UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
x
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019
|
OR
o
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
For the transition period from _________ to _________
|
Commission file number: 001-35352
WELLESLEY
BANCORP, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in
its charter)
Maryland
|
|
45-3219901
|
(State or other jurisdiction
of incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
|
|
|
100 Worcester Street, Suite 300, Wellesley, Massachusetts
|
|
02481
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code)
|
Issuer’s telephone number, including
area code: (781) 235-2550
Securities registered pursuant to Section
12(b) of the Act:
Title
of each class
|
Trading
Symbol(s)
|
Name
of each exchange on which registered
|
Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share
|
WEBK
|
The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC
|
Securities registered pursuant to Section
12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned
issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
Yes ¨ No
x
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to
file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act. Yes ¨ No x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements
for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (Section 232.405 of
this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).
Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated,
an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions
of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company”, and “emerging
growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
Large accelerated filer ¨
|
Accelerated filer ¨
|
|
Non-accelerated filer x
|
Smaller reporting company x
|
|
|
Emerging growth company ¨
|
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the
registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial standards provided
pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the
registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨
No x
The aggregate market value of the common stock held by non-affiliates
as of June 30, 2019 was $64,061,367, based on a closing price of $32.61.
As of March 15, 2020, the registrant had 2,599,845 shares of
its common stock outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
None
INDEX
Forward-Looking Statements
When used in this Annual Report on Form
10-K, the words or phrases “will likely result,” “are expected to,” “will continue,” ”intends,”
”believes,” “is anticipated,” “estimate,” “project” or similar expressions are
intended to identify “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act
of 1995. Such statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties including changes in economic conditions in the Company’s
market area, changes in policies by regulatory agencies, changes in legislation or accounting policies, fluctuations in interest
rates, demand for loans in the Company’s market area, competition and information provided by third-party vendors and the
matters described herein under “Item 1A. Risk Factors” that could cause actual results to differ materially from historical
results and those presently anticipated or projected. The Company wishes to caution readers not to place undue reliance on any
such forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date made. The Company wishes to advise readers that the factors listed
above could affect the Company’s financial performance and could cause the Company’s actual results for future periods
to differ materially from any opinions or statements expressed with respect to future periods in any current statements.
Management’s
ability to predict results or the effect of future plans or strategies is inherently uncertain. Factors that could affect actual
results include, but are not limited to, our ability to complete our previously announced business combination with Cambridge Bancorp,
interest rate trends, the general economic climate in our market area, as well as nationwide, the outbreak of the coronavirus or
other highly infectious or contagious diseases, our ability to control costs and expenses, competitive products and pricing, loan
delinquency rates and changes in federal and state legislation and regulation and tax laws. These factors should be considered
in evaluating the forward-looking statements and undue reliance should not be placed on such statements. Wellesley Bancorp, Inc.
assumes no obligation to update any forward-looking statements.
The Company does not undertake, and
specifically disclaims any obligation, to publicly release the result of any revisions which may be made to any forward-looking
statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of such statements or to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or
unanticipated events.
PART I
Item 1. Business
General
Wellesley Bancorp, Inc. Wellesley
Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company” or “Wellesley Bancorp”) was incorporated in September 2011 to be the holding
company for Wellesley Bank (the “Bank”) following the Bank’s conversion (the “Conversion”) from the
mutual to stock form of ownership. On January 25, 2012, the Conversion was completed and the Bank became the wholly-owned subsidiary
of the Company. Also on that date, the Company sold and issued 2,407,151 shares of its common stock at a price of $10.00 per share,
through which the Company received net offering proceeds of $21.2 million. The Company’s principal business activity is the
ownership of the outstanding shares of common stock of the Bank. The Company does not own or lease any property, but instead uses
the premises, equipment and other property of the Bank, with the payment of appropriate rental fees, as required by applicable
laws and regulations, under the terms of an expense allocation agreement entered into with the Bank.
Wellesley Bank. Founded in
1911, Wellesley Bank is a Massachusetts chartered cooperative bank headquartered in Wellesley, Massachusetts. We operate as a community-oriented
financial institution offering traditional financial services to consumers and businesses in our primary market areas of Wellesley,
Newton, Needham, Cambridge, Boston and the surrounding communities. We attract deposits from the general public and use those funds
to originate residential mortgage loans, commercial real estate loans and construction loans, commercial business loans, and, to
a lesser extent, home equity lines of credit and other consumer loans. We conduct our lending and deposit activities primarily
with individuals and small businesses in our primary market areas. In addition, we also provide investment management services
for high net worth individuals, families, businesses, private partnerships, nonprofit organizations, foundations and trusts through
our wholly-owned subsidiary, Wellesley Investment Partners, LLC, (“Wellesley Investment Partners”) a registered investment
advisor.
The Bank’s and the Company’s
executive offices are located at 100 Worcester Street, Suite 300, Wellesley, Massachusetts 02481 and its telephone number is (781)
235-2550.
Our website address is www.wellesleybank.com.
Information on our website should not be considered a part of this document.
Wellesley Bank Charitable Foundation.
In connection with the Conversion, the Company established the Wellesley Bank Charitable Foundation (the “Foundation”)
through the contribution of $225 thousand in cash and 157,477 shares of common stock. The total contribution expense recognized
by the Company in 2012 was $1.8 million pre-tax ($1.1 million after tax). The Foundation makes grants and donations to support
charitable purposes within the communities served, currently or in the future, by the Company.
Pending Merger with Cambridge Bancorp
On December 5, 2019, Cambridge Bancorp
(“Cambridge”) and the Company issued a joint press release announcing that Cambridge and the Company have entered into
an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) pursuant to which the Company will merge with and into Cambridge,
with Cambridge as the surviving entity (the “Merger”). Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, which has been
approved by the boards of directors and stockholders of both companies, stockholders of the Company will receive 0.580 shares of
Cambridge common stock for each share of Wellesley common stock. The transaction is subject to customary closing conditions
and is expected to close during the second quarter of 2020.
Market Area
We conduct our operations from our executive
office and six full-service branch offices located in Wellesley, Newton, Needham, and Boston. Our primary lending market is defined
by our Community Reinvestment Act assessment area, and generally includes the communities of the greater Boston area. Due to our
locations in and around Boston, our primary market area benefits from the presence of numerous institutions of higher learning,
medical care and research centers and the corporate headquarters of several investment and financial services companies. The greater
Boston metropolitan area also has many life science and high technology companies employing personnel with specialized skills.
These factors affect the economic vitality of the region and impact the demand for residential homes, residential construction,
office buildings, shopping centers, and other commercial properties in our market area.
Our market area is located largely in the
Boston-Cambridge-Quincy, Massachusetts/New Hampshire Metropolitan Statistical Area. Based on the 2010 United States census, the
Boston metropolitan area is the 10th largest metropolitan area in the United States. Located adjacent to major transportation corridors,
the Boston metropolitan area provides a highly diversified economic base, with major employment sectors ranging from services,
manufacturing and wholesale/retail trade, to finance, technology and medical care.
Competition
We face significant competition for deposits
and loans. Our most direct competition for deposits has historically come from the financial institutions operating in our primary
market area and from other financial service companies such as securities brokerage firms, credit unions and insurance companies.
We also face competition for investors’ funds from money market funds and mutual funds. At June 30, 2019, which is the most
recent date for which data is available from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”), we held 1.9% of the
deposits in Norfolk County, which was the 14th largest market share among the 42 financial institutions with offices
in Norfolk County. At June 30, 2019, we also held 13.7% of the deposits in the town of Wellesley, which was the third largest market
share among the 14 financial institutions with offices in Wellesley. Some of the banks owned by large national and regional holding
companies and other community-based banks that also operate in our primary market area are larger than we are and, therefore, may
have greater resources or offer a broader range of products and services.
Our competition for loans comes from financial
institutions, including credit unions, in our primary market area and from other financial service providers, such as mortgage
companies and mortgage brokers. Competition for loans also comes from nondepository financial service companies entering the mortgage
market, such as insurance companies, securities companies and specialty finance companies.
We expect competition to increase in the
future as a result of legislative, regulatory and technological changes and the continuing trend toward consolidation within the
financial services industry. Technological advances, for example, have lowered barriers to entry, allowed banks to expand their
geographic reach by providing services over the internet, and made it possible for nondepository institutions to offer products
and services that traditionally have been provided by banks. Competition for gathering deposits and originating loans could limit
our growth in the future.
Lending Activities
Residential Mortgage Loans.
The largest segment of our loan portfolio is residential mortgage loans, which enable borrowers to purchase or refinance existing
homes, most of which serve as the primary residence of the owner. At December 31, 2019, residential mortgage loans were $388.3
million, or 46.1%, of our total loan portfolio, consisting of $77.7 million and $310.6 million of fixed-rate and adjustable-rate
loans, respectively. We offer fixed-rate and adjustable-rate residential mortgage loans with terms up to 30 years. Generally, our
fixed-rate loans conform to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac underwriting guidelines and are originated with the intention to sell. Our
adjustable-rate mortgage loans generally adjust either every year or every three years after an initial fixed period that ranges
from three to ten years. Interest rates and payments on our adjustable-rate loans generally are adjusted to a rate equal to a specified
percentage above a representative U.S. Treasury index. Depending on the loan type, the maximum amount by which the interest rate
may increase or decrease is generally 2% per adjustment period and the lifetime interest rate caps range from 5% to 6% over the
initial interest rate of the loan.
Borrower demand for adjustable-rate loans,
as compared to fixed-rate loans, is a function of the level of interest rates, the expectations of changes in the level of interest
rates, the ability of borrowers to qualify for longer-term fixed-rate loans under regulatory guidelines, and the difference between
the interest rates and loan fees offered for fixed-rate mortgage loans as compared to the interest rates and loan fees for adjustable-rate
loans. The relative amount of fixed-rate and adjustable-rate mortgage loans that can be originated at any time is largely determined
by the demand for each in a competitive environment. The loan fees, interest rates and other provisions of mortgage loans are determined
by us on the basis of our own pricing criteria, competitive market conditions and regulatory requirements.
While residential mortgage loans are normally
originated with up to 30-year terms, such loans typically remain outstanding for substantially shorter periods because borrowers
often prepay their loans in full either upon sale of the property pledged as security or upon refinancing the original loan. Therefore,
average loan maturity is a function of, among other factors, the level of purchase and sale activity in the real estate market,
prevailing interest rates and the interest rates payable on outstanding loans. Additionally, our current practice is generally
to (1) sell to the secondary market newly originated 15 year or longer-term conforming fixed-rate residential mortgage loans, and
(2) to hold in our portfolio non-conforming loans, shorter-term fixed-rate loans and adjustable-rate loans. Generally, conforming
fixed-rate loans are sold to third parties with servicing released, although we have sold residential loans with servicing retained
under certain conditions. Wellesley Bank’s portfolio lending generally consists of conforming and non-conforming adjustable-rate
loans for owner-occupied and investor properties with loan-to-value ratios of up to 80%. Mortgage amortizations range from 15 to
30 years. We do not originate “interest only” mortgage loans on one-to-four family residential properties nor do we
offer loans that provide for negative amortization of principal such as “option ARM” loans where the borrower can pay
less than the interest owed on their loan. Additionally, we generally do not offer “subprime loans” (loans that are
made with low down payments to borrowers with weakened credit histories typically characterized by payment delinquencies, previous
charge-offs, judgments or bankruptcies, or borrowers with questionable repayment capacity) or “Alt-A” loans (loans
to borrowers having less than full documentation).
We will make loans with loan-to-value ratios
up to 90% (occasionally to 95% for first time home buyers and other qualified borrowers on an exception basis); however, we generally
require private mortgage insurance for loans with a loan-to-value ratio over 80%. We require all properties securing mortgage loans
in excess of $250 thousand to be appraised by a licensed real estate appraiser. We generally require title insurance on all first
mortgage loans. Exceptions to these lending policies are based on an evaluation of credit risk related to the borrower and the
size of the loan. Borrowers must obtain hazard insurance, and flood insurance is required for loans on properties located in a
flood zone.
In an effort to provide financing for first-time
buyers, we offer adjustable-rate and fixed-rate loan programs. We offer mortgage loans through this program to qualified individuals
and originate the loans using modified underwriting guidelines, modified loan conditions and reduced closing costs.
Commercial Real Estate Loans.
We also offer fixed-rate and adjustable-rate mortgage loans secured by commercial real estate properties, including loans secured
by multi-family real estate properties. At December 31, 2019, commercial real estate loans were $181.9 million, or 21.6%, of our
total loan portfolio, inclusive of $56.3 million in multi-family real estate loans. The commercial real estate loan portfolio consisted
of $24.2 million in fixed-rate loans and $157.7 million in adjustable-rate loans at December 31, 2019. Our primary focus is individual
commercial real estate loan originations to small and mid-size owner occupants and investors in amounts between $1.0 million and
$5.0 million. The average size for loans in this portfolio was $1.2 million at December 31, 2019. Our commercial real estate and
multi-family loans are generally secured by properties used for business purposes such as office buildings, warehouses, retail
facilities and apartment buildings. In addition to originating these loans, we also occasionally participate in commercial real
estate loans with other financial institutions located primarily in Massachusetts.
We originate fixed-rate and adjustable-rate
commercial real estate and multi-family loans for terms up to 30 years. Interest rates and payments on our adjustable-rate loans
generally adjust every three, five, seven or ten years and typically are adjusted to a rate equal to a specified percentage above
the corresponding Federal Home Loan Bank Classic Advance borrowing rate. Most of our adjustable-rate commercial real estate and
multi-family loans adjust every five years and amortize over a 25 year term. Since 2010, commercial real estate and multi-family
loan originations are generally subject to an interest rate floor. Loan amounts do not exceed 80% of the property’s appraised
value at the time the loan is originated.
At December 31, 2019, our largest commercial
real estate loan was $9.8 million and was secured by a memory care facility. At December 31, 2019, our largest multi-family real
estate loan was $9.8 million and was secured by multiple income producing properties. These loans are located in communities in
our primary lending area and were performing according to their original repayment terms at December 31, 2019.
Construction Loans. At December
31, 2019, construction loans were $138.0 million, or 16.4%, of our total loan portfolio. We primarily originate construction loans
to contractors and builders, and to a lesser extent, individuals, to finance the construction of residential dwellings. We also
make construction loans for commercial development projects, including small industrial buildings and retail and office buildings.
Our construction loans generally are fixed-rate, interest-only loans that provide for the payment of interest only during the construction
phase, which usually ranges from 12 to 24 months. The interest rates on our construction loans generally give consideration to
the prime rate as published in the Wall Street Journal. Construction loans generally are made with a loan-to-value ratio
of up to 75% of the appraised market value estimated upon completion of the project, but may be made up to a maximum loan-to-value
ratio of 80%. As appropriate to the underwriting and appraisal process for certain property classes, a “discounted cash flow
analysis” may be utilized. Before making a commitment to fund a construction loan, we require an appraisal of the property
by an independent licensed appraiser. We also will require an inspection of the property before disbursement of funds during the
term of the construction loan. Generally, our construction loans do not provide for interest payments to be funded by interest
reserves.
We lend to experienced local builders and
our construction loans are primarily secured by properties located within a 25 mile radius of Wellesley, Massachusetts. All borrowers
are underwritten and evaluated for creditworthiness based on past experience, debt service ability, net worth analysis including
available liquidity, and other credit factors. We require personal guarantees on all construction loans. Advances are only made
following an inspection of the property confirming completion of the required progress on the project and an update to the title
completed by a bank approved attorney.
Most of our loans for the construction
of residential properties are for residences being built that have not been sold prior to commencement of construction (speculative
loans). Construction loans secured by speculative residential loan projects totaled $83.3 million or 9.9% of our loan portfolio,
loans secured by owner-occupied residential real estate totaled $20.5 million, or 2.4% of our loan portfolio, and loans secured
by other commercial loan projects totaled $34.1 million or 4.1% of our loan portfolio.
At December 31, 2019, our largest outstanding
construction loan relationship was for multiple projects aggregating $10.8 million, of which $7.1 million was outstanding. These
projects consisted of multiple loans secured by construction mortgages on mixed-use and retail properties located in communities
in our primary lending area. This relationship was performing according to its original repayment terms at December 31, 2019.
Commercial Business Loans.
We make commercial business loans primarily in our market area to a variety of professionals, sole proprietorships and small businesses.
At December 31, 2019, commercial business loans were $97.3 million, or 11.5% of our total loan portfolio. Commercial lending products
include term loans, revolving lines of credit and equipment loans. Commercial business loans and lines of credit are made with
either variable or fixed rates of interest. Variable rates generally are based on the prime rate as published in The Wall Street
Journal, plus a margin. Fixed-rate business loans are generally priced by considering the prime rate and the comparable cost
of funding, typically from published rates of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston. Commercial business loans typically have shorter
maturity terms and higher interest spreads than real estate loans, but generally involve more credit risk because of the type and
nature of the collateral. We focus our efforts on small- to medium-sized, privately-held companies with local or regional businesses
that operate in our market area. In addition, commercial business loans are generally made to existing customers having a business
or individual deposit account, or new borrowers who are required to establish appropriate deposit relationships with Wellesley
Bank, if not already a depositor.
When making commercial loans, we
consider the financial statements of the borrower, their borrowing history, the debt service capabilities of the borrower,
the projected cash flows of the business and the value of the collateral, primarily accounts receivable, inventory and
equipment. These loans are generally supported by personal guarantees. At December 31, 2019, our largest commercial business
loan was $9.0 million. The loan is secured by leasehold improvements and revenue from a solar energy project and was
performing according to its original terms at December 31, 2019. Our largest commercial lines of credit were $4.0 million and
was secured by all business assets of the related companies. At December 31, 2019, there were no outstanding balances on the
line of credit.
Home Equity Lines of Credit.
We offer home equity lines of credit, which are generally secured by owner-occupied residences. At December 31, 2019, home equity
lines of credit were $36.7 million, or 4.5% of our total loan portfolio. Home equity lines of credit have adjustable rates of interest
with ten-year draws amortized over 15 years that are indexed to the Prime Rate as published by The Wall Street Journal and
generally are subject to an interest rate floor. Our home equity lines of credit generally have a monthly variable interest rate.
We offer home equity lines of credit with cumulative loan-to-value ratios generally up to 85%, when taking into account both the
balance of the home equity loans and first mortgage loan.
The procedures for underwriting home equity
lines of credit include an assessment of the applicant’s payment history on other debts and ability to meet existing obligations
and payments on the proposed loan. Although the applicant’s creditworthiness is a primary consideration, the underwriting
process also includes a comparison of the value of the collateral to the proposed loan amount. The procedures for underwriting
residential mortgage loans apply equally to home equity loans.
Other Consumer Loans. We
occasionally make fixed-rate second mortgage loans, automobile loans, loans secured by passbook or certificate accounts and overdraft
loans. At December 31, 2019, other consumer loans were $171 thousand or 0.02% of total loans.
The procedures for underwriting consumer
loans include an assessment of the applicant’s payment history on other debts and ability to meet existing obligations and
payments on the proposed loan. Although the applicant’s creditworthiness is a primary consideration, the underwriting process
also includes a comparison of the value of the collateral, if any, to the proposed loan amount.
Loan Underwriting and Monitoring
Fixed-Rate Residential Mortgage Loans.
Our fixed-rate mortgage loans conform to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac underwriting guidelines and are originated with the
intention to sell. A small portfolio of fixed-rate loans are held in the Bank’s portfolio, some of which may not conform
to secondary market standards, yet are still high credit quality loans. The interest rate spread on these loans, which tend to
have longer terms, are susceptible to rising interest rates as they are typically funded with shorter term funding. However, due
to the size of our portfolio and the probability for these loans to pre-pay prior to maturity, the interest rate risk is manageable.
Adjustable-Rate Residential Mortgage
Loans. Our adjustable-rate loans better offset the adverse effects on our net interest income in the event of an increase
in interest rates, as compared to fixed-rate mortgages. However, the increased mortgage payments required of adjustable-rate loans
in a rising interest rate environment could lead to an increase in delinquencies and defaults. In addition, although adjustable-rate
mortgage loans help make our asset base more responsive to changes in interest rates, the extent of this interest sensitivity is
limited by the annual and lifetime interest rate adjustment limits.
Commercial Real Estate Loans.
Loans secured by commercial real estate, including multi-family real estate, generally have larger balances and involve a greater
degree of risk than residential mortgage loans. Of primary concern in commercial real estate lending is the feasibility and cash
flow potential of the project and the borrower’s creditworthiness. Payments on loans secured by income properties often depend
on successful operation and management of the properties. As a result, repayment of such loans may be subject to a greater extent
than residential real estate loans to adverse conditions in the real estate market or the economy. To monitor cash flows on income
properties, we require borrowers and loan guarantors, where applicable, to provide annual financial statements on commercial real
estate loans. In reaching a decision on whether to make a commercial real estate loan, we consider the net operating income of
the property, the borrower’s expertise and credit history, and a certified appraisal documenting the value of the underlying
property. We also require an environmental survey for commercial real estate loans over $500 thousand.
Construction Loans.
Speculative construction financing of real estate properties is considered to involve a greater risk of loss than long-term
financing on improved, occupied real estate. Risk of loss on a speculative construction loan depends largely upon the
accuracy of the initial estimate of the property’s value at completion of construction or development and the estimated
cost (including interest) of construction. During the construction phase, a number of factors could result in delays and cost
overruns. If the estimate of construction costs proves to be inaccurate, we may be required to advance funds beyond the
amount originally committed to permit completion of the development. If the estimate of value proves to be inaccurate, we may
be confronted, at or before the maturity of the loan, with a project having a value which is insufficient to assure full
repayment. As a result of the foregoing, speculative construction lending often involves the disbursement of substantial
funds with repayment dependent, in part, on the success of the ultimate project rather than the ability of the borrower or
guarantor to repay principal and interest. If we are forced to foreclose on a project before or at completion due to a
default, there can be no assurance that we will be able to recover all of the unpaid balance of, and accrued interest on, the
loan as well as related foreclosure and holding costs. Construction financing of owner-occupied residential properties, while
exhibiting some of the risks of speculative construction financing, is considered less risky as repayment of loan principal
is generally a function of the borrower’s creditworthiness, and not typically based on the expected sale price of the
property.
Commercial Business Loans.
Unlike residential mortgage loans, which generally are made on the basis of the borrower’s ability to make repayment from
his or her employment or other income, and which are secured by real property whose value tends to be more easily ascertainable,
commercial business loans are of higher risk and typically are made on the basis of the borrower’s ability to make repayment
from the cash flow of the borrower’s business. As a result, the availability of funds for the repayment of commercial business
loans may depend substantially on the success of the business itself. Further, certain collateral securing such loans may depreciate
over time, may be difficult to appraise and may fluctuate in value.
Consumer Loans. Consumer
loans may entail greater risk than do residential mortgage loans, particularly in the case of consumer loans that are unsecured
or secured by assets that depreciate rapidly. Such cases often do not warrant further substantial collection efforts against the
borrower. Furthermore, the application of various federal and state laws, including federal and state bankruptcy and insolvency
laws, may limit the amount which can be recovered on such loans.
Loan Originations, Purchases and
Sales. Loan originations come from a number of sources. The primary source of loan originations are our in-house loan originators,
and to a lesser extent, local mortgage brokers, advertising, and referrals from customers. We occasionally participate with other
financial institutions in commercial real estate loan transactions.
Our current practice is generally (1) to
sell to the secondary market newly originated 15-year or longer-term conforming fixed-rate residential mortgage loans, and (2)
to hold in our portfolio non-conforming loans, shorter-term fixed-rate loans and adjustable-rate loans. Our decision to sell loans
is influenced by prevailing market interest rate conditions and interest rate risk management. Generally, loans are sold to third
parties with servicing released although we have sold residential loans with servicing retained under certain conditions. In addition,
we may sell participation interests in commercial real estate loans to local financial institutions, primarily the portion of loans
that exceed our borrowing limits or are in an amount that is considered prudent in concert with recognition of credit risk.
For the years ended December 31, 2019 and
2018, we originated loans totaling $330.2 million and $309.5 million, respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2019, we sold
$25.1 million of loans originated for sale, all of which were residential mortgage loans. For the year ended December 31, 2018,
we sold $8.5 million, all of which were residential mortgage loans. At December 31, 2019 and 2018, we had no loans sold with recourse.
Loan Approval Procedures and Authority.
Our lending activities follow written, nondiscriminatory underwriting standards and loan origination procedures established by
our Board of Directors and management. Loans in excess of $8.0 million must be authorized by a member of the Security Committee
of the Board of Directors while loans in excess of $10.0 million must be authorized by a majority of the members of the Security
Committee.
Loans-to-One Borrower Limit and Loan
Category Concentration. The maximum amount that we may lend to one borrower and the borrower’s related entities is
generally limited by statute to 20% of our capital, which is defined under Massachusetts law as the sum of our capital stock, surplus
account and undivided profits. Obligations secured by a first lien residential mortgage are excluded from the total borrower obligations
for purposes of this computation. At December 31, 2019, our regulatory limit on loans-to-one borrower was approximately $15.9 million.
At that date, our largest single borrower lending relationship was $10.8 million and consisted of multiple loans secured by construction
mortgages on mixed-use and retail properties located in communities in our primary lending area. These loans were performing in
accordance with their original repayment terms at December 31, 2019.
Loan Commitments. We issue
commitments for fixed-rate and adjustable-rate residential mortgage loans and other loans conditioned upon the occurrence of certain
events. Commitments to originate residential mortgage loans are legally binding agreements to lend to our customers. Generally,
these loan commitments expire after 60 days.
Investment Activities
We have legal authority to invest in
various types of securities, including U.S. Treasury obligations, obligations of various government-sponsored enterprises and
municipal governments, deposits at the Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston, certificates of deposit of federally insured
institutions, investment grade corporate bonds and investment grade marketable equity securities. We also are required to
maintain an investment in Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston stock. While we have the authority under applicable law to invest
in derivative securities, we had no investments in
derivative securities through December 31, 2019.
At December 31, 2019, our investment portfolio
consisted primarily of residential mortgage-backed securities and bonds issued by U.S. government agencies and government-sponsored
enterprises, state and municipal bonds, SBA and other asset-backed securities, and investment grade corporate bonds.
Our investment objectives are to provide
and maintain liquidity, to establish an acceptable level of interest rate and credit risk, to provide an alternate source of low-risk
investments when demand for loans is weak and to generate a favorable return. Management has the responsibility for the investment
portfolio subject to the guidelines established in our investment policy approved by the Board of Directors. Management works with
Wellesley Investment Partners, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Wellesley Bank and a registered investment advisor, in the day-to-day
management of the investment portfolio. The Board of Directors reviews the status of the portfolio on a monthly basis. The Asset/Liability
Committee, which meets on a quarterly basis, reviews an in-depth analysis of the portfolio including performance risk, credit risk
and interest rate risk.
Deposit Activities and Other Sources
of Funds
General. Deposits, borrowings
and loan repayments are the major sources of our funds for lending and other investment purposes. Scheduled loan repayments are
a relatively stable source of funds, while deposit inflows and outflows and loan prepayments are significantly influenced by general
interest rates and financial market conditions, and competitive pricing behavior within our market.
Deposit Accounts. Deposits
are attracted from within our market area based on reputation, by advertising and other marketing efforts, through online banking
and mobile capabilities, and through the offering of a broad selection of deposit instruments, including noninterest-bearing demand
deposits (such as checking accounts), interest-bearing demand accounts (such as NOW and money market accounts), savings accounts
and certificates of deposit. In addition, we participate in a national market clearinghouse through which we offer competitively
priced certificates of deposit to financial institutions and other corporate members of the clearinghouse. We also utilize brokered
deposits. In addition to accounts for individuals, we also offer several commercial checking accounts designed for businesses operating
in our market area and strongly encourage commercial borrowers to utilize our commercial business deposit products.
Deposit account terms vary according to
the minimum balance required, time periods the funds must remain on deposit, and the interest rate, among other factors. In determining
the terms of our deposit accounts, we consider the rates offered by our competition, our liquidity needs, profitability to us,
and customer preferences and concerns. We generally review our deposit mix and pricing on a weekly basis. Our deposit pricing strategy
has generally been to offer competitive rates and to periodically offer special rates to attract deposits of a specific type or
term.
Business Banking and Cash Management
Services. We offer a variety of deposit accounts designed for the businesses operating in our market area. Our business
banking deposit products include a commercial checking account and checking accounts specifically designed for small businesses.
We also offer remote capture products for business customers to meet their online banking needs. Additionally, we offer a commercial
NOW account with sweep features, automated clearinghouse (ACH) origination, on-line wire transfer, and money market accounts for
businesses. We are seeking to increase our commercial deposits through the offering of these types of cash management products.
Borrowings. We utilize
advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston to supplement our supply of investable funds. The Federal Home Loan Bank
functions as a central reserve bank providing credit for its member financial institutions. As a member, we are required to
own capital stock in the Federal Home Loan Bank and are authorized to apply for advances utilizing certain of our whole first
mortgage loans and other assets as collateral (principally securities which are obligations of, or guaranteed by, the United
States), provided certain standards related to creditworthiness have been met. Advances are made under several different
programs, each having its own interest rate and range of maturities. Depending on the program, limitations on the amount of
advances are based either on a fixed percentage of an institution’s net worth or on the Federal Home Loan Bank’s
assessment of the institution’s creditworthiness. At December 31, 2019, we had advances outstanding with the Federal
Home Loan Bank of Boston totaling $94.2 million, of which, short-term advances, those with original maturities less than one
year, totaled $20.0 million. At December 31, 2019, we had the ability to borrow a total of approximately $104.0 million in
additional funds from the FHLB. At December 31, 2019, we also had an available line of credit of $1.3 million with the
Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston at an interest rate that adjusts daily. We had no overnight advances with the Federal Home
Loan Bank on this date. All of our borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Bank are secured by a blanket lien on residential
real estate loans.
The Co-operative Central Bank provides
funds in the form of loans for liquidity purposes which are available to all cooperative member banks. Loan advances will generally
be made on an unsecured basis up to $5.0 million provided the following: the aggregate loan balance is less than 5% of total deposits
of the member bank; the member bank’s primary capital ratio is in excess of 5%; the member bank meets the required CAMELS
rating; and, the quarterly and year-to-date net income before extraordinary items is positive. At December 31, 2019, we had $5.0
million of unsecured borrowing capacity with the Co-operative Central Bank, none of which was outstanding.
At December 31, 2019, we had the ability
to borrow $9.2 million under a collateralized borrower-in-custody agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, none of which
was outstanding. We also had a $5.0 million unsecured line of credit with a correspondent bank, none of which was outstanding.
In December 2015, the Company issued $10.0
million of 6.0% fixed-to-floating rate, subordinated debentures maturing in 2025 to qualified institutional investors.
Personnel
As of December 31, 2019, we had 74 full-time
employees and six part-time employees, none of whom are represented by a collective bargaining unit. We believe our relationship
with our employees is good and productive.
Subsidiaries
Wellesley Bank is a subsidiary of Wellesley
Bancorp. The following are descriptions of Wellesley Bank’s wholly-owned subsidiaries:
Wellesley Investment Partners, LLC.
Wellesley Investment Partners, LLC, established in 2007, is a Massachusetts limited liability company that offers high net worth
individuals customized fee-based wealth management services. Customer securities are held by an independent third party custodian.
Wellesley Investment Partners is an SEC-registered investment advisor.
Wellesley Securities Corporation.
Wellesley Securities Corporation, established in 1992, is a Massachusetts corporation that engages in buying, selling and holding
securities on its own behalf. As a Massachusetts securities corporation, the income earned on Wellesley Securities Corporation’s
investment securities is subject to a lower state tax rate than that assessed on income earned on investment securities maintained
at Wellesley Bank. At December 31, 2019, $12.6 million of securities were held by Wellesley Securities Corporation.
Central Linden LLC. Organized
in 2010, Central Linden LLC is a Massachusetts limited liability company, formed for the purpose of holding, managing and selling
foreclosed real estate. Central Linden is currently inactive.
Regulation and Supervision
General. Wellesley Bank
is a Massachusetts-chartered cooperative bank and is the wholly-owned subsidiary of Wellesley Bancorp, a Maryland corporation,
which is a registered bank holding company. Wellesley Bank’s deposits are insured up to applicable limits by the FDIC and
by the Share Insurance Fund of the Co-operative Central Bank for amounts in excess of the FDIC limits. Wellesley Bank is subject
to extensive regulation by the Massachusetts Commissioner of Banks, as its chartering agency, and by the FDIC, its primary federal
regulator and deposit insurer. Wellesley Bank is required to file reports with, and is periodically examined by, the FDIC and the
Massachusetts Commissioner of Banks concerning its activities and financial condition and must obtain regulatory approvals prior
to entering into certain transactions, including, but not limited to, mergers with or acquisitions of other financial institutions.
As a registered bank holding company, Wellesley Bancorp is regulated by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the
“Federal Reserve Board”).
The regulatory and supervisory
structure establishes a comprehensive framework of activities in which an institution can engage and is intended primarily
for the protection of depositors and, for purposes of the FDIC, the deposit insurance fund, rather than for the protection of
stockholders and creditors. The regulatory structure also gives the regulatory authorities extensive discretion in connection
with their supervisory and enforcement activities and examination policies, including policies concerning the establishment
of deposit insurance assessment fees, classification of assets and establishment of adequate loan loss reserves for
regulatory purposes. Any change in such regulatory requirements and policies, whether by the Massachusetts legislature, the
Massachusetts Commissioner of Banks, the FDIC, the Federal Reserve Board or Congress, could have a material adverse impact on
the financial condition and results of operations of Wellesley Bancorp and Wellesley Bank. As is further described below, the
Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (“Dodd-Frank Act”) significantly changed the current
bank regulatory structure and may affect the lending, investment and general operating activities of depository institutions
and their holding companies.
Set forth below is a summary of certain
material statutory and regulatory requirements applicable to Wellesley Bancorp and Wellesley Bank. The summary is not intended
to be a complete description of such statutes and regulations and their effects on Wellesley Bancorp and Wellesley Bank.
The Dodd-Frank Act. The Dodd-Frank
Act has significantly changed the current bank regulatory structure and will affect future lending and investment activities and
general operations of depository institutions and their holding companies.
In particular, in 2013, the Federal Reserve
Board, the FDIC and the other federal bank regulatory agencies issued a final rule that revises their risk-based capital requirements
and the method for calculating risk-weighted assets to make them consistent with agreements that were reached by the Basel Committee
on Banking Supervision and certain provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act. See “—Federal Regulations—Capital Requirements.”
The Dodd-Frank Act also created the Consumer
Financial Protection Bureau with extensive powers to implement and enforce consumer protection laws. The Consumer Financial Protection
Bureau has broad rulemaking authority for a wide range of consumer protection laws that apply to all banks and savings associations,
among other things, including the authority to prohibit “unfair, deceptive or abusive” acts and practices. The Consumer
Financial Protection Bureau has examination and enforcement authority over all banks and savings associations with more than $10
billion in assets. Banks and savings associations with $10 billion or less in assets will continue to be examined for compliance
with federal consumer protection and fair lending laws by their applicable primary federal bank regulators. The Dodd-Frank Act
also weakens the federal preemption available for national banks and federal savings associations and gives state attorneys and
state banking regulators certain authority to enforce applicable federal consumer protection laws.
On May 24, 2018, the Economic Growth Regulatory
Relief, and Consumer Protection Act (EGRRCPA) amended some provisions in the Dodd-Frank Act. The amendments made by EGRRCPA provide
for additional tailoring of various provisions of the federal banking laws. Specifically, EGRRPCA is intended to simplify some
of the regulatory burden for smaller and mid-sized banking organizations. For example, on August 30, 2018, the Federal Reserve
published an interim final rule implementing revisions to the small bank holding company policy statement. The asset threshold
was raised from $1 billion to $3 billion to preclude small bank holding companies from maintaining consolidated regulatory capital
ratios; allows for non-equity funding, such as subordinated debt, to fund growth; and, allows for an 18 month examination cycle
for well-managed, well-capitalized banks.
Massachusetts Banking Laws and Supervision
General. As a Massachusetts-chartered
cooperative bank, Wellesley Bank is subject to supervision, regulation and examination by the Massachusetts Commissioner of Banks
and to various Massachusetts statutes and regulations which govern, among other things, investment powers, lending and deposit-taking
activities, borrowings, maintenance of surplus and reserve accounts, distribution of earnings and payment of dividends. In addition,
Wellesley Bank is subject to Massachusetts consumer protection and civil rights laws and regulations. The approval of the Massachusetts
Commissioner of Banks or the Massachusetts Board of Bank Incorporation is required for a Massachusetts-chartered bank to establish
or close branches, merge with other financial institutions, issue stock and undertake certain other activities.
Massachusetts regulations generally allow
Massachusetts banks, with appropriate regulatory approvals, to engage in activities permissible for federally chartered banks or
banks chartered by another state. The Commissioner also has adopted procedures reducing regulatory burdens and expense and expediting
branching by well-capitalized and well-managed banks.
Parity Regulation. In January
2015, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts adopted a law modernizing the Massachusetts banking law, which affords Massachusetts chartered
banks greater flexibility compared to federally chartered and out-of-state banks. The new provisions of Massachusetts banking law
took effect on April 7, 2015.
The Massachusetts banking legislation,
among other things, attempts to synchronize Massachusetts laws with certain federal requirements in the same area, streamline the
process for an institution to engage in activities permissible for federally chartered and out-of-state institutions, consolidate
corporate governance statutes and provide authority for the Commissioner to establish a tiered supervisory system for Massachusetts-chartered
institutions based on factors such as asset size, capital level, balance sheet composition, examination rating, compliance and
other factors deemed appropriate.
Dividends. A Massachusetts
stock bank may declare cash dividends from net profits not more frequently than quarterly. Noncash dividends may be declared at
any time. No dividends may be declared, credited or paid if the bank’s capital stock is impaired. The approval of the Massachusetts
Commissioner of Banks is required if the total of all dividends declared in any calendar year exceeds the total of its net profits
for that year combined with its retained net profits of the preceding two years. Dividends from Wellesley Bancorp may depend, in
part, upon receipt of dividends from Wellesley Bank. The payment of dividends from Wellesley Bank would be restricted by federal
law if the payment of such dividends resulted in Wellesley Bank failing to meet regulatory capital requirements.
Loans to One Borrower Limitations.
Massachusetts banking law grants broad lending authority. However, with certain limited exceptions, total obligations to one borrower
may not exceed 20% of the total of the bank’s capital, surplus and undivided profits.
Loans to a Bank’s Insiders.
Massachusetts banking laws require that insider loans, or loans to officers, directors and trustees be made in accordance with
Federal regulations. See “—Federal Regulations— Transactions with Affiliates and Loans to Insiders.”
Investment Activities. In
general, Massachusetts-chartered banks may invest in preferred and common stock of any corporation organized under the laws of
the United States, or any state subject to certain conditions. Federal law imposes additional restrictions on Wellesley Bank’s
investment activities. See “—Federal Regulations—Business and Investment Activities.”
Regulatory Enforcement Authority.
Any Massachusetts bank that does not operate in accordance with the regulations, policies and directives of the Massachusetts Commissioner
of Banks may be subject to sanctions for noncompliance, including revocation of its charter. The Massachusetts Commissioner of
Banks may, under certain circumstances, suspend or remove officers or directors who have violated the law, conducted the bank’s
business in an unsafe or unsound manner or contrary to the depositors’ interests or been negligent in the performance of
their duties. Upon finding that a bank has engaged in an unfair or deceptive act or practice, the Massachusetts Commissioner of
Banks may issue an order to cease and desist and impose a fine on the bank concerned. The Commissioner also has authority to take
possession of a bank and appoint a liquidating agent under certain conditions such as an unsafe and unsound condition to transact
business, the conduct of business in an unsafe or unauthorized manner or impaired capital. In addition, Massachusetts consumer
protection and civil rights statutes applicable to Wellesley Bank permit private individual and class action law suits and provide
for the rescission of consumer transactions, including loans, and the recovery of statutory and punitive damages and attorney’s
fees in the case of certain violations of those statutes.
