ODMO Odimo Inc (CE)

 

 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, DC 20549

FORM 10-Q

þ		QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009

OR

o		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                      to                     

Commission file number 000-51161

Odimo Incorporated

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware		22-3607813
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

9858 Clint Moore Road, Boca Raton, Fl		33496
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

(954) 993 -4703
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes þ      No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes o      No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer o		Accelerated filer o		Non-accelerated filer o		Smaller reporting company þ
				(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes þ      No o

As of August 13, 2009, the registrant had 11,086,575 shares of common stock outstanding.

 

 

ODIMO, INCORPORATED
TABLE OF CONTENTS

		Page
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION			1
ITEM 1. Financial Statements			1
ITEM 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations			8
ITEM 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk			11
ITEM 4T. Controls and Procedures			11
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION			12
ITEM 6. Exhibits			12
SIGNATURES			15
EX-31.1
EX-31.2
EX-32.1
EX-32.2

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. Financial Statements

ODIMO, INCORPORATED

BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except par value)

		June 30,				December 31,
		2009				2008
		(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Current Assets:
Cash		$	22			$	1
Prepaid expense and other current assets			—				4
Total		$	22			$	5
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIENCY)
Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable		$	229			$	236
Note payable to related party			3				3
Accrued liabilities			10				10
Total current liabilities			242				249
Commitments, Contingencies and Subsequent Events
Stockholders’ Equity (Deficiency):
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 50 million shares authorized, none issued and outstanding			—				—
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 300 million shares authorized, 11,086 and 7,753 shares issued and outstanding			10				7
Additional paid-in capital			104,499				104,424
Accumulated deficit			(104,729	)			(104,675	)
Total stockholders’ equity (deficiency)			(220	)			(244	)
Total		$	22			$	5

See notes to unaudited condensed financial statements.

ODIMO, INCORPORATED

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)

		Three Months Ended								Six Months Ended
		June 30, 2009				June 30, 2008				June 30, 2009				June 30, 2008
Revenues		$	—			$	—			$	—			$	1
Operating expenses			22				27				54				77
Loss from Operations			(22	)			(27	)			(54	)			(76	)
Interest expense, net			—				—				—				—
Net Loss		$	(22	)		$	(27	)		$	(54	)		$	(76	)
Net Loss per Common Share
Basic and diluted		$	(0.00	)		$	(0.00	)		$	(0.01	)		$	(0.01	)
Weighted Average Number of Shares:
Basic and diluted			11,086				7,753				9,982				7,620

See notes to unaudited condensed financial statements.

ODIMO, INCORPORATED

STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIENCY)
(in thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)

										Additional								Total
		Common Stock								Paid-In				Accumulated				Stockholders’
		Shares				Par Value				Capital				Deficit				Equity (Deficiency)
BALANCE-December 31, 2008			7,753			$	7			$	104,424			$	(104,675	)		$	(244	)
Sale of common stock			3,333				3				47								50
Credits arising from services contributed by related parties											28								28
Net loss															(54	)			(54	)
BALANCE-June 30, 2009			11,086			$	10			$	104,499			$	(104,729	)		$	(220	)

See notes to unaudited condensed financial statements.

ODIMO, INCORPORATED

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
(Unaudited)

		Six Months Ended
		June 30,
		2009				2008
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
Net loss		$	(54	)		$	(76	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Charge in lieu of compensation contributed by officer and related party			28				14
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
(Increase) decrease in:
Prepaid expenses and other current assets			4				(1	)
Increase (decrease) in:
Accounts payable			(7	)			(21	)
Accrued liabilities			—				(15	)
Net cash used in operating activities			(29	)			(99	)
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
Proceeds from notes payable to related party			—				10
Proceeds from sale of common stock			50				100
Net cash provided by financing activities			50				110
Net Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents			21				11
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Beginning			1				1
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Ending		$	22			$	12
Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information:
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest		$	—			$	—

See notes to unaudited condensed financial statements.

