AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(Amendment No. )
Filed by the Registrant ☐
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ☒
Check the appropriate box:
|Preliminary Proxy Statement
|Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
|Definitive Proxy Statement
|Definitive Additional Materials
|Soliciting Material Under § 240.14a-12
|AmeriServ Financial, Inc.
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
Partners I LP
J. Abbott R. Cooper
(Name of Persons(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check all boxes that apply):
|Fee paid previously with preliminary materials
|Fee computed on table in exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11
Driver Management Company
LLC, together with the other participants named herein (collectively, “Driver”), intends to nominate, and to file a preliminary
proxy statement and accompanying proxy card with the Securities and Exchange Commission to be used to solicit votes for the election of,
director nominees at the 2024 annual meeting of shareholders of AmeriServ Financial, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation (the “Company”).
On September 7, 2023, Driver
delivered to the Company a demand pursuant to Pennsylvania law to inspect certain of the Company’s books and records, a copy of
which is attached hereto as Exhibit 1 and incorporated herein by reference.
CERTAIN INFORMATION CONCERNING THE PARTICIPANTS
Driver Management Company LLC (“Driver
Management”), together with the other participants named herein (collectively, “Driver”), intends to nominate, and to
file a preliminary proxy statement and accompanying proxy card with the Securities and Exchange Commission to be used to solicit votes
for the election of, director nominees at the 2024 annual meeting of shareholders of AmeriServ Financial, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation
DRIVER STRONGLY ADVISES ALL SHAREHOLDERS OF
THE COMPANY TO READ ANY PROXY MATERIALS AS THEY BECOME AVAILABLE BECAUSE THEY WILL CONTAIN IMPORTANT INFORMATION. SUCH PROXY MATERIALS
WILL BE AVAILABLE AT NO CHARGE ON THE SEC’S WEB SITE AT HTTP://WWW.SEC.GOV. IN ADDITION,
THE PARTICIPANTS IN THIS PROXY SOLICITATION WILL PROVIDE COPIES OF PROXY MATERIALS WITHOUT CHARGE, WHEN AVAILABLE, UPON REQUEST.
The participants in the proxy solicitation
are currently anticipated to be Driver Management, Driver Opportunity Partners I LP (“Driver Opportunity”) and J. Abbott R.
As of the date hereof, the participants in
the proxy solicitation beneficially own in the aggregate 350,503 shares of Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share, of the Company (the
“Common Stock”). As of the date hereof, Driver Opportunity directly beneficially owns 350,503 shares of Common Stock, including
1,000 shares held in record name. Driver Management, as the general partner of Driver Opportunity, may be deemed to beneficially own the
350,503 shares of Common Stock directly beneficially owned by Driver Opportunity. Mr. Cooper, as the managing member of Driver Management,
may be deemed to beneficially own the 350,503 shares of Common Stock directly beneficially owned by Driver Opportunity.
September 7, 2023
J. Michael Adams
Board of Directors
AmeriServ Financial, Inc.
216 Franklin Street
Johnstown, PA 15901
Via Email and FedEx
DEMAND PURSUANT TO 15 Pa. C.S. § 1508 – RESPONSE WITHIN
FIVE BUSINESS DAYS REQUIRED
Driver Opportunity Partners I LP (together with its general partner,
Driver Management Company LLC, “Driver”) is the record owner of 1,000 shares of the common stock (the “Common
Stock”), par value $0.01, of AmeriServ Financial, Inc. (the “Corporation” or “AmeriServ”).