Insurance Fund. All Massachusetts-chartered
cooperative banks are required to be members of the Co-operative Central Bank, which maintains the Share Insurance Fund that insures
cooperative bank deposits in excess of federal deposit insurance coverage. The Co-operative Central Bank is authorized to charge
cooperative banks an annual assessment fee on deposit balances in excess of amounts insured by the FDIC. On February 14, 2020,
legislation approving the merger of the Share Insurance Fund into the Depositors Insurance Fund, a private, industry-sponsored
fund that insures all deposits above the FDIC limits for Massachusetts-chartered savings banks. Following the merger, which is
expected to become effective in March 2020, it is anticipated that the Bank’s deposits in excess of the FDIC insurance limits
will be insured by the Depositors Insurance Fund.
Protection of Personal Information.
Massachusetts has adopted regulatory requirements intended to protect personal information. The requirements are similar to existing
federal laws such as the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999, discussed below under “—Federal Regulations—Other
Regulations,” that require organizations to establish written information security programs to prevent identity theft.
The Massachusetts regulation also contains technology system requirements, especially for the encryption of personal information
sent over wireless or public networks or stored on portable devices.
Massachusetts has other statutes or regulations
that are similar to certain of the federal provisions discussed below.
Federal Regulations
Capital Requirements.
In July 2013, the Federal Reserve Board and the FDIC approved revisions to their capital adequacy guidelines and prompt
corrective action rules that implement the revised standards of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, commonly called
“Basel III,” and address relevant provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act. Basel III refers to two consultative
documents released by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision in December 2009, the rules text released in December 2010,
and loss absorbency rules issued in January 2011, which include significant changes to bank capital, leverage and liquidity
requirements.
The rules included new risk-based capital
and leverage ratios, which became effective January 1, 2015, and refined the definition of what constitutes “capital”
for purposes of calculating those ratios. The minimum capital level requirements applicable to Wellesley Bank are: (1) a common
equity Tier 1 capital ratio of 4.5%; (2) a Tier 1 capital ratio of 6%; (3) a total capital ratio of 8%; and, (4) a Tier 1 leverage
ratio of 4%. The rules eliminated the inclusion of certain instruments, such as trust preferred securities, from Tier 1 capital.
Instruments issued prior to May 19, 2010 are grandfathered for companies with consolidated assets of $15 billion or less. The rules
also established a “capital conservation buffer” of 2.5% above the adequate regulatory minimum capital requirements,
which must consist entirely of common equity Tier 1 capital and result in the following minimum ratios: (1) a common equity Tier
1 capital ratio of 7.0%; (2) a Tier 1 capital ratio of 8.5%; and (3) a total capital ratio of 10.5%. The new capital conservation
buffer requirement is fully implemented. An institution is subject to limitations on paying dividends, engaging in share repurchases,
and paying discretionary bonuses if its capital level falls below the buffer amount. These limitations establish a maximum percentage
of eligible retained income that could be utilized for such actions.
On May 24, 2018, the EGRRPCA amended provisions
in the Dodd-Frank Act as well as certain other statutes administered by the federal bank agencies. According to the recently passed
EGRRCPA, an alternative capital framework is available for qualifying community banking organizations. For banks with total assets
less than $10 billion, simplified calculations and reporting is available as long as the community bank leverage ratio is maintained
above 9.0%. Otherwise, the Basel III rules apply. In November 2018, the Federal Reserve Board, the FDIC, and the Office of the
Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) issued a joint proposal that simplified regulatory capital requirements for qualifying community
banking organizations, as required by the EGRRCPA. Under the proposal, a community banking organization would be eligible to elect
the community bank leverage ratio framework if it has less than $10 billion in total consolidated assets, limited amounts of certain
assets and off-balance sheet exposures, and a community bank leverage ratio greater than 9.0%. A qualifying community banking organization
that has chosen the proposed framework would not be required to calculate the existing risk-based and leverage capital requirements.
A firm would also be considered to have met the capital ratio requirements to be well capitalized for the agencies' prompt corrective
action rules provided it has a community bank leverage ratio greater than 9.0%.
Standards for Safety and Soundness.
As required by statute, the federal banking agencies adopted final regulations and Interagency Guidelines Establishing Standards
for Safety and Soundness to implement safety and soundness standards. The guidelines set forth the safety and soundness standards
that the federal banking agencies use to identify and address problems at insured depository institutions before capital becomes
impaired. The guidelines address internal controls and information systems, the internal audit system, credit underwriting, loan
documentation, interest rate exposure, asset growth, asset quality, earnings, compensation, fees and benefits and, more recently,
safeguarding customer information. If the appropriate federal banking agency determines that an institution fails to meet any standard
prescribed by the guidelines, the agency may require the institution to submit to the agency an acceptable plan to achieve compliance
with the standard.
Business and Investment Activities.
Under federal law, all state-chartered FDIC-insured banks have been limited in their activities as principal and in their debt
and equity investments to the type and the amount authorized for national banks, notwithstanding state law. Federal law permits
exceptions to these limitations. For example, certain state-chartered cooperative banks may, with FDIC approval, continue to exercise
state authority to invest in common or preferred stocks listed on a national securities exchange or the Nasdaq Global Market and
in the shares of an investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended. The maximum permissible
investment is the lesser of 100% of Tier 1 capital or the maximum amount permitted by Massachusetts law. Any such grandfathered
authority may be terminated upon the FDIC’s determination that such investments pose a safety and soundness risk or upon
the occurrence of certain events such as the cooperative bank’s conversion to a different charter.
The FDIC is also authorized to permit state
banks to engage in state authorized activities or investments not permissible for national banks (other than non-subsidiary equity
investments) if they meet all applicable capital requirements and it is determined that such activities or investments do not pose
a significant risk to the FDIC insurance fund. The FDIC has adopted regulations governing the procedures for institutions seeking
approval to engage in such activities or investments. The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999 specified that a state bank may control
a subsidiary that engages in activities as principal that would only be permitted for a national bank to conduct in a “financial
subsidiary,” if a bank meets specified conditions and deducts its investment in the subsidiary for regulatory capital purposes.
Prompt Corrective Regulatory Action.
Federal law requires, among other things, that federal bank regulatory authorities take “prompt corrective action”
with respect to banks that do not meet minimum capital requirements. For these purposes, the law establishes five capital categories:
well capitalized, adequately capitalized, undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized and critically undercapitalized.
The FDIC has adopted regulations to implement
the prompt corrective action legislation. An institution is deemed to be “well capitalized” if it has at least 5% leverage
capital, 8% Tier 1 risk-based capital, 10% total risk-based capital and 6.5% common equity Tier 1 risk-based capital. An institution
is “adequately capitalized” if it has at least 4% leverage capital, 6% Tier 1 risk-based capital, 8% total risk-based
capital and 4.5% common equity Tier 1 risk-based capital. An institution is “undercapitalized” if it has less than
4% leverage capital, 6% Tier 1 risk-based capital, 8% total risk-based capital or 4.5% common equity Tier 1 risk-based capital.
An institution is deemed to be “significantly undercapitalized” if it has less than 3% leverage capital, 4% Tier 1
risk-based capital, 6% total risk-based capital or 3% common equity Tier 1 risk-based capital. An institution is considered to
be “critically undercapitalized” if it has less than 2% tangible capital.
Transactions with Affiliates and
Loans to Insiders. Transactions between a bank (and, generally, its subsidiaries) and its related parties or affiliates
are limited by Sections 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act. An affiliate of a bank is any company or entity that controls,
is controlled by or is under common control with the bank. In a holding company context, the parent bank holding company and any
companies which are controlled by such parent holding company are affiliates of the bank. Generally, Sections 23A and 23B of the
Federal Reserve Act limit the extent to which the bank or its subsidiaries may engage in “covered transactions” with
any one affiliate to 10% of such institution’s capital stock and surplus and contain an aggregate limit on all such transactions
with all affiliates to an amount equal to 20% of such institution’s capital stock and surplus. The term “covered transaction”
includes the making of loans, purchase of assets, issuance of a guarantee and similar transactions. In addition, loans or other
extensions of credit by the institution to the affiliate are required to be collateralized in accordance with specified requirements.
The law also requires that affiliate transactions be on terms and conditions that are substantially the same or at least as favorable
to the institution, as those provided to non-affiliates.
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 generally
prohibits loans by a company to its executive officers and directors. The law contains a specific exception for loans by a depository
institution to its executive officers and directors in compliance with federal banking laws, assuming such loans are also permitted
under the law of the institution’s chartering state. Under such laws, a bank’s authority to extend credit to executive
officers, directors and 10% stockholders (“insiders”), as well as entities such persons control is restricted. The
law limits both the individual and aggregate amount of loans that may be made to insiders based, in part, on the bank’s capital
position and requires certain board approval procedures to be followed. Such loans are required to be made on terms substantially
the same as those offered to unaffiliated individuals and not involve more than the normal risk of repayment. There is an exception
for loans made pursuant to a benefit or compensation program that is widely available to all employees of the institution and does
not give preference to insiders over other employees. Loans to executive officers are further limited to loans of specific types
and amounts.
Enforcement. The FDIC has
extensive enforcement authority over insured state banks, including Wellesley Bank. That enforcement authority includes, among
other things, the ability to assess civil money penalties, issue cease and desist orders and remove directors and officers. In
general, enforcement actions may be initiated in response to violations of laws and regulations and unsafe or unsound practices.
The FDIC also has authority under federal law to appoint a conservator or receiver for an insured bank under certain circumstances.
The FDIC is required, with certain exceptions, to appoint a receiver or conservator for an insured state nonmember bank if that
bank was “critically undercapitalized” on average during the calendar quarter beginning 270 days after the date on
which the institution became “critically undercapitalized.”
Federal Insurance of Deposit Accounts.
Deposit accounts in Wellesley Bank are insured by the FDIC’s Deposit Insurance Fund, generally up to a maximum of $250 thousand
per separately insured depositor, pursuant to changes made permanent by the Dodd-Frank Act. The FDIC assesses insured depository
institutions to maintain the Deposit Insurance Fund. No institution may pay a dividend if in default of its deposit insurance assessment.
Under the FDIC’s risk-based assessment system, insured institutions are assigned to one of four risk categories based on
supervisory evaluations, regulatory capital levels and certain other factors, with less risky institutions paying lower assessments.
An institution’s assessment rate depends upon the category to which it is assigned. The FDIC may adjust rates uniformly from
one quarter to the next, except that no adjustment can deviate more than three basis points from the base scale without notice
and comment rulemaking.
A material increase in insurance premiums
would likely have an adverse effect on the operating expenses and results of operations of Wellesley Bank. Management cannot predict
what insurance assessment rates will be in the future.
Insurance of deposits may be terminated
by the FDIC upon a finding that an institution has engaged in unsafe or unsound practices, is in an unsafe or unsound condition
to continue operations or has violated any applicable law, regulation, rule, order or condition imposed by the FDIC. We do not
know of any practice, condition or violation that might lead to termination of Wellesley Bank’s deposit insurance.
Community Reinvestment Act.
Under the Community Reinvestment Act (“CRA”), a bank has a continuing and affirmative obligation, consistent with its
safe and sound operation, to help meet the credit needs of its entire community, including low and moderate income neighborhoods.
The CRA does not establish specific lending requirements or programs for financial institutions nor does it limit an institution’s
discretion to develop the types of products and services that it believes are best suited to its particular community. The CRA
does require the FDIC, in connection with its examination of a bank, to assess the institution’s record of meeting the credit
needs of its community and to take such record into account in its evaluation of certain applications by such institution, including
applications to establish or acquire branches and merge with other depository institutions. The CRA requires the FDIC to provide
a written evaluation of an institution’s CRA performance utilizing a four-tiered descriptive rating system. Wellesley Bank’s
most recent FDIC CRA rating was “Satisfactory.”
Massachusetts has its own statutory counterpart
to the CRA which is also applicable to Wellesley Bank. The Massachusetts version is generally similar to the CRA but utilizes a
five-tiered descriptive rating system. The Massachusetts Commissioner of Banks is required to consider a bank’s record of
performance under the Massachusetts law in considering any application by the bank to establish a branch or other deposit-taking
facility, relocate an office or to merge or consolidate with or acquire the assets and assume the liabilities of any other banking
institution. Wellesley Bank’s most recent rating under Massachusetts law was “Satisfactory.”
Federal Reserve System.
The Federal Reserve Board regulations require savings institutions to maintain noninterest earning reserves against their transaction
accounts, primarily Negotiable Order of Withdrawal (NOW) and regular checking accounts. For 2019, the regulations generally provide
that reserves be maintained against aggregate transaction accounts as follows: a 3% reserve ratio is assessed on net transaction
accounts up to and including $124.2 million; a 10% reserve ratio is applied above $124.2 million. The first $16.3 million of otherwise
reservable balances are exempted from the reserve requirements. Wellesley Bank complies with the foregoing requirements.
Federal Home Loan Bank System.
Wellesley Bank is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank System, which consists of twelve regional Federal Home Loan Banks. The
Federal Home Loan Bank System provides a central credit facility primarily for member institutions as well as other entities involved
in home mortgage lending. As a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston, Wellesley Bank is required to acquire and hold a
specified amount of shares of capital stock in the Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston. As of December 31, 2019, Wellesley Bank was
in compliance with this requirement.
Other Regulations
Some interest and other charges collected
or contracted by Wellesley Bank are subject to state usury laws and federal laws concerning interest rates and charges. Wellesley
Bank’s operations also are subject to state and federal laws applicable to credit transactions, such as the:
|
·
|
Truth-In-Lending Act, governing disclosures of credit terms to consumer borrowers;
|
|
·
|
Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, requiring that borrowers for mortgage loans for one- to
four-family residential real estate receive various disclosures, including good faith estimates of settlement costs, lender servicing
and escrow account practices, and prohibiting certain practices that increase the cost of settlement services;
|
|
·
|
Bank Secrecy Act of 1970, requiring financial institutions to assist U.S. government agencies to detect and prevent money laundering;
|
|
·
|
Home Mortgage Disclosure Act of 1975, requiring financial institutions to provide information to
enable the public and public officials to determine whether a financial institution is fulfilling its obligation to help meet the
housing needs of the community it serves;
|
|
·
|
Equal Credit Opportunity Act, prohibiting discrimination on the basis of race, creed, or other
prohibited factors in extending credit;
|
|
·
|
Fair Credit Reporting Act of 1978, governing the use and provision of information to credit reporting
agencies; and,
|
|
·
|
Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, governing the manner in which consumer debts may be collected
by collection agencies.
|
The deposit operations of Wellesley Bank
also are subject to the following state and federal laws:
|
·
|
Right to Financial Privacy Act, which imposes a duty to maintain confidentiality of consumer financial
records and prescribes procedures for complying with administrative subpoenas of financial records;
|
|
·
|
Electronic Funds Transfer Act and Regulation E promulgated thereunder, as well as Chapter 167B
of the General Laws of Massachusetts, that govern automatic deposits to and withdrawals from deposit accounts and customers’
rights and liabilities arising from the use of automated teller machines and other electronic banking services;
|
|
·
|
Electronic Check Clearing for the 21st Century Act (also known as “Check 21”), which
allows banks to create and receive “substitute checks” (reproduction of the original check), and discloses the customers
rights regarding “substitute checks” pertaining to these items having the “same legal standing as the original
paper check;”
|
|
·
|
Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act privacy statute which requires each depository institution to disclose its
privacy policy, identify parties with whom certain nonpublic customer information is shared and provide customers with certain
rights to “opt out” of disclosure to certain third parties;
|
|
·
|
Title III of The Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept
and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 (referred to as the “USA PATRIOT Act”), which significantly expands the responsibilities
of financial institutions in preventing the use of the United States financial system to fund terrorist activities. Among other
things, the USA PATRIOT Act and the related regulations requires banks operating in the United States to develop anti-money laundering
compliance programs, due diligence policies and controls to facilitate the detection and reporting of money laundering;
|
|
·
|
The Fair and Accurate Reporting Act of 2003, as an amendment to the Fair Credit Reporting Act,
as noted previously, which includes provisions to help reduce identity theft by providing procedures for the identification, detection,
and response to patterns, practices, or specific activities—known as “red flags”; and,
|
|
·
|
Truth in Savings Act, which establishes the requirement for clear and uniform disclosure of terms
and conditions regarding deposit interest and fees to help promote economic stability, competition between depository institutions,
and allow the consumer to make informed decisions.
|
Holding Company Regulation
Wellesley Bancorp, as a bank holding company,
is subject to examination, supervision, regulation, and periodic reporting under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended,
and as administered by the Federal Reserve Board. Wellesley Bancorp is required to obtain the prior approval of the Federal Reserve
Board to acquire all, or substantially all, of the assets of any bank or bank holding company. Prior Federal Reserve Board approval
would be required for Wellesley Bancorp to acquire direct or indirect ownership or control of any voting securities of any bank
or bank holding company if it would, directly or indirectly, own or control more than 5% of any class of voting shares of the bank
or bank holding company.
A bank holding company is generally prohibited
from engaging in, or acquiring, direct or indirect control of more than 5% of the voting securities of any company engaged in nonbanking
activities. One of the principal exceptions to this prohibition is for activities found by the Federal Reserve Board to be so closely
related to banking or managing or controlling banks as to be a proper incident thereto. Some of the principal activities that the
Federal Reserve Board has determined by regulation to be closely related to banking are: (1) making or servicing loans; (2) performing
certain data processing services; (3) providing securities brokerage services; (4) acting as fiduciary, investment or financial
advisor; (5) leasing personal or real property under certain conditions; (6) making investments in corporations or projects designed
primarily to promote community welfare; and (7) acquiring a savings association.
A bank holding company that meets specified
conditions, including that its depository institutions subsidiaries are “well capitalized” and “well managed,”
can opt to become a “financial holding company.” A “financial holding company” may engage in a broader
array of financial activities than permitted a typical bank holding company. Such activities can include insurance underwriting
and investment banking. Wellesley Bancorp does not anticipate opting for “financial holding company” status at this
time.
The Federal Reserve
Board has established capital requirements generally similar to the capital requirements for state member banks described above,
for bank holding companies. The Dodd-Frank Act required the Federal Reserve Board to promulgate consolidated capital requirements
for depository institution holding companies that are no less stringent, both quantitatively and in terms of components of capital,
than those applicable to institutions themselves. In 2013, the Federal Reserve Board issued a final rule implementing new capital
standards for all bank holding companies with $500 million or more in total consolidated assets. See “—Federal Regulations—Capital
Requirements.” On April 9, 2015, the Federal Reserve Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System adopted final amendments
to the Small Bank Holding Company Policy Statement. This final rule raises the asset threshold to qualify under the policy statement
from $500 million to $1 billion in total assets, expands the statement’s scope to include savings and loan holding companies,
revises the applicability of the board’s regulatory capital rules and revises certain reporting requirements. The policy
statement facilitates the transfer of ownership of small community banks by allowing their holding companies to operate with higher
levels of debt than would otherwise be permitted. While holding companies that meet the conditions of the policy statement are
excluded from consolidated capital requirements, their depository institutions continue to be subject to minimum capital requirements.
Eligible companies must also meet certain qualitative requirements with respect to nonbanking activities, off-balance sheet activities,
and publicly-registered debt and equity. On August 28, 2018, the Federal Reserve Board issued an interim final rule expanding the
applicability of the Federal Reserve Board's Small Bank Holding Company Policy Statement, as required by the Economic Growth, Regulatory
Relief, and Consumer Protection Act of 2018. The interim
final rule raises the policy statement's asset threshold from $1 billion to $3 billion in total consolidated assets. The
policy statement also applies to savings and loan holding companies with less than $3 billion in total consolidated assets.
This interim final rule took effect on August 30, 2018.
A bank holding company is generally required
to give the Federal Reserve Board prior written notice of any purchase or redemption of then outstanding equity securities if the
gross consideration for the purchase or redemption, when combined with the net consideration paid for all such purchases or redemptions
during the preceding 12 months, is equal to 10% or more of the company’s consolidated net worth. The Federal Reserve Board
may disapprove such a purchase or redemption if it determines that the proposal would constitute an unsafe and unsound practice,
or would violate any law, regulation, Federal Reserve Board order or directive, or any condition imposed by, or written agreement
with, the Federal Reserve Board. The Federal Reserve Board has adopted an exception to that approval requirement for well-capitalized
bank holding companies that meet certain other conditions.
The Federal Reserve Board has issued a
policy statement regarding the payment of dividends by bank holding companies. In general, the Federal Reserve Board’s policies
provide that dividends should be paid only out of current earnings and only if the prospective rate of earnings retention by the
bank holding company appears consistent with the organization’s capital needs, asset quality and overall financial condition.
The Federal Reserve Board’s policies also require that a bank holding company serve as a source of financial strength to
its subsidiary banks by using available resources to provide capital funds during periods of financial stress or adversity and
by maintaining the financial flexibility and capital-raising capacity to obtain additional resources for assisting its subsidiary
banks where necessary. The Dodd-Frank Act codified the source of strength policy and requires the promulgation of implementing
regulations. Under the prompt corrective action laws, the ability of a bank holding company to pay dividends may be restricted
if a subsidiary bank becomes undercapitalized. These regulatory policies could affect the ability of Wellesley Bancorp to pay dividends
or otherwise engage in capital distributions.
The Federal Deposit Insurance Act makes
depository institutions liable to the FDIC for losses suffered or anticipated by the insurance fund in connection with the default
of a commonly controlled depository institution or any assistance provided by the FDIC to such an institution in danger of default.
That law would have potential applicability if Wellesley Bancorp ever held as a separate subsidiary a depository institution in
addition to Wellesley Bank.
Wellesley Bancorp and Wellesley Bank will
be affected by the monetary and fiscal policies of various agencies of the United States Government, including the Federal Reserve
System. In view of changing conditions in the national economy and in the money markets, it is impossible for management to accurately
predict future changes in monetary policy or the effect of such changes on the business or financial condition of Wellesley Bancorp
or Wellesley Bank.
The status of Wellesley Bancorp as a registered
bank holding company under the Bank Holding Company Act will not exempt it from certain federal and state laws and regulations
applicable to corporations generally, including, without limitation, certain provisions of the federal securities laws.
Massachusetts Holding Company Regulation.
Under Massachusetts banking laws, a company owning or controlling two or more banking institutions, including a cooperative bank,
is regulated by the Massachusetts Division of Banks as a bank holding company. Each such bank holding company: (1) must obtain
the approval of the Massachusetts Board of Bank Incorporation before engaging in certain transactions, such as the acquisition
of more than 5% of the voting stock of another banking institution; (2) must register, and file reports, with the Massachusetts
Division of Banks; and (3) is subject to examination by the Division of Banks. Wellesley Bancorp would become a bank holding company
regulated by the Massachusetts Division of Banks if it acquires a second banking institution and holds and operates it separately
from Wellesley Bank.
Federal Securities Laws.
Our common stock is registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission under Section 12(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended. We are subject to information, proxy solicitation, insider trading restrictions, and other requirements under
the Exchange Act.
Federal Income Taxation
General. We report our income
on a calendar year basis using the accrual method of accounting. The federal income tax laws apply to us in the same manner as
to other corporations with some exceptions, including particularly our reserve for bad debts discussed below. The following discussion
of tax matters is intended only as a summary and does not purport to be a comprehensive description of the tax rules applicable
to us. Our federal income tax returns have not been audited in the most recent five year period. For its 2019 fiscal year, Wellesley
Bank’s maximum federal income tax rate was 21.0%. On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (“TCJA”) was
signed into law, which decreased the federal tax rate to 21.0%, from 34.0%, beginning January 1, 2018.
Bad Debt Reserves. For taxable
years beginning before June 30, 1996, thrift institutions that qualified under certain definitional tests and other conditions
of the Internal Revenue Code were permitted to use certain favorable provisions to calculate their deductions from taxable income
for annual additions to their bad debt reserve. A reserve could be established for bad debts on qualifying real property loans,
generally secured by interests in real property improved or to be improved, under the percentage of taxable income method or the
experience method. The reserve for non-qualifying loans was computed using the experience method. Federal legislation enacted in
1996 repealed the reserve method of accounting for bad debts and the percentage of taxable income method for tax years beginning
after 1995 and required savings institutions to recapture or take into income certain portions of their accumulated bad debt reserves.
Approximately $820 thousand of our accumulated bad debt reserves would not be recaptured into taxable income unless Wellesley Bank
makes a “non-dividend distribution” to Wellesley Bancorp as described below.
Distributions. If Wellesley
Bank makes “non-dividend distributions” to Wellesley Bancorp, the distributions will be considered to have been made
from Wellesley Bank’s unrecaptured tax bad debt reserves, including the balance of its reserves as of December 31, 1987,
to the extent of the “non-dividend distributions,” and then from Wellesley Bank’s supplemental reserve for losses
on loans, to the extent of those reserves, and an amount based on the amount distributed, but not more than the amount of those
reserves, will be included in Wellesley Bank’s taxable income. Non-dividend distributions include distributions in excess
of Wellesley Bank’s current and accumulated earnings and profits, as calculated for federal income tax purposes, distributions
in redemption of stock, and distributions in partial or complete liquidation. Dividends paid out of Wellesley Bank’s current
or accumulated earnings and profits will not be so included in Wellesley Bank’s taxable income.
The amount of additional taxable income
triggered by a non-dividend is an amount that, when reduced by the tax attributable to the income, is equal to the amount of the
distribution. Therefore, if Wellesley Bank makes a non-dividend distribution to Wellesley Bancorp, approximately one and one-half
times the amount of the distribution not in excess of the amount of the reserves would be includable in income for federal income
tax purposes, assuming a 21.0% federal corporate income tax rate. Wellesley Bank does not intend to pay non-dividends that would
result in a recapture of any portion of its bad debt reserves.
State Taxation
Financial institutions in
Massachusetts file combined income tax returns with affiliated companies that are not security corporations. The
Massachusetts excise tax rate for cooperative banks is currently 9.0% of federal taxable income, adjusted for certain items.
Taxable income includes gross income as defined under the Internal Revenue Code, plus interest from bonds, notes and
evidences of indebtedness of any state, including Massachusetts, less deductions, but not the credits, allowable under the
provisions of the Internal Revenue Code, except for those deductions relating to dividends received and income or franchise
taxes imposed by a state or political subdivision. Carryforwards and carrybacks of net operating losses and capital losses
are not allowed. Wellesley Bancorp’s state tax returns, as well as those of its subsidiaries, are not currently under
audit.
A financial institution or business corporation
is generally entitled to special tax treatment as a “security corporation” under Massachusetts law provided that: (1)
its activities are limited to buying, selling, dealing in or holding securities on its own behalf and not as a broker; and (2)
it has applied for, and received, classification as a “security corporation” by the Commissioner of the Massachusetts
Department of Revenue. A security corporation that is also a bank holding company under the Internal Revenue Code must pay a tax
equal to 0.33% of its gross income. A security corporation that is not a bank holding company under the Internal Revenue Code must
pay a tax equal to 1.32% of its gross income. Wellesley Bank’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Wellesley Securities Corporation,
is a Massachusetts securities corporation. As such, it has received security corporation classification by the Massachusetts Department
of Revenue, and does not conduct any activities deemed impermissible under the governing statutes and various regulations, directives,
letter rulings and administrative pronouncements issued by the Massachusetts Department of Revenue.
Executive Officers of the Registrant
The executive officers of Wellesley Bancorp, Inc. and Wellesley
Bank are elected annually by the board of directors and serve at the board’s discretion. The executive officers of Wellesley
Bancorp and Wellesley Bank are:
Name
|
Position
|
Thomas J. Fontaine
|
President and Chief Executive Officer of both Wellesley Bancorp and Wellesley Bank
|
|
|
Louis P. Crosier
|
President, Wellesley Investment Partners, LLC.
|
|
|
Michael W. Dvorak
|
Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer, Treasurer, and Corporate Secretary of Wellesley Bancorp and Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Wellesley Bank
|
|
|
Ralph L. Letner
|
Executive Vice President, Chief Banking Officer, and Chief Lending Officer of Wellesley Bank
|
|
|
Below is information regarding our executive
officers who are not directors. Ages presented are as of December 31, 2019.
Louis P. Crosier has served as President
of Wellesley Investment Partners since September 2014. Prior to joining Wellesley Investment Partners, Mr. Crosier was senior managing
director at Windhaven Investment Management from October 2011 to December 2012. Prior to Windhaven, Mr. Crosier was Managing Principal
of Windward Investment Management from September 2002 to October 2010. Mr. Crosier was also previously a Vice President in the
Wealth Management Division of Goldman Sachs & Co. Age 54.
Michael W. Dvorak has served as
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Wellesley Bank since July 2016. Prior to joining Wellesley Bank, Mr. Dvorak
served as Senior Vice President of Finance at State Street Corporation. Previous experience includes 15 years at Keycorp where
he was Executive Vice President and CFO of both the Community Bank and Consumer Bank. Mr. Dvorak was also an Assistant Vice President
at the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland. Age 59.
Ralph L. Letner has served as Executive
Vice President and Chief Lending Officer of Wellesley Bank since May 2014. Mr. Letner served as Senior Vice President/Commercial
Team Leader at Boston Private Bank and Trust Company in Boston, Massachusetts from July 2010 to May 2014. Prior to that, Mr. Letner
held several positions over 12 years at Citizens’ Bank in Boston, Massachusetts. Age 60.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Completion
of our previously announced merger with Cambridge Bancorp is subject to certain conditions, and if these conditions are not satisfied
or waived, the Merger will not be completed.
We
currently expect our previously announced business combination with Cambridge to be completed during the second quarter of 2020.
However, the obligations of Cambridge and us to complete the Merger are subject to the satisfaction or waiver (if permitted) of
a number of conditions. The satisfaction of all of the required conditions could delay the completion of the Merger for a
significant period of time or prevent it from occurring. Any delay in completing the Merger could cause the combined company
not to realize some or all of the benefits that the combined company expects to achieve if the Merger is successfully completed
within its expected timeframe. Further, there can be no assurance that the conditions to the closing of the Merger will be satisfied
or waived or that the merger will be completed.
Failure
to complete our previously announced merger with Cambridge Bancorp could negatively impact our stock price and our future business
and financial results.
If
our proposed merger with Cambridge is not completed for any reason, our ongoing business may be adversely affected and, without
realizing any of the benefits of having completed the Merger, we would be subject to a number of risks, including the following:
|
·
|
We are subject to certain restrictions on the conduct of
our business prior to completing the Merger, which may adversely affect our abilities to execute certain of our business strategies;
|
|
·
|
We may experience negative reactions from the financial markets,
including negative impacts on our stock price or from our customers, regulators and employees;
|
|
·
|
We have incurred and will continue to incur certain costs
and fees associated with the Merger and other transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement; and
|
|
·
|
Matters relating to the Merger (including integration planning)
have required substantial commitments of time and resources by our management, which would otherwise have been devoted to day-to-day
operations and other opportunities that may have been beneficial to us as an independent company.
|
In
addition, we could be subject to litigation related to any failure to complete the Merger or related to any enforcement proceeding
commenced against us to perform our obligations under the Merger Agreement. If the Merger is not completed, these risks may
adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and stock price.
We make and hold in our portfolio construction
loans, including speculative construction loans, which are considered to have greater credit risk than other types of residential
loans.
We originate construction loans for residential
properties and commercial real estate properties, including properties built on speculative, undeveloped property by builders and
developers who have not identified a buyer for the completed residential or commercial real estate property at the time of loan
origination. At December 31, 2019, $138.0 million, or 16.4%, of our loan portfolio consisted of construction loans. Construction
loans secured by speculative residential loan projects totaled $83.4 million, or 9.9% of our total loan portfolio; loans secured
by owner-occupied residential real estate, totaled $20.5 million, or 2.4% of our loan portfolio; and loans that were secured by
other commercial loan projects totaled $34.1 million or 4.1% of our loan portfolio.
Speculative construction lending
involves additional risks when compared with construction financing of owner-occupied residential properties or permanent
residential lending because funds are advanced upon the progress of the project, which is of uncertain value prior to its
completion. Because of the uncertainties inherent in estimating construction costs, the market value of the completed project
and the effects of governmental regulation of real property, it is relatively difficult to evaluate accurately the total
funds required to complete a project and the related loan-to-value ratio. This type of lending also typically involves higher
loan principal amounts and is often concentrated with a small number of builders. Consequently, an adverse development with
respect to one loan or one credit relationship can expose us to a significantly greater risk of loss compared to an adverse
development with respect to a residential mortgage loan. These loans often involve the disbursement of substantial funds with
repayment substantially dependent on the success of the ultimate project and the ability of the borrower to sell or lease the
property or obtain permanent take-out financing, rather than the ability of the borrower or guarantor to repay principal and
interest. If our appraisal of the value of a completed project proves to be overstated, we may have inadequate security for
the repayment of the loan upon completion of construction of the project and may incur a loss. While we believe we have
established adequate allowances in our financial statements to cover the credit risk of our construction loan portfolio,
there can be no assurance that losses will not exceed our allowances, which could adversely impact our future earnings.
Our ability to continue to originate a
significant amount of construction loans is dependent on the continued strength of the housing market in our market area. Further,
if we lost our relationship with several of our larger borrowers building in this area or there is a decline in the demand for
new housing in this area, it could be expected that the demand for construction loans would decline and our net income would be
adversely affected.
Our commercial lending exposes us to
greater lending risks.
At December 31, 2019, $279.2 million, or
33.1%, of our loan portfolio consisted of commercial real estate and commercial business loans. Commercial loans generally expose
a lender to greater risk of nonpayment and loss than residential mortgage loans because repayment of the loans often depends on
the successful operation of the business and the income stream of the borrowers. Such loans typically involve larger loan balances
to single borrowers or groups of related borrowers compared to residential mortgage loans. Also, many of our commercial borrowers
have more than one loan outstanding with us. Consequently, an adverse development with respect to one loan or one credit relationship
can expose us to a significantly greater risk of loss compared to an adverse development with respect to a residential mortgage
loan. Further, unlike residential mortgage loans or commercial real estate loans, commercial business loans may be secured by collateral
other than real estate, the value of which may be more difficult to appraise, and may be more susceptible to fluctuation in value.
Our level of nonperforming loans and
classified assets expose us to increased risk of loss. Also, our allowance for loan losses may prove to be insufficient to absorb
losses in our loan portfolio.
At December 31, 2019, loans that were internally
classified as either special mention, substandard, doubtful or loss totaled $5.4 million, representing 0.7% of total loans. Included
in the total of internally classified loans are nonperforming loans of $1.4 million, representing 0.2% of total loans. If these
loans do not perform according to their terms and the value of the collateral is insufficient to pay the remaining loan balance
or if the economy and/or the real estate market weakens, we could experience loan losses or be required to record additional provisions
to our allowance for loan losses, either of which could have a material adverse effect on our operating results. Like all financial
institutions, we maintain an allowance for loan losses at a level representing management’s best estimate of inherent losses
in the portfolio based upon management’s evaluation of the portfolio’s collectibility as of the corresponding balance
sheet date. However, our allowance for loan losses may be insufficient to cover actual loan losses, and future provisions for loan
losses could materially adversely affect our operating results.
At December 31, 2019, our allowance for
loan losses totaled $7.7 million, which represented 0.9% of total loans and 307.0% of nonperforming loans. Our regulators, as an
integral part of their examination process, periodically review the allowance for loan losses and may require us to increase the
allowance for loan losses by recognizing additional provisions for loan losses charged to income, or to charge off loans, which,
net of any recoveries, would decrease the allowance for loan losses. Any such additional provisions for loan losses or charge-offs,
as required by these regulatory agencies could have a material adverse effect on our operating results.
Management decided to delay the implementation of Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Update 2016-13,
Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326) in 2020, consistent with the smaller reporting company schedule.
The implementation of a new accounting
standard could require the Company to increase its allowance for loan losses and may have a material adverse effect on its financial
condition and results of operations.
FASB has adopted a new accounting standard
that will be effective for the Company’s first fiscal year after December 15, 2022, unless the Company chooses early
adoption. This standard, referred to as Current Expected Credit Loss, or CECL, will require financial institutions to determine
periodic estimates of lifetime expected credit losses on loans, and provide for the expected credit losses as allowances for loan
losses. This will change the current method of providing allowances for loan losses that are probable, which the Company expects
could require it to increase its allowance for loan losses, and will likely greatly increase the data the Company would need to
collect and review to determine the appropriate level of the allowance for loan losses. Any increase in the allowance for loan
losses, or expenses incurred to determine the appropriate level of the allowance for loan losses, may have a material adverse effect
on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.
A return of recessionary conditions
could result in increases in our level of non-performing loans and/or reduce demand for our products and services, which could
have an adverse effect on our results of operations.
The U.S. economy has long emerged from
the severe recession that occurred in 2008 and 2009. A return to prolonged deteriorating economic conditions could significantly
affect the markets in which we do business, the value of our loans and investments, our ongoing operations, and profitability.
Declines in real estate values and sales volumes and elevated unemployment levels may result in higher than expected loan delinquencies,
increases in our non-performing and classified assets and a decline in demand for our products and services. These events may cause
us to incur losses and may adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. Our non-performing assets and troubled
debt restructurings totaled $5.2 million, $1.3 million, and $748 thousand at December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The
resolution of problem assets has historically been exacerbated by the lengthy foreclosure process in Massachusetts and extended
workout plans with certain borrowers. As we work through the resolution of these assets, economic problems may cause us to incur
losses and may adversely affect our capital, liquidity, and financial condition.
The geographic concentration of our
loan portfolio and lending activities makes us vulnerable to a downturn in the local economy.
While there is not a single employer or
industry in our market area on which a significant number of our customers are dependent, a substantial portion of our loan portfolio
is comprised of loans secured by property located in the greater Boston metropolitan area. This makes us vulnerable to a downturn
in the local economy and real estate markets. Adverse conditions in the local economy such as unemployment, recession, a catastrophic
event or other factors beyond our control could impact the ability of our borrowers to repay their loans, which could impact our
net interest income. Decreases in local real estate values caused by economic conditions or other events could adversely affect
the value of the property used as collateral for our loans, which could cause us to realize a loss in the event of a foreclosure.
Our residential mortgage loans and home equity lines of credit
expose us to certain lending risks.
At December 31, 2019, $388.3 million, or
46.1% of our loan portfolio, consisted of residential mortgage loans and $36.7 million, or 4.4% of our loan portfolio consisted
of home equity lines of credit. We intend to continue to emphasize and grow these categories of loans, in particular residential
mortgage loans. Real estate values are susceptible to price volatility during changing economic conditions. Declines in real estate
values could cause some of our residential mortgage and home equity lines of credit to be inadequately collateralized, which would
expose us to a greater risk of loss if we seek to recover on defaulted loans by selling the real estate collateral.
Changes in interest rates may hurt our
profits and asset values and our strategies for managing interest rate risk may not be effective.
