The information in this statement of additional information is not complete and may
be changed. We may not sell these securities until the registration statement filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This statement of
additional information is not an offer to sell these securities and is not soliciting an
offer to buy these securities in any state where the offer or sale is not permitted.
Subject to Completion
Preliminary Statement of Additional Information dated October 30, 2024
NEUBERGER BERMAN HIGH YIELD STRATEGIES FUND INC.
STATEMENT OF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Neuberger Berman High Yield Strategies Fund Inc. (the “Fund”) is a closed-end, diversified management investment company.
This Statement of Additional Information (“SAI”) relating to shares of common stock of the Fund (“Common Stock”) is not a prospectus
and should be read in conjunction with the Fund’s Prospectus relating to Common Stock dated [ ], 2024 (“Prospectus”). This SAI does not include all information that a prospective investor should consider before purchasing Common Stock, and
investors should obtain and read the Fund’s Prospectus prior to purchasing such shares. You can get a free copy of the Prospectus from Neuberger Berman Investment Advisers LLC (“NBIA” or the “Manager”), 1290 Avenue of the Americas, 22nd Floor,
New York, NY 10104-0002 or by calling 877-461-1899. You may also obtain a copy of the Prospectus on the website (http://www.sec.gov) of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Capitalized terms used but not defined in this SAI have the
meanings ascribed to them in the Prospectus.
No person has been authorized to give any information or to make any representations not contained in the Prospectus or in this SAI in
connection with the offering made by the Prospectus, and, if given or made, such information or representations must not be relied upon as having been authorized by the Fund. The Prospectus and this SAI do not constitute an offering by the Fund
in any jurisdiction in which such offering may not lawfully be made.
The “Neuberger Berman” name and logo are registered service marks of Neuberger Berman Group LLC. “Neuberger Berman Investment Advisers
LLC” and the Fund name in this SAI are either service marks or registered service marks of Neuberger Berman Investment Advisers LLC.
This Statement of Additional Information is dated [ ], 2024.
©2024 Neuberger Berman Investment Advisers LLC. All rights reserved.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
Page
|
|
1
|
|
4
|
|
47
|
|
48
|
|
64
|
|
69
|
|
74
|
|
74
|
|
76
|
|
77
|
|
79
|
|
86
|
|
86
|
|
86
|
|
86
|
|
87
|
|
87
|
|
87
|
|
A-1
|
INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE, POLICIES AND LIMITATIONS
The investment objective and general investment policies of the Fund are described in the Fund’s Prospectus relating to the Common
Stock.
Additional information concerning the characteristics of certain of the Fund’s investments is set forth below. NBIA is responsible for
the day-to-day management of the assets of the Fund.
Unless otherwise specified, the investment objective, policies and limitations of the Fund are not fundamental. Any investment policy
or limitation that is not fundamental may be changed by the Board of Directors of the Fund (the “Board”) without stockholder approval. The fundamental investment policies and limitations of the Fund may not be changed without the approval of
the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Common Stock and, if outstanding, preferred stock (“Preferred Stock”) voting as a single class, as well as by the vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of Preferred
Stock tabulated separately. A “majority of the outstanding” shares means (i) 67% or more of the shares present at a meeting, if the holders of more than 50% of the shares are present or represented by proxy, or (ii) more than 50% of the shares,
whichever of (i) or (ii) is less. These percentages are specified by the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (“1940 Act”).
Unless otherwise indicated, any investment policy or limitation that involves a maximum percentage of securities or assets will not be
considered exceeded unless the percentage limitation is exceeded immediately after, and because of, a transaction by the Fund. If, because of changes in the value of the Fund’s portfolio, the asset coverage for any notes or other borrowings
(which, for the sake of clarity, do not include preferred stock) were to fall below 300%, this would limit the Fund’s ability to pay dividends and other distributions, and, therefore, the Fund intends to restore the 300% asset coverage as soon
as practical in light of the circumstances.
The Fund’s fundamental investment policies and limitations are as follows:
1. Borrowing. The Fund may not borrow money in excess of 33 1/3% of its total assets (including the amount of money borrowed) minus liabilities (other than the amount borrowed), except that
the Fund may borrow up to an additional 5% of its total assets for temporary purposes.
2. Commodities. The Fund may not purchase physical commodities or contracts thereon, except to the extent permitted under the 1940 Act, the rules and regulations thereunder, any applicable
interpretations or modifications by the SEC, the SEC staff or other authority with appropriate jurisdiction, or exemptive or other relief or permission from the SEC, SEC staff or other authority, or unless acquired as a result of the
ownership of securities or instruments, but this restriction shall not prohibit the Fund from purchasing futures contracts, options (including options on futures contracts, but excluding options or futures contracts on physical commodities
other than foreign currency), foreign currencies or forward contracts, swaps, caps, collars, floors and other financial instruments or from investing in securities of any kind, including, for the sake of clarity, securities of companies whose
principal or only business consists of investing in, owning, holding, extracting, transporting, processing, selling and/or dealing in or with physical commodities of any kind.
For purposes of the limitation on commodities, the Fund does not consider foreign currencies or forward contracts to be physical
commodities.
3. Diversification. The Fund is non-diversified under the 1940 Act.1
4. Industry Concentration. The Fund may not purchase any security if, as a result, 25% or more of its total assets (taken at current value) would be invested in the securities of issuers
having their principal business activities in the same industry. This limitation does not apply to securities issued or guaranteed by the U.S. Government or any of its agencies or instrumentalities (“U.S. Government and Agency Securities”).
5. Lending. The Fund may not lend any security or make any other loan if, as a result, more than 33 1/3% of its total assets (taken at current value) would be lent to other parties, except, in
accordance with its investment objective, policies, and limitations, (i) through the purchase of a portion of an issue of debt securities, loans, loan participations or other forms of direct debt instruments or (ii) by engaging in repurchase
agreements.
6. Real Estate. The Fund may not purchase real estate unless acquired as a result of the ownership of securities or instruments, but this restriction shall not prohibit the Fund from
purchasing securities issued by entities or investment vehicles that own or deal in real estate or interests therein or instruments secured by real estate or interests therein.
7. Senior Securities. The Fund may not issue senior securities, except as permitted by (i) the 1940 Act, the rules and regulations thereunder or any applicable interpretations or modifications
by the SEC, the SEC staff or other authority with appropriate jurisdiction, or (ii) exemptive or other relief or permission from the SEC, SEC staff or other authority.
8. Underwriting. The Fund may not underwrite securities of other issuers, except to the extent that the Fund, in disposing of portfolio securities, may be deemed to be an underwriter within
the meaning of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (“1933 Act”).
Under the 1940 Act, a “senior security” does not include any promissory note or evidence of indebtedness regarding a loan for
temporary purposes only and in an amount not exceeding 5% of the value of the total assets of the issuer at the time the loan is made. A loan is presumed to be for temporary purposes if it is repaid within sixty days and is not extended or
renewed. Any Preferred Stock, if outstanding, would be considered senior securities under the 1940 Act. The Fund may only issue Preferred Stock if the asset coverage (as defined in the 1940 Act) with respect to Preferred Stock would be at least
200% after such issuance.
Rule 18f-4, which became effective in August 2022, permits funds to engage in “derivatives transactions” as defined by that rule that
would otherwise be subject to the restrictions of Section 18 of the 1940 Act on their issuance of “senior securities.” For information on Rule 18f-4, see “Investment Strategies, Techniques and Risks -- Futures Contracts, Options on Futures
Contracts, Options on Securities and Indices, Forward Currency Contracts, Options on Foreign Currencies, and Swap Agreements” below. The Fund interprets its policies with respect to borrowing and lending to permit such activities as may be
lawful for the Fund, to the fullest extent permitted by the 1940 Act or by any rules, exemptions or interpretations thereunder that may be adopted, granted or issued by the SEC.
1 Under the 1940 Act, the status of a fund that was registered as non-diversified may, under certain circumstances, change to
that of a diversified fund. The Fund is currently a diversified fund.
If rating agencies assign different ratings to the same security, the Manager will determine which rating it believes best reflects
the security’s quality and risk at that time, which may be the highest of the several assigned ratings.
The Fund has ratings for its Preferred Stock. In order to maintain these ratings, the Fund is required to comply with investment
quality, diversification and other guidelines established by the rating agency, which may change over time. Such guidelines currently are more restrictive than the restrictions set forth above. The Fund does not believe that such guidelines
have a material adverse effect on its Common Stockholders or its ability to achieve its investment objective.
The Fund is also subject to the following non-fundamental restrictions and policies, which may be changed by the Board of Directors.
The Fund must:
1. Diversification. The Fund must diversify its holdings so that, at the end of each quarter of the Fund’s taxable year, (a) at least 50% of the value of the Fund’s total assets is represented
by cash and cash items, securities of other regulated investment companies, U.S. government securities and other securities, with such other securities limited, in respect of any one issuer, to an amount not greater than 5% of the value of
the Fund’s total assets and not greater than 10% of the outstanding voting securities of such issuer, and (b) not more than 25% of the value of the Fund’s total assets is invested in the securities (other than U.S. government securities or
securities of other regulated investment companies) of any one issuer or any two or more issuers that the Fund controls and which are determined to be engaged in the same, similar or related trades or businesses.
2. Investment Company Securities. The Fund may not invest in securities of other investment companies, except to the extent permitted by the 1940 Act and the rules thereunder, or as may be
permitted by an order of the SEC under the 1940 Act, or other relief from the provisions of the 1940 Act.
With respect to these investment restrictions and other policies described in this SAI or the Proxy Statement/Prospectus (except the
Fund’s policies on borrowings and the issuance of senior securities set forth above), if a percentage restriction is adhered to at the time of an investment or transaction, a later change in percentage resulting from a change in the values of
investments or the value of the Fund’s assets, unless otherwise stated, will not constitute a violation of such restriction or policy.
3. Cash Management and Temporary Defensive Positions. In anticipation of or in response to adverse market conditions, for cash management purposes, during a reasonable start-up period
following the completion of this offering, during the wind-down period, or for defensive purposes, the Fund may invest up to 100% of its total assets in cash or cash equivalents, U.S. Government and Agency Securities, commercial paper, and
certain other money market instruments, as well as repurchase agreements collateralized by the foregoing. In such a case, the Fund may not be pursuing, and may not achieve, its investment objective, and Common Stockholders may be adversely
affected.
INVESTMENT STRATEGIES, TECHNIQUES AND RISKS
The following information supplements the discussion of the Fund’s investment objective, policies and techniques in the Prospectus.
The Fund may make the following investments, among others, some of which are part of its principal investment strategies and some of which are not. The principal risks of the Fund’s principal strategies are discussed in the Prospectus. The Fund
may not buy all of the types of securities or use all of the investment techniques that are described.
Fixed Income Securities. Fixed income securities are subject to the risk of an issuer’s inability to meet principal and interest payments on its obligations (“credit risk”) and are subject to price
volatility due to such factors as interest rate sensitivity (“interest rate risk”), market perception of the creditworthiness of the issuer, and market liquidity (“market risk”). The value of the Fund’s fixed income investments is likely to
decline in times of rising market interest rates. Conversely, the value of the Fund’s fixed income investments is likely to rise in times of declining market interest rates. Typically, the longer the time to maturity of a given security, the
greater is the change in its value in response to a change in interest rates. Foreign debt securities are subject to risks similar to those of other foreign securities.
Lower-rated securities are more likely to react to developments affecting market and credit risk than are more highly rated
securities, which react primarily to movements in the general level of interest rates. Debt securities in the lowest rating categories may involve a substantial risk of default or may be in default. Changes in economic conditions or
developments regarding the individual issuer are more likely to cause price volatility and weaken the capacity of the issuer of such securities to make principal and interest payments than is the case for higher-grade debt securities. An
economic downturn affecting the issuer may result in an increased incidence of default. The market for lower-rated securities may be thinner and less active than for higher-rated securities. Pricing of thinly traded securities requires greater
judgment than pricing of securities for which market transactions are regularly reported. Odd lots may trade at lower prices than institutional round lots.
Ratings of Fixed Income
Securities. The Fund may purchase securities rated by S&P, Moody’s, Fitch, Inc. or any other nationally recognized statistical rating organization (“NRSRO”)
(please see the Prospectuses for further information). The ratings of an NRSRO represent its opinion as to the quality of securities it undertakes to rate. Ratings are not absolute standards of quality; consequently, securities with the same
maturity, duration, coupon, and rating may have different yields. In addition, NRSROs are subject to an inherent conflict of interest because they are often compensated by the same issuers whose securities they rate. Although the Fund may
rely on the ratings of any NRSRO, the Fund refer primarily to ratings assigned by S&P, Moody’s, and Fitch, Inc., which are described in Appendix A. The Fund may also invest in unrated securities that have been determined by the Manager to
be comparable in quality to the rated securities in which the Fund may permissibly invest.
High-Quality Debt
Securities. High-quality debt securities are securities that have received from at least one NRSRO, such as S&P, Moody’s or Fitch, Inc., a rating in one of
the two highest rating categories (the highest category in the case of commercial paper) or, if not rated by any NRSRO, such as U.S. Government and Agency Securities, have been determined by the Manager to be of comparable quality.
Investment Grade Debt
Securities. Investment grade debt securities are securities that have received, from at least one NRSRO that has rated it, a rating in one of the four highest
rating categories or, if not rated by any NRSRO, have been determined by the Manager to be of comparable quality. Moody’s deems securities rated in its fourth highest rating category (Baa) to have speculative characteristics; a change in
economic factors could lead to a weakened capacity of the issuer to repay. If a security receives one rating in one of the four highest rating categories and another rating below the fourth highest rating category, it will be considered
investment grade.
Duration and Maturity. Duration is a measure of the sensitivity of debt securities to changes in market interest rates, based on the entire cash flow associated with the securities, including payments
occurring before the final repayment of principal.
The Manager may utilize duration as a tool in portfolio selection instead of the more traditional measure known as “term to maturity.”
“Term to maturity” measures only the time until a debt security provides its final payment, taking no account of the pattern of the security’s payments prior to maturity. Duration incorporates a bond’s yield, coupon interest payments, final
maturity and call features into one measure. Duration therefore provides a more accurate measurement of a bond’s likely price change in response to a given change in market interest rates. The longer the duration, the greater the bond’s price
movement will be as interest rates change. For any fixed income security with interest payments occurring prior to the payment of principal, duration is always less than maturity.
Futures, options and options on futures have durations which are generally related to the duration of the securities underlying them.
Holding long futures or call option positions will lengthen the Fund’s duration by approximately the same amount as would holding an equivalent amount of the underlying securities. Short futures or put options have durations roughly equal to
the negative of the duration of the securities that underlie these positions, and have the effect of reducing portfolio duration by approximately the same amount as would selling an equivalent amount of the underlying securities.
There are some situations where even the standard duration calculation does not properly reflect the interest rate exposure of a
security. For example, floating and variable rate securities often have final maturities of ten or more years; however, their interest rate exposure corresponds to the frequency of the coupon reset. Another example where the interest rate
exposure is not properly captured by duration is the case of mortgage-backed securities. The stated final maturity of such securities is generally 30 years, but current and expected prepayment rates are critical in determining the securities’
interest rate exposure. In these and other similar situations, the Manager, where permitted, will use more sophisticated analytical techniques that incorporate the economic life of a security into the determination of its interest rate
exposure.
Lower-Rated Debt
Securities. Lower-rated debt securities or “junk” or “junk bonds” are those rated below the fourth highest category (including those securities rated as low as
D by S&P) or unrated securities of comparable quality. Securities rated below investment grade are often considered to be speculative. These securities have poor protection with respect to the issuer’s capacity to pay interest and repay
principal. Lower-rated debt securities generally offer a higher current yield than that available for investment grade issues with similar maturities, but they may involve significant risk under adverse conditions. In particular, adverse
changes in general economic conditions and in the industries in which the issuers are engaged and changes in the financial condition of the issuers are more likely to cause price volatility and weaken the capacity of the issuer to make
principal and interest payments than is the case for higher-grade debt securities. These securities are susceptible to default or decline in market value due to real or perceived adverse economic and business developments relating to the
issuer, market interest rates and market liquidity. In addition, the Fund that invests in lower-quality securities may incur additional expenses to the extent recovery is sought on defaulted securities. Because of the many risks involved in
investing in lower-rated debt securities, the success of such investments is dependent on the credit analysis of the Manager.
During periods of economic downturn or rising interest rates, highly leveraged issuers may experience financial stress which could
adversely affect their ability to make payments of interest and principal and increase the possibility of default. In addition, such issuers may not have more traditional methods of financing available to them and may be unable to repay debt at
maturity by refinancing. The
risk of loss due to default by such issuers is significantly greater because such securities frequently are unsecured and subordinated to the prior payment of senior indebtedness.
At certain times in the past, the market for lower-rated debt securities has expanded rapidly, and its growth generally paralleled a
long economic expansion. In the past, the prices of many lower-rated debt securities declined substantially, reflecting an expectation that many issuers of such securities might experience financial difficulties. As a result, the yields on
lower-rated debt securities rose dramatically. However, such higher yields did not reflect the value of the income stream that holders of such securities expected, but rather the risk that holders of such securities could lose a substantial
portion of their value as a result of the issuers’ financial restructuring or defaults. There can be no assurance that such declines will not recur.
The market for lower-rated debt issues generally is thinner or less active than that for higher quality securities, which may limit
the Fund’s ability to sell such securities at fair value in response to changes in the economy or financial markets. Judgment may play a greater role in pricing such securities than it does for more liquid securities. Adverse publicity and
investor perceptions, whether or not based on fundamental analysis, may also decrease the values and liquidity of lower rated debt securities, especially in a thinly traded market.
The Fund may invest in securities whose ratings imply an imminent risk of default with respect to such payments. Issuers of securities
in default may fail to resume principal or interest payments, in which case the Fund may lose its entire investment.
See Appendix A for further information about the ratings of debt securities assigned by S&P, Fitch, Inc., and Moody’s.
U.S. Government and
Agency Securities. “U.S. Government Securities” are obligations of the Treasury Department backed by the full faith and credit of the United States. During
times of market turbulence, investors may turn to the safety of securities issued or guaranteed by the Treasury Department, causing the prices of these securities to rise and their yields to decline. As a result of this and other market
influences, yields of short-term U.S. Treasury debt instruments are currently near historical lows.
“U.S. Government Agency Securities” are issued or guaranteed by U.S. Government agencies or by instrumentalities of the U.S.
Government, such as Ginnie Mae (also known as the Government National Mortgage Association), Fannie Mae (also known as the Federal National Mortgage Association), Freddie Mac (also known as the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation), SLM
Corporation (formerly, the Student Loan Marketing Association) (commonly known as “Sallie Mae”), Federal Home Loan Banks (“FHLB”), and the Tennessee Valley Authority. Some U.S. Government Agency Securities are supported by the full faith and
credit of the United States, while others may be supported by the issuer’s ability to borrow from the Treasury Department, subject to the Treasury Department’s discretion in certain cases, or only by the credit of the issuer. Accordingly, there
is at least a possibility of default. U.S. Government Agency Securities include U.S. Government Agency mortgage-backed securities. (See “Mortgage-Backed Securities” above.) The market prices of U.S. Government Agency Securities are not
guaranteed by the U.S. Government and generally fluctuate inversely with changing interest rates.
U.S. Government Agency Securities are deemed to include (i) securities for which the payment of principal and interest is backed by an
irrevocable letter of credit issued by the U.S. Government, its agencies, authorities or instrumentalities and (ii) participations in loans made to foreign governments or their agencies that are so guaranteed. The secondary market for certain
of these participations is extremely limited. In the absence of a suitable secondary market, such participations may therefore be regarded as illiquid.
The Fund may invest in separately traded principal and interest components of securities issued or guaranteed by the Treasury
Department. The principal and interest components of selected securities are traded independently under the Separate Trading of Registered Interest and Principal of Securities (“STRIPS”) program. Under the STRIPS program, the principal and
interest components are individually numbered and separately issued by the Treasury Department at the request of depository financial institutions, which then trade the component parts independently. The market prices of STRIPS generally are
more volatile than that of Treasury Department bills with comparable maturities.
Policies and Limitations. The Fund has no specific limits or requirements relating to the amount of assets invested in U.S. Government and Agency Securities; however, the Fund must invest according to its
investment objective and policies.
Real Estate-Related
Instruments. The Fund will not invest directly in real estate, but the Fund may invest in securities issued by real estate companies. Investments in the
securities of companies in the real estate industry subject the Fund to the risks associated with the direct ownership of real estate. These risks include declines in the value of real estate, risks associated with general and local economic
conditions, possible lack of availability of mortgage funds, overbuilding, extended vacancies of properties, increased competition, increase in property taxes and operating expenses, changes in zoning laws, losses due to costs resulting from
the clean-up of environmental problems, liability to third parties for damages resulting from environmental problems, casualty or condemnation losses, limitation on rents, changes in neighborhood values and the appeal of properties to
tenants, and changes in interest rates. In addition, certain real estate valuations, including residential real estate values, are influenced by market sentiments, which can change rapidly and could result in a sharp downward adjustment from
current valuation levels.
Real estate-related instruments include securities of real estate investment trusts (also known as “REITs”), commercial and
residential mortgage-backed securities and real estate financings. Such instruments are sensitive to factors such as real estate values and property taxes, interest rates, cash flow of underlying real estate assets, overbuilding, and the
management skill and creditworthiness of the issuer. Real estate-related instruments may also be affected by tax and regulatory requirements, such as those relating to the environment. REITs are sometimes informally characterized as equity
REITs and mortgage REITs. An equity REIT invests primarily in the fee ownership or leasehold ownership of land and buildings and derives its income primarily from rental income. An equity REIT may also realize capital gains (or losses) by
selling real estate properties in its portfolio that have appreciated (or depreciated) in value. A mortgage REIT invests primarily in mortgages on real estate, which may secure construction, development or long-term loans, and derives its
income primarily from interest payments on the credit it has extended.
REITs (especially mortgage REITs) are subject to interest rate risk. Rising interest rates may cause REIT investors to demand a higher
annual yield, which may, in turn, cause a decline in the market price of the equity securities issued by a REIT. Rising interest rates also generally increase the costs of obtaining financing, which could cause the value of the Fund’s REIT
investments to decline. During periods when interest rates are declining, mortgages are often refinanced. Refinancing may reduce the yield on investments in mortgage REITs. In addition, because mortgage REITs depend on payment under their
mortgage loans and leases to generate cash to make distributions to their shareholders, investments in such REITs may be adversely affected by defaults on such mortgage loans or leases.
REITs are dependent upon management skill, are not diversified, and are subject to heavy cash flow dependency, defaults by borrowers,
and self-liquidation. Domestic REITs are also subject to the possibility of failing to qualify for tax-free “pass-through” of distributed net income and net realized gains under the Code and failing to maintain exemption from the 1940 Act.
REITs are subject to management fees and other expenses. Therefore, investments in REITs will cause the Fund to bear its proportionate
share of the costs of the REITs’ operations. At the same time, the Fund will continue to pay its own management fees and expenses with respect to all of its assets, including any portion invested in REITs.
Direct Debt Instruments
including Loans, Loan Assignments, and Loan Participations. Direct debt includes interests in loans, notes and other interests in amounts owed to financial
institutions by borrowers, such as companies and governments, including emerging market countries. Direct debt instruments are interests in amounts owed by corporate, governmental, or other borrowers (including emerging market countries) to
lenders or lending syndicates. Purchasers of loans and other forms of direct indebtedness depend primarily upon the creditworthiness of the borrower for payment of principal and interest. The borrower may be in financial distress or may
default. If the Fund does not receive scheduled interest or principal payments on such indebtedness, the Fund’s share price and yield could be adversely affected. Participations in debt instruments may involve a risk of insolvency of the
selling bank. In addition, there may be fewer legal protections for owners of participation interests than for direct lenders. Direct indebtedness of developing countries involves a risk that the governmental entities responsible for the
repayment of the debt may be unable or unwilling to pay interest and repay principal when due. See the additional risks described under “Foreign Securities” in this SAI.
Direct debt instruments may have floating interest rates. These interest rates will vary depending on the terms of the underlying loan
and market conditions.
Loans, Loan Assignments,
and Loan Participations. Floating rate securities, including loans, provide for automatic adjustment of the interest rate at fixed intervals (e.g., daily, weekly, monthly, or semi-annually) or automatic adjustment of the interest rate whenever a specified interest rate or index changes. The interest rate on floating rate securities ordinarily is
determined by reference to SOFR (Secured Overnight Financing Rate), a particular bank’s prime rate, the 90-day Treasury Department Bill rate, the rate of return on commercial paper or bank certificates of deposit (“CDs”), an index of
short-term tax-exempt rates or some other objective measure. The Fund may invest in secured and unsecured loans.
The Fund may invest in direct debt instruments by direct investment as a lender, by taking an assignment of all or a portion of an
interest in a loan previously held by another institution or by acquiring a participation interest in a loan that continues to be held by another institution. It also may be difficult for the Fund to obtain an accurate picture of a selling
bank’s financial condition. Loans are subject to the same risks as other direct debt instruments discussed above and carry additional risks described in this section.
Direct Investments. When the Fund invests as an initial investor in a new loan, the investment is typically made at par value. Secondary purchases of loans may be made at a premium to par, at par,
or at a discount to par. Therefore, the Fund’s return on a secondary investment may be lower, equal, or higher than if the Fund had made a direct investment. As an initial investor in a new loan, the Fund may be paid a commitment fee.
Assignments. When the Fund purchases a loan by assignment, the Fund typically succeeds to the rights of the assigning lender under the loan agreement and becomes a lender under the loan
agreement. Subject to the terms of the loan agreement, the Fund typically succeeds to all the rights and obligations under the loan agreement of the assigning lender. However, assignments may be arranged through private negotiations between
potential assignees and potential assignors, and the rights and obligations acquired by the purchaser of an assignment may differ from, and be more limited than, those held by the assigning lender.
Participation Interests. The Fund’s rights under a participation interest with respect to a particular loan may be more limited than the rights of original lenders or of investors who acquire an
assignment of that loan. In purchasing participation interests, the Fund will have the right to receive payments of principal, interest and any fees to which it is entitled only from the lender selling the participation interest (the
“participating lender”) and only when the participating lender receives the payments from the borrower.
In a participation interest, the Fund will usually have a contractual relationship only with the selling institution and not the
underlying borrower. The Fund normally will have to rely on the participating lender to demand and receive payments in respect of the loans, and to pay those amounts on to the Fund; thus, the Fund will be subject to the risk that the lender may
be unwilling or unable to do so. In such a case, the Fund would not likely have any rights against the borrower directly. In addition, the Fund generally will have no right to object to certain changes to the loan agreement agreed to by the
participating lender.
In buying a participation interest, the Fund might not directly benefit from the collateral supporting the related loan and may be
subject to any rights of set off the borrower has against the selling institution. In the event of bankruptcy or insolvency of the borrower, the obligation of the borrower to repay the loan may be subject to certain defenses that can be
asserted by the borrower as a result of any improper conduct of the participating lender. As a result, the Fund may be subject to delays, expenses and risks that are greater than those that exist when the Fund is an original lender or assignee.
Creditworthiness. The Fund’s ability to receive payments in connection with loans depends on the financial condition of the borrower. The Manager will not rely solely on another lending
institution’s credit analysis of the borrower, but will perform its own investment analysis of the borrower. The Manager’s analysis may include consideration of the borrower’s financial strength, managerial experience, debt coverage,
additional borrowing requirements or debt maturity schedules, changing financial conditions, and responsiveness to changes in business conditions and interest rates. Indebtedness of borrowers whose creditworthiness is poor involves
substantially greater risks and may be highly speculative. Borrowers that are in bankruptcy or restructuring may never pay off their indebtedness, or may pay only a small fraction of the amount owed. In connection with the restructuring of a
loan or other direct debt instrument outside of bankruptcy court in a negotiated work-out or in the context of bankruptcy proceedings, equity securities or junior debt securities may be received in exchange for all or a portion of an interest
in the security.
In buying a participation interest, the Fund assumes the credit risk of both the borrower and the participating lender. If the
participating lender fails to perform its obligations under the participation agreement, the Fund might incur costs and delays in realizing payment and suffer a loss of principal and/or interest. If a participating lender becomes insolvent, the
Fund may be treated as a general creditor of that lender. As a general creditor, the Fund may not benefit from a right of set off that the lender has against the borrower. The Fund will acquire a participation interest only if the Manager
determines that the participating lender or other intermediary participant selling the participation interest is creditworthy.
Ratings. Loan interests may not be rated by independent rating agencies and therefore, investments in a particular loan participation may depend almost exclusively on the credit analysis
of the borrower performed by the Manager.
Agents. Loans are typically administered by a bank, insurance company, finance company or other financial institution (the “agent”) for a lending syndicate of financial institutions. In
a typical loan, the agent administers the terms of the loan agreement and is responsible for the collection of principal and interest and fee payments from the borrower and the apportionment of these payments to all lenders that are parties
to the loan agreement. In addition, an institution (which may be the agent) may hold collateral on behalf of the lenders. Typically, under loan agreements, the agent is given broad authority in monitoring the borrower’s performance and is
obligated to use the same care it would use in the management of its own
property. In asserting rights against a borrower, the Fund normally will be dependent on the willingness of the lead bank to assert these rights, or upon a vote of all the lenders to authorize
the action.
If an agent becomes insolvent, or has a receiver, conservator, or similar official appointed for it by the appropriate regulatory
authority, or becomes a debtor in a bankruptcy proceeding, the agent’s appointment may be terminated and a successor agent would be appointed. If an appropriate regulator or court determines that assets held by the agent for the benefit of the
purchasers of loans are subject to the claims of the agent’s general or secured creditors, the Fund might incur certain costs and delays in realizing payment on a loan or suffer a loss of principal and/or interest. The Fund may be subject to
similar risks when it buys a participation interest or an assignment from an intermediary.
Collateral. Although most of the loans in which the Fund invests are secured, there is no assurance that the collateral can be promptly liquidated, or that its liquidation value will be
equal to the value of the debt. In most loan agreements there is no formal requirement to pledge additional collateral if the value of the initial collateral declines. As a result, a loan may not always be fully collateralized and can decline
significantly in value.
If a borrower becomes insolvent, access to collateral may be limited by bankruptcy and other laws. Borrowers that are in bankruptcy
may pay only a small portion of the amount owed, if they are able to pay at all. In addition, if a secured loan is foreclosed, the Fund may bear the costs and liabilities associated with owning and disposing of the collateral. The collateral
may be difficult to sell and the Fund would bear the risk that the collateral may decline in value while the Fund is holding it. There is also a possibility that the Fund will become the owner of its pro rata share of the collateral which may
carry additional risks and liabilities. In addition, under legal theories of lender liability, the Fund potentially might be held liable as a co-lender. In the event of a borrower’s bankruptcy or insolvency, the borrower’s obligation to repay
the loan may be subject to certain defenses that the borrower can assert as a result of improper conduct by the Agent.
Some loans are unsecured. If the borrower defaults on an unsecured loan, the Fund will be a general creditor and will not have rights
to any specific assets of the borrower.
Liquidity. Loans are generally subject to legal or contractual restrictions on resale. Loans are not currently listed on any securities exchange or automatic quotation system. As a result,
there may not be a recognized, liquid public market for loan interests.
Prepayment Risk and
Maturity. Because many loans are repaid early, the actual maturity of loans is typically shorter than their stated final maturity calculated solely on the basis of
the stated life and payment schedule. The degree to which borrowers prepay loans, whether as a contractual requirement or at their election, may be affected by general business conditions, market interest rates, the borrower’s financial
condition and competitive conditions among lenders. Such prepayments may require the Fund to replace an investment with a lower yielding security which may have an adverse effect on the Fund’s share price. Prepayments cannot be predicted with
accuracy. Floating rate loans can be less sensitive to prepayment risk, but the Fund’s net asset value (“NAV”) may still fluctuate in response to interest rate changes because variable interest rates may reset only periodically and may not
rise or decline as much as interest rates in general.
Restrictive Covenants. A borrower must comply with various restrictive covenants in a loan agreement such
as restrictions on dividend payments and limits on total debt. The loan agreement may also contain a covenant requiring the borrower to prepay the loan with any free cash flow. A breach of a covenant is normally an event of default, which
provides the agent or the lenders the right to call the outstanding loan.
Fees and Expenses. The Fund may be required to pay and receive various fees and commissions in the process of purchasing, selling, and holding loans. The fee component may include any, or a
combination of, the following elements: assignment fees, arrangement fees, non-use fees, facility fees, letter of credit fees, and ticking fees. Arrangement fees are paid at the commencement of a loan as compensation for the initiation of the
transaction. A non-use fee is paid based upon the amount committed but not used under the loan. Facility fees are on-going annual fees paid in connection with a loan. Letter of credit fees are paid if a loan involves a letter of credit.
Ticking fees are paid from the initial commitment indication until loan closing if for an extended period. The amount of fees is negotiated at the time of closing. In addition, the Fund incurs expenses associated with researching and
analyzing potential loan investments, including legal fees.
Available Information. Loans normally are not registered with the SEC or any state securities commission or listed on any securities exchange. As a result, the amount of public information available
about a specific loan historically has been less extensive than if the loan were registered or exchange traded. They may also not be considered “securities,” and purchasers, such as the Fund, therefore may not be entitled to rely on the
strong anti-fraud protections of the federal securities laws.
Leveraged Buy-Out
Transactions. Loans purchased by the Fund may represent interests in loans made to finance highly leveraged corporate acquisitions, known as “leveraged buy-out”
transactions, leveraged recapitalization loans and other types of acquisition financing. The highly leveraged capital structure of the borrowers in such transactions may make such loans especially vulnerable to adverse changes in economic or
market conditions.
Junior Loans. The Fund may invest in second lien secured loans and secured and unsecured subordinated loans, including bridge loans (“Junior Loans”). In the event of a bankruptcy or
liquidation, second lien secured loans are generally paid only if the value of the borrower’s collateral is sufficient to satisfy the borrower’s obligations to the first lien secured lenders and even then, the remaining collateral may not be
sufficient to cover the amount owed to the Fund. Second lien secured loans give investors priority over general unsecured creditors in the event of an asset sale.
Junior Loans are subject to the same general risks inherent to any loan investment, including credit risk, market and liquidity risk,
and interest rate risk. Due to their lower place in the borrower’s capital structure, Junior Loans involve a higher degree of overall risk than senior loans of the same borrower.
Bridge Loans. Bridge loans or bridge facilities are short-term loan arrangements (e.g., 12 to 18 months) typically made by a borrower in anticipation of
intermediate-term or long-term permanent financing. Most bridge loans are structured as floating-rate debt with step-up provisions under which the interest rate on the bridge loan rises over time. Thus, the longer the loan remains
outstanding, the more the interest rate increases. In addition, bridge loans commonly contain a conversion feature that allows the bridge loan investor to convert its loan interest into senior exchange notes if the loan has not been prepaid
in full on or prior to its maturity date. Bridge loans may be subordinate to other debt and may be secured or unsecured. Like any loan, bridge loans involve credit risk. Bridge loans are generally made with the expectation that the borrower
will be able to obtain permanent financing in the near future. Any delay in obtaining permanent financing subjects the bridge loan investor to increased risk. A borrower’s use of bridge loans also involves the risk that the borrower may be
unable to locate permanent financing to replace the bridge loan, which may impair the borrower’s perceived creditworthiness.
