FORM 6-K
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Report of Foreign Private Issuer Pursuant to Rule 13a-16 or 15d-16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the month of November 2012
Commission File Number: 001-31819
Gold Reserve Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
926 W. Sprague Avenue, Suite 200
Spokane, Washington 99201
(Address of principal executive offices)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F.
Form 20-F
x
Form 40-F
¨
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by
Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1):
¨
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by
Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7):
¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information contained in this Form is also thereby furnishing the information to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12g3-2(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Yes
¨
No
x
If “Yes” is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in connection with Rule 12g3-2(b):
The following exhibits are furnished with this Form 6-K:
99.1
September 30, 2012 Interim Consolidated Financial Statements
99.2
September 30, 2012 Management’s Discussion and Analysis
99.3 Chief Executive Officer’s Certification of Interim Filings
99.4 Chief Financial Officer’s Certification of Interim Filings
Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
The information furnished under cover of this Form 6-K contains both historical information and forward-looking statements (within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act, Section 21E of the Exchange Act and the Securities Act (Ontario)) that may state our intentions, hopes, beliefs, expectations or predictions for the future. In this report, forward-looking statements are necessarily based upon a number of estimates and assumptions that, while considered reasonable by us at this time, are inherently subject to significant business, economic and competitive uncertainties and contingencies. We caution that such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other risks that may cause our actual financial results, performance, or achievements of the Company to be materially different from our estimated future results, performance, or achievements expressed or implied by those forward-looking statements.
These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, as well as assumptions that may never materialize, prove incorrect or materialize other than as currently contemplated which could cause our results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. The words “believe,” “anticipate,” “expect,” “intend,” “estimate,” “plan,” “may,” “could” and other similar expressions that are predictions of or indicate future events and future trends which do not relate to historical matters, identify forward-looking statements. Any such forward-looking statements are not intended to give any assurances as to future results. Numerous factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements. Due to risks and uncertainties, including the risks and uncertainties identified in our Annual Information Form, actual results may differ materially from current expectations.
Numerous factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements, including without limitation:
·
outcome of our ICSID arbitration against the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela;
·
continued servicing or restructuring of our convertible notes or other obligations as they come due;
·
equity dilution resulting from the conversion of the convertible notes in part or in whole to common shares;
·
value realized from the disposition of the remaining Brisas Project related assets;
·
outcome of the litigation regarding the enjoined hostile takeover bid for us;
·
ability to maintain continued listing on the NYSE MKT and/or the TSX Venture;
·
competition with companies that are not subject to or do not follow Canadian and U.S. laws and regulations;
·
corruption, uncertain legal enforcement and political and social instability;
·
regulatory, political and economic risks associated with Venezuela including changes in laws and legal regimes;
·
currency, metal prices and metal production volatility;
·
adverse U.S and Canadian tax consequences;
·
abilities and continued participation of certain key employees;
·
prospects for exploration and development of other mining projects by us; and
·
risks normally incident to the exploration, development and operation of mining properties.
Investors are cautioned not to put undue reliance on forward-looking statements, and investors should not infer that there has been no change in our affairs since the date of this report that would warrant any modification of any forward-looking statement made in this document, other documents filed periodically with securities regulators or documents presented on our website. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by this notice. We disclaim any intent or obligation to update publicly or otherwise revise any forward-looking statements or the foregoing list of assumptions or factors, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, subject to our disclosure obligations under applicable rules promulgated by the relevant securities regulators.
(Signature page follows)
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to
be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Dated: November 29, 2012
GOLD RESERVE INC.
(Registrant)
By: /s/
Robert A.
McGuinness
Name: Robert A. McGuinness
Title:
Vice President – Finance & CFO
Exhibit 99.1 Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
GOLD RESERVE INC.
(A Development Stage Enterprise)
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE
SHEETS
(Expressed in U.S. dollars)
|
|
September 30,
2012
|
|
|
December 31, 2011
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents (Note 4)
|
$
|
14,237,828
|
|
$
|
57,677,370
|
Assets
held for sale (Note 7)
|
|
–
|
|
|
450,000
|
Marketable
securities (Notes 5, 6)
|
|
698,939
|
|
|
892,271
|
Deposits,
advances and other (Note 12)
|
|
2,654,371
|
|
|
194,802
|
Total
current assets
|
|
17,591,138
|
|
|
59,214,443
|
Property,
plant and equipment, net (Note 7)
|
|
19,265,482
|
|
|
19,125,626
|
Total
assets
|
$
|
36,856,620
|
|
$
|
78,340,069
|
LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current Liabilities
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
payable and accrued expenses
|
$
|
1,496,457
|
|
$
|
2,076,131
|
Accrued
interest
|
|
1,165,496
|
|
|
234,545
|
Current
portion - convertible notes (Notes 12, 14)
|
|
2,490,000
|
|
|
–
|
Total
current liabilities
|
|
5,151,953
|
|
|
2,310,676
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible
notes (Notes 12, 14)
|
|
67,517,500
|
|
|
101,833,491
|
Total
liabilities
|
|
72,669,453
|
|
|
104,144,167
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Measurement
uncertainty (Note 1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHAREHOLDERS'
EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Serial
preferred stock, without par value
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authorized:
|
Unlimited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issued:
|
None
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares and equity units
|
|
246,296,902
|
|
|
244,023,265
|
Class A common shares, without par value
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authorized:
|
Unlimited
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issued and outstanding:
|
2012…59,798,972
|
2011…59,043,972
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity Units
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issued and outstanding:
|
2012…500,236
|
2011…500,236
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contributed Surplus
|
|
5,171,603
|
|
|
5,171,603
|
Stock options (Note 9)
|
|
19,426,676
|
|
|
17,143,278
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
(306,562,696)
|
|
|
(292,183,986)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
(145,318)
|
|
|
41,742
|
Total shareholders' deficit
|
|
(35,812,833)
|
|
|
(25,804,098)
|
Total liabilities and shareholders' deficit
|
$
|
36,856,620
|
|
$
|
78,340,069
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
Approved by the Board of Directors:
s/
Chris D. Mikkelsen
s/
Patrick D. McChesney
GOLD RESERVE INC.
(A Development Stage Enterprise)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Expressed in U.S. dollars)
|
|
Three Months ended
|
|
Nine Months ended
|
|
January 1, 2010
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
September 30,
|
|
through
|
|
|
2012
|
|
2011
|
|
2012
|
|
2011
|
|
September 30, 2012
|
OTHER INCOME
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
$
|
922
|
$
|
25,598
|
$
|
14,766
|
$
|
112,399
|
$
|
373,892
|
Litigation settlement (Note 13)
|
|
1,891,035
|
|
–
|
|
1,891,035
|
|
–
|
|
1,891,035
|
Gain on disposition of marketable securities
|
|
–
|
|
243,565
|
|
7,373
|
|
755,233
|
|
1,021,692
|
Gain on sale of equipment
|
|
25,581
|
|
913,732
|
|
25,581
|
|
1,460,727
|
|
1,905,721
|
Gain on sale of subsidiaries (Note 10)
|
|
–
|
|
–
|
|
–
|
|
–
|
|
474,577
|
Gain on extinguishment of debt
|
|
–
|
|
–
|
|
–
|
|
–
|
|
1,304
|
Foreign currency (loss) gain
|
|
(11,644)
|
|
31,635
|
|
(18,807)
|
|
9,773
|
|
(33,885)
|
|
|
1,905,894
|
|
1,214,530
|
|
1,919,948
|
|
2,338,132
|
|
5,634,336
|
EXPENSES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate general and administrative
|
|
1,231,499
|
|
1,199,949
|
|
5,479,136
|
|
5,525,691
|
|
15,393,620
|
Corporate communications
|
|
127,197
|
|
131,661
|
|
568,105
|
|
511,635
|
|
1,714,468
|
Exploration
|
|
149,487
|
|
–
|
|
334,276
|
|
–
|
|
334,276
|
Venezuelan operations
|
|
75,212
|
|
145,037
|
|
531,005
|
|
893,794
|
|
3,530,916
|
Equipment holding costs
|
|
198,025
|
|
330,497
|
|
758,436
|
|
1,269,058
|
|
3,994,871
|
Legal and accounting
|
|
554,446
|
|
124,750
|
|
1,152,425
|
|
427,689
|
|
2,117,252
|
Arbitration (Note 3)
|
|
349,410
|
|
2,649,335
|
|
3,216,273
|
|
5,795,180
|
|
16,165,279
|
Write-down of machinery and equipment
|
|
–
|
|
–
|
|
–
|
|
–
|
|
4,400,755
|
|
|
2,685,276
|
|
4,581,229
|
|
12,039,656
|
|
14,423,047
|
|
47,651,437
|
Loss before interest expense
|
|
(779,382)
|
|
(3,366,699)
|
|
(10,119,708)
|
|
(12,084,915)
|
|
(42,017,101)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
(969,680)
|
|
(1,694,917)
|
|
(4,259,002)
|
|
(5,013,734)
|
|
(17,611,132)
|
Net loss for the period
|
$
|
(1,749,062)
|
$
|
(5,061,616)
|
$
|
(14,378,710)
|
$
|
(17,098,649)
|
$
|
(59,628,233)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per share, basic and diluted
|
$
|
(0.03)
|
$
|
(0.09)
|
$
|
(0.24)
|
$
|
(0.29)
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
60,299,208
|
|
59,522,382
|
|
60,198,880
|
|
59,451,148
|
|
|
GOLD RESERVE INC.
(A Development Stage Enterprise)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
(Expressed in U.S. dollars)
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
January 1, 2010
|
|
|
Three Months ended
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
September 30,
|
|
through
|
|
|
2012
|
|
2011
|
|
2012
|
|
2011
|
|
September 30, 2012
|
Net loss for the period
|
$
|
(1,749,062)
|
$
|
(5,061,616)
|
$
|
(14,378,710)
|
$
|
(17,098,649)
|
$
|
(59,628,233)
|
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain (loss) on marketable securities
|
|
87,462
|
|
(130,344)
|
|
(179,687)
|
|
(506,148)
|
|
1,153,599
|
Adjustment for realized gains included in net loss
|
|
–
|
|
(243,565)
|
|
(7,373)
|
|
(755,233)
|
|
(1,021,692)
|
Other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
87,462
|
|
(373,909)
|
|
(187,060)
|
|
(1,261,381)
|
|
131,907
|
Comprehensive loss for the period
|
$
|
(1,661,600)
|
$
|
(5,435,525)
|
$
|
(14,565,770)
|
$
|
(18,360,030)
|
$
|
(59,496,326)
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
GOLD RESERVE INC.
