PART
I
Item
1. BUSINESS
Business
History
We were originally
incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware on November 3, 2010 with an initial business plan to import consumer electronics,
home appliances and plastic housewares. In March 2013, we filed an amended and restated certificate of incorporation to change
our name to “YAPPN Corp.” and increase our authorized capital stock to 200,000,000 shares of common stock, par value
$0.0001 per share and 50,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.0001 per share. Further, in March 2013, our Board of Directors
declared a stock dividend, whereby an additional 14 shares of our common stock was issued for each one share of common stock outstanding
to each holder of record on March 25, 2013. All per share information in this report reflect the effect of such stock dividend.
On December 22, 2014, our shareholders approved the increase of authorized and issued shares of common stock to 400,000,000 shares
of common stock.
Immediately following
the Asset Purchase, under the terms of an Agreement of Conveyance, Transfer and Assignment of Assets and Assumption of Obligations,
we transferred all of our pre-Asset Purchase assets and liabilities (consisting of our former business of import consumer electronics,
home appliances and plastic house wares) to our wholly owned subsidiary, Plesk Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation. Thereafter,
pursuant to a stock purchase agreement, we transferred all of the outstanding capital stock of Plesk Holdings, Inc. to certain
of our former shareholders in exchange for cancellation of an aggregate of 11,250,000 shares of our common stock held by such persons.
On March 28, 2013,
we purchased a prospective social media platform and related group of assets known as Yappn (“Yappn”) from Intertainment
Media, Inc. (“IMI”), a corporation organized under the laws of Canada, for 7,000,000 shares of our common stock, pursuant
to an asset purchase agreement (the “Purchase Agreement” and the transaction, the “Asset Purchase”) by
and among IMI, us, and our newly formed wholly owned subsidiary, Yappn Acquisition Sub., Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Yappn
Sub”). Mr. David Lucatch, our prior Chief Executive Officer was the Chief Executive Officer of IMI at that time. IMI, as
a result of this transaction had a controlling interest in our company. Included in the purchased assets is a services agreement
(the “Services Agreement”) dated March 21, 2013 by and among IMI and its wholly owned subsidiaries Ortsbo, Inc., a
corporation organized under the laws of Canada (“Ortsbo Canada”), and Ortsbo USA, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Ortsbo
USA” and, collectively with Ortsbo Canada, “Ortsbo”). Ortsbo is the owner of certain multi-language real time
translation intellectual property that we believe is a significant component of the Yappn business opportunity. On July 6, 2015,
Yappn entered into a definitive agreement to acquire all of the intellectual property assets of Ortsbo (see below).
On July 15, 2015,
after the approval of the Board of Directors of each company, Intertainment Media and Yappn entered into a definitive agreement
to acquire all of the intellectual property assets of Ortsbo.
The purchased assets
include US Patent No. 8,983,850 B2, US Patent No. 8,917,631 B2, US Patent No. 9,053,097 B2, and other intellectual property including
Ecommerce and Customer Care know-how for a total purchase price of approximately $17 Million, which will be paid by the assumption
of approximately $1 Million in debt and the issuance of $16 Million worth of our restricted common shares (32 Million shares at
$0.50 per share).
Intertainment Media
received Toronto Stock Venture Exchange final approval on September 14, 2015 to proceed with the transaction. On September 15,
2015, the acquisition of Ortsbo Intellectual property by our company was closed.
Our principal executive
offices are located at 1001 Avenue of the Americas, 11th Floor, New York, NY 10018 and our telephone number is (888) 859-4441.
Our website is http://www.yappn.com (Our website is expressly not incorporated into this filing).
Our
Business
Yappn delivers real-time
language translation products which enable vendors and consumers to communicate freely with one another, each in their own preferred
languages. The result is increased business and customer satisfaction.
Being able to conduct business
in multiple languages is essential. As per Common Sense Advisory (a research company specializing in the
areas
of translation, localization, interpreting, internationalization, globalization, marketing, international strategy, market intelligence,
web content, and procurement)
, Global eCommerce sales continue to increase at a rate of 15 percent per year and more than
72 percent of consumers say they are more likely to purchase online if the experience is in their preferred language.
Breaking down language barriers
creates business opportunities and promotes efficiency and effectiveness within organizations. While internet challenges have largely
been solved, resolving language barriers remains a costly issue for every company wishing to access global markets.
Through its proprietary
innovative language solutions, we believe Yappn has altered the translation paradigm by offering a completely customizable set
of tools to engage consumers in up to 67 languages. Yappn’s technology gives people, brands and organizations the power to
be social, conduct commerce and communicate freely without a language barrier.
Generic machine
translation, which can be found from providers like Google Translate
TM
or Microsoft Bing
TM
, employ a “word-for-word”
approach. Unfortunately, the translated result does not always reflect the essence of the original text and may not make sense.
Context (cultural, political and ethnic), syntax and meaning is simply not captured through generic machine translation methods.
Yappn
provides far more than simple word-for-word translation. Yappn translates the words as well as the context and syntax, thereby
ensuring that what is written in one language is translated into another in an accurate, meaningful and relevant way. This capability
is Yappn’s key differentiator.
Yappn
has the ability to detect the online or mobile user’s preferred language and translates the communication into the user’s
language in real-time. Yappn provides very “high fidelity” and accurate translation, without the necessity of direct
human translation or intervention, with an added option to customize translation settings, making the results simple, elegant
and cost effective.
Yappn
offers products for eCommerce, customer care, enhanced messaging collaboration (such as intranets, gaming or social platforms),
online marketing and custom translation solutions to a variety of verticals including entertainment, retail and marketing.
Continued expansion
of our business rollout will likely require additional debt or equity financing and there can be no assurance that additional
financing can be obtained on acceptable terms. We are in the early stage of commercialization, and management believes that we
have insufficient revenues to cover our operating costs. As such, we have incurred an operating loss since inception. This and
other factors raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Our continuation as a going concern is
dependent on our ability to meet our obligations, to obtain additional financing as may be required, and ultimately to attain
profitability. Our independent auditors have included an explanatory paragraph, in their audit report on our financial statements
for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2016 regarding concerns about our ability to continue as a going concern. Footnote 2 to the
Notes to this Form 10-K Report also discusses concerns about our ability to continue as a going concern. Our financial statements
do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
Our
Strategy
Our
management believes that Yappn approaches the challenge of real-time language translation in an entirely unique way. The result
is enhanced translations based on the context of the content or discussion, thereby significantly improving the translation result.
To
accomplish this, Yappn leverages the power of multiple generic machine translation (MT) providers, recognizing that many of these
commodity services specialize and produce substantially better results in some languages over others. This aggregated generic
machine translation is then passed through Yappn’s proprietary algorithms and enhancement processes which, in turn, provide
the optimal translation for the language requested. Yappn then applies yet another overlay of refinement through ‘lexicons’.
Lexicons are essentially custom dictionaries designed to improve the translation by contextualizing the result and making it relevant
to the specific commercial requirement. Lexicons can be industry or brand specific or both.
An
illustrative example of how Yappn’s lexicons work is reflected in its ability to distinguish between a car transmission
versus a radio transmission. Similarly, the system understands that the word “travel” means something different in
basketball than it does when planning a trip. Companies use various words in unique ways and Yappn’s lexicons continuously
evolve, improve and store these subtle nuances and then apply them to the final output to provide an enhanced and more optimal
translation.
Yappn
is not a generic machine translation provider but an enhancement to create better, customized results. Additionally, Yappn is not
a Language Service Provider (LSP) simply returning a document in another language; instead Yappn provides tools and solutions to
better utilize translation in the course of business.
Yappn’s
tools and solutions are built with industry leading technology and hosted on the Microsoft Azure® cloud-based platform which
provides Yappn with global reach, dependable presence, and dynamic scalability.
To
be certain that translation is highly accurate, Yappn’s services team initially works with the customer to develop an appropriate
database of lexicon additions which can be further improved after deployment using Yappn’s professional services or custom
tools. The lexicon can be enhanced on an on-going basis by the customer’s staff as-needed when additions and revisions are
required.
Yappn
can enable an auto update feature that can be used on demand or as a persistent connection that senses updates to the translation
source then has each addition either automatically changed or optionally human verified for fidelity, followed by an update to
the customer’s lexicon. For example, when a product description is updated; the machine translation will instantly display
the change in the store.
The
Yappn application suite is designed to provide a competitive advantage to commercial enterprises and power social users to communicate
more effectively without a language barrier, fostering and driving a competitive edge in a global marketplace.
Offering
an “a la carte” menu of tools to engage consumers, Yappn helps clients improve their customer’s experiences
and therefore increase customer satisfaction.
eCommerce
Platform Integration
: Dynamic translation encompassing the entire eCommerce experience, from online marketing to sales and
customer care
|
●
|
eCommerce
website
|
|
●
|
Vendor
input manager
|
|
●
|
Chat
|
|
●
|
Multilingual
search
|
Customer
Care
: Real-time translation of chat-based customer care
|
●
|
Customer
care integration
|
|
●
|
Custom
help solutions
|
Enhanced
Messaging
: Real-time translation support for messaging platforms
|
●
|
Intranet
|
|
●
|
Social
sharing & messaging
|
|
●
|
Business
sharing & messaging
|
|
●
|
Gaming
sharing & messaging
|
Marketing
:
Online marketing, engagement and socialization
|
●
|
Social
Wall
|
|
●
|
Global
tweets
|
|
●
|
Twitter
chats
|
|
●
|
Multilingual
live captioning & flash social events
|
Custom
Translation Solutions
: Solutions for unique translation requirements
|
●
|
Dynamic
website translations
|
|
●
|
Software
localization
|
|
●
|
Video
closed captioning
|
|
●
|
Virtual
trade shows
|
eCommerce
Platform Integration
Yappn’s
technology is, we contend, a game changing solution, providing a set of stand-alone commercial tools for brands to easily implement
cost effective globalization solutions that support the entire sales cycle, inclusive of the eCommerce website, shopping cart checkout,
marketing, sales and support. No longer is a company constrained to whom they can sell to because of language.
The
Yappn eCommerce experience is more than a simple translation of a store. eCommerce applications exist today to translate a copy
of a store to another language. However, creating a separate instance of a store in another language is problematic as it can
cause several business issues that are difficult to rectify, for example, inventory reconciliation and amalgamated sales reporting
would be left to the vendor to handle manually. The Yappn solution of enabling a single store that is presented in the customer’s
language of choice is a better business solution as we believe it will negate these issues.
Yappn
has made the integration of these services into a store quite simple. Yappn uses standardized web technologies to connect a secondary
database of the translations of the text, metadata and keywords on the site. The benefit of the database connection is the ability
to call accompanying data such as imagery, (e.g. replacing an English ad with a Spanish ad) and the ability to manage translation
without coding expertise. This integration also allows Yappn to access the text components of a secure third party checkout screen,
thereby reducing cart abandonment, which, we contend, is unique to Yappn’s services.
Security
and privacy is maintained via a variety of solutions such as SSL encryption and the exception of customer/user identification
and private information from machine translation services.
Customer
Care Platform Integration
Yappn
Customer Care allows customers to chat in their language of choice, while our clients can staff their customer care operations
in their language of choice.
Chat
is quickly becoming the preferred means for companies to communicate with their customers. Chat is replacing voice and e-mail
providing a window of opportunity for companies to better serve their customers and to do so more cost effectively.
Using
Yappn’s multilingual translation API in conjunction with the client’s existing chat portal, a Customer Service Representative
(CSR) can converse with customers in the customer’s language of choice with Yappn’s technology bridging the language
gap between the two individuals.
This
allows the CSR to think and type in their native language thereby providing better and more accurate service while reducing customer
care costs. Employing multilingual CSR staff is expensive and unnecessary with the use of Yappn’s customer care solution.
Enhanced
Messaging Platform Integration
Yappn’s
proprietary and easily integrated Enhanced Messaging Solution allows for real time communication between languages in a myriad
of platforms for social, business and gaming messaging. The translation is contextualized to provide superior translation results.
Much
of the communication that transpires on messaging platforms is conducted in a single language. This is not always by choice but
instead, is driven by the limitations of the platforms themselves.
Companies
that communicate internally but have staff, partners and customers with different languages can communicate more effectively when
the barrier of language is removed.
Yappn’s
technology can securely integrate into existing chat platforms through a simple API connection to Yappn’s Microsoft Azure®
cloud platform, reducing existing workflow disruptions which would require changes to a client work environment.
Marketing
Platform Integration
Yappn
has created several tools to support online marketing customized for a global audience.
Social
Wall: a fully branded and customized page, which includes the aggregation of a company’s major social media accounts and
#hashtags automatically displayed in any of the 67 languages. This allows followers to interact with all their social media accounts,
in their language and on the company’s website, giving the company back control of its marketing initiatives. Essentially,
a company can present a variety of social media sources on a single page in the language of a customer’s choice, regardless
of the original language the social media content was written in.
Multilingual
Chat: provides companies, brands, organizations and consumers with the ability to have topical discussions in almost any language.
Each user sees the chat experience in their preferred language and communicates to others in that language, allowing every user
to have a native experience in their individual language. The chat can be embedded to facilitate commenting on blogs, special event
discussions with brand ambassadors or as a standalone program, providing a place to discuss the company’s brand.
Live
and Global Events: a tool to promote a company’s brand which embeds our interface directly onto the company’s website
where the company can direct their consumers to attend a live Q&A while promoting the company’s brand on social media.
The technology allows the company to filter and reply to questions posted on Twitter™ and display them in an easy to read
format on the company website, creating a captive audience to market to. Yappn’s easy-to-use backend even allows the company
to reply to the attendees in their native language while automatically displaying the entire event in a user’s individual
language automatically.
Video
Captioning: If video promotion is an element of a company’s marketing strategy, allowing a global audience to watch and
understand these videos is a natural complement. Yappn’s translation system provides simple and accurate video sub-titling
in up to 67 languages, on a live or pre-recorded video, without disruption to the company’s current broadcast process.
Custom
Translation Solutions
Yappn
is a consistent agile developer of tools and solutions to address the three important elements of conducting business: online
marketing, sales and customer care. We are, however, keenly aware that technologies and trends are evolving almost as fast as
we are. For this reason, Yappn publishes its technology via a secured API to enable today’s entrepreneurs to enhance their
innovations with language capabilities. This secure credential-enabled connection is available in an SaaS or by way of pay per
use models and can be tested in sandbox environments. Each installation comes with full support from our development teams.
Digital
Widget Factory
In
November 2014, Yappn executed a three-year Master Services Agreement (MSA) and Statement of Work (SOW) with Digital Widget Factory
(Belize) (“DWF”) to develop and manage a minimum of 200 multilingual Ecommerce sites which will include multilingual
online marketing through traditional online services and social engagement. Contract terms allowed for pre-paid fees in association
with the project of a minimum of $700,000 plus ongoing professional fees in addition to 40% net profit on the program for the
term duration.
The
Global Content Market is an ever growing market, with Ipsos Market Research stating that 7 out of 10 online consumers in 24 countries
have indicated that in a month they share some type of content on social media sites, including pictures as well as articles and
something recommended, such as a product, service, movie or book. Emarketer.com also points out that global ad spending was estimated
at nearly $600 billion worldwide in 2015 with the increase in digital and mobile platforms being the key growth in ad spending.
Yappn,
through the program execution intended to provide multilingual online marketing through traditional online services and social
engagement with its proprietary patented technology to DWF. Yappn would do so by scheduling and supporting DWF’s revenue
programs related to direct and network online advertising, schedule and support DWF’s affiliate and Ecommerce partnerships
and also support DWF users to customize their content experience, submit original content and provides tools to incent sharing
of content and encourage users to build the membership base. Although Yappn ultimately is not proceeding with the DWF program
as originally contemplated, Yappn has provided content support as part of its service to Intelligent Content Enterprises, who
acquired the DWF technology, and Yappn is likely to continue to be the vendor of choice pertaining to language translation on
a go-forward basis, which more in line with Yappn’s current business model.
Revenues recognized
in the year ended May 31, 2016 from the DWF program totaled $812,533, which were from ongoing development of the sites for content
and surrounding technology. We billed DWF $802,592 for year ended May 31, 2016 that has not been recorded as revenue in our financial
statements. Our company has received acknowledgment and acceptance of the services performed during the year ended May 31, 2016,
however due to the long period without payment, management has determined the revenue recognition criteria for the unrecognized
component effective at the beginning of the second quarter of fiscal 2016 has not been met without having further history of receiving
cash payments.
Effective February
29, 2016, DWF sold the technology platform, partially developed by Yappn in conjunction with DWF’s principals, to Intelligent
Content Enterprises Inc. (“ICE”) in exchange for shares of ICE. As part of the transaction, DWF received ownership
and rights to 24 million common shares of ICE for a large minority shareholder position of ICE. During the fourth quarter, the
Company executed a promissory note from DWF, for the outstanding value of the billings of $2,125,000 (of which $1,123,289 is recorded
as a note receivable at year end and was previously recognized in revenue and a trade receivable). The promissory note is secured
by DWF’s ICE stock holdings in the amount of 2,250,000 restricted common shares, which at the market value at the time of
execution significantly exceeded the value of the promissory note. The note receivable includes monthly payments of differing amounts
with the final payment scheduled by November 30, 2016.
Additionally, the
Company received stock options for the purchase of shares of common stock of ICE from DWF. The first option entitles Yappn to
subscribe for purchase from DWF up to 1,000,000 fully paid and nonassessable shares of ICE’s common stock at a purchase
price of $0.55 per share, exercisable until $987,500 remains outstanding on the note receivable, of which the price of the option
is offset against $550,000 of the remaining note receivable. DWF can elect to buy out the option at any time at a price of $0.75
per each underlying share of the option agreement. For each missed payment (not the remedy period per the promissory note, but
any payment not made on the exact due date), the buyout price will increase by $0.05 per underlying share for each payment date
missed starting with the payment due on June 30, 2016 per the promissory note. The second option entitles Yappn to subscribe for
purchase from DWF up to 1,250,000 fully paid and nonassessable shares of ICE’s common stock at a purchase price of $0.35
per share until $437,500 is remaining on the note receivable. DWF can elect to buy out the option at any time at a price of $0.50
per each underlying share of the option agreement. For each missed payment (not the remedy period per the promissory note, but
any payment not made on the exact due date), the buyout price will increase by $0.05 per underlying share for each payment date
missed starting with the payment due on June 30, 2016 per the promissory note. The value of these options is not recognized in
the consolidated financial statements, as the maximum value recorded is limited to what has previously been recorded as revenue
as of May 31, 2016.
The
Services Agreement
We
acquired the rights to use the technology and management and development support services under the Services Agreement, dated
March 21, 2013 and amended October 2013, between Intertainment Media, Inc. (“IMI”), and IMI’s wholly owned Ortsbo
subsidiaries. Pursuant to the terms of the Services Agreement, Ortsbo made available to us its representational state transfer
application programming interface (the “Ortsbo API”), which provides multi-language real-time translation as a cloud
service. The Services Agreement also provides that Ortsbo makes its “Live and Global” product offering, which enables
a cross language experience for a live, video streaming production, available to us as a service for marketing and promoting the
Yappn product in the marketplace (the “Services”). The Services do not include the “chat” technology itself
and we shall be solely responsible for creating, securing or otherwise building out our website and any mobile applications to
include chat functionality, user forums, user feedback, and related functionality within which the Ortsbo API can be utilized
to enable multi-language use. Under the initial agreement, no intellectual property owned by Ortsbo would be transferred to us
except to the extent set forth in the Services Agreement as described in “Intellectual Property” set forth below.
In
October 2013, we amended the Services Agreement. Under the terms of the amendment to the Services Agreement, we have the first
right of refusal to purchase the Ortsbo platform and all its assets and operations for a period of two years; increasing the use
of Ortsbo's technology for business to consumer social programs at a purchase price to be negotiated at the time we exercise our
right. We would also have a right to purchase a copy of the source code only applicable to Yappn programs for $2,000,000 which
may be paid in cash or restricted shares of our common stock at a per share price of $1.50 per share. As part of the agreement,
we issued Ortsbo 166,667 shares of our restricted common stock. On April 28, 2014, we exercised our right to purchase a copy of
the source code for the Ortsbo property in exchange for 1,333,333 shares of restricted common stock for a value of $2,000,000.
On
July 6, 2015, we entered into a definitive agreement to acquire all of the intellectual property assets of Ortsbo which closed
on September 15, 2015. The purchased assets include US Patent No. 8,983,850 B2, US Patent No. 8,917,631 B2, US Patent No. 9,053,097
B2, and other intellectual property including Ecommerce and Customer Care know-how for a total purchase price of approximately
$17 Million, which was paid by the assumption of approximately $1 Million in debt and the issuance of $16 Million worth of our
restricted common shares (32 Million shares at $0.50 per share). Upon the completion of the transaction on September 15, 2015
the amended Services Agreement was terminated.
Competition
Our
business relating to and arising from the development of our assets is characterized by innovation, rapid change, patented, proprietary,
and disruptive technologies. We may face significant competition, including from companies that provide translation, tools to
facilitate the sharing of information, that enable marketers to display advertising and that provide users with multilingual real-time
translation of Ecommerce, events and proprietary social media and chat platforms. These may include:
|
●
|
Companies
that offer full-featured products that provide a similar range of communications and related capabilities that we provide.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Companies
that provide web and mobile-based information and entertainment products and services that are designed to engage users.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Companies
that offer Ecommerce solutions with built in language support.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Traditional
and online businesses that offer corporate sponsorship opportunities and provide media for marketers to reach their audiences
and/or develop tools and systems for managing and optimizing advertising campaigns.
|
Competitors,
in some cases, may have access to significantly more resources than Yappn.
We anticipate that we will compete to attract, engage, and retain clients and users, to attract and retain
marketers, to attract and retain corporate sponsorship opportunities, and to attract and retain highly talented individuals, especially
software engineers, designers, and product managers. As we introduce new features to the Yappn platform, as the platform evolves,
or as other companies introduce new platforms and new features to their existing platforms, we may become subject to additional
competition. We believe that our ability to quickly adapt to a changing marketplace, and our experienced management team, will
enable us to compete effectively in the market.
