- Quarterly Report (10-Q)

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF

THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2011

Commission File Number 0-18460

COMMUNITY CAPITAL CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

South Carolina	57-0866395
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

1402C Highway 72 West

Greenwood, SC 29649

(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)

(864) 941-8200

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No __

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes X No ___

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large Accelerated Filer ( ) Accelerated Filer ( ) Non-Accelerated Filer ( ) Smaller Reporting Company (X)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). YES__ NO X

APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock as of the latest practicable date 10,060,777 shares of common stock, $1.00 par value per share, as of July 31, 2011

CO MMUNITY CAPITAL CORPORATION

Index


PART I. - FINANCIAL INFORMATION		Page No.

Item 1.	Financial Statements (Unaudited)

	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets - June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010	3

	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations - Six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 and three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010	4

	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity and Comprehensive Income - Six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010	5

	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows - Six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010	6

	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	7-24

Item 2.	Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	25-50

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk	50

Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	50-51

PART II. - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	51

Item 1A.	Risk Factors	51

Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	52

Item 3.	Defaults Under Senior Securities	52

Item 4.	(Removed and Reserved)	52

Item 5.	Other Information	52

Item 6.	Exhibits	52

-2-

CO MMUNITY CAPITAL CORPORATION

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

PART I. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Item 1. Financial Statements

	June 30, 2011			December 31, 2010
(Dollars in thousands, except share data)	(Unaudited)
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents:
Cash and due from banks	$	10,389		$	9,315
Interest-bearing deposit accounts		65,840			27,860
Total cash and cash equivalents		76,229			37,175
Investment securities:
Securities available-for-sale		55,257			74,025
Nonmarketable equity securities		8,773			9,626
Total investment securities		64,030			83,651
Loans held for sale		2,163			5,516
Loans receivable		447,637			479,393
Less allowance for loan losses		(14,598	)		(17,165	)
Loans, net		433,039			462,228
Other real estate owned		13,146			13,496
Premises and equipment, net		14,980			15,342
Interest receivable		1,803			2,289
Prepaid expenses		2,390			3,349
Intangible assets		1,076			1,259
Cash surrender value of life insurance		17,742			17,397
Deferred tax asset		8,139			8,992
Income tax receivable		374			3,158
Other assets		1,941			2,082
Total assets	$	637,052		$	655,934

Liabilities:
Deposits:
Noninterest-bearing	$	107,130		$	103,080
Interest-bearing		367,486			392,102
Total deposits		474,616			495,182
Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank		95,400			95,400
Accrued interest payable		527			708
Junior subordinated debentures		10,310			10,310
Other liabilities		6,873			6,930
Total liabilities		587,726			608,530

Shareholders’ equity:
Common stock, $1.00 par value; 20,000,000 shares authorized; 10,721,350 shares issued at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010		10,721			10,721
Capital surplus		64,160			64,679
Accumulated other comprehensive income		476			(460	)
Retained deficit		(16,383	)		(17,189	)
Nonvested restricted stock		(58	)		(116	)
Treasury stock, at cost (660,573 and 704,702 shares in 2011 and 2010, respectively)		(9,590	)		(10,231	)

Total shareholders’ equity		49,326			47,404
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	637,052		$	655,934

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statments

-3-

CO MMUNITY CAPITAL CORPORATION

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations

(Unaudited)

(Dollars in thousands, except for per share data amounts)	Six Months Ended June 30,				Three Months Ended June 30,
	2011		2010		2011			2010
Interest income:
Loans, including fees	$	12,273	$	14,843	$	5,868		$	7,343
Investment securities:
Taxable		696		1,017		331			481
Tax-exempt		206		323		92			153
Nonmarketable equity securities		81		66		40			35
Other interest income		53		60		37			40
Total		13,309		16,309		6,368			8,052

Interest expense:
Deposits		1,837		3,904		834			1,974
Federal Home Loan Bank advances		1,641		1,648		825			825
Other interest expense		365		365		171			186
Total		3,843		5,917		1,830			2,985

Net interest income		9,466		10,392		4,538			5,067
Provision for loan losses		2,350		3,600		1,750			2,000
Net interest income after provision for loan losses		7,116		6,792		2,788			3,067

Other operating income:
Service charges on deposit accounts		753		973		378			492
Gains on sales of loans held for sale		779		708		353			410
Fees from brokerage services		140		144		64			80
Income from fiduciary activities		1,078		921		548			449
Gain on sales of securities available-for-sale		375		1,265		152			582
Other operating income		970		1,793		485			439
Total		4,095		5,804		1,980			2,452

Other operating expenses:
Salaries and employee benefits		5,009		4,919		2,438			2,480
Net occupancy		671		654		318			321
Amortization of intangible assets		183		202		86			100
Furniture and equipment		290		380		140			188
FDIC banking assessments		883		725		404			379
Net cost of operation of other real estate owned		752		863		593			568
Other operating expenses		2,477		2,193		1,288			1,109
Total		10,265		9,936		5,267			5,145

Income (loss) before income taxes		946		2,660		(499	)		374
Income tax provision (benefit)		140		707		(284	)		21

Net income (loss)	$	806	$	1,953	$	(215	)	$	353

Basic net income (loss) per share	$	0.08	$	0.20	$	(0.02	)	$	0.04
Diluted net income (loss) per share	$	0.08	$	0.20	$	(0.02	)	$	0.04

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

-4-

CO MMUNITY CAPITAL CORPORATION

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity and Comprehensive Income

For the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010

(Unaudited)

	Common Stock				Nonvested Restricted Stock			Capital Surplus			Retained Earnings (loss)			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (loss)			Treasury Stock			Total
(Dollars in thousands, except for share data)
	Shares		Amount
Balance, December 31, 2009		10,721,450	$	10,721	$	(364	)	$	66,473		$	(11,705	)	$	909		$	(12,277	)	$	53,757

Net income												1,953									1,953

Other comprehensive loss, net of tax benefit															(231	)					(231	)

Comprehensive Income																					1,722

Redemptions of treasury shares (76,870 shares)									(880	)								1,116			236

Capitalized expenses associated with rights offering									(54	)											(54	)

Amortization of deferred compensation on restricted stock						130															130

Balance, June 30, 2010		10,721,450	$	10,721	$	(234	)	$	65,539		$	(9,752	)	$	678		$	(11,161	)	$	55,791

Balance, December 31, 2010		10,721,350	$	10,721	$	(116	)	$	64,679		$	(17,189	)	$	(460	)	$	(10,231	)	$	47,404

Net income												806									806

Other comprehensive income, net of tax effects															936						936

Comprehensive Income																					1,742

Redemptions of treasury shares (44,129 shares)									(519	)								641			122

Amortization of deferred compensation on restricted stock						58															58

Balance, June 30, 2011		10,721,350	$	10,721	$	(58	)	$	64,160		$	(16,383	)	$	476		$	(9,590	)	$	49,326

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

-5-

CO MMUNITY CAPITAL CORPORATION

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Unaudited)

(Dollars in thousands)	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2011			2010
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	806		$	1,953
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation		380			478
Provision for loan losses		2,350			3,600
Deferred income tax benefit		853			697
Amortization of intangible assets		183			202
Amortization less accretion on investments		374			7
Amortization of deferred loan costs and fees, net		428			445
Amortization of deferred compensation on restricted stock		58			130
Write downs of other real estate owned		487			398
Net gain on sales of securities available-for-sale		(375	)		(1,265	)
Net loss on sale of other real estate owned		103			78
Disbursements of loans held for sale		(18,964	)		(18,875	)
Proceeds from sales of loans held for sale		22,317			15,396
Decrease in income tax receivable		2,784			9,634
Decrease in interest receivable		486			546
Decrease in interest payable		(181	)		(403	)
Decrease (increase) in other assets		273			(2,250	)
Increase (decrease) in other liabilities		(57	)		679
Net cash provided by operating activities		12,305			11,450

Cash flows from investing activities:
Net decrease in loans to customers		24,974			29,364
Purchases of securities available-for-sale		(1,709	)		(56,707	)
Proceeds from maturities and sales of securities available-for-sale		21,896			70,297
Purchases of nonmarketable equity securities		(44	)		(216	)
Proceeds from sales of nonmarketable equity securities		897			-
Proceeds from sales of other real estate owned		1,197			4,149
Purchases of premises and equipment		(18	)		(65	)
Net cash provided by investing activities		47,193			46,822

Cash flows from financing activities:
Net increase (decrease) in deposit accounts		(20,566	)		5,293
Advances of Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings		-			20,000
Repayments of Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings		-			(20,000	)
Sales of treasury stock		122			236
Capitalized expenses associated with rights offering		-			(54	)
Net cash provided (used) by financing activities		(20,444	)		5,475

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents		39,054			63,747

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		37,175			49,131

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	76,229		$	112,878

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

-6-

CO MMUNITY CAPITAL CORPORATION

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Note 1 - Basis of Presentation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the requirements for interim financial statements and, accordingly, they are condensed and omit disclosures that would substantially duplicate those contained in the most recent annual report to shareholders. The financial statements as of June 30, 2011 and for the interim periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 are unaudited and include all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation. The financial information as of December 31, 2010 has been derived from the audited financial statements as of that date. For further information, refer to the financial statements and the notes included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. In preparing the financial statements, the Company has evaluated events and transactions occurring subsequent to the financial statement date through the date the financial statements were available to be issued for potential recognition or disclosure.

Note 2 – Pending Merger

On March 30, 2011, the Company and Park Sterling Corporation (“Park Sterling”) entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) pursuant to which the Company will be merged with and into Park Sterling. Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, each outstanding share of the Company’s common stock will be converted into the right to receive either (i) $3.30 in cash or (ii) 0.6667 of a share of Park Sterling’s common stock. The election of consideration by the holders of the Company’s common stock is subject to the limitation that no more than 40% of the shares of the Company’s common stock be exchanged for cash.

Park Sterling and the Company have received approvals for the merger by the federal and state banking regulatory authorities. The merger is expected to close in the late third or early fourth quarter of 2011, and is subject to approval by the Company’s shareholders and the satisfaction of the closing conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement.

Note 3 - Supplemental Cash Flow Information

(Dollars in thousands)	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2011		2010
Cash paid during the period for:
Income taxes	$	160	$	1,518
Interest		4,024		6,128

Noncash investing and financing activities:
Foreclosures on loans	$	1,437	$	11,300

Note 4 - Shareholders' Equity

During the first six months of 2011, the Company sold 44,129 shares of treasury stock for total proceeds of $122,000. From April 2009 through March 2011, the Company’s 401(k) plan and Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan purchased shares from treasury versus the open market to generate additional capital for the Company. The purchase prices for these transactions are valued based on the end of day closing market price of the security.

-7-

CO MMUNITY CAPITAL CORPORATION

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Note 5 – Earnings (Losses) Per Share

A reconciliation of the numerators and denominators used to calculate basic and diluted earnings (losses) per share are as follows:

(Dollars in thousands, except per share)	Six Months Ended June 30, 2011
	Income (Numerator)		Shares (Denominator)		Per Share Amount
Basic earnings (losses) per share
Income (losses) available to common shareholders	$	806		10,032,089	$	0.08
Effect of dilutive securities
Unvested restricted stock		-		16,440
Diluted earnings (losses) per share
Income (losses) available to common shareholders plus assumed conversions	$	806		10,048,529	$	0.08

(Dollars in thousands, except per share)	Six Months Ended June 30, 2010
	Income (Numerator)		Shares (Denominator)		Per Share Amount
Basic earnings (losses) per share
Income (losses) available to common shareholders	$	1,953		9,875,871	$	0.20
Effect of dilutive securities
Unvested restricted stock		-		39,705
Diluted earnings (losses) per share
Income (losses) available to common shareholders plus assumed conversions	$	1,953		9,915,576	$	0.20

(Dollars in thousands, except per share)	Three Months Ended June 30, 2011
	Income (Numerator)			Shares (Denominator)		Per Share Amount
Basic earnings (losses) per share
Income (losses) available to common shareholders	$	(215	)		10,046,412	$	(0.02	)
Effect of dilutive securities
Unvested restricted stock		-			-
Diluted earnings (losses) per share
Income (losses) available to common shareholders plus assumed conversions	$	(215	)		10,046,412	$	(0.02	)

-8-

CO MMUNITY CAPITAL CORPORATION

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Note 5 - Earnings (Losses) Per Share - continued

(Dollars in thousands, except per share)	Three Months Ended June 30, 2010
	Income (Numerator)		Shares (Denominator)		Per Share Amount
Basic earnings (losses) per share
Income (losses) available to common shareholders	$	353		9,899,454	$	0.04
Effect of dilutive securities
Unvested restricted stock		-		36,582
Diluted earnings (losses) per share
Income (losses) available to common shareholders plus assumed conversions	$	353		9,936,036	$	0.04

Due to the net loss available to common shareholders for the three month period ended June 30, 2011, the unvested restricted stock was deemed to be antidilutive.

Note 6 - Comprehensive Income (Loss)

The following tables set forth the amounts of other comprehensive income (losses) included in equity along with the related tax effects:

	Six Months Ended June 30, 2011
(Dollars in thousands)	Pre-tax Amount		(Expense) Benefit			Net-of-tax Amount
Unrealized gains on securities:
Unrealized holding gains arising during the period	$	1,043	$	(355	)	$	688
Less: reclassification adjustment for gains realized in net income		375		(127	)		248
Net unrealized gains on securities		1,418		(482	)		936

Other comprehensive income	$	1,418	$	(482	)	$	936

	Six Months Ended June 30, 2010
(Dollars in thousands)	Pre-tax Amount			(Expense) Benefit			Net-of-tax Amount
Unrealized losses on securities:
Unrealized holding losses arising during the period	$	(1,616	)	$	550		$	(1,066	)
Less: reclassification adjustment for gains realized in net income		1,265			(430	)		835
Net unrealized losses on securities		(351	)		120			(231	)

Other comprehensive loss	$	(351	)	$	120		$	(231	)

-9-

CO MMUNITY CAPITAL CORPORATION

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Note 6 - Comprehensive Income (Loss) - continued

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2011
(Dollars in thousands)	Pre-tax Amount		(Expense) Benefit			Net-of-tax Amount
Unrealized gains on securities:
Unrealized holding gains arising during the period	$	820	$	(279	)	$	541
Less: reclassification adjustment for gains realized in net income		151		(51	)		100
Net unrealized gains on securities		971		(330	)		641

Other comprehensive income	$	971	$	(330	)	$	641

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2010
(Dollars in thousands)	Pre-tax Amount			(Expense) Benefit			Net-of-tax Amount
Unrealized gains on securities:
Unrealized holding gains arising during the period	$	(228	)	$	78		$	(150	)
Less: reclassification adjustment for losses realized in net income		582			(198	)		384
Net unrealized gains on securities		354			(120	)		234

Other comprehensive income	$	354		$	(120	)	$	234

Note 7 – Stock Based Compensation

The 2004 Equity Incentive Plan provides for the granting of restricted stock, statutory incentive stock options within the meaning of Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code as well as nonstatutory stock options, or stock appreciation rights of up to 258,750 shares of our common stock, to officers, employees, and directors. Awards may be granted for a term of up to ten years from the effective date of grant. Under this plan, our Board of Directors has sole discretion as to the exercise date of any awards granted. The per-share exercise price of incentive stock options may not be less than the fair value of a share of common stock on the date the option is granted. The per-share exercise price of nonqualified stock options may not be less than 50% of the fair value of a share on the effective date of grant. Any options that expire unexercised or are canceled become available for reissuance. No awards may be made on or after May 19, 2014.

There have been no shares issued during the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2011. Compensation costs associated with prior issuances of restricted stock was $58,000 and $130,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and $26,000 and $59,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. At June 30, 2011, we had 97,198 stock awards available for grant under the 2004 Equity Incentive Plan.

-10-

CO MMUNITY CAPITAL CORPORATION

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Note 8 – Investment Securities

Securities available-for-sale at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 consisted of the following:

	Amortized		Gross Unrealized				Estimated
(Dollars in thousands)	Cost		Gains		Losses		Fair Value
June 30, 2011
Obligations of state and local governments	$	8,485	$	91	$	53	$	8,523
Mortgage-backed securities		46,051		683		-		46,734
Total	$	54,536	$	774	$	53	$	55,257


December 31, 2010
Obligations of state and local governments	$	10,853	$	133	$	190	$	10,796
Mortgage-backed securities		63,869		157		797		63,229
Total	$	74,722	$	290	$	987	$	74,025

The following table shows gross unrealized losses and fair value, aggregated by investment category, and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, at June 30, 2011.