(A Development Stage Enterprise)
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
For the Nine Months
Ended September 30, 2012 and the Year Ended December 31, 2011
(Expressed in U.S.
dollars)
|
Common
Shares and Equity Units
|
Contributed
Surplus
|
Stock
Options
|
Accumulated
Deficit
|
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
|
KSOP
Debt
|
|
|
Common
Shares
|
Equity Units
|
Amount
|
Balance, December 31,
2010
|
58,769,851
|
500,236
|
$ 243,582,458
|
$ 5,171,603
|
$ 14,518,570
|
$(268,571,593)
|
$ 1,217,915
|
$ (110,691)
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23,612,393)
|
|
|
Other comprehensive
loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,176,173)
|
|
Stock option compensation
|
|
|
|
|
2,723,577
|
|
|
|
Fair value of options
exercised
|
|
|
98,869
|
|
(98,869)
|
|
|
|
Common shares issued
for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option exercises
($0.16/share avg.)
|
95,921
|
|
15,778
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services ($1.83/share
avg.)
|
178,200
|
|
326,160
|
|
|
|
|
|
KSOP allocation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110,691
|
Balance, December 31,
2011
|
59,043,972
|
500,236
|
244,023,265
|
5,171,603
|
17,143,278
|
(292,183,986)
|
41,742
|
-
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,378,710)
|
|
|
Other comprehensive
loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(187,060)
|
|
Stock option compensation
|
|
|
|
|
2,346,535
|
|
|
|
Fair value of options
exercised
|
|
|
63,137
|
|
(63,137)
|
|
|
|
Common shares issued
for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option exercises
($1.56/share avg.)
|
52,500
|
|
81,925
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services ($3.03/share
avg.)
|
702,500
|
|
2,128,575
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, September 30,
2012
|
59,798,972
|
500,236
|
$ 246,296,902
|
$ 5,171,603
|
$ 19,426,676
|
$(306,562,696)
|
$ (145,318)
|
$ -
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial
statements.
GOLD RESERVE INC.
(A Development Stage Enterprise)
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Expressed in U.S. dollars)
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
January 1, 2010
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
September 30,
|
|
through
|
|
|
2012
|
|
2011
|
|
2012
|
|
2011
|
|
September 30, 2012
|
Cash
Flows from Operating Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss for the period
|
$
|
(1,749,062)
|
$
|
(5,061,616)
|
$
|
(14,378,710)
|
$
|
(17,098,649)
|
$
|
(59,628,233)
|
Adjustments
to reconcile net loss to net cash
used in operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock option compensation
|
|
489,545
|
|
405,704
|
|
2,346,535
|
|
2,345,983
|
|
5,169,644
|
Depreciation
|
|
5,619
|
|
14,103
|
|
17,281
|
|
54,549
|
|
218,156
|
Gain on extinguishment of debt
|
|
–
|
|
–
|
|
–
|
|
–
|
|
(1,304)
|
Gain on sale of equipment
|
|
(25,581)
|
|
(913,732)
|
|
(25,581)
|
|
(1,460,727)
|
|
(1,905,721)
|
Gain
on sale of subsidiaries
|
|
–
|
|
–
|
|
–
|
|
–
|
|
(474,577)
|
Write-down
of machinery and equipment
|
|
–
|
|
–
|
|
–
|
|
–
|
|
4,400,755
|
Amortization
of premium on marketable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
debt
securities
|
|
–
|
|
–
|
|
–
|
|
–
|
|
175,020
|
Accretion of convertible notes
|
|
–
|
|
287,618
|
|
513,509
|
|
791,838
|
|
2,607,265
|
Net gain on disposition of marketable securities
|
|
–
|
|
(243,565)
|
|
(7,373)
|
|
(755,233)
|
|
(1,021,692)
|
Shares issued for compensation
|
|
356,416
|
|
187,193
|
|
1,978,189
|
|
1,311,864
|
|
4,008,763
|
Changes
in non-cash working capital:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in deposits and advances
|
|
(551,785)
|
|
311,858
|
|
(2,309,183)
|
|
62,701
|
|
(2,027,659)
|
Net
increase (decrease) in accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
683,389
|
|
(1,523,752)
|
|
351,277
|
|
1,713,875
|
|
(1,362,600)
|
Net
cash used in operating activities
|
|
(791,459)
|
|
(6,536,189)
|
|
(11,514,056)
|
|
(13,033,799)
|
|
(49,842,183)
|
Cash
Flows from Investing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds
from disposition of marketable securities
|
|
–
|
|
343,588
|
|
13,645
|
|
1,561,337
|
|
12,839,183
|
Purchase
of marketable securities
|
|
–
|
|
(42,732)
|
|
–
|
|
(698,574)
|
|
(1,726,718)
|
Purchase
of property, plant and equipment
|
|
(105,418)
|
|
(6,451)
|
|
(157,137)
|
|
(39,395)
|
|
(9,704,307)
|
Proceeds
from sales of equipment
|
|
25,581
|
|
7,817,146
|
|
475,581
|
|
16,457,541
|
|
25,847,737
|
Decrease
in restricted cash
|
|
–
|
|
–
|
|
–
|
|
–
|
|
9,489,777
|
Deconsolidation
of subsidiaries
|
|
–
|
|
–
|
|
–
|
|
–
|
|
(1,429,655)
|
Net
cash (used in) provided by investing activities
|
|
(79,837)
|
|
8,111,551
|
|
332,089
|
|
17,280,909
|
|
35,316,017
|
Cash
Flows from Financing Activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
proceeds from the issuance of common shares
|
|
–
|
|
–
|
|
81,925
|
|
15,778
|
|
141,364
|
Extinguishment
of convertible notes
|
|
(15,439,500)
|
|
–
|
|
(32,339,500)
|
|
–
|
|
(32,340,183)
|
Net
cash (used in) provided by financing activities
|
|
(15,439,500)
|
|
–
|
|
(32,257,575)
|
|
15,778
|
|
(32,198,819)
|
Change
in Cash and Cash Equivalents:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase
(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
(16,310,796)
|
|
1,575,362
|
|
(43,439,542)
|
|
4,262,888
|
|
(46,724,985)
|
Cash
and cash equivalents - beginning of period
|
|
30,548,624
|
|
60,874,004
|
|
57,677,370
|
|
58,186,478
|
|
60,962,813
|
Cash
and cash equivalents - end of period
|
$
|
14,237,828
|
$
|
62,449,366
|
$
|
14,237,828
|
$
|
62,449,366
|
$
|
14,237,828
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial
statements.
Note 1. The Company and
Significant Accounting Policies:
The Company.
Gold Reserve Inc.
(the “Company”) is engaged in the business of acquiring, exploring and
developing mining projects. The Company is an exploration stage company
incorporated in 1998 under the laws of the Yukon Territory, Canada and is the successor issuer to Gold Reserve Corporation which was incorporated in 1956.
In February 1999, Gold Reserve
Corporation became a subsidiary of Gold Reserve Inc., the successor issuer.
Generally, each shareholder exchanged its Gold Reserve Corporation shares for
an equal number of Gold Reserve Inc. Class A Common shares. For tax reasons,
certain U.S. holders elected to receive equity units in lieu of Gold Reserve Inc. Class A common shares. An equity unit is comprised of one Gold Reserve Inc. Class B common share and one Gold Reserve Corporation Class B common share, is
substantially equivalent to a Class A common share and is generally immediately
convertible into a Gold Reserve Inc. Class A common share. Unless otherwise
noted, general references to common shares of the Company include Class A
common shares and Equity Units as a group. At September 30, 2012, there were
500,236 Equity Units outstanding.
From 1992 to 2008 the Company
focused substantially all of its management and financial resources on the
development of the Brisas gold and copper project located in the Kilometre 88
mining district of the State of Bolivar in south-eastern Venezuela (which we refer to as the “Brisas Project” or “Brisas”). As further detailed in Note 3,
we discontinued development of the Brisas Project after it was seized by the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela (“Venezuela”) and are resolving our investment dispute through
arbitration against Venezuela under the Additional Facility Rules of the
International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (“ICSID”).
Concurrent with the arbitration
we are pursuing settlement of our dispute with Venezuela and are seeking to
invest in or acquire alternative mining projects (See Note 7). The Company has
no revenue producing mining operations at this time. All amounts shown herein
are expressed in U.S. dollars unless otherwise noted.
Principles of Consolidation
.
These consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The statements include the accounts of the
Company, Gold Reserve Corporation, four Venezuelan subsidiaries, a Mexican
subsidiary and four other subsidiaries which were formed to hold the Company’s
interest in its foreign subsidiaries or for future transactions. All
subsidiaries are wholly owned. All intercompany accounts and transactions have
been eliminated on consolidation. The Company’s policy is to consolidate those
subsidiaries where control exists. In Management’s opinion, all adjustments
necessary for a fair statement are reflected in the interim periods presented.
Development
Stage Enterprise.
As a result of the expropriation of the Brisas
Project by the Venezuelan government, the Company was forced to abandon its
development efforts on the project and, in 2009, expensed all capitalized costs
associated with its development. The expropriation resulted in the end of the
development of the Brisas project and management considers January 1, 2010 the
relevant inception date of the development of the Company’s new business of
acquiring and exploring other mining projects. ASC 915 requires additional
disclosures of development stage enterprises including cumulative amounts from
the inception of the development stage.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
.
The Company considers short-term, highly liquid investments purchased with an
original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents for purposes
of reporting cash equivalents and cash flows. The cost of these investments
approximates fair value. The Company manages the exposure of its cash and cash
equivalents to credit risk by diversifying its holdings into major Canadian and
U.S. financial institutions.
Exploration and Development
Costs
. Exploration costs incurred in locating areas of potential
mineralization or evaluating properties or working interests with specific
areas of potential mineralization are expensed as incurred. Development costs
of proven mining properties not yet producing are capitalized at cost and
classified as capitalized exploration costs under property, plant and
equipment. Property holding costs are charged to operations during the period
if no significant exploration or development activities are being conducted on
the related properties. Upon commencement of production, capitalized
exploration and development costs would be amortized based on the estimated
proven and probable reserves benefited. Properties determined to be impaired or
that are abandoned are written-down to the estimated fair value. Carrying
values do not necessarily reflect present or future values.
Property, Plant and
Equipment
. Property, plant and equipment are recorded at the lower of
cost less accumulated depreciation or estimated net realizable value. Included
in property, plant and equipment is $29 million of equipment that has been
adjusted to an estimated net realizable value of $19 million which is not being
depreciated. Replacements and major improvements are capitalized. Maintenance
and repairs are charged to expense as incurred. The cost and accumulated
depreciation of assets retired or sold are removed from the accounts and any
resulting gain or loss is reflected in operations. Depreciation is provided
using straight-line and accelerated methods over the lesser of the useful life
or lease term of the related asset.
Assets Held for
Sale.
Long-Lived assets are classified as held for sale in the period
in which certain criteria are met. Assets held for sale are measured at the
lower of carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell and are not
depreciated as long as they remain classified as held for sale.
Impairment of Long Lived
Assets
.
The Company reviews long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes
in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be
recoverable. If the sum of the expected future net cash flows to be generated
from the use or disposition of a long-lived asset (undiscounted and without
interest charges) is less than the carrying amount of the asset, an impairment
loss is recognized and the asset is written down to fair value. Fair value is
generally determined by discounting estimated cash flows, using quoted market
prices where available or making estimates based on the best information
available.
