United
States
Securities And Exchange Commission
Washington, D.C. 20549
______________
FORM 8-K
______________
CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant
to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities
Exchange Act of 1934
Date of Report (Date of earliest event
reported): November 16, 2015
CAMPUS
CREST COMMUNITIES, INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified
in Its Charter)
Maryland |
001-34872 |
27-2481988 |
(State or other jurisdiction |
(Commission File Number) |
(IRS Employer |
of incorporation or organization) |
|
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
2100 Rexford Road, Suite 414 |
|
Charlotte, North Carolina |
28211 |
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) |
(Zip Code) |
Registrant’s telephone number,
including area code: (704) 496-2500
Not Applicable
(Former name or former address, if changed
since last report)
Check the appropriate box below if the
Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:
¨ Written
communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)
x Soliciting
material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)
¨ Pre-commencement
communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))
¨ Pre-commencement
communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))
Item 2.02 Results of Operations
and Financial Condition.
On November 16, 2015, Campus Crest Communities,
Inc. (the “Company”) made available a copy of the Company’s Third Quarter 2015 Supplemental Analyst Package on
its website at www.campuscrest.com. A copy of the Company’s Third Quarter 2015 Supplemental Analyst Package is furnished
as Exhibit 99.1 to this current report.
The information contained in Item 2.02
of this current report on Form 8-K, including Exhibit 99.1, is furnished pursuant to Item 2.02 of Form 8-K and shall not be deemed
“filed” for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subject to the liabilities
of that section. Furthermore, the information in Item 2.02 of this current report on Form 8-K, including Exhibit 99.1, shall not
be deemed to be incorporated by reference in the filings of the registrant under the Securities Act of 1933.
Additional Information and Where to
Find It
This filing may be deemed solicitation
material in respect of the proposed acquisition of the Company by HSRE Quad Merger Parent, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
(“Parent”), an affiliate of Harrison Street Real Estate Capital, LLC (“HSRE”). In connection with the proposed
merger, the Company has filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") a preliminary proxy statement on November
16, 2015. A full description of the terms of the merger and the merger agreement can be found in the definitive proxy statement
that Campus Crest intends to file with the SEC to be used at its annual meeting of shareholders to approve the proposed transaction
with HSRE. STOCKHOLDERS ARE ADVISED TO READ CAMPUS CREST'S PRELIMINARY PROXY STATEMENT, AND, WHEN AVAILABLE, CAMPUS CREST’S
DEFINITIVE PROXY STATEMENT IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOLICITATION OF PROXIES FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING BECAUSE THESE STATEMENTS WILL
CONTAIN IMPORTANT INFORMATION. The definitive proxy statement will be mailed to stockholders as of a record date to be established
for voting on the proposed merger. Stockholders will also be able to obtain a copy of the proxy statement, without charge, by directing
a request to: Campus Crest, Investor Relations, 2100 Rexford Road, Suite 400, Charlotte, NC 28211, or at its website, www.campuscrest.com.
The preliminary proxy statement and definitive proxy statement, once available, can also be obtained, without charge, at the SEC's
internet site (http://www.sec.gov).
Participants in Solicitation
The directors, executive officers and certain
other members of management and employees of the Company may be deemed "participants" in the solicitation of proxies
from stockholders of the Company in favor of the proposed merger. Information regarding the persons who may, under the rules of
the SEC, be considered participants in the solicitation of the stockholders of the Company in connection with the proposed merger
will be set forth in the definitive proxy statement and the other relevant documents to be filed with the SEC. You can find information
about the Company's executive officers and directors in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014
(the "Form 10-K") as filed with the SEC on April 1, 2015 and Amendment No. 1 to the Form 10-K as filed with the SEC on
August 25, 2015 and the Company’s preliminary proxy statement as filed with the SEC on November 16, 2015.
Forward-Looking Statements
This communication contains "forward-looking
statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The forward-looking statements, which
include statements regarding the proposed merger between the Company and HSRE, may be identified by the inclusion of words such
as "expects," "anticipates," "intends," "plans," "believes," "seeks,"
"estimates," "goal" and variations of such words and other similar expressions, and are based on current expectations,
estimates, assumptions and projections that are subject to change, and actual results may differ materially from the forward-looking
statements. These statements, as they relate to the Company or HSRE, the management of either such company or the proposed merger,
involve risks and uncertainties that may cause results to differ materially from those set forth in the statements. The Company
intends that such forward-looking statements be subject to the safe-harbor provided by the Private Securities Litigation Reform
Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause the
Company's actual results, performance or achievements or industry results to be materially different from any future results, performance
or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Many factors, including the following, could cause actual
results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements: the occurrence of any event, change or other circumstances that
could give rise to the termination of the merger agreement; the outcome of the legal proceedings that have been, or may be, instituted
against the Company and others following announcement of the Company entering into the merger agreement; the inability to complete
the proposed merger due to the failure to satisfy the conditions to the merger, including obtaining the approval of the Company's
stockholders, lender consents and other closing conditions more fully described in the merger agreement; risks that the proposed
merger disrupts current plans and operations of the Company; potential difficulties in employee retention as a result of the proposed
merger; the value of any non-transferable contingent value rights which may be issued in connection with the merger; legislative,
regulatory and economic developments; risks related to disruption of management's attention from the Company's ongoing business
operations due to the proposed merger; the effect of the announcement of the proposed merger on the Company's relationships with
colleges and universities, relationships with tenants, operating results and business generally, and other risks and uncertainties
described under "Item 1A. Risk Factors" in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014
and in the Company's Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarters ended March 31, 2015, June 30, 2015 and September 30,
2015 and in other documents filed with the SEC by the Company. Given these uncertainties, current and prospective investors should
be cautioned in their reliance on such forward-looking statements. Except as required by law, the Company disclaims any obligation
to update any such factors or to publicly announce the results of any revision to any of the forward-looking statements contained
herein to reflect future events or developments. A more comprehensive discussion of risks, uncertainties, financial reporting restatements,
and forward-looking statements may be seen in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K and other periodic filings with the SEC.
Item 8.01 Other Events.
The disclosure set forth in Item 2.02 above
is incorporated herein by reference in response to this Item 8.01.
Item 9.01 Financial Statements and
Exhibits.
(d) Exhibits.
Exhibit
No. |
Exhibit
Description |
99.1 |
Campus Crest Communities, Inc. Third Quarter 2015 Supplemental Analyst Package |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned
hereunto duly authorized.
|
CAMPUS CREST COMMUNITIES, INC. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: /s/ Scott R. Rochon |
|
Scott R. Rochon |
|
Chief Accounting Officer |
Dated: November 16, 2015
Exhibit Index
Exhibit
Number |
Description |
99.1 |
Campus Crest Communities, Inc. Third Quarter 2015 Supplemental Analyst Package |
Exhibit 99.1
Third Quarter 2015
Supplemental Analyst Package
|
Contact: |
|
Investor Relations |
|
704-496-2571 |
|
Investor.Relations@CampusCrest.com |
THIRD QUARTER 2015
SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYST PACKAGE
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Financial Highlights |
3 |
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets |
4 |
|
|
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations |
5 |
|
|
Reconciliation of Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Common Stockholders to FFO, FFOA and Net Operating Income |
6 - 7 |
|
|
Wholly Owned Grove Property Results of Operations |
8 |
|
|
Quarterly Wholly Owned Grove Property Results of Operations |
9 |
|
|
Same Store Wholly Owned Property Operating Expenses |
10 |
|
|
Copper Beech Property Results of Operations |
11 |
|
|
HSRE and Beaumont Joint Venture Property Results of Operations |
12 |
|
|
Capital Structure as of September 30, 2015 |
13 |
|
|
Outstanding Debt and Maturity Schedule |
14 |
|
|
Outstanding Debt and Maturity Schedule - Joint Venture |
15 |
|
|
Portfolio Overview and Occupancy |
16 - 18 |
|
|
Investor Information |
19 |
|
|
Forward-Looking Statements |
20 |
CAMPUS CREST COMMUNITIES |
|
|
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS (unaudited) |
(in $000s, except per share and per bed data) |
|
|
|
Three
Months Ended September 30, |
|
Nine
Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
2015 |
|
2014 |
|
$
Change |
|
%
Change |
|
2015 |
|
2014 |
|
$
Change |
|
%
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
revenues |
$44,609 |
|
$28,309 |
|
$16,300 |
|
57.6% |
|
$130,617 |
|
$78,010 |
|
$52,607 |
|
67.4% |
|
NOI |
$19,214 |
|
$15,515 |
|
$3,699 |
|
23.8% |
|
$67,634 |
|
$43,425 |
|
$24,209 |
|
55.8% |
|
Net income (loss) attributable
to common stockholders 1, 2 |
($14,692) |
|
($129,974) |
|
$115,282 |
|
(88.7%) |
|
($21,002) |
|
($135,414) |
|
$114,412 |
|
(84.5%) |
|
Net
income (loss) per share - basic3 |
($0.23) |
|
($2.01) |
|
$1.78 |
|
(88.6%) |
|
($0.32) |
|
($2.09) |
|
$1.77 |
|
(84.7%) |
|
FFO |
($1,841) |
|
($118,125) |
|
$116,284 |
|
(98.4%) |
|
$8,307 |
|
($95,383) |
|
$103,690 |
|
(108.7%) |
|
FFO
per share - basic3 |
($0.03) |
|
($1.82) |
|
$1.79 |
|
(98.4%) |
|
$0.13 |
|
($1.48) |
|
$1.61 |
|
(108.8%) |
|
FFOA |
($2,048) |
|
$10,447 |
|
($12,495) |
|
(119.6%) |
|
$10,560 |
|
$29,000 |
|
($18,440) |
|
(63.6%) |
|
FFOA
per share - basic3 |
($0.03) |
|
$0.16 |
|
($0.19) |
|
(118.8%) |
|
$0.16 |
|
$0.45 |
|
($0.29) |
|
(64.4%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt
to total market capitalization |
63.0% |
|
50.5% |
|
n/a |
|
12.5% |
|
63.0% |
|
50.5% |
|
n/a |
|
12.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
Statistics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wholly
Owned - Grove |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
RevPOB 4 |
$506 |
|
$530 |
|
($24) |
|
(4.4%) |
|
$535 |
|
$527 |
|
$8 |
|
1.6% |
|
Average
Physical Occupancy 5 |
86.8% |
|
88.1% |
|
n/a |
|
(1.3%) |
|
87.7% |
|
88.5% |
|
n/a |
|
(0.8%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wholly
Owned - Copper Beech |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
RevPOB 4 |
$525 |
|
$501 |
|
$24 |
|
4.9% |
|
$501 |
|
$492 |
|
$9 |
|
1.8% |
|
Average
Physical Occupancy 5 |
88.3% |
|
90.9% |
|
n/a |
|
(2.6%) |
|
91.2% |
|
89.5% |
|
n/a |
|
1.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1For the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, results include certain equity in earnings (losses) in unconsolidated entities, severance,
transaction costs and write offs of other corporate assets.
2For the three months
ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, includes results from the Company’s investment in Copper Beech. The Company made its
initial investment in Copper Beech on March 18, 2013 and subsequently made additional investments. On September 30, 2013, the
Company entered into an amendment to the purchase and sale agreement that enabled the Company to acquire a 67% ownership interest
in 28 operating properties, while deferring ownership in 7 properties until the Company exercises future purchase options. On
August 18, 2014, the Company elected to not exercise the first purchase option and reverted to a 48% ownership interest in 35
operating properties. On January 30, 2015, the Company completed the initial closing of the Copper Beech transaction. As of September
30, 2015, the Company held a 100% interest in 29 Copper Beech properties and partial interest in 5 Copper Beech properties.
3For the period ended
September 30, 2015, shares issuable upon settlement of the exchange feature of the Exchangeable Senior notes were anti-dilutive
and were not included in the computation of earnings per share.
4Total revenue per occupied
bed includes rental and service revenues.
5Average monthly occupancy.