Intellectual
Property
We
own (i) the yappn.com domain name (which website is expressly not incorporated into this filing) and (ii) the Yappn name and all
trademarks, service marks, trade dress and copyrights associated with the Yappn name, logo and graphic art. We may prepare several
patent filings in the future. Upon payment of the applicable fees pursuant to the Services Agreement, we became the exclusive
owner of copyright in the literary works or other works of authorship delivered by Ortsbo to us as part of the Services provided
under the Services Agreement (the “Deliverables”). All such rights shall not be subject to rescission upon termination
of the Services Agreement. Also as set forth in the Services Agreement, we shall grant to Ortsbo (i) a non-exclusive (subject
to certain limitations) license to use the Deliverables for the sole purpose of developing its technology, (ii) a non-exclusive
license to use, solely in connection with the provision of the Services, any intellectual property owned or developed by us or
on our behalf and necessary to enable Ortsbo to provide the Services and (iii) a license to use intellectual property obtained
by us from third parties and necessary to enable Ortsbo to provide the Services. All such licenses shall expire upon termination
of the Services Agreement.
On
April 28, 2014, we purchased a copy of the source code for the Ortsbo property and all the rights associated with it.
On July 16, 2015,
we entered into a definitive agreement to acquire all of the intellectual property assets of Ortsbo which closed on September
15, 2015. The purchased assets include US No. 8,983,850 B2, US Patent No. 8,917,631 B2, US Patent No. 9,053,097 B2, and other
intellectual property including Ecommerce and Customer Care know-how (Proprietary lexicons and linguistic databases that integrate
into our language services platform). Upon completion of the transaction on September 15, 2015 the amended Services Agreement
was terminated.
We
continue to engage in activities to maintain and further build differentiated technologies that increase our intellectual properties.
Government
Regulation
We
are subject to a number of U.S. federal and state, and foreign laws and regulations that affect companies conducting business
on the Internet, many of which are still evolving and being tested in courts, and could be interpreted in ways that could harm
our business. These may involve user privacy, rights of publicity, data protection, content, intellectual property, distribution,
electronic contracts and other communications, competition, protection of minors, consumer protection, taxation and online payment
services. In particular, we are subject to federal, state, and foreign laws regarding privacy and protection of user data. Foreign
data protection, privacy, and other laws and regulations are often more restrictive than those in the United States. U.S. federal
and state and foreign laws and regulations are constantly evolving and can be subject to significant change. In addition, the
application and interpretation of these laws and regulations are often uncertain, particularly in the new and rapidly-evolving
industry in which we operate. There are also a number of legislative proposals pending before the U.S. Congress, various state
legislative bodies, and foreign governments concerning data protection which could affect us. For example, a revision to the 1995
European Union Data Protection Directive is currently being considered by legislative bodies that may include more stringent operational
requirements for data processors and significant penalties for non-compliance.
Legal
Proceedings
None.
Registration
Statement
We filed a Registration
Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-199569) (the “
Registration Statement
”) with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the “
SEC
”) on October 24, 2014 (amended November 7, 2014) for up to 7,592,667 shares of
our $0.0001 par value per share common stock (the "Common Stock") issuable to certain selling stockholders upon conversion
of promissory notes and/or warrants currently held by those selling stockholders, specifically (i) 1,844,000 shares of Common
Stock issuable to them upon exercise of promissory notes and (ii) 4,588,000 shares of Common Stock issuable to them upon exercise
of warrants. The warrants have an exercise prices varying from $1.00 to $2.20 per share per the registration statement. The Registration
Statement covering the above noted securities was declared effective under the Securities Act of 1933 on November 17, 2014. On
October 5, 2015, the Company filed a continuing registration statement in part to update this S-1 filing and subsequent to the
quarter end on December 2, 2015 filed an amendment to this S-1 filing, which is not, as of the date of this filing, been declared
effective (Note 9 of the financial statements).
Item
1A. Risk Factors.
The following risk factors should
be considered carefully in addition to the other information contained in this report. This report contains forward-looking statements.
Forward-looking statements relate to future events or our future financial performance. We generally identify forward-looking statements
by terminology such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “expects,” “plans,”
“anticipates,” “could,” “intends,” “target,” “projects,” “contemplates,”
“believes,” “estimates,” “predicts,” “potential” or “continue” or the
negative of these terms or other similar words. These statements are only predictions. The outcome of the events described in these
forward-looking statements is subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our customers’
or our industry’s actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking
statements, to differ. “Risk Factors,” “Management’s Discussion and Analysis” and “Business,”
as well as other sections in this report, discuss some of the factors that could contribute to these differences.
The forward-looking statements
made in this report relate only to events as of the date on which the statements are made. We undertake no obligation to update
any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which the statement is made or to reflect the
occurrence of unanticipated events
Investing
in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. Before investing in our common stock you should carefully consider the following
risks, together with the financial and other information contained in this report. If any of the following risks actually occurs,
our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected. In that case, the trading
price of our common stock would likely decline and you may lose all or a part of your investment.
SHOULD ONE OR MORE OF THE
FOREGOING RISKS OR UNCERTAINTIES MATERIALIZE, OR SHOULD THE UNDERLYING ASSUMPTIONS PROVE INCORRECT, ACTUAL RESULTS MAY DIFFER
SIGNIFICANTLY FROM THOSE ANTICIPATED, BELIEVED, ESTIMATED, EXPECTED, INTENDED, OR PLANNED.
Risks
Relating to Our Business
Our
limited operating history makes it difficult to evaluate our current business and future prospects
.
We are transitioning
from a development stage company to a growth company and have generated relatively limited revenue to date. We have, prior to
the purchase of the Yappn assets, as further described herein, been involved in unrelated businesses. We have limited history
in executing our business model which includes, among other things, implementing and completing alpha and beta testing programs,
attracting and engaging clients, customers and users, developing methods for providing clients, customers and users with access
to our services platform. Our limited operating history makes it difficult to evaluate our current business model and future prospects.
In
light of the costs, uncertainties, delays and difficulties frequently encountered by companies in the early stages of development
with limited operating history, there is a significant risk that we will not be able to implement or execute our current business
plan, or demonstrate that our business plan is sound; and/or raise sufficient funds in the capital markets to effectuate our business
plan. If we cannot execute any one of the foregoing or similar matters relating to our operations, our business may fail.
Competition
presents an ongoing threat to the success of our business.
We
may face significant competition in our business, including from companies that provide translation, tools to facilitate the sharing
of information, companies that enable marketers to display advertising and companies that provide development platforms for applications
developers. We may compete with companies that attempt to or offer products that replicate services we provide.
Many of our potential
competitors may have significantly greater resources or better competitive positions in certain product segments, geographic regions
or user demographics than we do. These factors may allow our competitors to respond more effectively than us to new or emerging
technologies and changes in market conditions. We believe that some of our potential users are aware of and actively engaging
with other products and services similar to, or as a substitute for, Yappn. In the event that our users increasingly engage with
other products and services, we may experience a decline in our business prospects.
Our competitors may
develop products, features, or services that are similar to ours or that achieve greater acceptance, may undertake more far-reaching
and successful product development efforts or marketing campaigns, or may adopt more aggressive pricing policies. Certain competitors
could use strong or dominant positions in one or more market areas not serviced by Yappn to gain competitive advantage against
us in areas where we operate. As a result, our competitors may acquire and engage clients at the expense of the growth or engagement,
which may negatively affect our business and financial results. We believe that our ability to compete effectively will depend
upon many factors both within and beyond our control, including:
|
●
|
the
popularity, usefulness, ease of use, performance, and reliability of our products compared to our competitors;
|
|
●
|
the
engagement of our clients and their users with our products;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
the
timing and market acceptance of products, including developments and enhancements to our or our competitors' products;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
our
ability to monetize our products, including our ability to successfully monetize mobile usage;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
the
frequency, size, and relative prominence of the ads displayed by us or our competitors;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
customer
service and support efforts;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
marketing
and selling efforts;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
changes
mandated by legislation, regulatory authorities, or litigation, including settlements and consent decrees, some of which may
have a disproportionate effect on us;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
acquisitions
or consolidation within our industry, which may result in more formidable competitors;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
our
ability to attract, retain, and motivate talented employees, particularly software engineers;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
our
ability to cost-effectively manage and grow our operations; and
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
our
reputation and brand strength relative to our competitors.
|
If
we are not able to compete effectively, our customer base and level of user engagement may decrease, which could make us less
attractive to marketers and materially and adversely affect our revenue and results of operations.
As previously explained,
implementation of our business plan will require debt or equity financing until we are out of the developmental stage and can
generate sufficient cash flows from operations. Competition may require increased needs for operating cash to meet such challenges.
Our
new products and changes to existing products could fail to generate revenue.
Our
ability to retain, increase, and engage our customer base and to escalate our revenue will depend heavily on our ability to enhance
our current products and create successful new products. We may introduce significant changes to our existing products or develop
and introduce new and unproven products, including using technologies with which we have little or no prior development or operating
experience. If new or enhanced products fail to engage clients, we may fail to attract or retain clients or to generate sufficient
revenue, operating margin, or other value to justify our investments, and our business may be adversely affected. In the future,
we may invest in new products and initiatives to generate revenue, but there is no guarantee these approaches will be successful.
If we are not successful with new approaches to monetization, we may not be able to maintain or grow our revenue as anticipated
or recover any associated development costs, and our financial results could be adversely affected.
One
customer has accounted for a significant portion of our business.
We have derived,
in recent history, a significant portion of our revenues from one customer. For example, this customer accounted for a total of
83% of our revenues for the year ended May 31, 2016 (90% - May 31, 2015). As part of a recent acquisition of this customer’s
technology, there are no further billings to this customer. The loss of this customer and the related non-payment of outstanding
amounts due to our company from this customer could materially and adversely affect our results of operations, financial position
and liquidity.
Our
costs are continuing to grow, which could harm our business model and profitability.
Developing
the Yappn platform has been a costly undertaking and we expect our expenses to continue to increase in the future as we implement
and complete continued rollout of our services and platform, build up our client base and develop and implement new product features.
We expect that we will incur increasing costs to support our anticipated future growth. In addition, our costs may increase as
we hire additional employees, particularly as a result of the significant competition that we face to attract and retain technical
talent. Our expenses may continue to grow faster than our revenue over time. Our expenses may be greater than we anticipate, and
our investments may not be successful. In addition, we may increase marketing, sales, and other operating expenses in order to
grow and expand our operations and to remain competitive. Increases in our costs may adversely affect our business and profitability.
Our business is subject to complex
and evolving U.S. and foreign laws and regulations regarding privacy, data protection, and other matters. Many of these laws and
regulations are subject to change and uncertain interpretation and could result in claims, monetary penalties, increased cost
of operations, or declines in user growth or engagement, or otherwise harm our new business model.
We are subject to a
variety of laws and regulations in the United States and abroad that involve matters central to our business, including user privacy,
rights of publicity, data protection, content, intellectual property, distribution, electronic contracts and other communications,
competition, protection of minors, consumer protection, taxation, securities law compliance, and online payment services. The
introduction of new products may subject us to additional laws and regulations. In addition, foreign data protection, privacy,
and other laws and regulations are often more restrictive than those in the United States. These U.S. federal and state as well
as foreign laws and regulations, which can be enforced by private parties or government entities, are constantly evolving and
can be subject to significant change. In addition, the application and interpretation of these laws and regulations are often
uncertain, particularly in the new and rapidly evolving industry in which we operate. For example, the interpretation of some
laws and regulations that govern the use of names and likenesses in connection with advertising and marketing activities is unsettled
and developments in this area could affect the manner in which we design our products, as well as our terms of use. A number of
proposals are pending before federal, state, and foreign legislative and regulatory bodies that could significantly affect our
business. For example, a revision to the 1995 European Union Data Protection Directive is currently being considered by European
legislative bodies that may include more stringent operational requirements for data processors and significant penalties for
non-compliance. Similarly, there have been a number of recent legislative proposals in the United States, at both the federal
and state level, that would impose new obligations in areas such as privacy and liability for copyright infringement by third
parties. These existing and proposed laws and regulations can be costly to comply with and can delay or impede the development
of new products, result in negative publicity, increase our operating costs, require significant management time and attention,
and subject us to inquiries or investigations, claims or other remedies, including fines or demands that we modify or cease existing
business practices.
Because from time to time we hold
a portion of our cash reserves in Canadian dollars and have a portion of our operating expenses in Canadian dollars, we may experience
losses due to foreign exchange translations.
From time to
time we hold a portion of our cash reserves in Canadian dollars. Due to foreign exchange rate fluctuations, the value of these
Canadian dollar reserves can result in translation gains or losses in U.S. dollar terms. If there was a significant decline in
the Canadian dollar versus the U.S. dollar, our converted Canadian dollar cash balances presented in U.S. dollars on our balance
sheet would significantly decline. If the US dollar significantly declines relative to the Canadian dollar our quoted US dollar
cash position would significantly decline as it would be more expensive in US dollar terms to pay Canadian dollar expenses. We
have not entered into derivative instruments to offset the impact of foreign exchange fluctuations. Such foreign exchange declines
could cause us to experience losses.
If
we are unable to protect our intellectual property, the value of our brand and other intangible assets may be diminished, and
our business may be adversely affected.
We
rely and expect to continue to rely on a combination of confidentiality and license agreements with our employees, consultants,
and third parties with whom we have relationships, as well as trademark, copyright, patent, trade secret, and domain name protection
laws, to protect our proprietary rights. In the future we may acquire additional patents or patent portfolios, which could require
significant cash expenditures. Third parties may knowingly or unknowingly infringe our proprietary rights, third parties may challenge
proprietary rights held by us, and pending and future trademark and patent applications may not be approved. In addition, effective
intellectual property protection may not be available in every country in which we operate or intend to operate our business.
In any or all of these cases, we may be required to expend significant time and expense in order to prevent infringement or to
enforce our rights. Although we have taken measures to protect our proprietary rights, there can be no assurance that others will
not offer products or concepts that are substantially similar to ours and compete with our business.
In
addition, from time to time, we may contribute software source code under open source licenses and make other technology we develop
available under other open licenses, and include open source software in our products. As a result of any open source contributions
and the use of open source in our products, we may license or be required to license innovations that turn out to be material
to our business and may also be exposed to increased litigation risk. If the protection of our proprietary rights is inadequate
to prevent unauthorized use or appropriation by third parties, the value of our brand and other intangible assets may be diminished
and competitors may be able to more effectively mimic our service and methods of operations. Any of these events could have an
adverse effect on our business and financial results.
Our business will be dependent
on our ability to maintain and scale our technical infrastructure, and any significant disruption in our service could damage our
reputation, result in a potential loss of customers, and adversely affect our financial results.
Our reputation and
ability to attract, retain, and serve our users may be dependent upon the reliable performance of the Yappn platform and our underlying
technical infrastructure. Performance delays or outages could be harmful to our business. If Yappn’s technology is unavailable
when customers attempt to access it, or if it does not load as quickly as they expect, customers may not return to our service
in the future, or cancel service with us. As Yappn continues to grow, we will need an increasing amount of technical infrastructure,
including network capacity, and computing power, to continue to satisfy the needs of our customers. It is possible that we may
fail to effectively scale and grow our technical infrastructure to accommodate these increased demands. In addition, our business
is subject to interruptions, delays, or failures resulting from our cloud services provider and / or factors beyond the normal
control of Yappn.
We
believe that a substantial portion of our network infrastructure will be provided by third parties. Any disruption or failure
in the services we receive from these providers could harm our ability to handle existing or increased traffic and could significantly
harm our business. Any financial or other difficulties these providers face may adversely affect our business, and we exercise
little control over these providers, which increases our vulnerability to problems with the services they provide.
We are exposed to general economic
conditions, which could have a materially adverse impact on our business, operating results and financial condition.
Recently there have
been adverse conditions and uncertainty in the global economy as the result of unstable global financial and credit markets, inflation,
and recession. These unfavorable economic conditions and the weakness of the credit market may continue to have an impact on our
Company’s business and financial condition. The current global macroeconomic environment may affect our Company’s
ability to access the capital markets and may be severely restricted at a time when our Company wishes or needs to access such
markets, which could have a materially adverse impact on our Company’s flexibility to react to changing economic and business
conditions or to carry on our operations.
We
could experience unforeseen difficulties in building and operating key portions of our technical infrastructure.
We intend to design
and build software that will rely upon cloud computing infrastructure and we may also develop our own data centers and technical
infrastructure through which we intend to service our products. These undertakings are complex, and unanticipated delays in the
completion of these projects or availability of components may lead to increased project costs, operational inefficiencies, or
interruptions in the delivery or degradation of the quality of our products. In addition, there may be issues related to this
infrastructure that are not identified during the testing phases of design and implementation, which may only become evident after
we have started to fully utilize the underlying equipment, that could further degrade the customer experience or increase our
costs.
Our
software is highly technical, and if it contains undetected errors, our business could be adversely affected.
Our
products incorporate software that is highly technical and complex. Our software has contained, and may now or in the future contain,
undetected errors, bugs, or vulnerabilities. Some errors in our software code may only be discovered after the code has been released.
Any errors, bugs, or vulnerabilities discovered in our code after release could result in damage to our reputation, loss of users,
loss of revenue, or liability for damages, any of which could adversely affect our business and financial results.
Our business may be impacted by information technology
system failures or network disruptions.
We may be subject to
information technology system failures and network disruptions. These may be caused by natural disasters, accidents, power disruptions,
telecommunications failures, acts of terrorism or war, computer viruses, physical or electronic break-ins, or other events or
disruptions. Such failures or disruptions could, among other things, prevent access to our services, compromise our delivery of
services or customer data, and result in delayed or cancelled use of our services. Such failures or disruptions can have materially
adverse impact on the Company’s financial condition and operating results.
The
loss of one or more of our key personnel, or our failure to attract and retain other highly qualified personnel in the future,
could harm our business.
We currently depend on
the continued services and performance of Edward Karthaus, Craig McCannell, Anthony R. Pearlman, and Steven Taylor, our Chief
Executive Officer and a director, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Technology Officer, and Chief Sales Officer, respectively.
As
we continue to grow, we cannot guarantee we will be able to attract the personnel we need to achieve a competitive position. In
particular, we intend to hire technical and sales personnel in fiscal 2017, and we expect to face significant competition from
other companies in hiring such personnel. As we mature, the incentives to attract, retain, and motivate employees provided by
our equity awards or by future arrangements may not be as effective as in the past, and if we issue significant equity to attract
additional employees, the ownership of our existing stockholders may be further diluted. If we do not succeed in attracting, hiring,
and integrating excellent personnel, or retaining and motivating existing personnel, we may be unable to grow effectively.
Risks
Relating to our Organization and our Common Stock
Difficulties
we may encounter managing our growth could adversely affect our results of operations.
If
we experience a period of rapid and substantial growth, and if such growth continues, we will continue to place a strain on our
limited administrative infrastructure. As our needs expand, we may need to hire a significant number of employees. This expansion
could place a significant strain on our managerial and financial resources. To manage the possible growth of our operations and
personnel, we will be required to:
|
●
|
improve
existing, and implement new, operational, financial and management controls, reporting systems and procedures;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
install
enhanced management information systems; and
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
train,
motivate and manage our employees.
|
We
may not be able to install adequate management information and control systems in an efficient and timely manner, and our current
or planned personnel, systems, procedures and controls may not be adequate to support our future operations. If we are unable
to manage growth effectively, our business would be seriously harmed.
Failure to achieve and maintain
effective internal controls in accordance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act could have a material adverse effect on
our business and operating results.
It
may be time consuming, difficult and costly for us to develop and implement the additional internal controls, processes and reporting
procedures required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. We may need to hire additional financial reporting, internal auditing and other
finance staff in order to develop and implement appropriate additional internal controls, processes and reporting procedures.
If
we fail to comply in a timely manner with the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act regarding internal control
over financial reporting or to remedy any material weaknesses in our internal controls that we may identify, such failure could
result in material misstatements in our financial statements, cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information
and have a negative effect on the trading price of our common stock.
Although management
does not anticipate having to fully comply with section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act in the next fiscal year, it is important
to note, pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and current SEC regulations, if we do meet the requirements to fully
comply with section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act we are required to prepare assessments regarding internal controls over financial
reporting and, furnish a report by our management on our internal control over financial reporting. Failure to achieve and maintain
an effective internal control environment or complete our Section 404 certifications could have a materially adverse effect on
our stock price.
In addition, in connection
with a future possible assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, we may discover “material
weaknesses” in our internal controls as defined in standards established by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board,
or the PCAOB. A material weakness is a significant deficiency, or combination of significant deficiencies, that results in more
than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected.
The PCAOB defines “significant deficiency” as a deficiency that results in more than a remote likelihood that a misstatement
of the financial statements that is more than inconsequential will not be prevented or detected.
In the event that
a material weakness is identified in the future, we will employ qualified personnel and adopt and implement policies and procedures
to address any material weaknesses that we identify. However, the process of designing and implementing effective internal controls
is a continuous effort that would require us to anticipate and react to changes in our business and the economic and regulatory
environments and to expend significant resources to maintain a system of internal controls that is adequate to satisfy our reporting
obligations as a public company. We cannot assure you that the measures we will take will remediate any material weaknesses that
we may identify or that we will implement and maintain adequate controls over our financial process and reporting in the future.
If applicable in
the future, any failure to complete our assessment of our internal control over financial reporting, to remediate any material
weaknesses that we may identify or to implement new or improved controls, or difficulties encountered in their implementation,
could harm our operating results, cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations or result in material misstatements in our
financial statements. Any such failure could also adversely affect the results of the periodic management evaluations of our internal
controls and, in the case of a failure to remediate any material weaknesses that we may identify, it would adversely affect the
annual auditor attestation reports regarding the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting that are required
under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Inadequate internal controls could also cause investors to lose confidence in our
reported financial information, which could have a negative effect on the trading price of our common stock.
Our
stock price may be volatile.