Foreign
Currency.
The U.S. dollar is the
Company’s (and its foreign subsidiaries’) functional currency. Monetary assets
and liabilities denominated in a foreign currency are translated into U.S.
dollars at the rates of exchange in effect at the balance sheet dates.
Non-monetary assets and liabilities are translated at historical rates and
revenue and expense items are translated at average exchange rates during the
reporting period, except for depreciation which is translated at historical
rates. Translation gains and losses are included in the statement of
operations.
Stock Based Compensation
.
The Company uses the fair value method of accounting for stock options. The
fair value of options granted to employees is computed using the Black-Scholes
method as described in Note 9 and is expensed over the vesting period of the
option. For non-employees, the fair value of stock based compensation is
recorded as an expense over the vesting period or upon completion of
performance. Consideration paid for shares on exercise of share options, in
addition to the fair value attributable to stock options granted, is credited
to capital stock. Fair value of restricted stock issued as compensation is
based on the grant date market value and expensed over the vesting period. The
Company also maintains the Gold Reserve Director and Employee Retention Plan.
Each Unit granted to a participant entitles such person to receive a cash
payment equal to the fair market value of one Gold Reserve Class A Common Share
(1) on the date the Unit was granted or (2) on the date any such participant
becomes entitled to payment, whichever is greater. Stock options, restricted
stock and Units granted under their respective plans become fully vested and
exercisable and/or payable upon a change of control.
Income Taxes
. The
Company uses the liability method of accounting for income taxes. Deferred tax
assets and liabilities are determined based on the differences between the tax
basis of assets and liabilities and those amounts reported in the financial
statements. The deferred tax assets or liabilities are calculated using the
enacted tax rates expected to apply in the periods in which the differences are
expected to be settled. Deferred tax assets are recognized to the extent that
they are considered more likely than not to be realized.
Use of Estimates
.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions
that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and
the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.
Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Measurement Uncertainty.
The
realizable value of the remaining equipment, originally purchased for the
Brisas Project, may be different than management’s current estimate. Any
operations we may have are subject to the effects of changes in legal, tax and
regulatory regimes, political, labor and economic developments, social and
political unrest, currency and exchange controls, import/export restrictions
and government bureaucracy in the countries in which we may operate. The
Company operates and files tax returns in a number of jurisdictions. The
preparation of such tax filings requires considerable judgment and the use of
assumptions. Accordingly, the amounts reported could vary in the future.
Net Loss Per Share
.
Net loss per share is computed by dividing net loss by the combined weighted
average number of Class A and B common shares outstanding during each year. In
periods in which a loss is incurred, the effect of potential issuances of
shares under options and convertible notes would be anti-dilutive, and
therefore basic and diluted losses per share are the same.
Convertible Notes
.
Convertible notes are classified as a liability and are initially recorded at
face value, net of issuance costs. The notes are subsequently accreted to face
value using the effective interest rate method over the expected life of the
notes, with the resulting charge recorded as interest expense.
Comprehensive Loss
.
Comprehensive loss includes net loss and other comprehensive income or loss.
Other comprehensive loss may include unrealized gains and losses on
available-for-sale securities and gains and losses on certain derivative
instruments. The Company presents comprehensive loss and its components in the
consolidated statements of comprehensive loss.
Financial
Instruments.
Marketable equity securities are classified as available
for sale with any unrealized gain or loss recorded in other comprehensive
income. Cash and cash equivalents, deposits, advances, accounts payable and
accrued expenses are accounted for at cost which approximates fair value.
Note 2. New Accounting Policies:
In
June 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2011-05 that
requires changes in the presentation of comprehensive income. Effective for
periods beginning after December 15, 2011, entities have the option of
presenting the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income, and
the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous
statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive
statements. The adoption of the updated guidance did not have an effect on the
Company’s financial statements.
In
May 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2011-04 which
contains amendments resulting in common fair value measurement and disclosure
requirements in financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP and
International Financial Reporting Standards. The amendments change the wording
used to describe the requirements in U.S. GAAP for measuring fair value and for
disclosing information about fair value measurements. This update is effective
for periods beginning after December 15, 2011 and did not have a significant
impact on the Company’s financial statements.
Note 3.
Expropriation of Brisas Project by Venezuela and Related Arbitration:
From 1992 to 2008 the Company
focused substantially all of its management and financial resources on the
development of the Brisas gold and copper project located in the Kilometer 88
mining district of the State of Bolivar in south-eastern Venezuela. After approval of the Brisas operating plan by the Ministry of Mines and the
Environmental and Social Impact Study by the Ministry of Environment in 2003
and early 2007, respectively, the Ministry of Environment issued in March 2007,
the Authorization for the Affectation of Natural Resources for the Construction
of Infrastructure and Services Phase of the Brisas Project (the “Authorization
to Affect”) which authorized the commencement of construction activities on the
Brisas Project. In April 2008, the Ministry of Environment revoked, without
notice, the Authorization to Affect.
In October 2009 we filed a
Request for Arbitration under the Additional Facility Rules of the
International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (“ICSID”), against
the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela (“Respondent”) seeking compensation in the
arbitration for all of the loss and damage resulting from Venezuela’s wrongful conduct. Gold Reserve alleges violations of three provisions of the
Canada-Venezuela Bilateral Investment Treaty (“BIT”) culminating in the
effective expropriation of Gold Reserve’s sizable investments in the
world-class Brisas gold/copper project and the promising Choco 5 property. In
November 2009 our Request for Arbitration was registered by ICSID (Gold Reserve
Inc. v. Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela (ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/09/1)). Our
claim includes the full market value of the legal rights to develop the
Brisas Project at the date of the Tribunal’s decision, the value of the
Choco 5 Property and interest on the claim. Our claim as last updated in our
July 2011 reply submission totals approximately $2.1 billion which includes
interest from April 14, 2008 (the date of the loss) to July 29, 2011 (the date
of our reply submission) of approximately $400 million.
The full market value of the
legal rights to develop the Brisas Project was measured by an independent
expert pursuant to a fair market value standard utilizing three standard
valuation approaches: (1) the Discounted Cash Flow Approach, (2) the Comparable
Publicly Traded Company Approach, and (3) the Comparable Transaction Approach.
These three valuations converged in a reasonably consistent range of values,
which were combined to arrive at a weighted average valuation based upon the
independent expert’s qualitative assessment of the robustness of the data
available to implement each valuation methodology.
Venezuela has numerous pending
arbitration actions being pursued against it at this time before ICSID and has
reportedly settled and/or made full or partial payment for damages to a limited
number of claimants in past months, although management has no specific
information regarding the actual amounts paid or what percentage such payments
represented of the original claim against Venezuela. Based on the uncertain
nature of arbitration under investment treaties, the timing and the amount of
an award or settlement, if any, the likelihood of its collection and the timing
thereof cannot be determined at this time.
In
compliance with the schedule originally set by the Tribunal which has been
amended by the Tribunal from time-to-time, we filed our initial written
submission, referred to as the Memorial, in September 2010. Thereafter in April
2011, the Respondent submitted its response to the Company’s Memorial, referred
to as the Counter-Memorial. Subsequent to that, the Company submitted its Reply
to the Respondent’s Counter Memorial in July 2011 and finally the Respondent
filed its Rejoinder in December 2011. The Rejoinder was the last filing to be
made prior to the oral hearing which was held February 13 to February 17, 2012.
The oral hearing was the
culmination of an extensive undertaking by the Company’s counsel, technical,
legal and financial experts, as well as its employees which focused on the
evidentiary record in the case and allowed counsel for both the Company and Respondent
to address the issues of jurisdiction, liability and damages. The oral hearing
also allowed the Tribunal to hear testimony from certain fact and expert
witnesses, as well as to address questions to each of the parties.
The Company and Respondent both submitted
post-hearing briefs on March 16, 2012, commenting in conclusion on the full evidentiary
record, as is typically permitted in such arbitrations. It is typical for
tribunals in this type of arbitration to require six to eighteen months from
the date of the oral hearing (the historical average is approximately 1.2
years) to finalize and issue its decision.
Subsequently, on July 25, 2012, the
Tribunal issued a procedural order requesting the production of further
evidence related to quantum issues to be delivered as a joint report of the
Parties’ experts, now scheduled for submission to the Tribunal on December 21,
2012.
The Board of Directors approved a Bonus Pool Plan
(“Bonus Plan”) in May 2012, which is intended to reward the participants,
including named executive officers, employees, directors and consultants, for
their past and future contributions including their efforts related to the
development of the Brisas Project, execution of the arbitration claim and the
collection of an award, if any. The bonus pool under the Bonus Plan will
generally be comprised of the gross proceeds or the fair value of any
consideration related to such transactions less applicable taxes times 1% of
the first $200 million and 5% thereafter. Participation in the Bonus Plan vests
upon the participant’s selection by the Committee of independent directors, subject
to voluntary termination of employment or termination for cause.
Note 4. Cash
and Cash Equivalents:
|
|
|
|
|
|
September
30,
|
|
December
31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
2011
|
US Treasury bills
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
$
|
40,000,000
|
Bank deposits
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,572,105
|
|
12,238,554
|
Money market funds
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,665,723
|
|
5,438,816
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
14,237,828
|
$
|
57,677,370
|
At September 30,
2012 and December 31, 2011, the Company had cash of approximately $17,000 and
$88,000 respectively, in Venezuela.
Note 5. Marketable Securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
September
30,
|
|
December
31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
2011
|
Fair value at beginning of year
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
892,271
|
$
|
2,263,923
|
Acquisitions
|
|
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
698,574
|
Dispositions, at cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,272)
|
|
(894,053)
|
Realized gain on sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,373)
|
|
(772,698)
|
Unrealized loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
(179,687)
|
|
(403,475)
|
Fair value at balance sheet date
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
698,939
|
$
|
892,271
|
The Company’s marketable
securities are classified as available-for-sale and are recorded at quoted
market value with gains and losses recorded within other comprehensive income
until realized. Realized gains and losses are based on the average cost method.
As of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, marketable securities had a
cost basis of $844,257 and $850,529, respectively.