Like other financial institutions, we are
subject to interest rate risk. Our primary source of income is net interest income, which is the difference between interest earned
on loans and investments and the interest paid on deposits and borrowings. Changes in the general level of interest rates can affect
our net interest income by affecting the difference between the weighted-average yield earned on our interest-earning assets and
the weighted-average rate paid on our interest-bearing liabilities, or interest rate spread, and the average life of our interest-earning
assets and interest-bearing liabilities. Changes in interest rates also can affect: (1) the ability to originate loans; (2) the
value of our interest-earning assets and our ability to realize gains or avoid losses from the sale of such assets; (3) the ability
to obtain and retain deposits in competition with other available investment alternatives; and (4) the ability of our borrowers
to repay adjustable or variable rate loans. Interest rates are highly sensitive to many factors, including government monetary
policies, domestic and international economic and political conditions and other factors beyond our control. Although we believe
that the estimated maturities of our interest-earning assets currently are well balanced in relation to the estimated maturities
of our interest-bearing liabilities, our profitability could be adversely affected as a result of changes in interest rates.
In order to decrease interest rate risk,
we utilize a variety of asset and liability management strategies such as increasing the amount of adjustable-rate loans and short
term investments, as well as using longer-term Federal Home Loan Bank advances to fund a portion of our lending activities. In
addition, we price longer-term certificates of deposit at an attractive rate to extend the average term of our deposits. Due to
market conditions and customer demand, these strategies may not be effective in decreasing our interest rate risk. In addition,
our interest rate risk mitigation strategies may be influenced by regulatory guidance and directives. As a result, we may be required
to take actions that, while mitigating our interest rate risk, may negatively impact our earnings.
Strong competition within our market
area could reduce our profits and slow growth.
We face a high level of competition
both in making loans and attracting deposits within our primary markets. This competition may make it difficult for us to
make new loans and may force us to offer lower loan rates and higher deposit rates. Pricing competition for loans and
deposits might result in our earning less on our loans and paying more on our deposits, which would reduce net interest
income. Competition also makes it more difficult to grow loans and deposits. At June 30, 2019, which is the most recent date
for which data is available from the FDIC, we held 1.9% of the deposits in Norfolk County, which was the 14th largest market
share among the 42 financial institutions with offices in Norfolk County. At June 30, 2019, we also held 13.7% of the
deposits in the town of Wellesley, which was the third largest market share among the 14 financial institutions with offices
in Wellesley. Some of the institutions with which we compete have substantially greater resources and lending limits than we
have and may offer services that we do not provide. We expect competition to increase in the future as a result of
legislative, regulatory and technological changes and the continuing trend of consolidation in the financial services
industry. Our profitability depends upon our continued ability to compete successfully in our market area.
We may not be able to generate sufficient
deposit growth to support our funding needs.
The largest contributor to our profitability
is net interest income, which is the difference between the interest we earn on loans and investments over the interest we pay
on deposits and borrowings. The interest rates we pay on deposits are typically lower than that which we would pay on borrowings.
To the extent that we are able to increase deposits to fund our asset growth, our profitability would be higher than it would if
those funds come from borrowings. With strong competition for deposits in the Wellesley/Newton/Needham/Cambridge/Boston market
areas, and numerous investment alternatives available to potential depositors, we may not be able to generate sufficient deposit
growth at acceptable interest rates to support our funding needs. In that event, we may need to increase the interest rates we
pay on deposits to generate additional deposit growth. In lieu of lower cost core deposit accounts, we may need to increase borrowings
or increase our use of high cost brokered deposits, which adversely affects our results of operations.
Our wealth management business is heavily
regulated, and the regulators have the ability to limit or restrict our activities and impose fines or suspensions on the conduct
of our business.
Our wealth management business is highly
regulated, primarily at the federal level. The failure of our subsidiary that provides investment management and wealth advisory
services to comply with applicable laws or regulations could result in fines, suspensions of individual employees or other sanctions
including revocation of such affiliate’s registration as an investment adviser. Changes in the laws or regulations governing
our wealth management business could have a material adverse impact on our profitability and operations.
Our wealth management businesses may
be negatively impacted by changes in economic and market conditions.
Our wealth management business may be negatively
impacted by changes in general economic and market conditions because the performance of such business is directly affected by
conditions in the financial and securities markets. The financial markets and businesses operating in the securities industry are
highly volatile (meaning that performance results can vary greatly within short periods of time) and are directly affected by,
among other factors, domestic and foreign economic conditions and general trends in business and finance, all of which are beyond
our control. Declines in the financial markets or a lack of sustained growth may result in a corresponding decline in our performance
and may adversely affect the assets that we manage.
We may not be able to attract and retain
wealth management clients due to competition.
Due to intense competition, our wealth
management subsidiary may not be able to attract and retain clients at a rate needed to continue to grow the business. Competition
is especially strong in our geographic market areas because there are numerous well-established, well-resourced, well-capitalized,
and successful investment management and wealth advisory firms in these areas.
Our ability to successfully attract and
retain investment management and wealth advisory clients is dependent upon our ability to compete with competitors’ investment
products, level of investment performance, client services and marketing and distribution capabilities. If we are not successful,
our results of operations and financial condition may be negatively impacted.
Our business strategy includes moderate
growth plans, and our financial condition and results of operations could be negatively affected if we fail to grow or fail to
manage our growth effectively.
We have experienced significant
growth since our initial public offering in January 2012, and we expect growth to continue at a more moderate rate in the
future, at levels commensurate with maintaining adequate regulatory capital. Expected growth in our assets, our deposits and
the scale of our operations, may come from organic growth or acquisitions. Organic growth will be driven by our growing
presence in the Wellesley/Newton/Needham/Cambridge/Boston market areas. We opened our sixth full-service branch in Newton
Centre in the second quarter of 2016. We opened our fifth full-service branch in Boston in the fourth quarter of 2013 and
relocated our wealth management subsidiary to separate office space in Wellesley in the fourth quarter of 2014. Achieving our
growth targets requires us to successfully execute our business strategies. As a full-service community banking institution,
our business strategies include continuing to expand our loan portfolio with more residential mortgage lending and larger
commercial lending relationships, and increased emphasis on competitive lower cost deposit products, in particular business
deposit and checking products. Our ability to successfully grow and achieve our objectives will also depend on the continued
availability of lending opportunities that meet our stringent underwriting standards.
The loss of our President and Chief Executive Officer could
hurt our operations.
We rely heavily on our President and Chief
Executive Officer, Thomas J. Fontaine. The loss of Mr. Fontaine could have an adverse effect on us because, as a small community
bank, Mr. Fontaine has more responsibility than would be typical at a larger financial institution with more employees. Currently,
we are party to a three-year employment contract with Mr. Fontaine. In addition, we have bank-owned life insurance on Mr. Fontaine.
Regulation of the financial services
industry is undergoing major changes, and we may be adversely affected by changes in laws and regulations.
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer
Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”) enacted in 2010 created a significant shift in the way financial institutions
operate. Additionally, the Dodd-Frank Act created the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau to administer consumer protection and
fair lending laws, a function that was formerly performed by the depository institution regulators. However, institutions with
less than $10.0 billion in assets will continue to be examined for compliance with consumer protection and fair lending laws and
regulations by, and be subject to the enforcement authority of, their prudential regulators. As required by the Dodd-Frank Act,
the federal banking regulators have proposed new consolidated capital requirements that will limit our ability to borrow at the
holding company level and invest the proceeds from such borrowings as capital in Wellesley Bank that could be leveraged to support
additional growth. The Dodd-Frank Act contains various other provisions designed to enhance the regulation of depository institutions
and prevent the recurrence of a financial crisis such as occurred in 2008 and 2009. The Dodd-Frank Act may have a material impact
on our operations, particularly through increased regulatory burden and compliance costs. Any future legislative changes could
have a material impact on our profitability, the value of assets held for investment or the value of collateral for loans. Future
legislative changes could also require changes to business practices or force us to discontinue businesses and potentially expose
us to additional costs, liabilities, enforcement action and reputational risk.
New capital rules generally require
insured depository institutions and their holding companies to hold more capital. The impact of new rules on our financial condition
and operations is uncertain but could be materially adverse.
In 2013, the FDIC and the other federal
bank regulatory agencies issued a final rule that revised their risk-based capital requirements and the method for calculating
risk-weighted assets to make them consistent with agreements that were reached by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision and
certain provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act. Under the revised capital standards, to be well-capitalized Wellesley Bank is required
to have a total risk-based capital ratio of 10.0%, a common equity to Tier 1 capital ratio of 6.5%, a Tier 1 capital ratio of 8.0%,
and a Tier 1 leverage ratio of 5.0%. The final rule became effective for Wellesley Bank on January 1, 2015. In addition, the capital
conservation buffer requirement was fully phased in and effective as of January 1, 2019.
The application of more stringent capital
requirements for Wellesley Bank could, among other things, result in lower returns on invested capital, require the raising of
additional capital, and result in regulatory actions if we were to be unable to comply with such requirements. Implementation of
changes to asset risk weightings for risk-based capital calculations, items included or deducted in calculating regulatory capital
and/or additional capital conservation buffers could result in management modifying its business strategy, and could limit our
ability to make distributions, including paying out dividends or buying back shares. Specifically, Wellesley Bank’s ability
to pay dividends is limited if Wellesley Bank does not have the capital conservation buffer required by the new capital rules,
which may limit our ability to pay dividends to stockholders. As of December 31, 2019 the Bank met all capital adequacy requirements
to which it is subject. In addition, the Bank meets the 2.50% required capital conservation buffer at December 31, 2019.
The
Company may be required to transition from the use of the LIBOR interest rate index in the future. adversely impact the interest
rate paid on our outstanding subordinated notes and may also impact some of our loans.
The Company has certain
loans, investment securities and debt obligations whose interest rate is indexed to the London InterBank Offered Rate (LIBOR).
The United Kingdom’s Financial Conduct Authority, which is responsible for regulating LIBOR, has announced that the publication
of LIBOR is not guaranteed beyond 2021 and it appears highly likely that LIBOR will be discontinued or modified by 2021. At this
time, no consensus exists as to what reference rate or rates or benchmarks may become acceptable alternatives to LIBOR, although
the Alternative Reference Rates Committee (a group of private-market participants convened by the Federal Reserve Board and the
Federal Reserve Bank of New York) has identified the Secured Overnight Financing Rate, or SOFR, as the recommend alternative to
LIBOR. Uncertainty as to the adoption, market acceptance or availability of SOFR or other alternative reference rates, may adversely
affect the value of LIBOR-based loans and securities in the Company’s portfolio and may impact the availability and cost
of hedging instruments and borrowings. The language in the Company’s LIBOR-based contracts and financial instruments has
developed over time and may have various events that trigger when a successor index to LIBOR would be selected. If a trigger is
satisfied, contracts and financial instruments may give the Company or the calculation agent, as applicable, discretion over the
selection of the substitute index for the calculation of interest rates. The implementation of a substitute index for the calculation
of interest rates under the Company’s loan agreements may result in the Company incurring significant expenses in effecting
the transition and may result in disputes or litigation with customers over the appropriateness or comparability to LIBOR of the
substitute index, any of which could have an adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations. The Company continues
to develop and implement plans to mitigate the risks associated with the expected discontinuation of LIBOR. In particular, the
Company has implemented or is in the process of implementing fallback language for LIBOR-linked loans.
We operate in a highly regulated environment and we may be
adversely affected by changes in laws and regulations.
Wellesley Bank is subject to extensive
government regulation, supervision and examination by the FDIC and the Massachusetts Commissioner of Banks. Wellesley Bancorp is
also subject to regulation and supervision by the Federal Reserve Board. Such regulation, supervision and examination govern the
activities in which we may engage and are intended primarily for the protection of the deposit insurance fund and our depositors.
Regulatory authorities have extensive discretion in their supervisory and enforcement activities, including the imposition of restrictions
on our operations, the classification of our assets and determination of the level of our allowance for loan losses. Any change
in such regulation and oversight, whether in the form of regulatory policy, regulations, legislation or supervisory action, may
have a material impact on our operations.
A significant percentage of our common
stock is held by our directors, executive officers and employee benefit plans which, if voted together, could prevent actions requiring
a supermajority vote, such as the amendment of certain provisions of the articles of incorporation and bylaws.
As of December 31, 2019, our directors
and executive officers, together with their associates, own 8.7% of Wellesley Bancorp’s outstanding shares of common stock.
In addition, our employee stock ownership plan owns 6.8% of our outstanding common stock. As a result, approximately 15.5% of our
outstanding shares are held by our directors, executive officers and our employee stock ownership plan. The articles of incorporation
and bylaws of Wellesley Bancorp contain supermajority voting provisions that require that the holders of at least 75% of Wellesley
Bancorp’s outstanding shares of voting stock approve certain actions including, but not limited to, the amendment of certain
provisions of Wellesley Bancorp’s articles of incorporation and bylaws. If our directors and executive officers and benefit
plans hold more than 25% of our outstanding common stock, the shares held by these individuals and benefit plans could be voted
in a manner that would ensure that the 75% supermajority needed to approve such actions could not be attained.
The articles of incorporation and bylaws
of Wellesley Bancorp and certain regulations may prevent or make more difficult certain transactions, including a sale or merger
of Wellesley Bancorp.
Provisions of the articles of incorporation
and bylaws of Wellesley Bancorp, state corporate law and federal and state banking regulations may make it more difficult for companies
or persons to acquire control of Wellesley Bancorp. Consequently, our stockholders may not have the opportunity to participate
in such a transaction and the trading price of our common stock may not rise to the level of other institutions that are more vulnerable
to hostile takeovers. The following factors may discourage takeover attempts or make them more difficult:
●
Articles of incorporation and bylaws. Provisions of the articles of incorporation and bylaws of Wellesley Bancorp
that may make it more difficult and expensive to pursue a takeover attempt that the board of directors opposes include the following:
|
·
|
supermajority voting requirements for changes to certain provisions of the articles of incorporation
and bylaws, which makes it more difficult for shareholders to change provisions of our governing documents;
|
|
·
|
a limitation on the right to vote shares, which prohibits any person who owns in excess of 10%
of the outstanding shares of Wellesley Bancorp common stock from any vote with respect to the shares held in excess of the limit;
|
|
·
|
the election of directors to staggered terms of three years, which makes it more difficult and
time consuming for a shareholder group to fully use its voting power to gain control of the board of directors at a single annual
meeting of shareholders without the consent of the incumbent board of directors of Wellesley Bancorp;
|
|
·
|
the removal of directors only for cause, which makes it more difficult for shareholders to remove
directors and replace them with their own nominees;
|
|
·
|
the absence of cumulative voting by stockholders in the election of directors, which may prevent
a shareholder from electing nominees opposed by the board of directors of Wellesley Bancorp;
|
|
·
|
provisions restricting the calling of special meetings of stockholders, which delays consideration
of shareholder proposal until the next annual meeting; and
|
|
·
|
provisions regarding the timing and content of stockholder proposals and nominations, which gives
our board of director’s time to consider the qualifications of proposed nominees, the merits of the proposals and, to the
extent deemed necessary or desirable by our board of directors, to inform shareholders and make recommendations about those matters.
|
●
Massachusetts and federal banking regulations and Maryland corporate law. State corporate law and federal banking
regulations place limitations on the acquisition of certain percentages of our common stock and impose restrictions on certain
significant stockholders.
We may be adversely affected by recent
changes in U.S. tax laws and regulations.
Changes in tax laws contained in the Tax
Cuts and Jobs Act, which was enacted in December 2017, include a number of provisions that will have an impact on the banking industry,
borrowers and the market for residential real estate. Included in this legislation was a reduction of the corporate income tax
rate from 34% to 21%. In addition, other changes included: (1) a lower limit on the deductibility of mortgage interest on single-family
residential mortgage loans; (2) the elimination of interest deductions for home equity loans; (3) a limitation on the deductibility
of business interest expense and, (4) a limitation on the deductibility of property taxes and state and local income taxes.
The recent changes in the tax laws may
have an adverse effect on the market for, and valuation of, residential properties, and on the demand for such loans in the future,
and could make it harder for borrowers to make their loan payments. In addition, these changes may also have a disproportionate
effect on taxpayers in states with high residential home prices and high state and local taxes, such as Massachusetts. If home
ownership becomes less attractive, demand for mortgage loans could decrease. The value of the properties securing loans in our
loan portfolio may be adversely impacted as a result of the changing economics of home ownership, which could require an increase
in our provision for loan losses that would reduce our profitability and could materially adversely affect our business, financial
condition and results of operations
We are dependent on our information
technology and telecommunications systems and third-party servicers; systems failures, interruptions or breaches of security could
have a material adverse effect on us.
Our business is dependent on the
successful and uninterrupted functioning of our information technology and telecommunications systems and third-party
servicers. The failure of these systems, or the termination of a third-party software license or service agreement on which
any of these systems is based, could interrupt our operations. Because our information technology and telecommunications
systems interface with and depend on third-party systems, we could experience service denials if demand for such services
exceeds capacity or such third-party systems fail or experience interruptions. If significant, sustained or repeated, a
system failure or service denial could compromise our ability to operate effectively, damage our reputation, result in a loss
of customer business, and/or subject us to additional regulatory scrutiny and possible financial liability, any of which
could have a material adverse effect on us.
Our third-party service providers may be
vulnerable to unauthorized access, computer viruses, phishing schemes and other security breaches. We may be required to expend
significant additional resources to protect against the threat of such security breaches and computer viruses, or to alleviate
problems caused by such security breaches or viruses. To the extent that the activities of our third-party service providers or
the activities of our customers involve the storage and transmission of confidential information, security breaches and viruses
could expose us to claims, regulatory scrutiny, litigation and other possible liabilities.
Security breaches and other disruptions
could compromise our information and expose us to liability, which would cause our business and reputation to suffer.
In the ordinary course of our business,
we collect and store sensitive data, including our proprietary business information and that of our customers, suppliers and business
partners; and personally identifiable information of our customers and employees. The secure processing, maintenance and transmission
of this information is critical to our operations and business strategy. We, our customers, and other financial institutions with
which we interact, are subject to ongoing, continuous attempts to penetrate key systems by individual hackers, organized criminals,
and in some cases, state-sponsored organizations. Despite our security measures, our information technology and infrastructure
may be vulnerable to attacks by hackers or breached due to employee error, malfeasance or other disruptions. Any such breach could
compromise our networks and the information stored there could be accessed, publicly disclosed, lost or stolen. Any such unauthorized
access, disclosure or other loss of information could result in legal claims or proceedings, liability under laws that protect
the privacy of personal information, and regulatory penalties; disrupt our operations and the services we provide to customers;
damage our reputation; and cause a loss of confidence in our products and services -- all of which could adversely affect our business,
revenues and competitive position. We may be required to spend significant capital and other resources to protect against the threat
of security breaches and computer viruses, or to alleviate problems caused by security breaches or viruses.
To remain competitive, we must keep
pace with technological change.
Financial products and services have become
increasingly technology-driven. Our ability to meet the needs of our customers competitively, and in a cost-efficient manner, is
dependent on the ability to keep pace with technological advances and to invest in new technology as it becomes available. The
ability to keep pace with technological change is important, and the failure to do so could have a material adverse impact on our
business and therefore on our financial condition and results of operations.
The outbreak of the recent coronavirus
("COVID-19"), or an outbreak of another highly infectious or contagious disease, could adversely affect the Company’s
business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our business is dependent upon the willingness
and ability of its customers to conduct banking and other financial transactions. The spread of a highly infectious or contagious
disease, such as COVID-19, could cause severe disruptions in the U.S. economy, which could in turn disrupt the business, activities,
and operations of our customers, as well our business and operations. Moreover, since the beginning of January 2020, the coronavirus
outbreak has caused significant disruption in the financial markets both globally and in the United States. The spread of COVID-19,
or an outbreak of another highly infectious or contagious disease, may result in a significant decrease in business and/or cause
our customers to be unable to meet existing payment or other obligations to us, particularly in the event of a spread of COVID-19
or an outbreak of an infectious disease in our market area. Although we maintain contingency plans for pandemic outbreaks, a spread
of COVID-19, or an outbreak of another contagious disease, could also negatively impact the availability of key personnel necessary
to conduct our business. Such a spread or outbreak could also negatively impact the business and operations of third party service
providers who perform critical services for our business. If COVID-19, or another highly infectious or contagious disease, spreads
or the response to contain COVID-19 is unsuccessful, we could experience a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition,
and results of operations.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
Not applicable.
Item 2. Properties
At December 31, 2019, we conducted business
through our main office, three full-service branch offices located in Wellesley, Massachusetts, one full-service branch office
in Boston, one full-service branch office in Newton Centre, and one full-service branch office in Needham, and separately, our
wealth management offices located in Wellesley. We own our Central Street main office in Wellesley. We lease our Worcester Street
home office (subject to a lease that expires in 2025, with renewable options through 2030), our Linden Street branch office (subject
to a lease that expires in 2022), our Washington Street branch office (subject to a lease that expires in 2021, with renewal options
through 2031), our wealth management office (subject to a lease that expires in 2021 with renewal options through 2026), our Newton
Centre branch office (subject to a lease that expires in 2026), and our Boston branch office (subject to a lease that expires in
2023, with renewal options through 2033). At December 31, 2019, the total net book value of our land, buildings, furniture, fixtures
and equipment was $3.5 million.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
On February 25, 2020, one purported stockholder
of the Company filed a putative derivative and class action lawsuit against Wellesley, the members of the Company’s board
of directors, Wellesley Bank, Cambridge Bancorp (“Cambridge”) and Cambridge Trust Company in the Circuit Court for
Baltimore City, Maryland, on behalf of himself and similarly situated Wellesley stockholders, and derivatively on behalf of the
Company, captioned Parshall v. Fontaine et al., Case No. 24-C-20-001127 (the “Merger Litigation”). The plaintiff generally
alleged that the Company’s board of directors breached its fiduciary obligations by approving the terms of the Agreement
and Plan of Merger, dated December 5, 2019, by and among the Company, Cambridge, Cambridge Trust Company and Wellesley Bank, which
provides for, among other things, the merger of the Company with and into Cambridge. The plaintiff further alleged inadequate merger
consideration. Lastly, the plaintiff alleged that the joint proxy statement/prospectus filed with the SEC on February 4, 2020 and
first mailed to the Company’s stockholders on February 6, 2020 contained materially incomplete disclosures about the merger.
The plaintiff sought injunctive relief, rescission of the merger or rescissory damages, other unspecified damages, and an award
of attorneys’ fees and expenses.
On March 6, 2020, the Company filed with
the SEC a Current Report on Form 8-K making additional disclosures to supplement the disclosures in the allegedly misleading proxy
statement as set forth in the complaint. The plaintiff agreed that the Form 8-K mooted his disclosure claims, and accordingly agreed
to voluntarily dismiss the complaint.
Periodically, there may be various claims and lawsuits against
us, such as claims to enforce liens, condemnation proceedings on properties in which we hold security interests, claims involving
the making and servicing of real property loans and other issues incident to our business. Such routine legal proceedings, in the
aggregate, are believed by management to be immaterial to our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.
PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related
Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Market for Common Equity and Related
Stockholder Matters
Wellesley Bancorp’s common stock
is listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market under the trading symbol “WEBK.” The following table sets forth the high and
low sales prices of the common stock and dividends paid per share for each of the quarters in the years ended December 31, 2019
and 2018.
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
Dividends
Paid Per
Share
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2019:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
$
|
45.97
|
|
|
$
|
30.60
|
|
|
$
|
0.060
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
33.25
|
|
|
|
30.11
|
|
|
|
0.060
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
35.50
|
|
|
|
30.03
|
|
|
|
0.060
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
|
33.79
|
|
|
|
27.95
|
|
|
|
0.055
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
Dividends
Paid Per
Share
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2018:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
$
|
34.20
|
|
|
$
|
27.74
|
|
|
$
|
0.055
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
|
34.50
|
|
|
|
31.75
|
|
|
|
0.055
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
|
34.09
|
|
|
|
28.50
|
|
|
|
0.055
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
|
30.70
|
|
|
|
28.01
|
|
|
|
0.050
|
|
As of March 15, 2020, there were approximately
261 holders of record of the Company’s common stock. We believe the number of beneficial owners of our common stock is greater
than the number of registered holders because a large amount of our common stock is held of record through brokerage firms in “street
name.”
Dividends
In February 2014, our Board of Directors
adopted a policy of paying cash dividends subject to all applicable statutory and regulatory capital and asset maintenance requirements.
We cannot guarantee that we will continue to pay dividends or that, if paid; we will not reduce or eliminate dividends in the future.
The Board of Directors may declare and
pay periodic special cash dividends in addition to, or in lieu of, regular cash dividends. In determining whether to declare or
pay any dividends, whether regular or special, the board of directors will take into account our financial condition and results
of operations, tax considerations, capital requirements, industry standards, and economic conditions. We will also consider the
regulatory restrictions that affect the payment of dividends by Wellesley Bank to the Company, discussed below.
Wellesley Bancorp is subject to Maryland
law, which generally permits a corporation to pay dividends on its common stock unless, after giving effect to the dividend, the
corporation would be unable to pay its debts as they become due in the usual course of its business or the total assets of the
corporation would be less than its total liabilities.
Dividends from Wellesley Bancorp may depend,
in part, upon receipt of dividends from Wellesley Bank because Wellesley Bancorp has no source of income other than dividends from
Wellesley Bank and earnings from investment of net proceeds from the offering retained by Wellesley Bancorp. Massachusetts banking
law and FDIC regulations limit distributions from Wellesley Bank to Wellesley Bancorp. See “Regulation and Supervision—Massachusetts
Banking Laws and Supervision—Dividends” and “—Federal Regulations—Prompt Corrective Regulatory Action.”
In addition, Wellesley Bancorp is subject to the Federal Reserve Board’s policy that dividends should be paid only out of
current earnings and only if the prospective rate of earnings retention by Wellesley Bancorp appears consistent with its capital
needs asset quality and overall financial condition. See “Regulation and Supervision—Holding Company Regulation.”
Any payment of non-dividends by Wellesley
Bank to the Company that would be deemed to be drawn out of Wellesley Bank’s bad debt reserves would require Wellesley Bank
to pay federal income taxes at the then current income tax rate on the amount deemed distributed. See “Item 1—Federal
Income Taxation” and “State Taxation.” Wellesley Bancorp does not contemplate any distribution by
Wellesley Bank that would result in this type of tax liability.
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
The summary consolidated financial information
presented below is derived in part from our audited consolidated financial statements. The following is only a summary and you
should read it in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes beginning on page 76. The information at December
31, 2019 and for the years then ended is derived in part from the audited consolidated financial statements of Wellesley Bancorp
that appear elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
|
|
At
December 31,
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
2019
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
Selected
Financial Condition Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
assets
|
|
$
|
945,218
|
|
|
$
|
871,420
|
|
|
$
|
805,395
|
|
|
$
|
695,283
|
|
|
$
|
621,182
|
|
Cash
and short-term investments
|
|
|
42,094
|
|
|
|
42,650
|
|
|
|
28,462
|
|
|
|
28,425
|
|
|
|
28,178
|
|
Securities
available for sale
|
|
|
29,815
|
|
|
|
66,770
|
|
|
|
66,486
|
|
|
|
64,648
|
|
|
|
62,434
|
|
Loans
held for sale
|
|
|
3,354
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
1,454
|
|
|
|
1,131
|
|
Loans
receivable, net
|
|
|
834,460
|
|
|
|
737,032
|
|
|
|
686,302
|
|
|
|
576,131
|
|
|
|
507,307
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
752,467
|
|
|
|
717,931
|
|
|
|
616,742
|
|
|
|
522,810
|
|
|
|
463,738
|
|
Short-term
borrowings
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
38,000
|
|
|
|
21,250
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
Long-term
debt
|
|
|
74,196
|
|
|
|
58,528
|
|
|
|
77,174
|
|
|
|
83,020
|
|
|
|
72,860
|
|
Subordinated
debentures
|
|
|
9,861
|
|
|
|
9,832
|
|
|
|
9,802
|
|
|
|
9,769
|
|
|
|
9,734
|
|
Total
stockholders’ equity
|
|
|
73,451
|
|
|
|
65,130
|
|
|
|
59,245
|
|
|
|
55,214
|
|
|
|
52,178
|
|
|
|
Years
Ended December 31,
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
2019
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
Operating
Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
and dividend income
|
|
$
|
40,290
|
|
|
$
|
33,638
|
|
|
$
|
28,366
|
|
|
$
|
24,804
|
|
|
$
|
22,085
|
|
Interest
expense
|
|
|
13,204
|
|
|
|
8,909
|
|
|
|
5,688
|
|
|
|
4,899
|
|
|
|
3,690
|
|
Net
interest income
|
|
|
27,086
|
|
|
|
24,729
|
|
|
|
22,678
|
|
|
|
19,905
|
|
|
|
18,395
|
|
Provision
for loan losses
|
|
|
915
|
|
|
|
585
|
|
|
|
735
|
|
|
|
437
|
|
|
|
475
|
|
Net
interest income, after provision for loan losses
|
|
|
26,171
|
|
|
|
24,144
|
|
|
|
21,943
|
|
|
|
19,468
|
|
|
|
17,920
|
|
Noninterest
income
|
|
|
3,109
|
|
|
|
2,586
|
|
|
|
1,987
|
|
|
|
1,710
|
|
|
|
1,226
|
|
Noninterest
expenses
|
|
|
21,178
|
|
|
|
18,563
|
|
|
|
17,181
|
|
|
|
16,404
|
|
|
|
14,845
|
|
Income
before income taxes
|
|
|
8,102
|
|
|
|
8,167
|
|
|
|
6,749
|
|
|
|
4,774
|
|
|
|
4,301
|
|
Provision
for income taxes
|
|
|
2,102
|
|
|
|
2,176
|
|
|
|
3,564
|
|
|
|
1,838
|
|
|
|
1,652
|
|
Net
income
|
|
$
|
6,000
|
|
|
$
|
5,991
|
|
|
$
|
3,185
|
|
|
$
|
2,936
|
|
|
$
|
2,649
|
|
|
|
At
or For the Years Ended
December
31,
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
Selected
Financial Ratios and Other Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance
Ratios:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return
on average assets
|
|
|
0.64
|
%
|
|
|
0.72
|
%
|
|
|
0.43
|
%
|
|
|
0.45
|
%
|
|
|
0.46
|
%
|
Return
on average equity
|
|
|
8.56
|
|
|
|
9.64
|
|
|
|
5.47
|
|
|
|
5.37
|
|
|
|
5.21
|
|
Interest
rate spread (1)
|
|
|
2.59
|
|
|
|
2.76
|
|
|
|
2.97
|
|
|
|
2.99
|
|
|
|
3.16
|
|
Net
interest margin (2)
|
|
|
2.96
|
|
|
|
3.04
|
|
|
|
3.16
|
|
|
|
3.17
|
|
|
|
3.31
|
|
Noninterest
expense to average assets
|
|
|
2.25
|
|
|
|
2.24
|
|
|
|
2.34
|
|
|
|
2.54
|
|
|
|
2.60
|
|
Efficiency
ratio (3)
|
|
|
70.14
|
|
|
|
67.96
|
|
|
|
69.66
|
|
|
|
75.89
|
|
|
|
75.66
|
|
Average
interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities
|
|
|
125.64
|
|
|
|
125.32
|
|
|
|
124.32
|
|
|
|
122.99
|
|
|
|
122.34
|
|
Average
equity to average total assets
|
|
|
7.44
|
|
|
|
7.48
|
|
|
|
7.92
|
|
|
|
8.46
|
|
|
|
8.90
|
|
Basic
earnings per share
|
|
$
|
2.44
|
|
|
$
|
2.49
|
|
|
$
|
1.34
|
|
|
$
|
1.26
|
|
|
$
|
1.14
|
|
Diluted
earnings per share
|
|
$
|
2.36
|
|
|
$
|
2.40
|
|
|
$
|
1.30
|
|
|
$
|
1.24
|
|
|
$
|
1.14
|
|
Dividends
per share
|
|
$
|
0.24
|
|
|
$
|
0.22
|
|
|
$
|
0.19
|
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
|
$
|
0.12
|
|
Dividend
payout ratio
|
|
|
9.63
|
%
|
|
|
8.63
|
%
|
|
|
14.07
|
%
|
|
|
11.85
|
%
|
|
|
10.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset
Quality Ratios:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonperforming
assets to total assets
|
|
|
0.26
|
%
|
|
|
0.13
|
%
|
|
|
0.07
|
%
|
|
|
0.09
|
%
|
|
|
0.24
|
%
|
Nonperforming
loans to total loans
|
|
|
0.30
|
|
|
|
0.15
|
|
|
|
0.08
|
|
|
|
0.10
|
|
|
|
0.29
|
|
Allowance
for loan losses to nonperforming loans
|
|
|
306.9
|
|
|
|
592.7
|
|
|
|
1,068.2
|
|
|
|
918.3
|
|
|
|
349.2
|
|
Allowance
for loan losses to total loans
|
|
|
0.91
|
|
|
|
0.91
|
|
|
|
0.89
|
|
|
|
0.93
|
|
|
|
1.00
|
|
Net
charge-offs to average loans outstanding during the period
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
0.02
|
|
|
|
0.02
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital
Ratios:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
capital to risk-weighted assets (4)
|
|
|
11.61
|
%
|
|
|
12.31
|
%
|
|
|
11.72
|
%
|
|
|
12.58
|
%
|
|
|
14.20
|
%
|
Common
equity Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets (4)
|
|
|
10.59
|
|
|
|
11.27
|
|
|
|
10.72
|
|
|
|
11.56
|
|
|
|
13.03
|
|
Tier
1 capital to risk-weighted assets (4)
|
|
|
10.59
|
|
|
|
11.27
|
|
|
|
10.72
|
|
|
|
11.56
|
|
|
|
13.03
|
|
Tier
1 capital to total average assets (4)(5)
|
|
|
8.36
|
|
|
|
8.44
|
|
|
|
8.37
|
|
|
|
9.06
|
|
|
|
9.40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
of full service offices
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
(1)
|
Represents the difference between the weighted average yield on average interest-earning assets
and the weighted average cost of average interest-bearing liabilities.
|
(2)
|
Represents net interest income as a percent of average
interest-earning assets.
|
(3)
|
Represents noninterest expense divided by the sum of net interest income and noninterest income,
excluding gains or losses on the sale of securities and loss on the early extinguishment of debt.
|
(4)
|
Capital ratios reflect the Bank-only capital position at the end of all periods presented as the
Company is not currently required to report regulatory capital requirements.
|
(5)
|
Average assets represent average assets for the most recent quarter within the respective period.
|
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations
On December 5, 2019, Cambridge Bancorp and the Company issued
a joint press release announcing that Cambridge and the Company have entered into the Merger Agreement pursuant to which the Company
will merge with and into Cambridge, with Cambridge as the surviving entity. Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, which
has been approved by the boards of directors and stockholders of both companies, stockholders of the Company will receive 0.580
shares of Cambridge common stock for each share of Company common stock. The transaction is subject to customary closing
conditions and is expected to close during the second quarter of 2020.
Overview
Income. Our primary source
of income is net interest income. Net interest income is the difference between interest income, which is the income that we earn
on our loans and investments, and interest expense, which is the interest that we pay on our deposits and borrowings. Other sources
of income include fees from investment management services, earnings from customer service fees (mostly from service charges on
deposit accounts), bank-owned life insurance, income from mortgage banking activities and fees from customer loan-related interest
rate swaps.
Provision for Loan Losses.
The allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level representing management’s best estimate of inherent losses in the
loan portfolio, based upon management’s evaluation of the portfolio’s collectibility. The allowance is established
through the provision for loan losses, which is charged against income. Charge-offs, if any, are charged to the allowance. Subsequent
recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance. Allocation of the allowance may be made for specific loans or pools of loans,
but the entire allowance is available for the entire loan portfolio.
Expenses. The noninterest
expenses we incur in operating our business consist of salaries and employee benefits, occupancy and equipment, data processing,
federal deposit insurance, professional fees, advertising and marketing, and other general and administrative expenses.
Salaries and employee benefits consist
primarily of salaries and wages paid to our employees, payroll taxes, and expenses for health insurance, retirement plans and other
employee benefits. We recognize annual employee compensation expenses stemming from our Employee Stock Ownership Plan (“ESOP”)
and our equity incentive plans. The actual amount of stock-related compensation and benefit expenses related to the ESOP is based
on the fair market value of the shares of our common stock at specific points in time.
Occupancy and equipment expenses, which
are the fixed and variable costs of buildings and equipment, consist primarily of depreciation charges, rental expenses, furniture
and equipment expenses, maintenance, real estate taxes and costs of utilities. Depreciation of premises and equipment is computed
using a straight-line method based on the estimated useful lives of the related assets, which range from three to 40 years, or
the expected lease terms, if shorter.
Data processing expense represents the
fees associated with all business applications we pay to third parties for the use of their software for recording and managing
deposit accounts, loan accounts, investment securities, general ledger, payroll and administrative functions within the organization.
Included in this category are primary contracts with vendors, service providers and maintenance agreements in support of these
functions.
Federal deposit insurance premiums are
payments we make to the FDIC for insurance of our deposit accounts.
Professional fees include consulting fees
and expenses associated with being a public company which consist primarily of legal and accounting fees, expenses of stockholder
communications and meetings, and stock exchange listing fees.
Advertising and marketing expense includes
costs associated with design and delivery of promotional material through a variety of media related to products and services we
make available to our customers.
Other general and administrative expenses
include office supplies, postage, insurance, board of directors and committee fees, and other miscellaneous operating expenses.
Business Strategy and Objectives
Wellesley Bank provides comprehensive premier
banking and wealth management services to successful people, families, businesses and non-profit organizations. With a legacy spanning
over 100 years, we are committed to delivering exceptional service and trusted advice to our clients.
At Wellesley Bank, it is all about the
people: our employees, our community and most importantly our clients. It’s about hiring great people, developing them and
treating them well, which, in turn, is a direct reflection on how we treat our clients. The foundation of our bank is built on
integrity, community and exceptional client service, where everyone is treated fairly and with respect. We pride ourselves in having
an entrepreneurial spirit, where we continue to evolve, stay open to ideas and make quick, sound decisions. This is our strategy
and our source of distinction.
Our primary objective is to operate and
grow a profitable community-oriented financial institution serving customers in our primary market areas. We seek to achieve this
by maintaining a strong capital position and high asset quality. Our operating objectives include the following:
Emphasizing lower cost core deposits
and accessing a wider network of funding sources to maintain low funding costs. We seek to increase net interest income
by controlling our funding costs. Over the past several years, we have sought to reduce our dependence on traditional higher cost
certificates of deposits in favor of stable lower cost demand deposits. We have utilized additional product offerings, technology
and a focus on customer service in working toward this goal. In addition, we seek demand deposits by growing commercial banking
relationships. Core deposits (demand, NOW, money market and savings accounts) comprised 71.2% of our total deposits at December
31, 2019. While our focus and strategy will be to continue to emphasize core deposits and relationship banking, we have occasionally
utilized our ability to grow certificates of deposit during times of greater loan demand as a means to support loan growth. We
do this through our retail and brokered certificate offerings and we participate in a national market clearinghouse for placing
competitively priced certificates of deposits with financial institutions, nonprofits and other corporate participants. National
market certificates of deposit are sometimes less costly funds than local market retail certificates, and may provide access to
a wider range of maturities than retail funds. In addition, we utilize borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston (“FHLB”)
to provide matched funding of commercial loans and short-term liquidity needs at relatively lower cost than retail deposits. Balances
of FHLB advances increased $20.7 million from $73.5 million at December 31, 2018 to $94.2 million at December 31, 2019.
Increasing our deposit market share
within our primary markets in eastern Massachusetts. Since its inception in 1911, Wellesley Bank has primarily served the
town of Wellesley, Massachusetts and the immediate surrounding communities. Despite considerable competition from larger financial
institutions, we have made significant progress in recent years to increase our market presence in the town of Wellesley and in
the greater Boston metropolitan area. Our deposits increased $34.5 million, or 4.8%, from $717.9 million at December 31, 2018 to
$752.5 million at December 31, 2019. At June 30, 2019 (the latest data available), we had 13.7% of the deposits in the town of
Wellesley, which represented the third largest market share out of 14 financial institutions with branches in the town of Wellesley.
