@yellowjerseypr.com
/ Matthew McHale
Editors' Note:
The MRE was prepared by Zack van Coller BSc (Hons), Special
Projects Geologist, Ariana Resources plc. Mr. van Coller is a
Competent Person as defined by the JORC Code, 2012 Edition. The
estimate was reviewed internally by Ruth Bektas BSc (Hons) CGeol
EurGeol, Projects Analyst, Ariana Resources plc. Miss Bektas is a
Competent Person as defined by the JORC Code, 2012 Edition. The
results are reported in accordance with the JORC Code, under the
direction of Dr. Kerim Sener BSc (Hons), MSc, PhD, Managing
Director of Ariana Resources plc, and a Competent Person as defined
by the JORC Code. Mr. van Coller and Dr. Sener have reviewed the
technical and scientific information in this press release relating
to the Mineral Resource estimates and approve the use of the
information contained herein.
The information in this announcement that relates to exploration
results is based on information compiled by Dr. Kerim Sener BSc
(Hons), MSc, PhD, Managing Director of Ariana Resources plc. Dr.
Sener is a Fellow of The Geological Society of London and a Member
of The Institute of Materials, Minerals and Mining and has
sufficient experience relevant to the styles of mineralisation and
type of deposit under consideration and to the activity that has
been undertaken to qualify as a Competent Person as defined by the
2012 edition of the Australasian Code for the Reporting of
Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves (JORC Code)
and under the AIM Rules - Note for Mining and Oil & Gas
Companies. Dr. Sener consents to the inclusion in the report of the
matters based on his information in the form and context in which
it appears
About Ariana Resources:
Ariana is an AIM-listed mineral exploration and development
company with an exceptional track-record of creating value for its
shareholders through its interests in active mining projects and
investments in exploration companies. Its current interests include
gold production in Turkey and copper-gold exploration and
development projects in Cyprus and Kosovo.
The Company holds 23.5% interest in Zenit Madencilik San. ve
Tic. A.S. a joint venture with Ozaltin Holding A.S. and Proccea
Construction Co. in Turkey which contains a depleted total of c.
2.1 million ounces of gold and other metals (as at July 2020). The
joint venture comprises the Kiziltepe Mine and the Tavsan and
Salinbas projects.
The Kiziltepe Gold-Silver Mine is located in western Turkey and
contains a depleted JORC Measured, Indicated and Inferred Resource
of 227,000 ounces gold and 3.7 million ounces silver (as at April
2020). The mine has been in profitable production since 2017 and is
expected to produce at a rate of c.20,000 ounces of gold per annum
to at least the mid-2020s. A Net Smelter Return ("NSR") royalty of
2.5% on production is being paid to Franco-Nevada Corporation.
The Tavsan Gold Project is located in western Turkey and
contains a JORC Measured, Indicated and Inferred Resource of
253,000 ounces gold and 0.7 million ounces silver (as at June
2020). The project is being progressed through permitting and an
Environmental Impact Assessment, with the intention of developing
the site to become the second joint venture gold mining operation.
A NSR royalty of up to 2% on future production is payable to
Sandstorm Gold.
The Salinbas Gold Project is located in north-eastern Turkey and
contains a JORC Measured, Indicated and Inferred Resource of 1.5
million ounces of gold (as at July 2020). It is located within the
multi-million ounce Artvin Goldfield, which contains the "Hot Gold
Corridor" comprising several significant gold-copper projects
including the 4 million ounce Hot Maden project, which lies 16km to
the south of Salinbas. A NSR royalty of up to 2% on future
production is payable to Eldorado Gold Corporation.
Ariana owns 75% of Western Tethyan Resources Ltd ("WTR"), which
operates across Eastern Europe and is based in Pristina, Republic
of Kosovo. The company is targeting its exploration on major
copper-gold deposits across the porphyry-epithermal transition.
Ariana owns 50% of UK-registered Venus Minerals Ltd ("Venus")
which is focused on the exploration and development of copper-gold
assets in Cyprus which contain a combined JORC Inferred Resource of
9.5Mt @ 0.65% copper (excluding additional gold, silver and
zinc).
Ariana operates its wholly-owned Asgard Metals Fund ("Asgard"),
as part of the Company's proprietary Project Catalyst Strategy. The
Fund will be focused on investments in high-value potential,
discovery-stage mineral exploration companies located across the
Eastern Hemisphere and within easy reach of Ariana's operational
hubs in Australia, Turkey and the UK.
Panmure Gordon (UK) Limited is broker to the Company and
Beaumont Cornish Limited is the Company's Nominated Adviser and
Broker.
