FIRST
RELIANCE BANCSHARES, INC.
Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
|
March
31,
|
|
|
December
31,
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
(Audited)
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
and due from banks
|
|
$
|
3,368,635
|
|
|
$
|
3,548,974
|
|
Interest-bearing
deposits with other banks
|
|
|
17,877,291
|
|
|
|
14,698,851
|
|
Total
cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
21,245,926
|
|
|
|
18,247,825
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time
deposits in other banks
|
|
|
101,309
|
|
|
|
101,207
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities
available-for-sale
|
|
|
11,253,414
|
|
|
|
12,144,843
|
|
Securities
held-to-maturity (Estimated fair value of $35,933,179 and $36,951,934 at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively)
|
|
|
35,643,920
|
|
|
|
36,951,934
|
|
Nonmarketable
equity securities
|
|
|
1,142,400
|
|
|
|
1,594,900
|
|
Total
investment securities
|
|
|
48,039,734
|
|
|
|
50,691,677
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage
loans held for sale
|
|
|
937,278
|
|
|
|
2,248,252
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans
receivable
|
|
|
239,634,692
|
|
|
|
238,502,131
|
|
Less
allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
(2,802,823
|
)
|
|
|
(2,894,153
|
)
|
Loans,
net
|
|
|
236,831,869
|
|
|
|
235,607,978
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premises,
furniture and equipment, net
|
|
|
24,131,418
|
|
|
|
24,333,616
|
|
Accrued
interest receivable
|
|
|
954,180
|
|
|
|
1,129,881
|
|
Other
real estate owned
|
|
|
7,236,115
|
|
|
|
8,932,634
|
|
Cash
surrender value life insurance
|
|
|
13,029,218
|
|
|
|
12,945,693
|
|
Other
assets
|
|
|
1,152,482
|
|
|
|
1,169,368
|
|
Total
assets
|
|
$
|
353,659,529
|
|
|
$
|
355,408,131
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
and Shareholders’ Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing
transaction accounts
|
|
$
|
66,652,989
|
|
|
$
|
65,576,524
|
|
Interest-bearing
transaction accounts
|
|
|
52,101,388
|
|
|
|
46,046,043
|
|
Savings
|
|
|
85,751,801
|
|
|
|
86,247,410
|
|
Time
deposits $100,000 and over
|
|
|
38,426,451
|
|
|
|
39,934,745
|
|
Other
time deposits
|
|
|
42,361,720
|
|
|
|
44,610,301
|
|
Total
deposits
|
|
|
285,294,349
|
|
|
|
282,415,023
|
|
Securities
sold under agreement to repurchase
|
|
|
5,386,566
|
|
|
|
4,876,118
|
|
Advances
from Federal Home Loan Bank
|
|
|
17,000,000
|
|
|
|
23,000,000
|
|
Junior
subordinated debentures
|
|
|
10,310,000
|
|
|
|
10,310,000
|
|
Accrued
interest payable
|
|
|
636,622
|
|
|
|
587,649
|
|
Other
liabilities
|
|
|
2,635,661
|
|
|
|
2,126,597
|
|
Total
liabilities
|
|
|
321,263,198
|
|
|
|
323,315,387
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders’
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred
stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series
A cumulative perpetual preferred stock - 15,349 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013
|
|
|
15,179,709
|
|
|
|
15,145,597
|
|
Series
B cumulative perpetual preferred stock - 767 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013
|
|
|
767,000
|
|
|
|
769,894
|
|
Common
stock, $0.01 par value; 20,000,000 shares authorized, 4,569,895 and 4,568,695 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2014
and December 31, 2013, respectively
|
|
|
45,699
|
|
|
|
45,687
|
|
Capital
surplus
|
|
|
30,611,309
|
|
|
|
30,609,281
|
|
Treasury stock,
at cost, 29,846 shares at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013
|
|
|
(201,686
|
)
|
|
|
(201,686
|
)
|
Nonvested
restricted stock
|
|
|
(21,774
|
)
|
|
|
(32,138
|
)
|
Retained
deficit
|
|
|
(14,132,769
|
)
|
|
|
(14,447,907
|
)
|
Accumulated
other comprehensive income
|
|
|
148,843
|
|
|
|
204,016
|
|
Total
shareholders’ equity
|
|
|
32,396,331
|
|
|
|
32,092,744
|
|
Total
liabilities and shareholders’ equity
|
|
$
|
353,659,529
|
|
|
$
|
355,408,131
|
|
See
notes to condensed consolidated financial statements
FIRST
RELIANCE BANCSHARES, INC.
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(Unaudited)
|
|
Three
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March
31,
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
Interest
income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans,
including fees
|
|
$
|
3,273,679
|
|
|
$
|
3,471,204
|
|
Investment
securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable
|
|
|
287,981
|
|
|
|
347,984
|
|
Nontaxable
|
|
|
28,571
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Other
interest income
|
|
|
11,902
|
|
|
|
26,343
|
|
Total
|
|
|
3,602,133
|
|
|
|
3,845,531
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time
deposits
|
|
|
249,119
|
|
|
|
604,663
|
|
Other
deposits
|
|
|
33,333
|
|
|
|
73,711
|
|
Other
interest expense
|
|
|
81,480
|
|
|
|
121,537
|
|
Total
|
|
|
363,932
|
|
|
|
799,911
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
interest income
|
|
|
3,238,201
|
|
|
|
3,045,620
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision
for loan losses
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
interest income after provision for loan losses
|
|
|
3,238,201
|
|
|
|
3,045,620
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest
income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service
charges on deposit accounts
|
|
|
383,375
|
|
|
|
413,315
|
|
Gain
on sale of mortgage loans
|
|
|
201,240
|
|
|
|
293,569
|
|
Income
from bank owned life insurance
|
|
|
83,525
|
|
|
|
85,040
|
|
Other
charges, commissions and fees
|
|
|
258,614
|
|
|
|
241,925
|
|
Gain
on sale of securities available-for-sale
|
|
|
5,321
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Other
non-interest income
|
|
|
73,709
|
|
|
|
83,649
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,005,784
|
|
|
|
1,117,498
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest
expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries
and benefits
|
|
|
1,812,735
|
|
|
|
1,928,709
|
|
Occupancy
expense
|
|
|
367,030
|
|
|
|
358,087
|
|
Furniture
and equipment expense
|
|
|
414,449
|
|
|
|
295,515
|
|
Other
operating expenses
|
|
|
1,303,415
|
|
|
|
1,567,386
|
|
Total
|
|
|
3,897,629
|
|
|
|
4,149,697
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
before taxes
|
|
|
346,356
|
|
|
|
13,421
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
tax
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income
|
|
|
346,356
|
|
|
|
13,421
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred
stock dividends
|
|
|
209,120
|
|
|
|
249,248
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deemed
dividends on preferred stock resulting from net accretion of discount and amortization of premium
|
|
|
31,218
|
|
|
|
43,900
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income (loss) available to common shareholders
|
|
$
|
106,018
|
|
|
$
|
(279,727
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average common
shares outstanding, basic
|
|
|
4,569,122
|
|
|
|
4,094,866
|
|
Average common
shares outstanding, diluted
|
|
|
4,649,502
|
|
|
|
4,094,866
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
(loss) per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
|
$
|
(0.07
|
)
|
Diluted
|
|
|
0.02
|
|
|
|
(0.07
|
)
|
See
notes to condensed consolidated financial statements
FIRST
RELIANCE BANCSHARES, INC.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)
(Unaudited)
|
|
Three
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March
31,
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income from operations
|
|
$
|
346,356
|
|
|
$
|
13,421
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities
available-for-sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
holding losses arising during the period
|
|
|
(64,972
|
)
|
|
|
(252,025
|
)
|
Income
tax benefit
|
|
|
(22,090
|
)
|
|
|
(31,246
|
)
|
Net
of income taxes
|
|
|
(42,882
|
)
|
|
|
(220,779
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassification
adjustment for gains (loss) realized in net income from operations
|
|
|
5,321
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Income
tax expense
|
|
|
1,809
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Net
of income taxes
|
|
|
3,512
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other-than-temporary
impairment on available-for-sale securities
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(70,000
|
)
|
Income
tax benefit
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(8,678
|
)
|
Net
of income taxes
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(61,322
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
comprehensive loss attributable to securities available-for-sale
|
|
|
(46,394
|
)
|
|
|
(159,457
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities
held-to-maturity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization
of net unrealized gains capitalized on securities transferred from available-for-sale
|
|
|
(13,302
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Income
tax benefit
|
|
|
(4,523
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Net
of income taxes
|
|
|
(8,779
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(55,173
|
)
|
|
|
(159,457
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive
income (loss)
|
|
$
|
291,183
|
|
|
$
|
(146,036
|
)
|
See
notes to condensed consolidated financial statements
FIRST
RELIANCE BANCSHARES, INC.
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity
For
the Three Months Ended March 31, 2014 and 2013
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Treasury
|
|
|
Restricted
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Surplus
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
Stock
|
|
|
(Deficit)
|
|
|
(Loss)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Balance,
December 31, 2012
|
|
$
|
18,199,743
|
|
|
$
|
40,949
|
|
|
$
|
27,991,132
|
|
|
$
|
(182,234
|
)
|
|
$
|
(123,466
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6,207,116
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,478,919
|
|
|
$
|
41,197,927
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,421
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,421
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes
in unrealized gains and losses on securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(159,457
|
)
|
|
|
(159,457
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accretion
of Series A Preferred stock discount
|
|
|
47,970
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(47,970
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization
of Series B Preferred stock premium
|
|
|
(4,070
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,070
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
Change in Restricted Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(735
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,770
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,039
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase
of treasury stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,210
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,210
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance,
March 31, 2013
|
|
$
|
18,243,643
|
|
|
$
|
40,953
|
|
|
$
|
27,990,397
|
|
|
$
|
(183,444
|
)
|
|
$
|
(83,696
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6,237,595
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,319,462
|
|
|
$
|
41,089,720
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance,
December 31, 2013
|
|
$
|
15,915,491
|
|
|
$
|
45,687
|
|
|
$
|
30,609,281
|
|
|
$
|
(201,686
|
)
|
|
$
|
(32,138
|
)
|
|
$
|
(14,447,907
|
)
|
|
$
|
204,016
|
|
|
$
|
32,092,744
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
346,356
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
346,356
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes
in unrealized gains and losses on securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(55,173
|
)
|
|
|
(55,173
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accretion
of Series A Preferred stock discount
|
|
|
34,112
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34,112
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization
of Series B Preferred stock premium
|
|
|
(2,894
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,894
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization
of nonvested restricted stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,364
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,364
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance
of common stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
2,028
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,040
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance,
March 31, 2014
|
|
$
|
15,946,709
|
|
|
$
|
45,699
|
|
|
$
|
30,611,309
|
|
|
$
|
(201,686
|
)
|
|
$
|
(21,774
|
)
|
|
$
|
(14,132,769
|
)
|
|
$
|
148,843
|
|
|
$
|
32,396,331
|
|
See
notes to condensed consolidated financial statements
FIRST
RELIANCE BANCSHARES, INC.
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
|
|
Three
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March
31,
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
346,356
|
|
|
$
|
13,421
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile
net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and
amortization expense
|
|
|
242,654
|
|
|
|
226,360
|
|
Gain on sale of
securities available-for-sale
|
|
|
(5,321
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
(Gain) loss on
sale of other real estate owned
|
|
|
(112,594
|
)
|
|
|
24,340
|
|
Impairment loss
on available-for-sale securities
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
70,000
|
|
Discount accretion
and premium amortization
|
|
|
41,118
|
|
|
|
78,908
|
|
Disbursements
for mortgage loans held for sale
|
|
|
(5,682,944
|
)
|
|
|
(5,781,617
|
)
|
Proceeds from
sale of mortgage loans held for sale
|
|
|
6,993,918
|
|
|
|
8,518,513
|
|
Decrease in interest
receivable
|
|
|
175,701
|
|
|
|
63,508
|
|
Increase in interest
payable
|
|
|
48,973
|
|
|
|
30,882
|
|
Increase for cash
surrender value of life insurance
|
|
|
(83,525
|
)
|
|
|
(85,040
|
)
|
Amortization of
deferred compensation on restricted stock
|
|
|
10,364
|
|
|
|
39,039
|
|
(Increase) decrease
in other assets
|
|
|
(16,500
|
)
|
|
|
157,334
|
|
Increase
in other liabilities
|
|
|
537,486
|
|
|
|
204,011
|
|
Net
cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
2,495,686
|
|
|
|
3,559,659
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (increase) decrease
in loans receivable
|
|
|
(1,235,891
|
)
|
|
|
3,133,351
|
|
Purchases of securities available-for-sale
|
|
|
(5,153,110
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Maturities of securities available-for-sale
|
|
|
1,269,650
|
|
|
|
4,667,566
|
|
Maturities of securities held-to-maturity
|
|
|
667,981
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Sales of securities available-for-sale
|
|
|
5,295,529
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Increase in time
deposits in other banks
|
|
|
(102
|
)
|
|
|
(100,153
|
)
|
Decrease in nonmarketable
equity securities
|
|
|
452,500
|
|
|
|
242,400
|
|
Sales of other real
estate owned
|
|
|
1,821,113
|
|
|
|
635,534
|
|
Purchases
of premises and equipment
|
|
|
(7,069
|
)
|
|
|
(37,929
|
)
|
Net
cash provided by investing activities
|
|
|
3,110,601
|
|
|
|
8,540,769
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing
activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in demand
deposits, interest-bearing transaction accounts and savings accounts
|
|
|
6,636,201
|
|
|
|
2,197,497
|
|
Net decrease in certificates
of deposit and other time deposits
|
|
|
(3,756,875
|
)
|
|
|
(16,345,580
|
)
|
Net increase in securities
sold under agreements to repurchase
|
|
|
510,448
|
|
|
|
200,176
|
|
Net decrease in a
dvances
from Federal Home Loan Bank
|
|
|
(6,000,000
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Issuance of common
stock
|
|
|
2,040
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Purchase
of treasury stock
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1,210
|
)
|
Net
cash used by financing activities
|
|
|
(2,608,186
|
)
|
|
|
(13,949,117
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease)
in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
2,998,101
|
|
|
|
(1,848,689
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents, beginning
|
|
|
18,247,825
|
|
|
|
38,062,903
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents, end
|
|
$
|
21,245,926
|
|
|
$
|
36,214,214
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during
the period for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
314,959
|
|
|
|
769,029
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental noncash
investing and financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreclosures on loans
transferred to other real estate owned
|
|
$
|
12,000
|
|
|
$
|
444,910
|
|
Net change in unrealized
losses on investment securities
|
|
|
(55,173
|
)
|
|
|
(159,457
|
)
|
See
notes to condensed consolidated financial statements
Notes
to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Note
1 - Basis of Presentation
First
Reliance Bancshares, Inc. (the “Company”) was incorporated to serve as a bank holding company for its subsidiary,
First Reliance Bank (the “Bank”). First Reliance Bank was incorporated on August 9, 1999 and commenced business on
August 16, 1999. The principal business activity of the Bank is to provide banking services to domestic markets, principally in
Florence, Lexington, and Charleston Counties in South Carolina. The Bank is a state-chartered commercial bank, and its deposits
are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”).
The
accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the requirements for interim financial
statements and, accordingly, they are condensed and omit certain disclosures that would appear in audited annual consolidated
financial statements. The consolidated financial statements as of March 31, 2014 and for the interim periods ended March 31, 2014
and 2013 are unaudited and, in the opinion of management, include all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered
necessary for a fair presentation. The consolidated financial information as of December 31, 2013 has been derived from the audited
consolidated financial statements as of that date. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and
the notes included in First Reliance Bancshares, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.
Note
2 - Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
The
following is a summary of recent authoritative pronouncements:
– First Quarter
In
January 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) amended the Receivables - Troubled Debt Restructurings
by Creditors subtopic of the Codification to address the reclassification of consumer mortgage loans collateralized by residential
real estate upon foreclosure. The amendments clarify the criteria for concluding that an in substance repossession or foreclosure
has occurred, and a creditor is considered to have received physical possession of residential real estate property collateralizing
a consumer mortgage loan. The amendments also outline interim and annual disclosure requirements. The amendments will be effective
for the Company for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2014. Companies are allowed to use either
a modified retrospective transition method or a prospective transition method when adopting this update. Early adoption is permitted.
The Company does not expect these amendments to have a material effect on its financial statements. Other accounting standards
that have been issued or proposed by the FASB or other standards-setting bodies are not expected to have a material impact on
the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Note
3 - Reclassifications
Certain
captions and amounts in the financial statements in the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2013 were reclassified
to conform to the March 31, 2014 presentation.