Securities Available-for-Sale

	Less than				Twelve months
	twelve months				or more				Total
			Unrealized				Unrealized				Unrealized
(Dollars in thousands)	Fair value		losses		Fair value		losses		Fair value		losses

Obligations of state and local governments	$	3,223	$	53	$	-	$	-	$	3,223	$	53

Mortgage-backed securities		-		-		-		-		-		-
Total	$	3,223	$	53	$	-			$		$	53

Securities Available-for-Sale

	Less than				Twelve months
	twelve months				or more				Total
			Unrealized				Unrealized				Unrealized
(Dollars in thousands)	Fair value		losses		Fair value		losses		Fair value		losses

Obligations of state and local governments	$	4,683	$	190	$	-	$	-	$	4,683	$	190

Mortgage-backed securities		47,998		797		-		-		47,998		797
Total	$	$ 52,681	$	987	$	-		-	$	52,681	$	987

Securities classified as available-for-sale are recorded at fair market value. The Company does not intend to sell these securities and it is more likely than not that the Company will not be required to sell the securities before recovery of its amortized cost. The Company believes, based on industry analyst reports and credit ratings, that the deterioration in value is attributable to changes in market rates and is not in the credit quality of the issuer and therefore, these losses are not considered other-than-temporary. The Company did not have any securities in a continuous loss position for twelve months or more.

-11-

CO MMUNITY CAPITAL CORPORATION

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Note 8 – Investment Securities - continued

The Company reviews its investment portfolio at least quarterly and more frequently when economic conditions warrant, assessing whether there is any indication of other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”). Factors considered in the review include estimated cash flows, length of time and extent to which market value has been less than cost, the financial condition and near term prospects of the issuer, and the Company's intent and ability to retain the security to allow for an anticipated recovery in market value.

If the review determines that there is OTTI, then an impairment loss is recognized in earnings equal to the entire difference between the investment’s cost and its fair value at the balance sheet date of the reporting period for which the assessment is made, or may recognize a portion in other comprehensive income. The fair value of investments on which OTTI is recognized then becomes the new cost basis of the investment.

The following table summarizes the maturities of securities available-for-sale as of June 30, 2011, based on the contractual maturities. Actual maturities may differ from the contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without penalty. Mortgage-backed securities are presented as a separate line item since paydowns are expected before the contractual maturity dates.

	Securities Available-For-Sale
	Amortized		Estimated
(Dollars in thousands)	Cost		Fair Value
Due in one year or less	$	325	$	327
Due after one year but within five years		1,468		1,501
Due after five years but within ten years		1,651		1,657
Due after ten years		5,041		5,038
		8,485		8,523
Mortgage-backed securities		46,051		46,734
Total	$	54,536	$	55,257

Proceeds from maturities and sales of securities available-for-sale during the six months ended June 30, 2011 were $21,896,000, which resulted in gross realized gains of $375,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2011.

At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, securities having amortized costs of approximately $44,024,000 and $32,681,000, respectively, were pledged as collateral for short-term borrowings, to secure public and trust deposits, and for other purposes as required and permitted by law.

The Company has nonmarketable equity securities consisting of investments in several financial institutions. These investments totaled $8,773,000 at June 30, 2011 and $9,626,000 at December 31, 2010. During the first six months of 2011, sales of nonmarketable equity securities totaled $897,000, and purchases of nonmarketable equity securities totaled $44,000. There were no losses recorded related to OTTI during the first six months of 2011.

Note 9- Loans Receivable

Loans receivable are summarized as follows:

(Dollars in thousands)	June 30, 2011		December 31, 2010
Commercial	$	44,336	$	51,112
Commercial real estate – construction		68,095		79,762
Commercial real estate – other		162,827		162,367
Residential		127,449		137,618
Home equity		39,427		42,167
Consumer		5,503		6,367
Total gross loans	$	447,637	$	479,393

-12-

CO MMUNITY CAPITAL CORPORATION

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Note 9- Loans Receivable - continued

At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company had sold participations in loans aggregating $3,646,000 and $3,665,000, respectively, to other financial institutions on a nonrecourse basis. Collections on loan participations and remittances to participating institutions conform to customary banking practices.

At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company had pledged approximately $98,665,000 and $101,870,000, respectively, of loans on residential and commercial real estate as collateral for advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank.

An analysis of the allowance for loan losses for the periods ended June 30, 2011, December 31, 2010, and June 30, 2010 is as follows:

(Dollars in thousands)	June 30, 2011			December 31, 2010			June 30, 2010
Balance, beginning of year	$	17,165		$	14,160		$	14,160
Provision charged to operations		2,350			18,350			3,600
Recoveries on loans previously charged-off		57			422			187
Loans charged-off		(4,974	)		(15,767	)		(4,770	)
Balance, end of year	$	14,598		$	17,165		$	13,177

An analysis of the allowance for loan losses for the six month period ended June 30, 2011 is as follows:

(Dollars in thousands)
Allowance for credit losses:	Commercial				Commercial Real Estate Construction				Commercial Real Estate Other				Consumer				Residential				HELOC				Unallocated				Total
Beginning balance		$	438			$	7,041			$	1,317			$	28			$	4,102			$	530			$	3,709			$	17,165
Chargeoffs			(392	)			(2,976	)			(341	)			(9	)			(1,018	)			(238	)			-				(4,974	)
Recoveries			11				1				-				7				34				4				-				57
Provisions			591				3,283				202				(5	)			(966	)			100				(855	)			2,350
Ending balance		$	648			$	7,349			$	1,178			$	21			$	2,152			$	396			$	2,854			$	14,598

Ending balance: Individually evaluated for impairment		$	7			$	-			$	22			$	-			$	-			$	-			$	-			$	29
Ending balance: Collectively evaluated for impairment		$	641			$	7,349			$	1,156			$	21			$	2,152			$	396			$	2,854			$	14,569

Loans receivable:
Ending balance		$	44,336			$	68,095			$	162,827			$	5,503			$	127,449			$	39,427			$	-			$	447,637
Ending balance: Individually evaluated for impairment		$	262			$	12,083			$	8,681			$	-			$	11,981			$	561			$	-			$	33,568
Ending balance: Collectively evaluated for impairment		$	44,074			$	56,012			$	154,146			$	5,503			$	115,468			$	38,866			$	-			$	414,069

-13-

CO MMUNITY CAPITAL CORPORATION

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Note 9- Loans Receivable - continued

An analysis of the allowance for loan losses for the year ended December 31, 2010 is as follows:

(Dollars in thousands)

Allowance for credit losses:	Commercial			Commercial Real Estate Construction			Commercial Real Estate Other			Consumer			Residential			HELOC			Unallocated			Total
Beginning balance	$	248		$	4,375		$	98		$	59		$	1,718		$	386		$	7,276		$	14,160
Chargeoffs		(493	)		(8,902	)		(1,309	)		(36	)		(4,481	)		(546	)		-			(15,767	)
Recoveries		1			104			61			25			226			5			-			422
Provisions		682			11,464			2,467			(20	)		6,639			685			(3,567	)		18,350
Ending balance	$	438		$	7,041		$	1,317		$	28		$	4,102		$	530		$	3,709		$	17,165

Ending balance: Individually evaluated for impairment	$	7		$	229		$	142		$	-		$	336		$	-		$	-		$	714
Ending balance: Collectively evaluated for impairment	$	431		$	6,812		$	1,175		$	28		$	3,766		$	530		$	3,709		$	16,451

Loans receivable:
Ending balance	$	51,112		$	79,762		$	162,367		$	6,367		$	137,618		$	42,167		$	-		$	479,393
Ending balance: Individually evaluated for impairment	$	690		$	17,430		$	8,993		$	-		$	12,218		$	54		$	-		$	39,385
Ending balance: Collectively evaluated for impairment	$	50,422		$	62,332		$	153,374		$	6,367		$	125,400		$	42,113		$	-		$	440,008

Credit Quality Indicators

The Company segments its commercial loans into risk categories based on relevant information about the ability of the borrowers and guarantors (if any) to service their debt. Relevant items include but are not limited to current financial information, historical payment and loan performance experience, credit documentation, public information and current economic trends. The Company analyzes loans individually by classifying the loans as to credit risk. Loans classified as substandard or special mention are reviewed quarterly by the Company for further signs of improvement or deterioration and to determine if the loan remains properly classified and what impairment may be required, if any. Other loans rated Pass, where the total credit exposure to one borrower is $500,000 or more, are reviewed at least annually to validate the assigned loan grade. In addition, any consumer or commercial unsecured loan or lines of $5,000 or more are specifically reviewed annually to validate the loan grade, if any. Further, during the renewal process of any loan, as well as if a loan becomes past due, or for any Home Equity Lines that have a loan-to-value greater than 80% and either are past due more than 30 days or are funded at 90% or more, the Company will evaluate the loan grade.

Consumer loans are not assigned a risk rating at loan origination. If a consumer loan becomes past due and shows signs of deterioration in the creditworthiness of the borrower, a rating classification will then be assigned for monitoring purposes and the loan will be monitored quarterly with the commercial loans indicated above.

Loans excluded from the scope of the annual review process are generally classified as pass credits until: (a) they become past due; (b) management becomes aware of deterioration in the credit worthiness of the borrower; or (c) the customer contacts the Company for a modified repayment plan. In these circumstances, the loan is specifically evaluated for potential classification as to special mention, substandard, doubtful or loss.

-14-

CO MMUNITY CAPITAL CORPORATION

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Note 9- Loans Receivable – continued

The Company utilizes an asset risk classification system in compliance with guidelines established by the Federal Reserve as part of its efforts to improve commercial asset quality. “Special Mention” loans are defined as loans that in management’s opinion are subject to potential future ratings downgrades, where market conditions may unfavorably affect the borrower in the future or where there are declining trends in the borrower's operations or where market conditions may unfavorably affect the borrower in the future. “Substandard” assets have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt and that the Company may experience a loss if the weakness(es) are not corrected. Assets that are rated “Doubtful” have the same characteristics of a substandard asset with an additional weakness that make collection or liquidation of the asset highly questionable, and there is a high probability of loss based on currently existing facts, conditions or values.

The following table summarizes the credit risk profile of the Company’s commercial loan portfolio for the periods ended June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 based on the Company’s internally assigned grade:

Commercial Credit Exposure

(Dollars in thousands)

					Commercial Real Estate				Commercial Real Estate
	Commercial				Construction				Other
	June 30, 2011		December 31, 2010		June 30, 2011		December 31, 2010		June 30, 2011		December 31, 2010
Grade:
Pass	$	40,016	$	46,959	$	44,528	$	57,003	$	144,812	$	142,598
Special mention		1,788		2,093		4,600		843		2,767		8,676
Substandard		2,532		2,060		17,598		20,250		15,248		11,093
Doubtful		-		-		1,369		1,666		-		-
Total	$	44,336	$	51,112	$	68,095	$	79,762	$	162,827	$	162,367

Consumer Credit Exposure

(Dollars in thousands)

The following table summarizes the credit risk profile of the Company’s residential loan portfolio for the periods ended June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 based on the Company’s internally assigned grade. In determining the classification of a subprime loan, the company utilizes the definition supplied by the Federal Home Loan Bank.

	Residential Prime				Residential Subprime
Grade:	June 30, 2011		December 31, 2010		June 30, 2011		December 31, 2010
Pass	$	99,523	$	108,000	$	3,034	$	2,731
Special mention		4,422		5,834		834		672
Substandard		18,290		19,110		1,346		1,271
Doubtful		-		-		-		-
Total	$	122,235	$	132,944	$	5,214	$	4,674

-15-

CO MMUNITY CAPITAL CORPORATION

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Note 9- Loans Receivable – continued

The following table summarizes the credit risk profile of the Company’s consumer loan portfolio for the periods ended June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 based on payment activity:

(Dollars in thousands)

	Consumer
	Overdraft Protection				HELOC				Consumer Other
	June 30, 2011		December 31, 2010		June 30, 2011			December 31, 2010	June 30, 2011			December 31, 2010
Performing	$	1,164	$	1,228	$	38,866	$	42,113	$	4,339	$	5,139
Nonperforming		-		-		561		54		-		-
Total	$	1,164	$	1,228	$	39,427	$	42,167	$	4,339	$	5,139

Impaired Loans

The following is a summary of information relating to impaired loans at June 30, 2011:

(Dollars in thousands)			Unpaid				Average		Interest
	Recorded		Principal		Related		Recorded		Income
	Investment		Balance		Allowance		Investment		Recognized
With no related allowance recorded:
Commercial	$	112	$	136	$	-	$	118	$	1
Commercial real estate – construction		12,083		24,460		-		13,143		14
Commercial real estate – other		8,189		8,769		-		8,385		98
Residential – prime		10,844		13,433		-		11,412		47
Residential – subprime		1,137		1,297		-		1,511		15
HELOC		561		722		-		697		6

With an allowance recorded:
Commercial		150		150		7		150		5
Commercial real estate – construction		-		-		-		-		-
Commercial real estate – other		492		492		22		493		15
Residential – prime		-		-		-		-		-

Total:
Commercial	$	262	$	286	$	7	$	268	$	6
Commercial real estate – construction		12,083		24,460		-		13,143		14
Commercial real estate – other		8,681		9,261		22		8,878		113
Residential – prime		10,844		13,433		-		11,412		47
Residential – subprime		1,137		1,297		-		1,511		15
HELOC		561		722		-		697		6
Totals	$	33,568	$	49,459	$	29	$	35,909	$	201

-16-

CO MMUNITY CAPITAL CORPORATION

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Note 9- Loans Receivable - continued

The following is a summary of information relating to impaired loans at December 31, 2010:

(Dollars in thousands)			Unpaid				Average		Interest
	Recorded		Principal		Related		Recorded		Income
	Investment		Balance		Allowance		Investment		Recognized
With no related allowance recorded:
Commercial	$	538	$	539	$	-	$	365	$	10
Commercial real estate – construction		12,908		22,552		-		19,163		398
Commercial real estate – other		7,393		7,885		-		7,892		356
Residential – prime		9,363		11,377		-		10,935		143
Residential – subprime		1,189		1,229		-		1,163		31
HELOC		54		71		-		71		1

With an allowance recorded:
Commercial		152		152		7		157		11
Commercial real estate – construction		4,522		4,743		229		4,689		2
Commercial real estate – other		1,600		1,601		142		1,615		96
Residential – prime		1,666		1,667		336		1,681		49

Total:
Commercial	$	690	$	691	$	7	$	522	$	21
Commercial real estate – construction		17,430		27,295		229		23,852		400
Commercial real estate – other		8,993		9,486		142		9,507		452
Residential – prime		9,363		11,377		-		10,935		143
Residential – subprime		2,855		2,896		336		2,844		80
HELOC		54		71		-		71		1
Totals	$	39,385	$	51,816	$	714	$	47,731	$	1,097

Modifications

The following is a summary of information relating to modifications and troubled debt restructurings (“TDRs”) at June 30, 2011:

			Pre-Modification		Post-Modification
	Number of		Outstanding Recorded		Outstanding Recorded
(Dollars in thousands)	Contracts		Investments		Investments
Troubled debt restructuring:
Commercial		1	$	149	$	149
Commercial real estate – construction		7		7,008		7,008
Commercial real estate – other		7		3,228		3,228
Residential – prime		8		6,387		6,387
Residential – subprime		3		442		442
Total		26	$	17,214	$	17,214

Troubled debt restructuring that subsequently defaulted	Number of Contracts	Recorded Investment
Commercial real estate – construction	3		$	2,199
Commercial real estate – other	2		$	1,218
Residential – prime	3		$	4,428

-17-

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Note 9- Loans Receivable - continued

The following is a summary of information relating to modifications and troubled debt restructurings at December 31, 2010:

		Pre-Modification		Post-Modification
	Number of	Outstanding Recorded		Outstanding Recorded
(Dollars in thousands)	Contracts	Investments		Investments
Troubled debt restructuring:
Commercial	1	$	152	$	152
Commercial real estate – construction	5		2,756		2,756
Commercial real estate – other	4		2,998		2,998
Residential – prime	8		7,237		7,237
Residential – subprime	2		790		790
Total	20	$	13,933	$	13,933

