UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
x
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the Quarterly Period Ended June 30,
2015
o
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from _________
to __________
Commission file number: 000-28347
ONCOVISTA INNOVATIVE THERAPIES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in
its charter)
Nevada |
33-0881303 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(IRS Employer Identification No.) |
14785 Omicron Drive
Suite 104
San Antonio, Texas 78245
(Address of principal executive offices)
(210) 677-6000
(Registrant's telephone number, including
area code)
Indicate
by check mark whether the issuer: (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports),
and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x
No o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive
Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405
of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post
such files). Yes x
No o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller
reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated
filer,” “accelerated
filer” and “smaller
reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer o |
Accelerated filer o |
Non-accelerated filer o |
Smaller reporting company x |
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). Yes o
No x
State the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant's
classes of common equity, as of the latest practicable date: 22,012,896 shares of common stock with a par value of $.001 outstanding
as of August 14, 2015.
ONCOVISTA INNOVATIVE THERAPIES, INC.
FORM 10-Q
FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2015
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM
1 – FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
ONCOVISTA INNOVATIVE THERAPIES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
| |
June 30, | | |
December 31, | |
| |
2015 | | |
2014 | |
ASSETS | |
(Unaudited) | | |
| |
Current assets: | |
| | |
| |
Cash and cash equivalents | |
$ | 28,068 | | |
$ | 12,514 | |
Total current assets | |
| 28,068 | | |
| 12,514 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Total assets | |
$ | 28,068 | | |
$ | 12,514 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
LIABILITIES AND DEFICIT | |
| | | |
| | |
Current liabilities: | |
| | | |
| | |
Accounts payable (including
related party account payable of $1,476,293 and $1,304,293, respectively) | |
$ | 1,830,819 | | |
$ | 1,671,909 | |
Accrued expenses (including
related party accrued expenses of $810,000 and $760,000, respectively) | |
| 2,834,318 | | |
| 2,579,436 | |
Loan payable (including accrued interest of $20,597 and $8,329, respectively) | |
| 410,597 | | |
| 208,329 | |
Current portion of settlement payable | |
| 1,222,817 | | |
| 450,000 | |
Other liability – stock grant | |
| 66,000 | | |
| 66,000 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Total current liabilities | |
| 6,364,551 | | |
| 4,975,674 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Settlement payable – net of current portion | |
| 700,000 | | |
| 700,000 | |
Total liabilities | |
| 7,064,551 | | |
| 5,675,674 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Deficit | |
| | | |
| | |
Common stock, $.001 par value; 147,397,390 shares authorized, 22,012,896 shares issued and outstanding | |
| 22,012 | | |
| 22,012 | |
Additional paid-in capital | |
| 20,217,341 | | |
| 20,217,341 | |
Accumulated deficit | |
| (27,275,836 | ) | |
| (25,902,513 | ) |
Total deficit | |
| (7,036,483 | ) | |
| (5,663,160 | ) |
Total liabilities and deficit | |
$ | 28,068 | | |
$ | 12,514 | |
See accompanying notes to the condensed
consolidated financial statements
ONCOVISTA INNOVATIVE THERAPIES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Statements of
Operations
(Unaudited)
| |
Three Months Ended | | |
Six Months Ended | |
| |
June 30, | | |
June 30, | |
| |
2015 | | |
2014 | | |
2015 | | |
2014 | |
| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| |
Revenue | |
$ | – | | |
$ | – | | |
$ | – | | |
$ | – | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Operating expenses: | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Research and development | |
| 161,069 | | |
| 125,031 | | |
| 321,978 | | |
| 275,304 | |
General and administrative | |
| 927,163 | | |
| 162,713 | | |
| 1,039,078 | | |
| 257,783 | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Total operating expenses | |
| 1,088,232 | | |
| 287,744 | | |
| 1,361,056 | | |
| 533,087 | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Loss from operations | |
| (1,088,232 | ) | |
| (287,744 | ) | |
| (1,361,056 | ) | |
| (533,087 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Other income (expense): | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Interest income | |
| - | | |
| 1 | | |
| - | | |
| 6 | |
Loss on derivative liability | |
| - | | |
| (603,516 | ) | |
| - | | |
| (665,535 | ) |
Interest expense | |
| (7,602 | ) | |
| (1,667 | ) | |
| (12,267 | ) | |
| (1,667 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Total other income (expense), net | |
| (7,602 | ) | |
| (605,182 | ) | |
| (12,267 | ) | |
| (667,196 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Net loss | |
$ | (1,095,834 | ) | |
$ | (892,926 | ) | |
$ | (1,373,323 | ) | |
$ | (1,200,283 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | |
Net
loss per share - basic and diluted | |
$ | (0.05 | ) | |
$ | (0.04 | ) | |
$ | (0.06 | ) | |
$ | (0.06 | ) |
Weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period - basic and diluted | |
| 22,012,896 | | |
| 21,627,868 | | |
| 22,012,896 | | |
| 21,627,868 | |
See accompanying notes to the condensed
consolidated financial statements
ONCOVISTA INNOVATIVE THERAPIES, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Statements of
Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
| |
Six months ended June
30, | |
| |
2015 | | |
2014 | |
Cash flows from operating activities | |
| | | |
| | |
Net loss | |
$ | (1,373,323 | ) | |
$ | (1,200,283 | ) |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities: | |
| | | |
| | |
Depreciation | |
| - | | |
| 477 | |
Stock-based compensation | |
| - | | |
| 995 | |
Interest expense | |
| - | | |
| 1,667 | |
Loss on derivative liability | |
| - | | |
| 665,535 | |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | |
| | | |
| | |
Prepaid and other current assets | |
| - | | |
| 7,350 | |
Accounts payable | |
| 158,910 | | |
| 97,681 | |
Accrued expenses | |
| 1,027,699 | | |
| 337,612 | |
Accrued interest payable | |
| 12,268 | | |
| - | |
Net cash used in operating activities | |
| (174,446 | ) | |
| (88,966 | ) |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Cash flows from investing activities | |
| - | | |
| - | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Cash flows for financing activities | |
| | | |
| | |
Proceeds from loans payable | |
| 190,000 | | |
| 100,000 | |
Net cash provided by financing activities | |
| 190,000 | | |
| 100,000 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents | |
| 15,554 | | |
| 11,034 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period | |
| 12,514 | | |
| 44,898 | |
| |
| | | |
| | |
Cash and cash equivalent at end of period | |
$ | 28,068 | | |
$ | 55,932 | |
See accompanying notes to the condensed
consolidated financial statements
Note 1. |
BASIS OF PRESENTATION, ORGANIZATION AND NATURE OF OPERATIONS |
OncoVista Innovative Therapies, Inc. (“OVIT”)
is a biopharmaceutical company developing targeted anticancer therapies by utilizing tumor-associated biomarkers. OVIT’s
product pipeline is comprised of advanced (Phase II) and early (Phase I) clinical-stage compounds, late preclinical drug candidates
and early preclinical leads. OVIT is not committed to any single treatment modality or class of compound, but believes that successful
treatment of cancer requires a tailored approach based upon individual patient disease characteristics.