Pursuant to 15 Pa. C.S. § 1508(b), Driver is hereby exercising
its right to inspect certain books and records (collectively, the “Books and Records”) and demands to inspect (and
make copies or extracts therefrom) the following documents relating to the adoption, enforcement, and application of Section 2.14 (the
“Interlocks Bylaw”) and Section 2.16 (the “Background Check Bylaw”; together with the Interlocks
Bylaw, the “Challenged Bylaws”) of the Corporation’s bylaws (the “Bylaws”):
|A complete set of the minutes of any meetings of AmeriServ’s board of directors (including any committees thereof, the “Board”)
concerning the Interlocks Bylaw and the Background Check Bylaw, including without limitation any meetings during which the Board discussed,
considered, or contemplated (i) the purpose of either the Interlocks Bylaw or the Background Check Bylaw, (ii) the impact of either the
Interlocks Bylaw or the Background Check Bylaw on the ability of any AmeriServ shareholder to nominate any individual for election to
director or the ability of any person so nominated to be elected as a director, (iii) whether either the Interlocks Bylaw or the Background
Check Bylaw fixed any qualifications for service on the Board, (iv) whether the Bylaws in effect prior to the inclusion of Interlocks
Bylaw or the Background Check Bylaw allowed for amendment of the Bylaws to include the Interlocks Bylaw or the Background Check Bylaw
without the approval of AmeriServ shareholders, (v) whether any applicable law or regulation made adoption of either the Interlocks Bylaw
or the Background Check Bylaw necessary or desirable, (vi) any connection between the Interlocks Bylaw and the Depository Institution
Management Interlocks Act, 12 U.S.C. §§ 3201 et seq., and the related rules, 12 C.F.R. § 212, 238.91-99, promulgated by
the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (taken together, the “Interlocks Rules”), (vii) the process for,
and the criteria to be used, in deciding whether to grant the approval contemplated by the Interlocks Bylaw, (viii) the process for, and
the criteria to be used, in determining whether a person should be precluded from serving as a director as contemplated by the Background
Check Bylaw, (ix) the Board’s background check policy, (x) whether, as contemplated by the Interlocks Bylaw, to approve J. Abbott
R. Cooper for service on the Board, (xi) the determination to declare that the Interlocks bylaw rendered Mr. Cooper ineligible for election
to the Board prior to becoming a director of a depositary institution, including, without limitation, any analysis whether the Corporation
competes with The First of Long Island Corporation, or (xii) any decision to waive the background check requirement contemplated by the
Background Check Bylaw, (together, the “Relevant Matters”);
|All documents provided to the Board concerning any of the Relevant Matters;
1266 East Main Street
Stamford, CT 06902
|Any documents and communications between or among the Board (including any individual member(s) or committee(s) thereof and any advisor)
concerning the Relevant Matters;
|Copies of all correspondence between AmeriServ (including through its counsel or any other AmeriServ agent or representative) and
the United States Securities and Exchange Commission regarding the Interlocks Bylaw;
|Documents and communications sufficient to demonstrate whether all the individuals serving on the Board since the adoption of the
Background Check Bylaw have undergone a background check as contemplated by the Background Check Bylaw and whether the Board has, with
respect to each of those individuals, made an affirmative decision that the information revealed by the background check would not preclude
the individual from serving as a director; and
|Documents reflecting or referring to the procedure for requesting the “approval” contemplated by the Interlocks Bylaw
and the criteria (if any) employed by the Board in determining whether to grant such approval; and
|Documents reflecting or referring to the Board’s “background check policy” and the criteria (if any) employed by
the Board in determining whether any information revealed in a background check “should preclude” an individual from serving
on the Board.
* * *
Under Pennsylvania law, Driver has the right to make its own inspection
of the Books and Records, including non-public Books and Records, for any proper purpose, including to make its own determination as to
whether the Corporation is being properly managed.1
The burden of demonstrating that Driver has an improper or unreasonable purpose falls on the Corporation.2
Mere claims by the Corporation that Driver is an “activist” investor or is seeking information to be used in connection with
a contested election of directors are not sufficient to establish an improper purpose.3
The purpose of this demand is (i) to investigate possible breaches
of fiduciary duty and violations of the Pennsylvania Business Corporation Law by members of the Board in connection with the adoption
and enforcement of the Challenged Bylaws, (ii) to use information obtained through inspection of the Books and Records to evaluate possible
litigation (including litigation seeking to declare the Challenged Bylaws invalid) or other corrective matters, and (iii) to communicate
information obtained through inspection of the Books and Records to other AmeriServ shareholders so that they may be informed of Board
actions and policies that interfere with a shareholder’s right to nominate candidates for election to director.