Troubled debt restructuring that subsequently defaulted	Number of Contracts	Recorded Investment
Commercial real estate – construction	3		$	2,199
Commercial real estate - other	2		$	1,426
Residential – prime	3		$	2,898

The following is a summary of information pertaining to TDRs:

(Dollars in thousands)	June 30, 2011		December 31, 2010
Nonperforming TDRs	$	15,879	$	10,122
Performing TDRs:
Commercial	$	149	$	152
Commercial real estate - construction		141		378
Residential		1,045		3,281
Total performing TDRs	$	1,335	$	3,811
Total TDRs	$	17,214	$	13,933

Analysis of Past Due Loans Receivable

The following is a summary of information relating to analysis of past due loans receivable at June 30, 2011:

													Recorded
(Dollars in thousands)					Greater						Total		Investment
	30 – 59 days		60 – 89 days		Than		Total				Loans		> 90 days and
	Past Due		Past Due		90 days		Past Due		Current		Receivable		Accruing
Commercial	$	300	$	41	$	112	$	453	$	43,883	$	44,336	$	-
Commercial RE - Construction		655		271		11,601		12,527		54,547		68,095		1,021
Commercial RE – Other		589		446		7,982		9,017		153,810		162,827		-
Residential – prime		719		370		9,782		10,871		111,264		122,235		100
Residential - subprime		48		-		680		728		4,486		5,214		-
HELOC		425		-		150		575		38,852		39,427		-
Consumer – OD Protection		-		-		-		-		1,164		1,164		-
Consumer – Other		32		26		-		58		4,281		4,339		-
Total	$	2,768	$	1,154	$	30,307	$	34,229	$	412,287	$	447,637	$	1,121

-18-

CO MMUNITY CAPITAL CORPORATION

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Note 9- Loans Receivable - continued

The following is a summary of information relating to analysis of past due loans receivable at December 31, 2010:

													Recorded
(Dollars in thousands)					Greater						Total		Investment
	30 – 59 days		60 – 89 days		Than		Total				Loans		> 90 days and
	Past Due		Past Due		90 days		Past Due		Current		Receivable		Accruing
Commercial	$	255	$	14	$	44	$	313	$	50,799	$	51,112	$	-
Commercial RE - Construction		76		-		14,615		14,691		65,071		79,762		-
Commercial RE – Other		223		233		2,198		2,654		159,053		162,367		660
Residential – prime		146		302		9,180		9,628		122,934		132,944		382
Residential - subprime		164		-		398		562		4,112		4,674		-
HELOC		-		113		54		167		42,000		42,167		-
Consumer – OD Protection		5		-		-		5		1,223		1,228		-
Consumer – Other		16		-		-		16		5,123		5,139		-
Total	$	885	$	662	$	26,489	$	28,036	$	450,315	$	479,393	$	1,042

Loans Receivable on Nonaccrual Status

The following is a summary of information relating to loans receivable on nonaccrual status for the periods ended June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010:

	June 30,		December 31,
(Dollars in thousands)	2011		2010
Commercial	$	112	$	44
Commercial RE - Construction		11,943		14,615
Commercial RE – Other		7,994		2,198
Residential – prime		10,360		8,553
Residential - subprime		976		1,025
HELOC		561		54
Total	$	31,946	$	26,489

In the normal course of business, the Company is a party to financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk. These financial instruments are commitments to extend credit, commitments under credit card arrangements and letters of credit and have elements of risk in excess of the amount recognized in the balance sheet. Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. A commitment involves, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the consolidated balance sheets. The Company’s exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the instrument is represented by the contractual notional amount of the instrument. Since certain commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. Letters of credit are conditional commitments issued to guarantee a customer’s performance to a third party and have essentially the same credit risk as other lending facilities. The Company uses the same credit policies in making commitments to extend credit as it does for on-balance-sheet instruments.

-19-

CO MMUNITY CAPITAL CORPORATION

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Note 10– Other Real Estate Owned

The Bank possessed $13,146,000 in other real estate owned at June 30, 2011. Transactions in other real estate owned for the periods ended June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 are summarized below:

	June 30,			December 31,
(Dollars in thousands)	2011			2010
Balance, beginning of period	$	13,496		$	7,165
Additions		1,437			16,460
Sales		(1,197	)		(8,938	)
Write downs		(590	)		(1,191	)
Balance, end of period	$	13,146		$	13,496

The following is a summary of information relating to analysis of other real estate owned at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010:

	June 30,		December 31,
(Dollars in thousands)	2011		2010
Construction, land development and other land	$	12,487	$	12,111
Commercial RE – Other		340		1,020
Residential		319		365
Total	$	13,146	$	13,496

Note 11 – Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The fair value of a financial instrument is the amount at which an asset or obligation could be exchanged in a current transaction between willing parties, other than in a forced or liquidation sale. Fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time based on relevant market information and information about the financial instruments. Because no market value exists for a significant portion of the financial instruments, fair value estimates are based on judgments regarding future expected loss experience, current economic conditions, risk characteristics of various financial instruments, and other factors.

The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of significant financial instruments:

Cash and Due from Banks and Interest-Bearing Deposit Accounts - The carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value.

Investment Securities - The fair values of securities held-to-maturity are based on quoted market prices or dealer quotes. For securities available-for-sale, fair value equals the carrying amount which is the quoted market price. If quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on quoted market prices of comparable securities.

Nonmarketable Equity Securities - Cost is a reasonable estimate of fair value for nonmarketable equity securities because no quoted market prices are available and the securities are not readily marketable. The carrying amount is adjusted for any permanent declines in value.

Cash Surrender Value of Life Insurance - The carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value.

Loans Receivable and Loans Held for Sale - For certain categories of loans, such as variable rate loans which are repriced frequently and have no significant change in credit risk and credit card receivables, fair values are based on the carrying amounts. The fair value of other types of loans is estimated by discounting the future cash flows using the current rates at which similar loans would be made to the borrowers with similar credit ratings and for the same remaining maturities.

Accrued Interest Receivable and Payable - The carrying value of these instruments is a reasonable estimate of fair value.

-20-

CO MMUNITY CAPITAL CORPORATION

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Note 11 – Fair Value Of Financial Instruments - continued

Deposits - The fair value of demand deposits, savings, and money market accounts is the amount payable on demand at the reporting date. The fair values of certificates of deposit are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies current interest rates to a schedule of aggregated expected maturities.

Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank - The carrying amounts of variable rate borrowings are reasonable estimates of fair value because they can be repriced frequently. The fair values of fixed rate borrowings are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies the Company’s current borrowing rate from the Federal Home Loan Bank.

Junior Subordinated Debentures – The fair value of fixed rate junior subordinated debentures are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies the Company’s current borrowing rate. The carrying amounts of variable rate borrowings are reasonable estimates of fair value because they can reprice frequently.

Off-Balance-Sheet Financial Instruments – Fair values of off-balance sheet, credit-related financial instruments are based on fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements and the counterparties’ credit standing.

Commitments to Extend Credit and Commercial Letters of Credit – Because commitments to expand credit and commercial letters of credit are made using variable rates, or are recently executed, the contract value is a reasonable estimate of fair value.

The carrying values and estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments are as follows:

	June 30, 2011				December 31, 2010
	Carrying		Estimated		Carrying		Estimated
(Dollars in thousands)	Amount		Fair Value		Amount		Fair Value

Financial Assets:
Cash and due from banks	$	10,389	$	10,389	$	9,315	$	9,315
Interest-bearing deposit accounts		65,840		65,840		27,860		27,860
Securities available-for-sale		55,257		55,257		74,025		74,025
Nonmarketable equity securities		8,773		8,773		9,626		9,626
Cash surrender value of life insurance		17,742		17,742		17,397		17,397
Loans and loans held for sale		449,800		450,190		484,909		483,885
Accrued interest receivable		1,803		1,803		2,289		2,289

Financial Liabilities:
Demand deposit, interest bearing
transaction, and savings accounts	$	347,542	$	347,542	$	341,994	$	341,994
Certificates of deposit and other time deposits		127,074		127,422		153,188		154,187
Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank		95,400		100,338		95,400		100,753
Junior subordinated debentures		10,310		10,310		10,310		10,422
Accrued interest payable		527		527		708		708


	Notional		Estimated		Notional		Estimated
	Amount		Fair Value		Amount		Fair Value
Off-Balance Sheet Financial Instruments:
Commitments to extend credit	$	49,204	$	-	$	49,961	$	-
Letters of credit		1,520		-		1,647		-

-21-

CO MMUNITY CAPITAL CORPORATION

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Note 11 – Fair Value Of Financial Instruments - continued

Accounting standards provide a framework for measuring and disclosing fair value which require disclosure about the fair value of assets and liabilities recognized on the balance sheet, whether the measurements are made on a recurring basis or on a nonrecurring basis. Fair value is defined as the exchange in price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Accounting standards also establish a fair value hierarchy, which requires an entity to maximize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value.

The Company utilizes fair value measurements to record fair value adjustments to certain assets and to determine fair value disclosures. The objective is to enable the reader of the financial statements to assess the inputs used to develop those measurements by establishing a hierarchy for ranking the quality and reliability of the information used to determine fair values.

Assets and liabilities carried at fair value are classified and disclosed in one of the following three categories:

Level 1	Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 1 assets and liabilities include debt and equity securities and derivative contracts that are traded in an active exchange market, as well as U.S. Treasuries, and money market funds.

Level 2	Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities. Level 2 assets and liabilities include debt securities with quoted prices that are traded less frequently than exchange-traded instruments, mortgage-backed securities, municipal bonds, corporate debt securities, and derivative contracts whose value is determined using a pricing model with inputs that are observable in the market or can be derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data. This category generally includes certain derivative contracts and impaired loans.

Level 3	Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. Level 3 assets and liabilities include financial instruments whose value is determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar techniques, as well as instruments for which the determination of fair value requires significant management judgment or estimation. For example, this category generally includes certain private equity investments, retained residual interests in securitizations, residential mortgage servicing rights, and highly-structured or long-term derivative contracts.

Following is a description of valuation methodologies used for assets and liabilities recorded at fair value.

Investment Securities Available-for-Sale – Investment securities available-for-sale are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Fair value measurement is based upon quoted prices, if available. If quoted prices are not available, fair values are measured using independent pricing models or other model-based valuation techniques such as the present value of cash flows, adjusted for the security’s rating, prepayment assumptions and other factors such as credit loss assumptions. Level 1 securities includes those traded on an active exchange such as the New York Stock Exchange, Treasury securities that are traded by dealers or brokers in active over-the-counter market and money market funds. Level 2 securities include mortgage backed securities issued by government sponsored entities, municipal bonds and corporate debt securities. Securities classified as Level 3 include asset-backed securities in less liquid markets.

Loans Held- for-Sale- The carrying amount of loans held for sale is a reasonable estimate of fair value.

-22-

CO MMUNITY CAPITAL CORPORATION

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Note 11 – Fair Value Of Financial Instruments - continued

Loans – The Company does not record loans at fair value on a recurring basis, however, from time to time, a loan is considered impaired and an allowance for loan loss is established. Loans for which it is probable that payment of interest and principal will not be made in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan are considered impaired. Once a loan is identified as individually impaired, management measures impairment. The fair value of impaired loans is estimated using one of several methods, including the collateral value, market value of similar debt, enterprise value, liquidation value and discounted cash flows. Those impaired loans not requiring a specific allowance represent loans for which the fair value of expected repayments or collateral exceed the recorded investment in such loans. Impaired loans where an allowance is established based on the fair value of collateral require classification in the fair value hierarchy. When the fair value of the collateral is based on an observable market price or a current appraised value, the Company records the loan as nonrecurring Level 2. When an appraised value is not available or management determines the fair value of the collateral is further impaired below the appraised value and there is no observable market price, the Company records the loan as nonrecurring Level 3.

Other Real Estate Owned – Foreclosed assets are adjusted to fair value upon transfer of the loans to other real estate owned. Real estate acquired in settlement of loans is recorded initially at estimated fair value of the property less estimated selling costs at the date of foreclosure. The initial recorded value may be subsequently reduced by additional allowances, which are charges to earnings if the estimated fair value of the property less estimated seling costs declines below the initial recorded value. Fair value is based upon independent market prices, appraised values of the collateral or management’s estimation of the value of the collateral. When the fair value of the collateral is based on an observable market price or a current appraised value, the Company records the foreclosed asset as nonrecurring Level 2. When an appraised value is not available or management determines the fair value of the collateral is further impaired below the appraised value and there is no observable market price, the Company records the foreclosed asset as nonrecurring Level 3.

The table below presents the balances of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis by level within the hierarchy.

June 30, 2011	Quoted market price in active markets		Significant other observable inputs		Significant unobservable inputs
(Dollars in thousands)	(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
Mortgage-backed securities	$	-	$	46,734	$	-
State and municipal obligations		-		8,523
Available-for-sale securities		-		55,257		-
Loans held for sale		-		2,163		-
Total	$	-	$	57,420	$	-

December 31, 2010
(Dollars in thousands)
Mortgage-backed securities	$	-	$	63,229	$	-
State and municipal obligations		-		10,796		-
Available-for-sale securities		-		74,025		-
Loans held for sale		-		5,516		-
Total	$	-	$	79,541	$	-

There were no liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis for the periods ended June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.

Certain assets and liabilities are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis; that is, the instruments are not measured at fair value on an ongoing basis but are subject to fair value adjustments in certain circumstances (for example, when there is evidence of impairment). The following table presents the assets and liabilities carried on the balance sheet by caption and by level within the valuation hierarchy (as described above) for which a nonrecurring change in fair value has been recorded during the year.

-23-

CO MMUNITY CAPITAL CORPORATION

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Note 11 – Fair Value Of Financial Instruments - continued

June 30, 2011	Quoted market price in active markets		Significant other observable inputs		Significant unobservable inputs
(Dollars in thousands)	(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
Other real estate owned	$	-	$	9,483	$	3,663
Impaired loans		-		31,926		1,613
Total	$	-	$	41,409	$	5,276
December 31, 2010
(Dollars in thousands)
Other real estate owned	$	-	$	8,781	$	4,715
Impaired loans		-		35,498		3,173
Total	$	-	$	44,279	$	7,888

There were no liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis for the periods ended June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.

-24-

CO MMUNITY CAPITAL CORPORATION

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

In this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, or this “Quarterly Report,” we refer to Community Capital Corporation as “we,” “us,” “our,” or the “Company,” unless we specifically state otherwise or the context indicates otherwise, and we refer to our bank subsidiary, CapitalBank, as our “Bank,” unless we specifically state otherwise or the context indicates otherwise .

Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

Some of our statements contained in, or incorporated by reference into, this Quarterly Report are "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). Forward-looking statements may relate to our financial condition, results of operation, plans, objectives, or future performance. Forward-looking statements are based on many assumptions and estimates and are not guarantees of future performance. Our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in any forward-looking statements, as they will depend on many factors about which we are unsure, including many factors which are beyond our control. The words “may,” “would,” “could,” “should,” “will,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “predict,” “project,” “potential,” “believe,” “continue,” “assume,” “believe,” “intend,” “plan,” and “estimate,” as well as similar expressions, are meant to identify such forward-looking statements. Potential risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ from those anticipated in any forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, those described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 under Item 1A “Risk Factors” and the following:

reduced earnings due to higher credit losses generally and specifically because losses in the sectors of our loan portfolio secured by real estate are greater than expected due to economic factors, including, but not limited to, declining real estate values, increasing interest rates, increasing unemployment, or changes in payment behavior or other factors;

·	reduced earnings due to higher credit losses because our loans are concentrated by loan type, industry segment, borrower type, or location of the borrower or collateral;

·	high concentration of our real estate-based loans collateralized by real estate in a weak commercial real estate market;

·	adequacy of the level of our allowance for loan losses;

·	the rate of delinquencies and amounts of charge-offs;

·	challenges, costs, and complications associated with the continued development of our branches;

·	changes in political conditions or the legislative or regulatory environment;

·	significant increases in competitive pressure in CapitalBank’s banking and financial services industries;

·	general economic conditions, either nationally or regionally and especially in our primary service area, becoming less favorable than expected, resulting in, among other things, a deterioration in credit quality;

·	adverse conditions in the stock market, the public debt market, and other capital markets;

·	changes occurring in business conditions and inflation;

·	changes in technology;

·	changes in monetary and tax policies;

·	the rates of loan growth;

·	adverse changes in asset quality and resulting credit risk-related losses and expenses;

·	loss of consumer confidence and economic disruptions resulting from terrorist activities;

·	changes in the securities markets; and

·	other risks and uncertainties detailed from time to time in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”).