Through its former subsidiary, AdnaGen
AG (“AdnaGen”), OVIT previously developed diagnostic kits for several cancer indications, and marketed diagnostic kits
in Europe for the detection of circulating tumor cells (“CTCs”) in patients with cancer.
OVIT used the proceeds from the sale of
its shares in AdnaGen to fund development activities for its drug candidate portfolio. Additionally, OVIT is evaluating
several opportunities to license or acquire other compounds or diagnostic technologies that it believes will provide for treatments
that are highly targeted with low or no toxicity.
At June 30, 2015, OVIT had two full time
employees. OncoVista, Inc. (“OncoVista”), OVIT’s operating subsidiary, had no full-time employees.
Note 2. |
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES |
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited interim condensed
consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America (“GAAP”) and the rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the
“Commission”) for interim financial information. Accordingly, they do not include all the information and footnotes
necessary for a comprehensive presentation of financial position, results of operations, and changes in deficit or cash flows.
It is management's opinion, however, that all material adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) have been made,
which are necessary for a fair financial statement presentation. The interim results for the period ended June 30, 2015 are not
necessarily indicative of results for the full fiscal year.
The unaudited interim consolidated financial
statements should be read in conjunction with the required financial information included as part of OVIT’s Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2014.
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include
the accounts of OVIT and OncoVista (collectively, the “Company”). All intercompany balances have been eliminated in
consolidation.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements
in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities
and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues
and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Significant estimates include the valuation
of warrants and stock options granted for services or compensation, estimates of the probability and potential magnitude of contingent
liabilities and the valuation allowance for deferred tax assets.
Net Loss per Share
Basic earnings (loss) per share are computed
by dividing the net income (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings per
share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding including the effect of share
equivalents. Common stock equivalents consist of shares issuable upon the exercise of certain common stock purchase
warrants and stock options.
As the Company had net losses
from operations for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, all unvested restricted stock, stock
options and warrants are considered to be anti-dilutive. As of June 30, 2015 and 2014, the following shares have been
excluded since their inclusion in the computation of diluted EPS would be anti-dilutive:
| |
2015 | | |
2014 | |
Stock options outstanding under various stock option plans | |
| 1,231,500 | | |
| 1,381,500 | |
Warrants | |
| 100,000 | | |
| 1,625,000 | |
Restricted shares | |
| 336,847 | | |
| 300,000 | |
Total | |
| 1,668,347 | | |
| 3,006,500 | |
Share-Based Compensation
All share-based payments to employees are
recorded and expensed in the statements of operations under Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 718 “Compensation
– Stock Compensation.” ASC 718 requires the measurement and recognition of compensation expense
for all share-based payment awards made to employees and directors including grants of employee stock options based on estimated
fair values. The Company has used the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to estimate grant date fair value for all option
grants.
Share-based compensation expense is based
on the value of the portion of share-based payment awards that is ultimately expected to vest during the year, less expected forfeitures. ASC
718 requires forfeitures to be estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures
differ from those estimates.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
The Company continually
assesses any new accounting pronouncements to determine their applicability. When it is determined that a new accounting pronouncement
affects the Company’s financial reporting, the Company undertakes a study to determine the consequences of the change to
its consolidated financial statements and assures that there are proper controls in place to ascertain that the Company’s
consolidated financial statements properly reflect the change.
In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU No. 2014-09 “Revenue
from Contracts from Customers,” which supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in “Revenue Recognition (Topic
605),” and requires entities to recognize revenue in a way that depicts the transfer of potential goods or services to customers
in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled to the exchange for those goods or services.
ASU 2014-09 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2016, and is to
be applied retrospectively, with early adoption permitted. In July 2015, the FASB extended the effective date by one year. The
Company is currently evaluating the new standard and assessing the potential impact on its operations and financial statements.
In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU No.
2014-15, “Presentation of Financial Statements – Going Concern: Disclosures of Uncertainties about an Entity’s
Ability to Continue as a Going Concern.” This new standard requires management to perform interim and annual assessments
of an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year of the date the financial statements are issued.
An entity must provide certain disclosures if conditions or events raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to
continue as a going concern. The guidance is effective for annual periods ending after December 15, 2016, and interim periods
thereafter, with early application permitted. The Company is currently evaluating this new standard and the potential impact
this standard may have upon adoption.