Note
4 - Investment Securities
The
amortized cost and estimated fair values of securities available-for-sale were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Gross
Unrealized
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
March 31, 2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
$
|
8,450,875
|
|
|
$
|
35,043
|
|
|
$
|
13,833
|
|
|
$
|
8,472,085
|
|
Corporate bonds
|
|
|
2,771,515
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
20,186
|
|
|
|
2,751,329
|
|
Equity security
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
11,252,390
|
|
|
$
|
35,043
|
|
|
$
|
34,019
|
|
|
$
|
11,253,414
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
$
|
9,277,577
|
|
|
$
|
87,635
|
|
|
$
|
46,579
|
|
|
$
|
9,318,633
|
|
Corporate bonds
|
|
|
2,765,950
|
|
|
|
30,260
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,796,210
|
|
Equity security
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
12,073,527
|
|
|
$
|
117,895
|
|
|
$
|
46,579
|
|
|
$
|
12,144,843
|
|
The
amortized cost and estimated fair values of securities held-to-maturity were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Gross
Unrealized
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
March
31, 2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S.
Government sponsored agencies
|
|
$
|
6,912,687
|
|
|
$
|
90,591
|
|
|
$
|
114,576
|
|
|
$
|
6,888,702
|
|
Mortgage-backed
securities
|
|
|
25,346,867
|
|
|
|
630,243
|
|
|
|
184,657
|
|
|
|
25,792,453
|
|
Municipals
|
|
|
3,159,870
|
|
|
|
92,154
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3,252,024
|
|
|
|
|
35,419,424
|
|
|
$
|
812,988
|
|
|
$
|
299,233
|
|
|
$
|
35,933,179
|
|
Unamortized
capitalization of net unrealized gains on securities transferred from available-for-sale
|
|
|
224,496
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
35,643,920
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December
31, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S.
Government sponsored agencies
|
|
$
|
7,146,409
|
|
|
$
|
80,707
|
|
|
$
|
156,131
|
|
|
$
|
7,070,985
|
|
Mortgage-backed
securities
|
|
|
26,404,573
|
|
|
|
537,133
|
|
|
|
210,365
|
|
|
|
26,731,341
|
|
Municipals
|
|
|
3,163,155
|
|
|
|
17,569
|
|
|
|
31,116
|
|
|
|
3,149,608
|
|
|
|
|
36,714,137
|
|
|
$
|
635,409
|
|
|
$
|
397,612
|
|
|
$
|
36,951,934
|
|
Capitalization
of net unrealized gains on securities transferred from available-for-sale
|
|
|
237,797
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
36,951,934
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At
December 31, 2013, the Company transferred certain securities to the held-to-maturity category from available-for-sale, since
the Company has the ability and management intends to hold these securities to maturity. At the time of the reclassification,
the securities were carried at their estimated fair value of $36,951,934, including net unrealized gains of $237,797. The net
unrealized gain is being amortized to other comprehensive income (loss) over the life of the underlying securities.
The
following is a summary of maturities of securities available-for-sale and held-to-maturity as of March 31, 2014. The amortized
cost and estimated fair values are based on the contractual maturity dates. Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities
because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without penalty. Mortgage-backed securities are presented
as a separate line, maturities of which are based on expected maturities since paydowns are expected to occur before contractual
maturity dates.
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
|
Available-for-Sale
|
|
|
Held-to-Maturity
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Fair
Value
|
|
Due after ten years
|
|
$
|
2,771,515
|
|
|
$
|
2,751,329
|
|
|
$
|
9,991,039
|
|
|
$
|
10,140,726
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
8,450,875
|
|
|
|
8,472,085
|
|
|
|
25,652,881
|
|
|
|
25,792,453
|
|
Equity security
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
11,252,390
|
|
|
$
|
11,253,414
|
|
|
$
|
35,643,920
|
|
|
$
|
35,933,179
|
|
The following table shows gross unrealized losses and fair value
of securities available-for-sale, aggregated by investment category, and length of time that individual securities have been in
a continuous realized loss position at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013.
|
|
March 31, 2014
|
|
|
December 31, 2013
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
Less Than 12 Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
$
|
1,925,806
|
|
|
$
|
13,833
|
|
|
$
|
1,999,360
|
|
|
$
|
46,579
|
|
Corporate bonds
|
|
|
2,751,329
|
|
|
|
20,186
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total securities available-for-sale
|
|
$
|
4,677,135
|
|
|
$
|
34,019
|
|
|
$
|
1,999,360
|
|
|
$
|
46,579
|
|
The
following table shows gross unrealized losses and fair value of securities held-to-maturity, aggregated by investment category,
and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position at March 31, 2014 and December
31, 2013.
|
|
March
31, 2014
|
|
|
December
31, 2013
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
Less Than 12 Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S.
Government sponsored agencies
|
|
$
|
4,402,949
|
|
|
$
|
114,576
|
|
|
$
|
4,549,325
|
|
|
$
|
156,131
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
4,889,633
|
|
|
|
184,657
|
|
|
|
5,011,313
|
|
|
|
210,365
|
|
Municipals
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,037,029
|
|
|
|
31,116
|
|
Total
securities held-to-maturity
|
|
$
|
9,292,582
|
|
|
$
|
299,233
|
|
|
$
|
11,597,667
|
|
|
$
|
397,612
|
|
At
March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, there were no investment securities that had been in a loss position for twelve months or
more.
During
the first quarter of 2014, gross proceeds from the sale of available-for-sale securities were $5,295,529, resulting in realized
gross gains of $39,110 and gross losses of $33,789. There were no sales of investment securities during the first quarter of 2013.
Note
5 – Loans Receivable and Allowance for Loan Losses
Major
classifications of loans receivable are summarized as follows:
|
|
March
31,
|
|
|
December
31,
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
Real estate loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
$
|
23,890,521
|
|
|
$
|
24,175,347
|
|
Residential:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential 1-4
family
|
|
|
35,761,717
|
|
|
|
35,873,036
|
|
Multifamily
|
|
|
3,890,201
|
|
|
|
4,312,057
|
|
Second mortgages
|
|
|
4,077,550
|
|
|
|
4,245,778
|
|
Equity
lines of credit
|
|
|
21,427,102
|
|
|
|
21,270,126
|
|
Total
residential
|
|
|
65,156,570
|
|
|
|
65,700,997
|
|
Nonresidential
|
|
|
105,861,288
|
|
|
|
104,378,485
|
|
Total real estate
loans
|
|
|
194,908,379
|
|
|
|
194,254,829
|
|
Commercial and industrial
|
|
|
32,584,523
|
|
|
|
32,486,848
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
12,136,195
|
|
|
|
11,725,319
|
|
Other
|
|
|
5,595
|
|
|
|
35,135
|
|
Total
loans
|
|
$
|
239,634,692
|
|
|
$
|
238,502,131
|
|
The
Company has pledged certain loans as collateral to secure its borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Bank. The total of loans pledged
was $79,515,357 and $76,972,548 at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively.
The
following is an analysis of the allowance for loan losses by class of loans for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and the
year ended December 31, 2013.
March
31, 2014
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real
Estate Loans
|
|
|
Real
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars
in Thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
Estate
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
and
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning
balance
|
|
$
|
2,894
|
|
|
$
|
303
|
|
|
$
|
1,043
|
|
|
$
|
1,382
|
|
|
$
|
2,728
|
|
|
$
|
65
|
|
|
$
|
101
|
|
Provisions
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
Recoveries
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Charge-offs
|
|
|
(202
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(188
|
)
|
|
|
(192
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
Ending
balance
|
|
$
|
2,803
|
|
|
$
|
280
|
|
|
$
|
1,045
|
|
|
$
|
1,303
|
|
|
$
|
2,628
|
|
|
$
|
100
|
|
|
$
|
75
|
|
December
31, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real
Estate Loans
|
|
|
Real
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars
in Thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
Estate
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
and
Other
|
|
Beginning
balance
|
|
$
|
4,167
|
|
|
$
|
1,441
|
|
|
$
|
951
|
|
|
$
|
1,129
|
|
|
$
|
3,521
|
|
|
$
|
616
|
|
|
$
|
30
|
|
Provisions
|
|
|
610
|
|
|
|
(980
|
)
|
|
|
903
|
|
|
|
1,136
|
|
|
|
1,059
|
|
|
|
(548
|
)
|
|
|
99
|
|
Recoveries
|
|
|
455
|
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
350
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
Charge-offs
|
|
|
(2,338
|
)
|
|
|
(296
|
)
|
|
|
(988
|
)
|
|
|
(918
|
)
|
|
|
(2,202
|
)
|
|
|
(92
|
)
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
Ending balance
|
|
$
|
2,894
|
|
|
$
|
303
|
|
|
$
|
1,043
|
|
|
$
|
1,382
|
|
|
$
|
2,728
|
|
|
$
|
65
|
|
|
$
|
101
|
|
The
following is a summary of loans evaluated for impairment individually and collectively, by class as of March 31, 2014 and December
31, 2013.
March 31, 2014
Allowance for Loan Losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real
Estate Loans
|
|
|
Real
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars
in Thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
Estate
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
and
Other
|
|
Allowance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Evaluated
for impairment Individually
|
|
$
|
561
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
144
|
|
|
$
|
369
|
|
|
$
|
515
|
|
|
$
|
46
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Collectively
|
|
|
2,242
|
|
|
|
278
|
|
|
|
901
|
|
|
|
934
|
|
|
|
2,113
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
Allowance
for loan losses
|
|
$
|
2,803
|
|
|
$
|
280
|
|
|
$
|
1,045
|
|
|
$
|
1,303
|
|
|
$
|
2,628
|
|
|
$
|
100
|
|
|
$
|
75
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Evaluated
for impairment Individually
|
|
$
|
15,243
|
|
|
$
|
2,456
|
|
|
$
|
3,212
|
|
|
$
|
8,049
|
|
|
$
|
13,717
|
|
|
$
|
1,435
|
|
|
$
|
91
|
|
Collectively
|
|
|
224,392
|
|
|
|
21,434
|
|
|
|
61,945
|
|
|
|
97,812
|
|
|
|
181,191
|
|
|
|
31,150
|
|
|
|
12,051
|
|
Loans
receivable
|
|
$
|
239,635
|
|
|
$
|
23,890
|
|
|
$
|
65,157
|
|
|
$
|
105,861
|
|
|
$
|
194,908
|
|
|
$
|
32,585
|
|
|
$
|
12,142
|
|
December
31, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real
Estate Loans
|
|
|
Real
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars
in Thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
Estate
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
and
Other
|
|
Allowance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Evaluated
for impairment Individually
|
|
$
|
405
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
185
|
|
|
$
|
163
|
|
|
$
|
350
|
|
|
$
|
53
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
Collectively
|
|
|
2,489
|
|
|
|
301
|
|
|
|
858
|
|
|
|
1,219
|
|
|
|
2,378
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
Allowance
for loan losses
|
|
$
|
2,894
|
|
|
$
|
303
|
|
|
$
|
1,043
|
|
|
$
|
1,382
|
|
|
$
|
2,728
|
|
|
$
|
65
|
|
|
$
|
101
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Evaluated
for impairment Individually
|
|
$
|
18,160
|
|
|
$
|
2,495
|
|
|
$
|
3,091
|
|
|
$
|
10,998
|
|
|
$
|
16,584
|
|
|
$
|
1,480
|
|
|
$
|
96
|
|
Collectively
|
|
|
220,342
|
|
|
|
21,680
|
|
|
|
62,610
|
|
|
|
93,381
|
|
|
|
177,671
|
|
|
|
31,007
|
|
|
|
11,664
|
|
Loans
receivable
|
|
$
|
238,502
|
|
|
$
|
24,175
|
|
|
$
|
65,701
|
|
|
$
|
104,379
|
|
|
$
|
194,255
|
|
|
$
|
32,487
|
|
|
$
|
11,760
|
|
The
Company identifies impaired loans through its normal internal loan review process. Loans on the Company’s problem loan watch
list are considered potentially impaired loans. These loans are evaluated in determining whether all outstanding principal and
interest are expected to be collected. Loans are not considered impaired if a minimal delay occurs and all amounts due, including
accrued interest at the contractual interest rate for the period of delay, are expected to be collected.
The
following summarizes the Company’s impaired loans as of March 31, 2014.
|
|
|
|
|
Unpaid
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
(Dollars
in Thousands)
|
|
Recorded
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
Related
|
|
|
Recorded
|
|
|
|
Investment
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Allowance
|
|
|
Investment
|
|
With no related allowance
recorded:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
$
|
674
|
|
|
$
|
849
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
677
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
2,496
|
|
|
|
3,468
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,312
|
|
Nonresidential
|
|
|
6,735
|
|
|
|
6,938
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
6,391
|
|
Total real estate
loans
|
|
|
9,905
|
|
|
|
11,255
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
9,380
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
Consumer and other
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
|
10,016
|
|
|
|
11,381
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
9,483
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
With an allowance
recorded:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
1,782
|
|
|
|
1,782
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1,799
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
716
|
|
|
|
750
|
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
840
|
|
Nonresidential
|
|
|
1,314
|
|
|
|
1,417
|
|
|
|
369
|
|
|
|
3,132
|
|
Total real estate
loans
|
|
|
3,812
|
|
|
|
3,949
|
|
|
|
515
|
|
|
|
5,771
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
1,414
|
|
|
|
1,484
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
1,441
|
|
Consumer and other
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
5,227
|
|
|
|
5,434
|
|
|
|
561
|
|
|
|
7,219
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
2,456
|
|
|
|
2,631
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2,476
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
3,212
|
|
|
|
4,218
|
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
3,152
|
|
Nonresidential
|
|
|
8,049
|
|
|
|
8,355
|
|
|
|
369
|
|
|
|
9,523
|
|
Total real estate
loans
|
|
|
13,717
|
|
|
|
15,204
|
|
|
|
515
|
|
|
|
15,151
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
1,435
|
|
|
|
1,511
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
1,458
|
|
Consumer and other
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
15,243
|
|
|
$
|
16,815
|
|
|
$
|
561
|
|
|
$
|
16,702
|
|
The
following summarizes the Company’s impaired loans as of December 31, 2013.
|
|
|
|
|
Unpaid
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
(Dollars
in Thousands)
|
|
Recorded
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
Related
|
|
|
Recorded
|
|
|
|
Investment
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Allowance
|
|
|
Investment
|
|
With no related allowance
recorded:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
$
|
680
|
|
|
$
|
849
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
1,599
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
2,127
|
|
|
|
2,272
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3,038
|
|
Nonresidential
|
|
|
6,047
|
|
|
|
6,365
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
8,187
|
|
Total real estate
loans
|
|
|
8,854
|
|
|
|
9,486
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
12,824
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,131
|
|
Consumer and other
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
|
8,949
|
|
|
|
9,595
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
14,030
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unpaid
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
(Dollars
in Thousands)
|
|
Recorded
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
Related
|
|
|
Recorded
|
|
|
|
Investment
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Allowance
|
|
|
Investment
|
|
With an allowance
recorded:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
$
|
1,815
|
|
|
$
|
1,815
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
1,777
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
964
|
|
|
|
999
|
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
|
1,299
|
|
Nonresidential
|
|
|
4,951
|
|
|
|
5,087
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
2,803
|
|
Total real estate loans
|
|
|
7,730
|
|
|
|
7,901
|
|
|
|
350
|
|
|
|
5,879
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
1,468
|
|
|
|
1,538
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
606
|
|
Consumer and other
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
9,211
|
|
|
|
9,453
|
|
|
|
405
|
|
|
|
6,513
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
2,495
|
|
|
|
2,664
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
3,375
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
3,091
|
|
|
|
3,271
|
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
|
4,337
|
|
Nonresidential
|
|
|
10,998
|
|
|
|
11,452
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
10,990
|
|
Total real estate
loans
|
|
|
16,584
|
|
|
|
17,387
|
|
|
|
350
|
|
|
|
18,702
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
1,480
|
|
|
|
1,556
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
1,737
|
|
Consumer and other
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
18,160
|
|
|
$
|
19,048
|
|
|
$
|
405
|
|
|
$
|
20,543
|
|
Interest
income on impaired loans other than nonaccrual loans is recognized on an accrual basis. Interest income on nonaccrual loans is
recognized only as collected. For the quarters ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, interest income recognized on nonaccrual loans was
$31,086 and $148,728, respectively. If the nonaccrual loans had been accruing interest at their original contracted rates, related
income would have been $110,227 and $289,706 for quarters ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
A
summary of current, past due and nonaccrual loans as of March 31, 2014 was as follows:
|
|
Past
Due
|
|
|
Past
Due Over 90 days
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30-89
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
(
Dollars
in Thousands
)
|
|
Days
|
|
|
Accruing
|
|
|
Accruing
|
|
|
Past
Due
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
Real estate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
475
|
|
|
$
|
475
|
|
|
$
|
23,415
|
|
|
$
|
23,890
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,796
|
|
|
|
1,972
|
|
|
|
63,185
|
|
|
|
65,157
|
|
Nonresidential
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3,986
|
|
|
|
3,986
|
|
|
|
101,875
|
|
|
|
105,861
|
|
Total real estate
loans
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
6,257
|
|
|
|
6,433
|
|
|
|
188,475
|
|
|
|
194,908
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,353
|
|
|
|
1,353
|
|
|
|
31,232
|
|
|
|
32,585
|
|
Consumer and other
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
12,051
|
|
|
|
12,142
|
|
Totals
|
|
$
|
188
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
7,689
|
|
|
$
|
7,877
|
|
|
$
|
231,758
|
|
|
$
|
239,635
|
|
A
summary of current, past due and nonaccrual loans as of December 31, 2013 was as follows:
|
|
Past
Due
|
|
|
Past
Due Over 90 days
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(
Dollars in Thousands
)
|
|
30-89
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Days
|
|
|
Accruing
|
|
|
Accruing
|
|
|
Past
Due
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
Real estate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
481
|
|
|
$
|
492
|
|
|
$
|
23,683
|
|
|
$
|
24,175
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
344
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,672
|
|
|
|
2,016
|
|
|
|
63,685
|
|
|
|
65,701
|
|
Nonresidential
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
|
5,006
|
|
|
|
5,157
|
|
|
|
99,222
|
|
|
|
104,379
|
|
Total real estate
loans
|
|
|
379
|
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
|
7,159
|
|
|
|
7,665
|
|
|
|
186,590
|
|
|
|
194,255
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,393
|
|
|
|
1,396
|
|
|
|
31,091
|
|
|
|
32,487
|
|
Consumer and other
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
11,659
|
|
|
|
11,760
|
|
Totals
|
|
$
|
401
|
|
|
$
|
135
|
|
|
$
|
8,626
|
|
|
$
|
9,162
|
|
|
$
|
229,340
|
|
|
$
|
238,502
|
|
Included
in the loan portfolio are particular loans that have been modified in order to maximize the collection of loan balances. If, for
economic or legal reasons related to the customer’s financial difficulties, the Company grants a concession compared to
the original terms and conditions on the loan, the modified loan is classified as a troubled debt restructuring (“TDR”).