These risks are exacerbated by the developments over the past few years in national and international financial markets, and we are unable to predict what effect these uncertain market conditions will continue to have on our Company. During 2008 and 2009, the capital and credit markets experienced unprecedented levels of extended volatility and disruption which continued to affect the Company in 2010 and 2011. There can be no assurance that these unprecedented recent developments will not materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

All forward-looking statements in this report are based on information available to us as of the date of this report. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in our forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee you that these expectations will be achieved. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or otherwise revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise.

-25-

CO MMUNITY CAPITAL CORPORATION

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - continued

Overview

We are a bank holding company headquartered in Greenwood, South Carolina with 18 banking offices located in 13 different cities throughout South Carolina. Since our formation in 1988, we have grown in our core markets through organic growth, and to expand our market presence from central South Carolina to the upstate region of South Carolina, we have made selective acquisitions and formed de novo banking operations. We continuously evaluate our branch network to determine how to best serve our customers efficiently and to improve our profitability.

We operate a general commercial and retail banking business through our bank subsidiary, CapitalBank. We believe our commitment to quality and personalized banking services is a factor that contributes to our competitiveness and success. Through the Bank, we provide a full range of lending services, including real estate, consumer and commercial loans to individuals and small to medium-sized businesses in our market areas, as well as residential mortgage loans. Our primary focus has been on real estate construction loans, commercial mortgage loans and residential mortgage loans. We complement our lending services with a full range of retail and commercial banking products and services, including checking, savings and money market accounts, certificates of deposit, credit card accounts, individual retirement accounts, safe deposit accounts, money orders and electronic funds transfer services. In addition to our traditional banking services, we also offer customers trust and fiduciary services. We make discount securities brokerage services available through a third-party brokerage service that has contracted with CapitalBank.

Like most community banks, we derive the majority of our income from interest we receive on our loans and investments. Our primary source of funds for making these loans and investments is our deposits, on which we pay interest. Consequently, one of the key measures of our success is our amount of net interest income, or the difference between the income earned on our interest-earning assets, such as loans and investments, and the expense cost of our interest-bearing liabilities, such as deposits. Another key measure is the spread between the yield we earn on these interest-earning assets and the rate we pay on our interest-bearing liabilities.

A number of tables are included to assist in the description of these measures. For example, the “Average Balances” table shows the average balance for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 and for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 of each category of assets and liabilities, as well as the yield earned or the rate paid with respect to each category. A review of this table show’s that our loans typically provide higher interest yields than do other types of interest-bearing assets, which is why we intend to channel a substantial percentage of our earning assets into our loan portfolio. We also track the sensitivity of the various categories of assets and liabilities to changes in interest rates, and a table is included for explanation. Finally, a number of tables are included that provide detail about our investment securities, loans, deposits and other borrowings.

There are risks inherent in all loans, so we maintain an allowance for loan losses to absorb probable losses on existing loans that may become uncollectible. We establish and maintain this allowance by charging a provision for loan losses against our operating earnings. In the following section we have included a detailed discussion of this process.

In addition to earning interest on our loans and investments, we earn income through fees and other expenses we charge to our customers. We describe the various components of this non-interest income, as well as our non-interest expenses, in the following discussion.

Markets in the United States and elsewhere have experienced extreme volatility and disruption for more than three years. These circumstances have exerted significant downward pressure on prices of equity securities and virtually all other asset classes, and have resulted in substantially increased market volatility, severely constrained credit and capital markets, particularly for financial institutions, and an overall loss of investor confidence. Loan portfolio performances have deteriorated at many institutions resulting from, among other factors, a weak economy and a decline in the value of the collateral supporting their loans. Dramatic slowdowns in the housing industry with falling home prices and increasing foreclosures and unemployment have created strains on financial institutions. Many borrowers are now unable to repay their loans, and the collateral securing these loans has, in some cases, declined below the loan balance. The following discussion and analysis describes our performance in this challenging economic environment.

-26-

CO MMUNITY CAPITAL CORPORATION

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – continued

For the foreseeable future, we do not intend to declare cash dividends. We intend to retain earnings to grow our business and strengthen our capital base. Future dividends are subject to the discretion of our board of directors and will depend on a number of factors, including future earnings, our financial condition, cash requirements, and general business conditions. Our ability to distribute cash dividends will depend entirely upon CapitalBank’s ability to distribute dividends to the company. As a state bank, CapitalBank is subject to legal limitations on the amount of dividends it is permitted to pay. In addition, the Written Agreement prohibits us and CapitalBank from declaring or paying dividends, without the prior written approval of the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond and the S.C. Board, respectively. Furthermore, neither us nor CapitalBank may declare or pay a cash dividend on any of its capital stock if we are insolvent or if the payment of the dividend would render us as insolvent or unable to pay our obligations as they become due in the ordinary course of business.

As of June 30, 2011, we had total consolidated assets of approximately $637 million, total deposits of approximately $475 million, total consolidated liabilities, including deposits, of approximately $588 million, and total consolidated shareholders’ equity of approximately $49 million. While the majority of our loan portfolio continues to perform well, real estate, construction and land development portion of our portfolio has been negatively impacted by current economic climate and the deterioration in the residential real estate sector. We continue to actively manage our non-performing assets and we may sell assets and take advantage of other market opportunities to dispose of problem assets. Recently, we have emphasized cost controls throughout our organization, which have been an important focus as economic growth has slowed.

On March 30, 2011, we entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger with Park Sterling Corporation ("Park Sterling") pursuant to which our Company will merge with and into Park Sterling, with Park Sterling as the surviving entity, in a cash and stock transaction valued at approximately $32.4 million (based on the closing price of Company stock on March 29, 2011). The transaction value will change due to fluctuations in the price of Park Sterling common stock. Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, our shareholders will receive for each share of common stock owned one of the following: (i) $3.30 in cash; or (ii) 0.6667 of a share of Park Sterling common stock. In total, 60% of our outstanding shares of common stock will be exchanged for shares of Park Sterling common stock and 40% of our outstanding shares of common stock will be exchanged for cash. The merger is currently expected to be completed in the late third or early fourth quarter of 2011, pending receipt of the approval of our shareholders. We have already received regulatory approvals from the federal and state banking regulatory authorities. The merger agreement also provides that we must pay to Park Sterling a cash fee of $2,000,000 and up to $500,000 in respect of Park Sterling’s legal and due diligence expenses if the merger agreement is terminated under certain conditions.

Regulatory Considerations

In October 2009, the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond conducted its safety and soundness examination of CapitalBank. Since receiving the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond’s report of examination in October 2009, which was based on CapitalBank’s financial statements as of June 30, 2009 and loan data as of September 15, 2009, CapitalBank has been actively addressing the concerns raised in the report and as a result has improved its financial condition materially since the examination date. Although CapitalBank has materially improved its financial condition since the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond’s October 2009 examination and remained well capitalized as of June 30, 2010, we entered into the Written Agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond and the S.C. Board on July 28, 2010 to ensure that certain requirements imposed by the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond are fully addressed by CapitalBank.

-27-

CO MMUNITY CAPITAL CORPORATION

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – continued

The Written Agreement requires CapitalBank to take certain actions to continue to address concerns raised in the examination. A summary of the material requirements of the Written Agreement and CapitalBank’s status on complying with the Written Agreement is as follows:

Requirements of the Written Agreement

CapitalBank’s Compliance Status

Submit to the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond and the S.C. Board, by September 26, 2010, an enhanced written plan to strengthen CapitalBank’s credit risk management practices that must include (a) periodic review and revision of risk exposure limits to address changes in market conditions, (b) strategies to minimize credit losses and reduce the level of problem assets, (c) enhancement of risk rating of loans to ensure changes to individual ratings are adequately supported and (d) reducing the level of commercial real estate concentrations and timeframes for achieving the reduced levels.		CapitalBank submitted a plan to strengthen its credit risk management practices to the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond and the S.C. Board on August 26, 2010.

Submit to the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond and the S.C. Board, by September 26, 2010, an enhanced written lending and credit administration program that must include (a) underwriting standards that require documented analyses of a borrower’s and guarantor’s cash flow, including any contingent liabilities, (b) enhancement of policies and procedures relating to the acquisition, management and disposition of OREO, including bank-financed disposition, and (c) the appropriate accounting treatment for costs incurred in connection with the maintenance of collateral.		CapitalBank submitted an enhanced written lending and credit administration program to the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond and the S.C. Board on August 26, 2010.

Not extend, renew or restructure any credit to or for the benefit of any borrower, including any related interest of the borrower, whose loans or other extensions of credit are criticized in the October 2009 report of examination or in any subsequent report of examination, without the prior approval of a majority of CapitalBank’s board of directors or a designated committee thereof.		CapitalBank believes that it has complied with this provision of the Written Agreement.

Submit to the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond and the S.C. Board, by September 26, 2010, a written plan designed to improve CapitalBank’s position through repayment, amortization, liquidation, additional collateral or other means on OREO, and each loan, relationship or other asset in excess of $750,000 that are past due as to principal or interest more than 90 days as of the date of the Written Agreement, are on CapitalBank’s problem loan list or were adversely classified in the October 2009 report of examination.		CapitalBank has developed a written plan designed to reduce classified assets, and CapitalBank submitted its plan to the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond and the S.C. Board on August 26, 2010.

-28-

CO MMUNITY CAPITAL CORPORATION

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – continued
Submit to the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond and the S.C. Board, within 30 days of the date that any additional OREO or loan, relationship or other asset in excess of $750,000 becomes past due as to principal or interest for more than 90 days, is on CapitalBank’s problem loan list or is adversely classified in any subsequent report of examination, a written plan to improve CapitalBank’s position on such loan, relationship or asset.		CapitalBank believes that it has complied with this provision of the Written Agreement.

Submit to the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond and the S.C. Board, within 30 days after the end of each calendar quarter, a written progress report to update each asset improvement plan, which must include the carrying value of the loan or other asset and changes in the nature and value of supporting collateral, along with a copy of CapitalBank’s current problem loan list, a list of all loan renewals and extensions without full collection of interest in the last quarter and past due/nonaccrual reports.		CapitalBank has submitted to the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond and the S.C. Board quarterly progress reports updating each asset improvement plan. As a result, CapitalBank believes that it has complied with this provision of the Written Agreement.

Eliminate, by August 7, 2010, from CapitalBank’s books, by charge-off or collection, all assets or portions of assets classified “loss” in the October 2009 report of examination that have not been previously collected in full or charged off, and, thereafter, within 30 days from the receipt of any federal or state report of examination, charge off all assets classified “loss” unless otherwise approved in writing by the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond and the S.C. Board.		CapitalBank believes that it has complied with this provision of the Written Agreement.

Review and revise CapitalBank’s ALLL methodology consistent with relevant supervisory guidance and the findings and recommendations regarding the ALLL set forth in the October 2009 report of examination, and, by September 26, 2010, submit a description of the revised methodology to the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond and the S.C. Board.		CapitalBank revised its ALLL methodology and submitted the revised methodology to the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond and the S.C. Board on August 26, 2010.

Submit to the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond and the S.C. Board, by September 26, 2010, a written program for the maintenance of an adequate ALLL, which must provide for a review of the ALLL by the CapitalBank board of directors on at least a quarterly calendar basis, and submit to the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond and the S.C. Board, within 30 days after the end of each calendar quarter, a written report regarding the board of directors’ quarterly review of the ALLL and a description of any changes to the methodology used in determining the amount of the ALLL for that quarter.		CapitalBank believes that it has complied with this provision of the Written Agreement.

-29-

CO MMUNITY CAPITAL CORPORATION

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – continued
Submit to the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond and the S.C. Board, by September 26, 2010, a joint written plan of Community Capital and CapitalBank to maintain sufficient capital at Community Capital, on a consolidated basis, and at CapitalBank, as a separate legal entity on a stand-alone basis; and notify the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond and the S.C. Board, no more than 30 days after the end of any calendar quarter, if Community Capital’s consolidated capital ratios, or the Bank’s capital ratios (total risk-based, Tier 1 risk-based or leverage), fall below the approved capital plan’s minimum ratios.		CapitalBank submitted a joint plan to maintain sufficient capital at Community Capital, on a consolidated basis, and at CapitalBank, as a separate entity on a stand-alone basis, to the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond and the S.C. Board on August 26, 2010. CapitalBank believes that it has complied with this provision of the Written Agreement.

Submit to the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond and the S.C. Board, by September 26, 2010, a revised written liquidity policy that includes the establishment of an appropriate minimum liquidity ratio.		CapitalBank submitted a revised written liquidity policy to the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond and the S.C. Board on August 26, 2010.

Submit to the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond and the S.C. Board, by September 26, 2010, a revised written contingency funding plan that includes adverse scenario planning and identifies and quantifies available sources of liquidity for each scenario.		CapitalBank submitted a revised written contingency funding plan to the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond and the S.C. Board on August 26, 2010.

Submit to the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond and the S.C. Board, by October 26, 2010, a written business plan for the remainder of 2010 to improve CapitalBank’s earnings and overall condition.		CapitalBank submitted a business plan for the remainder of 2010 to the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond and the S.C. Board on August 26, 2010.

Submit to the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond and the S.C. Board, at least 30 days prior to the beginning of each calendar year during the term of the Written Agreement, a business plan and budget for the upcoming calendar year.		CapitalBank submitted a business plan for the year ending December 31, 2011 to the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond and the S.C. Board on October 28, 2010.

Not declare or pay any dividends without the prior written approval of the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, the Director of the Division of Banking Supervision and Regulation of the Board of Governors (Director), and, as to CapitalBank, the S.C. Board; not directly or indirectly take any other form of payment representing a reduction in capital from CapitalBank without the prior written approval of the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond; and not make any distributions of interest, principal or other sums on subordinated debentures or trust preferred securities without the prior written approval of the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond and the Director.		Community Capital and CapitalBank believe that they have complied with this provision of the Written Agreement.

-30-

CO MMUNITY CAPITAL CORPORATION

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – continued

Not, directly or indirectly, incur, increase or guarantee any debt without the prior written approval of the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, and not, directly or indirectly, purchase or redeem any shares of stock of Community Capital without the prior written approval of the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond.		Community Capital and CapitalBank believe that they have complied with this provision of the Written Agreement.

Submit to the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond and the S.C. Board, within 30 days after the end of each calendar quarter, joint written progress reports detailing the form and manner of all actions taken to secure compliance with the Written Agreement and the results thereof.		Community Capital and CapitalBank believe that they have complied with this provision of the Written Agreement.

The Written Agreement does not contain any provisions to increase capital and will not result in any change to financial results. We intend to take all actions necessary to enable CapitalBank to comply with the requirements of the Written Agreement, and as of the date hereof CapitalBank has submitted all documentation required to the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond and the S.C. Board. Nevertheless, there can be no assurance that CapitalBank will be able to fully comply with the provisions of the Written Agreement, and the determination of CapitalBank’s compliance will be made by the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond and the S.C. Board. If CapitalBank is unable to comply with the requirements of the Written Agreement, it could be subject to further regulatory action by the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond and the S.C. Board.

Financial Condition

The following is a discussion of our financial condition as of June 30, 2011 compared to December 31, 2010 and the results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to the three and six months ended June 30, 2010. We encourage you to read this discussion and analysis in conjunction with our financial statements and the other statistical information included in this Quarterly Report.

Critical Accounting Policies

We have adopted various accounting policies that govern the application of accounting principles generally accepted in the United States in the preparation of our financial statements. Our significant accounting policies are described in the footnotes to the consolidated financial statements at December 31, 2010 as filed on our Annual Report on Form 10-K. Certain accounting policies involve significant judgments and assumptions by us that have a material impact on the carrying value of certain assets and liabilities. We consider these accounting policies to be critical accounting policies. The judgments and assumptions we use are based on historical experience and other factors, which we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Because of the nature of the judgments and assumptions we make, actual results could differ from these judgments and estimates, which could have a material impact on our carrying values of assets and liabilities and our results of operations.