Note 6. Fair Value
Measurements:
ASC 820
establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation
techniques used to measure fair value into three broad levels: Level 1 inputs
are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities, Level
2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are
directly or indirectly observable for the asset or liability and Level 3 inputs
are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability that reflect the entity’s
own assumptions.
|
|
Fair value
September 30, 2012
|
Level 1
|
Level 2
|
Level 3
|
Marketable
securities
|
|
$ 698,939
|
$ 698,939
|
–
|
–
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value
December 31, 2011
|
Level 1
|
Level 2
|
Level 3
|
Marketable
securities
|
|
$ 892,271
|
$ 892,271
|
–
|
–
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 7. Property, Plant and Equipment:
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
Net
|
September 30, 2012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Machinery and
equipment
|
$
|
18,985,828
|
$
|
–
|
$
|
18,985,828
|
Furniture and
office equipment
|
|
524,362
|
|
(479,884)
|
|
44,478
|
Leasehold
improvements
|
|
41,190
|
|
(41,190)
|
|
–
|
Venezuelan
property and equipment
|
|
1,309,073
|
|
(1,223,907)
|
|
85,166
|
Mineral
property
|
|
150,010
|
|
–
|
|
150,010
|
|
$
|
21,010,463
|
$
|
(1,744,981)
|
$
|
19,265,482
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
Net
|
December 31, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Machinery and
equipment
|
$
|
18,985,828
|
$
|
–
|
$
|
18,985,828
|
Furniture and
office equipment
|
|
517,235
|
|
(463,066)
|
|
54,169
|
Leasehold
improvements
|
|
41,190
|
|
(40,727)
|
|
463
|
Venezuelan
property and equipment
|
|
1,415,972
|
|
(1,330,806)
|
|
85,166
|
|
$
|
20,960,225
|
$
|
(1,834,599)
|
$
|
19,125,626
|
Machinery and equipment includes
amounts paid for equipment previously intended for use on the Brisas project.
At December 31, 2011 equipment with a carrying value of approximately $0.45
million was reclassified to assets held for sale and sold during the first
quarter of 2012 for its carrying value.
In May 2012 the Company entered
into an Option Agreement with Soltoro Ltd. (“Soltoro”) whereby Soltoro granted
Gold Reserve the right to earn an undivided 51% interest in the La Tortuga
property located in Jalisco State, Mexico. The Option Agreement allows the
Company to acquire an undivided 51% interest by making an aggregate $650,000 in
option payments to Soltoro as well as expending $3 million on the property over
3 years. At completion of the earn-in a joint venture agreement will be
formalized. The Company may subsequently exercise an option to acquire an
additional 9% interest in the property for $2,000,000. Upon signing, the
Company made an initial $50,000 option payment and at the end of July 2012 the
Company made an additional $100,000 option payment to Soltoro. La Tortuga is an
11,562 hectare property being investigated for its base and precious metal
potential with occurrences of copper and gold mineralization over 49 square
kilometers. Work on the property has included 151 line-kilometers of Induced
Polarization, diamond drill holes, mapping and sampling and ground magnetics.
Note 8. KSOP Plan:
The KSOP Plan, adopted in 1990 for the benefit of employees, is comprised of two parts, (1) a salary reduction component, or 401(k), and (2) an employee share ownership component, or ESOP. Unallocated shares are recorded as a reduction to shareholders’ equity. Allocation of common shares or cash contributions to participants’ accounts, subject to certain limitations, is at the discretion of the Company’s board of directors. The fair market value of the shares when allocated is recorded in the statement of operations with a reduction of the KSOP debt account. In 2011, the Plan allocated $127,220 cash and common shares valued at $110,690 to eligible participants.
Note 9. Stock Based Compensation Plans:
Equity Incentive Plans
In order to comply with the requirements of the TSX Venture Exchange (“TSXV”), the Company adopted and the shareholders approved on June 27, 2012, the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2012 Plan”) to replace the Company’s previous equity incentive plans: the 1997 Equity Incentive Plan (the “1997 Plan”) and the 2008 Venezuelan Equity Incentive Plan (the “Venezuelan plan”). Upon shareholder approval, all awards previously granted pursuant to the 1997 Plan and the Venezuelan Plan became subject to the 2012 Plan and the previous plans were terminated. The 2012 Plan permits the grants of stock options of up to 10% of the issued and outstanding common shares of the Company on a rolling basis. Since the previous plans had a combined number of options outstanding in excess of 10% of the common shares outstanding, the Company currently is unable to grant any additional options. The Company provides newly issued shares to satisfy stock option exercises. The grants are made for terms of up to ten years with vesting periods as required by the TSXV and as may be determined by a committee established pursuant to the 2012 Plan, or in certain cases, by the Company’s board of directors.
Share option transactions for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, as combined, are as follows:
|
2012
|
|
2011
|
|
|
Shares
|
Weighted Average Exercise Price
|
|
Shares
|
Weighted Average Exercise Price
|
|
Options outstanding - beginning of period
|
5,185,188
|
$ 1.42
|
|
3,178,102
|
$ 2.39
|
|
Options exercised
|
(52,500)
|
1.56
|
|
(138,501)
|
0.93
|
|
Options expired
|
–
|
–
|
|
(670,913)
|
4.44
|
|
Options forfeited
|
–
|
–
|
|
(126,000)
|
1.82
|
|
Options granted
|
1,620,500
|
2.89
|
|
3,793,000
|
1.85
|
|
Options outstanding - end of period
|
6,753,188
|
$ 1.77
|
|
6,035,688
|
$ 1.87
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable - end of period
|
3,900,238
|
$ 1.56
|
|
3,079,438
|
$ 1.88
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table relates to stock options at September 30, 2012:
|
Outstanding Options
|
|
Exercisable Options
|
Exercise Price Range
|
Number
|
Weighted Average Exercise Price
|
Aggregate Intrinsic Value
|
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (Years)
|
|
Number
|
Weighted Average Exercise Price
|
Aggregate Intrinsic Value
|
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (Years)
|
$0.29 - $0.29
|
1,079,188
|
$0.29
|
$3,183,605
|
1.18
|
|
1,079,188
|
$0.29
|
$3,183,605
|
1.18
|
$0.73 - $0.73
|
468,500
|
$0.73
|
1,175,935
|
1.46
|
|
468,500
|
$0.73
|
1,175,935
|
1.46
|
$1.82 - $1.82
|
2,635,000
|
$1.82
|
3,741,700
|
3.26
|
|
1,297,500
|
$1.82
|
1,842,450
|
3.26
|
$1.92 - $1.92
|
950,000
|
$1.92
|
1,254,000
|
8.69
|
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
$2.89 - $2.89
|
1,620,500
|
$2.89
|
567,175
|
4.33
|
|
1,055,050
|
$2.89
|
369,268
|
4.33
|
$0.29 - $2.89
|
6,753,188
|
$1.77
|
$9,922,415
|
3.82
|
|
3,900,238
|
$1.56
|
$6,571,258
|
2.76
|
During
the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, the Company granted
approximately 1.6 million and 3.8 million options, respectively. The Company
recorded non-cash compensation expense during 2012 and 2011 of $2.3 million and
$2.3 million, respectively, for stock options granted in 2012 and prior
periods. As of September 30, 2012, compensation expense of $0.7 million related
to unvested options remains to be recognized over the remaining vesting period.
The weighted average grant
date fair value of options granted during the nine months ended September 30, 2012
and 2011 was calculated at $1.39 and $1.23, respectively. The fair value of
options granted was determined using the Black-Scholes model based on the
following weighted average assumptions:
|
2012
|
2011
|
Risk free interest rate
|
0.29%
|
1.63%
|
Expected
Term
|
2.9 years
|
4.0 years
|
Expected
volatility
|
65%
|
97%
|
Dividend
yield
|
nil
|
nil
|
The risk free interest rate
is based on the US Treasury rate on the date of grant for a period equal to the
expected term of the option. The expected term is based on historical exercise
experience and expected post-vesting behavior. The expected volatility is based
on historical volatility of the Company’s stock over a period equal to the
expected term of the option.
Restricted Stock
During the nine months
ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, the Company granted 0.7 million and 0.2
million shares of restricted stock, respectively to employees and directors of
the Company. The fair value of restricted stock issued as compensation is based
on the grant date market value and expensed over the vesting period. The
Company recorded non-cash compensation expense during 2012 and 2011 of $2.0
million and $1.3 million, respectively, for stock granted in 2012 and prior
periods.
Retention Units Plan
The Company also maintains the Gold Reserve Director and
Employee Retention Plan. Units granted under the plan become fully vested and
payable upon achievement of certain milestones related to the Brisas project or
in the event of a change of control. The Company’s Board of Directors has considered,
but not acted upon alternative vesting provisions for the units to more
adequately reflect the current business objectives of the Company. Each unit
granted to a participant entitles such person to receive a cash payment equal
to the fair market value of one Gold Reserve Class A Common Share (1) on the
date the unit was granted or (2) on the date any such participant becomes
entitled to payment, whichever is greater. As of September 30, 2012 an
aggregate of 1,457,500 unvested units have been granted to directors and
executive officers of the Company and 315,000 units have been granted to other
employees. The Company currently does not accrue a liability for these units
as events required for vesting of the units have not yet occurred. The minimum
value of these units, based on the grant date value of the Class A shares, was
approximately $7.7 million.
Note 10. Related Party Transactions:
MGC Ventures Inc. (“MGC Ventures”).
The Chief Executive Officer, President, Vice President-Finance and Vice
President-Administration of the Company are also directors and/or officers and
shareholders of MGC Ventures. On December 15, 2010, the non-affiliated
shareholders of MGC Ventures approved the redemption of all of the shares of
MGC Ventures common stock held by Gold Reserve. Gold Reserve received $0.9
million and recorded a gain on sale of subsidiary of $0.2 million. Prior to the
redemption, Gold Reserve owned 12,062,953 common shares of MGC Ventures which
represented 44% of its outstanding shares. MGC Ventures owned 258,083 common
shares of the Company at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011. During the
last three years, the Company sublet a portion of its office space to MGC
Ventures for $6,000 per year.
Great Basin
Energies Inc. (“Great Basin”).
The Chief Executive Officer, President,
Vice President-Finance and Vice President-Administration of the Company are
also directors and/or officers and shareholders of Great Basin. On December 15,
2010, the non-affiliated shareholders of Great Basin approved the redemption of
all of the shares of Great Basin common stock held by Gold Reserve. Gold
Reserve received $1.2 million and recorded a gain on sale of subsidiary of $0.3
million. Prior to the redemption, Gold Reserve owned 15,661,595 common shares
of Great Basin which represented 45% of its outstanding shares. Great Basin owned 491,192 common shares of the Company at September 30, 2012 and December
31, 2011. During the last three years, the Company sublet a portion of its
office space to Great Basin for $6,000 per year.
Note 11. Shareholder Rights Plan:
The Company instituted
a shareholder rights plan (the “Rights Plan”) in 1999. Since the original
approval by the shareholders, the Rights Plan and the Rights Plan agreement
have been amended and continued from time to time. In June 2012, the
shareholders approved certain amendments to the Rights Plan including
continuing the Shareholder Rights Plan until June 30, 2015 and amending certain
provisions of the Rights Plan which would exempt the Large Note Holders from
triggering the Plan as a result of the Restructuring (See Note 12. Convertible
Notes). The Rights Plan is designed to give the Board of Director’s time to
consider alternatives, allow shareholders time to properly assess the merits of
a bid and insure they receive full and fair value for their common shares. One
right is issued in respect of each outstanding share. The rights become
exercisable only when a person, including any party related to it or acting
jointly with it, acquires or announces its intention to acquire 20% or more of
the Company’s outstanding shares without complying with the “permitted bid”
provisions of the Rights Plan. Each right would, on exercise, entitle the
holder, other than the acquiring person and related persons, to purchase Class
A common shares of the Company at a 50% discount to the market price at the
time.