The
stock market in general has experienced volatility that often has been unrelated to the operating performance of any specific
public company. The market price of our common stock is likely to be highly volatile and could fluctuate widely in price in response
to various factors, many of which are beyond our control, including the following:
|
●
|
changes
in our industry;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
competitive
pricing pressures;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
our
ability to obtain working capital financing;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
additions
or departures of key personnel;
|
|
●
|
limited
"public float" in the hands of a small number of persons whose sales or lack of sales could result in positive or
negative pricing pressure on the market price for our common stock;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
sales
of our common stock (particularly following effectiveness of any resale registration statements or expiration of lockup agreements);
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
our
ability to execute our business plan;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
operating
results that fall below expectations;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
loss
of any strategic relationship;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
regulatory
developments;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
economic
and other external factors;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
period-to-period
fluctuations in our financial results; and
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
inability
to develop or acquire new or needed technology.
|
In
addition, the securities markets have from time to time experienced significant price and volume fluctuations that are unrelated
to the operating performance of particular companies. These market fluctuations may also materially and adversely affect the market
price of our common stock.
The market for our
common shares is characterized by significant price volatility when compared to seasoned issuers and we expect that our share
price will continue to be more volatile than a seasoned issuer for the indefinite future. The volatility in our share price is
attributable to a number of factors. First, as noted above, our common shares are sporadically and thinly traded. As a consequence
of this lack of liquidity, the trading of relatively small quantities of shares by our shareholders may disproportionately influence
the price of those shares in either direction. The price for our shares could, for example, decline precipitously in the event
that a large number of our common shares are sold on the market without commensurate demand, as compared to a seasoned issuer
which could better absorb those sales without adverse impact on its share price. Secondly, we are a speculative or “risky”
investment due to our limited operating history and lack of profits to date and uncertainty of future market acceptance for our
potential products. As a consequence of this enhanced risk, more risk-adverse investors may, under the fear of losing all or most
of their investment in the event of negative news or lack of progress, be more inclined to sell their shares on the market more
quickly and at greater discounts than would be the case with the stock of a seasoned issuer. Many of these factors are beyond
our control and may decrease the market price of our common shares, regardless of our operating performance. We cannot make any
predictions or projections as to what the prevailing market price for our common shares will be at any time, including as to whether
our common shares will sustain their current market prices, or as to what effect that the sale of shares or the availability of
common shares for sale at any time will have on the prevailing market price.
Shareholders
should be aware that, according to SEC Release No. 34-29093, the market for penny stocks has suffered in recent years from patterns
of fraud and abuse. Such patterns include (1) control of the market for the security by one or a few broker-dealers that are often
related to the promoter or issuer; (2) manipulation of prices through prearranged matching of purchases and sales and false and
misleading press releases; (3) boiler room practices involving high-pressure sales tactics and unrealistic price projections by
inexperienced sales persons; (4) excessive and undisclosed bid-ask differential and markups by selling broker-dealers; and (5)
the wholesale dumping of the same securities by promoters and broker-dealers after prices have been manipulated to a desired level,
along with the resulting inevitable collapse of those prices and with consequent investor losses. Our management is aware of the
abuses that have occurred historically in the penny stock market. Although we do not expect to be in a position to dictate the
behavior of the market or of broker-dealers who participate in the market, management will strive within the confines of practical
limitations to prevent the described patterns from being established with respect to our securities. The occurrence of these patterns
or practices could increase the volatility of our share price.
Volatility
in our common share price may subject us to securities litigation, thereby diverting our resources that may have a material effect
on our profitability and results of operations.
As
discussed in the preceding risk factors, the market for our common shares is characterized by significant price volatility when
compared to seasoned issuers, and we expect that our share price will continue to be more volatile than a seasoned issuer for
the indefinite future. In the past, plaintiffs have often initiated securities class action litigation against a company following
periods of volatility in the market price of its securities. We may in the future be the target of similar litigation. Securities
litigation could result in substantial costs and liabilities and could divert management’s attention and resources.
We
have not paid dividends in the past and do not expect to pay dividends in the future. Any return on investment may be limited
to the value of our common stock.
We
have never paid cash dividends on our common stock and do not anticipate doing so in the foreseeable future. The payment of dividends
on our common stock will depend on earnings, financial condition and other business and economic factors affecting us at such
time as our board of directors may consider relevant. If we do not pay dividends, our common stock may be less valuable because
a return on investment will only occur if our stock price appreciates.
Our
common stock may be considered a “penny stock,” and thereby be subject to additional sale and trading regulations
that may make it more difficult to sell.
Our common stock is
considered to be a “penny stock.” It does not qualify for one of the exemptions from the definition of “penny
stock” under Section 3a51-1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act. Our common stock is
a “penny stock” because it meets one or more of the following conditions (i) the stock trades at a price less than
$5.00 per share; (ii) it is not traded on a “recognized” national exchange, or (iii) it is not quoted on the NASDAQ
Global Market. The principal result or effect of being designated a “penny stock” is that securities broker-dealers
participating in sales of our common stock are subject to the “penny stock” regulations set forth in Rules 15-2 through
15g-9 promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act. For example, Rule 15g-2 requires broker-dealers dealing in penny stocks to
provide potential investors with a document disclosing the risks of penny stocks and to obtain a manually signed and dated written
receipt of the document at least two business days before effecting any transaction in a penny stock for the investor's account.
Moreover, Rule 15g-9 requires broker-dealers in penny stocks to approve the account of any investor for transactions in such stocks
before selling any penny stock to that investor. This procedure requires the broker-dealer to (i) obtain from the investor information
concerning his or her financial situation, investment experience and investment objectives; (ii) reasonably determine, based on
that information, that transactions in penny stocks are suitable for the investor and that the investor has sufficient knowledge
and experience as to be reasonably capable of evaluating the risks of penny stock transactions; (iii) provide the investor with
a written statement setting forth the basis on which the broker-dealer made the determination in (ii) above; and (iv) receive
a signed and dated copy of such statement from the investor, confirming that it accurately reflects the investor's financial situation,
investment experience and investment objectives. Compliance with these requirements may make it more difficult and time consuming
for holders of our common stock to resell their shares to third parties or to otherwise dispose of them in the market or otherwise.
FINRA
sales practice requirements may also limit a stockholder's ability to buy and sell our stock.
In
addition to the “penny stock” rules described above, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has adopted
rules that require that in recommending an investment to a customer, a broker-dealer must have reasonable grounds for believing
that the investment is suitable for that customer. Prior to recommending speculative low priced securities to their non-institutional
customers, broker-dealers must make reasonable efforts to obtain information about the customer's financial status, tax status,
investment objectives and other information. Under interpretations of these rules, FINRA believes that there is a high probability
that speculative low priced securities will not be suitable for at least some customers. FINRA requirements make it more difficult
for broker-dealers to recommend that their customers buy our common stock, which may limit your ability to buy and sell our stock
and have an adverse effect on the market for our shares.
Offers
or availability for sale of a substantial number of shares of our common stock may cause the price of our common stock to decline.
If
our stockholders sell substantial amounts of our common stock in the public market upon the expiration of any statutory holding
period, under Rule 144, expiration of any lock-up agreements, or issued upon the exercise of outstanding options or warrants,
it could create a circumstance commonly referred to as an “overhang” and in anticipation of which the market price
of our common stock could fall. The existence of an overhang, whether or not sales have occurred or are occurring, also could
make more difficult our ability to raise additional financing through the sale of equity or equity-related securities in the future
at a time and price that we deem reasonable or appropriate.
Exercise of options, warrants,
and converting any debt may have a dilutive effect on our common stock.
If the price per
share of our common stock at the time of exercise of any warrants, options or any other convertible securities is in excess of
the various exercise or conversion prices of such convertible securities, exercise or conversion of such convertible securities
would have a dilutive effect on our common stock. Further, any additional financing that we secure may require the granting of
rights, preferences or privileges senior to those of our common stock and which could result in additional dilution of the existing
ownership interests of our common stockholders.
Investor
relations activities, nominal “float” and supply and demand (limited supply) factors may affect the price of our common
stock.
We
expect to utilize various techniques such as non-deal road shows and investor relations campaigns in order to create investor
awareness for our company. These campaigns may include personal, video and telephone conferences with investors and prospective
investors in which our business model is described, as well as newsletters, emails, mailings and/or video or print distributions
that describe our business model. We may provide compensation to investor relations firms and pay for newsletters, websites, mailings
and email campaigns that are produced by third-parties based upon publicly-available information concerning us. We will not be
responsible for the content of analyst reports and other writings and communications by investor relations firms not authored
by us or from publicly available information. We do not intend to review or approve the content of such analysts’ reports
or other materials based upon analysts’ own research or methods. Investor relations firms should generally disclose when
they are compensated for their efforts, but whether such disclosure is made or complete is not under our control. Our investors
may be willing, from time to time, to encourage investor awareness through similar activities. Investor awareness activities may
also be suspended or discontinued which may impact the trading market of our common stock.
The
SEC and FINRA enforce various statutes and regulations intended to prevent manipulative or deceptive devices in connection with
the purchase or sale of any security and carefully scrutinize trading patterns and company news and other communications for false
or misleading information, particularly in cases where the hallmarks of “pump and dump” activities may exist, such
as rapid share price increases or decreases. We and our shareholders may be subjected to enhanced regulatory scrutiny due to the
small number of holders who initially will own the registered shares of our common stock publicly available for resale, and the
limited trading markets in which such shares may be offered or sold which have often been associated with improper activities
concerning penny-stocks, such as the OTC Bulletin Board or the OTCQB Marketplace (Pink OTC) or pink sheets. Until such time as
the restricted shares of the Company are registered or available for resale under Rule 144, there will continue to be a small
percentage of shares held by a small number of investors, many of whom acquired such shares in privately negotiated purchase and
sale transactions at prices that may be significantly lower than the current market price, that will constitute the entire available
trading market. The Supreme Court has stated that manipulative action is a term of art connoting intentional or willful conduct
designed to deceive or defraud investors by controlling or artificially affecting the price of securities. Often times, manipulation
is associated by regulators with forces that upset the supply and demand factors that would normally determine trading prices.
A small percentage of our outstanding common stock will initially be available for trading, held by a small number of individuals
or entities. Accordingly, the supply of common stock for sale will be extremely limited for an indeterminate amount of time, which
could result in higher bids, asks or sales prices than would otherwise exist. Securities regulators have often cited thinly-traded
markets, small numbers of holders, and awareness campaigns as components of their claims of price manipulation and other violations
of law when combined with manipulative trading, such as wash sales, matched orders or other manipulative trading timed to coincide
with false or touting press releases. There can be no assurance that our or third-parties’ activities, or the small number
of potential sellers or small percentage of stock in the “float,” or determinations by purchasers or holders as to
when or under what circumstances or at what prices they may be willing to buy or sell stock, will not artificially impact (or
would be claimed by regulators to have affected) the normal supply and demand factors that determine the price of stock. Our market
price should not be relied upon as a valid indicator of our value until such time as a sustained and established market has been
established for our common stock.
Our
certificate of incorporation allows for our board to create new series of preferred stock without further approval by our stockholders,
which could adversely affect the rights of the holders of our common stock.
Our
board of directors has the authority to fix and determine the relative rights and preferences of preferred stock. Our board of
directors also has the authority to issue preferred stock without further stockholder approval. As a result, our board of directors
could authorize the issuance of a series of preferred stock that would grant to holders the preferred right to our assets upon
liquidation, the right to receive dividend payments before dividends are distributed to the holders of common stock and the right
to the redemption of the shares, together with a premium, prior to the redemption of our common stock. In addition, our board
of directors could authorize the issuance of a series of preferred stock that has greater voting power than our common stock or
that is convertible into our common stock, which could decrease the relative voting power of our common stock or result in dilution
to our existing stockholders.
Public
disclosure requirements and compliance with changing regulation of corporate governance pose challenges for our management team
and result in additional expenses and costs which may reduce the focus of management and the profitability of our company.
Changing
laws, regulations and standards relating to corporate governance and public disclosure, including the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform
and Consumer Protection Act and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and SEC regulations,
have created uncertainty for public companies and significantly increased the costs and risks associated with accessing the U.S.
public markets. Our management team will need to devote significant time and financial resources to comply with both existing
and evolving standards for public companies, which will lead to increased general and administrative expenses and a diversion
of management time and attention from revenue generating activities to compliance activities.
SHOULD
ONE OR MORE OF THE FOREGOING RISKS OR UNCERTAINTIES MATERIALIZE, OR SHOULD THE UNDERLYING ASSUMPTIONS PROVE INCORRECT, ACTUAL
RESULTS MAY DIFFER SIGNIFICANTLY FROM THOSE ANTICIPATED, BELIEVED, ESTIMATED, EXPECTED, INTENDED OR PLANNED
Item
1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.
This
Item is not applicable to us as we are not an accelerated filer, a large accelerated filer, or a well-seasoned issuer.
Item
2. Properties.
We do not own any
real property at this time. We presently utilize office space in New York, New York on a month to month basis and any fees are
nominal. We have a Canadian office with a monthly lease which was assigned from IMI in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016 with
nominal fees in fiscal 2016. Monthly lease payments are approximately $7,500 per month with the lease ending October 1, 2017.
Item
3. Legal Proceedings.
We
are subject from time to time to litigation, claims and suits arising in the ordinary course of business. As of August 18, 2016,
we were not a party to any material litigation, claim or suit whose outcome could have a material effect on our audited consolidated
financial statements.
Item
4. Mine Safety Disclosures.
Not
applicable.
PART
III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.
Directors
and Executive Officers
All
of our directors hold office until the next annual meeting of stockholders and until their successors have been elected and qualified
or until their earlier resignation or removal unless his or her office is earlier vacated in accordance with our bylaws or he
or she becomes disqualified to act as a director. Our officers shall hold office until the meeting of the Board of Directors following
the next annual meeting of stockholders and until his successor has been elected and qualified or until his earlier resignation
or removal. The Board of Directors may remove any officer for cause or without cause.
Our
executive officers and directors and their respective ages as of the date of this Annual Report are as follows:
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Position
Held
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ed
Karthaus
|
|
57
|
|
Chief
Executive Officer and Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
Craig
McCannell
|
|
39
|
|
Chief
Financial Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anthony
R. Pearlman
|
|
54
|
|
Chief
Technology Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steven
Taylor
|
|
47
|
|
Chief
Sales Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
David
Berry
|
|
51
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
C.
Kent
Jespersen
|
|
70
|
|
Chairman
of the Board and Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrie
Stone
|
|
59
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tracie
Crook
|
|
51
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
David
Fleck
|
|
56
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
|
|
Luis
Vazquez-Senties
|
|
68
|
|
Director
|
The
following is a brief account of the education and business experience of each director, executive officer and key employee during
at least the past five years, indicating each person’s principal occupation during the period, and the name and principal
business of the organization by which he or she was employed, and including other directorships held in reporting companies.
Ed
Karthaus, Chief Executive Officer and Director.
Ed Karthaus has more than 30 years of experience in the technology, financial
services and telecommunications industries. He was previously the COO of Teneda Inc. and has held senior executive leadership
roles at Prophix Software Inc., D+H, Filogix LP and NCR Canada. He has served on the Board of Directors of the Research, Innovation
and Commercialization Centre (RIC Centre) and remains an Advisor today. Ed began his career with Xerox Canada and Oracle Canada.
Craig McCannell,
Chief Financial Officer.
Mr. McCannell, 39, is the Chief Financial Officer of Yappn Corp. and the CFO of Intertainment Media
Inc. since July 2013 and the Director of Finance of Intertainment Media, Inc. from January 2012 to July 2013. Mr. McCannell
served as an account executive for Robert Half Management Resources from April 2011 to September 2011 and a Senior Manager in
the Assurance practice for Ernst & Young LLP from September 1999 to August 2010.
Anthony
R. Pearlman, Chief Technology Officer.
Mr. Pearlman, 54, is a seasoned technology expert with over 25 years of experience
providing high-tech services and solutions including all facets of technology and business development, combined with an
extensive relationship network and global technology market knowledge to Government, Public, and Private Organizations. Mr.
Pearlman was the President of Enghouse Systems Limited (TSX: ESL) for six years, where he was responsible for the operational
management of a global software development company serving the needs of multiple verticals with a diversified offering of
enterprise software and service solutions. Prior to working for Enghouse, Mr. Pearlman was the CIO for Valu-net Corporation
for six years and was responsible for the operational management of one of the first leading edge eCommerce development
companies in North America.
Steven
Taylor, Chief Sales Officer,
Mr. Taylor, 47 has over 23 years of experience in driving profitable growth in Advertising, Digital
Media and Software as a Service (SaaS). Prior to joining Yappn, Mr. Taylor was the CEO of Resolver Inc. from 2002 until 2015 when
the company was sold to Klass Capital. During his tenure at Resolver, Mr. Taylor oversaw all aspects of the business including
Sales, Marketing, Technology, M&A, Finance and Investor Relations. Prior to Resolver, Mr. Taylor was an instrumental part
of Cyberplex’s growth in revenue from $1 Million to almost $40 Million over a five-year period. He speaks extensively at
conferences on various topics including growing SaaS businesses, corporate governance and the translation technology solutions
and industry.
David Berry, Director.
David Berry, 51 obtained a BSc honours in mathematics from Queen’s University, an MBA in Finance and accounting from
Rotman School of Management as well as a CFA and a CA. After leaving Ernst & Young LLP in 1995, David moved to Scotia McLeod.
He ran the preferred share department from 1997 – 2005 and built it from a department that made virtually no money and had
very little market share to the biggest profit center at Scotia Bank and a market share of 70%, numbers never seen before in Canada.
He became the highest paid trader on Bay Street for this period. Since leaving Scotia he has been managing his personal portfolio,
a portion of which he uses in a merchant bank type capacity financing companies that have great potential but have poor means to
finance.
C. Kent Jespersen, Chairman.
Kent Jespersen, 70, has extensive and diverse international experience in government, business, and executive leadership. He
has diverse governance experience in a number of industries. He has held numerous leadership positions in national and international
non-profit organizations. Mr. Jespersen is also a Director of Axia NetMedia Corporation, Chairman and Director of Seven Generations
Ltd. and Chairman and Director of Iskander Energy Corp. Mr. Jespersen holds a Bachelor of Science in Education and a Master of
Science in Education from the University of Oregon.
Carrie Stone, Director.
Carrie Stone, 59, is President of cStone & Associates, an international executive search firm, performing senior executive
and board assignments since 2003. She advises companies and boards on complex business issues and strategies for talent acquisition,
pay for performance, transition, and succession planning. Ms. Stone served as a venture partner with Enterprise Partners Venture
Capital, a $1.1B venture fund investing in disruptive technologies and biotechnology. Prior CEO leadership and senior executive
experience includes building high growth consumer products and retail business with the Walt Disney Company and JCrew. Ms. Sone
is a member of the corporate directors forum, serving on the director of the year nominating committee. Ms. Stone was named to
the Agenda Compensation 100, identifying the 100 top candidates to serve on compensation committees. Ms. Stone co-founded the San
Diego Women Corporate Directors Chapter in 2013. She serves on the Executive Committee. She is an 18 year Member of Young Presidents’
Organization/World President’s Organization including serving on the International Board Of Directors, International Forum
Committee Chair, Compensation And Diversity Committees, and, Committee Leadership of 8 Global Leadership Conferences. Ms. Stone
Holds a B.S. From the University Of Vermont, attended Stanford University Law School Director’s College, and Harvard Business
School’s Executive Education, Compensation Committees.
David Fleck, Director.
Mr. Fleck, 56, has had a 27 year career in the financial services industry starting as an investment banker with Merrill Lynch
Canada in 1986. In 1989 he joined the Institutional Equity team at Burns Fry Ltd and remained with the firm after it was bought
out by the Bank of Montreal in 1994. A few years later he became Global Co-Head of the Equity Group at the bank. In 2008, David
retired from BMO Capital Markets and started an interesting career path in the midst of a global financial crisis. In 2009 he became
president of an international quantitatively based money manager called Mapleridge Capital. In 2011 he accepted the position of
President and CEO of Macquarie Capital Markets Canada, a full service capital markets business. David is currently a partner at
Delaney Capital Management, a Canadian based money management firm with approximately $2 billion in assets under management. David
is a board member of Alamos Gold Inc. and has served as a director of a number of Canadian based charities. He is currently Vice-Chair
of Soulpepper Theatre Company and a board member of the Art Gallery of Ontario Foundation. He received his MBA from INSEAD and
recently completed the Institute of Corporate Directors program at the Rotman School of Management.
Luis Vazquez-Senties,
Director,
Mr. Vazquez-Senties, 68, is the founder and Chairman of the Board of Directors of Diavaz since 1982 to date. Diavaz
is made up by 15 companies, all of them related to the Mexican energy industry, ranging from oil and gas exploration and production,
its process, transportation, storage until its final consumption. He has been and still is an advisor of several national and international
companies, all of them related to the energy industry. Eng. Mr. Vazquez-Senties was member of the Board of Directors at TransAlta
from 2001 to 2009. Mr. Vazquez-Senties actively participates in a wide variety of Chambers, Associations, as well as Professional
and Entrepreneurial Organizations. Currently, Eng. Mr. Vazquez-Senties is Vice President of Mexico´s Chapter of the World
Energy Council, as well as Board Member of the Mexican Natural Gas Association. Mr. Vazquez-Senties is a chemical engineer, who
graduated from Ryerson University in Toronto, Canada.
Tracie
Crook, Director.
Tracie Crook, 51, is the Chief Operating Officer of McCarthy Tétrault LLP. Prior to that she was President
and CEO of the ResMor Trust Company, a federally regulated mortgage provider, Director of Business Management for the TSX Group
and Director of Management and Outsourcing with Sprint Canada. A Certified Director, Tracie currently sits on the Board of the
Fraser Institute and was a former Board member of the Ontario Public Service Employees’ Union, the Housing Services Inc.,
and the GMAC Residential Funding of Canada Limited. Ms. Crook holds a Master of Science from Central Michigan University, a Bachelor
of Business Administration from Ferris State University and has taken executive courses at Harvard Business School, the Massachusetts
Institute of Technology (MIT) and Queen’s University.