For further information on Ariana you are invited to visit the
Company's website at www.arianaresources.com .
Glossary of Technical Terms:
" Cu " chemical symbol for copper ;
"JORC" the Joint Ore Reserves Committee;
"m" Metres;
"MRE" Mineral Resource Estimate
Ends.
JORC Code, 2012 Edition - Table 1
West Apliki (WA) and Apliki Mine (AM), Cyprus
(data as at Oct 2021, MRE reported Nov 2021)
Section 1 Sampling Techniques and Data
(Criteria in this section apply to all succeeding sections.)
Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Sampling
techniques * Nature and quality of sampling (eg cut channels, * Drilling for 24,538 meters of drilling was used to
random chips, or specific specialised industry delineate areas of mineralisation.
standard measurement tools appropriate to the
minerals under investigation, such as down hole gamma
sondes, or handheld XRF instruments, etc). These * Mineralised zones were defined on the basis of
examples should not be taken as limiting the broad sulphide percentage following visual inspection.
meaning of sampling.
* Percussion chips in mineralised zones were collected
* Include reference to measures taken to ensure sample at 1m intervals. Samples were split on the drill site
representivity and the appropriate calibration of any using a 2-tier riffle splitter to a sub-sample of
measurement tools or systems used. approximately 3-5kg. Samples were transferred to the
Mitsero processing plant, where they were sun- or
oven-dried before being sub-sampled to 250g, then
* Aspects of the determination of mineralisation that pulverised and then sent to the Nicosia Chemical
are Material to the Public Report. Laboratories, for wet chemical analysis for base
metals and sulphur.
* In cases where 'industry standard' work has been done
this would be relatively simple (eg 'reverse * Historical CMC sampling between 1930 to 1970s were
circulation drilling was used to obtain 1 m samples analysed at the Xeros processing plant laboratory. No
from which 3 kg was pulverised to produce a 30 g data is currently available of the historical methods
charge for fire assay'). In other cases more or procedures.
explanation may be required, such as where there is
coarse gold that has inherent sampling problems.
Unusual commodities or mineralisation types (eg * Percussion samples were typically split to form
submarine nodules) may warrant disclosure of detailed composite samples ranging from 1m to a maximum of
information. 10m.No drill core or chips sample archives exist.
* Drilling runs void of mineralisation was not a
priority for the company and therefore not all drill
holes/drill runs have been sampled once
mineralisation controls were established.
* Portable handheld XRF analysis has been used on all
modern diamond drilling for initial identification of
mineralised zones. PQ and HQ core is cut by diamond
saw. Quarter core was sent to ALS in Ireland for fire
assay for gold and ME-ICP analysis for other
elements. Remaining core is archived and/or used for
further geological studies.
Drilling
techniques * Drill type (eg core, reverse circulation, open-hole * In total 24,538m of drilling for 248 drill holes has
hammer, rotary air blast, auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) been completed across the Apliki Projects.
and details (eg core diameter, triple or standard
tube, depth of diamond tails, face-sampling bit or
other type, whether core is oriented and if so, by o Apliki Mine: 9,902.24m (100 holes), Min. 3m, Mx. 457m, Avg. 96m.
what method, etc). o West Apliki: 13,435.49m (96 holes), Min. 25m, Max. 355m, Avg. 140m.
o Apliki Stockpiles: 1,117m (49 holes), Min. 6m, Max. 58m, Avg. 22m.
* To date, there have only been 3 diamond drill holes
(for DD) completed on the Project.
* All other drilling to date on the project consists of
wireline, rotary open hole percussion and Schramm T64
drilling.
* All drilling to date on West Apliki was initiated
from 1968 and all completed by Venus Minerals (VMS),
Hellenic Copper Mines (HCM), Hellenic Mining Company
(mother company of HCM) (EME), Cyprus Mining
Corporation (CMC) (see table below).
Drill Meters Number Type Year Drilled Archived QA/QC
Series of by material procedures
holes
900 5,845.96 29 RC 1968 CMC No Not noted
--------- -------- ----- ------------- ---------- --------- ------------
WA 5,164.45 43 RC 1969 CMC No Not noted
--------- -------- ----- ------------- ---------- --------- ------------
600 323.08 2 RC 1970 CMC No Not noted
--------- -------- ----- ------------- ---------- --------- ------------
AW 2,102.00 22 RC 2000 HCM (1) No Not noted
2011 (AW21) EME (21)
--------- -------- ----- ------------- ---------- --------- ------------
QA/QC
insertion
rate of 15%
incl.
coarse,
pulp and
Half HQ field
VMD 383.80 3 DDH 2021 VMS core duplicates.
