TC TuanChe Ltd

Table of Contents

​

​

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

​

FORM 20-F

​

(Mark One)

​

​

Date of event requiring this shell company report                   

For the transition period from ___________ to                    

Commission file number: 001-38737

​

TuanChe Limited

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

​

N/A

(Translation of Registrant’s name into English)

Cayman Islands

(Jurisdiction of incorporation)

9F, Ruihai Building, No. 21 Yangfangdian Road

Haidian District Beijing 100038

The People’s Republic of China

(Address of principal executive offices)

Wei Wen, Chief Executive Officer

9F, Ruihai Building, No. 21 Yangfangdian Road

Haidian District Beijing 100038

The People’s Republic of China

Telephone: (86-10)6398-2942

E-mail: wenwei@tuanche.com

(Name, Telephone, E-mail and/or Facsimile number and Address of Company Contact Person)

​

Securities registered or to be registered, pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

​

* Not for trading, but only in connection with the listing on the Nasdaq Capital Market of American depositary shares

Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act.

None

(Title of Class)

Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act.

None

(Title of Class)

​

Table of Contents

Indicate the number of issued and outstanding shares of each of the issuer’s classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report:

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Of 1934.  Yes  ◻    No  ⌧

If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.   Yes  ☐    No  ⌧

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.   Yes  ⌧    No  ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).  Yes  ⌧   No  ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

​

If an emerging growth company that prepares its financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards † provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.   ☒

† The term “new or revised financial accounting standard” refers to any update issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board to its Accounting Standards Codification after April 5, 2012.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report.  ☐

If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements.  ☐

Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b).  ☐

Indicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing:

​

If “Other” has been checked in response to the previous question indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow.  Item 17  ◻    Item 18  ◻

If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).   Yes  ◻    No  ☒

​

​

​

Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

​

​

​

​

i

Table of Contents

INTRODUCTION

Except where the context otherwise requires and for purposes of this annual report on Form 20-F only:

Names of certain companies provided in this annual report are translated or transliterated from their original Chinese legal names.

Discrepancies in any table between the amounts identified as total amounts and the sum of the amounts listed therein are due to rounding.

This annual report on Form 20-F includes our audited consolidated financial statements for the 2020, 2021 and 2022 fiscal years.

1

Table of Contents

This annual report on Form 20-F contains information from an industry report commissioned by us and prepared by iResearch in 2018, an independent research firm, to provide information regarding our industry and our market position in China. We refer to this report as the iResearch report.

This annual report contains translations of certain Renminbi amounts into U.S. dollars at specified rates. Unless otherwise stated, the translation of Renminbi into U.S. dollars has been made at RMB6.8972 to US$1.00, the noon buying rate in effect on December 30, 2022 as set forth in the H.10 Statistical Release of the Federal Reserve Board. We make no representation that any Renminbi or U.S. dollar amounts could have been, or could be, converted into U.S. dollars or Renminbi, as the case may be, at any particular rate, the rates stated below, or at all. The PRC government imposes controls over its foreign currency reserves in part through direct regulation of the conversion of Renminbi into foreign exchange and through restrictions on foreign trade.

TuanChe Limited, our ultimate Cayman Islands holding company, does not have any substantive operations. We carry out our value-added telecommunications business in China through our subsidiaries in China, the VIEs, and their subsidiaries. We, through TuanYuan, Sangu Maolu and Chema Beijing, our wholly owned subsidiaries in China (“WFOEs”), entered into a series of contractual arrangements with the VIEs, TuanChe Internet, Drive New Media, Internet Drive Technology and Tansuojixian Beijing, and their respective shareholders. We, together with the VIEs, are subject to PRC laws relating to, among others, restrictions over foreign investments in value-added telecommunications services set out in the Special Administrative Measures (Negative List) for Foreign Investment Access (2021 Version) (the “Negative List (2021 Version)”), promulgated by the Ministry of Commerce (“MOFCOM”), and the National Development and Reform Commission (the “NDRC”), in China. Our contractual arrangements with the VIEs enable us to (1) exercise effective control over the VIEs; (2) receive substantially all of the economic benefits of the VIEs; and (3) have an exclusive option to purchase all or part of the equity interests in the VIEs when and to the extent permitted by PRC law. As a result, we operate our value-added communications business in China through the VIEs and their subsidiaries, and we could receive the economic rights and exercise significant influence on the VIEs’ business operations that results in consolidation of the VIEs’ operations and financial results into our financial statements through the contractual arrangements, provided that we meet the conditions for consolidation under U.S. GAAP. The VIE structure is used to replicate foreign investment in China-based companies where the PRC laws restrict direct foreign investment in the operating companies. Our contractual arrangements with the VIEs are not equivalent of an investment in the VIEs. Neither we nor our subsidiaries own any share in the VIEs. Investors in the ADSs are purchasing equity securities of our ultimate Cayman Islands holding company rather than purchasing equity securities of the VIEs. Because of our corporate structure, we are subject to risks due to uncertainty of the interpretation and the application of the PRC laws and regulations, including but not limited to limitation on foreign ownership of value-added telecommunications service companies, and the PRC regulatory authorities could disallow our corporate structure at any time. We are also subject to the risks of uncertainty about any future actions of the PRC government in this regard. Our contractual agreements may not be effective in providing control over the VIEs. We may also be subject to sanctions imposed by PRC regulatory agencies, including Chinese Securities Regulatory Commission, if we fail to comply with their rules and regulations. In 2020, 2021 and 2022, our PRC subsidiaries received cash of nil, RMB2.0 million and nil, respectively, from the VIEs for services rendered to the VIEs and their subsidiaries. In 2020, 2021 and 2022, our PRC subsidiaries paid cash of nil, RMB0.6 million and nil, respectively, to the VIEs for services provided by the VIEs and their subsidiaries.

We and the VIEs face various legal and operational risks and uncertainties related to being based in and having significant operations in China. The PRC government has significant authority to exert influence on the ability of a China-based company, such as us and the VIEs, to conduct its business, accept foreign investments or list on U.S. or other foreign exchanges. For example, we and the VIEs face risks associated with regulatory approvals of offshore offerings, oversight on cybersecurity and data privacy, as well as the historical lack of inspection by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (the “PCAOB”), on our auditors. Such risks could result in a material change in our operations and/or the value of the ADSs or could significantly limit or completely hinder our ability to offer ADSs and/or other securities to investors and cause the value of such securities to significantly decline or be worthless. The PRC government also has significant discretion over the conduct of the business of us and the VIEs and may intervene with or influence our operations or the development of the value-added telecommunications service industry as it deems appropriate to further regulatory, political and societal goals. Furthermore, the PRC government has recently indicated an intent to exert more oversight and control over overseas securities offerings and foreign investment in China-based companies. Any such action, once taken by the PRC government, could significantly limit or completely hinder our ability to offer securities to investors and cause the value of such securities to significantly decline or in extreme cases, become worthless. For further details, see “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Corporate Structure” and “Item 3. Key Information—D. Risk Factors—Risks Related to Doing Business in China.”