Our market position is fortified by three full-service offices in Wellesley. We believe Wellesley and the surrounding market area
will continue to provide opportunities for growth. We expanded our market reach into Boston through a full-service office that
opened in November 2013 and opened a new full-service banking office in Newton Centre in the spring of 2016.
Continuing to develop our
commercial real estate lending, commercial business lending, and construction lending, as well as increasing our commercial
business depository relationships in our market area. We have worked to increase our commercial relationships by
developing our premier bankers and diversifying our loan portfolio beyond residential mortgage loans along with offering
business deposit and checking products. From December 31, 2018 to December 31, 2019, our commercial real estate, construction
and commercial business loan portfolio increased $95.6 million, or 29.7%, and at December 31, 2019 was 49.5% of our total
loan portfolio. The reason for the increase in the portfolio is due to the development of a successful commercial pipeline
over the past few years. In connection with our commercial business loan portfolio, we also have focused on providing a full
banking relationship and, as a result, experienced an increase in our business deposit and checking accounts. Our business
checking accounts increased $2.8 million, or 2.7% during 2019 and represented 13.7% of our total deposits as of December 31,
2019. In addition, we continue to expand and develop our cash management products, along with on-line and mobile banking
solutions to better serve our commercial customers.
Increasing our residential mortgage
lending in our market area. We believe there are opportunities to increase residential mortgage lending in our market areas.
The town of Wellesley and its surrounding communities have a sound economy. As a result, the demand for residential mortgage loans
in our market area, in particular larger “jumbo” loans, has been steady. From December 31, 2018 to December 31, 2019,
our residential loans increased $5.8 million, or 1.5%, and at December 31, 2019 were 46.1% of our total loan portfolio. In addition
to our traditional markets in the town of Wellesley and surrounding communities, our lending territory currently includes sections
of Boston in Suffolk County and Cambridge in Middlesex County, which we believe provide additional lending opportunities and further
diversifies our residential loan portfolio.
Continuing conservative underwriting
practices while maintaining a high quality loan portfolio. We believe that strong asset quality is a key to long-term financial
success. We have sought to maintain a high level of asset quality and manageable credit risk by using conservative underwriting
standards and applying diligent monitoring and collection efforts. Nonperforming loans increased from $1.1 million at December
31, 2018 to $2.5 million at December 31, 2019. At December 31, 2019, nonperforming loans were 0.30% of the total loan portfolio
and 0.26% of total assets. The increase in nonperforming loans was the result of slowing payments on a home equity line of credit
and a commercial and industrial loan with a deteriorating cash flow situation. We believe both situations will be favorably resolved
in the short-term. We intend to increase our commercial real estate, construction and commercial business lending, while continuing
our philosophy of managing large loan exposures through conservative loan underwriting and sound credit administration standards.
Seeking to enhance fee income by
growing investment advisory services. Our profits rely heavily on the spread between the interest earned on loans and
securities and interest paid on deposits and borrowings. In order to decrease our reliance on net interest income, we have pursued
initiatives to increase noninterest income. In particular, we offer a full array of investment advisory services for individuals,
nonprofits, institutions, and endowments through our wholly-owned subsidiary, Wellesley Investment Partners, LLC, a registered
investment advisor. We appointed a new president of Wellesley Investment Partners in the fourth quarter of 2014 and have augmented
our business development efforts and research and support functions with a number of key individuals as we intend to grow and
develop this aspect of our business. Investment management fees relating to our investment advisory services totaled $1.7 million,
$1.6 million and $1.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
Critical Accounting Policies
We consider accounting policies involving
significant judgments and assumptions by management that have, or could have, a material impact on the carrying value of certain
assets or on income to be critical accounting policies.
Allowance for Loan Losses. The
allowance for loan losses is the amount estimated by management as necessary to cover losses inherent in the loan portfolio at
the balance sheet date. The allowance is established through the provision for loan losses, which is charged to income. Determining
the amount of the allowance for loan losses necessarily involves a high degree of judgment. Among the material estimates required
to establish the allowance are the following factors: the likelihood of default; the loss exposure at default; the amount and timing
of future cash flows on impaired loans; the value of collateral; and the determination of loss factors to be applied to the various
elements of the portfolio. All of these estimates are susceptible to significant change. Management reviews the level of the allowance
at least quarterly and establishes the provision for loan losses based upon an evaluation of the portfolio, past loss experience,
current economic conditions and other factors related to the collectibility of the loan portfolio. Although we believe that we
use the best information available to establish the allowance for loan losses, future adjustments to the allowance may be necessary
if economic or other conditions differ substantially from the assumptions used in making the current evaluation. In addition, the
FDIC and Massachusetts Commissioner of Banks, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review our allowance
for loan losses and may require us to recognize adjustments to the allowance based on their judgments about information available
to them at the time of their examination. A large loss could deplete the allowance and require increased provisions to replenish
the allowance, which would adversely affect earnings. See notes 1 and 6 of the notes to consolidated financial statements included
in this document.
Deferred Tax Assets. Deferred
tax assets and liabilities are reflected at currently enacted income tax rates applicable to the period in which the deferred tax
assets or liabilities are expected to be realized or settled. Management reviews deferred tax assets on a quarterly basis to identify
any uncertainties pertaining to realization of such assets. In determining whether a valuation allowance is required against deferred
tax assets, management assesses historical and forecasted operating results, including a review of eligible carryforward periods,
tax planning opportunities and other relevant considerations. We believe the accounting estimate related to the valuation allowance
is a critical estimate because the underlying assumptions can change from period to period. For example, the 2017 enactment of
TCJA, the law that reduced our federal tax rate from 34.0% to 21.0%, caused us to re-value our deferred tax asset.
Balance Sheet Analysis
General. Total assets increased
$73.8 million, or 8.5%, from $871.4 million at December 31, 2018 to $945.2 million at December 31, 2019. Total assets increased
primarily due to an increase in net loans of $97.4 million, or 13.2%, along with the addition of an operating lease right-of-use
asset of $6.5 million and an increase in loans held for sale of $3.3 million, partially offset by a reduction in investments of
$37.0 million. Total liabilities increased $65.5 million due to deposit growth of $34.5 million, additional FHLB borrowings of
$20.7 million, and the addition of an operating lease liability of $6.5 million.
Loans. Net loans increased
$97.4 million, or 13.2%, from $737.0 million at December 31, 2018 to $834.5 million at December 31, 2019. The bank has been successful
in emphasizing commercial loans: commercial real estate loans increased $33.9 million to $181.9 million; construction loans increased
$31.3 million to $138.0 million; and commercial and industrial loans increased $30.4 million to $97.3 million. The increase in
commercial and industrial loans reflects our continued emphasis on originating these types of loans and increased loan demand.
Permanent construction loans, or those loans financing construction of owner-occupied residential properties, totaled $20.5 million
at December 31, 2019, while speculative construction loans on residential properties, representing loans to builders, totaled $83.3
million at December 31, 2019. The increase in construction loan balances generally was due to the continued strong demand for new
home construction within our primary markets.
Residential real estate loans increased
$5.8 million, or 1.5%, to $388.3 million. Fixed-rate residential loans increased $13.5 million to $77.7 million. Adjustable-rate
residential mortgage loans decreased $7.6 million, or 2.4%, to $310.6 million. We continue to sell some conforming longer-term
fixed-rate residential loans that we have originated. For the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, residential mortgage loans
originated and sold to investors totaled $25.1 million and $8.5 million, respectively.
The following table sets forth the composition of our loan portfolio,
excluding loans held for sale, at the dates indicated.
|
|
At
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
Real estate loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
mortgage
|
|
$
|
388,325
|
|
|
|
46.10
|
%
|
|
$
|
382,510
|
|
|
|
51.43
|
%
|
|
$
|
329,026
|
|
|
|
47.52
|
%
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
|
181,928
|
|
|
|
21.60
|
|
|
|
148,006
|
|
|
|
19.90
|
|
|
|
138,784
|
|
|
|
20.05
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
138,007
|
|
|
|
16.38
|
|
|
|
106,723
|
|
|
|
14.35
|
|
|
|
120,004
|
|
|
|
17.33
|
|
Total real estate loans
|
|
|
708,260
|
|
|
|
84.08
|
|
|
|
637,239
|
|
|
|
85.68
|
|
|
|
587,814
|
|
|
|
84.90
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial loans
|
|
|
97,281
|
|
|
|
11.54
|
|
|
|
66,890
|
|
|
|
8.99
|
|
|
|
67,971
|
|
|
|
9.82
|
|
Consumer loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home
equity lines of credit
|
|
|
36,693
|
|
|
|
4.36
|
|
|
|
39,486
|
|
|
|
5.31
|
|
|
|
36,378
|
|
|
|
5.25
|
|
Other
|
|
|
171
|
|
|
|
0.02
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
0.02
|
|
|
|
214
|
|
|
|
0.03
|
|
Total
loans
|
|
|
842,405
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
743,778
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
692,377
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
Less:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred loan origination (fees) costs
|
|
|
(292
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance
for loan losses
|
|
|
(7,653
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,738
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,153
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loans
|
|
$
|
834,460
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
737,032
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
686,302
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
Real estate loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage
|
|
$
|
268,059
|
|
|
|
46.09
|
%
|
|
$
|
256,470
|
|
|
|
50.05
|
%
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
|
121,134
|
|
|
|
20.83
|
|
|
|
103,106
|
|
|
|
20.11
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
110,390
|
|
|
|
18.98
|
|
|
|
94,886
|
|
|
|
18.52
|
|
Total real estate loans
|
|
|
499,583
|
|
|
|
85.90
|
|
|
|
454,462
|
|
|
|
88.68
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial loans
|
|
|
49,347
|
|
|
|
8.48
|
|
|
|
23,681
|
|
|
|
4.62
|
|
Consumer loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity lines of credit
|
|
|
32,437
|
|
|
|
5.58
|
|
|
|
34,083
|
|
|
|
6.65
|
|
Other
|
|
|
216
|
|
|
|
0.04
|
|
|
|
256
|
|
|
|
0.05
|
|
Total loans
|
|
|
581,583
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
512,482
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
Less:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred loan origination (fees) costs
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
(5,432
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,112
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Net loans
|
|
$
|
576,131
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
507,307
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan Maturity. The following
table sets forth certain information at December 31, 2019 regarding scheduled contractual maturities. The table does not include
any estimate of prepayments which could significantly shorten the average life of all loans and may cause our actual repayment
experience to differ from that shown below. Demand loans having no stated schedule of repayments and no stated maturity are reported
as due in one year or less. The amounts shown below exclude net deferred loan costs and fees.
|
|
December
31, 2019
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
Residential
Mortgage
Loans
|
|
|
Commercial
Real Estate
Loans
|
|
|
Construction
Loans
|
|
|
Commercial
Loans
|
|
|
Consumer
Loans
|
|
|
Total
Loans
|
|
Amounts due in:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One year or
less
|
|
$
|
3,051
|
|
|
$
|
10,571
|
|
|
$
|
84,369
|
|
|
$
|
18,953
|
|
|
$
|
1,979
|
|
|
$
|
118,923
|
|
More than one year to
five years
|
|
|
3,098
|
|
|
|
18,724
|
|
|
|
32,600
|
|
|
|
9,029
|
|
|
|
5,865
|
|
|
|
69,316
|
|
More
than five years
|
|
|
382,176
|
|
|
|
152,633
|
|
|
|
21,038
|
|
|
|
69,299
|
|
|
|
29,020
|
|
|
|
654,166
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
388,325
|
|
|
$
|
181,928
|
|
|
$
|
138,007
|
|
|
$
|
97,281
|
|
|
$
|
36,864
|
|
|
$
|
842,405
|
|
Fixed vs. Adjustable Rate Loans.
The following table sets forth the dollar amount of all scheduled maturities of loans at December 31, 2019 that are due after December
31, 2020 and have either fixed interest rates or adjustable interest rates. The amounts shown below exclude net deferred loan costs
and fees.
(In thousands)
|
|
Fixed
Rates
|
|
|
Floating or
Adjustable
Rates
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Real estate loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage
|
|
$
|
70,039
|
|
|
$
|
315,235
|
|
|
$
|
385,274
|
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
|
22,628
|
|
|
|
148,729
|
|
|
|
171,357
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
39,002
|
|
|
|
14,636
|
|
|
|
53,638
|
|
Commercial loans
|
|
|
21,274
|
|
|
|
57,054
|
|
|
|
78,328
|
|
Consumer loans
|
|
|
2,910
|
|
|
|
31,975
|
|
|
|
34,885
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
155,853
|
|
|
$
|
567,629
|
|
|
$
|
723,482
|
|
Securities. Our securities portfolio consists
primarily of residential mortgage-backed securities issued by U.S. government agencies and government sponsored enterprises, corporate
bonds, SBA and other asset-backed securities and municipal bonds. Securities available for sale decreased by $37.0 million, or
55.4%, to $29.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, primarily due to the sale of lower yielding securities which were
used to pay down higher cost borrowings.
The following table sets forth the amortized cost and fair values
of our securities portfolio at the dates indicated.
|
|
At
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
Amortized
Cost
|
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
|
Amortized
Cost
|
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
|
Amortized
Cost
|
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
Residential mortgage-backed
securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government National
Mortgage Association
|
|
$
|
2,770
|
|
|
$
|
2,815
|
|
|
$
|
3,846
|
|
|
$
|
3,847
|
|
|
$
|
3,358
|
|
|
$
|
3,351
|
|
Government-sponsored enterprises
|
|
|
2,224
|
|
|
|
2,266
|
|
|
|
11,382
|
|
|
|
11,223
|
|
|
|
11,690
|
|
|
|
11,649
|
|
SBA and other asset-backed securities
|
|
|
4,082
|
|
|
|
4,192
|
|
|
|
11,720
|
|
|
|
11,627
|
|
|
|
11,961
|
|
|
|
11,963
|
|
State and municipal bonds
|
|
|
7,446
|
|
|
|
7,821
|
|
|
|
12,908
|
|
|
|
12,908
|
|
|
|
13,026
|
|
|
|
13,287
|
|
Government-sponsored enterprise obligations
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
|
3,994
|
|
|
|
8,000
|
|
|
|
7,813
|
|
|
|
8,000
|
|
|
|
7,834
|
|
Corporate bonds
|
|
|
8,597
|
|
|
|
8,727
|
|
|
|
18,151
|
|
|
|
17,857
|
|
|
|
17,166
|
|
|
|
17,161
|
|
U.S.Treasury
bonds
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
1,495
|
|
|
|
1,495
|
|
|
|
1,241
|
|
|
|
1,241
|
|
Total
securities available for sale
|
|
$
|
29,119
|
|
|
$
|
29,815
|
|
|
$
|
67,502
|
|
|
$
|
66,770
|
|
|
$
|
66,442
|
|
|
$
|
66,486
|
|
At December 31, 2019, we had no investments in a single company
or entity (other than the U.S. Government or an agency of the U.S. Government) that had an aggregate book value in excess of 10%
of equity.
The following table sets forth the stated
maturities and weighted average yields of debt securities at December 31, 2019. Weighted average yields on tax-exempt securities
are not presented on a tax equivalent basis. Certain mortgage related securities have adjustable interest rates and will reprice
annually within the various maturity ranges. These repricing schedules, as well as monthly principal payments on mortgage- and
asset-backed securities, are not reflected in the table below.
|
|
One
Year or Less
|
|
|
More
than One Year
to Five Years
|
|
|
More
than Five
Years
to Ten Years
|
|
|
More
than Ten Years
|
|
|
Total
|
|
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
|
Amortized
Cost
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Yield
|
|
|
Amortized
Cost
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Yield
|
|
|
Amortized
Cost
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Yield
|
|
|
Amortized
Cost
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Yield
|
|
|
Amortized
Cost
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Yield
|
|
State and municipal bonds
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
2,063
|
|
|
|
3.17
|
|
|
|
3,029
|
|
|
|
2.79
|
|
|
|
2,354
|
|
|
|
3.09
|
|
|
|
7,446
|
|
|
|
2.99
|
|
Government-sponsored
enterprise obligations
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
1.77
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
2.00
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
|
1.83
|
|
Corporate
bonds
|
|
|
1,850
|
|
|
|
2.09
|
|
|
|
2,747
|
|
|
|
2.87
|
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
|
5.66
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
8,597
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
|
Total
debt securities
|
|
$
|
1,850
|
|
|
|
2.09
|
%
|
|
$
|
7,810
|
|
|
|
2.53
|
%
|
|
$
|
8,029
|
|
|
|
4.12
|
%
|
|
$
|
2,354
|
|
|
|
3.09
|
%
|
|
$
|
20,043
|
|
|
|
3.19
|
%
|
Deposits. Our primary
sources of funds are retail deposit accounts held primarily by individuals and businesses within our market area. Deposits
increased $34.5 million, or 4.8%, during the year ended December 31, 2019 due primarily to increases in money market accounts
of $75.4 million, or 37.0%; noninterest-bearing demand deposits of $23.0 million, or 18.6%; and, NOW accounts of $1.9
million, or 5.2%; partially offset by decreases in certificate of deposit accounts of $61.6 million, or 28.8%; and, in
regular and other savings accounts of $4.2 million, or 10.4%. Brokered certificate of deposit accounts decreased $35.5
million to $47.0 million at December 31, 2019 accounting for most of the decline in certificates of deposits. During 2019, we
continued our evolution of the premier service relationship-based delivery model. Leveraging our expansion of offices and
investments in our premier bankers, we have been able to grow our core, relationship-based deposits significantly. We have
continued to upgrade our business and consumer online banking capabilities and focused our business development activities on
client relationships across product lines.
The following table sets forth the average balances of our deposit
products at the dates indicated.
|
|
For the Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
Noninterest-bearing demand deposits
|
|
$
|
129,477
|
|
|
|
17.35
|
%
|
|
$
|
115,854
|
|
|
|
17.78
|
%
|
|
$
|
96,011
|
|
|
|
17.41
|
%
|
Interest-bearing deposits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOW
|
|
|
38,629
|
|
|
|
5.18
|
|
|
|
36,627
|
|
|
|
5.62
|
|
|
|
35,399
|
|
|
|
6.42
|
|
Money market
|
|
|
257,559
|
|
|
|
34.52
|
|
|
|
155,439
|
|
|
|
23.85
|
|
|
|
119,862
|
|
|
|
21.74
|
|
Regular and other savings
|
|
|
74,870
|
|
|
|
10.04
|
|
|
|
91,780
|
|
|
|
14.09
|
|
|
|
96,454
|
|
|
|
17.50
|
|
Term certificates of deposit
|
|
|
245,569
|
|
|
|
32.91
|
|
|
|
251,912
|
|
|
|
38.66
|
|
|
|
203,645
|
|
|
|
36.93
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
746,104
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
651,612
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
551,371
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
The following table indicates the amount of jumbo certificates
of deposit by time remaining until maturity at December 31, 2019. Jumbo certificates of deposit require minimum deposits of $250
thousand. Between the FDIC’s and Co-operative Central Bank’s deposit insurance coverage, these funds are fully insured.
(In thousands)
|
|
Jumbo
Certificates of
Deposits
|
|
Maturity Period at December 31, 2019:
|
|
|
|
|
Three months or less
|
|
$
|
17,081
|
|
Over three through six months
|
|
|
18,927
|
|
Over six through twelve months
|
|
|
37,541
|
|
Over twelve months
|
|
|
17,232
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
90,781
|
|
Borrowings. We primarily
use advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston (“FHLB”) to supplement deposit growth as a source of funds for
loans and securities.
Long-term debt, consisting entirely of
FHLB advances, increased $15.7 million, or 26.8%, for the year ended December 31, 2019. At December 31, 2019 and 2018, short-term
borrowings consisted entirely of advances from the FHLB with original maturities less than one year. Balances outstanding at December
31, 2019 were $20.0 million, an increase of $5.0 million over balances at December 31, 2018. Long-term and short-term borrowings
were typically used to fund loan growth and support short-term liquidity needs resulting from the timing of loan originations and
irregular deposit flows.
At December 31, 2019, subordinated debt,
net of issuance costs, totaled $9.9 million as a result of the sale by the Company of $10.0 million of subordinated debentures
maturing in 2025 to qualified institutional investors in December 2015. The funds received from the sale have been used for general
corporate purposes including the down-streaming of substantially all of the funds to the Bank in the form of additional paid-in
capital, to support the growth objectives of the Bank.
The following table sets forth selected information regarding
borrowings for the periods indicated.
|
|
At or For the Year Ended December 31,
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
2019
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
Short-term Borrowings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of the year
|
|
$
|
20,000
|
|
|
$
|
15,000
|
|
|
$
|
38,000
|
|
Average balance during the year
|
|
|
32,855
|
|
|
|
27,943
|
|
|
|
23,533
|
|
Maximum outstanding at any month end during the year
|
|
|
54,000
|
|
|
|
51,000
|
|
|
|
38,000
|
|
Weighted average interest rate at end of the year
|
|
|
2.10
|
%
|
|
|
2.44
|
%
|
|
|
1.53
|
%
|
Weighted average interest rate during the year
|
|
|
2.63
|
%
|
|
|
2.08
|
%
|
|
|
1.25
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term Debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of the year
|
|
$
|
74,196
|
|
|
$
|
58,528
|
|
|
$
|
77,174
|
|
Average balance during the year
|
|
|
68,269
|
|
|
|
75,565
|
|
|
|
89,319
|
|
Maximum outstanding at any month end during the year
|
|
|
77,643
|
|
|
|
95,399
|
|
|
|
100,848
|
|
Weighted average interest rate at end of the year
|
|
|
2.61
|
%
|
|
|
1.65
|
%
|
|
|
1.32
|
%
|
Weighted average interest rate during the year
|
|
|
2.40
|
%
|
|
|
1.66
|
%
|
|
|
1.32
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subordinated Debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of the year
|
|
$
|
9,861
|
|
|
$
|
9,832
|
|
|
$
|
9,802
|
|
Average balance during the year
|
|
|
9,846
|
|
|
|
9,816
|
|
|
|
9,784
|
|
Maximum outstanding at any month end during the year
|
|
|
9,861
|
|
|
|
9,832
|
|
|
|
9,802
|
|
Weighted average interest rate at end of the year
|
|
|
6.12
|
%
|
|
|
6.12
|
%
|
|
|
6.12
|
%
|
Weighted average interest rate during the year
|
|
|
6.39
|
%
|
|
|
6.43
|
%
|
|
|
6.47
|
%
|
Results of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2019
and 2018
Overview. Net income was
$6.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, an increase of $9 thousand, or 0.2% as compared to December, 2018. Earnings
were lessened by merger-related expenses. For the year ended December 31, 2019, compared to 2018, net interest income plus non-interest
income increased $2.9 million, offset by an increase in non-interest expenses of $2.6 million and an increase in the provision
for loan losses of $330 thousand. The tax provision decreased $74 thousand.
Net Interest Income. Net
interest income for the year ended December 31, 2019 totaled $27.1 million compared to $24.7 million for the year ended December
31, 2018, an increase of $2.4 million, or 9.5%. The increase in net interest income was primarily due to greater interest and dividend
income, which increased by $6.7 million, or 19.8%, to $40.3 million for 2019 from $33.6 million for 2018. The average balance of
interest-earning assets increased 12.4%, with an average rate earned on these assets of 4.41% for 2019.
Interest income from loans and loans held for sale increased $6.6 million, or 21.4%, due to a 14.6% increase in the average
balance of loans and loans held for sale and an increase of 26 basis points in the average rate earned on loans and loans held
for sale. Most of the remaining increase was from higher balances in short-term investments combined with the rise in short-term
interest rates.
Interest expense increased $4.3
million, or 48.2%, during this period due to an increase in deposit balances and rates paid on interest-bearing deposits and
short- and long-term borrowings. The average rates paid on deposits increased by 43 basis points in 2019 primarily due to a
shift in the mix of deposits to higher cost term certificates and money market accounts. Rates paid on money market accounts
increased 62 basis points during the period while rates paid on term certificates increased 49 basis points. Average balances
of interest-bearing deposits increased $80.9 million or 15.1% in 2019. We experienced an increase in the average balance of
money market accounts of 65.7% for the year ended December 31, 2019, as compared to the prior year, while the average balance
of savings accounts decreased 18.4% during that period. Balances in lower cost NOW checking accounts and interest free
checking accounts increased 8.9% during 2019 and helped to mitigate the interest expense increase.
During 2019, we reduced our average combined
use of FHLB short- and long-term borrowings due to their relatively higher interest rate cost as compared to core deposits. FHLB
short-term borrowings increased $4.9 million and carried an average rate of 2.63% in 2019, compared to 2.08% in 2018. As a result,
interest expense on short-term borrowings increased $285 thousand. Overall interest cost on long-term FHLB advances increased $386
thousand, or 30.7% as compared to the prior year. Average balances of long-term FHLB advances decreased $7.3 million to $68.3 million
at December 31, 2019, while the rate paid on FHLB advances increased 74 basis points to 2.40% in 2019.
Average Balances and Yields.
The following table presents information regarding average balances of assets and liabilities, the total dollar amounts of interest
income and dividends from average interest-earning assets, the total dollar amounts of interest expense on average interest-bearing
liabilities, and the resulting annualized average yields and costs. The yields and costs for the periods indicated are derived
by dividing income or expense by the average balances of assets or liabilities, respectively, for the periods presented. Average
balances have been calculated using daily balances. Loan fees are included in interest income on loans and are insignificant. Yields
are not presented on a tax-equivalent basis. Any adjustments necessary to present yields on a tax-equivalent basis are insignificant.
|
|
For the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Average
Outstanding
Balance
|
|
|
Interest
Earned/
Paid
|
|
|
Average
Yield/
Rate
|
|
|
Average
Outstanding
Balance
|
|
|
Interest
Earned/
Paid
|
|
|
Average
Yield/
Rate
|
|
|
Average
Outstanding
Balance
|
|
|
Interest
Earned/
Paid
|
|
|
Average
Yield/
Rate
|
|
Interest-earning Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
$
|
38,334
|
|
|
$
|
757
|
|
|
|
1.97
|
%
|
|
$
|
29,092
|
|
|
$
|
509
|
|
|
|
1.75
|
%
|
|
$
|
21,602
|
|
|
$
|
220
|
|
|
|
1.02
|
%
|
Debt securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable
|
|
|
43,484
|
|
|
|
1,270
|
|
|
|
2.92
|
|
|
|
54,106
|
|
|
|
1,441
|
|
|
|
2.66
|
|
|
|
53,706
|
|
|
|
1,338
|
|
|
|
2.49
|
|
Tax-exempt
|
|
|
11,514
|
|
|
|
291
|
|
|
|
2.53
|
|
|
|
12,917
|
|
|
|
327
|
|
|
|
2.53
|
|
|
|
12,293
|
|
|
|
305
|
|
|
|
2.48
|
|
Total loans and loans held for sale
|
|
|
815,692
|
|
|
|
37,670
|
|
|
|
4.62
|
|
|
|
711,528
|
|
|
|
31,028
|
|
|
|
4.36
|
|
|
|
624,784
|
|
|
|
26,251
|
|
|
|
4.20
|
|
FHLB stock
|
|
|
5,095
|
|
|
|
302
|
|
|
|
5.93
|
|
|
|
5,767
|
|
|
|
333
|
|
|
|
5.77
|
|
|
|
6,153
|
|
|
|
252
|
|
|
|
4.09
|
|
Total interest-earning assets
|
|
|
914,119
|
|
|
|
40,290
|
|
|
|
4.41
|
|
|
|
813,410
|
|
|
|
33,638
|
|
|
|
4.14
|
|
|
|
718,539
|
|
|
|
28,366
|
|
|
|
3.95
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
(7,093
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,394
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,611
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-earning assets less allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
907,026
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
807,016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
712,928
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-earning assets
|
|
|
34,198
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,541
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,664
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
941,224
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
830,557
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
735,592
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regular savings accounts
|
|
$
|
74,870
|
|
|
|
429
|
|
|
|
0.57
|
|
|
$
|
91,780
|
|
|
|
524
|
|
|
|
0.57
|
|
|
$
|
96,454
|
|
|
|
432
|
|
|
|
0.45
|
|
NOW checking accounts
|
|
|
38,629
|
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
0.37
|
|
|
|
36,627
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
0.31
|
|
|
|
35,399
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
0.26
|
|
Money market accounts
|
|
|
257,559
|
|
|
|
4,134
|
|
|
|
1.61
|
|
|
|
155,439
|
|
|
|
1,537
|
|
|
|
0.99
|
|
|
|
119,862
|
|
|
|
640
|
|
|
|
0.53
|
|
Certificates of deposit
|
|
|
245,569
|
|
|
|
5,365
|
|
|
|
2.18
|
|
|
|
251,912
|
|
|
|
4,269
|
|
|
|
1.69
|
|
|
|
203,645
|
|
|
|
2,416
|
|
|
|
1.19
|
|
Total interest-bearing deposits
|
|
|
616,627
|
|
|
|
10,069
|
|
|
|
1.63
|
|
|
|
535,758
|
|
|
|
6,442
|
|
|
|
1.20
|
|
|
|
455,360
|
|
|
|
3,581
|
|
|
|
0.79
|
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
|
32,855
|
|
|
|
865
|
|
|
|
2.63
|
|
|
|
27,943
|
|
|
|
580
|
|
|
|
2.08
|
|
|
|
23,533
|
|
|
|
293
|
|
|
|
1.24
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
68,269
|
|
|
|
1,642
|
|
|
|
2.40
|
|
|
|
75,565
|
|
|
|
1,256
|
|
|
|
1.66
|
|
|
|
89,319
|
|
|
|
1,182
|
|
|
|
1.32
|
|
Subordinated debt
|
|
|
9,846
|
|
|
|
628
|
|
|
|
6.39
|
|
|
|
9,816
|
|
|
|
631
|
|
|
|
6.43
|
|
|
|
9,784
|
|
|
|
632
|
|
|
|
6.47
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities
|
|
|
727,597
|
|
|
|
13,204
|
|
|
|
1.81
|
|
|
|
649,082
|
|
|
|
8,909
|
|
|
|
1.37
|
|
|
|
577,996
|
|
|
|
5,688
|
|
|
|
0.98
|
|
Noninterest-bearing demand deposits
|
|
|
129,477
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
115,854
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96,011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other noninterest-bearing liabilities
|
|
|
14,087
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,494
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,336
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
871,161
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
768,430
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
677,343
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
70,063
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
62,127
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,249
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity
|
|
$
|
941,224
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
830,557
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
735,592
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
27,086
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
24,729
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
22,678
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest rate spread (1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.59
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.76
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.97
|
%
|
Net interest-earning assets (2)
|
|
$
|
186,522
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
164,328
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
140,543
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest margin (3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.96
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.04
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.16
|
%
|
Average total interest-earning assets to average total interest-bearing liabilities
|
|
|
125.64
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125.32
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
124.32
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Represents
the difference between the weighted average yield on average interest-earning assets
and the weighted average cost of average interest-bearing liabilities.
|
|
(2)
|
Represents
total average interest-earning assets less total average interest-bearing liabilities.
|
|
(3)
|
Represents
net interest income as a percent of average interest-earning assets.
|
Rate/Volume Analysis. The
following table sets forth the effects of changing rates and volumes on our net interest income. The rate column shows the effects
attributable to changes in rate (changes in rate multiplied by prior volume). The volume column shows the effects attributable
to changes in volume (changes in volume multiplied by prior rate). The total increase (decrease) column represents the sum of the
prior columns. For purposes of this table, changes attributable to changes in both rate and volume that cannot be segregated have
been allocated proportionally based on the changes due to rate and the changes due to volume.
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2019
Compared to
December 31, 2018
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2018
Compared to
December 31, 2017
|
|
|
|
Increase (Decrease)
Due to
|
|
|
Total
Increase
|
|
|
Increase (Decrease)
Due to
|
|
|
Total
Increase
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Volume
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
Volume
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
Interest-earning Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
$
|
176
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
$
|
247
|
|
|
$
|
94
|
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
$
|
289
|
|
Debt securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable
|
|
|
(335
|
)
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
(169
|
)
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
103
|
|
Tax-exempt
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
Total loans and loans held for sale
|
|
|
4,734
|
|
|
|
1,908
|
|
|
|
6,642
|
|
|
|
3,753
|
|
|
|
1,024
|
|
|
|
4,777
|
|
FHLB stock
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
Total interest-earning assets
|
|
|
4,499
|
|
|
|
2,153
|
|
|
|
6,652
|
|
|
|
3,857
|
|
|
|
1,415
|
|
|
|
5,272
|
|
Interest-bearing Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regular savings
|
|
|
(97
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(94
|
)
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
NOW checking
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
Money market
|
|
|
1,333
|
|
|
|
1,264
|
|
|
|
2,597
|
|
|
|
232
|
|
|
|
665
|
|
|
|
897
|
|
Certificates of deposit
|
|
|
(105
|
)
|
|
|
1,200
|
|
|
|
1,095
|
|
|
|
660
|
|
|
|
1,193
|
|
|
|
1,853
|
|
Total interest-bearing deposits
|
|
|
1,138
|
|
|
|
2,489
|
|
|
|
3,627
|
|
|
|
875
|
|
|
|
1,986
|
|
|
|
2,861
|
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
|
285
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
224
|
|
|
|
287
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
(106
|
)
|
|
|
492
|
|
|
|
386
|
|
|
|
(112
|
)
|
|
|
186
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
Subordinated debt
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities
|
|
|
1,146
|
|
|
|
3,149
|
|
|
|
4,295
|
|
|
|
825
|
|
|
|
2,396
|
|
|
|
3,221
|
|
Increase in net interest income
|
|
$
|
3,353
|
|
|
$
|
(996
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,357
|
|
|
$
|
3,033
|
|
|
$
|
(982
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,051
|
|
Provision for Loan Losses.
During the year ended December 31, 2019, we recorded a $915 thousand provision to the allowance for loan losses as compared to
a provision of $585 thousand for the year ended December 31, 2018. The 2019 provision reflects a change in our mix of loans and
favorable loan portfolio performance, along with the establishment of a specific reserve of $350 thousand for a commercial and
industrial loan that was downgraded late in 2019.
From December 31, 2018 to December
31, 2019, nonperforming loans increased from $1.1 million to $2.5 million. The increase was due to one home equity line of
credit and one commercial and industrial loan relationship moving to non-accrual status. Criticized and classified assets
were $5.4 million at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Commercial real estate, construction and commercial business
loans, which bear higher risk and generally larger loss reserves than our residential mortgage loans, increased as an overall
portion of our loan portfolio from 43.2% of loans at December 31, 2018 to 49.5% at December 31, 2019.
An analysis of the changes in the allowance
for loan losses is presented under “—Risk Management—Analysis and Determination of the Allowance for Loan
Losses.”
Noninterest Income. Noninterest
income increased $523 thousand, or 20.2%, to $3.1 million during the year ended December 31, 2019, from $2.6 million for the year
ended December 31, 2018. Income from customer interest rate swaps increased $526 thousand from 2018 to 2019 associated with our
increase in commercial lending activity. For 2019, wealth management fees totaled $1.7 million, an increase of $59 thousand, or
3.6%, from 2018, resulting from the increase in assets under management within our wealth management subsidiary. Total assets under
management, including the bank’s portfolio, were $419.5 million. In 2019, we recorded income from mortgage banking activities
of $211 thousand compared to 2018 when income from mortgage banking activities totaled $99 thousand. The volume of loans originated
for sale in 2019 totaled $28.4 million as compared to $8.5 million for 2018. A discontinued website development project resulted
in a loss $121 thousand with the write-down of the associated fixed asset.
Noninterest Expense. Noninterest
expense increased $2.6 million, or 14.1%, to $21.2 million during the year ended December 31, 2019, from $18.6 million for the
year ended December 31, 2018. Salaries and employee benefits increased $1.4 million, or 13.1%, and totaled $12.3 million, compared
to $10.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. The compensation increase is attributable to annual merit increases and
promotions along with the expansion of staff. Occupancy and equipment expense increased $284 thousand primarily related to annual
increases in rent expense and the full year impact of the relocation of business operations to a new home office. Professional
fees increased $583 thousand due mainly to higher corporate legal expenses and professional fees associated with the proposed merger
with Cambridge trust. Data processing expense was higher by $282 thousand and other general administrative costs and advertising
costs increased $97 thousand associated with increased business volumes. FDIC insurance costs decreased $50 thousand, primarily
due to a one-time small bank credit.
Income Taxes. Income tax
provision decreased by $74 thousand for the year ended December 31, 2019 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2018. The effective
tax rate for 2019 was 25.9% compared with 26.6% for 2018.
Risk Management
Overview. Managing risk is
an essential part of successfully managing a financial institution. Our most prominent risk exposures are credit risk, interest
rate risk, market risk and liquidity risk. Credit risk is the risk of not collecting the interest and/or the principal balance
of a loan or security when it is due. Interest rate risk is the potential reduction of net interest income as a result of changes
in interest rates. Market risk arises from fluctuations in interest rates that may result in changes in the values of financial
instruments, such as available-for-sale securities that are recorded at fair value. Liquidity risk is the possible inability to
fund obligations to depositors, lenders or borrowers when due. Other risks that we face are operational risks and reputation risk.
Operational risks include risks related to fraud, cyber security, regulatory compliance, processing errors, and technology and
disaster recovery. Reputation risk is the risk that negative publicity or press, whether true or not, could cause a decline in
our customer base and revenue.
Credit Risk Management. Our
strategy for credit risk management focuses on having well-defined credit policies and uniform underwriting criteria and providing
prompt attention to potential problem loans. This strategy also emphasizes conservative loan-to-value ratios and guarantees of
construction and commercial real estate loans by parties with substantial net worth. In addition, annually, we engage an outside
loan review firm to perform a thorough review of our commercial portfolio. This review involves analyzing all large borrowing relationships,
delinquency trends and loan collateral valuation in order to identify impaired loans. We do not originate “interest only”
mortgage loans on one-to-four family residential properties nor do we offer loans that provide for negative amortization of principal
such as “option ARM” loans where the borrower can pay less than the interest owed on their loan. Additionally, we generally
do not offer “subprime loans” (loans that are made with low down payments to borrowers with weakened credit histories
typically characterized by payment delinquencies, previous charge-offs, judgments or bankruptcies, or borrowers with questionable
repayment capacity) or “Alt-A” loans (loans to borrowers having less than full documentation).
When a borrower fails to make a
required loan payment, management takes a number of steps to have the borrower cure the delinquency and restore the loan to
current status. Management makes initial contact with the borrower when the loan becomes 15 days past due. If payment is not
received by the 30th day of delinquency, efforts to contact the borrower are increased, and a plan of collection is pursued
for each individual loan. A particular plan of collection may lead to foreclosure, the timing of which depends on the
prospects for the borrower bringing the loan current, the financial strength and commitment of any guarantors, and the type
and value of the collateral securing the loan and other factors. If a foreclosure action is instituted and the loan is not
brought current, paid in full, or refinanced before the foreclosure sale, the real property securing the loan generally is
sold at foreclosure. We may consider loan workout arrangements with certain borrowers under certain circumstances, as well as
the sale of the nonperforming loans.
Management informs the board of directors
on a monthly basis of the amount of loans delinquent more than 30 days. Management also provides detailed reporting of loans greater
than 90 days delinquent, all loans in foreclosure and all foreclosed and repossessed property that we own.