Note 12. Convertible Notes:
In May 2007, the Company issued
$103,500,000 aggregate principal amount of senior subordinated convertible
notes, of which $102,347,000 remained outstanding prior to June 15, 2012. Convertible
notes with a face value of $1,153,000 were previously settled in cash or
repurchased by the Company in the open market at a total cost of approximately
$452,000. The unsecured notes, bear interest at a rate of 5.50% annually, pay
interest semi-annually in arrears and mature on June 15, 2022.
Key Indenture terms include:
§
Any outstanding notes are convertible, at the option of the note
holder, into Class A common shares of the Company at the initial conversion
rate, subject to adjustment, of 132.626 shares per $1,000 principal amount
(equivalent to a conversion price of $7.54). Unless there was continuing an
event of default under the Company’s indenture, conversion could be affected at
the Company’s option by delivering common shares, cash or a combination thereof.
§
The note holders also had a one-time option (the “Put Option”) to
require the Company to repurchase the notes on June 15, 2012, at a price equal
to 100% of the principal amount of the notes plus accrued but unpaid interest,
in whole or in part at the option of the Company, by delivering cash and/or common
shares.
§
Beginning on June 16, 2012, the Company, at its option, can redeem
all or part of the notes for cash at a redemption price equal to 100% of the
principal amount being redeemed plus accrued and unpaid interest.
§
The covenants contained in the indenture are limited to
administrative issues such as payments of interest, maintenance of office or
agency location, delivery of reports and other related issues. Likewise, events
of default are defined as failure to pay interest and principal amounts when
due, default in the performance of covenants, failure to convert notes upon
holder’s exercise of conversion rights and similar provisions or the Company’s
failure to give notice of a fundamental change which is generally defined as
events related to a change of control in the Company.
On May 16, 2012, the Company
notified the convertible note holders, as required by the Indenture, that they
had the right to require the Company to purchase all or a portion of their notes
on June 15, 2012 and that the Company would pay, in cash, any notes validly
surrendered. On June 15, 2012, pursuant to the Put Option, note holders elected
to surrender $16.9 million of the notes to the Company for cash.
Concurrent
with the Put Option, the Company announced the Restructuring agreement (the
“Restructuring”), subject to shareholder approval, with its three largest note
holders, who held approximately 88% of the outstanding notes. The terms of the Restructuring
were approved by shareholders in June 2012 and the Company and the three
largest note holders signed the Amended and Restated Subordinated Note
Restructuring Agreement on July 3, 2012 which, among other terms, provided for
the redemption of the remaining notes held by the three largest note holders that
were not previously surrendered to the Company pursuant to the Put Option.
Subsequently, in the third
quarter, the next largest note holder was added to the Restructuring bringing
the total notes subject to the Restructuring to approximately 98.7% of the
notes outstanding (herein referred to as the “Large Note Holders”). Thereafter
in the third quarter, management also offered the same restructuring terms to
the holders of the remaining 1.3% of the Company’s outstanding notes (the “Other
Note Holders”).
The general terms of the
Restructuring are as follows:
For each $1,000 in principal
amount, plus any accrued and unpaid interest on the notes through the date on
which the Restructuring is consummated:
$700 principal
amount of notes were exchanged for: (i) $200 in cash, (ii) 147.06 Common Shares
(equivalent to a conversion price of $3.40), and (iii) a pro rata portion of
the aggregate 5.535% Contingent Value Right (“CVR”).
$300 principal
of notes remain outstanding and represent the same continuing indebtedness,
subject to certain amended terms including: (i) maturity date is June 29, 2014;
(ii) convertible into 250 shares of Common Stock per $1,000 (equivalent to a
conversion price of $4.00) at any time after the closing date upon 3 days prior
written notice to the Company; (iii) mandatory redemption obligation for an
amount of cash equal to 120% of the face value thereof plus accrued and unpaid
interest upon certain events related to the receipt of proceeds connected with
the arbitration proceedings or sale or other disposition of the Company’s
mining data; (iv) optional redemption for shares of Common Stock at the
conversion price noted above plus cash for any accrued and unpaid interest if
the closing sale price of its common shares is equal to or greater than 200% of
the conversion price for at least 20 trading days in the period of 30
consecutive trading days; and (v) redemption at maturity by payment of cash in
an amount equal to the principal plus accrued and unpaid interest thereon.
The CVR entitles each note holder
to receive, net of certain deductions (including income tax calculation), a pro
rata portion of a maximum aggregate amount of 5.535% of the proceeds actually
received by the Company with respect to the Arbitration proceedings or
disposition of the Brisas Project mining data. The proceeds, if any, could be
cash, commodities, bonds, shares or any other consideration received by the
Company and if such proceeds are other than cash, the fair market value of such
non-cash proceeds, net of any required deductions (e.g., for taxes) will be
subject to the CVR.
A fee of up to $1 million will
also be paid to note holders electing the Restructuring based on their pro rata
share of the total notes restructured.
The table
below summarizes the effects of the Put Option and the Restructuring through
September 30, 2012.
Notes Outstanding prior to June 15, 2012
|
$102,347,000
|
Less June 15, 2012 Put Option
|
(16,900,000)
|
Notes outstanding at July 1, 2012
|
$85,447,000
|
|
|
|
Large Note Holders
|
98.7%
|
$84,367,000
|
Other Note Holders
|
1.3%
|
1,080,000
|
Total
|
100.0%
|
85,447,000
|
Cash paid in July 2012
(1)
|
|
(15,439,500)
|
Notes outstanding at September 30, 2012
|
$ 70,007,500
|
Short term
|
|
$ 2,490,000
|
Long term
|
|
$ 67,517,500
|
(1)
A total of $16,887,500 cash was payable pursuant to
the terms of the Restructuring of which $15,439,500 was paid in July 2012.
The Offer period related to the Restructuring
expired on November 23, 2012, thereafter the redemption of the existing notes
pursuant to the Restructuring was finalized and the remaining cash, shares and
modified notes were issued on or around November 27, 2012. (See Note 14.
Subsequent Event)
The
company incurred certain legal and other transaction costs in connection with
the Restructuring and these costs have been deferred as part of Deposits,
advances and other, pending completion of the Restructuring.
The notes are classified as a
liability and were initially recorded at face value, net of issuance costs. The
notes were accreted to face value at June 15, 2012 using the effective interest
rate method, with the resulting charge recorded as interest expense. The
Company capitalized interest and accretion on the notes until October, 2009,
when the Company filed for arbitration and when Venezuela seized the Brisas
Project. Thereafter all interest and accretion on the notes has been expensed.
The Company has paid $5.6 million in interest on the notes during each of the
last three years.
Note 13. Litigation:
During December 2008, the Company
filed an action in the Ontario Surperior Court of Justice against Rusoro Mining
Ltd and Rusoro’s financial advisor Endeavour Financial International
Corporation relating to damages from an unsolicited takeover offer. Both
parties filed counterclaims in 2009 and the Company amended its original claim
in 2010. In September 2012, the Company entered a settlement agreement with
both Endeavour and Rusoro. Under the settlement, dismissing all legal actions,
Endeavour paid the Company Cdn $1,500,000 and Rusoro paid
Cdn $250,000, issued 2,500,000 common shares and a conditional promissory note
in the amount of $1,000,000. The promissory note will become due and payable
when Rusoro is successful in the arbitration it has commenced against the
Venezuelan Government seeking compensation for the nationalization of Rusoro's
gold assets in Venezuela.
Note 14. Subsequent Event:
The Offer period related to the
convertible note Restructuring expired on November 23, 2012, thereafter the
redemption of the existing notes pursuant to the Restructuring was finalized
and the remaining cash, shares and modified notes were issued on or around
November 27, 2012. Holders of an aggregate of $84,405,000 of notes elected to
participate in the Restructuring and $1,042,000 of notes declined to participate
(See Note 12. Convertible Notes).
Pursuant to the terms of the
Restructuring, the Company was obligated to pay remaining cash of $1,448,000 (a
total of $16,887,500 due pursuant to the Restructuring less $15,439,500
previously paid in July 2012), issue $42,202,500 of equity (12,412,501 shares),
exchange existing convertible notes for Modified Notes totaling $25,315,000 and
issue CVR’s totaling 5.468%.
Convertible notes outstanding
subsequent to the Restructuring transaction totaled $26,357,000, which is
comprised of $25,315,000 of Modified Notes and $1,042,000 of old notes held by
Other Note Holders who declined to participate in the Restructuring. Management
expects to redeem such remaining notes held by Other Note Holders for cash in
the near future. The Restructuring is summarized in the table below:
|
|
|
20%
|
50%
|
30%
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
$3.40/share
Shares #
|
Equity $
|
Modified
Notes
|
CVR
%
|
|
|
|
Large Note Holders
|
98.74%
|
$84,367,000
|
$16,875,500
|
12,406,913
|
$42,183,500
|
$25,308,000
|
5.465%
|
Other Note Holders
|
0.04%
|
38,000
|
12,000
|
5,588
|
19,000
|
7,000
|
.003%
|
Total electing Restructuring
|
98.78%
|
84,405,000
|
$16,887,500
|
12,412,501
|
$42,202,500
|
$25,315,000
|
5.468%
|
Non-electing Note Holders
|
1.22%
|
1,042,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total notes subject to
Restructuring
|
100.0%
|
$85,447,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid in July 2012
pursuant to the Restructuring
|
(15,439,500)
|
(15,439,500)
|
|
|
|
|
Notes outstanding September
30, 2012
|
|
$70,007,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Non-electing Note
holders
|
(1,042,000)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Notes participating in
Restructuring
|
$68,965,500
|
$1,448,000
|
12,412,501
|
$42,202,500
|
$25,315,000
|
|
Restructuring transaction
– November 27, 2012:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining
cash paid- Electing Note Holders
|
(1,448,000)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
issued
|
(42,202,500)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Modified
Notes post closing
|
$25,315,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-electing Other Note Holders
|
1,042,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes remaining outstanding
|
$26,357,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
99.2 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations
Overview
This
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations, dated
November 29, 2012 is intended to assist in understanding and assessing our
results of operations and financial condition and should be read in conjunction
with the consolidated financial statements and related notes.
Gold Reserve,
an exploration stage company, is engaged in the business of acquiring,
exploring and developing mining projects. In addition to obtaining a working
interest in the La Tortuga project, establishing the local operating entity and
commencing related exploration (See Note 7 to the consolidated financial
statements); settling the litigation related to a breach of fiduciary
responsibility during the course of a 2008 unsolicited takeover bid (See Note
13 to the consolidated financial statements); concluding the convertible note
Restructuring on November 27, 2012 (See Notes 12 and 14 to the consolidated
financial statements); and responding to the Tribunal’s July 25, 2012
procedural order requesting the production of further evidence related to
quantum issues (See Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements); management
continues to pursue its arbitration claim against Venezuela including efforts
to reach an amicable settlement that could include a monetary agreement and/or
project participation and the sale of the remaining assets previously purchased
for the Brisas Project.