Concessions can relate to the contractual interest rate, maturity date or payment structure of the note. As part of our workout
plan for individual loan relationships, we may restructure loan terms to assist borrowers facing financial challenges in the current
economic environment.
At
March 31, 2014 there were 30 loans classified as a TDR totaling $7,274,231. Of the 30 loans, 16 loans totaling $4,564,197 were
performing while 14 loans totaling $2,710,034 were not performing. As of December 31, 2013 there were 30 loans classified as TDRs
totaling $7,157,230. Of the 30 loans, 16 loans totaling $3,481,589 were performing while 14 loans totaling $3,675,641 were not
performing. All of these restructured loans resulted in either extended maturity or lowered rates and were included in the impaired
loan balance.
The
following table provides, by class, the number of loans modified in TDRs during the first quarters of 2014 and 2013.
(
Dollars
in Thousands
)
|
|
For
the Quarter Ended March 31, 2014
|
|
|
For
the Quarter Ended March 31, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unpaid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unpaid
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Recorded
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Recorded
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
|
of
Loans
|
|
|
Investment
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
of
Loans
|
|
|
Investment
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
Extended maturity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer and other
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reduced Rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate - Residential
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
170
|
|
|
|
170
|
|
Totals
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
62
|
|
|
$
|
62
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
183
|
|
|
$
|
183
|
|
The
following table provides the number of loans and leases modified in TDRs during the previous 12 months which subsequently defaulted
during the quarter ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively, as well as the recorded investments and unpaid principal balances
as of March 31, 2014 and 2013. Loans in default are those past due greater than 89 days.
(
Dollars
in Thousands
)
|
|
For
the Quarter Ended March 31, 2014
|
|
|
For
the Quarter Ended March 31, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unpaid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unpaid
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Recorded
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Recorded
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
|
of
Loans
|
|
|
Investment
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
of
Loans
|
|
|
Investment
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
Reduced Rate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
62
|
|
|
$
|
62
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
170
|
|
|
$
|
170
|
|
Nonresidential
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
|
|
119
|
|
Totals
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
62
|
|
|
$
|
62
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
289
|
|
|
$
|
289
|
|
All
loans modified in TDRs are evaluated for impairment. The nature and extent of impairment of TDRs, including those which have experienced
a subsequent default, are considered in determining an appropriate level of allowance for credit losses.
Credit
Indicators
Loans
are categorized into risk categories based on relevant information about the ability of borrowers to service their debt, including,
among other factors: current financial information, historical payment experience, credit documentation, public information, and
current economic trends. The following definitions are utilized for risk ratings, which are consistent with the definitions used
in supervisory guidance:
Special
Mention -
Loans classified as special mention have a potential weakness that deserves management's close attention. If left
uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects for the loan or of the institution's
credit position at some future date.
Substandard
-
Loans classified as substandard are inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or
of the collateral pledged, if any. Loans so classified have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation
of the debt. They are characterized by the distinct possibility that the institution will sustain some loss if the deficiencies
are not corrected.
Doubtful
-
Loans classified as doubtful have all the weaknesses inherent in those classified as substandard, with the added characteristic
that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values,
highly questionable and improbable.
Loans
not meeting the criteria above that are analyzed individually as part of the above described process are considered to be pass
rated loans.
As
of March 31, 2014, and based on the most recent analysis performed, the risk category of loans by class of loans is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real
Estate Loans
|
|
|
Real
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars
in Thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
Estate
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
and
Other
|
|
Pass
|
|
$
|
196,445
|
|
|
$
|
14,565
|
|
|
$
|
55,823
|
|
|
$
|
84,372
|
|
|
$
|
154,760
|
|
|
$
|
29,737
|
|
|
$
|
11,948
|
|
Special mention
|
|
|
31,032
|
|
|
|
8,850
|
|
|
|
5,987
|
|
|
|
14,695
|
|
|
|
29,532
|
|
|
|
1,412
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
Substandard
|
|
|
12,158
|
|
|
|
475
|
|
|
|
3,347
|
|
|
|
6,794
|
|
|
|
10,616
|
|
|
|
1,436
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
Doubtful
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Totals
|
|
$
|
239,635
|
|
|
$
|
23,890
|
|
|
$
|
65,157
|
|
|
$
|
105,861
|
|
|
$
|
194,908
|
|
|
$
|
32,585
|
|
|
$
|
12,142
|
|
As
of December 31, 2013, and based on the most recent analysis performed, the risk category
of loans by class of loans is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real
Estate Loans
|
|
|
Real
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars
in Thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
Estate
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
and
Other
|
|
Pass
|
|
$
|
193,839
|
|
|
$
|
14,406
|
|
|
$
|
56,227
|
|
|
$
|
81,891
|
|
|
$
|
152,524
|
|
|
$
|
29,735
|
|
|
$
|
11,580
|
|
Special mention
|
|
|
27,926
|
|
|
|
9,085
|
|
|
|
5,904
|
|
|
|
11,588
|
|
|
|
26,577
|
|
|
|
1,271
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
Substandard
|
|
|
16,737
|
|
|
|
684
|
|
|
|
3,570
|
|
|
|
10,900
|
|
|
|
15,154
|
|
|
|
1,481
|
|
|
|
102
|
|
Doubtful
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Totals
|
|
$
|
238,502
|
|
|
$
|
24,175
|
|
|
$
|
65,701
|
|
|
$
|
104,379
|
|
|
$
|
194,255
|
|
|
$
|
32,487
|
|
|
$
|
11,760
|
|
The
Company enters into financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs
of its customers. These financial instruments consist of commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit. Commitments
to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract.
Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. A commitment
involves, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the balance sheet.
The Company’s exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other parties to the instrument is represented
by the contractual notional amount of the instrument. Since certain commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon,
the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. The Company uses the same credit policies
in making commitments to extend credit as it does for on-balance-sheet instruments. Letters of credit are conditional commitments
issued to guarantee a customer’s performance to a third party and have essentially the same credit risk as other lending
facilities.
Collateral
held for commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit varies but may include accounts receivable, inventory, property,
plant, equipment, and income-producing commercial properties.
The
following table summarizes the Company’s off-balance sheet financial instruments whose contract amounts represent credit
risk at the dates indicated below:
|
|
March
31,
|
|
|
December
31,
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
Commitments to extend credit
|
|
$
|
35,508,578
|
|
|
$
|
34,397,688
|
|
Standby letters of credit
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
|
|
8,000
|
|
Note
6 – Other Real Estate Owned
Transactions
in other real estate owned (“OREO”) for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and year ended December 31, 2013 are
summarized below:
|
|
March
31,
|
|
|
December
31,
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
$
|
8,932,634
|
|
|
$
|
15,289,991
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
|
|
4,827,496
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
(1,708,519
|
)
|
|
|
(6,279,377
|
)
|
Write downs
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(4,905,476
|
)
|
Ending balance
|
|
$
|
7,236,115
|
|
|
$
|
8,932,634
|
|
The
Company recognized a net gain of $112,594 and a net loss of $24,340 on the sale of OREO for the three months ended March 31, 2014
and 2013, respectively.
OREO
expense for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 was $115,286 and $216,265, respectively, which includes gains and losses
on sales.
Note
7 – Shareholders’ Equity
Common
Stock
–
The following is a summary of the changes in common shares outstanding for the three months ended March
31, 2014 and 2013.
|
|
Three
Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March
31,
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares outstanding
at beginning of the period
|
|
|
4,568,695
|
|
|
|
4,094,861
|
|
Issuance of common stock
|
|
|
1,200
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Issuance of non-vested restricted shares
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,245
|
|
Forfeiture of restricted shares
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(835
|
)
|
Common shares
outstanding at end of the period
|
|
|
4,569,895
|
|
|
|
4,095,271
|
|
Preferred
Stock
-
On March 6, 2009, the Company completed a transaction with the United States Treasury (the “Treasury”)
under the Troubled Asset Relief Program Capital Purchase Program, whereby the Company sold 15,349 shares of its Series A Cumulative
Perpetual Preferred Stock (the “Series A Shares”) to the Treasury. In addition, the Treasury received a
warrant to purchase 767 shares of the Company’s Series B Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock (the “Series B Shares”),
which was immediately exercised for a nominal exercise price. The preferred shares issued to the Treasury qualify as Tier 1 capital
for regulatory purposes. On March 1, 2013, the Treasury auctioned the subject securities in a private transaction with unaffiliated
third-party investors.
The
Series A Preferred Stock is a senior cumulative perpetual preferred stock that has a liquidation preference of $1,000 per share,
pays cumulative dividends at a rate of 5% per year (approximately $767,000 annually) for the first five years and beginning May
15, 2014, at a rate of 9% per year (approximately $1,381,000 annually). Dividends are payable quarterly. At any time, the Company
may, at its option and with regulatory approval, redeem the Series A Preferred Stock at par value plus accrued and unpaid dividends.
The Series A Preferred Stock is generally non-voting.
The
Series B Preferred Stock is a cumulative perpetual preferred stock that has the same rights, preferences, privileges, voting rights
and other terms as the Series A Preferred Stock, except that dividends will be paid at the rate of 9% per year and may not be
redeemed until all the Series A Preferred Stock has been redeemed. The Series A and Series B Preferred Shares will receive preferential
treatment in the event of liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company.
The
Company must request prior approval from the Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond (the “Federal Reserve”) prior to declaring
or paying dividends on its common stock or preferred stock, or making scheduled interest payments on its trust-preferred securities.
Such approval was not granted by the Federal Reserve for payment of the Company’s dividends and interest payments due and
payable in the ten consecutive quarters ended March 31, 2014. Additionally, such approval was not granted for payments due in
the second quarter of 2014. Since the Company has not paid the dividend on its Series A and Series B Shares for more than six
consecutive quarterly periods, the holders of these shares currently have the right to appoint up to two individuals to the Company’s
board of directors. To date, the right to appoint directors has not been exercised by the holders.
As
of March 31, 2014, dividends in arrears on the Series A and Series B shares totaled $2,091,200.
Note
8 – Income Taxes
The
income tax expense related to the Company’s pretax income for the first quarters of 2014 and 2013 was offset by a reversal
of an equal amount of the Company’s valuation allowance related to its deferred tax assets. Therefore, no income tax provision
was recorded for the first quarters of 2014 and 2013.
Note
9 – Net Income (Loss) Per Common Share
Net
income (loss) available to common shareholders represents net income (loss) adjusted for preferred dividends including dividends
declared, accretions of discounts and amortization of premiums on preferred stock issuances and cumulative dividends related to
the current dividend period that have not been declared as of period end. All potential dilutive common shares equivalents were
deemed to be anti-dilutive for the quarter ended March 31, 2013, due to the net loss available to common shareholders.
The
following is a summary of the net income (loss) per common share calculations for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013.
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
Net income (loss)
available to common shareholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
346,356
|
|
|
$
|
13,421
|
|
Preferred stock dividends
|
|
|
209,120
|
|
|
|
249,248
|
|
Deemed
dividends on preferred stock resulting from net accretion of discount and amortization of premium
|
|
|
31,218
|
|
|
|
43,900
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income (loss) available to common shareholders
|
|
$
|
106,018
|
|
|
$
|
(279,727
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income
(loss) per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income (loss) available to common shareholders
|
|
$
|
106,018
|
|
|
$
|
(279,727
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average common
shares outstanding – basic
|
|
|
4,569,122
|
|
|
|
4,094,866
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
income (loss) per common share
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
|
$
|
(0.07
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income
(loss) per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income (loss) available to common shareholders
|
|
$
|
106,018
|
|
|
$
|
(279,727
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average common shares outstanding –
basic
|
|
|
4,569,122
|
|
|
|
4,094,866
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilutive
potential common shares
|
|
|
80,380
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average common
shares outstanding – diluted
|
|
|
4,649,502
|
|
|
|
4,094,866
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
net income (loss) per common share
|
|
$
|
0.02
|
|
|
$
|
(0.07
|
)
|
Note
10 - Equity Incentive Plan
On
January 19, 2006, the Company adopted the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), which provides for the granting
of dividend equivalent rights options, performance unit awards, phantom shares, stock appreciation rights and stock awards, each
of which are subject to such conditions based upon continued employment, passage of time or satisfaction of performance criteria
or other criteria as permitted by the plan. The plan, as amended on September 17, 2010, allows the Company to award, subject to
approval by the Board of Directors, up to 950,000 shares of stock, to officers, employees, and directors, consultants and service
providers of the Company or its affiliates. Awards may be granted for a term of up to ten years from the effective date of grant.
Under the Plan, our Board of Directors has sole discretion as to the exercise date of any awards granted. The per-share exercise
price of incentive stock awards may not be less than the market value of a share of common stock on the date the award is granted.
Any awards that expire unexercised or are canceled become available for re-issuance.
The
Company can issue the restricted shares as of the grant date either by the issuance of share certificate(s) evidencing restricted
shares or by documenting the issuance in uncertificated or book entry form on the Company's stock records. Except as provided
by the Plan, the employee does not have the right to make or permit to exist any transfer or hypothecation of any restricted shares.
When restricted shares vest, the employee must either pay the Company within two business days the amount of all tax withholding
obligations imposed on the Company or make an election pursuant to Section 83(b) of the Internal Revenue Code to pay taxes at
grant date.
Restricted
shares may be subject to one or more objective employment, performance or other forfeiture conditions established by the Plan
Committee at the time of grant. The restricted shares will not vest unless the Company’s retained earnings at the end of
the fiscal quarter preceding the third anniversary of the restricted share award date are greater than the award value of the
restricted shares. Any shares of restricted stock that are forfeited will again become available for issuance under the Plan.
An employee or director has the right to vote the shares of restricted stock after grant until they are forfeited. Compensation
cost for restricted stock is equal to the market value of the shares at the date of the award and is amortized to compensation
expense over the vesting period. Dividends, if any, will be paid on awarded but unvested stock.
The
Company did not issue any shares of restricted stock, nor were there any forfeitures of restricted stock, during the first quarter
of 2014. During the three months ended March 31, 2013 the Company issued 1,245 shares of restricted stock pursuant to the Plan. The
shares cliff vest in three years and are fully vested in 2016, subject to meeting the performance criteria of the Plan. The weighted-average
fair value per share of restricted stock issued during the three months ended March 31, 2013 was $1.76. Compensation
cost associated with the issuances was $2,191 for the quarter ended March 31, 2013. During the first quarter of 2013, 835 shares
were forfeited, having a weighted average price of $3.50. Shares vested in the first quarters of 2014 and 2013 were 14,827 and
30,229, respectively. Compensation cost amortized to expense for the first quarters of 2014 and 2013 was $10,364 and $39,039,
respectively.