ODIMO INCORPORATED
Notes to Financial Statements

1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Business — The Company is a non-operating public shell company. The Company is seeking suitable candidates for a business combination with a private company. The Company previously was an online retailer of watches, luxury goods, diamonds and jewelry through three websites, www.diamond.com, www.ashford.com and www.worldofwatches.com. The Company’s operating results disclosed in this Quarterly Report on Form 10 Q are not meaningful to its future results.

Basis of Presentation — The accompanying unaudited financial statements as of June 30, 2009 have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for interim financial information on Form 10-Q and reflect all adjustments which, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position as of June 30, 2009 and results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 and cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008. All such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. The results of operations for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for a full year. The statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.

Use of Estimates — The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“generally accepted accounting principles”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

General and Administrative Expenses — General and administrative expenses include professional fees, insurance, rent, and other general corporate expenses.

Income Taxes — The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. SFAS No. 109 requires an asset and liability approach. Under this method, a deferred tax asset or liability is recognized with respect to all temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and the tax bases of assets and liabilities and with respect to the benefit from utilizing tax loss carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are reflected at currently enacted income tax rates applicable to the period in which the deferred tax assets or liabilities are expected to be realized or settled. As changes in tax laws or rates are enacted, deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted through the provision for income taxes. A valuation allowance is provided for deferred tax assets if it is more likely than not these items will either expire before the Company is able to realize their benefit, or that future deductibility is prohibited or uncertain.

Loss Per Share — Basic loss per share is computed based on the average number of common shares outstanding and diluted earnings per share is computed based on the average number of common and potential common shares outstanding under the treasury stock method. The calculation of diluted loss per share was the same as the basic loss per share for each period presented since the inclusion of potential common stock in the computation would be antidilutive.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards —In May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 165, “Subsequent Events” (“SFAS 165”). SFAS 165 establishes principles and requirements for subsequent events. In particular, this Statement sets forth the period after the balance sheet date during which management of a reporting entity shall evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial statements, the circumstances under which an entity shall recognize events or transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in its financial statements, and the disclosures that an entity shall make about events or transactions that occurred after the balance sheet date. SFAS 165 is effective for interim or annual financial periods ending after June 15, 2009, and shall be applied prospectively. The adoption of this SFAS 165 did not have a material effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows; see Note 6 “Subsequent Events”.

ODIMO INCORPORATED
Notes to Financial Statements

In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 168, The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“SFAS No. 168”). SFAS No. 168 establishes the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Codification”) as the source of authoritative U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”) recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities. Rules and interpretive releases of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) under authority of federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative U.S. GAAP for SEC registrants. SFAS No. 168 and the Codification are effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. When effective, the Codification will supersede all existing non-SEC accounting and reporting standards. All other non-grandfathered, non-SEC accounting literature not included in the Codification will become non-authoritative. Following SFAS No. 168, the FASB will not issue new standards in the form of Statements, FASB Staff Positions, or Emerging Issues Task Force Abstracts. Instead, the FASB will issue Accounting Standards Updates, which will serve only to: (a) update the Codification; (b) provide background information about the guidance; and (c) provide the bases for conclusions on the change(s) in the Codification. The content of the Codification will carry the same level of authority when effective. The U.S. GAAP hierarchy will be modified to include only two levels of U.S. GAAP, authoritative and non-authoritative. In the FASB’s view, the Codification will not change U.S. GAAP. The Company does not believe the adoption of SFAS No. 168 will have a material impact on its financial position or results of operations. It will, however, change the references to specific U.S. GAAP contained within the financial statements, notes thereto and information contained in the Company’s filings with the SEC.