Family
Relationships
There
are currently no family relationships between any of the members of our board of directors or our executive officers.
Conflicts
of Interest
Members
of our management are associated with other firms involved in a range of business activities. Consequently, there are potential
inherent conflicts of interest in their acting as officers and directors of our company. Although the officers and directors are
engaged in other business activities, we anticipate they will devote an important amount of time to our affairs.
Our
officers and directors are now and may in the future become shareholders, officers or directors of other companies, which may
be formed for the purpose of engaging in business activities similar to ours. Accordingly, additional direct conflicts of interest
may arise in the future with respect to such individuals acting on behalf of us or other entities. Moreover, additional conflicts
of interest may arise with respect to opportunities which come to the attention of such individuals in the performance of their
duties or otherwise. Currently, we do not have a right of first refusal pertaining to opportunities that come to their attention
and may relate to our business operations.
Our
officers and directors are, so long as they are our officers or directors, subject to the restriction that all opportunities contemplated
by our plan of operation which come to their attention, either in the performance of their duties or in any other manner, will
be considered opportunities of, and be made available to us and the companies that they are affiliated with on an equal basis.
A breach of this requirement will be a breach of the fiduciary duties of the officer or director. If we or the companies with
which the officers and directors are affiliated both desire to take advantage of an opportunity, then said officers and directors
would abstain from negotiating and voting upon the opportunity. However, all directors may still individually take advantage of
opportunities if we should decline to do so. Except as set forth above, we have not adopted any other conflict of interest policy
with respect to such transactions.
Involvement
in Certain Legal Proceedings
None
of the following events have occurred during the past ten years and are material to an evaluation of the ability or integrity
of any director or officer of the Company:
|
1.
|
A
petition under the Federal bankruptcy laws or any state insolvency law was filed by or against, or a receiver, fiscal agent
or similar officer was appointed by a court for the business or property of such person, or any partnership in which he was
a general partner at or within two years before the time of such filing, or any corporation or business association of which
he was an executive officer at or within two years before the time of such filing;
|
|
2.
|
Such
person was convicted in a criminal proceeding or is a named subject of a pending criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations
and other minor offenses);
|
|
|
|
|
3.
|
Such
person was the subject of any order, judgment, or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any court of
competent jurisdiction, permanently or temporarily enjoining him from, or otherwise limiting, the following activities:
|
|
a.
|
Acting
as a futures commission merchant, introducing broker, commodity trading advisor, commodity pool operator, floor broker, leverage
transaction merchant, any other person regulated by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, or an associated person of any
of the foregoing, or as an investment adviser, underwriter, broker or dealer in securities, or as an affiliated person, director
or employee of any investment company, bank, savings and loan association or insurance company, or engaging in or continuing
any conduct or practice in connection with such activity;
|
|
b.
|
Engaging
in any type of business practice; or
|
|
|
|
|
c.
|
Engaging
in any activity in connection with the purchase or sale of any security or commodity or in connection with any violation of
Federal or State securities laws or Federal commodities laws;
|
|
4.
|
Such
person was the subject of any order, judgment or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any Federal or
State authority barring, suspending or otherwise limiting for more than 60 days the right of such person to engage in any
activity described in paragraph (f)(3)(i) of this section, or to be associated with persons engaged in any such activity;
|
|
|
|
|
5.
|
Such
person was found by a court of competent jurisdiction in a civil action or by the Commission to have violated any Federal
or State securities law, and the judgment in such civil action or finding by the Commission has not been subsequently reversed,
suspended, or vacated;
|
|
|
|
|
6.
|
Such
person was found by a court of competent jurisdiction in a civil action or by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to
have violated any Federal commodities law, and the judgment in such civil action or finding by the Commodity Futures Trading
Commission has not been subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated;
|
|
|
|
|
7.
|
Such
person was the subject of, or a party to, any Federal or State judicial or administrative order, judgment, decree, or finding,
not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, relating to an alleged violation of:
|
|
a.
|
Any
Federal or State securities or commodities law or regulation; or
|
|
|
|
|
b.
|
Any
law or regulation respecting financial institutions or insurance companies including, but not limited to, a temporary or permanent
injunction, order of disgorgement or restitution, civil money penalty or temporary or permanent cease-and-desist order, or
removal or prohibition order; or
|
|
c.
|
Any
law or regulation prohibiting mail or wire fraud or fraud in connection with any business entity; or
|
|
8.
|
Such
person was the subject of, or a party to, any sanction or order, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any self-regulatory
organization (as defined in Section 3(a)(26) of the Exchange Act (15 U.S.C. 78c(a)(26))), any registered entity (as defined
in Section 1(a)(29) of the Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. 1(a)(29)), or any equivalent exchange, association, entity or
organization that has disciplinary authority over its members or persons associated with a member.
|
Meetings
and Committees of the Board of Directors
Our
Board of Directors held 7 formal meetings during the year ended May 31, 2016.
The
Board of Directors has a separately designated standing Audit Committee established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of
the Exchange Act. The members of our Audit Committee are David Fleck, who serves as Chairperson of the Audit Committee, Tracie
Crook and C. Kent Jespersen. Our Board of Directors has determined that Mr. Fleck qualifies as a “financial expert” as
that term is defined in the rules of the SEC implementing requirements of the SARBANES-OXLEY Act of 2002. The Audit Committee
meets four (4) times per year.
The
Board of Directors has a separately designated Compensation Committee.
The
members of our Compensation Committee are Carrie Stone, who serves as Chairperson of the Compensation Committee, David Berry and
C. Kent Jespersen.
The
Board of Directors is responsible for all other committee activity, outside the Audit Committee and Compensation Committee.
We
believe that the Board of Directors through its meetings can perform all of the duties and responsibilities which might be contemplated
by additional committees. As our business expands we anticipate forming other committees.
Board
Leadership Structure and Role in Risk Oversight
Our
Board of Directors is primarily responsible for overseeing our risk management processes. The Board of Directors receives and
reviews periodic reports from management, auditors, legal counsel, and others, as considered appropriate regarding our company’s
assessment of risks. The Board of Directors focuses on the most significant risks facing our company and our company’s general
risk management strategy, and also ensures that risks undertaken by our company are consistent with the Board’s appetite
for risk. While the Board oversees our company, our company’s management is responsible for day-to-day risk management processes.
We believe this division of responsibilities is the most effective approach for addressing the risks facing our company and that
our Board leadership structure supports this approach.
Material
Changes to the Procedures by which Security Holders May Recommend Nominees to the Board of Directors
Except
as may be provided in our bylaws, we do not have in place any procedures by which security holders may recommend nominees to the
Board of Directors.
Section
16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Section
16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our directors, executive officers, and persons who own more than 10% of our common stock to
file reports of ownership and changes in ownership of our common stock with the SEC. Based on the information available to us
during the year ended May 31, 2016, we believe that all applicable Section 16(a) filing requirements were met on a timely basis.
Code
of Ethics
As
part of our system of corporate governance, our Board of Directors has adopted a Code of Ethics and Conduct that is specifically
applicable to our Chief Executive Officer and senior financial officers. If we make substantive amendments to the Code of Ethics
and Conduct or grant any waiver, including any implicit waiver, we will disclose the nature of such amendment or waiver on our
website or in a report on Form 8-K within four days of such amendment or waiver.
Item
11. Executive Compensation.
Summary
Compensation Table
The following table sets
forth certain compensation information for: (i) the person who served as the Chief Executive Officer of Yappn Corp during the year
ended May 31, 2016, regardless of the compensation level, and (ii) each of our other executive officers, serving as an executive
officer at any time during 2016. The foregoing persons are collectively referred to in this prospectus as the “Named Executive
Officers.” Compensation information is shown for the years ended May 31, 2016 and May 31, 2015:
Name and Principal
Position
|
|
Year
|
|
Salary
($)
|
|
|
Bonus
($)
|
|
|
Stock
Awards
($)
|
|
|
Option
Awards
($)
|
|
|
Non-
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Comp
($)
|
|
|
Non-
Qualified
Deferred
Comp
Earnings
($)
|
|
|
All
Other
Comp
($)
|
|
|
Totals
($)
|
|
Ed Karthaus, CEO
|
|
2016
|
|
|
47,633
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
193,006
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
3,176
|
|
|
|
243,815
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anthony R. Pearlman, CTO
|
|
2016
|
|
|
66,667
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
131,041
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
202,708
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Steven Tylor, CSO
|
|
2016
|
|
|
27,425
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
96,503
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
1,097
|
|
|
|
125,025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Craig McCannell, CFO
|
|
2016
|
|
|
160,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
131,041
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
|
|
303,041
|
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
120,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
66,518
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
9,000
|
|
|
|
195,518
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David Lucatch, Former CEO
|
|
2016
|
|
|
83,125
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
52,638
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
5,250
|
|
|
|
141,013
|
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
190,000
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
247,569
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
|
|
449,569
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David Bercovitch, Former COO
|
|
2016
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
39,041
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
39,041
|
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
115,283
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
115,283
|
|
Mr. Neil Stiles was appointed as out Chief
Executive Office on November 5, 2015 and resigned on February 21, 2016. Mr. Stiles received consulting fees of $75,000 and travel
and accommodation expense reimbursement in relation to his executive position.
Employment
Agreements
On
September 1, 2014 we entered into an employment agreement with Craig McCannell, our CFO, which has an indefinite term. Under the
terms of this agreement, Mr. McCannell will continue to serve as our Chief Financial Officer. Mr. McCannell will receive a base
salary of $160,000 per year in the first year of the agreement, subject to future increases in base salary as well as options
that vest over time. Mr. McCannell will be entitled to certain bonus payments based on the revenue of the Company and standard
expense reimbursements and benefits.
On
January 1, 2016 we entered into an employment arrangement with Anthony R. Pearlman, our CTO, finalized by agreement on March
30, 2016 which has an indefinite term. Under the terms of this agreement, Mr. Pearlman will continue to serve as our Chief
Technology Officer. Mr. Pearlman will receive a base salary of $160,000 per year in the first year of the agreement, subject
to future increases in base salary as well as options that vest over time. Mr. Pearlman will be entitled to certain bonus
payments based on the revenue of the Company and standard expense reimbursements and benefits.
On
February 22, 2016, we entered into an employment agreement with Edward Karthaus, our CEO, which has an indefinite term. Under
the terms of this agreement, Mr. Karthaus will continue to serve as our Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Karthaus will receive a base
salary of $225,000 CAD per year in the first year of the agreement, subject to future increases in base salary as well as options
that vest over time. Mr. Karthaus will be entitled to certain bonus payments based on the revenue of the Company and standard
expense reimbursements and benefits.
On
March 21, 2016, we entered into an employment agreement with Steve Taylor, our CSO, which has an indefinite term. Under the terms
of this agreement, Mr. Taylor will continue to serve as our Chief Sales Officer. Mr. Taylor will receive a base salary of $180,000
CAD per year in the first year of the agreement, subject to future increases in base salary as well as options that vest over
time. Mr. Taylor will be entitled to certain bonus payments based on the revenue of the Company and standard expense reimbursements
and benefits.
On June 1, 2014, we entered
into an employment agreement with David Lucatch, our previous CEO, which had an indefinite term. Under the terms of this agreement,
Mr. Lucatch would continue to serve as our Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Lucatch received a base salary of $190,000 per year in
the first year of the agreement, subject to future increases in base salary as well as options that vest over time. Mr. Lucatch
was entitled to certain bonus payments based on the revenue of the Company and standard expense reimbursements and benefits. On
November 5, 2015, Mr. Lucatch resigned as our Chief Executive Officer.
On
October 31, 2014, we entered into a consulting agreement with Maranden Holdings, Inc., an entity controlled by David Bercovitch,
memorializing the agreement by which David Bercovitch would act as our Chief Operating Officer. Under the terms of this agreement,
Mr. Bercovitch served as our Chief Operating Officer. Maranden Holdings, Inc. received one hundred fifty thousand (150,000) common
stock purchase warrants as compensation in lieu of cash salary, such common stock purchase warrants vesting over two years. Maranden
Holdings, Inc. was entitled to certain bonus payments and payment of expenses. On
May
1, 2016, Mr. Bercovitch resigned as our Chief Operating Officer.
Outstanding
Equity Awards as of May 31, 2016
Outstanding
stock options granted to Named Executive Officers (“NEO’s”) and Directors as at May 31, 2016 are as follows:
|
|
Option Awards
|
Name
|
|
No. of Securities Underlying Unexercised
Options Exercisable (#)
|
|
|
No. of Securities Underlying
Unexercised Options
Unexercisable (#)
|
|
|
Option Exercise Price ($)
|
|
|
Option
Expiration
Date
|
Ed Kauthaus
|
|
|
750,000
|
|
|
|
2,250,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.25
|
|
|
March 21, 2021
|
Anthony R. Pearlman
|
|
|
375,000
|
|
|
|
1,125,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.25
|
|
|
March 21, 2021
|
Steve Taylor
|
|
|
375,000
|
|
|
|
1,125,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.25
|
|
|
March 21, 2021
|
David Lucatch*
|
|
|
200,000
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.25
|
|
|
August 14, 2019
|
David Lucatch*
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.25
|
|
|
March 2, 2020
|
Craig McCannell
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.25
|
|
|
August 14, 2019
|
Craig McCannell
|
|
|
66,667
|
|
|
|
33,333
|
|
|
$
|
0.25
|
|
|
March 2, 2020
|
Craig McCannell
|
|
|
375,000
|
|
|
|
1,125,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.25
|
|
|
March 21, 2021
|
David Bercovitch**
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.25
|
|
|
August 14, 2019
|
David Bercovitch**
|
|
|
26,667
|
|
|
|
13,333
|
|
|
$
|
0.25
|
|
|
March 2, 2020
|
*On November 5, 2015, Mr. Lucatch resigned as
our Chief Executive Officer.
** On May 1, 2016, Mr. Bercovitch resigned as
our Chief Operating Officer.
The
Company has no stock appreciation rights.
Options
Exercises and Stocks Vested
None
Grants
of Plan-Based Awards
None.
Non-Qualified
Deferred Compensation
None.
Golden
Parachute Compensation
None.
Compensation
of Directors
Directors
who provide services to the Company in other capacities have been previously reported under “Summary Compensation”.
The following table summarizes compensation paid to or earned by our directors who are not Named Executive Officers for their
service as directors of our company during the fiscal year ended May 31, 2016.
Name
|
|
Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($)
|
|
|
Stock Awards ($)
|
|
|
Option Awards
(1)
($)
|
|
|
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)
|
|
|
Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($)
|
|
|
All other
Compensation
($)
|
|
|
Total
(1)
($)
|
|
Edward Karthaus
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
David Berry
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
C. Kent Jespersen
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Carrie Stone
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Tracie Crook
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
David Fleck
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
Luis Vazquez-Senties
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
(1)
|
The
values in the “Option Awards” and included within the “Total” columns above do not represent a cash
payment of any kind. Rather these values represent the calculated Binomial lattice model theoretical value of granted options.
It is important to note that these granted options may or may not ever be exercised. Whether granted options are exercised
or not will be based primarily, but not singularly, on the Company’s future stock price and whether the granted options
become “in-the-money”. If these granted options are unexercised and expire, the cash value or benefit to the above
noted individuals is $nil
.
|
On March 21, 2016, the Board
of Directors passed a resolution for a contingent common stock award in line with the metrics used in the CEO’s targets for
additional bonus compensation. The award would see the members of the board of directors as well as the advisory board members
receive common shares for the Company reaching revenue milestones. Per the resolution, 500,000 common shares for each director
and 250,000 for each advisory board member would be issued when the following milestones are met: (i) $3.5 million in new revenue
generated and realized within 12 months of the start date and minimum of 5 new recurring revenue contracts being signed within
12 months of the start date; or (ii) $5 million of new revenue generated and realized within 24 months of the start date and minimum
of 5 new recurring revenue contracts being signed within 12 months of the start date.
Directors
are permitted to receive fixed fees and other compensation for their services as Directors. The Board of Directors has the authority
to fix the compensation of Directors. No amounts have been paid to, or accrued to, Directors in such capacity.
Since our incorporation
on November 3, 2010 and until May 31, 2016, we have not paid any cash compensation to our directors in consideration for their
services rendered to our Company in their capacity as such. Directors have been granted stock options as noted above.
Item
12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.
The following tables set
forth certain information as of August 18, 2016 regarding the beneficial ownership of our common stock, based on an aggregate of
38,509,497 shares of common stock consisting of (a) 30,081,163 shares of common stock issued and outstanding and (b) 8,428,334
issuable upon the conversion of securities, by (i) each executive officer and director; (ii) all of our executive officers and
directors as a group; and (iii) each person or entity who, to our knowledge, owns more than 5% of our common stock.
Beneficial
ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC. These rules generally attribute beneficial ownership of securities
to persons who possess sole or shared voting power or investment power with respect to those securities and include ordinary shares
issuable upon the exercise of stock options that are immediately exercisable or exercisable within 60 days. Except as otherwise
indicated, all persons listed below have sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares beneficially owned by them,
subject to applicable community property laws. The information is not necessarily indicative of beneficial ownership for any other
purpose.
Unless
otherwise indicated in the footnotes to the following table, each person named in the table has sole voting and investment power
and that person’s address is c/o Yappn Corp.,
1001 Avenue of the Americas, 11th Floor,
New York, NY 10018
.
Name of Beneficial Owner
|
|
Number of Shares Beneficially Owned
(1)
|
|
|
Percentage
Beneficially Owned
(1)
|
|
5% Owners
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intertainment Media, Inc. (2)
|
|
|
16,812,500
|
|
|
|
45.43
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Officers and Directors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edward Karthaus (3)
|
|
|
750,000
|
|
|
|
2.03
|
%
|
Anthony R. Pearlman (4)
|
|
|
501,667
|
|
|
|
1.36
|
%
|
Craig McCannell (5)
|
|
|
501,667
|
|
|
|
1.36
|
%
|
Steve Taylor (6)
|
|
|
375,000
|
|
|
|
1.01
|
%
|
Luis Vazquez-Senties (7)
|
|
|
3,116,667
|
|
|
|
8.42
|
%
|
C. Kent Jespersen (8)
|
|
|
801,533
|
|
|
|
2.17
|
%
|
David Berry (9)
|
|
|
287,121
|
|
|
|
0.78
|
%
|
Carrie Stone
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Tracie Crook (10)
|
|
|
90,000
|
|
|
|
0.24
|
%
|
David Fleck (11)
|
|
|
350,000
|
|
|
|
0.95
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All executive officers and directors as a group (ten persons)(12)
|
|
|
6,928,334
|
|
|
|
18.72
|
%
|
(1)
|
Shares
of common stock beneficially owned and the respective percentages of beneficial ownership of common stock assumes the exercise
of all options, warrants and other securities convertible into common stock beneficially owned by such person or entity currently
exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of August 18, 2016. In computing the number of shares beneficially owned
and the percentage ownership, shares of common stock that may be acquired within 60 days of August 18, 2016 pursuant to the
exercise of options, warrants or convertible notes are deemed to be outstanding for that person. Such shares, however,
are not deemed outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person.
|
(2)
|
Consists
of 15,312,500 shares of common stock held by Intertainment Media, Inc. and 1,500,000 shares of common stock held by Ortsbo,
Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Intertainment Media, Inc. Intertainment Media, Inc. is controlled by S. Wayne
Parsons and has an address of Unit 11 - 1673 Richmond Street, London, Ontario N6G 2N3
|
|
|
(3)
|
Consists solely of beneficially owned shares of common stock underlying convertible securities.
|
|
|
(4)
|
Consists solely of beneficially owned shares of common stock underlying convertible securities.
|
|
|
(5)
|
Consists solely of beneficially owned shares of common stock underlying convertible securities.
|
|
|
(6)
|
Consists solely of beneficially owned shares of common stock underlying convertible securities.
|
|
|
(7)
|
Consists of 800,000 shares of common stock and 2,316,667 beneficially owned shares of common stock underlying convertible securities.
|
|
|
(8)
|
Consists of 168,200 shares of common stock and 633,333 beneficially owned shares of common stock underlying convertible securities
|
|
|
(9)
|
Consists of 237,361 shares of common stock and 50,000 beneficially owned shares of common stock underlying convertible securities. In addition, David Berry controls Winterberry Investments Inc., where there is an outstanding obligation to issue 17,687,500 Shares
|
|
|
(10)
|
Consists of 40,000 shares of common stock and 50,000 beneficially owned shares of common stock underlying convertible securities
|
|
|
(11)
|
Consists of 300,000 shares of common stock and 50,000 beneficially owned shares of common stock underlying convertible securities.
|
|
|
(12)
|
Consists of an aggregate of 1,545,321 shares of common stock and 6,928,334 beneficially owned shares of common stock underlying convertible securities.
|
Description
of Securities
In
March 2013, we filed an amended and restated certificate of incorporation to increase our authorized capital stock to 200,000,000
shares of common stock, par value $0.0001 per share and 50,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.0001 per share
On
December 31, 2014, we filed an amended and restated certificate of incorporation to increase the Company’s authorized number
of common shares to 400,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.0001 per share.
The
following statements relating to the capital stock set forth the material terms of our securities; however, reference is made
to the more detailed provisions of, and such statements are qualified in their entirety by reference to, the Certificate of Incorporation,
amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation and the By-laws.
Common
stock
The
holders of our Common Stock are entitled to one vote per share on all matters to be voted on by our stockholders, including the
election of directors. Our stockholders are not entitled to cumulative voting rights, and, accordingly, the holders of a majority
of the shares voting for the election of directors can elect the entire board of directors if they choose to do so and, in that
event, the holders of the remaining shares will not be able to elect any person to our board of directors.