--------- -------- ----- ------------- ---------- --------- ------------
* Drilling of the EME holes was performed with the
Schramm T64 down-the-hole rig, HCM hole with
Ingersoll T4 whereas the CMC drilling was mainly
performed by rotary methods (Failing 1250) for the
first series (integer hole identifiers) and by
percussion methods (churn drilling) for the series of
holes prefixed WA.
Drill sample
recovery * Method of recording and assessing core and chip * Drill core recoveries for the diamond DD drilling (3
sample recoveries and results assessed. holes) averaged 90%. These were manually calculated
by measuring the total core recovery against the
drilling runs noted by the drilling company.
* Measures taken to maximise sample recovery and ensure
representative nature of the samples.
* Recovery for historic holes (CMC data) exists in
archived hardcopy memoirs. These, to date, have not
* Whether a relationship exists between sample recovery been fully reviewed or digitised, and will be a
and grade and whether sample bias may have occurred priority for the Venus team in the near future.
due to preferential loss/gain of fine/coarse
material.
Logging
* Whether core and chip samples have been geologically * All historic percussion drill holes were geologically
and geotechnically logged to a level of detail to logged in the field by use of rinsed chips returned
support appropriate Mineral Resource estimation, after every drilled metre. Logs were then drafted
mining studies and metallurgical studies. post laboratory analysis to produce detailed hardcopy
assay lithological logs.
* Whether logging is qualitative or quantitative in
nature. Core (or costean, channel, etc) photography. * VMS holes - logged in detail digitally; CMC holes -
logged in detail in hard-copy; HCM holes - logged
digitally; EME holes - no logging.
* The total length and percentage of the relevant
intersections logged.
* Logging intervals are based on lithologies.
* Logging is to a standard suitable to support a
Mineral Resource Estimate.
Sub-sampling
techniques * If core, whether cut or sawn and whether quarter, * For diamond drilling (3 holes): HQ size drill-core
and sample half or all core taken. samples were cut by a diamond saw into quarter core.
preparation Quarter core is sent for analysis in batches in line
with the Company's quality control procedures, whilst
* If non-core, whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary one quarter is held back for future metallurgical
split, etc and whether sampled wet or dry. analysis and the remaining half core is archived.
* For all sample types, the nature, quality and * For percussion drilling (145 holes): Samples were
appropriateness of the sample preparation technique. prepared on site using a riffle splitter to separate
half of the material. Samples were sun dried, crushed
to -12mm, split, dried in oven, pulverised to -300
* Quality control procedures adopted for all mesh before assay.
sub-sampling stages to maximise representivity of
samples.
* Drilling completed on the Apliki stockpiles used an
open hole Churn drilling method. Samples were
* Measures taken to ensure that the sampling is analysed and handled using HCM's own internal
representative of the in situ material collected, procedures.
including for instance results for field
duplicate/second-half sampling.
* Whether sample sizes are appropriate to the grain
size of the material being sampled.
Quality
of assay * The nature, quality and appropriateness of the * HMC applied a random quality control (QC) programme
data and assaying and laboratory procedures used and whether during its historic drilling campaigns, whereby
laboratory the technique is considered partial or total. standards and blanks were entered into the sample
tests stream erratically and at random.
* For geophysical tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF
instruments, etc, the parameters used in determining * No internal reporting of HMC's QA/QC sampling results
the analysis including instrument make and model, were available for review.
reading times, calibrations factors applied and their
derivation, etc.
* The samples collected by CMC were analysed through
the electrolysis method (gravimetric methods) at the
* Nature of quality control procedures adopted (eg company's laboratory in Xeros.
standards, blanks, duplicates, external laboratory
checks) and whether acceptable levels of accuracy (ie
lack of bias) and precision have been established. * The samples collected by HCM and EME were analysed
through atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS) method
at the company's laboratory in Skouriotissa.
* The diamond drill core was analysed at ALS Laboratory
Services in Ireland ("ALS Ireland") for gold using a
50g fire assay (Au-AA23) and ME-ICP41 for copper and
other elements.
Verification
of sampling * The verification of significant intersections by * Diamond drill core samples from Venus Minerals' 2021
and assaying either independent or alternative company personnel. due diligence drilling was reviewed by CP. Mr. Zack
van Coller in November 2021. These holes were angled
holes designed specifically to test multiple
* The use of twinned holes. high-grade intercepts from historic holes at West
Apliki.