Delayed draw term loans. The Fund may be obligated under the terms of the relevant loan documents to advance additional funds after the initial disbursement that it makes at the time of its investment.
For example, the loan may not have been fully funded” at that time or the lenders may have ongoing commitments to make further advances up to a stated maximum. When a loan has been fully
funded, however, repaid principal amounts normally may not be reborrowed. Interest accrues on the outstanding principal amount of the loan. The borrower
normally may pay a fee during any commitment period.
Policies and Limitations. The Fund does not intend to invest in loan instruments that could require additional investments upon the borrower’s demand but may invest in loans that require funding at a
later date following the initial investment in the loan.
The Fund’s policies limit the percentage of its assets that can be invested in the securities of one issuer or in issuers primarily
involved in one industry. Legal interpretations by the SEC staff may require the Fund to treat both the lending bank and the borrower as “issuers” of a loan participation by the Fund. In combination, the Fund’s policies and the SEC staff’s
interpretations may limit the amount the Fund can invest in loan participations.
For purposes of determining its dollar-weighted average maturity or duration, the Fund calculates the remaining maturity or duration
of loans on the basis of the stated life and payment schedule.
Mortgage-Backed
Securities. Mortgage-backed securities, including residential and commercial mortgage-backed securities, represent direct or indirect participations in, or are
secured by and payable from, pools of mortgage loans. Those securities may be guaranteed by a U.S. Government agency or instrumentality (such as by Ginnie Mae); issued and guaranteed by a government-sponsored stockholder-owned corporation,
though not backed by the full faith and credit of the United States (such as by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac (collectively, the “GSEs”), and described in greater detail below); or issued by fully private issuers. Private issuers are generally
originators of and investors in mortgage loans and include savings associations, mortgage bankers, commercial banks, investment bankers, and special purpose entities. Private mortgage-backed securities may be backed by U.S. Government agency
supported mortgage loans or some form of non-governmental credit enhancement.
Government-related guarantors (i.e., not backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S.
Government) include Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Fannie Mae is a government-sponsored corporation owned by stockholders. It is subject to general regulation by the Federal Housing Finance Authority (“FHFA”). Fannie Mae purchases residential
mortgages from a list of approved seller/servicers that include state and federally chartered savings and loan associations, mutual savings banks, commercial banks, credit unions and mortgage bankers. Fannie Mae guarantees the timely payment of
principal and interest on pass-through securities that it issues, but those securities are not backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. Government.
Freddie Mac is a government-sponsored corporation formerly owned by the twelve Federal Home Loan Banks and now owned by stockholders.
Freddie Mac issues Participation Certificates (“PCs”), which represent interests in mortgages from Freddie Mac’s national portfolio. Freddie Mac guarantees the timely payment of interest and ultimate collection of principal on the PCs it
issues, but those PCs are not backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. Government.
The Treasury Department has historically had the authority to purchase obligations of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. However, in 2008,
due to capitalization concerns, Congress provided the Treasury Department with additional authority to lend the GSEs emergency funds and to purchase their stock. In September 2008, those capital concerns led the Treasury Department and the FHFA
to announce that the GSEs had been placed in conservatorship.
Since that time, the GSEs have received significant capital support through Treasury Department preferred stock purchases as well as
Treasury Department and Federal Reserve purchases of their mortgage
backed securities (“MBS”). While the MBS purchase programs ended in 2010, the Treasury Department announced in December 2009 that it would continue its
support for the entities’ capital as necessary to prevent a negative net worth. However, no assurance can be given that the Federal Reserve, Treasury Department, or FHFA initiatives will ensure that the GSEs will remain successful in meeting
their obligations with respect to the debt and MBS they issue into the future.
In 2012, the FHFA initiated a strategic plan to develop a program related to credit risk transfers intended to reduce Fannie Mae’s and
Freddie Mac’s overall risk through the creation of credit risk transfer assets (“CRTs”). CRTs come in two primary series: Structured Agency Credit Risk (“STACRs”) for Freddie Mac and Connecticut Avenue Securities (“CAS”) for Fannie Mae,
although other series may be developed in the future. CRTs are typically structured as unsecured general obligations of either entities guaranteed by a government-sponsored stockholder-owned corporation, though not backed by the full faith and
credit of the United States (such as by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac (collectively, the “GSEs”) or special purpose entities), and their cash flows are based on the performance of a pool of reference loans. Unlike traditional residential MBS
securities, bond payments typically do not come directly from the underlying mortgages. Instead, the GSEs either make the payments to CRT investors, or the GSEs make certain payments to the special purpose entities and the special purpose
entities make payments to the investors. In certain structures, the special purpose entities make payments to the GSEs upon the occurrence of credit events with respect to the underlying mortgages, and the obligation of the special purpose
entity to make such payments to the GSE is senior to the obligation of the special purpose entity to make payments to the CRT investors. CRTs are typically floating rate securities and may have multiple tranches with losses first allocated to
the most junior or subordinate tranche. This structure results in increased sensitivity to dramatic housing downturns, especially for the subordinate tranches. Many CRTs also have collateral performance triggers (e.g., based on credit
enhancement, delinquencies or defaults, etc.) that could shut off principal payments to subordinate tranches. Generally, GSEs have the ability to call all of the CRT tranches at par in 10 years.
In addition, the future of the GSEs is in serious question as the U.S. Government is considering multiple options, ranging on a
spectrum from significant reform, nationalization, privatization, consolidation, or abolishment of the entities. Congress is considering several pieces of legislation that would reform the GSEs, proposing to address their structure, mission,
portfolio limits, and guarantee fees, among other issues.
The FHFA and the Treasury Department (through its agreement to purchase GSE preferred stock) have imposed strict limits on the size of
GSEs’ mortgage portfolios. In August 2012, the Treasury Department amended its preferred stock purchase agreements to provide that the GSEs’ portfolios would be wound down at an annual rate of 15 percent (up from the previously agreed annual
rate of 10 percent), requiring the GSEs to reach the $250 billion target by December 31, 2018. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were below the $250 billion cap for year-end 2018. On December 21, 2017, a letter agreement between the Treasury
Department and Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac changed the terms of the senior preferred stock certificates to permit the GSEs each to retain a $3 billion capital reserve, quarterly. Under the 2017 letter, each GSE paid a dividend to the Treasury
Department equal to the amount that its net worth exceeded $3 billion at the end of each quarter. On September 30, 2019, the Treasury Department and the FHFA, acting as conservator to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, announced amendments to the
respective senior preferred stock certificates that will permit the GSEs to retain earnings beyond the $3 billion capital reserves previously allowed through the 2017 letter agreements. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are now permitted to maintain
capital reserves of $25 billion and $20 billion, respectively.
Mortgage-backed securities may have either fixed or adjustable interest rates. Tax or regulatory changes may adversely affect the
mortgage securities market. In addition, changes in the market’s perception of the issuer may affect the value of mortgage-backed securities. The rate of return on mortgage-backed
securities may be affected by prepayments of principal on the underlying loans, which generally increase as market interest rates decline; as a result,
when interest rates decline, holders of these securities normally do not benefit from appreciation in market value to the same extent as holders of other non-callable debt securities.
Because many mortgages are repaid early, the actual maturity and duration of mortgage-backed securities are typically shorter than
their stated final maturity and their duration calculated solely on the basis of the stated life and payment schedule. In calculating its dollar-weighted average maturity and duration, the Fund may apply certain industry conventions regarding
the maturity and duration of mortgage-backed instruments. Different analysts use different models and assumptions in making these determinations. The Fund uses an approach that the Manager believes is reasonable in light of all relevant
circumstances. If this determination is not borne out in practice, it could positively or negatively affect the value of the Fund when market interest rates change. Increasing market interest rates generally extend the effective maturities of
mortgage-backed securities, increasing their sensitivity to interest rate changes.
Mortgage-backed securities may be issued in the form of collateralized mortgage obligations (“CMOs”) or collateralized mortgage-backed
bonds (“CBOs”). CMOs are obligations that are fully collateralized, directly or indirectly, by a pool of mortgages; payments of principal and interest on the mortgages are passed through to the holders of the CMOs, although not necessarily on a
pro rata basis, on the same schedule as they are received. CBOs are general obligations of the issuer that are fully collateralized, directly or indirectly, by a pool of mortgages. The mortgages serve as
collateral for the issuer’s payment obligations on the bonds, but interest and principal payments on the mortgages are not passed through either directly (as with mortgage-backed “pass-through” securities issued or guaranteed by U.S. Government
agencies or instrumentalities) or on a modified basis (as with CMOs). Accordingly, a change in the rate of prepayments on the pool of mortgages could change the effective maturity or the duration of a CMO but not that of a CBO (although, like
many bonds, CBOs may be callable by the issuer prior to maturity). To the extent that rising interest rates cause prepayments to occur at a slower than expected rate, a CMO could be converted into a longer-term security that is subject to
greater risk of price volatility.
Governmental, government-related, and private entities (such as commercial banks, savings institutions, private mortgage insurance
companies, mortgage bankers, and other secondary market issuers, including securities broker-dealers and special purpose entities that generally are affiliates of the foregoing established to issue such securities) may create mortgage loan
pools to back CMOs and CBOs. Such issuers may be the originators and/or servicers of the underlying mortgage loans, as well as the guarantors of the mortgage-backed securities. Pools created by non-governmental issuers generally offer a higher
rate of interest than governmental and government-related pools because of the absence of direct or indirect government or agency guarantees. Various forms of insurance or guarantees, including individual loan, title, pool, and hazard insurance
and letters of credit, may support timely payment of interest and principal of non-governmental pools. Governmental entities, private insurers, and mortgage poolers issue these forms of insurance and guarantees. The Manager considers such
insurance and guarantees, as well as the creditworthiness of the issuers thereof, in determining whether a mortgage-backed security meets the Fund’s investment quality standards. There can be no assurance that private insurers or guarantors can
meet their obligations under insurance policies or guarantee arrangements. The Fund may buy mortgage-backed securities without insurance or guarantees, if the Manager determines that the securities meet the Fund’s quality standards. The Manager
will, consistent with the Fund’s investment objective, policies and limitations and quality standards, consider making investments in new types of mortgage-backed securities as such securities are developed and offered to investors.
Policies and Limitations. The Fund may not purchase mortgage-backed securities that, in the Manager’s opinion, are illiquid if, as a result, more than 15% of the Fund’s net assets would be invested in
illiquid securities.
Other Mortgage-Related Securities. Other
mortgage-related securities include securities other than those described above that directly or indirectly represent a participation in, or are secured by and payable from, mortgage loans on real property, including stripped mortgage-backed
securities. Other mortgage-related securities may be equity or debt securities issued by agencies or instrumentalities of the U.S. Government or by private originators of, or investors in, mortgage loans, including savings and loan
associations, homebuilders, mortgage banks, commercial banks, investment banks, partnerships, trusts and special purpose entities of the foregoing.
Asset-Backed Securities. Asset-backed securities represent direct or indirect participations in, or are secured by and payable from, pools of assets such as, among other things, motor vehicle
installment sales contracts, installment loan contracts, leases of various types of real and personal property, and receivables from revolving credit (credit card) agreements, or a combination of the foregoing. These assets are securitized
through the use of trusts and special purpose corporations. Credit enhancements, such as various forms of cash collateral accounts or letters of credit, may support payments of principal and interest on asset-backed securities. Although these
securities may be supported by letters of credit or other credit enhancements, payment of interest and principal ultimately depends upon individuals paying the underlying loans, which may be affected adversely by general downturns in the
economy. Asset-backed securities are subject to the same risk of prepayment described with respect to mortgage-backed securities and to extension risk (the risk that an issuer of a security will make principal payments slower than anticipated
by the investor, thus extending the securities’ duration). The risk that recovery on repossessed collateral might be unavailable or inadequate to support payments, however, is greater for asset-backed securities than for mortgage-backed
securities.
Certificates for Automobile ReceivablesSM (“CARSSM”) represent undivided fractional interests in a trust whose assets consist of a
pool of motor vehicle retail installment sales contracts and security interests in the vehicles securing those contracts. Payments of principal and interest on the underlying contracts are passed through monthly to certificate holders and are
guaranteed up to specified amounts by a letter of credit issued by a financial institution unaffiliated with the trustee or originator of the trust. Underlying installment sales contracts are subject to prepayment, which may reduce the overall
return to certificate holders. Certificate holders also may experience delays in payment or losses on CARSSM if the trust does not realize the full amounts due on underlying installment sales contracts because of unanticipated legal or
administrative costs of enforcing the contracts; depreciation, damage, or loss of the vehicles securing the contracts; or other factors.
Credit card receivable securities are backed by receivables from revolving credit card agreements (“Accounts”). Credit balances on
Accounts are generally paid down more rapidly than are automobile contracts. Most of the credit card receivable securities issued publicly to date have been pass-through certificates. In order to lengthen their maturity or duration, most such
securities provide for a fixed period during which only interest payments on the underlying Accounts are passed through to the security holder; principal payments received on the Accounts are used to fund the transfer of additional credit card
charges made on the Accounts to the pool of assets supporting the securities. Usually, the initial fixed period may be shortened if specified events occur which signal a potential deterioration in the quality of the assets backing the security,
such as the imposition of a cap on interest rates. An issuer’s ability to extend the life of an issue of credit card receivable securities thus depends on the continued generation of principal amounts in the underlying Accounts and the
non-occurrence of the specified events. The non-deductibility of consumer interest, as well as competitive and general economic factors, could adversely affect the rate at which new receivables are created in an Account and conveyed to an
issuer, thereby shortening the
expected weighted average life of the related security and reducing its yield. An acceleration in cardholders’ payment rates or any other event that
shortens the period during which additional credit card charges on an Account may be transferred to the pool of assets supporting the related security could have a similar effect on its weighted average life and yield.
Credit cardholders are entitled to the protection of state and federal consumer credit laws. Many of those laws give a holder the
right to set off certain amounts against balances owed on the credit card, thereby reducing amounts paid on Accounts. In addition, unlike the collateral for most other asset-backed securities, Accounts are unsecured obligations of the
cardholder.
Variable or Floating Rate
Securities; Demand and Put Features. Variable rate and floating rate securities provide for automatic adjustment of the interest rate at fixed intervals (e.g.,
daily, weekly, monthly, or semi-annually) or automatic adjustment of the interest rate whenever a specified interest rate or index changes. The interest rate on variable and floating rate securities (collectively, “Adjustable Rate
Securities”) ordinarily is determined by reference to a particular bank’s prime rate, the 90-day Treasury Department Bill rate, the rate of return on commercial paper or bank CDs, an index of short-term tax-exempt rates or some other
objective measure.
Adjustable Rate Securities frequently permit the holder to demand payment of the obligations’ principal and accrued interest at any
time or at specified intervals not exceeding one year. The demand feature usually is backed by a credit instrument (e.g., a bank letter of credit) from a creditworthy issuer and sometimes by insurance from a creditworthy insurer. Without these
credit enhancements, some Adjustable Rate Securities might not meet the Fund’s quality standards. Accordingly, in purchasing these securities, the Fund relies primarily on the creditworthiness of the credit instrument issuer or the insurer. The
Fund can also buy fixed rate securities accompanied by a demand feature or by a put option, which permits the Fund to sell the security to the issuer or third party at a specified price. The Fund may rely on the creditworthiness of issuers of
the credit enhancements in purchasing these securities.
Warrants and Rights. Warrants and rights may be acquired by the Fund in connection with other securities or separately. Warrants are securities permitting, but not obligating, their holder to subscribe for other securities or commodities and
provide the Fund with the right to purchase at a later date other securities of the issuer. Rights are similar to warrants but typically are issued by a company to existing holders of its stock and provide those holders the right to purchase
additional shares of stock at a later date. Rights also normally have a shorter duration than warrants. Warrants and rights do not carry with them the right to dividends or voting rights with respect to the securities that they entitle their
holder to purchase, and they do not represent any rights in the assets of the issuer. Warrants and rights may be more speculative than certain other types of investments and entail risks that are not associated with a similar investment in a
traditional equity instrument. While warrants and rights are generally considered equity securities, because the value of a warrant or right is derived, at least in part, from the value of the underlying securities, they may be considered
hybrid instruments that have features of both equity securities and derivative instruments. However, there are characteristics of warrants and rights that differ from derivatives, including that the value of a warrant or right does not
necessarily change with the value of the underlying securities. The purchase of warrants and rights involves the risk that the Fund could lose the purchase value of the warrants or rights if the right to subscribe to additional shares is not
exercised prior to the warrants’ or rights’ expiration date because warrants and rights cease to have value if they are not exercised prior to their expiration date. Also, the purchase of warrants and rights involves the risk that the
effective price paid for the warrants or rights added to the subscription price of the related security may exceed the value of the subscribed security’s market price such as when there is no movement in the price of the underlying security.
The market for warrants or rights may be very limited and it may be difficult to sell them promptly at an acceptable price.
Illiquid Securities. Generally, an illiquid security is any investment that may not reasonably be expected to be sold or disposed of in current market conditions in seven calendar days or less
without the sale or disposition significantly changing the market value of the investment. Illiquid securities may include unregistered or other restricted securities and repurchase agreements maturing in greater than seven days. Illiquid
securities may also include commercial paper under Section 4(2) of the 1933 Act, and Rule 144A securities (restricted securities that may be traded freely among qualified institutional buyers pursuant to an exemption from the registration
requirements of the securities laws); these securities are considered illiquid unless the Manager determines they are liquid. Most such securities held by the Fund are deemed liquid. Generally, foreign securities freely tradable in their
principal market are not considered restricted or illiquid, even if they are not registered in the United States. Illiquid securities may be difficult for the Fund to value or dispose of due to the absence of an active trading market. The
sale of some illiquid securities by the Fund may be subject to legal restrictions, which could be costly to the Fund.
Repurchase Agreements. In a repurchase agreement, the Fund purchases securities from a bank that is a member of the Federal Reserve System, from a foreign bank or from a U.S. branch or agency of a
foreign bank, or from a securities dealer that agrees to repurchase the securities from the Fund at a higher price on a designated future date. Repurchase agreements generally are for a short period of time, usually less than a week. Costs,
delays, or losses could result if the selling party to a repurchase agreement becomes bankrupt or otherwise defaults. The Manager monitors the creditworthiness of sellers. If the Fund enters into a repurchase agreement subject to foreign law
and the counter-party defaults, the Fund may not enjoy protections comparable to those provided to certain repurchase agreements under U.S. bankruptcy law and may suffer delays and losses in disposing of the collateral as a result.
Policies and Limitations. Repurchase agreements with a maturity of more than seven days are considered to be illiquid securities. The Fund may enter into a repurchase agreement only if (1) the underlying
securities are of a type that the Fund’s investment policies and limitations would allow it to purchase directly, (2) the market value of the underlying securities, including accrued interest, at all times equals or exceeds the repurchase
price and (3) payment for the underlying securities is made only upon satisfactory evidence that the securities are being held for the Fund’s account by its custodian or a bank acting as the Fund’s agent.
Securities Loans. The Fund may lend portfolio securities to banks, brokerage firms, and other institutional investors, provided that cash or equivalent collateral, initially equal to at least
102% (105% in the case of foreign securities) of the market value of the loaned securities, is maintained by the borrower with the Fund or with the Fund’s lending agent, who holds the collateral on the Fund’s behalf. Thereafter, cash or
equivalent collateral, equal to at least 100% of the market value of the loaned securities, is to be continuously maintained by the borrower with the Fund. The Fund may invest the cash collateral and earn income, or it may receive an agreed
upon amount of interest income from a borrower that has delivered equivalent collateral. During the time securities are on loan, the borrower will pay the Fund an amount equivalent to any dividends or interest paid on such securities. These
loans are subject to termination at the option of the Fund or the borrower. The Fund may pay reasonable administrative and custodial fees in connection with a loan and may pay a negotiated portion of the interest earned on the cash or
equivalent collateral to the borrower. The Fund does not have the right to vote on securities while they are on loan. However, it is the Fund’s policy to attempt to terminate loans in time to vote those proxies that the Fund has determined
are material to the interests of the Fund. The Manager believes the risk of loss on these transactions is slight because if a borrower were to default for any reason, the collateral should satisfy the obligation. However, as with other
extensions of secured credit, loans of portfolio securities involve some risk of loss of rights in the collateral should the borrower fail financially. The Fund may loan securities through third parties not affiliated with NBIA that would act
as agent to lend securities to principal borrowers.
Policies and Limitations. The Fund may lend its securities with a value not exceeding 33-1/3% of its total assets (taken at current value) to banks, brokerage firms or other institutional investors. The
Fund has authorized State Street Bank and Trust Company (“State Street”) to effect loans of available securities of the Fund with entities on State Street’s approved list of borrowers, which includes State Street and its affiliates. The Fund
may obtain a list of these approved borrowers. Borrowers are required continuously to secure their obligations to return securities on loan from the Fund by depositing collateral in a form determined to be satisfactory by the Board. The
collateral, which must be marked to market daily, must be initially equal to at least 102% (105% in the case of foreign securities) of the market value of the loaned securities, which will also be marked to market daily. Thereafter, the
collateral must be equal to at least 100% of the market value of the loaned securities. See the section entitled “Cash Management and Temporary Defensive Positions” for additional information on how the Fund may invest the collateral
obtained from securities lending. The Fund does not count uninvested collateral for purposes of any investment policy or limitation that requires the Fund to invest specific percentages of its assets in accordance with its principal
investment program.
Restricted Securities and
Rule 144A Securities. The Fund may invest in “restricted securities,” which generally are securities that may be resold to the public only pursuant to an
effective registration statement under the 1933 Act or an exemption from registration. Regulation S under the 1933 Act is an exemption from registration that permits, under certain circumstances, the resale of restricted securities in
offshore transactions, subject to certain conditions, and Rule 144A under the 1933 Act is an exemption that permits the resale of certain restricted securities to qualified institutional buyers.
Since its adoption by the SEC in 1990, Rule 144A has facilitated trading of restricted securities among qualified institutional
investors. To the extent restricted securities held by the Fund qualify under Rule 144A and an institutional market develops for those securities, the Fund expects that it will be able to dispose of the securities without registering the resale
of such securities under the 1933 Act. However, to the extent that a robust market for such 144A securities does not develop, or a market develops but experiences periods of illiquidity, investments in Rule 144A securities could increase the
level of the Fund’s illiquidity. Where an exemption from registration under the 1933 Act is unavailable, or where an institutional market is limited, the Fund may, in certain circumstances, be permitted to require the issuer of restricted
securities held by the Fund to file a registration statement to register the resale of such securities under the 1933 Act. In such case, the Fund will typically be obligated to pay all or part of the registration expenses, and a considerable
period may elapse between the decision to sell and the time the Fund may be permitted to resell a security under an effective registration statement. If, during such a period, adverse market conditions were to develop, or the value of the
security were to decline, the Fund might obtain a less favorable price than prevailed when it decided to sell. Restricted securities for which no market exists are priced by a method that the Fund Directors believe accurately reflects fair
value.
Reverse Repurchase
Agreements. In a reverse repurchase agreement, the Fund sells portfolio securities to another party and agrees to repurchase the securities at an agreed-upon
price and date, which reflects an interest payment. Reverse repurchase agreements involve the risk that the other party will fail to return the securities in a timely manner, or at all, which may result in losses to the Fund. The Fund could
lose money if it is unable to recover the securities and the value of the collateral held by the Fund is less than the value of the securities. These events could also trigger adverse tax consequences to the Fund. Reverse repurchase
agreements also involve the risk that the market value of the securities sold will decline below the price at which the Fund is obligated to repurchase them. Reverse repurchase agreements may be viewed as a form of borrowing by the Fund. When
the Fund enters into a reverse repurchase agreement, any fluctuations in the market value of either the securities transferred to another party or the securities in which the proceeds may be invested would affect the market value of the
Fund’s assets. During the term of the agreement, the Fund may also be obligated to pledge additional cash and/or securities in the event of a decline in the fair value of the transferred security. The Manager monitors the creditworthiness of
counterparties to reverse repurchase agreements. For the Fund’s policies and limitations on borrowing, see “Investment Objective, Policies and Limitations -- Borrowing” above.
Policies and Limitations. Rule 18f-4 under the 1940 Act, among other things, permits a fund to treat reverse repurchase transactions (and other similar financing transactions) either as borrowings
(subject to the asset coverage requirements under the 1940 Act) or as “derivatives transactions” subject to the requirements of Rule 18f-4. Accordingly, any reverse repurchase agreements treated as a borrowing will be considered borrowings
for purposes of the Fund’s investment policies and limitations concerning borrowings. Any reverse repurchase agreement treated as a derivatives transaction as defined in Rule 18f-4 under the 1940 Act will be subject to the requirements of
that rule.
Foreign Securities. The Fund may invest in equity, debt, or other securities of foreign issuers and foreign branches of U.S. banks. These securities may be U.S. dollar denominated or denominated in
or indexed to foreign currencies and may include (1) common and preferred stocks, (2) negotiable CDs, commercial paper, fixed time deposits, and bankers’ acceptances, (3) obligations of other corporations, and (4) obligations of foreign
governments and their subdivisions, agencies, and instrumentalities, international agencies, and supranational entities. Foreign issuers are issuers organized and doing business principally outside the United States and include banks,
non-U.S. governments, and quasi-governmental organizations. Investments in foreign securities involve sovereign and other risks, in addition to the credit and market risks normally associated with domestic securities. These risks include the
possibility of adverse political and economic developments (including political or social instability, nationalization, expropriation, or confiscatory taxation); the potentially adverse effects of the unavailability of public information
regarding issuers, less governmental supervision and regulation of financial markets, reduced liquidity of certain financial markets, and the lack of uniform accounting, auditing, and financial reporting standards or the application of
standards that are different or less stringent than those applied in the United States; different laws and customs governing securities tracking; and possibly limited access to the courts to enforce the Fund’s rights as an investor. It may be
difficult to invoke legal process or to enforce contractual obligations abroad, and it may be especially difficult to sue a foreign government in the courts of that country.
Additionally, investing in foreign currency denominated securities involves the additional risks of (a) adverse changes in foreign
exchange rates, (b) nationalization, expropriation, or confiscatory taxation, and (c) adverse changes in investment or exchange control regulations (which could prevent cash from being brought back to the United States). Additionally, dividends
and interest payable on foreign securities (and gains realized on disposition thereof) may be subject to foreign taxes, including taxes withheld from those payments. Commissions on foreign securities exchanges are often at fixed rates and are
generally higher than negotiated commissions on U.S. exchanges, although the Fund endeavors to achieve the most favorable net results on portfolio transactions.
Foreign securities often trade with less frequency and in less volume than domestic securities and therefore may exhibit greater price
volatility. Additional costs associated with an investment in foreign securities may include higher custodial fees than apply to domestic custody arrangements and transaction costs of foreign currency conversions.
Foreign markets also have different clearance and settlement procedures. In certain markets, there have been times when settlements
have been unable to keep pace with the volume of securities transactions, making it difficult to conduct such transactions. Delays in settlement could result in temporary periods when a portion of the assets of the Fund are uninvested and no
return is earned thereon. The inability of the Fund to make intended security purchases due to settlement problems could cause the Fund to miss attractive investment opportunities. Inability to dispose of portfolio securities due to settlement
problems could result in losses to the Fund due to subsequent declines in value of the securities or, if the Fund has entered into a contract to sell the securities, could result in possible liability to the purchaser. The inability
of the Fund to settle security purchases or sales due to settlement problems could cause the Fund to pay additional expenses, such as interest charges.
Securities of issuers traded on exchanges may be suspended, either by the issuers themselves, by an exchange or by government
authorities. The likelihood of such suspensions may be higher for securities of issuers in emerging or less-developed market countries than in countries with more developed markets. Trading suspensions may be applied from time to time to the
securities of individual issuers for reasons specific to that issuer, or may be applied broadly by exchanges or governmental authorities in response to market events. Suspensions may last for significant periods of time, during which trading in
the securities and instruments that reference the securities, such as participatory notes (or “P-notes”) or other derivative instruments, may be halted. In the event that the Fund holds material positions in such suspended securities or
instruments, the Fund’s ability to liquidate its positions or provide liquidity to investors may be compromised and the Fund could incur significant losses.
Interest rates prevailing in other countries may affect the prices of foreign securities and exchange rates for foreign currencies.
Local factors, including the strength of the local economy, the demand for borrowing, the government’s fiscal and monetary policies, and the international balance of payments, often affect interest rates in other countries. Individual foreign
economies may differ favorably or unfavorably from the U.S. economy in such respects as growth of gross national product, rate of inflation, capital reinvestment, resource self-sufficiency, and balance of payments position.
The Fund may invest in American Depositary Receipts (“ADRs”), European Depositary Receipts (“EDRs”), Global Depositary Receipts
(“GDRs”) and International Depositary Receipts (“IDRs”). ADRs (sponsored or unsponsored) are receipts typically issued by a U.S. bank or trust company evidencing its ownership of the underlying foreign securities. Most ADRs are denominated in
U.S. dollars and are traded on a U.S. stock exchange. However, they are subject to the risk of fluctuation in the currency exchange rate if, as is often the case, the underlying securities are denominated in foreign currency. EDRs are receipts
issued by a European bank evidencing its ownership of the underlying foreign securities and are often denominated in a foreign currency. GDRs are receipts issued by either a U.S. or non-U.S. banking institution evidencing its ownership of the
underlying foreign securities and are often denominated in U.S. dollars. IDRs are receipts typically issued by a foreign bank or trust company evidencing its ownership of the underlying foreign securities. Depositary receipts involve many of
the same risks of investing directly in foreign securities, including currency risks and risks of foreign investing.
Issuers of the securities underlying sponsored depositary receipts, but not unsponsored depositary receipts, are contractually
obligated to disclose material information in the United States. Therefore, the market value of unsponsored depositary receipts is less likely to reflect the effect of such information.
Securities of Issuers in
Emerging Market Countries. The risks described above for foreign securities may be heightened in connection with investments in emerging market countries.
Historically, the markets of emerging market countries have been more volatile than the markets of developed countries, reflecting the greater uncertainties of investing in less established markets and economies. In particular, emerging
market countries may have less stable governments; may present the risks of nationalization of businesses, restrictions on foreign ownership and prohibitions on the repatriation of assets; and may have less protection of property rights than
more developed countries. The economies of emerging market countries may be reliant on only a few industries, may be highly vulnerable to changes in local or global trade conditions and may suffer from high and volatile debt burdens or
inflation rates. Local securities markets may trade a small number of securities and may be unable to respond effectively to increases in trading volume, potentially making prompt liquidation of holdings difficult or impossible at times.
In determining where an issuer of a security is based, the Manager may consider such factors as where the company is legally
organized, maintains its principal corporate offices and/or conducts its principal operations.
Additional costs could be incurred in connection with the Fund’s investment activities outside the United States. Brokerage
commissions may be higher outside the United States, and the Fund will bear certain expenses in connection with its currency transactions. Furthermore, increased custodian costs may be associated with maintaining assets in certain
jurisdictions.
Policies and Limitations. To limit the risks inherent in investing in foreign currency denominated securities of foreign issuers traded outside of the U.S., the Fund may not purchase such securities if,
as a result, more than 20% of its total assets (taken at market value) would be invested in such securities. Within those limitations, however, the Fund is not restricted in the amount it may invest in securities denominated in any one
foreign currency.
Investments in securities of foreign issuers are subject to the Fund’s quality standards.
Commercial Paper. Commercial paper is a short-term debt security issued by a corporation, bank, municipality, or other issuer, usually for purposes such as financing current operations. The Fund
may invest in commercial paper that cannot be resold to the public without an effective registration statement under the 1933 Act. While some restricted commercial paper normally is deemed illiquid, the Manager may
in certain cases determine that such paper is liquid.
Collateralized Loan
Obligations. The Fund also may invest in collateralized loan obligations (“CLOs”), which are another type of asset-backed security. A CLO is a trust or other
special purpose entity that is comprised of or collateralized by a pool of loans, including domestic and non-U.S. senior secured loans, senior unsecured loans and subordinate corporate loans, including loans that may be rated below investment
grade or equivalent unrated loans. The loans generate cash flow that is allocated among one or more classes of securities (“tranches”) that vary in risk and yield. The most senior tranche has the best credit quality and the lowest yield
compared to the other tranches. The equity tranche has the highest potential yield but also has the greatest risk, as it bears the bulk of defaults from the underlying loans and helps to protect the more senior tranches from risk of these
defaults. However, despite the protection from the equity and other more junior tranches, more senior tranches can experience substantial losses due to actual defaults and decreased market value due to collateral default and disappearance of
protecting tranches, market anticipation of defaults, as well as aversion to CLO securities as a class.
Normally, CLOs are privately offered and sold and are not registered under state or federal securities laws. Therefore, investments in
CLOs may be characterized by the Fund as illiquid securities; however, an active dealer market may exist for CLOs allowing a CLO to qualify for transactions pursuant to Rule 144A under the 1933 Act. CLOs normally charge management fees and
administrative expenses, which are in addition to those of the Fund.
The riskiness of investing in CLOs depends largely on the quality and type of the collateral loans and the tranche of the CLO in which
the Fund invests. In addition to the normal risks associated with fixed-income securities discussed elsewhere in this SAI and the Fund’s Prospectus (such as interest rate risk and credit risk), CLOs carry risks including, but not limited to:
(i) the possibility that distributions from the collateral will not be adequate to make interest or other payments; (ii) the quality of the collateral may decline in value or default; (iii) the Fund may invest in CLO tranches that are
subordinate to other tranches; and (iv) the complex structure of the CLO may not be fully understood at the time of investment or may result in the quality of the underlying collateral not being fully understood and may produce disputes with
the issuer or unexpected investment results. In addition, interest on certain tranches of a CLO may be paid
in-kind (meaning that unpaid interest is effectively added to principal), which involves continued exposure to default risk with respect to such
payments. Certain CLOs may receive credit enhancement in the form of a senior-subordinate structure, over-collateralization or bond insurance, but such enhancement may not always be present and may fail to protect the Fund against the risk of
loss due to defaults on the collateral. Certain CLOs may not hold loans directly, but rather, use derivatives such as swaps to create “synthetic” exposure to the collateral pool of loans. Such CLOs entail the risks of derivative instruments
described elsewhere in this SAI.
Banking and Savings
Institution Securities. These include CDs, time deposits, bankers’ acceptances, and other short-term and long-term debt obligations issued by commercial banks
and savings institutions. The CDs, time deposits, and bankers’ acceptances in which the Fund invest typically are not covered by deposit insurance. A certificate of deposit is a short-term negotiable certificate issued by a commercial bank
against funds deposited in the bank and is either interest-bearing or purchased on a discount basis. A bankers’ acceptance is a short-term draft drawn on a commercial bank by a borrower, usually in connection with an international commercial
transaction. The borrower is liable for payment as is the bank, which unconditionally guarantees to pay the draft at its face amount on the maturity date. Fixed time deposits are obligations of branches of U.S. banks or foreign banks that are
payable at a stated maturity date and bear a fixed rate of interest. Although fixed time deposits do not have a market, there are no contractual restrictions on the right to transfer a beneficial interest in the deposit to a third party.