We believe the allowance for loan losses is a critical accounting policy that requires the most significant judgments and estimates used in preparation of our consolidated financial statements. Refer to the portion of this discussion that addresses our allowance for loan losses for a description of our processes and methodology for determining our allowance for loan losses.

The Allowance for Loan Losses represents our estimate of probable losses inherent in the lending portfolio. See Provision and Allowance for Losses for additional discussion including factors impacting the Allowance and the methodology for analyzing the adequacy of the Allowance. This methodology relies upon our judgment. Our judgments are based on an assessment of various issues, including, but not limited to, the pace of loan growth, emerging portfolio concentrations, the risk management system relating to lending activities, entry into new markets, new product offerings, loan portfolio quality trends, and uncertainty in current economic and business conditions. We consider the year-end Allowance appropriate and adequate to cover probable losses in the loan portfolio. However, our judgment is based upon a number of assumptions about current events, which are believed to be reasonable, but which may or may not prove valid. Thus, there can be no assurance that loan losses in future periods will not exceed the current Allowance amount or that future increases in the Allowance will not be required. No assurance can be given that our ongoing evaluation of the loan portfolio, in light of changing economic conditions and other relevant circumstances, will not require significant future additions to the Allowance, thus adversely impacting the results of operations of the Company.

-31-

CO MMUNITY CAPITAL CORPORATION

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – continued

We believe the accounting for OREO is a critical accounting policy that requires judgments and estimates used in preparation of our consolidated financial statements. OREO is initially recorded at fair value, less any costs to sell. If the fair value, less cost to sell at the time of foreclosure, is less than the loan balance, the deficiency is charged against the allowance for loan losses. If

the fair value, less cost to sell, of the OREO decreases during the holding period, a valuation allowance is established with a charge to foreclosed property costs. When the OREO is sold, a gain or loss is recognized on the sale for the difference between the sales proceeds and the carrying amount of the property. Financed sales of OREO are accounted for in accordance with ASC 360-20, Real Estate Sales.

We evaluate securities for other-than-temporary impairment at least on a quarterly basis, and more frequently when economic or market concerns warrant such evaluation. Consideration is given to the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, the financial condition of the issuer, the outlook for receiving the contractual cash flows of the investments, and anticipated outlook for changes in the general level of interest rates, and our intent and ability to retain our investment in the issuer for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value or for a debt security whether it is more-likely-than-not that the Company will be required to sell the debt security prior to recovering its fair value.

We use assumptions and estimates in determining income taxes payable or refundable for the current year, deferred income tax liabilities and assets for events recognized differently in its financial statements and income tax returns, and income tax expense. Determining these amounts requires analysis of certain transactions and interpretation of tax laws and regulations. We exercise considerable judgment in evaluating the amount and timing of recognition of the resulting tax liabilities and assets. These judgments and estimates are reevaluated on a continual basis as regulatory and business factors change. No assurance can be given that either the tax returns submitted by us or the income tax reported on the Consolidated Financial Statements will not be adjusted by either adverse rulings by the United States Tax Court, changes in the tax code, or assessments made by the Internal Revenue Service. We are subject to potential adverse adjustments, including, but not limited to, an increase in the statutory federal or state income tax rates, the permanent nondeductibility of amounts currently considered deductible either now or in future periods, and the dependency on the generation of future taxable income, including capital gains, in order to ultimately realize deferred income tax assets. Historically, our estimated income taxes have been materially correct, and we are not aware of any reason that a material change will occur in the future.

Recent Developments

Markets in the United States and elsewhere have experienced extreme volatility and disruption over the past three plus years. These circumstances have exerted significant downward pressure on prices of equity securities and virtually all other asset classes, and have resulted in substantially increased market volatility, severely constrained credit and capital markets, particularly for financial institutions, and an overall loss of investor confidence. Loan portfolio performances have deteriorated at many institutions resulting from, among other factors, a weak economy and a decline in the value of the collateral supporting their loans. Dramatic slowdowns in the housing industry, due in part to falling home prices and increasing foreclosures and unemployment, have created strains on financial institutions. Many borrowers are now unable to repay their loans, and the collateral securing these loans has, in some cases, declined below the loan balance. In response to the challenges facing the financial services sector, beginning in 2008 a multitude of new regulatory and governmental actions have been announced, including the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act ("EESA"), approved by Congress and signed by President Bush on October 3, 2008 and the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act on February 17, 2009, amonth others. Some of the more recent actions include:

On July 21, 2010, the U.S. President signed into law the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (the “Dodd-Frank Act”), a comprehensive regulatory framework that will likely result in dramatic changes across the financial regulatory system, some of which became effective immediately and some of which will not become effective until various future dates. Implementation of the Dodd-Frank Act will require many new rules to be made by various federal regulatory agencies over the next several years. Uncertainty remains as to the ultimate impact of the Dodd-Frank Act until final rulemaking is complete, which could have a material adverse impact either on the financial services industry as a whole or on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows. Provisions in the legislation that affect consumer financial protection regulations, deposit insurance assessments, payment of interest on demand deposits, and interchange fees could increase the costs associated with deposits and place limitations on certain revenues those deposits may generate. The Dodd-Frank Act includes provisions that, among other things, will:

-32-

CO MMUNITY CAPITAL CORPORATION

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – continued

Recent Developments - continued

o	Centralize responsibility for consumer financial protection by creating a new agency, the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection, responsible for implementing, examining, and enforcing compliance with federal consumer financial laws;

o	Create the Financial Stability Oversight Council that will recommend to the Federal Reserve increasingly strict rules for capital, leverage, liquidity, risk management and other requirements as companies grow in size and complexity;

Provide mortgage reform provisions regarding a customer’s ability to repay, restricting variable-rate lending by requiring that the ability to repay variable-rate loans be determined by using the maximum rate that will apply during the first five years of a variable-rate loan term, and making more loans subject to provisions for higher cost loans, new disclosures, and certain other revisions;

Change the assessment base for federal deposit insurance from the amount of insured deposits to consolidated assets less tangible capital, eliminate the ceiling on the size of the Deposit Insurance Fund (“DIF”), and increase the floor on the size of the DIF, which generally will require an increase in the level of assessments for institutions with assets in excess of $10 billion;

o	Make permanent the $250,000 limit for federal deposit insurance and provide unlimited federal deposit insurance until December 31, 2012 for noninterest-bearing demand transaction accounts at all insured depository institutions;

o	Implement corporate governance revisions, including with regard to executive compensation and proxy access by shareholders, which apply to all public companies, not just financial institutions;

o	Repeal the federal prohibitions on the payment of interest on demand deposits, thereby permitting depository institutions to pay interest on business transactions and other accounts;

Amend the Electronic Fund Transfer Act (“EFTA”) to, among other things, give the Federal Reserve the authority to establish rules regarding interchange fees charged for electronic debit transactions by payment card issuers having assets over $10 billion and to enforce a new statutory requirement that such fees be reasonable and proportional to the actual cost of a transaction to the issuer;

Eliminate the Office of Thrift Supervision (“OTS”) on July 21, 2011. On that date, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, which is currently the primary federal regulator for national banks, became the primary federal regulator for federal thrifts. In addition, on that date, the Federal Reserve began supervising and regulating all savings and loan holding companies that were formerly regulated by the OTS.

On September 27, 2010, the U.S. President signed into law the Small Business Jobs Act of 2010 (the “Act”). The Small Business Lending Fund (the “SBLF”), which was enacted as part of the Act, is a $30 billion fund that encourages lending to small businesses by providing Tier 1 capital to qualified community banks with assets of less than $10 billion. On December 21, 2010, the U.S. Treasury published the application form, term sheet and other guidance for participation in the SBLF. Under the terms of the SBLF, the Treasury will purchase shares of senior preferred stock from banks, bank holding companies, and other financial institutions that will qualify as Tier 1 capital for regulatory purposes and rank senior to a participating institution’s common stock. The application deadline for participating in the SBLF is May 16, 2011. Based on the program criteria, we did not apply to participate in the SBLF.

Internationally, both the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (the “Basel Committee”) and the Financial Stability Board (established in April 2009 by the Group of Twenty (“G-20”) Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors to take action to strengthen regulation and supervision of the financial system with greater international consistency, cooperation, and transparency) have committed to raise capital standards and liquidity buffers within the banking system (“Basel III”). On September 12, 2010, the Group of Governors and Heads of Supervision agreed to the calibration and phase-in of the Basel III minimum capital requirements (raising the minimum Tier 1 common equity ratio to 4.5% and minimum Tier 1 equity ratio to 6.0%, with full implementation

-33-

CO MMUNITY CAPITAL CORPORATION

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – continued

by January 2015) and introducing a capital conservation buffer of common equity of an additional 2.5% with full implementation by January 2019. The U.S. federal banking agencies support this agreement. In December 2010, the Basel Committee issued the Basel III rules text, outlining the details and time-lines of global regulatory standards on bank capital adequacy and liquidity. According to the Basel Committee, the framework sets out higher and better-quality capital, better risk coverage, the introduction of a leverage ratio as a backstop to the risk-based requirement, measures to promote the build-up of capital that can be drawn down in periods of stress, and the introduction of two global liquidity standards.

In November 2010, the Federal Reserve's monetary policymaking committee, the Federal Open Market Committee (“FOMC”), decided that further support to the economy was needed. With short-term interest rates already nearing 0%, the FOMC agreed to deliver that support by committing to purchase additional longer-term securities, as it did in 2008 and 2009. The FOMC intends to buy an additional $600 billion of longer-term U.S. Treasury securities by mid-2011 and will continue to reinvest repayments of principal on its holdings of securities, as it has been doing since August 2010.

In November 2010, the FDIC approved two proposals that amend the deposit insurance assessment regulations. The first proposal implements a provision in the Dodd-Frank Act that changes the assessment base from one based on domestic deposits (as it has been since 1935) to one based on assets. The assessment base changes from adjusted domestic deposits to average consolidated total assets minus average tangible equity. The second proposal changes the deposit insurance assessment system for large institutions in conjunction with the guidance g iven in the Dodd-Frank Act. In February 2011, the FDIC approved the final rules that change the assessment base from domestic deposits to average assets minus average tangible equity, adopt a new scorecard-based assessment system for financial institutions with more than $10 billion in assets, and finalize the designated reserve ratio target size at 2.0% of insured deposits. We elected to voluntarily participate in the unlimited deposit insurance component of the Treasury’s Transaction Account Guarantee Program (“TAGP”) through December 31, 2010. Coverage under the program was in addition to and separate from the basic coverage available under the FDIC’s general deposit insurance rules. As a result of the Dodd-Frank Act that was signed into law on July 21, 2010, the program ended on December 31, 2010, and all institutions are now required to provide full deposit insurance on noninterest-bearing transaction accounts until December 31, 2012. There will not be a separate assessment for this as there was for institutions participating in the deposit insurance component of the TAGP.

On April 19, 2011, the Federal Reserve Board issued a proposed rule under Regulation Z that would require creditors to determine a consumer’s ability to repay a mortgage before making the loan and would establish minimum mortgage underwriting standards. The proposal is being made pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Act. The proposed rule, if implemented in its current form, provides four options for complying with the ability-to-repay requirement and would apply to all consumer mortgages, except home equity lines of credit, timeshare plans, reverse mortgages, or temporary loans. The proposal would also implement the Dodd-Frank Act’s limits on prepayment penalties, lengthen the time creditors must retain records that evidence compliance with the ability to-repay and prepayment penalty provisions, and prohibit evasion of the rule by structuring a closed-end extension of credit as an open-end plan.

In June 2011, the Federal Reserve Board approved a final debit card interchange rule in accordance with the Dodd-Frank Act. The final rule caps an issuer's base fee at 21 cents per transaction and allows an additional five basis point charge per transaction to help cover fraud losses. Although the rule technically does not apply to institutions with less than $10 billion in assets, such as CapitalBank, there is concern that the price controls may harm community banks, which could be pressured by the marketplace to lower their own interchange rates.

Although it is likely that further regulatory actions will arise as the Federal government attempts to address the economic situation, we cannot predict the effect that fiscal or monetary policies, economic control, or new federal or state legislation may have on our business and earnings in the future.

-34-

CO MMUNITY CAPITAL CORPORATION

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – continued

Results of Operations

Net Interest Income

The largest component of our net income is our net interest income, which is the difference between the income earned on assets and interest paid on deposits and borrowings used to support such assets. Net interest income is determined by the yields earned on our interest-earning assets and the rates paid on our interest-bearing liabilities, the relative amounts of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities and the degree of mismatch and the maturity and repricing characteristics of our interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. Net interest income divided by average interest-earning assets represents our net interest margin.

The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, certain information related to our average balance sheet and our average yields on assets and average costs of liabilities. Such yields are derived by dividing income or expense by the average balance of the corresponding assets or liabilities. Average balances have been derived from the daily balances throughout the periods indicated.

	Average Balances, Income and Expenses, and Rates
	For the Three Months Ended
	June 30, 2011							June 30, 2010
(Dollars in thousands)	Average Balance		Income/ Expense		Yield/ Rate (1)			Average Balance		Income/ Expense		Yield/ Rate (1)
Assets:
Earning Assets:
Loans (2)(4)	$	459,243		5,874		5.13	%	$	538,676		7,350		5.47	%
Securities, taxable (3)		52,088		331		2.55	%		52,272		481		3.69	%
Securities, nontaxable (3)(4)		8,528		124		5.83	%		14,260		211		5.93	%
Nonmarketable equity securities		9,047		40		1.77	%		10,387		35		1.35	%
Fed funds sold and other		60,011		37		0.25	%		78,844		39		0.20	%
Total earning assets		588,917		6,406		4.36	%		694,439		8,116		4.69	%
Non-earning assets		56,808							57,612
Total assets	$	645,725						$	752,051

Liabilities:
Interest bearing liabilities:
Interest bearing transaction accounts		197,047		391		0.80	%		202,858		579		1.14	%
Savings accounts		43,692		70		0.64	%		45,383		144		1.27	%
Time deposits		131,894		373		1.13	%		232,747		1,250		2.15	%
Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings		95,400		825		3.47	%		95,400		826		3.47	%
Junior subordinated debentures		10,310		171		6.65	%		10,310		186		7.24	%
Total interest bearing liabilities		478,343		1,830		1.53	%		586,698		2,985		2.04	%
Non-interest bearing liabilities		117,948							109,890
Shareholders’ equity		49,434							55,463
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	645,725						$	752,051
Net interest spread						2.83	%						2.65	%
Net interest income/margin			$	4,576		3.12	%			$	5,131		2.96	%

---------------

(1)	Annualized for the three month period.

(2)	The effect of loans in nonaccrual status and fees collected is not significant to the computations. All loans and deposits are domestic.

(3)	Average investment securities exclude the valuation allowance on securities available-for-sale.

(4)	Fully tax-equivalent basis at 38% tax rate for nontaxable securities and loans.

-35-

CO MMUNITY CAPITAL CORPORATION

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – continued

Net Interest Income – continued

The tax-effected net interest spread and net interest margin were 2.83% and 3.12%, respectively, for the three month period ended June 30, 2011, compared to 2.65% and 2.96% for the three month period ended June 30, 2010. During the three months ended June 30, 2011, earning assets averaged $588,917,000, compared to $694,439,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2010. Interest earning assets exceeded interest earning liabilities by $110,574,000, and $107,741,000 for the three month periods ended June 30, 2011 and June 30, 2010, respectively.

For the three months ended June 30, 2011, our tax-effected net interest income, the major component of our net income, was $4,576,000 compared to $5,131,000 for the same period of 2010, a decrease of $555,000 or 10.82%. The decline in net interest income is a result of a decline in volume of earning assets and the movement of assets on the balance sheet out of higher yielding loans in to lower yielding, more liquid investments and interest bearing bank balances. The average rate realized on interest-earning assets decreased to 4.36% from 4.69%, while the average rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities also decreased to 1.53% from 2.04% for the three month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Our tax-effected interest income for the three months ended June 30, 2011 was $6,406,000, which consisted of $5,874,000 on loans, $495,000 on investments, and $37,000 on federal funds sold and interest bearing deposits with correspondent banks. The tax-effected income for the three months ended June 30, 2010 was $8,116,000, which consisted of $7,350,000 on loans, $727,000 on investments, and $39,000 on federal funds sold and interest bearing deposits with correspondent banks. Interest on loans for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and June 30, 2010, represented 91.69% and 90.56%, respectively, of total interest income. Average loans represented 77.98% and 77.57% of average earning assets for the three month periods ended June 30, 2011 and June 30, 2010, respectively.

