NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
1. Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of NCI, Inc. and its subsidiaries (NCI or the Company)
have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the U. S. (GAAP) for interim financial information and pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
As a result, certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been condensed or omitted. In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited interim condensed
consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments necessary to fairly present the Companys financial position as of June 30, 2017 and its results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, and
cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, which consist of normal and recurring adjustments. The information disclosed in the notes to the financial statements for these periods is unaudited. The current periods results
of operations are not necessarily indicative of results that may be achieved for any future period. All numbers in tables are presented in thousands except share and per share numbers. For further information, refer to the financial statements and
footnotes included in NCIs Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, as filed with the SEC
.
Recently Issued
Accounting Pronouncements
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, which simplifies several aspects of the accounting for share-based payments,
including immediate recognition of all excess tax benefits and deficiencies in the income statement, changing the threshold to qualify for equity classification up to the employees maximum statutory tax rates, allowing an entity-wide
accounting policy election to either estimate the number of awards that are expected to vest or account for forfeitures as they occur, and clarifying the classification on the statement of cash flows for the excess tax benefit and employee taxes
paid when an employer withholds shares for tax-withholding purposes. The Company adopted ASU 2016-09 effective January 1, 2017 on a prospective basis. The Company elected to continue to estimate the number of awards that are expected to vest.
2. Business Overview
NCI is a leading provider of
enterprise solutions and services to U.S. defense, intelligence, health care and civilian government agencies. We have the expertise and proven track record to solve our customers most important and complex mission challenges through
technology and innovation. Our team of highly skilled professionals focuses on delivering cost-effective solutions and services in the areas of agile software application and systems development/integration; cybersecurity and information assurance;
engineering and logistics support; enterprise information management and advanced analytics; cloud computing and IT infrastructure optimization; health IT and medical support; IT service management; and modeling, simulation and training.
Headquartered in Reston, Virginia, the Company has approximately 2,000 employees operating at more than 100 locations worldwide. The majority of the Companys revenue was derived from contracts with the U.S. Federal Government, directly as a
prime contractor or as a subcontractor. NCI primarily conducts business throughout the U. S. The Company reports operating results and financial data as one reportable segment.
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, the Company generated approximately 62% of revenue from the Department of Defense, including agencies
within the intelligence community, and approximately 38% of revenue from federal civilian agencies. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, the Company generated approximately 64% of revenue from the Department of Defense, including
agencies within the intelligence community, and approximately 36% of revenue from federal civilian agencies.
NCIs Program Executive Office Soldier
(PEO Soldier) contract is the Companys largest revenue-generating contract and accounted for approximately 16% and 17% of revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The Companys PEO Soldier
program is a cost-plus fee contract consisting of a base period and four option periods for a total term of five years, which commenced in October 1, 2015. NCIs Cyber Network Operations and Security Support (CNOSS) program,
supporting the U.S. Army Network Enterprise Technology Command accounted for approximately 11% of revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016. This cost-plus-fixed-fee, single award indefinite delivery indefinite quantity contract
consists of a 12-month base period with two one-year option periods and one six-month option period, and commenced in October 2014.
4
3. Misappropriation Loss and Related Expenses
As previously disclosed, in January 2017, the Company identified a misappropriation of Company funds by its former controller. An internal investigation of the
matter was completed in March 2017, and revealed that the former controller had embezzled $19.4 million through a circumvention of controls, which included transfers from the payroll account to his personal account, creating fictitious invoices, and
altering bank account statements to conceal the misappropriations. Misappropriation loss and related expenses totaled approximately $2.2 million and $1.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively and
approximately $8.9 and $2.9 for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Misappropriation loss and related expenses includes the loss due to embezzled funds as well as external professional service fees including legal,
forensic accounting, audit and other consulting fees.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30,
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
Misappropriation loss
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,369
|
|
|
$
|
380
|
|
|
$
|
2,909
|
|
Expenses related to misappropriation loss
|
|
|
2,244
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,481
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,244
|
|
|
$
|
1,369
|
|
|
$
|
8,861
|
|
|
$
|
2,909
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share exclude dilution and are computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period.