In May 2012, the Company entered
into an Option Agreement with Soltoro Ltd. (“Soltoro”) whereby Soltoro granted
Gold Reserve the right to earn an undivided 51% interest in the La Tortuga
property, a copper and gold prospect located in Jalisco State, Mexico. Previously in 1992 and 2000, the Company acquired the Brisas Project and the Choco 5
property, respectively, both located in the Guayana region of Bolivar State, Venezuela and which are now the subject of an arbitration proceeding as discussed below.
Brisas Arbitration
From 1992 to 2008 we focused
substantially all of our management and financial resources on the development
of the Brisas Project. In April 2008, after a series of actions which concluded
with the revocation of our previously authorized right to develop the Brisas Project,
the Venezuelan government expropriated the Brisas Project and also effectively deprived
the Company of its ability to further develop the Choco 5 property. Any
information contained in this report relating to our past development efforts
for the Brisas Project and status of the Choco 5 property are presented only
for informational and historical purposes and should not be construed as an
indication of our expectations regarding the future development and operation
of these properties or the outcome of the arbitration proceedings.
In October 2009 we filed a
Request for Arbitration under the Additional Facility Rules of the International
Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (“ICSID”), against the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela (“Respondent”) seeking compensation in the arbitration for all
of the loss and damage resulting from Venezuela’s wrongful conduct. Gold
Reserve alleges violations of three provisions of the Canada-Venezuela BIT
culminating in the effective expropriation of Gold Reserve’s sizable
investments in the world-class Brisas Project and the promising Choco 5
property. Gold Reserve Inc. v. Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela (ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/09/1). (See Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements)
Our claim as last updated in our
July 2011 Reply totals approximately $2.1 billion which includes interest from
April 14, 2008 (the date of the loss) to July 29, 2011 (the date of our reply)
of approximately $400 million. The claim represents the full market value
of the legal rights to develop the Brisas Project at the date of the
Tribunal’s decision, the value of the Choco 5 Property and interest on the
claim calculated since the loss.
The Company is well advanced in
the arbitration process. The oral hearing which was completed as scheduled on February
17, 2012, represented the conclusion of an extensive undertaking by the
Company’s counsel, technical, legal and financial experts and its employees.
The oral hearing focused on the evidentiary record in the case, allowing counsel
for both the Company and Venezuela to address the issues of jurisdiction,
liability and damages, allowed the arbitral tribunal to hear testimony from
fact and expert witnesses, and to address questions to each of the parties.
The Company and Respondent both submitted
post-hearing briefs on March 16, 2012, commenting in conclusion on the full
evidentiary record, as is typically permitted in such arbitrations. It is
typical for tribunals in this type of arbitration to require six to eighteen
months from the date of the oral hearing (the historical average is
approximately 1.2 years) to finalize and issue its decision. Subsequently, on
July 25, 2012, the Tribunal issued a procedural order requesting the production
of further evidence related to quantum issues to be delivered as a joint report
of the Parties’ experts, now scheduled for submission to the Tribunal on
December 21, 2012.
Exchange Listings
During April 2008 the Venezuelan
government effectively expropriated the Brisas Project. Subsequently, the
expropriation led NYSE MKT (the “NYSE”) and the Toronto Stock Exchange (the
“TSX”) to conclude that the Company “no longer complied” with its listing rules
and in June and November 2011, the Company was advised by the NYSE and the TSX,
respectively, that each intended to delist the Company’s common shares. The
Company appealed both notifications. In October 2011, the NYSE approved a plan
to regain compliance with its listing standards (the “Plan”). The NYSE Plan
provided for an 18 month schedule, starting June 20, 2011, the initial date of
the notice of non-compliance, whereby the Company was required to obtain a
working interest in one or more acceptable mineral exploration properties by
June 2012 with commensurate exploration expenditures of at least $5 million
made thereon by December 20, 2012. The Company also appealed the TSX’s
original determination, submitting a plan similar to that approved by the NSYE,
with the TSX determining the plan was not sufficiently advanced for additional
time to regain compliance. As a result, trading of the Company’s common shares
moved from the TSX to the TSX.V (symbol “GRZ.V”) commencing February 1, 2012.
In May 2012 the Company signed an
Option Agreement with Soltoro Ltd. (“Soltoro”) whereby Soltoro granted Gold
Reserve the right to earn an undivided 51% interest in the La Tortuga property,
a copper and gold prospect located in Jalisco State, Mexico. The Option
Agreement allows the Company to acquire an undivided 51% interest by making an
aggregate $650,000 in option payments to Soltoro as well as expending $3
million on the property over 3 years and provides for the option to
subsequently acquire an additional 9% interest in the property for $2,000,000. (See
Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements)
Management believed that the
discretionary requirement that the Company expend $5 million on one or more
properties during the time period November 2011 through December 21, 2012 would
be challenging but that the opportunity to remain listed on the NSYE was
extremely beneficial to the Company’s shareholders, note holders and the future
of the Company. During 2012, the Company has been involved in arbitration
activities, restructuring of its convertible notes, settling other litigation
and since the May 2012 agreement with Soltoro, through the third quarter ending
September 30, 2012 and up to November 29, 2012 the Company has made rational
and methodical progress with the exploration of La Tortuga. At this time
management does not expect to achieve compliance with the minimum expenditures
of $5 million within the required time frame as outlined in the Plan and, as a
result, the Company will remain subject to delisting procedures pursuant to the
NYSE rules.
Convertible Notes
Restructuring
On May 16, 2012, the Company
notified the convertible note holders, as required by the Indenture, that they
had the right to require the Company to purchase all or a portion of their
Notes on June 15, 2012 (the “Put Option”) and that the Company would pay, in
cash, any notes validly surrendered. On June 15, 2012 note holders elected to
surrender $16.9 million of notes to the Company for cash resulting in a remaining
balance of notes outstanding at June 30, 2012 of $85,447,000. (See Notes 12 and
14 to the consolidated financial statements)
Concurrent with the Put Option,
the Company announced the Restructuring agreement (the “Restructuring”),
subject to shareholder approval, with its three largest note holders, who held
approximately 88% of the outstanding notes. The terms of the Restructuring were
approved by shareholders in June 2012 and the Company and the three largest
note holders signed the Amended and Restated Subordinated Note Restructuring
Agreement on July 3, 2012 which, among other terms, provided for the redemption
of the remaining notes held by the three largest note holders that were not
previously surrendered to the Company pursuant to the Put Option.
Subsequently, in the third
quarter, the next largest note holder was added to the Restructuring bringing
the total notes subject to the Restructuring to approximately 98.7% of the
notes outstanding (herein referred to as the “Large Note Holders”). Thereafter
in the third quarter, management also offered the same restructuring terms to
the holders of the remaining 1.3% of the Company’s outstanding notes (the
“Other Note Holders”).
The
general terms of the Restructuring are as follows:
For each $1,000
in principal amount, plus any accrued and unpaid interest on the notes through
the date on which the Restructuring is consummated:
$700 principal amount of notes were
exchanged for: (i) $200 in cash, (ii) 147.06 Common Shares (equivalent to a
conversion price of $3.40), and (iii) a pro rata portion of the aggregate 5.535%
Contingent Value Right (“CVR”).
$300
principal of notes remain outstanding and represent the same continuing
indebtedness, subject to certain amended terms including: (i) maturity date is
June 29, 2014; (ii) convertible into 250 shares of Common Stock per $1,000
(equivalent to a conversion price of $4.00) at any time after the closing date
upon 3 days prior written notice to the Company; (iii) mandatory redemption
obligation for an amount of cash equal to 120% of the face value thereof plus
accrued and unpaid interest upon certain events related to the receipt of
proceeds connected with the arbitration proceedings or sale or other
disposition of the Company’s mining data; (iv) optional redemption for shares of
Common Stock at the conversion price noted above plus cash for any accrued and
unpaid interest if the closing sale price of its common shares is equal to or
greater than 200% of the conversion price for at least 20 trading days in the
period of 30 consecutive trading days; and (v) redemption at maturity by
payment of cash in an amount equal to the principal plus accrued and unpaid
interest thereon.
The CVR entitles each note holder to
receive, net of certain deductions (including income tax calculation), a pro
rata portion of a maximum aggregate amount of 5.535% of the proceeds actually
received by the Company with respect to the Arbitration proceedings or
disposition of the Brisas Project mining data. The proceeds may be cash,
commodities, bonds, shares or any other consideration received by the Company and
if such proceeds are other than cash, the fair market value of such non-cash
proceeds, net of any required deductions (e.g., for taxes) will be subject to
the CVR.
A fee of up to $1 million will also be
paid to note holders electing the Restructuring based on their pro rata share
of the total notes restructured.
The table below summarizes the effects of the Put Option and the
Restructuring through
September 30, 2012.
Notes Outstanding prior to June 15, 2012
|
$102,347,000
|
Less June 15, 2012 Put Option
|
(16,900,000)
|
Notes outstanding at July 1, 2012
|
$85,447,000
|
|
|
|
Large Note Holders
|
98.7%
|
$84,367,000
|
Other Note Holders
|
1.3%
|
1,080,000
|
Total
|
100.0%
|
85,447,000
|
Cash paid in July 2012
(1)
|
|
(15,439,500)
|
Notes outstanding at September 30, 2012
|
$ 70,007,500
|
Short term
|
|
$ 2,490,000
|
Long term
|
|
$ 67,517,500
|
(1)
A total of $16,887,500 cash was payable pursuant to
the terms of the Restructuring of which $15,439,500 was paid in July 2012.
The Offer period related to the
convertible note Restructuring expired on November 23, 2012, thereafter the
redemption of the existing notes pursuant to the Restructuring was finalized
and the remaining cash, shares and modified notes were issued on or around
November 27, 2012. Holders of an aggregate of $84,405,000 of notes elected to
participate in the Restructuring and $1,042,000 of notes declined to
participate (See Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements).
Pursuant to the terms of the
Restructuring, the Company was obligated to pay remaining cash of $1,448,000 (a
total of $16,887,500 due pursuant to the Restructuring less $15,439,500
previously paid in July 2012), issue $42,202,500 of equity (12,412,501 shares),
exchange existing convertible notes for Modified Notes totaling $25,315,000 and
issue CVR’s totaling 5.468%.