* Documentation of primary data, data entry procedures,
data verification, data storage (physical and * No representative samples or archived material exists
electronic) protocols. for the historic drill holes.
* Discuss any adjustment to assay data. * Logging procedures are sufficient to meet industry
standards. However, it was not possible to
comprehensively evaluate historic sampling
procedures.
* Prior to resource estimation, below detection limit
assay results are replaced with values of zero.
* Detailed hardcopy archives of all historic
(1920s-1970s) drilling data are stored at the
Skouriotissa Mine offices. Data collected post 1970's
are archived in digital Excel and Access databases at
the Skouriotissa Mine offices.
Location
of data * Accuracy and quality of surveys used to locate drill * Historical collar locations were recorded in local
points holes (collar and down-hole surveys), trenches, mine Cassini coordinate system, converted graphically to
workings and other locations used in Mineral Resource UTM European Datum 1950, Zone 36 North.
estimation.
* No down hole survey of any holes exists due to the
* Specification of the grid system used. vertical drilling of all holes.
* Quality and adequacy of topographic control. * The 2021 diamond drill holes were surveyed from
surface to end of hole using a DeviShot multi-shot
downhole survey tool. Readings were taken on 25m
intervals.
* EME and HCM collars have been surveyed by DGPS.
* Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) digital
elevation data was used to constrain the MRE data at
surface.
Data spacing
and * Data spacing for reporting of Exploration Results. * The resource area was typically drilled on a regular
distribution pattern allowing for an average of 30m spacing
between collars.
* Whether the data spacing and distribution is
sufficient to establish the degree of geological and
grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral Resource * The West Apliki Project is currently split in to two
and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and main related mineralisation areas: WA Main and WA
classifications applied. Small, but reported as a whole.
* Whether sample compositing has been applied. * The Apliki Mine Deposit is only the material
remaining below the historic pit floor.
* Samples were composited using hard boundaries to 1m
and 3m, respectively for West Apliki and Apliki Mine
prior to estimation using Leapfrog EDGE software.
* The current data spacing in association with
geological mapping is sufficient to establish
geological continuity and grade continuity.
Orientation
of data * Whether the orientation of sampling achieves unbiased * The majority of drilling (245 holes) was completed as
in relation sampling of possible structures and the extent to vertical holes. The 3 diamond drill holes in 2021
to which this is known, considering the deposit type. were angled at c.50 degrees. The recent drilling
geological indicated that the WA body may not be as flat lying
structure as indicated by historic drilling, and may be
* If the relationship between the drilling orientation shallowly dipping instead. A structural trend plane
and the orientation of key mineralised structures is orientated to an azimuth of 068(o) with a 40-degree
considered to have introduced a sampling bias, this dip was used to re-model the WA geology.
should be assessed and reported if material.
Sample
security * The measures taken to ensure sample security. * Hellenic Mining Company Ltd. was responsible for
sample security between the late 1960s and early
1970s. The precise procedures are not fully known due
to loss of historic records.
* Samples were historically processed and analysed at
the Xeros Mine laboratory and at the Nicosia Chemical
Laboratories, which are no longer operational.
Audits
or reviews * The results of any audits or reviews of sampling * Venus Minerals has implemented QA/QC programmes based
techniques and data. on international best practice for the 2021 Due
Diligence drilling.
* Audits of historic drill samples were not possible.
============= ============================================================ ===============================================================================================
Section 2 Reporting of Exploration Results
(Criteria listed in the preceding section also apply to this
section.)
Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Mineral
tenement * Type, reference name/number, location and ownership * The Apliki License is owned 100% by Hellenic Copper
and land including agreements or material issues with third Mines Ltd.
tenure status parties such as joint ventures, partnerships,
overriding royalties, native title interests,
historical sites, wilderness or national park and * Within Cyprus, there is a 1% royalty to the
environmental settings. Government on copper sales once produced.
* The security of the tenure held at the time of
reporting along with any known impediments to * There are no known impediments to current operations.
obtaining a licence to operate in the area.
Exploration
done by other * Acknowledgment and appraisal of exploration by other * 1912 Mining Engineer Charles Godfrey travelled to
parties parties. Cyprus after reading in ancient books that the island
was rich in copper and noticing promising ancient
Roman slag heaps in the area.
* 1916 Cyprus Mines Corporation (CMC) was established
by Seeley W. Mudd and Harvey Seeley Mudd. From 1916
to the early 1970's CMC was responsible for the
exploration and discovery of several significant VMS
copper deposits within Cyprus, including Apliki and
Apliki West. Drilling contractors and geologists were
sourced from the USA.