Diluted earnings per share reflect potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock. Diluted earnings per share include the incremental effect of stock options
calculated using the treasury stock method. Shares that are anti-dilutive are not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share. For the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, approximately 27,000 and 8,000 shares, respectively,
were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share, because to do so would have been anti-dilutive. For the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, approximately 52,000 and 4,000 shares, respectively, were not included in the
computation of diluted earnings per share, because to do so would have been anti-dilutive. The following table details the computation of basic and diluted earnings per common share (Class A and Class B) for the three months ended June 30,
2017 and 2016.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30,
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
2,277
|
|
|
$
|
2,553
|
|
|
$
|
1,469
|
|
|
$
|
5,141
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of basic shares outstanding during the period
|
|
|
13,323
|
|
|
|
13,184
|
|
|
|
13,300
|
|
|
|
13,169
|
|
Dilutive effect of stock options and restricted stock after application of treasury stock
method
|
|
|
590
|
|
|
|
674
|
|
|
|
573
|
|
|
|
678
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of diluted shares outstanding during the period
|
|
|
13,913
|
|
|
|
13,858
|
|
|
|
13,873
|
|
|
|
13,847
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share
|
|
$
|
0.17
|
|
|
$
|
0.19
|
|
|
$
|
0.11
|
|
|
$
|
0.39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share
|
|
$
|
0.16
|
|
|
$
|
0.18
|
|
|
$
|
0.11
|
|
|
$
|
0.37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
5. Accounts Receivable
Accounts receivable consists of billed and unbilled amounts. The following table details accounts receivable at the end of each period:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
|
June 30,
2017
|
|
|
December 31,
2016
|
|
Billed receivables
|
|
$
|
24,376
|
|
|
$
|
19,367
|
|
Unbilled receivables:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts billable at end of period
|
|
|
26,505
|
|
|
|
25,484
|
|
Other
|
|
|
7,727
|
|
|
|
7,003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total unbilled receivables
|
|
|
34,232
|
|
|
|
32,487
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accounts receivable
|
|
|
58,608
|
|
|
|
51,854
|
|
Less: Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
|
742
|
|
|
|
742
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accounts receivable, net
|
|
$
|
57,866
|
|
|
$
|
51,112
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other unbilled receivables primarily consist of amounts that will be billed upon milestone completions and other accrued
amounts that cannot be billed as of the end of the period. Substantially all unbilled receivables are expected to be billed and collected within the next 12 months.
6. Property and Equipment
The following table details
property and equipment at the end of each period:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
|
June 30,
2017
|
|
|
December 31,
2016
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Furniture and equipment
|
|
$
|
22,035
|
|
|
$
|
21,799
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
7,452
|
|
|
|
7,450
|
|
Real property
|
|
|
549
|
|
|
|
549
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,036
|
|
|
|
29,798
|
|
Less: Accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
25,209
|
|
|
|
23,466
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
$
|
4,827
|
|
|
$
|
6,332
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expense for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 was $0.9 million and $0.8
million, respectively. Depreciation and amortization expense for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 was $1.7 million.
7. Intangible
Assets
The following table details intangible assets at the end of each period:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
|
June 30,
2017
|
|
|
December 31,
2016
|
|
Contract and customer relationships
|
|
$
|
33,284
|
|
|
$
|
33,284
|
|
Developed software
|
|
|
1,113
|
|
|
|
1,113
|
|
Less: Accumulated amortization
|
|
|
(20,627
|
)
|
|
|
(18,811
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
$
|
13,770
|
|
|
$
|
15,586
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
Amortization expense of intangible assets for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 was
$0.9 million. Amortization expense of intangible assets for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 was $1.8 million. Intangible assets are primarily amortized on a straight line basis over periods ranging from seven to 11 years.