The
Plan also allows for the issuance of Stock Appreciation Rights ("SARs"). The SARs entitle the participant to receive
the excess of (1) the market value of a specified or determinable number of shares of the stock at the exercise date over the
fair value at grant date or (2) a specified or determinable price which may not in any event be less than the fair market value
of the stock at the time of the award. Upon exercise, the Company can elect to settle the awards using either Company stock or
cash. The shares start vesting after five years and vest at 20% per year until fully vested. Compensation cost for SARs is amortized
to compensation expense over the vesting period. No SARs were issued during the first quarters of 2014 and 2013.
Note
11 – Fair Value Measurements
Generally
accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) provide a framework for measuring and disclosing fair value that requires
disclosures about the fair value of assets and liabilities recognized in the balance sheet, whether the measurements are made
on a recurring basis (for example, available-for-sale investment securities) or on a nonrecurring basis (for example, impaired
loans).
Fair
value is defined as the exchange in price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price)
in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants
on the measurement date. GAAP also establishes a fair value hierarchy that requires an entity to maximize the use of observable
inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value.
The
Company utilizes fair value measurements to record fair value adjustments to certain assets and to determine fair value disclosures.
Securities available-for-sale are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Additionally, from time to time, the Company may
be required to record at fair value other assets on a nonrecurring basis, such as loans held for sale, loans held for investment
and certain other assets. These nonrecurring fair value adjustments typically involve application of the lower of cost or market
accounting or the writing down of individual assets.
The
following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of significant financial instruments:
Fair
Value Hierarchy
The
Company groups assets and liabilities at fair value in three levels, based on the markets in which the assets and liabilities
are traded and the reliability of the assumptions used to determine the fair value. These levels are:
|
Level 1
-
|
Valuation is based upon quoted prices for
identical instruments traded in active markets.
|
|
Level 2
-
|
Valuation
is based upon quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets
that are not active, and model-based valuation techniques for which all significant assumptions are observable in the market.
|
|
Level 3
-
|
Valuation
is generated from model-based techniques that use at least one significant assumption not observable in the market. These unobservable
assumptions reflect estimates of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. Valuation techniques
include the use of option pricing models, discounted cash flow models and similar techniques.
|
Assets
Recorded at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
Following
is a description of valuation methodologies used for assets and liabilities recorded at fair value.
Securities
Available-for-Sale -
Securities available for sale are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Fair value measurement
is based upon quoted prices, if available. If quoted prices are not available, fair values are measured using independent pricing
models or other model-based valuation techniques such as the present value of future cash flows, adjusted for the security’s
credit rating, prepayment assumptions and other factors such as credit loss assumptions. Level 1 securities include those traded
on an active exchange such as the New York Stock Exchange, Treasury securities that are traded by dealers or brokers in active
over-the counter markets and money market funds. Level 2 securities include mortgage backed securities issued by government sponsored
entities, municipal bonds and corporate debt securities. Securities classified as Level 3 include asset-backed securities in less
liquid markets.
Loans
- The Company does not record loans at fair value on a recurring basis, however, from time to time, a loan is considered
impaired and an allowance for loan loss is established. Loans for which it is probable that payment of interest and principal
will not be made in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan are considered impaired. Once a loan is identified as individually
impaired, management measures impairment. The fair value of impaired loans is estimated using one of several methods, including
the collateral value, market value of similar debt, enterprise value, liquidation value and discounted cash flows. Those impaired
loans not requiring a specific allowance represent loans for which the fair value of expected repayments or collateral exceed
the recorded investment in such loans. At March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, a significant portion of impaired loans were evaluated
based upon the fair value of the collateral. Impaired loans where an allowance is established based on the fair value of collateral
require classification in the fair value hierarchy. When the fair value of the collateral is based on an observable market price
or a current appraised value, the Company records the loan as nonrecurring Level 2. When an appraised value is not available or
management determines the fair value of the collateral is further impaired below the appraised value and there is no observable
market price, the Company records the loan as nonrecurring Level 3.
Mortgage
Loans Held for Sale -
The fair value of loans held for sale is estimated based upon binding contracts and quotes from
third party investors resulting in a Level 2 classification.
Other
Real Estate Owned
- Foreclosed assets are adjusted to fair value upon transfer of the loans to OREO. Real estate acquired
in settlement of loans is recorded initially at estimated fair value of the property less estimated selling costs at the date
of foreclosure. The initial recorded value may be subsequently reduced by additional allowances, which are charges to earnings
if the estimated fair value of the property less estimated selling costs declines below the initial recorded value. Fair value
is based upon independent market prices, appraised values of the collateral or management’s estimation of the value of the
collateral. When the fair value of the collateral is based on an observable market price or a current appraised value, the Company
records the foreclosed asset as nonrecurring Level 2. When an appraised value is not available or management determines the fair
value of the collateral is further impaired below the appraised value and there is no observable market price, the Company records
the foreclosed asset as nonrecurring Level 3.
The
tables below present the balances of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis by level within the hierarchy
at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013.
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Level
1
|
|
|
Level
2
|
|
|
Level
3
|
|
March 31, 2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
$
|
8,472,085
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
8,472,085
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Corporate bonds
|
|
|
2,751,329
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,751,329
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Equity
security
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
11,253,414
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
11,253,414
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Mortgage loans
held for sale (1)
|
|
|
937,278
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
937,278
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
$
|
12,190,692
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
12,190,692
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
$
|
9,318,633
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
9,318,633
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Corporate bonds
|
|
|
2,796,210
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,796,210
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Equity
security
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
12,144,843
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
12,144,843
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Mortgage loans
held for sale (1)
|
|
|
2,248,252
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,248,252
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
$
|
14,393,095
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
14,393,095
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
(1) Carried at
the lower of cost or market.
There
were no liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013.
Assets
Recorded at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis
Certain
assets and liabilities are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis; that is, the instruments are not measured at fair value
on an ongoing basis but are subject to fair value adjustments in certain circumstances (for example, when there is evidence of
impairment). The following table presents the assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis at March 31,
2014 and December 31, 2013, aggregated by level in the fair value hierarchy within which those measurements fall.
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Level
1
|
|
|
Level
2
|
|
|
Level
3
|
|
March 31, 2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collateral-dependent
impaired loans receivable
|
|
$
|
10,392,155
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
10,392,155
|
|
Other
real estate owned
|
|
|
7,236,115
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
7,236,115
|
|
Total
assets at fair value
|
|
$
|
17,628,270
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
17,628,270
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Level
1
|
|
|
Level
2
|
|
|
Level
3
|
|
December 31, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collateral-dependent
impaired loans receivable
|
|
$
|
13,359,438
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
13,359,438
|
|
Other
real estate owned
|
|
|
8,932,634
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
8,932,634
|
|
Total
assets at fair value
|
|
$
|
22,292,072
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
22,292,072
|
|
For
level 3 assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the significant unobservable
inputs in the fair value measurements were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
General
|
|
|
Valuation
Technique
|
|
Significant
Unobservable Inputs
|
|
Range
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collateral-dependant impaired loans
receivable
|
|
Appraised Value
|
|
Collateral discounts
|
|
0-10%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other real estate owned
|
|
Appraised Value
|
|
Collateral discounts and estimated
costs to sell
|
|
0-10%
|
There
were no liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013.
Disclosures
about Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The
following describes the valuation methodologies used by the Company for estimating fair value of financial instruments not recorded
at fair value in the balance sheet on a recurring or nonrecurring basis:
Cash
and Due from Banks and Interest-bearing Deposits with Other Banks
- The carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair
value.
Time
Deposits in other Banks
- The carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value.
Securities
Held-to-Maturity
- The fair values of securities held-to-maturity are based on quoted market prices or dealer quotes.
If quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on quoted market prices of comparable securities
Equity
Securities
-
The carrying amount of nonmarketable equity securities is a reasonable estimate of fair value since
no ready market exists for these securities.
Loans
Receivable
– For certain categories of loans, such as variable rate loans which are repriced frequently and have
no significant change in credit risk, fair values are based on the carrying amounts. The fair value of other types of loans is
estimated by discounting the future cash flows using the current rates at which similar loans would be made to borrowers with
similar credit ratings and for the same remaining maturities.
Deposits
- The fair value of demand deposits, savings, and money market accounts is the amount payable on demand at the reporting
date. The fair values of certificates of deposit are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies current interest
rates to a schedule of aggregated expected maturities.
Securities
Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase
- The carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value because these instruments
typically have terms of one day.
Advances
From Federal Home Loan Bank
-
The fair values of fixed rate borrowings are estimated using a discounted cash flow
calculation that applies the Company’s current borrowing rate from the Federal Home Loan Bank. The carrying amounts of variable
rate borrowings are reasonable estimates of fair value because they can be repriced frequently.
Junior
Subordinated Debentures
- The carrying value of the junior subordinated debentures approximates their fair value since
they were issued at a floating rate.
Accrued
Interest Receivable and Payable
- The carrying value of these instruments is a reasonable estimate of fair value.
Off-Balance
Sheet Financial Instruments
- Fair values of off-balance sheet lending commitments are based on fees currently charged
to enter into similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements and the counterparties' credit standing.
The
following presents the carrying amount, fair value, and placement in the fair value hierarchy of the Company’s financial
instruments as of March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013. This table excludes financial instruments for which the carrying amount
approximates fair value. For short-term financial assets such as cash and cash equivalents, the carrying amount is a reasonable
estimate of fair value due to the relatively short time between the origination of the instrument and its expected realization.
For financial liabilities such as noninterest-bearing demand, interest-bearing demand, and savings deposits, the carrying amount
is a reasonable estimate of fair value due to these products having no stated maturity.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
Value Measurements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prices
in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Active
Markets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for
Identical
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
or
|
|
|
Observable
|
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
(Level
1)
|
|
|
(Level
2)
|
|
|
(Level
3)
|
|
March 31, 2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities held-to-maturity
|
|
$
|
35,643,920
|
|
|
$
|
35,933,179
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
35,933,179
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Loans receivable
|
|
|
239,634,692
|
|
|
|
241,656,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
241,656,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certificates of deposit
|
|
$
|
80,788,171
|
|
|
$
|
81,138,000
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
81,138,000
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank
|
|
|
17,000,000
|
|
|
|
17,009,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
17,009,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities held-to-maturity
|
|
$
|
36,951,934
|
|
|
$
|
36,951,934
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
36,951,934
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Loans receivable
|
|
|
238,502,131
|
|
|
|
240,472,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
240,472,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certificates of deposit
|
|
$
|
84,545,046
|
|
|
$
|
85,081,000
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
85,081,000
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank
|
|
|
23,000,000
|
|
|
|
23,010,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
23,010,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Note
12 - Subsequent Events
Subsequent
events
are events or transactions that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued. Recognized
subsequent events are events or transactions that provide additional evidence about conditions that existed at the date of the
balance sheet, including the estimates inherent in the process of preparing financial statements. Unrecognized subsequent
events are events that provide evidence about conditions that did not exist at the date of the balance sheet but arose after that
date. Management has reviewed events occurring through the date the financial statements were issued and no subsequent events
occurred that require accrual or disclosure.
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operation
The following discussion reviews our results
of operations and assesses our financial condition as of and for the periods indicated. You should read the following discussion
and analysis in conjunction with the discussion of forward-looking statements and unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements
as of and for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013 included elsewhere in this report and the audited consolidated financial
statements included our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking
Statements
The statements contained in this report
on Form 10-Q that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements subject to the safe harbor created by the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995. We caution readers of this report that such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown
risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different
from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements.
Although we believe that our expectations
of future performance are based on reasonable assumptions within the bounds of our knowledge of our business and operations, there
can be no assurance that actual results will not differ materially from our expectations.
These forward-looking statements involve
risks and uncertainties and may not be realized due to a variety of factors, including, but not limited to the following:
·
deterioration
in the financial condition of borrowers resulting in significant increases in loan losses and provisions for those losses;
|
·
|
changes
in loan underwriting, credit review or loss reserve policies associated with economic
conditions, examination conclusions, or regulatory developments;
|
|
·
|
the failure of assumptions underlying the establishment
of reserves for possible loan losses;
|
|
·
|
changes
in political and economic conditions, including the political and economic effects of
the current economic downturn and other major developments, including the ongoing war
on terrorism, continued tensions in the Middle East, and the ongoing economic challenges
facing the European Union;
|
|
·
|
changes
in financial market conditions, either internationally, nationally or locally in areas
in which the Company conducts its operations, including, without limitation, reduced
rates of business formation and growth, commercial and residential real estate development,
and real estate prices;
|
|
·
|
the
Company’s ability to comply with any requirements imposed on it or the Bank by
their respective regulators, and the potential negative consequences that may result;
|
|
·
|
the
impacts of renewed regulatory scrutiny on consumer protection and compliance led by the
Consumer Finance Protection Bureau;
|
|
·
|
fluctuations
in markets for equity, fixed-income, commercial paper and other securities, which could
affect availability, market liquidity levels, and pricing;
|
|
·
|
governmental
monetary and fiscal policies, including the undetermined effects of the Federal Reserve’s
“Quantitative Easing” program, as well as other legislative and regulatory
changes;
|
|
·
|
changes
in capital standards and asset risk-weighting included in promulgated rules to implement
the so-called “Basel III” accords;
|
|
·
|
the
risks of changes in interest rates or an unprecedented period of record-low interest
rates on the level and composition of deposits, loan demand and the values of loan collateral,
securities and interest sensitive assets and liabilities; and
|
|
·
|
the
effects of competition from other commercial banks, thrifts, mortgage banking firms,
consumer finance companies, credit unions, securities brokerage firms, insurance companies,
money market and other mutual funds and other financial institutions operating in our
market area and elsewhere, including institutions operating regionally, nationally and
internationally, together with such competitors offering banking products and services
by mail, telephone and the Internet.
|
Forward-looking statements speak only
as of the date on which they are made. We undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or
circumstances after the date on which the statement is made to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.
Overview
The following discussion describes our
results of operations for the quarter ended March 31, 2014 as compared to the quarter ended March 31, 2013 and also analyzes our
financial condition as of March 31, 2014 as compared to December 31, 2013.
Like most community bank holding companies,
we derive the majority of our income from interest received on our loans and investments. Our primary source of funds for
making these loans and investments is our deposits, on which we pay interest. Consequently, one of the key measures of our
success is our amount of net interest income, or the difference between the income on our interest-earning assets, such as loans
and investments, and the expense on our interest-bearing liabilities, such as deposits and borrowings. Another key measure
is the spread between the yield we earn on these interest-earning assets and the rate we pay on our interest-bearing liabilities,
which is called our net interest spread.
Due to risks inherent in all loans, we
maintain an allowance for loan losses to absorb probable losses on existing loans that may become uncollectible. We maintain
this allowance by charging a provision for loan losses against our operating earnings for each period. We have included
a detailed discussion of this process, as well as several tables describing our allowance for loan losses.
In addition to earning interest on our
loans and investments, we earn income through fees and other charges to our customers. We have also included a discussion
of the various components of this non-interest income, as well as our non-interest expense.
The following discussion and analysis
also identifies significant factors that have affected our financial position and operating results during the periods included
in the accompanying financial statements. We encourage you to read this discussion and analysis in conjunction with our
financial statements and the other statistical information included in our filings with the SEC.
Critical Accounting Policies
We have adopted various accounting policies,
which govern the application of accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America in the preparation of
our financial statements. Our significant accounting policies are described in the notes to the consolidated financial statements
at December 31, 2013 as filed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K. Certain accounting policies involve significant judgments and
assumptions we have made, which have a material impact on the carrying value of certain assets and liabilities. We consider these
accounting policies to be critical accounting policies. The judgments and assumptions we use are based on the historical experience
and other factors, which we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Because of the nature of our judgments and assumptions,
actual results could differ from these judgments and estimates which could have a major impact on our carrying values of assets
and liabilities and our results of operations.
We believe the allowance for loan losses
is a critical accounting policy that requires the most significant judgments and estimates used in preparation of our consolidated
financial statements. Refer to the portion of this discussion that addresses our allowance for loan losses for a description of
our processes and methodology for determining our allowance for loan losses.