In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 167, Amendment to Interpretation 46(R) (“SFAS No. 167”). SFAS No. 167 amends Interpretation 46(R) to replace the quantitative-based risks and rewards calculation for determining which enterprise, if any, has a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity with an approach focused on identifying which enterprise has the power to direct the activities of a variable interest entity that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance and (1) the obligation to absorb losses of the entity or (2) the right to receive benefits from the entity. An approach that is expected to be primarily qualitative will be more effective for identifying which enterprise has a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity. SFAS No. 167 requires an additional reconsideration event when determining whether an entity is a variable interest entity when any changes in facts and circumstances occur such that the holders of the equity investment at risk, as a group, lose the power from voting rights or similar rights of those investments to direct the activities of the entity that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance. It also requires ongoing assessments of whether an enterprise is the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity. These requirements will provide more relevant and timely information to users of financial statements. SFAS No. 167 amends Interpretation 46(R) to require enhanced disclosures that will provide users of financial statements with more transparent information about an enterprise’s involvement in a variable interest entity. The enhanced disclosures are required for any enterprise that holds a variable interest in a variable interest entity. SFAS No. 167 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2009. The Company is in the process of evaluating the effect, if any, the adoption of SFAS No. 167 will have on its financial statements.

2. GOING CONCERN CONSIDERATIONS

The Company’s independent registered public accounting firm’s report on its financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 includes an explanatory paragraph regarding the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. As shown in its historical financial statements, the Company has incurred significant recurring net losses for the past several years and as of December 31, 2008, its financial statements reflected negative working capital and a stockholders’ equity deficiency. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Further, the registered public accounting firm’s report states that the financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

As of December 31, 2008 the Company had borrowed from Alan Lipton, its Chairman of the Board of Directors the sum of $3,000. The Company used the proceeds of the loans from Mr. Lipton for payment of its existing liabilities. As of June 30, 2009, the Company raised an additional $50,000 from existing stockholders for working capital purposes.

The Company is a non-operating public shell company and is seeking suitable candidates for a business combination with a private company. The Company may seek to raise additional capital through the issuance of equity or debt, including loans from related parties, to acquire sufficient liquidity to satisfy its future liabilities. Such additional capital may not be available timely or on terms acceptable to the Company, if at all. The Company’s plans to repay its liabilities as they become due may be impacted adversely by its inability to have sufficient liquid assets to satisfy its liabilities. These financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

ODIMO INCORPORATED
Notes to Financial Statements

3. STOCK OPTION PLAN

The stock option transactions related to the Plan are summarized as follows (in thousands, except weighted average exercise price) for six months ended June 30, 2009:

		June 30, 2009
						Weighted
						Average
						Exercise
		Options				Price
Outstanding at beginning of year			26			$	24.48
Granted			—				—
Exercised			—				—
Canceled			(-	)			( -	)
Outstanding at June 30, 2009			26			$	24.48
Outstanding exercisable at June 30, 2009			26			$	24.48

The weighted average remaining life of outstanding stock options is 3 years.

4. INCOME TAXES

Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code generally imposes an annual limitation on the amount of net operating loss carryforwards that may be used to offset taxable income when a corporation has undergone significant changes in its stock ownership. The Company has reviewed the applicability of the annual limitations imposed by Section 382 caused by changes that occurred prior to, as well as, during the six months ended June 30, 2009 in its stock ownership and believes that the availability of the net operating loss carryforwards is substantially limited. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to utilize any net operating loss carryforwards in the future.

5. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Note Payable to Related Party — As of June 30, 2009, the Company had borrowed from Alan Lipton, its Chairman of the Board of Directors the sum of $3,000 which bears interest at 4% and is due on demand. The Company used the proceeds of the loans from Mr. Lipton for payment of its existing liabilities.

Sale of Common Stock — On March 3, 2009 the Company sold 3,333,333 newly issued shares of its common stock, par value $.001, to four investors for a gross purchase price of $50,000. An entity controlled by Alan Lipton, the Company’s Chairman of the Board, and purchased 1,000,000 of these shares. There were no underwriting discounts or commissions paid in the sale.

Services Contributed by Stockholders — During the first six months of 2009, certain stockholders rendered professional services to the Company. A charge in lieu of compensation for the estimated fair value of the services rendered by the officer and the related party has been charged to expense together with a credit to additional paid in capital in the accompanying financial statements of $14,000 and $28,000 for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2009.

6. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

Subsequent events have been evaluated through the close of business on August 13, 2009, the date the financial statements were issued. No events required disclosure.

ITEM 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

      The following discussion should be read in conjunction with Odimo Incorporated’s (“Odimo,” the “Company,” “we,” “our,” “us,”) Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and the related Notes contained elsewhere in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q . All statements in the following discussion that are not reports of historical information or descriptions of current accounting policy are forward-looking statements. Please consider our forward-looking statements in light of the factors that may affect operating results set forth herein.

Non-Operating Shell Company

     We are a non operating shell corporation. We intend to effect a merger, acquisition or other business combination with an operating company by using a combination of capital stock, cash on hand, or other funding sources, if available. We intend to devote substantially all of our time to identifying potential merger or acquisition candidates. We have reviewed very few merger candidates to date and there can be no assurances that we will enter into such a transaction in the near future or on terms favorable to us, or that other funding sources will be available.

Cessation of Online Retailing Business of the Company

     Prior to May 2006, we were an online retailer of high quality diamonds and fine jewelry, current season brand name watches and luxury goods through three websites, www.diamond.com, www.worldofwatches.com and www.ashford.com. In May 2006, we sold assets related to our online diamond and jewelry business operations, including our domain name www.diamond.com. In December 2006, we sold assets related to our online watch business operations, including our domain name www.worldofwatches.com. In April 2007, we sold our domain name www.ashford.com and related intellectual property rights, product images and other intangibles.

     Other than Amerisa Kornblum, our President and Chief Financial Officer, who, commencing in 2008, serves the Company for no compensation, we have no full time employees.

Going Concern

     Our independent registered public accounting firm’s report on our financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 includes an explanatory paragraph regarding our ability to continue as a going concern. As shown in our historical financial statements, we have incurred significant recurring net losses and negative cash flows from operations for the past several years and as of December 31, 2008, our financial statements reflect negative working capital and a stockholders’ equity deficiency.

     These conditions raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Further, the registered public accounting firm’s report states that the financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

     On March 2, 2009 we sold 3,333,333 newly issued shares of our common stock, par value $.001, to four investors for a gross purchase price of $50,000. An entity controlled by Alan Lipton, our Chairman of the Board purchased 1,000,000 of these shares. There were no underwriting discounts or commissions paid in connection with the sale of these shares.

     On February 4, 2008 we sold 714,284 newly issued shares of our common stock, par value $.001, to four investors for a gross purchase price of $100,000. An entity controlled by Alan Lipton, our Chairman of the Board and Amerisa Kornblum, our President and Chief Financial Officer each purchased 178,571 of these shares. There were no underwriting discounts or commissions paid in connection with the sale of these shares.

     We may seek to raise additional capital through the issuance of equity or debt, including loans from related parties, to acquire sufficient liquidity to satisfy our future liabilities. Such additional capital may not be available timely or on terms acceptable to us, if at all. Our plans to repay our liabilities as they become due may be impacted adversely by our inability to have sufficient liquid assets to satisfy our liabilities.

Comparison of Quarter Ended June 30, 2009 to Quarter Ended June 30, 2008

     We generated no revenue during either the quarter ended June 30, 2009 or 2008.

      General and Administrative Expenses. General and administrative expenses for the quarters ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 were $22,000 and $27,000. We believe that while we are a non-operating shell company, our operating expenses will include rent, accounting and other general and administrative expenses as well as costs associated with seeking to locate and consummate a business combination.

      Net Loss. Net loss for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 was $22,000 compared to $27,000 for the quarter ended June 30, 2008.

Comparison of Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 to Six Months Ended June 30, 2008

      Total Revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 was zero and $1,000 (consisting solely of commissions).

      General and Administrative Expenses. General and administrative expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2009 were $54,000 compared to $77,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2008. We believe that while we are a non-operating shell company, our operating expenses will include rent, insurance, salaries, accounting and other general and administrative expenses as well as costs associated with seeking to locate and consummate a business combination.