Expected amortization expense for the remainder of the fiscal year ending December 31, 2017, and for each of the fiscal years thereafter, is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ending December 31,
|
|
|
|
2017 (remaining six months)
|
|
|
1,816
|
|
2018
|
|
|
3,150
|
|
2019
|
|
|
3,049
|
|
2020
|
|
|
3,027
|
|
2021
|
|
|
2,728
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
13,770
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
8. Share-Based Payments
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, the Company granted 94,000 non-qualified stock options to purchase shares of Class A common
stock with a weighted average exercise price of $16.66. During the three months ended June 30, 2017, 80,000 stock options were exercised at a weighted-average price of $5.55. During the six months ended June 30, 2017, 92,500 stock options
were exercised at a weighted-average price of $6.17. As of June 30, 2017, there were 934,000 stock options outstanding with a weighted average exercise price of $8.47. During the three months ended June 30, 2017, 30,000 shares of restricted
stock were granted and 20,000 shares of restricted stock were cancelled or forfeited. During the six months ended June 30, 2017, 30,000 shares of restricted stock were granted and 91,080 shares of restricted stock were cancelled or forfeited.
During the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, zero and 21,253 shares of restricted stock vested, respectively. As of June 30, 2017, there were 246,167 shares of restricted stock outstanding.
The following table summarizes stock compensation expense allocated to cost of revenue and general and administrative costs for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2017 and 2016:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30,
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
Cost of revenue
|
|
$
|
(3
|
)
|
|
$
|
36
|
|
|
$
|
33
|
|
|
$
|
115
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
232
|
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
556
|
|
|
|
428
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
229
|
|
|
$
|
214
|
|
|
$
|
589
|
|
|
$
|
543
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2017, there was approximately $3.5 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to
unvested stock compensation arrangements. This cost is expected to be fully amortized over the next five years, with approximately $0.6 million, $1.1 million, $0.8 million, $0.7 million and $0.3 million amortized during the
remainder of 2017, and the full years of 2018, 2019, 2020, and 2021, respectively. The cost of stock compensation is included in the Companys Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income and expensed over the service period of the equity
awards.
On January 6, 2017, pursuant to the terms of the Separation Agreement entered into on November 29, 2016 between the Company and Marco
de Vito, our former Chief Operating Officer, the Company paid Mr. de Vito $2.1 million for the repurchase of 272,000 vested stock options, which represented the difference between the closing price on the date of the agreement and the exercise
prices of the vested options. The Company recorded the payment as a reduction to additional paid-in capital in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet.
9. Debt
On May 25, 2017, the Company entered into
the Fifth Amendment (the Amendment) to the Amended and Restated Loan and Security Agreement, dated December 13, 2010, as amended by and among the Company and its subsidiaries, SunTrust Bank, which acted as administrative agent for
the lenders, the lenders named therein and the other parties thereto (the Credit Agreement). The Amendment modifies certain provisions of the Credit Agreement to, among other things:
|
|
|
extend the commitment termination date from May 31, 2017 to September 30, 2017;
|
|
|
|
amend the definition of Earnings before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization (EBITDA) to deduct from the calculation thereof, to the extent deducted to determine consolidated net income under the
Credit Agreement, nonrecurring expenses not incurred in the ordinary course of business and related to the investigation and/or litigation by the Company of the alleged embezzlement by the former corporate controller of the Company, in an aggregate
amount not to exceed $10,000,000, subject to the qualifications and limitations provided for therein;
|
|
|
|
amend the definition of Swingline Commitment from $500,000 to $8,000,000; and
|
|
|
|
subject to certain conditions, permit the Company to pay a one-time dividend in an amount not to exceed $2,500,000 in the aggregate.
|
The outstanding borrowings are collateralized by a security interest in substantially all of the Companys assets. The lenders also require a direct
assignment of all contracts at the lenders discretion. The outstanding balance under the Credit Agreement accrues interest based on one-month LIBOR plus an applicable margin, ranging from 210 to 310 basis points, based on the ratio of our
outstanding senior funded debt to EBITDA as defined in the Credit Agreement.