Deposit notes are notes issued by commercial banks that generally bear fixed rates of interest and typically have original maturities ranging from eighteen months to five years.
Banks are subject to extensive governmental regulations that may limit both the amounts and types of loans and other financial
commitments that may be made and the interest rates and fees that may be charged. The profitability of this industry is largely dependent upon the availability and cost of capital, which can fluctuate significantly when interest rates change.
Also, general economic conditions, consolidation and competition among banking and savings institutions play an important part in the operations of this industry and exposure to credit losses arising from possible financial difficulties of
borrowers might affect a bank’s ability to meet its obligations. Bank obligations may be general obligations of the parent bank or may be limited to the issuing branch by the terms of the specific obligations or by government regulation.
In 2010, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”) was passed, which significantly impacted
the financial services industry, including more stringent regulation of depository institutions and their holding companies. Federal regulatory agencies are still implementing many of the Dodd-Frank Act’s provisions but increased regulation
could impact the operations and profitability of depository institutions and their holding companies.
In addition, securities of foreign banks and foreign branches of U.S. banks may involve investment risks in addition to those relating
to domestic bank obligations. Such risks include future political and economic developments, the possible seizure or nationalization of foreign deposits, and the possible adoption of foreign governmental restrictions that might adversely affect
the payment of principal and interest on such obligations. In addition, foreign banks and foreign branches of U.S. banks may be subject to less stringent reserve requirements and non-U.S. issuers generally are subject to different accounting,
auditing, reporting and recordkeeping standards than those applicable to U.S. issuers.
In March 2023, the shut-down of certain financial institutions raised economic concerns over disruption in the U.S. banking system.
There can be no certainty that the actions taken by the U.S. government to strengthen public confidence in the U.S. banking system will be effective in mitigating the effects of financial institution failures on the economy and restoring public
confidence in the U.S. banking system.
Zero Coupon Securities,
Step Coupon Securities, Pay-in-Kind Securities and Discount Obligations. The Fund may invest in zero coupon securities, step coupon securities and pay-in-kind
securities. These do not entitle the holder to any periodic payment of interest prior to maturity or that specify a future date when the securities begin to pay current interest. The Fund may also acquire certain debt securities at a
discount. These discount obligations involve special risk considerations. Zero coupon securities and step coupon securities are debt obligations that are issued and traded at a discount from their face amount or par value (known as “original
issue discount” or “OID”). OID varies depending on prevailing interest rates, the time remaining until cash payments begin, the liquidity of the security, and the perceived credit quality of the issuer.
Zero coupon securities and step coupon securities are redeemed at face value when they mature. Accrued OID must be included in the
Fund’s gross income for federal tax purposes ratably each taxable year prior to the receipt of any actual payments. Pay-in-kind securities pay “interest” through the issuance of additional securities. Because the Fund must distribute
substantially all of its net investment income (including non-cash income attributable to OID and “interest” on pay-in-kind securities) and net realized gains to its stockholders each taxable year to continue to qualify for treatment as a RIC
and to minimize or avoid payment of federal income and excise taxes, the Fund may have to dispose of portfolio securities under disadvantageous circumstances to generate cash, or may be required to borrow, to satisfy the distribution
requirements. See “Tax Matters – Taxation of the Fund.”
The market prices of zero coupon securities, step coupon securities, pay-in-kind securities and discount obligations generally are
more volatile than the prices of securities that pay cash interest periodically. Those securities and obligations are likely to respond to changes in interest rates to a greater degree than other types of debt securities having a similar
maturity and credit quality.
Convertible Securities. A convertible security is a bond, debenture, note, preferred stock, or other security or debt obligation that may be converted into or exchanged for a prescribed amount of
common stock of the same or a different issuer within a particular period of time at a specified price or formula. Convertible securities generally have features of, and risks associated with, both equity and fixed income instruments. As
such, the value of most convertible securities will vary with changes in the price of, and will be subject to the risks associated with, the underlying common stock. Additionally, convertible securities are also subject to the risk that the
issuer may not be able to pay principal or interest when due and the value of the convertible security may change based on the issuer’s credit rating.
A convertible security entitles the holder to receive the interest paid or accrued on debt or the dividend paid on preferred stock
until the convertible security matures or is redeemed, converted or exchanged. Before conversion, such securities ordinarily provide a stream of income with generally higher yields than common stocks of the same or similar issuers, but lower
than the yield on non-convertible debt. Convertible securities are usually subordinated to comparable-tier non-convertible securities and other senior debt obligations of the issuer, but rank senior to common stock in a company’s capital
structure. The value of a convertible security is a function of (1) its yield in comparison to the yields of other securities of comparable maturity and quality that do not have a conversion privilege and (2) its worth if converted into the
underlying common stock.
The price of a convertible security often reflects variations in the price of the underlying common stock in a way that
non-convertible debt may not. Convertible securities may be issued by smaller capitalization companies whose stock prices may be more volatile than larger capitalization companies. A convertible security may have a mandatory conversion feature
or a call feature that subjects it to redemption at the option of the issuer at a price established in the security’s governing instrument. If a convertible security held by the Fund is called for redemption, the Fund will be required to
convert it into the underlying
common stock, sell it to a third party or permit the issuer to redeem the security. Any of these actions could have an adverse effect on the Fund’s ability to achieve its investment objective.
Inflation-Indexed
Securities. Inflation-indexed bonds are fixed income securities whose principal value or coupon (interest payment) is periodically adjusted according to the
rate of inflation. The Fund may invest in inflation-indexed securities issued in any country. Two structures are common. The Treasury Department and some other issuers use a structure that accrues inflation into the principal value of the
bond. Other issuers pay out the index based accruals as part of a semiannual coupon. The Fund may invest in Treasury Department securities the principal value of which is adjusted daily in accordance with changes to the Consumer Price Index.
Such securities are backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. Government. Interest is calculated on the basis of the current adjusted principal value. The principal value of inflation-indexed securities declines in periods of deflation,
but holders at maturity receive no less than par. If inflation is lower than expected during the period the Fund holds the security, the Fund may earn less on it than on a conventional bond.
The Fund may invest in Treasury Department inflation-indexed securities, formerly called “U.S. Treasury Inflation Protected
Securities” (“U.S. TIPS”), which are backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. Government. The periodic adjustment of U.S. TIPS is currently tied to the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (“CPI-U”), which is calculated by the
Bureau of Labor Statistics, which is part of the Labor Department. The CPI-U is a measurement of changes in the cost of living, made up of components such as housing, food, transportation and energy. Inflation-indexed bonds issued by a non-U.S.
government are generally adjusted to reflect a comparable inflation index, calculated by that government. There can be no assurance that the CPI-U or any non-U.S. inflation index will accurately measure the real rate of inflation in the prices
of goods and services. In addition, there can be no assurance that the rate of inflation in a non-U.S. country will be correlated to the rate of inflation in the United States. The three-month lag in calculating the CPI-U for purposes of
adjusting the principal value of U.S. TIPS may give rise to risks under certain circumstances.
Interest is calculated on the basis of the current adjusted principal value. The principal value of inflation-indexed securities
declines in periods of deflation, but holders at maturity receive no less than par. However, if the Fund purchases inflation-indexed securities in the secondary market whose principal values have been adjusted upward due to inflation since
issuance, the Fund may experience a loss if there is a subsequent period of deflation. If inflation is lower than expected during the period the Fund holds the security, the Fund may earn less on it than on a conventional bond. The Fund may
also invest in other inflation-related bonds which may or may not provide a guarantee of principal. If a guarantee of principal is not provided, the adjusted principal value of the bond repaid at maturity may be less than the original principal
amount.
Because the coupon rate on inflation-indexed securities is lower than fixed-rate Treasury Department securities, the CPI-U would have
to rise at least to the amount of the difference between the coupon rate of the fixed-rate Treasury Department issues and the coupon rate of the inflation-indexed securities, assuming all other factors are equal, in order for such securities to
match the performance of the fixed-rate Treasury Department securities. Inflation-indexed securities are expected to react primarily to changes in the “real” interest rate (i.e., the nominal (or stated)
rate less the rate of inflation), while a typical bond reacts to changes in the nominal interest rate. Accordingly, inflation-indexed securities have characteristics of fixed-rate Treasury Department securities having a shorter duration.
Changes in market interest rates from causes other than inflation will likely affect the market prices of inflation-indexed securities in the same manner as conventional bonds.
Any increase in the principal value of an inflation-indexed security is taxable in the year the increase occurs, even though its
holders do not receive cash representing the increase until the security
matures. Because the Fund must distribute substantially all of its net investment income (including non-cash income attributable to those principal value
increases) and net realized gains to its stockholders each taxable year to continue to qualify for treatment as a RIC and to minimize or avoid payment of federal income and excise taxes, the Fund may have to dispose of other investments under
disadvantageous circumstances to generate cash, or may be required to borrow, to satisfy its distribution requirements. The Treasury Department began issuing inflation-indexed bonds in 1997. Certain non-U.S. governments, such as the United
Kingdom, Canada and Australia, have a longer history of issuing inflation-indexed bonds, and there may be a more liquid market in certain of these countries for these securities.
Swap Agreements. The Fund may enter into swap agreements to manage or gain exposure to particular types of investments (including commodities, equity securities, interest rates or indices of
equity securities in which the Fund otherwise could not invest efficiently) or to help enhance the value of its portfolio. The Fund may also enter into other types of swap agreements, including total return swaps, inflation swaps, currency
swaps and credit default swaps, and may write (sell) and purchase options thereon for hedging and non-hedging purposes.
Swap agreements historically have been individually negotiated and structured to include exposure to a variety of different types of
investments or market factors. Swap agreements are two party contracts entered into primarily by institutional investors. Swap agreements can vary in term like other fixed-income investments. Most swap agreements are currently traded
over-the-counter. In a standard “swap” transaction, two parties agree to exchange one or more payments based, for example, on the returns (or differentials in rates of return) earned or realized on particular predetermined investments or
instruments (such as securities, indices, or other financial or economic interests). The gross payments to be exchanged (or “swapped”) between the parties are calculated with respect to a notional amount, which is the predetermined dollar
principal of the trade representing the hypothetical underlying quantity upon which payment obligations are computed. If a swap agreement provides for payment in different currencies, the parties may agree to exchange the principal amount. A
swap also includes an instrument that is dependent on the occurrence, nonoccurrence or the extent of the occurrence of an event or contingency associated with a potential financial, economic or commercial consequence, such as a credit default
swap.
Depending on how they are used, swap agreements may increase or decrease the overall volatility of the Fund’s investments and its
share price and yield. Swap agreements are subject to liquidity risk, meaning that the Fund may be unable to sell a swap agreement to a third party at a favorable price. Swap agreements may involve leverage and may be highly volatile; depending
on how they are used, they may have a considerable impact on the Fund’s performance. The risks of swap agreements depend upon the Fund’s ability to terminate its swap agreements or reduce its exposure through offsetting transactions. Swaps are
highly specialized instruments that require investment techniques and risk analyses different from those associated with stocks, bonds, and other traditional investments.
Some swaps currently are, and more in the future will be, centrally cleared. Swaps that are centrally cleared are subject to the
creditworthiness of the clearing organization involved in the transaction. For example, an investor could lose margin payments it has deposited with its futures commission merchant as well as the net amount of gains not yet paid by the clearing
organization if the clearing organization becomes insolvent or goes into bankruptcy. In the event of bankruptcy of the clearing organization, the investor may be entitled to the net amount of gains the investor is entitled to receive plus the
return of margin owed to it only in proportion to the amount received by the clearing organization’s other customers, potentially resulting in losses to the investor.
To the extent a swap is not centrally cleared, the use of a swap involves the risk that a loss may be sustained as a result of the
insolvency or bankruptcy of the counterparty or the failure of the counterparty to make required payments or otherwise comply with the terms of the agreement. If a counterparty’s
creditworthiness declines, the value of the swap might decline, potentially resulting in losses to the Fund. Changing conditions in a particular market
area, whether or not directly related to the referenced assets that underlie the swap agreement, may have an adverse impact on the creditworthiness of the counterparty. If a default occurs by the counterparty to such a transaction, the Fund may
have contractual remedies pursuant to the agreements related to the transaction.
Following the passage of the Dodd-Frank Act and promulgation of related CFTC regulations, U.S. swap markets have undergone substantial
change in recent years. Reporting and recordkeeping requirements are now required for all swap transactions in the U.S., and certain swaps may also be subject to margin, clearing and trade execution mandates, among other regulatory obligations.
Regulations adopted by the CFTC, SEC and prudential regulators may require certain Fund counterparties to post and collect margin on OTC swaps, and exchanges also have minimum margin requirements for exchange-traded and cleared swaps. The
prudential regulators issued final rules that require banks subject to their supervision to exchange variation and initial margin in respect of their obligations arising under OTC swap agreements with certain of their counterparties. The CFTC
adopted similar rules that apply to CFTC-registered swap dealers that are not banks. Such rules will generally require the Fund to set aside additional eligible assets in order to meet the new variation and initial margin requirements when they
enter into OTC swap agreements. The European Supervisory Authorities (“ESA”), various national regulators in Europe, the Australian Securities & Investment Commission, the Japanese Financial Services Agency and the Canadian Office of the
Superintendent of Financial Institutions adopted rules and regulations that are similar to that of the U.S. prudential regulators. All such variation and initial margin requirements are now effective. Due to these regulations, the Fund may be
required by its swap dealer counterparties to enter into additional documentation (including ISDA Credit Support Annexes), and post and collect margin related to its swap agreements.
CFTC regulations now also allow for the minimum transfer amount (“MTA”) of initial and variation margin to apply separately to each
separately managed investment account or sleeve (“SMA”) that an asset manager is responsible for, rather than having to calculate the MTA across all accounts of the Fund or other counterparty. An SMA’s MTA may be calculated separately from
other SMAs of the same legal entity so long as it meets the following conditions: (1) the SMA is managed by an asset manager and is governed by an investment management agreement, pursuant to which the SMA owner has granted the asset manager
authority with respect to certain of the owner’s assets; (2) swaps are entered into by the asset manager on behalf of the SMA pursuant to the investment management agreement, and (3) the swaps of such SMA are subject to a master netting
agreement that does not permit netting of initial or variation margin obligations across SMAs of the legal entity that have swaps outstanding with the applicable swap dealer counterparty; and (4) the MTA is no greater than $50,000 for each
applicable SMA. As of the date of this SAI, the prudential regulators have not provided similar relief, although swaps dealers subject to a prudential regulator are expected to act in a manner consistent with the relief provided by the CFTC.
Regulations adopted by the prudential regulators require certain banks to include in a range of financial contracts, including swap
agreements, terms delaying or restricting default, termination and other rights in the event that the bank and/or its affiliates become subject to certain types of resolution or insolvency proceedings. The regulations could limit the Fund’s
ability to exercise a range of cross-default rights if its counterparty, or an affiliate of the counterparty, is subject to bankruptcy or similar proceedings. Such regulations could further negatively impact the Fund’s use of swaps.
Swap agreements can take many different forms and are known by a variety of names including, but not limited to, interest rate swaps,
mortgage swaps, total return swaps, inflation swaps, asset swaps (where parties exchange assets, typically a debt security), currency swaps, equity swaps, credit default swaps, commodity-linked swaps, and contracts for differences. The Fund may
also write (sell) and purchase options on swaps (swaptions).
Interest Rate Swaps,
Mortgage Swaps, and Interest Rate “Caps,” “Floors,” and “Collars.” In a typical interest rate swap agreement, one party agrees to make regular payments equal to a floating rate on a specified amount in
exchange for payments equal to a fixed rate, or a different floating rate, on the same amount for a specified period. Mortgage swap agreements are similar to interest rate swap agreements, except the notional principal amount is tied to a
reference pool of mortgages or index of mortgages. In an interest rate cap or floor, one party agrees, usually in return for a fee, to make payments under particular circumstances. For example, the purchaser of an interest rate cap has the
right to receive payments to the extent a specified interest rate exceeds an agreed level; the purchaser of an interest rate floor has the right to receive payments to the extent a specified interest rate falls below an agreed level. An
interest rate collar entitles the purchaser to receive payments to the extent a specified interest rate falls outside an agreed range.
Among other techniques, the Fund may use interest rate swaps to offset declines in the value of fixed income securities held by the
Fund. In such an instance, the Fund may agree with a counterparty to pay a fixed rate (multiplied by a notional amount) and the counterparty to pay a floating rate multiplied by the same notional amount. If long-term interest rates rise,
resulting in a diminution in the value of the Fund’s portfolio, the Fund would receive payments under the swap that would offset, in whole or in part, such diminution in value; if interest rates fall, the Fund would likely lose money on the
swap transaction. The Fund may also enter into constant maturity swaps, which are a variation of the typical interest rate swap. Constant maturity swaps are exposed to changes in long-term interest rate movements.
Total Return Swaps. The Fund may enter into total return swaps (“TRS”) to obtain exposure to a security or market without owning or taking physical custody
of such security or market. The Fund may be either a total return receiver or a total return payer. Generally, the total return payer sells to the total return receiver an amount equal to all cash flows and price appreciation on a defined
security or asset payable at periodic times during the swap term (i.e., credit risk) in return for a periodic payment from the total return receiver based on a designated index (e.g., SOFR or another reference rate) and spread, plus the
amount of any price depreciation on the reference security or asset. The total return payer does not need to own the underlying security or asset to enter into a total return swap. The final payment at the end of the swap term includes final
settlement of the current market price of the underlying reference security or asset, and payment by the applicable party for any appreciation or depreciation in value. Usually, collateral must be posted by the total return receiver to secure
the periodic interest-based and market price depreciation payments depending on the credit quality of the underlying reference security and creditworthiness of the total return receiver, and the collateral amount is marked-to-market daily
equal to the market price of the underlying reference security or asset between periodic payment dates. TRS may effectively add leverage to the Fund’s portfolio because, in addition to its net assets, the Fund would be subject to investment
exposure on the notional amount of the swap. If the Fund is the total return receiver in a TRS, then the credit risk for an underlying asset is transferred to the Fund in exchange for its receipt of the return (appreciation) on that asset. If
the Fund is the total return payer, it is hedging the downside risk of an underlying asset but it is obligated to pay the amount of any appreciation on that asset.
Inflation Swaps. In an inflation swap, one party agrees to pay the cumulative percentage increase in a price index, such as the Consumer Price Index, over the term of the swap (with some lag on
the referenced inflation index) and the other party agrees to pay a compounded fixed rate. Inflation swaps may be used to protect the Fund’s NAV against an unexpected change in the rate of inflation measured by an inflation index.
Currency Swaps. A currency swap involves the exchange by the Fund and another party of the cash flows on a notional amount of two or more currencies
based on the relative value differential among them, such as exchanging a right to receive a payment in foreign currency for the right to receive U.S. dollars. The Fund may enter into currency swaps (where the parties exchange their
respective rights to make or receive payments in specified currencies). Currency swap agreements may be entered into on a net basis
or may involve the delivery of the entire principal value of one designated currency in exchange for the entire principal value of another designated
currency. In such cases, the entire principal value of a currency swap is subject to the risk that the counterparty will default on its contractual delivery obligations.
Equity Swaps. Equity swaps are contracts that allow one party to exchange the returns,
including any dividend income, on an equity security or group of equity securities for another payment stream. Under an equity swap, payments may be made at the conclusion of the equity swap or periodically during its term. The Fund may enter
into equity swaps. An equity swap may be used to invest in a market without owning or taking physical custody of securities in circumstances in which direct investment may be restricted for legal reasons or is otherwise deemed impractical or
disadvantageous. Furthermore, equity swaps may be illiquid and the Fund may be unable to terminate its obligations when desired. In addition, the value of some components of an equity swap (such as the dividends on a common stock) may also be
sensitive to changes in interest rates.
Credit Default Swaps. In a credit default swap, the credit default protection buyer makes periodic payments, known as premiums, to the credit default protection seller. In return, the credit default
protection seller will make a payment to the credit default protection buyer upon the occurrence of a specified credit event. A credit default swap can refer to a single issuer or asset, a basket of issuers or assets or index of assets, each
known as the reference entity or underlying asset. The Fund may act as either the buyer or the seller of a credit default swap. The Fund may buy or sell credit default protection on a basket of issuers or assets, even if a number of the
underlying assets referenced in the basket are lower-quality debt securities. In an unhedged credit default swap, the Fund buys credit default protection on a single issuer or asset, a basket of issuers or assets or index of assets without
owning the underlying asset or debt issued by the reference entity. Credit default swaps involve greater and different risks than investing directly in the referenced asset, because, in addition to market risk, credit default swaps include
liquidity, counterparty and operational risk.
Credit default swaps allow the Fund to acquire or reduce credit exposure to a particular issuer, asset or basket of assets. If a swap
agreement calls for payments by the Fund, the Fund must be prepared to make such payments when due. If the Fund is the credit default protection seller, the Fund will experience a loss if a credit event occurs and the credit of the reference
entity or underlying asset has deteriorated. If the Fund is the credit default protection buyer, the Fund will be required to pay premiums to the credit default protection seller. In the case of a physically settled credit default swap in which
the Fund is the protection seller, the Fund must be prepared to pay par for and take possession of debt of a defaulted issuer delivered to the Fund by the credit default protection buyer. Any loss would be offset by the premium payments the
Fund receives as the seller of credit default protection.
Commodity-Linked Swaps. Commodity-linked swaps are two party contracts in which the parties agree to
exchange the return or interest rate on one instrument for the return of a particular commodity, commodity index or commodity futures or options contract. The payment streams are calculated by reference to an agreed upon notional amount. A
one-period swap contract operates in a manner similar to a forward or futures contract because there is an agreement to swap a commodity for cash at only one forward date. The Fund may engage in swap transactions that have more than one
period and therefore more than one exchange of payments. The Fund may invest in total return commodity swaps to gain exposure to the overall commodity markets. In a total return commodity swap, the Fund will receive the price appreciation of
a commodity index, a portion of the index, or a single commodity in exchange for paying an agreed-upon fee. If a commodity swap is for one period, the Fund will pay a fixed fee, established at the outset of the swap. However, if the term of a
commodity swap is more than one period, with interim swap payments, the Fund will pay an adjustable or floating fee. With “floating” rate, the fee is pegged to a base rate such as SOFR or another reference rate, and is adjusted each period.
Therefore, if interest rates increase over the term of the swap contract, the Fund may be required to pay a higher fee at each swap reset date.
Dollar Rolls. In a “dollar roll,” the Fund sells securities for delivery in the current month and simultaneously agrees to repurchase substantially similar (i.e.,
same type and coupon) securities on a specified future date from the same party. During the period before the repurchase, the Fund forgoes principal and interest payments on the securities. The Fund is compensated by the difference between
the current sales price and the forward price for the future purchase (often referred to as the “drop”), as well as by the interest earned on the cash proceeds of the initial sale. Dollar rolls may increase fluctuations in the Fund’s NAV and
may be viewed as a form of leverage. A “covered roll” is a specific type of dollar roll in which the Fund holds an offsetting cash position or a cash-equivalent securities position that matures on or before the forward settlement date of the
dollar roll transaction. There is a risk that the counterparty will be unable or unwilling to complete the transaction as scheduled, which may result in losses to the Fund. The Manager monitors the creditworthiness of counterparties to dollar
rolls.
Policies and Limitations. Dollar rolls are considered borrowings for purposes of the Fund’s investment policies and limitations concerning borrowings.
Securities of Other
Investment Companies. As indicated above, investments by the Fund in shares of other investment companies are subject to the limitations of the 1940 Act and the
rules and regulations thereunder. However, pursuant to Rule 12d1-4, the Fund is permitted to invest in shares of certain investment companies beyond the limits contained in the 1940 Act and the rules and regulations thereunder if the Fund
complies with the adopted framework for fund of funds arrangements under the rule. The Fund may invest in the securities of other investment companies, including open-end management companies, closed-end management companies (including
business development companies (“BDCs”)) and unit investment trusts, that are consistent with its investment objective and policies. Such an investment may be the most practical or only manner in which the Fund can invest in certain asset
classes or participate in certain markets, such as foreign markets, because of the expenses involved or because other vehicles for investing in those markets may not be available at the time the Fund is ready to make an investment. When
investing in the securities of other investment companies, the Fund will be indirectly exposed to all the risks of such investment companies’ portfolio securities. In addition, as a shareholder in an investment company, the Fund would
indirectly bear its pro rata share of that investment company’s advisory fees and other operating expenses. Fees and expenses incurred indirectly by the Fund as a result of its investment in shares of one or more other investment companies
generally are referred to as “acquired fund fees and expenses” and may appear as a separate line item in the Fund’s Prospectus fee table. For certain investment companies, such as BDCs, these expenses may be significant. The 1940 Act imposes
certain restraints upon the operations of a BDC. For example, BDCs are required to invest at least 70% of their total assets primarily in securities of private companies or thinly traded U.S. public companies, cash, cash equivalents, U.S.
government securities and high quality debt investments that mature in one year or less. As a result, BDCs generally invest in less mature private companies, which involve greater risk than well-established, publicly-traded companies. In
addition, the shares of closed-end management companies may involve the payment of substantial premiums above, while the sale of such securities may be made at substantial discounts from, the value of such issuer’s portfolio securities.
Historically, shares of closed-end funds, including BDCs, have frequently traded at a discount to their NAV, which discounts have, on occasion, been substantial and lasted for sustained periods of time.
Certain money market funds that operate in accordance with Rule 2a-7 under the 1940 Act float their NAV while others seek to preserve
the value of investments at a stable NAV (typically $1.00 per share). An investment in a money market fund, even an investment in the Fund seeking to maintain a stable NAV per share, is not guaranteed, and it is possible for the Fund to lose
money by investing in these and other types of money market funds. If the liquidity of a money market fund’s portfolio deteriorates below certain levels, the money market fund may suspend redemptions (i.e., impose a redemption gate) and thereby
prevent the Fund from selling its investment in the money market fund or impose a fee of up to 2% on amounts the Fund redeems from the money market fund (i.e., impose a liquidity fee).
Policies and Limitations. For cash management purposes, the Fund may invest an unlimited amount of its uninvested cash and cash collateral received in connection with securities lending in shares of
money market funds and unregistered funds that operate in compliance with Rule 2a-7 under the 1940 Act, whether or not advised by the Manager or an affiliate, under specified conditions. See “Cash Management and Temporary Defensive
Positions.”
Otherwise, the Fund’s investment in securities of other investment companies is generally limited to (i) 3% of the total voting stock
of any one investment company, (ii) 5% of the Fund’s total assets with respect to any one investment company and (iii) 10% of the Fund’s total assets in all investment companies in the aggregate.
Fund of funds arrangements must comply with the provisions of the 1940 Act, Rule 12d1-4, or another rule. Pursuant to Rule 12d1-4, the
Fund is permitted to exceed the limits of Section 12 of the 1940 Act if the Fund complies with Rule 12d1-4’s conditions, including (i) limits on control and voting; (ii) required evaluations and findings; (iii) required fund of funds investment
agreements; and (iv) limits on complex structures.
Futures Contracts,
Options on Futures Contracts, Options on Securities and Indices, Forward Currency Contracts, Options on Foreign Currencies, and Swap Agreements (collectively, “Financial Instruments”). Financial Instruments are instruments whose value is dependent upon the value of an underlying asset or assets, which may include stocks, bonds, commodities, interest rates, currency exchange rates, or
related indices. As described below, Financial Instruments may be used for "hedging" purposes, meaning that they may be used in an effort to offset a decline in value in the Fund’s other investments, which could result from changes in
interest rates, market prices, currency fluctuations, or other market factors. Financial Instruments may also be used for non-hedging purposes in an effort to implement a cash management strategy, to enhance income or gain, to manage or
adjust the risk profile of the Fund or the risk of individual positions, to gain exposure more efficiently than through a direct purchase of the underlying security, or to gain exposure to securities, markets, sectors or geographical areas.
The Dodd-Frank Act requires the SEC and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) to establish new regulations with respect to
derivatives defined as security-based swaps (e.g., derivatives based on an equity or a narrowly based equity index) and swaps (e.g., derivatives based on a
broad-based index or commodity), respectively, and the markets in which these instruments trade. In addition, it subjected all security-based swaps and swaps to SEC and CFTC jurisdiction, respectively.
Rule 18f-4 under the 1940 Act regulates the use of derivatives transactions as defined by that rule for certain funds registered under
the 1940 Act (“Rule 18f-4”). Due to the way derivatives transactions are defined by Rule 18f-4, it includes transactions traditionally characterized as derivatives as well as certain transactions that have not been traditionally characterized
as derivatives. Unless the Fund qualifies as a “limited derivatives user” as defined in Rule 18f-4, the rule, among other things, requires the Fund to establish a derivatives risk management program, comply with certain value-at-risk (“VAR”)
based leverage limits, appoint a derivatives risk manager and provide additional disclosure both publicly and to the SEC regarding its derivatives positions. Rule 18f-4 provides an exception for limited derivatives users, which Rule 18f-4
defines as any fund that limits its derivatives exposure to 10% of its net assets, excluding certain currency and interest rate hedging transactions. Limited derivatives users are exempt from Rule 18f-4’s requirements to comply with VaR-based
limits, appoint a derivatives risk manager, and adopt a derivatives risk management program. A limited derivatives user must still adopt and implement policies and procedures reasonably designed to manage its derivatives risk.
Futures Contracts and
Options on Futures Contracts. The Fund may purchase and sell futures contracts (sometimes referred to as “futures”) and options thereon for hedging purposes (i.e., to attempt to
offset against changes in the prices of securities or, in the case of foreign currency futures and options thereon, to attempt to offset against changes
in prevailing currency exchange rates) or non-hedging purposes.
A “purchase” of a futures contract (or entering into a “long” futures position) entails the buyer’s assumption of a contractual
obligation to take delivery of the instrument underlying the contract at a specified price at a specified future time. A “sale” of a futures contract (or entering into a “short” futures position) entails the seller’s assumption of a contractual
obligation to make delivery of the instrument underlying the contract at a specified price at a specified future time.
The value of a futures contract tends to increase or decrease in tandem with the value of its underlying instrument. Therefore,
purchasing futures contracts will tend to increase the Fund’s exposure to positive and negative price fluctuations in the underlying instrument, much as if the Fund had purchased the underlying instrument directly. The Fund may purchase futures
contracts to fix what the Manager believes to be a favorable price for securities the Fund intends to purchase. When the Fund sells a futures contract, by contrast, the value of its futures position will tend to move in a direction contrary to
the market for the underlying instrument. Selling futures contracts, therefore, will tend to offset both positive and negative market price changes, much as if the Fund had sold the underlying instrument. The Fund may sell futures contracts to
offset a possible decline in the value of its portfolio securities. In addition, the Fund may purchase or sell futures contracts with a greater or lesser value than the securities it wishes to hedge to attempt to compensate for anticipated
differences in volatility between positions the Fund may wish to hedge and the standardized futures contracts available to it, although this may not be successful in all cases. Further, a loss incurred on a particular transaction being used as
a hedge does not mean that it failed to achieve its objective, if the goal was to prevent a worse loss that may have resulted had a particular securities or cash market investment suffered a substantial loss and there were no offsetting hedge.
Certain futures, including index futures and futures not calling for the physical delivery or acquisition of the instrument underlying
the contract, are settled on a net cash payment basis rather than by the delivery of the underlying instrument. In addition, although futures contracts by their terms may call for the physical delivery or acquisition of the instrument
underlying the contract, in most cases the contractual obligation is extinguished by being closed out before the expiration of the contract. A futures position is closed out by buying (to close out an earlier sale) or selling (to close out an
earlier purchase) an identical futures contract calling for delivery in the same month. This may result in a profit or loss. While futures contracts entered into by the Fund will usually be liquidated in this manner, the Fund may instead make
or take delivery of the underlying instrument or utilize the cash settlement process whenever it appears economically advantageous for it to do so.
Because the futures markets may be more liquid than the cash markets, the use of futures contracts permits the Fund to enhance
portfolio liquidity and maintain a defensive position without having to sell portfolio securities. For example, (i) futures contracts on single stocks, interest rates and indices (including on narrow-based indices) and options thereon may be
used as a maturity or duration management device and/or a device to reduce risk or preserve total return in an adverse environment for the hedged securities, and (ii) foreign currency futures and options thereon may be used as a means of
establishing more definitely the effective return on, or the purchase price of, securities denominated in foreign currencies that are held or intended to be acquired by the Fund.
For purposes of managing cash flow, the Fund may use futures and options thereon to increase its exposure to the performance of a
recognized securities index.
With respect to currency futures, the Fund may sell a currency futures contract or a call option thereon, or may purchase a put option
on a currency futures contract, if the Manager anticipates that
exchange rates for a particular currency will fall. Such a transaction will be used as a hedge (or, in the case of a sale of a call option, a partial
hedge) against a decrease in the value of portfolio securities denominated in that currency. If the Manager anticipates that exchange rates for a particular currency will rise, the Fund may purchase a currency futures contract or a call option
thereon to protect against an increase in the price of securities that are denominated in that currency and that the Fund intends to purchase. The Fund also may purchase a currency futures contract or a call option thereon for non-hedging
purposes when the Manager anticipates that a particular currency will appreciate in value, but securities denominated in that currency do not present attractive investment opportunities and are not held in the Fund’s investment portfolio.
“Initial Margin” with respect to a futures contract is the amount of assets that must be deposited by the Fund with, or for the
benefit of, a futures commission merchant or broker in order to initiate the Fund’s futures positions. Initial margin is the margin deposit made by the Fund when it enters into a futures contract; it is intended to assure performance of the
contract by the Fund. If the value of the Fund’s futures account declines by a specified amount, the Fund will receive a margin call and be required to post assets sufficient to restore the equity in the account to the initial margin level.
(This is sometimes referred to as “variation margin;” technically, variation margin refers to daily payments that a clearing member firm is required to pay to the clearing organization based upon marking to market of the firm’s portfolio.)
However, if favorable price changes in the futures account cause the margin deposit to exceed the required initial margin level, the excess margin may be transferred to the Fund. The futures commission merchant or clearing member firm through
which the Fund enters into and clears futures contracts may require a margin deposit in excess of exchange minimum requirements based upon its assessment of the Fund’s creditworthiness. In computing its NAV, the Fund will mark to market the
value of its open futures positions. The Fund also must make margin deposits with respect to options on futures that it has written (but not with respect to options on futures that it has purchased, if the Fund has paid the required premium in
full at the outset). If the futures commission merchant or broker holding the margin deposit or premium goes bankrupt, the Fund could suffer a delay in recovering excess margin or other funds and could ultimately suffer a loss.
Because of the low margin deposits required, futures trading involves an extremely high degree of leverage; as a result, a relatively
small price movement in a futures contract may result in immediate and substantial loss, or gain, to the investor. Losses that may arise from certain futures transactions are potentially unlimited, and may exceed initial margin deposits as well
as deposits made in response to subsequent margin calls.