The
holders of the Company’s Common Stock are entitled to receive ratably such dividends, if any, as may be declared from time
to time by the board of directors, in its discretion, from funds legally available there for and subject to prior dividend rights
of holders of any shares of our Preferred Stock which may be outstanding. Upon the Company’s liquidation, dissolution or
winding up, subject to prior liquidation rights of the holders of our Preferred Stock, if any, the holders of our Common Stock
are entitled to receive on a pro rata basis our remaining assets available for distribution. Holders of the Company’s Common
Stock have no preemptive or other subscription rights, and there are no conversion rights or redemption or sinking fund provisions
with respect to such shares. All outstanding shares of the Company’s Common Stock are fully paid and not liable to further
calls or assessment by the Company.
Preferred
Stock
The
Company is authorized to issue 50,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.0001. The designations, rights, and preferences
of such preferred stock are to be determined by the Board of Directors. Subsequently, 10,000,000 shares were designated as Series
A Preferred Stock. The Series A Preferred Stock collectively has liquidation preference and the right to convert to one share
of common stock for each share of preferred stock.
As
of August 18, 2016, we have no Series A Convertible Preferred Stock issued and outstanding.
Dividends
Dividends,
if any, will be contingent upon our revenues and earnings, if any, capital requirements and financial conditions. The payment
of dividends, if any, will be within the discretion of our Board of Directors. We presently intend to retain all earnings, if
any, for use in its business operations and accordingly, the Board of Directors does not anticipate declaring any dividends prior
to a business combination.
Indemnification
of directors and officers
Under
the Delaware General Corporation Law, we can indemnify our directors and officers against liabilities they may incur in such capacities,
including liabilities under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”). Our amended and restated
articles of incorporation provide that, pursuant to Delaware law, our directors shall not be liable for monetary damages for breach
of the directors’ fiduciary duty of care to us and our stockholders. This provision in the articles of incorporation does
not eliminate the duty of care, and in appropriate circumstances equitable remedies such as injunctive or other forms of non-monetary
relief will remain available under Delaware law. In addition, each director will continue to be subject to liability for breach
of the director’s duty of loyalty to us or our stockholders, for acts or omissions not in good faith or involving intentional
misconduct or knowing violations of law, for any transaction from which the director directly or indirectly derived an improper
personal benefit, and for payment of dividends or approval of stock repurchases or redemptions that are unlawful under Delaware
law. The provision also does not affect a director’s responsibilities under any other law, such as the federal securities
laws or state or federal environmental laws.
Our
bylaws, as amended, provide for the indemnification of our directors and officers to the fullest extent permitted by the Delaware
General Corporation Law. We are not, however, required to indemnify any director or officer in connection with any (a) willful
misconduct, (b) willful neglect, or (c) gross negligence toward or on behalf of us in the performance of his or her duties as
a director or officer. We are required to advance, prior to the final disposition of any proceeding, promptly on request, all
expenses incurred by any director or officer in connection with that proceeding on receipt of any undertaking by or on behalf
of that director or officer to repay those amounts if it should be determined ultimately that he or she is not entitled to be
indemnified under our bylaws or otherwise.
We
have been advised that, in the opinion of the SEC, any indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933
is against public policy, as expressed in the Securities Act, and is, therefore, unenforceable.
Amendment
of our Bylaws
Our
bylaws may be adopted, amended or repealed by the affirmative vote of a majority of our outstanding shares. Subject to applicable
law, our bylaws also may be adopted, amended or repealed by our Board of Directors.
Item
13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.
None
of our executive officers serves on the board of directors or compensation committee of another company that has any executive
officer serving on our Board of Directors (or Board of Directors acting as the Compensation Committee).
No
person who served on our Board of Directors (or Board of Directors acting as the Compensation Committee) had any relationship
requiring disclosure under Item 404 of Regulation S-K.
For the year ended May 31,
2016, related party fees incurred and paid for general development and managerial services performed by Intertainment Media, Inc.
and its subsidiary totaled $146,982. As of May 31, 2016 the related party liability balance totaled $16,654.
For the year ended May 31, 2015, related party fees incurred and paid for general development and managerial
services performed by Intertainment Media, Inc. and its subsidiary totaled $794,085. As of May 31, 2015 the related party liability
balance totaled $468,766.
Review,
approval or ratification of transactions with related persons
Our
Board of Directors is responsible to approve all related party transactions. We have not adopted written policies and procedures
specifically for related person transactions.
Director
Independence
Mr.
C. Kent Jespersen, Ms. Carrie Stone, Ms. Tracie Crook, Mr. Luis Vazquez-Senties and Mr. David Fleck were each deemed to be an
“independent director”, as that term is defined by the listing standards of the national exchanges and SEC
rules.
Item
14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services.
Fees
paid to the Company’s current principal accountant, MNP, LLP, were as follows:
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
May 31,
|
|
|
May 31,
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
Audit fees (1)
|
|
$
|
64,200
|
|
|
|
53,500
|
|
Audit related fees (2)
|
|
$
|
67,677
|
|
|
|
51,146
|
|
Tax fees (3)
|
|
$
|
3,852
|
|
|
|
17,530
|
|
All other fees (4)
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
The
aggregate fees billed by our principal accountant, MNP, LLP, for the May 31, 2016 and May 31, 2015 audit of our annual financial
statements and other fees that are normally provided by the accountant in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or
engagements for the fiscal years ended May 31, 2016 and May 31, 2015.
The
aggregate fees billed by our principal accountants for assurance and advisory services that were related to the performance of
the audit or review of our financial statements for the fiscal years ended May 31, 2016 and May 31, 2015.
The
aggregate fees billed for professional services rendered by our principal accountants for tax compliance, tax advice, tax planning
and tax preparation for the fiscal years ended May 31, 2016 and May 31, 2015.
The
aggregate fees billed for products and services provided by our principal accountants for the fiscal years ended May 31, 2016
and May 31, 2015, other than for audit fees and tax fees.
Pre-Approval
Policies and Procedures
The
Audit Committee pre-approves all audit and non-audit services performed by the Company’s auditor and the fees to be paid
in connection with such services in order to assure that the provision of such services does not impair the auditor’s independence.
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
May
31, 2016
All
references to “dollars”, “$” or “US$” are to United States dollars and all references to “Canadian”
are to Canadian dollars. United States dollar equivalents of Canadian dollar figures are based on the exchange rate as reported
by the Bank of Canada on the applicable date.
1.
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Basis
of Presentation and Organization
Yappn
Corp., formerly “Plesk Corp.”, (the “Company”) was incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware
on November 3, 2010. The business plan of the Company is to provide effective unique and proprietary tools and services that create
dynamic solutions that enhance a brand’s messaging, media, e-commerce and support platforms. The Company has offices in
the United States and Canada. In March 2013, the Company acquired a concept and technology license from Intertainment Media Inc.,
a Canadian company, in exchange for 7,000,000 shares of common stock of the Company. As a result of this exchange, Intertainment
Media Inc. acquired, at that time, a seventy percent (70%) ownership of the Company. On September 15, 2015, the Company closed
the acquisition of Ortsbo Inc.’s (subsidiary of Intertainment Media Inc.) intellectual property. As a result of the acquisition,
Intertainment Media Inc.’s ownership was reduced to 37%. The accompanying consolidated financial statements of the Company
were prepared from the accounts of the Company under the accrual basis of accounting.
Principles
of Consolidation
The
consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Yappn Acquisition Corp.
and Yappn Canada, Inc. All inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated on consolidation.
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
For
purposes of reporting within the consolidated statement of cash flows, the Company considers all cash on hand, cash accounts not
subject to withdrawal restrictions or penalties, and all highly liquid debt instruments purchased with a maturity of three months
or less to be cash and cash equivalents.
Intangible
Assets
Intangible
assets consist of acquired technology, and patents, acquired from a related party and were accordingly recorded at the cost as
recorded in the records of the related party at the time of acquisition (Note 4). The Company amortizes acquired technology over
its estimated useful life considered to be 5 years, on a straight-line basis. Patents are amortized commencing at the receipt
of approval of the patents or acquisition of patents. Should the patent process be unsuccessful, the entire amount relating to
the patent is expensed in the period this is determined. The Company continually evaluates the remaining estimated useful life
of its intangible assets to determine whether events and circumstances warrant a revision to the remaining period of amortization.
Intagible Asset Impairment
The Company reviews its long-lived
assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts of the assets may not be
recoverable through undiscounted future cash flows. If impairment exists based on expected future undiscounted cash flows, a loss
is recognized in income. The amount of the impairment loss is the excess of the carrying amount of the impaired asset over the
fair value of the asset, typically based on discounted future cash flows. The Company has assessed its long-lived assets and has
determined that there was no impairment in their carrying amounts at May 31, 2016.
Revenue Recognition
The Company recognizes revenues when completion
of services has occurred provided there is persuasive evidence of an agreement, acceptance has been approved by its customers,
the fee is fixed or determinable based on the completion of stated terms and conditions, and collection of any related receivable
is reasonably assured. All of the Company’s current revenues are classified as services. Services are billed on a time and
materials basis and are recognized as revenue as services are rendered at the time of billing which is typically a bi-weekly or
monthly basis.
Cost
of Revenue
The
cost of revenue consists primarily of expenses associated with the delivery and distribution of services. These include expenses
related to the operation of data centers, salaries, benefits and customer project based costs for certain personnel in the Company’s
operations.
Marketing,
Advertising and Promotion Costs
Advertising
and marketing costs are expensed as incurred and totaled $236,083 and $1,099,054 for the years ended May 31, 2016 and May 31,
2015.
Loss
per Common Share
Basic loss per common share is computed by
dividing the net loss attributable to the common stockholders by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding
during the period. Fully diluted loss per share is computed similar to basic loss per share except that the denominator is increased
to include the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the potential common shares had been issued
and if the additional common shares were dilutive. As of May 31, 2016, the Company had outstanding five year warrants to purchase
an additional 39,055,346 shares of common stock (Note 10) at a per share exercise price ranging from $0.01 to $2.20, 10,390,000
stock options (Note 12) with an exercise price ranging from $0.25 to $1.00, and convertible notes and debentures that are convertible
into 11,567,539 shares of common stock at the option of the holder based on the value of the debt host at the time of conversion
with exercise prices ranging from $0.25 to $1.50. All of these issuances have a dilutive effect on earnings per share when the
Company has net income for the period.
Income
Taxes
Deferred
tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and
liabilities using the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. A valuation
allowance is established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amounts expected to be realized.
The
Company accounts for income taxes under the provisions of ASC 740, “Accounting for Income Tax”. It prescribes a recognition
threshold and measurement attributes for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected
to be taken in a tax return. As a result, the Company has applied a more-likely-than-not recognition threshold for all tax uncertainties.
The guidance only allows the recognition of those tax benefits that have a greater than 50% likelihood of being sustained upon
examination by the various taxing authorities. The Company is subject to taxation in the United States. All of the Company’s
tax years since inception remain subject to examination by Federal and state jurisdictions.
The
Company classifies penalties and interest related to unrecognized tax benefits as income tax expense in the consolidated statements
of operations and comprehensive loss. There have been no penalties or interest related to unrecognized tax benefits reflected
in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss for the years ended May 31, 2016 and May 31, 2015.
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
The
Company estimates the fair value of financial instruments using the available market information and valuation methods. Considerable
judgment is required in estimating fair value. Accordingly, the estimates of fair value may not be indicative of the amounts the
Company could realize in a current market exchange.
The
Company follows FASB (“Paragraph 820-10-35-37”) to measure the fair value of its financial instruments. US GAAP establishes
a fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three (3) broad levels.
The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities
and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. The three (3) levels of fair value hierarchy are described below:
Level
1 - Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;
Level
2 - Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; or other inputs that
are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities;
and
Level
3 - Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are financial instruments whose values are
determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar techniques, as well as instruments for which the
determination of fair value requires significant judgment or estimation.
If
the inputs used to measure the financial assets and liabilities fall within more than one level described above, the categorization
is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement of the instrument. The convertible promissory
notes and debentures (Note 7) are classified as Level 2 financial liabilities.
As
of May 31, 2016 and May 31, 2015, the carrying value of accounts receivable, note receivable, accounts payable, accrued expenses,
short term loans, accrued development and related expenses and line of credit approximated fair value due to the short-term nature
of these instruments.
Fair
Value of Derivative Instruments, and Warrants
The
Company issued other five year warrants as part of subscription agreements that included convertible promissory notes, debentures
and line of credit, some of which had price protection provisions that expired after twelve months. Upon expiration of the price
protection, the instruments were treated as equity instruments.
In
the event the Company has exceeded its authorized number of common stock issuable on a diluted basis, the Company applies the
earliest issuance date sequencing approach to determine which derivatives recorded in additional paid in capital, require reclassification
to financial liabilities. Under the earliest issuance date sequencing approach, the financial instruments recorded in equity that
have stock issuable in common stock (excluding stock options) earlier than the date of the breach of the authorized stock limit
continue to be classified as a component of additional paid in capital. All derivatives that are issuable into common stock (other
than stock options) issued subsequent to the breach of the authorized stock limit on a diluted basis, are recorded as financial
liabilities. Upon a rectification of the breach of the authorized stock limit, those instruments that would otherwise be recorded
as component of additional paid in capital, will be reclassified to additional paid in capital.
When
applicable, the instruments are measured at fair value using a binomial lattice valuation methodology and are included in the
consolidated balance sheets as derivative liabilities. Both unrealized and realized gains and losses related to the derivatives
are recorded based on the changes in the fair values and are reflected as a financing expenses on the consolidated statements
of operations and comprehensive loss.
Hybrid
Financial Instruments
The Company elected to apply the fair value
option to account for certain hybrid financial instruments. The Company made an irrevocable election to measure hybrid financial
instruments including convertible promissory notes and debentures at fair value in their entirety, with changes in fair value
recognized in earnings at each balance sheet date. The election may be made on an instrument by instrument basis.
Fair
Value of Convertible Promissory Notes and Debentures
The
Company has issued convertible promissory notes and debentures that are convertible into common stock, at the option of the holder,
at conversion prices based on the trading price per share over a period of time. As a result of the variability in the amount
of common stock to be issued, these instruments are reflected at fair value. These instruments are measured at the greater of
the present value of the note discounted at market rates or using a binomial lattice valuation methodology and are included in
the consolidated balance sheets under the caption “convertible promissory notes and debentures”. Any unrealized and
realized gains and losses related to the convertible promissory notes are recorded based on the changes in the fair values and
are reflected as change in fair value of derivative liabilities and convertible promissory notes on the consolidated statements
of operations and comprehensive loss.
Estimates
The
consolidated financial statements are prepared on the basis of accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management
to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent
assets and liabilities as of the date of the consolidated financial statements.
The
Company’s significant estimates include the fair value of financial instruments including the underlying assumptions to
estimate the fair value of derivative financial instruments and convertible promissory notes and the valuation allowance of deferred
tax assets.
Management
regularly reviews its estimates utilizing currently available information, changes in facts and circumstances, historical experience
and reasonable assumptions. After such reviews, if deemed appropriate, those estimates are adjusted accordingly.
These
significant accounting estimates bear the risk of change due to the fact that there are uncertainties attached to those estimates
and certain estimates are difficult to measure or value.
Reclassifications
Certain
amounts in the prior year presented have been reclassified to conform to the current year classification. These reclassifications
have no effect on the previously reported net loss.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards
Update No. 2014-09 which was amended in August 2015 by Update No 2015-14: Revenue from Contracts with Customers. The standard outlines
a five-step model for revenue recognition with the core principle being that a company should recognize revenue when it transfers
control of goods or services to customers at an amount that reflects the consideration to which it expects to be entitled in exchange
for those goods or services. Companies can choose to apply the standard using either the full retrospective approach or a modified
retrospective approach. Under the modified approach, financial statements will be prepared for the year of adoption using the new
standard but prior periods presented will not be adjusted. Instead, companies will recognize a cumulative catch-up adjustment to
the opening balance of retained earnings. This new guidance is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December
15, 2017, including interim periods within that reporting period. The Company has not yet made a determination as to the method
of application (full retrospective or modified retrospective). It is too early to assess whether the impact of the adoption of
this new guidance will have a material impact on the Company's results of operations or financial position.
On August 27, 2014 the FASB issued a new financial
accounting standard on going concern, Update 2014-15, “Presentation of Financial Statements – Going Concern (subtopic
205-40): Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern.” The standard provides
guidance about management’s responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about the organization’s
ability to continue as a going concern. The amendments in this update apply to all companies. They become effective in the annual
period ending after December 15, 2016, with early application permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this
accounting standard.
In November 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standard Update (“ASU”) 2014-16, “Determining Whether
the Host Contract in a Hybrid Financial Instrument Issued in the Form of a Share Is More Akin to Debt or to Equity.” The ASU clarifies
how current guidance should be interpreted in evaluating the economic characteristics and risks of a host contract in a hybrid
financial instrument that is issued in the form of a share. Specifically, the amendments clarify that an entity should consider
all relevant terms and features, including the embedded derivatives feature being evaluated for bifurcation, in evaluating the
nature of a host contract. The ASU is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2015. The Company
has determined there is no material impact to the accounting treatment of its hybrid financial instruments based on this new standard.
2.
Going Concern
The
accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern.
The Company has experienced negative cash flows from operations since inception and has incurred a deficit of $21,664,425 through
May 31, 2016.
As
of May 31, 2016, the Company had a working capital deficit of $2,991,854. During the year ended May 31, 2016, net cash used in
operating activities was $2,794,756. The Company expects to have similar cash needs for the next twelve months. At the present
time, the Company does not have sufficient funds to fund operations over the next twelve months.
Implementation of the Company business plan will require additional debt or equity financing and there can
be no assurance that additional financing can be obtained on acceptable terms. The Company has realized limited revenues to cover
its operating costs. As such, the Company has incurred an operating loss since inception. This and other factors raise substantial
doubt about their ability to continue as a going concern. The Company’s continuation as a going concern is dependent on its
ability to meet their obligations, to obtain additional financing as may be required, and ultimately to attain profitability. The
consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
Management plans to meet its operating cash
flow requirements from financing activities until the future operating activities become sufficient to support the business to
enable the Company to continue as a going concern. The Company continues to work on generating operating cash flows from the commercialization
of its business. Until those cash flows are sufficient the Company will pursue other financing when deemed necessary.
The
Company is pursuing a number of different financing opportunities in order to execute its business plan. These include, short
term debt arrangements, convertible debt arrangements, common share equity financings, either through a private placement or through
the public markets. During the year ended May 31, 2016, the Company raised $3,259,126 through various financial instruments, net
of repayments. Subsequent to the year ended May 31, 2016, the Company raised $100,000 in cash proceeds (Note 15).
There
can be no assurance that the raising of future equity or debt will be successful or that the Company’s anticipated financing
will be available in the future, at terms satisfactory to the Company. Failure to achieve the equity and financing at satisfactory
terms and amounts could have a materially adverse effect on the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. If the Company
cannot successfully raise additional capital and implement its strategic development plan, its liquidity, financial condition
and business prospects will be materially and adversely affected, and the Company may have to cease operations.
3.
Concentration of Credit Risk and Accounts and Note Receivable
All of the Company’s revenues are attributed
to a small number of customers. One customer comprises 97% of the combined note and account receivable balance as at May 31, 2016
and 83% of the revenue recorded for the year ended May 31, 2016. One customer comprises 90% of the accounts receivable as at May
31, 2015 and 90% of the revenue recorded for the year ended May 31, 2015. The Company billed its largest customer $1,615,125 for
the year ended May 31, 2016, $802,592 has not been recorded as part of the note receivable or revenue in the Company’s consolidated
financial statements. Due to the long period without payment, the Company has determined the revenue recognition criteria starting
at the beginning of the Company’s second quarter for Digital Widget Factory (Belize) (“DWF”) has not been met
until reasonable assurance over collectability has been established.
Effective
February 29, 2016, DWF sold the technology platform, partially developed by Yappn, in conjunction with DWF’s principals,
to Intelligent Content Enterprises Inc. (“ICE”) in exchange for shares of ICE. As part of the transaction, DWF received
ownership and rights to 24 million common shares of ICE for a large minority shareholder position of ICE. During the fourth quarter,
the Company executed a promissory note from DWF, for the outstanding value of the billings of $2,125,000 (of which $1,123,289
is recorded as a note receivable at year end and was previously recognized in revenue and a trade receivable). The promissory
note is secured by DWF’s ICE stock holdings in the amount of 2,250,000 restricted common shares, which at the market value
at the time of execution significantly exceeded the value of the promissory note. The note receivable includes monthly payments
of differing amounts with the final payment scheduled by November 30, 2016.
Additionally,
the Company received stock options for the purchase of shares of common stock of ICE from DWF. The first option entitles Yappn
to subscribe for purchase from DWF up to 1,000,000 fully paid and nonassessable shares of ICE’s common stock at a purchase
price of $0.55 per share exercisable until $987,500 remains outstanding on the note receivable, of which the price of the option
is offset against $550,000 of the remaining note receivable. DWF can elect to buy out the option at any time at a price of $0.75
per each underlying share of the option agreement. For each missed payment (not the remedy period per the promissory note, but
any payment not made on the exact due date), the buyout price will increase by $0.05 per underlying share for each payment date
missed starting with the payment due on June 30, 2016 per promissory note. The second option entitles Yappn to subscribe for purchase
from DWF up to 1,250,000 fully paid and nonassessable shares of ICE’s common stock at a purchase price of $0.35 per share
until $437,500 is remaining on the note receivable. DWF can elect to buy out the option at any time at a price of $0.50 per each
underlying share of the option agreement. For each missed payment (not the remedy period per the promissory note, but any payment
not made on the exact due date), the buyout price will increase by $0.05 per underlying share for each payment date missed starting
with the payment due on June 30, 2016 per promissory note. The value of these options is not recognized in the consolidated financial
statements, as the maximum value recorded is limited to what has previously been recorded as revenue as at May 31, 2016.
4.