Note 3. |
GOING CONCERN AND MANAGEMENT’S PLANS |
As reflected in the accompanying consolidated
financial statements, the Company reported a net loss of approximately $1,373,000, net cash used in operations of approximately
$174,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2015, an accumulated deficit of approximately $27 million and total deficit of approximately
$7 million at June 30, 2015. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
The accompanying consolidated financial
statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities
in the normal course of business. These financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recovery
of the recorded assets or the classification of the liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue
as a going concern. The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent on management’s ability
to further implement its strategic plan, obtain additional capital, principally by obtaining additional debt and/or equity financing,
and generate revenues from collaborative agreements or sale of pharmaceutical products. There can be no assurance that these plans
will be sufficient or that additional financing will be available in amounts or terms acceptable to the Company, if at all.
Equipment balances at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 are
summarized below:
| |
2015(Unaudited) | | |
2014 | |
Equipment | |
| 30,132 | | |
$ | 30,132 | |
Computer and office equipment | |
| 9,326 | | |
| 9,326 | |
| |
| 39,458 | | |
| 39,458 | |
Less: accumulated depreciation | |
| (39,458 | ) | |
| (39,458 | ) |
Equipment, net | |
$ | - | | |
$ | - | |
Accrued expenses at June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 are
summarized below:
| |
2015(Unaudited) | | |
2014 | |
Legal and professional | |
$ | - | | |
$ | 58,025 | |
Clinical and other studies | |
| 138,427 | | |
| 138,427 | |
Compensation | |
| 1,579,245 | | |
| 1,341,338 | |
Minimum royalty | |
| 1,085,000 | | |
| 1,010,000 | |
Other | |
| 31,646 | | |
| 31,646 | |
Total accrued expenses | |
$ | 2,834,318 | | |
$ | 2,579,436 | |
During the six months ended June 30, 2015,
the Company borrowed $190,000 on various dates in exchange for unsecured notes from a related party. The notes have an interest
rate of 8%, and are due one year from the date of issuance. If the Company has not paid the notes in full by the respective due
dates, the interest rate increases to 10% per annum. Total accrued interest at June 30, 2015 is $20,597.
During the year ended December 31, 2014,
the Company borrowed $200,000 in exchange for unsecured notes. The notes have an interest rate of 8%, and were due on April 15,
2015. As the Company did not pay the notes in full and the holders did not convert the notes by April 15, 2015, the interest has
now rate increased to 10% per annum. The debt holders may convert the principal and any interest into shares of common stock at
a price of $0.75 per share, or 80% of the per share price of the Company’s next equity offering.
The Company evaluated the conversion and
contingent conversion features of the notes and determined that there was no bifurcation of the embedded conversion option required,
and that there was no beneficial conversion feature on the date of the borrowing.
Note 7. |
FAIR VALUE INFORMATION |
The fair value framework requires a categorization
of assets and liabilities into three levels based upon the assumptions (inputs) used to price the assets and liabilities. Level
1 provides the most reliable measure of fair value, whereas Level 3 generally requires significant management judgment. The three
levels are defined as follows:
Level 1: Unadjusted quoted prices
in active markets for identical assets and liabilities.
Level 2: Observable inputs other
than those included in Level 1. For example, quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets or quoted prices
for identical assets or liabilities in inactive markets.
Level 3: Unobservable inputs
reflecting management’s own assumptions about the inputs used in pricing the asset or liability.
There were no financial assets or liabilities
measured at fair value, with the exception of cash and cash equivalents as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014. The fair values
of accounts payable, notes payable and stock grant liability approximate the carrying amounts due to the short term nature of these
instruments. The fair value of related party accounts payable and accrued expenses are not practicable to estimate due to the related
party nature of the underlying transactions.
Note 8. |
LEASES, COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES |
Lease Obligations
In January 2011, the Company entered a
three-year lease with an affiliate of the CEO for laboratory space which expired in December 2013. During 2014 and through the
six months ended June 30, 2015, the Company utilized the space even though no terms have been negotiated and no payments have been
made. The Company, however, continued to record rent expense on a month to month basis. Total rent expense amounted to approximately
$72,000 for each of the six month periods ended June 30, 2015 and 2014. These amounts are included in accrued expenses.
Legal Matters
On August 26, 2011, an action was filed
against the Company in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County, entitled CAMOFI Master LDC and CAMHZN LDC
against OncoVista Innovative Therapies, Inc. and OncoVista, Inc. The action seeks damages for the alleged breach of a Subscription
Agreement, a Warrant Agreement and an Anti-Dilution Agreement and seeks an order directing the issuance of (i) an aggregate of
1,980,712,767 shares of the Company’s common stock, and (ii) warrants to purchase an aggregate of 702,857,767 shares of
the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.001. On October 20, 2011, the Company filed an answer to the complaint.
On November 1, 2011, the plaintiffs made an extensive document request to the Company for all documents related to the matter.
The Company’s legal counsel began taking depositions and has requested access to CAMOFI Master LDC and CAMHZN Master LDC
principals for further depositions. On June 29, 2012 CAMOFI Master LDC and CAMHZN Master LDC filed for summary judgment. On August
9, 2012, the parties filed a stipulation with the court extending the return date of motion for summary judgment until September
10, 2012. The court has not yet ruled on the motion to dismiss. Oral arguments for the motion were conducted before the court
on January 17, 2013. The judge asked the parties to reconvene and to try to seek a settlement. While the judge indicated her belief
that the Company was in breach of the anti-dilution agreement, she also indicated that it may not be equitable to direct the issuance
of hundreds of millions of additional shares, and reserved her decision on the issue at that time. On July 13, 2015, the parties
were able to reach a final settlement. The Company is to pay approximately $1.2 million in settlement costs and issue 1,545,634
shares of the Company’s common stock. The settlement amount has been recorded as a settlement payable and is due over a
period of three years. The shares were issued in August 2015, and the $1.2 million is to be paid in installments:
$450,000 by the end of 2015, and $300,000 and $400,000 by the end of 2016 and 2017, respectively. If the Company does not
meet the terms of the settlement framework, the framework would require the Company to make additional payments of $2.5 million
plus accrued interest, at the rate of 9%.