2

Table of Contents

Our financial statements contained in the annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022 have been audited by an independent registered public accounting firm that was not included in the list of PCAOB Identified Firms of having been unable to be inspected or investigated completely by the PCAOB in the PCAOB Determination Report issued in December 2021. We have not been identified by the SEC as a commission-identified issuer under the Holding Foreign Company Accountable Act (the “HFCA Act”), as of the date of this annual report. On August 26, 2022, the CSRC, MOFCOM, and the PCAOB signed a Statement of Protocol (the “Protocol”), governing inspections and investigations of audit firms based in mainland China and Hong Kong. Pursuant to the Protocol, the PCAOB shall have independent discretion to select any issuer audits for inspection or investigation and has the unfettered ability to transfer information to the SEC. On December 15, 2022, the PCAOB announced that it was able to secure complete access to inspect and investigate PCAOB-registered public accounting firms headquartered in mainland China and Hong Kong in 2022, and the PCAOB Board vacated its previous determinations that the PCAOB was unable to inspect or investigate completely registered public accounting firms headquartered in mainland China and Hong Kong. However, whether the PCAOB will continue to be able to satisfactorily conduct inspections of PCAOB-registered public accounting firms headquartered in mainland China and Hong Kong is subject to uncertainty and depends on a number of factors out of our, and our auditor’s, control. The PCAOB is continuing to demand complete access in mainland China and Hong Kong moving forward and is already making plans to resume regular inspections in early 2023 and beyond, as well as to continue pursuing ongoing investigations and initiate new investigations as needed. The PCAOB has indicated that it will act immediately to consider the need to issue new determinations with the HFCA Act if needed. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if, in the future, we have been identified by the SEC for two consecutive years as a commission-identified issuer whose registered public accounting firm is determined by the PCAOB that it is unable to inspect or investigate completely because of a position taken by one or more authorities in China, the SEC may prohibit our shares or the ADSs from being traded on a national securities exchange or in the over the counter trading market in the United States. Additionally, on June 22, 2021, the U.S. Senate passed the Accelerating Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act, which would amend the HFCA Act and require the SEC to prohibit an issuer’s securities from trading on any U.S. stock exchanges if its auditor is not subject to PCAOB inspections for two consecutive years instead of three. On December 29, 2022, the Accelerating Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act was signed into law, and the number of consecutive non-inspection years required for triggering the prohibitions under the HFCAA is reduced from three years to two. Furthermore, we and our investors are deprived of the benefits of such PCAOB inspections. If we fail to meet the new listing standards specified in the HFCA Act, we could face possible delisting from the Nasdaq Stock Market, cessation of trading in over the counter market, deregistration from the SEC and/or other risks, which may materially and adversely affect, or effectively terminate, the ADSs trading in the United States.

The ADSs are listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market under the symbol “TC.”

MARKET AND INDUSTRY DATA

Market data and certain industry forecasts used in this annual report were obtained from internal surveys, market research, publicly available information and industry publications. Industry publications generally state that the information contained therein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but that the accuracy and completeness of such information is not guaranteed. Similarly, internal surveys, industry forecasts and market research, while believed to be reliable, have not been independently verified, and we make no representation as to the accuracy of such information.

3

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

5

Table of Contents

The following table presents the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss and cash flows relating to the Parent, the VIEs and the non-variable interest entities for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2021 and 2022.

Consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive (loss)/income data

​

​

​

6

Table of Contents

Cash Flows through Our Organization

TuanChe Limited is a holding company with no material operations of its own. We currently conduct our operations through our WFOEs, the VIEs and their respective subsidiaries. Cash is transferred through our organization in the manner as follows: (1) we may transfer funds to our WFOEs through our Hong Kong subsidiary, TuanChe Information Limited, by additional capital contributions or shareholder loans, as the case may be; (2) our subsidiaries in China may provide loans to the VIEs, subject to statutory limits and restrictions; (3) the VIEs may pay service fees to our subsidiaries in China for services rendered by our subsidiaries in China; (4) our subsidiaries in China may pay service fees to the VIEs for services rendered by the VIEs; and (5) our subsidiaries in China may make dividends or other distributions to us through TuanChe Information Limited. We do not have cash management policies dictating how funds are transferred throughout our organization. We may encounter difficulties in our ability to transfer cash between subsidiaries in China and other subsidiaries largely due to various PRC laws and regulations imposed on foreign exchange. If we intend to distribute dividends through TuanChe Limited, our WFOEs will transfer the dividends to TuanChe Information Limited in accordance with the laws and regulations of the PRC, and then TuanChe Information Limited will transfer the dividends to TuanChe Limited, and the dividends will be distributed from TuanChe Limited to all shareholders respectively in proportion to the shares they hold, regardless of whether the shareholders are U.S. investors or investors in other countries or regions.

In 2020, 2021 and 2022, our PRC subsidiaries received cash of nil, RMB2.0 million and nil, respectively, from the VIEs for services rendered to the VIEs and their subsidiaries. In 2020, 2021 and 2022, our PRC subsidiaries paid cash of nil, RMB0.6 million and nil, respectively, to the VIEs for services provided by the VIEs and their subsidiaries. The foregoing cash flows include all distributions and transfers between our Cayman Islands holding company, our subsidiaries and the VIEs as of the date of this annual report.

7

Table of Contents

Our Operations in China and Permissions Required from the PRC Authorities for Our Operations