Acquisition of Intellectual Property (and Reverse Split)
On
September 15, 2015, the Company finalized its purchase of intellectual property assets of Ortsbo, Inc. (“Ortsbo”)
pursuant to an Asset Purchase Agreement executed and closed on July 15, 2015. With this closing, the Company had an obligation
to issue 31,987,000 shares of common stock of Yappn. During the second quarter of fiscal 2016, from the share issuance obligations
from the purchase of the Ortsbo intellectual property assets, 12,998,682 shares were issued comprising 8,312,500 to Ortsbo and
4,686,182 to the former debt and minority shareholders of Ortsbo, which were valued at $1,806,608 leaving 18,988,318 shares to
be issued as of May 31, 2016. As of the filing date, these aforementioned shares remain to be issued at the request of the holders.
Yappn also assumed $975,388 of debt as part of the transaction. This assumed debt was immediately subscribed as part of the secured
debenture in Yappn (Note 6). The fair value for the agreed upon consideration for the acquisition of intellectual property from
Ortsbo was $16,968,888, however, due to the common control of Ortsbo Inc. and the Company, the value of the intangible assets
acquired from Ortsbo was recorded at the carrying value in the financial records of Ortsbo Inc. This value was $5,421,068 on September
15, 2015. The Company amortized $747,830 during the year ended May 31, 2016 and has a recorded value of $4,676,221 as at May 31,
2016.
In
connection with the terms of the Asset Purchase Agreement related to the purchase of intellectual property assets of Ortsbo, the
Company committed to complete a share consolidation. On September 9, 2015, the Company amended its Certificate of Incorporation
to implement a reverse stock split in the ratio of 1 share for every 10 shares of common stock. This amendment was approved and
filed with the Delaware Secretary of State on September 9, 2015. FINRA declared the Company’s 1-for-10 reverse stock split
ex-dividend date effective as of October 2, 2015. The reverse stock split reduced the Company’s common stock outstanding
from approximately 134,344,806 shares to approximately 13,434,481 shares. The effect of this reverse stock split has been
retrospectively reflected in these financial statements.
5.
Short Term Loans
On April 1, 2014, the Company entered into
a short term loan for $219,480 (Canadian $239,720) with a private investor. The loan had a maturity of July 10, 2014 with an interest
rate of 1% per month. The Company repaid $46,025 (Canadian $50,000) in fiscal 2015 and $37,214 (Canadian $50,905) during the year
ended May 31, 2016. As at May 31, 2016, the loan had a value of $105,885 ($138,815 Canadian).
On
January 7, 2014, the Company borrowed $253,200 (Canadian $280,000) from a private investor. The loan had a term of three months
and had an interest rate of 12% per annum payable at the maturity date. A preparation fee of 10% or $25,300 (Canadian $28,000)
was paid at inception. The loan was extended past its due date of April 7, 2014 and is accruing interest without penalty until
payment. On June 12, 2014, the Company repaid $142,506 (Canadian $152,000) against the loan and on June 27, 2014 $90,777 (Canadian
$100,000) was retired and contributed to a subscription agreement for Units that included an unsecured 6% convertible debenture,
$100 par value, convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock and 166,667 issuable shares of common stock (Series
C warrants) at a purchase price of $2.20 per share (Note 7). As at May 31, 2016 an amount of $21,358 ($28,000 Canadian) remains
outstanding.
On
July 17, 2014, the Company borrowed $100,915 (Canadian $110,000) from a private investor in the form of a short term loan due
on December 31, 2014. This loan carries a 1% arrangement fee and an interest rate of 1% per month. During fiscal 2015 $90,145
(Canadian $105,000) was repaid on this note. The remaining balance was repaid during the year ended May 31, 2016.
On
August 4, 2014, the Company borrowed $93,458 (Canadian $100,000) in the form of a bridge loan from a private investor, with combined
origination fees and interest of $3,210 (Canadian $3,500), due on August 14, 2014. The Company repaid $22,768 (Canadian $25,000)
of this loan on August 25, 2014 and nil during the year ended May 31, 2016. As of May 31, 2016, the value of the remaining balance
of the loan was $57,208 (Canadian $75,000).
On
May 6, 2015, the Company borrowed $150,000 ($187,000 Canadian) in the form of a bridge loan from a private investor with a financing
fee of $6,000 ($7,200 Canadian). This loan was paid back on June 30, 2015.
On
May 11, 2015 and June 19, 2015, the Company received $497,728 ($596,000 Canadian) from intended subscribers for secured debentures,
which closed on July 15, 2015. The Company treated these as a short term loans where interest is accrued at 12% (same rate as
the secured debenture) for each lender from the date of the loan to the date of the subscription for the secured debenture (Note
6).
On
July 10, 2015, the Company borrowed $250,000 in the form of a bridge loan from a private investor. This loan was paid back on
July 16, 2015.
During
the year ended May 31, 2016, the Company received $1,201,000 from intended subscribers of a secured debenture financing closed
on December 30, 2015 and $170,468 from a director that closed on May 1, 2016. The Company treated these as short term loans where
interest is accrued at 12% (same rate as the secured debenture) for each lender from the date of the loan to the date of the subscription
for the secured convertible debenture (Note 8).
During
the fourth quarter of fiscal 2016, the Company received $100,000 from a director as an intended subscription in anticipation of
a third closing of a private placement of units consisting of one common stock at $0.25 per share and one common stock purchase
warrant with an exercise price of $0.25 per share (Note 13, 15).
The
following is a summary of Short Term Loans:
Principal amounts
|
|
April 1,
2014
Term Loan
|
|
|
January 7,
2014
Term Loan
|
|
|
Other Loans
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Fair value at May 31, 2014
|
|
$
|
220,159
|
|
|
$
|
257,152
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
477,311
|
|
Borrowing during the first quarter
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
369,607
|
|
|
|
369,607
|
|
Borrowing during the third quarter
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
16,098
|
|
|
|
16,098
|
|
Borrowing during the fourth quarter
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
814,192
|
|
|
|
814,192
|
|
Total
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,199,897
|
|
|
|
1,199,897
|
|
Fair value adjustments
|
|
|
(21,589
|
)
|
|
|
(1,356
|
)
|
|
|
(21,893
|
)
|
|
|
(44,838
|
)
|
Repayments
|
|
|
(46,025
|
)
|
|
|
(142,506
|
)
|
|
|
(436,134
|
)
|
|
|
(624,665
|
)
|
Conversions
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(90,777
|
)
|
|
|
(125,000
|
)
|
|
|
(215,777
|
)
|
Fair value at May 31, 2015
|
|
$
|
152,545
|
|
|
$
|
22,513
|
|
|
$
|
616,870
|
|
|
$
|
791,928
|
|
Borrowing during the first quarter
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
328,265
|
|
|
|
328,265
|
|
Borrowing during the second quarter
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,201,000
|
|
|
|
1,201,000
|
|
Borrowing during the third quarter
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
170,468
|
|
|
|
170,468
|
|
Borrowing during the fourth quarter
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
Fair value adjustments
|
|
|
(9,446
|
)
|
|
|
(1,155
|
)
|
|
|
(22,822
|
)
|
|
|
(33,423
|
)
|
Conversions
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1,832,768
|
)
|
|
|
(1,832,768
|
)
|
Repayments
|
|
|
(37,214
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(403,805
|
)
|
|
|
(441,019
|
)
|
Fair value at May 31, 2016
|
|
$
|
105,885
|
|
|
$
|
21,358
|
|
|
$
|
157,208
|
|
|
$
|
284,451
|
|
6.
Line of Credit and Secured Debentures
On April 7, 2014, the Company finalized its
line of credit arrangement whereby the Company could borrow up to $3,000,000 from a third party lender. The loan agreement was
for an initial two year term subject to the lender’s right to demand repayment of the outstanding balance. It carried an
interest rate of 12% per annum and a 1% draw down fee on each draw. Pursuant to the loan agreement, the Company issued the lender
warrants to purchase up to 800,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $1.00. Upon the Company’s
first draw down of $200,000 from the line of credit, 200,000 five year warrants vest. For each subsequent $100,000 the Company
draws, 100,000 five year warrants vested until the 800,000 warrants were vested (Note 10). The Company’s shares of common
stock that were issuable on the exercise of warrants were granted registration rights, allowing the shares to be sold. In addition,
the Company entered into a general security agreement with the lender to which it granted the lender a first position security
interest in all of its assets and in the event of default under the security agreement or the promissory note, the lender may
foreclose on the assets of the Company.
During
fiscal 2015, the Company borrowed $1,900,155 against the line of credit and repaid $533,130 resulting in a net additional amount
drawn down against the line of credit of $1,367,025 and an outstanding obligation of $2,167,025 at May 31, 2015. During fiscal
2016, the Company borrowed $150,000 against the line of credit and converted $2,000,000 to secured debentures. The facility is
no longer available to the Company and the outstanding obligation was $nil at May 31, 2016.
Yappn closed the first tranche of
secured debentures in the amount of $4.5 million. The secured debentures carry an annual interest rate of 12% payable at
maturity. Maturity was initially the earlier of the date proceeds are available from a public offering or December 31, 2015.
During the third fiscal quarter, the holders of the Secured Debentures (the “Holders”) agreed to extend the
maturity date of the Secured Debentures from December 31, 2015 to July 15, 2020, and were provided with the right to amend
the Secured Debenture such that a Holder shall have the right, at any time after the earlier of (i) six (6) months from the
date of first issuance of any subsequent Debentures; and (ii) June 30, 2016, to require the Company to satisfy the
outstanding obligations underlying the Secured Debenture; provided, however, that at least two thirds (66.67%) of the Holders
of the principal amount of the Secured Debentures consent to a put of their Secured Debentures to the Company. Yappn executed
a non-binding letter of intent with Winterberry Investments Inc. ("Winterberry"), a private company led by Mr.
David Berry, pursuant to which Winterberry will facilitate and manage the financing transaction as well as to advise on
Yappn's future capital programs. The Company received $2.5 million of this financing in the form of cash and cash
commitments, including conversion of the short term loans obtained on May 11, 2015 and June 19, 2015 as described in Note 5.
$2,000,000 of the $4.5 million financing is conversion of a portion of the Company’s existing debt that remained in the
secured debenture. $925,000 was repaid out of the secured debenture, in the form of cash in the amount of $465,000 with the
remainder in the form of the release of secured deposit that was applied against accounts receivable. On September 15,
2015, the Company closed the acquisition of intellectual property from Ortsbo, and as part of this closing, assumed debt and
non-controlling equity interests from Ortsbo in the amount of $975,388 that was immediately subscribed to a second tranche of
secured debentures. The secured debentures balance as at May 31, 2016, was $4,550,388 (Note 13).
7.
Convertible Promissory Notes and Debentures
The
Company has issued various convertible notes and debentures with various terms. As a result of the variability in the amount of
shares of common stock to be issued in accordance with variable pricing terms or conversion price protection clauses, the Company
recorded these instruments as liabilities at fair value until the point in time when price protection clauses expired. The Company
has determined the convertible notes and debentures to be Level 2 fair value measurement and where applicable has used the binominal
lattice pricing model to calculate the fair value as of May 31, 2016, and the commitment dates.
The
following is a summary of the convertible promissory notes and debentures as of May 31, 2016 and 2015:
Principal amounts:
|
|
JMJ
Financial
Notes
|
|
|
Convertible
Debentures
|
|
|
Other
Notes
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Total Borrowings at May 31, 2014
|
|
$
|
80,000
|
|
|
$
|
2,219,000
|
|
|
$
|
92,500
|
|
|
$
|
2,391,500
|
|
Borrowing on June 27, 2014
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
Borrowing on September 2, 2014
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
125,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
125,000
|
|
Borrowing on September 3, 2014
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
Borrowing on October 6, 2014
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
Borrowing on October 22, 2014
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
Borrowing on October 27, 2014
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
Borrowing on December 24, 2014
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
|
|
75,000
|
|
Borrowing on December 24, 2014
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
Borrowing on December 29, 2014
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
Borrowing on February 4, 2015
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
115,000
|
|
|
|
115,000
|
|
Borrowing on February 9, 2015
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
90,750
|
|
|
|
90,750
|
|
Borrowing on March 30, 2015
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
92,000
|
|
|
|
92,000
|
|
Borrowing on April 15, 2015
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
69,000
|
|
|
|
69,000
|
|
Borrowing on April 20, 2015
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
Borrowing on April 23, 2015
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
60,500
|
|
|
|
60,500
|
|
Borrowing on April 23, 2015
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
25,000
|
|
Conversions
|
|
|
(80,000
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(80,000
|
)
|
Repayments
|
|
|
(90,000
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(92,500
|
)
|
|
|
(182,500
|
)
|
Total Borrowings at May 31, 2015
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,694,000
|
|
|
|
727,250
|
|
|
|
3,421,250
|
|
Borrowings on June 24, 2015
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
45,375
|
|
|
|
45,375
|
|
Borrowings on June 29, 2015
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
45,375
|
|
|
|
45,375
|
|
Repayments
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(818,000
|
)
|
|
|
(818,000
|
)
|
Total Borrowings at May 31, 2016
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
2,694,000
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
2,694,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible notes and debt at fair value at May 31, 2014
|
|
$
|
142,189
|
|
|
$
|
2,264,140
|
|
|
$
|
100,846
|
|
|
$
|
2,507,175
|
|
Convertible notes and debt at fair value at the commitment date, issued during 2015
|
|
|
137,071
|
|
|
|
436,887
|
|
|
|
1,020,110
|
|
|
|
1,594,068
|
|
Change in fair value (from commitment date)
|
|
|
(70,223
|
)
|
|
|
(755,194
|
)
|
|
|
858,573
|
|
|
|
33,156
|
|
Repayments (cash)
|
|
|
(103,220
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(135,051
|
)
|
|
|
(238,271
|
)
|
Conversions to common stock
|
|
|
(105,817
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(105,817
|
)
|
Convertible notes and debt at fair value at May 31, 2015
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,945,833
|
|
|
|
1,844,478
|
|
|
|
3,790,311
|
|
Convertible notes and debt at fair value at the commitment date issued during 2016
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
171,990
|
|
|
|
171,990
|
|
Change in fair value
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
768,991
|
|
|
|
(1,132,904
|
)
|
|
|
(363,913
|
)
|
Conversions to common share issuance obligation
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(260,000
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(260,000
|
)
|
Repayments (cash)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(883,564
|
)
|
|
|
(883,564
|
)
|
Convertible notes and debt at fair value at May 31, 2016
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
2,454,824
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
2,454,824
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at May 31, 2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,633,347
|
|
|
|
1,844,478
|
|
|
|
3,477,825
|
|
Long term
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
312,486
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
312,486
|
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
1,945,833
|
|
|
$
|
1,844,478
|
|
|
$
|
3,790,311
|
|
Balance at May 31, 2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,454,824
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,454,824
|
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
2,454,824
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
2,454,824
|
|
JSJ
Investments Inc.
On
December 24, 2014, the Company sold a convertible note in the principal amount of $100,000 to JSJ Investments Inc. The convertible
note matures on June 23, 2015 and has an interest rate of 15% per annum payable at maturity. The note may be converted into common
stock of the Company on or after the maturity date at a conversion price of 50% of the lowest 15 days prior to conversion or $1.00.
Early payback penalties are 140% from 120-150 days and 150% up to the maturity date of the note. This convertible note was repaid
on June 24, 2015.
LG
Capital Funding, LLC
On
December 24, 2014, the Company sold a convertible note in the principal amount of $75,000. The convertible note matures on December
24, 2015 and has an interest rate of 8% per annum. The note may be converted into shares of common stock of the Company at any
time beginning on the 180th day of the date of the note at a conversion price of 55% of the average of 2 lowest closing bid prices
from the 10 days prior to conversion. Early payback penalties are 150% and payback is eligible up to 180 days from the inception
of the note. This convertible note was repaid on June 24, 2015.
Vista
Capital Investments, LLC
On
December 29, 2014, the Company sold a convertible note in the principal amount of $110,000, 10% original issuance discount and
advanced $50,000 on closing. The convertible note matures on December 29, 2015 and has a one-time interest charge of 12%. The
note may be converted into shares of common stock of the Company at any time beginning on the 180th day of the date of the note
at a conversion price of 60% of the lowest trading price from the 25 days prior to conversion or $1.00. Early payback penalties
are 125% up to 90 days and 145% after 90 days. On April 23, 2015, Company borrowed an additional $25,000 against this convertible
note. The $50,000 drawn on December 29, 2014 was repaid on June 26, 2015. The $25,000 drawn on April 23, 2015 against this
convertible note was repaid on October 20, 2015. There is no further balance outstanding on this note.
Typenex
Co-Investments, LLC
On
February 4, 2015, the Company sold a convertible note in the principal amount of $115,000 carrying a 10% original issuance discount
(“OID”). The convertible note matures on January 4, 2016 and has an interest rate of 10% per annum. The note may be
converted into common stock at an exercise price of $1.00 per share six months after the sale of the note. The Company can repay
the note within the first six months at a penalty of 125% of principal amount. After six months, repayments can be made on an
installment basis, either in cash (plus OID), or in shares of common stock. If installment payments are made in the form of common
stock, the effective price for the stock issuance is at 70% of the average of the three lowest closing bid prices over a ten day
look back period from the date the installment is due. The installments must be made on a monthly schedule if the lender does
not convert at their option at the exercise price of $1.00 per share. At the funding date the Company issued 70,000 fixed price
warrants at an exercise price of $1.00 per share with no price protection. The warrants were recorded at a value of $37,100 in
additional paid-in capital (Note 10). The Company elected not to prepay the Typenex Co-Investment, LLC convertible note, and made
all installment payments in the form of cash totaling $123,383 from August to January 2016 comprising principal and interest.
On January 5, 2016, the Company repaid this convertible note in full.
Iconic
Holdings, LLC
On February 9, 2015, the Company sold a convertible
note with a face value of $220,000, carrying a 10% original issuance discount. $90,750 was advanced to the Company on closing
of the note. The convertible note matures on February 9, 2016 and has an interest rate on the principal balance of 10%. The note
may be converted into shares of common stock of the Company at any time beginning on the 180th day of the date of the note at
a conversion price of 60% of the lowest average daily trading price from the 25 days prior to conversion or $1.00, whichever is
lower. The note carries early payback penalties on principal repayment which are 115% from 1-60 days, 125% between 61 and 120
days, 130% between 121 and 180 days, and may not be paid back after 180 days without consent from the Holder. During August 2015,
the Company prepaid the portion of the convertible note advanced in February 2015 in the principal amount of $90,750. On June
24, 2015 and June 29, 2015, Iconic Holdings LLC, provided funding of $90,750 (two advances of $45,375) to the Company under the
existing convertible note. On January 5, 2016, the Company repaid this convertible note in full.
Group
10 Holdings LLC
On
March 30, 2015, the Company sold a convertible note for the principal amount of $92,000 with a 10% original issue discount. The
convertible note matures on March 30, 2016 and has an interest rate of 12% per annum. The note may be converted into shares of
common stock of the Company at any time beginning on the 180th day of the date of the note at a conversion price of 55% of the
average of the two lowest closing bid prices with a twenty day look back period as of the date a notice of conversion is given.
The debenture may be paid back any time before maturity with a prepayment penalty of 123%. On October 6, 2015, the Company repaid
this convertible note in full.
Vis
Vires Group, Inc.
On
April 15, 2015, the Company sold a convertible note for the principal amount of $69,000. The convertible note matures on January
6, 2016 and has an interest rate of 8% per annum. The note may be converted into shares of common stock of the Company at any
time beginning on the 180th day of the date of the note at a conversion price of 58% of the average of the three lowest trading
prices from previous ten trading days including the date notice is given. The note may be paid back any time before maturity with
a prepayment penalty of 110% if paid back within the first 30 days, 115% if paid back between 31 and 60 days, 120% if paid between
61 and 90 days, 125% if paid between 91 and 120 days, 130% if paid between 121 and 150 days, and 135% if paid back between 151
and 180 days after which it cannot be repaid. On October 13, 2015, the Company repaid this note in full.
Adar
Bays, LLC
On
April 20, 2015, the Company sold a convertible note for the principal amount of $50,000. The convertible note matures on April
20, 2016 and has an interest rate of 8% per annum. The note may be converted into shares of common stock of the Company at any
time beginning on the 180th day of the date of the note at a conversion price of 60% of the average of the three lowest trading
prices from previous fifteen trading days. The note may be paid back any time before maturity with a prepayment penalty of 140%.
On October 20, 2015, the Company repaid this note in full.
Auctus
Private Equity Fund, LLC
On
April 23, 2015, the Company sold a convertible note for the principal amount of $60,500. The convertible note matures on January
21, 2016 and has an interest rate of 10% per annum. The note may be converted into shares of common stock of the Company at any
time beginning on the 180th day of the date of the note at a conversion price of 60% of the average of the two lowest trading
prices from previous twenty trading days. The note may be paid back any time before maturity with a prepayment penalty of 130%.
On October 20, 2015 the Company repaid this note in full.
The
following table summarizes the fair values by fiscal quarter for issued convertible variable notes and the inputs to determine
fair value at commitment date and quarter end dates.