15 Pa. C.S. § 1725(a) provides that the directors of a Pennsylvania
corporation shall be elected by its shareholders. Both the Interlocks Bylaw and the Background Check Bylaw give the Board the unfettered
right to veto candidates for election to director without reference to any objective criteria, making a mockery of corporate democracy’s
fundamental principle of shareholder democracy. The right to elect directors—a right expressly given shareholders by Pennsylvania
law—means little if the Board can determine, without reference to any objective criteria to which shareholders have been provided
reasonable prior notice, that information revealed in a background check “should preclude” any individual from being eligible
for election to director. Similarly, the notion that—unless “approved” by the Board—any individual that is serving,
or has within the previous five years has served, on the board of another depositary institution (theoretically the kind of individual
that would have the most relevant experience) is barred from being elected to the Board represents an impermissible restriction on the
1 See, Zerbey v. J.H. Zerbey Newspapers, Inc., 560 A.2d 191, 198 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1989)(holding that wanting to determine whether a corporation “is being properly managed in a general sense” constitutes a proper purpose under 15 Pa. C.S. § 1508).
2 Goldman v. Trans-United Industries, Inc., 171 788, 790 (Pa. 1961).
3 See, Sto-Rox Focus on Renewal Neighborhood Corp. v. King, 398 A.2d 241, 243 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 1979).
In addition, the Board has failed to provide AmeriServ shareholders
with any information that might permit an AmeriServ shareholder to attempt to comply with either the Interlocks Bylaw or the Background
Check Bylaw. There is no publicly available description of the process by which an individual can request the “approval” contemplated
by the Interlocks bylaw. Indeed, that the Board publicly declared that the Interlocks Bylaw prohibited Mr. Cooper from election to the
Board before Mr. Cooper had even become a director of another depositary institution and thus became subject to the Interlocks
Bylaw suggests that there is no process by which an individual can seek the contemplated “approval” and, instead, such “approval”
is granted entirely at the whim of the Board.4
Similarly, the Board’s “background check policy” is not publicly available, so there is no way for an individual to
be able to comply with that policy.
Finally, with respect to both the Interlocks Bylaw and the Background
Check Bylaw, the lack of objective criteria for granting “approval” for, or determining that an individual is “precluded”
from, election to the Board both gives the Board an absolute veto right over who may be elected to the Board and deprives any AmeriServ
shareholder wishing to nominate an individual for election to director any ability to reasonably predict whether that individual will
be eligible for election to director. Such uncertainty is likely to have an extreme chilling effect on both a shareholder’s willingness
to nominate an individual to be a candidate for election to director as well as that individual’s willingness to be nominated. Taken
in their totality, the Challenged Bylaws constitute an impermissible interference by the Board in AmeriServ shareholders’ rights
to elect directors.
* * *
For the record, Driver believes that both the Interlocks Bylaw and
the Background Check Bylaw are invalid and in violation of 15 Pa. C.S. § 1725(a). Nothing contained in this letter shall be deemed
to be or construed as an admission by Driver that the Challenged Bylaws are valid or enforceable.
Pursuant to 15 Pa. C.S. § 1508(c), the Corporation has five
business days from receipt of this demand to reply substantively to this demand. Please advise the undersigned as promptly as practicable
when and where the books and records covered by this demand will be made available to Driver. To the extent the Corporation wishes to
provide Driver with copies of the books and records covered by this demand, Driver will bear the reasonable out of pocket costs incurred
by the Corporation in copying and delivering those books and records to Driver. If the Corporation contends this demand is incomplete
or deficient in any respect, please notify the undersigned immediately in writing setting forth the facts that the Corporation contends
support its position and specifying any additional information believed to be required. In the absence of such prompt notice, Driver will
assume that this demand complies in all respects with the requirements of 15 Pa. C.S. § 1508(b).
|Driver Opportunity Partners I LP
|Driver Management Company, its general partner
|/s/ J. Abbott R. Cooper
I verify that the statements made in this demand are true and correct.
I understand that any false statements made herein are subject to the penalties of 18 Pa. C.S. § 4904.
|Date: September 7, 2023
|Signed: /s/ J. Abbott R.. Cooper
4 See, e.g., https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/707605/000155837023003930/tmb-20230315xex99d2.htm (stating “Additionally, the Notice’s purported nomination of Mr. Cooper – who is set to become a director of New York-based First of Long Island Corporation – does not comply with AmeriServ’s interlocks bylaw that prohibits Board members and nominees to the Board from, among other things, concurrent directorships with other depository institutions” (emphasis added)).
AmeriServ Financial (NASDAQ:ASRV)
Historical Stock Chart
From Feb 2024 to Mar 2024
AmeriServ Financial (NASDAQ:ASRV)
Historical Stock Chart
From Mar 2023 to Mar 2024