Regulatory Matters
Following an examination of the Bank by
the FDIC during the first quarter of 2010, the Bank's Board of Directors agreed to enter into a Memorandum of Understanding (the
"Bank MOU") with the FDIC and the South Carolina Board of Financial Institutions (the “SC Board”) that became
effective August 19, 2010. Among other things, the Bank MOU provides for the Bank to (i) review and formulate objectives relative
to liquidity and growth, including a reduction in reliance on volatile liabilities, (ii) formulate plans for the reduction and
improvement in adversely classified assets, (iii) maintain a Tier 1 leverage capital ratio of 8% and continue to be "well
capitalized" for regulatory purposes, (iv) continue to maintain an adequate allowance for loan and lease losses, (v) not
pay any dividend to the Bank's parent holding company without the approval of the regulators, (vi) review officer performance
and consider additional staffing needs, and (vii) provide progress reports and submit various other information to the regulators.
In addition, on the basis of the same
examination by the FDIC and the SC Board, the Federal Reserve requested that the Company enter into a separate Memorandum of Understanding,
which the Company entered into in December 2010 (the "Company MOU"). While this agreement provides for many of the same
measures suggested by the Bank MOU, the Company MOU requires that the Company seek pre-approval from the Federal Reserve prior
to the declaration or payment of dividends or other interest payments relating to its securities. As a result, until the Company
is no longer subject to the Company MOU, it will be required to seek regulatory approval prior to paying scheduled dividends on
its preferred stock and on its trust preferred securities, including the Series A and Series B Preferred Shares. This provision
will also apply to the Company's common stock, although to date, the Company has not elected to pay dividends on its shares of
common stock.
The Federal Reserve approved the scheduled
payment of dividends on the Company’s preferred stock and interest payments on the Company’s trust preferred securities
for the first three quarters of 2011; however, the Federal Reserve did not approve the Company’s request to pay dividends
and interest payments relating to its outstanding classes of preferred stock and trust preferred securities due and payable in
the fourth quarter of 2011, and such consent has not been granted thereafter, largely out of deference to the Federal Reserve’s
policy statement on dividends.
A policy statement published by the Board
of Governors of the Federal Reserve System indicates that, as a general matter, it believes the board of directors of a bank holding
company should eliminate, defer, or significantly reduce the company’s dividends if:
|
·
|
the
company’s net income available to shareholders for the preceding four quarters
is not sufficient to fully fund the dividends;
|
|
·
|
the
prospective rate of earnings retention is not consistent with the company’s capital
needs and overall current and prospective financial condition; or
|
|
·
|
the
company will not meet, or is in danger of not meeting, its minimum regulatory capital
adequacy ratios.
|
The policy statement notes that a failure
to do so could result in a supervisory finding that the organization is operating in an unsafe and unsound manner. We believe
that the criteria noted above will be heavily weighted by the Federal Reserve in evaluating any future request by the Company
to pay dividends on its Series A Shares and the Series B Shares and interest on its outstanding trust preferred securities. Accordingly,
we do not anticipate submitting further approval requests until such time as each of the stated criteria has been met or there
are other compelling reasons to believe such a request, if submitted, would be approved.
In response to these regulatory matters,
the Bank and the Company have taken various actions designed to improve our lending procedures, nonperforming assets, liquidity
and capital position and other conditions related to our operations, which are more fully described in turn as part of this discussion.
We believe that the successful completion of these initiatives, and the continued improvement of the local economy of the communities
we serve, will result in full compliance with our regulatory obligations with the FDIC, the SC Board and the Federal Reserve and
position us well for stability and growth over the long term.
Effect of Economic Trends
Economic conditions, competition and federal
monetary and fiscal policies also affect financial institutions. Lending activities are also influenced by regional and local
economic factors, such as housing supply and demand, competition among lenders, customer preferences and levels of personal income
and savings in our primary market area.
Results of Operations
Our results of operations for the first
quarter of 2014 were $385,745 higher than results achieved in the first quarter of 2013. Specifically, for the first quarter 2014,
we realized a net income available to common shareholders of $106,018, or a basic and diluted income per share of $0.02. For the
first quarter 2013, we incurred a net loss available to common shareholders of $279,727, or a basic and diluted loss per share
of $0.07.
Our 2014 operating results were positively
impacted by the reduction of $252,068 in our noninterest expenses and an increase of $192,581 in our net interest income.
However,
our operating results were negatively impacted by the reduction of $111,714 in noninterest income. A detailed
discussion of each of these items follows.
Income Statement Review
Net
Interest Income
The largest component of our net income
is net interest income, which is the difference between the income earned on assets and interest paid on deposits and on the borrowings
used to support such assets. Net interest income is determined by the yields earned on our interest-earning assets and the rates
paid on interest-bearing liabilities, the relative amounts of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, and the
degree of mismatch and the maturity and repricing characteristics of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities.
The total interest-earning assets yield rate less the total interest-bearing liabilities rate represents our net interest rate
spread.
Net interest income for the first quarter
of 2014 was $3,238,201 compared to $3,045,620 for the first quarter of 2013, an increase of $192,581, or 6.32%. The increase is
due primarily to the 18.95% decline in the average volume of our interest bearing liabilities, slightly offset by a decline in
the average volume of our earning assets of 16.06%. Additionally, we reduced the average rate paid on our interest bearing liabilities
by 46 basis points, while we were able to increase the average rate earned on our earning assets by 51 basis points.
For the first quarter of 2014, average-earning
assets totaled $299,638,201 with an annualized average yield of 4.88% compared to $356,963,528 and 4.37%, respectively, for the
first quarter of 2013. Average interest-bearing liabilities totaled $249,959,338 with an annualized average cost of 0.59% for
first quarter of 2014 compared to $308,409,906 and 1.05%, respectively, for the first quarter of 2013.
Our net interest margin and net interest
spread were 4.38% and 4.29%, respectively, for the first quarter of 2014 compared to 3.46% and 3.32%, respectively, for the first
quarter of 2013.
Because loans often provide a higher yield
than other types of earning assets, one of our goals is to maintain our loan portfolio as the largest component of total earning
assets. Loans comprised 80.86% and 73.40% of average earning assets at March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Loan interest income
for the three months ended March 31 2014 and 2013 was $3,273,679 and $3,471,204, respectively. The annualized average yield on
loans was 5.48% and 5.37% for the first quarters of 2014 and 2013, respectively. Average balances of loans decreased to $242,289,822
during the first quarter of 2014, a decrease of $19,734,496 from the average of $262,024,318 during first quarter of 2013. Our
loan interest income for the first quarter of 2014 was favorably impacted by the significant reduction of our non-performing loans.
At March 31, 2014 our nonaccruing loans totaled $7,688,522 compared to $19,539,884 as of March 31, 2013, a decrease of $11,851,362,
or 60.65%. Additional information may be found in the “Rate/Volume Analysis” presented below.
Available-for-sale and held-to-maturity
investment securities averaged $48,070,625 and $57,969,319 for the first quarters of 2014 and 2013, respectively. Their percentage
of average earning assets was relatively the same for both periods, 16.04% for 2014 compared to 16.24% for 2013. Interest earned
on these securities totaled $316,552 and $347,984 for the first quarters of 2014 and 2013, respectively, resulting in an annualized
average yield of 2.67% and 2.43%, respectively.
Our average interest-bearing deposits
were $215,923,992 and $282,714,350 for the first quarters of 2014 and 2013, respectively. This represented a decrease of $66,790,358,
or 23.62%. Total interest paid on deposits for first quarters of 2014 and 2013 was $282,452 and $678,374, respectively. As our
loan demand declined, we concurrently lowered our rates paid for deposits, specifically for time deposits, which is the primary
reason that the amount of our average time deposits are $53,289,342, or 38.89%, lower during the first quarter of 2014 than during
the same period in 2013.
The average balance of our other interest-bearing
liabilities was $34,035,346 and $25,695,556 for the first quarters of 2014 and 2013, respectively. This represented an increase
of $8,339,790, or 32.46%, which is primarily attributable to the increase of $6,835,658 in our average volume of borrowing from
the Federal Home Loan Bank, that replaced our higher cost time deposits. For the first quarter of 2014, the annualized average
cost of borrowing from the Federal Home Land Bank was 0.43%, while the average rate paid on time deposits was 1.21% for this period.
The following table sets forth, for the
periods indicated, certain information related to our average balance sheet and our average yields on assets and average costs
of liabilities. Such yields are derived by dividing income or expense by the average balance of the corresponding assets or liabilities.
Average balances have been derived from the daily balances throughout the periods indicated.
|
|
Average
Balances, Income and Expenses, and Rates
|
|
Period
ended March 31,
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Income/
|
|
|
Yield/
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Income/
|
|
|
Yield/
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Income/
|
|
|
Yield/
|
|
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Expense
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Expense
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Expense
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earning assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans
(1)
|
|
$
|
242,290
|
|
|
$
|
3,274
|
|
|
|
5.48
|
%
|
|
$
|
262,024
|
|
|
$
|
3,471
|
|
|
|
5.37
|
%
|
|
$
|
303,831
|
|
|
$
|
4,400
|
|
|
|
5.82
|
%
|
Securities, taxable
|
|
|
44,922
|
|
|
|
288
|
|
|
|
2.60
|
|
|
|
57,969
|
|
|
|
348
|
|
|
|
2.43
|
|
|
|
66,157
|
|
|
|
465
|
|
|
|
2.82
|
|
Securities, nontaxable
|
|
|
3,148
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
3.61
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
20,155
|
|
|
|
197
|
|
|
|
3.93
|
|
Other earning assets
|
|
|
9,278
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
0.52
|
|
|
|
36,970
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
0.30
|
|
|
|
39,732
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
0.28
|
|
Total
earning assets
|
|
|
299,638
|
|
|
|
3,602
|
|
|
|
4.88
|
|
|
|
356,963
|
|
|
|
3,846
|
|
|
|
4.37
|
|
|
|
429,875
|
|
|
|
5,089
|
|
|
|
4.76
|
|
Non-earning assets
|
|
|
48,546
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,168
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,599
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
assets
|
|
$
|
348,184
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
412,131
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
488,474
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
Balances, Income and Expenses, and Rates
|
|
Period
ended March 31,
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Income/
|
|
|
Yield/
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Income/
|
|
|
Yield/
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Income/
|
|
|
Yield/
|
|
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Expense
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Expense
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Expense
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
Liabilities
and Shareholders' Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing
deposits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transaction
accounts
|
|
$
|
46,462
|
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
|
0.08
|
%
|
|
$
|
43,956
|
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
|
0.13
|
%
|
|
$
|
42,449
|
|
|
$
|
32
|
|
|
|
0.31
|
%
|
Savings
and money
market accounts
|
|
|
85,721
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
0.12
|
|
|
|
101,728
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
0.24
|
|
|
|
120,732
|
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
|
0.41
|
|
Time
deposits
|
|
|
83,741
|
|
|
|
249
|
|
|
|
1.21
|
|
|
|
137,030
|
|
|
|
605
|
|
|
|
1.79
|
|
|
|
201,244
|
|
|
|
1,052
|
|
|
|
2.10
|
|
Total
interest-bearing deposits
|
|
|
215,924
|
|
|
|
283
|
|
|
|
0.53
|
|
|
|
282,714
|
|
|
|
679
|
|
|
|
0.97
|
|
|
|
364,425
|
|
|
|
1,206
|
|
|
|
1.33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
interest-bearing liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
Home Loan Bank borrowing
|
|
|
17,835
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
0.43
|
|
|
|
11,000
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
2.36
|
|
|
|
13,000
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
2.04
|
|
Junior
subordinated debentures
|
|
|
10,310
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
0.58
|
|
|
|
10,310
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
0.54
|
|
|
|
10,310
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
0.61
|
|
Other
|
|
|
5,890
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
0.14
|
|
|
|
4,386
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
0.09
|
|
|
|
470
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
0.10
|
|
Total
other interest-bearing
Liabilities
|
|
|
34,035
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
0.97
|
|
|
|
25,696
|
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
1.91
|
|
|
|
23,780
|
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
2.18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
interest-bearing liabilities
|
|
|
249,959
|
|
|
|
364
|
|
|
|
0.59
|
|
|
|
308,410
|
|
|
|
800
|
|
|
|
1.05
|
|
|
|
388,205
|
|
|
|
1,335
|
|
|
|
1.38
|
|
Noninterest-bearing deposits
|
|
|
63,080
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,799
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,929
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
2,883
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,901
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,695
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders'
equity
|
|
|
32,262
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,021
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,645
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
liabilities and equity
|
|
$
|
348,184
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
412,131
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
488,474
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
interest income/interest spread
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,238
|
|
|
|
4.29
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,046
|
|
|
|
3.32
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,754
|
|
|
|
3.38
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
yield on earning assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.38
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.46
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.51
|
%
|
|
(1)
|
Includes mortgage loans held for sale and nonaccruing loans
|
Net interest income can be analyzed in
terms of the impact of changing interest rates and changing volume. The following tables set forth the effect which the
varying levels of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities and the applicable rates have had on changes in net
interest income for the periods presented.
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
2014 Compared to 2013
|
|
|
2013 Compared to 2012
|
|
|
|
Due to increase (decrease)
in
|
|
|
Due to increase (decrease)
in
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Volume
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Volume
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Interest income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
$
|
(269
|
)
|
|
$
|
70
|
|
|
$
|
(199
|
)
|
|
$
|
(595
|
)
|
|
$
|
(334
|
)
|
|
$
|
(929
|
)
|
Securities, taxable
|
|
|
(83
|
)
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
(60
|
)
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
|
|
(62
|
)
|
|
|
(117
|
)
|
Securities, tax exempt
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
(98
|
)
|
|
|
(98
|
)
|
|
|
(196
|
)
|
Other earning assets
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Total interest income
|
|
|
(379
|
)
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
(244
|
)
|
|
|
(751
|
)
|
|
|
(493
|
)
|
|
|
(1,244
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing deposits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing transaction accounts
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
Savings and money market accounts
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
|
|
(62
|
)
|
Time deposits
|
|
|
(194
|
)
|
|
|
(162
|
)
|
|
|
(356
|
)
|
|
|
(306
|
)
|
|
|
(142
|
)
|
|
|
(448
|
)
|
Total interest-bearing deposits
|
|
|
(201
|
)
|
|
|
(195
|
)
|
|
|
(396
|
)
|
|
|
(322
|
)
|
|
|
(207
|
)
|
|
|
(529
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other interest-bearing liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
(70
|
)
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Junior subordinated debentures
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Total other interest-bearing liabilities
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
(66
|
)
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense
|
|
|
(175
|
)
|
|
|
(261
|
)
|
|
|
(436
|
)
|
|
|
(332
|
)
|
|
|
(204
|
)
|
|
|
(536
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
$
|
(204
|
)
|
|
$
|
396
|
|
|
$
|
192
|
|
|
$
|
(419
|
)
|
|
$
|
(289
|
)
|
|
$
|
(708
|
)
|
Provision and Allowance for Loan Losses
We have developed policies and procedures
for evaluating the overall quality of our credit portfolio and the timely identification of potential problem credits. On a quarterly
basis, our Board of Directors reviews and approves the appropriate level for the allowance for loan losses based upon management’s
recommendations, the results of our internal monitoring and reporting system, and an analysis of economic conditions in our market.
The objective of management has been to fund the allowance for loan losses at a level greater than or equal to our internal risk
measurement system for loan risk.
Additions to the allowance for loan losses,
which are expensed as the provision for loan losses on our statement of operations, are made periodically to maintain the allowance
at an appropriate level based on management’s analysis of the potential risk in the loan portfolio. Loan losses and recoveries
are charged or credited directly to the allowance. The amount of the provision is a function of the level of loans outstanding,
the level of nonperforming loans, historical loan loss experience, the amount of loan losses actually charged against the reserve
during a given period, and current and anticipated economic conditions.
The allowance represents an amount which
management believes will be adequate to absorb inherent losses on existing loans that may become uncollectible. Our judgment as
to the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses is based on a number of assumptions about future events, which we believe to
be reasonable, but which may or may not prove to be accurate. Our determination of the allowance for loan losses is based on regular
evaluations of the collectability of loans, including consideration of factors such as the balance of impaired loans, the quality,
mix, and size of our overall loan portfolio, economic conditions that may affect the borrower’s ability to repay, the amount
and quality of collateral securing the loans, our historical loan loss experience, and a review of specific problem loans. We
also consider subjective issues such as changes in our lending policies and procedures, changes in the local and national economy,
changes in volume or type of credits, changes in the volume or severity of problem loans, quality of loan review and board of
director oversight, concentrations of credit, and peer group comparisons.
More specifically, in determining our
allowance for loan losses, we regularly review loans for specific and impaired reserves based on the appropriate impairment assessment
methodology. Pooled reserves are determined using historical loss trends measured over a four-quarter average applied to risk
rated loans grouped by Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council (“FFIEC”) call code and segmented by impairment
status. The pooled reserves are calculated by applying the appropriate historical loss ratio to the loan categories. Impaired
loans greater than a minimum threshold established by management are excluded from this analysis. The sum of all such amounts
determines our pooled reserves. In line with our peer group, we review historical losses over four quarters, which results in
a provision estimate responsive to current economic conditions. The historical loss factors utilized in our model have been updated
as of the end of the fourth quarter 2014 to reflect losses realized through the end of fourth quarter 2013.