Accounting
allocation of initial proceeds:
|
|
Second
Quarter
Fiscal 2015
|
|
|
Third
Quarter
Fiscal 2015
|
|
|
Fourth
Quarter
Fiscal 2015
|
|
|
First
Quarter
Fiscal 2016
|
|
Gross
proceeds
|
|
$
|
90,000
|
|
|
$
|
430,750
|
|
|
$
|
296,500
|
|
|
$
|
90,750
|
|
Fair
value of promissory notes
|
|
|
(137,071
|
)
|
|
|
(656,507
|
)
|
|
|
(363,604
|
)
|
|
|
(171,990
|
)
|
Fair
value of equity warrant
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(37,100
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Financing
expense on the issuance of promissory notes
|
|
$
|
47,071
|
|
|
$
|
262,857
|
|
|
$
|
67,104
|
|
|
$
|
81,240
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Key
inputs to determine the fair value at the commitment date:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
price
|
|
$
|
0.40-1.20
|
|
|
$
|
0.50-0.70
|
|
|
$
|
0.50-0.60
|
|
|
$
|
0.60
|
|
Current
exercise price
|
|
$
|
0.40-0.60
|
|
|
$
|
0.20-1.00
|
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
Time
to expiration – days
|
|
|
389-436
|
|
|
|
181-365
|
|
|
|
250-366
|
|
|
|
225-230
|
|
Risk
free interest rate
|
|
|
.1-.11
|
%
|
|
|
.14-.26
|
%
|
|
|
.09-.27
|
%
|
|
|
.30-.27
|
%
|
Estimated
volatility
|
|
|
150
|
%
|
|
|
150
|
%
|
|
|
150
|
%
|
|
|
150
|
%
|
Dividend
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Key
inputs to determine the fair value at May 31, 2015:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
price
|
|
$
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
0.50
|
|
|
$
|
0.60
|
|
|
$
|
N/A
|
|
Current
exercise price
|
|
$
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
0.30-1.00
|
|
|
$
|
0.30
|
|
|
$
|
N/A
|
|
Time
to expiration – days
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
115-346
|
|
|
|
212-325
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Risk
free interest rate
|
|
|
N/A
|
%
|
|
|
.07-.22
|
%
|
|
|
.06-.26
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
%
|
Estimated
volatility
|
|
|
N/A
|
%
|
|
|
150
|
%
|
|
|
150
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
%
|
Dividend
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Convertible
Debentures with Series A and B Warrants
On
January 29, 2014, February 27, 2014, and April 1, 2014, the Company issued 395, 305, and 469 Units for $395,000, $305,000, and
$469,000 respectively, to accredited investors under subscription agreements. The Units, as defined in the subscription agreements,
consist of (i) one unsecured 6% convertible promissory note, $100 par value, convertible into shares of the Company’s common
stock; (ii) a warrant entitling the holder thereof to purchase 1,000 shares of common stock (individually Series A Warrant) at
an exercise price of $1.50; and, (iii) a warrant entitling the holder thereof to purchase 1,000 shares of common stock (individually
Series B Warrant) at an exercise price of $2.00. (Note 10). The purchase price for each Unit was $1,000 and resulted in a funding
total of $1,069,000 in cash and the retirement of $100,000 debt obligation to a private investor (Note 5).
The
notes mature 24 months from the issuance date and have an interest rate of 6% per annum payable in arrears on the earlier of a
default date or the maturity date. The notes may be converted at any time after the original issuance date at the election of
their holders to convert all or part of the outstanding and unpaid principal amount and accrued interest at a conversion price
of $1.00 per share. The Series A and Series B warrants permit cashless exercise beginning with the effective date unless and until
a registration statement covering the resale of the shares underlying the warrants is effective with the Securities and Exchange
Commission. Under the subscription agreement, the Company has granted price protection provisions that provide the holder of Series
A warrants with a potential increase in the amount of common stock exchanged or a reduction in the exercise price of the instruments
should the Company subsequently issue stock or securities convertible into common stock at a price lower than the stated exercise
price of $1.50 for a period of twelve months from issuance. The Company determined the warrants issued to the Line of Credit lenders
(Note 6) qualified as a breach of this covenant, therefore all Series A warrants were revalued to a $1.00 exercise price with
the adjustment reflected as a change in the fair value. Any amount of principal or interest which is not paid when due, shall
bear interest at the rate of 16% per annum from the date it is due. The Series B warrants do not provide any price protection
provisions and therefore are treated as equity instruments at the commitment date and thereafter. Both the Series A and Series
B warrants have a five year life.
As
some of the instruments are considered derivatives and the assigned fair values were greater than the net cash proceeds from the
transaction, the excess was treated as a financing expense on issuance of derivative instruments for accounting purposes and reported
on the Company’s consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss below the operating loss as an “other
expense”.
The
convertible debentures due on January 29, February 27, 2016, and April 1, 2016 were not repaid or converted into common shares
of the Company by the maturity dates. Non-repayment of the debentures triggered a penalty interest rate whereby the stated interest
rate goes up to 16% from the original 6%. The Company management is diligently working with the debenture holders on either extension
terms or conversion into common shares as the Company does not currently have the ability to repay these debtholders in cash.
$260,000 in principal value of debenture holders have agreed to accept an offer for additional investment which also carried with
it an agreement to convert their debenture into common stock at a price of $0.25 per share and a repricing of previously issued
warrants to a $0.25 exercise price per common share (Note 10).
The
following table summarizes the fair values of Convertible Debentures with Series A and B Warrants and the respective inputs to
determine fair values at the commitment date and the year-end dates.
Accounting
allocation of initial proceeds:
|
|
January 29,
2014
|
|
|
February 27,
2014
|
|
|
April
1,
2014
|
|
Gross
proceeds
|
|
$
|
395,000
|
|
|
$
|
305,000
|
|
|
$
|
469,000
|
|
Fair
value of the convertible promissory notes
|
|
|
(320,787
|
)
|
|
|
(247,696
|
)
|
|
|
(665,511
|
)
|
Derivative
warrant liability fair value – Series A (Note 11)
|
|
|
(161,950
|
)
|
|
|
(125,050
|
)
|
|
|
(776,664
|
)
|
Financing
expense on the issuance of instruments
|
|
$
|
87,737
|
|
|
$
|
67,746
|
|
|
$
|
973,175
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Key
inputs to determine the fair value at the commitment date:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
price
|
|
$
|
0.50
|
|
|
$
|
0.50
|
|
|
$
|
1.80
|
|
Current
exercise price – promissory notes
|
|
$
|
1.00
|
|
|
$
|
1.00
|
|
|
$
|
1.00
|
|
Current
exercise price – Series A warrants
|
|
$
|
1.50
|
|
|
$
|
1.50
|
|
|
$
|
1.50
|
|
Time
to expiration – days (promissory notes)
|
|
|
732
|
|
|
|
731
|
|
|
|
731
|
|
Time
to expiration – days (warrants)
|
|
|
1,826
|
|
|
|
1,826
|
|
|
|
1,826
|
|
Risk
free interest rate (promissory notes)
|
|
|
.32
|
%
|
|
|
.32
|
%
|
|
|
.32
|
%
|
Risk
free interest rate (warrants)
|
|
|
1.52
|
%
|
|
|
1.51
|
%
|
|
|
1.74
|
%
|
Estimated
volatility
|
|
|
150
|
%
|
|
|
150
|
%
|
|
|
150
|
%
|
Dividend
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Market
interest rate for the Company
|
|
|
18
|
%
|
|
|
18
|
%
|
|
|
18
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Key
inputs to determine the fair value of the promissory notes at May 31, 2015:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
price
|
|
$
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
N/A
|
|
Current
exercise price
|
|
$
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
N/A
|
|
Time
to expiration – days
|
|
|
243
|
|
|
|
272
|
|
|
|
306
|
|
Risk
free interest rate
|
|
|
N/A
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
%
|
Estimated
volatility
|
|
|
N/A
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
%
|
Dividend
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Key
inputs to determine the fair value of the promissory notes at May 31, 2016:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock
price
|
|
$
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
N/A
|
|
Current
exercise price
|
|
$
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
N/A
|
|
Time
to expiration – days
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Risk
free interest rate
|
|
|
N/A
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
%
|
Estimated
volatility
|
|
|
N/A
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
%
|
Dividend
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Convertible
Debentures with Series C or Series D Warrants
During
the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014 the Company authorized and issued 1,050 Units for $1,050,000 to private investors. The Units,
as defined in the subscription agreement, consist of (i) one unsecured 6% convertible debenture, $100 par value convertible into
shares of the Company’s common stock at a conversion price of $1.50 per share with a price protection clause on any conversion
feature issued after the issuance date that mature in 2 years; and (ii) a warrant entitling the holder thereof to purchase 700,000
shares of common stock (Series C Warrant) at a purchase price of $2.20 per share that expires in 5 years (Note 10).
In
the first and second quarter of fiscal 2015, the Company authorized and issued 7 issuances for 125, 125, 25, 75, 25, 50, and 50
Units. This total authorized and issuance of 475 Units, at a value of $475,000, was to seven independent accredited investors
in exchange for $300,000 in cash and release of $90,777 (Canadian $100,000) in the loan originated on January 7, 2014 as described
in Note 5 and $50,000 in settlement of trade payables. The Units, as defined in the subscription agreement, consist of (i) one
unsecured 6% convertible debenture, $100 par value convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at a conversion
price of $1.50 per share that matures in five years; and (ii) a warrant entitling the holder thereof to purchase 316,666 shares
of common stock (Series D Warrant) at a purchase price of $2.20 per share that expires in five years (Note 10).
The
debentures mature 24 months from the issuance date and have an interest rate of 6% per annum payable in arrears on the earlier
of a default date or the maturity date. The notes may be converted at any time after the original issuance date at the election
of their holders to convert all or part of the outstanding and unpaid principal amount and accrued interest at a conversion price
of $1.50 per share. The warrants may be exercised in whole or in part.
Due
to the Company’s breach of the authorization limit of common stock on a diluted basis on August 14, 2014, the Company initially
classified the above noted warrants issued since this date as financial liabilities, which would otherwise be recorded as equity
instruments and classified as part of additional paid in capital. All derivatives other than stock options issuable into common
stock were to be classified and accounted for as financial liabilities until the breach of the Company’s authorization limit
of common stock on a diluted basis was rectified. On December 31, 2014 the Company increased its authorized share issuance limit
to 400,000,000 which rectified the breach. The accounting impact of the August 14, 2014, breach only occurred under the earliest
issue date sequencing approach at the date of the next issued applicable derivative, which was September 2, 2014. On December
31, 2014, all derivatives impacted by the Company’s breach of its authorized share limit were reclassified to equity from
liabilities.
The
following table summarizes the fair values of Convertible Debentures with Series C or Series D Warrants and the respective inputs
to determine fair values at the commitment date and the year-end dates.
Accounting allocation of initial proceeds:
|
|
Fourth
Quarter Fiscal 2014
|
|
|
First
Quarter Fiscal 2015
|
|
|
Second
Quarter Fiscal 2015
|
|
Gross proceeds
|
|
$
|
1,050,000
|
|
|
$
|
250,000
|
|
|
$
|
225,000
|
|
Fair value of the convertible debentures
|
|
|
(852,726
|
)
|
|
|
(254,167
|
)
|
|
|
(182,720
|
)
|
Fair value of liability warrants
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(152,951
|
)
|
Fair value of equity warrants
|
|
|
(197,274
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Financing expense on the issuance of derivative instruments
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
4,167
|
|
|
$
|
110,671
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Key inputs to determine the fair value at the commitment date:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock price
|
|
$
|
1.50-1.60
|
|
|
$
|
2.00
|
|
|
$
|
N/A
|
|
Current exercise price
|
|
$
|
1.50
|
|
|
$
|
1.50
|
|
|
$
|
N/A
|
|
Time to expiration – days
|
|
|
731
|
|
|
|
731
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Risk free interest rate
|
|
|
.37
|
%
|
|
|
.45
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
%
|
Estimated volatility
|
|
|
150
|
%
|
|
|
150
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
%
|
Dividend
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Market interest rate for the Company
|
|
|
18
|
%
|
|
|
18
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Key inputs to determine the fair value of the convertible debentures at May 31, 2015:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock price
|
|
$
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
N/A
|
|
Current exercise price
|
|
$
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
N/A
|
|
Time to expiration – days
|
|
|
328-365
|
|
|
|
393
|
|
|
|
460-515
|
|
Risk free interest rate
|
|
|
N/A
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
%
|
Estimated volatility
|
|
|
N/A
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
%
|
Dividend
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Market interest rate for the Company
|
|
|
N/A
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Key inputs to determine the fair value of the convertible debentures at May 31, 2016:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock price
|
|
$
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
N/A
|
|
Current exercise price
|
|
$
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
N/A
|
|
|
$
|
N/A
|
|
Time to expiration – days
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
94-149
|
|
Risk free interest rate
|
|
|
N/A
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
%
|
Estimated volatility
|
|
|
N/A
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
%
|
Dividend
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
Market interest rate for the Company
|
|
|
N/A
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
%
|
8.
Convertible Secured Debentures
On December 30, 2015, the Company completed a secured debenture and warrant financing originally for $2,086,000
($1,075,000 from directors of the Company) through the offering of units by way of private placement, with each unit consisting
of (i) a 12% secured convertible debenture with a maturity date of five years from issuance convertible at $0.25 per common stock
and (ii) ten (10) five year common share purchase warrants, vesting in 1/3 increments with 1/3 vested in one year, 1/3 to be vested
in two years and 1/3 to be vested in three years and having an exercise price of $0.01 per share (Note 10). The units were sold
at $1.00 per unit. This closing includes conversion of $1,201,000 in short term loans advanced during the quarter prior to the
closing of this secured debenture. Additionally, this includes $46,000 that the Company initially anticipated subscription receipts
for, however funds were not received; therefore $46,000 of the subscription receivable was deducted from debentures in the fourth
quarter of fiscal 2016.
Values
were allocated for this private placement between the debt, equity warrants, and the beneficial conversion feature. The valuation
approach involved determining a fair value for the debt and warrants and then using the relative fair value method to allocate
value to these components. Based on relative fair values, the present value method was used to determine the fair values of the
debt and the binomial tree option pricing model was used to determine the fair value of the warrants. The value of the interest
and principal payments of the debentures resulted in a value of $459,020 for the debentures and the binomial model resulted in
a value for warrants for $1,580,980. The assumptions used for the binomial model are: Volatility 177%, expected life of five years,
risk free interest rate of 1.80%, and dividend rate of 0%. Additionally, this convertible secured debenture instrument includes
a beneficial conversion feature as the effective conversion price is less than the Company’s market price of common stock
on the commitment date. The value of this beneficial conversion feature is $459,020. The resulting fair value of the debt is $nil,
with $1,580,980 allocated to equity warrants (Note 10) and $459,020 to the beneficial conversion feature, both which are recorded
as components of additional paid in capital.
On
May 1, 2016, the Company closed a secured debenture and warrant financing through conversion of a short term loan of $170,468
from a director of the Company that was otherwise payable on demand in cash. The offering of units was by way of private placement,
with each unit consisting of (i) a 12% secured convertible debenture with a maturity date of five years from issuance convertible
at $0.25 per common stock and (ii) ten (10) five year common share purchase warrants, vesting in 1/3 increments with 1/3 vested
immediately, 1/3 to be vested in one year and 1/3 to be vested in two years and having an exercise price of $0.01 per share (Note
10). The units were sold at $1.00 per unit.
Values
were allocated for this private placement between debt, equity warrants, and the beneficial conversion feature similar to the
secured debenture and warrant financing of $2,040,000 closed in the third quarter (see above). The value of the interest and principal
payments of the debentures resulted in a value of $51,396 for the debentures and the binomial model resulted in a value for warrants
for $119,072. The assumptions used for the binomial model are: Volatility 180%, expected life of five years, risk free interest
rate of 1.28%, and dividend rate of 0%. Additionally, this convertible secured debenture instrument includes a beneficial conversion
feature as the effective conversion price is less than the Company’s market price of common stock on the commitment date.
The value of this beneficial conversion feature is $51,396. The resulting fair value of the debt is $nil, with $119,072 allocated
to equity warrants (Note 10) and $51,396 to the beneficial conversion feature, both which are recorded as components of additional
paid in capital.
The difference between the fair value and face value of the debentures is to be accreted up to face value
over the term to maturity using the effective interest method. The carrying value of the debenture liability as at May 31, 2016
is $170,932 for the December 30, 2015 closing and $4,347 for the May 1, 2016 closing, which is the amount of accretion recorded
during the year ended May 31, 2016 which was recorded as change in fair value.
The
following table summarizes the fair values of the components of the convertible secured debentures, including the debt, warrants,
and the beneficial conversion feature.
Accounting allocation of initial proceeds:
|
|
December 30,
2015
|
|
|
May 1,
2016
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Gross proceeds
|
|
$
|
2,040,000
|
|
|
$
|
170,468
|
|
|
$
|
2,210,468
|
|
Fair value of the convertible secured debt
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Fair value of equity warrants (Note 10)
|
|
|
(1,580,980
|
)
|
|
|
(119,072
|
)
|
|
|
(1,700,052
|
)
|
Beneficial conversion feature
|
|
|
(459,020
|
)
|
|
|
(51,396
|
)
|
|
|
(510,416
|
)
|
Convertible secured debt at fair value at the commitment date, issued during 2016
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Change in fair value (from commitment date)
|
|
|
170,932
|
|
|
|
4,347
|
|
|
|
175,279
|
|
Repayments (cash)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Convertible secured debenture at fair value at May 31, 2016
|
|
$
|
170,932
|
|
|
$
|
4,347
|
|
|
$
|
175,279
|
|
On
May 1, 2016, the Company completed another secured debenture financing with a consultant in settlement of $200,000 in obligations
with similar terms as the above private placement with no warrant financing, through the offering of units by way of private placement,
with each unit consisting of (i) a 12% secured convertible debenture with a maturity date of five years from issuance convertible
at $0.25 per common (Note 13). The $200,000 debenture was accounted for as a single debt instrument.
9.
Common Stock
On December 31, 2014, the Company’s authorized
number of common shares was increased to 400,000,000.
From April 9, 2014 through February 3, 2015,
various holders of convertible preferred stock exercised their right to convert to common stock. A total of 936,000 shares of convertible
preferred stock were converted into common stock (Note 10).
During fiscal 2015, the Company issued 329,000
shares of common stock to consultants and vendors at a value of $307,967.
On August 31, 2015 the Company issued 11,667
shares of common stock in the form of a cashless exercise with a previous allocation to equity of $37,100 in full settlement of
warrants issued to Typenex (Note 7).
On September 15, 2015, the Company closed an
agreement with Ortsbo Inc. to acquire all of its intellectual property assets. The purchased assets include US Patent No. 8,983,850
B2, US Patent No. 8,917,631 B2, US Patent No. 9,053,097 B2, and other intellectual property including Ecommerce and Customer Care
know-how for a total purchase price of $16,968,888, which was paid by the assumption of $975,388 in debt and the issuance of $15,993,500
worth of Yappn restricted common shares (32 Million shares at $0.50 per share), however, due to the common control of Ortsbo Inc.
and the Company, the value of the intangible assets acquired from Ortsbo was recorded at the carrying value in the financial records
of Ortsbo Inc. This value was $5,421,068 on September 15, 2015. During the second quarter, 12,998,682 shares were issued at a value
of $1,806,609 with obligations incurred to issue the remaining 18,988,318 shares when signed registration forms are all obtained
by the Company. As at the filing date, the 18,988,318 shares at a value of $2,639,071 remain reserved but not issued (Note 4).
On April 18, 2016 the Company issued 1,008,000
shares of common stock for $252,000 cash received against the first tranche of a private placement of units consisting of one common
stock at $0.25 per share and one common stock purchase warrant with an exercise price of $0.25 per share (Note 10). These
warrants will vest in increments of thirds with the first 1/3 being vested on April 17, 2017, second increment of 1/3 on April
17, 2018, and last 1/3 on April 17, 2019. Company completed a relative fair value calculation to allocate the proceeds between
common stock and warrants for $157,046 and $94,854 respectively. The assumptions used for valuation were: Volatility 180%, expected
life of five years, risk free interest rate of 1.24%, and dividend rate of 0%.
On May 17, 2016 the Company issued 2,640,000
shares of common stock for $660,000 cash received against the second tranche of a private placement of units consisting of one
common stock at $0.25 per share and one common stock purchase warrant with an exercise price of $0.25 per share (Note 10).
1,200,000 of the shares from the second tranche for $300,000 were issued to two members of the board of directors (Note 13). These
warrants will vest in increments of thirds with the first 1/3 being vested on May 16, 2017, second increment of 1/3 on May 16,
2018, and last 1/3 on May 16, 2019. Company completed a relative fair value calculation to allocate the proceeds between common
stock and warrants for $411,515 and $248,221 respectively. The assumptions used for valuation were: Volatility 179%, expected life
of five years, risk free interest rate of 1.29%, and dividend rate of 0%.
Registration
Statement
The Company filed a Registration Statement on
Form S-1 (File No. 333-199569) (the “
Registration Statement
”) with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the “
SEC
”) for up to 7,592,667 shares of Yappn Corp.’s $0.0001 par value per share common stock
(the "Common Stock") issuable to certain selling stockholders upon conversion of promissory notes and/or warrants currently
held by those selling stockholders, specifically (i) 1,844,000 shares of Common Stock issuable to them upon exercise of promissory
notes and (ii) 4,588,000 shares of Common Stock issuable to them upon exercise of warrants. The warrants have an exercise price
varying from $0.25 to $2.20 per share (subject to adjustment). The Registration Statement covering the above noted shares was declared
effective under the Securities Act of 1933 on November 17, 2014. On October 5, 2015, the Company filed a continuing registration
statement in part to update to this S-1 filing, and subsequently filed an amendment to this filing and which is not, as of the
date of this filing, been declared effective.
As
part of the contractual rights of certain existing convertible debenture holders, the Company finalized its calculation of shares
to be issued in association with the timing of filing its Registration Statement noted above. This resulted in a value of shares
to be issued at 99,344 in the amount of $124,567. These shares have not been issued as of May 31, 2016.
10.
Preferred Stock and Warrants
Series
A Preferred Stock and attached warrants
The
Company has an authorized limit of 50,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.0001.
The
following table reflects the preferred stock activity for the years ended May 31, 2016 and May 31, 2015:
|
|
Preferred Stock
|
|
Total – as of May 31, 2014
|
|
|
201,000
|
|
Conversion of preferred stock into common stock
|
|
|
(201,000
|
)
|
Total – as of May 31, 2015 and May 31, 2016
|
|
|
-
|
|
The
201,000 preferred shares were exchanged into common shares on February 3, 2015 at a conversion value of $201,000.
On
March 28, 2013, May 31, 2013 and June 7, 2013, the Company issued a total of 936,000 five year warrants as part of a Unit under
subscription agreements that included Series A preferred shares with full ratchet anti-dilution protection provisions. The price
protection provisions were effective for twelve months from date of issuance.
On
November 15, 2013, the Company issued 12,000 warrants under the same full ratchet anti-dilution provisions as the other warrants,
to a broker as compensation for a portion of the private placement made on May 31, 2013 for these Units.