The Fund may enter into futures contracts and options thereon that are traded on exchanges regulated by the CFTC or on non-U.S.
exchanges. U.S. futures contracts are traded on exchanges that have been designated as “contract markets” by the CFTC; futures transactions must be executed through a futures commission merchant that is a member of the relevant contract market.
Futures executed on regulated futures exchanges have minimal counterparty risk to the Fund because the exchange’s clearing organization assumes the position of the counterparty in each transaction. Thus, the Fund is exposed to risk only in
connection with the clearing organization and not in connection with the original counterparty to the transaction. However, if a futures customer defaults on a futures contract and the futures commission merchant carrying that customer’s
account cannot cover the defaulting customer’s obligations on its futures contracts, the clearing organization may use any or all of the collateral in the futures commission merchant’s customer omnibus account — including the assets of the
futures commission merchant’s other customers, such as the Fund — to meet the defaulting customer’s obligations. This is sometimes referred to as "fellow customer risk." Trading on non-U.S. exchanges is subject to the legal requirements of the
jurisdiction in which the exchange is located and to the rules of such exchange, and may not involve a clearing mechanism and related guarantees. Funds deposited in connection with such trading may also be subject to the
bankruptcy laws of such other jurisdiction, which may result in a delay in recovering such funds in a bankruptcy and could ultimately result in a loss.
An option on a futures contract gives the purchaser the right, in return for the premium paid, to assume a position in the contract (a
long position if the option is a call and a short position if the option is a put) at a specified exercise price at any time during the option exercise period. The writer of the option is required upon exercise to assume a short futures
position (if the option is a call) or a long futures position (if the option is a put). Upon exercise of the option, the accumulated cash balance in the writer’s futures margin account is delivered to the holder of the option. That balance
represents the amount by which the market price of the futures contract at exercise exceeds, in the case of a call, or is less than, in the case of a put, the exercise price of the option. Options on futures have characteristics and risks
similar to those of securities options, as discussed herein.
Although the Fund believes that the use of futures contracts and options may benefit it, if the Manager’s judgment about the general
direction of the markets or about interest rate or currency exchange rate trends is incorrect, the Fund’s overall return would be lower than if it had not entered into any such contracts. The prices of futures contracts and options are volatile
and are influenced by, among other things, actual and anticipated changes in interest or currency exchange rates, which in turn are affected by fiscal and monetary policies and by national and international political and economic events. At
best, the correlation between changes in prices of futures contracts or options and of securities being hedged can be only approximate due to differences between the futures and securities markets or differences between the securities or
currencies underlying the Fund’s futures or options position and the securities held by or to be purchased for the Fund. The currency futures or options market may be dominated by short-term traders seeking to profit from changes in exchange
rates. This would reduce the value of such contracts used for hedging purposes over a short-term period. Such distortions are generally minor and would diminish as the contract approaches maturity.
Under certain circumstances, futures exchanges may limit the amount of fluctuation in the price of a futures contract or option
thereon during a single trading day; once the daily limit has been reached, no trades may be made on that day at a price beyond that limit. Daily limits govern only price movements during a particular trading day, however; they do not limit
potential losses. In fact, a daily limit may increase the risk of loss, because prices can move to the daily limit for several consecutive trading days with little or no trading, thereby preventing liquidation of unfavorable futures and options
positions and subjecting traders to substantial losses. If this were to happen with respect to a position held by the Fund, it could (depending on the size of the position) have an adverse impact on the Fund’s NAV. In addition, the Fund would
continue to be subject to margin calls and might be required to maintain the position being hedged by the futures contract or option thereon or to maintain cash or securities in a collateral account.
Many electronic trading facilities that support futures trading are supported by computer-based component systems for the order,
routing, execution, matching, registration or clearing of trades. The Fund’s ability to recover certain losses may be subject to limits on liability imposed by the system provider, the market, the clearing house or member firms.
Policies and Limitations. The Fund may purchase and sell futures contracts and options thereon in an attempt to hedge against changes in the prices of securities or, in the case of foreign currency
futures and options thereon, to hedge against prevailing currency exchange rates. The Fund will not engage in transactions in futures and options on futures for speculation.
Call Options on
Securities. The Fund may write (sell) covered call options and purchase call options on securities for hedging purposes (i.e.,
to attempt to reduce, at least in part, the effect on the Fund’s NAV of price fluctuations of securities held by the Fund) or non-hedging purposes. When writing call
options, the Fund writes only “covered” call options. A call option is “covered” if the Fund simultaneously holds an equivalent position in the security
underlying the option. Portfolio securities on which the Fund may write and purchase call options are purchased solely on the basis of investment considerations consistent with the Fund’s investment objective.
When the Fund writes a call option, it is obligated to sell a security to a purchaser at a specified price at any time until a certain
date if the purchaser decides to exercise the option. The Fund will receive a premium for writing a call option. So long as the obligation of the call option continues, the Fund may be assigned an exercise notice, requiring it to deliver the
underlying security against payment of the exercise price. The Fund may be obligated to deliver securities underlying an option at less than the market price.
The writing of covered call options is a conservative investment technique that is believed to involve relatively little risk (in
contrast to the writing of “naked” or uncovered call options, which the Fund will not do), but is capable of enhancing the Fund’s total return. When writing a covered call option, the Fund, in return for the premium, gives up the opportunity
for profit from a price increase in the underlying security above the exercise price, but retains the risk of loss should the price of the security decline.
If a call option that the Fund has written expires unexercised, the Fund will realize a gain in the amount of the premium; however,
that gain may be offset by a decline in the market value of the underlying security during the option period. If a call option that the Fund has written is exercised, the Fund will realize a gain or loss from the sale of the underlying
security.
When the Fund purchases a call option, it pays a premium to the writer for the right to purchase a security from the writer for a
specified amount at any time until a certain date. The Fund generally would purchase a call option to offset a previously written call option or to protect itself against an increase in the price of a security it intends to purchase.
Policies and Limitations. The Fund may write covered call options and may purchase call options on securities. The Fund may also write covered call options and may purchase call options in related
closing transactions. The Fund writes only “covered” call options on securities it owns (in contrast to the writing of “naked” or uncovered call options, which the Fund will not do).
The Fund would purchase a call option to offset a previously written call option. The Fund also may purchase a call option to protect
against an increase in the price of the securities it intends to purchase.
Put Options on
Securities. The Fund may write (sell) and purchase put options on securities for hedging purposes (i.e., to attempt to
reduce, at least in part, the effect on the Fund’s NAV of price fluctuations of securities held by the Fund) or non-hedging purposes. Portfolio securities on which the Fund may write and purchase put options are purchased solely on the basis
of investment considerations consistent with the Fund’s investment objective.
When the Fund writes a put option, it is obligated to acquire a security at a certain price at any time until a certain date if the
purchaser decides to exercise the option. The Fund will receive a premium for writing a put option. When writing a put option, the Fund, in return for the premium, takes the risk that it must purchase the underlying security at a price that may
be higher than the current market price of the security. If a put option that the Fund has written expires unexercised, the Fund will realize a gain in the amount of the premium.
When the Fund purchases a put option, it pays a premium to the writer for the right to sell a security to the writer for a specified
amount at any time until a certain date. The Fund generally would purchase a put option to protect itself against a decrease in the market value of a security it owns.
Policies and Limitations. The Fund generally writes and purchases put options on securities for hedging purposes (e.g., to reduce, at least in part, the effect of
price fluctuations of securities the Fund holds on its NAV).
General Information
About Options on Securities. The exercise price of an option may be below, equal to, or above the market value of the underlying security at the time the option
is written. Options normally have expiration dates between three and nine months from the date written. American-style options are exercisable at any time prior to their expiration date. European-style
options are exercisable only immediately prior to their expiration date. The obligation under any option written by the Fund terminates upon expiration of the option or, at an earlier time, when the Fund offsets the option by entering into a
“closing purchase transaction” to purchase an option of the same series. If an option is purchased by the Fund and is never exercised or closed out, the Fund will lose the entire amount of the premium paid.
Options are traded both on U.S. national securities exchanges and in the OTC market. Options also are traded on non-U.S. exchanges.
Exchange-traded options are issued by a clearing organization affiliated with the exchange on which the option is listed; the clearing organization in effect guarantees completion of every exchange-traded option. In contrast, OTC options are
contracts between the Fund and a counterparty, with no clearing organization guarantee. Thus, when the Fund sells (or purchases) an OTC option, it generally will be able to “close out” the option prior to its expiration only by entering into a
closing transaction with the dealer to whom (or from whom) the Fund originally sold (or purchased) the option. There can be no assurance that the Fund would be able to liquidate an OTC option at any time prior to expiration. Unless the Fund is
able to effect a closing purchase transaction in a covered OTC call option it has written, it will not be able to liquidate securities used as cover until the option expires or is exercised or until different cover is substituted. In the event
of the counterparty’s insolvency, the Fund may be unable to liquidate its options position and the associated cover. The Manager monitors the creditworthiness of dealers with which the Fund may engage in OTC options transactions.
The premium the Fund receives (or pays) when it writes (or purchases) an option is the amount at which the option is currently traded
on the applicable market. The premium may reflect, among other things, the current market price of the underlying security, the relationship of the exercise price to the market price, the historical price volatility of the underlying security,
the length of the option period, the general supply of and demand for credit, and the interest rate environment. The premium the Fund receives when it writes an option is recorded as a liability on the Fund’s statement of assets and
liabilities. This liability is adjusted daily to the option’s current market value.
Closing transactions are effected in order to realize a profit (or minimize a loss) on an outstanding option, to prevent an underlying
security from being called, or to permit the sale or the put of the underlying security. Furthermore, effecting a closing transaction permits the Fund to write another call option on the underlying security with a different exercise price or
expiration date or both. There is, of course, no assurance that the Fund will be able to effect closing transactions at favorable prices. If the Fund cannot enter into such a transaction, it may be required to hold a security that it might
otherwise have sold (or purchase a security that it might otherwise not have bought), in which case it would continue to be at market risk on the security.
The Fund will realize a profit or loss from a closing purchase transaction if the cost of the transaction is less or more than the
premium received from writing the call or put option. Because increases in the market price of a call option generally reflect increases in the market price of the underlying security, any loss resulting from the repurchase of a call option is
likely to be offset, in whole or in part, by appreciation of the underlying security owned by the Fund; however, the Fund could be in a less advantageous position than if it had not written the call option.
The Fund pays brokerage commissions or spreads in connection with purchasing or writing options, including those used to close out
existing positions. From time to time, the Fund may purchase an underlying security for delivery in accordance with an exercise notice of a call option assigned to it, rather than deliver the security from its inventory. In those cases,
additional brokerage commissions are incurred.
The hours of trading for options may not conform to the hours during which the underlying securities are traded. To the extent that
the options markets close before the markets for the underlying securities close, significant price and rate movements can take place in the underlying markets that cannot be reflected in the options markets.
Additionally, volatility in the market for equity securities, which can impact a single stock or certain segments of stocks and can
happen suddenly, can meaningfully increase the risk of loss associated with options.
Put and Call Options on
Securities Indices and Other Financial Indices. The Fund may
write (sell) and purchase put and call options on securities indices and other financial indices for hedging or non-hedging purposes. In so doing, the Fund can pursue many of the same objectives it would pursue through the purchase and sale
of options on individual securities or other instruments.
Options on securities indices and other financial indices are similar to options on a security or other instrument except that, rather
than settling by physical delivery of the underlying instrument, options on indices settle by cash settlement; that is, an option on an index gives the holder the right to receive, upon exercise of the option, an amount of cash if the closing
level of the index upon which the option is based is greater than, in the case of a call, or is less than, in the case of a put, the exercise price of the option (except if, in the case of an OTC option, physical delivery is specified). This
amount of cash is equal to the difference between the closing price of the index and the exercise price of the option times a specified multiple (multiplier), which determines the total dollar value for each point of such difference. The seller
of the option is obligated, in return for the premium received, to make delivery of this amount.
A securities index fluctuates with changes in the market values of the securities included in the index. The gain or loss on an option
on an index depends on price movements in the instruments comprising the market, market segment, industry or other composite on which the underlying index is based, rather than price movements in individual securities, as is the case with
respect to options on securities. The risks of investment in options on indices may be greater than the risks of investment in options on securities.
The effectiveness of hedging through the purchase of securities index options will depend upon the extent to which price movements in
the securities being hedged correlate with price movements in the selected securities index. Perfect correlation is not possible because the securities held or to be acquired by the Fund will not exactly match the composition of the securities
indices on which options are available.
For purposes of managing cash flow, the Fund may purchase put and call options on securities indices to increase its exposure to the
performance of a recognized securities index.
Securities index options have characteristics and risks similar to those of securities options, as discussed herein. Certain
securities index options are traded in the OTC market and involve liquidity and credit risks that may not be present in the case of exchange-traded securities index options.
Policies and Limitations. For purposes of managing cash flow, the Fund may purchase put and call options on securities indices to increase the Fund’s exposure to the performance of a recognized
securities index, such as the S&P 500 Index. All securities index options purchased by the Fund will be listed and traded on an exchange.
Options on Foreign
Currencies. The Fund may write (sell) and purchase covered call and put options on foreign currencies for hedging or non-hedging purposes. The Fund may use
options on foreign currencies to protect against decreases in the U.S. dollar value of securities held or increases in the U.S. dollar cost of securities to be acquired by the Fund or to protect the U.S. dollar equivalent of dividends,
interest, or other payments on those securities. In addition, the Fund may write and purchase covered call and put options on foreign currencies for non-hedging purposes (e.g., when the Manager
anticipates that a foreign currency will appreciate or depreciate in value, but securities denominated in that currency do not present attractive investment opportunities and are not held in the Fund’s investment portfolio). The Fund may
write covered call and put options on any currency in order to realize greater income than would be realized on portfolio securities alone.
Currency options have characteristics and risks similar to those of securities options, as discussed herein. Certain options on
foreign currencies are traded on the OTC market and involve liquidity and credit risks that may not be present in the case of exchange-traded currency options.
Policies and Limitations. The Fund may enter into forward contracts for the purpose of hedging and not for speculation.
Forward Foreign Currency
Transactions. The Fund may enter into contracts for the purchase or sale of a specific currency at a future date, which may be any fixed number of days in
excess of two days from the date of the contract agreed upon by the parties, at a price set at the time of the contract (“forward currency contracts”) for hedging or non-hedging purposes. The Fund also may engage in foreign currency
transactions on a spot basis (i.e., cash transaction that results in actual delivery within two days) at the spot rate prevailing in the foreign currency market.
The Fund may enter into forward currency contracts in an attempt to hedge against changes in prevailing currency exchange rates (i.e., as a means of establishing more definitely the effective return on, or the purchase price of, securities denominated in foreign currencies). The Fund may also enter into forward currency contracts to
protect against decreases in the U.S. dollar value of securities held or increases in the U.S. dollar cost of securities to be acquired by the Fund or to protect the U.S. dollar equivalent of dividends, interest, or other payments on those
securities. In addition, the Fund may enter into forward currency contracts for non-hedging purposes when the Manager anticipates that a foreign currency will appreciate or depreciate in value, but securities denominated in that currency do not
present attractive investment opportunities and are not held in the Fund’s investment portfolio. The cost to the Fund of engaging in forward currency contracts varies with factors such as the currency involved, the length of the contract
period, and the market conditions then prevailing.
Sellers or purchasers of forward currency contracts can enter into offsetting closing transactions, similar to closing transactions on
futures, by purchasing or selling, respectively, an instrument identical to the instrument sold or bought, respectively. Secondary markets generally do not exist for forward currency contracts, however, with the result that closing transactions
generally can be made for forward currency contracts only by negotiating directly with the counterparty. Thus, there can be no assurance that the Fund will in fact be able to close out a forward currency contract at a favorable price prior to
maturity. In addition, in the event of insolvency of the counterparty, the Fund might be unable to close out a forward currency contract at any time prior to maturity. In either event, the Fund would continue to be subject to market risk with
respect to the position, and would continue to be required to maintain a position in the securities or currencies that are the subject of the hedge or to maintain cash or securities.
The precise matching of forward currency contract amounts and the value of the securities involved generally will not be possible
because the value of such securities, measured in the foreign currency, will change after the forward currency contract has been established. Thus, the Fund might need to purchase or
sell foreign currencies in the spot (cash) market to the extent such foreign currencies are not covered by forward currency contracts. The projection of
short-term currency market movements is extremely difficult, and the successful execution of a short-term hedging strategy is highly uncertain.
The Manager believes that the use of foreign currency hedging techniques, including “proxy-hedges,” can provide significant protection
of NAV in the event of a general increase or decrease in the value of the U.S. dollar against foreign currencies. For example, the return available from securities denominated in a particular foreign currency would decline if the value of the
U.S. dollar increased against that currency. Such a decline could be partially or completely offset by an increase in the value of a hedge involving a forward currency contract to sell that foreign currency or a proxy-hedge involving a forward
currency contract to sell a different foreign currency whose behavior is expected to resemble the behavior of the currency in which the securities being hedged are denominated but which is available on more advantageous terms.
However, a hedge or a proxy-hedge cannot protect against exchange rate risks perfectly and, if the Manager is incorrect in its
judgment of future exchange rate relationships, the Fund could be in a less advantageous position than if such a hedge had not been established. If the Fund uses proxy-hedging, it may experience losses on both the currency in which it has
invested and the currency used for hedging if the two currencies do not vary with the expected degree of correlation. Using forward currency contracts to protect the value of the Fund’s securities against a decline in the value of a currency
does not eliminate fluctuations in the prices of the underlying securities. The Fund may experience delays in the settlement of its foreign currency transactions.
Forward currency contracts in which the Fund may engage include foreign exchange forwards. The consummation of a foreign exchange
forward requires the actual exchange of the principal amounts of the two currencies in the contract (i.e., settlement on a physical basis). Because foreign exchange forwards are physically settled
through an exchange of currencies, they are traded in the interbank market directly between currency traders (usually large commercial banks) and their customers. A foreign exchange forward generally has no deposit requirement, and no
commissions are charged at any stage for trades; foreign exchange dealers realize a profit based on the difference (the spread) between the prices at which they are buying and the prices at which they are selling various currencies. When the
Fund enters into a foreign exchange forward, it relies on the counterparty to make or take delivery of the underlying currency at the maturity of the contract. Failure by the counterparty to do so would result in the loss of any expected
benefit of the transaction.
The Fund may be required to obtain the currency that it must deliver under the foreign exchange forward through the sale of portfolio
securities denominated in such currency or through conversion of other assets of the Fund into such currency. When the Fund engages in foreign currency transactions for hedging purposes, it will not enter into foreign exchange forwards to sell
currency or maintain a net exposure to such contracts if their consummation would obligate the Fund to deliver an amount of foreign currency materially in excess of the value of its portfolio securities or other assets denominated in that
currency.
Forward currency contracts in which the Fund may engage also include non-deliverable forwards (“NDFs”). NDFs are cash-settled,
short-term forward contracts on foreign currencies (each a “Reference Currency”) that are non-convertible and that may be thinly traded or illiquid. NDFs involve an obligation to pay an amount (the “Settlement Amount”) equal to the difference
between the prevailing market exchange rate for the Reference Currency and the agreed upon exchange rate (the “NDF Rate”), with respect to an agreed notional amount. NDFs have a fixing date and a settlement (delivery) date. The fixing date is
the date and time at which the difference between the prevailing market exchange rate and the agreed upon
exchange rate is calculated. The settlement (delivery) date is the date by which the payment of the Settlement Amount is due to the party receiving
payment.
Although NDFs are similar to forward exchange forwards, NDFs do not require physical delivery of the Reference Currency on the
settlement date. Rather, on the settlement date, the only transfer between the counterparties is the monetary settlement amount representing the difference between the NDF Rate and the prevailing market exchange rate. NDFs typically may have
terms from one month up to two years and are settled in U.S. dollars.
NDFs are subject to many of the risks associated with derivatives in general and forward currency transactions, including risks
associated with fluctuations in foreign currency and the risk that the counterparty will fail to fulfill its obligations. Although NDFs have historically been traded OTC, in the future, pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Act, they may be
exchange-traded. Under such circumstances, they may be centrally cleared and a secondary market for them will exist. With respect to NDFs that are centrally cleared, an investor could lose margin payments it has deposited with the clearing
organization as well as the net amount of gains not yet paid by the clearing organization if the clearing organization breaches its obligations under the NDF, becomes insolvent or goes into bankruptcy. In the event of bankruptcy of the clearing
organization, the investor may be entitled to the net amount of gains the investor is entitled to receive plus the return of margin owed to it only in proportion to the amount received by the clearing organization’s other customers, potentially
resulting in losses to the investor. Even if some NDFs remain traded OTC, they will be subject to margin requirements for uncleared swaps and counterparty risk common to other swaps, as discussed below.
The Fund may purchase securities of an issuer domiciled in a country other than the country in whose currency the securities are
denominated.
Combined Transactions.
The Fund may enter into multiple transactions, which may include multiple options transactions, multiple interest rate transactions and any combination of options and
interest rate transactions, instead of a single Financial Instrument, as part of a single or combined strategy when, in the judgment of the Manager, it is in the best interests of the Fund to do so. A combined transaction will usually contain
elements of risk that are present in each of its component transactions. Although the Fund will normally enter into combined transactions based on the Manager’s judgment that the combined transactions will reduce risk or otherwise more
effectively achieve the desired portfolio management goal, it is possible that the combined transactions will instead increase risk or hinder achievement of the desired portfolio management goal.
Regulatory Limitations
on Using Futures, Options on Futures, and Swaps. The CFTC has adopted regulations that subject registered investment companies and/or their investment advisors
to regulation by the CFTC if the registered investment company invests more than a prescribed level of its NAV in commodity futures, options on commodities or commodity futures, swaps, or other financial instruments regulated under the
Commodity Exchange Act, or if the registered investment company is marketed as a vehicle for obtaining exposure to such commodity interests.
As discussed in more detail below, the Manager has claimed an exclusion from CPO registration pursuant to CFTC Rule 4.5, with respect
to the Fund. To remain eligible for this exclusion, the Fund must comply with certain limitations, including limits on trading in commodity interests, and restrictions on the manner in which the Fund markets its commodity interests trading
activities. These limitations may restrict the Fund’s ability to pursue its investment strategy, increase the costs of implementing its strategy, increase its expenses and/or adversely affect its total return.
To qualify for the CFTC Rule 4.5 exclusion, the Fund is permitted to engage in unlimited “bona fide hedging” (as defined by the CFTC),
but if the Fund uses commodity interests other than for bona fide hedging purposes, the aggregate initial margin and premiums required to establish these positions, determined at the time the most recent position was established, may not exceed
5% of the Fund’s NAV (after taking into account unrealized profits and unrealized losses on any such positions and excluding the amount by which options that are “in-the-money” at the time of purchase are “in-the-money”) or, alternatively, the
aggregate net notional value of non-bona fide hedging commodity interest positions, determined at the time the most recent position was established, may not exceed 100% of the Fund’s NAV (after taking into account unrealized profits and
unrealized losses on any such positions). In addition to complying with these de minimis trading limitations, to qualify for the exclusion, the Fund must satisfy a marketing test, which requires, among
other things, that the Fund not hold itself out as a vehicle for trading commodity interests.
The Fund may be exposed to commodity interests indirectly in excess of the de minimis trading
limitations described above. Such exposure may result from the Fund’s investment in other investment vehicles, such as real estate investment trusts, collateralized loan obligations, collateralized debt obligations and other securitization
vehicles that may invest directly in commodity interests. These investment vehicles are referred to collectively as “underlying investment vehicles.” The CFTC treats a fund as a commodity pool whether it invests in commodity interests directly
or indirectly through its investments in underlying investment vehicles. The CFTC staff has issued a no-action letter permitting the manager of a fund that invests in such underlying investment vehicles to defer registering as a CPO or claiming
the exclusion from the CPO definition until six months from the date on which the CFTC issues additional guidance on the application of the calculation of the de minimis trading limitations in the
context of the CPO exemption in CFTC Regulation 4.5 (the "Deadline"). Such guidance is expected to clarify how to calculate compliance with the de minimis trading limitations given a fund’s investments
in underlying investment vehicles that may cause the fund to be deemed to be indirectly trading commodity interests. The Manager has filed the required notice to claim this no-action relief with respect to each Fund. In addition, the Manager
has claimed an exclusion (under CFTC Regulation 4.5) from the CPO definition with respect to each Fund. As a result, at this time the Manager is not required to register as a CPO with respect to any Fund and need not generally comply with the
regulatory requirements otherwise applicable to a registered CPO. Prior to the Deadline, however, the Manager will determine with respect to each Fund whether it must operate as a registered CPO or whether it can rely on an exemption or
exclusion from the CPO definition. If the Manager determines that it can rely on the exclusion in CFTC Regulation 4.5 with respect to the Fund, then the Manager, in its management of that Fund, will comply with one of the two alternative de minimis trading limitations in that regulation. Complying with the de minimis trading limitations may restrict the
Manager’s ability to use derivatives as part of the Fund’s investment strategies. Although the Manager believes that it will be able to execute each Fund’s investment strategies within the de minimis trading
limitations, the Fund’s performance could be adversely affected. If the Manager determines that it cannot rely on the exclusion in CFTC Regulation 4.5 with respect to the Fund, then the Manager will serve as a registered CPO with respect to
that Fund. CPO regulation would increase the regulatory requirements to which the Fund is subject and it is expected that it would increase costs for the Fund.
Pursuant to authority granted under the Dodd-Frank Act, the Treasury Department issued a notice of final determination stating that
foreign exchange forwards and foreign exchange swaps, as defined in the Dodd-Frank Act and described above, should not be considered swaps for most purposes. Thus, foreign exchange forwards and foreign exchange swaps are not deemed to be
commodity interests. Therefore, if the Manager determines that it can rely on the exclusion in CFTC Regulation 4.5 with respect to the Fund, the Fund may enter into foreign exchange forwards and foreign exchange swaps without such transactions
counting against the de minimis trading limitations discussed above. Notwithstanding the Treasury Department determination, foreign exchange forwards and foreign exchange swaps (1) must be reported to
swap data repositories, (2) may be subject to business conduct standards, and (3) are subject to antifraud
and anti-manipulation proscriptions of swap execution facilities. In addition, for purposes of determining whether any Fund may be subject to initial
margin requirements for uncleared swaps, the average daily aggregate notional amount of a foreign exchange forward or a foreign exchange swap must be included in the calculation of whether such Fund has a “material swaps exposure” as defined in
the regulations.
In addition, pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Act and regulations adopted by the CFTC in connection with implementing the Dodd-Frank Act,
NDFs are deemed to be commodity interests, including for purposes of amended CFTC Regulation 4.5, and are subject to the full array of regulations under the Dodd-Frank Act. Therefore, if the Manager determines that it can rely on the exclusion
in CFTC Regulation 4.5 with respect to the Fund, the Fund will limit its investment in NDFs as discussed above.
The staff of the CFTC has issued guidance providing that, for purposes of determining compliance with CFTC Regulation 4.5, and the de
minimis trading limitations discussed above, swaps that are centrally-cleared on the same clearing organization may be netted where appropriate, but no such netting is permitted for uncleared swaps. To the extent some NDFs remain traded OTC and
are not centrally-cleared, the absolute notional value of all such transactions, rather than the net notional value, would be counted against the de minimis trading limitations discussed above.
General Risks of
Financial Instruments. The primary risks in using Financial Instruments are: (1) imperfect correlation or no correlation between changes in market value of the
securities or currencies held or to be acquired by the Fund and the prices of Financial Instruments; (2) possible lack of a liquid secondary market for Financial Instruments and the resulting inability to close out Financial Instruments when
desired; (3) the fact that the skills needed to use Financial Instruments are different from those needed to select the Fund’s securities; (4) the fact that, although use of Financial Instruments for hedging purposes can reduce the risk of
loss, they also can reduce the opportunity for gain, or even result in losses, by offsetting favorable price movements in hedged investments; (5) the possible inability of the Fund to purchase or sell a portfolio security at a time that would
otherwise be favorable for it to do so, or the possible need for the Fund to sell a portfolio security at a disadvantageous time; and (6) when traded on non-U.S. exchanges, Financial Instruments may not be regulated as rigorously as in the
United States. There can be no assurance that the Fund’s use of Financial Instruments will be successful.
In addition, Financial Instruments may contain leverage to magnify the exposure to the underlying asset or assets.
The Fund’s use of Financial Instruments may be limited by the provisions of the Code and Treasury Department regulations with which it
must comply to continue to qualify as a RIC. See “Additional Tax Information.” Financial Instruments may not be available with respect to some currencies, especially those of so-called emerging market countries.
Policies and Limitations. When hedging, the Manager intends to reduce the risk of imperfect correlation by investing only in Financial Instruments whose behavior is expected to resemble or offset that of
the Fund’s underlying securities or currency. The Manager intends to reduce the risk that the Fund will be unable to close out Financial Instruments by entering into such transactions only if the Manager believes there will be an active and
liquid secondary market.
Accounting Considerations
for Financial Instruments. When the Fund writes an option, an amount equal to the premium it receives is included in its Statement of Assets and Liabilities as
a liability. The amount of the liability is subsequently marked to market to reflect the current market value of the option written. When the Fund purchases an option, the premium the Fund pays is recorded as an asset in that statement and is
subsequently adjusted to the current market value of the option.
In the case of a regulated futures contract the Fund purchases or sells, an amount equal to the initial margin deposit is recorded as
an asset in its Statement of Assets and Liabilities. The amount of the asset is subsequently adjusted to reflect changes in the amount of the deposit as well as changes in the value of the contract.
Borrowing and Leverage. The Fund is authorized to borrow amounts up to 33 1/3% of its total assets (including the amount borrowed) minus liabilities (other than the amount borrowed). The use of
borrowed fund involves the speculative factor known as “leverage.” The Fund uses leverage for investment purposes and currently has issued Preferred Stock and utilizes a secured credit facility (the “Facility”). The Fund may, and has in the
past, issued private placed notes to obtain leverage. The issuance of Preferred Stock permits the Fund to assume leverage in an amount up to 50% of its total assets (taking into account the effect of any outstanding other borrowings). The use
of loans under the Facility or notes, if any, permit the Fund to assume leverage in an amount up to 33 1/3% of its total assets. Preferred Stock and notes have priority on the income and assets of the Fund over the Common Stock and have
certain other rights with respect to voting and the election of Directors. In certain circumstances, the net asset value of and distributions payable on Common Stock could be adversely affected by such preferences. The Fund’s leveraged
capital structure creates special risks not associated with unleveraged funds having similar investment objectives and policies. The Fund utilizes leverage only when there is an expectation that it will benefit the Fund. To the extent the
income or other gain derived from securities purchased with the proceeds of borrowings or preferred stock issuances exceeds the interest or distributions the Fund has to pay thereon, the Fund’s net income or other gain is greater than if
leverage had not been used. Conversely, if the income or other gain from the securities purchased through leverage is not sufficient to cover the cost of such leverage, the Fund’s total return would be less than if leverage had not been used.
If leverage is used, in certain circumstances, the Fund could be required to liquidate securities it would not otherwise sell in order to satisfy distributions or interest obligations. The Fund may also borrow up to an additional 5% of its
total assets for temporary purposes without regard to the foregoing limitations. See “Investment Objective, Policies and Limitations.” This could include, for example, borrowing on a short-term basis in order to facilitate the settlement of
portfolio securities transactions.
When-Issued and
Delayed-Delivery Securities and Forward Commitments. The Fund may purchase securities on a when-issued or delayed-delivery basis and may purchase or sell
securities on a forward commitment basis. These transactions involve a commitment by the Fund to purchase or sell securities at a future date (ordinarily within two months, although the Fund may agree to a longer settlement period). These
transactions may involve mortgage-backed securities, such as GNMA, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac certificates. The price of the underlying securities (usually expressed in terms of yield) and the date when the securities will be delivered and
paid for (the settlement date) are fixed at the time the transaction is negotiated. When-issued and delayed-delivery purchases and forward commitment transactions are negotiated directly with the other party, and such commitments are not
traded on exchanges.
When-issued and delayed-delivery purchases and forward commitment transactions enable the Fund to “lock in” what the Manager believes
to be an attractive price or yield on a particular security for a period of time, regardless of future changes in interest rates. For instance, in periods of rising interest rates and falling prices, the Fund might sell securities it owns on a
forward commitment basis to limit its exposure to falling prices. In periods of falling interest rates and rising prices, the Fund might purchase a security on a when-issued, delayed-delivery or forward commitment basis and sell a similar
security to settle such purchase, thereby obtaining the benefit of currently higher yields. When-issued, delayed-delivery and forward commitment transactions are subject to the risk that the counterparty may fail to complete the purchase or
sale of the security. If this occurs, the Fund may lose the opportunity to purchase or sell the security at the agreed upon price. To reduce this risk, the Fund will enter into transactions with established counterparties and the Manager will
monitor the creditworthiness of such counterparties.
The value of securities purchased on a when-issued, delayed-delivery or forward commitment basis and any subsequent fluctuations in
their value are reflected in the computation of the Fund’s NAV starting on the date of the agreement to purchase the securities. Because the Fund has not yet paid for the securities, this produces an effect similar to leverage. The Fund does
not earn interest on securities it has committed to purchase until the securities are paid for and delivered on the settlement date. Because the Fund is committed to buying them at a certain price, any change in the value of these securities,
even prior to their issuance, affects the value of the Fund’s interests. The purchase of securities on a when-issued or delayed-delivery basis also involves a risk of loss if the value of the security to be purchased declines before the
settlement date. When the Fund makes a forward commitment to sell securities it owns, the proceeds to be received upon settlement are included in that Fund’s assets. Fluctuations in the market value of the underlying securities are not
reflected in the Fund’s NAV as long as the commitment to sell remains in effect.
When-issued, delayed-delivery and forward commitment transactions may cause the Fund to liquidate positions when it may not be
advantageous to do so in order to satisfy its purchase or sale obligations.
The Fund will purchase securities on a when-issued or delayed-delivery basis or purchase or sell securities on a forward commitment
basis only with the intention of completing the transaction and actually purchasing or selling the securities. If deemed advisable as a matter of investment strategy, however, the Fund may dispose of or renegotiate a commitment after it has
been entered into. The Fund also may sell securities it has committed to purchase before those securities are delivered to the Fund on the settlement date. The Fund may realize capital gains or losses in connection with these transactions.
The Fund may also enter into a TBA agreement and “roll over” such agreement prior to the settlement date by selling the obligation to
purchase the pools set forth in the agreement and entering into a new TBA agreement for future delivery of pools of mortgage-backed securities. TBA mortgage-backed securities may increase prepayment risks because the underlying mortgages may be
less favorable than anticipated by the Fund.
Policies and Limitations.
The Fund will purchase securities on a when-issued or delayed-delivery basis or purchase or sell securities on a forward commitment
basis only with the intention of completing the transaction and actually purchasing or selling the securities. If deemed advisable as a matter of investment strategy, however, the Fund may dispose of or renegotiate a commitment after it has
been entered into. The Fund also may sell securities it has committed to purchase before those securities are delivered to the Fund on the settlement date. The Fund may realize capital gains or losses in connection with these transactions.
Depending on the terms of the when-issued, delayed-delivery and forward commitment transactions, these transactions may meet the definition of a derivatives transaction under Rule 18f-4 under the 1940 Act and, if they do, they will be subject
to the requirements of that rule.