We and the VIEs have obtained all licenses, permits or approvals from the PRC regulatory authorities for our and the VIEs’ business operations of offline marketing services and online marketing services, except that we and/or the VIEs may need to obtain certain permits each time before we and/or the VIEs hold an offline event. We and the VIEs did not obtain requisite permits for the provision of certain livestreaming services when provided at a preliminary stage. As of the date of this annual report, we and the VIEs have taken measures to rectify such defect by entering into collaboration arrangements with the operators of livestreaming platforms holding the requisite permits, and we have not received any inquiry or investigation from any PRC government authority regarding such service provision. As of the date of this annual report, except as disclosed above and in “—D. Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business and Industry—Failure to obtain, renew, or retain licenses, permits or approvals or failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations may affect our ability to conduct our business” in this annual report, we and the VIEs have obtained all licenses, permits or approvals to conduct our and the VIEs’ business. As of the date of this annual report, TuanChe Internet Information Service (Beijing) Co., Ltd. has obtained certain value-added telecommunications service license for the operation of internet content service from the Beijing Administration of Telecommunications which will remain valid until September 2023, Shenzhen Drive New Media Co., Ltd. has obtained certain value-added telecommunications service license for the operation of internet content service from the Guangdong Administration of Telecommunications which will remain valid until June 2024, and TuanChe (Beijing) Automobile Sales & Service Co., Ltd., a subsidiary of TuanChe Internet, has obtained certain value-added telecommunications service license for the operation of internet content service from the Beijing Administration of Telecommunications which will remain valid until January 2026. Under PRC laws and regulations, we and the VIEs are required to obtain and maintain the aforementioned licenses, permits and approvals in order to conduct and operate our and the VIEs’ business. In addition, we and the VIEs may be required to obtain certain permits each time before we and the VIEs hold an offline event, including a security permit to organize large-scale mass activities and a permit for temporary occupation of urban roads, depending on the estimated number of participants and the need to temporarily occupy public roads. Although we and the VIEs have endeavored and will continue to endeavor to obtain all necessary permits according to our estimate of the condition of each specific event, we cannot assure you that we and the VIEs have been or will continue to be in full compliance with the licensing requirements for all the offline events we and the VIEs have held or will hold because the regulatory practices with respect to an offline event vary among different regions and the local authorities retain broad discretion in enforcing the license requirements. In addition, if relevant PRC government authorities determine that we or the VIEs are operating our offline events without proper licenses or permits or impose additional restrictions on the operation of any of our offline events, we and the VIEs might be subject to administration penalties, such as fines, confiscation of income, additional restrictions and force discontinuation of our offline events, which may materially and adversely affect our and the VIEs’ business, results of operations and financial condition. As of the date of this annual report, we and the VIEs have not been denied application for any permits or licenses required for our and the VIEs’ business operations and the offline events we and the VIEs have held. As of the date of this annual report, we and the VIEs have obtained requisite licenses in full compliance with applicable laws and regulations for offline events held, and we and the VIEs have not received any inquiry or investigation from any PRC government authority regarding non-compliance of the offline events. See ““—D. Risk Factors—Risks Related to Our Business and Industry—Our and the VIEs’ failure to obtain necessary permits for offline events may subject us and the VIEs to penalties and adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition.” However, the licensing requirements in China are constantly evolving, and we may be subject to more stringent regulatory requirements due to changes in the political or economic policies in the relevant jurisdictions. We cannot assure you that we or the VIEs will be able to satisfy such regulatory requirements, and as a result, we or the VIEs may be unable to retain, obtain or renew relevant licenses, permits or approvals in the future. If we or the VIEs fail to do so, we or the VIEs may be subject to administrative penalties or sanctions, which may materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, if we, our subsidiaries or the VIEs inadvertently conclude that other permissions and approvals, including those from the CAC or the CSRC, are not required or applicable laws, regulations or interpretations change and we, our subsidiaries or the VIEs are required to obtain such permissions or approvals in the future, we, our subsidiaries’ and the VIEs’ operations in China may be subject to sanctions imposed by the relevant PRC regulatory authority, including fines and penalties, revocation of our subsidiaries’ and the VIEs’ licenses and suspension of their respective business, restrictions or limitations on our ability to pay dividends outside of China, regulatory orders, litigation or adverse publicity, and other forms of sanctions that may materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

A.[Reserved]

B.Capitalization and Indebtedness

Not applicable.

8

Table of Contents

C.Reasons for the Offer and Use of Proceeds

Not applicable.

D.Risk Factors

An investment in the ADSs involves risks. You should carefully consider the risks described below, as well as the other information included or incorporated by reference in this annual report, before making an investment decision. Our business, financial condition or results of operations could be materially adversely affected by any of these risks. The market or trading price of the ADSs could decline due to any of these risks, and you may lose all or part of your investment. In addition, the risks discussed below also include forward-looking statements and our actual results may differ substantially from those discussed in these forward-looking statements. Please note that additional risks not presently known to us, that we currently deem immaterial or that we have not anticipated may also impair our business and operations.

Summary Risk Factors

Our business is subject to numerous risks and uncertainties, including risks that may prevent us from achieving our business objectives or may adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, and prospects. These risks are discussed more fully below and include, but are not limited to, risks related to:

Risks Related to Our Business and Industry

Risks Related to Our Corporate Structure

Risks Related to Doing Business in China

9

Table of Contents

Risks Related to Our Securities, including the ADSs

Risks Related to Our Business and Industry

We rely on China’s automotive industry for our net revenues and future growth, the prospects of which are subject to many uncertainties, including government regulations and policies.

We rely on China’s automotive industry for our net revenues and future growth. We and the VIEs benefited greatly from the rapid growth of China’s automotive industry in the past. However, the prospects of China’s automotive industry are subject to many uncertainties, including those relating to general economic conditions in China, the urbanization rate of China’s population and the cost of automobiles. In addition, government policies may have a considerable impact on the growth of the automotive industry in China. For example, in an effort to alleviate traffic congestion and improve air quality, a number of cities in China have issued regulations to limit the number of new passenger car license plates issued each year starting from 2010. In September 2013, the PRC government released a plan for the prevention and remediation of air pollution, which requires large cities to further restrict the number of automobiles. Since 2010, the Beijing municipal government has issued the interim regulations, which were amended from time to time, to control the quantity of small passenger cars in the city. Pursuant to the latest Interim Provisions of Quantity Adjustment and Control for Small Passenger Cars in Beijing and the Implementing Rules of the Interim Provisions of Quantity Adjustment and Control for Small Passenger Cars in Beijing (Revised in 2020), both of which were came into force on January 1, 2021, the city imposes an annual quota on the issuance of new vehicle registration plates. The annual car license plate quota in 2023 has been further reduced to 100,000, down from 150,000 in 2017. Some other cities in China, including Tianjin, Hangzhou, and Shenzhen, have also implemented certain interim provisions to control the quantity of small cars in the cities. Such regulatory developments, as well as other uncertainties, may adversely affect the growth prospects of China’s automotive industry, and in turn reduce consumer demand for automobiles. If automakers, auto dealers or automotive service providers reduce their marketing expenditures as a result, our and the VIEs’ business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

10

Table of Contents

Our and the VIEs’ business operations have been and may continue to be materially and adversely affected by the COVID-19 pandemic.

The outbreak of a novel strain of coronavirus (COVID-19) spread throughout China and to other countries globally. We, the VIEs, as well as our and the VIEs’ suppliers and customers, have experienced significant business disruptions due to government-mandated quarantine measures and travel restrictions to contain the spread of the pandemic. Out of public health concerns, we and the VIEs cancelled all offline events such as auto shows and special promotion events previously scheduled in February and March 2020, and held very few offline events in April 2020. We and the VIEs continued to reduce the number of offline events in the first half of 2020, as the Chinese government issued guidelines to continue to curb indoor public gatherings. For example, on April 6, 2020, the State Council promulgated a notice pursuant to which the various shows and fairs shall be temporarily suspended due to the COVID-19 pandemic. As the COVID-19 pandemic became largely under control in China, we and the VIEs saw a rapid pick-up of the number of auto shows we held in the second half of 2020. However, regional outbreak may occur from time to time, causing us and the VIEs to have no choice but cancel our auto shows and special promotion events. In 2021 and early 2022, the various variants of COVID-19, including Omicron and Deltacron, were spreading in many cities in China, and the local governments took strict prevention and control measures to reduce gatherings and control the spread of the virus, and as a result, we and the VIEs cancelled 157 and 109 auto shows in 2021 and 2022, respectively, in response to such control measures, which negatively impacted our business, result of operations, financial condition and liquidity. As the PRC government has relaxed quarantine measures and travel restrictions and other restrictive measures as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic since late 2022, our and the VIEs’ operations experienced temporary disruption due to employee contraction of the virus and gradually resumed to normal, and we and the VIEs have witnessed a decrease in auto show cancellation. As of the date of this annual report, we held 80 auto shows so far in 2023. However, the spread of COVID-19 may continue to cause a general slowdown of the Chinese economy in 2021, 2022 and beyond, leading to a further slump in the demand for automobiles in China. In response to the significant impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, we and the VIEs implemented measures to adjust the pace of business expansion and conserve resources, such as furlough arrangements and scaling back recruitment budget and employee size in 2020, 2021 and 2022. As the COVID-19 pandemic has been largely contained, our and the VIEs’ daily operation has been mostly back to normal with necessary pandemic prevention measures in place. However, regional outbreak of COVID-19 may still subject our and the VIEs’ business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows to uncertainties, and we and the VIEs may resort to other cost cutting measures if the outbreak of COVID-19 and its impact persist or escalate, which may result in labor disputes and have a material adverse effect on our and the VIEs’ business, results of operations and financial condition. We and the VIEs are closely monitoring the development of the COVID-19 pandemic and continuously evaluate its impact on our and the VIEs’ business, results of operations, financial condition and liquidity, the severity of which will depend on the duration of the pandemic and the government’s responsive measures.