Analysis of Nonperforming and Classified
Assets. We consider foreclosed assets, loans that are maintained on a nonaccrual basis and loans that are past due 90 days
or more and still accruing to be nonperforming assets. Loans are generally placed on nonaccrual status when they are classified
as impaired or when they become 90 days or more past due. Loans are classified as impaired when, based on current information and
events, it is probable that we will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest when due according to
the contractual terms of the loan agreement. At the time a loan is placed on nonaccrual status, the accrual of interest ceases
and interest income previously accrued on such loans is reversed against current period interest income. Payments received on a
nonaccrual loan are first applied to the outstanding principal balance when collectibility of principal is in doubt.
Real estate that we acquire as a result
of foreclosure or by deed-in-lieu of foreclosure is classified as other real estate owned until it is sold. When property is acquired
it is recorded at the lower of its cost or fair market value at the date of foreclosure. Any holding costs and declines in fair
value after acquisition of the property result in charges against income.
Troubled debt restructurings (“TDRs”)
occur when we grant borrowers concessions that we would not otherwise grant but for economic or legal reasons pertaining to the
borrower’s financial difficulties. These concessions may include, but are not limited to, modifications of the terms of the
debt, the transfer of assets or the issuance of an equity interest by the borrower to satisfy all or part of the debt, or the substitution
or addition of borrower(s). We will not return a TDR to accrual status until the borrower has demonstrated the ability to make
principal and interest payments under the restructured terms for at least six consecutive months.
The following table provides information
with respect to our nonperforming assets, including TDRs, at the dates indicated. We did not have any accruing loans past due 90
days or more at the dates presented.
|
|
At
December 31,
|
|
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
|
2019
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
Nonaccrual
loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real
estate loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
mortgage
|
|
$
|
562
|
|
|
$
|
581
|
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
|
$
|
773
|
|
Commercial
real estate
|
|
|
548
|
|
|
|
556
|
|
|
|
576
|
|
|
|
591
|
|
|
|
645
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
883
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
Total
nonaccrual loans
|
|
|
2,493
|
|
|
|
1,137
|
|
|
|
576
|
|
|
|
591
|
|
|
|
1,463
|
|
Other
real estate owned
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
Total
nonperforming assets
|
|
|
2,493
|
|
|
|
1,137
|
|
|
|
576
|
|
|
|
591
|
|
|
|
1,463
|
|
Accruing
troubled debt restructurings (1)
|
|
|
2,675
|
|
|
|
165
|
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
|
179
|
|
|
|
185
|
|
Total
nonperforming assets and accruing troubled debt restructurings
|
|
$
|
5,168
|
|
|
$
|
1,301
|
|
|
$
|
748
|
|
|
$
|
770
|
|
|
$
|
1,648
|
|
Total
nonperforming loans to total loans
|
|
|
0.30
|
%
|
|
|
0.15
|
%
|
|
|
0.08
|
%
|
|
|
0.10
|
%
|
|
|
0.29
|
%
|
Total
nonperforming assets to total assets
|
|
|
0.26
|
%
|
|
|
0.13
|
%
|
|
|
0.07
|
%
|
|
|
0.09
|
%
|
|
|
0.24
|
%
|
Total
nonperforming assets and accruing troubled debt restructurings to total assets
|
|
|
0.55
|
%
|
|
|
0.15
|
%
|
|
|
0.09
|
%
|
|
|
0.11
|
%
|
|
|
0.27
|
%
|
(1) Non-accruing
TDRs totaled $548 thousand, $556 thousand, $576 thousand, $214 thousand, and $220 thousand at December 31, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016,
and 2015, respectively. There were no non-accruing TDRs at December 31, 2016.
Interest income that would have been
recorded for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 had non-accruing loans been current according to their original terms
amounted to $61 thousand and $56 thousand, respectively. Income related to nonaccrual loans included in interest income for
the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 amounted to $42 thousand and $65 thousand, respectively.
Federal regulations require us to review
and classify assets on a regular basis. In addition, the FDIC and the Massachusetts Commissioner of Banks have the authority to
identify problem assets and, if appropriate, require them to be classified. There are three classifications for problem assets:
substandard, doubtful and loss. “Substandard assets” must have one or more defined weaknesses and are characterized
by the distinct possibility that we will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected. “Doubtful assets”
have the weaknesses of substandard assets with the additional characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation
in full on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions and values questionable, and there is a high probability of loss.
An asset classified as ‘loss” is considered uncollectible and of such little value that continuance as an asset of
the institution is not warranted. When management classifies an asset as substandard or doubtful, a specific allowance for loan
losses may be established. If management classifies an asset as loss, an amount equal to 100% of the portion of the asset classified
loss is charged to the allowance for loan losses. The regulations also provide for a “special mention” category, described
as assets that do not currently expose the Bank to a sufficient degree of risk to warrant classification but do possess credit
deficiencies or potential weaknesses deserving the Bank’s close attention. The Bank also utilizes an eleven grade internal
loan rating system for commercial real estate, construction and commercial loans to assist in evaluating individual loans and determining
assets classifications. See note 6 in the notes to the consolidated financial statements.
The following table shows the aggregate amounts of our criticized
and classified assets at the dates indicated.
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
2019
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
Special mention assets
|
|
$
|
875
|
|
|
$
|
2,562
|
|
|
$
|
1,777
|
|
Substandard assets
|
|
|
4,011
|
|
|
|
2,290
|
|
|
|
3,114
|
|
Doubtful assets
|
|
|
548
|
|
|
|
556
|
|
|
|
576
|
|
Loss assets
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
5,434
|
|
|
$
|
5,408
|
|
|
$
|
5,467
|
|
At December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, none
of the special mention loans were in nonaccrual status. The decrease in special mention assets in 2019 was primarily the result
of several borrowers’ loans being downgraded to substandard. Total substandard assets included one accruing commercial loan
relationship totaling $2.0 million that subsequently paid off in January, 2020.
Other than as disclosed in the above tables,
there are no other loans where management has serious doubts about the ability of the borrowers to comply with the present loan
repayment terms.
Delinquencies. The following
table provides information about delinquencies in our loan portfolio at the dates indicated.
|
|
At
December 31, 2019
|
|
|
At
December 31, 2018
|
|
(In
thousands)
|
|
30
– 59
Days
Past
Due
|
|
|
60
– 89
Days
Past
Due
|
|
|
>90
Days
Past
Due
|
|
|
30
– 59
Days
Past
Due
|
|
|
60
– 89
Days
Past
Due
|
|
|
>90
Days
Past
Due
|
|
Real
estate loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
mortgage
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
|
$
|
1,551
|
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
Commercial
real estate
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
548
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
556
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
Commercial
loans
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
Consumer
loans
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
|
$
|
1,048
|
|
|
$
|
1,551
|
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
|
$
|
556
|
|
The balance of commercial loans more than
90 days past due at December 31, 2019 and 2018 consist of one commercial loan customer. The balance of consumer loans more than
90 days past due at December 31, 2019 consist of one home equity line of credit loan customer. The balance of loans 30-59 days
past due in 2018 consisted of three loans, secured by one-to-four family residences, to three separate customers.
Analysis and Determination of the
Allowance for Loan Losses. The allowance for loan losses is a valuation allowance for probable losses inherent in the loan
portfolio. We evaluate the need to establish allowances against losses on loans on a quarterly basis. When additional allowances
are necessary, a provision for loan losses is charged to earnings.
Our methodology for assessing the appropriateness
of the allowance for loan losses consists of the following: (1) an allocated component related to impaired loans; (2) a general
component related to the remainder of the loan portfolio; and (3) an unallocated component related to overall uncertainties that
could affect management’s estimate of probable losses. Although we determine the amount of each element of the allowance
separately, the entire allowance for loan losses is available to absorb losses in the entire portfolio.
Allowance on Impaired Loans.
The allocated component of the allowance for loan losses relates to loans that are individually evaluated and determined to be
impaired. The allowance for each impaired loan is determined by either the present value of expected future cash flows or, if the
loan is collateral dependent, by the fair value of the collateral less estimated costs to sell. We identify a loan as impaired
when, based upon current information and events, it is probable that we will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal
or interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Management evaluates loans other than smaller-balance
homogeneous loans for impairment. If a loan is determined to be impaired, an individual loss assessment is performed to determine
the likelihood of a loss and, if applicable, the estimated measurement of the loss. Smaller-balance homogeneous loans, such as
performing residential real estate loans and consumer loans, are generally excluded from an individual impairment analysis and
are collectively evaluated by management to estimate losses inherent in those loans. However, certain smaller-balance homogeneous
loans will be individually evaluated for impairment when they reach nonperforming status or become subject to a restructuring agreement.
Allowance on the Remainder of the
Loan Portfolio. The general component of the allowance for loan losses relates to loans that are not impaired. Management
determines the appropriate loss factor for each group of loans with similar risk characteristics within the portfolio based on
loss experience and qualitative and environmental factors for loans in each group. Loan categories may include types of loans categorized
by product, large credit exposures, concentrations, loan grade, or any other characteristic that causes a loan’s risk profile
to be similar to another. We consider qualitative or environmental factors that are likely to cause estimated credit losses associated
with our existing portfolio to differ from historical loss experience including changes in lending policies and procedures; changes
in the nature and volume of the loan portfolio; changes in experience, ability and depth of loan management; changes in the volume
and severity of past due loans, nonaccrual loans and adversely graded or classified loans; changes in the quality of the loan review;
changes in the value of underlying collateral for collateral dependent loans; the existence of or changes in concentrations of
credit; changes in economic or business conditions; and the effect of competition, and legal or regulatory requirements on estimated
credit losses. Our qualitative and environmental factors are reviewed on a quarterly basis as is our historical loss experience
to ensure they are reflective of current conditions in our loan portfolio and economy.
Unallocated Allowance. Management
maintains an unallocated component within the allowance for loan losses to cover uncertainties that could affect our overall estimate
of probable losses. This component recognizes the imprecision inherent in the assumptions used in the methodologies for estimating
the allocated and general components of the allowance, and is generally not a significant component of the overall allowance.
We identify loans that may need to be charged-off
as a loss by reviewing all impaired loans and related loss analyses. Loan losses are charged against the allowance when we believe
the uncollectibility of the loan balance is confirmed. A borrower’s inability to make payments under the terms of the loan
and a shortfall in collateral value would generally result in our charging off the loan to the extent of the loss deemed to be
confirmed.
The following table sets forth the breakdown of the allowance
for loan losses by loan category at the dates indicated.
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
% of
Allowance
to Total
Allowance
|
|
|
% of
Loans in
Category
to Total
Loans
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
% of
Allowance
to Total
Allowance
|
|
|
% of
Loans in
Category
to Total
Loans
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
% of
Allowance
to Total
Allowance
|
|
|
% of
Loans in
Category
to Total
Loans
|
|
Real estate loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage
|
|
$
|
2,100
|
|
|
|
27.44
|
%
|
|
|
46.10
|
%
|
|
$
|
2,216
|
|
|
|
32.89
|
%
|
|
|
51.43
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,722
|
|
|
|
27.98
|
%
|
|
|
47.52
|
%
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
|
1,626
|
|
|
|
21.25
|
|
|
|
21.60
|
|
|
|
1,602
|
|
|
|
23.78
|
|
|
|
19.90
|
|
|
|
1,520
|
|
|
|
24.71
|
|
|
|
20.05
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
1,823
|
|
|
|
23.82
|
|
|
|
16.38
|
|
|
|
1,462
|
|
|
|
21.69
|
|
|
|
14.35
|
|
|
|
1,661
|
|
|
|
27.00
|
|
|
|
17.33
|
|
Commercial loans
|
|
|
1,864
|
|
|
|
24.36
|
|
|
|
11.54
|
|
|
|
1,124
|
|
|
|
16.68
|
|
|
|
8.99
|
|
|
|
917
|
|
|
|
14.91
|
|
|
|
9.82
|
|
Consumer loans
|
|
|
239
|
|
|
|
3.12
|
|
|
|
4.38
|
|
|
|
260
|
|
|
|
3.86
|
|
|
|
5.33
|
|
|
|
239
|
|
|
|
3.88
|
|
|
|
5.28
|
|
Total allocated allowance
|
|
|
7,652
|
|
|
|
99.99
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
6,664
|
|
|
|
98.90
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
6,059
|
|
|
|
98.48
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
Unallocated
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
1.10
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
1.52
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
7,653
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
6,738
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
6,153
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
At
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
%
of
Allowance
to
Total
Allowance
|
|
|
%
of
Loans
in
Category
to
Total
Loans
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
%
of
Allowance
to
Total
Allowance
|
|
|
%
of
Loans
in
Category
to
Total
Loans
|
|
Real
estate loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
mortgage
|
|
$
|
1,422
|
|
|
|
26.18
|
%
|
|
|
46.09
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,490
|
|
|
|
29.15
|
%
|
|
|
50.05
|
%
|
Commercial
real estate
|
|
|
1,145
|
|
|
|
21.08
|
|
|
|
20.83
|
|
|
|
1,025
|
|
|
|
20.05
|
|
|
|
20.11
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
1,827
|
|
|
|
33.63
|
|
|
|
18.98
|
|
|
|
1,684
|
|
|
|
32.94
|
|
|
|
18.52
|
|
Commercial
loans
|
|
|
703
|
|
|
|
12.94
|
|
|
|
8.48
|
|
|
|
509
|
|
|
|
9.96
|
|
|
|
4.62
|
|
Consumer
loans
|
|
|
214
|
|
|
|
3.93
|
|
|
|
5.62
|
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
|
4.70
|
|
|
|
6.70
|
|
Total
allocated allowance
|
|
|
5,311
|
|
|
|
97.76
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
4,948
|
|
|
|
96.80
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
Unallocated
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
2.24
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
|
3.20
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
5,432
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
5,112
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
Although we believe that we use the best
information available to establish the allowance for loan losses at a level that represents management’s best estimate of
losses in the loan portfolio at the balance sheet date, future adjustments to the allowance for loan losses may be necessary and
our results of operations could be adversely affected if circumstances differ substantially from the assumptions used in making
the determinations. Furthermore, while we believe we have established our allowance for loan losses in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America, there can be no assurance that the FDIC or the Massachusetts Commissioner
of Banks, in reviewing our loan portfolio, will not require us to increase our allowance for loan losses based on judgments different
from ours. In addition, because future events affecting borrowers and collateral cannot be predicted with certainty, there can
be no assurance that the existing allowance for loan losses is adequate or that increases will not be necessary should the quality
of any loans deteriorate as a result of the factors discussed above. The spread of a highly infectious or contagious disease, such
as COVID-19, could cause severe disruptions in the U.S. economy, which could in turn disrupt the business, activities, and operations
of our customers, as well our business and operations. Moreover, since the beginning of January 2020, the coronavirus outbreak
has caused significant disruption in the financial markets both globally and in the United States. The spread of COVID-19, or an
outbreak of another highly infectious or contagious disease, may result in a significant decrease in business and/or cause our
customers to be unable to meet existing payment or other obligations to us, particularly in the event of a spread of COVID-19 or
an outbreak of an infectious disease in our market area. Any material increase in the allowance for loan losses may
adversely affect our financial condition and results of operation.
Analysis of Loan Loss Experience. The following
table sets forth an analysis of the allowance for loan losses for the periods indicated.
|
|
At
or For the Years Ended
December
31,
|
|
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
|
2019
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
Allowance
at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
6,738
|
|
|
$
|
6,153
|
|
|
$
|
5,432
|
|
|
$
|
5,112
|
|
|
$
|
4,738
|
|
Provision
for loan losses
|
|
|
915
|
|
|
|
585
|
|
|
|
735
|
|
|
|
437
|
|
|
|
475
|
|
Charge-offs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real
estate loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
Commercial
loans
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
Consumer
loans
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Total
charge-offs
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
Recoveries
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
Net
charge-offs
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
Allowance
at end of year
|
|
$
|
7,653
|
|
|
$
|
6,738
|
|
|
$
|
6,153
|
|
|
$
|
5,432
|
|
|
$
|
5,112
|
|
Allowance
for loan losses to nonperforming loans at end of year
|
|
|
306.94
|
%
|
|
|
592.66
|
%
|
|
|
1,068.16
|
%
|
|
|
918.32
|
%
|
|
|
349.42
|
%
|
Allowance
for loan losses to total loans at end of year
|
|
|
0.91
|
%
|
|
|
0.91
|
%
|
|
|
0.89
|
%
|
|
|
0.93
|
%
|
|
|
1.00
|
%
|
Net
charge-offs to average loans outstanding during the year
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
|
0.02
|
%
|
|
|
0.02
|
%
|
Interest Rate Risk Management.
We manage the interest rate sensitivity of our interest-bearing liabilities and interest-earning assets in an effort to minimize
the adverse effects of changes in the interest rate environment. Deposit accounts typically react more quickly to changes in market
interest rates than mortgage loans because of the shorter maturities of deposits. As a result, sharp increases in interest rates
may adversely affect our earnings while decreases in interest rates may beneficially affect our earnings. To reduce the potential
volatility of our earnings, we have sought to improve the match between asset and liability maturities and rates, while maintaining
an acceptable interest rate spread. Our strategy for managing interest rate risk emphasizes originating adjustable-rate loans for
retention in our loan portfolio, selling in the secondary market substantially all newly originated conforming fixed-rate residential
mortgage loans, promoting core deposit products and short-term time deposits, adjusting the maturities of borrowings and adjusting
the investment portfolio mix and duration. We currently do not participate in balance sheet hedging programs, such as interest
rate swaps or other activities involving the use of derivative financial instruments.
We have an Asset/Liability Committee, which
includes members of management, to communicate, coordinate and control all aspects of asset-liability management. The committee
establishes and monitors the volume, maturities, pricing and mix of assets and funding sources with the objective of managing assets
and funding sources to provide results that are consistent with liquidity, growth, risk limits and profitability goals.
Interest Rate Risk Analysis.
We analyze our interest rate sensitivity position to manage the risk associated with interest rate movements through the use of
interest income and equity simulations. The matching of assets and liabilities may be analyzed by examining the extent to which
such assets and liabilities are “interest sensitive.” An asset or liability is said to be interest rate sensitive within
a specific time period if it will mature or reprice within that time period.
Our goal is to manage asset and liability
positions to moderate the effects of interest rate fluctuations on net interest income and the present value of our equity. Interest
income and equity simulations are completed quarterly and presented to the Asset/Liability Committee and the board of directors.
The simulations provide an estimate of the impact of changes in interest rates on net interest income and the present value of
our equity under a range of assumptions. The numerous assumptions used in the simulation process are reviewed by the Asset/Liability
Committee on a yearly basis. Changes to these assumptions can significantly affect the results of the simulation. The simulation
incorporates assumptions regarding the potential timing in the repricing of certain assets and liabilities when market rates change
and the changes in spreads between different market rates. The simulation analysis incorporates management’s current assessment
of the risk that pricing margins will change adversely over time due to competition or other factors.
Simulation analysis is only an estimate
of our interest rate risk exposure at a particular point in time. We continually review the potential effect changes in interest
rates could have on the repayment of rate sensitive assets and funding requirements of rate sensitive liabilities.
The table below sets forth an approximation
of our exposure as a percentage of estimated net interest income for the next 12 month period using interest income and equity
simulations. The simulations use projected repricing of assets and liabilities at December 31, 2019 on the basis of contractual
maturities, anticipated repayments and scheduled rate adjustments. Prepayment rates can have a significant impact on the simulations.
Because of the large percentage of loans we hold, rising or falling interest rates have a significant impact on the prepayment
speeds of our earning assets that, in turn, affect the rate sensitivity position. When interest rates rise, prepayments tend to
slow. When interest rates fall, prepayments tend to rise. Our asset sensitivity would be reduced if prepayments slow and would
increase if prepayments accelerated. While we believe such assumptions to be reasonable, there can be no assurance that assumed
prepayment rates will approximate actual future mortgage-backed security and loan repayment activity.
The following table reflects changes in
estimated net interest income for the Bank at December 31, 2019 through December 31, 2020, assuming a static balance sheet. These
estimates are in compliance with our internal policy limits.
|
|
Net Interest Income
|
|
Basis Point (“bp”) Change in Rates
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
$
|
29,181
|
|
|
$
|
468
|
|
|
|
1.63
|
%
|
200
|
|
|
29,208
|
|
|
|
495
|
|
|
|
1.72
|
|
0
|
|
|
28,713
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
(100)
|
|
|
28,503
|
|
|
|
(210
|
)
|
|
|
(0.73
|
)
|
The following table reflects changes in the present value of
equity for the Bank at December 31, 2019. These estimates are also in compliance with our internal policy limits.
|
|
Present Value of Equity
|
|
Basis Point (“bp”) Change in Rates
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
% Change
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
$
|
94,562
|
|
|
$
|
249
|
|
|
|
0.26
|
%
|
200
|
|
|
98,012
|
|
|
|
3,699
|
|
|
|
3.92
|
|
0
|
|
|
94,313
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
(100)
|
|
|
89,401
|
|
|
|
(4,912
|
)
|
|
|
(5.21
|
)
|
Liquidity Management. Liquidity
is the ability to meet current and future financial obligations of a short-term and long-term nature. Our primary sources of funds
consist of deposit inflows, loan repayments, maturities and sales of securities, and borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Bank
of Boston. While maturities and scheduled amortization of loans and securities are predictable sources of funds, deposit flows,
calls of investment securities and borrowed funds and prepayments on loans are greatly influenced by general interest rates, economic
conditions and competition.
Management regularly adjusts our investments
in liquid assets based upon an assessment of (1) expected loan demand, (2) expected deposit flows, (3) yields available on interest-earning
deposits and securities, and (4) the objectives of our interest-rate risk and investment policies.
Our most liquid assets are cash and cash
equivalents, interest-bearing deposits in other banks, and securities available for sale. The levels of these assets depend on
our operating, financing, lending and investing activities during any given period. At December 31, 2019, cash and cash equivalents,
which include short-term investments, totaled $42.1 million. Securities classified as available-for-sale, whose aggregate fair
value exceeds cost, provide additional sources of liquidity and had a fair value of $29.8 million at December 31, 2019. In addition,
at December 31, 2019, we had the ability to borrow approximately $104.0 million in additional funds from the Federal Home Loan
Bank of Boston. On December 31, 2019, we had $74.2 million of long-term debt outstanding, and $20.0 million of short-term borrowings
outstanding, all of which were Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston advances. In addition, at December 31, 2019, we had the ability
to borrow $5.0 million from the Co-operative Central Bank on an unsecured basis, and $9.2 million from the Federal Reserve Bank
under a collateralized borrowing program, none of which was outstanding at that date. The Company also has a $5.0 million unsecured
line of credit with a correspondent bank. No additional advances were outstanding at December 31, 2019.
At December 31, 2019, we had $192.1 million in loan commitments
outstanding, which included $150.0 in available line of credit for individuals and corporate customers and unadvanced funds on
construction loans. Certificates of deposit due within one year of December 31, 2019 total $169.6 million, or 78.3% of total certificates
of deposit. The large percentage of certificates of deposit that mature within one year reflects customers’ hesitancy to
invest their funds for long periods. If these maturing deposits are not renewed, we will be required to seek other sources of funds,
including other certificates of deposit and borrowings. Depending on market conditions, we may be required to pay higher rates
on such deposits or other borrowings than we currently pay on the certificates of deposit. Management believes, however, based
on past experience that a significant portion of our certificates of deposit will be renewed. We have the ability to attract and
retain deposits by adjusting the interest rates offered.
In addition, we believe that our branch
network, which is presently comprised of three full-service retail banking offices located in our Wellesley market area, our banking
office in Boston, an office in Newton, an office in Needham, and the general cash flows from our existing lending and investment
activities, will afford us sufficient long-term liquidity.
In the normal course of business, the Company
contracts with numerous vendors to provide a wide range of services for the organization. Many of these contracts exceed
one year in length. The cost of these contracts is generally recorded as period expenses and presented in appropriate line
items in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
The following table presents certain of our contractual obligations
as of December 31, 2019.
|
|
December
31, 2019 – Payments Due by Period
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Within
One
Year
|
|
|
Over
One
to
Three
Years
|
|
|
Over
Three
to
Five
Years
|
|
|
Over
Five
Years
|
|
Contractual Obligations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term
debt obligations
|
|
$
|
74,196
|
|
|
$
|
47,000
|
|
|
$
|
8,961
|
|
|
$
|
18,235
|
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
Subordinated debt obligations
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
Operating lease obligations
|
|
|
7,311
|
|
|
|
1,633
|
|
|
|
2,665
|
|
|
|
1,994
|
|
|
|
1,019
|
|
Other
contractual obligations
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
91,576
|
|
|
$
|
48,702
|
|
|
$
|
11,626
|
|
|
$
|
20,229
|
|
|
$
|
11,019
|
|
Financing and Investing Activities
Our primary investing activities are the
origination of loans and the purchase of securities. Primary financing activities consist of transactions in deposit accounts and
Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings. Deposit flows are affected by the overall level of interest rates, the interest rates and products
offered by us, local competitors, and other factors. Management generally manages the pricing of deposits to be competitive and
to increase core deposit and customer relationships. Occasionally, management offers promotional rates on certain deposit products
to attract deposits.
In addition, on December 17, 2015, the
Company entered into a Subordinated Note Purchase Agreement with certain institutional accredited investors (the “Purchasers”)
pursuant to which the Company sold and issued $10.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 6.00% fixed-to-floating rate subordinated
notes due 2025 (the “Notes”). The Notes were issued by the Company to the Purchasers at a price equal to 100% of their
face amount. The net proceeds from the Notes offering will be used for general corporate purposes, including for the provision
of additional liquidity and working capital.
The Notes have a stated maturity of December 30, 2025, and bear
interest at a fixed rate of 6.00% per year, from and including December 17, 2015 to, but excluding, December 30, 2020, computed
on the basis of a 360-day year consisting of twelve 30-day months, payable semi-annually in arrears. From and including December
30, 2020 to, but excluding the maturity date or early redemption date, the interest rate shall reset quarterly to an interest rate
per year equal to the then current three-month LIBOR rate plus 435.5 basis points, computed on the basis of a 360-day year and
the actual number of days elapsed, payable quarterly in arrears. The Notes are redeemable, in whole or in part, on or after December
30, 2020 and at any time upon the occurrences of certain events.
The following table presents our primary
investing and financing activities during the periods indicated.
|
|
Years Ended
December 31,
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
2019
|
|
|
2018
|
|
Investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan originations, net of principal payments
|
|
$
|
(97,705
|
)
|
|
$
|
(50,704
|
)
|
Proceeds from calls, maturities and principal repayments of securities available for sale
|
|
|
9,826
|
|
|
|
11,710
|
|
Proceeds from sales of securities available for sale
|
|
|
28,406
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
Purchases of securities available for sale
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
(12,914
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in deposits
|
|
|
34,536
|
|
|
|
101,189
|
|
Increase (decrease) in short-term borrowings
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
(23,000
|
)
|
Increase (decrease) in long-term debt
|
|
|
15,668
|
|
|
|
(18,646
|
)
|
Capital Management. We are
subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the FDIC and the Massachusetts Commissioner of Banks, including
a risk-based capital measure. The risk-based capital guidelines include both a definition of capital and a framework for calculating
risk-weighted assets by assigning balance sheet assets and off-balance sheet items to broad risk categories. At December 31, 2019,
we exceeded all of our regulatory capital requirements. We are considered “well capitalized” under regulatory guidelines.
See “Regulation and Supervision—Federal Regulations—Capital Requirements” and note 15 of the notes
to consolidated financial statements.
We may elect to use capital management
tools such as cash dividends and common share repurchases to enhance stockholder value.
The Board of Directors declared cash dividends
totaling $0.235 per share for the year ended December 31, 2019. There can be no assurance that the Board of Directors will declare
any future cash dividends.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements.
In the normal course of operations, we engage in a variety of financial transactions that, in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America, are not recorded in our financial statements. These transactions involve, to
varying degrees, elements of credit, interest rate and liquidity risk. Such transactions are used primarily to manage customers’
requests for funding and take the form of loan commitments and lines of credit. For information about our loan commitments and
unused lines of credit, see note 14 of the notes to consolidated financial statements.
For the years ended December 31, 2019 and
2018, we did not engage in any off-balance sheet transactions reasonably likely to have a material effect on our financial condition,
results of operations or cash flows.
Impact of Recent Accounting Pronouncements
For a discussion of the impact of recent
accounting pronouncements, see note 1 of the notes to consolidated financial statements included in this Form 10-K.
Effect of Inflation and Changing Prices
The consolidated financial statements and
related financial data presented in this Form 10-K have been prepared according to accounting principles generally accepted in
the United States of America, which require the measurement of financial positions and operating results in terms of historical
dollars without considering the change in the relative purchasing power of money over time due to inflation. The primary impact
of inflation on our operations is reflected in increased operating costs and the effect that general inflation may have on both
short-term and long-term interest rates. Unlike most industrial companies, virtually all the assets and liabilities of a financial
institution are monetary in nature. As a result, interest rates generally have a more significant impact on a financial institution’s
performance than do general levels of inflation. Although inflation expectations do affect interest rates, interest rates do not
necessarily move in the same direction or to the same extent as the prices of goods and services.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative
Disclosures About Market Risk
This item is not applicable as the Company is a smaller reporting
company.
Item 8. Financial Statements and
Supplementary Data
The information required by this item is included herein beginning
on 60.
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants
on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
Not applicable.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
(a) Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Company’s management, including
the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, have evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s
“disclosure controls and procedures,” as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended, (the “Exchange Act”). Based upon their evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal
financial officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company’s disclosure controls and
procedures were effective for the purpose of ensuring that the information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Company
files or submits under the Exchange Act with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) (1) is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms; and (2) is accumulated and communicated
to the Company’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow
timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
(b) Internal Control Over Financial
Reporting
The management of the Company is responsible
for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. The internal control process has been designed
under our supervision to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of the
Company’s financial statements for external reporting purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America.
Management assessed the effectiveness of
the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, utilizing the framework established in Internal
Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
(“COSO”). Based on this assessment, management has determined that the Company’s internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2019 is effective.
Our internal control over financial reporting
includes policies and procedures that pertain to the maintenance of records that accurately and fairly reflect, in reasonable detail,
transactions and dispositions of assets and provide reasonable assurances of the following: (1) transactions are recorded as necessary
to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States;
(2) receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and the directors of the Company;
and (3) unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the Company’s
financial statements are prevented or timely detected.
All internal control systems, no matter
how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable
assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness
to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
This annual report does not include an
attestation report of the Company’s registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting
pursuant to the rules of the SEC that permit the Company to provide only management’s assessment in the annual report.
(c) Changes to Internal Control Over
Financial Reporting
There were no changes in the Company’s
internal control over financial reporting during the three months ended December 31, 2019 that have materially affected, or are
reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Item 9B. Other Information
Not applicable.
PART III
Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant.
Board of Directors
The Company’s Board of Directors
consists of eight members. The Board is divided into three classes with three-year staggered terms, with approximately one-third
of the directors elected each year.
Information regarding the Board’s
nominees and the directors continuing in office is provided below. Unless otherwise stated, each person has held his or her current
occupation for the last five years. Ages presented are as of December 31, 2019. The starting year of service as director relates
to service on the Board of Directors of the Bank.
The following directors have terms
ending in 2020:
Thomas J. Fontaine has served as
the President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Wellesley Bank since November 2009. Mr. Fontaine served as
President of Wellesley Bank from April 2006 to November 2009 and as Executive Vice President prior to April 2006. Age 56. Director
since 2006.
Mr. Fontaine’s extensive knowledge
of the Company’s operations, along with his former experience in the local banking industry and involvement in business and
civic organizations in the communities that we serve, affords the Board of Directors with valuable insight regarding the business
and operations of the Company. Mr. Fontaine’s knowledge of our business, combined with his success and strategic vision,
position him well to continue to serve as our President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman.
Nancy Marden Goodall is Vice President
and Treasurer of Captain Marden’s Seafood, a wholesale seafood supplier, seafood store and restaurant based out of Wellesley,
Massachusetts. Age 59. Director since 2011.
Ms. Goodall’s strong ties to the
community provide the Board of Directors with valuable insight regarding the local business and consumer environment. She also
is a strong advocate of the Company through her civic and community involvement.
Kathryn M. Hinderhofer has spent
over 35 years in the financial services industry, retiring in 2014 as EVP of Operations and Technology of National Bank Holdings
Corp. Before National Bank Holdings, Ms. Hinderhofer spent 17 years at Citizens Financial Group where she was responsible for leading
the business integration activities and divestitures relating to 26 acquisitions completed by Citizens during that time. Prior
to Citizens, Ms. Hinderhofer held senior management positions in retail banking, mortgage banking, commercial and consumer lending
at the Boston Five Cents Savings Bank, which was acquired by Citizens Financial Group. Ms. Hinderhofer is a director of Micronotes,
a Boston based enterprise marketing management company that partners with financial institutions. She is also an Overseer at Newton
Wellesley Hospital and previously chaired the Trustees and Governance Committee at Newton Country Day School. She holds a BA in
Economics from Boston College and an MBA from Suffolk University. Age 68. Director since September 2016.
Ms. Hinderhofer’s extensive experience
and knowledge of the financial services industry along with her involvement in business and civic organizations in the communities
we serve, affords the Board of Directors with valuable insight regarding the business and operations of the Company. In addition,
Ms. Hinderhofer’s background provides the Board of Directors with critical experience in certain banking industry matters,
which are essential to the business of the Company.
The following directors have terms ending
in 2021:
Garry R. Holmes joined R.W. Holmes
Realty, Co, Inc. in 1986 as a licensed commercial real estate broker and has been the President since 1995. Age 56.
Mr. Holmes’ background offers
the Board of Directors critical experience in real estate development, specifically within the region in which the Company
conducts its business and provides the Board of Directors with valuable insight regarding the local business and consumer
environment. Mr. Holmes also has strong ties to the community through his service on the Executive Committee for NAIOP
Massachusetts and is past chair of the Board of Trustees for the Foundation for Metro West, a nonprofit organization that
connects donors with philanthropic organizations. Mr. Holmes also currently serves on Babson College’s Advisory
Council. Director since 2018.
Tina L.
Wang is an owner of the dental practice Premier Dental Group of Wellesley. Ms. Wang also serves on the Massachusetts
Dental Society Committee for Peer Review as well as for Health and Wellness. Ms. Wang is also a past president of the Metropolitan
District Dental Society. Age 59. Director since 2009
Ms. Wang has
strong ties to the community through her dental practice and, provides the Board of Directors with opportunities
to continue to serve the local community. She also is a strong advocate of the Company through her civic and community involvement.
The following directors have terms ending
in 2022:
Simon R. Gerlin has been the Chief
Financial Officer and Executive Vice President of Finance of MassDevelopment since February 2013. Prior to MassDevelopment, Mr.
Gerlin served in executive finance, compliance, and audit roles at Clean Harbors Environmental Services from 2009 until 2012 and
spent 16 years at PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. Mr. Gerlin is a certified public accountant and member of the American Institute
of CPAs. Age 61. Director since 2016.
Mr. Gerlin’s background as a certified
public accountant and executive serving in compliance and audit roles provides the Board with significant financial and operational
expertise.
James J. Malerba was an
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer with Radius Bank from 2014 to 2018. Prior to Radius Bank, Mr. Malerba
was Executive Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer and Controller with State Street Bank from 2004 to 2014. Age 65.
Director since 2019.
Mr. Malerba’s background as an executive
serving in compliance and audit roles will provide the Board with significant financial and operational expertise.
Leslie B. Shea is a sole practitioner
attorney doing business as Wilder & Shea. Age 74. Director since 2003.
As a practicing attorney, Mr. Shea provides
the Board of Directors with important knowledge and insight necessary to assess the legal issues inherent to the business of the
Company. In addition, Mr. Shea has strong ties to the community and provides the Board of Directors with opportunities to continue
to serve the local community.
Executive Officers who are Not Also Directors
Louis P. Crosier has served as President
of Wellesley Investment Partners since September 2014. Prior to joining Wellesley Investment Partners, Mr. Crosier was senior managing
director at Windhaven Investment Management from October 2011 to December 2012. Prior to Windhaven, Mr. Crosier was Managing Principal
of Windward Investment Management from September 2002 to October 2010. Mr. Crosier was also previously a Vice President in the
Wealth Management Division of Goldman Sachs & Co. Age 54.
Michael W. Dvorak has served as
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Wellesley Bank since July 2016. Prior to joining Wellesley Bank, Mr. Dvorak
served as Senior Vice President of Finance at State Street Corporation. Previous experience includes 15 years at Keycorp where
he was Executive Vice President and CFO of both the Community Bank and Consumer Bank. Mr. Dvorak was also an Assistant Vice President
at the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland. Age 59.
Ralph L. Letner has served as Executive
Vice President and Chief Lending Officer of Wellesley Bank since May 2014. Mr. Letner served as Senior Vice President/Commercial
Team Leader at Boston Private Bank and Trust Company in Boston, Massachusetts from July 2010 to May 2014. Prior to that, Mr. Letner
held several positions over 12 years at Citizens’ Bank in Boston, Massachusetts. Age 60.
Audit Committee and Audit Committee
Financial Expert
The Audit Committee is comprised of
Simon R. Gerlin, Nancy Marden Goodall, James J. Malerba, and Leslie B. Shea. The Audit Committee is responsible for providing
oversight relating to our consolidated financial statements and financial reporting process, systems of internal accounting
and financial controls, internal audit function, annual independent audit and the compliance and ethics programs established
by management and the Board. The Audit Committee is also responsible for engaging the Company’s independent registered
public accounting firm and monitoring its conduct and independence. The Board of Directors has determined that Simon R.
Gerlin is an audit committee financial expert as defined under the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Mr.
Gerlin is independent under the current listing standards of the NASDAQ Stock Market applicable to audit committee members.
The Audit Committee has the authority to engage legal counsel or other experts or consultants as it deems appropriate to
carry out its responsibilities.
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership
Reporting Compliance
General
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 requires the Company’s executive officers and directors, and persons who own more than 10% of any registered
class of the Company’s equity securities, to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the Securities and Exchange
Commission. Executive officers, directors and greater than 10% shareholders are required by regulation to furnish the Company with
copies of all Section 16(a) reports they file.
Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports
Based solely on the Company’s review of copies of the
reports it has received and written representations provided to it from the individuals required to file the reports, the Company
believes that each of its executive officers and directors has complied with applicable reporting requirements for transactions
in Wellesley Bancorp common stock during the year ended December 31, 2019, except for a Form 4 for Mr. Fontaine and a Form 4 for
Mr. Letner, in each case filed after the due date to report a withholding of shares to satisfy a tax obligation that arose in connection
with the vesting of a stock award.
Code of Ethics
The Company has adopted a code of ethics
and business conduct which applies to all of the Company’s and the Bank’s directors, officers and employees. A copy
of the code of ethics and business conduct is available to stockholders on the Investor Relations portion of the Bank’s website
at www.wellesleybank.com.
Item 11. Executive Compensation.
Summary Compensation Table
The following information is furnished
for the principal executive officer and the next two highly compensated executive officers of the Company whose total compensation
for the year ended December 31, 2019 exceeded $100,000. These individuals are referred to in this Form 10-K as “named executive
officers.”