8
Our Credit Agreement (i) restricts our ability to repurchase or redeem our capital stock, or merge or
consolidate with another entity; (ii) limits our ability to borrow additional funds or to obtain other financing in the future for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions, investments and general corporate purposes; and
(iii) limits our ability to dispose of our assets, to create liens on our assets, to extend credit or to issue dividends to our stockholders.
During
the second quarter of 2017 and 2016, the Company had a weighted average outstanding loan balance of $3.4 million and $16.4 million, respectively, and a weighted average borrowing rate of 3.1% and 2.3%, respectively.
As of June 30, 2017, there was no outstanding balance under the Credit Agreement and the Company was in compliance with all its loan covenants.
10. Income Taxes
As of June 30, 2017, the Company
accrued interest expense related to uncertain tax positions totaling $0.8 million. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, the Company recorded $0.1 million and $0.1 million, respectively in interest expense related to
its uncertain tax positions in Interest Expense in the Consolidated Statements of Income.
11. Leases
In March 2017, the Company executed the sixth amendment to the corporate office lease agreement (the Lease Amendment). The Lease Amendment extended
the termination date to October 31, 2027 and provided certain rent abatement, tenant allowances, and adjustments to base rent. Minimum lease payments under the Lease Amendment are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
For the year ending December 31,
|
|
|
|
2017 (remaining six months)
|
|
$
|
971
|
|
2018
|
|
|
1,967
|
|
2019
|
|
|
2,022
|
|
2020
|
|
|
2,077
|
|
2021
|
|
|
2,135
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
13,674
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total minimum lease payments
|
|
$
|
22,846
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12. Dividends
The
Companys Board of Directors declared and the Company paid the following dividends during the periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Declaration Date
|
|
Dividend
Per Share
|
|
|
Record Date
|
|
|
Total Amount
|
|
|
Payment Date
|
|
February 8, 2016
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
|
|
February 26, 2016
|
|
|
$
|
2,020
|
|
|
|
March 18, 2016
|
|
13. Related Party Transactions
The Company purchased services under a subcontract from Renegade Technology Systems, Inc., which is a government contractor wholly-owned by Rajiv Narang, the
son of Charles K. Narang, Chairman of the Board of Directors. For the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, the expense incurred under this agreement was approximately $0.6 million and $0.2 million, respectively. For the six
months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, the expense incurred under this agreement was approximately $1.0 million and $0.4 million, respectively. As of June 30, 2017 and 2016, outstanding amounts due to Renegade Technology Systems,
Inc. under this agreement were $0.2 million and $0.1 million, respectively.
14. Contingencies
Government Audits
Payments to the Company
on U.S. Federal Government contracts are subject to adjustment upon audit by various agencies of the U.S. Federal Government. Audits of costs and the related payments have been performed through 2009 for NCI Information Systems, Inc., the
Companys primary corporate vehicle for government contracting. In the opinion of management, the final determination of costs and related payments for unaudited years will not have a material effect on the Companys financial position,
results of operations, or liquidity.
9
Litigation
Civil Suit Against Former Controller
As previously
disclosed on January 23, 2017, the Company commenced an internal investigation upon discovering that its former controller, Jon Frank, had been embezzling money from the Company. Upon completion of the internal investigation, the Company
determined that the actual amount of the embezzlement by Mr. Frank during the period from January 2010 through 2017 was approximately $19.4 million. The Company believes that Mr. Frank acted alone and found no evidence that any other
NCI employee was aware of or colluded in the embezzlement of Company funds and found no evidence of any unlawful activity apart from that associated with Mr. Franks embezzlement of Company funds.
On January 23, 2017, the Company filed a lawsuit against Mr. Frank in the Circuit Court of Fairfax County in the State of Virginia to recover the
embezzled funds.