Our and the VIEs’ business is substantially dependent on our and the VIEs’ collaboration with industry customers, including automakers, auto dealers, and automotive service providers, and our and the VIEs’ agreements with them typically do not contain long-term contractual commitments.

Our and the VIEs’ business is substantially dependent on collaboration with automakers, auto dealers and automotive service providers. We and the VIEs’ generally enter into cooperation agreements with them (1) on an ad-hoc basis for a particular auto show or special promotion event or (2) for a stipulated term of up to one year, and our and the VIEs’ agreements do not impose any contractual obligations requiring them to maintain their relationships with us or the VIEs beyond the completion of each such event we and the VIEs organize or beyond the contractual term. Accordingly, there is no guarantee for future cooperation after the event and there is no assurance that we and the VIEs can maintain stable and long-term business relationships with any such industry customers. If a significant number of our and the VIEs’ industry customers terminate or do not renew their agreements with us or the VIEs and we and the VIEs are not able to replace these business partners on commercially reasonable terms in a timely manner, or at all, our and the VIEs business, results of operations and financial condition would be materially and adversely affected.

11

Table of Contents

If we and the VIEs fail to attract and retain automobile consumers, our and the VIEs’ business and results of operations may be materially and adversely affected.

In order to maintain and strengthen our and the VIEs’ leading market position and to attract industry customers, we and the VIEs must continue to attract and retain consumers to our and the VIEs’ auto shows and other offline events. We and the VIEs must also innovate and introduce services and applications that improve consumers’ purchase experience. In addition, we and the VIEs must maintain and enhance our and the VIEs’ brand recognition among automobile consumers. If we and the VIEs fail to enhance consumers’ ability to secure favorable purchase prices, offer a superior purchase experience or maintain and enhance our and the VIEs’ brand, we and the VIEs may not be able to attract and retain automobile consumers and thus fail to retain and attract industry customers, from whom we and the VIEs derive net revenues, and our and the VIEs’ brand and reputation may be materially and adversely affected.

If our and the VIEs’ consumer base decreases, our and the VIEs’ service offerings may be less attractive to industry customers. As a result, our and the VIEs’ net revenues may decline, and our and the VIEs’ business, financial condition and results of operations may be materially and adversely affected.

We have a limited track record in operating in the NEV industry, which makes it difficult to evaluate our business and growth prospects.

We announced our plan to expand into the NEV industry in January 2021, and we have a limited track record in operating in the NEV industry, and hence have limited experience in designing, developing, manufacturing, marketing and selling NEVs. We face a number of risks and challenges in China’s NEV industry, including but not limited to our ability to develop and produce safe, reliable and high quality NEVs, advance our technologies, expand our sales and service network, market and promote our products and services, improve our operational efficiency and attract, retain and motivate our employees, in particular, our R&D personnel. If we fail to address any or all of these risks and challenges, our business may be materially and adversely affected.

We may face intense competition in China’s NEV market, and demand for NEVs may be cyclical and volatile.

China’s NEV market is intensely competitive. We will compete with both local and international competitors, established companies and potential new entrants. If we successfully execute our plan to expand into the NEV market, we will directly compete with other NEV companies, which include electric vehicles, plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (including extended-range electric vehicles) and fuel cell electric vehicles, and we may also face competition from new and well-funded entrants, which will increase the level of competition we face. In addition, volatility in the NEV industry may materially and adversely affect our business, prospects, operating results and financial condition. The sales volume of NEVs in China may not grow at the rate that we expect, or at all. Demand for NEVs could be volatile, depending to a large extent on general economic, political and social conditions in a given market and the introduction of new vehicles and technologies. We have fewer financial resources than more established automakers to withstand changes in the market and disruptions in demand. Demand for NEVs may also be affected by factors directly impacting automobile prices or the cost of purchasing and maintaining automobiles, such as sales and financing incentives, prices of raw materials and components, cost of oil and gasoline and governmental regulations, including tariffs, import regulation and sales taxes. These factors may have a more pronounced impact on our business given our relatively smaller scale and less financial resources as compared to many traditional automakers.

Our successful expansion into the NEV industry largely depends on our ability to develop, manufacture and deliver NEVs of high quality, safety, reliability and consumer appeal, on schedule and at a large scale.

Our successful expansion into the NEV industry largely depends on our ability to develop, manufacture, and deliver at a large scale NEVs of high quality, safety, reliability and appeal to consumers in a timely manner. This ability is subject to risks, including:

12

Table of Contents

Any of the foregoing could materially and adversely affect our ability to successfully expand into the NEV industry, which would in turn affect our growth prospects.

We and the VIEs have incurred net losses in the past and may incur losses again in the future.

We and the VIEs commenced business operations in 2010, and only began to generate significant net revenues in 2012 from group-purchase facilitation business. Our net revenues were, RMB330.2 million, RMB357.6 million, RMB183.2 million (US$26.6 million) in 2020, 2021 and 2022, respectively. We and the VIEs may fail to recapture a sustainable growth rate, which may continue to decrease in the future, especially considering the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. We experienced net loss attributable to our shareholders of RMB163.0 million, RMB101.9 million and RMB158.1 million (US$22.9 million) in 2020, 2021 and 2022, respectively. See “Item 8. Financial Information—A. Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information” in this annual report.

Our and the VIEs’ ability to achieve profitability and positive cash flow will depend in large part on our and the VIEs’ ability to execute our and the VIEs’ growth strategies and appropriately control our and the VIEs’ costs and expenses. We and the VIEs may continue to incur significant losses in the future for a number of reasons, including the other risks described in this annual report. We and the VIEs may also further encounter unforeseen expenses, difficulties, complications, delays and other unknown events. If we and the VIEs fail to increase net revenues at the rate we and the VIEs anticipate or if our and the VIEs’ expenses increase at a faster rate than the increase in our and the VIEs’ net revenues, we and the VIEs may not be able to achieve profitability.