Name and Principal Position
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Salary
|
|
|
Bonus
|
|
|
Stock
Awards (1)
|
|
|
Option
Awards
|
|
|
All Other
Compensation (2)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Thomas J. Fontaine
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
$
|
410,970
|
|
|
$
|
320,000
|
|
|
$
|
113,000
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
158,641
|
|
|
$
|
1,002,611
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer of Wellesley Bancorp and Wellesley Bank
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
|
399,000
|
|
|
|
122,500
|
|
|
|
102,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
104,889
|
|
|
|
728,389
|
|
Michael W. Dvorak
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
|
262,600
|
|
|
|
66,000
|
|
|
|
56,500
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
50,226
|
|
|
|
435,326
|
|
Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer, Wellesley Bancorp and Wellesley Bank
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
|
223,600
|
|
|
|
57,500
|
|
|
|
54,400
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
35,405
|
|
|
|
370,905
|
|
Ralph L. Letner
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
|
252,500
|
|
|
|
62,500
|
|
|
|
42,375
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
61,878
|
|
|
|
419,656
|
|
Executive Vice President, Chief Banking Officer and Chief Lending Officer of Wellesley Bank
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
|
235,040
|
|
|
|
60,000
|
|
|
|
34,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
50,814
|
|
|
|
379,854
|
|
|
(1)
|
These amounts reflect the aggregate grant date fair value for outstanding restricted stock awards,
computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, based on Wellesley Bancorp’s stock price as of the date of grant, which was
$27.00.
|
|
(2)
|
Details of the amounts reported in the “All Other Compensation” column for 2019 are
provided in the table below.
|
|
|
Mr. Fontaine
|
|
|
Mr. Dvorak
|
|
|
Mr. Letner
|
|
Employer matching contributions to 401(k) Plan
|
|
$
|
19,600
|
|
|
$
|
19,600
|
|
|
$
|
19,477
|
|
Fair market value of allocations under the ESOP
|
|
|
24,218
|
|
|
|
24,218
|
|
|
|
24,218
|
|
Dividends paid on unvested restricted stock awards
|
|
|
940
|
|
|
|
1,502
|
|
|
|
527
|
|
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan contribution
|
|
|
35,467
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Perquisites (a)
|
|
|
78,416
|
|
|
|
4,906
|
|
|
|
17,656
|
|
|
(a)
|
Consists of automobile costs, vehicle fair market value and premiums paid on long-term healthcare,
long-term disability insurance, group term life insurance, bank-owned life insurance and executive wellness.
|
Employment Agreements and Severance Arrangements
Employment Agreement.
Wellesley Bancorp and Wellesley Bank maintain an employment agreement with Mr. Fontaine. The term of the agreement runs for three
years from the effective date of the agreement and automatically renews daily so that each day the term again becomes three years,
unless either party provides notice to the other party of its intention for the term of the agreement not to renew. The employment
agreement establishes a base salary and certain levels of incentive compensation and bonuses for Mr. Fontaine and provides
for his participation in certain benefits arrangements. The agreement also provides for certain perquisites to be provided to him,
including the use of a Wellesley Bank-owned automobile, to which we will transfer title to Mr. Fontaine, plus an amount to
make him whole for any taxes due as a result of the transfer, upon his retirement or other termination of employment (other than
if we terminate his employment for cause).
Under the employment agreement,
we may terminate Mr. Fontaine’s employment for “cause” at any time in accordance with the terms of the
agreement. If we terminate Mr. Fontaine’s employment for cause, we will have no further financial obligation to
him except for the payment of any amounts that he has earned but that have not been paid as of the effective date of his
termination and benefits accrued under certain employee benefit plans. We may also terminate Mr. Fontaine’s
employment for any other reason that does not constitute cause upon 60-days’ notice. Mr. Fontaine may terminate
his employment with us for “good reason” in accordance with the terms of the agreement. The term “good
reason” includes (1) a material diminution in duties and responsibilities; (2) a material diminution in his
base salary; and, (3) a change in reporting responsibilities. In addition, Mr. Fontaine may terminate his
employment within the period beginning three months prior to and ending 12 months after a change in control. If we terminate
Mr. Fontaine for reasons that do not constitute cause or if Mr. Fontaine voluntarily terminates employment with
good reason or in connection with a change in control, then we will pay him a lump sum amount equal to the product of his
average monthly compensation by the number of months remaining during the unexpired term of the agreement or, if greater, 12.
For purposes of the employment agreement, “average monthly compensation” equals the monthly average of
Mr. Fontaine’s three highest years of compensation, as reported on Form W-2. We may reduce change in control
related payments to Mr. Fontaine to eliminate the imposition of excise taxes on those payments, unless the payments less
the excise taxes would be greater than the reduced payments. In addition, we will pay him the cost of obtaining health
insurance through COBRA for the unexpired term of the agreement or, if greater, 12 months. The employment agreement provides
for certain post-employment obligations with respect to Mr. Fontaine’s ability to compete with Wellesley Bank and
to solicit customers and employees of Wellesley Bank if we terminate his employment other than for cause or he terminates his
employment for good reason or in connection with a change in control.
On March 27, 2018 the Company and
the Bank entered into a new employment agreement with Mr. Fontaine which clarifies the change in control benefit provided in the
prior employment agreement, by providing Mr. Fontaine with a severance benefit equal to three times his highest annual compensation
in the event his employment is terminated without “cause” or for good reason following a change in control. In addition,
Mr. Fontaine will receive a lump sum cash payment equal to the cost of COBRA coverage for Mr. Fontaine and his family for a period
of thirty-six months. The employment agreement also includes a “net after tax benefit” approach in the event the change
in control severance benefits under the employment agreement or otherwise result in “excess parachute payments” under
Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
Employee Severance Compensation Plans.
Wellesley Bank maintains a severance compensation agreement with Mr. Letner that provides him with a severance benefit of 24 months
base salary if he is dismissed without cause or dismissed or demoted within 12 months of the effective date of a change in control,
as defined in the Wellesley Bank Employee Severance Compensation Plan. In addition, the Bank would continue to pay the Bank’s
share of health insurance premiums in accordance with the Bank’s then existing health insurance plan.
Wellesley Bank also maintains a severance
compensation agreement with Michael W. Dvorak. Mr. Dvorak’s severance compensation agreements allow for continued payment
of his base salary for 24 months and for ongoing payment of Wellesley Bank’s share of Mr. Dvorak’s health insurance
premiums if they elect COBRA health care continuation coverage following a termination without cause, or the same benefits if Mr.
Dvorak is not offered a comparable position following a change of control.
Pension and Nonqualified Retirement Benefits
Pension Plan. Wellesley
Bank sponsored a tax-qualified defined benefit pension plan for its employees. The accrual of benefits was frozen and the plan
was fully funded as of November 1, 2011, with all of the benefit obligations under the plan transferred to CBERA, the plan administrator.
Mr. Fontaine participates in the plan. Benefits under the plan are computed on the basis of compensation and years of service.
Employee Stock Ownership Plan.
Wellesley Bank sponsors an employee stock ownership plan (the “ESOP”) for the benefit of eligible employees who have
attained age 21 and are credited with a year of service. Contributions to the ESOP and shares released from the suspense account
as any loans used by the plan to acquire stock are repaid and allocated annually among plan participants based on each participant’s
relative compensation. Participants become fully vested in their accounts under the ESOP after six years of credited service.
Salary Continuation Agreement.
Wellesley Bank has entered into a salary continuation agreement with Mr. Fontaine. Under the salary continuation agreement, upon
separating from service on or after reaching age 65, we will pay Mr. Fontaine a lump sum benefit equivalent to a 15-year annual
benefit equal to 75% of his highest earnings (as defined in the agreement), less our portion of social security benefits, pension
plan benefits and our matching contributions under our 401(k) plan. If Mr. Fontaine separates from service or dies before
receiving benefits under the agreement, we will pay him or his beneficiary a lump sum benefit equal to his accrued liability retirement
account under the agreement. We will pay the lump sum benefit to his beneficiary within 60 days of his death or the early retirement
benefit to Mr. Fontaine no later than the first day of the second month following his separation from service (subject to
certain possible restrictions under the federal tax code). Mr. Fontaine is 100% vested in his benefits under the salary continuation
agreement. Under the agreement, the accrued liability account for Mr. Fontaine generally reflects the amount of the liability
of the supplemental benefit accrued by the Bank for financial statement purposes. Upon a change in control, Mr. Fontaine will
become entitled to the benefit to which he would have otherwise become entitled at his normal retirement age of 65 (regardless
of his actual age). We will pay the change in control benefit in a single lump sum payment on the first day of the month following
the month in which Mr. Fontaine attains age 65.
Supplemental Executive
Retirement Plan. We sponsor a supplemental executive retirement plan (“SERP”) to provide
participating executives with benefits otherwise limited under the employee stock ownership plan and/or 401(k) plan due to
limitations under the Internal Revenue Code or the terms of the employee stock ownership plan loan. Specifically, the plan
provides benefits to eligible individuals that we cannot provide under the employee stock ownership plan and/or 401(k) plan
as a result of these limitations, but that we would have provided under those plans but for these limitations. In addition to
providing for benefits lost under the tax-qualified plans as a result of limitations imposed by the Internal Revenue Code,
the SERP also provides supplemental benefits to designated individuals upon a change of control before the complete scheduled
repayment of the employee stock ownership plan loan. Generally, upon a change in control, the SERP provides the participant
with a benefit equal to the benefit the individual would have received under the employee stock ownership plan had he
remained employed throughout the term of the plan, less the benefits actually provided under the employee stock ownership
plan on behalf of the participant. At this time, only Mr. Fontaine participates in the SERP.
Outstanding Equity Awards
The following table provides information concerning unexercised
options and stock awards outstanding as of December 31, 2019 that have not vested for each named executive officer.
|
|
|
|
Option
Awards
|
|
|
Stock
Awards
|
|
Name
|
|
Grant
Date
|
|
Number
of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Exercisable
|
|
|
Number
of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Unexercisable
|
|
|
Option
Exercise
Price
|
|
|
Option
Expiration
Date
|
|
|
Number
of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested (1)
|
|
|
Market
Value of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested (2)
|
|
Thomas
J. Fontaine
|
|
10/01/2012
|
|
|
16,285
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
15.35
|
|
|
|
10/01/2022
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
01/01/2019
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
$
|
181,040
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael
W. Dvorak
|
|
10/01/2016
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
3,200
|
|
|
|
144,832
|
|
|
|
01/01/2019
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
90,520
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ralph
L. Letner
|
|
10/01/2014
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
19.00
|
|
|
|
10/01/2024
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
01/01/2019
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
|
67,890
|
|
|
(1)
|
Shares awarded to Mr. Dvorak on October 1, 2016 vest in five equal annual installments commencing
on October 1, 2017. Shares awarded to Mr. Fontaine, Mr. Dvorak and Mr. Letner on 1/1/2019 vest in three equal annual installments
commencing on 1/1/2020.
|
|
(2)
|
Based on $45.26 per share, the closing price for our common stock on December 31, 2019.
|
Director Compensation
The following table provides the compensation
received by individuals who served as directors, and who were not also named executive officers, of the Company during 2019. No
options were granted to any of the directors in 2019.
|
|
Fees Earned or
Paid in Cash
|
|
|
Stock
Awards (1)
|
|
|
All Other
Compensation (2)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Simon R. Gerlin
|
|
$
|
43,208
|
|
|
$
|
14,125
|
|
|
$
|
505
|
|
|
$
|
57,838
|
|
Kathryn M. Hinderhofer
|
|
|
40,660
|
|
|
|
14,125
|
|
|
|
505
|
|
|
|
55,290
|
|
Garry R. Holmes
|
|
|
39,789
|
|
|
|
14,125
|
|
|
|
787
|
|
|
|
54,701
|
|
Nancy Marden Goodall
|
|
|
38,904
|
|
|
|
14,125
|
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
53,147
|
|
James Malerba
|
|
|
16,185
|
|
|
|
93,810
|
|
|
|
360
|
|
|
|
110,355
|
|
Theodore F. Parker (3)
|
|
|
22,719
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
6,250
|
|
|
|
28,969
|
|
Leslie B. Shea.
|
|
|
40,301
|
|
|
|
14,125
|
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
54,544
|
|
Edwin G. Silver (4)
|
|
|
21,486
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
3,750
|
|
|
|
25,236
|
|
Robert L. Skolnick (3)
|
|
|
20,943
|
|
|
|
–
|
|
|
|
6,250
|
|
|
|
27,193
|
|
Tina L. Wang
|
|
|
36,595
|
|
|
|
14,125
|
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
50,838
|
|
|
(1)
|
This column reflects the grant date fair value of Wellesley Bancorp common stock awarded to our
directors computed in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718 - Stock
Compensation (“FASB ASC Topic 718”). The grant date fair value for the stock awards included in this column for all
directors, except for Mr. Malerba, is based on the closing price of Wellesley Bancorp common stock on January 2, 2019, which was
$28.25. The grant date fair value for the stock awards included in this column for Mr. Malerba is based on the closing price of
Wellesley Bancorp common stock on August 1, 2019, which was $31.27.
|
|
(2)
|
Represents dividends received on unvested stock awards and Board service recognition.
|
|
(3)
|
In accordance with the terms of the Company’s Bylaws, Mr. Parker and Mr. Skolnick’s
terms as a director expired as of May 23, 2019.
|
|
(4)
|
Mr. Silver resigned from the Board on March 31, 2019.
|
Cash Retainer and Meeting Fees for Non-Employee
Directors
The following table
sets forth the applicable fees that were paid to our non-employee directors for their service on the Board of Directors of the
Company and the Bank during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019.
Annual fee for Company Board Members
|
|
$
|
5,786
|
|
Annual fee for Bank Clerk of the Board
|
|
|
9,826
|
|
Annual fee for Bank Board Members
|
|
|
9,082
|
|
Monthly board meeting fee for the Clerk of the Bank Board
|
|
|
819
|
|
Monthly board meeting fee for all other Bank Board Members
|
|
|
749
|
|
Annual committee meeting fee for all Directors
|
|
|
10,063
|
|
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners
and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
The following table provides information
as of March 15, 2020 about the persons known to the Company to be the beneficial owners of more than 5% of the Company’s
outstanding common stock. A person may be considered to beneficially own any shares of common stock over which he or she has, directly
or indirectly, sole or shared voting or investment power. Unless otherwise indicated, the beneficial owner has sole voting and
investment power with respect to the listed shares.
Name and Address
|
|
Number of
Shares Owned
|
|
|
Percent
of Common Stock
Outstanding (1)
|
|
Strategic Value Investors LP
Strategic Value Bank Partners LLC
Ben Mackovak
Marty Adams
Umberto Fedeli
127 Public Square, Suite 2810
Cleveland, Ohio 44114
|
|
|
193,489
|
(2)
|
|
|
7.44
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wellesley Bank Employee Stock Ownership Plan
100 Worcester Street, Suite 300
Wellesley, Massachusetts 02481
|
|
|
176,275
|
(3)
|
|
|
6.78
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FJ Capital Management LLC
Financial Opportunity Fund LLC
Financial Opportunity Long/Short Fund LLC
Martin Friedman
1313 Dolley Madison Blvd, Ste 306
McLean, VA 22101
|
|
|
144,146
|
(4)
|
|
|
5.55
|
%
|
|
(1)
|
Based on 2,599,105 shares of the registrant’s
common stock outstanding as of March 15, 2020.
|
|
(2)
|
Based on a Schedule 13G filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 11, 2020. Strategic Value Investors, LP is a Delaware limited partnership. Ben Mackovak, Marty Adams and Umberto Fedeli serve as managing members of Strategic Value Bank Partners LLC. Strategic Value Bank Partners LLC, is an Ohio limited liability company, which serves as the general partner of Strategic Value Investors, LP.
|
|
(3)
|
Based on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 10, 2020. Shares held by the ESOP trust and allocated to the accounts of participants are voted in accordance with the participants’ instructions and unallocated shares are voted in the same ratio as ESOP participants direct voting of allocated shares or, in the absence of such direction, in the ESOP trustees’ best judgment. As of December 31, 2019, 86,407 shares had been allocated to participants.
|
|
(4)
|
Based on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 11, 2020. Financial Opportunity Fund LLC and Financial Opportunity Long/Short Fund LLC are Delaware limited liability companies, of which FJ Capital Management LLC (a Delaware limited liability company) is the managing member. Martin Friedman is the Managing Member of FJ Capital Management LLC; as such, Mr. Friedman may be deemed to be a beneficial owner of reported shares but as to which Mr. Friedman disclaims beneficial ownership.
|
The following table provides information
as of March 15, 2020 about the shares of Company common stock that may be considered to be owned by each director, nominee for
director, executive officer named in the Summary Compensation Table and by all directors, nominees for director and executive officers
of the Company as a group. A person may be considered to beneficially own any shares of common stock over which he or she has,
directly or indirectly, sole or shared voting or investment power. Unless otherwise indicated, each of the named individuals has
sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares shown and none of the named individuals has pledged his or her shares.
Name
|
|
Number
of Shares
Owned (excluding
options) (1)
|
|
|
Number of
Shares That
May be Acquired
Within 60 days by
Exercising Options
|
|
|
Percent of Shares of
Common Stock
Outstanding
|
|
Directors:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thomas J. Fontaine (2)
|
|
|
55,384
|
|
|
|
16,285
|
|
|
|
2.76
|
%
|
Simon R. Gerlin
|
|
|
4,300
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Nancy Marden Goodall (3)
|
|
|
27,011
|
|
|
|
9,027
|
|
|
|
1.38
|
%
|
Kathryn M. Hinderhofer
|
|
|
6,675
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Garry R. Holmes (4)
|
|
|
24,000
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
James J. Malerba
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Leslie B. Shea (5)
|
|
|
32,011
|
|
|
|
9,027
|
|
|
|
1.57
|
%
|
Tina L. Wang
|
|
|
24,511
|
|
|
|
9,027
|
|
|
|
1.29
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Named Executive Officers Who Are Not Directors:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Michael W. Dvorak
|
|
|
11,218
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Ralph L. Letner
|
|
|
10,292
|
|
|
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
All Directors and Executive Officers as a Group (10 persons)
|
|
|
199,402
|
|
|
|
51,366
|
|
|
|
9.65
|
%
|
|
*
|
Represents less than 1% of the Company’s outstanding shares.
|
(1)
|
Amounts include unvested shares. For Ms. Marden Goodall, Mr. Shea and Ms. Wang, amounts include 500 unvested shares
of restricted stock. For Mr. Gerlin and Ms. Hinderhofer, amounts include 1,700 unvested shares of restricted stock. For Mr. Holmes,
amount includes 2,900 unvested shares of restricted stock. For Mr. Malerba, amount includes 3,000 unvested shares
of restricted stock. In addition, for each executive officer listed, amounts include the following:
|
Name
|
|
Unvested Shares
of Restricted
Stock Awards
|
|
|
Shares Allocated
under the Wellesley
Bank ESOP
|
|
|
Shares Held in Trust in the
Wellesley Bank 401(k) Plan
|
|
Thomas J. Fontaine
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
|
2,898
|
|
|
|
12,931
|
|
Michael W. Dvorak
|
|
|
5,200
|
|
|
|
933
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
Ralph L. Letner
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
|
|
2,240
|
|
|
|
2,435
|
|
Individuals have voting but no investment power with respect
to shares of restricted stock and shares allocated under the ESOP. Individuals have investment and voting power with respect to
shares credited under the 401(k) Plan.
(2)
|
Includes 8,000 shares held as a trustee for various trusts and 100 shares held as custodian for children.
|
(3)
|
Includes 12,500 shares held as trustee for a profit sharing plan.
|
(4)
|
Includes 20,500 shares held in partnerships.
|
(5)
|
Includes 7,500 shares held as trustee for various trusts.
|
Change in Control
The Company has entered into an
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of December 5, 2019, by and among Cambridge Bancorp, Cambridge Trust Company, a
Massachusetts-chartered trust company and wholly-owned subsidiary of Cambridge Bancorp, the Company, and the Company’s
wholly-owned subsidiary, Wellesley Bank, pursuant to which (1) the Company will merge with and into Cambridge Bancorp, with
Cambridge Bancorp as the surviving entity, and (2) Wellesley Bank will merge with and into Cambridge Trust Company, with
Cambridge Trust Company as the surviving entity.
Aside from the transactions contemplated
by the Merger Agreement, management of the Company knows of no arrangements, including any pledge by any person of securities of
the Company, the operation of which may at a subsequent date result in a change in control of the Company.
Equity Compensation Plan
The following table sets forth information as of December 31,
2019 about Company common stock that may be issued under the Company’s equity compensation plans.
Plan category
|
|
Number of
securities to
be issued upon
exercise
of outstanding
options,
warrants and
rights
(a)
|
|
|
Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding
options,
warrants and
rights
(b)
|
|
|
Number of
securities
remaining
available for
future issuance
under
equity
compensation
plans (excluding
securities reflected
in
column (a)
(c)
|
|
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders
|
|
|
122,956
|
|
|
$
|
15.74
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
Total
|
|
|
122,956
|
|
|
$
|
15.74
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions,
and Director Independence.
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 generally
prohibits loans by the Company to its executive officers and directors. However, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act contains a specific exemption
from such prohibition for loans by Wellesley Bank to its executive officers and directors in compliance with federal banking regulations.
Federal regulations require that all loans or extensions of credit to executive officers and directors of insured institutions
must be made on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable
transactions with persons not related to Wellesley Bank and must not involve more than the normal risk of repayment or present
other unfavorable features. Wellesley Bank is therefore prohibited from making any new loans or extensions of credit to executive
officers and directors at different rates or terms than those offered to the general public. Notwithstanding this rule, federal
regulations permit Wellesley Bank to make loans to executive officers and directors at reduced interest rates if the loan is made
under a benefit program generally available to all other employees and does not give preference to any executive officer or director
over any other employee. All outstanding loans made by Wellesley Bank to its related persons (as defined under the Securities and
Exchange Commission rules), were made in accordance with Wellesley Bank’s mortgage discount program, which applies only to
fixed- or adjustable-rate mortgage loans that are held in the portfolio of Wellesley Bank. The discount offered under this program
is 50 basis points less than the published rate offered to the public. The program is offered to all full- and part-time employees
of Wellesley Bank and to all members of the Board of Directors.
Set forth below is certain information
as to loans made by Wellesley Bank to certain of its directors and executive officers, or their affiliates, whose aggregate indebtedness
to Wellesley Bank exceeded $120,000 at any time since January 1, 2019. Each listed individual participated in the above-referenced
benefit program generally available to all other employees and does not give preference to any executive officer or director over
any other employee.
Name
of Individual
|
|
Loan
Type
|
|
Date
Originated
|
|
Original
Loan Amount
|
|
|
Highest Balance
During
Fiscal 2019
|
|
|
Balance
on
December 31,2019
|
|
|
Interest Rate on
December 31, 2019
|
|
|
Amount
of
Principal
Paid
During
Fiscal
2019
|
|
|
Amount
of
Interest
Paid
During
Fiscal
2019
|
|
Nancy
M. Goodall
|
|
Commercial
real estate
|
|
12/28/2009
|
|
$
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
$
|
118,234
|
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
|
|
5.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
118,234
|
|
|
$
|
9,408
|
|
|
|
Commercial
term loan
|
|
5/7/2015
|
|
|
225,000
|
|
|
|
68,752
|
|
|
|
20,942
|
|
|
|
3.99
|
|
|
|
47,810
|
|
|
|
3,795
|
|
|
|
Commercial
term loan
|
|
12/13/2017
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
|
|
245,219
|
|
|
|
187,946
|
|
|
|
4.40
|
|
|
|
57,273
|
|
|
|
12,273
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Garry
R. Holmes
|
|
Commercial
real estate
|
|
12/10/2003
|
|
$
|
1,050,000
|
|
|
$
|
646,629
|
|
|
$
|
599,670
|
|
|
|
4.25
|
%
|
|
$
|
46,958
|
|
|
$
|
26,945
|
|
|
|
Commercial
real estate
|
|
10/14/2016
|
|
|
4,830,000
|
|
|
|
4,783,609
|
|
|
|
4,667,649
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
|
|
|
115,960
|
|
|
|
191,862
|
|
|
|
Commercial
real estate
|
|
12/17/2009
|
|
|
415,000
|
|
|
|
297,532
|
|
|
|
278,172
|
|
|
|
4.25
|
|
|
|
19,359
|
|
|
|
12,442
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Theodore
F. Parker
|
|
Residential
mortgage (1)
|
|
3/4/2015
|
|
$
|
275,000
|
|
|
$
|
255,722
|
|
|
$
|
249,101
|
|
|
|
2.63
|
%
|
|
$
|
6,621
|
|
|
$
|
6,633
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leslie
B. Shea
|
|
Residential
mortgage
|
|
9/28/2007
|
|
$
|
550,000
|
|
|
$
|
314,955
|
|
|
$
|
306,005
|
|
|
|
5.63
|
%
|
|
$
|
8,949
|
|
|
$
|
17,487
|
|
|
|
Residential
mortgage
|
|
7/29/2010
|
|
|
350,000
|
|
|
|
297,847
|
|
|
|
289,455
|
|
|
|
4.88
|
|
|
|
8,391
|
|
|
|
11,521
|
|
|
|
Home
equity line of credit
|
|
9/6/2017
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
67,934
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
3.50
|
|
|
|
67,934
|
|
|
|
1,705
|
|
|
|
Home
equity line of credit
|
|
10/1/2018
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
168,127
|
|
|
|
168,127
|
|
|
|
4.50
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,030
|
|
|
|
Commercial
real estate
|
|
11/17/2017
|
|
|
225,000
|
|
|
|
224,834
|
|
|
|
220,440
|
|
|
|
3.63
|
|
|
|
4,393
|
|
|
|
7,999
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tina
L. Wang
|
|
Home
equity line of credit
|
|
7/21/2003
|
|
$
|
1,000,000
|
|
|
$
|
71,861
|
|
|
$
|
71,861
|
|
|
|
4.5
|
%
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
2,725
|
|
|
|
Residential
mortgage
|
|
12/12/2011
|
|
|
365,000
|
|
|
|
140,418
|
|
|
|
101,502
|
|
|
|
3.38
|
|
|
|
38,915
|
|
|
|
4,140
|
|
|
|
Commercial
line of credit
|
|
11/5/2011
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
99,989
|
|
|
|
5.50
|
|
|
|
32,309
|
|
|
|
4,327
|
|
|
|
Commercial
line of credit
|
|
5/31/2013
|
|
|
675,000
|
|
|
|
264,301
|
|
|
|
153,768
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
|
|
|
110,532
|
|
|
|
9,411
|
|
|
|
Commercial
term loan
|
|
12/16/2015
|
|
|
49,214
|
|
|
|
25,639
|
|
|
|
13,113
|
|
|
|
4.00
|
|
|
|
12,525
|
|
|
|
808
|
|
|
|
Commercial
line of credit
|
|
1/17/2017
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
Commercial
term loan
|
|
3/29/2017
|
|
|
350,000
|
|
|
|
290,012
|
|
|
|
222,528
|
|
|
|
4.25
|
|
|
|
67,483
|
|
|
|
12,095
|
|
(1)
|
Mr.
Parker’s term as a director expired as of May 23, 2019.
|
Other than as described above, all loans,
the principal balances of which exceeded $120,000 at any time during the year ended December 31, 2019, made by Wellesley Bank to
executive officers, directors, immediate family members of executive officers and directors, or organizations with which executive
officers and directors are affiliated, were made in the ordinary course of business, on substantially the same terms including
interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with persons not related to Wellesley
Bank and did not involve more than normal risk of collectability or present other unfavorable features. In addition, loans made
to a director or executive officer must be approved in advance by a majority of the disinterested members of the Board of Directors.
Director Independence
All of our directors are independent under
the current listing standards of the NASDAQ Stock Market, except Thomas J. Fontaine, who serves as Chairman of the Board, Chief
Executive Officer and President of Wellesley Bancorp and Wellesley Bank. In determining the independence of directors, the Board
of Directors considered the transactions disclosed in this Item 13 under the heading “—Transactions
with Related Persons” which the Board determined, in each case, did not interfere with their exercise of independent
judgment in carrying out their responsibilities as a director.
Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.
Audit Fees
The following table sets forth the fees billed for services
provided to the Company and the Bank by Wolf & Company, P.C. for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018.
|
|
2019
|
|
|
2018
|
|
Audit fees (1)
|
|
$
|
161,000
|
|
|
$
|
154,000
|
|
Tax fees (2)
|
|
|
25,550
|
|
|
|
24,500
|
|
All other fees (3)
|
|
|
97,320
|
|
|
|
25,225
|
|
|
(1)
|
Audit fees consist of fees for professional services rendered for the audit of the Company’s consolidated financial statements included in its Annual Reports on Form 10-K. The amount also includes fees related to the review of the consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, as well as services normally provided by the independent auditor in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements.
|
|
(2)
|
Tax fees consist of fees for tax compliance services, including tax planning and advice and preparation of tax returns.
|
|
(3)
|
All other consists of fees related to merger related services, enterprise risk management and in 2018, a Rule 206 Examination for Wellesley Investment Partners, LLC.
|
Policy on Audit Committee Pre-Approval of Audit and Permissible
Non-Audit Services of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Audit Committee is responsible
for appointing and reviewing the work of the independent registered public accounting firm and setting the independent
registered public accounting firm’s compensation. In accordance with its charter, the Audit Committee
approves, in advance, all audit and permissible non-audit services to be performed by the independent registered public
accounting firm. This approval process ensures that the independent registered public accounting firm does not
provide any non-audit services to the Company that are prohibited by law or regulation. During the year ended
December 31, 2019, all services were approved in advance by the Audit Committee in compliance with these procedures.
PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
(a)
|
List of Documents Filed as Part of this Report
|
|
(1)
|
Financial Statements. The following consolidated financial statements are incorporated by reference from Item
8 hereof:
|
Report of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm
Consolidated Balance Sheets as
of December 31, 2019 and 2018
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive
Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2019 and 2018
Consolidated Statements of Changes
in Stockholders’ Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2019 and 2018
Consolidated Statements of Cash
Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2019 and 2018
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements
(b)
|
Exhibits. The following is a list of exhibits
filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and is also the Exhibit Index.
|
No.
|
|
Description
|
3.1
|
|
Articles of Incorporation of Wellesley Bancorp, Inc. (1)
|
3.2
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws of Wellesley Bancorp,
Inc. (12)
|
4.1
|
|
Form of 6.00% Fixed-to-Floating Subordinated Note Due 2025 (3)
|
4.2
|
|
Description of securities registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934
|
10.1
|
|
Employment Agreement between Wellesley Bancorp, Inc., Wellesley Bank and Thomas J. Fontaine + (2)
|
10.2
|
|
Amended and Restated Executive Salary Continuation Agreement between Wellesley Bank and Thomas J. Fontaine, as amended + (4)
|
10.3
|
|
Wellesley Bank Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan+ (5)
|
10.4
|
|
Wellesley Bank Employee Severance Compensation Plan+ (6)
|
10.5
|
|
Wellesley Bancorp, Inc. 2012 Equity Incentive Plan + (7)
|
10.6
|
|
Wellesley Bancorp, Inc. 2016 Equity Incentive Plan + (8)
|
10.7
|
|
Severance Agreement between Wellesley Bank and
Ralph Letner + (9)
|
10.8
|
|
Form of subordinated Note Purchase Agreement dated December 17, 2015, by and among Wellesley Bancorp, Inc. and the Purchasers identified therein (10)
|
10.9
|
|
Severance Compensation Agreement between Wellesley Bank and Michael W. Dvorak dated May 23, 2016 + (11)
|
10.10
|
|
Severance Compensation Agreement between Wellesley Bank and Louis Crosier+
|
21.1
|
|
Subsidiaries of Wellesley Bancorp, Inc.
|
23.1
|
|
Consent of Wolf & Company, P.C.
|
31.1
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer
|
31.2
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer
|
32.1
|
|
Section 1350 Certifications
|
101.1
|
|
The following materials from the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019, formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, (iii) the Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity, (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and (v) the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
|
|
+
|
Management contract or compensatory agreement or arrangement.
|
(1) Incorporated
herein by reference to the Company’s Pre-Effective Amendment No. 2 to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-176764),
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 7, 2011.
(2)
Incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (file No. 333-176764), filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on September 9, 2011.
(3) Incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s Current Report
on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 17, 2015 (included as Exhibit A to the purchase Agreement
filed as Exhibit 10.1 thereto).
(4) Incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended March 31, 2012, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 11, 2012 (filed as Exhibits 10.1 thereto).
(5) Incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on January 30, 2012 (filed as Exhibit 10.2 thereto).
(6) Incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s Current
Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 27, 2016 (filed as Exhibit 10.1 thereto).
(7) Incorporated
herein by reference to Appendix A to the Company’s Proxy Statement, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
July 10, 2012.
(8) Incorporated herein by reference to Appendix A to the Company’s Proxy Statement filed, with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on April 13, 2016.
(9) Incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 26, 2015 (filed as Exhibit 10.6 thereto).
(10) Incorporated herein
by reference to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 17,
2015 (filed as Exhibit 10.1 thereto).
(11) Incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 8, 2016 (filed as exhibit 10.1 thereto).
(12) Incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 29, 2018.
(c)
Financial Statement Schedules. All schedules for which this provision is made in the applicable accounting regulations of
the Securities and Exchange Commission are omitted because of the absence of conditions under which they are required or because
the required information is included in the consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto.
Item 16. Form 10-K Summary
None
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized.
|
|
WELLESLEY BANCORP, INC.
|
|
|
|
March 27, 2020
|
By:
|
/s/ Thomas J. Fontaine
|
|
|
Thomas J. Fontaine
|
|
|
President, Chief Executive Officer and
|
|
|
Chairman of the Board
|
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the
dates indicated.
/s/ Thomas J. Fontaine
|
|
President, Chief Executive Officer and
|
March 27, 2020
|
Thomas J. Fontaine
|
|
Chairman of the Board
|
|
(principal executive officer)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Michael W. Dvorak
|
|
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
|
March 27, 2020
|
Michael W. Dvorak
|
|
|
|
(principal financial and accounting officer)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Simon R. Gerlin
|
|
Director
|
March 27, 2020
|
Simon R. Gerlin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Nancy Marden Goodall
|
|
Director
|
March 27, 2020
|
Nancy Marden Goodall
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Kathryn M. Hinderhofer
|
|
Director
|
March 27, 2020
|
Kathryn M. Hinderhofer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Garry R. Holmes
|
|
Director
|
March 27, 2020
|
Garry R. Holmes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ James J. Malerba
|
|
Director
|
March 27, 2020
|
Theodore F. Parker
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Leslie B. Shea
|
|
Director
|
March 27, 2020
|
Leslie B. Shea
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Tina L. Wang
|
|
Director
|
March 27, 2020
|
Tina L. Wang
|
|
|
|
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements
of Wellesley Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Wellesley Bancorp,
Inc.:
Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated
balance sheets of Wellesley Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiary (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, and the
related consolidated statements of comprehensive income, changes in stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the years then
ended, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion,
the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December
31, 2019 and 2018, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Basis for Opinion
These consolidated financial statements
are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's consolidated financial
statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United
States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal
securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with
the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether
the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required
to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits we are
required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion
on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audits included performing procedures
to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing
procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and
disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe
that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
/s/
Wolf & Company, P.C.
|
|
|
|
We have served as the Company's auditor
since 1999.
|
|
|
|
Boston, Massachusetts
|
|
|
|
March 27, 2020
|
|
Wellesley Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks
|
|
$
|
7,886
|
|
|
$
|
7,678
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
34,208
|
|
|
|
34,972
|
|
Total cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
42,094
|
|
|
|
42,650
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certificates of deposit
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Securities available for sale, at fair value
|
|
|
29,815
|
|
|
|
66,770
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank of Boston stock, at cost
|
|
|
4,906
|
|
|
|
4,747
|
|
Loans held for sale
|
|
|
3,354
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
842,113
|
|
|
|
743,770
|
|
Less allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
(7,653
|
)
|
|
|
(6,738
|
)
|
Loans, net
|
|
|
834,460
|
|
|
|
737,032
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank-owned life insurance
|
|
|
8,005
|
|
|
|
7,769
|
|
Premises and equipment, net
|
|
|
3,508
|
|
|
|
3,924
|
|
Operating lease, right-of-use asset
|
|
|
6,473
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
Accrued interest receivable
|
|
|
2,525
|
|
|
|
2,288
|
|
Net deferred tax asset
|
|
|
2,713
|
|
|
|
2,804
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
7,265
|
|
|
|
3,336
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
945,218
|
|
|
$
|
871,420
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing
|
|
$
|
139,969
|
|
|
$
|
116,926
|
|
Interest-bearing
|
|
|
612,498
|
|
|
|
601,005
|
|
Total deposits
|
|
|
752,467
|
|
|
|
717,931
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
74,196
|
|
|
|
58,528
|
|
Subordinated debentures
|
|
|
9,861
|
|
|
|
9,832
|
|
Lease liability
|
|
|
6,543
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
|
|
|
8,700
|
|
|
|
4,999
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
871,767
|
|
|
|
806,290
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Notes 13 and 14)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders' equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 1,000,000 shares authorized, none issued
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 14,000,000 shares authorized, 2,599,105 and
2,525,611 shares issued and outstanding in 2019 and 2018, respectively
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
28,169
|
|
|
|
26,462
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
45,625
|
|
|
|
40,203
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
530
|
|
|
|
(533
|
)
|
Unearned compensation – ESOP
|
|
|
(899
|
)
|
|
|
(1,027
|
)
|
Total stockholders' equity
|
|
|
73,451
|
|
|
|
65,130
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity
|
|
$
|
945,218
|
|
|
$
|
871,420
|
|
See accompanying notes
to consolidated financial statements.