As we mention above, we track our portfolio
and analyze loans grouped by FFIEC call code categories. The first step in this process is to risk grade each loan in the portfolio
based on one common set of parameters. These parameters include items like debt-to-worth ratio, liquidity of the borrower, net
worth, experience in a particular field and other factors such as underwriting exceptions. Weight is also given to the relative
strength of any guarantors on the loan.
After risk grading each loan, we then
segment the portfolio by FFIEC call code groupings, separating out substandard and impaired loans. The remaining loans
are grouped into “performing loan pools.” The loss history for each performing loan pool is measured over
a specific period of time to create a loss factor. The relevant look back period is determined by management, regulatory guidance,
and current market events. The loss factor is then applied to the pool balance and the reserve per pool calculated. Loans
deemed to be substandard but not impaired are segregated and a loss factor is applied to this pool as well. Loans are
segmented based upon sizes as smaller impaired loans are pooled and a loss factor applied, while larger impaired loans are assessed
individually using the appropriate impairment measuring methodology. Finally, five qualitative factors are utilized
to assess economic and other trends not currently reflected in the loss history. These factors include concentration of credit
across the portfolio, the experience level of management and staff, effects of changes in risk selection and underwriting practice,
industry conditions and the current economic and business environment. A quantitative value is assigned to each of
the five factors, which is then applied to the performing loan pools. Negative trends in the loan portfolio increase the quantitative
values assigned to each of the qualitative factors and, therefore, increase the reserve. For example, as general economic
and business conditions decline, this qualitative factor’s quantitative value will increase, which will increase the reserve
requirement for this factor. Similarly, positive trends in the loan portfolio, such as improvement in general economic
and business conditions, will decrease the quantitative value assigned to this qualitative factor, thereby decreasing the reserve
requirement for this factor. These factors are reviewed and updated by our management committee on a regular basis
to arrive at a consensus for our qualitative adjustments.
Periodically, we adjust the amount of
the allowance based on changing circumstances. We recognize loan losses to the allowance and add subsequent recoveries back to
the allowance for loan losses. In addition, on a quarterly basis, we informally compare our allowance for loan losses to various
peer institutions; however, we recognize that allowances will vary, as financial institutions are unique in the make-up of their
loan portfolios and customers, which necessarily creates different risk profiles and risk weighting of qualitative factors for
the institutions. We would only consider further adjustments to our allowance for loan losses based on this peer review if our
allowance was significantly different from our peer group. To date, we have not made any such adjustment. There can be no assurance
that charge-offs of loans in future periods will not exceed the allowance for loan losses as estimated at any point in time or
that provisions for loan losses will not be significant to a particular accounting period, especially considering the overall
economic weakness in many of our market areas due to a slow recovery from the recent downturn.
Various regulatory agencies review our
allowance for loan losses through their periodic examinations, and they may require additions to the allowance for loan losses
based on their judgment and assumptions about the economic condition of our market and the loan portfolio at the time of their
examinations. Our losses will undoubtedly vary from our estimates, and it is possible that charge-offs in future periods will
exceed the allowance for loan losses as estimated at any point in time.
As of March 31, 2014 and 2013, the allowance
for loan losses was $2,802,823 and $4,198,520, respectively, a decrease of $1,395,697, or 33.20%, from the 2013 allowance, reflecting
significant reductions in practically all categories of our problem loans. As a percentage of total loans, the allowance for loan
losses was 1.17% and 1.64% at March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. See the discussion regarding the provision expense and
“Activity in the Allowance for Loan Losses” below for additional information regarding our asset quality and loan
portfolio.
For the first quarters of 2014 and 2013,
we did not record a provision for loan losses. Our analysis of the allowance for loan losses as of March 31, 2014, revealed that
our overall loss rates have been stabilizing over the past several allowance calculations and that our credit exposure is phasing
out in the Myrtle Beach market and the Charleston market, which were particularly hard-hit by the downturn in real estate markets.
Additionally, not having to record a provision for loan losses is reflective of our success in aggressively reducing our exposure
in these markets and the volume of high-risk construction loans on our books.
We believe
the allowance for loan losses at March 31, 2014, is adequate to meet potential loan losses inherent in the loan portfolio and,
as described earlier, to maintain the flexibility to adjust the allowance should our local economy and loan portfolio either improve
or decline in the future.
Noninterest Income
For the first quarter of 2014 compared
to first quarter 2013, noninterest income decreased $111,714, or 10.10%. The decrease is due primarily to the following. During
the first half of 2013, the U.S. economy experienced historically low mortgage rates, which resulted in a high volume of homeowners
choosing to refinance their existing mortgages. However, during latter half of 2013, mortgage interest rates began to rise, resulting
in a decrease in the number of refinanced mortgages. This led to the $92,329 decline in the gain on the sale of mortgage loans
for the first quarter of 2014.
Noninterest Expenses
For the quarters ended March 31, 2014
and 2013, noninterest expense totaled $3,897,629 and $4,149,697, respectively, a decrease of $252,068, or 6.07%.
The expense for salaries and benefits
was $1,812,735 and $1,928,709 for the first quarters of 2014 and 2013, respectively. By improving operating efficiencies, we were
able to reduce the expense for this category by $115,974, or 6.01%
Furniture and equipment expense for the
first quarters of 2014 and 2013 was $414,449 and $295,515, respectively, for an increase of $118,934. The increase is related
to data processing refunds received in the first quarter of 2013 for prior year service interruptions and lost income.
Other operating expenses for first quarter
of 2014 were $263,971, or 16.84% lower than experienced in for the first quarter of 2013. For the first quarters of 2014 and 2013,
other operating expenses were $1,303,415 and $1,567,386, respectively. A detailed explanation for the significant changes in this
expense category follows.
|
1.
|
Professional fees were higher for
the first quarter of 2014 as a result of legal fees relating to litigation arising in
the ordinary course of our business as well defending a lawsuit filed by certain clients
of the Schurlknight and Rivers Law Firm (“S&R”), which was a customer
of the Bank.
|
|
2.
|
OREO expenses for the first quarter
of 2014 were $100,979 lower than the first quarter of 2013. The decrease is attributable
to the net gain/loss recognized on the sale of OREO properties that are included in OREO
expenses. For the first quarter of 2014 we realized a net gain of $112,594, while for
the first quarter of 2013 we realized a net loss of $24,340.
|
|
3.
|
During the first quarter of 2013,
we recorded a $70,000 impairment loss on our equity security that was purchased for $100,000.
In the first quarter of 2014, there was no impairment loss.
|
|
4.
|
The cost of our FDIC insurance assessments
for the first quarter of 2014 declined $59,426, largely because we successfully reduced
the average volume of our higher cost time deposits.
|
Income Taxes
The income tax expense related to our
pretax income for the first quarters of 2014 and 2013 was offset by a reversal of an equal amount in our valuation allowance related
to our deferred tax assets. Therefore no income tax provision was required for the first quarters of 2014 and 2013.
Balance Sheet Review
General
At March 31, 2014, we had total assets
of $353.7 million, consisting principally of $240.6 million in loans, $48.0 million in investments, and $21.2 million in cash
and due from banks. Our liabilities at March 31, 2014, totaled $321.3 million, which consisted principally of $285.3 million
in deposits, $17.0 million in FHLB advances, and $15.7 million in other borrowings. At March 31, 2014, our shareholders’
equity was $32.4 million.
At December 31, 2013, we had total assets
of $355.4 million, consisting principally of $240.8 million in loans, $50.7 million in investments, and $18.2 million in cash
and due from banks. Our liabilities at December 31, 2013 totaled $323.3 million, consisting principally of $282.4 million in deposits,
$23.0 million in FHLB advances, and $15.2 million in other borrowings. At December 31, 2013, our shareholders' equity was $32.1
million.
Investment Securities
The investment securities portfolio, which
is also a component of our total earning assets, consists of securities available-for-sale, securities held-to-maturity and nonmarketable
equity securities.
Securities Available-for-Sale
-
At March 31, 2014, our investment in available-for-sale securities was $11,253,414. This is $891,429, or 7.34%, lower
than our investment of $12,144,843 in available-for-sale securities at December 31, 2013. These securities are carried at their
estimated fair value.
Securities Held-to-Maturity -
At
March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, securities held-to-maturity were $35,643,920 and $36,951,934, respectively, a decrease of
$1,308,014, or 3.54%. These securities are carried at amortized cost, including the net unrealized gain in available-for-sale-securities
that were reclassified as held-to-maturity on December 31, 2013. The net unrealized gain is being amortized to other comprehensive
income over the life of the underlying securities. The net unrealized gain included in the amortized cost at March 31, 2014 and
December 31, 2013, was $224,496 and $237,797, respectively. We intend to hold these securities to maturity and have the ability
to do so.
The amortized costs and the estimated
fair value of our securities available-for-sale and held-to-maturities at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013 are shown in the
following tables.
Available-for-Sale
|
|
March 31, 2014
|
|
|
December 31, 2013
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
$
|
8,450,875
|
|
|
$
|
8,472,085
|
|
|
$
|
9,277,577
|
|
|
$
|
9,318,633
|
|
Corporate bonds
|
|
|
2,771,515
|
|
|
|
2,751,329
|
|
|
|
2,765,950
|
|
|
|
2,796,210
|
|
Equity security
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
11,252,390
|
|
|
$
|
11,253,414
|
|
|
$
|
12,073,527
|
|
|
$
|
12,144,843
|
|
Held-to-Maturity
|
|
March 31, 2014
|
|
|
December 31, 2013
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Estimated
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Government sponsored enterprises
|
|
$
|
6,912,687
|
|
|
$
|
6,888,702
|
|
|
$
|
7,146,409
|
|
|
$
|
7,070,985
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
|
25,346,867
|
|
|
|
25,792,453
|
|
|
|
26,404,573
|
|
|
|
26,731,341
|
|
Municipals
|
|
|
3,159,870
|
|
|
|
3,252,024
|
|
|
|
3,163,155
|
|
|
|
3,149,608
|
|
Total
|
|
|
35,419,424
|
|
|
$
|
35,933,179
|
|
|
|
36,714,137
|
|
|
$
|
36,951,934
|
|
Capitalization of net unrealized gains on securities transferred from available-for-sale
|
|
|
224,496
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
237,797
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
35,643,920
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
36,951,934
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March
31, 2014, there were no securities available-for-sale or securities held-to-maturity that had been in a loss position for twelve
months or more.
Distribution and Yields
Contractual maturities and yields on our
securities available-for-sale and held-to-maturity at March 31, 2014 are shown in the following tables. Expected maturities may
differ from contractual maturities because issuers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment
penalties. Mortgage-backed securities are presented separately, maturities of which are based on expected maturities since paydowns
are expected to occur before contractual maturity dates.
Available-for-Sale
(1)
|
|
Due after
|
|
|
|
ten years
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Yield
|
|
Corporate bonds
|
|
$
|
2,751
|
|
|
|
0.54
|
%
|
|
(1)
|
Excludes mortgage-backed securities
totaling $8,472,085 with a yield of 2.58% and an equity security in the amount $30,000.
|
Held-to-Maturity (2)
|
|
Due after
|
|
|
|
ten years
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Yield
|
|
U.S. Government sponsored agencies
|
|
$
|
6,845
|
|
|
|
3.24
|
%
|
Municipals
|
|
|
3,146
|
|
|
|
4.20
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
9,991
|
|
|
|
3.53
|
%
|
|
(2)
|
Excludes mortgage-backed securities
totaling $25,653 with a yield of 3.19%.
|
Nonmarketable Equity Securities
–
Nonmarketable equity securities are recorded at their original cost since no ready market exists
for these securities. At March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, nonmarketable equity securities consisted of Federal Home Loan
Bank and Community Bankers Bank stock, which are recorded at their original cost of $1,084,300 and $58,100, respectively and $1,536,800
and $58,100, respectively. These securities are held primarily as a pre-requisite for accessing liquidity sources provided by
the issuers of these securities.
Loans
Loans, including loans held for sale,
are the largest category of earning assets and typically provide higher yields than the other types of earning assets. Associated
with the higher loan yields are the inherent credit and liquidity risks, which we attempt to control and counterbalance. Loans
averaged $242,289,822 during the first quarter of 2014 compared to $262,024,318 during the first quarter of 2013, a decrease of
$19,734,496, or 7.53%. From March 31, 2013 to March 31, 2014, we charged off loans totaling approximately $2,374,000 and foreclosed
on loans totaling approximately $4,395,000, whereby the loan balances were transferred to other real estate owned. The remainder
of this decrease was the result of the economic downturn in our markets and worldwide deleveraging that caused the volume of new
loan customers and average loan balances carried by current customers to decrease. At March 31, 2014, total loans were $240,571,970
compared to $240,750,383 at December 31, 2013, a decrease of $174,413, or 0.07%. Excluding loans held for sale, loans were $239,634,692
at March 31, 2014, compared to $238,502,131 at December 31, 2013, an increase of $1,132,561, or 0.47%. This increase is mainly
attributable to the rise of $1,482,803 in our nonresidential loans, which includes commercial loans secured by real estate. During
the latter part of 2013, we renewed our emphasis on marketing commercial loan products to small business owners.
The following table summarizes the composition
of our loan portfolio at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013.
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Mortgage loans on real estate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
$
|
23,890,521
|
|
|
|
9.97
|
%
|
|
$
|
24,175,347
|
|
|
|
10.14
|
%
|
Residential 1-4 family
|
|
|
35,761,717
|
|
|
|
14.92
|
|
|
|
35,873,036
|
|
|
|
15.04
|
|
Multifamily
|
|
|
3,890,201
|
|
|
|
1.62
|
|
|
|
4,312,057
|
|
|
|
1.81
|
|
Second mortgages
|
|
|
4,077,550
|
|
|
|
1.70
|
|
|
|
4,245,778
|
|
|
|
1.78
|
|
Equity lines of credit
|
|
|
21,427,102
|
|
|
|
8.94
|
|
|
|
21,270,126
|
|
|
|
8.92
|
|
Total residential
|
|
|
65,156,570
|
|
|
|
27.18
|
|
|
|
65,700,997
|
|
|
|
27.55
|
|
Nonresidential
|
|
|
105,861,288
|
|
|
|
44.18
|
|
|
|
104,378,485
|
|
|
|
43.76
|
|
Total real estate loans
|
|
|
194,908,379
|
|
|
|
81.33
|
|
|
|
194,254,829
|
|
|
|
81.45
|
|
Commercial and industrial
|
|
|
32,584,523
|
|
|
|
13.60
|
|
|
|
32,486,848
|
|
|
|
13.62
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
12,136,195
|
|
|
|
5.06
|
|
|
|
11,725,319
|
|
|
|
4.92
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
5,595
|
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
35,135
|
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
Total loans
|
|
$
|
239,634,692
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
238,502,131
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
In the context of this discussion, a “real
estate mortgage loan” is defined as any loan, other than a loan for construction purposes, secured by real estate, regardless
of the purpose of the loan. It is common practice for financial institutions in our market area to obtain a mortgage
on the borrower’s real estate when possible, in addition to any other available collateral. This real estate
collateral is taken as security to reinforce the likelihood of the ultimate repayment of the loan and tends to increase management’s
willingness to make real estate loans and, to that extent, also tends to increase the magnitude of the real estate loan portfolio
component.
The largest component of our loan portfolio
is real estate mortgage loans. At March 31, 2014, real estate mortgage loans totaled $194,908,379 and represented 81.33% of the
total loan portfolio, compared to $194,254,829, or 81.45%, at December 31, 2013. This represents an increase of $653,550, or 0.34%,
from the December 31, 2013 balance.
Residential mortgage loans totaled $65,156,570
at March 31, 2014, and represented 27.18% of the total loan portfolio, compared to $65,700,997 and 27.55% respectively, at December
31, 2013. Residential real estate loans consist of first and second mortgages on single or multi-family residential
dwellings.
Nonresidential mortgage loans, which include
commercial loans and other loans secured by multi-family properties and farmland, totaled $105,861,288 at March 31, 2014, compared
to $104,378,485 at December 31, 2013. This represents an increase of $1,482,803, or 1.42%, from the December 31, 2013
balance. These loans represented 44.18% and 43.76% of the total loans at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively.
Real estate construction loans were $23,890,521
and $24,175,348 at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively, and represented 9.97% and 10.14% of the total loan portfolio,
respectively. From December 31, 2013 to March 31, 2014, these loans declined $284,827, or 1.18%.