CAMPUS CREST COMMUNITIES |
|
|
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (unaudited) |
(in $000s) |
|
|
|
|
September
30, |
|
December
31, |
|
|
2015
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
Investment in real
estate, net: |
|
|
|
|
Student
housing properties1 |
|
$1,581,512 |
|
$935,962 |
Accumulated
depreciation |
|
(163,748) |
|
(128,121) |
Land
and properties held for sale2 |
|
15,019 |
|
37,163 |
Land
held for investment3 |
|
7,413
|
|
7,413
|
Investment in real
estate, net |
|
1,440,196 |
|
852,417 |
Investment in unconsolidated
entities1 |
|
81,852 |
|
259,740 |
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
16,166 |
|
15,240 |
Restricted cash3 |
|
11,434 |
|
5,429 |
Student receivables,
net |
|
3,606 |
|
1,587 |
Cost and earnings
in excess of construction billings |
|
- |
|
3,887 |
Intangible assets,
net |
|
4,691 |
|
- |
Other assets |
|
25,635
|
|
35,742
|
Total assets |
|
$1,583,580
|
|
$1,174,042
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and
equity |
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
Mortgage
and construction loans |
|
$602,223 |
|
$300,673 |
Line
of credit and other debt |
|
369,714 |
|
317,746 |
Accounts
payable and accrued expenses |
|
35,567 |
|
53,816 |
Construction
billings in excess of cost and earnings |
|
- |
|
481 |
Other
liabilities |
|
32,370
|
|
22,092
|
Total
liabilities |
|
1,039,874
|
|
694,808
|
Equity: |
|
|
|
|
Preferred
stock |
|
$61 |
|
$61 |
Common
stock |
|
648 |
|
648 |
Additional
common and preferred paid-in capital |
|
781,540 |
|
773,998 |
Accumulated
deficit and distributions |
|
(313,418) |
|
(301,566) |
Accumulated
other comprehensive loss |
|
(3,695) |
|
(2,616) |
Total stockholders'
equity |
|
465,136 |
|
470,525 |
Noncontrolling interests |
|
78,570
|
|
8,709
|
Total equity |
|
543,706
|
|
479,234
|
Total liabilities
and equity |
|
$1,583,580
|
|
$1,174,042
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 As of September 30, 2015, the Company's 100% interest
in 29 Copper Beech properties (and Copper Beech at Ames), pursuant to the closing of the Copper Beech transaction, is included
in "Student housing properties." In prior periods, the Company's investment in these properties was included in "Investment
in unconsolidated entities."
2 As of September 30, 2015, includes four land parcels
and one property that the Company intends to divest.
3 As of September 30, 2015, includes six strategically
held land parcels that could be used for the development of phase two properties, with an aggregate bed count ranging from approximately
1,000 to 1,500.
4 Restricted cash includes escrow accounts held by
lenders for the purpose of paying taxes, insurance and funding capital improvements.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (unaudited) |
|
|
(in $000s, except per share data) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
2015 |
|
2014 |
|
$ Change |
|
2015 |
|
2014 |
|
$ Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Student housing rental |
|
$42,254 |
|
26,985 |
|
$15,269 |
|
124,766 |
|
74,256 |
|
$50,510 |
Student housing services |
|
2,196 |
|
1,043 |
|
1,153 |
|
5,251 |
|
3,043 |
|
2,208 |
Property management services |
|
159 |
|
281 |
|
(122) |
|
600 |
|
711 |
|
(111) |
Total revenues |
|
44,609 |
|
28,309 |
|
16,300 |
|
130,617 |
|
78,010 |
|
52,607 |
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Student housing operations |
|
25,236 |
|
12,513 |
|
12,723 |
|
62,383 |
|
33,874 |
|
28,509 |
General and administrative |
|
8,404 |
|
3,178 |
|
5,226 |
|
26,865 |
|
10,332 |
|
16,533 |
Severance1 |
|
- |
|
720 |
|
(720) |
|
570 |
|
720 |
|
(150) |
Write-off of predevelopment costs |
|
- |
|
29,790 |
|
(29,790) |
|
- |
|
29,790 |
|
(29,790) |
Write-off of other assets |
|
796 |
|
7,765 |
|
(6,969) |
|
2,162 |
|
7,765 |
|
(5,603) |
Transaction costs2 |
|
758 |
|
286 |
|
472 |
|
3,890 |
|
2,331 |
|
1,559 |
Ground leases |
|
121 |
|
120 |
|
1 |
|
361 |
|
357 |
|
4 |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
18,913 |
|
7,036 |
|
11,877 |
|
66,530 |
|
21,270 |
|
45,260 |
Total operating expenses |
|
54,228 |
|
61,408 |
|
(7,180) |
|
162,761 |
|
106,439 |
|
56,322 |
Equity in earnings (loss) of unconsolidated entities3,4 |
|
(973) |
|
635 |
|
(1,608) |
|
(2,332) |
|
63 |
|
(2,395) |
Impairment of unconsolidated entities |
|
- |
|
(50,866) |
|
50,866 |
|
- |
|
(50,866) |
|
50,866 |
Effect of not exercising Copper Beech purchase option |
|
- |
|
(34,047) |
|
34,047 |
|
- |
|
(34,047) |
|
34,047 |
Operating income (loss) |
|
(10,592) |
|
(117,377) |
|
106,785 |
|
(34,476) |
|
(113,279) |
|
78,803 |
Nonoperating income (expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net |
|
(9,239) |
|
(3,639) |
|
(5,601) |
|
(26,297) |
|
(9,965) |
|
(16,332) |
Gain on purchase of Copper Beech5 |
|
(1,242) |
|
- |
|
(1,242) |
|
26,793 |
|
- |
|
26,793 |
Gain on purchase of unconsolidated entity6 |
|
6,370 |
|
- |
|
6,370 |
|
6,370 |
|
- |
|
6,370 |
Gain on sale of assets7 |
|
1,400 |
|
- |
|
1,400 |
|
9,148 |
|
- |
|
9,148 |
Other income (expense) |
|
(626) |
|
(41) |
|
(585) |
|
(677) |
|
129 |
|
(806) |
Total nonoperating expense, net |
|
(3,337) |
|
(3,680) |
|
342 |
|
15,337 |
|
(9,836) |
|
25,173 |
Net income (loss) before income tax benefit (expense) |
|
(13,929) |
|
(121,057) |
|
107,128 |
|
(19,139) |
|
(123,115) |
|
103,976 |
Income tax benefit (expense) |
|
(164) |
|
(1,131) |
|
967 |
|
(164) |
|
(731) |
|
567 |
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
|
(14,093) |
|
(122,188) |
|
108,095 |
|
(19,303) |
|
(123,846) |
|
104,543 |
Income (loss) from discontinued operations8 |
|
- |
|
(5,506) |
|
5,506 |
|
(1,157) |
|
(3,191) |
|
2,034 |
Net income (loss) |
|
(14,093) |
|
(127,694) |
|
113,601 |
|
(20,460) |
|
(127,037) |
|
106,577 |
Less: Dividends on preferred stock |
|
3,050 |
|
3,050 |
|
- |
|
9,150 |
|
9,150 |
|
- |
Less: Net income or (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests |
|
(2,451) |
|
(770) |
|
(1,681) |
|
(8,608) |
|
(773) |
|
(7,835) |
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders |
|
($14,692) |
|
($129,974) |
|
$115,282 |
|
($21,002) |
|
($135,414) |
|
$114,412 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per share data - basic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to common stockholders |
|
($0.23) |
|
($1.92) |
|
|
|
($0.30) |
|
($2.04) |
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations attributable to common stockholders |
|
- |
|
($0.09) |
|
|
|
($0.02) |
|
($0.05) |
|
|
Net income (loss) per share attributable to common stockholders |
|
($0.23) |
|
($2.01) |
|
|
|
($0.32) |
|
($2.09) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted |
|
64,762 |
|
64,770 |
|
|
|
64,746 |
|
64,650 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1For the nine months
ended September 30, 2015, severance includes termination benefits for former executives in connection with the Company's strategic
repositioning.
2Transaction costs were
$0.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015, primarily attributable to costs associated with our strategic alternative
process of $0.4 million and various other costs aggregating to $0.4 million. Transaction costs were $3.9 million for the nine
months ended September 30, 2015, primarily attributable to consents, professional fees and other related costs totaling $2.9 million
related to the Copper Beech acquisition, $0.4 million associated with our strategic alternative process, and $0.6 million related
to various other costs.
3For the nine months
ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, includes results from the Company’s investment in Copper Beech. The Company made its
initial investment in Copper Beech on March 18, 2013 and subsequently made additional investments. On September 30, 2013, the
Company entered into an amendment to the purchase and sale agreement that enabled the Company to acquire a 67% ownership interest
in 28 operating properties, while deferring ownership in 7 properties until the Company exercises future purchase options. On
August 18, 2014, the Company elected to not exercise the first purchase option and reverted to a 48% interest ownership interest
in 35 operating properties. On January 30, 2015, the Company completed the initial closing of the Copper Beech transaction. As
of September 30, 2015, the Company held a 100% interest in 29 Copper Beech properties and partial interest in 5 Copper Beech properties.
4For the three months
and nine months ended September 30, 2015, $1.3 million and $2.3 million equity in losses of unconsolidated entities were contributed
from the Montreal operations, respectively.
5For the three months
ended September 30, 2015, the gain on Copper Beech was reduced by $1.2 million which related to a settlement with CB Investors
of all outstanding items. This brings the total gain through the nine months ended September 30, 2015 to $26.8 million.
6During the three months
ended September 30, 2015, the Company acquired its remaining interest in The Grove at Fayetteville, Arkansas. In connection with
that purchase, a $6.4 million gain was recognized.
7In connection with the
previously announced strategic repositioning the Company recognized a $3.1 million gain from the sale of a portfolio of six undeveloped
land parcels in 1Q 2015. The Company also recognized a $4.6 million gain from the sale of The Grove at Lawrence, Kansas and The
Grove at Conway, Arkansas in 1Q 2015. In 3Q 2015, the Company recognized a $1.4 million gain from the sale of The Grove at Laramie,
Wyoming, The Grove at Norman, Oklahoma and the Grove at San Angelo, Texas.
8No construction and
development revenues were recorded during the three months ended September 30, 2015. For the nine months ended September 30, 2015,
the Company recorded expenses of $1.2 million due to the wind down of its construction and development operations. For the three
months ended September 30, 2014, the Company recorded $5.6 million of revenues and $11.1 million of expenses for a loss of $5.5
million. For the nine months ended September 30, 2014, the Company recorded revenue from its construction and development operations
of $23.2 million and expenses of $26.4 million resulting in loss of $3.2 million.
CAMPUS
CREST COMMUNITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RECONCILIATION
OF NET INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS TO FUNDS FROM OPERATIONS ("FFO") & FUNDS FROM OPERATIONS
ADJUSTED ("FFOA") (unaudited) |
(in
$000s, except per share data) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three
Months Ended September 30, |
|
Nine
Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
2015 |
|
2014 |
|
$
Change |
|
2015 |
|
2014 |
|
$
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss attributable to common stockholders |
($14,692) |
|
($129,974) |
|
$115,282
|
|
($21,002) |
|
($135,414) |
|
$114,412
|
Real
estate related depreciation and amortization |
18,359
|
|
6,590
|
|
11,769
|
|
64,555
|
|
20,175
|
|
44,380
|
Real
estate related depreciation and amortization - unconsolidated entities |
1,020
|
|
5,259
|
|
(4,239) |
|
7,065
|
|
19,856
|
|
(12,791) |
Gain
on sale of assets1 |
(1,400) |
|
- |
|
(1,400) |
|
(9,148) |
|
- |
|
(9,148) |
Gain
on purchase of unconsolidated entity2 |
(6,370) |
|
- |
|
(6,370) |
|
(6,370) |
|
- |
|
(6,370) |
Loss
(gain) on purchase of Copper Beech3 |
1,242
|
|
- |
|
1,242
|
|
(26,793) |
|
- |
|
(26,793) |
FFO
available to common shares |
(1,841) |
|
(118,125) |
|
116,284
|
|
8,307
|
|
(95,383) |
|
103,690
|
Elimination
of the following: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transaction
costs4 |
758
|
|
286
|
|
472
|
|
3,890
|
|
2,331
|
|
1,559
|
Impairment
of land and predevelopment costs |
- |
|
29,790
|
|
(29,790) |
|
- |
|
29,790
|
|
(29,790) |
Impairment
of unconsolidated entities |
- |
|
50,866
|
|
(50,866) |
|
- |
|
50,866
|
|
(50,866) |
Write-off
of other assets |
796
|
|
7,765
|
|
(6,969) |
|
2,162
|
|
7,765
|
|
(5,603) |
Severance |
- |
|
720
|
|
(720) |
|
570
|
|
720
|
|
(150) |
Income
tax expense |
164
|
|
1,131
|
|
(967) |
|
164
|
|
731
|
|
(567) |
Discontinued
operations5 |
- |
|
5,506
|
|
(5,506) |
|
1,157
|
|
3,191
|
|
(2,034) |
Effect
of not exercising Copper Beech purchase option |
- |
|
34,047
|
|
(34,047) |
|
- |
|
34,047
|
|
(34,047) |
FV
adjustment of CB debt6 |
(1,925) |
|
(1,539) |
|
(386) |
|
(5,690) |
|
(5,058) |
|
(632) |
Funds
from operations adjusted (FFOA) available to common shares |
($2,048) |
|
$10,447
|
|
($12,495) |
|
$10,560
|
|
$29,000
|
|
($18,440) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FFO
per share - basic |
($0.03) |
|
($1.82) |
|
$1.79
|
|
$0.13
|
|
($1.48) |
|
$1.61
|
FFOA
per share - basic |
($0.03) |
|
$0.16
|
|
($0.19) |
|
$0.16
|
|
$0.45
|
|
($0.29) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
average common shares - basic |
64,762
|
|
64,770
|
|
|
|
64,746
|
|
64,650
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1In connection with the
previously announced strategic repositioning the Company recognized a $3.1 million gain from the sale of a portfolio of six undeveloped
land parcels in 1Q 2015. The Company also recognized a $4.6 million gain from the sale of The Grove at Lawrence, Kansas and The
Grove at Conway, Arkansas in 1Q 2015. In 3Q 2015, the Company recognized a $1.4 million gain from the sale of The Grove at Laramie,
Wyoming, The Grove at Norman, Oklahoma and the Grove at San Angelo, Texas.