Interest expense for the three months ended June 30, 2011 was $1,830,000, which consisted of $834,000 related to deposits and $996,000 related to other borrowings. Interest expense for the three months ended June 30, 2010 was $2,985,000, which consisted of $1,973,000 related to deposits and $1,012,000 related to other borrowings. Interest expense on deposits for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and June 30, 2010 represented 45.57% and 66.10%, respectively, of total interest expense. Average interest bearing deposits represented 77.90% and 81.98% of average interest bearing liabilities for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and June 30, 2010, respectively.

	Average Balances, Income and Expenses, and Rates
	For the Six Months Ended
	June 30, 2011							June 30, 2010
(Dollars in thousands)	Average Balance		Income/ Expense		Yield/ Rate (1)			Average Balance		Income/ Expense		Yield/ Rate (1)
Assets:
Earning Assets:
Loans (2)(4)	$	467,570		12,284		5.30	%	$	549,403		14,857		5.45	%
Securities, taxable (3)		57,329		696		2.45	%		53,477		1,017		3.84	%
Securities, nontaxable (3)(4)		9,462		275		5.86	%		15,039		446		5.98	%
Nonmarketable equity securities		9,270		82		1.78	%		10,328		66		1.29	%
Fed funds sold and other		45,938		53		0.23	%		61,502		60		0.20	%
Total earning assets		589,569		13,390		4.58	%		689,749		16,446		4.81	%
Non-earning assets		58,471							61,167
Total assets	$	648,040						$	750,916

-36-

CO MMUNITY CAPITAL CORPORATION

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – continued

Net Interest Income – continued

Liabilities:
Interest bearing liabilities:
Interest bearing transaction accounts		194,789		786	0.81	%		196,679		1,131	1.16	%
Savings accounts		43,256		152	0.71	%		44,286		282	1.28	%
Time deposits		139,053		899	1.30	%		235,145		2,491	2.14	%
Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings		95,400		1,641	3.47	%		95,400		1,648	3.48	%
Junior subordinated debentures		10,310		365	7.14	%		10,310		365	7.14	%
Total interest bearing liabilities		482,808		3,843	1.61	%		581,820		5,917	2.05	%
Non-interest bearing liabilities		115,990						114,163
Shareholders’ equity		49,242						54,933
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	648,040					$	750,916
Net interest spread					2.97	%					2.76	%
Net interest income/margin			$	9,547	3.27	%			$	10,529	3.08	%

---------------

(1)	Annualized for the six month period.

(2)	The effect of loans in nonaccrual status and fees collected is not significant to the computations. All loans and deposits are domestic.

(3)	Average investment securities exclude the valuation allowance on securities available-for-sale.

(4)	Fully tax-equivalent basis at 38% tax rate for nontaxable securities and loans.

The tax-effected net interest spread and net interest margin were 2.97% and 3.27%, respectively, for the six month period ended June 30, 2011, compared to 2.76% and 3.08% for the six month period ended June 30, 2010. During the six months ended June 30, 2011, earning assets averaged $589,569,000, compared to $689,749,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2010. Interest earning assets exceeded interest earning liabilities by $106,761,000, and $107,929,000 for the six month periods ended June 30, 2011 and June 30, 2010, respectively.

For the six months ended June 30, 2011, our tax-effected net interest income, the major component of our net income, was $9,547,000 compared to $10,529,000 for the same period of 2010, a decrease of $982,000 or 9.33%. The decline in net interest income is a result of a decline in volume of earning assets and the movement of assets on the balance sheet out of higher yielding loans in to lower yielding, more liquid investments and interest bearing bank balances. The average rate realized on interest-earning assets decreased to 4.58% from 4.81%, and the average rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities decreased to 1.61% from 2.05% for the six month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively .

Our tax-effected interest income for the six months ended June 30, 2011 was $13,390,000, which consisted of $12,284,000 on loans, $1,053,000 on investments, and $53,000 on federal funds sold and interest bearing deposits with correspondent banks. The tax-effected income for the six months ended June 30, 2010 was $16,446,000, which consisted of $14,857,000 on loans, $1,529,000 on investments, and $60,000 on fed funds sold and interest bearing deposits with correspondent banks. Interest on loans for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and June 30, 2010, represented 91.74% and 90.34%, respectively, of total interest income. Average loans represented 79.31% and 76.65% of average earning assets for the six month periods ended June 30, 2011 and June 30, 2010, respectively.

Interest expense for the six months ended June 30, 2011 was $3,843,000, which consisted of $1,837,000 related to deposits and $2,006,000 related to other borrowings. Interest expense for the six months ended June 30, 2010 was $5,917,000, which consisted of $3,904,000 related to deposits and $2,013,000 related to other borrowings. Interest expense on deposits for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and June 30, 2010 represented 47.80% and 65.98%, respectively, of total interest expense. Average interest bearing deposits represented 78.11% and 81.83% of average interest bearing liabilities for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and June 30, 2010, respectively.

-37-

CO MMUNITY CAPITAL CORPORATION

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – continued

Net Interest Income – continued

Analysis of Changes in Net Interest Income

The following tables set forth the effect that the varying levels of earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities and the applicable rates have had on changes in net interest income for the time periods indicated.

	Three Months Ended
	June 30, 2011 vs. 2010										June 30, 2010 vs. 2009
	Variance Due to										Variance Due to
(Dollars in thousands)	Volume (1)				Rate (1)			Total			Volume (1)				Rate (1)			Total
Earning Assets
Loans		$	(1,036	)	$	(440	)	$	(1,476	)		$	(1,203	)	$	143		$	(1,060	)
Securities, taxable			(2	)		(148	)		(150	)			109			(146	)		(37	)
Securities, nontaxable			(83	)		(4	)		(87	)			(162	)		(20	)		(182	)
Nonmarketable equity securities			(5	)		10			5				44			(40	)		4
Federal funds sold and other			(10	)		8			(2	)			28			4			32
Total interest income			(1,136	)		(574	)		(1,710	)			(1,184	)		(59	)		(1,243	)

Interest-Bearing Liabilities
Interest-bearing deposits:
Interest-bearing transaction accounts			(17	)		(171	)		(188	)			26			224			250
Savings accounts			(5	)		(69	)		(74	)			24			(42	)		(18	)
Time deposits			(419	)		(458	)		(877	)			193			(275	)		(82	)
Total interest-bearing deposits			(441	)		(698	)		(1,139	)			243			(93	)		150
Other short-term borrowings			-			-			-				(12	)		(12	)		(24	)
Federal Home Loan Bank advances			-			-							(393	)		(240	)		(633	)
Junior subordinate debt			-			(15	)		(15	)			-			9			9
Total interest expense			(441	)		(713	)		(1,154	)			(162	)		(336	)		(498	)
Net interest income		$	(695	)	$	139		$	(556	)		$	(1,022	)	$	277		$	(745	)

-------------------------

(1)	Volume-rate changes have been allocated to each category based on the percentage of the total change.

-38-

CO MMUNITY CAPITAL CORPORATION

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – continued

Net Interest Income – continued

	Six Months Ended
	June 30, 2011 vs. 2010										June 30, 2010 vs. 2009
	Variance Due to										Variance Due to
(Dollars in thousands)	Volume (1)				Rate (1)			Total			Volume (1)				Rate (1)			Total
Earning Assets
Loans		$	(2,160	)	$	(413	)	$	(2,573	)		$	(2,234	)	$	184		$	(2,050	)
Securities, taxable			69			(390	)		(321	)			198			(314	)		(116	)
Securities, nontaxable			(162	)		(9	)		(171	)			(347	)		(53	)		(400	)
Nonmarketable equity securities			(7	)		23			16				85			(80	)		5
Federal funds sold and other			(17	)		10			(7	)			48			4			52
Total interest income			(2,277	)		(779	)		(3,056	)			(2,250	)		(259	)		(2,509	)

Interest-Bearing Liabilities
Interest-bearing deposits:
Interest-bearing transaction accounts			(11	)		(334	)		(345	)			(4	)		516			512
Savings accounts			(7	)		(123	)		(130	)			48			(96	)		(48	)
Time deposits			(815	)		(777	)		(1,592	)			507			(731	)		(224	)
Total interest-bearing deposits			(833	)		(1,234	)		(2,067	)			551			(311	)		240
Other short-term borrowings			-			-			-				(29	)		(29	)		(58	)
Federal Home Loan Bank advances			-			(7	)		(7	)			(855	)		(413	)		(1,268	)
Junior subordinate debt			-			-			-				-			6			6
Total interest expense			(833	)		(1,241	)		(2,074	)			(333	)		(747	)		(1,080	)
Net interest income		$	(1,444	)	$	462		$	(982	)		$	(1,917	)	$	488		$	(1,429	)

-------------------------

(1)	Volume-rate changes have been allocated to each category based on the percentage of the total change.

Provision and Allowance for Loan Losses

The allowance for loan losses represents management’s estimate of probable losses inherent in the loan portfolio. We have developed policies and procedures for evaluating the overall quality of our loan portfolio and the timely identification of potential problem loans. The Board of Directors reviews and approves the appropriate level for the Bank’s allowance for loan losses quarterly based upon management’s recommendations, results of the internal monitoring and reporting system, analysis of economic conditions in our markets, and review of historical statistical data for both us and other financial institutions. Additions to the allowance for loan losses, which are expensed as the provision for loan losses on our income statement, are periodically made to maintain the allowance at an appropriate level based on our analysis of the potential risk in the loan portfolio. Loan losses, which include write downs and charge-offs, and recoveries are charged or credited directly to the allowance. The amount of the provision is a function of the level of loans outstanding, the level of nonperforming loans, historical loan loss experience, the amount of loan losses actually charged against the reserve during a given period, and current and anticipated economic conditions.

Our allowance for loan losses is based upon judgments and assumptions of risk elements in the portfolio, future economic conditions, and other factors affecting borrowers. The process includes identification and analysis of loss potential in various portfolio segments utilizing a credit risk grading process and specific reviews and evaluations of significant problem loans. In addition, we monitor overall portfolio quality through observable trends in delinquency, charge offs, and general and economic conditions in the service area. Risks are inherent in making all loans, including risks with respect to the period of time over which loans may be repaid, risks resulting from changes in economic and industry conditions, risks inherent in dealing with individual borrowers, and, in the case of a collateralized loan, risks resulting from uncertainties about the future value of the collateral.

-39-

CO MMUNITY CAPITAL CORPORATION

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – continued

Provision and Allowance for Loan Losses – continued

In determining our allowance for loan loss, we regularly reviews loans for specific and impaired reserves based on the appropriate impairment assessment methodology. Pooled reserves are determined using historical loss trends measured over a four quarter rolling average applied to risk rated loans grouped by Federal Financial Examination Council (FFIEC) call code and segmented by impairment status. The pooled reserves are calculated by applying the appropriate historical loss ratio to the loan categories. Impaired loans greater than a minimum threshold established by management are excluded from this analysis. The sum of all such amounts determines our pooled reserves.

We track our portfolio and analyze loans grouped by FFIEC call code categories. The first step in this process is to risk grade each and every loan in the portfolio based on one common set of parameters. These parameters include items like debt-to-worth ratio, liquidity of the borrower, net worth, experience in a particular field and other factors such as underwriting exceptions. Weight is also given to the relative strength of any guarantors on the loan.

After risk grading each loan, we then segments the portfolio by FFIEC call code groupings, separating out substandard or impaired loans. The remaining loans are grouped into “performing loan pools.” The loss history for each performing loan pool is measured over an eight quarter rolling average to create a loss factor. The loss factor is then applied to the pool balance and the reserve per pool calculated. Loans deemed to be substandard but not impaired are segregated and a loss factor is applied to this pool as well. Finally, impaired loans are segmented based upon size; smaller impaired loans are pooled and loss factor applied, while larger impaired loans are assessed individually using the appropriate impairment measuring methodology.

In developing its ASC 450-20 general reserve estimate, we have segmented the loan portfolio into 12 risk categories:

·	installment loans

·	home equity lines of credit

·	DDA overdraft loans

·	cash secured loans

·	mortgage loans for resale

·	1-4 family residential loans

·	1-4 family residential construction loans

·	commercial real estate loans including (other construction and land loans, multi-family, commercial real estate owner-occupied, commercial real estate other and commercial and farm land)

Loss experience on each of the risk categories is compiled over the previous four quarters (or 12 months). Each of the segments of the loan portfolio is analyzed for historical loss percentages. CapitalBank then applies the results generated from the four quarter loss history analysis to each of these segments. When a particular loan is identified as impaired, it is removed from the corresponding segment and individually analyzed and measured for specific reserve allocation.

Qualitative and environmental factors include external risk factors that we believe are representative of our overall lending environment. We have identified the following factors in establishing a more comprehensive system of controls in which we can monitor the quality the quality of the loan portfolio:

·	Portfolio risk;

·	Loan policy, procedures and monitoring risk;

·	National and local economic trends and conditions;

·	Concentration risk;

·	Acquisition and development loan portfolio risks; and

·	Impaired loan portfolio additional risks.

Certain problem loans are reviewed individually for impairment. An impaired loan may not represent an expected loss; however a loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that a creditor will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. In determining if a loan is impaired, the Bank considers all non-accrual loans, loans whose terms are modified in a troubled debt restructuring, and any other loan that is individually evaluated and determined to be impaired based on risk ratings and loan amounts of certain segments of the Bank’s loan portfolio. If a loan is individually evaluated and identified as impaired, it is measured by using either the fair value of the collateral, less expected costs to sell, present value of expected future cash flows, discounted at the loans effective interest rate, or observable market price of the loan. Management chooses a method on a loan-by-loan basis. Measuring impaired loans requires judgment and estimates and the eventual outcomes may differ from those estimates. At June 30, 2011, impaired loans totaled $33.6 million, all of which are valued on a nonrecurring basis at the lower of cost or market value of the underlying collateral.

-40-

CO MMUNITY CAPITAL CORPORATION

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – continued

Provision and Allowance for Loan Losses – continued

Total provision expense for the three months ended June 30, 2011 was $1,750,000, compared to $2,000,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2010. Total provision expense for the six months ended June 30, 2011 was $2,750,000, compared to $3,600,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2010. The allowance for loan losses was 3.26% of total loans at June 30, 2011, compared to 2.53% at June 30, 2010.

Based on present information and an ongoing evaluation, management considers the allowance for loan losses to be adequate to meet presently known and inherent losses in the loan portfolio. However, underlying assumptions may be impacted in future periods by changes in economic conditions, the impact of regulatory examinations, and the discovery of information with respect to borrowers, which was not known to management at the time of the issuance of the Company’s consolidated financial statements. Therefore, management’s assumptions may or may not prove valid. Thus, there can be no assurance that charge-offs in future periods will not exceed the allowance for loan losses or that additional increases in the allowance for loan losses will not be required, especially considering the overall weakness in the real estate market in our market areas. Additionally, no assurance can be given that management’s ongoing evaluation of the loan portfolio, in light of changing economic conditions and other relevant factors, will not require significant future additions to the allowance for loan losses, thus adversely impacting the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.

Activity in the Allowance for Loan Losses is as follows:

	June 30,
	2011			2010
Gross loans outstanding, end of period	$	447,637		$	521,486
Average loans outstanding	$	467,570		$	549,403
Balance, January 1,	$	17,165		$	14,160
Provision for loan losses for the period		2,350			3,600
Charge-offs:
Commercial and agricultural		392			35
Real estate – construction		3,034			1,670
Real estate – mortgage		1,301			2,694
Home equity		238			347
Consumer installment and other		9			24
Total charge-offs	$	4,974		$	4,770
Recoveries:
Commercial and agricultural		11			1
Real estate – construction		1			168
Real estate – mortgage		34			5
Home equity		4			2
Consumer installment and other		7			11
Total recoveries		57			187
Net charge-offs	$	4,917		$	4,583
Balance, end of period	$	14,598		$	13,177

Allowance for loan losses to loans outstanding		3.26	%		2.53	%

Net charge-offs to average loans		1.05	%		0.84	%

-41-

CO MMUNITY CAPITAL CORPORATION

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – continued

Provision and Allowance for Loan Losses – continued

Allocation of the Allowance for Loan Losses

The following table presents the allocation of the allowance for loan losses by category.