      Net Loss. Net loss for the six months ended June 30, 2009 was $54,000 compared to a net loss of $76,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2008.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

     As of June 30, 2009, we had cash of approximately $22,000 and total liabilities of $242,000 compared to cash of $1,000 and total liabilities of $249,000 as of December 31, 2008.

     We intend to continue devoting substantially all of our time to identifying merger or acquisition candidates. In the event we locate an acceptable operating business, we intend to effect the transaction utilizing any combination of our Common Stock, cash on hand, or other funding sources that we reasonably believe are available. However, there can be no assurances that we will be able to consummate a merger or acquisition of an operating business on terms favorable to us, if at all, or that other funding sources will be available.

Discussion of Cash Flows

     Net cash used in operating activities for the six months ended June 30, 2009 was $29,000 compared to $99,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2008.

     Net cash provided by financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2009 was $50,000 from the sale of common stock. Net cash provided by financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2008 was $110,000 from the sale of common stock and proceeds from the issuance of a note payable to an affiliated party.

Outstanding Stock Options

     As of June 30, 2009, we had outstanding vested options to purchase approximately 26,618 shares of common stock, at a weighted average exercise price of $24.48 per share. We have no outstanding unvested options. The per share value of each share of common stock underlying the vested options, based on the difference between the weighted average exercise price per option and the estimated fair market value of the shares at the dates of the grant of the options (also referred to as intrinsic value), ranges from $0 to $16.25 per share.

Liquidity Sources

     Our current sources of liquidity consist of cash on hand. As of June 30, 2009, we had $22,000 of cash compared to $1,000 of cash as of December 31, 2008.

     Until required for other purposes, our cash and cash equivalents are maintained in deposit accounts or highly liquid investments with original maturities of 90 days or less at the time of purchase.

     We may seek to raise additional capital through the issuance of equity or debt, including loans from related parties, to acquire sufficient liquidity to satisfy our future liabilities. Such additional capital may not be available timely or on terms acceptable to us, if at all. Our plans to repay our liabilities as they become due may be impacted adversely by our inability to have sufficient liquid assets to satisfy our liabilities.

     Our independent registered public accounting firm’s report on our financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 includes an explanatory paragraph regarding our ability to continue as a going concern. As shown in our historical financial statements, we have incurred significant recurring net losses and negative cash flows from operations for the past several years and as of December 31, 2008, our financial statements reflect negative working capital and a stockholders’ equity deficiency. These conditions raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Further, the registered public accounting firm’s report states that the financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

     During the six months ended June 30, 2009, we funded our operations primarily with cash on hand and from the net proceeds from the sale of shares.

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

     We do not have any off balance sheet arrangements.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

     Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make significant estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to income taxes, contingencies and litigation. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

     While our significant accounting policies are described in more detail in Note 1 to our consolidated financial statements included in this report, we believe the policies discussed below are the most critical to understanding our financial position and results of operations.

Income Taxes

     We use the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized by applying statutory tax rates in effect in the years in which the differences between the financial reporting and tax filing bases of existing assets and liabilities are expected to reverse. We have considered future taxable income and ongoing prudent and feasible tax planning strategies in assessing the need for a valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets. We have recorded a full valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets since we have determined that it is more likely than not that we may not be able to realize our deferred tax asset in the future.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

     In May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 165, “Subsequent Events” (“SFAS 165”). SFAS 165 establishes principles and requirements for subsequent events. In particular, this Statement sets forth the period after the balance sheet date during which management of a reporting entity shall evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial statements, the circumstances under which an entity shall recognize events or transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in its financial statements, and the disclosures that an entity shall make about events or transactions that occurred after the balance sheet date. SFAS 165 is effective for interim or annual financial periods ending after June 15, 2009, and shall be applied prospectively. The adoption of this SFAS 165 did not have a material effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows; see Note 6 “Subsequent Events”.