2During the three months
ended September 30, 2015, the Company acquired its remaining interest in The Grove at Fayetteville, Arkansas. In connection with
that purchase, a $6.4 million gain was recognized.
3During the quarter ended
September 30, 2015, the Company reached agreement with the CB Investors on all outstanding matters which resulted in a reduction
of the gain on the purchase of Copper Beech of $1.2 million.
4Transaction costs were
$0.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015, primarily attributable to costs associated with our strategic alternative
process of $0.4 million and various other costs aggregating to $0.4 million.Transaction costs were $3.9 million for the nine months
ended September 30, 2015, primarily attributable to consents, professional fees and other related costs totaling $2.9 million
related to the Copper Beech acquisition, $0.4 million associated with our strategic alternative process, and $0.6 million related
to various other costs.
5No construction and
development revenues were recorded during the three months ended September 30, 2015. For the nine months ended September 30, 2015,
the Company recorded expenses of $1.2 million due to the wind down of its construction and development operations. For the three
months ended September 30, 2014, the Company recorded $5.6 million of revenues and $11.1 million of expenses for a loss of $5.5
million. For the nine months ended September 30, 2014, the Company recorded revenue from its construction and development operations
of $23.2 million and expenses of $26.4 million resulting in loss of $3.2 million.
6Includes the Company's
proportionate share of non-cash fair value debt and other purchase accounting adjustments in its investment in Copper Beech accounted
for under the equity method, as well as the fair value of debt adjustments for those Copper Beech properties consolidated during
the nine months ended September 30, 2015.
CAMPUS
CREST COMMUNITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RECONCILIATION
OF NET INCOME (LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO COMMON STOCKHOLDERS TO NET OPERATING INCOME ("NOI") (unaudited) |
(in
$000s, except per share data) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three
Months Ended September 30, |
|
Nine
Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
20151 |
|
20141 |
|
20151 |
|
20141 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income (loss) attributable to common stockholders |
($14,692) |
|
($129,974) |
|
($21,002) |
|
($135,414) |
|
Net
loss attributable to noncontrolling interests |
(2,451) |
|
(770) |
|
(8,608) |
|
(773) |
|
Preferred
stock dividends |
3,050
|
|
3,050
|
|
9,150
|
|
9,150
|
|
Income
tax expense |
164
|
|
1,131
|
|
164
|
|
731
|
|
Other
(income) expense |
626
|
|
41
|
|
677
|
|
(129) |
|
Gain
on sale of assets |
(1,400) |
|
-
|
|
(9,148) |
|
-
|
|
Gain
of purchase of unconsolidated entity |
(6,370) |
|
-
|
|
(6,370) |
|
-
|
|
Severance |
-
|
|
720
|
|
570
|
|
720
|
|
(Gain)
loss on purchase of Copper Beech |
1,242
|
|
-
|
|
(26,793) |
|
-
|
|
(Income)
loss on discontinued operations |
-
|
|
5,506
|
|
1,157
|
|
3,191
|
|
Interest
expense |
9,239
|
|
3,639
|
|
26,297
|
|
9,965
|
|
Equity
in losses of unconsolidated entities |
973
|
|
(635) |
|
2,332
|
|
(63) |
|
Depreciation
and amortization |
18,913
|
|
7,036
|
|
66,530
|
|
21,270
|
|
Impairment
of investment in unconsolidated joint venture |
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
-
|
|
Ground
lease expense |
121
|
|
120
|
|
361
|
|
357
|
|
General
and administrative expense |
8,404
|
|
3,178
|
|
26,865
|
|
10,332
|
|
Impairment
of unconsolidated entities |
-
|
|
50,866
|
|
-
|
|
50,866
|
|
Effect
of not exercising Copper Beech purchase option |
-
|
|
34,047
|
|
-
|
|
34,047
|
|
Impairment
of land, predevelopment costs and asset held for sale |
-
|
|
29,790
|
|
-
|
|
29,790
|
|
Write-off
of corporate other assets |
796
|
|
7,765
|
|
2,162
|
|
7,765
|
|
Transaction
costs |
758
|
|
286
|
|
3,890
|
|
2,331
|
|
Property
management services |
(159) |
|
(281) |
|
(600) |
|
(711) |
|
Total
NOI |
$19,214 |
|
$15,515 |
|
$67,634 |
|
$43,425 |
|
Grove
same store properties NOI2 |
$8,688 |
|
$12,232 |
|
$35,786 |
|
$37,709 |
|
Wholly
owned Copper Beech properties NOI |
$7,941 |
|
$
- |
|
$22,427 |
|
$
- |
|
New
properties NOI3,4 |
$1,903 |
|
$2,407 |
|
$7,249 |
|
$3,349
|
|
Grove
Pullman and Toledo NOI5 |
$682 |
|
$876 |
|
$2,172 |
|
$2,367
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 "Same store"
properties are the Company's wholly-owned operating properties acquired or placed in-service prior to the beginning of the earliest
period presented and owned by the Company and remaining in service through the end of the latest period presented or period being
analyzed. "New properties" are the Company's wholly-owned operating properties acquired or placed in service after the
beginning of the earliest period presented or period being analyzed.
2 Includes NOI contribution
from Copper Beech at Ames. This is a consolidated wholly-owned property.
3 For the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, includes financial results for The Grove at Denton. The Company acquired its joint venture
partner's interest in The Grove at Denton on January 21, 2014. The occupancy data and net operating income related to Denton are
included in new properties in the subsequent pages. Net operating income earned after acquisition is reported above, while amounts
earned prior to acquisition were reported under the equity method of accounting.
4 For the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2015, includes financial results for The Grove at Fayetteville. The Company acquired its joint venture
partner's interest in The Grove at Fayetteville on August 7, 2015. The occupancy data and net operating income related to Fayetteville
are included in new properties in the subsequent pages. Net operating income earned after acquisition is reported above, while
amounts earned prior to acquisition were reported under the equity method of accounting.
5 Includes NOI contribution
from the operations of The Grove at Pullman and the Toledo, OH redevelopment, as well as business interruption insurance proceeds
from The Grove at Pullman.
CAMPUS
CREST COMMUNITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WHOLLY
OWNED GROVE PROPERTY RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (unaudited) |
(in
$000s, except bed data) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three
Months Ended September 30, |
|
Nine
Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
|
2015 |
|
2014 |
|
Change |
|
%
Change |
|
2015 |
|
2014 |
|
Change |
|
%
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Same
store properties (Number of properties)1, 2 |
|
30
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
per occupied bed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental
revenue per occupied bed per month3 |
|
$489
|
|
$505
|
|
($16) |
|
(3.2%) |
|
$513
|
|
$503
|
|
$10
|
|
2.1%
|
Services
revenue per occupied bed per month |
|
19
|
|
21
|
|
(2) |
|
(11.9%) |
|
19
|
|
21
|
|
(2) |
|
(9.9%) |
Total
revenue per occupied bed |
|
$508
|
|
$526
|
|
($18) |
|
(3.4%) |
|
$532
|
|
$524
|
|
$8
|
|
1.6%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
number of owned beds |
|
16,308
|
|
16,308
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,308
|
|
16,308
|
|
|
|
|
Average
physical occupancy |
|
87.3% |
|
90.1% |
|
|
|
(2.8%) |
|
89.1% |
|
89.9% |
|
|
|
(0.9%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
revenue |
|
$21,763
|
|
$23,172
|
|
($1,409) |
|
(6.1%) |
|
$69,709
|
|
$69,162
|
|
$547
|
|
0.8%
|
Property
operating expenses |
|
13,075
|
|
10,940
|
|
2,135
|
|
19.5%
|
|
33,923
|
|
31,453
|
|
2,470
|
|
7.9%
|
Net
operating income |
|
$8,688
|
|
$12,232
|
|
($3,544) |
|
(29.0%) |
|
$35,786
|
|
$37,709
|
|
($1,923) |
|
(5.1%) |
Operating
margin4 |
|
39.9% |
|
52.8% |
|
|
|
(12.9%) |
|
51.3% |
|
54.5% |
|
|
|
(3.2%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New
properties (Number of properties)5, 6 |
|
7
|
|
7
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
7
|
|
0
|
|
|
Revenue
per occupied bed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental
revenue per occupied bed per month3 |
|
$481
|
|
$535
|
|
($54) |
|
(10.1%) |
|
$533
|
|
$533
|
|
$0
|
|
0.0%
|
Services
revenue per occupied bed per month |
|
18
|
|
18
|
|
(0) |
|
(0.2%) |
|
16
|
|
18
|
|
(2) |
|
(11.1%) |
Total
revenue per occupied bed |
|
$499
|
|
$553
|
|
($54) |
|
(9.8%) |
|
$549
|
|
$551
|
|
($2) |
|
(0.4%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
number of owned beds |
|
4,321
|
|
3,286
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,321
|
|
1,906
|
|
|
|
|
Average
physical occupancy |
|
85.1% |
|
78.2% |
|
|
|
6.9%
|
|
82.5% |
|
75.9% |
|
|
|
6.5%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
revenue |
|
$5,505
|
|
$4,264
|
|
$1,241
|
|
29.1%
|
|
$17,612
|
|
$7,127
|
|
$10,485
|
|
147.1%
|
Property
operating expenses |
|
3,474
|
|
1,679
|
|
1,795
|
|
106.9%
|
|
9,651
|
|
3,275
|
|
6,376
|
|
194.7%
|
Net
operating income |
|
$2,032
|
|
$2,584
|
|
($552) |
|
(21.3%) |
|
$7,961
|
|
$3,852
|
|
$4,109
|
|
106.7%
|
Operating
margin4 |
|
36.9% |
|
60.6% |
|
|
|
(23.7%) |
|
45.2% |
|
54.0% |
|
|
|
(8.8%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ALL
PROPERTIES (Number of properties) |
|
37
|
|
37
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
37
|
|
0
|
|
|
Revenue
per occupied bed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental
revenue per occupied bed per month3 |
|
$487
|
|
$509
|
|
($22) |
|
(4.4%) |
|
$517
|
|
$506
|
|
$11
|
|
2.2%
|
Services
revenue per occupied bed per month |
|
19
|
|
20
|
|
(1) |
|
(6.5%) |
|
18
|
|
21
|
|
(3) |
|
(14.3%) |
Total
revenue per occupied bed |
|
$506
|
|
$530
|
|
($24) |
|
(4.5%) |
|
$535
|
|
$527
|
|
$8
|
|
1.5%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
number of owned beds |
|
20,629
|
|
19,594
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,629
|
|
18,214
|
|
|
|
|
Average
physical occupancy |
|
86.8% |
|
88.1% |
|
|
|
(1.3%) |
|
87.7% |
|
88.5% |
|
|
|
(0.8%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
revenue |
|
$27,269
|
|
$27,436
|
|
($167) |
|
(0.6%) |
|
$87,320
|
|
$76,289
|
|
$11,031
|
|
14.5%
|
Property
operating expenses |
|
16,549
|
|
12,619
|
|
3,930
|
|
31.1%
|
|
43,574
|
|
34,727
|
|
8,847
|
|
25.5%
|
Net
operating income |
|
$10,720
|
|
$14,817
|
|
($4,097) |
|
(27.7%) |
|
$43,746
|
|
$41,562
|
|
$2,184
|
|
5.3%
|
Operating
margin4 |
|
39.3% |
|
54.0% |
|
|
|
(14.7%) |
|
50.1% |
|
54.5% |
|
|
|
(4.4%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
Grove at Pullman & Toledo NOI7 |
|
$682
|
|
$876
|
|
($194) |
|
(22.1%) |
|
$2,172
|
|
$2,367
|
|
($195) |
|
(8.2%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1Excludes financial results
from The Grove at Pullman. On July 14, 2013, the Company experienced a fire at this property during development. As of September
30, 2015, all 584 beds were in operation. For comparability of results, Pullman will continue to be excluded until year over year
results are not impacted by the business interruption.