Warrants
The
following is a summary of warrants issued, exercised and expired through May 31, 2016:
|
|
Shares
Issuable
Under
Warrants
|
|
|
Equity Value
|
|
|
Exercise
Price
|
|
|
Expiration
|
|
Outstanding as of May 31, 2012
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Issued on March 28, 2013
|
|
|
401,000
|
|
|
|
917,087
|
|
|
$
|
1.00
|
|
|
|
March 28, 2018
|
|
Issued on May 31, 2013
|
|
|
370,000
|
|
|
|
543,530
|
|
|
$
|
0.54
|
|
|
|
May 31, 2018
|
|
Exercised and expired
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total – as of May 31, 2013
|
|
|
771,000
|
|
|
|
1,460,617
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Issued on June 7, 2013
|
|
|
165,000
|
|
|
|
211,670
|
|
|
$
|
0.54
|
|
|
|
June 7, 2018
|
|
Issued on November 15, 2013
|
|
|
12,000
|
|
|
|
3,744
|
|
|
$
|
1.00
|
|
|
|
November 15, 2018
|
|
Issued Series A warrants on January 29, 2014
|
|
|
135,000
|
|
|
|
135,989
|
|
|
$
|
1.00
|
|
|
|
January 29, 2019
|
|
Issued Series A warrants on January 29, 2014 - Repriced
|
|
|
260,000
|
|
|
|
261,906
|
|
|
$
|
0.25
|
|
|
|
January 29, 2019
|
|
Issued Series B warrants on January 29, 2014
|
|
|
135,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
2.00
|
|
|
|
January 29, 2019
|
|
Issued Series B warrants on January 29, 2014 - Repriced
|
|
|
260,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
0.25
|
|
|
|
January 29, 2019
|
|
Issued Series A warrants on February 27, 2014
|
|
|
305,000
|
|
|
|
224,135
|
|
|
$
|
1.00
|
|
|
|
February 27, 2019
|
|
Issued Series B warrants on February 27, 2014
|
|
|
305,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
2.00
|
|
|
|
February 27, 2019
|
|
Issued Series A warrants on April 1, 2014
|
|
|
469,000
|
|
|
|
234,969
|
|
|
$
|
1.00
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2019
|
|
Issued Series B warrants on April 1, 2014
|
|
|
469,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
2.00
|
|
|
|
April 1, 2019
|
|
Issued to Lender – Line of Credit
|
|
|
800,000
|
|
|
|
1,495,200
|
|
|
$
|
1.00
|
|
|
|
April 7, 2019
|
|
Issued Series C warrants on April 23, 2014
|
|
|
33,333
|
|
|
|
9,395
|
|
|
$
|
2.20
|
|
|
|
April 23, 2019
|
|
Issued Series C warrants on May 30, 2014
|
|
|
666,667
|
|
|
|
187,574
|
|
|
$
|
2.20
|
|
|
|
May 30, 2019
|
|
Exercised and expired
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total – as of May 31, 2014
|
|
|
4,786,000
|
|
|
|
4,225,199
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issued Series C warrants on June 27, 2014
|
|
|
166,667
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
2.20
|
|
|
|
June 27, 2019
|
|
Issued Series C warrants on September 2, 2014
|
|
|
83,333
|
|
|
|
38,584
|
|
|
$
|
2.20
|
|
|
|
September 2, 2019
|
|
Issued Series D warrants on October 6, 2014
|
|
|
33,333
|
|
|
|
15,567
|
|
|
$
|
2.20
|
|
|
|
October 6, 2019
|
|
Issued Series D warrants on October 27, 2014
|
|
|
33,333
|
|
|
|
15,667
|
|
|
$
|
2.20
|
|
|
|
October 27, 2019
|
|
Issued warrants – consultants
|
|
|
330,000
|
|
|
|
165,330
|
|
|
$
|
1.50
|
|
|
|
May 30, 2019
|
|
Issued warrants on February 4, 2015 Typenex Co-Investments, LLC
|
|
|
70,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
1.00
|
|
|
|
February 4, 2020
|
|
Issued warrants – consultant on May 31, 2015
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
990
|
|
|
$
|
1.00
|
|
|
|
May 31, 2017
|
|
Issued warrants – consultant on May 31, 2015
|
|
|
15,000
|
|
|
|
2,970
|
|
|
$
|
1.50
|
|
|
|
May 31, 2017
|
|
Exercised and expired
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total – as of May 31, 2015
|
|
|
5,522,666
|
|
|
|
4,464,307
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issued warrants to advisory board on September 28, 2015
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
|
|
233,490
|
|
|
$
|
1.00
|
|
|
|
August 31, 2020
|
|
Issued to Lender – Line of Credit on November 5, 2015
|
|
|
1,700,000
|
|
|
|
519,520
|
|
|
$
|
1.00
|
|
|
|
April 7, 2019
|
|
Issued warrants to consultant on November 5, 2015
|
|
|
100,000
|
|
|
|
23,240
|
|
|
$
|
1.00
|
|
|
|
October 16, 2017
|
|
Issued warrants on December 30, 2015
|
|
|
20,400,000
|
|
|
|
1,580,980
|
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
December 29, 2020
|
|
Issued warrants to advisory board on March 21, 2016
|
|
|
1,750,000
|
|
|
|
41,246
|
|
|
$
|
0.25
|
|
|
|
March 21, 2021
|
|
Issued warrants to consultant on May 1, 2016
|
|
|
4,000,000
|
|
|
|
721,200
|
|
|
$
|
0.25
|
|
|
|
May 1, 2021
|
|
Issued warrants on May 1, 2016
|
|
|
1,704,680
|
|
|
|
119,072
|
|
|
$
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
May 1, 2021
|
|
Issued warrants for private placement on April 18, 2016
|
|
|
1,008,000
|
|
|
|
94,854
|
|
|
$
|
0.25
|
|
|
|
April 18, 2021
|
|
Issued warrants for private placement on May 17, 2016
|
|
|
2,640,000
|
|
|
|
248,221
|
|
|
$
|
0.25
|
|
|
|
May 17, 2021
|
|
Exercised Warrants Typenex Co-Investments, LLC
|
|
|
(70,000
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
1.00
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total – as of May 31, 2016
|
|
|
39,055,346
|
|
|
|
8,046,130
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
outstanding warrants at May 31, 2016 and May 31, 2015 have a weighted average exercise price of approximately $0.31 and $1.42
respectively and have an approximate weighted average remaining life of 4.3 and 3.7 years, respectively.
Warrants
attached to Line of Credit, Convertible debentures, Secured Converted Debentures, and Common Stock Private Placement are described
in Notes 6, 7, 8, and Note 9.
During
fiscal 2015, the Company issued warrants to three consulting firms in the amount of 200,000, 130,000, and 20,000 respectively
included in consulting expense when issued, with an exercise price ranging from $1.00 to $1.50 and with expiry dates of five years
from the date of issuance.
The Company issued 300,000 warrants on September
28, 2015 to new advisors in advance of their appointment to the Board of Directors at an exercise price of $1.00 with expiry of
five years from September 1, 2015. These were expensed as stock based compensation. The warrants exercise price was repriced on
March 21, 2016 to $0.25 and a nominal expense was recorded. The assumptions used for initial and repricing valuation are: Volatility
178-180%, expected life of five years, risk free interest rate of 1.38%-1.42%, and dividend rate of 0%.
The Company issued 1,700,000 warrants to the
line of credit holder included in financing expense in contemplation of taking a pari passu security position and allowing Winterberry
to act as collateral agent for the secured debenture financing. These warrants were issued November 5, 2015 have an exercise price
of $1.00 with expiry date of April 7, 2019. The assumptions used for valuation were: Volatility 178%, expected life of five years,
risk free interest rate of 1.65%, and dividend rate of 0%.
The Company issued warrants to a consultant
in the amount of 100,000 included in financing expense on November 5, 2015 at an exercise price of $1.00 with expiry date of October
16, 2017. The assumptions used for valuation were: Volatility 178%, expected life of approximately two years, risk free interest
rate of 0.85%, and dividend rate of 0%.
The Company issued 1,750,000 warrants on March
21, 2016 to new the advisory board at an exercise price of $0.25 with expiry date of March 21, 2021. These were expensed as stock
based compensation. These warrants will vest in increments of 1/3 with the first 1/3 being vested on March 21, 2017, second increment
of 1/3 on March 21, 2018, and last 1/3 on March 21, 2019. The assumptions used for valuation were: Volatility 180%, expected life
of five years, risk free interest rate of 1.38%, and dividend rate of 0%.
On May 1, 2016 the Company issued 4,000,000 warrants to an entity, Imagination 7 Ventures, LLC controlled
by the former CEO (Note 13) at an exercise price of $0.25 included in consulting expense with an expiry of May 1, 2021. The assumptions
used for valuation were: Volatility 180%, expected life of five years, risk free interest rate of 1.28%, and dividend rate of 0%.
11.
Derivative Warrant Liabilities
Warrants
with price protection provisions, which were effective for 12 months from date of issuance were recorded as liabilities until
such provision expired. Additionally, during Q1 of Fiscal 2015, the Company breached its authorized share limit on a diluted basis,
which required any additional warrants that otherwise would have been recorded as equity instruments to be recorded as liability
instruments. On December 31, 2014, the Company rectified its breach of authorized share limit and the warrants were reclassified
to equity.
For the years ended May 31, 2016 and May 31,
2015, the revaluation of the warrants at each reporting period resulted in the recognition of a gain of $nil and $1,081,984 respectively
within the Company’s consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss and is included under the caption “Change
in fair value of derivative liabilities and convertible promissory notes”.
12.
Employee Benefit and Incentive Plans
On
August 14, 2014, the Board of Directors approved the adoption of the 2014 Stock Option Plan. The Company completed its first grant
of stock options immediately after the plan was approved and second grant of stock options on March 2, 2015. In fiscal 2016 the
Company completed a grant of stock options on March 21, 2016. The Company also re-priced certain stock options on March 21, 2016
that were issued in fiscal 2015.
The
following table outlines the options granted and related disclosures:
|
|
Stock
Options
|
|
|
Weighted-
Average
Exercise Price
|
|
Outstanding at May 31, 2014
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Granted in fiscal 2015
|
|
|
1,804,500
|
|
|
|
1.00
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Cancelled, forfeited or expired
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Outstanding at May 31, 2015
|
|
|
1,804,500
|
|
|
$
|
1.00
|
|
Granted in fiscal 2016
|
|
|
8,775,000
|
|
|
|
0.25
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Cancelled, forfeited or expired
|
|
|
(189,500
|
)
|
|
|
1.00
|
|
Outstanding at May 31, 2016
|
|
|
10,390,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.28
|
|
Options exercisable at May 31, 2016
|
|
|
3,417,500
|
|
|
$
|
0.51
|
|
Fair value of options vested as at May 31, 2016
|
|
$
|
1,456,301
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
On
August 21, 2015, the Company amended its 2014 Stock Option Plan to increase the number of options available to 25,000,000.
As
at May 31, 2016, vested and exercisable options do not have any intrinsic value and have a weighted-average remaining contractual
term of 3.9 years. It is expected the 6,972,500 unvested options will ultimately vest. These options have a weighted average exercise
price of $0.29 per share and a weighted average remaining term of 4.64 years. The aggregate intrinsic value of options represents
the total pre-tax intrinsic value, the difference between our closing stock price as at May 31, 2016 and the option’s exercise
price, for all options that are in the money. This value was $nil as at May 31, 2016.
As
at May 31, 2016, there is $1,555,476 of unearned stock based compensation cost related to stock options granted that have not
yet vested (6,972,500 options). This cost is expected to be recognized over a remaining weighted average period of 1.7 years.
710,000
of the stock options granted on August 14, 2014 vest 1/3 immediately, 1/3 after one year and 1/3 after two years. 15,000 options
that vest contingent on revenue targets have expired unvested, and 15,000 options have vested on April 1, 2015. The remaining
options all have immediate vesting terms. 520,000 of the stock options granted on March 2, 2015 vest 1/3 immediately, 1/3 after
one year and 1/3 after two years. 50,000 vest 1/2 immediately and 1/2 after one year. The remaining options all have immediate
vesting terms. 8,750,000 of the stock options granted on March 21, 2016 vest 1/4 immediately, 1/4 after one year, 1/4 after two
years, and 1/4 after three years. The remaining 25,000 options all have immediate vesting terms.
The
estimated fair value of options granted on August 14, 2014 is measured using the binomial model using the following assumptions:
Total number of shares issued under options
|
|
|
1,047,000
|
|
Stock price
|
|
$
|
1.00
|
|
Exercise price
|
|
$
|
1.00
|
|
Time to expiration – days (2 year options)
|
|
|
730
|
|
Time to expiration – days (5 year options)
|
|
|
1,826
|
|
Risk free interest rate (2 year options)
|
|
|
.42
|
%
|
Risk free interest rate (5 year options)
|
|
|
1.58
|
%
|
Forfeiture rate (all options)
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
Estimated volatility (all options)
|
|
|
150
|
%
|
Weighted-average fair value of options granted
|
|
|
0.90
|
|
Dividend
|
|
|
-
|
|
The
estimated fair value of options granted on March 2, 2015 is measured using the binomial model using the following assumptions:
Total number of shares issued under options
|
|
|
757,500
|
|
Stock price
|
|
$
|
0.60
|
|
Exercise price
|
|
$
|
1.00
|
|
Time to expiration – days (2 year options)
|
|
|
730
|
|
Time to expiration – days (5 year options)
|
|
|
1,826
|
|
Risk free interest rate (2 year options)
|
|
|
.66
|
%
|
Risk free interest rate (5 year options)
|
|
|
1.57
|
%
|
Forfeiture rate (all options)
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
Estimated volatility (all options)
|
|
|
150
|
%
|
Weighted-average fair value of options granted
|
|
|
0.50
|
|
Dividend
|
|
|
-
|
|
The
estimated fair value of options granted on March 21, 2016 is measured using the binomial model using the following assumptions:
Total number of shares issued under options
|
|
|
8,775,000
|
|
Stock price
|
|
$
|
0.20
|
|
Exercise price
|
|
$
|
0.25
|
|
Time to expiration – days (5 year options)
|
|
|
1,826
|
|
Risk free interest rate (5 year options)
|
|
|
1.38
|
%
|
Forfeiture rate (all options)
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
Estimated volatility (all options)
|
|
|
180
|
%
|
Weighted-average fair value of options granted
|
|
|
0.25
|
|
Dividend
|
|
|
-
|
|
The
assumptions used in the stock based compensation binomial models are consistent with the methodology used in valuing the Company’s
other derivatives debt and warrant financings. Due to a lack of history, the Company has assumed the expected life of the options
is the contractual life of the options.
13.
Related Party Balances and Transactions
Services
provided by Intertainment Media, Inc. personnel were invoiced on a per hour basis at a market rate per hour as determined by the
type of activity and the skill set provided. Costs incurred by Intertainment Media, Inc. on behalf of the Company for third party
purchases are invoiced at cost.
On
September 15, 2015, the Company closed an agreement with Ortsbo Inc. to acquire all of its intellectual property assets. The purchased
assets include US Patent No. 8,983,850 B2, US Patent No. 8,917,631 B2, US Patent No. 9,053,097 B2, and other intellectual property
including Ecommerce and Customer Care know. With this closing, the Company had an obligation to issue 31,987,000 shares of common
stock of Yappn. During the year 12,998,682 shares were issued comprising of 8,312,500 to Ortsbo Inc. and 4,686,182 to the former
debt and minority shareholders of Ortsbo, which were valued at $1,806,608, leaving 18,988,318 shares to be issued at May 31, 2016
comprising 17,687,500 to Winterberry and 1,300,818 to a former holder of Ortsbo stock. As of the filing date, these aforementioned
shares remain to be issued. Yappn also assumed $975,388 of debt as part of the transaction. This assumed debt was immediately
subscribed as part of the secured debenture in Yappn (Note 8). The fair value for the agreed upon consideration for the acquisition
of Intellectual property from Ortsbo was $16,968,888. This transaction was completed on September 15, 2015. Due to the common
control of Ortsbo Inc. and Yappn Corp at the time of the acquisition, the value of the Intangible assets acquired from Ortsbo
was recorded at the carrying value in the financial records of Ortsbo Inc. This value was $5,421,068 on September 15, 2015 (Note
4).
For
the year ended May 31, 2016, related party fees incurred and paid for general development and managerial services performed by
Intertainment Media, Inc. and its subsidiary totaled $146,982 ($794,085 – year ended May 31, 2015). $92,589 is related to
managerial services and $54,393 related to development. As of May 31, 2016 the related party liability balance totaled $16,654
($468,766 – May 31, 2015).
Directors subscribed for $1,783,526 of $4,550,388
from the secured debenture that closed in September 2015 at which time they were not directors. Directors also subscribed for
$1,075,000 of the $2,086,000 convertible secured debentures issued on December 30, 2015 (Note 8). A director also advanced $170,468
to the Company on a second closing of the same convertible secured debenture financing closed on December 30, 2015 (Note 8). This
$170,468 was subscribed to a second closing on May 1, 2016.
The
Company issued 300,000 warrants on September 28, 2015 to advisors prior to their appointment as Board of Directors at an exercise
price of $1.00 with expiry of five years from September 1, 2015. These were expensed as stock based compensation. These warrants
were repriced to $0.25 on March 21, 2016 and are valued at $233,490.
The
Company also issued 1,750,000 warrants on March 21, 2016 to the Company’s Advisory Board at an exercise price of $0.25 with
expiry date of March 21, 2021. These were expensed as stock based compensation.
On
May 1, 2016, the Company completed secured debenture financing with a consultant, whose principal is the former CEO of the Company,
for $200,000 with no warrant financing, through the offering of units by way of private placement, with each unit consisting of
(i) a 12% secured convertible debenture with a maturity date of five years from issuance convertible at $0.25 per common. This
closing includes conversion of $200,000 in consulting expense. The Company also issued 4,000,000 warrants at an exercise price
of $0.25 included in consulting expense with an expiry of May 1, 2021. Consultant was also granted a $100,000 signing bonus payable
in cash. All obligations due to the former CEO of Yappn including $294,906 in cash obligations as an employee and $18,200 as a
consultant have been forgiven. All obligations being forgiven were recorded as general and administrative expenses within fiscal
2016 and were reversed out from general and administrative expenses.
1,200,000
of the shares from the 2
nd
tranche of common stock private placement at $0.25 per unit totaling $300,000 in cash proceeds
were issued to two members of the board of directors (Note 9).
During the fourth quarter, the Company received
$100,000 from directors as subscription in anticipation of a third closing of a private placement of units consisting of one common
stock at $0.25 per share and one common stock purchase warrant with an exercise price of $0.25 per share (Note 15).
On
March 21, 2016, the Board of Directors passed a resolution for a contingent common stock award in line with the metrics used in
the CEO’s targets for additional bonus compensation. The award would see the members of the board as well as the advisory
board receive common shares for the Company reaching revenue milestones. Per the resolution, 500,000 common shares for each director
and 250,000 for each advisory board member would be issued when the following milestones are met: (i) $3.5 million in new revenue
generated and realized within 12 months of the start date and minimum of 5 new recurring revenue contracts being signed within
12 months of the start date; or (ii) $5 million of new revenue generated and realized within 24 months of the start date and minimum
of 5 new recurring revenue contracts being signed within 12 months of the start date.
14.
Income Taxes
The
provision for income taxes for the years ended May 31, 2016 and 2015 consisted of the following:
|
|
May 31,
2016
|
|
|
May 31,
2015
|
|
Current
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
(6,473,887
|
)
|
|
|
(1,121,962
|
)
|
Change in valuation allowance
|
|
|
6,473,887
|
|
|
|
1,121,962
|
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
The
Company’s income tax rate computed at the statutory federal rate of 35% (2015 – 35%) differs from its effective tax
rate primarily due to permanent items, state taxes and the change in the deferred tax asset valuation allowance.
|
|
May 31,
2016
|
|
|
May 31,
2015
|
|
Income tax at statutory rate
|
|
|
35.00
|
%
|
|
|
35.00
|
%
|
Permanent differences
|
|
|
-8.00
|
|
|
|
-11.00
|
|
Change in valuation allowance
|
|
|
-27.00
|
|
|
|
-24.00
|
|
Total
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
Deferred
income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial
reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, management
evaluates whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of its deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate
realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those
temporary differences become deductible. Management considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, projected future
taxable income and tax planning strategies in making this assessment. Based on Management’s evaluation, the net deferred
tax asset was offset by a full valuation allowance. The Company’s deferred tax asset valuation allowance will be reversed
if and when the Company generates sufficient taxable income in the future to utilize the tax benefits of the related deferred
tax assets.
The
tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to the Company’s deferred tax asset as of May 31, 2016 and May 31, 2015
are as follows:
|
|
May 31,
2016
|
|
|
May 31,
2015
|
|
Net operating losses
|
|
$
|
5,116,331
|
|
|
$
|
2,835,823
|
|
Intangible Assets
|
|
|
4,193,378
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Less: valuation allowance
|
|
|
(9,309,709
|
)
|
|
|
(2,835,823
|
)
|
Net deferred tax asset
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
As of May 31, 2016 and May 31, 2015 the Company had a net operating losses carry-forward of approximately
$14,618,084 and $8,100,000, respectively, which may be used to offset future taxable income and begins to expire in 2033.
15.
Subsequent Events
The
Company received $155,000 in total payments against the Note receivable from DWF (Belize) up to the filing date.
On
July 6, 2016 the Company issued 90,000 warrants at an exercise price of $0.25 as settlement against prior accounts payables.
On July 5 and 22, 2016 the Company received advances and subscription agreements toward a third tranche of
a private placement of units consisting of one common stock at $0.25 per share and one common stock purchase warrant with an exercise
price of $0.25 per share. Total proceeds were all from directors or non-arm’s length parties to directors of $200,000, that
will obligate the issuance of common stock of 800,000, and 800,000 warrants, $100,000 of the advances had been previously advanced
by a director and recorded as short term loan as at May 31, 2016.
PART
IV
Item
15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.