On February 16, 2012, the Company filed an action in the 225 Judicial District Court
of the State of Texas, Bexar County, entitled OncoVista Innovative Therapies, Inc. against J. Michael Edwards. The action seeks
damages relating to the executive employment agreement of J. Michael Edwards, our former Chief Financial Officer. Specifically
we are seeking to have the Stock Option Agreement granted to Mr. Edwards on January 6, 2009 be declared void ab initio
. The Company is also seeking damages and attorney fees. On March 30, 2012, the Company received a copy of a counterclaim
that may be filed in the same court and is seeking approximately $197,000, plus certain health and life insurance benefits, in
alleged compensation due. On December 12, 2012 Mr. Edwards filed a third party petition in the court against third party defendant
Alexander L. Weis, our Chairman, CEO and President. Depositions are ongoing, and the Company believes the counterclaimant’s
allegations are without merit and intends to vigorously defend these claims.
Note 9. |
RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS |
Alexander L. Weis, Ph.D., Chairman of the
Company’s Board of Directors and its Chief Executive Officer, President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary, and a significant
shareholder, is a beneficial owner of Lipitek International, Inc. and Lipitek Research, LLC. The Company leases its laboratory
space from Lipitek, Inc. During 2014 and the six months ended June 30, 2015, the Company utilized the space even though no terms
have been negotiated and no payments have been made. The Company, however, continued to record rent expense on a month-to-month
basis. Management believes that rent is based on reasonable and customary rates as if the space were rented to a third party.
On November 17, 2005, the Company entered
into a purchase agreement with Lipitek and Dr. Weis, under which Lipitek granted the Company an option to purchase all membership
interests in Lipitek Research, LLC (Lipitek Research) for a purchase price of $5.0 million, which is payable quarterly based upon
revenues of Lipitek Research, up to $50,000 per quarter. Through June 30, 2015, the Company had paid a total of $550,000 toward
this agreement and has accrued $1,150,000, representing one quarterly payment for 2009 and all of the 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014,
and two quarters of 2015 amounts, which are included in accounts payable in the consolidated balance sheets as of June 30, 2015
and December 31, 2014 and as a component of research and development expense for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014. The
Company has not made any payments toward the agreement in 2014 and 2015.
Prior to the full payment of the purchase
price, the Company has the option, upon 30 days written notice, to abandon the purchase of Lipitek Research and would forfeit the
amounts already paid. All intellectual property developments by Lipitek Research through the term of the agreement or
2012, whichever is later, shall remain the Company’s property, irrespective of whether the option is exercised. In
addition, the Company will receive 80% of the research and development revenue earned by Lipitek while the agreement is in place.
In 2015 and 2014, the Company did not recognize any revenue from its share of Lipitek revenue.
For the potential acquisition of Lipitek,
the Company determined that, under SEC Regulation S-X, Rule 11-01(d) (“ 11-01 ”), and ASC 805 Lipitek would
be classified as a development stage company and thus was not considered a business. As a result, purchase accounting rules did
not apply. The Company also cannot determine with any certainty at this time, if it will exercise the option to purchase
Lipitek in the future.
In addition, the Company has a license
agreement with Lipitek which requires the Company to pay minimum royalties. The Company has accrued $50,000 and $100,000, which
is included in accrued expenses in the consolidated balance sheets of as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively.
Note 10. |
EQUITY (DEFICIT) |
Common Stock
The Company is authorized to issue up to 147,397,390 shares
of common stock. At June 30, 2015, shares of common stock reserved for future issuance are as follows:
Stock options outstanding | |
| 1,231,500 | |
Warrants outstanding | |
| 100,000 | |
Stock options available for grant | |
| 2,309,250 | |
Restricted shares | |
| 336,847 | |
| |
| 3,977,597 | |
Stock Option Plans
All option grants are expensed in the appropriate
period based upon each award’s vesting terms, in each case with an offsetting credit to additional paid in capital. Under
the authoritative guidance for share based compensation, in the event of termination, the Company will cease to recognize compensation
expense. There is no deferred compensation recorded upon initial grant date, instead, the fair value of the share-based payment
is recognized ratably over the stated vesting period. No stock options were granted during the six months ended June 30, 2015 and
2014.