2Excludes financial results
from the Toledo, OH redevelopment property the Company acquired on March 15, 2013.
3Beginning with the ‘14/’15
academic year, the Company recognizes revenue for new leases over the term of the lease (typically 11.5 months) rather than in
conjunction with the lease payments (typically 12 equal monthly payments). While this policy change will have no cash impact,
and will have minimal year-over-year impact on a go-forward basis, the adjustment has the effect of lower reported revenue in
three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, as compared to prior year.
4Operating margin is
calculated by dividing NOI for the period by total student housing rental and services revenues for the period.
5For the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, includes financial results for The Grove at Denton and The Grove at Fayetteville. The
Company acquired its joint venture partner's interest in The Grove at Denton on January 21, 2014 and the interest in The Grove
at Fayetteville on August 7, 2015. The occupancy data and net operating income related to Denton and Fayetteville are included
in new properties. Note that the portion of earnings prior to the properties becoming wholly owned were captured in the Equity
in Earnings line in the comprehensive statements of income (loss). For comparability, full period results have been shown herein
and therefore will not agree to Page 7.
6For the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2015, includes financial results for the 2014 wholly-owned and consolidated deliveries (The Grove at
Gainesville, The Grove at Grand Forks, The Grove at Slippery Rock, The Grove at Mt. Pleasant and Copper Beech at Ames).
7Includes NOI contribution
from the operations of The Grove at Pullman and the Toledo, OH redevelopment property.
CAMPUS
CREST COMMUNITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
QUARTERLY
WHOLLY OWNED GROVE PROPERTY RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (unaudited) |
(in
$000s, except bed data) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three
Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
September
30, 2014 |
|
December
31, 2014 |
|
March
31, 2015 |
|
June
30, 2015 |
|
September
30, 2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Same
store properties (Number of properties)1, 2 |
|
30
|
|
30
|
|
30
|
|
30
|
|
30
|
|
Revenue
per occupied bed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental
revenue per occupied bed per month3 |
|
$505
|
|
$512
|
|
$525
|
|
$529
|
|
$489
|
|
Services
revenue per occupied bed per month |
|
21
|
|
15
|
|
17
|
|
20
|
|
19
|
|
Total
revenue per occupied bed |
|
$526
|
|
$527
|
|
$542
|
|
$549
|
|
$508
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
number of owned beds |
|
16,308
|
|
16,308
|
|
16,308
|
|
16,308
|
|
16,308
|
|
Average
physical occupancy |
|
90.1% |
|
91.6% |
|
90.7% |
|
89.2% |
|
87.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
revenue |
|
$23,172
|
|
$24,120
|
|
$24,075
|
|
$23,871
|
|
$21,763
|
|
Property
operating expenses |
|
10,940
|
|
10,388
|
|
10,473
|
|
10,375
|
|
13,075
|
|
Net
operating income |
|
$12,232
|
|
$13,732
|
|
$13,602
|
|
$13,496
|
|
$8,688
|
|
Operating
margin4 |
|
52.8% |
|
56.9% |
|
56.5% |
|
56.5% |
|
39.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New
properties (Number of properties)5, 6, 7 |
|
7
|
|
7
|
|
7
|
|
7
|
|
7
|
|
Revenue
per occupied bed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental
revenue per occupied bed per month3 |
|
$535
|
|
$531
|
|
$558
|
|
$563
|
|
$481
|
|
Services
revenue per occupied bed per month |
|
18
|
|
11
|
|
14
|
|
16
|
|
18
|
|
Total
revenue per occupied bed |
|
$553
|
|
$541
|
|
$572
|
|
$579
|
|
$499
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
number of owned beds |
|
3,286
|
|
4,321
|
|
4,321
|
|
4,321
|
|
4,321
|
|
Average
physical occupancy |
|
78.2% |
|
80.5% |
|
80.9% |
|
81.4% |
|
85.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
revenue |
|
$4,264
|
|
$5,649
|
|
$6,001
|
|
$6,106
|
|
$5,505
|
|
Property
operating expenses |
|
1,679
|
|
2,426
|
|
3,058
|
|
3,120
|
|
3,474
|
|
Net
operating income |
|
$2,584
|
|
$3,223
|
|
$2,943
|
|
$2,987
|
|
$2,032
|
|
Operating
margin4 |
|
60.6% |
|
57.1% |
|
49.0% |
|
48.9% |
|
36.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ALL
PROPERTIES (Number of properties) |
|
37
|
|
37
|
|
37
|
|
37
|
|
37
|
|
Revenue
per occupied bed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental
revenue per occupied bed per month3 |
|
$509
|
|
$516
|
|
$532
|
|
$535
|
|
$487
|
|
Services
revenue per occupied bed per month |
|
20
|
|
14
|
|
16
|
|
19
|
|
19
|
|
Total
revenue per occupied bed |
|
$530
|
|
$529
|
|
$548
|
|
$555
|
|
$506
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
number of owned beds |
|
19,594
|
|
20,629
|
|
20,629
|
|
20,629
|
|
20,629
|
|
Average
physical occupancy |
|
88.1% |
|
89.2% |
|
88.7% |
|
87.6% |
|
86.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
revenue |
|
$27,436
|
|
$29,770
|
|
$30,076
|
|
$29,977
|
|
$27,269
|
|
Property
operating expenses |
|
12,619
|
|
12,814
|
|
13,531
|
|
13,494
|
|
16,549
|
|
Net
operating income |
|
$14,817
|
|
$16,955
|
|
$16,545
|
|
$16,483
|
|
$10,720
|
|
Operating
margin4 |
|
54.0% |
|
57.0% |
|
55.0% |
|
55.0% |
|
39.3% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
Grove at Pullman & Toledo NOI8 |
|
$876
|
|
$910
|
|
$721
|
|
$769
|
|
$682
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1Excludes financial results
from The Grove at Pullman. On July 14, 2013, the Company experienced a fire at this property during development. As of September
2015, all 584 beds were in operation. For comparability of results, Pullman will continue to be excluded until year over year
results are not impacted by the business interruption.
2Excludes financial results
from the Toledo, OH redevelopment property the Company acquired on March 15, 2013.
3Beginning with the ‘14/’15
academic year, the Company recognizes revenue for new leases over the term of the lease (typically 11.5 months) rather than in
conjunction with the lease payments (typically 12 equal monthly payments). While this policy change will have no cash impact,
and will have minimal year-over-year impact on a go-forward basis, the adjustment has the effect of lower reported revenue in
the three ended September 30, 2015, as compared to prior year.
4Operating margin is
calculated by dividing NOI for the period by total student housing rental and services revenues for the period.
5For all periods, includes
financial results for the 2014 wholly-owned deliveries (The Grove at Gainesville, The Grove at Grand Forks, The Grove at Slippery
Rock, The Grove at Mt. Pleasant and Copper Beech at Ames).
6For all periods, includes
financial results for The Grove at Denton. The Company acquired its joint venture partner's interest in the Grove at Denton on
January 21, 2014.
7For all periods, includes
financial results for The Grove at Fayetteville. The Company acquired its joint venture partner's interest in the Grove at Fayetteville
on August 7, 2015.
8Includes NOI contribution
from the operations of The Grove at Pullman and the Toledo, OH redevelopment property.
CAMPUS
CREST COMMUNITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SAME
STORE WHOLLY OWNED GROVE PROPERTY OPERATING EXPENSES (unaudited) |
(in
$000s, except bed data) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three
Months Ended September 30, 2015 |
|
Three
Months Ended September 30, 2014 |
|
Y-o-Y
Total Change |
|
|
Total |
|
%
of Total |
|
Per
Bed/Month |
|
|
Total |
|
%
of Total |
|
Per
Bed/Month |
|
$ |
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payroll |
|
$2,824
|
|
21.6%
|
|
$58
|
|
|
$2,401
|
|
21.9%
|
|
$49
|
|
$423
|
|
17.6%
|
Marketing |
|
501
|
|
3.8%
|
|
10
|
|
|
375
|
|
3.4%
|
|
8
|
|
127
|
|
33.8%
|
Office,
Administration & Other |
|
811
|
|
6.2%
|
|
17
|
|
|
643
|
|
5.9%
|
|
13
|
|
168
|
|
26.1%
|
Bad
Debt |
|
464
|
|
3.5%
|
|
9
|
|
|
1,378
|
|
12.6%
|
|
28
|
|
(914) |
|
(66.3%) |
Utilities |
|
3,610
|
|
27.6%
|
|
74
|
|
|
3,120
|
|
28.5%
|
|
64
|
|
490
|
|
15.7%
|
Repairs
and Maintenance1 |
|
2,463
|
|
18.8%
|
|
50
|
|
|
795
|
|
7.3%
|
|
16
|
|
1,668
|
|
209.7%
|
Taxes
and Insurance |
|
2,401
|
|
18.4%
|
|
49
|
|
|
2,228
|
|
20.4%
|
|
46
|
|
174
|
|
7.8%
|
Total |
|
$13,075
|
|
100.0%
|
|
$267
|
|
|
$10,940
|
|
100.0%
|
|
$224
|
|
$2,135
|
|
19.5%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Same
Store |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wholly
Owned Beds |
|
16,308
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,308
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wholly
Owned Properties |
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine
Months Ended September 30, 2015 |
|
Nine
Months Ended September 30, 2014 |
|
Y-o-Y
Total Change |
|
|
Total |
|
%
of Total |
|
Per
Bed/Month |
|
|
Total |
|
%
of Total |
|
Per
Bed/Month |
|
$ |
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payroll |
|
$7,762
|
|
22.9%
|
|
$53
|
|
|
$7,005
|
|
22.2%
|
|
$48
|
|
$757
|
|
10.8%
|
Marketing |
|
1,101
|
|
3.2%
|
|
7
|
|
|
949
|
|
3.0%
|
|
6
|
|
152
|
|
16.0%
|
Office,
Administration & Other |
|
2,102
|
|
6.2%
|
|
14
|
|
|
1,884
|
|
6.0%
|
|
13
|
|
218
|
|
11.6%
|
Bad
Debt |
|
1,497
|
|
4.4%
|
|
10
|
|
|
2,125
|
|
6.8%
|
|
14
|
|
(628) |
|
(29.6%) |
Utilities |
|
10,303
|
|
30.4%
|
|
70
|
|
|
9,913
|
|
31.5%
|
|
68
|
|
390
|
|
3.9%
|
Repairs
and Maintenance1 |
|
3,911
|
|
11.5%
|
|
27
|
|
|
2,759
|
|
8.8%
|
|
19
|
|
1,152
|
|
41.8%
|
Taxes
and Insurance |
|
7,247
|
|
21.4%
|
|
49
|
|
|
6,849
|
|
21.8%
|
|
47
|
|
398
|
|
5.8%
|
Total |
|
$33,923
|
|
100.0%
|
|
$231
|
|
|
$31,484
|
|
100.0%
|
|
$215
|
|
$2,439
|
|
7.7%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Same
Store |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wholly
Owned Beds |
|
16,308
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,308
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wholly
Owned Properties |
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1During the '14/'15
academic year, the Company changed its accounting policy in connection with turn expenses to recognize costs in the period in
which they are incurred as compared to its previous policy of accounting for the costs of turn ratably over the twelve month academic
year. As a result, on a going forward basis, expenses related to turn will be predominantly recognized during the third quarter
of the year.