* Initial exploration at Apliki started in 1935 and the
presence of sulphide mineralization was documented in
1937 (Bruce, 1947). Mining of the deposit started in
the 1960s by Cyprus Mines Corporation (CMC) using
opencut methods and ended in 1974 following the
events of 1974.
* Up to the cessation of mining in 1974, approximately
1,650,000 tons with 1.8% Cu and 36% S were mined
(Adamides, 1982). On the north side of the opencut a
small amount of low-grade disseminated ore still
remains, while the southern extensions merge into
altered ground and are mainly covered by waste rock
dumps.
Geology
* Deposit type, geological setting and style of * The Apliki copper deposits are concentrations of
mineralisation. mainly low-grade cupriferous mineralisation developed
in the basal units of the Pillow Lava Series of the
Troodos ophiolite with a well-defined subvertical
N-NE fault playing a major role in controlling the
mineralisation. The highest grades are concentrated
on the hanging wall side of the structure, although
low-grade mineralisation locally persists into the
footwall side beyond the structure.
* Copper mineralisation at Apliki is associated with
Volcanic Massive Sulphide (VMS) deposition at or near
the palaeo-seafloor. ME-ICP multi-element analysis of
the 2021 DD drilling has revealed that Apliki does
not contain associated gold, zinc or lead like other
VMS related projects within Cyprus.
* The mineralogical characteristics of the ore have
been described in previous work (Adamides, 2001),
with secondary copper minerals (chalcocite, covellite,
delafossite, chrysocolla) at higher levels, and
occurrence of chalcopyrite at depth, also in
association with secondary minerals.
* The principal copper minerals are bornite, covellite
and chalcocite resulting from the breakdown of
chalcopyrite. In the upper levels this replacement is
almost total. Secondary copper minerals are also
observed coating pyrite.
Drill hole * No new exploration data is included in this report.
Information * A summary of all information material to the
understanding of the exploration results including a
tabulation of the following information for all
Material drill holes:
o easting and northing
of the drill hole
collar
o elevation or RL
(Reduced Level - elevation
above sea level in
metres) of the drill
hole collar
o dip and azimuth
of the hole
o down hole length
and interception depth
o hole length.
* If the exclusion of this information is justified on
the basis that the information is not Material and
this exclusion does not detract from the
understanding of the report, the Competent Person
should clearly explain why this is the case.
Data
aggregation * In reporting Exploration Results, weighting averaging * No aggregation has been applied beyond the standard
methods techniques, maximum and/or minimum grade truncations 1m sampling interval honouring lithological changes
(eg cutting of high grades) and cut-off grades are down to 20 cm.
usually Material and should be stated.
* No metal equivalent has been applied. Metals are
* Where aggregate intercepts incorporate short lengths reported per metal.
of high grade results and longer lengths of low grade
results, the procedure used for such aggregation
should be stated and some typical examples of such
aggregations should be shown in detail.
* The assumptions used for any reporting of metal
equivalent values should be clearly stated.
Relationship
between * These relationships are particularly important in the * All drill-holes within the Apliki Mine and West
mineralisation reporting of Exploration Results. Apliki deposit were advanced vertically.
widths and
intercept
lengths * If the geometry of the mineralisation with respect to * All intercepts are down-hole, true-width not known.
the drill hole angle is known, its nature should be
reported.
* Diamond drilling completed in 2021 was inclined to
approximately 50 degrees, and was designed to test
* If it is not known and only the down hole lengths are lateral continuity of mineralisation between multiple
reported, there should be a clear statement to this intercepts of the vertical historic drilling
effect (eg 'down hole length, true width not known').
Diagrams Geological cross-section through the West Apliki Area.
* Appropriate maps and sections (with scales) and
tabulations of intercepts should be included for any
significant discovery being reported These should
include, but not be limited to a plan view of drill
hole collar locations and appropriate sectional
views.
Balanced
reporting * Where comprehensive reporting of all Exploration * Full balanced reporting of exploration results has
Results is not practicable, representative reporting been undertaken and is disclosed within the technical
of both low and high grades and/or widths should be reporting supporting this latest 2021 review.
practiced to avoid misleading reporting of
Exploration Results.
Other
substantive * Other exploration data, if meaningful and material, * Metallurgical test-work: rolling bottle test and
exploration should be reported including (but not limited to): column test for Apliki West and Apliki stock
data geological observations; geophysical survey results; completed.
geochemical survey results; bulk samples - size and
method of treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk
density, groundwater, geotechnical and rock
characteristics; potential deleterious or
contaminating substances.