The stock-based compensation expense recorded
by the Company for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, with respect to awards under the Company’s stock plans are
as follows:
| |
2015 | | |
2014 | |
Research and development | |
$ | - | | |
$ | 995 | |
General and administrative | |
| - | | |
| - | |
Total employee stock-based compensation | |
$ | - | | |
$ | 995 | |
The following is a summary of the Company’s stock option
activity:
| |
Shares | | |
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price | | |
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term | |
Aggregate Intrinsic
Value | |
| |
| | | |
| | | |
| |
| | |
Outstanding at January 1, 2015 | |
| 1,381,500 | | |
$ | 0.91 | | |
| |
| | |
Granted | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| |
| | |
Exercised | |
| - | | |
| - | | |
| |
| | |
Forfeited | |
| (150,000 | ) | |
| 0.10 | | |
| |
| | |
Outstanding at June 30, 2015 | |
| 1,231,500 | | |
$ | 1.01 | | |
3.81 years | |
$ | 475,419 | |
Options Exercisable at June 30, 2015 | |
| 1,231,500 | | |
$ | 1.01 | | |
3.81 years | |
$ | 475,419 | |
Warrants
The following is a summary of the Company’s warrant activity:
| |
Shares | | |
Weighted Average Exercise Price | | |
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term | |
Aggregate Intrinsic Value | |
Outstanding at January 1, 2015 | |
| 350,000 | | |
$ | 0.37 | | |
| |
| | |
Granted | |
| - | | |
| | | |
| |
| | |
Forfeited | |
| (250,000 | ) | |
| 0.40 | | |
| |
| | |
Outstanding at June 30, 2015 | |
| 100,000 | | |
| 0.30 | | |
1.32 years | |
$ | 14,250 | |
Exercisable at June 30, 2015 | |
| 100,000 | | |
| 0.30 | | |
1.32 years | |
$ | 14,250 | |
ITEM 2 – MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Our Management’s Discussion and Analysis
contains not only statements that are historical facts, but also statements that are forward-looking (within the meaning of Section
27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Exchange Act). Forward-looking statements are, by their very nature,
uncertain and risky. These risks and uncertainties include international, national and local general economic and market
conditions; demographic changes; our ability to sustain, manage, or forecast growth; our ability to successfully make and integrate
acquisitions; raw material costs and availability; new product development and introduction; existing government regulations and
changes in, or the failure to comply with, government regulations; adverse publicity; competition; the loss of significant customers
or suppliers; fluctuations and difficulty in forecasting operating results; changes in business strategy or development plans;
business disruptions; the ability to attract and retain qualified personnel; the ability to protect technology; and other risks
that might be detailed from time to time in our filings with the SEC.
Although the forward-looking statements
in this report reflect the good faith judgment of our management, such statements can only be based on facts and factors currently
known by them. Consequently, and because forward-looking statements are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties,
the actual results and outcomes may differ materially from the results and outcomes discussed in the forward-looking statements.
You are urged to carefully review and consider the various disclosures made by us in this report and in our other reports as we
attempt to advise interested parties of the risks and factors that may affect our business, financial condition, and results of
operations and prospects.
The following discussion and analysis should
be read in conjunction with our financial statements, including the notes thereto, appearing elsewhere in this Report.
Overview
We are a biopharmaceutical company developing
targeted anticancer therapies by utilizing tumor-associated biomarkers. Our therapeutic strategy is based on targeting the patient’s
tumor(s) with treatments that will deliver drugs selectively based upon specific biochemical characteristics of the cancer cells
comprising the tumor. Through a combination of licensing agreements, as well as mergers and acquisitions, we have acquired the
rights to several technologies with the potential to more effectively treat cancers and significantly improve quality-of-life for
patients. We believe that the development of targeted approaches to the administration of anticancer agents should lead to improved
outcomes and reduced toxicity.
We previously developed diagnostic kits
through our former majority-owned German operating subsidiary, AdnaGen, for several cancer indications, and marketed diagnostic
kits in Europe for the detection of CTCs in patients with cancer. On October 28, 2010, we entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement
with Alere Holdings, whereby we, and the other AdnaGen shareholders, agreed to sell our respective shares of AdnaGen, and all AdnaGen
related business assets, to Alere Holdings for: (i) a $10 million up-front payment; (ii) $10 million in potential milestone payments
contingent upon the achievement of various balance sheet objectives within 24 months; and (iii) up to $63 million in potential
milestone payments contingent upon the achievement of various clinical, regulatory and sales objectives within next 36 months.
We are entitled to receive our pro rata portion of approximately 78.01% of the up-front and potential milestone payments. In
November 2010, we received $6.0 million, net of expenses and certain fees, as our share of the $10 million up-front payment. No
milestone payments were received in 2015 or 2014.
Development Programs
Our most advanced product candidate is
Cordycepin (OVI-123) which is in Phase I/II clinical trials for refractory leukemia patients who express the enzyme terminal deoxynucleotidyl
transferase (TdT). We have received orphan drug designation from the FDA for Cordycepin which affords us seven years of market
exclusivity once the drug is approved for marketing. We initiated a Phase I/II trial based on the “original” ADA-sensitive
compound in the second quarter of 2008. The trial was initiated at two U.S. centers, The Dana Farber Cancer Institute in Boston,
Massachusetts and the Cancer Therapy Research Center at the University of Texas Health Sciences Center at San Antonio, Texas, and
is designed to enroll up to 24 patients in the first stage and up to 20 patients in the second stage. In October 2009, after enrolling
five patients in this clinical trial, we placed the clinical trial on administrative hold due to our limited capital resources.
We have engaged a clinical research organization (“CRO”) in France to do additional pre-clinical in-vitro evaluations
of Cordycepin and the ADA inhibitor Pentostatin with the intent of gaining a better understanding of the inhibition effects of
Pentostatin on Cordycepin. We are in the process of reinitiating the Phase I/II clinical trial to determine the maximum tolerated
dose, and expect to start enrolling patients in 2015 if additional financing is available.
We have completed Good Laboratory Practice
(“GLP”) animal drug safety studies in two species for our lead drug candidate from the L-nucleoside conjugate program
(OVI-117). We have accumulated in vitro and in vivo data indicating that several of the L-nucleoside
conjugates are effective against various types of cancer. To date, OVI-117 has undergone two proof-of-concept studies of human
cancers in animal models, as both a single agent and as a multi-agent combination therapy with oxaliplatin. The Investigational
New Drug application (IND) was submitted to the FDA on June 2, 2012 and approved by the FDA on July 5, 2012. We engaged a contract
manufacturer and a clinical batch of OVI-117 is available for use in our proposed Phase 1 trial. The clinical protocol has been
written and a principal investigator engaged. We believe that OVI-117 should be ready to enter Phase I clinical trials in 2015
if additional financing is available.