Structured Notes. The Fund may invest in structured notes, such as participatory notes, credit linked notes and securities (“CLNs”), exchange-traded notes (“ETNs”) and other related instruments.
These instruments are notes where the principal and/or interest rate or value of the structured note is determined by reference to the performance of an underlying indicator. Underlying indicators may include a security or other financial
instrument, asset, currency, interest rate, credit rating, commodity, volatility measure or index. Generally, investments in such notes are used as a substitute for positions in underlying indicators. The interest and/or principal payments
that may be made on a structured note may vary widely, depending on a variety of factors, including the volatility of the underlying indicator. The performance results of structured notes will not replicate exactly the performance of the
underlying indicator that the notes seek to
replicate due to transaction costs and other expenses. Issuers of structured notes can vary and may include corporations, banks, broker-dealers and
limited purpose trusts or other vehicles. Structured notes may be exchange traded or traded OTC and privately negotiated.
Investments in structured notes involve many of the same risks associated with a direct investment in the underlying indicator the
notes seek to replicate. Structured notes may be considered hybrid instruments as they may exhibit features of both fixed income securities and derivatives. The return on a structured note that is linked to a particular underlying indicator
that pays dividends generally is increased to the extent of any dividends paid in connection with the underlying indicator. However, the holder of a structured note typically does not receive voting rights and other rights as it would if it
directly owned the underlying indicator. In addition, structured notes are subject to counterparty risk, which is the risk that the issuer of the structured note will not fulfill its contractual obligation to complete the transaction with the
Fund. Structured notes constitute general unsecured contractual obligations of the issuer of the note and the Fund is relying on the creditworthiness of such issuer and has no rights under a structured note against the issuer of an underlying
indicator. Structured notes involve transaction costs. Structured notes may be considered illiquid and, therefore, structured notes considered illiquid will be subject to the Fund’s percentage limitation on investments in illiquid securities.
CLNs are typically issued by a limited purpose trust or other vehicle (the “CLN trust”) that, in turn, invests in a derivative or
basket of derivatives instruments, such as credit default swaps, interest rate swaps and/or other securities, in order to provide exposure to certain high yield, sovereign debt, emerging markets, or other fixed income markets. Generally,
investments in CLNs represent the right to receive periodic income payments (in the form of distributions) and payment of principal at the end of the term of the CLN. However, these payments are conditioned on the CLN trust’s receipt of
payments from, and the CLN trust’s potential obligations, to the counterparties to the derivative instruments and other securities in which the CLN trust invests. For example, the CLN trust may sell one or more credit default swaps, under which
the CLN trust would receive a stream of payments over the term of the swap agreements provided that no event of default has occurred with respect to the referenced debt obligation upon which the swap is based. If a default were to occur, the
stream of payments may stop and the CLN trust would be obligated to pay the counterparty the par (or other agreed upon value) of the referenced debt obligation. This, in turn, would reduce the amount of income and principal that the Fund would
receive as an investor in the CLN trust.
The Fund may enter in CLNs to gain access to sovereign debt and securities in emerging markets, particularly in markets where the Fund
is not able to purchase securities directly due to domicile restrictions or tax restrictions or tariffs. In such an instance, the issuer of the CLN may purchase the reference security directly and/or gain exposure through a credit default swap
or other derivative.
The Fund’s investments in CLNs are subject to the risks associated with the underlying reference obligations and derivative
instruments, including, among others, credit risk, default risk, counterparty risk, interest rate risk, leverage risk and management risk.
Structured notes may also include exchange-traded notes (“ETNs”), which are typically unsecured and unsubordinated like other
structured notes. ETN returns are based upon the performance of one or more underlying indicators and typically, no periodic coupon payments are distributed and no principal protections exists, even at maturity. ETNs are listed on an exchange
and traded in the secondary market. An ETN can be held until maturity, at which time the issuer pays the investor a cash amount equal to the principal amount, subject to the day’s market benchmark or strategy factor. When the Fund invests in
ETNs, it will bear its proportionate share of any fees and expenses borne by the ETN. Because fees reduce the amount of return at maturity or upon redemption, if the value of the underlying indicator decreases or does not increase
significantly, the Fund may receive less than the principal amount of its investment at maturity or upon redemption. In addition, the value of an ETN also may be influenced by time to maturity, level of
supply and demand for the ETN, volatility and lack of liquidity in underlying indicator, changes in the applicable interest rates, and economic, legal,
political, or geographic events that affect the underlying indicator. Some ETNs that use leverage can, at times, be relatively illiquid, and thus they may be difficult to purchase or sell at a fair price. Leveraged ETNs are subject to the same
risk as other instruments that use leverage in any form. There may be restrictions on the Fund’s right to redeem its investment in an ETN, which are generally meant to be held until maturity. A decision by the Fund to sell ETN holdings may be
limited by the availability of a secondary market. In addition, although an ETN may be listed on an exchange, the issuer may not be required to maintain the listing, and there can be no assurance that a secondary market will exist for an ETN.
Equity Securities. The Fund may invest, to a limited extent, in equity securities, which may include common stocks, preferred stocks, convertible securities and warrants. Common stocks and
preferred stocks represent shares of ownership in a corporation. Preferred stocks usually have specific dividends and rank after bonds and before common stock in claims on assets of the corporation should it be dissolved. Increases and
decreases in earnings are usually reflected in a corporation’s stock price. Convertible securities are debt or preferred equity securities convertible into common stock. Usually, convertible securities pay dividends or interest at rates
higher than common stock, but lower than other securities. Convertible securities usually participate to some extent in the appreciation or depreciation of the underlying stock into which they are convertible. Warrants are options to buy a
stated number of shares of common stock at a specified price anytime during the life of the warrants.
To the extent the Fund invests in such securities, the value of securities held by the Fund will be affected by changes in the stock
markets, which may be the result of domestic or international political or economic news, changes in interest rates or changing investor sentiment. At times, the stock markets can be volatile and stock prices can change substantially. Because
some investors purchase equity securities with borrowed money, an increase in interest rates can cause a decline in equity prices. The equity securities of smaller companies are more sensitive to these changes than those of larger companies.
This market risk will affect the Fund’s NAV per share, which will fluctuate as the value of the securities held by the Fund changes. Not all stock prices change uniformly or at the same time and not all stock markets move in the same direction
at the same time. Other factors affect a particular stock’s prices, such as poor earnings reports by an issuer, loss of major customers, major litigation against an issuer, or changes in governmental regulations affecting an industry. Adverse
news affecting one company can sometimes depress the stock prices of all companies in the same industry. Not all factors can be predicted.
Terrorism Risks. The terrorist attacks in the United States on September 11, 2001, had a disruptive effect on the U.S. economy and financial markets. Terrorist attacks and other geopolitical
events have led to, and may in the future lead to, increased short-term market volatility and may have long-term effects on U.S. and world economies and financial markets. Those events could also have an acute effect on individual issuers,
related groups of issuers, or issuers concentrated in a single geographic area. A similar disruption of the financial markets or other terrorist attacks could adversely impact interest rates, auctions, secondary trading, ratings, credit risk,
inflation and other factors relating to portfolio securities and adversely affect Fund service providers and the Fund’s operations.
Recent Market Conditions. Both U.S. and international markets have experienced significant volatility in recent months and years. As a result of such volatility, investment returns may fluctuate
significantly. National economies are substantially interconnected, as are global financial markets, which creates the possibility that conditions in one country or region might adversely impact issuers in a different country or region.
However, the interconnectedness of economies and/or markets may be diminishing or changing, which may impact such economies and markets in ways that cannot be foreseen at this time.
Although interest rates were unusually low in recent years in the U.S. and abroad, recently, the Federal Reserve and certain foreign
central banks raised interest rates as part of their efforts to address rising inflation. In addition, ongoing inflation pressures could continue to cause an increase in interest rates and/or negatively impact companies. It is difficult to
accurately predict the pace at which interest rates might increase or start decreasing, or the timing, frequency or magnitude of any such changes in interest rates, or when such changes might stop or reverse course. Additionally, various
economic and political factors could cause the Federal Reserve or other foreign central banks to change their approach in the future and such actions may result in an economic slowdown both in the U.S. and abroad. Unexpected changes in interest
rates could lead to significant market volatility or reduce liquidity in certain sectors of the market. Deteriorating economic fundamentals may, in turn, increase the risk of default or insolvency of particular issuers, negatively impact market
value, cause credit spreads to widen, and reduce bank balance sheets. Any of these could cause an increase in market volatility, reduce liquidity across various markets or decrease confidence in the markets. Also, regulators have expressed
concern that changes in interest rates may cause investors to sell fixed income securities faster than the market can absorb them, contributing to price volatility. Over the longer term, the interest rate increases may present a greater risk
than has historically been the case due to the prior period of relatively low interest rates and the effect of government fiscal and monetary policy initiatives and potential market reaction to those initiatives, or their alteration or
cessation. Historical patterns of correlation among asset classes may break down in unanticipated ways during times of high volatility, disrupting investment programs and potentially causing losses.
Some countries, including the U.S., have adopted more protectionist trade policies. Slowing global economic growth, the rise in
protectionist trade policies, changes to some major international trade agreements, risks associated with the trade agreement between the United Kingdom and the European Union, and the risks associated with trade negotiations between the U.S.
and China, could affect the economies of many nations in ways that cannot necessarily be foreseen at the present time. In addition, if the U.S. dollar continues to be strong, it may decrease foreign demand for U.S. assets, which could have a
negative impact on certain issuers and/or industries.
Regulators in the U.S. have proposed and adopted a number of changes to regulations involving the markets and issuers, some of which
implicate the Fund. The full effect of various newly adopted regulations is not currently known. Additionally, it is not currently known whether any of the proposed regulations will be adopted. However, due to the scope of regulations being
proposed, and adopted, certain of these changes to regulation could limit the Fund’s ability to pursue its investment strategies or make certain investments, may make it more costly for it to operate or adversely impact its performance.
Further, advancements in technology may also adversely impact market movements and liquidity and may affect the overall performance of the Fund. For example, the advanced development and increased regulation of artificial intelligence may
impact the economy and the performance of the Fund. As artificial intelligence is used more widely, the profitability and growth of the Fund’s holdings may be impacted, which could impact the overall performance of the Fund.
Tensions, war, or open conflict between nations, such as between Russia and Ukraine, in the Middle East, or in eastern Asia could
affect the economies of many nations, including the United States. The duration of ongoing hostilities and any sanctions and related events cannot be predicted. Those events present material uncertainty and risk with respect to markets globally
and the performance of the Fund and its investments or operations could be negatively impacted.
Certain illnesses spread rapidly and have the potential to significantly and adversely affect the global economy. The impact of
epidemics and/or pandemics that may arise in the future could negatively affect the economies of many nations, individual companies and the global securities and commodities markets, including their liquidity, in ways that cannot necessarily be
foreseen at the present time and could last for an extended period of time.
High public debt in the U.S. and other countries creates ongoing systemic and market risks and policymaking uncertainty. There is no
assurance that the U.S. Congress will act to raise the nation’s debt ceiling; a failure to do so could cause market turmoil and substantial investment risks that cannot now be fully predicted. Unexpected political, regulatory and diplomatic
events within the U.S. and abroad may affect investor and consumer confidence and may adversely impact financial markets and the broader economy.
China’s economy, which had been sustained through debt-financed spending on housing and infrastructure, appears to be experiencing a
significant slowdown and growing at a lower rate than prior years. Due to the size of China’s economy, such a slowdown could impact a number of other countries.
There is widespread concern about the potential effects of global climate change on property and security values. Certain issuers,
industries and regions may be adversely affected by the impact of climate change in ways that cannot be foreseen. The impact of legislation, regulation and international accords related to climate change may negatively impact certain issuers
and/or industries.
A rise in sea levels, a change in weather patterns, including an increase in powerful storms and large wildfires, and/or a
climate-driven increase in flooding could cause properties to lose value or become unmarketable altogether. Unlike previous declines in the real estate market, properties in affected zones may not ever recover their value. The U.S.
administration appears concerned about the climate change problem and is focusing regulatory and public works projects around those concerns. Regulatory changes and divestment movements tied to concerns about climate change could adversely
affect the value of certain land and the viability of industries whose activities or products are seen as accelerating climate change.
Losses related to climate change could adversely affect corporate issuers and mortgage lenders, the value of mortgage-backed
securities, the bonds of municipalities that depend on tax or other revenues and tourist dollars generated by affected properties, and insurers of the property and/or of corporate, municipal or mortgage-backed securities. Since property and
security values are driven largely by buyers’ perceptions, it is difficult to know the time period over which these market effects might unfold.
Thermal Coal Policy.
Investments by the Fund in securities issued by companies that have more than 25% of revenue derived from thermal coal mining or are
expanding new thermal coal power generation are subject to formal review and approval by Neuberger Berman’s Environmental, Social and Governance Committee before the initiation of any new investment positions in the securities of those
companies.
The investment program described above is speculative and entails substantial risks, and the Fund’s risk management methods may not
accurately predict future risk exposures. There can be no assurance that the investment objective of the Fund will be achieved.
PORTFOLIO TRADING AND TURNOVER RATE
The Fund may engage in active and frequent trading. The Fund’s turnover rate is calculated by dividing (1) the lesser of the cost of
the securities purchased or the proceeds from the securities sold by the Fund during the fiscal year (other than securities, including options, whose maturity or expiration date at the time of acquisition was one year or less) by (2) the
month-end average of the value of such securities owned by the Fund during the fiscal year. The Fund generally does not engage in the trading of securities for the purpose of realizing short-term profits, but it will adjust its portfolio as it
deems advisable in view of prevailing or anticipated market conditions to accomplish its investment objective. For example, the Fund may sell portfolio securities in anticipation of a movement in interest rates. Higher turnover rates can
result in corresponding increases in the Fund’s transaction costs, which must be borne by the Fund and its stockholders. High portfolio turnover may
result in the Fund’s realization of net short-term capital gains that, when distributed to stockholders, will be taxable as ordinary income. Frequency of portfolio turnover will not be a limiting factor if the Fund considers it advantageous to
purchase or sell securities.
Directors and Officers
The Board is responsible for overseeing the management of the business and affairs of the Fund, including general supervision of the
duties performed by NBIA. Subject to the provisions of the Fund’s Articles and Maryland law, the Board has all powers necessary and convenient to carry out this responsibility, including the election and removal of the Fund’s officers. Among
other things, the Board generally oversees the portfolio management of the Fund and reviews and approves the Fund’s investment management agreement and other principal contracts.
The following tables set forth information concerning the Directors and officers of the Fund. All persons named as Directors and
officers also serve in similar capacities for other funds administered or managed by NBIA.
The Board of Directors
Name,
(Year of Birth),
and Address(1)
|
Position(s)
and Length of
Time Served(2)
|
Principal Occupation(s)(3)
|
Number of Portfolios in Fund Complex Overseen
|
Other Directorships Held
Outside Fund Complex(3)
|
Class I
|
Independent Fund Directors
|
Marc Gary (1952)
|
Director since 2015
|
Executive Vice Chancellor Emeritus, The Jewish Theological Seminary, since 2020; formerly, Executive Vice Chancellor and Chief Operating Officer, The Jewish Theological Seminary, 2012 to 2020; formerly,
Executive Vice President and General Counsel, Fidelity Investments, 2007 to 2012; formerly, Executive Vice President and General Counsel, BellSouth Corporation, 2004 to 2007; formerly, Vice President and Associate General Counsel,
BellSouth Corporation, 2000 to 2004; formerly, Associate, Partner, and National Litigation Practice Co-Chair, Mayer, Brown LLP, 1981 to 2000; formerly, Associate Independent Counsel, Office of Independent Counsel, 1990 to 1992.
|
50
|
Director, Jewish Federation of Atlanta, since 2023; Director, Israel Policy Forum, since 2023; Director, JCC of Westchester, since 2022; Director, Jewish Democratic Counsel of America, since 2022; Chair
and Director, USCJ Supporting Foundation, since 2021; Director, UJA Federation of Greater New York, since 2019; Trustee, The Jewish Theological Seminary, since 2014; Director, Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights Under Law
(not-for-profit), since 2005; formerly, Director, Jewish Federation of New York, 2017 to 2023; formerly, Director, Legility, Inc. (privately held for-profit company), 2012 to 2021; formerly, Director, Equal Justice Works
(not-for-profit), 2005 to 2014; formerly, Director, Corporate Counsel Institute, Georgetown University Law Center, 2007 to 2012; formerly, Director, Greater Boston Legal Services (not-for-profit), 2007 to 2012.
|
Name,
(Year of Birth),
and Address(1)
|
Position(s)
and Length of
Time Served(2)
|
Principal Occupation(s)(3) |
Number of Portfolios in Fund Complex Overseen |
Other Directorships Held
Outside Fund Complex(3)
|
Martha C. Goss (1949)
|
Director since 2007
|
Formerly, President, Woodhill Enterprises Inc./Chase Hollow Associates LLC (personal investment vehicle), 2006 to 2020; formerly, Consultant, Resources Global Professionals (temporary staffing), 2002 to
2006; formerly, Chief Financial Officer, Booz-Allen & Hamilton, Inc., 1995 to 1999; formerly, Enterprise Risk Officer, Prudential Insurance, 1994 to 1995; formerly, President, Prudential Asset Management Company, 1992 to 1994;
formerly, President, Prudential Power Funding (investments in electric and gas utilities and alternative energy projects), 1989 to 1992; formerly, Treasurer, Prudential Insurance Company, 1983 to 1989.
|
50
|
Director, American Water (water utility), since 2003; Director, Allianz Life of New York (insurance), since 2005; formerly, Director, Berger Group Holdings, Inc. (engineering consulting firm), 2013 to
2018; formerly, Director, Financial Women’s Association of New York (not-for-profit association), 1987 to 1996 and 2003 to 2019; Trustee Emerita, Brown University, since 1998; Director, Museum of American Finance (not-for-profit), since
2013; formerly, Non-Executive Chair and Director, Channel Reinsurance (financial guaranty reinsurance), 2006 to 2010; formerly, Director, Ocwen Financial Corporation (mortgage servicing), 2005 to 2010; formerly, Director, Claire’s
Stores, Inc. (retailer), 2005 to 2007; formerly, Director, Parsons Brinckerhoff Inc. (engineering consulting firm), 2007 to 2010; formerly, Director, Bank Leumi (commercial bank), 2005 to 2007; formerly, Advisory Board Member, Attensity
(software developer), 2005 to 2007; formerly, Director, Foster Wheeler Manufacturing, 1994 to 2004; formerly, Director, Dexter Corp. (Manufacturer of Non-Wovens, Plastics, and Medical Supplies), 1992 to 2001.
|
Name,
(Year of Birth),
and Address(1)
|
Position(s)
and Length of
Time Served(2)
|
Principal Occupation(s)(3) |
Number of Portfolios in Fund Complex Overseen |
Other Directorships Held
Outside Fund Complex(3)
|
Michael M. Knetter (1960)
|
Director since 2007
|
President and Chief Executive Officer, University of Wisconsin Foundation, since 2010;
formerly, Dean, School of Business, University of Wisconsin - Madison; formerly, Professor of International Economics and Associate Dean, Amos Tuck School of Business - Dartmouth College, 1998 to 2002. |
50 |
Director, 1WS Credit Income Fund, since 2018; Board Member, American Family Insurance (a
mutual company, not publicly traded), since March 2009; formerly, Trustee, Northwestern Mutual Series Fund, Inc., 2007 to 2011; formerly, Director, Wausau Paper, 2005 to 2011; formerly, Director, Great Wolf Resorts, 2004 to 2009. |
Class II
|
Independent Fund Directors
|
Michael J. Cosgrove (1949)
|
Director since 2015
|
President, Carragh Consulting USA, since 2014; formerly, Executive, General Electric Company, 1970 to 2014, including President, Mutual Funds and Global Investment Programs, GE Asset Management, 2011 to
2014, President and Chief Executive Officer, Mutual Funds and Intermediary Business, GE Asset Management, 2007 to 2011, President, Institutional Sales and Marketing, GE Asset Management, 1998 to 2007, and Chief Financial Officer, GE
Asset Management, and Deputy Treasurer, GE Company, 1988 to 1993.
|
50
|
Member of Advisory Board, Burke Neurological Institute, since 2021; Parish Councilor, St. Pius X, since 2021, and Treasurer, since 2020; formerly, Director, America Press, Inc. (not-for-profit Jesuit
publisher), 2015 to 2021; formerly, Director, Fordham University, 2001 to 2018; formerly, Director, The Gabelli Go Anywhere Trust, June 2015 to June 2016; formerly, Director, Skin Cancer Foundation (not-for-profit), 2006 to 2015;
formerly, Director, GE Investments Funds, Inc., 1997 to 2014; formerly, Trustee, GE Institutional Funds, 1997 to 2014; formerly, Director, GE Asset Management, 1988 to 2014; formerly, Director, Elfun Trusts, 1988 to 2014; formerly,
Trustee, GE Pension & Benefit Plans, 1988 to 2014; formerly, Member of Board of Governors, Investment Company Institute.
|
Ami G. Kaplan (1960)
|
Director since 2023
|
Formerly, Partner, Deloitte LLP, 1982 to 2023, including Vice Chair, 2017 to 2020; formerly, President and Board Chair, Women’s Forum of New York, 2014 to 2016.
|
50
|
None.
|
Name,
(Year of Birth),
and Address(1)
|
Position(s)
and Length of
Time Served(2)
|
Principal Occupation(s)(3) |
Number of Portfolios in Fund Complex Overseen |
Other Directorships Held
Outside Fund Complex(3)
|
Deborah C. McLean (1954)
|
Director since 2015
|
Member, Circle Financial Group (private wealth management membership practice), since 2011; Managing Director, Golden Seeds LLC (an angel investing group), since 2009; Adjunct Professor (Corporate
Finance), Columbia University School of International and Public Affairs, since 2008; formerly, Visiting Assistant Professor, Fairfield University, Dolan School of Business, Fall 2007; formerly, Adjunct Associate Professor of Finance,
Richmond, The American International University in London, 1999 to 2007.
|
50
|
Board Member, The Maritime Aquarium at Norwalk, since 2020; Board Member, Norwalk Community College Foundation, since 2014; formerly, Dean’s Advisory Council, Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study, 2014
to 2023; formerly, Director and Treasurer, At Home in Darien (not-for-profit), 2012 to 2014; formerly, Director, National Executive Service Corps (not-for-profit), 2012 to 2013; formerly, Trustee, Richmond, The American International
University in London, 1999 to 2013.
|
George W. Morriss (1947)
|
Director since 2007
|
Formerly, Adjunct Professor, Columbia University School of International and Public Affairs, 2012 to 2018; formerly, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, People’s United Bank, Connecticut
(a financial services company), 1991 to 2001.
|
50
|
Director and Audit Chair, 1WS Credit Income Fund, since 2018; Director and Chair, Thrivent Church Loan Income Fund, since 2018; formerly, Trustee, Steben Alternative Investment Funds, Steben Select
Multi-Strategy Fund, and Steben Select Multi-Strategy Master Fund, 2013 to 2017; formerly, Treasurer, National Association of Corporate Directors, Connecticut Chapter, 2011 to 2015; formerly, Manager, Larch Lane Multi-Strategy Fund
complex (which consisted of three funds), 2006 to 2011; formerly, Member, NASDAQ Issuers’ Affairs Committee, 1995 to 2003.
|
Name,
(Year of Birth),
and Address (1)
|
Position(s)
and Length of
Time Served(2)
|
Principal Occupation(s)(3) |
Number of Portfolios in Fund Complex Overseen |
Other Directorships Held
Outside Fund Complex(3)
|
Paul M. Nakasone (1963)
|
Director since 2024
|
Formerly, Director, National Security Agency, 2018 to 2024; formerly, Commander, U.S. Cyber Command, 2018-2024.
|
50
|
None.
|
Class III |
Independent Fund Directors |
Franklyn E. Smith (1961)
|
Director since 2023
|
Formerly, Partner, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, 1989 to 2021.
|
50
|
Director, Zurich American Insurance Company, Zurich American Life Insurance Company and Zurich American Life Insurance Company of New York, since 2023.
|
Name,
(Year of Birth),
and Address(1)
|
Position(s)
and Length of
Time Served(2)
|
Principal Occupation(s)(3) |
Number of Portfolios in Fund Complex Overseen |
Other Directorships Held
Outside Fund Complex(3)
|
Tom D. Seip (1950)
|
Director since 2006; Chair of the Board since 2008; Lead Independent Director from 2006 to 2008
|
Formerly, Managing Member, Ridgefield Farm LLC (a private investment vehicle), 2004 to 2016; formerly, President and CEO, Westaff, Inc. (temporary staffing), May 2001 to January 2002; formerly, Senior
Executive, The Charles Schwab Corporation, 1983 to 1998, including Chief Executive Officer, Charles Schwab Investment Management, Inc.; formerly, Trustee, Schwab Family of Funds and Schwab Investments, 1997 to 1998; formerly, Executive
Vice President-Retail Brokerage, Charles Schwab & Co., Inc., 1994 to 1997.
|
50
|
Trustee, University of Maryland, Shore Regional Health System, since 2020; formerly, Director, H&R Block, Inc. (tax services company), 2001 to 2018; formerly, Director, Talbot Hospice Inc., 2013 to
2016; formerly, Chairman, Governance and Nominating Committee, H&R Block, Inc., 2011 to 2015; formerly, Chairman, Compensation Committee, H&R Block, Inc., 2006 to 2010; formerly, Director, Forward Management, Inc. (asset
management company), 1999 to 2006.
|
Fund Director who is an “Interested Person”
|
Joseph V. Amato* (1962)
|
Chief Executive Officer and President since 2018; Director since 2009
|
President and Director, Neuberger Berman Group LLC, since 2009; President and Chief Executive Officer, Neuberger Berman BD LLC and Neuberger Berman Holdings LLC (including its predecessor, Neuberger Berman
Inc.), since 2007; Chief Investment Officer (Equities) and President (Equities), NBIA (formerly, Neuberger Berman Fixed Income LLC and including predecessor entities), since 2007, and Board Member of NBIA, since 2006; formerly, Global
Head of Asset Management of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.’s (“LBHI”) Investment Management Division, 2006 to 2009; formerly, member of LBHI’s Investment Management Division’s Executive Management Committee, 2006 to 2009; formerly,
Managing Director, Lehman Brothers Inc. (“LBI”), 2006 to 2008; formerly, Chief Recruiting and Development Officer, LBI, 2005 to 2006; formerly, Global Head of LBI’s Equity Sales and a Member of its Equities Division Executive Committee,
2003 to 2005; President and Chief Executive Officer, ten registered investment companies for which NBIA acts as investment manager and/or administrator.
|
50
|
Member of Board of Advisors, McDonough School of Business, Georgetown University, since 2001; Member of New York City Board of Advisors, Teach for America, since 2005; Trustee, Montclair Kimberley Academy
(private school), since 2007; Member of Board of Regents, Georgetown University, since 2013.
|
|
(1) |
The business address of each listed person is 1290 Avenue of the Americas, New York, New York 10104.
|
|
(2) |
The Board of Directors shall at all times be divided as equally as possible into three classes of Directors designated Class I, Class II and Class III. Class I, Class II and Class III Directors shall serve until the Annual Meeting of
Stockholders held in 2027, 2025 and 2026, respectively, and then until each third Annual Meeting of Stockholders thereafter, or until their successors have been duly elected and qualified.
|
|
(3) |
Except as otherwise indicated, each individual has held the positions, including directorships, shown for at least the last five years. “Other Directorships” includes directorships held during the past five years by the applicable
Director.
|
|
* |
Indicates a Director who is an “interested person” within the meaning of the 1940 Act. Mr. Amato is an interested person of the Fund by virtue of the fact that he is an officer of NBIA and/or its affiliates.
|
Information about the Officers of the Fund (other than those listed above)
Name, Address and
(Year of Birth)(1)
|
Position(s) and Length
of Time Served(2)
|
Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years
|
Claudia A. Brandon (1956)
|
Executive Vice President since 2008; Secretary since 2006
|
Senior Vice President, Neuberger Berman, since 2007 and Employee since 1999; Senior Vice President, NBIA, since 2008 and Assistant Secretary since 2004; formerly, Vice President,
Neuberger Berman, 2002 to 2006; formerly, Vice President, Mutual Fund Board Relations, NBIA, 2000 to 2008; formerly, Vice President, NBIA, 1986 to 1999 and Employee, 1984 to 1999; Executive Vice President and Secretary, twenty-eight
registered investment companies for which NBIA acts as investment manager and/or administrator.
|
Agnes Diaz (1971)
|
Vice President since 2013
|
Senior Vice President, Neuberger Berman, since 2012; Senior Vice President, NBIA, since 2012 and Employee since 1996; formerly, Vice President, Neuberger Berman, 2007 to 2012; Vice
President, ten registered investment companies for which NBIA acts as investment manager and/or administrator.
|
Anthony DiBernardo (1979)
|
Assistant Treasurer since 2011
|
Senior Vice President, Neuberger Berman, since 2014; Senior Vice President, NBIA, since 2014, and Employee since 2003; formerly, Vice President, Neuberger Berman, 2009 to 2014;
Assistant Treasurer, ten registered investment companies for which NBIA acts as investment manager and/or administrator.
|
Name, Address and
(Year of Birth)(1)
|
Position(s) and Length
of Time Served(2)
|
Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years |
Corey A. Issing (1978)
|
Chief Legal Officer since 2016 (only for purposes of sections 307 and 406 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002); Interim Chief Compliance Officer since 2024
|
General Counsel, Mutual Funds, since 2016 and Managing Director, NBIA, since 2017; formerly, Associate General Counsel, 2015 to 2016; Counsel, 2007 to 2015; Senior Vice President, 2013
to 2016; Vice President, 2009 to 2013; Chief Legal Officer (only for purposes of sections 307 and 406 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002), twenty-eight registered investment companies for which NBIA acts as investment manager and/or
administrator.
|
Sheila R. James (1965)
|
Assistant Secretary since 2006
|
Senior Vice President, Neuberger Berman, since 2023 and Employee since 1999; Senior Vice President, NBIA, since 2023; formerly, Vice President, Neuberger Berman, 2008 to 2023;
Assistant Vice President, Neuberger Berman, 2007; Employee, NBIA, 1991 to 1999; Assistant Secretary, twenty-eight registered investment companies for which NBIA acts as investment manager and/or administrator.
|
Brian Kerrane (1969)
|
Chief Operating Officer since 2015; Vice President since 2008
|
Managing Director, Neuberger Berman, since 2013; Chief Operating Officer, Mutual Funds, and Managing Director, NBIA, since 2015; formerly, Senior Vice President, Neuberger Berman, 2006
to 2014; Vice President, NBIA, 2008 to 2015 and Employee since 1991; Chief Operating Officer, ten registered investment companies for which NBIA acts as investment manager and/or administrator; Vice President, twenty-eight registered
investment companies for which NBIA acts as investment manager and/or administrator.
|
Anthony Maltese (1959)
|
Vice President since 2015
|
Senior Vice President, Neuberger Berman, since 2014 and Employee since 2000; Senior Vice President, NBIA, since 2014; Vice President, ten registered investment companies for which NBIA
acts as investment manager and/or administrator.
|
Josephine Marone (1963)
|
Assistant Secretary since 2017
|
Senior Paralegal, Neuberger Berman, since 2007 and Employee since 2007; Assistant Secretary, twenty-eight registered investment companies for which NBIA acts as investment manager
and/or administrator.
|
Name, Address and
(Year of Birth)(1)
|
Position(s) and Length
of Time Served(2)
|
Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years |
Owen F. McEntee, Jr. (1961)
|
Vice President since 2008
|
Vice President, Neuberger Berman, since 2006; Vice President, NBIA, since 2006 and Employee since 1992; Vice President, ten registered investment companies for which NBIA acts as
investment manager and/or administrator.
|
John M. McGovern (1970)
|
Treasurer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer since 2006
|
Managing Director, Neuberger Berman, since 2022; Senior Vice President, NBIA, since 2007 and Employee since 1993; formerly, Senior Vice President, Neuberger Berman, 2007 to 2021;
formerly, Vice President, Neuberger Berman, 2004 to 2006; formerly, Assistant Treasurer, 2002 to 2005; Treasurer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer, ten registered investment companies for which NBIA acts as investment
manager and/or administrator.
|
Frank Rosato (1971)
|
Assistant Treasurer since 2006
|
Vice President, Neuberger Berman, since 2006; Vice President, NBIA, since 2006 and Employee since 1995; Assistant Treasurer, ten registered investment companies for which NBIA acts as
investment manager and/or administrator.
|
|
(1) |
The business address of each listed person is 1290 Avenue of the Americas, New York, New York 10104.
|
|
(2) |
Pursuant to the Bylaws of the Fund each officer elected by the Directors shall hold office until his or her successor shall have been elected and qualified or until his or her earlier death, inability to serve, or resignation.
Officers serve at the pleasure of the Directors and may be removed at any time with or without cause.
|
The Board of Directors
The Board is responsible for managing the business and affairs of the Fund. Among other things, the Board generally oversees the
portfolio management of the Fund and reviews and approves the Fund’s investment management agreement and other principal contracts. It is the Fund’s policy that at least three quarters of the Board shall be comprised of Fund Directors who are
not “interested persons” of NBIA (including its affiliates) or the Fund (“Independent Fund Directors”).
The Board has appointed an Independent Fund Director to serve in the role of Chairman of the Board. The Chair’s primary
responsibilities are (i) to participate in the preparation of the agenda for meetings of the Board and in the identification of information to be presented to the Board; (ii) to preside at all meetings of the Board; (iii) to act as the Board’s
liaison with management between meetings of the Board; and (iv) to act as the primary contact for board communications. The Chair may perform such other functions as may be requested by the Board from time to time. Except for any duties
specified herein or pursuant to the Fund’s Articles of Incorporation or Bylaws, the designation as Chair does not impose on such Independent Fund Director any duties, obligations or liability that is greater than the duties, obligations or
liability imposed on such person as a member of the Board, generally.
As described below, the Board has an established committee structure through which the Board considers and addresses important matters
involving the Fund, including those identified as presenting conflicts or potential conflicts of interest for management. The Independent Fund Directors also regularly meet outside the presence of management and are advised by experienced
independent legal counsel knowledgeable in matters of investment company regulation. The Board periodically evaluates its structure and composition as well as various aspects of its operations. The Board believes that its leadership structure,
including its Independent Chair and its committee structure, is appropriate in light of, among other factors, the asset size of the fund complex overseen by the Board, the nature and number of funds overseen by the Board, the number of Fund
Directors, the range of experience represented on the Board and the Board’s responsibilities.
Additional Information About Directors
In nominating each candidate to serve, the Board is generally aware of each Director’s skills, experience, judgment, integrity,
analytical ability, intelligence, common sense, previous profit and not-for-profit board membership and, for each Independent Fund Director, his or her demonstrated willingness to take an independent and questioning stance toward management.