Currently, the demand for real estate
loans in our market area is weak, largely because of a slow recovery from the recent recession that affected many businesses and
individuals in our market area.
Commercial and industrial loans increased
$97,675, or 0.30%, to $32,584,523 at March 31, 2014, from $32,486,848 at December 31, 2013. The increase is attributable to our
renewed emphasis on marketing commercial loan products to small business owners. At March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, commercial
and industrial loans represented 13.60% and 13.62%, respectively, of the total loan portfolio.
Our loan portfolio is also comprised of
consumer and other loans that totaled $12,141,790 and $11,760,454 at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively, and represented
5.07% and 4.93%, respectively, of the total loan portfolio. From December 31, 2013 to March 31, 2014, our consumer and other loans
have increased by $381,336, resulting primarily from the implementation of several marketing programs designed to increase consumer
borrowings.
Our loan portfolio reflects the diversity
of our markets. The economies of our markets contain elements of medium and light manufacturing, higher education,
regional health care, and distribution facilities. We expect our local economy to remain stable; however, due to the slow economic
recovery in some of our markets, we do not expect any material growth in our loan portfolio in the near future. We do not engage
in foreign lending.
Maturities and Sensitivity of Loans
to Changes in Interest Rates
The information in the following tables
is based on the contractual maturities of individual loans, including loans which may be subject to renewal at their contractual
maturity. Renewal of such loans is subject to review and credit approval, as well as modification of terms upon maturity.
Actual repayments of loans may differ from the maturities reflected below because borrowers have the right to prepay obligations
with or without prepayment penalties.
The following table summarizes loan maturity
distribution by type and related interest rate characteristics at March 31, 2014.
|
|
|
|
|
Over
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One Year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One Year or
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
Over Five
|
|
|
|
|
(
Dollars in thousands
)
|
|
Less
|
|
|
Five Years
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate
|
|
$
|
46,059
|
|
|
$
|
123,239
|
|
|
$
|
25,610
|
|
|
$
|
194,908
|
|
Commercial and industrial
|
|
|
16,883
|
|
|
|
15,506
|
|
|
|
196
|
|
|
|
32,585
|
|
Consumer and other
|
|
|
1,670
|
|
|
|
7,921
|
|
|
|
2,551
|
|
|
|
12,142
|
|
|
|
$
|
64,612
|
|
|
$
|
146,666
|
|
|
$
|
28,357
|
|
|
$
|
239,635
|
|
Loans maturing after one year with:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed interest rates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
129,281
|
|
Floating interest rates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,742
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
175,023
|
|
Allowance for Loan Losses
The following table summarizes the allocation
of the allowance for loan losses at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013.
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
% of
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
2014
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Real estate loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
$
|
280
|
|
|
|
9.99
|
%
|
|
$
|
303
|
|
|
|
10.47
|
%
|
Residential
|
|
|
1,045
|
|
|
|
37.28
|
|
|
|
1,043
|
|
|
|
36.04
|
|
Nonresidential
|
|
|
1,303
|
|
|
|
46.49
|
|
|
|
1,382
|
|
|
|
47.75
|
|
Total real estate loans
|
|
|
2,628
|
|
|
|
93.76
|
|
|
|
2,728
|
|
|
|
94.26
|
|
Commercial and industrial
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
3.57
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
2.25
|
|
Consumer and other
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
2.67
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
3.49
|
|
Total loans
|
|
$
|
2,803
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
2,894
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
Activity in the Allowance for Loan
Losses
The following table summarizes the activity
related to our allowance for loan losses for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013.
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
Balance, January 1,
|
|
$
|
2,894
|
|
|
$
|
4,167
|
|
Loans charged off:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate – Construction
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Real estate – Residential
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
Real estate – Nonresidential
|
|
|
188
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
Total real estate loans
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
Commercial and industrial
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Consumer and other
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Total loan losses
|
|
|
202
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recoveries of previous loan losses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate – Construction
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
Real estate – Residential
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
Real estate – Nonresidential
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total real estate loans
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
168
|
|
Commercial and industrial
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
Consumer and other
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Total recoveries
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
198
|
|
Net charge-offs (recoveries)
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Balance, March 31,
|
|
$
|
2,803
|
|
|
$
|
4,199
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans outstanding, end of period
|
|
$
|
239,635
|
|
|
$
|
256,710
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses to loans outstanding
|
|
|
1.17
|
%
|
|
|
1.64
|
%
|
Risk Elements in the Loan Portfolio
The following table shows the nonperforming
assets, percentages of net charge-offs, and the related percentage of allowance for loan losses for the three months ended March
31, 2014 and 2013.
|
|
March 31,
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
Loans over 90 days past due and still accruing
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
544
|
|
Loans on nonaccrual:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real Estate Construction
|
|
|
475
|
|
|
|
2,288
|
|
Real Estate Residential
|
|
|
1,796
|
|
|
|
3,454
|
|
Real Estate Nonresidential
|
|
|
3,986
|
|
|
|
11,908
|
|
Total real estate loans
|
|
|
6,257
|
|
|
|
17,650
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
1,353
|
|
|
|
1,808
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
Total nonaccrual loans
|
|
|
7,689
|
|
|
|
19,540
|
|
Total of nonperforming loans
|
|
|
7,689
|
|
|
|
20,084
|
|
Other nonperforming assets
|
|
|
7,236
|
|
|
|
15,075
|
|
Total nonperforming assets
|
|
$
|
14,925
|
|
|
$
|
35,159
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of nonperforming assets to total assets
|
|
|
4.20
|
%
|
|
|
8.70
|
%
|
Percentage of nonperforming loans to total loans
|
|
|
3.21
|
%
|
|
|
7.82
|
%
|
Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of non-performing loans
|
|
|
36.45
|
%
|
|
|
20.91
|
%
|
Loans over 90 days past due and
still accruing
– At March 31, 2014 and 2013, loans over 90 days past due and still accruing interest totaled $0
and $544,017, respectively.
This improvement was achieved primarily by aggressively monitoring past
due loans.
Nonaccruing loans
–
At March 31, 2014 and 2013, loans totaling $7,688,522 and $19,539,884, respectively, were in nonaccrual status. The improvement
in nonaccrual loans was due primarily to charge-offs, foreclosures, and repayments. Generally, loans are placed on nonaccrual
status if principal or interest payments become 90 days past due and/or we deem the collectibility of the principal and/or interest
to be doubtful. Once a loan is placed in nonaccrual status, all previously accrued and uncollected interest is reversed
against interest income. Interest income on nonaccrual loans is recognized on a cash basis when the ultimate collectability is
no longer considered doubtful. Loans are returned to accrual status when the principal and interest amounts contractually
due are brought current and future payments are reasonably assured. For the first quarters of 2014 and 2013, interest income recognized
on nonaccrual loans was $31,086 and $148,728, respectively. If the nonaccrual loans had been accruing interest at their original
contracted rates, related income would have been $110,227 and $289,706 for quarters ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
All nonaccruing loans at March 31, 2014 and 2013 were included in our classification of impaired loans at those dates.
Restructured loans -
In
situations where, for economic or legal reasons related to a borrower’s financial difficulties, a concession to the borrower
is granted that we would not otherwise consider, the related loan is classified as a TDR. The restructuring of a loan may include
the transfer of real estate collateral, either through the pledge of additional properties by the borrower or through a transfer
to the Bank in lieu of foreclosures. Restructured loans may also include the borrower transferring to the Bank receivables from
third parties, other assets, or an equity interest in the borrower in full or partial satisfaction of the loan, a modification
of the loan terms, or a combination of the above.
At March 31, 2014 there were 30 loans
classified as a TDR totaling $7,274,231. Of the 30 loans, 16 loans totaling $4,564,197 were performing while 14 loans totaling
$2,710,034 were not performing. As of March 31, 2013 there were 51 loans classified as a TDR totaling $13,062,003. Of the 51 loans,
17 loans totaling $5,533,207 were performing while 34 loans totaling $7,528,795 were not performing. From March 31, 2013 to March
31, 2014, TDR loans decreased by $5,787,772 due to charge-offs, foreclosures and repayments. All restructured loans resulted in
either extended maturity or lowered rates and were included in the impaired loan balance.
Impaired loans
- At March
31, 2014, we had impaired loans totaling $15,242,612, as compared to $26,613,230 at March 31, 2013. The improvement in impaired
loans in the first quarter of 2014 compared to the same period in 2013 was primarily attributable to the reduction of high-risk
construction loans on our books and the phasing out of our credit exposure in the Myrtle Beach and Charleston markets, which were
particularly hard hit by the downturn in real estate markets in 2013. At March 31, 2014, there were 9 borrowers that accounted
for approximately 70.09% of the total amount of the impaired loans at that date. These loans were primarily commercial real estate
loans located in the following South Carolina areas: 53% in the Coastal area, 22% in the Columbia area and 25% in the Florence
area. Impaired loans, as a percentage of total loans, were 6.36% at March 31, 2014 as compared 9.98% at March 31, 2013.
During the quarter ended March 31, 2014,
the average investment in impaired loans was approximately $16,702,000 as compared to $26,739,000 during the quarter ended March
31, 2013. Impaired loans with a specific allocation of the allowance for loan losses totaled $5,227,045 and $7,729,196 at March
31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The amount of the specific allocation at March 31, 2014 and 2013 was $560,661 and $405,265, respectively.
The downturn in the real estate market
that began in 2008 and continued into the first quarter of 2014 has resulted in an increase in loan delinquencies, defaults and
foreclosures; however, we believe these trends are stabilizing as the liquidation prices for our OREO has stabilized for vertical
construction, indicating some stabilization of demand for that product. In some cases, the current economic downturn
has resulted in a significant impairment to the value of our collateral and limits our ability to sell the collateral upon foreclosure
at its appraised value. There is also risk that downward trends could continue at a higher pace. If real estate values
further decline, it is also more likely that we would be required to increase our allowance for loan losses.
On a quarterly basis, we analyze each
loan that is classified as impaired during the period to determine the potential for possible loan losses. This analysis is focused
upon determining the then current estimated value of the collateral, local market condition, and estimated costs to foreclose,
repair and resell the property. The net realizable value of the property is then computed and compared to the loan balance to
determine the appropriate amount of specific reserve for each loan.
Other nonperforming assets
- Other nonperforming assets consist of OREO that was acquired through foreclosure. OREO is carried at fair market value
minus estimated costs to sell. Current appraisals are obtained at time of foreclosure and write-downs, if any, charged to the
allowance for loan losses as of the date of foreclosure. On a regular basis
,
we reevaluate our OREO properties for
impairment. Along with gains and losses on disposal, expenses to maintain such assets and subsequent changes in the valuation
allowance are included in other noninterest expense.
As of March 31, 2014, we had OREO properties
totaling $7,236,115, geographically located in the following South Carolina areas – 63.00% in the Coastal area, 8.21% in
the Columbia area and 28.79% in the Florence area. The combined nature of these properties is 92.83% commercial and 7.17%
residential and other. We are diligently trying to dispose of our OREO properties; however, the relatively low demand in many
of these market segments affects our ability to do so in a timely manner without experiencing additional losses. This
is especially true for properties consisting of raw land.
From March 31, 2013 to March 31, 2014,
OREO decreased $7,838,912, or 52.00%. During this period, sales and write downs were $7,328,022 and $4,905,476, respectively,
while properties acquired through foreclosures totaled $4,394,586.
The write downs noted in the previous
paragraph were primarily the result of an extensive marketing analysis of our OREO properties that we made during the fourth quarter
of 2013, taking into consideration our experience as to the time required to sell OREO properties, the volume of OREO properties
held by other banks in our market area, and the deeply discounted prices being offered for the purchase of OREO properties. As
a result of this analysis, we increased our write downs by $3,500,000 for estimated future losses on the sale on our OREO properties.
OREO expense for the three months ended
March 31, 2014 and 2013 was $115,286 and $216,265, respectively, which includes a net gain of $112,594 and a net loss of $24,340
on sales, respectively.
Deposits and Other Interest-Bearing
Liabilities
Average interest-bearing liabilities decreased
$58,450,568, or 18.95%, to $249,959,338 for the first quarter of 2014, from $308,409,906 for the comparable 2013 period. This
decrease is primarily attributable to the significant reduction in our average interest-bearing deposits.
Deposits
- For the quarters
ended March 31, 2014 and 2013, average total deposits were $279,004,035 and $343,513,855, respectively, which is a decrease of
$66,790,353, or 19.44%. As our loan demand declined, we concurrently lowered our rates paid for deposits, specifically for time
deposits, which is the primary reason that the amount of our average time deposits are $53,289,342, or 38.89%, lower during the
first quarter of 2014 than during the same period in 2013. At March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, total deposits were $285,294,349
and $282,415,023, respectively, a decrease of $2,879,326, or 1.02%.
Average interest-bearing deposits decreased
$66,790,358, or 23.62%, to $215,923,992 for the quarter ended March 31, 2014, from $282,714,350 for the quarter ended March 31,
2013.
The average balance of non-interest bearing
deposits increased $2,280,538, or 3.75%, to $63,080,043 for the three months ended March 31, 2014, from $60,799,505 for the three
months ended March 31, 2013.
The following table shows the average
balance amounts and the average rates paid on deposits held by us for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013.
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
Non-interest bearing demand deposits
|
|
$
|
63,080,043
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
$
|
60,799,505
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Interest bearing demand deposits
|
|
|
46,462,181
|
|
|
|
0.08
|
|
|
|
43,955,905
|
|
|
|
0.13
|
|
Savings accounts
|
|
|
85,720,561
|
|
|
|
0.12
|
|
|
|
101,727,853
|
|
|
|
0.24
|
|
Time deposits
|
|
|
83,741,250
|
|
|
|
1.21
|
|
|
|
137,030,592
|
|
|
|
1.79
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
279,004,035
|
|
|
|
0.41
|
%
|
|
$
|
343,513,855
|
|
|
|
0.80
|
%
|
Core deposits, which exclude time deposits
of $100,000 or more, provide a relatively stable funding source for our loan portfolio and other earning assets. Our core deposits
were $246,867,898 and $242,480,278 at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively. As of March 31, 2014 and December 31,
2013, our core deposits were 86.53% and 85.86% of total deposits, respectively. Overall, we have placed a high priority on securing
low-cost local deposits over other, more costly, funding sources in the current low-rate environment.
Included
in time deposits of $100,000 and over, at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, are brokered time deposits of $23,005,000. In
accordance with our asset/liability management strategy, we do not intend to renew or replace the brokered deposits outstanding
at March 31, 2014, when they mature.
Deposits, and particularly core deposits,
have been our primary source of funding and have enabled us to meet successfully both our short-term and long-term liquidity needs.
We anticipate that such deposits will continue to be our primary source of funding in the future. Our loan-to-deposit ratio was
84.00% and 84.45% on March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively.
The maturity distribution of our time
deposits of $100,000 or more at March 31, 2014 is set forth in the following table:
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
Three months or less
|
|
$
|
12,553,720
|
|
Over three through twelve months
|
|
|
13,793,015
|
|
Over one year through three years
|
|
|
11,692,887
|
|
Over three years
|
|
|
386,829
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
38,426,451
|
|
Approximately 68.56% of our time deposits
of $100,000 or more had scheduled maturities within one year. Large certificate of deposit customers tend to be extremely sensitive
to interest rate levels, making these deposits less reliable sources of funding for liquidity planning purposes than core deposits.
We expect most certificates of deposit with maturities less than one year to be renewed upon maturity. However, there is the possibility
that some certificates may not be renewed. We believe that, should these certificates of deposit not be renewed, the impact would
be minimal on our operations and liquidity due to the availability of other funding sources.
Other Borrowings -
Other
borrowings at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, consist of the following:
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
|
|
$
|
5,386,566
|
|
|
$
|
4,876,118
|
|
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank
|
|
|
17,000,000
|
|
|
|
23,000,000
|
|
Junior subordinated debentures
|
|
|
10,310,000
|
|
|
|
10,310,000
|
|
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
mature on a one to seven day basis. These agreements are secured by U.S. government agency securities. Advances from the Federal
Home Loan Bank mature at different periods, as discussed in the footnotes to the financial statements, and are secured by our
one to four family residential mortgage loans and our investment in the Federal Home Loan Bank stock. The junior subordinated
debentures mature on November 23, 2035 and have an interest rate of LIBOR plus 1.83%.
Capital Resources
Total shareholders' equity at March 31,
2014 and December 31, 2013 was $32.4 million and $32.1 million, respectively. The $0.3 million increase during the first three
months of 2014 resulted mainly from our net income of $0.3 million.
The following table shows the return on
average assets (net income divided by average total assets), return on average equity (net income divided by average equity),
and equity to assets ratio (average equity divided by average total assets) for the three months ended March 31, 2014 and 2013.