Research and development expenditures for
the above projects totaled approximately $322,000 and $275,000 for the six months ended June, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
We expect we will incur additional expenses of between $2.0 million to $3.0 million to complete the current phases of development
for the projects described above.
Other Research and Development Plans
In addition to conducting Phase I and Phase II clinical trials,
we plan to conduct pre-clinical research to accomplish the following:
| · | further
deepen and broaden our understanding of the mechanism of action (MoA) of our products in cancer; |
| · | develop
alternative delivery systems and determine the optimal dosage for different patient groups; |
| · | demonstrate
proof of concept in animal models of human cancers; and |
| · | develop
successor products to our current products. |
Other Strategic Plans
In addition to developing our existing
anti-cancer drug portfolio, we plan to obtain rights to additional drug candidates or diagnostic technologies through licensing,
partnerships, and mergers/acquisitions. Our efforts in this area will be guided by business considerations (cost of the opportunity,
fit with existing portfolio, etc.) as well as input from our clinical advisory board regarding likelihood of successful clinical
development and marketing approval. Our goal is to create a well-balanced product portfolio including lead molecules in different
stages of development and addressing different medical needs.
Critical Accounting Policies
We have identified the policies below as critical to our business
operations and the understanding of our results of operations. The impact and any associated risks related to these policies on
our business operations are disclosed throughout this section where such policies affect our reported and expected financial results.
The preparation of our financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets
and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of our financial statements, and the reported amounts
of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. There can be no assurance that actual results will not differ from those
estimates.
Revenue Recognition . While we have
not recognized revenues from continuing operations, we anticipate that future revenues will be generated from product sales. We
expect to recognize revenue from product sales in accordance with SEC, Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) No. 104, “Revenue
Recognition” that requires we recognize revenue when each of the following four criteria is met: 1) a contract or sales arrangement
exists; 2) products have been shipped or services have been rendered; 3) the price of the products or services is fixed or determinable;
and 4) collectability is reasonably assured. We anticipate that our customers will have no right of return for products sold. Revenues
will be considered to be earned upon shipment.
Share-Based Compensation. We
follow Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 718 “Compensation – Stock Compensation”
which requires the measurement and recognition of compensation expense for all share-based payment awards made to employees
and directors including grants of employee stock options based on estimated fair values. We have used the Black-Scholes option
pricing model to estimate grant date fair value for all option grants. The assumptions we use in calculating the fair
value of share-based payment awards represent management’s best estimates, but these estimates involve inherent uncertainties
and the application of management judgment. As such, as we use different assumptions based on a change in factors, our stock-based
compensation expense could be materially different in the future.
Results of Operations
Three Months Ended June 30, 2015 and 2014
Research and development. Research
and development expenses increased by approximately $36,000, or 29%, to approximately $161,000 for the three months ended June
30, 2015, as compared to approximately $125,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2014. The increase was due to slightly higher
costs in various research and development expenses.
General and administrative. General
and administrative expenses increased by approximately $764,000, or 470%, to approximately $927,000 for the three months ended
June 30, 2015, as compared to approximately $163,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2014, primarily due to the settlement
costs.
Other Expense. Other expense decreased
$598,000, or 99% to expense of approximately $8,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2015, as compared to expense of approximately
$605,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2014. The decrease was primarily due to a loss on derivative liability of approximately
$604,000 that was recognized in 2014, partially offset by an increase in an interest expense related to the bridge loans in 2015.
Six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014
Research and development. Research
and development expenses increased by approximately $47,000, or 17%, to approximately $322,000 for the six months ended June 30,
2015, as compared to approximately $275,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2014. The increase was due to higher costs in various
research and development expenses.
General and administrative. General and administrative
expenses increased by approximately $781,000, or 303%, to approximately $1,039,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2015, as compared
to approximately $258,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2014, primarily due to the settlement costs.
Other Expense. Other expense decreased
$655,000, or 98% to expense of approximately $12,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2015, as compared to expense of approximately
$667,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2014. The decrease was primarily due to a loss on derivative liability of approximately
$666,000 that was recognized in 2014, partially offset by an increase in an interest expense related to the bridge loans in 2015.
Going Concern and Recent Events
Our consolidated financial statements for
the six months ended June 30, 2015 have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and
the settlement of liabilities and commitments in the normal course of business. We reported a net loss of approximately $1,373,000,
and net cash used in continuing operations of approximately $174,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2015, an accumulated deficit
of approximately $27 million and total deficit of approximately $7 million as of June 30, 2015. The Report of the Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm on the Company’s financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2014 includes a “going
concern” explanatory paragraph expressing substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
Our ability to continue as a going concern depends on the success
of management’s plans to achieve the following:
| · | Continue
to aggressively seek investment capital; |
| · | Develop
our product pipeline; |
| · | Advance
scientific progress in our research and development; and |
| · | Continue
to monitor and implement cost control initiatives to conserve cash. |
Liquidity and Capital Resources
At June 30, 2015, we had cash and cash
equivalents of approximately $28,000 compared to approximately $13,000 at December 31, 2014. In order to preserve principal and
maintain liquidity, our funds are primarily invested in checking and interest bearing saving accounts with the primary objective
of capital preservation.
The Company is to pay approximately $1.2
million in settlement costs over a period of three years with approximately $450,000 due by the end of 2015, and $300,000 and $400,000
due by the end of 2016 and 2017, respectively. Our ability to continue as a going concern is dependent on our ability to further
implement our strategic plan, continue to obtain additional debt and/or equity financing, and generate additional revenues from
collaborative agreements.