We and the VIEs may also continue to incur net losses in the future due to various factors beyond our and the VIEs’ control, such as changes in the macroeconomic and regulatory environment, as well as competitive dynamics. Our and the VIEs’ inability to respond to these changes in a timely and effective manner may materially and adversely affect our and the VIEs’ business, results of operations and financial condition.

We and the VIEs may face liquidity risks in the operation and expansion of our and the VIEs’ business.

We and the VIEs face liquidity risks in the operation of our and the VIEs’ businesses. Under our and the VIEs’ auto show business, we and the VIEs in some cases permit industry customers to pay us and the VIEs after they attend the offline events we and the VIEs organize. We and the VIEs also in some cases pay service and venue providers in advance. As we and the VIEs undertake to expand industry customer base to include more automakers, we and the VIEs may offer extended payment periods. If our and the VIEs industry customers fail to pay us and the VIEs within the pre-agreed payment periods, or if we and the VIEs are unable to collect the proceeds from secondary dealers before or shortly after we and the VIEs pay automakers or franchised dealerships, we and the VIEs may have outlay capital, which might impose a strain on our and the VIEs’ working capital. Further, while we and the VIEs continue to explore opportunities to grow our and the VIEs’ business, we and the VIEs have not yet achieved a business scale that is able to generate a sufficient level of revenues to achieve net profit and positive cash flows from operating activities, and we expect the operating losses and negative cash flows from operations will continue for the foreseeable future. While we believe we have sufficient cash for the next twelve months from the date of this annual report, if we are unable to grow the business to achieve economies of scale in the future, it will become even more difficult for us to sustain a sufficient source of cash to cover our operating costs. The liquidity risks could materially and adversely affect our business, results of our and the VIEs’ operations, and financial condition.

13

Table of Contents

We have entered into collaboration, and may establish or seek collaborations, strategic alliances or equity investment in connection with our expansion into the NEV industry in the future, and we may not timely realize the benefits of such arrangements.

We may from time to time establish or seek collaborations, strategic alliances or equity investment in connection with our expansion into the NEV industry. As of the date of this annual report, we have collaborated with NEV technology solution providers and manufacturers in China, including YangMing, S-TECH and IAT. We face significant competition in seeking appropriate strategic partners, and the negotiation process for collaboration, alliances or licensing arrangements can be complex and time-consuming. Moreover, we may not be successful in our efforts to establish a strategic partnership or other alternative arrangements for research, development and commercialization of our NEVs. Any of these relationships may require us to incur non-recurring and other charges, increase our near and long-term expenditures, issue securities that dilute our existing shareholders, or disrupt our management and business. Furthermore, such collaborations are subject to numerous risks, which may include the following:

As a result, we may not be able to realize the benefit of current or future collaborations, strategic alliances or equity investment in connection with our expansion into the NEV industry if we are unable to successfully launch our NEV products or achieve the revenue or specific net income that justifies such arrangement. If we fail to enter into collaborations or do not have sufficient funds or expertise to undertake the necessary research, development and commercialization activities, we may not be able to further develop our NEV products or bring them to market and generate expected revenue, which would harm our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects.

​

14

Table of Contents

Historically our and the VIEs’ business focuses have evolved and may continue to change in the future, which may make it difficult to evaluate our and the VIEs’ business by comparing our results of operations from period to period, or to predict the profitability of certain of our and the VIEs’ business lines due to their limited operating history.

We and the VIEs have expanded and adjusted business focuses multiple times in the past in order to compete in the evolving automotive industry in China. We and the VIEs commenced automobile group-purchase business in 2010, and began auto show business in the fourth quarter of 2016. In 2017, we and the VIEs expanded auto shows to tier-3 and below cities. We and the VEs began the operation of virtual dealership business in the second quarter of 2018, and we and the VIEs ceased operation of, and did not generate any revenue from, virtual dealership business in 2021. In January 2020, we completed the acquisition of Longye, a leading developer and implementer of social CRM cloud systems for China’s automotive industry. Going forward, we and the VIEs may establish new business lines or discontinue existing ones as our and the VIEs’ business further develops and new business opportunities arise in the automotive industry. On January 21, 2022, we announced our preliminary plan to expand into and develop the new electric vehicle business. As a result, it is difficult to make period-over-period comparisons of our results of operations, liquidity position or financial conditions. In addition, it may be difficult to predict the profitability of our and the VIEs’ certain business lines, especially special promotion events and online marketing services, due to their limited operating history. We cannot assure you that our and the VIEs’ business will continue to grow as a result of our and the VIEs’ expanded and adjusted business focuses, or that our and the VIEs’ attempts to expand or adjust our and the VIEs’ business focus will be successful.

Our share incentive plans and grant of equity-based awards in the future may dilute our existing shareholders and cause us to incur substantial share-based compensation expenses.

In June 2018, our directors approved the 2018 Share Incentive Plan (the “2018 Plan”), pursuant to which up to 38,723,321 ordinary shares may be granted to our employees, directors and consultants. As of the date of this annual report, 6,848,252 ordinary shares remain available for grants under the Plan. In March 2023, our directors approved the 2023 Share Incentive Plan (the “2023 Plan”), pursuant to which 169,172,564 ordinary shares have been reserved for future issuance to our employees, directors and consultants, representing 43.0% of our total issued and outstanding ordinary shares as of December 31, 2022, and the 2023 Plan will significantly dilute our existing shareholders. We may adopt new share incentive plans to permit the grants of additional equity-based awards, especially in light of our recent endeavor to explore the NEV industry. We believe the grants of equity-based awards are important to our ability to attract, retain and motivate our employees. Any future grants of equity-based awards may dilute our existing shareholders and cause the value in their investment to decline. Additionally, we may incur substantial share-based compensation expenses in connection with such grants, which may materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

We and the VIEs may not be able to successfully operate and expand social CRM cloud services, which could materially and adversely affect our and the VIEs’ business, results of operations and financial condition.

In January 2020, we completed the acquisition of Longye, a leading developer and implementer of social customer relationship management (social CRM) cloud systems for China’s automotive industry. Longye’s principal software as a service (SaaS) product, Cheshangtong, provides China’s auto dealers with social CRM cloud services based on a system that facilitates the effective flow of information between auto dealers and customers. We and the VIEs may fail to successfully integrate Longye into our and the VIEs’ business operations due to limited operating experience and other reasons beyond our and the VIEs’ control. We cannot assure you that Cheshangtong will continue to enjoy its popularity among auto dealers. Should any resulting disputes arise or should we and the VIEs fail to integrate Longye into our and the VIEs’ business operations, our and the VIEs’ business, results of operations and financial condition could be materially and adversely affected.

​

15

Table of Contents

Our and the VIEs’ business is subject to risks related to the overall automotive industry ecosystem, including consumer demand, consumption habits, global supply chain challenges and other macroeconomic issues.