On February 2, 2017, the Honorable Chief Judge White entered an Order for Preliminary Injunction and Asset Freeze (the
Preliminary Injunction) against Mr. Frank. Among other things, the Preliminary Injunction placed an immediate freeze on all monies and assets of Mr. Frank and ordered Mr. Frank to prepare and deliver to the Company an
accounting of his personal assets. In addition, pursuant to the Preliminary Injunction, Mr. Frank agreed to cooperate with the Company to identify, recover and return to the Company all assets that he obtained wrongfully or acquired with
wrongfully-obtained funds.
Government Agency Investigations
In connection with the discovery of Mr. Franks embezzlement of money from the Company, the Company self-reported such matter to the SEC and the
civil and criminal divisions of the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ).
By letter to the Company dated February 1, 2017, the DOJ has
identified the Company as a possible victim of Mr. Franks conduct. On February 8, 2017, the SEC commenced a formal investigation and has served the Company with a subpoena requesting certain documents and information relevant to the
embezzlement of Company funds by Mr. Frank. The Company is cooperating fully with the DOJ and the SEC in connection with their respective investigations, which are ongoing.
The United States Attorneys Office for the Eastern District of Virginia (USAO EDVA) has opened a civil fraud investigation into the impact
of Mr. Franks conduct on the Companys government contracts. The Company is cooperating fully with the USAO EDVA and the Inspectors General of relevant government agencies in connection with this investigation, which is ongoing. At
this time, we do not have an estimate of the financial impact on the Company, if any, of the investigation being conducted by the USAO EDVA.
10
15. Subsequent Events
Acquisition of NCI by Affiliates of H.I.G. Capital, LLC
On July 2, 2017, NCI entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the Merger Agreement) with Cloud Intermediate Holdings, LLC, a Delaware
limited liability company (Parent), and Cloud Merger Sub, Inc., a Delaware corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of Parent (Purchaser). Parent and Purchaser are beneficially owned by affiliates of H.I.G. Capital, LLC
(together with Parent and Purchaser, HIG).
Pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement, on July 17, 2017, Purchaser commenced a tender
offer (the Offer) to purchase all of the outstanding shares of Class A common stock, par value $0.019 per share, and Class B common stock, par value $0.019 per share, of NCI (the Shares), at a price of $20.00 per Share,
net to the seller thereof in cash, without interest (such amount, as it may be adjusted pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement, the Offer Price), and subject to deduction for any required withholding of taxes. The initial
expiration date of the Offer is 12:00 midnight, New York City time, on August 11, 2017 (which is the end of the day on August 11, 2017), subject to extension in certain circumstances as required or permitted by the Merger Agreement.
The consummation of the Offer is subject to customary closing conditions, including, among other things: (i) there having been validly tendered and not
validly withdrawn prior to the expiration of the Offer that number of Shares representing at least a majority of the voting power of the Shares then outstanding on a fully diluted basis (assuming that the shares of Class B common stock will convert
to shares of Class A common stock upon consummation of the Offer); (ii) the expiration or termination of the waiting period under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 (which condition was satisfied on July 27, 2017);
(iii) the accuracy of NCIs representations and warranties, as of the expiration of the Offer, subject to certain qualifications set forth in the Merger Agreement; and (iv) other customary conditions to the Offer set forth in Annex A
to the Merger Agreement. The transaction will be financed through a combination of equity financing in an amount not less than $130.0 million that has been committed by H.I.G. Middle Market LBO Fund II, L.P., an affiliate of HIG, and debt financing
in an aggregate amount of $197.5 million that has been committed by KKR Credit Advisors (US) LLC. The consummation of the Offer and the Merger is not subject to any financing condition.
Following the consummation of the Offer, and subject to the satisfaction or waiver of the conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement, Purchaser will be
merged with and into NCI, with NCI continuing as the surviving corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of Parent (the Merger). The Merger Agreement provides that the Merger will be effected pursuant to Section 251(h) of the
Delaware General Corporation Law (the DGCL), without a vote of the stockholders of NCI.
At the effective time of the Merger (the
Effective Time), each Share that is outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time, other than the Shares owned by NCI, Parent or Purchaser, or by stockholders who have validly exercised and perfected their appraisal rights under
the DGCL, will be canceled and converted into the right to receive the Offer Price, payable to the holder thereof on the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement.