Further work
* The nature and scale of planned further work (eg * Additional work to be completed at Apliki can be
tests for lateral extensions or depth extensions or summarised as following:
large-scale step-out drilling).
o Twin more of the historical drill holes to validate
* Diagrams clearly highlighting the areas of possible the data,
extensions, including the main geological enabling an upgrade in resource classification due to
interpretations and future drilling areas, provided increase in
this information is not commercially sensitive. confidence.
o Surface mapping to confirm the interpretation of a
shallowly dipping
ore body.
o Specific gravity studies to allow a more accurate
density to be
attributed to the domains at Apliki.
o Metallurgical test work for the potential
mineralisation beyond
the east wall of the Apliki Mine.
=============== =============================================================== ========================================================================
Section 3 Estimation and Reporting of Mineral Resources
(Criteria listed in section 1, and where relevant in section 2,
also apply to this section.)
Criteria JORC Code explanation Commentary
Database
integrity * Measures taken to ensure that data has not been * Modern laboratory data has been received in digital
corrupted by, for example, transcription or keying format and uploaded directly to the database.
errors, between its initial collection and its use
for Mineral Resource estimation purposes.
* The database is stored on a server as Excel
spreadsheets and imported to Geovia Surpac.
* Data validation procedures used.
* There are hardcopies of the CMC drilling and ChemLab
for EME and HCM drilling.
Site visits
* Comment on any site visits undertaken by the * The Competent Person for this project is Zack van
Competent Person and the outcome of those visits. Coller BSc, FGS. Mr. van Coller is Ariana Resources'
Special Projects Geologist and Competent Person as
defined by the JORC Code. Mr. van Coller last visited
* If no site visits have been undertaken indicate why the project in November 2021.
this is the case.
* The work has been reviewed by Ruth Bektas BSc CGeol
EurGeol, Ariana Resource's Project Analyst and
Competent Person as defined by the JORC Code.
Geological
interpretation * Confidence in (or conversely, the uncertainty of ) * Better correlations across the whole deposit were
the geological interpretation of the mineral deposit. established for all datasets when remodelling the
geology as a dipping/plunging body of mineralisation,
rather than flat lying (as previously modelled). A
* Nature of the data used and of any assumptions made. structural trend plane orientated to an azimuth of
068(o) with a 40-degree dip was used to re-model the
WA geology, which resulted in overall better grade
* The effect, if any, of alternative interpretations on correlations of various high- and low-grade
Mineral Resource estimation. intercepts across the deposit.
* The use of geology in guiding and controlling Mineral * Additional drilling and surface mapping is required
Resource estimation. to add more detail and confirm this model.
* The factors affecting continuity both of grade and * Interpretation was completed by Mr. Zack van Coller,
geology. creating 3D wireframe models according to logged
assayed mineralisation above a 0.10% Cu modelling
cut-off grade. Higher-grade mineralisation was not
sub-domained, as it was not deemed necessary to do
so.
* Three main mineralised zones have been defined, which
are related, but separated: Apliki Mine, West Apliki
and the Apliki Stockpiles.
* The stockpiles at Apliki Mine have been modelled and
estimated separately to the in-situ resources.
* Grade through West Main is generally homogeneous
(0.2%-1.0% Cu) with occasional narrow high-grade
zones containing 1-3% Cu.
* All models created were based upon interval
selections that referenced the copper grades,
lithological descriptions and structural
interpretation, where appropriate. Where continuity
was not established between sections, the strike
extrapolation was limited both manually (wireframes)
and statistically (interpolations).
Dimensions
* The extent and variability of the Mineral Resource * The West Apliki mineralisation follows a NE trend,
expressed as length (along strike or otherwise), plan dipping approximately 40 degrees to the SE.
width, and depth below surface to the upper and lower
limits of the Mineral Resource.
* The mineralisation is partly present at the base of
the historic pit, but extends further along strike
below the surface.
* West Apliki contains the bulk volume of defined
mineralisation, extending to a vertical depth of
approximately 150m.
* West Apliki is approximately 180m by 375m, and 50m to
the east is WA which is approximately 190m by 85m.
* The main body of mineralisation is approximately
60-70m thick in true thickness.
* Apliki Mine Deposit is 160m by 90m by 100m deep, and
trends N-S.
* The remaining resources at Apliki Mine of immediate
interest are those occurring as the base of the
historical pit, where approximately 340,000 cubic
meters of moderate (0.5% Cu) to high grade (>1% Cu)
mineralisation still remain. Additionally, there is
further potential to expand the Apliki Mine resource
to the north and east of the open pit walls, however,
further work is required to determine the full extent
and nature of the remaining resources here, a
significant priority for future Venus exploration.