Convertible notes outstanding
subsequent to the Restructuring transaction totaled $26,357,000, which is
comprised of $25,315,000 of Modified Notes and $1,042,000 of old notes held by
Other Note Holders who declined to participate in the Restructuring. Management
expects to redeem such remaining notes held by Other Note Holders for cash in
the near future. The Restructuring is summarized in the table below:
|
|
|
20%
|
50%
|
30%
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
$3.40/share
Shares #
|
Equity $
|
Modified
Notes
|
CVR
%
|
|
|
|
Large Note Holders
|
98.74%
|
$84,367,000
|
$16,875,500
|
12,406,913
|
$42,183,500
|
$25,308,000
|
5.465%
|
Other Note Holders
|
0.04%
|
38,000
|
12,000
|
5,588
|
19,000
|
7,000
|
.003%
|
Total electing Restructuring
|
98.78%
|
84,405,000
|
$16,887,500
|
12,412,501
|
$42,202,500
|
$25,315,000
|
5.468%
|
Non-electing Note Holders
|
1.22%
|
1,042,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total notes subject to Restructuring
|
100.0%
|
$85,447,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid in July 2012 pursuant to the Restructuring
|
(15,439,500)
|
(15,439,500)
|
|
|
|
|
Notes outstanding September 30, 2012
|
|
$70,007,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Non-electing Note holders
|
(1,042,000)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Notes participating in Restructuring
|
$68,965,500
|
$1,448,000
|
12,412,501
|
$42,202,500
|
$25,315,000
|
|
Restructuring transaction – November 27, 2012:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining cash paid- Electing Note Holders
|
(1,448,000)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity issued
|
(42,202,500)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Modified Notes post closing
|
$25,315,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-electing Other Note Holders
|
1,042,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes remaining outstanding
|
$26,357,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Litigation
Settlement
During December 2008 the Company
filed an action in the Ontario Surperior Court of Justice against Rusoro Mining
Ltd and Rusoro’s financial advisor Endeavour Financial International
Corporation relating to damages from an unsolicited takeover offer. Both
parties filed counterclaims in 2009 and the Company amended its original claim
in 2010. On September 20, 2012, the Company entered a settlement agreement with
both Endeavour and Rusoro. Under the settlement dismissing all legal actions
Endeavour paid the Company Cdn $1,500,000 and Rusoro paid Cdn $ 250,000, issued
2,500,000 common shares and a conditional promissory note in the amount of
$1,000,000. The promissory note will become due and payable when Rusoro is
successful in the arbitration it has commenced against the Venezuelan
Government seeking compensation for the nationalization of Rusoro's gold assets
in Venezuela.
Exploration
Prospects
In May 2012 the Company entered
into an Option Agreement with Soltoro Ltd. (“Soltoro”) whereby Soltoro granted
Gold Reserve the right to earn an undivided 51% interest in the La Tortuga
property located in Jalisco State, Mexico. The Option Agreement allows the
Company to acquire an undivided 51% interest by making an aggregate $650,000 in
option payments to Soltoro as well as expending $3 million on the property over
3 years. At completion of the earn-in a joint venture agreement will be
formalized. The Company may subsequently exercise an option to acquire an
additional 9% interest in the property for $2,000,000. Upon signing, the
Company made an initial $50,000 option payment and at the end of July 2012 the
Company made an additional $100,000 option payment to Soltoro. La Tortuga is an
11,562 hectare property being investigated for its base and precious metal
potential with occurrences of copper and gold mineralization over 49 square
kilometers. Work on the property has included 151 line-kilometers of Induced
Polarization, diamond drill holes, mapping and sampling and ground magnetics. Inception
to date, the Company has expended approximately $500,000 including $150,000
capitalized as property, plant and equipment.
In addition to the Company’s Option
Agreement with Soltoro, management has identified a number of other potential
mineral prospects and has signed or is in the process of signing
confidentiality agreements allowing access to the target company’s confidential
information regarding such prospects. As with any similarly-situated mining
company, we are evaluating multiple prospects and these efforts are subject to,
among other things, the mineralized potential, the terms of any agreement, the
level and quality of previous work completed by the target companies,
schedules, weather and geography. We are focusing on prospects that have potential
for success and generally located in a politically friendly jurisdiction which
has clear and well established mining, tax and environmental laws, an
experienced mining authority and likely to be an open pit versus an underground
prospect.
Financial Overview
The Company’s current financial
position and continuing results of operations are a product of the substantial
operating deficits and Brisas Project development costs incurred since 1992,
the issuance of $183 million of convertible notes and common shares and the
acquisition of approximately $125 million of equipment subsequent to the
issuance of the Authorization to Affect, the subsequent termination of the development
of Brisas and Choco 5, as a result of the seizure of the Brisas Project, the
ongoing ICSID arbitration, the write-down of previously capitalized costs and
equipment associated with the project development and the ongoing efforts to dispose
of such equipment as well as the impact of the Restructuring described above
and in Note 12 to the consolidated financial statements.
We have no commercial production
at this time and, as a result, we have not recorded revenue or cash flows from
mining operations and continue to experience losses from operations, a trend we
expect to continue unless and until the investment dispute regarding Brisas is
resolved favorably to the Company and/or we acquire or invest in an alternative
project which results in positive results from operations.
Historically we have financed the
Company’s operations through the issuance of common stock, other equity
securities and convertible debt. The timing of any such new investment or
transaction if any, and the amounts that may be required cannot be determined
at this time and are subject to available cash, the collection, if any, of an
award or settlement related to the Arbitration, sale of remaining equipment
originally slated for the Brisas Project, the timing of the redemption of the
remaining old notes held by Other Note Holders which did not elect to
participate in the Restructuring and/or future financings, if any. The Company
has only one operating segment, the exploration and development of mineral
properties.
Liquidity and
Capital Resources
At September
30, 2012, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of approximately $14.2,
million which represents a decrease from December 31, 2011 of approximately $43.4
million. The net decrease for the nine months was primarily due to cash used for
redemption of convertible notes of $32.4 million (See Notes 12 and 14 to the
consolidated financial statements) and cash used by operations of $11.5
million. The components of changes in cash are more fully described in the
“Operating,” “Investing” and “Financing” Activities section below.
|
2012
|
2011
|
Change
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$ 14,237,828
|
$ 57,677,370
|
$ (43,439,542)
|
As of September 30, 2012, our
total financial resources, which include cash and cash equivalents and
marketable securities, totaled approximately $14.9 million. In addition, the
Company holds Brisas Project related equipment that it intends to dispose of in
the near term. This equipment is carried on the balance sheet (as property,
plant and equipment) at its estimated fair value of approximately $19 million.
The Offer period related to the
convertible note Restructuring expired on November 23, 2012, thereafter the
redemption of the existing notes pursuant to the Restructuring was finalized
and the remaining cash, shares and modified notes were issued on or around
November 27, 2012 (See Notes 12 and 14 to the consolidated financial
statements). The Restructuring is summarized in the table below:
|
Face Value
|
Redeemed for
|
|
of Notes
|
Cash
|
Shares #
|
Shares $$
|
Modified Notes
|
Large Note Holders
|
$ 84,367,000
|
$ 16,875,500
|
12,406,913
|
$ 42,183,500
|
$ 25,308,000
|
Other Note Holders
|
38,000
|
12,000
|
5,588
|
19,000
|
7,000
|
|
$ 84,405,000
|
$ 16,887,500
|
12,412,501
|
$ 42,202,500
|
$ 25,315,000
|
Non-electing Note Holders
|
1,042,000
|
1,042,000
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
$85,447,000
|
$17,929,500
|
12,412,501
|
$ 42,202,500
|
$ 25,315,000
|
Cash paid in July 2012
|
(15,439,500)
|
(15,439,500)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Remaining Obligation
|
$70,007,500
|
$2,490,000
|
12,412,501
|
$ 42,202,500
|
$ 25,315,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Electing Note Holders
|
$68,965,500
|
$1,448,000
|
12,412,501
|
$ 42,202,500
|
$ 25,315,000
|
Non-electing Note Holders
|
$1,042,000
|
$1,042,000
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
$70,007,500
|
$2,490,000
|
12,412,501
|
$ 42,202,500
|
$ 25,315,000
|
The timing and extent of additional funding, if any, depends on a number of important factors, including, but not limited to the timing and outcome of our investment dispute with Venezuela, the timing and the amount of proceeds, if any, from the sale of Brisas Project related equipment, the extent of future acquisitions or investments, if any, status of the financial markets and our share price.
We believe that cash and investment balances and funds available from potential future equipment sales will be sufficient to enable us to fund our activities through 2013. As of November 29, 2012, we had approximately $11 million in cash and investments, which are held primarily in US dollar denominated accounts.
Operating Activities
Cash flow used by operating activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 was approximately $11.5 million and $13.0 million, respectively. Cash flow used by operating activities consists of net operating losses (the components of which are more fully discussed below) adjusted for certain non-cash income and expense items primarily related to stock options and common shares issued in lieu of cash compensation, accretion of convertible notes, gains on sale of equipment and marketable securities, and certain non-cash changes in working capital. Cash flow used by operating activities during the nine months ended September 30, 2012 decreased from the prior comparable period primarily due to a decrease in professional fees and expenses connected with the arbitration and the receipt of funds as a result of settlement of litigation related to a 2008 unsolicited takeover bid for the Company. (See Note 13 to the consolidated financial statements)
Investing Activities
During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, net cash provided by investing activities decreased approximately $8.2 million and $16.9 million from the comparable periods in 2011. The decrease in funds provided by investing activities primarily resulted from the reduction in the sales of Brisas Project related equipment during the comparable periods. As of September 30, 2012, the Company held approximately $19 million of Brisas project related equipment intended for future sale.
|
|
3 months
|
|
|
9 months
|
|
|
2012
|
2011
|
Change
|
2012
|
2011
|
Change
|
Proceeds (net of purchases) of marketable securities
|
$ -
|
$ 300,856
|
$ (300,856)
|
$ 13,645
|
$ 862,763
|
$ (849,118)
|
Purchase of property, plant and equipment
|
(105,418)
|
(6,451)
|
(98,967)
|
(157,137)
|
(39,395)
|
(117,742)
|
Proceeds from sale of equipment
|
25,581
|
7,817,146
|
(7,791,565)
|
475,581
|
16,457,541
|
(15,981,960)
|
|
$ (79,837)
|
$ 8,111,551
|
$ (8,191,388)
|
$ 332,089
|
$ 17,280,909
|
$ (16,948,820)
|
Financing Activities
During the nine months ended September 30, 2012, the Company redeemed $32.4 million of its convertible notes (See Liquidity and Capital Resources above and Notes 12 and 14 to the consolidated financial statements). The Company had no other significant financing activities in 2012 and 2011. Net proceeds from the issuance of common shares relate to the exercise of employee stock options and totaled $81,925 and $15,778 during the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
Contractual Obligations
The following table sets forth information on the Company’s material contractual obligation payments for the periods indicated as of September 30, 2012:
|
Payments due by Period
|
|
Total
|
Less than 1 Year
|
1-3 Years
|
4-5 Years
|
More Than 5 Years
|
Convertible Notes
(1)
|
$70,007,500
|
$44,692,500
|
$25,315,000
|
-
|
-
|
Interest
|
4,010,237
|
2,563,537
|
1,446,700
|
-
|
-
|
|
$74,017,737
|
$47,256,037
|
$26,761,700
|
-
|
-
|
1
In May 2007, the Company issued $103,500,000 aggregate principal amount of senior subordinated convertible notes, of which $102,347,000 remained outstanding prior to June 15, 2012. Convertible notes with a face value of $1,153,000 were previously settled in cash or repurchased by the Company in the open market at a total cost of approximately $452,000.