To date, we have financed our operations
principally through proceeds of offerings of securities exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act. We can
provide no assurance that additional funding will be available on terms acceptable to us, or at all. Accordingly, we may not be
able to secure the funding which is required to expand research and development programs beyond their current levels or at levels
that may be required in the future. If we cannot secure adequate financing, we may be required to delay, scale back or eliminate
one or more of our research and development programs or to enter into license or other arrangements with third parties to commercialize
products or technologies that we would otherwise seek to develop and commercialize ourselves. Our future capital requirements will
depend upon many factors, including:
| · | Continued
scientific progress in our research and development programs; |
| · | Costs
and timing of conducting clinical trials and seeking regulatory approvals and patent prosecutions; |
| · | Competing
technological and market developments; and |
| · | Our
ability to establish additional collaborative relationships. |
Accordingly, we may be required to issue
equity or debt securities or enter into other financial arrangements, including relationships with corporate and other partners,
in order to raise additional capital. Depending upon market conditions, we may not be successful in raising sufficient additional
capital for our short or long-term requirements. In such event, our business, prospects, financial condition, and results of operations
would be materially adversely affected.
Operating Activities. For
the six months ended June 30, 2015, net cash used in operations increased $85,000, or 96% to approximately $174,000 compared to
approximately $89,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2014. The increase was primarily due to an increase in legal fees paid.
Investing Activities. There
was no cash provided by or used in investing activities for the six month periods ended June 30, 2015 and 2014.
Financing Activities. For
the six months ended June 30, 2015, net cash provided by financing activities increased by $90,000 compared to 100,000 for the
six months ended June 30, 2014. The increase is attributed to additional bridge loan raised during the period.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
The Company continually
assesses any new accounting pronouncements to determine their applicability. When it is determined that a new accounting pronouncement
affects the Company’s financial reporting, the Company undertakes a study to determine the consequences of the change to
its consolidated financial statements and assures that there are proper controls in place to ascertain that the Company’s
consolidated financial statements properly reflect the change.
In May 2014,
FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09 “Revenue from Contracts from Customers,” which supersedes the revenue recognition requirements
in “Revenue Recognition (Topic 605),” and requires entities to recognize revenue in a way that depicts the transfer
of potential goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled
to the exchange for those goods or services. ASU 2014-09 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years,
beginning after December 15, 2016, and is to be applied retrospectively, with early adoption permitted. In July 2015, the FASB
extended the effective date by one year. The Company is currently evaluating the new standard and assessing the potential impact
on its operations and financial statements.
In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU No.
2014-15, “Presentation of Financial Statements – Going Concern: Disclosures of Uncertainties about an Entity’s
Ability to Continue as a Going Concern.” This new standard requires management to perform interim and annual assessments
of an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year of the date the financial statements are issued.
An entity must provide certain disclosures if conditions or events raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to
continue as a going concern. The guidance is effective for annual periods ending after December 15, 2016, and interim periods
thereafter, with early application permitted. The Company is currently evaluating this new standard and the potential impact
this standard may have upon adoption.
ITEM 3 –
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
We are a smaller reporting company as defined
by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act and are not required to provide the information under this item.
ITEM 4 –
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of June 30, 2015, the end of the period
covered by this report, we conducted, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive
Officer, an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) in ensuring that information required to be disclosed by us in our reports
is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the required time periods. Based on the foregoing, our Chief Executive Officer
concluded that because of the material weakness in internal control over financial reporting described below, our disclosure controls
and procedures were not effective as of June 30, 2015.
Management’s Quarterly Report on Internal Control over
Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing
and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). Our internal control
system is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, our principal executive and principal financial officer, or persons
performing similar functions, and effected by our Board of Directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance
with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“ U.S. GAAP ” ).
Our internal control over financial reporting
includes policies and procedures that pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect
transactions and dispositions of assets; provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation
of financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP, and that receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with
the authorization of our management and directors; and provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.
Because of our inherent limitations, internal
control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness
to future periods are subject to risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Management assessed the effectiveness of
our internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2015. In making this assessment we used the criteria set forth by
the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COS0) in Internal Control – Integrated Framework.
As a result of its assessment, management identified a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting. Based
on the weakness described below, management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of
June 30, 2015.
A material weakness is a deficiency, or
combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that, there is a reasonable possibility that a
material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. As a result
of our assessment, management identified the following material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting as of June
30, 2015:
| · | While there were internal
controls and procedures in place that relate to financial reporting and the prevention and detection of material misstatements,
these controls did not meet the required documentation and effectiveness requirements under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act ( “ SOX
” ) and therefore, management could not certify that these controls were correctly implemented. As a result, it was
management ’ s opinion that the lack of documentation warranted a material weakness in the financial reporting process. |
| · | Our disclosure controls
and procedures were not effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit
under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC ’ s
rules and forms and to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the
Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our CFO, as appropriate to allow timely decisions. Inadequate
controls include the lack of procedures used for identifying, determining, and calculating required disclosures and other supplementary
information requirements. |
| · | There is lack of segregation
of duties in financial reporting, as our financial reporting and all accounting functions are performed by a consultant. This
weakness is due to our lack of working capital to hire additional staff during the period covered by this report. We intend to
hire additional accounting personnel to assist with financial reporting as soon as our finances will allow. |
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There were no significant changes in our internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the six months ended June 30, 2015 that have materially affected or are reasonably likely
to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM
1 – LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
On August 26, 2011, an action was filed
against the Company in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County, entitled CAMOFI Master LDC and CAMHZN LDC
against OncoVista Innovative Therapies, Inc. and OncoVista, Inc. The action seeks damages for the alleged breach of a Subscription
Agreement, a Warrant Agreement and an Anti-Dilution Agreement and seeks an order directing the issuance of (i) an aggregate of
1,980,712,767 shares of the Company’s common stock, and (ii) warrants to purchase an aggregate of 702,857,767 shares of
the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.001. On October 20, 2011, the Company filed an answer to the complaint.