CAMPUS CREST COMMUNITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COPPER
BEECH PROPERTY RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (unaudited) |
|
|
(in $000s, except bed data) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three
Months Ended September 30, |
|
Nine
Months Ended September 30, |
|
2015 |
|
2014 |
|
Change |
|
%
Change |
|
2015 |
|
2014 |
|
Change |
|
%
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wholly
owned same store properties (Number of properties)1, 2 |
29
|
|
29
|
|
- |
|
|
|
29
|
|
29
|
|
- |
|
|
Revenue
per occupied bed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental
revenue per occupied bed per month |
$477
|
|
$456
|
|
$21
|
|
4.7%
|
|
$461
|
|
$456
|
|
$5
|
|
1.1%
|
Services
revenue per occupied bed per month |
48
|
|
45
|
|
3
|
|
7.1%
|
|
40
|
|
36
|
|
4
|
|
10.2%
|
Total
revenue per occupied bed |
$525
|
|
$501
|
|
$24
|
|
4.9%
|
|
$501
|
|
$492
|
|
$9
|
|
1.8%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
number of owned beds |
11,520
|
|
11,520
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,520
|
|
11,520
|
|
|
|
|
Average
physical occupancy |
88.3% |
|
90.9% |
|
|
|
(2.6%) |
|
91.2% |
|
89.5% |
|
|
|
1.7%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
revenue |
$16,051
|
|
$15,745
|
|
$306
|
|
1.9%
|
|
$47,377
|
|
$45,657
|
|
$1,719
|
|
3.8%
|
Property
operating expenses |
8,110
|
|
6,144
|
|
1,965
|
|
32.0%
|
|
20,261
|
|
17,501
|
|
2,760
|
|
15.8%
|
Net
operating income3 |
$7,941
|
|
$9,601
|
|
($1,659) |
|
(17.3%) |
|
$27,116
|
|
$28,157
|
|
($1,041) |
|
(3.7%) |
Operating
margin4 |
49.5% |
|
61.0% |
|
|
|
(11.5%) |
|
57.2% |
|
61.7% |
|
|
|
(4.5%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joint
venture same store properties (Number of properties)5 |
5
|
|
5
|
|
- |
|
|
|
5
|
|
5
|
|
- |
|
|
Revenue
per occupied bed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental
revenue per occupied bed per month |
$521
|
|
$496
|
|
$25
|
|
5.1%
|
|
$505
|
|
$491
|
|
$14
|
|
2.8%
|
Services
revenue per occupied bed per month |
54
|
|
48
|
|
6
|
|
12.2%
|
|
41
|
|
39
|
|
2
|
|
4.9%
|
Total
revenue per occupied bed |
$575
|
|
$544
|
|
$31
|
|
5.8%
|
|
$546
|
|
$530
|
|
$15
|
|
2.9%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
number of owned beds |
4,343
|
|
4,343
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,343
|
|
4,343
|
|
|
|
|
Average
physical occupancy |
92.9% |
|
94.9% |
|
|
|
(2.0%) |
|
94.4% |
|
95.0% |
|
|
|
(0.6%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
revenue |
$6,969
|
|
$6,729
|
|
$241
|
|
3.6%
|
|
$20,136
|
|
$19,692
|
|
$444
|
|
2.3%
|
Property
operating expenses |
2,703
|
|
2,345
|
|
358
|
|
15.3%
|
|
6,891
|
|
6,744
|
|
147
|
|
2.2%
|
Net
operating income |
$4,267
|
|
$4,383
|
|
($117) |
|
(2.7%) |
|
$13,244
|
|
$12,948
|
|
$297
|
|
2.3%
|
Operating
margin4 |
61.2% |
|
65.1% |
|
|
|
(3.9%) |
|
65.8% |
|
65.8% |
|
|
|
0.0%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ALL
PROPERTIES (Number of properties) |
34
|
|
34
|
|
- |
|
|
|
34
|
|
34
|
|
- |
|
|
Revenue
per occupied bed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental
revenue per occupied bed per month3 |
$490
|
|
$467
|
|
$23
|
|
4.8%
|
|
$473
|
|
$466
|
|
$7
|
|
1.6%
|
Services
revenue per occupied bed per month |
50
|
|
46
|
|
4
|
|
8.7%
|
|
40
|
|
37
|
|
3
|
|
8.6%
|
Total
revenue per occupied bed |
$540
|
|
$513
|
|
$27
|
|
5.2%
|
|
$513
|
|
$503
|
|
$11
|
|
2.1%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
number of owned beds |
15,863
|
|
15,863
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,863
|
|
15,863
|
|
|
|
|
Average
physical occupancy |
89.6% |
|
92.0% |
|
|
|
(2.4%) |
|
92.1% |
|
91.0% |
|
|
|
1.1%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
revenue |
$23,020
|
|
$22,474
|
|
$546
|
|
2.4%
|
|
$67,512
|
|
$65,349
|
|
$2,163
|
|
3.3%
|
Property
operating expenses |
10,813
|
|
8,489
|
|
2,323
|
|
27.4%
|
|
27,152
|
|
24,245
|
|
2,907
|
|
12.0%
|
Net
operating income |
$12,207
|
|
$13,985
|
|
($1,777) |
|
(12.7%) |
|
$40,360
|
|
$41,104
|
|
($744) |
|
(1.8%) |
Operating
margin4 |
53.0% |
|
62.2% |
|
|
|
(9.2%) |
|
59.8% |
|
62.9% |
|
|
|
(3.1%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1On January 30, 2015,
the Company completed the initial closing of the Copper Beech transaction and acquired the sellers' remaining interest in 25 student
housing properties of a portfolio consisting of 36 student housing properties. During Q2 2015, the Company acquired the seller's'
remaining interest in 4 additional properties. Remaining interest in Copper Beech at Ames was also acquired pursuant to the second
amendment and has been included in the wholly owned Grove results of operations as it was historically a consolidated property.
2Excludes financial
results from Copper Beech at Kalamazoo- Phase I. Pursuant to the initial closing of the Copper Beech transaction on January 30,
2015, the Company had no ownership interest in the property as of September 30, 2015.
3For the nine months
ended September 30, 2015, $22,427 and $4,689 were recorded as consolidated net operating income and investment in unconsolidated
entities, respectively.
4Operating margin
is calculated by dividing NOI for the period by total student housing rental and services revenues for the period.
5Includes financial
results for Copper Beech at Morgantown, Copper Beech at Harrisonburg, Copper Beech at State College - Parkway Plaza, Copper Beech
at Greenville and Copper Beech at Kalamazoo - Phase II.
CAMPUS CREST COMMUNITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HSRE AND BEAUMONT JOINT VENTURE AND OTHER PROPERTY RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (unaudited) |
(in $000s, except per bed data) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three
Months Ended September 30, |
|
Nine
Months Ended September 30, |
|
2015 |
|
2014 |
|
Change |
|
%
Change |
|
2015 |
|
2014 |
|
Change |
|
%
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HSRE
AND BEAUMONT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Same
store properties (Number of properties)1 |
2
|
|
2
|
|
- |
|
|
|
2
|
|
2
|
|
- |
|
|
Revenue
per occupied bed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental
revenue per occupied bed per month2 |
$542
|
|
$597
|
|
($55) |
|
(9.2%) |
|
$594
|
|
$587
|
|
$7
|
|
1.1%
|
Services
revenue per occupied bed per month |
23
|
|
21
|
|
2
|
|
10.4%
|
|
21
|
|
19
|
|
2
|
|
10.4%
|
Total
revenue per occupied bed |
$565
|
|
$618
|
|
($53) |
|
(8.5%) |
|
$615
|
|
$607
|
|
$7
|
|
1.2%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
number of owned beds |
1,184
|
|
1,184
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,184
|
|
1,184
|
|
|
|
|
Average
physical occupancy |
83.7% |
|
82.2% |
|
|
|
1.5%
|
|
81.8% |
|
79.9% |
|
|
|
1.9%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
revenue |
$1,680
|
|
$1,804
|
|
($124) |
|
(6.9%) |
|
$5,357
|
|
$5,161
|
|
$196
|
|
3.8%
|
Property
operating expenses |
864
|
|
754
|
|
109
|
|
14.5%
|
|
2,673
|
|
2,560
|
|
113
|
|
4.4%
|
Net
operating income |
$816
|
|
$1,050
|
|
($233) |
|
(22.2%) |
|
$2,684
|
|
$2,602
|
|
$82
|
|
3.2%
|
Operating
margin3 |
48.6% |
|
58.2% |
|
|
|
(9.6%) |
|
50.1% |
|
50.4% |
|
|
|
(0.3%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NEW
PROPERTIES (Number of properties)4 |
5
|
|
5
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
5
|
|
0
|
|
|
Revenue
per occupied bed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental
revenue per occupied bed per month2 |
$776
|
|
$756
|
|
$20
|
|
2.6%
|
|
$839
|
|
$756
|
|
$83
|
|
10.9%
|
Services
revenue per occupied bed per month |
85
|
|
23
|
|
62
|
|
272.1%
|
|
105
|
|
23
|
|
82
|
|
356.4%
|
Total
revenue per occupied bed |
$861
|
|
$779
|
|
$82
|
|
10.5%
|
|
$944
|
|
$779
|
|
$164
|
|
21.1%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
number of owned beds |
4,277
|
|
2,134
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,277
|
|
711
|
|
|
|
|
Average
physical occupancy |
51.0% |
|
36.0% |
|
|
|
15.0%
|
|
40.9% |
|
36.0% |
|
|
|
4.9%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
revenue |
$5,632
|
|
$1,796
|
|
$3,836
|
|
213.6%
|
|
$14,851
|
|
$1,796
|
|
$13,055
|
|
726.9%
|
Property
operating expenses |
3,610
|
|
850
|
|
2,760
|
|
324.7%
|
|
13,951
|
|
850
|
|
13,101
|
|
1541.2%
|
Net
operating income |
$2,022
|
|
$946
|
|
$1,076
|
|
113.8%
|
|
$899
|
|
$946
|
|
($47) |
|
(4.9%) |
Operating
margin3 |
35.9% |
|
52.7% |
|
|
|
(16.8%) |
|
6.1% |
|
52.7% |
|
|
|
(46.6%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ALL
PROPERTIES (Number of properties)1,4 |
7
|
|
7
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
7
|
|
0
|
|
|
Revenue
per occupied bed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rental
revenue per occupied bed per month2 |
$703
|
|
$667
|
|
$36
|
|
5.3%
|
|
$752
|
|
$623
|
|
$128
|
|
20.6%
|
Services
revenue per occupied bed per month |
66
|
|
22
|
|
44
|
|
202.0%
|
|
75
|
|
20
|
|
55
|
|
277.6%
|
Total
revenue per occupied bed |
$769
|
|
$689
|
|
$80
|
|
11.6%
|
|
$826
|
|
$643
|
|
$183
|
|
28.5%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
number of owned beds |
5,461
|
|
3,318
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,461
|
|
1,895
|
|
|
|
|
Average
physical occupancy |
58.1% |
|
52.5% |
|
|
|
5.6%
|
|
49.7% |
|
63.4% |
|
|
|
(13.7%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
revenue |
$7,312
|
|
$3,600
|
|
$3,712
|
|
103.1%
|
|
$20,208
|
|
$6,957
|
|
$13,250
|
|
190.5%
|
Property
operating expenses |
4,474
|
|
1,604
|
|
2,869
|
|
178.8%
|
|
16,624
|
|
3,410
|
|
13,215
|
|
387.6%
|
Net
operating income |
$2,839
|
|
$1,996
|
|
$843
|
|
42.2%
|
|
$3,583
|
|
$3,548
|
|
$36
|
|
1.0%
|
Operating
margin3 |
38.8% |
|
55.4% |
|
|
|
(16.6%) |
|
17.7% |
|
51.0% |
|
|
|
(33.3%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred
investments5, 6 |
$7,323
|
|
$2,682
|
|
$4,640
|
|
|
|
$7,323
|
|
$2,682
|
|
$4,640
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1Excludes
The Grove at Denton; the Company acquired its joint venture partner's interest in this property on January 21, 2014. Also excludes
financial results from The Grove at Stillwater, The Grove at Conway and The Grove at Lawrence. The properties were sold during
1Q 2015. Excludes The Grove at Fayetteville; the Company acquired its joint venture partner's interest in this property on August
7, 2015. Also excludes financial results from The Grove at Norman, The Grove at Laramie and The Grove at San Angelo,
as those properties were sold during 3Q 2015. Remaining properties are The Grove at Indiana and The Grove at State
College.