     In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 168, The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“SFAS No. 168”). SFAS No. 168 establishes the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Codification”) as the source of authoritative U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”) recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities. Rules and interpretive releases of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) under authority of federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative U.S. GAAP for SEC registrants. SFAS No. 168 and the Codification are effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. When effective, the Codification will supersede all existing non-SEC accounting and reporting standards. All other non-grandfathered, non-SEC accounting literature not included in the Codification will become non-authoritative. Following SFAS No. 168, the FASB will not issue new standards in the form of Statements, FASB Staff Positions, or Emerging Issues Task Force Abstracts. Instead, the FASB will issue Accounting Standards Updates, which will serve only to: (a) update the Codification; (b) provide background information about the guidance; and (c) provide the bases for conclusions on the change(s) in the Codification. The content of the Codification will carry the same level of authority when effective. The U.S. GAAP hierarchy will be modified to include only two levels of U.S. GAAP, authoritative and non-authoritative. In the FASB’s view, the Codification will not change U.S. GAAP. The Company does not believe the adoption of SFAS No. 168 will have a material impact on its financial position or results of operations. It will, however, change the references to specific U.S. GAAP contained within the financial statements, notes thereto and information contained in the Company’s filings with the SEC.

     In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 167, Amendment to Interpretation 46(R) (“SFAS No. 167”). SFAS No. 167 amends Interpretation 46(R) to replace the quantitative-based risks and rewards calculation for determining which enterprise, if any, has a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity with an approach focused on identifying which enterprise has the power to direct the activities of a variable interest entity that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance and (1) the obligation to absorb losses of the entity or (2) the right to receive benefits from the entity. An approach that is expected to be primarily qualitative will be more effective for identifying which enterprise has a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity. SFAS No. 167 requires an additional reconsideration event when determining whether an entity is a variable interest entity when any changes in facts and circumstances occur such that the holders of the equity investment at risk, as a group, lose the power from voting rights or similar rights of those investments to direct the activities of the entity that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance. It also requires ongoing assessments of whether an enterprise is the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity. These requirements will provide more relevant and timely information to users of financial statements. SFAS No. 167 amends Interpretation 46(R) to require enhanced disclosures that will provide users of financial statements with more transparent information about an enterprise’s involvement in a variable interest entity. The enhanced disclosures are required for any enterprise that holds a variable interest in a variable interest entity. SFAS No. 167 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2009. The Company is in the process of evaluating the effect, if any, the adoption of SFAS No. 167 will have on its financial statements.

ITEM 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

     Our exposure to market risk due to changes in interest rates relates primarily to the increase or decrease in the amount of interest income we can earn on our cash equivalents. Our risk associated with fluctuating interest rates is limited to our investments in interest rate sensitive financial instruments. Under our current policies, we do not use interest rate derivative instruments to manage exposure to interest rate changes. We attempt to increase the safety and preservation of our invested principal funds by limiting default risk, market risk and reinvestment risk. We mitigate default risk by investing in investment grade securities. A hypothetical 100 basis point adverse move in interest rates along the entire interest rate yield curve would not materially affect the fair value of our interest sensitive financial instruments due to their relatively short term nature. Declines in interest rates over time will, however, reduce our interest income while increases in interest rates over time will increase our interest income.

ITEM 4T. Controls and Procedures

a. Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.

     We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate, to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, we recognize that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.

     Since January 2007, Amerisa Kornblum began to serve as both our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer whereas prior to that date, Ms. Kornblum was the Chief Financial Officer. Commencing January 1, 2007, we have observed that, although our operations subsequent to the year ended December 31, 2006 have been and continue to be limited, we have a material weakness in our internal controls over financial reporting in that we create, review and process financial data without internal independent review due to our not having sufficient personnel. Due to this material weakness, there is more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of our financial statements could occur and not be detected, prevented or corrected. Notwithstanding this material weakness, we believe that the financial statements included in this Form 10-Q fairly present, in all material respects, our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows for the periods and dates presented.

b. Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.