On June 15, 2012, pursuant to the Put Option, note holders elected to surrender $16.9 million of the notes to the Company for cash. In July, 2012 the Company paid $15,439,500 in cash pursuant to the restructuring and on November 27, 2012 the Company finalized the Restructuring transaction by paying an additional $1,448,000 in cash and issuing $42,202,500 (12,412,501 common shares) of equity and $25,315,000 of modified debt. Total remaining debt as of November 27, 2012 includes $1,042,000 related to old notes held by Other Note Holders that did not elect to participate in the Restructuring. Such notes are expected to be redeemed in the near future. (See Notes 12 and 14 to the consolidated financial statements and management’s discussion and analysis). The Modified Notes are unsecured, bear interest at a rate of 5.50% annually, pay interest semi-annually in arrears and mature on June 29, 2014.
Results of Operations
Summary Results of Operations
Consolidated net loss for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 was approximately $1.7 million and $14.4 million, respectively, compared to $5.1 million and $17.1 million in the comparable periods in 2011.
|
|
3 months
|
|
|
9 months
|
|
|
2012
|
2011
|
Change
|
2012
|
2011
|
Change
|
Other Income
|
$ 1,905,894
|
$ 1,214,530
|
$ 691,364
|
$ 1,919,948
|
$ 2,338,132
|
$ (418,184)
|
Total expenses
|
(3,654,956)
|
(6,276,146)
|
2,621,190
|
(16,298,658)
|
(19,436,781)
|
3,138,123
|
Net Loss
|
$ (1,749,062)
|
$ (5,061,616)
|
$ 3,312,554
|
$(14,378,710)
|
$(17,098,649)
|
$ 2,719,939
|
Other Income
We have no commercial production at this time and, as a result, other income is often variable from period to period due to one-time or otherwise variable sources of income. The change in other income was primarily due to settlement of litigation in the third quarter of 2012 offset by decreases in gain on sale of equipment and gain on disposition of marketable securities.
|
|
3 months
|
|
|
9 months
|
|
|
2012
|
2011
|
Change
|
2012
|
2011
|
Change
|
Interest
|
$ 922
|
$ 25,598
|
$ (24,676)
|
$ 14,766
|
$ 112,399
|
$ (97,633)
|
Litigation settlement
|
1,891,035
|
-
|
1,891,035
|
1,891,035
|
-
|
1,891,035
|
Gain on disposition of marketable securities
|
-
|
243,565
|
(243,565)
|
7,373
|
755,233
|
(747,860)
|
Gain on sale of equipment
|
25,581
|
913,732
|
(888,151)
|
25,581
|
1,460,727
|
(1,435,146)
|
Foreign currency gain (loss)
|
(11,644)
|
31,635
|
(43,279)
|
(18,807)
|
9,773
|
(28,580)
|
|
$ 1,905,894
|
$ 1,214,530
|
$ 691,364
|
$ 1,919,948
|
$ 2,338,132
|
$ (418,184)
|
Expenses
Total expenses for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 decreased $2.6 million and $3.1 million, respectively over the comparable periods in 2011. The decreases were primarily due to decreases in arbitration costs, equipment holding costs, Venezuelan expenses and interest partially offset by increases in legal and general and administrative costs, including exploration costs.
With the completion of the oral hearing in the Company’s arbitration against Venezuela in the first quarter of 2012, arbitration costs significantly decreased in the second and third quarters. Equipment holding costs have decreased as the Company has sold some of the equipment originally intended for the Brisas project and Venezuelan costs have decreased as the Company has significantly reduced its operations there. General and administrative expense increased primarily due to a non-cash increase in equity-based compensation and legal increased due to corporate and tax planning issues.
|
|
3 months
|
|
|
9 months
|
|
|
2012
|
2011
|
Change
|
2012
|
2011
|
Change
|
Corporate general and administrative
|
$ 1,231,499
|
$ 1,199,949
|
$ 31,550
|
$ 5,479,136
|
$ 5,525,691
|
$ (46,555)
|
Venezuelan expenses
|
75,212
|
145,037
|
(69,825)
|
531,005
|
893,794
|
(362,789)
|
Corporate communications
|
127,197
|
131,661
|
(4,464)
|
568,105
|
511,635
|
56,470
|
Exploration
|
149,487
|
-
|
149,487
|
334,276
|
-
|
334,276
|
Legal and accounting
|
554,446
|
124,750
|
429,696
|
1,152,425
|
427,689
|
724,736
|
|
2,137,841
|
1,601,397
|
536,444
|
8,064,947
|
7,358,809
|
706,138
|
Arbitration
|
349,410
|
2,649,335
|
(2,299,925)
|
3,216,273
|
5,795,180
|
(2,578,907)
|
Equipment holding costs
|
198,025
|
330,497
|
(132,472)
|
758,436
|
1,269,058
|
(510,622)
|
Interest expense
|
969,680
|
1,694,917
|
(725,237)
|
4,259,002
|
5,013,734
|
(754,732)
|
Total Expenses for the Period
|
$ 3,654,956
|
$ 6,276,146
|
$ (2,621,190)
|
$ 16,298,658
|
$ 19,436,781
|
$ (3,138,123)
|
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
The Company is not a party to any off-balance sheet arrangements that have, or are reasonably likely to have, a current or future material effect on the Company’s financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues, expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.
Transactions with Related Parties
MGC Ventures Inc. (“MGC Ventures”)
. The Chief Executive Officer, President, Vice President-Finance and Vice President-Administration of the Company are also directors and/or officers and shareholders of MGC Ventures. On December 15, 2010, the non-affiliated shareholders of MGC Ventures approved the redemption of all of the shares of MGC Ventures common stock held by Gold Reserve. Gold Reserve received $0.9 million and recorded a gain on sale of subsidiary of $0.2 million. Prior to the redemption, Gold Reserve owned 12,062,953 common shares of MGC Ventures which represented 44% of its outstanding shares. MGC Ventures owned 258,083 common shares of the Company at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011. During the last three years, the Company sublet a portion of its office space to MGC Ventures for $6,000 per year.
Great Basin Energies Inc. (“Great Basin”)
. The Chief Executive Officer, President, Vice President-Finance and Vice President-Administration of the Company are also directors and/or officers and shareholders of Great Basin. On December 15, 2010, the non-affiliated shareholders of Great Basin approved the redemption of all of the shares of Great Basin common stock held by Gold Reserve. Gold Reserve received $1.2 million and recorded a gain on sale of subsidiary of $0.3 million. Prior to the redemption, Gold Reserve owned 15,661,595 common shares of Great Basin which represented 45% of its outstanding shares. Great Basin owned 491,192 common shares of the Company at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011. During the last three years, the Company sublet a portion of its office space to Great Basin for $6,000 per year.
Exhibit 99.3 Chief Executive
Officer’s Certification of Interim Filings
Form 52-109F2
Certification
of interim filings – full certificate
I,
Rockne J. Timm, Chief Executive Officer of Gold Reserve Inc., certify the
following:
-
I
have reviewed the interim financial report and interim MD&A (together,
the “interim filings”) of Gold Reserve Inc. (the “issuer”) for the interim
period ended September 30, 2012.
-
Based
on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the interim
filings do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to
state a material fact required to be stated or that is necessary to make a
statement not misleading in light of the circumstances under which it was
made, with respect to the period covered by the interim filings.
-
Based
on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the interim
financial report together with the other financial information included in
the interim filings fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, financial performance and cash flows of the issuer, as of the
date of and for the periods presented in the interim filings.
-
The
issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (DC&P) and internal
control over financial reporting (ICFR), as those terms are defined in
National Instrument 52-109
Certification of Disclosure in Issuers’
Annual and Interim Filings,
for the issuer.
-
Subject
to the limitations, if any, described in paragraphs 5.2 and 5.3, the
issuer’s other certifying officer and I have, as at the end of the period
covered by the interim filings
(a) designed
DC&P, or caused it to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance that
(i)
material information relating to
the issuer is made known to us by others, particularly during the period in
which the interim filings are being prepared; and
(ii)
information required to be
disclosed by the issuer in its annual filings, interim filings or other reports
filed or submitted by it under securities legislation is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time periods specified in securities
legislation; and
(b)
designed ICFR, or caused it to be
designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements
for external purposes in accordance with the issuer’s GAAP.
5.1
The control framework the issuer’s other certifying
officer and I used to design the issuer’s ICFR is the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) framework.
5.2
N/A
5.3
N/A
-
The issuer has disclosed in
its interim MD&A any change in the issuer’s ICFR that occurred during
the period beginning on January 1, 2012 and ended on September 30, 2012
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the issuer’s ICFR.
Date:
November 29, 2012
/s/Rockne J. Timm
Rockne J. Timm
Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 99.4 Chief
Financial Officer’s Certification of Interim Filings
Form 52-109F2
Certification
of interim filings – full certificate
I, Robert A. McGuinness, Chief Financial Officer of
Gold Reserve Inc., certify the following:
-
I
have reviewed the interim financial report and interim MD&A (together,
the “interim filings”) of Gold Reserve Inc. (the “issuer”) for the interim
period ended September 30, 2012.
-
Based
on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the interim
filings do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to
state a material fact required to be stated or that is necessary to make a
statement not misleading in light of the circumstances under which it was
made, with respect to the period covered by the interim filings.
-
Based
on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the interim
financial report together with the other financial information included in
the interim filings fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, financial performance and cash flows of the issuer, as of the
date of and for the periods presented in the interim filings.
-
The
issuer’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (DC&P) and internal
control over financial reporting (ICFR), as those terms are defined in
National Instrument 52-109
Certification of Disclosure in Issuers’
Annual and Interim Filings,
for the issuer.
-
Subject
to the limitations, if any, described in paragraphs 5.2 and 5.3, the
issuer’s other certifying officer and I have, as at the end of the period
covered by the interim filings
(a) designed
DC&P, or caused it to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance that
(iii)
material information relating to
the issuer is made known to us by others, particularly during the period in
which the interim filings are being prepared; and
(iv)
information required to be
disclosed by the issuer in its annual filings, interim filings or other reports
filed or submitted by it under securities legislation is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time periods specified in securities
legislation; and
(c)
designed ICFR, or caused it to be
designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements
for external purposes in accordance with the issuer’s GAAP.
5.1
The control framework the issuer’s other certifying
officer and I used to design the issuer’s ICFR is the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) framework.
5.2
N/A
5.3
N/A
-
The issuer has disclosed in
its interim MD&A any change in the issuer’s ICFR that occurred during
the period beginning on January 1, 2012 and ended on September 30, 2012
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the issuer’s ICFR.
Date:
November 29, 2012
/s/Robert
A. McGuinness
Robert A. McGuinness
Chief Financial Officer
Gold Reserve (AMEX:GRZ)
Historical Stock Chart
From Apr 2024 to May 2024
Gold Reserve (AMEX:GRZ)
Historical Stock Chart
From May 2023 to May 2024