2Beginning
with the ‘14/’15 academic year, the Company recognizes revenue for new leases over the term of the lease (typically
11.5 months) rather than in conjunction with the lease payments (typically 12 equal monthly payments). While this policy change
will have no cash impact, and will have minimal year-over-year impact on a go-forward basis, the adjustment related to changing
the policy has the effect of higher reported revenue in the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2015, as compared
to prior year.
3Operating
margin is calculated by dividing NOI for the period by total student housing rental and services revenues for the period. Expenses
include property management fees as compared to prior year.
4For
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, includes financial results for the 2014 joint venture deliveries
(The Grove at Greensboro, The Grove at Louisville, evo at Cira Centre South, evo Centre-Ville and evo Vieux-Montreal).
5As
of September 30, 2015, the Company held preferred investments in The Grove at Indiana, The Grove at Greensboro and The Grove at
Louisville of approximately $7,323. These preferred interests entitle the Company to a 9.0% return on the investment
but otherwise do not change its effective ownership interest in these properties.
6As
of September 30, 2014, the Company held preferred investment in The Grove at Indiana of approximately $2,682. This
preferred interest entitles the Company to a 9.0% return on the investment but otherwise does not change its effective ownership
interest in this property.
CAMPUS CREST COMMUNITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CAPITAL STRUCTURE AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 |
|
(in $000s, except per share data) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Closing
common stock price at September 30, 2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
$5.32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common
stock |
|
|
|
|
|
64,632
|
Operating
partnership units |
|
|
|
|
|
12,809
|
Restricted
stock |
|
|
|
|
|
124
|
Total
shares and units outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
77,565
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
equity market value |
|
|
|
|
|
$412,646
|
Total
preferred equity outstanding1 |
|
|
|
|
|
152,500
|
Total
consolidated debt outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
961,265
|
Total
market capitalization |
|
|
|
|
|
$1,526,411
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt
to total market capitalization3, 4 |
|
|
|
|
|
63.0% |
Debt
to gross assets2, 3, 4 |
|
|
|
|
|
55.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
number of unencumbered operating properties |
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
Average |
|
Principal |
%
of Total |
|
Average |
|
Years
to |
Wholly
Owned Debt3, 4 |
Outstanding |
Principal
Outstanding |
|
Interest
Rate |
|
Maturity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed
rate mortgage loans |
$396,485
|
41.2% |
|
5.4%
|
|
2.4
|
Variable
rate mortgage loan |
45,920
|
4.8% |
|
3.3%
|
|
1.8
|
Construction
loans |
150,583
|
15.7% |
|
2.4%
|
|
1.2
|
Variable
rate credit facility |
263,500
|
27.4% |
|
2.2%
|
|
1.3
|
Exchangeable
notes5 |
97,925
|
10.2% |
|
5.5%
|
|
3.1
|
Other
debt6 |
6,852
|
0.7% |
|
3.37% |
|
6.0
|
Total/Weighted
Average |
$961,265
|
100.0% |
|
3.97% |
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.00%
Series A cumulative redeemable preferred stock redeemable February 2017. |
2Gross
assets is defined as total assets plus accumulated depreciation, as reported in the Company's September 30, 2015 consolidated
balance sheet. |
3Excludes
debt associated with Copper Beech, HSRE and Beaumont joint ventures. See page 15 for details related to this debt. The
Company is the guarantor of certain of these loans. |
4Wholly
owned debt reflects principal balance, excluding impact of fair value debt and purchase accounting adjustments as reflected
on the consolidated balance sheet. |
5Senior
unsecured exchangeable notes, maturity in October 2018. |
|
|
|
|
|
6Includes
$4,181 Line of Credit assumed as part of the Copper Beech transaction and $2,308 bond assumed as a part of the purchase of
the Flagstaff, AZ property. |
|
|
CAMPUS
CREST COMMUNITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OUTSTANDING
DEBT AND MATURITY SCHEDULE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in $000s) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal
Balance at |
|
Interest
Rate |
|
Maturity |
|
Years
to |
Years
to |
|
|
|
Consolidated
Debt |
|
|
9/30/2015 |
|
|
Date |
|
Maturity |
Maturity |
|
|
Notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate
debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Citi
Credit facility & Term Loan |
|
|
$263,500 |
|
2.21% |
|
1/8/2017 |
|
1.3 |
1.3 |
|
|
One
twelve month extension option |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchangeable
Notes1 |
|
|
97,925 |
|
5.53% |
|
10/9/2018 |
|
3.1 |
3.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
debt2 |
|
|
6,852 |
|
3.37% |
|
8/16/2021 |
|
6.0 |
6.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wholly Owned Construction loans - Grove |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
Grove at Pullman, WA |
|
|
$13,887 |
|
2.39% |
|
9/5/2016 |
|
0.9 |
0.9 |
|
|
Two
twelve month extension option |
The
Grove at Slippery Rock, PA |
|
|
17,738 |
|
2.34% |
|
6/21/2016 |
|
0.7 |
0.7 |
|
|
Two
twelve month extension option |
The
Grove at Muncie, IN |
|
|
13,892 |
|
2.44% |
|
6/21/2016 |
|
0.7 |
0.7 |
|
|
Two
twelve month extension option |
The
Grove at Ft. Collins, CO |
|
|
18,998 |
|
2.09% |
|
7/13/2016 |
|
0.8 |
0.8 |
|
|
Two
twelve month extension option |
The
Grove at Gainesville, FL |
|
|
25,593 |
|
2.34% |
|
3/13/2017 |
|
1.5 |
1.5 |
|
|
Sixty
to one hundred twenty days extension option |
Copper
Beech at Ames, IA |
|
|
22,051 |
|
2.44% |
|
5/2/2017 |
|
1.6 |
1.6 |
|
|
Two
twelve month extension option |
Vivo
at Toledo, OH |
|
|
4,377 |
|
2.34% |
|
11/25/2017 |
|
2.2 |
2.2 |
|
|
Thirty
to ninety days extension option |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wholly Owned Construction loans - Copper Beech |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statesboro,
GA Phase II |
|
|
$9,226 |
|
2.69% |
|
11/1/2016 |
|
1.1 |
1.1 |
|
|
|
CMU
Phase II—Mount Pleasant, MI |
|
|
9,072 |
|
2.69% |
|
2/1/2017 |
|
1.4 |
1.4 |
|
|
|
Auburn,
AL |
|
|
15,750 |
|
2.19% |
|
2/6/2017 |
|
1.4 |
1.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sub
Total3 |
|
|
$150,583 |
|
2.37% |
|
|
|
1.2 |
1.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wholly
Owned Mortgage loans - Grove |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
Grove at Milledgeville, GA |
|
|
$15,477 |
|
6.12% |
|
10/1/2016 |
|
1.0 |
1.0 |
|
|
Principal
and interest |
The
Grove at Carrollton, GA |
|
|
13,954 |
|
6.13% |
|
10/11/2016 |
|
1.0 |
1.0 |
|
|
Principal
and interest |
The
Grove at Las Cruces, NM |
|
|
14,421 |
|
6.13% |
|
10/11/2016 |
|
1.0 |
1.0 |
|
|
Principal
and interest |
The
Grove at Denton, TX |
|
|
16,420 |
|
2.34% |
|
3/1/2017 |
|
1.4 |
1.4 |
|
|
Principal
and interest, floating rate |
The
Grove at Asheville, NC |
|
|
14,166 |
|
5.77% |
|
4/11/2017 |
|
1.6 |
1.6 |
|
|
Principal
and interest |
The
Grove at Ellensburg, WA |
|
|
15,669 |
|
5.10% |
|
9/1/2018 |
|
3.0 |
3.0 |
|
|
Principal
and interest |
The
Grove at Nacogdoches, TX |
|
|
16,666 |
|
5.01% |
|
9/1/2018 |
|
3.0 |
3.0 |
|
|
Principal
and interest |
The
Grove at Greeley, CO |
|
|
14,753 |
|
4.29% |
|
10/1/2018 |
|
3.0 |
3.0 |
|
|
Principal
and interest |
The
Grove at Clarksville, TN |
|
|
16,028 |
|
4.03% |
|
7/1/2022 |
|
6.9 |
6.9 |
|
|
Principal
and interest |
The
Grove at Columbia, MO |
|
|
22,396 |
|
3.83% |
|
7/1/2022 |
|
6.9 |
6.9 |
|
|
Principal
and interest |
The
Grove at Statesboro, GA |
|
|
17,895 |
|
4.01% |
|
1/1/2023 |
|
7.4 |
7.4 |
|
|
Principal
and interest |
The
Grove at Fayetteville, AR |
|
|
14,500 |
|
5.64% |
|
9/1/2018 |
|
3.0 |
3.0 |
|
|
Principal
and interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wholly Owned Mortgage loans - Copper Beech |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IUP
Phase II - Indiana |
|
|
$5,854 |
|
5.90% |
|
10/1/2015 |
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
|
Principal
and interest |
CMU
Phase I - Mount Pleasant, MI |
|
|
17,911 |
|
5.47% |
|
10/1/2015 |
|
0.0 |
0.0 |
|
|
Principal
and interest |
Copper
Beech I - State College |
|
|
4,919 |
|
5.61% |
|
2/11/2016 |
|
0.4 |
0.4 |
|
|
Principal
and interest |
IUP
Buy - Indiana |
|
|
2,307 |
|
5.45% |
|
6/6/2016 |
|
0.7 |
0.7 |
|
|
Principal
and interest |
San
Marcos, TX Phase I |
|
|
32,718 |
|
5.45% |
|
6/6/2016 |
|
0.7 |
0.7 |
|
|
Principal
and interest |
Bloomington |
|
|
10,354 |
|
6.22% |
|
10/1/2016 |
|
1.0 |
1.0 |
|
|
Principal
and interest |
Allendale
Phase I |
|
|
22,616 |
|
5.98% |
|
10/1/2016 |
|
1.0 |
1.0 |
|
|
Principal
and interest |
Columbia,
MO |
|
|
23,373 |
|
6.22% |
|
10/1/2016 |
|
1.0 |
1.0 |
|
|
Principal
and interest |
Radford |
|
|
11,807 |
|
5.99% |
|
11/6/2016 |
|
1.1 |
1.1 |
|
|
Principal
and interest |
IUP
Phase I - Indiana |
|
|
6,500 |
|
2.15% |
|
6/2/2017 |
|
1.7 |
1.7 |
|
|
Principal
and interest |
Allendale
Phase II |
|
|
11,485 |
|
6.27% |
|
9/6/2017 |
|
2.0 |
2.0 |
|
|
Principal
and interest |
Columbia,
SC Phase I |
|
|
35,661 |
|
6.27% |
|
9/6/2017 |
|
2.0 |
2.0 |
|
|
Principal
and interest |
Statesboro,
GA Phase I |
|
|
29,862 |
|
5.81% |
|
10/6/2017 |
|
2.0 |
2.0 |
|
|
Principal
and interest |
Copper
Beech II - State College |
|
|
8,353 |
|
5.97% |
|
8/1/2019 |
|
3.9 |
3.9 |
|
|
Principal
and interest |
Columbia,
SC Phase II |
|
|
5,837 |
|
5.41% |
|
8/1/2020 |
|
4.9 |
4.9 |
|
|
Principal
and interest |
Oakwood
- State College |
|
|
5,502 |
|
4.99% |
|
10/1/2020 |
|
5.1 |
5.1 |
|
|
Principal
and interest |
Fresno,
CA |
|
|
15,000 |
|
2.19% |
|
9/5/2016 |
|
0.9 |
0.9 |
|
|
Principal
and interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sub
Total3 |
|
|
$442,405 |
|
5.22% |
|
|
|
2.3 |
2.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
/ Weighted Average3 |
|
|
$961,265
|
|
3.97% |
|
|
|
2.0 |
2.0 |
|
|
|
1Senior
unsecured exchangeable notes, maturity in October 2018.