Wellesley Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive
Income
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
Interest and dividend income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and fees on loans and loans held for sale
|
|
$
|
37,670
|
|
|
$
|
31,028
|
|
Interest on debt securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable
|
|
|
1,270
|
|
|
|
1,441
|
|
Tax-exempt
|
|
|
291
|
|
|
|
327
|
|
Interest on short-term investments and certificates of deposit
|
|
|
757
|
|
|
|
509
|
|
Dividends on FHLB stock
|
|
|
302
|
|
|
|
333
|
|
Total interest and dividend income
|
|
|
40,290
|
|
|
|
33,638
|
|
Interest expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
10,069
|
|
|
|
6,442
|
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
|
865
|
|
|
|
580
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
1,642
|
|
|
|
1,256
|
|
Subordinated debentures
|
|
|
628
|
|
|
|
631
|
|
Total interest expense
|
|
|
13,204
|
|
|
|
8,909
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
27,086
|
|
|
|
24,729
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
915
|
|
|
|
585
|
|
Net interest income, after provision for loan losses
|
|
|
26,171
|
|
|
|
24,144
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer service fees
|
|
|
184
|
|
|
|
176
|
|
Mortgage banking activities
|
|
|
211
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
Income on bank-owned life insurance
|
|
|
236
|
|
|
|
234
|
|
Wealth management fees
|
|
|
1,675
|
|
|
|
1,616
|
|
Miscellaneous
|
|
|
803
|
)
|
|
|
461
|
|
Total noninterest income
|
|
|
3,109
|
|
|
|
2,586
|
|
Noninterest expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and employee benefits
|
|
|
12,261
|
|
|
|
10,842
|
|
Occupancy and equipment
|
|
|
3,288
|
|
|
|
3,004
|
|
Data processing
|
|
|
1,272
|
|
|
|
990
|
|
FDIC insurance
|
|
|
576
|
|
|
|
626
|
|
Professional fees
|
|
|
1,349
|
|
|
|
766
|
|
Advertising and marketing
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
|
323
|
|
Other general and administrative
|
|
|
2,192
|
|
|
|
2,012
|
|
Total noninterest expenses
|
|
|
21,178
|
|
|
|
18,563
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
8,102
|
|
|
|
8,167
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
2,102
|
|
|
|
2,176
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
6,000
|
|
|
|
5,991
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities
|
|
|
1,436
|
|
|
|
(776
|
)
|
Reclassification adjustment for gains recognized in noninterest income
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
--
|
|
Deferred income tax (provision) benefit
|
|
|
(365
|
)
|
|
|
197
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax
|
|
|
1,063
|
|
|
|
(579
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
$
|
7,063
|
|
|
$
|
5,412
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
2.44
|
|
|
$
|
2.49
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
2.36
|
|
|
$
|
2.40
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
2,461,527
|
|
|
|
2,404,371
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
2,553,805
|
|
|
|
2,502,784
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
Wellesley Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Consolidated Statements of Changes in
Stockholders’ Equity
Years Ended December 31, 2019 and 2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
Stock
|
|
|
Additional
Paid-in
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Other
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Unearned
Compensation-
|
|
|
Total
Stockholders’
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Income (Loss)
|
|
|
ESOP
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
(Dollars
in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
Balance
at December 31, 2017
|
|
|
2,506,532
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
25,601
|
|
|
|
34,736
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
(1,156
|
)
|
|
|
59,245
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive
income
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
5,991
|
|
|
|
(579
|
)
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
5,412
|
|
Reclassification
related to Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (Note 13)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
Dividends
paid to common stockholders ($0.215 per share)
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
(517
|
)
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
(517
|
)
|
Share-based
compensation – equity incentive plan
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
379
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
379
|
|
Restricted
stock awards granted
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
Restricted
stock forfeitures
|
|
|
(400
|
)
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
Stock
options exercised
|
|
|
19,054
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
292
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
292
|
|
Common
stock repurchased in connection with restricted stock awards
|
|
|
(2,575
|
)
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
(87
|
)
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
(87
|
)
|
ESOP
shares committed to be allocated (12,838 shares)
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
277
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
406
|
|
Balance
at December 31, 2018
|
|
|
2,525,611
|
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
|
$
|
26,462
|
|
|
$
|
40,203
|
|
|
$
|
(533
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,027
|
)
|
|
$
|
65,130
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive
income
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
6,000
|
|
|
|
1,063
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
7,063
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends
paid to common stockholders ($0.235 per share)
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
(578
|
)
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
(578
|
)
|
Share-based
compensation – equity incentive plan
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
345
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
345
|
|
Restricted
stock awards granted
|
|
|
14,500
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
Restricted
stock forfeitures
|
|
|
(6,050
|
)
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
Stock
options exercised
|
|
|
65,685
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1,092
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
1,093
|
|
Common
stock repurchased in connection with restricted stock awards
|
|
|
(641
|
)
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
ESOP
shares committed to be allocated (12,838 shares)
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
290
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
418
|
|
Balance
at December 31, 2019
|
|
|
2,599,105
|
|
|
$
|
26
|
|
|
$
|
28,169
|
|
|
$
|
45,625
|
|
|
$
|
530
|
|
|
$
|
(899
|
)
|
|
$
|
73,451
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated
financial statements.
Wellesley Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
6,000
|
|
|
$
|
5,991
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
915
|
|
|
|
585
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
829
|
|
|
|
767
|
|
Net amortization of securities premiums and discounts
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
143
|
|
Gains on sale of securities, net
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
--
|
|
Principal balance of loans sold
|
|
|
25,083
|
|
|
|
8,544
|
|
Loans originated for sale
|
|
|
(28,437
|
)
|
|
|
(8,544
|
)
|
Accretion of net deferred loan fees
|
|
|
(638
|
)
|
|
|
(611
|
)
|
Income on bank-owned life insurance
|
|
|
(236
|
)
|
|
|
(234
|
)
|
Amortization of subordinated debt issuance costs
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
Deferred income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
(274
|
)
|
|
|
(255
|
)
|
ESOP expense
|
|
|
418
|
|
|
|
406
|
|
Share-based compensation
|
|
|
345
|
|
|
|
379
|
|
Net change in other assets and liabilities
|
|
|
(240
|
)
|
|
|
(348
|
)
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
3,930
|
|
|
|
6,853
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Activity in securities available for sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturities, prepayments and calls
|
|
|
9,826
|
|
|
|
11,710
|
|
Purchases
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
(12,914
|
)
|
Sales
|
|
|
28,422
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
Redemption (purchase) of Federal Home Loan Bank stock
|
|
|
(159
|
)
|
|
|
1,190
|
|
Loan originations, net of principal payments
|
|
|
(97,705
|
)
|
|
|
(50,704
|
)
|
Additions to premises and equipment
|
|
|
(629
|
)
|
|
|
(1,241
|
)
|
Proceeds from sale of premises and equipment
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
Net cash used by investing activities
|
|
|
(60,185
|
)
|
|
|
(51,896
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in deposits
|
|
|
34,536
|
|
|
|
101,189
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt
|
|
|
33,000
|
|
|
|
36,000
|
|
Repayments of long-term debt
|
|
|
(17,332
|
)
|
|
|
(54,646
|
)
|
Increase in short-term borrowings
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
(23,000
|
)
|
Stock options exercised
|
|
|
1,093
|
|
|
|
292
|
|
Common stock repurchased
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
(87
|
)
|
Cash dividends paid
|
|
|
(578
|
)
|
|
|
(517
|
)
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
55,699
|
|
|
|
59,231
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(556
|
)
|
|
|
14,188
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
|
|
|
42,650
|
|
|
|
28,462
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
|
|
$
|
42,094
|
|
|
$
|
42,650
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplementary information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid
|
|
$
|
12,998
|
|
|
$
|
8,709
|
|
Income taxes paid
|
|
|
2,563
|
|
|
|
2,782
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated
financial statements.
Wellesley Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Years Ended December 31, 2019 and 2018
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
1.
|
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
|
Pending Merger with Cambridge Bancorp
On December 5, 2019, Cambridge Bancorp
(“Cambridge”) and the Company issued a joint press release announcing that Cambridge and the Company have entered into
an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) pursuant to which the Company will merge with and into Cambridge,
with Cambridge as the surviving entity (the “Merger”). Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, which has been
approved by the boards of directors and stockholders of both companies, stockholders of the Company will receive 0.580 shares of
Cambridge common stock for each share of Wellesley common stock. The transaction is subject to customary closing conditions
and is expected to close during the second quarter of 2020.
Basis of presentation and consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include
the accounts of the Wellesley Bancorp, Inc. ( the “Company” ) and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Wellesley Bank (the
“Bank”), the principal operating entity, and its wholly-owned subsidiaries: Wellesley Securities Corporation, which
engages in the business of buying, selling and dealing in securities exclusively on its own behalf; Wellesley Investment Partners,
LLC, formed to provide investment management services for individuals, not-for-profit entities and businesses; and Central Linden,
LLC, formed to hold, manage and sell foreclosed real estate. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated
in consolidation. Assets under management at Wellesley Investment Partners, LLC are not included in these consolidated financial
statements because they are not assets of the Company.
Business and operating segments
The Company provides a variety of financial
services to individuals, non-profit organizations, small businesses and other entities within eastern Massachusetts. Its primary
deposit products are checking, savings, money market deposits, and term certificate accounts and its primary lending products are
residential and commercial real estate loans, construction loans, commercial loans, and consumer loans.
Management evaluates the Company’s performance
and allocates resources based on a single segment concept.
Use of estimates
In preparing consolidated financial statements
in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, management is required to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the consolidated balance sheet and
reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. A material
estimate that is particularly susceptible to significant change in the near term relates to the determination of the allowance
for loan losses.
Significant group concentrations of credit risk
Most
of the Company’s lending activities are with customers located within the New England region of the country. The Company
does not have any significant concentrations to any one industry or customer.
Cash equivalents
Cash equivalents include amounts due from
banks and short-term investments with original maturities of three months or less, primarily balances held at the Federal Reserve
Bank of Boston. The Company maintains cash balances in excess of federally insured limits.
Wellesley Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Years Ended December 31, 2019 and 2018
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Certificates of deposit
Certificates of deposit are carried at cost,
which approximates fair value.
Fair value hierarchy
The Company groups its assets and liabilities
measured at fair value in three levels, based on the markets in which the assets and liabilities are traded and the reliability
of the assumptions used to determine fair value.
Level 1 – Valuation is based on quoted
market prices in active exchange markets for identical assets and liabilities. Valuations are obtained from readily available pricing
sources.
Level 2 – Valuation is based on observable
inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not
active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of
the assets or liabilities. Valuations are obtained from readily available pricing sources.
Level 3 – Valuation is based on unobservable
inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets and liabilities.
Level 3 assets and liabilities include those whose value is determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies,
or similar techniques, as well as those for which the determination of fair value requires significant management judgment or estimation.
Securities available for sale
Securities classified as available for
sale are carried at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses excluded from earnings and reported in other comprehensive income/loss.
Purchase premiums and discounts are amortized
to earnings by methods which do not differ materially from the interest method. Discounts and non-callable security premiums are
amortized over contractual lives of the securities. Callable security premiums are amortized over the earlier of the contractual
lives or the earliest call date of the securities. Gains and losses on the sale of securities are recorded on the trade date and
are determined using the specific identification method.
Each reporting period, the Company evaluates
all debt securities with a fair value below amortized cost to determine whether other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”)
exists.
OTTI is required to be recognized if (1)
the Company intends to sell the security; (2) it is “more likely than not” that the Company will be required to sell
the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis; or (3) for debt securities, the present value of expected cash flows
is not sufficient to recover the entire amortized cost basis. For all impaired debt securities that the Company intends to sell,
or more likely than not will be required to sell, the full amount of the depreciation is recognized as OTTI through earnings. Credit-related
OTTI for all other impaired debt securities is recognized through earnings. Non-credit related OTTI for such debt securities is
recognized in other comprehensive income, net of applicable taxes.
Federal Home Loan Bank stock
The
Bank, as a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) of Boston, is required to maintain an investment in capital
stock of the FHLB. Based on redemption provisions of the FHLB, the stock has no quoted market value and is carried at cost. At
its discretion, the FHLB may declare dividends on the stock. The Bank reviews for impairment based on the ultimate recoverability
of the cost basis in the FHLB stock. As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, no impairment has been recognized.
Wellesley Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Years Ended December 31, 2019 and 2018
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Loans held for sale
Loans
originated and intended for sale in the secondary market are carried at the lower of cost or estimated fair value in the aggregate.
Net unrealized losses, if any, are recognized through a valuation allowance by charges to income.
Loans
The loan portfolio consists of real estate,
commercial and other loans to the Company’s customers in its primary market areas in eastern Massachusetts. The ability of
the Company’s debtors to honor their contracts is dependent upon the economy in general and the real estate and construction
economic sectors within our markets.
Loans that management has the intent and
ability to hold for the foreseeable future, or until maturity or pay-off, are reported at their outstanding unpaid principal balances
adjusted for charge-offs, the allowance for loan losses, and any deferred loan origination fees or costs. Interest income is accrued
on the unpaid principal balance. Loan origination fees, net of certain direct origination costs, are deferred and recognized as
an adjustment of the related loan yield using the interest method.
Interest is generally not accrued on loans
which are identified as impaired or loans which are ninety days or more past due. Past due status is based on the contractual terms
of the loan. Interest income previously accrued on such loans is reversed against current period interest income. Interest income
on non-accrual loans is recognized only to the extent of interest payments received and is first applied to the outstanding principal
balance when collectibility of principal is in doubt. Loans are returned to accrual status when all principal and interest amounts
contractually due are brought current and future payments are reasonably assured through sustained payment performance for at least
six months.
Allowance for loan losses
The allowance for loan losses is established
through a provision for loan losses charged to earnings as losses are estimated to occur. Loan losses are charged against the allowance
when management believes the uncollectibility of the loan balance is confirmed. Subsequent recoveries are credited to the allowance.
The allowance for loan losses is evaluated
on a regular basis by management. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires estimates that are susceptible to significant
revision as more information becomes available. The allowance consists of general, allocated and unallocated components.
General component
The general component is based on the following
loan segments: residential real estate, commercial real estate, construction, commercial, home equity lines of credit and other
consumer. Management considers a rolling average of historical losses for each segment based on a time frame appropriate to capture
relevant loss data for each loan segment, generally 3 and 10 years. This historical loss factor is adjusted for the following qualitative
factors: levels/trends in delinquencies; trends in volume, concentrations and terms of loans; level of collateral protection; effects
of changes in risk selection and underwriting standards; experience/ability/depth of lending management and staff; and national
and local economic trends and conditions. There were no significant changes to the Company’s policies or methodology pertaining
to the general component of the allowance during 2019 or 2018.
The qualitative factor adjustments are
determined based on the various risk characteristics of each loan segment. Risk characteristics relevant to each portfolio segment
are as follows:
Residential real estate – The Company
generally does not originate loans with a loan-to-value ratio greater than 80 percent and does not originate subprime loans. Most
loans in this segment are collateralized by one-to-four family residential real estate and repayment is dependent on the credit
quality of the individual borrower. The overall health of the economy, including unemployment rates and housing prices, will have
an effect on the credit quality of this segment.
Wellesley Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Years Ended December 31, 2019 and 2018
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Commercial real estate – Loans in
this segment are primarily income-producing properties in the Company’s primary market areas in eastern Massachusetts. The
underlying cash flows generated by the properties may be adversely impacted by a downturn in the economy as evidenced by increased
vacancy rates, which in turn, will have an effect on the credit quality in this segment. Management typically obtains rent rolls
annually and continually monitors the cash flows of these loans.
Construction – Loans in this segment
include speculative construction loans primarily on residential properties for which payment is derived from sale of the property.
Credit risk is affected by cost overruns, time to sell at an adequate price, and market conditions. Residential construction
loans in this segment also include loans to build one-to-four family owner-occupied properties, which are subject to the same credit
quality factors as residential real estate.
Commercial – Loans in this segment
are made to businesses and are generally secured by assets of the business. Repayment is expected from the cash flows of the business.
A weakened economy, and resultant decreased consumer spending, may have an adverse effect on the credit quality in this segment.
Home equity lines of credit – Loans
in this segment are collateralized by one-to-four family residential real estate and repayment is dependent on the credit quality
of the individual borrower. The overall health of the economy, including unemployment rates and housing prices, may have an effect
on the credit quality of this segment.
Other consumer – Loans in this segment
are generally unsecured and repayment is dependent on the credit quality of the individual borrower.
Allocated component
The allocated component relates to loans
that are classified as impaired. Impairment is measured on a loan-by-loan basis by either the present value of expected future
cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, the fair value of the loan or, if the loan is collateral dependent,
by the fair value of the collateral, less estimated costs to sell. An allowance is established when the discounted cash flows (or
collateral value) of the impaired loan are lower than the carrying value of that loan. Large groups of smaller-balance homogeneous
loans are collectively evaluated for impairment. Accordingly, the Company does not separately identify performing individual residential
and consumer loans for impairment disclosures, unless such loans are subject to a troubled debt restructuring agreement.
A loan is considered impaired when, based
on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal
or interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Factors considered by management in determining
impairment include payment status, collateral value, and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments
when due. Loans that experience insignificant payment delays and payment shortfalls generally are not classified as impaired. Management
determines the significance of payment delays and payment shortfalls on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration all of
the circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower, including the length of the delay, the reasons for the delay, the borrower’s
prior payment record, and the amount of the shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed.
The Company periodically may agree to modify
the contractual terms of loans. When a loan is modified and a concession is made to a borrower experiencing financial difficulty,
the modification is considered a troubled debt restructuring (“TDR”). All TDRs are initially classified as impaired.
Unallocated component
An unallocated component is maintained
to cover uncertainties that could affect management’s estimate of probable losses. The unallocated component of the allowance
reflects the margin of imprecision inherent in the underlying assumptions used in the methodologies for estimating allocated and
general reserves in the portfolio.
Premises and equipment
Land is carried at cost. Buildings, leasehold
improvements and equipment are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization computed on the straight-line method
over the estimated useful lives of the assets or the expected terms of the leases, if shorter. Expected terms include lease option
periods to the extent that the exercise of such options is reasonably assured.
Wellesley Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Years Ended December 31, 2019 and 2018
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Bank-owned life insurance
Bank-owned life insurance policies are
reflected on the consolidated balance sheets at cash surrender value. Changes in cash surrender value are reflected in noninterest
income, and are not subject to income taxes.
Transfers of financial assets
Transfers of an entire financial asset,
a group of entire financial assets, or a participating interest in an entire financial asset are accounted for as sales when control
over the assets has been surrendered. Control over transferred assets is deemed to be surrendered when (1) the assets have been
isolated from the Company; (2) the transferee obtains the right to pledge or exchange the transferred assets; and (3) the Company
does not maintain effective control over the transferred assets.
During the normal course of business, the
Company may transfer a portion of a financial asset, for example, a participation loan. In order to be eligible for sales treatment,
the transfer of the portion of the loan must meet the criteria of a participating interest. If it does not meet criteria of a participating
interest, the transfer must be accounted for as a secured borrowing. In order to meet criteria for a participating interest, all
cash flows from the loan must be divided proportionately, the rights of each loan holder must have the same priority, the loan
holders must have no recourse to the transferor other than standard representations and warranties and no loan holder has the right
to pledge or exchange the entire loan.
Derivative financial instruments
Derivative financial instruments are recognized
as assets and liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets and measured at fair value.
Derivative Loan Commitments
Mortgage loan commitments are referred
to as derivative loan commitments if the loan that will result from exercise of the commitment will be held for sale upon funding.
Loan commitments that are derivatives are recognized at fair value, including servicing values, on the consolidated balance sheet
in other assets and other liabilities with changes in their fair values recorded in miscellaneous income. Fair values of the loan
commitments are recognized based on changes in the fair value of the underlying mortgage due to interest rate changes, changes
in the probability the derivative loan commitment will be exercised, and the passage of time. In estimating fair value, the Company
assigns a probability to a loan commitment based on the expectation that it will be exercised and the loan will be funded.
Forward Loan Sale Commitments
To protect against the price risk inherent
in derivative loan commitments, the Company utilizes “best efforts” forward loan sale commitments to mitigate the risk
of potential decreases in the values of loans that would result from the exercise of the derivative loan commitments. Forward loan
sale commitments are recognized at fair value on the consolidated balance sheet in other assets and other liabilities with changes
in their fair values recorded in miscellaneous income. Fair values for forward loan sale commitments are based on changes in the
fair values of the underlying loans.
Interest Rate Swap Agreements
The Company has entered into financial
instruments in the normal course of business to manage exposure to fluctuations in interest rates for its commercial customers.
Instruments related to commercial loan swaps are considered derivatives. These derivatives are recognized on the consolidated balance
sheet in other assets and other liabilities and measured at fair value with changes in their fair value recorded in miscellaneous
income.
Wellesley Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Years Ended December 31, 2019 and 2018
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Advertising costs
Advertising costs are expensed as incurred.
Income taxes
Deferred tax assets and liabilities relate
to temporary differences between the book and tax bases of certain assets and liabilities, and are reflected at currently enacted
income tax rates applicable to the period in which the deferred tax assets or liabilities are expected to be realized or settled.
As changes in tax laws or rates are enacted, deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted through the provision for income
taxes. A valuation allowance is established against deferred tax assets when, based upon the available evidence including historical
and projected taxable income, it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The
Company does not have any uncertain tax positions at December 31, 2019 or 2018 which require accrual or disclosure. The Company
records interest and penalties as part of income tax expense. No interest or penalties were recorded for the years ended December
31, 2019 and 2018.
Share-based compensation plans
The Company measures and recognizes compensation
cost relating to share-based payment transactions based on the grant date fair value of the equity instruments issued. Share-based
compensation is recognized over the period the employee is required to provide services for the award. Reductions in compensation
expense associated with forfeited options are estimated at the date of grant, and this estimated forfeiture rate is adjusted annually
based on actual forfeiture experience. The Company uses the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to determine the fair value of stock
options granted.
Employee stock ownership plan
Compensation expense for the Employee Stock
Ownership Plan (“ESOP”) is recorded at an amount equal to the shares allocated by the ESOP multiplied by the average
fair market value of the shares during the period. The Company recognizes compensation expense ratably over the year based on the
number of shares expected to be allocated by the ESOP. Unearned compensation applicable to the ESOP is reflected as a reduction
of stockholders’ equity in the consolidated balance sheet. The difference between the average fair market value and the cost
of the shares allocated by the ESOP is recorded as an adjustment to stockholders’ equity.
Comprehensive
income
Accounting principles generally require
that recognized revenue, expenses, gains and losses be included in net income. Although certain changes in assets and liabilities,
such as unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities, are reported as a separate component of the stockholders’
equity section of the consolidated balance sheets, such items, along with net income, are components of comprehensive income (loss).
The components of accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss) and related tax effects are as follows:
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Net
unrealized gains (losses) on securities available for sale
|
|
$
|
696
|
|
|
$
|
(732
|
)
|
Tax effect
|
|
|
(166
|
)
|
|
|
199
|
|
Net-of- tax amount
|
|
$
|
530
|
|
|
$
|
(533
|
)
|
Wellesley Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Years Ended December 31, 2019 and 2018
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Earnings per share
Basic earnings per share represents income
available to common stockholders divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted
earnings per share reflects additional common shares that would have been outstanding if dilutive potential common shares had been
issued, as well as any adjustment to income that would result from the assumed issuance. Unallocated ESOP shares are not deemed
outstanding for earnings per share calculations. Under the Company’s 2012 and 2016 Equity Incentive Plans, stock awards contain
non-forfeitable dividend rights. Accordingly, these shares are considered outstanding for computation of basic earnings per share.
Potential common shares that may be issued by the Company relate to outstanding stock options determined using the treasury stock
method.
Earnings per common share have been computed
based on the following:
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
Net income applicable to common stock
|
|
$
|
6,000
|
|
|
$
|
5,991
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average number of common shares issued
|
|
|
2,558
|
|
|
|
2,513
|
|
Less: Average unallocated ESOP shares
|
|
|
(96
|
)
|
|
|
(109
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average number of common shares outstanding used to calculate basic earnings per common share
|
|
|
2,462
|
|
|
|
2,404
|
|
Effect of dilutive stock options
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average number of common shares outstanding used to calculate diluted earnings per common share
|
|
|
2,554
|
|
|
|
2,503
|
|
Earnings per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
2.44
|
|
|
$
|
2.49
|
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
2.36
|
|
|
$
|
2.40
|
|
There were no anti-dilutive options that
were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018. Anti-dilutive
shares are common stock equivalents with exercise prices less than the average market value of the Company’s stock for the
periods presented.
Recent accounting
pronouncements
Effective January 1, 2019, the
Company adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Account Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-02,
Leases (Topic 842), which requires a lessee to record a right-to-use asset and liability representing the obligation to
make lease payments for long-term leases. Upon adoption of the ASU, the Company recorded an increase in assets of $7.8 million
and an increase in liabilities of $7.8 million on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as a result of recognizing the right-of-use assets
and liabilities.
In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU
2016-13, Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326), which requires entities to measure expected credit losses
based on relevant information about past events, including historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and
supportable forecasts that affect the collectibility of the reported amount. Entities will use forward-looking information to
better form their credit loss estimates. Credit losses on available-for-sale debt securities should be measured in a manner
similar to current GAAP; however, recognized credit losses will be presented as an allowance rather than as a write-down.
This ASU was scheduled to be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within
those fiscal years. However, the FASB recently voted to propose delaying the standard by three years for small reporting
companies, which included Wellesley Bank. The Board of Directors voted to delay implementation of the standard.
Wellesley
Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Years
Ended December 31, 2019 and 2018
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
2.
|
RESTRICTIONS ON CASH AND AMOUNTS DUE FROM BANKS
|
The Bank is required to maintain average
balances on hand or with the Federal Reserve Bank. The reserve balance amounted to $6.2 million and $5.1 million at December 31,
2019 and 2018, respectively.
|
3.
|
SHORT-TERM INVESTMENTS
|
Short-term investments are comprised of the
following:
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Federal Reserve Bank deposits
|
|
$
|
24,104
|
|
|
$
|
29,856
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank deposits
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
263
|
|
Money market accounts
|
|
|
10,102
|
|
|
|
4,853
|
|
|
|
$
|
34,208
|
|
|
$
|
34,972
|
|
|
4.
|
CERTIFICATES OF DEPOSIT
|
Certificates of deposit held by the Bank
amounted to $100 thousand, mature within one year and have a weighted average rate of 1.73% at December 31, 2019 and 2.48% at December
31, 2018.
|
5.
|
SECURITIES AVAILABLE FOR SALE
|
The amortized cost and fair value of securities
available for sale, with gross unrealized gains and losses, follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
December 31, 2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government National Mortgage Association
|
|
$
|
2,770
|
|
|
$
|
61
|
|
|
$
|
(16
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,815
|
|
Government-sponsored enterprises
|
|
|
2,224
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
2,266
|
|
SBA and other asset-backed securities
|
|
|
4,082
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
4,192
|
|
State and municipal bonds
|
|
|
7,446
|
|
|
|
375
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
7,821
|
|
Government-sponsored enterprise obligations
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
3,994
|
|
Corporate bonds
|
|
|
8,597
|
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
8,727
|
|
|
|
$
|
29,119
|
|
|
$
|
738
|
|
|
$
|
(42
|
)
|
|
$
|
29,815
|
|
Wellesley Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Years Ended December 31, 2019 and 2018
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
December 31, 2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government National Mortgage Association
|
|
$
|
3,846
|
|
|
$
|
44
|
|
|
$
|
(43
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,847
|
|
Government-sponsored enterprises
|
|
|
11,382
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
(188
|
)
|
|
|
11,223
|
|
SBA and other asset-backed securities
|
|
|
11,720
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
(157
|
)
|
|
|
11,627
|
|
State and municipal bonds
|
|
|
12,908
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
(111
|
)
|
|
|
12,908
|
|
Government-sponsored enterprise obligations
|
|
|
8,000
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
(187
|
)
|
|
|
7,813
|
|
Corporate bonds
|
|
|
18,151
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
(322
|
)
|
|
|
17,857
|
|
U.S. Treasury bonds
|
|
|
1,495
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
1,495
|
|
|
|
$
|
67,502
|
|
|
$
|
276
|
|
|
$
|
(1,008
|
)
|
|
$
|
66,770
|
|
For the year ended December 31, 2019, proceeds
from sales of available-for-sale securities amounted to $28.4 million with gross realized gains of $145 thousand and gross realized
losses of $137 thousand which are included in miscellaneous income. For the years ended December 31, 2018 there were no sales of
securities.
The amortized cost and fair value of debt
securities by contractual maturity at December 31, 2019 are as follows below. Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities
because the issuers, in certain instances, have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within 1 year
|
|
$
|
1,850
|
|
|
$
|
1,850
|
|
After 1 year to 5 years
|
|
|
7,810
|
|
|
|
7,874
|
|
After 5 years to 10 years
|
|
|
8,029
|
|
|
|
8,352
|
|
After 10 years
|
|
|
2,354
|
|
|
|
2,466
|
|
|
|
|
20,043
|
|
|
|
20,542
|
|
Mortgage- and asset-backed securities
|
|
|
9,076
|
|
|
|
9,273
|
|
|
|
$
|
29,119
|
|
|
$
|
29,815
|
|
Wellesley Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Years Ended December 31, 2019 and 2018
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Information pertaining to securities with
gross unrealized losses, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous
loss position, follows:
|
|
Less Than Twelve Months
|
|
|
Twelve Months or Greater
|
|
|
|
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
|
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
|
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
|
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
December 31, 2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government National Mortgage Association
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
|
$
|
(16
|
)
|
|
$
|
908
|
|
Government-sponsored enterprises
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
342
|
|
SBA and other asset-backed securities
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
290
|
|
Government-sponsored enterprise obligations
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
2,994
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
Corporate bonds
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
$
|
(6
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,994
|
|
|
$
|
(36
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,540
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage-backed securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government National Mortgage Association
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
|
$
|
(43
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,755
|
|
Government-sponsored enterprises
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
(187
|
)
|
|
|
7,880
|
|
SBA and other asset-backed securities
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
(157
|
)
|
|
|
5,455
|
|
State and municipal bonds
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
386
|
|
|
|
(109
|
)
|
|
|
6,257
|
|
Government-sponsored enterprise obligations
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
(187
|
)
|
|
|
7,813
|
|
Corporate bonds
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
5,705
|
|
|
|
(293
|
)
|
|
|
11,124
|
|
|
|
$
|
(32
|
)
|
|
$
|
6,194
|
|
|
$
|
(976
|
)
|
|
$
|
40,284
|
|
Management evaluates securities for other-than-temporary
impairment at least on a quarterly basis, and more frequently when economic or market conditions warrant such evaluations. At December
31, 2019, various debt securities have unrealized losses with aggregate depreciation of 0.75% from their aggregate amortized cost
basis. These unrealized losses relate principally to the effect of interest rate changes on the fair value of debt securities and
not to an increase in credit risk of the issuers. As the Company does not intend to sell the securities and it is more likely than
not that the Company will not be required to sell the securities before recovery of their amortized cost, which may be maturity,
the Company does not consider these securities to be other-than-temporarily impaired at December 31, 2019.
Wellesley Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Years Ended December 31, 2019 and 2018
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
6.
|
LOANS AND ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES
|
A summary of the balances of loans is as follows:
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Real estate loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential – fixed
|
|
$
|
77,679
|
|
|
$
|
64,218
|
|
Residential – variable
|
|
|
310,646
|
|
|
|
318,292
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
181,928
|
|
|
|
148,006
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
138,007
|
|
|
|
106,723
|
|
|
|
|
708,260
|
|
|
|
637,239
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Secured
|
|
|
92,347
|
|
|
|
61,563
|
|
Unsecured
|
|
|
4,934
|
|
|
|
5,327
|
|
|
|
|
97,281
|
|
|
|
66,890
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity lines of credit
|
|
|
36,693
|
|
|
|
39,486
|
|
Other
|
|
|
171
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
|
36,864
|
|
|
|
39,649
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans
|
|
|
842,405
|
|
|
|
743,778
|
|
Net deferred originations costs
|
|
|
(292
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
Total loans, net of deferred fees
|
|
|
842,113
|
|
|
|
743,770
|
|
Less:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
(7,653
|
)
|
|
|
(6,738
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, net
|
|
$
|
834,460
|
|
|
$
|
737,032
|
|
The
Company has transferred a portion of its originated residential and commercial real estate loans to participating lenders. The
amounts transferred have been accounted for as sales and are therefore not included in the Company’s accompanying consolidated
balance sheets. The Company and participating lenders share ratably in any gains or losses that may result from the borrower’s
lack of compliance with contractual terms of the loans. The Company continues to service the loans on behalf of the participating
lenders and, as such, collects cash payments from the borrowers, remits payments (net of servicing fees) to participating lenders
and disburses required escrow funds to relevant parties. At December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company was servicing commercial real
estate loans for participants aggregating $287 thousand and $5.3 million, respectively. At December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company
was servicing residential real estate loans for participants aggregating $8.1 million and $9.5 million, respectively.
Whole
mortgage loans sold and serviced for others are not included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The unpaid principal
balance of mortgage loans serviced for others was $2.4 million and $2.7 million at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
The
Company has pledged certain residential and commercial real estate loans to secure FHLB advances and available lines of credit.
(See Notes 10 and 11.)
Wellesley Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Years Ended December 31, 2019 and 2018
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
The following table summarizes the activity in the allowance
for loan losses by portfolio segment for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018:
|
|
Residential
Real Estate
|
|
|
Commercial
Real Estate
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
Home
Equity
|
|
|
Other
Consumer
|
|
|
Unallocated
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance at December 31, 2018
|
|
$
|
2,216
|
|
|
$
|
1,602
|
|
|
$
|
1,462
|
|
|
$
|
1,124
|
|
|
$
|
257
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
74
|
|
|
$
|
6,738
|
|
Provision (credit) for
loan losses
|
|
|
(116
|
)
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
361
|
|
|
|
740
|
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(73
|
)
|
|
|
915
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance at December
31, 2019
|
|
$
|
2,100
|
|
|
$
|
1,626
|
|
|
$
|
1,823
|
|
|
$
|
1,864
|
|
|
$
|
235
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
7,653
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
December 31, 2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance at December 31, 2017
|
|
$
|
1,722
|
|
|
$
|
1,520
|
|
|
$
|
1,661
|
|
|
$
|
917
|
|
|
$
|
237
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
94
|
|
|
$
|
6,153
|
|
Provision (credit) for
loan losses
|
|
|
494
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
(199
|
)
|
|
|
207
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
585
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance at December
31, 2018
|
|
$
|
2,216
|
|
|
$
|
1,602
|
|
|
$
|
1,462
|
|
|
$
|
1,124
|
|
|
$
|
257
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
74
|
|
|
$
|
6,738
|
|
Further information pertaining
to the allowance for loan losses and impaired loans at December 31, 2019 and 2018 is as follows:
|
|
Residential
Real Estate
|
|
|
Commercial
Real Estate
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
Home
Equity
|
|
|
Other
Consumer
|
|
|
Unallocated
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
December 31,
2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance
related to impaired loans
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
|
$
|
350
|
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
|
$
|
350
|
|
Allowance
related to non-impaired loans
|
|
|
2,100
|
|
|
|
1,626
|
|
|
|
1,823
|
|
|
|
1,514
|
|
|
|
235
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
7,303
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
allowance
|
|
$
|
2,100
|
|
|
$
|
1,626
|
|
|
$
|
1,823
|
|
|
$
|
1,864
|
|
|
$
|
235
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
7,653
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired
loan balances
|
|
$
|
721
|
|
|
|
2,565
|
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
|
$
|
1,993
|
|
|
$
|
500
|
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
|
$
|
5,779
|
|
Non-impaired
loan balances
|
|
|
387,604
|
|
|
|
179,363
|
|
|
|
138,007
|
|
|
|
95,288
|
|
|
|
36,193
|
|
|
|
171
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
836,626
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
loans
|
|
$
|
388,325
|
|
|
$
|
181,928
|
|
|
$
|
138,007
|
|
|
$
|
97,281
|
|
|
$
|
36,693
|
|
|
$
|
171
|
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
|
$
|
842,405
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance
related to impaired loans
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
Allowance
related to non-impaired loans
|
|
|
2,216
|
|
|
|
1,602
|
|
|
|
1,462
|
|
|
|
1,124
|
|
|
|
257
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
6,738
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
allowance
|
|
$
|
2,216
|
|
|
$
|
1,602
|
|
|
$
|
1,462
|
|
|
$
|
1,124
|
|
|
$
|
257
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
74
|
|
|
$
|
6,738
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired
loan balances
|
|
$
|
746
|
|
|
|
2,846
|
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
|
$
|
3,592
|
|
Non-impaired
loan balances
|
|
|
381,764
|
|
|
|
145,160
|
|
|
|
106,723
|
|
|
|
66,890
|
|
|
|
39,486
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
740,186
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
loans
|
|
$
|
382,510
|
|
|
$
|
148,006
|
|
|
$
|
106,723
|
|
|
$
|
66,890
|
|
|
$
|
39,486
|
|
|
$
|
163
|
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
|
$
|
743,778
|
|
Wellesley Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Years Ended December 31, 2019 and 2018
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
The following is a summary of past due and
non-accrual loans at December 31, 2019 and 2018:
|
|
30-59
Days
Past
Due
|
|
|
60-89
Days
Past
Due
|
|
|
Past
Due 90
Days
or
More
|
|
|
Total
Past
Due
|
|
|
Past
Due 90
Days
or More
and
Still Accruing
|
|
|
Non-
accrual
Loans
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
December
31, 2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
real estate
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
|
$
|
562
|
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
548
|
|
|
|
548
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
548
|
|
Commercial loans
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
883
|
|
Home
equity lines of credit
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
|
$
|
1,048
|
|
|
$
|
1,048
|
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
|
$
|
2,493
|
|
December
31, 2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential real estate
|
|
$
|
1,551
|
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
|
$
|
1,551
|
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
|
$
|
581
|
|
Commercial
real estate
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
556
|
|
|
|
556
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
556
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,551
|
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
|
$
|
556
|
|
|
$
|
2,107
|
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
|
$
|
1,137
|
|
The following is a summary of impaired loans
at December 31, 2019 and 2018:
|
|
December
31, 2019
|
|
|
December
31, 2018
|
|
|
|
Recorded
Investment
|
|
|
Unpaid
Principal
Balance
|
|
|
Related
Allowance
|
|
|
Recorded
Investment
|
|
|
Unpaid
Principal
Balance
|
|
|
Related
Allowance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans without
a valuation allowance:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
real estate
|
|
$
|
721
|
|
|
$
|
738
|
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
|
$
|
746
|
|
|
$
|
764
|
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
|
2,565
|
|
|
|
2,691
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
2,846
|
|
|
|
2,974
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
Commercial loans
|
|
|
1,110
|
|
|
|
1,110
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
Home
equity lines of credit
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
4,896
|
|
|
|
5,039
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
3,592
|
|
|
|
3,738
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans with
a valuation allowance:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
loans
|
|
|
883
|
|
|
|
883
|
|
|
|
350
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
impaired loans
|
|
$
|
5,779
|
|
|
$
|
5,922
|
|
|
$
|
350
|
|
|
$
|
3,592
|
|
|
$
|
3,738
|
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
Wellesley Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Years Ended December 31, 2019 and 2018
Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements
Further information pertaining to impaired
loans follows:
|
|
Year
Ended December 31, 2019
|
|
|
Year
Ended December 31, 2018
|
|
|
|
Average
Recorded
Investment
|
|
|
Interest
Income
Recognized
|
|
|
Interest
Income
Recognized
on
Cash Basis
|
|
|
Average
Recorded
Investment
|
|
|
Interest
Income
Recognized
|
|
|
Interest
Income
Recognized
on
Cash
Basis
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Residential
real estate
|
|
$
|
734
|
|
|
$
|
34
|
|
|
$
|
26
|
|
|
$
|
819
|
|
|
$
|
34
|
|
|
$
|
28
|
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
|
2,704
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
2,920
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
Commercial loans
|
|
|
717
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
Home
equity lines of credit
|
|
|
167
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
4,322
|
|
|
$
|
191
|
|
|
$
|
42
|
|
|
$
|
3,739
|
|
|
$
|
123
|
|
|
$
|
64
|
|
One commercial loan relationship with a line
of credit has $145 thousand availability at December 31, 2019.
TDRs, which are included in impaired loans,
totaled $3.2 million at December 31, 2019 and $721 thousand at December 31, 2018. There was one TDR, totaling $548 thousand and
$556 thousand, on non-accrual status at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
The following is a summary of troubled
debt restructurings recorded for the year ended December 31, 2019:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
Contracts
|
|
|
Pre-
Modification
Outstanding
Recorded
Investment
|
|
|
Post-
Modification
Outstanding
Recorded
Investment
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
Commercial real estate
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
2,155
|
|
|
$
|
2,155
|
|
During the year ended December 31, 2019,
the Company recorded a TDR for one commercial loan relationship to provide working capital line of credit during the sale of the
collateral property. The loan relationship subsequently paid off in 2020.
There were no TDRs recorded during the
year ended December 31, 2018.
There were no TDRs that defaulted (90 days
or more past due) during the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, and for which default was within one year of the restructure
date.
Credit Quality Information
The Company utilizes an eleven-grade internal
loan rating system for commercial real estate, construction and commercial loans.
Loans rated 1-4: Loans in these categories
are considered “pass” rated loans with low to average risk.
Loans rated 5: Loans in this category are
considered “special mention.” These loans are starting to show signs of potential weakness and are being closely monitored
by management.
Wellesley Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Years Ended December 31, 2019 and 2018
Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements
Loans rated 6: Loans in this category are
considered “substandard.” Generally, a loan is considered substandard if it is inadequately protected by the current
net worth and paying capacity of the obligors and/or the collateral pledged. There is a distinct possibility that the Company will
sustain some loss if the weakness is not corrected.