For candidates to serve as Independent Fund Directors, independence from the Manager, its affiliates and other principal service providers is critical. Each Director also has considerable familiarity with the funds in the Neuberger Berman fund
complex, the Manager, and their operations, as well as the special regulatory requirements governing regulated investment companies and the special responsibilities of investment company directors, and in the case of each Director who has
served on the Board over multiple years, as a result of his or her substantial prior service as a director of the funds in the Neuberger Berman fund complex. No particular qualification, experience or background establishes the basis for any
Director’s position on the Board and the Governance and Nominating Committee and individual Board members may have attributed different weights to the various factors.
In addition to the information set forth in the table above and other relevant qualifications, experience, attributes or skills
applicable to a particular Director, the following provides further information about the qualifications and experience of each Director.
Independent Fund Directors
Michael J. Cosgrove: Mr. Cosgrove is President of an asset management consulting firm. He has experience as President, Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Financial Officer of the asset management
division of a major multinational corporation. He also has experience as a President of institutional sales and marketing for the asset management division of the same corporation, where he was responsible for all distribution, marketing, and
development of mutual fund products. He also has served as a member of the boards of various not-for-profit organizations. He has served as a Fund Director for multiple years.
Marc Gary: Mr. Gary has legal and investment management experience as executive vice president and general counsel of a major asset management firm. He also has experience as executive vice
president and general counsel at a large corporation, and as national litigation practice chair at a large law firm. He has served as a member of the boards of various profit and not-for-profit organizations. He formerly served as the
executive vice chancellor and COO of a religious seminary where he oversaw the seminary’s institutional budget. He has served as a Fund Director for multiple years.
Martha Clark Goss: Ms. Goss has experience as chief operating and financial officer of an insurance holding company. She has experience as an investment professional, head of an investment unit and
treasurer for a major insurance company, experience as the Chief Financial Officer of two consulting firms, and experience as a lending officer and credit analyst at a major bank. She has experience managing a personal investment vehicle. She
has served as a member of the boards of various profit and not-for-profit organizations, including five NYSE listed companies, and a university. She has served as a Fund Director for multiple years.
Ami G. Kaplan: Ms. Kaplan has experience in the financial services industry. She was a partner at a large professional service firm, where she worked with global financial services clients on
various matters. In her 40 years at that firm, she served in many different roles, including as Vice Chair of the firm and Deputy New York Regional Managing Partner. She is member of the New York and New Jersey State Societies of CPA and has
held a variety of roles with not-for-profit company boards. She has served as a Fund Director since 2023.
Michael M. Knetter: Dr. Knetter has organizational management experience as a dean of a major university business school and as President and CEO of a university supporting foundation. He also has
responsibility for overseeing management of the university’s endowment. He has academic experience as a professor of international economics. He has served as a member of the boards of various public companies and another mutual fund. He has
served as a Fund Director for multiple years.
Deborah C. McLean: Ms. McLean has experience in the financial services industry. She is currently involved with a high net worth private wealth management membership practice and an angel investing
group, where she is active in investment screening and deal leadership and execution. For many years she has been engaged in numerous roles with a variety of not-for-profit and private company boards and has taught corporate finance at the
graduate and undergraduate levels. She commenced her professional training at a major financial services corporation, where she was employed for multiple years. She has served as a Fund Director for multiple years.
George W. Morriss: Mr. Morriss has experience in senior management and as chief financial officer of a financial services company. He has investment management experience as a portfolio manager
managing personal and institutional funds. He has served as a member of a committee of representatives from companies listed on NASDAQ. He has served on the board of another mutual fund complex. He has served as a member of the board of funds
of hedge funds. He has an advanced degree in finance. He has served as a Fund Director for multiple years.
Paul M. Nakasone: General Nakasone has organizational management and cybersecurity experience. He has held many leadership roles with the United States Army and Department of Defense over the
span of nearly four decades, including serving as commander of United States Cyber Command, director of the National Security Agency, chief of the Central Security Service, and numerous other leadership roles across all levels of the Joint
Force and Army, with assignments in Korea, Iraq, and Afghanistan. In these roles, General Nakasone has led forces in peace and war along with advising on geopolitical and cybersecurity matters. He has served as a Fund Director since 2024.
Tom D. Seip: Mr. Seip has experience in senior management and as chief executive officer and director of a financial services company overseeing other mutual funds and brokerage. He has
experience as director of an asset management company. He has experience in management of a private investment partnership. He has served as a Fund Director for multiple years and as Independent Chair and/or Lead Independent Director of the
Board.
Franklyn E. Smith: Mr. Smith has experience in the financial services industry. He was a partner at a large professional service firm, where he was the Market Team leader and Primary Reporting
Partner in the New York office’s Asset & Wealth Management Practice. He spent 32 years at that firm servicing financial services clients, with a focus on mutual fund clients for the last 25 years. He is a CPA with a license in New York
and holds an advanced degree in public accounting. He serves on the boards of a major insurance company and a not-for-profit organization. He has served as a Fund Director since 2023.
Directors who are “Interested Persons”
Joseph V. Amato: Mr. Amato has investment management experience as an executive with Neuberger Berman and another financial services firm. Effective July 1, 2018, Mr. Amato began serving as Chief
Executive Officer and President of the Fund and the other funds in the Neuberger Berman fund complex. He also serves as Neuberger Berman’s Chief Investment Officer for equity investments. He has experience in leadership roles within Neuberger
Berman and its affiliated entities. He has served as a member of the board of a major university business school. He has served as a Fund Director for multiple years.
Information About Committees
The Fund has established several standing committees to oversee particular aspects of the Fund’s management. The standing committees
of the Board are described below.
Audit Committee. The Audit Committee’s purposes are: (a) in accordance with exchange requirements and Rule 32a-4 under the 1940 Act, to oversee the accounting and financial reporting processes of
the Fund and, as the Committee deems appropriate, to inquire into the internal control over financial reporting of service providers; (b) in accordance with exchange requirements and Rule 32a-4 under the 1940 Act, to oversee the quality and
integrity of the Fund’s financial statements and the independent audit thereof; (c) in accordance with exchange requirements and Rule 32a-4 under the 1940 Act, to oversee, or, as appropriate, assist Board oversight of, the Fund’s compliance
with legal and regulatory requirements that relate to the Fund’s accounting and financial reporting, internal control over financial reporting and independent audits; (d) to approve prior to appointment by the Board, the engagement of the
Fund’s independent auditors and, in connection therewith, to review and evaluate the qualifications, independence and performance of the Fund’s independent auditors; (e) to act as a liaison between the Fund’s independent registered public
accounting firm and the full Board; (f) to prepare an audit committee report as required by Item 407(d) of Regulation S-K to be included in proxy statements relating to the election of directors; (g) to oversee the operation of policies and
procedures reasonably designed to ensure that each portfolio holding is valued in an appropriate and timely manner, reflecting information known to management (including management’s internal Valuation Committee) about the issuer, current
market conditions, and other material factors (“Pricing Policy”); (h) to consider and evaluate, and to recommend to the Board when the Audit Committee deems it appropriate, amendments to the Pricing Policy proposed by management, counsel, the
auditors, the Committee itself or others; and (i) to oversee fair value determinations performed by the Manager as the Fund’s valuation designee and, in connection therewith, to receive and review the reports and notifications required to be
provided by the valuation designee pursuant to Rule 2a-5 under the 1940 Act and to request such information from the valuation designee as the Committee deems necessary to oversee the performance of fair value determinations by the valuation
designee. Its members are Michael J. Cosgrove (Chair), Martha C. Goss (Vice Chair), and Deborah C. McLean. All members are Independent Fund Directors. During the fiscal year ended October 31, 2023, the Audit Committee met seven times.
Closed-End Funds Committee. The Fund’s Closed-End Funds Committee is responsible for consideration and evaluation of issues specific to the Fund. Its members are George W. Morriss (Chair), Ami G. Kaplan,
and Franklyn E. Smith (Vice Chair). All members are Independent Fund Directors. During the fiscal year ended October 31, 2023, the Closed-End Funds Committee met eight times.
Contract Review Committee.
The Contract Review Committee is responsible for reviewing and making recommendations to the Board regarding whether to approve or renew the Fund’s principal
contractual arrangements and such other agreements or plans involving the Fund as the Board determines from time to time. The Contract Review Committee oversees and guides the process by which the Independent Fund Directors consider whether
to approve or renew such contracts and plans. Its members are Marc Gary, Deborah C. McLean (Chair), George W. Morriss (Vice Chair), Michael J. Cosgrove, and Franklyn E. Smith. All members are Independent Fund Directors. During the fiscal year
ended October 31, 2023, the Contract Review Committee met six times.
Ethics and Compliance
Committee. The Ethics and Compliance Committee generally: (a) coordinates the Board’s oversight of the Fund’s Chief Compliance Officer (“CCO”) in connection with the
implementation of the Fund’s program for compliance with Rule 38a-1 under the 1940 Act and the Fund’s implementation and enforcement of its compliance policies and procedures; (b) oversees the compliance with the Fund’s Code of Ethics, which
restricts the personal securities transactions, including transactions
in Fund shares, of employees, officers, and directors; (c) considers and evaluates management’s framework for identifying, prioritizing, and managing
compliance risks; (d) oversees the program by which the Manager seeks to monitor and improve the quality of execution for portfolio transactions; and (e) considers and evaluates management’s reports regarding internal audit reviews involving
compliance matters; payments made to third-party intermediaries; and proxy voting policies, guidelines and procedures. The Committee shall not assume oversight duties to the extent that such duties have been assigned by the Board expressly to
another Committee of the Board (such as oversight of internal controls over financial reporting, which has been assigned to the Audit Committee) or to the Board as a whole. The Committee’s primary function is oversight. Each investment adviser,
principal underwriter, administrator, custodian and transfer agent (collectively, “Service Providers”) is responsible for its own compliance with the federal securities laws and for devising, implementing, maintaining and updating appropriate
policies, procedures and codes of ethics to ensure compliance with applicable laws and regulations and their contracts with the Fund. The CCO is responsible for administering the Fund’s compliance program, including devising and implementing
appropriate methods of testing compliance by the Fund and its Service Providers. Its members are Marc Gary (Chair), Ami G. Kaplan (Vice Chair), Michael M. Knetter, and Tom D. Seip. All members are Independent Fund Directors. The entire Board
will receive at least annually a report on the compliance programs of the Fund and service providers and the required annual reports on the administration of the Code of Ethics and the required annual certifications from the Fund and NBIA.
During the fiscal year ended October 31, 2023, the Ethics and Compliance Committee met four times.
Executive Committee. The Executive Committee is responsible for acting in an emergency when a quorum of the Board of Directors is not available; the Committee has all the powers of the Board of
Directors when the Board is not in session to the extent permitted by Maryland law. Its members are Joseph V. Amato (Vice Chair), Michael J. Cosgrove, Marc Gary, Martha C. Goss, Michael M. Knetter, Deborah C. McLean, George W. Morriss, and
Tom D. Seip (Chair). All members, except for Mr. Amato, are Independent Fund Directors. During the fiscal year ended October 31, 2023, the Executive Committee met one time.
Governance and Nominating
Committee. The Governance and Nominating Committee is responsible for: (a) considering and evaluating the structure, composition and operation of the Board of
Directors and each committee thereof, including the operation of the annual self-evaluation by the Board; (b) evaluating and nominating individuals to serve as Fund Directors including as Independent Fund Directors, as members of committees,
as Chair of the Board and as officers of the Fund; (c) recommending for Board approval any proposed changes to Committee membership and recommending for Board and Committee approval any proposed changes to the Chair and Vice Chair
appointments of any Committee following consultation with members of each such Committee; and (d) considering and making recommendations relating to the compensation of Independent Fund Directors. Its members are Martha C. Goss (Chair), Paul
M. Nakasone (Vice Chair), Michael M. Knetter, and Tom D. Seip. All members are Independent Fund Directors. The selection and nomination of candidates to serve as independent directors is committed to the discretion of the current Independent
Fund Directors. The Committee will consider nominees recommended by stockholders; stockholders may send resumes of recommended persons to the attention of Claudia A. Brandon, Secretary, Neuberger Berman Funds, 1290 Avenue of the Americas, New
York, NY 10104. During the fiscal year ended October 31, 2023, the Governance and Nominating Committee met two times.
Investment Performance
Committee. The Investment Performance Committee is responsible for overseeing and guiding the process by which the Board reviews Fund performance and interfacing
with management personnel responsible for investment risk management. Each Fund Director is a member of the Committee. Michael M. Knetter and Deborah C. McLean are the Chair and the Vice Chair, respectively, of the Committee. All members,
except for Mr. Amato, are Independent Fund Directors. During the fiscal year ended October 31, 2023, the Investment Performance Committee met four times.
Risk Management Oversight
As an integral part of its responsibility for oversight of the Fund in the interests of stockholders, the Board oversees risk
management of the Fund’s portfolio management, administration and operations. The Board views risk management as an important responsibility of management.
The Fund faces a number of risks, such as investment risk, counterparty risk, valuation risk, liquidity risk, reputational risk, risk
of operational failure or lack of business continuity, cybersecurity risk, and legal, compliance and regulatory risk.
Risk management seeks to identify and address risks, i.e., events or circumstances that could have material adverse effects on the
business, operations, stockholder services, investment performance or reputation of the Fund. Under the overall supervision of the Board, the Fund, the Manager, and the affiliates of the Manager, or other service providers to the Fund, employ a
variety of processes, procedures and controls to identify various of those possible events or circumstances, to lessen the probability of their occurrence and/or to mitigate the effects of such events or circumstances if they do occur.
Different processes, procedures and controls are employed with respect to different types of risks.
The Board exercises oversight of the Manager’s risk management processes primarily through the Board’s committee structure. The
various committees, as appropriate, and/or at times the Board, meet periodically with the Chief Risk Officer, head of operational risk, the Chief Information Security Officer, the CCO, the Treasurer, the Chief Investment Officers for equity,
alternative and fixed income, the heads of Internal Audit, and the Fund’s independent auditor. The committees, or the Board, as appropriate, review with these individuals, among other things, the design and implementation of risk management
strategies in their respective areas, and events and circumstances that have arisen and responses thereto.
The Board recognizes that not all risks that may affect the Fund can be identified, that it may not be practical or cost-effective to
eliminate or mitigate certain risks, that it may be necessary to bear certain risks (such as investment-related risks) to achieve the Fund’s goals, and that the processes, procedures and controls employed to address certain risks may be limited
in their effectiveness. Moreover, reports received by the Directors as to risk management matters are typically summaries of the relevant information. Furthermore, it is in the very nature of certain risks that they can be evaluated only as
probabilities, and not as certainties. As a result of the foregoing and other factors, the Board’s risk management oversight is subject to substantial limitations, and no risk management program can predict the likelihood or seriousness of, or
mitigate the effects of, all potential risks.
Compensation and Indemnification
The Fund’s Articles provide that the Fund will indemnify its Fund Directors and officers against liabilities and expenses reasonably
incurred in connection with litigation in which they may be involved because of their offices with the Fund, unless it is adjudicated that they (a) engaged in bad faith, willful misfeasance, gross negligence, or reckless disregard of the duties
involved in the conduct of their offices, or (b) did not act in good faith in the reasonable belief that their action was in the best interest of the Fund. In the case of settlement, such indemnification will not be provided unless it has been
determined (by a court or other body approving the settlement or other disposition, by a majority of disinterested directors based upon a review of readily available facts, or in a written opinion of independent counsel) that such officers or
Fund Directors have not engaged in willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence, or reckless disregard of their duties.
Officers and Directors who are interested persons of the Fund, as defined in the 1940 Act, receive no salary or fees from the Fund.
Effective January 1, 2024, for serving as a trustee/director of the funds in the Neuberger Berman fund complex, each Independent Fund
Director and each Director who is an “interested person” but who is not an employee of NBIA or its affiliates receives an annual retainer of $200,000, paid quarterly, and a fee of $17,500 for each of the regularly scheduled meetings he or she
attends in-person or by telephone. For any additional special in-person or telephonic meeting of the Board, the Governance and Nominating Committee will determine whether a fee is warranted. To compensate for the additional time commitment, the
Chair of the Audit Committee, the Chair of the Contract Review Committee and the Chair of the Closed-End Funds Committee each receives $25,000 per year, and each Chair of the other Committees receives $20,000 per year, with the exception of the
Chair of the Executive Committee who receives no additional compensation for this role. No additional compensation is provided for service on a Board committee. The Chair of the Board who is also an Independent Fund Director receives an
additional $90,000 per year.
The Neuberger Berman Funds reimburse Independent Fund Directors for their travel and other out-of-pocket expenses related to
attendance at Board meetings. The Independent Fund Director compensation is allocated to each fund in the Neuberger Berman fund complex based on a method the Board finds reasonable.
The following table sets forth information concerning the compensation of the Fund Directors. The Fund does not have any retirement
plan for the Fund Directors.
TABLE OF COMPENSATION
Name and Position with the Fund
|
Aggregate Compensation from
the Fund for the Fiscal Year
Ended October 31, 2023
|
Total Compensation from
Registered Investment
Companies in the Neuberger
Berman Fund Complex Paid to
Directors for Calendar Year
Ended December 31, 2023
|
Independent Fund Directors
|
Michael J. Cosgrove, Director
|
$5,356
|
$265,000
|
Marc Gary, Director
|
$5,178
|
$255,000
|
Martha C. Goss, Director
|
$5,178
|
$255,000
|
Ami G. Kaplan, Director*
|
$1,551
|
$135,989
|
Michael M. Knetter, Director
|
$5,178
|
$255,000
|
Deborah C. McLean, Director
|
$5,381
|
$265,000
|
George W. Morriss, Director
|
$5,356
|
$265,000
|
Paul M. Nakasone, Director**
|
--
|
--
|
Tom D. Seip, Chairman of the Board and Director
|
$6,295
|
$310,000
|
Franklyn E. Smith, Director*
|
$1,551
|
$135,989
|
James G. Stavridis, Director***
|
$4,873
|
$240,000
|
Director who is an “Interested Person”
|
Joseph V. Amato, Chief Executive Officer, President and Director
|
$0
|
$0
|
|
* |
Ami G. Kaplan and Franklyn E. Smith became Fund Directors on June 30, 2023.
|
|
** |
Paul M. Nakasone became a Fund Director on September 24, 2024.
|
|
*** |
James G. Stavridis retired from his position as Fund Director effective June 30, 2024.
|
Ownership of Securities
The following table sets forth the aggregate dollar range of equity securities owned by each Fund Director in all the funds in the
fund family overseen by the Fund Director, valued as of December 31, 2023.
Name of Fund Director
|
Dollar Range of Equity Securities Held in the Registrant
|
Aggregate Dollar Range of Equity Securities Owned in all Registered Investment Companies Overseen by Fund Director in Family of Investment Companies
|
Independent Fund Directors
|
Michael J. Cosgrove
|
A
|
E
|
Marc Gary
|
A
|
E
|
Martha C. Goss
|
A
|
E
|
Ami G. Kaplan
|
A
|
A
|
Michael M. Knetter
|
A
|
E
|
Deborah C. McLean
|
A
|
E
|
George W. Morriss
|
E
|
E
|
Tom D. Seip
|
A
|
E
|
Franklyn E. Smith
|
A
|
A
|
Fund Director who is an “Interested Person”
|
Joseph V. Amato
|
A
|
E
|
A = None; B = $1-$10,000; C = $10,001-$50,000; D = $50,001-$100,000; E = over $100,000
Independent Fund Directors’ Ownership of Securities
As of December 31, 2023, no Independent Fund Director (or his/her immediate family members) owned securities of NBIA or securities in
an entity controlling, controlled by or under common control with NBIA (not including shares of registered investment companies).
Codes of Ethics
The Fund and NBIA have personal securities trading policies that restrict the personal securities transactions of employees, officers,
and Directors. Their primary purpose is to ensure that personal trading by these individuals does not disadvantage any fund managed by NBIA. The portfolio managers and other investment personnel who comply with the policies’ pre-clearance and
disclosure procedures may be permitted to purchase, sell or hold certain types of securities which also may be or are held in the funds they advise, but are restricted from trading in close conjunction with the Fund or taking personal advantage
of investment opportunities that may belong to the Fund. Text-only versions of the Codes of Ethics can be viewed online or downloaded from the EDGAR Database on the SEC’s internet web site at www.sec.gov. In addition, copies of the Codes of
Ethics may be obtained, after paying a duplicating fee, by e-mail request at publicinfo@sec.gov.
INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATION SERVICES
Investment Manager and Administrator
NBIA serves as the investment manager to the Fund pursuant to a management agreement with the Fund, dated as of August 6, 2010
(“Management Agreement”). NBIA also provides investment management and advisory services to private accounts of institutional and individual clients and to mutual
funds and other registered investment companies. As of September 30, 2024, NBIA and its affiliates had approximately $509 billion in assets under
management. NBIA is located at 1290 Avenue of the Americas, New York, New York 10104-0002.
The Management Agreement provides, in substance, that NBIA will make and implement investment decisions for the Fund in its discretion
and will continuously develop an investment program for the Fund’s assets. The Management Agreement permits NBIA to effect securities transactions on behalf of the Fund through associated persons of NBIA. The Management Agreement also
specifically permits NBIA to compensate, through higher commissions, brokers and dealers who provide investment research and analysis to the Fund, although NBIA has no current plans to pay a material amount of such compensation.
The Management Agreement provides that NBIA shall not be subject to any liability in connection with the performance of its services
thereunder in the absence of willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence or reckless disregard of its obligations and duties. In the event that litigation against NBIA, in connection with its obligations under the Management Agreement or
administration agreement (described below), ends with a determination that NBIA acted without culpability, the Fund will reimburse NBIA for reasonable attorney’s fees and other expenses. In the event a matter ends without a court ruling on
NBIA’s culpability, any unresolved issue will be determined by a committee of disinterested Directors who were not party to the suit or by an opinion of independent legal counsel. The Fund may advance expenses to NBIA if (1) a committee of
non-party disinterested Directors or independent legal counsel determines that NBIA is likely to prevail, and (2) the Fund is adequately assured of repayment in the event of an adverse result.
NBIA provides to the Fund, without separate cost, office space, equipment, and facilities and the personnel necessary to perform
executive, administrative, and clerical functions. NBIA will pay all salaries, expenses, and fees of the officers, Directors, and employees of the Fund who are officers, Directors, or employees of NBIA. Director(s) and/or officer(s) of NBIA
currently serve as Directors and officers of the Fund. See “Management of the Fund-Directors and Officers.”
Pursuant to the Management Agreement, the Fund agrees to pay NBIA an annual management fee, payable on a monthly basis, at the annual
rate of 0.60% of the Fund’s average daily total assets minus liabilities other than the aggregate indebtedness entered into for purposes of leverage (“Managed Assets”). The liquidation preference of the Preferred Stock is not considered a
liability or permanent equity.
NBIA provides facilities, services, and personnel as well as accounting, record keeping and other services to the Fund pursuant to an
administration agreement with the Fund, dated as of August 6, 2010 (“Administration Agreement”). Under the Administration Agreement, NBIA also provides certain stockholder, stockholder-related, and other services that are not furnished by the
Fund’s stockholder servicing agent. NBIA provides the direct stockholder services specified in the Administration Agreement and assist the stockholder servicing agent in the development and implementation of specified programs and systems to
enhance overall stockholder servicing capabilities. NBIA solicits and gathers stockholder proxies, performs services connected with the Fund’s exchange listing, and furnishes other services the parties agree from time to time should be provided
under the Administration Agreement.
For administrative services, the Fund pays NBIA at the annual rate of 0.05% of average daily Managed Assets. With the Fund’s consent,
NBIA may subcontract to third parties some of its responsibilities to the Fund under the Administration Agreement. In addition, the Fund may compensate such third parties for accounting and other services.
All fees and expenses are accrued daily and are deducted before payment of distributions to stockholders. The Management Agreement
continues until October 31, 2025. The Management Agreement is renewable thereafter from year to year with respect to the Fund, so long as its continuance is approved at least annually (1) by the vote of a majority of the Independent Fund
Directors, cast in person at a meeting called for the purpose of voting on such approval, and (2) by the vote of a majority of the Directors or by a 1940 Act majority vote of the outstanding stock of the Fund. The Administration Agreement
continues until October 31, 2025. The Administration Agreement is renewable from year to year, so long as its continuance is approved at least annually (1) by the vote of a majority of the Independent Fund Directors, and (2) by the vote of a
majority of the Directors or by a 1940 Act majority vote of the outstanding stock in the Fund.
The Management Agreement is terminable, without penalty, on 60 days’ written notice either by the Fund or by NBIA. The Administration
Agreement is terminable, without penalty, on 60 days’ written notice either by NBIA or by the Fund. Each Agreement will terminate automatically if it is assigned.
Except as otherwise described in the Prospectus, the Fund will pay, in addition to the investment management fee described above, all
expenses not assumed by NBIA, including, without limitation, fees and expenses of Directors who are not “interested persons” of NBIA or the Fund, interest charges, taxes, brokerage commissions, expenses of issue of shares, fees and expenses of
registering and qualifying Fund shares for distribution under federal and state laws and regulations, charges of custodians, auditing and legal expenses, expenses of determining NAV of the Fund, reports to stockholders, expenses of meetings of
stockholders, expenses of printing and mailing prospectuses, proxy statements and proxies to existing stockholders, and its proportionate share of insurance premiums and professional association dues or assessments. The Fund will also be
responsible for such nonrecurring expenses as may arise, including litigation in which the Fund may be a party, and other expenses as determined by the Board. The Fund may have an obligation to indemnify its officers and Directors with respect
to such litigation.
The total dollar amounts paid by the Fund to the Manager for the last three fiscal years ended October 31, 2023, October 31, 2022 and
October 31, 2021 are $1,957,767, $1,808,569 and $1,890,500, respectively.
Management and Control of NBIA
NBIA with its principal offices at Avenue of the Americas, New York, New York 10104, is a registered investment adviser and an
indirect subsidiary of Neuberger Berman Group LLC (“NBG,” and together with its consolidated subsidiaries “NB Group”). NBG is a holding company that through its subsidiaries provides a broad range of global asset management services.
NBG’s voting equity is owned by NBSH Acquisition, LLC (“NBSH”). NBSH is owned by current and former employees, directors consultants
and, in certain instances, their permitted transferees.
Portfolio Manager Information Accounts
Managed
Joseph Lind, CFA (Managing Director of NBIA) and Christopher Kocinski, CFA (Managing Director of NBIA) serve as portfolio managers of
the Fund. The table below describes the accounts for which they have day-to-day management responsibility as of October 31, 2023.
Type of Account
|
Number of
Accounts
Managed
|
Total Assets
Managed
($ millions)
|
Number of Accounts
Managed for which
Advisory Fee is
Performance-Based
|
Assets Managed
for which Advisory
Fee is Performance-
Based
($ millions)
|
Joseph Lind
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
1
|
$720
|
0
|
$0
|
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles**
|
25
|
$8,981
|
1
|
$522
|
Other Accounts***
|
23
|
$5,463
|
3
|
$317
|
Christopher Kocinski
|
Registered Investment Companies*
|
1
|
$720
|
0
|
$0
|
Other Pooled Investment Vehicles**
|
25
|
$8,981
|
1
|
$522
|
Other Accounts***
|
22
|
$5,387
|
3
|
$317
|
|
* |
Registered Investment Companies include: Mutual Funds.
|
|
** |
A portion of certain accounts may be managed by other portfolio managers; however, the total assets of such accounts are included above even though the portfolio manager listed above is not involved in the day-to-day management of
the entire account.
|
|
*** |
Other Accounts include: Institutional Separate Accounts, Sub-Advised Accounts and Managed Accounts (WRAP Accounts).
|
Conflicts of Interest
Actual or apparent conflicts of interest may arise when a portfolio manager has day-to-day management responsibilities with respect to
more than one Fund or other account. The management of multiple funds and accounts (including proprietary accounts) may give rise to actual or potential conflicts of interest if the funds and accounts have different or similar objectives,
benchmarks, time horizons, and fees, as the portfolio manager must allocate his or her time and investment ideas across multiple funds and accounts. The portfolio manager may execute transactions for another fund or account that may adversely
impact the value of securities or instruments held by the Fund, and which may include transactions that are directly contrary to the positions taken by the Fund. For example, a portfolio manager may engage in short sales of securities or
instruments for another account that are the same type of securities or instruments in which a fund it manages also invests. In such a case, the portfolio manager could be seen as harming the performance of the Fund for the benefit of the
account engaging in short sales if the short sales cause the market value of the securities or instruments to fall. Additionally, if a portfolio manager identifies a limited investment opportunity that may be suitable for more than one fund or
other account, the Fund may not be able to take full advantage of that opportunity. There may also be regulatory limitations that prevent the Fund from participating in a transaction that another account or fund managed by the same portfolio
manager will invest. For example, the 1940 Act prohibits the Fund from participating in certain transactions with certain of its affiliates and from participating in “joint” transactions alongside certain of its affiliates. The prohibition on
“joint” transactions may limit the ability of the Fund to participate alongside its affiliates in privately negotiated transactions unless the transaction is otherwise permitted under existing regulatory guidance and may reduce the amount of
privately negotiated transactions that the Fund may participate. Further, the Manager may take an investment position or action for a fund or account that may be different from, inconsistent with, or have different rights than (e.g., voting
rights, dividend or repayment priorities or other features that may conflict with one another), an action or position taken for one or more other funds or accounts, including the Fund, having similar or different objectives. A conflict may also
be created by investing in different parts of an issuer’s capital structure (e.g., equity or debt, or different positions in the debt structure). Those positions and actions may adversely impact, or in some instances benefit, one or more
affected accounts, including the funds. Potential conflicts may also arise because portfolio decisions and related actions regarding a position held for a fund or another account may not be in the best interests of a position held by another
fund or account having similar or different objectives. If one account were to buy or sell portfolio securities or instruments shortly before another account bought or sold the same securities or instruments, it could affect the price paid or
received by the second account. Securities selected
for funds or accounts other than the Fund may outperform the securities selected for the Fund. Finally, a conflict of interest may arise if the Manager
and a portfolio manager have a financial incentive to favor one account over another, such as a performance-based management fee that applies to one account but not all funds or accounts for which the portfolio manager is responsible. In the
ordinary course of operations, certain businesses within the Neuberger Berman organization (the “Firm”) will seek access to material nonpublic information. For instance, NBIA portfolio managers may obtain and utilize material non-public
information in purchasing loans and other debt instruments and certain privately placed or restricted equity instruments. From time to time, NBIA portfolio managers will be offered the opportunity on behalf of applicable clients to participate
on a creditors or other similar committee in connection with restructuring or other “work-out” activity, which participation could provide access to material nonpublic information. The Firm maintains procedures that address the process by which
material non-public information may be acquired intentionally by the Firm. When considering whether to acquire material nonpublic information, the Firm will attempt to balance the interests of all clients, taking into consideration relevant
factors, including the extent of the prohibition on trading that would occur, the size of the Firm’s existing position in the issuer, if any, and the value of the information as it relates to the investment decision-making process. The
acquisition of material non-public information would likely give rise to a conflict of interest since the Firm may be prohibited from rendering investment advice to clients regarding the securities or instruments of such issuer and thereby
potentially limiting the universe of securities or instruments that the Firm, including the Fund, may purchase or potentially limiting the ability of the Firm, including the Fund, to sell such securities or instruments. Similarly, where the
Firm declines access to (or otherwise does not receive or share within the Firm) material non-public information regarding an issuer, the portfolio managers could potentially base investment decisions with respect to assets of such issuer
solely on public information, thereby limiting the amount of information available to the portfolio managers in connection with such investment decisions. In determining whether or not to elect to receive material non-public information, the
Firm will endeavor to act fairly to its clients as a whole. The Firm reserves the right to decline access to material nonpublic information, including declining to join a creditors or similar committee. NBIA and the Fund have adopted certain
compliance procedures which are designed to address these types of conflicts. However, there is no guarantee that such procedures will detect each and every situation in which a conflict arises.
Compensation of Portfolio Managers
Our compensation philosophy is one that focuses on rewarding performance and incentivizing our employees. We are also focused on
creating a compensation process that we believe is fair, transparent, and competitive with the market.
Compensation for portfolio managers consists of either (i) fixed (salary) and variable (discretionary bonus) compensation but is more
heavily weighted on the variable portion of total compensation, (ii) on a production model, whereby formulaic compensation is paid from the team compensation pool on a fixed schedule (typically monthly) or (iii) a combination of salary, bonus
and/or production compensation. Compensation is paid from a team compensation pool made available to the portfolio management team with which the portfolio manager is associated. The size of the team compensation pool is determined based on a
formula that takes into consideration a number of factors including the pre-tax revenue that is generated by that particular portfolio management team, less certain adjustments. The amount allocated to individual portfolio managers is
determined on the basis of a variety of criteria, including investment performance (including the aggregate multi-year track record), utilization of central resources (including research, sales and operations/support), business building to
further the longer term sustainable success of the investment team, effective team/people management, and overall contribution to the success of Neuberger Berman. Certain portfolio managers may manage products other than mutual funds, such as
high net worth separate accounts. The share of pre-tax revenue a portfolio manager receives pursuant to any such arrangement will vary based on certain revenue thresholds.
The terms of our long-term retention incentives are as follows:
Employee-Owned Equity. Certain employees (primarily senior leadership and investment professionals) participated in Neuberger Berman’s equity ownership structure, which was launched as part of the
firm’s management buyout in 2009 and designed to incentivize and retain key personnel. We currently offer an equity acquisition program which allows employees a more direct opportunity to invest in Neuberger Berman.
Contingent Compensation. Certain employees may participate in the Neuberger Berman Group Contingent Compensation Plan (the “CCP”) to serve as a means to further align the interests of our employees with
the success of the firm and the interests of our clients, and to reward continued employment. Under the CCP, up to 20% of a participant’s annual total compensation in excess of $500,000 is contingent and subject to vesting. The contingent
amounts are maintained in a notional account that is tied to the performance of a portfolio of Neuberger Berman investment strategies as specified by the firm on an employee-by-employee basis. By having a participant’s contingent compensation
tied to Neuberger Berman investment strategies, each employee is given further incentive to operate as a prudent risk manager and to collaborate with colleagues to maximize performance across all business areas. In the case of members of
investment teams, including portfolio managers, the CCP is currently structured so that such employees have exposure to the investment strategies of their respective teams as well as the broader Neuberger Berman portfolio.
Restrictive Covenants. Most investment professionals, including portfolio managers, are subject to notice periods and restrictive covenants which include employee and client non-solicit restrictions as
well as restrictions on the use of confidential information. In addition, depending on participation levels, certain senior professionals who have received equity grants have also agreed to additional notice and transition periods and, in
some cases, non-compete restrictions.
Ownership of Securities
Set forth below is the dollar range of equity securities beneficially owned by the Fund’s Portfolio Managers in the Registrant as of
October 31, 2023.