     Other than as set forth above, our management has determined that there have been no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the period covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 6. Exhibits

     (a) Exhibits

Exhibit		Description
2.1 (1)		Asset Purchase Agreement among registrant and Ashford.com, Inc. dated December 6, 2002
3.1 (1)		Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation
3.2 (1)		Amended and Restated Bylaws
4.1 (1)		Form of Specimen Stock Certificate
4.2.1 (1)		Investors’ Rights Agreement dated November 18, 1999 by and between the registrant and certain holders of the registrant’s capital stock
4.2.2 (1)		Amended and Restated Registration Rights Agreement dated March 30, 2004 by and between the registrant and certain holders of the registrant’s capital stock
10.1.1 (1)		Odimo Incorporated Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan
10.1.2 (1)		Form of Stock Option Agreement pursuant to the Odimo Incorporated Stock Incentive Plan
10.2 (1)		Amended and Restated Series C Convertible Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of March 30, 2004 between the registrant and SDG Marketing, Inc.
10.3.1 (1)		Promissory Note dated December 6, 2002 by the registrant in favor of GSI Commerce Solutions, Inc.
10.3.2 (1)		Security Agreement dated December 6, 2002 between the registrant and GSI Commerce Solutions, Inc., as assignee
10.3.3 (1)		Patents, Trademarks, Copyrights and Licenses Security Agreement dated December 6, 2002 between the registrant and GSI Commerce Solutions, Inc., as assignee
10.4.1 (1)		Lease Agreement dated December 14, 1999 between the registrant and MDR Fitness Corp.
10.4.2 (1)		Lease Amendment and Extension Agreement dated January 8, 2003 between the registrant and MDR Fitness Corp.
10.5.1 (1)		Employment Agreement dated July 12, 2004 between the registrant and Alan Lipton
10.5.2 (1)		Employment Agreement dated July 12, 2004 between the registrant and Jeff Kornblum
10.5.3 (1)		Employment Agreement dated July 12, 2004 between the registrant and Amerisa Kornblum
10.5.4 (1)		Employment Agreement dated July 12, 2004 between the registrant and George Grous
10.5.5 (1)		Lock-up Agreement dated July 12, 2004, between the registrant and Alan Lipton
10.5.6 (1)		Lock-up Agreement dated July 12, 2004, between the registrant and Jeff Kornblum
10.5.7 (1)		Lock-up Agreement dated July 12, 2004, between the registrant and Amerisa Kornblum
10.5.8 (1)		Lock-up Agreement dated July 12, 2004, between the registrant and George Grous
10.5.9 (1)		Lock-up Agreement dated July 12, 2004, between the registrant and Michael Dell’Arciprete
10.5.10 (1)		Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated August 27, 2004 between the registrant and Alan Lipton
10.6 (1)		Form of Indemnification Agreement between the registrant and each of its directors and executive officers
10.7 (1)		Supply Agreement dated March 30, 2004 between the registrant and SDG Marketing, Inc.
10.8.1 (1)		Loan and Security Agreement dated as of July 31, 2004 by and among Silicon Valley Bank, the registrant and its subsidiaries Ashford.com, Inc. and D.I.A. Marketing, Inc.
10.8.2 (1)		Revolving Promissory Note dated as of July 31, 2004 in favor of Silicon Valley Bank, by the registrant and its subsidiaries Ashford.com, Inc. and D.I.A. Marketing, Inc.