	June 30, 2011					June 30, 2010
	Amount		%			Amount		%

Commercial	$	648		4.44	%	$	136		1.03	%
Commercial real estate – construction		7,349		50.34	%		2,446		18.56	%
Commercial real estate – other		1,178		8.07	%		139		1.06	%
Consumer		21		0.15	%		50		0.38	%
Residential		2,152		14.74	%		1,671		12.67	%
HELOC		396		2.71	%		501		3.80	%
Unallocated		2,854		19.55	%		8,234		62.50	%
Total	$	14,598		100.00	%	$	13,177		100.00	%

Nonperforming Assets

The following table sets forth our nonperforming assets for the dates indicated.

(Dollars in thousands)	June 30,
	2011			2010
Nonaccrual loans	$	31,946		$	22,887
Other real estate owned	$	13,146		$	13,840
Total nonperforming assets	$	45,092		$	36,727

Loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing interest	$	1,121		$	1,252
Impaired loans still accruing interest	$	1,622		$	62,456
Troubled debt restructurings	$	17,214		$	16,645
Nonperforming assets to period end assets		7.08	%		4.85	%

When an asset is classified as non-performing, it is CapitalBank’s policy to perform an impairment analysis to determine its fair market value. Depending on the size of the transaction, CapitalBank uses appraisals (for transactions greater than $250,000) or internal evaluations (for transactions less than or equal to $250,000) to determine fair market value as soon as practical after the asset has been identified as non-performing. When performing an internal evaluation, comparable sales, tax assessed value, physical condition of the asset, surrounding neighborhood conditions and/or broker opinions may be used to further support the internal evaluation. In the case of third party appraisals, each appraisal’s assumptions and conclusions of value are reviewed in CapitalBank’s credit administration department and adjustments may be made to CapitalBank's loan loss allowance as deemed necessary to reflect any diminuition in the fair market value of the asset.

Accrual of interest is discontinued on a loan when CapitalBank believes, after considering economic and business conditions and collection efforts that the borrower’s financial condition is such that the collection of interest is doubtful. A delinquent loan is generally placed in nonaccrual status when it becomes 90 days or more past due. When a loan is placed in nonaccrual status, all interest that has been accrued on the loan but remains unpaid is reversed and deducted from current earnings as a reduction of reported interest income. No additional interest is accrued on the loan balance until the collection of both principal and interest becomes reasonably certain. When a problem loan is finally resolved, CapitalBank may ultimately write-down or charge off the principal balance of the loan that would necessitate additional charges to earnings. The additional interest income, which would have been recognized into earnings if CapitalBank’s nonaccrual loans had been current in accordance with their original terms, would have been $308,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and $707,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2011.

Total nonperforming assets totaled $45.1 million at June 30, 2011 and $36.7 million at June 30, 2010. This amount consists primarily of nonaccrual loans that totaled $31.9 million and $22.9 million at June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The increase in nonaccrual loans is primarily due to their migration into other real estate owned status and CapitalBank’s efforts of selling these assets. Nonperforming assets were 10.07% of total loans at June 30, 2011. The allowance for loan losses to period end nonperforming assets was 32.37% at June 30, 2011. A significant portion, or 99.7%, of nonperforming loans at June 30, 2011 were secured by real estate. Community Capital has evaluated the underlying collateral on these loans and believes that the collateral on these loans is sufficient to minimize future losses. However, the recent downturn in the real estate market has resulted in increased loan delinquencies, defaults

-42-

CO MMUNITY CAPITAL CORPORATION

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – continued

Provision and Allowance for Loan Losses – continued

and foreclosures, and Community Capital believes that these trends are likely to continue. In some cases, this downturn has resulted in a significant impairment to the value of the collateral used to secure these loans and the ability to sell the collateral upon foreclosure. These conditions have adversely affected CapitalBank’s loan portfolio. The real estate collateral in each case provides an alternate source of repayment in the event of default by the borrower and may deteriorate in value during the time the credit is extended. If real estate values continue to decline, it is also more likely that CapitalBank would be required to increase its allowance for loan losses. If during a period of reduced real estate values CapitalBank is required to liquidate the property collateralizing a loan to satisfy the debt or to increase the allowance for loan losses, this could materially reduce Community Capital’s profitability and adversely affect its financial condition.

Potential Problem Loans . At June 30, 2011, through its internal review mechanisms, we had identified $15.2 million of criticized loans and $57.7 million of classified loans. The results of this internal review process are the primary determining factor in CapitalBank’s assessment of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses.

CapitalBank’s criticized loans decreased from $18.9 million at December 31, 2010 to $15.2 million at June 30, 2011. Total classified loans increased from $56.6 million at December 31, 2010 to $57.7 million at June 30, 2011. The aggregate $2.6 million decrease in criticized and classified loans from December 31, 2010 to June 30, 2011 were primarily due to real estate development and single family construction loans, all of which are secured by real estate.

The continued elevated level of criticized and classified loans is primarily due to the current economic downturn and related decline in demand for residential real estate. As a result of the slowing demand, several real estate developers are having significant cash flow issues. Furthermore, residential real estate values are declining further exacerbating these cash flow issues.

Impaired loans primarily consist of nonperforming loans and TDRs, but can include other loans identified by management as being impaired. Historically, CapitalBank considered all loans identified as “substandard” assets to be “impaired” assets. A regulatory external audit identified the need to separate these categories per the actual regulatory definition for each classification. A bank asset may meet the definition of “substandard” while not also meeting the definition of “impaired.” However, all assets meeting the definition of “impaired” are automatically “substandard.” Accordingly, CapitalBank evaluated those loans identified as substandard and separated “substandard” assets from “substandard and impaired” assets.

We classify loans as TDRs when certain modifications are made to the loan terms and concessions are granted to the borrowers due to financial difficulty experienced by those borrowers. We only restructure loans for borrowers in financial difficulty that have designed a viable business plan to fully pay off all obligations, including outstanding debt, interest and fees, either by generating additional income from the business or through liquidation of assets. Generally, these loans are restructured to provide the borrower additional time to execute upon their plans. With respect to restructured loans, we grant concessions by (1) reduction of the stated interest rate for the remaining original life of the debt, or (2) extension of the maturity date at a stated interest rate lower than the current market rate for new debt with similar risk. We do not generally grant concessions through forgiveness of principal or accrued interest. Restructured loans where a concession has been granted through extension of the maturity date generally include extension of payments in an interest only period, extension of payments with capitalized interest and extension of payments through a forbearance agreement. These extended payment terms are also combined with a reduction of the stated interest rate in certain cases. Success in restructuring loans has been mixed but it has proven to be a useful tool in certain situations to protect collateral values and allow certain borrowers additional time to execute upon defined business plans. In situations where a TDR is unsuccessful and the borrower is unable to follow through with terms of the restricted agreement, the loan is placed on nonaccrual status and continues to be written down to the underlying collateral value. Our policy with respect to accrual of interest on loans restructured in a TDR follows relevant supervisory guidance. That is, if a borrower has demonstrated performance under the previous loan terms and shows capacity to perform under the restructured loan terms; continued accrual of interest at the restructured interest rate is likely. If a borrower was materially delinquent on payments prior to the restructuring but shows capacity to meet the restructured loan terms, the loan will likely continue as nonaccrual going forward. Lastly, if the borrower does not perform under the restructured terms, the loan is placed on nonaccrual status. We will continue to closely monitor these loans and will cease accruing interest on them if management believes that the borrowers may not continue performing based on the restructured note terms. If, after previously being classified as a TDR, a loan is restructured a second time, then that loan is automatically placed on nonaccrual status. Our policy with respect to nonperforming loans requires the borrower to make a minimum of six consecutive payments in accordance with the loan terms before that loan can be placed back on accrual status. Further, the borrower must show capacity to continue performing into the future prior to restoration of accrual status. To date, we have not restored any nonaccrual loan classified as a TDR to accrual status.

-43-

CO MMUNITY CAPITAL CORPORATION

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – continued

Provision and Allowance for Loan Losses – continued

The following is a summary of information pertaining to TDRs:

(Dollars in thousands)	June 30, 2011		December 31, 2010
Nonperforming TDRs	$	15,879	$	10,122
Performing TDRs:
Commercial	$	149	$	152
Commercial real estate – construction		141		378
Residential		1,045		3,281
Total performing TDRs	$	1,335	$	3,811
Total TDRs	$	17,214	$	13,933

Noninterest Income

Total noninterest income for the six months ended June 30, 2011 was $4,095,000, a decrease of $1,709,000, or 29.44%, compared to $5,804,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2010, and was $1,980,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2011, a decrease of $472,000, or 19.25%, compared to the three months ended June 30, 2010. Other operating income decreased $823,000, or 45.90%, to $970,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to $1,793,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2010, primarily due to a payment of $912,000 we received during the first quarter of 2010 for the settlement of a lawsuit regarding the management of a participation loan. Other operating income increased $46,000, or 10.48%, to $485,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared to $439,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2010.

We also recognized gains on the sale of securities available-for-sale in the amount of $375,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2011, compared to $1,265,000 in gains on the sale of securities available-for-sale for the six months ended June 30, 2010. Gains on sale of securities available-for-sale were $152,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2011, compared to $582,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2010.

Service charges on deposit accounts decreased $220,000, or 22.61%, from the six months ended June 30, 2010 to the six months ended June 30, 2011 and $114,000, or 23.17%, from the three months ended June 30, 2010 to the three months June 30, 2011. Gains on sales of loans held for sale increased $71,000, or 10.03%, from $708,000 to $779,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2011, compared to the six months ended June 30, 2010 and decreased $57,000, or 13.90%, from $410,000 to $353,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2010.

The income from fiduciary activities increased $157,000, or 17.05%, from $921,000 for the six-month period ended June 30, 2010 to $1,078,000 for the six-month period ended June 30, 2011, and $99,000, or 22.05%, from $449,000 for the three-month period ended June 30, 2010 to $548,000 for the three-month period ended June 30, 2011. The increase is primarily due to growth of new accounts as well as increased market value of assets under management. Fees from brokerage services decreased $4,000, or 2.7%, from the six months ended June 30, 2010 to the six months ended June 30, 2011 and decreased $16,000, or 20.00%, for the three months ended June 30, 2011 from the three months ended June 30, 2010.

Noninterest Expense

Total noninterest expense for the first six months of 2011 was $10,265,000, a decrease of $329,000, or 3.31%, when compared to $9,936,000 for the first six months of 2010. For the quarter ended June 30, 2011, noninterest expense was $5,267,000, an increase of $122,000, or 2.37%, over the comparable period of 2010.

The primary component of noninterest expense is salaries and benefits, which increased $90,000, or 1.83%, from $4,919,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2010 to $5,009,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2011, and decreased $42,000, or 1.69%, from $2,480,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2010 to $2,438,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2011.

-44-

CO MMUNITY CAPITAL CORPORATION

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – continued

Noninterest Expense - continued

We realized an increase in FDIC assessments of $158,000, or 21.79%, from $725,000 for the six-month period ended June 30, 2010 to $883,000 for the six-month period ended June 30, 2011. The increase is primarily a result of increases in the FDIC insurance premiums due to the recession of the U.S. economy and failure of unaffiliated FDIC-insured depository institutions. FDIC assessments increased $25,000, or 6.60%, from $379,000 for the three-month period ended June 30, 2010 to $404,000 for the three-month period ended June 30, 2011.

Net occupancy expense increased $17,000, or 2.60%, for the six-month period ended June 30, 2011 over the related period in 2010, and decreased $3,000, or 0.93%, for the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared to the same period in 2010. The amortization of intangible assets decreased $19,000, or 9.41%, from $202,000 from the six-month period ended June 30, 2010 to $183,000 for the six-month period ended June 30, 2011, and decreased $14,000, or 0.14%, from the three-month period ended June 30, 2010 to the three months ended June 30, 2011. Furniture and equipment expense decreased $90,000, or 23.68%, from the six-month period ended June 30, 2010 to the six-month period ended June 30, 2011, and decreased $48,000, or 25.53%, from the three-month period ended June 30, 2010 to the three-month period ended June 30, 2011.

Net cost of operation of other real estate owned decreased $111,000, or 12.86%, to $752,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2011 from $863,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2010. For the three-month period ended June 30, 2011, net cost of operation of other real estate increased $25,000, or 4.40% to $593,000 from $568,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2010.

Other operating expenses were $2,477,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2011, as compared to $2,193,000 for the same period in 2010, an increase of $284,000, or 12.95%. Other operating expenses increased $179,000, or 16.14%, for the three month period ended June 30, 2011 compared to the three month period ended June 30, 2010. The increase is primarily due to expenses related to the proposed merger with Park Sterling Corporation which totaled $314,000 for the six-month period ended June 30, 2011, and $179,000 for the three-month period ended June 30, 2011.

Income Taxes

For the six months ended June 30, 2011, the effective income tax rate was 14.80% and the income tax provision was $140,000. Our lower effective tax rate are a result of tax-exempt income on securities and bank owned life insurance. For the quarter ended June 30, 2011, the effective tax rate was 56.91% and the income tax benefit was $284,000. The tax benefit for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 was due to our net loss.

For the six months ended June 30, 2010, the effective income tax rate was 26.58% and the income tax provision was $707,000. For the quarter ended June 30, 2010, the effective tax rate was 5.61% and the income tax provision was $21,000.

Net Income (Loss)

The combination of the above factors resulted in net income of $806,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to net income of $1,953,000 for the comparable period in 2010, a decrease of $1,147,000, or 58.73%. For the quarter ended June 30, 2011, net losses were was $215,000, a decrease of $568,000 when compared to net income of $353,000 for the second quarter of 2010.

Assets and Liabilities

During the first six months of 2011, total assets decreased $18,882,000, or 2.88%, when compared to December 31, 2010. We experienced a decrease of $31,756,000, or 6.62%, in loans during the first six months of 2011. Total investment securities decreased 23.46%, or $19,621,000, when compared to December 31, 2010. Cash and due from banks including interest-bearing deposit accounts increased $39,054,000, or 105.05%, to $76,229,000 at June 30, 2011 compared to $37,175,000 at December 31, 2010. The increase in cash at June 30, 2011 compared to December 31, 2010 was primarily due to our efforts to increase our on-balance sheet liquidity. As a result, we retained significant balances in our Federal Reserve account rather than investing them in other types of assets. On the liability side, total deposits decreased $20,566,000, or 4.15%, to $474,616,000 at June 30, 2011.

-45-

CO MMUNITY CAPITAL CORPORATION

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – continued

Investment Securities

Investment securities decreased $19,621,000, or 23.46%, to $64,030,000 at June 30, 2011 from $83,651,000 at December 31, 2010. Securities available for sale decreased $18,768,000, or 25.35%, during the first six months of 2011 and nonmarketable equity securities decreased $853,000, or 8.86%, during the first six months of 2011. As of June 30, 2011, securities available for sale totaling $51,033,000 were in an unrealized loss position, all of which have been in a loss position for less than 12 months. Based on industry analyst reports and credit ratings, we believe that the deterioration in value is attributable to changes in market interest rates and is not in the credit quality of the issuer, and, therefore, these losses are not considered other-than-temporary.

We review our investment portfolio at least quarterly and more frequently when economic conditions warrant, assessing whether there is any indication of other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”). Factors considered in the review include estimated cash flows, length of time and extent to which market value has been less than cost, the financial condition and near term prospects of the issuer, and our intent and ability to retain the security to allow for an anticipated recovery in market value.