Portfolio Manager
|
Dollar Range of Equity Securities
Owned in the Registrant
|
Christopher Kocinski
|
A
|
Joseph Lind
|
E
|
|
|
A = None
|
E = $100,001-$500,000
|
B = $1-$10,000
|
F = $500,001-$1,000,000
|
C = $10,001 - $50,000
|
G = Over $1,000,000
|
D =$50,001-$100,000
|
|
Other Investment Companies or Accounts Managed
The investment decisions concerning the Fund and the other registered investment companies managed by NBIA (collectively, “Other NB
Funds”) have been and will continue to be made independently of one another. In terms of their investment objectives, most of the Other NB Funds differ from the Fund. Even where the investment objectives are similar, however, the methods used
by the Other NB Funds and the Fund to achieve their objectives may differ. The investment results achieved by all of the registered investment companies managed by NBIA have varied from one another in the past and are likely to vary in
the future. In addition, NBIA or its affiliates may manage one or more Other NB Funds or other accounts with similar investment objectives and strategies
as the Fund that may have risks that are greater or less than the Fund.
There may be occasions when the Fund and one or more of the Other NB Funds or other accounts or funds managed by NBIA are
contemporaneously engaged in purchasing or selling the same securities from or to third parties. When this occurs, the transactions may be aggregated to obtain favorable execution to the extent permitted by applicable law and regulations. The
transactions will be allocated according to one or more methods designed to ensure that the allocation is equitable to the Fund and accounts involved. Although in some cases this arrangement may have a detrimental effect on the price or volume
of the securities as to the Fund, in other cases it is believed that the Fund’s ability to participate in volume transactions may produce better executions for it. In any case, it is the judgment of the Directors that the desirability of the
Fund having its advisory arrangements with NBIA outweighs any disadvantages that may result from contemporaneous transactions.
The Fund is subject to certain limitations imposed on all advisory clients of NBIA (including the Fund, the Other NB Funds, and other
managed funds or accounts) and personnel of NBIA and its affiliates. These may include, for example, limits that may be imposed in certain industries or by certain companies, and policies of NBIA that limit the aggregate purchases, by all
accounts under management, of the outstanding shares of public companies.
Proxy Voting
The Board has delegated to NBIA the responsibility to vote proxies related to the securities held in the Fund’s portfolio. Under this
authority, NBIA would be required by the Board to vote proxies related to portfolio securities in the best interests of the Fund and its stockholders. The Board permits NBIA to contract with a third party to obtain proxy voting and related
services, including research of current issues.
NBIA has implemented written Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures (“Proxy Voting Policy”) that are designed to reasonably ensure that
NBIA votes proxies prudently and in the best interest of its advisory clients for whom NBIA has voting authority, including the Fund. The Proxy Voting Policy also describes how NBIA addresses any conflicts that may arise between its interests
and those of its clients with respect to proxy voting.
NBIA’s Governance and Proxy Committee (“Proxy Committee”) is responsible for developing, authorizing, implementing and updating the
Proxy Voting Policy, administering and overseeing the proxy voting process and engaging and overseeing any independent third-party vendors as voting delegates to review, monitor and/or vote proxies. In order to apply the Proxy Voting Policy
noted above in a timely and consistent manner, NBIA utilizes Glass, Lewis & Co. (“Glass Lewis”) to vote proxies in accordance with NBIA’s voting guidelines or, in instances where a material conflict has been determined to exist, in
accordance with the voting recommendations of an independent third party. NBIA retains final authority and fiduciary responsibility for proxy voting. NBIA believes that this process is reasonably designed to address material conflicts of
interest that may arise between NBIA and a client as to how proxies are voted.
In the event that an investment professional at NBIA believes that it is in the best interests of a client or clients to vote proxies
in a manner inconsistent with the voting guidelines, the Proxy Committee will review information submitted by the investment professional to determine that there is no material conflict of interest between NBIA and the client with respect to
the voting of the proxy in the requested manner.
If the Proxy Committee determines that the voting of a proxy as recommended by the investment professional would not be appropriate,
the Proxy Committee shall: (i) take no further action, in which case Glass Lewis shall vote such proxy in accordance with the voting guidelines; (ii) disclose such conflict to the client or clients and obtain written direction from the client
as to how to vote the proxy; (iii) suggest that the client or clients engage another party to determine how to vote the proxy; or (iv) engage another independent third party to determine how to vote the proxy.
The Fund may invest in shares of affiliated funds and may own substantial portions of these underlying affiliated funds. When the Fund
holds shares of underlying affiliated funds, the Fund will vote proxies of those funds in the same proportion as the vote of all other holders of the fund’s shares, unless the Board otherwise instructs. Information regarding how the Fund voted
proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent 12-month period ended June 30 is available, without charge, by calling 1-800-877-9700 (toll-free) or by visiting www.nb.com or the website of the SEC, www.sec.gov.
Brokerage and Research Services
Orders for the purchase or sale of portfolio securities are placed on behalf of the Fund by NBIA pursuant to the terms of the advisory
agreement. In effecting securities transactions, the Fund seeks to obtain the best price and execution of orders. While affiliates of NBIA are permitted to act as brokers for the Fund in the purchase and sale of its portfolio securities (other
than certain securities traded on the OTC market) where such brokers are capable of providing best execution (“Affiliated Brokers”), the Fund generally uses unaffiliated brokers.
For Fund transactions which involve securities traded on the OTC market, the Fund purchases and sells OTC securities in principal
transactions with dealers who are the principal market makers for such securities.
During the fiscal years ended October 31, 2023, October 31, 2022 and October 31, 2021, the Fund did not pay brokerage commissions.
During the fiscal year ended October 31, 2023, the Fund did not acquire or hold any securities of its “regular brokers or dealers” (as defined under the 1940 Act).
The amount of brokerage commissions paid by the Fund may vary significantly from year to year due to a variety of factors, including
the types of investments selected by the Manager, investment strategy changes, changing asset levels, stockholder activity, and/or portfolio turnover.
Commission rates, being a component of price, are considered along with other relevant factors in evaluating best price and execution.
In selecting a broker other than an Affiliated Broker to execute Fund transactions, NBIA generally considers the quality and reliability of brokerage services, including execution capability, speed of execution, overall performance, and
financial responsibility, and may consider, among other factors, research and other investment information or services (“research services”) provided by those brokers as well as any expense offset arrangements offered by the brokers.
The Fund may use an Affiliated Broker where, in the judgment of NBIA, that firm is able to obtain a price and execution at least as
favorable as other qualified brokers. To the Fund’s knowledge, no affiliate of the Fund receives give-ups or reciprocal business in connection with its securities transactions.
The use of an Affiliated Broker for the Fund is subject to the requirements of Section 11(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended (the “1934 Act”). Section 11(a) prohibits members of national securities exchanges from retaining compensation for executing exchange transactions for accounts which they or their affiliates manage, except where they have the
authorization of the persons authorized to transact business for the account and comply with certain annual reporting requirements. Before an
Affiliated Broker is used, the Fund and NBIA expressly authorize the Affiliated Broker to retain such compensation, and the Affiliate Broker would have
to agree to comply with the reporting requirements of Section 11(a).
Under the 1940 Act, commissions paid by the Fund to an Affiliated Broker in connection with a purchase or sale of securities on a
securities exchange may not exceed the usual and customary broker’s commission. Accordingly, it is the Fund’s policy that the commissions paid an Affiliated Broker will be at least as favorable to the Fund as those that would be charged by
other qualified brokers having comparable execution capability in NBIA’s judgment. The Fund does not deem it practicable and in its best interests to solicit competitive bids for commissions on each transaction effected by an Affiliated Broker.
However, when an Affiliated Broker is executing portfolio transactions on behalf of the Fund, consideration regularly will be given to information concerning the prevailing level of commissions charged by other brokers on comparable
transactions during comparable periods of time. The 1940 Act generally prohibits an Affiliated Broker from acting as principal in the purchase of portfolio securities from, or the sale of portfolio securities to, the Fund unless an appropriate
exemption is available.
A committee of Independent Fund Directors from time to time reviews, among other things, information relating to the commissions
charged by an Affiliated Broker to the Fund and to their other customers and information concerning the prevailing level of commissions charged by other brokers having comparable execution capability.
To ensure that accounts of all investment clients, including the Fund, are treated fairly in the event that an Affiliated Broker
receives transaction instructions regarding the same security for more than one investment account at or about the same time, the Affiliated Broker may combine orders placed on behalf of clients, including advisory accounts in which affiliated
persons have an investment interest, for the purpose of negotiating brokerage commissions or obtaining a more favorable price. Where appropriate, securities purchased or sold may be allocated, in terms of amount, to a client according to the
proportion that the size of the order placed by that account bears to the aggregate size of orders contemporaneously placed by the other accounts, subject to de minimis exceptions. All participating accounts will pay or receive the same price
when orders are combined.
Under policies adopted by the Board, an Affiliated Broker may enter into agency cross-trades on behalf of the Fund. An agency
cross-trade is a securities transaction in which the same broker acts as agent on both sides of the trade and the broker or an affiliate has discretion over one of the participating accounts. In this situation, the Affiliated Broker would
receive brokerage commissions from both participants in the trade. The other account participating in an agency cross-trade with the Fund cannot be an account over which the Affiliated Broker exercises investment discretion. A member of the
Board of Directors who will not be affiliated with the Affiliated Broker will review information about each agency cross- -trade that the Fund participates in.
In selecting a broker to execute Fund transactions, the Manager considers the quality and reliability of brokerage services, including
execution capability, speed of execution, overall performance, and financial responsibility, and may consider, among other factors, research and other investment information provided by non-affiliated brokers.
A committee comprised of officers of NBIA who are portfolio managers of the Fund and Other NB Funds (collectively, “NB Funds”) and
some of NBIA’s managed accounts (“Managed Accounts”) periodically evaluates throughout the year the nature and quality of the brokerage and research services provided by other brokers. Based on this evaluation, the committee establishes a list
and projected rankings of preferred brokers for use in determining the relative amounts of commissions to be allocated to those brokers. Ordinarily, the brokers on the list effect a large portion of the brokerage transactions for the NB
Funds and the Managed Accounts. However, in any semi-annual period, brokers not on the list may be used, and the relative amounts of brokerage
commissions paid to the brokers on the list may vary substantially from the projected rankings. These variations reflect the following factors, among others: (1) brokers not on the list or ranking below other brokers on the list may be selected
for particular transactions because they provide better price and/or execution, which is the primary consideration in allocating brokerage; (2) adjustments may be required because of periodic changes in the execution capabilities of or research
or other services provided by particular brokers or in the execution or research needs of the NB Funds and/or the Managed Accounts; and (3) the aggregate amount of brokerage commissions generated by transactions for the NB Funds and the Managed
Accounts may change substantially from one semi-annual period to the next.
The commissions paid to a broker other than an Affiliated Broker may be higher than the amount another firm might charge if the
Manager determines in good faith that the amount of those commissions is reasonable in relation to the value of the brokerage and research services provided by the broker. The Manager believes that those research services benefit the Fund by
supplementing the information otherwise available to the Manager. That research may also be used by the Manager in servicing Other NB Funds and in servicing the Managed Accounts. On the other hand, research received by the Manager from brokers
effecting portfolio transactions on behalf of the Other NB Funds and from brokers effecting portfolio transactions on behalf of the Managed Accounts may be used for the Fund’s benefit.
In certain instances, the Manager may specifically allocate brokerage for research services (including research reports on issuers and
industries as well as economic and financial data) which may otherwise be purchased for cash. While the receipt of such services has not reduced the Manager’s normal internal research activities, the Manager’s expenses could be materially
increased if it were to generate such additional information internally. To the extent such research services are provided by others, the Manager is relieved of expenses it may otherwise incur. In some cases research services are generated by
third parties but provided to the Manager by or through broker dealers. Research obtained in this manner may be used in servicing any or all clients of the Manager and may be used in connection with clients other than those client’s whose
brokerage commissions are used to acquire the research services described herein. With regard to allocation of brokerage to acquire research services described above the Manager always considers its best execution obligation when deciding which
broker to utilize.
Insofar as Fund transactions result from active management of equity securities, and insofar as Fund transactions result from seeking
capital appreciation by selling securities whenever sales are deemed advisable without regard to the length of time the securities may have been held, it may be expected that the aggregate brokerage commissions paid by the Fund to brokers
(including to Affiliated Brokers) may be greater than if securities were selected solely on a long-term basis.
The Fund may, from time to time, loan portfolio securities to broker-dealers affiliated with NBIA (“Affiliated Borrowers”) in
accordance with the terms and conditions of an order issued by the SEC. The order exempts such transactions from the provisions of the 1940 Act that would otherwise prohibit these transactions, subject to certain conditions. In accordance with
the order, securities loans made by the Fund to Affiliated Borrowers are fully secured by cash collateral. Each loan to an Affiliated Borrower by the Fund will be made on terms at least as favorable to the Fund as comparable loans to
unaffiliated borrowers, and no loans will be made to an Affiliated Borrower unless the Affiliated Borrower represents that the terms are at least as favorable to the Fund as those it provides to unaffiliated lenders in comparable transactions.
All transactions with Affiliated Borrowers will be reviewed periodically by officers of the Fund and reported to the Board.
To permit the Fund to maintain more stable monthly distributions, the Fund may from time to time distribute less than the entire
amount of distributable cash flow received as cash distributions from its portfolio securities in a particular period. Such undistributed cash flow would be available to supplement future distributions, including distributions that might
otherwise have been reduced by a decrease in the Fund’s net cash flow due to fluctuations in cash distributions received on portfolio securities (or other sources of income) or expenses or due to an increase in the distribution rate or interest
rate on the Fund’s borrowings, Preferred Stock or notes, if any. As a result, the distributions the Fund pays for any particular period may be more or less than the amount of cash flow received as cash distributions from portfolio securities
during such period. Undistributed cash flow received as cash distributions from portfolio securities are be included in the Fund’s NAV and, correspondingly, distributions from undistributed cash flow received as cash distributions from
portfolio securities will reduce that NAV.
For information relating to the impact of the borrowings or the issuance of Preferred Stock or notes on the distributions made by the
Fund to Common Stockholders, see “Use of Leverage” in the Prospectus.
While any Preferred Stock is outstanding, the Fund may not declare any cash dividend or other distribution on its Common Stock unless
at the time of such declaration (1) all accumulated dividends on the Preferred Stock have been paid and (2) the NAV of the Fund’s portfolio (determined after deducting the amount of such dividend or other distribution) is at least 200% of the
liquidation value of any outstanding Preferred Stock. While any borrowings or notes are outstanding, the Fund may not declare any cash dividend or other distribution on its Common Stock unless at the time of such declaration the NAV of the
Fund’s portfolio (determined after deducting the amount of such dividend or other distribution) is at least 300% of the principal amount of any borrowings or notes.
Common Stock
The Articles authorize the issuance of one billion (1,000,000,000) shares. The Common Stock will be issued with a par value of $0.0001
per share. All Common Stock has equal rights as to the payment of dividends and the distribution of assets upon liquidation. Common Stock will, when issued, be fully paid and non-assessable, and will have no pre-emptive or conversion rights or
rights to cumulative voting. Whenever Preferred Stock is outstanding, Common Stockholders will not be entitled to receive any distributions from the Fund unless all accrued dividends on Preferred Stock have been paid, and unless asset coverage
(as defined in the 1940 Act) with respect to Preferred Stock would be at least 200% after giving effect to such distributions. See “Preferred Stock” below. Whenever loans under the Facility or notes are outstanding, Common Stockholders will not
be entitled to receive any distributions from the Fund unless asset coverage (as defined in the 1940 Act) with respect to the loans and notes would be at least 300%.
The Common Stock is listed on the NYSE American. The Fund intends to hold annual meetings of stockholders so long as the Common Stock
is listed on a national securities exchange and such meetings are required as a condition to such listing.
Shares of closed-end investment companies may frequently trade at prices lower than NAV. Shares of closed-end investment companies
have during some periods traded at prices higher than NAV and during other periods traded at prices lower than NAV. There can be no assurance that shares of Common Stock or shares of other closed-end funds will trade at a price higher than NAV
in the future. NAV generally increases when interest rates decline, and decreases when interest rates rise. Whether investors will realize gains or losses upon the sale of Common Stock will not depend solely upon the Fund’s NAV but will
depend entirely upon whether the market price of the Common Stock at the time of sale is above or below the original purchase price for the shares. Since
the market price of the Fund’s Common Stock will be determined by factors beyond the control of the Fund, the Fund cannot predict whether the Common Stock will trade at, below, or above NAV or at, below or above the initial public offering
price. Accordingly, the Common Stock is designed primarily for long-term investors, and investors in the Common Stock should not view the Fund as a vehicle for trading purposes. See “Repurchase of Common Stock; Tender Offers; Conversion to
Open-end Fund” and the Fund’s Prospectus under “Use of Leverage.”
Preferred Stock
The Fund currently has preferred stock outstanding. The Articles authorize the Board to create additional classes of stock. The
Preferred Stock may be issued in one or more classes or series, with such rights as determined by action of the Board without the approval of the Common Stockholders.
Although the terms of any Preferred Stock, including their distribution rate, voting rights, liquidation preference and redemption
provisions, would be determined by the Board (subject to applicable law and the Articles) if it authorizes a Preferred Stock offering, Preferred Stock would likely pay distributions based on short-term rates. The liquidation preference,
preference on distribution, voting rights and redemption provisions of the Preferred Stock may be as stated below.
As used in this SAI, unless otherwise noted, the Fund’s “net assets” include assets of the Fund attributable to any outstanding Common
Stock, Preferred Stock, loans and notes, with no deduction for the liquidation preference of the Preferred Stock or principal amount of the loans or notes. Solely for financial reporting purposes, however, the Fund is required to exclude the
liquidation preference of Preferred Stock from “net assets,” so long as the Preferred Stock has redemption features that are not solely within the control of the Fund. For all regulatory and tax purposes, the Fund’s Preferred Stock will be
treated as stock (rather than indebtedness).
Limited Issuance of Preferred Stock.
Under the 1940 Act, the Fund could issue Preferred Stock with an aggregate liquidation value of up to one-half of the value of the Fund’s net assets, measured immediately after issuance of the Preferred Stock. “Liquidation value” means the
original purchase price of the shares being liquidated plus any accrued and unpaid dividends. In addition, the Fund is not permitted to declare any cash dividend or other distribution on its Common Stock unless the liquidation value of the
Preferred Stock is less than one-half of the value of the Fund’s net assets (determined after deducting the amount of such dividend or distribution) immediately after the distribution. To the extent that the Fund has outstanding any senior
securities representing indebtedness (such as through the use of derivative instruments that constitute senior securities), the aggregate amount of such senior securities will be added to the total liquidation value of any outstanding
Preferred Stock for purposes of these asset coverage requirements. The Fund intends to purchase or redeem Preferred Stock, if necessary, to keep the liquidation value of the Preferred Stock plus the aggregate amount of other senior securities
representing indebtedness at or below one-half of the value of the Fund’s net assets.
Distribution Preference. The Preferred
Stock would have complete priority over the Common Stock as to distribution of assets.
Liquidation Preference. In the event of
any voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the affairs of the Fund, holders of Preferred Stock (“Preferred Stockholders”) would be entitled to receive a preferential liquidating distribution (expected to equal the
original purchase price per share plus accumulated and unpaid dividends thereon, whether or not earned or declared) before any distribution of assets is made to Common Stockholders. After payment of the full amount of the liquidating
distribution to which they are entitled, Preferred Stockholders would not be entitled to any further
participation in any distribution of assets by the Fund. A consolidation or merger of the Fund with or into any business trust or corporation or a sale
of all or substantially all of the assets of the Fund shall not be deemed to be a liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Fund.
Voting Rights. In connection with any
issuance of Preferred Stock, the Fund must comply with Section 18(i) of the 1940 Act, which requires, among other things, that Preferred Stock be voting shares. Except as otherwise provided in the Articles or otherwise required by applicable
law, Preferred Stockholders would vote together with Common Stockholders as a single class.
In connection with the election of the Fund’s Directors, Preferred Stockholders, voting as a separate class, would also be entitled to
elect two of the Fund’s Directors, and the remaining Directors shall be elected by Common Stockholders and Preferred Stockholders, voting together as a single class. In addition, if at any time dividends on the Fund’s outstanding Preferred
Stock shall be unpaid in an amount equal to two full years’ dividends thereon, the holders of all outstanding Preferred Stock, voting as a separate class, would be entitled to elect a majority of the Fund’s Directors until all dividends in
arrears have been paid or declared and set apart for payment.
The affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding Preferred Stock, voting as a separate class, shall be required to
approve any action requiring a vote of security holders under Section 13(a) of the 1940 Act including, among other things, changes in the Fund’s investment objective, the conversion of the Fund from a closed-end to an open-end company, or
changes in the investment restrictions described as fundamental policies under “Investment Objective, Policies and Limitations.” The class or series vote of Preferred Stockholders described above shall in each case be in addition to any
separate vote of the requisite percentage of Common Stock and Preferred Stock necessary to authorize the action in question.
Preferred Stockholders would not be entitled to vote on matters placed before stockholders if, at or prior to the time when a vote is
required, such shares shall have been (1) redeemed or (2) called for redemption and sufficient funds shall have been deposited in trust to effect such redemption.
Redemption, Purchase and Sale of Preferred
Stock by the Fund. The terms of the Preferred Stock may provide that they are redeemable at certain times, in whole or in part, at the original purchase price per share plus accumulated dividends, that the Fund may tender for or
purchase Preferred Stock and that the Fund may subsequently resell any shares so tendered for or purchased. Any redemption or purchase of Preferred Stock by the Fund will reduce the leverage applicable to Common Stock, while any resale of
shares by the Fund will increase such leverage.
The Fund currently does not intend to issue Preferred Stock. The discussion above describes the possible offering of preferred shares
by the Fund. If the Board determines to authorize such an offering, the terms of the Preferred Stock may be the same as, or different from, the terms described above, subject to applicable law and the Articles.
CERTAIN PROVISIONS IN THE ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION AND BYLAWS
The Fund’s Articles of Incorporation (“Articles”) include provisions that could limit the ability of other entities or persons to
acquire control of the Fund or convert the Fund to an open-end fund.
The Articles require a vote by a majority of the Directors, including a majority of the Independent Fund Directors, of the Fund, and
holders of at least 75% of the shares of capital stock of the Fund outstanding and entitled to vote, except as described below, to authorize (1) the Fund’s conversion from a closed-end to an open-end investment company; (2) any merger or
consolidation or share exchange of the
Fund with or into any other company; (3) the dissolution or liquidation of the Fund; (4) any sale, lease or exchange of all or substantially all of the
Fund’s assets to any Principal Stockholder (as defined below); (5) a change in the nature of the business of the Fund so that it would cease to be an investment company registered under the 1940 Act; (6) with certain exceptions, the issuance of
any securities of the Fund to any Principal Stockholder for cash; or (7) any transfer by the Fund of any securities of the Fund to any Principal Stockholder in exchange for cash, securities or other property having an aggregate fair market
value of $1 million ($1,000,000) or more; provided, with respect to (1) through (5), if such action has been authorized by the affirmative vote of 75% of the Directors, including a majority of the Independent Fund Directors, then the
affirmative vote of the holders of only a majority of the Fund’s shares of capital stock outstanding and entitled to vote at the time is required; and provided, further, with respect to (6) and (7), if such transaction has been authorized by
the affirmative vote of 75% of the Directors, including a majority of the Independent Fund Directors, no stockholder vote is required to authorize such action. The term “Principal Stockholder” means any person, entity or group that holds,
directly or indirectly, more than 5% of the outstanding shares of the Fund and includes any associates or affiliates of such person or entity or of any member of the group. None of the foregoing provisions may be amended except by the vote of
at least 75% of the outstanding shares of capital stock of the Fund outstanding and entitled to vote thereon. As discussed in the Prospectus, certain of the actions described above also require approval by the holders of the Preferred Shares,
tallied separately. Certain of the transactions described above, even if approved by stockholders, may be prohibited by the 1940 Act.
The percentage votes required under these provisions, which are greater than the minimum requirements under Maryland law or the 1940
Act, will make more difficult a change in the Fund’s business or management and may have the effect of depriving Common Stockholders of an opportunity to sell shares at a premium over prevailing market prices by discouraging a third party from
seeking to obtain control of the Fund in a tender offer or similar transaction. The Board believes that the provisions of the Articles relating to such higher votes are in the best interest of the Fund and its stockholders.
The Bylaws provide that certain federal or state courts in Maryland shall, to the fullest extent permitted by law, be the sole and
exclusive forum in which certain types of litigation may be brought unless the Fund consents in writing to the selection of an alternative forum. The Bylaws further provide that any person or entity purchasing or otherwise acquiring any
interest in any security of the Fund shall be deemed to have notice of, and consented to, the exclusive forum provisions therein.
The Bylaws contain provisions the effect of which is to prevent matters, including nominations of Directors, from being considered at
a stockholders’ meeting where the Fund has not received notice of the matters generally at least 120 but no more than 150 days prior to the first anniversary of the date of mailing of the preceding year’s annual meeting of stockholders.
Reference should be made to the Articles and Bylaws on file with the SEC for the full text of these provisions.
REPURCHASE OF COMMON STOCK; TENDER OFFERS; CONVERSION TO OPEN-END FUND
The Fund is a closed-end management investment company, and as such its stockholders do not have the right to cause the Fund to redeem
their shares. Instead, the Fund’s Common Stock trades in the open market at a price that is a function of several factors, including distribution levels (which are in turn affected by expenses), NAV, call protection, distribution stability,
portfolio credit quality, relative demand for and supply of such shares in the market, general market and economic conditions and other factors. Shares of a closed-end management investment company may frequently trade at prices lower than NAV.
The Board regularly monitors the relationship between the market price and NAV of the Common Stock.
If the Common Stock were to trade at a substantial discount to NAV for an extended period of time, the Board may consider the
repurchase of its Common Stock on the open market or in private transactions, the making of a tender offer for such shares, or the conversion of the Fund to an open-end management investment company. The Fund cannot assure you that the Board
will decide to take or propose any of these actions, or that share repurchases or tender offers will actually reduce market discount.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, at any time when the Fund has Preferred Stock outstanding, the Fund may not purchase, redeem or
otherwise acquire any of its Common Stock unless (1) all accrued dividends on Preferred Stock have been paid and (2) at the time of such purchase, redemption or acquisition, the NAV of the Fund’s portfolio (determined after deducting the
acquisition price of the Common Stock) is at least 200% of the liquidation value of the outstanding Preferred Stock (expected to equal the original purchase price per share plus any accrued and unpaid dividends thereon).
Subject to its investment limitations, the Fund may borrow to finance the repurchase of shares or to make a tender offer. Interest on
any borrowings to finance share repurchase transactions or the accumulation of cash by the Fund in anticipation of share repurchases or tenders will reduce the Fund’s net income. Any share repurchase, tender offer or borrowing that might be
approved by the Board would have to comply with the 1934 Act and the 1940 Act and the rules and regulations thereunder.
The Board may also from time to time consider submitting to the holders of the shares of stock of the Fund a proposal to convert the
Fund to an open-end investment company. In determining whether to exercise its sole discretion to submit this issue to stockholders, the Board would consider all factors then relevant, including the relationship of the market price of the
Common Stock to NAV, the extent to which the Fund’s capital structure is leveraged and the possibility of re-leveraging, the spread, if any, between the yields on securities in the Fund’s portfolio and interest and dividend charges on any
Preferred Stock and/or other borrowings issued by the Fund and general market and economic conditions.
See “Anti-Takeover Provisions in the Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws” in the Prospectus and “Certain Provisions in the Articles
of Incorporation and Bylaws” in this SAI for a discussion of voting requirements applicable to conversion of the Fund to an open-end company. If the Fund converted to an open-end management investment company, it would be required to redeem all
Preferred Stock and notes then outstanding and prepay any loans (requiring in turn that it liquidate a portion of its investment portfolio), if any, and the Fund’s Common Stock would no longer be listed on the NYSE American. In contrast to a
closed-end management investment company, stockholders of an open-end management investment company may require the company to redeem their shares at any time (except in certain circumstances as authorized by or under the 1940 Act) at their
NAV, less any redemption charge that is in effect at the time of redemption. In order to avoid maintaining large cash positions or liquidating favorable investments to meet redemptions, open-end companies typically engage in a continuous
offering of their common stock. Open-end companies are thus subject to periodic asset in-flows and out-flows that can complicate portfolio management.
The repurchase by the Fund of its shares at prices below NAV will result in an increase in the NAV of those shares that remain
outstanding. However, there can be no assurance that share repurchases or tenders at or below NAV will result in the Fund’s shares trading at a price equal to their NAV. Nevertheless, the fact that the Fund’s shares may be the subject of
repurchase or tender offers at NAV from time to time, or that the Fund may be converted to an open-end company, may reduce any spread between market price and NAV that might otherwise exist.
In addition, a purchase by the Fund of its Common Stock will decrease the Fund’s total assets. This would likely have the effect of
increasing the Fund’s expense ratio. Any purchase by the Fund of its Common Stock at a time when Preferred Stock, loans or notes are outstanding will increase the leverage applicable to the outstanding Common Stock then remaining. See the
Fund’s Prospectus under “Risks – Leverage Risk.”
Before deciding whether to take any action if the Fund’s Common Stock trades below NAV, the Board would consider all relevant factors,
including the extent and duration of the discount, the liquidity of the Fund’s portfolio, the impact of any action that might be taken on the Fund or its stockholders, market considerations and alternative actions that might be taken. Based on
these considerations, even if the Fund’s Common Stock should trade at a discount, the Board may determine that, in the interest of the Fund and its stockholders, that the Fund should not be converted to an open-end structure and, perhaps, that
no action should be taken at that time.
The following is a brief general summary of certain material federal tax considerations affecting the Fund and its stockholders with
respect to the purchase, ownership, and disposition of Common Stock. It is based on the Code, the regulations thereunder, judicial authorities, published positions of the IRS, and other applicable authorities, all as in effect on the date
hereof and all of which are subject to change or differing interpretations (possibly with retroactive effect); no assurance can be given that future legislation, regulations, court decisions, and/or administrative pronouncements will not
significantly change applicable law and materially affect the conclusions expressed herein, and any such change, even though made after an investor has invested in the Fund, could be applied retroactively. Tax matters are complicated, and this
discussion does not purport to be complete or to deal with all aspects of federal income taxation that may be relevant to an investor in light of his, her, or its particular circumstances or to Common Stockholders (such as those enumerated in
the Prospectus) who or that are subject to special federal tax rules.
Unless otherwise noted, this discussion applies only to a U.S. Stockholder (as defined in the Prospectus) that holds Common Stock as a
capital asset (generally, an asset held for investment). If a partnership holds Common Stock, the federal income tax treatment of a partner in the partnership generally will depend on the partner’s status and the partnership’s activities.
The tax consequences of an
investment in and holding Common Stock will depend on the particular facts of each investor’s situation. Prospective investors are advised to consult their own tax advisers with respect to the application to their own circumstances of the
general federal income tax rules summarized below, and with respect to other federal, state, local, or foreign tax consequences to them, before making an investment in Common Stock.
Taxation of the Fund
The Fund intends to qualify each taxable year for treatment as a RIC. To qualify for that treatment, the Fund must, among other
things:
(a) derive at least 90% of its gross income each taxable year from interest, dividends, payments with respect to securities loans and gains from the sale or
other disposition of securities or foreign currencies, or other income (including gains from options, futures or forward contracts) derived with respect to its business of investing in securities or those currencies and net income derived
from an interest in a qualified publicly traded partnership (“QPTP”) (“Income Requirement”);
(b) distribute with respect to each taxable year at least the sum of 90% of its investment company taxable income (consisting generally of net investment
income, the excess, if any, of net short-term capital gain over net long-term capital loss, and net gains from certain foreign currency transactions,
(c) if any, all determined without regard to any deduction for dividends paid) and 90% of its net exempt interest, if any, for that year (“Distribution
Requirement”); and
(d) diversify its holdings so that, at the end of each quarter of its taxable year, (1) at least 50% of the value of its total assets is represented by cash and
cash items, Government securities, securities of other RICs and other securities limited in respect of any one issuer to a value not greater than 5% of the value of the Fund’s total assets and to not more than 10% of the issuer’s outstanding
voting securities, and (2) not more than 25% of the value of the Fund’s total assets is invested in the securities (other than those of the Government or other RICs) of any one issuer or of two or more issuers that the Fund controls and are
engaged in the same, similar or related trades or businesses, or the securities of one or more QPTPs (“Diversification Requirements”).
If the Fund qualifies for treatment as a RIC, it will not be subject to federal income tax on net income and realized gains it timely
distributes to its stockholders. If the Fund failed to qualify for that treatment for any taxable year — either (1) by failing to satisfy the Distribution Requirement, even if it satisfied the Income and Diversification Requirements, or (2) by
failing to satisfy the Income Requirement and/or either Diversification Requirement and was unable to, or determined not to, avail itself of Code provisions that enable a RIC to cure a failure to satisfy any of the Income and Diversification
Requirements as long as the failure “is due to reasonable cause and not due to willful neglect” and the RIC pays a deductible tax calculated in accordance with those provisions and meets certain other requirements — then for federal income tax
purposes it would be taxed as an ordinary corporation on the full amount of its taxable income for that year without being able to deduct the distributions it makes to its stockholders. In addition, for those purposes the stockholders would
treat all those distributions, including distributions of net capital gain (i.e., the excess of net long-term capital gain over net short-term capital loss), as dividends to the extent of the Fund’s
earnings and profits, taxable as ordinary income, except that, for individual and certain other non-corporate stockholders (each, an “individual stockholder”), the part thereof that is “qualified dividend income” (“QDI”) would be subject to
federal income tax at the rates for net capital gain — a maximum of 15% for a single stockholder with taxable income not exceeding $518,900 ($583,750 for married stockholders filing jointly) and 20% for those individual stockholders with
taxable income exceeding those respective amounts (which apply for 2024 and will be adjusted for inflation annually); and all or part of those dividends distributions might be eligible for the dividends received deduction. Furthermore, the Fund
could be required to recognize unrealized gains, pay substantial taxes and interest, and make substantial distributions before requalifying for RIC treatment.
The Fund intends to distribute at least annually to its stockholders all or substantially all of its investment company taxable
income. The Fund also will annually (1) distribute its net capital gain or (2) retain all or a portion of its net capital gain for investment. If the Fund retains any such income or gain, it will be subject to tax at regular corporate rates on
the retained amount. See “Taxation of the Stockholders” below for a description of the consequences to the Fund’s stockholders of its retention of net capital gain.
To the extent the Fund fails to distribute in a calendar year at least an amount equal to the sum of (1) 98% of its ordinary income
for that year plus (2) 98.2% of its capital gain net income for the one-year period ending October 31 of that year plus (3) 100% of any retained amount of either from the prior year, it will be subject to a nondeductible 4% excise tax (“Excise
Tax”). For these purposes, the Fund will be treated as having distributed any amount with respect to which it pays income tax. The Fund intends generally to make distributions sufficient to avoid imposition of the Excise Tax.
If the Fund issues Preferred Stock, then, at any time when Preferred Stock is outstanding, and the Fund’s assets are insufficient to
satisfy certain requirements, the Fund will be required to suspend distributions to holders of the Common Stock until those requirements are satisfied. Doing so may prevent the Fund from satisfying the Distribution Requirement and may therefore
jeopardize its qualification for treatment as a RIC or cause it to incur an income tax or Excise Tax liability or both.