In addition, at the Effective Time, (i) each outstanding option to purchase Shares (each, a Company Option), whether or not then exercisable
or vested, will be canceled and converted into the right to receive from Parent or NCI an amount in cash equal to (a) the excess, if any, of (1) the Offer Price minus (2) the exercise price of such Company Option, multiplied by
(b) the number of Shares subject to such Company Option, and (ii) each outstanding award of restricted Shares (each, a Company RSA) (which shall be deemed to be fully vested) will be canceled and converted into the right to
receive an amount in cash equal to the product of (a) the Offer Price and (b) the number of Shares subject to such Company RSA.
NCI, Parent and
Purchaser have made customary representations, warranties and covenants in the Merger Agreement. NCIs covenants include, among other things, covenants regarding the operation of NCIs business prior to the Effective Time and covenants not
to solicit third party proposals relating to alternative transactions or provide information or enter into discussions in connection with alternative transactions, subject to exceptions to permit the Board of Directors to comply with its fiduciary
duties.
The Merger Agreement also includes customary termination rights in favor of each of NCI and Parent. NCI has agreed to pay Parent a termination
fee of $11.3 million if, among other circumstances, NCI terminates the Merger Agreement in compliance with its terms in order to accept a superior proposal or if Parent terminates the Merger Agreement because the Board of Directors has changed its
recommendation to NCIs stockholders with respect to the Offer or NCI has willfully and materially breached its obligations not to solicit third party proposals relating to alternative transactions. Parent has agreed to pay NCI a termination
fee of $19.7 million if NCI terminates the Merger Agreement because Parent has extended the Offer due to unavailability of its debt financing as of the expiration of the Offer or because, when all conditions to the Offer are satisfied, the full
proceeds of the debt financing are not available to Parent, and as a result, Parent fails to consummate the Offer within three business days following the expiration of the Offer.
Transaction Litigation
The Company and members of
NCIs Board of Directors are named as defendants in three putative class action lawsuits, all filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, challenging the Transaction, one of which also names Parent and
Purchaser as defendants. The first suit was filed on July 19, 2017 and is docketed as
Elliot Schwartz v. NCI, Inc., Charles K. Narang, Paul A. Dillahay, James P. Allen, Paul V. Lombardi, Cindy E. Moran, Austin J. Yerks and Daniel R. Young
,
Case No. 1:17-CV-00816-LO-TCB (the Schwartz Action). The second suit was filed on July 21, 2017 and is docketed as
Colleen Witmer v. NCI, Inc., Charles K. Narang, Paul A. Dillahay, James P. Allen, Paul V. Lombardi, Cindy E. Moran,
Austin J. Yerks, Daniel R. Young, H.I.G. Capital, L.L.C., Cloud Intermediate Holdings, L.L.C., and Cloud Merger Sub, Inc.
,
Case No. 1:17-CV-00838-LO-JFA (the Witmer Action). The third suit was filed on July 25, 2017 and is
docketed as
Deborah A. Nichols v. NCI, Inc., Charles K. Narang, Paul A. Dillahay, Daniel R. Young, Paul Lombardi, James P. Allen, Cindy E. Moran and Austin J. Yerks
,
Case No. 1:17-CV-00839-LO-MSN (the Nichols Action). Each
of the Schwartz Action, the Witmer Action and the Nichols Action allege that NCI and the members of NCIs Board of Directors violated Section 14 of the Exchange Act by issuing a Schedule 14D-9 that was materially misleading and omitted material
facts related to the Offer and the Merger. Each of the Schwartz Action, the Witmer Action and the Nichols Action also allege that the members of NCIs Board of Directors violated Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act, as controlling persons who had
the ability to prevent the Schedule 14D-9 from being materially false and misleading. Each of the Schwartz Action, the Witmer Action and the Nichols Action seek, among other things, an injunction against the consummation of the proposed Offer and
Merger and an award of costs for the actions, including reasonable attorneys and experts fees.
11