Decreasing consumer demand could adversely affect the market for automobile purchases and, as a result, adversely affect our and the VIEs’ business. Consumer purchases of new and used automobiles generally decline during recessionary periods and other periods in which disposable income is adversely affected. Purchases of new and used automobiles are typically discretionary for consumers and have been, and may continue to be, affected by negative trends in the economy, including the rising cost of energy and gasoline, the limited availability and increasing cost of credit, reductions in business and consumer confidence, stock market volatility, and increased unemployment. Further, in recent years the automotive market has experienced rapid changes in technology and consumer demands. Self-driving technology, ride sharing, transportation networks, and other fundamental changes in transportation could impact consumer demand for the purchase of automobiles. A reduction in the number of automobiles purchased by consumers could adversely affect automakers and auto dealers and lead to a reduction in their spending on our and the VIEs’ services. In addition, our and the VIEs’ business may be negatively affected by challenges to the overall automotive industry ecosystem, including global supply chain challenges and other macroeconomic issues such as uncertainty with respect to trade policies, treaties, government regulations and tariffs between China and the United States due to the recent trade tension. Specifically, following the disruptions to semiconductor manufacturers due to the COVID-19 pandemic and an increase in global demand for personal computers for work-from-home economies, there is an ongoing global chip shortage, which would materially and adversely affect the automotive industry, and demand from our and the VIEs’ industry customers for our and the VIEs’ automobile marketing and distribution services may thus decline, which may materially and adversely affect our and the VIEs’ business, results of operations and financial condition. The global chip shortage may also make it difficult for us and the VIEs to procure sufficient chip supply if and when we launch our electric vehicle manufacturing business. The occurrence of any of the foregoing could materially and adversely affect our and the VIEs’ business, results of operations, and financial condition.

If we and the VIEs fail to help facilitate the marketing and sales of industry customers due to factors beyond our and the VIEs’ control, our and the VIEs’ operational and financial results might suffer.

Our and the VIEs’ industry customers are attracted to our and the VIEs’ offline events due to their marketing needs and the prospects of selling a large number of automobiles to individual consumers through the events. The marketing results and the sales volume at our and the VIEs’ offline events might fail to meet the expectation of our and the VIEs’ industry customers due to factors beyond our and the VIEs’ control, including among others, changes in the regulatory environment, a downturn or unfavorable development in the automotive industry, overall economic downturn and the resulting decrease in purchasing power and willingness of consumers, and contingencies that occur on event dates such as inclement weather or sudden public security measures which affect our and the VIEs’ ability to host the events effectively, or at all. Other factors that affect consumer attendance at our and the VIEs’ offline events may also affect sales volume, such as conflicts with other local events, road traffic control, outbreak of contagious disease or the potential for infection, or acts of nature, such as earthquakes, storms, and typhoons. If we and the VIEs fail to help facilitate the marketing and sales of our and the VIEs’ industry customers, they might be less inclined to participate in our and the VIEs’ future events, which directly affects our and the VIEs’ business, results of operations, and financial condition.

We and the VIEs may incur additional costs and decrease the number of auto shows due to severe weather conditions, which could negatively impact our gross profit margin and overall results of operations.

We and the VIEs host most of the auto shows outdoors. The table below sets forth the number of outdoor auto shows during the periods indicated:

​

​

16

Table of Contents

In addition to the COVID-19 pandemic, severe weather conditions may also cause unplanned cancellation of our and the VIEs’ outdoor auto shows and lower the level of industry customer attendance at the affected auto shows, resulting in a decrease in our net revenues. For example, in 2020, we and the VIEs cancelled two auto shows due to weather conditions. In addition, to ensure the smooth operation of these outdoor auto shows and minimize the impact of potential severe weather conditions on these outdoor auto shows, we and the VIEs may seek to manage such contingencies by securing backup indoor venues or setting up temporary facilities for these auto shows. These contingency management plans could lead to our and the VIEs’ outlay of additional financial resources, which could negatively impact our gross profit margin and overall results of operations.

Our and the VIEs’ failure to obtain necessary permits for offline events may subject us and the VIEs to penalties and adversely affect our and the VIEs’ business, results of operations, and financial condition.

Under PRC laws and regulations, we and the VIEs may be required to obtain certain permits each time before we and the VIEs hold an offline event, including a security permit to organize large-scale mass activities and a permit for temporary occupation of urban roads, depending on the estimated number of participants and the need to temporarily occupy public roads. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—Regulation—Regulations Relating to Security Administration of Large-scale Mass Activities and Temporary Urban Road Occupation” in this annual report. Although we and the VIEs have endeavored and will continue to endeavor to obtain all necessary permits according to our and the VIEs’ estimate of the condition of each specific event, we cannot assure you that we and the VIEs have been or will continue to be in full compliance with the licensing requirements for all the offline events we and the VIEs have held or will hold because the regulatory practices with respect to an offline event vary among different regions and the local authorities retain broad discretion in enforcing the licensing requirements. In addition, the licensing requirements in China are constantly evolving, and we and the VIEs may be subject to more stringent regulatory requirements due to political or economic changes in the future. We cannot assure you that we and the VIEs will be able to satisfy such regulatory requirements and as a result we and the VIEs may be unable to obtain the necessary permits for each of our offline events in a timely manner in the future. TuanChe Internet is renewing the commercial performance permit, which expired on November 10, 2022. We and the VIEs would not engage in activities that would be potentially deemed as public live artistic performance until a successful renewal of such certificate is obtained, and we do not expect such renewal process would adversely affect our and the VIEs’ current business operations. If relevant PRC government authorities determine that we and the VIEs are operating offline events without proper licenses or permits or impose additional restrictions on the operation of any of the offline events, we and the VIEs might be subject to administrative penalties, such as fines, confiscation of income, additional restrictions and forced discontinuation of the offline events, which may materially and adversely affect our and the VIEs’ business, results of operations, and financial condition. As of the date of this annual report, except as disclosed above, we and the VIEs have obtained requisite licenses in full compliance with applicable laws and regulations for offline events held, and we and the VIEs have not received any inquiry or investigation from any PRC government authority regarding non-compliance of the offline events.

Relevant government authorities may suspend our and the VIEs’ offline events due to various reasons beyond our and the VIEs’ control.

Even if we and the VIEs have obtained all prerequisite permits, government authorities may unexpectedly suspend our and the VIEs’ scheduled offline events due to a variety of reasons beyond our and the VIEs’ control. For example, two weeks prior to an auto show in April 2018 in Beijing National Stadium, the local public security authority abruptly demanded that the VIEs suspend the auto show for one morning, even though the VIEs had already obtained the required approvals. Under such circumstances, we and the VIEs usually negotiate with industry customers to reschedule the auto show. In addition, the local police security authorities may prevent consumers from entering our and the VIEs’ auto shows and impose administrative penalties on us and the VIEs if the visitor flow exceeds the prescribed limit. Such abrupt suspensions, re-scheduling and restrictions might adversely affect the sales volumes of our and the VIEs’ industry customers, which in turn could discourage them from participating in our and the VIEs’ future events and materially and adversely affect our and the VIEs’ business, results of operations, and financial condition. As of the date of this annual report, we and the VIEs have obtained requisite licenses in full compliance with applicable laws and regulations for offline events held, and we and the VIEs have not received any inquiry or investigation from any PRC government authority regarding non-compliance of the offline events.