Taxation of the Stockholders
Distributions on the Fund’s shares to a stockholder are generally subject to federal income tax as described in the Prospectus and
below, even though those distributions may economically represent a return of the stockholder’s investment. Such a distribution is likely to occur in respect of shares purchased when the Fund has undistributed income or gains that are either
unrealized or realized but not distributed. Those realized gains may be required to be distributed even when the Fund has unrealized losses. Distributions are taxable to a stockholder even if they are paid from net income or gains the Fund
earned before the stockholder’s investment (and thus included in the price the stockholder paid).
For U.S. federal income tax purposes, except with respect to capital gain distributions described below, distributions paid out of the
Fund’s current or accumulated earnings and profits generally will be taxable as ordinary dividend income. The Fund generally does not expect to pay dividends that would qualify as qualified dividend income taxable at lower rates for individuals
or dividends that would be eligible for the dividends received deduction if received by Fund stockholders that are corporations. For this pupose, “qualified dividend income” means dividends received from U.S. corporations and “qualified foreign
corporations,” provided that certain holding period and other requirements in respect of the stock of such corporations are met.
If the Fund should have income that qualifies for the reduced tax rate applicable to qualified dividend income, the maximum amount
allowable will be reported by the Fund. This amount will be reflected on Form 1099-DIV for the applicable calendar year.
Distributions of net capital gain, if any, reported as capital gains dividends are taxable to a stockholder as long-term capital
gains, regardless of how long the stockholder has held the Common Stock. A distribution of an amount in excess of the Fund’s current and accumulated earnings and profits will be treated by a Fund stockholder as a return of capital which is
applied against and reduces the stockholder’s basis in his or her Common Stock. To the extent that the amount of any such distribution exceeds the stockholder’s basis in his or her Common Stock, the excess will be treated by the stockholder as
gain from a sale or exchange of the Common Stock. Distributions of gains from the sale of investments that the Fund owned for one year or less will be taxable as ordinary income.
If the Fund retains any net capital gain, it may designate all or part of the retained amount as undistributed capital gains in a
notice to its stockholders. If the Fund makes such a designation, it would be required to pay federal income tax at the rate of 21% on the undistributed gain (“Fund tax”) and each stockholder subject to federal income tax (1) would be required
to include in income for federal income tax purposes, as long-term capital gain, his or her proportionate share of the designated gain (which, in the case of an individual stockholder, would be taxed at the rates for net capital gain described
above), (2) would be entitled to credit his or her proportionate share of the Fund tax against his or her federal income tax liability, if any, and to claim a refund to the extent the credit exceeds that liability, and (3) would increase the
tax basis in his or her Common Stock by an amount equal to the difference between the included gain and that share of the Fund tax.
Distributions of the Fund’s “investment company taxable income” to non-U.S. stockholders (including interest income and the excess of
net short-term capital gain over net long-term capital losses) will generally be subject to withholding of federal tax at a 30% rate (or lower rate provided by an applicable treaty) as dividends to the extent of the Fund’s current and
accumulated earnings and profits unless the distributions are effectively connected with a U.S. trade or business of the non-U.S. stockholders, and, if
an income tax treaty applies, attributable to a permanent establishment in the United States of the non-U.S. stockholders. In the case of such
effectively connected income, the distributions will be subject to U.S. federal income tax at the rates applicable to U.S. persons, plus, in certain cases where the Non-U.S. stockholders is a corporation, a branch profits tax at a 30% rate (or
lower rate provided by an applicable treaty). Exemptions from the 30% withholding tax are provided for dividends properly designated as interest related dividends or as short-term capital gain dividends paid by the Fund with respect to its
qualified net interest income or qualified short-term gain.
Actual or deemed distributions of the Fund’s net capital gains (i.e., net long-term capital
gains in excess of short-term capital losses) to a non-U.S. stockholders, and gains realized by a non-U.S. stockholders upon the sale of Fund shares, will not be subject to federal withholding tax and generally will not be subject to U.S.
federal income tax unless (a) the distributions or gains are effectively connected with a U.S. trade or business of the non-U.S. stockholder and, if an income tax treaty applies, are attributable to a permanent establishment or fixed base
maintained by the non-U.S. stockholder in the United States, or (b) the non-U.S. stockholder is an individual, has been present in the United States for 183 days or more during the taxable, and certain other conditions are satisfied.
If the Fund distributes its net capital gains in the form of deemed rather than actual distributions, a non-U.S. stockholder will be
entitled to a U.S. federal income tax credit or tax refund equal to the stockholder’s allocable share of the tax the Fund pays on the capital gains deemed to have been distributed. In order to obtain the refund, the non-U.S. stockholder must
obtain a U.S. taxpayer identification number and file a U.S. federal income tax return even if the non-U.S. stockholder would not otherwise be required to obtain a U.S. taxpayer identification number or file a U.S. federal income tax return.
For a corporate non-U.S. stockholder, distributions (both actual and deemed), and gains realized upon the sale of shares that are effectively connected to a U.S. trade or business may, under certain circumstances, be subject to an additional
“branch profits tax” at a 30% rate (or at a lower rate if provided for by an applicable treaty).
A non-U.S. stockholder who is a non-resident alien individual, and who is otherwise subject to withholding of federal tax, may be
subject to information reporting and backup withholding of U.S. federal income tax on dividends unless the non-U.S. stockholder provides the Fund or the dividend paying agent with an IRS Form W-8BEN (or an acceptable substitute form) or
otherwise meets documentary evidence requirements for establishing that it is a non-U.S. stockholder or otherwise establishes an exemption from backup withholding.
Under the Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act (“FATCA”), “foreign financial institutions” (“FFIs”) or “non-financial foreign entities”
(“NFFEs”) that are Fund stockholders may be subject to a generally nonrefundable 30% withholding tax on income dividends the Fund pays. Proposed regulations (effective while pending) have been issued to eliminate the application of the
withholding tax to capital gain distributions and the proceeds from the repurchase of Common Stock that was scheduled to take effect in 2019. As discussed below, the FATCA withholding tax generally can be avoided (a) by an FFI, if it reports
certain information regarding direct and indirect ownership of financial accounts U.S. persons hold with the FFI and (b) by an NFFE, if (i) it certifies that it has no substantial U.S. persons as owners or (ii) it does have such owners and
reports information relating to them to the withholding agent. The U.S. Treasury Department has negotiated intergovernmental agreements (“IGAs”) with certain countries and is in various stages of negotiations with other foreign countries with
respect to one or more alternative approaches to implement FATCA; entities in those countries may be required to comply with the terms of the IGA instead of Treasury regulations.
An FFI can avoid FATCA withholding by becoming a “participating FFI,” which requires the FFI to enter into a tax compliance agreement
with the IRS under section 1471(b) of the Code. Under such an agreement, a participating FFI agrees to (1) verify and document whether it has U.S. accountholders, (2) report certain information regarding their accounts to the IRS, and (3) meet
certain other specified requirements.
An FFI resident in a country that has entered into a Model I IGA with the United States must report to that country’s government
(pursuant to the terms of the applicable IGA and applicable law), which will, in turn, report to the IRS. An FFI resident in a Model II IGA country generally must comply with U.S. regulatory requirements, with certain exceptions, including the
treatment of recalcitrant accountholders. An FFI resident in one of those countries that complies with whichever of the foregoing that applies will be exempt from FATCA withholding.
An NFFE that is the beneficial owner of a payment from the Fund can avoid FATCA withholding generally by certifying that it does not
have any substantial U.S. owners or by providing the name, address, and taxpayer identification number of each such owner. The NFFE will report to the Fund or other applicable withholding agent, which will, in turn, report information to the
IRS.
Those foreign stockholders also may fall into certain exempt, excepted, or deemed compliant categories established by Treasury
regulations, IGAs, and other guidance regarding FATCA. An FFI or NFFE that invests in the Fund will need to provide the Fund with documentation properly certifying the entity’s status under FATCA to avoid FATCA withholding. The requirements
imposed by FATCA are different from, and in addition to, the tax certification rules to avoid backup withholding described in the Prospectus. Foreign investors are urged to consult their tax advisers regarding the application of these
requirements to their own situation and the impact thereof on their investment in the Fund.
Tax Consequences of Certain Investments
REMICs. The Fund may invest in REITs that (1) hold residual interests in real estate mortgage investment conduits (“REMICs”) or (2) engage in mortgage securitization transactions that
cause the REITs to be taxable mortgage pools (“TMPs”) or have a qualified REIT subsidiary that is a TMP. A portion of the net income allocable to REMIC residual interest holders may be an “excess inclusion.” The Code authorizes the issuance
of regulations dealing with the taxation and reporting of excess inclusion income of REITs and RICs that hold residual REMIC interests and of REITs, or qualified REIT subsidiaries, that are TMPs. Although those regulations have not yet been
issued, the Treasury Department and the IRS issued a notice in 2006 (“Notice”) announcing that, pending the issuance of further guidance (which has not yet been issued), the IRS would apply the principles in the following paragraphs to all
excess inclusion income, whether from REMIC residual interests or TMPs.
The Notice provides that a REIT must (1) determine whether it or its qualified REIT subsidiary (or a part of either) is a TMP and, if
so, calculate the TMP’s excess inclusion income under a “reasonable method,” (2) allocate its excess inclusion income to its stockholders generally in proportion to dividends paid, (3) inform stockholders that are not “disqualified
organizations” (i.e., governmental units and tax-exempt entities that are not subject to tax on their unrelated business taxable income (“UBTI”)) of the amount and character of the excess inclusion
income allocated thereto, (4) pay tax (at the highest federal income tax rate imposed on corporations) on the excess inclusion income allocable to its stockholders that are disqualified organizations, and (5) apply the withholding tax
provisions with respect to the excess inclusion part of dividends paid to foreign persons without regard to any treaty exception or reduction in tax rate. Excess inclusion income allocated to certain tax-exempt entities (including qualified
retirement plans, individual retirement accounts, and public charities) constitutes UBTI to them.
A RIC with excess inclusion income is subject to rules identical to those in clauses (2) through (5) above (substituting “that are
nominees” for “that are not ‘disqualified organizations’” in clause (3) and inserting “record” after “its” in clause (4)). The Notice further provides that a RIC is not required to report
the amount and character of the excess inclusion income allocated to its stockholders that are not nominees, except that (1) a RIC with excess inclusion
income from all sources that exceeds 1% of its gross income must do so and (2) any other RIC must do so by taking into account only excess inclusion income allocated to the RIC from REITs the excess inclusion income of which exceeded 3% of its
dividends. The Fund will not invest directly in REMIC residual interests and does not intend to invest in REITs that, to its knowledge, invest in those interests or are TMPs or have a qualified REIT subsidiary that is a TMP.
After calendar year-end, REITs can and often do change the category (e.g., ordinary income
dividend, capital gain distribution, or return of capital) of the distributions they have made during that year, which would result at that time in the Fund’s also having to re-categorize some of the distributions it made to its stockholders.
These changes would be reflected in the annual Form 1099, together with other tax information. Those forms generally will be distributed to stockholders in February of each year, although the Fund may, in one or more years, request from the IRS
an extension of time to distribute those forms until mid-March to enable it to receive the latest information it can from the REITs in which it invests and thereby accurately report that information to its stockholders on a single form (rather
than having to send amended forms).
For taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017 and before January 1, 2026, the Code allows individuals and certain non-corporate
entities a deduction for 20% of “qualified REIT dividends.” Treasury Regulations allow a RIC to pass the character of its qualified REIT dividends through to its shareholders, provided they meet certain holding period requirements. As a result,
the Fund stockholder will be eligible to receive the benefit of the 20% deduction with respect to the Fund’s REIT-based dividends.
Hedging Transactions. The use of hedging strategies, such as writing (selling) and purchasing options and futures contracts and entering into forward currency contracts, involves complex rules that
will determine for income tax purposes the amount, character and timing of recognition of the gains and losses the Fund realizes in connection therewith. Gains from the disposition of foreign currencies (except certain gains that may be
excluded by future regulations), and gains from options, futures and forward currency contracts the Fund derives with respect to its business of investing in securities or foreign currencies, will be treated as qualifying income under the
Income Requirement. Certain of the Fund’s investment practices are subject to special and complex federal income tax provisions that may, among other things, (1) disallow, suspend or otherwise limit the allowance of certain losses or
deductions, (2) convert lower taxed long-term capital gain to higher taxed short-term capital gain or ordinary income, (3) convert an ordinary loss or a deduction to a capital loss (the deductibility of which is more limited), (4) cause the
Fund to recognize income or gain without a corresponding receipt of cash, (5) adversely affect the timing as to when a purchase or sale of securities is deemed to occur and (6) adversely alter the characterization of certain complex financial
transactions. The Fund will monitor its transactions and may make certain tax elections to mitigate the effect of these rules and prevent its disqualification as a RIC.
Foreign Securities. Interest and dividends the Fund receives, and gains it realizes, on foreign securities may be subject to income, withholding or other taxes imposed by foreign countries and U.S.
possessions that would reduce the yield and/or total return on its securities. Tax treaties between certain countries and the United States may reduce or eliminate these taxes, however, and many foreign countries do not impose taxes on
capital gains in respect of investments by foreign investors.
The Fund may invest in the stock of “passive foreign investment companies” (“PFICs”). A PFIC is any foreign corporation (with certain
exceptions) that, in general, meets either of the following tests for a taxable year: (1) at least 75% of its gross income is passive or (2) an average of at least 50% of its assets produce, or are held for the production of, passive income.
Under certain circumstances, if the Fund holds stock of a PFIC, it will be subject to federal income tax on a portion of any “excess distribution” the Fund receives on the stock or of any gain on its disposition of the stock (collectively,
“PFIC income”), plus
interest thereon, even if the Fund distributes the PFIC income as a taxable dividend to its stockholders. The balance of the PFIC income will be included
in the Fund’s investment company taxable income and, accordingly, will not be taxable to it to the extent it distributes that income to its stockholders. Fund distributions thereof will not be eligible for the 15% and 20% maximum federal income
tax rates on individual stockholders’ QDI.
If the Fund invests in a PFIC and elects to treat the PFIC as a “qualified electing fund” (“QEF”), then in lieu of the Fund’s
incurring the foregoing tax and interest obligation, it would be required to include in income each year its pro rata share of the QEF’s annual ordinary earnings and net capital gain -- which the Fund
most likely would have to distribute to satisfy the Distribution Requirement and avoid imposition of the Excise Tax -- even if the Fund did not receive those earnings and gain from the QEF. In most instances it will be very difficult, if not
impossible, to make this election because of certain requirements thereof.
The Fund may elect to “mark-to-market” any stock in a PFIC it owns at the end of its taxable year. “Marking-to-market,” in this
context, means including in gross income each taxable year (and treating as ordinary income) the excess, if any, of the fair market value of the stock over the Fund’s adjusted basis therein as of the end of that year. Pursuant to the election,
the Fund also may deduct (as an ordinary, not a capital, loss) the excess, if any, of its adjusted basis in PFIC stock over the fair market value thereof as of the taxable year-end, but only to the extent of any net marked-to-market gains with
respect to that stock the Fund included in income for prior taxable years under the election. The Fund’s adjusted basis in each PFIC’s stock subject to the election would be adjusted to reflect the amounts of income included and deductions
taken thereunder.
Investors should be aware that determining whether a foreign corporation is a PFIC is a fact-intensive determination that is based on
various facts and circumstances and thus is subject to change, and the principles and methodology used in determining whether a foreign corporation is a PFIC are subject to interpretation. As a result, the Fund may not be able, at the time it
acquires a foreign corporation’s shares, to ascertain whether the corporation is a PFIC and that a foreign corporation may become a PFIC after the Fund acquires shares therein. While the Fund generally will seek to avoid investing in PFIC
shares to avoid the tax consequences detailed above, there are no guarantees that it will be able to do so, and it reserves the right to make such investments as a matter of its investment policy.
Securities Issued or
Purchased at a Discount. The Fund may acquire zero coupon or other securities issued with original issue discount (“OID”). As a holder of those securities, the Fund
must include in gross income the OID that accrues on them during the taxable year, even if it receives no corresponding payment on them during the year. Because the Fund annually must distribute substantially all of its investment company
taxable income, including any OID, to satisfy the Distribution Requirement and avoid imposition of the Excise Tax, it may be required in a particular taxable year to distribute as a dividend an amount that is greater than the total amount of
cash it actually receives. Those distributions will be made from the Fund’s cash assets or from the proceeds of sales of its portfolio securities, if necessary. The Fund may realize capital gains or losses from those sales, which would
increase or decrease its investment company taxable income and/or net capital gain.
* * *
The foregoing is only a general summary of some of the important federal tax considerations generally affecting the Fund and its
stockholders. No attempt is made to present a complete explanation of the federal tax treatment of the Fund’s activities, and this discussion is not intended to be a substitute for careful tax planning. Accordingly, potential investors are
urged to consult their own tax advisers for more detailed information and for information regarding any state, local or foreign taxes applicable to the Fund and their purchasing, holding and disposing of Common Stock.
Stockholders of the Fund receive unaudited semi-annual financial statements, as well as year-end financial statements audited by the
independent auditors for the Fund. The Fund’s statements show the investments owned by it and the market values thereof and provide other information about the Fund and its operations.
CUSTODIAN, TRANSFER AGENT AND DIVIDEND DISBURSEMENT AGENT
State Street Bank and Trust Company, One Lincoln Street, Boston, MA 02111, serves as custodian for assets of the Fund. Equiniti Trust
Company, LLC serves as the transfer agent, registrar and distribution disbursement agent for the Common Stock. Equiniti Trust Company, LLC serves as agent for the Distribution Reinvestment Plan relating to the Common Stock.
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Ernst & Young LLP serves as independent auditors for the Fund. Ernst & Young LLP provides audit services, tax return
preparation and assistance and consultation in connection with review of the Fund’s filings with the SEC.
CONTROL PERSONS AND PRINCIPAL HOLDERS OF SECURITIES
A control person is a person who beneficially owns, either directly or indirectly, more than 25% of the voting securities of a
company. As of February 2, 2024, the Fund did not know of any person or entity who “controlled” the Fund.
In addition, the Directors and officers of the Fund, in the aggregate, owned less than 1% of the Fund’s outstanding shares of Common
Stock as of February 2, 2024. Information regarding each Director’s and portfolio manager’s ownership of shares of Common Stock is set forth above under “Ownership of Securities.”
As of October 18, 2024, the Fund did not know of any person who owned of record or beneficially 5% or more of the outstanding shares
of Common Stock or Preferred Stock of the Fund other than those listed below.
Name and Address of Beneficial Owner
|
Class
|
Amount of Beneficial
Ownership
|
Percent of Class
|
First Trust Portfolios L.P.
First Trust Advisors L.P.
The Charger Corporation
120 East Liberty Drive, Suite 400
Wheaton, IL 60187
|
Common
|
6,047,846 (1)
|
23.32%
|
Bank of America Corporation
Bank of America Corporate Center
100 N Tryon Street, Charlotte, NC 28255
|
Preferred
|
400(2)
|
100%
|
|
(1) |
Based on an amended Schedule 13G filed by First Trust Portfolios L.P., First Trust Advisors L.P. and The Charger Corporation on October 11, 2024.
|
|
(2) |
Based on a Schedule 13G filed by Bank of American Corporation on October 6, 2023.
|
K&L Gates LLP, 1601 K Street, N.W., Washington D.C. 20006, will pass upon certain legal matters in connection with shares of
Common Stock offered by the Fund, and also acts as counsel to the Fund.
The audited financial statements included in the Fund’s
Annual Report on Form N-CSR for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2023 (the “Annual Report”), together with the report of Ernst & Young LLP for the
Fund’s Annual Report, are incorporated herein by reference to the Fund’s Annual Report. In addition, the unaudited financial statements for the six months ended April 30, 2024 may be found in the Fund’s
Semi-annual Report on Form N-CSR for the period ended April 30, 2024 (the “Semi-annual Report”), and are incorporated by reference into this
Prospectus. All other portions of the Annual and Semi-annual Reports are not incorporated herein by reference and are not part of the registration statement, this SAI, the Prospectus or any Prospectus Supplement.
A Registration Statement on Form N-2, including any amendments thereto, relating to the shares of the Fund offered hereby, has been
filed by the Fund with the SEC, Washington, D.C. The Fund’s Prospectus and this SAI do not contain all of the information set forth in the Registration Statement, including any exhibits and schedules thereto. For further information with
respect to the Fund and the shares offered or to be offered hereby, reference is made to the Fund’s Registration Statement. Statements contained in the Fund’s Prospectus and this SAI as to the contents of any contract or other document referred
to are not necessarily complete and in each instance reference is made to the copy of such contract or other document filed as an exhibit to the Registration Statement, each such statement being qualified in all respects by such reference.
Copies of the Registration Statement may be inspected without charge at the SEC’s website (http://www.sec.gov).
Long-Term and Short-Term Debt Securities Rating Descriptions
S&P Global Ratings Long-Term Issue
Credit Ratings*:
The following descriptions have been published by Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC.
AAA – An obligation rated ‘AAA’ has the highest rating assigned by S&P Global Ratings. The obligor’s capacity to meet its financial commitments on the obligation is extremely strong.
AA – An obligation rated ‘AA’ differs from the highest-rated obligations only to a small degree. The obligor’s capacity to meet its financial commitments on the obligation is very strong.
A – An obligation rated ‘A’ is somewhat more susceptible to the adverse effects of changes in circumstances and economic conditions than obligations in higher-rated categories. However, the obligor’s capacity to meet its
financial commitments on the obligation is still strong.
BBB – An obligation rated ‘BBB’ exhibits adequate protection parameters. However, adverse economic conditions or chang ing
circumstances are more likely to weaken the obligor’s capacity to meet its financial commitments on the obligation.
BB, B, CCC, CC, and C – Obligations rated ‘BB’, ‘B’, ‘CCC’, ‘CC’, and ‘C’ are regarded as having significant speculative characteristics. ‘BB’ indicates the least degree of speculation and ‘C’ the highest. While such obligations
will likely have some quality and protective characteristics, these may be outweighed by large uncertainties or major exposure to adverse conditions.
BB – An obligation rated ‘BB’ is less vulnerable to nonpayment than other speculative issues. However, it faces major ongoing uncertainties or exposure to adverse business, financial, or economic conditions that could lead to
the obligor’s inadequate capacity to meet its financial commitments on the obligation.
B – An obligation rated ‘B’ is more vulnerable to nonpayment than obligations rated ‘BB’, but the obligor currently has the capacity to meet its financial commitments on the obligation. Adverse business, financial, or economic
conditions will likely impair the obligor’s capacity or willingness to meet its financial commitments on the obligation.
CCC – An obligation rated ‘CCC’ is currently vulnerable to nonpayment and is dependent upon favorable business, financial, and economic conditions for the obligor to meet its financial commitments on the obligation. In the event
of adverse business, financial, or economic conditions, the obligor is not likely to have the capacity to meet its financial commitments on the obligation.
CC – An obligation rated ‘CC’ is currently highly vulnerable to nonpayment. The ‘CC’ rating is used when a default has not yet occurred but S&P Global Ratings expects default to be a virtual certainty, regardless of the
anticipated time to default.
C – An obligation rated ‘C’ is currently highly vulnerable to nonpayment, and the obligation is expected to have lower relative seniority or lower ultimate recovery compared with obligations that are rated higher.
D – An obligation rated ‘D’ is in default or in breach of an imputed promise. For non-hybrid capital instruments, the ‘D’ rating category is used when payments on an obligation are not made on the date due, unless S&P
Global Ratings believes that such payments will be made within the next five business days in the absence of a stated grace period or within the earlier of the stated grace period or the next 30 calendar days. The ‘D’ rating also will be used
upon the filing of a bankruptcy petition or the taking of similar action and where default on an obligation is a virtual certainty, for example due to automatic stay provisions. A rating on an obligation is lowered to ‘D’ if it is subject to
a distressed debt restructuring.
*Ratings from ‘AA’ to ‘CCC’ may be modified by the addition of a plus (+) or minus (-) sign to show relative standing within the rating categories.
Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. (“Moody’s”)
-- Global Long-Term Rating Scale:
The following descriptions have been published by Moody’s Investors Service, Inc.
Aaa – Obligations rated Aaa are judged to
be of the highest quality, subject to the lowest level of credit risk.
Aa – Obligations rated Aa are judged to
be of high quality and are subject to very low credit risk.
A – Obligations rated A are judged to be
upper-medium grade and are subject to low credit risk.
Baa – Obligations rated Baa are judged to
be medium-grade and subject to moderate credit risk and as such may possess certain speculative
characteristics.
Ba – Obligations rated Ba are judged to be
speculative and are subject to substantial credit risk.
B – Obligations rated B are considered
speculative and are subject to high credit risk.
Caa – Obligations rated Caa are judged to
be speculative of poor standing and are subject to very high credit risk.
Ca – Obligations rated Ca are highly
speculative and are likely in, or very near, default, with some prospect of recovery of principal and
interest.
C – Obligations rated C are the lowest
rated and are typically in default, with little prospect for recovery of principal or interest.
Note: Moody’s appends numerical modifiers 1, 2,
and 3 to each generic rating classification from Aa through Caa. The modifier 1 indicates that the obligation ranks in the higher end of its generic rating category; the modifier 2 indicates a mid-range ranking; and the modifier 3 indicates a
ranking in the lower end of that generic rating category. Additionally, a “(hyb)” indicator is appended to all ratings of hybrid securities issued by banks, insurers, finance companies, and securities firms.*
* By their terms, hybrid securities allow for the omission of scheduled dividends, interest, or principal payments, which can potentially result in
impairment if such an omission occurs. Hybrid securities may also be subject to contractually allowable write-downs of principal that could result in impairment. Together with the hybrid indicator, the long-term obligation rating assigned to a
hybrid security is an expression of the relative credit risk associated with that security.
Fitch Ratings, Inc. (“Fitch”) -- Corporate Finance Obligations –
Long-Term Rating Scale:
The following descriptions have been published by Fitch Ratings, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its subsidiaries.
AAA – Highest Credit Quality. ‘AAA’ ratings denote the lowest expectation of credit risk. They are assigned only in cases of exceptionally strong capacity for
payment of financial commitments. This capacity is highly unlikely to be adversely affected by foreseeable events.
AA – Very High Credit Quality. ‘AA’ ratings denote expectations of very low credit risk. They indicate very strong capacity for payment of financial commitments.
This capacity is not significantly vulnerable to foreseeable events.
A – High Credit Quality. ‘A’ ratings denote expectations of low credit risk. The capacity for payment of financial commitments is considered strong. This capacity may,
nevertheless, be more vulnerable to adverse business or economic conditions than is the case for higher ratings.
BBB – Good Credit Quality. ‘BBB’ ratings indicate that expectations of credit risk are currently low. The capacity for payment of financial commitments is
considered adequate, but adverse business or economic conditions are more likely to impair this capacity.
BB – Speculative. ‘BB’ ratings indicate an elevated vulnerability to credit risk, particularly in the event of adverse changes in business or economic conditions
over time; however, business or financial alternatives may be available to allow financial commitments to be met.
B – Highly Speculative. ‘B’ ratings indicate that material credit risk is present.
CCC – Substantial Credit Risk. ‘CCC’ ratings indicate that substantial credit risk is present.
CC – Very High Levels of Credit Risk. ‘CC’ ratings indicate very high levels of credit risk.
C – Exceptionally High Levels of Credit Risk. ‘C’ indicates exceptionally high levels of credit risk.
Ratings in the categories of ‘CCC’, ‘CC’ and ‘C’ can also relate to obligations or issuers that are in default. In this case, the rating does not opine
on default risk but reflects the recovery expectation only.
DBRS -- Long-Term Obligations Rating Scale:
The following descriptions have been published by DBRS Morningstar.
AAA – Highest credit quality. The capacity for the payment of financial obligations is exceptionally high and unlikely to be adversely affected by future events.
AA – Superior credit quality. The capacity for the payment of financial obligations is considered high. Credit quality differs from AAA only to a small degree. Unlikely to be significantly vulnerable
to future events.
A – Good credit quality. The capacity for the payment of financial obligations is substantial, but of lesser credit quality than AA. May be vulnerable to future events, but qualifying negative factors are
considered manageable.
BBB – Adequate credit quality. The capacity for the payment of financial obligations is considered acceptable. May be vulnerable to future events.
BB – Speculative, non-investment-grade credit quality. The capacity for the payment of financial obligations is uncertain. Vulnerable to future events.
B – Highly speculative credit quality. There is a high level of uncertainty as to the capacity to meet financial obligations.
CCC, CC, C – Very highly speculative credit quality. In danger of defaulting on financial obligations. There is little difference between these three categories, although CC and C rating
categories are normally applied to obligations that are seen as highly likely to default or subordinated to obligations rated in the CCC to B range. Obligations in respect of which default has not technically taken place but is considered
inevitable may be rated in the C category.
D – When the issuer has filed under any applicable bankruptcy, insolvency, or winding-up statute or there is a failure to satisfy an obligation after the exhaustion of grace periods, a downgrade to D may
occur. Morningstar DBRS may also use SD (Selective Default) in cases where only some securities are impacted, such as the case of a distressed exchange. See the Default Definition document on dbrsmorningstar.com under Understanding Ratings
for more information.
S&P Global Ratings -- Short-Term Issue
Credit Ratings:
The following descriptions have been published by Standard & Poor’s Financial Services LLC.
A-1 – A short-term obligation rated ‘A-1’ is rated in the highest category by S&P Global Ratings. The obligor’s capacity to meet its financial commitments on the obligation is strong. Within this
category, certain obligations are designated with a plus sign (+). This indicates that the obligor’s capacity to meet its financial commitments on these obligations is extremely strong.
A-2 – A short-term obligation rated ‘A-2’ is somewhat more susceptible to the adverse effects of changes in circumstances and economic conditions than obligations in higher rating categories. However,
the obligor’s capacity to meet its financial commitments on the obligation is satisfactory.
A-3 – A short-term obligation rated ‘A-3’ exhibits adequate protection parameters. However, adverse economic conditions or changing circumstances are more likely to weaken an obligor’s capacity to meet
its financial commitments on the obligation.
B – A short-term obligation rated ‘B’ is regarded as vulnerable and has significant speculative characteristics. The obligor currently has the capacity to meet its financial commitments; however, it faces
major ongoing uncertainties that could lead to the obligor’s inadequate capacity to meet its financial commitments.
C – A short-term obligation rated ‘C’ is currently vulnerable to nonpayment and is dependent upon favorable business, financial, and economic conditions for the obligor to meet its financial commitments on
the obligation.
D – A short-term obligation rated ‘D’ is in default or in breach of an imputed promise. For non-hybrid capital instruments, the ‘D’ rating category is used when payments on an obligation are not made on the
date due, unless S&P Global Ratings believes that such payments will be made within any stated grace period. However, any stated grace period longer than five business days will be treated as five business days. The ‘D’ rating also will
be used upon the filing of a bankruptcy petition or the taking of a similar action and where default on an obligation is a virtual certainty, for example due to automatic stay provisions. A rating on an obligation is lowered to ‘D’ if it is
subject to a distressed debt restructuring.
Dual ratings may be assigned to debt issues that have a put option or demand feature. The first component of the rating addresses
the likelihood of repayment of principal and interest as due, and the second component of the rating addresses only the demand feature. The first component of the rating can relate to either a short-term or long-term transaction and accordingly
use either short-term or long-term rating symbols. The second component of the rating relates to the put option and is assigned a short-term rating symbol (for example, ‘AAA/A-1+’ or ‘A-1+/A-1’). With U.S. municipal short-term demand debt, the
U.S. municipal short-term note rating symbols are used for the first component of the rating (for example, ‘SP-1+/A-1+’).
Moody’s -- Global Short-Term Rating Scale:
The following descriptions have been published by Moody’s Investors Service, Inc.
P-1 – Ratings of Prime-1 reflect a superior ability to repay short-term obligations.
P-2 – Ratings of Prime-2 reflect a strong ability to repay short-term obligations.
P-3 – Ratings of Prime-3 reflect an acceptable ability to repay short-term obligations.
NP – Issuers (or supporting institutions) rated Not Prime do not fall within any of the Prime rating categories.
Fitch -- Short-Term Ratings Assigned to Issuers and Obligations:
The following descriptions have been published by Fitch Ratings, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its subsidiaries.
F1 – Highest Short-Term Credit Quality. Indicates the strongest intrinsic capacity for timely payment of financial commitments; may have an added ‘+’ to denote
any exceptionally strong credit feature.
F2 – Good Short-Term Credit Quality. Good intrinsic capacity for timely payment of financial commitments.
F3 – Fair Short-Term Credit Quality. The intrinsic capacity for timely payment of financial commitments is adequate.
B – Speculative Short-Term Credit Quality. Minimal capacity for timely payment of financial commitments, plus heightened vulnerability to near term adverse changes in financial and economic conditions.
C - High Short-Term Default Risk. Default is a real possibility.
RD – Restricted Default. Indicates an entity that has defaulted on one or more of its financial commitments, although it continues to meet other financial obligations. Typically applicable to entity
ratings only.
D – Default. Indicates a broad-based default event for an entity, or the default of a short-term obligation.
DBRS -- Commercial Paper and Short-Term Debt
Rating Scale:
The following descriptions have been published by DBRS Morningstar.
R-1 (high) – Highest credit quality. The capacity for the payment of short-term financial obligations as they fall due is exceptionally high. Unlikely to be adversely affected by future
events.
R-1 (middle) – Superior credit quality. The capacity for the payment of short-term financial obligations as they fall due is very high. Differs from R-1 (high) by a relatively modest degree.
Unlikely to be significantly vulnerable to future events.
R-1 (low) – Good credit quality. The capacity for the payment of short-term financial obligations as they fall due is substantial. Overall strength is not as favourable as higher rating
categories. May be vulnerable to future events, but qualifying negative factors are considered manageable.
R-2 (high) – Upper end of adequate credit quality. The capacity for the payment of short-term financial obligations as they fall due is acceptable. May be vulnerable to future events.
R-2 (middle) – Adequate credit quality. The capacity for the payment of short-term financial obligations as they fall due is acceptable. May be vulnerable to future events or may be exposed to
other factors that could reduce credit quality.
R-2 (low) – Lower end of adequate credit quality. The capacity for the payment of short-term financial obligations as they fall due is acceptable. May be vulnerable to future events. A number
of challenges are present that could affect the issuer’s ability to meet such obligations.
R-3 – Lowest end of adequate credit quality. There is a capacity for the payment of short-term financial obligations as they fall due. May be vulnerable to future events, and the certainty of meeting such
obligations could be impacted by a variety of developments.
R-4 – Speculative credit quality. The capacity for the payment of short-term financial obligations as they fall due is uncertain.
R-5 – Highly speculative credit quality. There is a high level of uncertainty as to the capacity to meet short‑term financial obligations as they fall due.
D – When
the issuer has filed under any applicable bankruptcy, insolvency, or winding up statute or there is a failure to satisfy an obligation after the exhaustion of grace periods, a downgrade to D may occur. Morningstar DBRS may also use SD
(Selective Default) in cases where only some securities are impacted, such as the case of a “distressed exchange”.
See the Default Definition document on dbrsmorningstar.com under Understanding Ratings for more information.