2Includes
$4,181 Line of Credit assumed as part of the Copper Beech transaction and $2,308 bond assumed as a part of the purchase of the
Flagstaff, AZ property.
3Wholly
owned debt reflects principal balance, excluding impact of fair value debt and purchase accounting adjustments as reflected on
the consolidated balance sheet.
CAMPUS CREST COMMUNITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OUTSTANDING DEBT AND MATURITY SCHEDULE - JOINT VENTURE |
|
|
(in
$000s) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal
Balance |
Interest
Rate |
Maturity |
Years
to |
|
|
Property |
Ownership |
|
9/30/2015 |
Date |
Maturity |
|
Notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
Grove at State College, PA1 |
20.0% |
|
18,619 |
2.24% |
9/30/2015 |
0.0 |
|
Interest
only |
Copper
Beech at State College, PA - Parkway Plaza |
48.0% |
|
18,500 |
2.15% |
10/1/2018 |
3.0 |
|
Principal
and interest |
The
Grove at Indiana, PA1 |
20.0% |
|
17,217 |
2.44% |
12/19/2015 |
0.2 |
|
Interest
only |
evo
Centre-Ville and evo Vieux-Montreal1 |
47.0% |
|
81,886 |
5.68% |
1/13/2016 |
0.3 |
|
Interest
only |
Copper
Beech at Morgantown, WV |
48.0% |
|
34,326 |
5.45% |
6/6/2016 |
0.7 |
|
Principal
and interest |
Copper
Beech at Harrisonburg, VA |
48.0% |
|
52,922 |
5.45% |
6/6/2016 |
0.7 |
|
Principal
and interest |
evo
at Cira Centre South1 |
30.0% |
|
96,158 |
2.39% |
7/25/2016 |
0.8 |
|
Interest
only |
The
Grove at Louisville, KY1 |
30.0% |
|
26,603 |
2.44% |
9/6/2016 |
0.9 |
|
Interest
only |
The
Grove at Greensboro, NC1 |
30.0% |
|
18,428 |
2.29% |
9/30/2018 |
3.0 |
|
Interest
only |
Copper
Beech at Greenville, NC |
48.0% |
|
46,196 |
5.34% |
9/1/2020 |
4.9 |
|
Principal
and interest |
Copper
Beech at Kalamazoo, MI - Phase II |
48.0% |
|
7,742 |
5.68% |
10/1/2020 |
5.0 |
|
Principal
and interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
/ Weighted Average |
|
|
$418,597 |
4.04% |
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note:
The Company's pro rata share of HSRE and Beaumont joint venture debt as of September 30, 2015 was $88,011. Pro rata share
of Copper Beech joint venture debt as of September 30, 2015 was $76,724. |
1Footnote
indicates the Company is a guarantor of the loan. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CAMPUS
CREST COMMUNITIES |
|
|
GROVE
PORTFOLIO OVERVIEW AND OCCUPANCY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Occupancy,
as of |
|
|
|
|
Year
Opened/ |
|
|
|
September
30, |
Property |
Grouping1 |
|
Primary
University |
Acquired |
Properties |
Units
|
Beds
|
2015 |
2014 |
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wholly
Owned Operating Properties - Grove |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
Grove at Asheville, NC |
(A) |
|
UNC
- Asheville |
2005 |
|
154 |
448 |
99.1% |
99.8% |
(0.6%) |
The
Grove at Carrollton, GA |
(A) |
|
University
of West Georgia |
2006 |
|
168 |
492 |
97.0% |
93.1% |
3.9% |
The
Grove at Las Cruces, NM |
(A) |
|
New
Mexico State University |
2006 |
|
168 |
492 |
81.7% |
81.7% |
0.0% |
The
Grove at Milledgeville, GA |
(A) |
|
Georgia
College & State University |
2006 |
|
168 |
492 |
96.1% |
99.4% |
(3.3%) |
The
Grove at Abilene, TX |
(A) |
|
Abilene
Christian University |
2007 |
|
192 |
504 |
90.5% |
91.3% |
(0.8%) |
The
Grove at Ellensburg, WA |
(A) |
|
Central
Washington University |
2007 |
|
192 |
504 |
86.3% |
100.0% |
(13.7%) |
The
Grove at Greeley, CO |
(A) |
|
University
of Northern Colorado |
2007 |
|
192 |
504 |
99.8% |
100.0% |
(0.2%) |
The
Grove at Mobile, AL—Phase I & II2 |
(A) |
|
University
of South Alabama |
2007/2008 |
|
384 |
1,008 |
86.3% |
86.4% |
(0.1%) |
The
Grove at Nacogdoches, TX—Phase I & II2 |
(A) |
|
Stephen
F. Austin State Univ. |
2007/2012 |
|
260 |
682 |
85.5% |
83.1% |
2.3% |
The
Grove at Cheney, WA |
(A) |
|
Eastern
Washington University |
2008 |
|
192 |
512 |
99.6% |
94.7% |
4.9% |
The
Grove at Lubbock, TX |
(A) |
|
Texas
Tech University |
2008 |
|
192 |
504 |
94.2% |
92.5% |
1.8% |
The
Grove at Stephenville, TX |
(A) |
|
Tarleton
State University |
2008 |
|
192 |
504 |
100.0% |
100.0% |
0.0% |
The
Grove at Troy, AL |
(A) |
|
Troy
University |
2008 |
|
192 |
514 |
96.5% |
98.6% |
(2.1%) |
The
Grove at Waco, TX |
(A) |
|
Baylor
University |
2008 |
|
192 |
504 |
87.3% |
90.3% |
(3.0%) |
The
Grove at Murfreesboro, TN |
(A) |
|
Middle
Tennessee State University |
2009 |
|
186 |
504 |
94.0% |
99.8% |
(5.8%) |
The
Grove at San Marcos, TX |
(A) |
|
Texas
State University |
2009 |
|
192 |
504 |
99.0% |
96.4% |
2.6% |
The
Grove at Moscow, ID |
(A) |
|
University
of Idaho |
2009 |
|
192 |
504 |
97.2% |
84.7% |
12.5% |
The
Grove at Huntsville, TX |
(A) |
|
Sam
Houston State University |
2010 |
|
192 |
504 |
100.0% |
100.0% |
0.0% |
The
Grove at Statesboro, GA |
(A) |
|
Georgia
Southern University |
2010 |
|
200 |
536 |
76.9% |
86.6% |
(9.7%) |
The
Grove at Ames, IA |
(A) |
|
Iowa
State University |
2011 |
|
216 |
584 |
98.3% |
100.0% |
(1.7%) |
The
Grove at Clarksville, TN |
(A) |
|
Austin
Peay State University |
2011 |
|
208 |
560 |
71.6% |
74.1% |
(2.5%) |
The
Grove at Columbia, MO |
(A) |
|
University
of Missouri |
2011 |
|
216 |
632 |
85.3% |
74.1% |
11.2% |
The
Grove at Ft. Wayne, IN |
(A) |
|
Indiana
University-Purdue University Ft. Wayne |
2011 |
|
204 |
540 |
71.5% |
77.6% |
(6.1%) |
The
Grove at Valdosta, GA |
(A) |
|
Valdosta
State University |
2011 |
|
216 |
584 |
91.6% |
86.6% |
5.0% |
The
Grove at Denton, TX |
(A) |
|
University
of North Texas |
2011 |
|
216 |
584 |
98.6% |
100.0% |
(1.4%) |
The
Grove at Auburn, AL |
(A) |
|
Auburn
University |
2012 |
|
216 |
600 |
99.7% |
100.0% |
(0.3%) |
The
Grove at Fayetteville, AR |
(A) |
|
University
of Arkansas |
2012 |
|
232 |
632 |
86.2% |
66.5% |
19.8% |
The
Grove at Flagstaff, AZ |
(A) |
|
Northern
Arizona University |
2012 |
|
216 |
584 |
99.0% |
99.3% |
(0.3%) |
The
Grove at Orono, ME |
(A) |
|
University
of Maine |
2012 |
|
188 |
620 |
97.4% |
100.0% |
(2.6%) |
The
Grove at Ft. Collins, CO |
(A) |
|
Colorado
State University |
2013 |
|
218 |
612 |
100.0% |
100.0% |
0.0% |
The
Grove at Muncie, IN |
(A) |
|
Ball
State University |
2013 |
|
216 |
584 |
83.4% |
87.3% |
(3.8%) |
The
Grove at Pullman, WA3 |
(A) |
|
Washington
State University |
2013 |
|
216 |
584 |
99.3% |
100.0% |
(0.8%) |
The
Grove at Flagstaff, AZ - Phase II2 |
(A) |
|
Northern
Arizona University |
2013 |
|
54 |
192 |
98.4% |
99.5% |
(1.0%) |
The
Grove at Gainesville, FL |
(B) |
|
University
of Florida |
2014 |
|
256 |
682 |
99.9% |
54.3% |
45.6% |
The
Grove at Grand Forks, ND |
(B) |
|
University
of North Dakota |
2014 |
|
224 |
600 |
67.5% |
99.8% |
(32.3%) |
The
Grove at Mt. Pleasant, MI |
(B) |
|
Central
Michigan University |
2014 |
|
224 |
584 |
68.3% |
76.2% |
(7.9%) |
The
Grove at Slippery Rock, PA |
(B) |
|
Slippery
Rock University |
2014 |
|
201 |
603 |
93.0% |
85.4% |
7.6% |
Total
- Wholly Owned Operating Properties - Grove |
|
|
|
37 |
7,537 |
20,577 |
90.9% |
91.7% |
(0.8%) |
1
Groupings detailed as follows: (A) reflects the same store properties as of September 30, 2015; (B) reflects the 2014 development
deliveries.
2The
Grove at Flagstaff, AZ - Phase I & II are counted as two properties in the Company's property count. The Grove at Nacogdoches,
TX - Phase II and The Grove at Mobile, AL—Phase II are not counted as separate assets from Phase I of each respective asset.
3
On July 14, 2013, the Company experienced a fire at this development property. As of September 30, 2015, all 584 beds are
in operation.