On November 1, 2011, the plaintiffs made an extensive document request to the Company for all documents related to the matter.
The Company’s legal counsel began taking depositions and has requested access to CAMOFI Master LDC and CAMHZN Master LDC
principals for further depositions. On June 29, 2012 CAMOFI Master LDC and CAMHZN Master LDC filed for summary judgment. On August
9, 2012, the parties filed a stipulation with the court extending the return date of motion for summary judgment until September
10, 2012. The court has not yet ruled on the motion to dismiss. Oral arguments for the motion were conducted before the court
on January 17, 2013. The judge asked the parties to reconvene and to try to seek a settlement. While the judge indicated her belief
that the Company was in breach of the anti-dilution agreement, she also indicated that it may not be equitable to direct the issuance
of hundreds of millions of additional shares, and reserved her decision on the issue at that time. On July 13, 2015, the parties
were able to reach a final settlement. The Company is to pay approximately $1.2 million in settlement costs and issue 1,545,634
shares of the Company’s common stock. The settlement amount has been recorded as a settlement payable and is due over a
period of three years. The shares were issued in August 2015, and the $1.2 million is to be paid in installments:
$450,000 by the end of 2015, and $300,000 and $400,000 by the end of 2016 and 2017, respectively. If the Company does not
meet the terms of the settlement framework, the framework would require the Company to make additional payments of $2.5 million
plus accrued interest, at the rate of 9%.
On February 16, 2012, the Company filed an action in the 225 Judicial District Court
of the State of Texas, Bexar County, entitled OncoVista Innovative Therapies, Inc. against J. Michael Edwards. The action seeks
damages relating to the executive employment agreement of J. Michael Edwards, our former Chief Financial Officer. Specifically
we are seeking to have the Stock Option Agreement granted to Mr. Edwards on January 6, 2009 be declared void ab initio
. The Company is also seeking damages and attorney fees. On March 30, 2012, the Company received a copy of a counterclaim
that may be filed in the same court and is seeking approximately $197,000, plus certain health and life insurance benefits, in
alleged compensation due. On December 12, 2012 Mr. Edwards filed a third party petition in the court against third party defendant
Alexander L. Weis, our Chairman, CEO and President. Depositions are ongoing, and the Company believes the counterclaimant’s
allegations are without merit and intends to vigorously defend these claims.
ITEM 1A –
RISK FACTORS
We are a smaller reporting company as defined
by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act and are not required to provide the information under this item.
ITEM 2 –
UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
There have been no
events which are required to be reported under this item.
ITEM 3 –
DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
There have been no events which are required
to be reported under this item.
ITEM 4 –
MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.
ITEM 5 –
OTHER INFORMATION
Not applicable.
ITEM 6 –
EXHIBITS
Exhibits:
Exhibit No. |
|
Description |
31.1 |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
31.2 |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
32 |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
101.INS |
|
XBRL Instance Document |
|
|
|
|
|
101.SCH |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document |
|
|
|
|
|
101.CAL |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document |
|
|
|
|
|
101.DEF |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document |
|
|
|
|
|
101.LAB |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document |
|
|
|
|
|
101.PRE |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document |
|
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section
13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
ONCOVISTA INNOVATIVE THERAPIES, INC. |
|
|
|
/s/ Alexander L. Weis, Ph.D. |
|
Alexander L. Weis, Ph.D. |
|
Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Financial
Officer
(Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial
Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
|
|
Date: August 14, 2015
EXHIBIT 31.1
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
AND PRESIDENT
PURSUANT TO THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
OF 1934,
RULES 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a)
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002
I, Alexander L. Weis, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2015 of OncoVista Innovative Therapies, Inc. (the "registrant");
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does
not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial
statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s)
and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the
registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure
controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Designed such internal control
over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external
purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness
of the registrant's disclosure control and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d) Disclosed in this report
any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting; and
5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s)
and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors
and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies
and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not
material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.
Date:
August 14, 2015 |
/s/ Alexander L. Weis, Ph.D. |
|
Alexander L. Weis, Ph.D., |
|
Chief Executive Officer and President |
EXHIBIT 31.2
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
OF 1934,
RULES 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a)
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002
I, Alexander L. Weis, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2015 of OncoVista Innovative Therapies, Inc. (the "registrant");
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does
not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial
statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s)
and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the
registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure
controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Designed such internal control
over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external
purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness
of the registrant's disclosure control and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d) Disclosed in this report
any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting; and
5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s)
and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors
and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies
and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not
material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.
Date:
August 14, 2015 |
/s/ Alexander L. Weis, Ph.D. |
|
Alexander L. Weis, Ph.D., |
|
Chief Financial Officer |
EXHIBIT 32
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002
In connection with
the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of OncoVista Innovative Therapies, Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended June 30,
2015 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Alexander L. Weis, Chief Executive Officer,
President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) The information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the consolidated financial condition of the Company as of the dates presented and consolidated
results of operations of the Company for the periods presented.
Dated: August 14, 2015
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ Alexander L. Weis, Ph.D. |
|
|
Alexander L. Weis, Ph.D. |
|
|
Chief Executive Officer, President and Chief Financial Officer |
|
This certification has been furnished solely
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
A signed original of this written statement
required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
OncoVista Innovative The... (CE) (USOTC:OVIT)
Historical Stock Chart
From Nov 2024 to Dec 2024
OncoVista Innovative The... (CE) (USOTC:OVIT)
Historical Stock Chart
From Dec 2023 to Dec 2024