* Apliki Mine stockpiles are 200m by 315m by 80m deep,
as surveyed by DGPS.
Estimation
and modelling * The nature and appropriateness of the estimation * Details of the estimation method, parameters and
techniques technique(s) applied and key assumptions, including results are contained in the related Apliki 2021 MRE
treatment of extreme grade values, domaining, Memorandum (Venus Minerals and Ariana Resources
interpolation parameters and maximum distance of Internal Report, 2021).
extrapolation from data points. If a computer
assisted estimation method was chosen include a
description of computer software and parameters used. * The Mineral Resources have been estimated into a
block model prepared in Leapfrog EDGE. The block
model comprises the following parameters:
* The availability of check estimates, previous
estimates and/or mine production records and whether
the Mineral Resource estimate takes appropriate
account of such data. * A set of copper grade-based wireframe models were
created in Leapfrog EDGE to select the samples used
in the estimation and to constrain the interpolation.
* The assumptions made regarding recovery of
by-products.
* Grade estimates were based on 1m composited assay
data (3m composites for Apliki Mine). A hard domain
* Estimation of deleterious elements or other non-grade boundary was applied.
variables of economic significance (eg sulphur for
acid mine drainage characterisation).
* Estimation was carried out using inverse distance
weighted squared (ID2) at the parent block scale
* In the case of block model interpolation, the block using a two (Apliki Mine) or three-pass (West Apliki)
size in relation to the average sample spacing and estimation using all available composites.
the search employed.
* Estimation parameters are as follows:
* Any assumptions behind modelling of selective mining
units.
* Any assumptions about correlation between variables.
* The resource estimation technique is appropriate for
the style of mineralisation.
* Description of how the geological interpretation was
used to control the resource estimates.
* Only copper was estimated as the historical database
does not contain data for other elements.
* Discussion of basis for using or not using grade Multi-element data from 2021 drilling suggests that
cutting or capping. there are not economic concentrations of other major
metals.
* The process of validation, the checking process used,
the comparison of model data to drill hole data, and * Top-cut requirements were assessed and a copper
use of reconciliation data if available. top-cut of 3% was used for West Apliki. No top-cut
was used for Apliki Mine or the stockpiles.
* Block model validation was completed with visual
inspection on plan and section view.
Moisture
* Whether the tonnages are estimated on a dry basis or * Tonnage is estimated on a dry basis in accordance
with natural moisture, and the method of with the specific gravity determination.
determination of the moisture content.
Cut-off
parameters * The basis of the adopted cut-off grade(s) or quality * Reporting copper at specified cut-off grades were
parameters applied. based upon costs and recoveries established from the
company's internal records. A reporting cut-off grade
of 0.2% Cu was used for the final classified in-situ
resources. The Apliki Mine stockpiles were reported
at 0.15% Cu cut-off due to the lower mining costs
expected.
Mining factors
or assumptions * Assumptions made regarding possible mining methods, * No mining factors (i.e. dilution, ore loss,
minimum mining dimensions and internal (or, if recoverable resources at selective mining block size)
applicable, external) mining dilution. It is always have been applied.
necessary as part of the process of determining
reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction
to consider potential mining methods, but the * The project was previously operated as two open-pits.
assumptions made regarding mining methods and
parameters when estimating Mineral Resources may not
always be rigorous. Where this is the case, this
should be reported with an explanation of the basis
of the mining assumptions made.
Metallurgical
factors or * The basis for assumptions or predictions regarding * The copper minerals present are conducive to acid
assumptions metallurgical amenability. It is always necessary as leaching and hydrometallurgical recovery processes as
part of the process of determining reasonable planned for the Apliki development. Heap-leach is
prospects for eventual economic extraction to planned.
consider potential metallurgical methods, but the
assumptions regarding metallurgical treatment
processes and parameters made when reporting Mineral * Several hundred thousand tonnes of the Apliki
Resources may not always be rigorous. Where this is stockpiles were treated at the Skouriotissa acid
the case, this should be reported with an explanation leach operation at Skouriotissa, proving amenable to
of the basis of the metallurgical assumptions made. the process.
* The Skouriotissa ore treated by the acid leach at
Skouriotissa is similar in many respects to the West
Apliki ore, providing considerable confidence in the
processing route.
* HCM operated the acid leach operation at Skouriotissa
for almost 25 years. HCM personnel have played a
leading role in developing the processing plan at
Apliki, and test work of Apliki ore was important in
the planning.
* The processing will utilise the relocated
Skouriotissa plant that was decommissioned in 2019.