17

Table of Contents

Successful strategic relationships with third-party cooperative partners are important for our and the VIEs’ future success.

We and the VIEs have established strategic relationships with third-party business partners from a variety of industries. For example, we and the VIEs have established strategic business relationships with insurance companies that offer automotive insurance products during our and the VIEs’ offline events, which we believe will enhance consumers’ end-to-end shopping experience. We and the VIEs have also entered into strategic partnerships with Tmall Auto, the automotive arm of Alibaba Group’s Tmall, through which we expect to further explore additional growth opportunities along China’s automotive transaction value chain, and Beijing Easyhome Furnishing Chain Group Co., Ltd., a company that operates one of the largest home improvement supplies and furniture chains in China, through which we expect to jointly establish an innovative one-stop retail experience that combines home decoration products and automotive services to serve a broader range of consumers in China. Also, we and the VIEs operate some of our and the VIEs’ auto shows in cooperation with one of the leading e-commerce platforms in China, which we believe will increase the influence of our and the VIEs’ auto shows. We anticipate that we will continue to leverage our strategic relationships with existing third-party business partners and potentially establish new relationships with more partners in order to grow our and the VIEs’ business, especially the NEV business. However, we and the VIEs’ may have disagreements or disputes with such third-party business partners, or our and the VIEs’ interests may not be aligned with theirs, which could cause disruptions to or terminations of such business collaboration and adversely affect our and the VIEs’ reputation, results of operations, and financial condition.

We and the VIEs face various forms of competition, and if we and the VIEs fail to compete effectively, we and the VIEs may lose market shares and our and the VIEs’ business, prospects, and results of operations may be materially and adversely affected.

We and the VIEs compete with alternative auto show organizers and other marketing service providers. As we and the VIEs expand business operations and service offerings, we expect to encounter more competitors from more industries and markets as well as different forms of competition. Some of these competitors or potential competitors may have longer operating histories and may have better resources than us and the VIEs in terms of funding, management, technology and sales and marketing. Our and the VIEs’ competitors may be acquired and consolidated by owners who are able to further invest significant resources into our and the VIEs’ operating field. If we and the VIEs are unable to compete effectively and at a reasonable cost against our and the VIEs’ existing and future competitors, our and the VIEs’ business, prospects, and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

If we and the VIEs are unable to manage business growth or execute growth strategies effectively, our and the VIEs’ business and prospects may be materially and adversely affected.

We and the VIEs have historically experienced rapid growth in our and the VIEs’ auto shows and other offline events nationwide. Our net revenues increased significantly from RMB280.7 million in 2017 to RMB651.0 million in 2018, and remained stable at RMB644.8 million in 2019. Our net revenue decreased to RMB330.2 million in 2020. We were not able to sustain this level of growth in 2020 due to the impact of COVID-19 that led to cancellation of most of our and the VIEs’ auto shows and offline events. Our revenue increased to RMB357.6 million (US$56.1 million) in 2021, primarily due to our continuous and expanded collaboration with a commercial bank for our referral services. Our net revenues then decreased by 48.8% from RMB357.6 million in 2021 to RMB183.2 million (US$26.6 million) in 2022, primarily due to a reduced number of offline activities as a result of tightened government restrictions in response to regional COVID-19 outbreak. We may not be able to achieve business and revenue growth in the future due to a number of factors, including, among others, our and the VIEs’ ability to retain and expand industry customer base, maintain customer satisfaction, compete effectively within the automotive industry, integrate, develop, motivate and manage an increasing number of employees, control expenses and acquire the resources for future growth as well as macroeconomic factors that are beyond our and the VIEs’ control, such as the global chip shortage. If our and the VIEs’ operational capabilities fall behind, the quality of our and the VIEs’ services and efficiency of operations could suffer, which could harm our and the VIEs’ brand, results of operations and overall business.

In addition, our and the VIEs’ anticipated development and expansion plans will place a significant strain on our and the VIEs’ management, systems and resources. Our development and expansion strategies of new electric vehicle business will require substantial managerial efforts and skills and incurrence of additional expenditures and may subject us to new or increased risks. Moreover, our and the VIEs’ expansion strategies may incur higher costs than the net revenues generated. Our and the VIEs’ failure to efficiently or effectively implement growth strategies or manage the growth of our and the VIEs’ operations may limit our and the VIEs’ future growth and hamper our and the VIEs’ business strategies.

18

Table of Contents

The consolidated financial statements incorporated by reference herein contain disclosures related to our ability to continue as a going concern.

The consolidated financial statements included in this annual report were prepared on a going concern basis, which assumes that we will continue to operate in the future in the normal course of business. We have incurred recurring operating losses since our inception, including net losses of RMB163.5 million, RMB101.9 million and RMB158.1 million (US$22.9 million) in 2020, 2021 and 2022, respectively. Net cash used in operating activities was RMB88.9 million, RMB92.3 million and RMB109.7 million (US$15.9 million) in 2020, 2021 and 2022, respectively. Accumulated deficit was RMB983.6 million and RMB1,141.8 million (US$165.5 million) as of December 31, 2021 and 2022. As of December 31, 2021 and 2022, we had cash and cash equivalents of RMB63.5 million and RMB69.9 million (US$10.1 million), respectively. These conditions raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.

Our ability to continue as a going concern is dependent on our management’s ability to successfully execute the business plan of reducing fixed labor cost and pursuing potential financing to improve our cash flow from operating and financing activities. Based on cash flow projections from operating and financing activities and our current balance of cash and cash equivalents, our management believes that our current cash and cash equivalents and anticipated cash flow from operations upon successful execution of our business plans will be sufficient to meet our anticipated cash needs from operations and other commitments for at least the next 12 months from the date of this annual report. However, there is no assurance that the plans will be successfully implemented. Failure to successfully implement the plan will have a material adverse effect on our and the VIEs’ business, results of operations and financial position, and may materially and adversely affect our ability to continue as a going concern.

Our independent registered public accounting firm included an explanatory paragraph expressing substantial doubt relating to our ability to continue as a going concern in its report on our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2022. The inclusion of a going concern explanatory paragraph may negatively impact the trading price of the ADSs, have an adverse impact on our and the VIEs’ relationship with third parties with whom we and the VIEs do business, including our and the VIEs’ customers, vendors and employees, and could make it challenging and difficult for us and the VIEs to raise additional debt or equity financing to the extent needed, all of which could have a material adverse impact on our and the VIEs’ business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects.

For additional information on the above-referenced accounting standards and matters affecting our ability to continue as a going concern, see Note 2 of the financial statements included in this report and the discussion included in “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects—B. Liquidity and Capital Resources—Liquidity and Capital Resources.”