Loans

Loans receivable decreased $31,756,000, or 6.62%, since December 31, 2010. Real estate mortgage and commercial loans decreased $8,928,000, or 3.19%, to $270,632,000 at June 30, 2011. Real estate construction loans decreased $11,337,000, or 11.44% , to $87,739,000 at June 30, 2011. Commercial and agricultural loans decreased $8,473,000, or 21.33%, to $31,247,000 at June 30, 2011. Balances within the major loan receivable categories as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 are as follows:

(Dollars in thousands)	June 30, 2011		December 31, 2010
Commercial and agricultural	$	31,247	$	39,720
Real estate – construction		87,739		99,076
Real estate - mortgage and commercial		270,632		279,560
Home equity		39,427		42,167
Consumer, installment		17,425		17,636
Consumer, credit card and checking		1,167		1,234
	$	447,637	$	479,393

Premises and Equipment

Our purchases of fixed assets during the first six months of 2011 totaled $18,000. Of this amount, $11,000 was during the second quarter of 2011. Total fixed assets, net of depreciation, decreased $362,000 during the first six months of 2011.

Deposits

Total deposits increased $20,566,000, or 4.15%, to $474,616,000 at June 30, 2011 from $495,182,000 at December 31, 2010. Noninterest-bearing deposits increased $4,050,000, or 3.93%, from $103,080,000 at December 31, 2010 to $107,130,000 at June 30, 2011, and interest-bearing deposits decreased $24,616,000, or 6.28% from $392,102,000 at December 31, 2010 to $367,486,000 at June 30, 2011.

-46-

CO MMUNITY CAPITAL CORPORATION

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – continued

Deposits - continued

Balances within the major deposit categories as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 are as follows:

(Dollars in thousands)	June 30, 2011		December 31, 2010

Noninterest-bearing demand deposits	$	107,130	$	103,080
Interest-bearing demand deposits		65,706		63,024
Money market accounts		130,166		133,409
Savings deposits		44,540		42,481
Certificates of deposits		119,225		145,339
Brokered certificates of deposit		7,849		7,849
	$	474,616	$	495,182

Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank

Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta to us totaled $95,400,000 at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010. Of the $95,400,000 in advances with Federal Home Loan Bank, the following have scheduled maturities greater than one year:

Maturing on	Interest Rate		Principal
(Dollars in thousands)
03/05/13	1.94% - fixed, callable 09/06/11	$	5,400
01/06/14	0.41% - adjustable rate, resets 07/06/11		10,000
01/06/14	0.41% - adjustable rate, resets 07/06/11		10,000
01/16/15	2.77% - fixed, callable 07/18/11		10,000
06/03/15	3.36% - fixed, callable 09/06/11		15,000
02/02/17	4.31% - fixed, callable 08/02/11		10,000
05/18/17	4.15% - fixed, callable 08/18/11		10,000
			$ 70,400

Junior Subordinated Debentures

On June 15, 2006, Community Capital Corporation Statutory Trust I (a non-consolidated subsidiary) issued $10,000,000 in trust preferred securities with a maturity of June 15, 2036. The rate was fixed at 7.04% until June 14, 2011, at which point the rate adjusts quarterly to the three-month LIBOR plus 1.55%, and can be called without penalty beginning on June 15, 2011. The rate adjusted to 1.80% on June 15, 2011. In accordance with the revised FIN 46, the Trust has not been consolidated in these financial statements. We received from the Trust the $10,000,000 proceeds from the issuance of the securities and the $310,000 initial proceeds from the capital investment in the Trust, and accordingly have shown the funds due to the Trust as $10,310,000 junior subordinated debentures.

The proceeds from the issuance were used to extinguish short-term borrowings and to inject capital into the Bank, as the current regulatory rules allow certain amount of junior subordinated debentures to be included in the calculation of regulatory capital.

In January 2010, we announced the decision to defer future interest payments on our trust preferred subordinated debt, beginning with our interest payment due on March 15, 2010, for the foreseeable future to maintain cash levels at the holding company level. The terms of the debentures and trust indentures allow for us to defer interest payments for up to 20 consecutive quarters without default or penalty. During the period that the interest deferrals are elected, we will continue to record interest expense associated with the debentures. Upon the expiration of the deferral period, all accrued and unpaid interest will be due and payable.

-47-

CO MMUNITY CAPITAL CORPORATION

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – continued

Capital

Quantitative measures established by the federal banking agencies to ensure capital adequacy require us to maintain minimum ratios of Tier 1 and total capital as a percentage of assets and off-balance-sheet exposures, adjusted for risk weights ranging from 0% to 100%. Tier 1 capital consists of common shareholders’ equity, excluding the unrealized gain or loss on securities available-for-sale, minus certain intangible assets. Tier 2 capital consists of the allowance for loan losses subject to certain limitations. Total capital for purposes of computing the capital ratios consists of the sum of Tier 1 and Tier 2 capital. The regulatory minimum requirements are 4% for Tier 1 and 8% for total risk-based capital.

We are also required to maintain capital at a minimum level based on total average assets, which is known as the leverage ratio. Only the strongest banks are allowed to maintain capital at the minimum requirement of 3%. All others are subject to maintaining ratios at least 1% to 2% above the minimum.

The following table summarizes capital ratios and the regulatory minimum requirements at June 30, 2011:

	Tier 1 Risk-based			Total Risk-based			Tier 1 Leverage
Actual ratio:
Community Capital Corporation		11.87	%		13.15	%		8.32	%
CapitalBank		11.70	%		12.97	%		8.19	%
Regulatory minimums:
For capital adequacy purposes		4.00	%		8.00	%		4.00	%
To be well-capitalized under prompt action provisions		6.00	%		10.00	%		5.00	%

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Shareholders’ equity was increased by net income of $806,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2011. Due to changes in the market rates of interest, the fair value of our securities available for sale increased, which had the effect of increasing shareholder’s equity by $936,000, net of deferred taxes, for the six months ended June 30, 2011 when compared to December 31, 2010. Total equity also increased by $58,000 for the amortization of deferred compensation on restricted stock for the six months ended June 30, 2011. Total equity was also increased by $122,000 for sales of treasury shares.

Our liquidity position remained strong during the first six months of 2011, as we had no overnight wholesale borrowings and $65,723,000 in our Federal Reserve correspondent account at June 30, 2011. For the near term, maturities and sales of securities available-for-sale and cash on hand are expected to be sources of liquidity as we deploy these funds into loans and other investments to achieve the desired mix of assets and liabilities. At June 30, 2011, we had $10,675,000 of securities available-for-sale as sources of liquidity. We also expect to build our deposit base. Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank, availability at Federal Reserve Bank Discount Window, and our correspondent banks will also continue to serve as a funding source, at least for the near future. At June 30, 2011, we had no borrowings outstanding and had the ability to receive $4,060,000 in funds under the terms of our agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank. Additionally, we have the ability to receive an additional $98,665,000 in advances under the terms of our agreement with the Federal Home Loan Bank. Short-term borrowings by the Bank are not expected to be a primary source of liquidity for the near term; however, we have approximately $15,000,000 of unused lines of credit to purchase federal funds.

-48-

CO MMUNITY CAPITAL CORPORATION

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - continued

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

Through the operations of the Bank, we have made contractual commitments to extend credit in the ordinary course of our business activities. These commitments are legally binding agreements to lend money to our customers at predetermined interest rates for a specified period of time. At June 30, 2011, we had issued commitments to extend credit of $49,204,000 and standby letters of credit of $1,520,000 through various types of commercial lending arrangements. Approximately $38,922,000 of these commitments to extend credit had variable rates.

The following table sets forth the length of time until maturity for unused commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit at June 30, 2011.

(Dollars in thousands)	Within One Month		After One Through Three Months		After Three Through Twelve Months		Within One Year		Greater Than One Year		Total

Unused commitments to extend credit	$	2,979	$	4,092	$	11,560	$	18,631	$	30,573	$	49,204
Standby letters of credit		228		652		615		1,495		25		1,520
Total	$	3,207	$	4,744	$	12,175	$	20,126	$	30,598	$	50,724

We evaluate each customer’s credit worthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary by us upon extension of credit, is based on our credit evaluation of the borrower. Collateral varies but may include accounts receivable, inventory, property, plant and equipment, commercial and residential real estate.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

The following is a summary of recent authoritative pronouncements that affect accounting, reporting, and disclosure of financial information:

In July 2010, the Receivables topic of the Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) was amended by Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2010-20 to require expanded disclosures related to a company’s allowance for credit losses and the credit quality of its financing receivables. The amendments require the allowance disclosures to be provided on a disaggregated basis. The Company is required to include these disclosures in its interim and annual financial statements. See Note 9 in our Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 1 above.

Disclosures about Troubled Debt Restructurings (“TDRs”) required by ASU 2010-20 were deferred by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) in ASU 2011-01 issued in January 2011. In April 2011 the FASB issued ASU 2011-02 to assist creditors with their determination of when a restructuring is a TDR. The determination is based on whether the restructuring constitutes a concession and whether the debtor is experiencing financial difficulties as both events must be present. Disclosures related to TDRs under ASU 2010-20 will be effective for reporting periods beginning after June 15, 2011.

In December 2010, the Intangibles topic of the ASC was amended to modify Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test for reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts. For those reporting units, an entity is required to perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test if it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists. Any resulting goodwill impairment should be recorded as a cumulative-effect adjustment to beginning retained earnings upon adoption. Impairments occurring subsequent to adoption should be included in earnings. The amendment is effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2011.

Also in December 2010, the Business Combinations topic of the ASC was amended to specify that if a public entity presents comparative financial statements, the entity should disclose revenue and earnings of the combined entity as though the business combination that occurred during the current year had occurred as of the beginning of the comparable prior annual reporting period only. The amendment also requires that the supplemental pro forma disclosures include a description of the nature and amount of any material, nonrecurring pro forma adjustments directly attributable to the business combination included in the reported pro forma revenue and earnings. This amendment is effective for the Company for business

-49-

CO MMUNITY CAPITAL CORPORATION

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - continued

combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after January 1, 2011, although early adoption is permitted. The Company does not expect the amendment to have any impact on the financial statements.

In April 2011, the criteria used to determine effective control of transferred assets in the Transfers and Servicing topic of the ASC was amended by ASU 2011-03. The requirement for the transferor to have the ability to repurchase or redeem the financial assets on substantially the agreed terms and the collateral maintenance implementation guidance related to that criterion were removed from the assessment of effective control. The other criteria to assess effective control were not changed. The amendments are effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2012 but are not expected to have a material effect on the financial statements.

ASU 2011-04 was issued in May 2011 to amend the Fair Value Measurement topic of the ASC by clarifying the application of existing fair value measurement and disclosure requirements and by changing particular principles or requirements for measuring fair value or for disclosing information about fair value measurements. The amendments will be effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2012 but are not expected to have a material effect on the financial statements.

The Comprehensive Income topic of the ASC was amended in June 2011. The amendment eliminates the option to present other comprehensive income as a part of the statement of changes in stockholders’ equity. The amendment requires consecutive presentation of the statement of net income and other comprehensive income and requires an entity to present reclassification adjustments from other comprehensive income to net income on the face of the financial statements. The amendments will be applicable to the Company on January 1, 2012 and will be applied retrospectively.

Other accounting standards that have been issued or proposed by the FASB or other standards-setting bodies are not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Not Applicable.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Controls Evaluation and Related CEO and CFO Certifications. We conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our “disclosure controls and procedures” (Disclosure Controls) as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report. The controls evaluation was done under the supervision and with the participation of management, including our Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO).

Attached as exhibits to this Quarterly Report are certifications of the CEO and the CFO, which are required in accordance with Rule 13a-14 of the Exchange Act. This “Controls and Procedures” section includes the information concerning the controls evaluation referred to in the certifications, and it should be read in conjunction with the certifications for a more complete understanding of the topics presented.

Definition of Disclosure Controls. Disclosure Controls are controls and procedures designed to reasonably assure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. Disclosure Controls are also designed to reasonably assure that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including the CEO and CFO, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Our Disclosure Controls include components of our internal control over financial reporting, which consists of control processes designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of our financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the U.S. To the extent that components of our internal control over financial reporting are included within our Disclosure Controls, they are included in the scope of our quarterly controls evaluation.

-50-

CO MMUNITY CAPITAL CORPORATION

Item 4. Controls and Procedures - continued

Limitations on the Effectiveness of Controls. The company’s management, including the CEO and CFO, does not expect that our Disclosure Controls or our internal control over financial reporting will prevent all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the control system’s objectives will be met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Controls can also be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the controls. The design of any system of controls is based in part on certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or deterioration in the degree of compliance with policies or procedures. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

Scope of the Controls Evaluation. The evaluation of our Disclosure Controls included a review of the controls’ objectives and design, the company’s implementation of the controls and the effect of the controls on the information generated for use in this Quarterly Report. In the course of the controls evaluation, we sought to identify data errors, control problems or acts of fraud and confirm that appropriate corrective actions, including process improvements, were being undertaken. This type of evaluation is performed on a quarterly basis so that the conclusions of management, including the CEO and CFO, concerning the effectiveness of the controls can be reported in our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and to supplement our disclosures made in our Annual Report on Form 10-K. Many of the components of our Disclosure Controls are also evaluated on an ongoing basis by our finance personnel, as well as our independent auditors who evaluate them in connection with determining their auditing procedures related to their report on our annual financial statements and not to provide assurance on our controls. The overall goals of these various evaluation activities are to monitor our Disclosure Controls, and to modify them as necessary. Our intent is to maintain the Disclosure Controls as dynamic systems that change as conditions warrant.

Among other matters, we also considered whether our evaluation identified any “significant deficiencies” or “material weaknesses” in our internal control over financial reporting, and whether the company had identified any acts of fraud involving personnel with a significant role in our internal control over financial reporting. This information was important both for the controls evaluation generally, and because Item 5 in the certifications of the CEO and CFO requires that the CEO and CFO disclose that information to our Board’s Audit Committee and to our independent auditors. In the professional auditing literature, “significant deficiencies” are referred to as “reportable conditions,” which are deficiencies in the design or operation of controls that could adversely affect our ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data in the financial statements. Auditing literature defines “material weakness” as a particularly serious reportable condition in which the internal control does not reduce to a relatively low level the risk that misstatements caused by error or fraud may occur in amounts that would be material in relation to the financial statements and the risk that such misstatements would not be detected within a timely period by employees in the normal course of performing their assigned functions. We also sought to address other controls matters in the controls evaluation, and in each case if a problem was identified, we considered what revision, improvement and/or correction to make in accordance with our ongoing procedures.

Conclusions. Based upon the controls evaluation, our CEO and CFO have concluded that, subject to the limitations noted above, as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report, our Disclosure Controls were effective to provide reasonable assurance that material information relating to us and our consolidated subsidiaries is made known to management, including the CEO and CFO, particularly during the period when our periodic reports are being prepared.

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

We are party to certain litigation that we consider routine and incidental to our business. Management does not expect the results of any of these actions to have a material effect on our business, results of operations or financial condition.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Not Applicable.

-51-

CO MMUNITY CAPITAL CORPORATION

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

Not Applicable.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

Not Applicable.

Item 4. (Removed and Reserved)

Item 5. Other Information

None.

Item 6. Exhibits

Exhibit 31.1

Certification of Principal Executive Officer required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Exhibit 31.2

Certificate of Principal Financial Officer required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Exhibit 32

Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

101

The following financial statements from the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Community Capital Corporation for the quarter ended June 30, 2011, formatted in eXtensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL): (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Income, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity and Comprehensive Income (Loss), (iv) Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows and (v) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.(1)

(1)	As provided in Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, this information shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 11 and 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subject to liability under those sections.

-52-

CO MMUNITY CAPITAL CORPORATION

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

COMMUNITY CAPITAL CORPORATION

By:

/s/ WILLIAM G. STEVENS

William G. Stevens

President & Chief Executive Officer

Date: August 5, 2011

By:

/s/ R. WESLEY BREWER

R. Wesley Brewer

Chief Financial Officer

-53-

Community Capital (NASDAQ:CPBK)
Historical Stock Chart
From May 2024 to Jun 2024

Click Here for more Community Capital Charts.

Community Capital (NASDAQ:CPBK)
Historical Stock Chart
From Jun 2023 to Jun 2024

Market Data

News

Trading Tools

Markets

Discover

Hot Features

Follow Feed

Options Flow

Monitor

CPBK Community Capital Corp. (MM)

News

Your Recent History

Company

Business

Popular

Get The App

Trending Now

Toplists

Market Data

News

Trading Tools

Markets

Discover

Hot Features

Follow Feed

Options Flow

Monitor

CPBK Community Capital Corp. (MM)

News

Your Recent History

Company

Business

Popular

Get The App