While we have not paid a cash dividend on our common stock since our inception, the Company has declared and paid dividends on
its outstanding shares of preferred stock, and made quarterly interest payments on its trust-preferred securities as agreed. Under
the terms of the Company MOU, the terms of which are more fully described as part of “Management’s Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation – Regulatory Matters,” the Company must request prior approval
from the Federal Reserve prior to declaring or paying dividends on its common stock or preferred stock, or making scheduled interest
payments on its trust-preferred securities. The Federal Reserve approved the scheduled payment of dividends on the Company’s
preferred stock and interest payments on the Company’s trust preferred securities for the first three quarters of 2011;
however, the Federal Reserve did not approve the Company’s request to pay dividends and interest payments relating to its
outstanding classes of preferred stock and trust preferred securities due and payable in the fourth quarter of 2011, and such
consent has not been granted thereafter, largely out of deference to the Federal Reserve’s policy statement on dividends.
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
Return on average assets
|
|
|
0.40
|
%
|
|
|
0.01
|
%
|
Return on average equity
|
|
|
4.35
|
|
|
|
0.13
|
|
Average equity to average assets ratio
|
|
|
9.27
|
|
|
|
9.95
|
|
The Company and the Bank are subject to
various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements
can initiate certain mandatory and possible additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a material
effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework
for prompt corrective action, the Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of the Company’s
assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance-sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The Company’s
capital amounts and classifications are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings,
and other factors. Currently, the Bank MOU requires that the Bank maintain a Tier 1 leverage ratio of 8%, and our other regulatory
capital ratios at such levels so as to be considered well capitalized for regulatory purposes. We continue to be in full
compliance with this requirement of the Bank MOU. Additional discussion of the Bank MOU is included above as part of “Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation – Regulatory Matters.”
Quantitative measures established by regulation
to ensure capital adequacy require the Company to maintain minimum ratios of Tier 1 and total capital as a percentage of assets
and off-balance-sheet exposures, adjusted for risk weights ranging from 0% to 100%. Tier 1 capital of the Company consists
of common shareholders’ equity, excluding the unrealized gain or loss on securities available-for-sale, minus certain intangible
assets. The Company’s Tier 2 capital consists of the allowance for loan losses subject to certain limitations.
Total capital for purposes of computing the capital ratios consists of the sum of Tier 1 and Tier 2 capital. The regulatory minimum
requirements are 4% for Tier 1 capital and 8% for total risk-based capital; under the provisions of the Bank MOU the Bank will
be required to maintain a Tier 1 leverage ratio of 8% and a total risk-based capital ratio of 10%. However, as the Company
has less than $500 million in assets, its activities and regulatory capital structure are de-emphasized pursuant to the Federal
Reserve's Small Bank Holding Company Policy Statement, with all significant business activities attributed to the Bank by the
Company's regulators.
The Company and the Bank are also required
to maintain capital at a minimum level based on quarterly average assets, which is known as the leverage ratio. Only the strongest
banks are allowed to maintain capital at the minimum requirement of 3%. All others are subject to maintaining ratios 1% to 2%
above the minimum.
The Company and the Bank were each considered
to be “well capitalized” for regulatory purposes at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013.
The following table shows the regulatory
capital ratios for the Company and the Bank at March 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013.
|
|
March 31, 2014
|
|
|
December 31, 2013
|
|
|
|
Holding
|
|
|
|
|
|
Holding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Company
|
|
|
Bank
|
|
|
Company
|
|
|
Bank
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets)
|
|
|
15.93
|
%
|
|
|
14.55
|
%
|
|
|
15.75
|
%
|
|
|
14.35
|
%
|
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)
|
|
|
14.94
|
%
|
|
|
13.56
|
%
|
|
|
14.73
|
%
|
|
|
13.34
|
%
|
Leverage or Tier 1 capital (to total average assets)
|
|
|
12.21
|
%
|
|
|
11.08
|
%
|
|
|
11.78
|
%
|
|
|
10.67
|
%
|
In July
2013, the Federal Reserve, the FDIC, and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency each approved final rules to implement
the Basel III regulatory capital reforms, among other changes required by the Dodd-Frank Act. The rules will apply to all national
and state banks, such as the Bank, and savings associations and most bank holding companies and savings and loan holding companies,
which we collectively refer to herein as “covered banking organizations.” Bank holding companies with less than $500
million in total consolidated assets, such as the Company, are not subject to the final rules, nor are savings and loan holding
companies substantially engaged in commercial activities or insurance underwriting. The framework requires covered banking organizations
to hold more and higher quality capital, which acts as a financial cushion to absorb losses, taking into account the impact of
risk. The approved rules include a new minimum ratio of common equity Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets of 4.5% as well as
a common equity Tier 1 capital conservation buffer of 2.5% of risk-weighted assets. The rules also raise the minimum ratio of
Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets from 4% to 6% and include a minimum leverage ratio of 4% for all banking institutions.
In terms of quality of capital, the final rules emphasize common equity Tier 1 capital and implement strict eligibility criteria
for regulatory capital instruments. The final rules also change the methodology for calculating risk-weighted assets to enhance
risk sensitivity. The requirements in the rules begin to phase in on January 1, 2015 for covered banking organizations such as
the Bank. The requirements in the rules will be fully phased in by January 1, 2019. The ultimate impact of the new capital standards
on the Bank is currently being reviewed.
Effect of Inflation and Changing Prices
The effect of relative purchasing power
over time due to inflation has not been taken into account in our consolidated financial statements. Rather, our financial
statements have been prepared on a historical cost basis in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
Unlike most
industrial companies, the assets and liabilities of financial institutions such as our bank subsidiary are primarily monetary
in nature. Therefore, interest rates have a more significant effect on our performance than do the general rate of inflation and
of goods and services. In addition, interest rates do not necessarily move in the same direction or in the same magnitude as the
prices of goods and services. As discussed previously in "Management’s Discussion and Analysis - Rate/Volume Analysis,"
we seek to manage the relationships between interest sensitive-assets and liabilities in order to protect against wide interest
rate fluctuations, including those resulting from inflation
.
Off-Balance Sheet Risk
Through our operations, we have made contractual
commitments to extend credit in the ordinary course of business activities. These commitments are legally binding agreements to
lend money to our customers at predetermined interest rates for a specified period of time. At March 31, 2014, we had issued commitments
to extend credit of $35.9 million and standby letters of credit of $0.1 million through various types of commercial lending arrangements.
Approximately $31.8 million of these commitments to extend credit had variable rates.
The following table sets forth the length
of time until maturity for unused commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit at March 31, 2014.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After One
|
|
|
Three
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
Within
|
|
|
Greater
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One
|
|
|
Three
|
|
|
Twelve
|
|
|
One
|
|
|
Than
|
|
|
|
|
(
Dollars in Thousands
)
|
|
Month
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
One Year
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Unused commitments to extend credit
|
|
$
|
1,565
|
|
|
$
|
1,246
|
|
|
$
|
11,232
|
|
|
$
|
14,043
|
|
|
$
|
21,465
|
|
|
$
|
35,508
|
|
Standby letters of credit
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
Totals
|
|
$
|
1,565
|
|
|
$
|
1,246
|
|
|
$
|
11,307
|
|
|
$
|
14,118
|
|
|
$
|
21,465
|
|
|
$
|
35,583
|
|
Market Risk
Market risk is the risk of loss from adverse
changes in market prices and rates and principally arises from interest rate risk inherent in our lending, investing, deposit
gathering, and borrowing activities. Other types of market risks, such as foreign currency exchange rate risk and commodity
price risk, do not generally arise in the normal course of our business. Our finance committee monitors and considers methods
of managing exposure to interest rate risk. We have both an internal finance committee consisting of senior management and
directors that meets at various times during each quarter and a management finance committee that meets weekly as needed.
The finance committees are responsible for maintaining the level of interest rate sensitivity of our interest sensitive assets
and liabilities within board-approved limits.
We actively monitor and manage our interest
rate risk exposure principally by measuring our interest sensitivity "gap," which is the positive or negative dollar
difference between assets and liabilities that are subject to interest rate repricing within a given period of time. Interest
rate sensitivity can be managed by repricing assets or liabilities, selling securities available for sale, replacing an asset
or liability at maturity, or adjusting the interest rate during the life of an asset or liability. Managing the amount of
assets and liabilities repricing in this same time interval helps to hedge the risk and minimize the impact on net interest income
of rising or falling interest rates. We generally would benefit from increasing market rates of interest when we have an
asset-sensitive gap position and generally would benefit from decreasing market rates of interest when we are liability-sensitive.
We were liability sensitive during the year ended December 31, 2013 and during the three months ended March 31, 2014. As of March
31, 2014, we expect to be liability sensitive for the next nine months because a majority of our deposits reprice over a 12-month
period. Approximately 33% of our loans were variable rate loans at March 31, 2014. The ratio of cumulative gap to total earning
assets after 12 months was a negative 44.69% because $137.0 million more liabilities will reprice in a 12-month period than assets.
However, our gap analysis is not a precise indicator of our interest sensitivity position. The analysis presents only a static
view of the timing of maturities and repricing opportunities, without taking into consideration that changes in interest rates
do not affect all assets and liabilities equally. For example, rates paid on a substantial portion of core deposits may
change contractually within a relatively short time frame, but those rates are viewed by us as significantly less interest-sensitive
than market-based rates such as those paid on noncore deposits. Net interest income may be affected by other significant factors
in a given interest rate environment, including changes in the volume and mix of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing
liabilities.
Liquidity and Interest Rate Sensitivity
Liquidity represents the ability of a
company to convert assets into cash or cash equivalents without significant loss and the ability to raise additional funds by
increasing liabilities. Liquidity management involves monitoring our sources and use of funds in order to meet our
day-to-day cash flow requirements while maximizing profits. Liquidity management is made more complicated because different
balance sheet components are subject to varying degrees of management control. For example, the timing of maturities
of securities in our investment portfolio is fairly predictable and is subject to a high degree of control at the time investment
decisions are made. However, net deposit inflows and outflows are far less predictable and are not subject to the same
degree of control.
At March 31, 2014, our liquid assets,
consisting of cash and cash equivalents amounted to $21.2 million, or 6.01% of total assets. Our investment securities,
excluding nonmarketable securities, at March 31, 2014, amounted to $46.9 million, or 13.26% of total assets. Investment
securities traditionally provide a secondary source of liquidity since they can be converted into cash in a timely manner. However,
$15.5 million of these securities were pledged as collateral to secure public deposits and borrowings as of March 31, 2014. At
December 31, 2013, our liquid assets, consisting of cash and cash equivalents, amounted to $18.2 million, or 5.13% of total assets. Our
investment securities, excluding nonmarketable securities, at December 31, 2013 amounted to $49.1 million, or 13.81% of total
assets. Investment securities traditionally provide a secondary source of liquidity since they can be converted into
cash in a timely manner. However, $17.2 million of these securities were pledged as collateral to secure public deposits
and borrowings as of December 31, 2013.
Our ability to maintain and expand our
deposit base and borrowing capabilities serves as our primary source of liquidity. For the near future, it is our intention
to reduce the use of wholesale funding to fund loan demand, instead relying on lower-cost funding sources, particularly core deposits. We
plan to meet our future cash needs through the liquidation of temporary investments, the generation of deposits, and from additional
borrowings. In addition, we will receive cash upon the maturity and sale of loans and the maturity of investment securities.
At March 31, 2014, we had a $5.6 million unused line of credit with the Federal Reserve and had sufficient unpledged securities
that would have allowed us to borrow an additional $31.3 million from the Federal Reserve. Also, as member of the Federal Home
Loan Bank of Atlanta, (the “FHLB”), we can make applications for borrowings that can be made for leverage purposes. The
FHLB requires that securities, qualifying mortgage loans, and stock of the FHLB owned by the Bank be pledged to secure any advances
from them. We have an available line to borrow funds from the FHLB up to 30% of the Bank’s total assets, which provide additional
available funds of $106.4 million at March 31, 2014. At that date the Bank had drawn $17.0 million on this line. Finally,
we had available at March 31, 2014 an unsecured line of credit, which was unused, to purchase up to $10.0 million of federal funds
from an unrelated correspondent institution. We believe that the sources described above will be sufficient to meet our
future liquidity needs.
The Company is largely dependent upon
dividends from the Bank as a source of cash. The Bank MOU restricts the ability of the Bank to declare and pay dividends
to the Company. The Company MOU requires the Company to obtain approval of the Federal Reserve prior to declaring dividends.
The Federal Reserve did not approve the Company’s request to pay dividends and interest payments relating to its outstanding
classes of preferred stock and trust preferred securities due and payable in the fourth quarter of 2011, and such consent has
not been granted thereafter, largely out of deference to the Federal Reserve’s policy statement on dividends. See “Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation—Regulatory Matters” for additional information
relating to the Company MOU.
Asset/liability management is the process
by which we monitor and control the mix and maturities of our assets and liabilities. The essential purposes of asset/liability
management are to ensure adequate liquidity and to maintain an appropriate balance between interest sensitive assets and liabilities
in order to minimize potentially adverse impacts on earnings from changes in market interest rates
.
We
have both an internal finance committee consisting of senior management that meets at various times during each quarter and a
management finance committee that meets weekly as needed. The finance committees are responsible for maintaining the level
of interest rate sensitivity of our interest-sensitive assets and liabilities within board-approved limits.
Interest Sensitivity Analysis
The following table sets forth information
regarding our rate sensitivity as of March 31, 2014, for each of the time intervals indicated. The information in the table may
not be indicative of our rate sensitivity position at other points in time. In addition, the maturity distribution indicated
in the table may differ from the contractual maturities of the earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities presented due to
consideration of prepayment speeds under various interest rate change scenarios in the application of the interest rate sensitivity
methods described above.
The following table sets forth our interest
rate sensitivity March 31, 2014.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After
|
|
|
|
|
|
Greater
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After
One
|
|
|
Three
|
|
|
|
|
|
Than
One
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
Through
|
|
|
Within
|
|
|
Year
or
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One
|
|
|
Three
|
|
|
Twelve
|
|
|
One
|
|
|
Non-
|
|
|
|
|
(
Dollars in Thousands
)
|
|
Month
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Sensitive
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-earning assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing
deposits in other banks
|
|
$
|
17,877
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
17,877
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
17,877
|
|
Time Deposits in
other banks
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
Loans (1)
|
|
|
20,582
|
|
|
|
12,761
|
|
|
|
32,206
|
|
|
|
65,549
|
|
|
|
175,023
|
|
|
|
240,572
|
|
Securities - taxable
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
43,752
|
|
|
|
43,752
|
|
Securities - nontaxable
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3,146
|
|
|
|
3,146
|
|
Nonmarketable
securities
|
|
|
1,142
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,142
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,142
|
|
Total
earning assets
|
|
|
39,601
|
|
|
|
12,761
|
|
|
|
32,307
|
|
|
|
84,669
|
|
|
|
221,921
|
|
|
|
306,590
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing deposits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demand deposits
|
|
|
52,101
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
52,101
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
52,101
|
|
Savings deposits
|
|
|
85,752
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
85,752
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
85,752
|
|
Time
deposits
|
|
|
17,518
|
|
|
|
7,801
|
|
|
|
36,138
|
|
|
|
61,457
|
|
|
|
19,331
|
|
|
|
80,788
|
|
Total interest-bearing
deposits
|
|
|
155,371
|
|
|
|
7,801
|
|
|
|
36,136
|
|
|
|
199,310
|
|
|
|
19,331
|
|
|
|
218,641
|
|
Federal Home Loan
Bank advances
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
17,000
|
|
|
|
17,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
17,000
|
|
Junior subordinated
debentures
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
10,310
|
|
|
|
10,310
|
|
Repurchase
agreements
|
|
|
5,387
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
5,387
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
5,387
|
|
Total
interest-bearing liabilities
|
|
|
160,758
|
|
|
|
7,801
|
|
|
|
53,138
|
|
|
|
221,697
|
|
|
|
29,641
|
|
|
|
251,338
|
|
Period gap
|
|
$
|
(121,157
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,960
|
|
|
$
|
(20,831
|
)
|
|
$
|
(137,028
|
)
|
|
$
|
192,280
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative
gap
|
|
$
|
(121,157
|
)
|
|
$
|
(116,197
|
)
|
|
$
|
(137,028
|
)
|
|
$
|
(137,028
|
)
|
|
$
|
55,252
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratio of cumulative
gap to total earning assets
|
|
|
(39.52
|
)%
|
|
|
(37.90
|
)%
|
|
|
(44.69
|
)%
|
|
|
(44.69
|
)%
|
|
|
18.02
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Including mortgage loans held for
sale
|