CAMPUS
CREST COMMUNITIES |
|
|
COPPER
BEECH PORTFOLIO OVERVIEW AND OCCUPANCY1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Occupancy,
as of |
|
|
|
|
Year
Opened/ |
|
|
|
|
|
September
30, |
Property |
Grouping |
|
Primary
University |
Acquired |
|
Properties |
Units |
Beds |
|
2015 |
|
2014 |
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wholly
Owned Operating Properties - Copper Beech |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copper
Beech at Bloomington, IN - Colonial Crest |
(A) |
|
Indiana
University |
1970 |
|
|
206 |
402 |
|
86.3% |
|
77.1% |
9.2% |
Copper
Beech at Indiana, PA - IUP I |
(A) |
|
Indiana
University of Pennsylvania |
1971 |
|
|
95 |
239 |
|
88.3% |
|
100.0% |
(11.7%) |
Copper
Beech at Indiana, PA - IUP II |
(A) |
|
Indiana
University of Pennsylvania |
1973 |
|
|
72 |
172 |
|
90.1% |
|
100.0% |
(9.9%) |
Copper Beech
at Indiana, PA - IUP Buy |
(A) |
|
Indiana
University of Pennsylvania |
1975 |
|
|
43 |
76 |
|
85.5% |
|
100.0% |
(14.5%) |
Copper
Beech at State College, PA - CB I |
(A) |
|
Penn
State University |
1996 |
|
|
59 |
177 |
|
100.0% |
|
100.0% |
0.0% |
Copper
Beech at State College, PA - CB II |
(A) |
|
Penn
State University |
1998 |
|
|
87 |
257 |
|
100.0% |
|
100.0% |
0.0% |
Copper
Beech at State College, PA - Oakwood |
(A) |
|
Penn
State University |
2000 |
|
|
48 |
144 |
|
100.0% |
|
100.0% |
0.0% |
Copper
Beech at Harrisonburg, VA - Grand Duke |
(A) |
|
James
Madison University |
2001 |
|
|
120 |
124 |
|
98.4% |
|
100.0% |
(1.6%) |
Copper
Beech at State College, PA - Oak Hill |
(A) |
|
Penn
State University |
2003 |
|
|
106 |
318 |
|
100.0% |
|
100.0% |
0.0% |
Copper
Beech at State College, PA - Northbrook Greens |
(A) |
|
Penn
State University |
2003 |
|
|
166 |
250 |
|
99.2% |
|
100.0% |
(0.8%) |
Copper
Beech at West Lafayette, IN – Klondike |
(A) |
|
Purdue
University |
2003 |
|
|
219 |
486 |
|
89.5% |
|
87.4% |
2.1% |
Copper
Beech at West Lafayette, IN – Baywater |
(A) |
|
Purdue
University |
2004 |
|
|
137 |
488 |
|
85.9% |
|
70.1% |
15.8% |
Copper
Beech at Radford, VA |
(A) |
|
Radford
University |
2005 |
|
|
222 |
500 |
|
98.8% |
|
100.0% |
(1.2%) |
Copper
Beech at Bloomington, IN |
(A) |
|
Indiana
University |
2005 |
|
|
107 |
297 |
|
76.8% |
|
71.0% |
5.7% |
Copper
Beech at Mount Pleasant, MI - Phase I |
(A) |
|
Central
Michigan University |
2005 |
|
|
204 |
632 |
|
63.0% |
|
100.0% |
(37.0%) |
Copper
Beech at Bowling Green, OH - Phase I |
(A) |
|
Bowling
Green University |
2005 |
|
|
128 |
400 |
|
100.0% |
|
99.8% |
0.2% |
Copper
Beech at Fresno, CA |
(A) |
|
California
State University at Fresno |
2006 |
|
|
178 |
506 |
|
98.8% |
|
90.1% |
8.7% |
Copper
Beech at Allendale, MI - Phase I |
(A) |
|
Grand
Valley State University |
2006 |
|
|
206 |
614 |
|
99.5% |
|
100.0% |
(0.5%) |
Copper
Beech at Columbia, MO |
(A) |
|
University
of Missouri |
2006 |
|
|
214 |
654 |
|
96.3% |
|
89.4% |
6.9% |
Copper
Beech at Bowling Green, OH - Phase II |
(A) |
|
Bowling
Green University |
2007 |
|
|
72 |
216 |
|
98.6% |
|
100.0% |
(1.4%) |
Copper
Beech at Allendale, MI - Phase II |
(A) |
|
Grand
Valley State University |
2007 |
|
|
82 |
290 |
|
100.0% |
|
100.0% |
0.0% |
Copper
Beech at Columbia, SC - Phase I |
(A) |
|
University
of South Carolina |
2007 |
|
|
278 |
824 |
|
49.3% |
|
97.6% |
(48.3%) |
Copper
Beech at Statesboro, GA - Phase I |
(A) |
|
Georgia
Southern University |
2007 |
|
|
246 |
754 |
|
94.4% |
|
97.1% |
(2.7%) |
Copper
Beech at Columbia, SC - Phase II |
(A) |
|
University
of South Carolina |
2008 |
|
|
72 |
178 |
|
52.8% |
|
98.3% |
(45.5%) |
Copper
Beech at Auburn, AL |
(A) |
|
Auburn
University |
2009 |
|
|
271 |
754 |
|
97.6% |
|
92.7% |
4.9% |
Copper Beech
at San Marcos, TX - Phase I |
(A) |
|
Texas
State University |
2011 |
|
|
273 |
840 |
|
96.2% |
|
88.7% |
7.5% |
Copper
Beech at San Marcos, TX - Phase II |
(A) |
|
Texas
State University |
2012 |
|
|
142 |
410 |
|
96.1% |
|
88.3% |
7.8% |
Copper
Beech at Mount Pleasant, MI - Phase II |
(A) |
|
Central
Michigan University |
2013 |
|
|
119 |
256 |
|
98.0% |
|
94.5% |
3.5% |
Copper Beech
at Statesboro, GA - Phase II |
(A) |
|
Georgia
Southern University |
2013 |
|
|
82 |
262 |
|
96.9% |
|
98.5% |
(1.5%) |
Copper Beech
at Ames, IA |
(B) |
|
Iowa State University |
2014 |
|
|
219 |
636 |
|
100.0% |
|
81.3% |
18.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sub-Total
/ Weighted Average |
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
4,473 |
12,156 |
|
90.1% |
|
93.4% |
(3.2%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joint
Venture Operating Properties - Copper Beech |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copper Beech
at State College, PA - Parkway Plaza |
(A) |
|
Penn
State University |
1967 |
|
|
429 |
633 |
|
99.7% |
|
98.7% |
0.9% |
Copper Beech
at Harrisonburg, VA |
(A) |
|
James
Madison University |
2008 |
|
|
414 |
1,218 |
|
96.1% |
|
99.9% |
(3.9%) |
Copper Beech
at Greenville, NC |
(A) |
|
East
Carolina University |
2008 |
|
|
439 |
1,232 |
|
96.9% |
|
95.5% |
1.4% |
Copper Beech
at Kalamazoo, MI - Phase II |
(A) |
|
Western
Michigan University |
2008 |
|
|
115 |
340 |
|
74.7% |
|
67.6% |
7.1% |
Copper Beech
at Morgantown, WV |
(A) |
|
West
Virginia University |
2010 |
|
|
335 |
920 |
|
98.3% |
|
100.0% |
(1.7%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
- Copper Beech Portfolio |
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
6,205 |
16,499 |
|
91.6% |
|
94.1% |
(2.5%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CAMPUS
CREST COMMUNITIES |
|
|
HSRE AND
BEAUMONT PORTFOLIO OVERVIEW AND OCCUPANCY (cont'd) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Occupancy,
as of |
|
|
|
|
Year
Opened/ |
|
|
|
September
30, |
Property |
Grouping1 |
Primary
University |
Acquired |
Properties |
Units |
Beds |
2015 |
2014 |
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HSRE
and Beaumont Joint Venture Operating Properties |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
Grove at Indiana, PA |
(A) |
|
Indiana
University of Pennsylvania |
2013 |
|
224 |
600 |
69.5% |
65.7% |
3.8% |
The
Grove at State College, PA |
(A) |
|
Penn
State University |
2013 |
|
216 |
584 |
100.0% |
100.0% |
0.0% |
The
Grove at Greensboro, NC |
(B) |
|
University of North
Carolina at Greensboro |
2014 |
|
216 |
584 |
76.2% |
57.4% |
18.8% |
The
Grove at Louisville, KY |
(B) |
|
University
of Louisville |
2014 |
|
252 |
656 |
65.2% |
61.4% |
3.8% |
evo
at Cira Centre South |
(B) |
|
University
of Pennsylvania / Drexel University |
2014 |
|
344 |
850 |
97.3% |
46.7% |
50.6% |
evo
Centre-Ville |
(B) |
|
Concordia
University / McGill University / (ÉTS) |
2014 |
|
715 |
1,294 |
53.3% |
8.0% |
45.3% |
evo
Vieux-Montreal |
(B) |
|
McGill
University |
2014 |
|
488 |
929 |
43.8% |
13.0% |
30.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
- Joint Venture Operating Properties |
|
|
|
7 |
2,455 |
5,497 |
69.1% |
42.5% |
26.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Operating Properties2 |
|
|
|
|
79 |
16,197 |
42,573 |
88.3% |
92.4% |
(4.1%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Same Store
Properties (A) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wholly-Owned |
|
|
|
|
62 |
10,886 |
29,628 |
91.0% |
92.3% |
(1.3%) |
Joint
Venture |
|
|
|
|
7 |
2,172 |
5,527 |
93.3% |
93.1% |
0.1% |
Total
- Same Store |
|
|
|
|
69 |
13,058 |
35,155 |
91.4% |
92.4% |
(1.1%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014 Deliveries
(B) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wholly-Owned |
|
|
|
|
5 |
1,124 |
3,105 |
86.4% |
78.8% |
7.6% |
Joint
Venture |
|
|
|
|
5 |
2,015 |
4,313 |
64.8% |
31.5% |
33.3% |
Total
- 2014 Deliveries |
|
|
|
|
10 |
3,139 |
7,418 |
73.9% |
51.3% |
22.6% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
Groupings detailed as follows: (A) reflects the same store properties as of June 30, 2015; (B) reflects the 2014 development deliveries.
2
The redevelopment of the 100% owned property in Toledo, OH is excluded. The Grove at Denton is included for purposes of
this presentation. The Company acquired its joint venture partner's interest in the Grove at Denton on January 21, 2014. The occupancy
data related to Denton is included in 2014 deliveries.
CAMPUS
CREST COMMUNITIES |
|
|
INVESTOR
INFORMATION |
|
|
Executive
Management |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David Coles |
Interim Chief
Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
Aaron Halfacre |
President and
Chief Investment Officer |
|
|
|
|
John Makuch |
Interim Chief
Financial Officer |
|
|
|
|
Scott Rochon |
Chief Accounting
Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate
Headquarters |
|
|
Investor
Relations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2100
Rexford Road #414 |
|
|
(704) 496-2571 |
|
|
Charlotte, NC
28211 |
|
|
investor.relations@campuscrest.com |
|
|
(704) 496-2500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Covering
Analysts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Barclays Capital
Inc. |
Ross Smotrich |
|
(212) 526-2306 |
|
ross.smotrich@barclays.com |
Citigroup Global Markets
Inc. |
Michael Bilerman
/ Nick Joseph |
|
(212) 816-1383
/ (212) 816-1909 |
|
michael.bilerman@citi.com
/ nicholas.joseph@citi.com |
Raymond James &
Associates |
Paul D. Puryear
/ Buck Horne |
|
(727) 567-2253
/ (727) 567-2561 |
|
paul.puryear@raymondjames.com
/ buck.horne@raymondjames.com |
Sidoti &
Company, LLC |
Jeff Lau |
|
(212) 453-7029 |
|
jlau@sidoti.com |
Bank of America
Merrill Lynch |
Jana Galan /
Jane Wong |
|
(646) 855-3081
/ (646) 855-3378 |
|
jana.galan@baml.com
/ jane.wong1@baml.com |
Wunderlich Securities |
Craig Kucera |
|
(540) 277-3366 |
|
ckucera@wundernet.com |
FORWARD
- LOOKING STATEMENTS
This
document, together with other statements and information publicly disseminated by the Company, contains certain forward-looking
statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended. The Company intends such forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor provisions for forward-looking
statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and includes this statement for purposes of complying
with these safe harbor provisions. Forward-looking statements relate to expectations, beliefs, projections, future plans and strategies,
anticipated events or trends and similar expressions concerning matters that are not historical facts. In some cases, you can
identify forward-looking statements by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “may,” “will,” “should,”
“expects,” “intends,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,”
“predicts” or “potential” or the negative of these words and phrases or similar words or phrases which
are predictions of or indicate future events or trends and which do not relate solely to historical matters. Forward-looking statements
in this press release include, among others, the performance of properties in occupancy and yield targets, outlook and guidance
for full year 2013 FFO and the related underlying assumptions, growth and development opportunities, leasing activities, financing
strategies, and development and construction projects. You should not rely on forward-looking statements since they involve known
and unknown risks, uncertainties, assumptions and contingencies, many of which are beyond the Company’s control that may
cause actual results to differ significantly from those expressed in any forward-looking statement. All forward-looking statements
reflect the Company’s good faith beliefs, assumptions and expectations, but they are not guarantees of future performance.
Furthermore, except as otherwise required by federal securities laws, the Company disclaims any obligation to publicly update
or revise any forward-looking statement to reflect changes in underlying assumptions or factors, new information, data or methods,
future events or other changes. For a further discussion of these and other factors that could cause the Company’s future
results to differ materially from any forward-looking statements, see the risk factors discussed in the Company’s most recent
Annual Report on Form 10-K, as updated in the Company’s Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q.
Lehman Abs Mbna Capa (NYSE:CCG)
Historical Stock Chart
From Feb 2025 to Mar 2025
Lehman Abs Mbna Capa (NYSE:CCG)
Historical Stock Chart
From Mar 2024 to Mar 2025