Exhibit		Description
10.8.3 (1)		Intellectual Property Security Agreements dated as of July 31, 2004 in favor of Silicon Valley Bank, by each of the registrant and Ashford.com, Inc.
10.8.4 (1)		Unconditional Guaranties dated as of July 31, 2004 of Softbank Capital LP, Softbank Capital Partners LP and Softbank Capital Advisors Fund LP
10.9 (1)		Commercial Lease dated as of January 1, 2006 between the registrant and IBB Realty, LLC
10.10 (1)		First Loan Modification Agreement dated as of November 13, 2004 by and among Silicon Valley Bank, the registrant and its subsidiaries Ashford.com, Inc. and D.I.A. Marketing, Inc.
10.11 (1)		First Amended and Restated Note dated as of November 13, 2004 in favor of Silicon Valley Bank by the registrant and its subsidiaries Ashford.com, Inc. and D.I.A. Marketing, Inc.
10.12 (1)		Amendment and Reaffirmation of Guaranty dated as of November 13, 2004 of Softbank Capital, LP, Softbank Capital Partners, LP and Softbank Capital Advisors Fund LP
10.13 (1)		Second Loan Modification Agreement dated as of January 7, 2005 by and among Silicon Valley Bank, the registrant and its subsidiaries Ashford.com, Inc. and D.I.A. Marketing, Inc.
10.14 (1)		Second Amended and Restated Note dated as of January 7, 2005 in favor of Silicon Valley Bank, by the registrant and its subsidiaries Ashford.com, Inc. and D.I.A. Marketing, Inc.
10.15 (1)		Second Amendment and Reaffirmation of Guaranty dated as of January 7, 2005 of Softbank Capital, L.P., Softbank Capital Partners, LP and Softbank Capital Advisors Fund LP
10.16 (1)		Confirmation letter dated January 7, 2005 from Softbank Capital Partners LP, regarding financial support.
10.17 (5)		Termination Agreement dated March 29, 2006 by and between Odimo Incorporated and SDG Marketing, Inc.
10.18 (5)		Third Amendment to Loan and Security Agreement dated March 30, 2006, by and among Silicon Valley Bank, Odimo Incorporated, Ashford.com, Inc. and D.I.A. Marketing, Inc.
10.19 (6)		Asset Purchase Agreement dated as of May 11, 2006 by and among Ice.com, Inc., Ice Diamond, LLC, and Odimo Incorporated.
10.20 (6)		Transition Services Agreement dated as of this May 11, 2006, by and between Ice Diamond, LLC, Ice.com, Inc., and Odimo Incorporated.
10.21 (6)		Separation Agreement dated May 11, 2006 by Odimo Incorporated and Alan Lipton.
10.22 (6)		Amendment No. 1 to Employment Contract dated as of May 11, 2006, by and among Odimo Incorporated and Jeffrey Kornblum.
10.23 (7)		Modification and Settlement Agreement dated November 6, 2006 by and between IBB Realty, LLC and Odimo Incorporated.
10.24 (8)		Asset Purchase Agreement dated as of December 1, 2006 by and among Odimo Incorporated, Worldofwatches.com, Inc. and ILS Holdings, LLC.
10.25 (9)		Separation Agreement dated as of January 16, 2007 by and among Odimo Incorporated and Jeff Kornblum.
10.26 (9)		Separation Agreement dated as of January 16, 2007 by and among Odimo Incorporated and George Grous.
10.27 (9)		Termination Agreement dated as of January 15, 2007 by and among Odimo Incorporated and Amerisa Kornblum.
10.30 (11)		8% Secured Promissory Note in the Principal Amount of $300,000
10.31 (11)		Amended and Restated 8% Promissory Note in the Principal Amount of $500,000
10.32 (11)		8% Demand Promissory Note in the Principal Amount of $30,000
10.33 (10)		Asset Purchase Agreement dated as of April 6, 2007 by and among Odimo Incorporated, Ashford.com, Inc. and Luxi Group, LLC.
10.34 (12)		Amended and Restated 8% Promissory Note in the Principal Amount of $525,000
14.1 (2)		Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
16.1 (3)		Letter of Deloitte & Touche LLP dated September 2, 2005
16.2 (3)		Letter of Rachlin Cohen & Holtz LLP dated September 2, 2005
21.1 (1)		Subsidiaries of Odimo Incorporated
23.1 (12)		Consent of Rachlin LLP
31.1 (4)		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) promulgated pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
31.2 (4)		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) promulgated pursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
32.1 (4)		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.2 (4)		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

SIGNATURES

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Odimo (CE) (USOTC:ODMO)
Historical Stock Chart
From Nov 2024 to Dec 2024

Odimo (CE) (USOTC:ODMO)
Historical Stock Chart
From Dec 2023 to Dec 2024