Loans rated 7: Loans in this category are
considered “doubtful.” Loans classified as doubtful have all the weaknesses inherent in those classified substandard
with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts,
highly questionable and improbable.
Loans rated 8: Loans in this category are
considered uncollectible “loss” and of such little value that their continuance as loans is not warranted.
Loans rated 9: Loans in this category are
not rated and include commercial loans under $25 thousand with no other outstandings or relationships with the Company.
Loans rated 10: Loans in this category
include loans which otherwise require rating but which have not been rated, or loans for which the Company’s loan policy
does not require rating.
Loans rated 11: Loans in this category
include credit commitments/relationships that cannot be rated due to a lack of financial information or inaccurate financial information.
If within 60 days of the assignment of an 11 rating, information is still not available to allow a standard rating, the credit
will be rated 6.
On an annual basis, or more often if needed,
the Company formally reviews the ratings on all commercial real estate, construction and commercial loans. During each calendar
year, the Company engages an independent third party to review a significant portion of loans within these segments. Management
uses the results of these reviews as part of its annual review process. On a monthly basis, the Company reviews the residential
real estate and consumer loan portfolio for credit quality primarily through the use of delinquency reports.
The following table presents the Company’s
loans by risk rating:
|
|
December 31, 2019
|
|
|
December 31, 2018
|
|
|
|
Commercial
Real
Estate
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Commercial
Real
Estate
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Loans rated 1-4
|
|
$
|
178,488
|
|
|
$
|
138,007
|
|
|
$
|
95,287
|
|
|
$
|
411,782
|
|
|
$
|
144,243
|
|
|
$
|
106,723
|
|
|
$
|
65,245
|
|
|
$
|
316,211
|
|
Loans rated 5
|
|
|
875
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
875
|
|
|
|
917
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
1,645
|
|
|
|
2,562
|
|
Loans rated 6
|
|
|
2,017
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
1,994
|
|
|
|
4,011
|
|
|
|
2,290
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
2,290
|
|
Loans rated 7
|
|
|
548
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
548
|
|
|
|
556
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
556
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
181,928
|
|
|
$
|
138,007
|
|
|
$
|
97,281
|
|
|
$
|
417,216
|
|
|
$
|
148,006
|
|
|
$
|
106,723
|
|
|
$
|
66,890
|
|
|
$
|
321,619
|
|
Wellesley
Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Years
Ended December 31, 2019 and 2018
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
7. PREMISES AND
EQUIPMENT
A summary of the cost and accumulated depreciation
and amortization of premises and equipment is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Useful Lives In
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
Premises:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land
|
|
$
|
50
|
|
|
$
|
50
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
821
|
|
|
|
701
|
|
|
|
35-40
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
3,695
|
|
|
|
3,924
|
|
|
|
5-15
|
|
Equipment
|
|
|
3,845
|
|
|
|
3,704
|
|
|
|
3-5
|
|
|
|
|
8,411
|
|
|
|
8,379
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(4,903
|
)
|
|
|
(4,455
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Premises and equipment, net
|
|
$
|
3,508
|
|
|
$
|
3,924
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total depreciation and amortization expense
for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 amounted to $829 thousand and $767 thousand, respectively.
Effective January 1, 2019, operating leases
are included in operating lease right-of-use (“ROU”) asset and liabilities in our consolidated balance sheet. These
operating leases provide the physical facilities for our sales and service locations, administration and operations offices, and
ATMs.
ROU assets represent our right to use an underlying asset for
the lease term and lease liabilities represent our obligation to make lease payments arising from the lease. Operating lease ROU
assets and liabilities were recognized at the accounting adoption date based on the present value of lease payments over the remaining
lease term. As our leases do not provide an implicit rate, we use the Federal Home Loan Bank borrowing rates that best align with
the lease term in determining the present value of lease payments. Our lease terms may include options to extend or terminate the
lease, which we include when it is reasonably certain that we will exercise that option. For operating leases, the lease expense
is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term. The operating lease expense for the twelve months ended December 31,
2019 was $1.6 million.
The table below summarizes other information related to our
operating leases as of December 31, 2019:
Cash flows from operating leases, in thousands, for the year 2019
|
|
$
|
1,596
|
|
Weighted average remaining lease term, in years
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
Weighted average discount rate
|
|
|
3.13
|
%
|
The ROU asset and liability at December 31, 2019 amounted to
$6.5 million.
Wellesley
Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Years
Ended December 31, 2019 and 2018
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
The table below summarizes the maturity of the operating lease
liabilities as of December 31, 2019:
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
2020
|
|
$
|
1,633
|
|
2021
|
|
|
1,483
|
|
2022
|
|
|
1,182
|
|
2023
|
|
|
1,101
|
|
2024
|
|
|
893
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
1,019
|
|
Total lease payments
|
|
|
7,311
|
|
Less imputed interest
|
|
|
(768
|
)
|
Present value of lease liabilities
|
|
$
|
6,543
|
|
The Bank is under agreement to take possession
of an additional 4,431 square feet of office space in 2020 for a term of 74 months that will increase the Bank’s ROU assets
by $1.3 million.
The leases contain options to extend for
up to ten years. The cost of such options is not included above. Total rent expense amounted to $1.6 million and $1.4 million for
the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
9. DEPOSITS
A summary of deposit balances, by type, is
as follows:
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Demand
|
|
$
|
139,969
|
|
|
$
|
116,926
|
|
NOW
|
|
|
38,876
|
|
|
|
36,944
|
|
Money market
|
|
|
278,953
|
|
|
|
203,578
|
|
Regular and other savings
|
|
|
77,979
|
|
|
|
82,218
|
|
Total non-certificate accounts
|
|
|
535,777
|
|
|
|
439,666
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term certificates of $250 thousand and greater
|
|
|
90,781
|
|
|
|
106,052
|
|
Term certificates less than $250 thousand
|
|
|
125,909
|
|
|
|
172,213
|
|
Total term certificates
|
|
|
216,690
|
|
|
|
278,265
|
|
Total deposits
|
|
$
|
752,467
|
|
|
$
|
717,931
|
|
Term certificates include brokered deposits
amounting to $47.0 million and $82.5 million at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
Wellesley
Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Years
Ended December 31, 2019 and 2018
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
A summary of term certificates by maturity
is as follows:
|
|
December 31, 2019
|
|
|
December 31, 2018
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Weighted Average
Rate
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Weighted Average
Rate
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Within 1 year
|
|
$
|
169,600
|
|
|
|
2.18
|
%
|
|
$
|
228,449
|
|
|
|
2.01
|
%
|
Over 1 year to 2 years
|
|
|
35,296
|
|
|
|
1.96
|
|
|
|
43,237
|
|
|
|
2.23
|
|
Over 2 years to 3 years
|
|
|
6,604
|
|
|
|
2.03
|
|
|
|
2,666
|
|
|
|
1.60
|
|
Over 3 years to 4 years
|
|
|
5,190
|
|
|
|
1.95
|
|
|
|
3,913
|
|
|
|
2.09
|
|
|
|
$
|
216,690
|
|
|
|
2.13
|
%
|
|
$
|
278,265
|
|
|
|
2.04
|
%
|
10. SHORT-TERM
BORROWINGS AND AVAILABLE LINES OF CREDIT
At December 31, 2019 and 2018, short-term
borrowings consisted entirely of fixed-rate advances from the FHLB with original maturities of less than one year. The weighted
average interest rate on advances outstanding at December 31, 2019 and 2018 was 2.50% and 2.44%, respectively. All borrowings from
the FHLB are secured by a blanket lien on qualified collateral. (See Notes 6 and 11.)
Borrowings available under an available
FHLB variable-rate line of credit amounted to $1.3 million as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. No advances were outstanding
under the line of credit at December 31, 2019 or 2018.
At December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company
has pledged commercial real estate loans of $21.8 million and $16.8 million, respectively, to access the Federal Reserve Bank discount
window. At December 31, 2019 and 2018, the available line amounted to $9.2 million and $6.9 million, respectively. No advances
were outstanding at December 31, 2019 or 2018.
The Company has $5.0 million of unsecured
borrowing capacity with the Co-operative Central Bank, none of which was outstanding at December 31, 2019 and 2018. The Company
also has a $5.0 million unsecured line of credit with a correspondent bank. No advances were outstanding at December 31, 2019 or
2018.
11. LONG-TERM
DEBT
Long-term debt, and related maturities, at
December 31, 2019 and 2018 consists of fixed-rate FHLB advances, as follows:
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Weighted Average Rates
|
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
|
$
|
10,000
|
|
|
|
--
|
%
|
|
|
1.60
|
%
|
|
2020
|
|
|
|
47,000
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
2.29
|
|
|
|
2.03
|
|
|
2021
|
|
|
|
8,000
|
|
|
|
8,000
|
|
|
|
2.48
|
|
|
|
2.48
|
|
|
2022
|
*
|
|
|
961
|
|
|
|
1,320
|
|
|
|
1.84
|
|
|
|
1.84
|
|
|
2023
|
**
|
|
|
18,235
|
|
|
|
19,208
|
|
|
|
3.54
|
|
|
|
0.91
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
74,196
|
|
|
$
|
58,528
|
|
|
|
2.50
|
%
|
|
|
1.65
|
%
|
*At December 31, 2019 and 2018, includes
an amortizing advance totaling $960 thousand and $1.3 million, respectively, requiring monthly principal and interest of $32 thousand.
Wellesley
Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Years
Ended December 31, 2019 and 2018
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
** At December 31, 2019, includes an amortizing advance amounting
to $3.2 million requiring monthly principal and interest of $88 thousand. At December 31, 2019, includes a $15 million advance
callable in 2020.
All borrowings from the FHLB are secured by a blanket lien on
qualified collateral, defined principally as 75% of the carrying value of first mortgage loans on owner-occupied residential property.
(See Note 6.)
12. SUBORDINATED
DEBT
On December 17, 2015, the Company closed
its private offering of $10.0 million, 6.00% fixed-to-floating rate Subordinated Notes due December 30, 2025 (the “Notes”).
The Notes were offered to institutional accredited investors at par. The Company is using the proceeds for general corporate purposes.
Interest on the Notes is payable semi-annually in arrears on June 30 and December 30 of each year. The Company recorded issuance
costs of $266 thousand, which are being amortized over the period to maturity on an effective interest method. The carrying value,
net of issuance costs, totaled $9.9 million at both December 31, 2019 and 2018.
These Notes bear a fixed rate of interest
of 6.00% for the first five years at which time, and at any interest payment date thereafter, the Notes may be called at par at
the Company’s option. Subsequent to the initial call date, the Notes bear a floating rate of interest that reprices and is
payable quarterly at the 3-month LIBOR rate plus 435.5 basis points.
Allocation of federal and state income taxes
between current and deferred portions is as follows:
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Current tax provision:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
1,592
|
|
|
$
|
1,669
|
|
State
|
|
|
784
|
|
|
|
762
|
|
|
|
|
2,376
|
|
|
|
2,431
|
|
Deferred tax provision (benefit):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
|
(186
|
)
|
|
|
(170
|
)
|
State
|
|
|
(88
|
)
|
|
|
(85
|
)
|
|
|
|
(274
|
)
|
|
|
(255
|
)
|
Total tax provision
|
|
$
|
2,102
|
|
|
$
|
2,176
|
|
Wellesley
Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Years
Ended December 31, 2019 and 2018
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
The reasons for the differences between
the statutory federal income tax rate and the effective tax rates are summarized as follows:
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Statutory tax rate
|
|
$
|
1,701
|
|
|
$
|
1,715
|
|
Increase (decrease) resulting from:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State taxes, net of federal tax benefit
|
|
|
550
|
|
|
|
535
|
|
Income on bank-owned life insurance
|
|
|
(50
|
)
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
Tax exempt bond income
|
|
|
(77
|
)
|
|
|
(86
|
)
|
Share-based compensation
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Other, net
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
65
|
|
Effective tax
|
|
$
|
2,102
|
|
|
$
|
2,176
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective tax rates
|
|
|
26.0
|
%
|
|
|
26.6
|
%
|
The tax effects of each item that gives
rise to deferred tax assets (liabilities) are as follows:
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
$
|
2,151
|
|
|
$
|
1,894
|
|
Employee benefit plans
|
|
|
1,001
|
|
|
|
916
|
|
Partnerships and other investments
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Net unrealized loss on securities available for sale
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
199
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
3,203
|
|
|
|
3,031
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(299
|
)
|
|
|
(198
|
)
|
Net unrealized gain on securities available for sale
|
|
|
(166
|
)
|
|
|
--
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
Deferred loan fees
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
(490
|
)
|
|
|
(227
|
)
|
Net deferred tax asset
|
|
$
|
2,713
|
|
|
$
|
2,804
|
|
The federal income tax reserve for loan
losses at the Company’s base year amounted to $820 thousand. If any portion of the reserve is used for purposes other than
to absorb loan losses for which established, approximately 150% of the amount actually used (limited to the amount of the reserve)
would be subject to taxation in the year in which used. As the Company intends to use the reserve only to absorb loan losses, a
deferred income tax liability of $231 thousand has not been provided.
On December 22, 2017, the President signed
into law the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Act”). The Act includes a number of changes in existing tax law impacting
businesses including, among other things, a reduction in the corporate income tax rate from 34% to 21%, effective on January 1,
2018. As a result of this rate reduction, the Company revalued its net deferred tax asset as of December 22, 2017, resulting in
a reduction in the value of the net deferred tax asset of $979 thousand, which was recorded as additional income tax provision
in the Company’s consolidated statements of comprehensive income in 2017.
Wellesley Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Years Ended December 31, 2019 and 2018
Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements
The $979 thousand, in 2017, in income tax
provision includes a tax provision of $7 thousand relating to the impact of the rate change on deferred tax items originally recorded
through other comprehensive income. This accounting treatment effectively stranded $7 thousand of deferred tax items in accumulated
other comprehensive income (“AOCI”). In February 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-02, Reclassification of Certain
Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, which allows a reclassification from AOCI to retained earnings to
eliminate the stranded tax effects resulting from the Act. As permitted, the Company early adopted the ASU and recorded a $7 thousand
decrease in retained earnings and a corresponding increase in AOCI as of January 1, 2018.
The Company’s income tax returns
are subject to review and examination by federal and state taxing authorities. The Company is currently open to audit under the
applicable statutes of limitations by the Internal Revenue Service for the years ended December 31, 2016 through 2020. The years
open to examination by state taxing authorities vary by jurisdiction; no years prior to 2016 are open.
14. DERIVATIVE
INSTRUMENTS
Certain derivative instruments do not meet
the requirements to be accounted for as hedging instruments. These undesignated derivative instruments are recognized on the consolidated
balance sheet at fair value, with changes in the fair value recorded in miscellaneous income.
Derivative Loan Commitments
Mortgage loan commitments are referred
to as derivative loan commitments if the loan that will result from exercise of the commitment will be held for sale upon funding.
The Company enters into commitments to fund residential mortgage loans at specified rates and times in the future, with the intention
that these loans will subsequently be sold in the secondary market.
Outstanding derivative loan commitments
expose the Company to the potential for changes in the fair value of the underlying loans as interest rates change, along with
the value of the loan commitment. If interest rates increase, the value of these loan commitments will decrease. Conversely, if
interest rates decrease, the value of these loan commitments will increase. The notional amount of undesignated derivative loan
commitments was $350 thousand at December 31, 2019. The fair value of these commitments was a liability of $1 thousand. There were
no outstanding derivative loan commitments at December 31, 2018.
Forward Loan Sale Commitments
To protect against the price risk inherent
in derivative loan commitments, the Company utilizes “best efforts” forward loan sale commitments to mitigate the risk
of potential decreases in the values of loans that would result from the exercise of the derivative loan commitments. With a “best
efforts” contract, the Company commits to deliver an individual mortgage loan of a specified principal amount and quality
to an investor if the loan to the underlying borrower closes. Generally, the price the investor will pay the seller for an individual
loan is specified prior to the loan being funded.
The Company expects that these forward
loan sale commitments will experience changes in fair value opposite to the change in fair value of derivative loan commitments.
The notional amount of undesignated forward loan sale commitments was $3.7 million at December 31, 2019. The fair value of these
commitments was a liability of $4 thousand. There were no undesignated forward loan sale commitments at December 31, 2018
Interest Rate Swap Agreements
The Company has entered into
derivative financial instruments in the normal course of business to manage exposure to fluctuations in interest rates for
its commercial customers. Typically these agreements have generally been limited to loan level interest rate swap agreements,
which are entered into with borrowers and a third party. Typically, the Company enters into a floating-rate loan and a
fixed-rate swap directly with a loan customer. The Company offsets the fixed-rate interest rate risk with an identical
offsetting swap with a swap dealer. This is referred to as a “back-to-back” swap structure. As this structure has
equal and offsetting interest rate contacts, fair value gains and losses recorded each month are offsetting.
Wellesley Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Years Ended December 31, 2019 and 2018
Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements
The notional amounts are amounts on which
calculations, payments, and the value of the derivatives are based. Notional amounts do not represent direct credit exposures.
The primary risk associated with these transactions is the ability of the counter parties to meet the terms of the contract. The
fair value of the derivative instruments is reflected on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet as other assets and other
liabilities as appropriate. At December 31, 2019, cash in the amount of $5.8 million is pledged as collateral by the Company to
its third-party financial institution counter-party. Changes in fair values are recorded in miscellaneous income in the consolidated
statements of income. There is no credit valuation adjustment at December 31, 2019 or 2018.
The table below presents the interest rate
swaps outstanding at December 31, 2019 and 2018:
|
|
With commercial
|
|
|
With third-party
|
|
|
|
loan borrowers
|
|
|
financial institutions
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
|
Notional amount
|
|
$
|
71,941
|
|
|
$
|
28,320
|
|
|
$
|
71,941
|
|
|
$
|
28,320
|
|
Receive (pay) fixed rate (weighted average)
|
|
|
4.43
|
%
|
|
|
5.09
|
%
|
|
|
(4.43
|
)%
|
|
|
(5.09
|
)%
|
Receive (pay) variable rate (weighted average)
|
|
|
(3.79
|
)%
|
|
|
(5.06
|
)%
|
|
|
3.79
|
%
|
|
|
5.06
|
%
|
Weighted average remaining years
|
|
|
11.0 years
|
|
|
|
12.8 years
|
|
|
|
11.0 years
|
|
|
|
12.8 years
|
|
Unrealized fair value gain (loss)
|
|
$
|
3,472
|
|
|
$
|
264
|
|
|
($
|
3,472
|
)
|
|
($
|
264
|
)
|
|
15.
|
OTHER COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
|
Credit-related financial instruments
The Company is a party to financial instruments
with off-balance-sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments
include commitments to extend credit which involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of
the amount recognized in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. At December 31, 2019 and 2018, the following financial instruments
were outstanding whose contract amounts represent credit risk:
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Commitments to grant loans
|
|
$
|
39,922
|
|
|
$
|
9,417
|
|
Unadvanced funds on home equity lines of credit
|
|
|
41,837
|
|
|
|
41,769
|
|
Unadvanced funds on commercial lines of credit
|
|
|
36,736
|
|
|
|
32,511
|
|
Unadvanced funds on construction loans
|
|
|
71,468
|
|
|
|
65,542
|
|
Standby letters of credit
|
|
|
1,427
|
|
|
|
1,427
|
|
Overdraft lines of credit
|
|
|
473
|
|
|
|
486
|
|
Commitments to grant loans are
agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments
generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. The commitments for home
equity and commercial lines of credit may expire without being drawn upon, therefore, the total commitment amounts do not
necessarily represent future cash requirements. Home equity and certain commercial lines of credit are generally
collateralized by real estate or business assets. Commitments to grant loans and unadvanced funds on construction loans are
also secured by real estate.
Wellesley Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Years Ended December 31, 2019 and 2018
Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements
Standby letters of credit are conditional
commitments issued by the Company to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. Those letters of credit are primarily
issued to support public and private borrowing arrangements. All letters of credit have expiration dates within one year. The credit
risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loan facilities to customers.
The Company collateralizes those commitments for which collateral is deemed necessary.
Employment agreements
The Company has entered into employment
agreements with certain executives for periods up to three years. The agreements generally provide for specified minimum levels
of annual compensation and benefits. In addition, the agreements provide for specified lump sum payments and the continuation of
benefits upon certain events of termination, as defined, including a change in control of the Company.
Contingencies
Various legal claims arise from time to time
in the normal course of business which, in the opinion of management, will have no material effect on the consolidated financial
position of the Company.
|
16.
|
MINIMUM REGULATORY CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS
|
The Bank is subject to various regulatory
capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain
mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect
on the Bank’s consolidated financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt
corrective action, the Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of their assets, liabilities
and certain off-balance-sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The capital amounts and classification
are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings, and other factors.
Federal banking regulations require a minimum
ratio of common equity Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets of 4.5%, a minimum ratio of Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets
of 6%, a minimum ratio of total capital to risk-weighted assets of 8% and a minimum leverage ratio of 4% for all banking organizations.
Additionally, community banking institutions must maintain a capital conservation buffer of common equity Tier 1 capital in an
amount greater than 2.5% of total risk-weighted assets above adequately capitalized levels to avoid being subject to limitations
on capital distributions and discretionary bonuses. Management believes that the Company’s capital levels will remain as
“well-capitalized”, and above the buffer-enhanced levels.
Wellesley Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Years Ended December 31, 2019 and 2018
Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements
As of December 31, 2019, the most
recent notification from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation categorized the Bank as “well capitalized” under
the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. To be categorized as well capitalized, the Bank must maintain minimum Total
risk-based, Common Equity Tier 1 risk-based, Tier 1 risk-based and Tier 1 leverage ratios as set forth in the following
table. There are no conditions or events since the recent notification that management believes have changed the Bank’s well
capitalized designation. The Bank’s capital amounts and ratios as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 are presented in the following
tables:
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Minimum
to be
Adequately Capitalized
under Prompt Corrective
Action Provisions
|
|
|
Minimum
to be Well
Capitalized Under
Prompt Corrective
Action Provisions
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Ratio
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Ratio
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Ratio
|
|
|
|
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
|
December
31, 2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital
to risk-weighted assets
|
|
$
|
87,146
|
|
|
|
11.6
|
%
|
|
$
|
60,027
|
|
|
|
8.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
75,034
|
|
|
|
10.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common equity Tier 1 capital
to risk-weighted assets
|
|
|
79,493
|
|
|
|
10.6
|
|
|
|
33,765
|
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
|
|
48,772
|
|
|
|
6.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted
assets
|
|
|
79,493
|
|
|
|
10.6
|
|
|
|
45,020
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
|
|
60,027
|
|
|
|
8.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier 1 capital to average
assets
|
|
|
79,493
|
|
|
|
8.4
|
|
|
|
38,014
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
47,517
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital to risk-weighted
assets
|
|
$
|
79,222
|
|
|
|
12.3
|
%
|
|
$
|
51,474
|
|
|
|
8.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
64,342
|
|
|
|
10.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common equity Tier 1 capital
to risk-weighted assets
|
|
|
72,484
|
|
|
|
11.3
|
|
|
|
28,954
|
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
|
|
41,822
|
|
|
|
6.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted
assets
|
|
|
72,484
|
|
|
|
11.3
|
|
|
|
38,605
|
|
|
|
6.0
|
|
|
|
51,474
|
|
|
|
8.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier 1 capital to average
assets
|
|
|
72,484
|
|
|
|
8.4
|
|
|
|
34,347
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
42,934
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
17.
|
EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
|
401(k) plan
The Company has a 401(k) plan which provides
for voluntary contributions by participating employees subject to IRS limitations. In 2019 and 2018, the Company matched the employee’s
voluntary contribution at a level of 100% of the employee’s contributions up to the first 7% of the employee’s compensation.
Total plan expense for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 amounted to $365 thousand and $338 thousand, respectively.
Wellesley Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Years Ended December 31, 2019 and 2018
Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements
Supplemental retirement agreement
The Company has entered into a
supplemental retirement agreement with a current officer, which provides for payments upon attaining the retirement age
specified in the agreement. The present value of these future payments is accrued over the remaining service term and at
December 31, 2019 and 2018, amounted to $2.0 million and $1.6 million, respectively. Supplemental retirement benefits
generally vest as they are accrued, however a termination of employment subsequent to a change in control of the Company will
result in the vesting of all benefits that would have accrued to the officer’s normal retirement date. Total
supplemental retirement expense for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 amounted to $465 thousand and $242 thousand,
respectively.
Endorsement split-dollar life insurance arrangements
The Company is the sole owner of life insurance
policies pertaining to certain of the Company’s executives. The Company has entered into agreements with these executives
whereby the Company has agreed to maintain a life insurance policy in effect during the executives’ retirement, which will
pay to the executives’ estates or beneficiaries a portion of the death benefit that the Company will receive as beneficiary
of such policies. Total split-dollar insurance expense totaled $2 thousand for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
Employee bonus program
The Company has established an employee
bonus program whereby approximately 10% to 20% of the Company’s consolidated income, before income taxes and incentive compensation
expense, is allocated for distribution to eligible employees. Total related bonus expense for the years ended December 31, 2019
and 2018 amounted to $1.5 million and $1.4 million, respectively.
Equity incentive plan
Under
the Company’s 2016 Equity Incentive Plan, the Company may grant restricted stock awards to its employees and directors for
up to 75,000 shares of its common stock. A restricted stock award (the “award”) is a grant of shares of Company
common stock for no consideration, subject to a vesting schedule or the satisfaction of market conditions or performance criteria.
Awarded shares are held in reserve for each grantee by the Company’s transfer agent, and will be issued from previously authorized
but unissued shares upon vesting. The fair value of the stock awards, based on the market price at the grant date, will be recognized
over the five-year vesting period. During 2019, the Board of Directors
granted stock awards of 14,500 to certain directors and executive officers. The fair value of the stock awards, based on the market
price of the stock on the grant dates, was recorded as unearned compensation, and is being amortized over the vesting period.
Under the Company’s 2012 Equity Incentive
Plan, the Company granted stock options to its employees and directors in the form of incentive stock options and non-qualified
stock options totaling 231,894 shares of its common stock. The exercise price of each stock option was not less than the fair market
value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant, and the maximum term of each option is 10 years from the date of
each award. The vesting period was five years from the date of grant, with vesting at 20% per year.
Under the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan, the Company also granted
stock awards to management, employees and directors. Awarded shares are held in reserve for each grantee by the Company’s
transfer agent, and will be issued from previously authorized but unissued shares upon vesting. The fair value of the stock awards,
based on the market price at the grant date, is recognized over the five-year vesting period.
The Company’s 2012 Equity Incentive Plan was terminated upon approval of the 2016 Equity Incentive Plan.
Wellesley Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Years Ended December 31, 2019 and 2018
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Stock Options
A summary of option activity under the 2012 Equity Incentive
Plan for the year ended December 31, 2019 is presented below:
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Non-vested
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
|
|
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Grant
Date Fair
Value
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In years)
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2019
|
|
|
193
|
|
|
$
|
16.11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
4.13
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
4.33
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(66
|
)
|
|
|
16.63
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
19.07
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
4.01
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2019
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
$
|
16.09
|
|
|
|
3.24
|
|
|
$
|
3,671
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
4.13
|
|
Exercisable at December 31, 2019
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
$
|
15.74
|
|
|
|
3.21
|
|
|
$
|
3,630
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the years ended December 31, 2019 and
2018, share-based compensation expense applicable to the stock options was $18 thousand and $36 thousand, respectively. There was
no recognized tax benefit related to this expense for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
Unrecognized compensation expense for non-vested
stock options totaled $4 thousand as of December 31, 2019, which will be recognized over the remaining vesting period of 0.75 years.
Stock Awards
For the years ended December 31, 2019 and
2018, respectively, 14,500 and 3,000 restricted stock awards were granted with weighted average grant date fair values of $28.88
and $34.00.
The following table presents the activity
in non-vested stock awards under the equity incentive plans for the year ended December 31, 2019:
|
|
Number of
Shares
|
|
|
Grant-date
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested stock awards at beginning of year
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
$
|
23.97
|
|
Restricted shares granted
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
28.88
|
|
Shares vested
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
22.43
|
|
Shares forfeited
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
24.39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested stock awards at end of year
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
$
|
23.97
|
|
For the year ended December 31, 2019 and
2018, compensation expense applicable to the stock awards was $326 thousand and $343 thousand, respectively, and the recognized
tax benefit related to this expense was $92 thousand and $97 thousand, respectively. Unrecognized compensation expense for non-vested
restricted stock totaled $544 thousand as of December 31, 2019, which will be recognized over the remaining weighted average vesting
period of 2.17 years.
Wellesley Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Years Ended December 31, 2019 and 2018
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Employee stock ownership plan
The Company maintains an Employee Stock
Ownership Plan (“ESOP”) to provide eligible employees the opportunity to own Company stock. The ESOP is a tax-qualified
retirement plan for the benefit of all Company employees. Contributions are allocated to eligible participants on the basis of
compensation, subject to federal tax limits.
The Company granted a loan to the ESOP
for the purchase of shares of the Company’s common stock on the closing date of the Company’s mutual-to- stock conversion
in 2012. As of December 31, 2019, the ESOP holds 176,275 shares or 6.8% of the common stock outstanding on that date. The loan
obtained by the ESOP from the Company to purchase common stock is payable annually over 15 years at the rate of 3.25% per annum.
The loan can be prepaid without penalty. Loan payments are expected to be funded by cash contributions from the Bank. The loan
is secured by the shares purchased, which are held in a suspense account for allocation among participants as the loan is repaid.
Cash dividends paid on allocated shares will be distributed to participants and cash dividends paid on unallocated shares will
be used to repay the outstanding debt of the ESOP. Shares used as collateral to secure the loan are released and available for
allocation to eligible employees as the principal and interest on the loan is paid.
At December 31, 2019, the remaining principal balance on the
ESOP debt is payable as follows:
Year Ending
December 31,
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
2020
|
|
$
|
131
|
|
2021
|
|
|
135
|
|
2022
|
|
|
140
|
|
2023
|
|
|
144
|
|
2024
|
|
|
149
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
312
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,011
|
|
Shares held by the ESOP include the following:
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
2018
|
|
Allocated
|
|
|
86,407
|
|
|
|
75,193
|
|
Unallocated
|
|
|
89,868
|
|
|
|
102,706
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
176,275
|
|
|
|
177,899
|
|
The fair value of unallocated shares was
$4.1 million and $2.8 million at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
Total
compensation expense recognized in connection with the ESOP for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 was $418 thousand and
$406 thousand, respectively.
Wellesley Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Years Ended December 31, 2019 and 2018
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
18.
|
RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
|
Information pertaining to loans to directors,
executive officers and their affiliates (exclusive of loans to any such persons which in the aggregate do not exceed $60 thousand)
is as follows:
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
7,873
|
|
|
$
|
3,460
|
|
Principal additions (1)
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
5,820
|
|
Principal reductions (2)
|
|
|
(1,103
|
)
|
|
|
(1,407
|
)
|
Balance at end of year
|
|
$
|
6,933
|
|
|
$
|
7,873
|
|
(1) In 2018, includes $5.7 million of loans
associated with a newly appointed director during the year, which represent the outstanding loan balances at the effective date
of appointment.
(2) Includes amounts associated with individuals
no longer considered to be an insider as of December 31, 2019 and 2018.
Such loans are made in the ordinary course
of business at the Company’s normal credit terms, except for certain loans, which were granted with an interest rate discount
of 0.50% under the Company’s Mortgage Discount Program. This program applies only to fixed- or adjustable-rate mortgage loans
that are held in the Company’s portfolio. The program is offered to all full- and part-time employees of the Company and
to all members of its Board of Directors.
Deposits from related parties held by the
Bank amounted to $4.6 million and $7.8 million at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
19.
|
RESTRICTIONS ON BANK DIVIDENDS, LOANS AND ADVANCES
|
Federal and state banking regulations place
certain restrictions on dividends paid and loans or advances made by the Bank to the Company. The total amount of dividends, which
may be paid in any calendar year, cannot exceed the Bank’s net income for the current year, plus the Bank’s net income
retained for the previous two years, without regulatory approval. Loans or advances are limited to 10% of the Bank’s capital
stock and surplus on a secured basis.
20.
|
FAIR VALUES OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
|
Determination of fair value
The Company uses fair value measurements
to record fair value adjustments to certain assets and liabilities and to determine fair value disclosures. Fair value is the price
that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at
the measurement date. Fair value is best determined based upon quoted market prices. However, in many instances, there are no quoted
market prices for the Company’s various assets and liabilities. In cases where quoted market prices are not available, fair
values are based on estimates using present value or other valuation techniques. Those techniques are significantly affected by
the assumptions used, including the discount rate and estimates of future cash flows. Accordingly, the fair value estimates may
not be realized in an immediate settlement of the assets and liabilities.
The following methods and assumptions were
used by the Company in estimating fair value disclosures:
Wellesley Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Years Ended December 31, 2019 and 2018
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Cash, cash equivalents and
certificates of deposit: The carrying amounts approximate fair values based on the short-term nature of the assets.
Securities available for
sale: Fair value measurements are obtained from a third-party pricing service and are not adjusted by management. All securities
are measured at fair value in Level 2 based on valuation models that consider standard input factors such as observable market
data, benchmark yields, interest rate volatilities, broker/dealer quotes, credit spreads and new issue data.
Federal Home Loan Bank stock:
The carrying value of FHLB stock is deemed to approximate fair value, based on the redemption provisions of the FHLB of Boston.
Loans held for sale:
Fair values are based on commitments in effect from investors or prevailing market prices.
Loans, net: For variable-rate
loans that reprice frequently and with no significant change in credit risk, fair values are based on carrying values. Fair values
for other loans are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, using market interest rates currently being offered for loans
with similar terms to borrowers of similar credit quality. Fair values for impaired loans are estimated using discounted cash flow
analyses or underlying collateral values, where applicable.
Deposits: The fair values
disclosed for non-certificate deposit accounts are, by definition, equal to the amount payable on demand at the reporting date
(i.e., their carrying amounts). Fair values for fixed-rate certificates of deposit are estimated using a discounted cash
flow calculation that applies market interest rates currently being offered on certificates to a schedule of aggregated expected
monthly maturities on time deposits.
Short-term borrowings:
The carrying amount of short-term borrowings approximates fair value, based on the short-term nature of the liabilities.
Long-term debt: The fair
values of long-term debt are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses based on the current incremental borrowing rates in
the market for similar types of borrowing arrangements.
Subordinated debt: The
fair values reported for subordinated debentures are based on the discounted value of contractual cash flows. The discount rates
used are representative of approximate rates currently offered on instruments with similar terms and maturities.
Accrued interest: The
carrying amounts of accrued interest approximate fair value
Forward loan sale commitments
and derivative loan commitments: The fair value of forward loan sale commitments and derivative loan commitments are based
on fair values of the underlying mortgage loans, including servicing values as applicable. The fair value of derivative loan commitments
also considers the probability of such commitments being exercised.
Interest rate swap agreements:
The fair values of interest rate swap agreements are based on a valuation model that uses primarily observable inputs, such as
benchmark yield curves and interest rates and also the value associated with the counterparty risk. Credit risk adjustments consider
factors such as the likelihood of default by the Company and its counterparties, its net exposure and remaining contractual life.
Off-balance sheet instruments:
Fair values for off-balance-sheet lending commitments are based on fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking
into account the remaining terms of the agreements and the counterparties’ credit standing. The fair values of these instruments
are considered immaterial.
Wellesley Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Years Ended December 31, 2019 and 2018
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Assets and liabilities measured at fair
value on a recurring basis
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value
on a recurring basis at December 31, 2019 and 2018 are summarized below:
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Total
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
December 31, 2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities available for sale
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
|
$
|
28,293
|
|
|
$
|
1,522
|
|
|
$
|
29,815
|
|
Interest rate swap agreements
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
3,472
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
3,472
|
|
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
|
$
|
31,765
|
|
|
$
|
1,522
|
|
|
$
|
33,287
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilites
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative loan commitments
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
Forward loan sale commitments
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Interest rate swap agreements
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
3,472
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
3,472
|
|
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
|
$
|
3,472
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
3,477
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities available for sale
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
|
$
|
65,261
|
|
|
$
|
1,509
|
|
|
$
|
66,770
|
|
Interest rate swap agreements
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
264
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
264
|
|
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
|
$
|
65,525
|
|
|
$
|
1,509
|
|
|
$
|
67,034
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilites
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swap agreements
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
|
$
|
264
|
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
|
$
|
264
|
|
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on
a non-recurring basis
The Company may also be required, from
time to time, to measure certain other assets at fair value on a non-recurring basis in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles. These adjustments to fair value usually result from application of lower-of-cost-or-market (“LOCOM”) accounting
or write-downs of individual assets.
|
|
December 31, 2019
|
|
|
December 31, 2018
|
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Loans held for sale
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
|
$
|
3,354
|
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
There are no liabilities at December 31,
2019 and 2018 measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis.
Wellesley Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary
Years Ended December 31, 2019 and 2018
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Summary of fair values of financial instruments
The estimated fair values, and related
carrying amounts of the Company’s financial instruments are outlined in the tables below. Certain financial instruments and
all nonfinancial instruments are excluded from disclosure requirements. Accordingly, the aggregate fair value amounts presented
herein do not represent the underlying fair value of the Company.
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
December 31, 2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
42,094
|
|
|
$
|
42,094
|
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
|
$
|
42,094
|
|
Certificates of deposit
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Securities available for sale
|
|
|
29,815
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
28,293
|
|
|
|
1,522
|
|
|
|
29,815
|
|
FHLB stock
|
|
|
4,906
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
4,906
|
|
|
|
4,906
|
|
Loans held for sale
|
|
|
3,354
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
3,354
|
|
|
|
3,354
|
|
Loans, net
|
|
|
834,460
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
839,084
|
|
|
|
839,084
|
|
Accrued interest receivable
|
|
|
2,525
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
2,525
|
|
|
|
2,525
|
|
Interest rate swap agreements
|
|
|
3,472
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
3,472
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
3,472
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
$
|
752,467
|
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
|
$
|
752,699
|
|
|
$
|
752,699
|
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
74,196
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
75,256
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
75,256
|
|
Subordinated debt
|
|
|
9,861
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
9,788
|
|
|
|
9,788
|
|
Accrued interest payable
|
|
|
692
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
692
|
|
|
|
692
|
|
Interest rate swap agreements
|
|
|
3,472
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
3,472
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
3,472
|
|
Derivative loan commitments
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Forward loan sale commitments
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
42,650
|
|
|
$
|
42,650
|
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
|
$
|
42,650
|
|
Certificates of deposit
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
Securities available for sale
|
|
|
66,770
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
65,261
|
|
|
|
1,509
|
|
|
|
66,770
|
|
FHLB stock
|
|
|
4,747
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
4,747
|
|
|
|
4,747
|
|
Loans, net
|
|
|
737,032
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
732,427
|
|
|
|
732,427
|
|
Accrued interest receivable
|
|
|
2,288
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
2,288
|
|
|
|
2,288
|
|
Interest rate swap agreements
|
|
|
264
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
264
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
264
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
$
|
717,931
|
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
|
$
|
716,685
|
|
|
$
|
716,685
|
|
Short-term borrowings
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
58,528
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
58,192
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
58,192
|
|
Subordinated debt
|
|
|
9,832
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
9,691
|
|
|
|
9,691
|
|
Accrued interest payable
|
|
|
487
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
487
|
|
|
|
487
|
|
Interest rate swap agreements
|
|
|
264
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
264
|
|
|
|
--
|
|
|
|
264
|
|
Wellesley Bancorp (NASDAQ:WEBK)
Historical Stock Chart
From Oct 2024 to Nov 2024
Wellesley Bancorp (NASDAQ:WEBK)
Historical Stock Chart
From Nov 2023 to Nov 2024