HCM personnel are expected to play a leading role in
implementing the mining and processing operations at
Apliki.
Environmental
factors or * Assumptions made regarding possible waste and process * The Competent Person is not aware of any known
assumptions residue disposal options. It is always necessary as environmental or permitting issues on the project.
part of the process of determining reasonable
prospects for eventual economic extraction to
consider the potential environmental impacts of the
mining and processing operation. While at this stage
the determination of potential environmental impacts,
particularly for a greenfields project, may not
always be well advanced, the status of early
consideration of these potential environmental
impacts should be reported. Where these aspects have
not been considered this should be reported with an
explanation of the environmental assumptions made.
Bulk density
* Whether assumed or determined. If assumed, the basis * An assumed density of 2.4 g/cm(3) was applied to the
for the assumptions. If determined, the method used, block model.
whether wet or dry, the frequency of the measurements
,
the nature, size and representativeness of the * Further measurements are required to determine actual
samples. densities more accurately.
* The bulk density for bulk material must have been
measured by methods that adequately account for void
spaces (vugs, porosity, etc), moisture and
differences between rock and alteration zones within
the deposit.
* Discuss assumptions for bulk density estimates used
in the evaluation process of the different materials.
Classification
* The basis for the classification of the Mineral * The resource classification at the project considers
Resources into varying confidence categories. the following criteria:
* Whether appropriate account has been taken of all o Confidence in the sampling data and geological
relevant factors (ie relative confidence in interpretation.
tonnage/grade estimations, reliability of input data, o The data distribution (based upon graphical analysis and
confidence in continuity of geology and metal values, average distance to informing composites).
quality, quantity and distribution of the data). o Grade continuity analysis.
o The quality of geological interpretation, cross-cutting
relationships geological modelling
* Whether the result appropriately reflects the and data weighting.
Competent Person's view of the deposit. * Categorical classification of the Apliki Mine and
West Apliki mineralisation has conservatively been
restricted to Indicated and Inferred resources only.
This is primarily because all historic drilling data
to date cannot be appropriately audited without
additional drilling being completed. With an increase
in confidence in the historical data, the
classification of the resource can readily be
upgraded to higher classifications as appropriate.
Audits or
reviews * The results of any audits or reviews of Mineral * An internal peer review of the modelling, estimation
Resource estimates. and reporting were conducted for this study. No
external reviews or audits have been completed.
Discussion of
relative * Where appropriate a statement of the relative * The resource estimate is deemed appropriately
accuracy/ accuracy and confidence level in the Mineral Resource accurate globally, based upon the informing data. The
confidence estimate using an approach or procedure deemed accuracy and global/local basis of the resource
appropriate by the Competent Person. For example, the estimate is suitably accounted for in the resource
application of statistical or geostatistical classification.
procedures to quantify the relative accuracy of the
resource within stated confidence limits, or, if such
an approach is not deemed appropriate, a qualitative * Additional confidence in the data obtained from
discussion of the factors that could affect the historic drilling is required in order to advance
relative accuracy and confidence of the estimate. further understanding of the Project and this is
likely to be achieved following a further
confirmatory diamond drilling programme.
* The statement should specify whether it relates to
global or local estimates, and, if local, state the
relevant tonnages, which should be relevant to
technical and economic evaluation. Documentation
should include assumptions made and the procedures
used.
* These statements of relative accuracy and confidence
of the estimate should be compared with production
data, where available.
=============== ============================================================ =================================================================
NOTE: Sections 4 and 5 are not relevant to this work as no
reserves are being estimated and there is no estimation or
reporting of diamonds or other gemstones in this project.
This information is provided by RNS, the news service of the
London Stock Exchange. RNS is approved by the Financial Conduct
Authority to act as a Primary Information Provider in the United
Kingdom. Terms and conditions relating to the use and distribution
of this information may apply. For further information, please
contact rns@lseg.com or visit www.rns.com.
RNS may use your IP address to confirm compliance with the terms
and conditions, to analyse how you engage with the information
contained in this communication, and to share such analysis on an
anonymised basis with others as part of our commercial services.
For further information about how RNS and the London Stock Exchange
use the personal data you provide us, please see our Privacy
Policy.
END
MSCUPGCGPUPGUBG
(END) Dow Jones Newswires
December 01, 2021 04:24 ET (09:24 GMT)
Ariana Resources (LSE:AAU)
Historical Stock Chart
From Feb 2024 to Mar 2024
Ariana Resources (LSE:AAU)
Historical Stock Chart
From Mar 2023 to Mar 2024