Our and the VIEs’ business depends heavily on our and the VIEs’ reputation and consumer perception of our and the VIEs’ brand, and any negative publicity or other harm to our and the VIEs’ brand or failure to maintain and enhance our and the VIEs’ brand recognition may materially and adversely affect our and the VIEs’ financial condition and results of operations.

We believe that our and the VIEs’ reputation and consumer perception of our brand “TuanChe” are critical to our financial condition and results of operations. Maintaining and enhancing our and the VIEs’ reputation and brand recognition depends primarily on the quality and consistency of our and the VIEs’ services, as well as the success of our and the VIEs’ marketing and promotional efforts. While we and the VIEs have devoted significant resources to brand promotion efforts in recent years, our and the VIEs’ ongoing marketing efforts may not be successful in further promoting our and the VIEs’ brand. In addition, there may be from time to time negative publicity about us and the VIEs, our and the VIEs’ business, management or services. For example, if auto dealers breach their contracts with automobile consumers concluded during the auto show and raise the purchase price, we and the VIEs may be found at fault by consumers and our and the VIEs’ reputation may be materially and adversely affected. We and the VIEs may be subject to litigation as well as government or regulatory investigation as a result of such negative publicity, which might require us and the VIEs to spend significant time and resources to resolve.

19

Table of Contents

Our and the VIEs’ failure to satisfactorily handle complaints from industry customers and consumers could also harm our and the VIEs’ reputation and discourage them from attending our and the VIEs’ future offline events. For example, they may complain about the cancellation or rescheduling of our and the VIEs’ auto shows. While we and the VIEs have been improving and will continue to improve our and the VIEs’ customer service capabilities, we cannot assure you that our and the VIEs’ employees will satisfactorily resolve all complaints from industry customers or consumers. If we and the VIEs fail to resolve a particular complaint from industry customers or consumers, whether or not such resolutions are within our and the VIEs’ control, our and the VIEs’ perceived reputation and the confidence these industry customers and consumers place in us and the VIEs may diminish, which could materially and adversely affect our and the VIEs’ business, financial condition and results of operations.

Acquisitions, strategic alliances and investments could prove difficult to integrate, disrupt our and the VIEs’ business and lower our and the VIEs’ results of operations and the value of your investment.

As part of our business strategy, we regularly evaluate investments in, or acquisitions of, complementary businesses, joint ventures, services and technologies. For example, in January 2020, we completed the acquisition of Longye, a leading system developer and implementer of social CRM systems. We expect that periodically we will continue to make such investments and acquisitions and establish such strategic collaboration relationships in the future. Acquisitions, strategic alliances and investments involve numerous risks, including:

In addition, if we finance acquisitions by issuing equity or convertible debt securities, such arrangements may dilute our existing shareholders, which could affect the market price of the ADSs. Further, if we fail to properly evaluate and execute acquisitions or investments, our business and prospects may be seriously harmed and the value of your investment may decline.

Furthermore, we may fail to identify or secure suitable acquisition and business partnership opportunities or our and the VIEs’ competitors may capitalize on such opportunities before we do, which could impair our and the VIEs’ ability to compete with our and the VIEs’ competitors and adversely affect our and the VIEs’ growth prospects and results of operations.

Any financial or economic crisis, or perceived threat of such a crisis, including a significant decrease in consumer confidence, may materially and adversely affect our and the VIEs’ business, financial condition and results of operations.

Any actual or perceived threat of a financial crisis in China, in particular a credit and banking crisis, could have an indirect, but material and adverse, impact on our and the VIEs’ business and results of operations. Economic conditions in China are sensitive to global economic conditions, as well as changes in domestic economic and political policies and the expected or perceived overall economic growth rate in China.

20

Table of Contents

Furthermore, any slowdown in China’s economic development might lead to tighter credit markets, increased market volatility, sudden declines in business and consumer confidence and dramatic changes in business and consumer behaviors. For example, the COVID-19 pandemic has caused a general slowdown of the Chinese economy in 2020, and in response to the uncertainty in economic conditions, consumers might delay, reduce or cancel purchases of automobiles, which to some extent are considered as luxury items by many people in China, and as a result, our and the VIEs’ industry customers may also defer, reduce or cancel purchasing our and the VIEs’ services. In addition, although the government-mandated quarantine measures against the COVID-19 pandemic have largely been lifted in China, normal economic activities in China, including production, transportation and sales of automobiles, may be disrupted if there is any regional outbreak of COVID-19. The spread of the COVID-19 pandemic throughout the world has also materially and adversely affected the supply chain of China’s automobile industry, as well as the business, results of operations, financial condition and liquidity of major market players in this industry, including automakers and auto dealers, from whom we generate a substantial portion of our net revenues. To the extent any fluctuations in the Chinese economy significantly affect the demand from automakers or auto dealers for our and the VIEs’ services or change the spending habits of automobile consumers, our and the VIEs’ business, results of operations, and financial condition may be materially and adversely affected. See “—Our and the VIEs’ business operations have been and may continue to be materially and adversely affected by the COVID-19 pandemic.”

In addition, the economic downturn may reduce the number of automakers and auto dealers in China resulting in the decrease of the demand for our and the VIEs’ services. Since the early 1990s, many non-automotive enterprises joined China’s automotive industry and began to offer new lines of automobiles. An increasing number of foreign brands gradually entered the PRC market primarily by forming joint ventures with Chinese brands. Growing automobile production capacity and production volume have significantly increased the number of auto dealers. By contrast, negative economic trends could lead to market consolidation of automakers and auto dealers, which in effect will reduce our and the VIEs’ customer base and, in turn, reduce the demand for our and the VIEs’ services. As a result, our ability to generate net revenues, as well as our and the VIEs’ business, results of operations and financial condition, will be materially and adversely affected.

We and the VIEs may not be able to successfully expand our and the VIEs’ operations into certain additional geographical markets in China.

We and the VIEs organized auto shows in 172, 142 and 76 cities across China in 2020, 2021 and 2022, and we had sales representatives located in 126, 119 and 83 cities as of December 31, 2020, 2021 and 2022, respectively. We and the VIEs plan to expand our and the VIEs’ operations to more cities and counties in China. Geographic expansion is particularly important for us and the VIEs to acquire more industry customers, whose operations are usually localized and spread out in the regions they serve. Nonetheless, expansion into new geographical markets imposes additional burdens on our and the VIEs’ sales, marketing and general managerial resources. As China is a large and diverse market, business practices and demands may vary significantly by region and our and the VIEs’ experience in the markets in which we and the VIEs currently operate may not be applicable in other parts of China. As a result, we and the VIEs may not be able to leverage our and the VIEs’ experience when entering into new markets in China. If we and the VIEs are unable to manage expansion efforts effectively, if such expansion efforts take longer than planned or if costs for these efforts exceed expectations, our and the VIEs’ business, results of operations, and financial condition may be materially and adversely affected.

We and the VIEs may be subject to administrative penalties if we and the VIEs fail to register our and the VIEs’ premises as branches.

Under the PRC laws and regulations, a company is required to register a branch, whether in the form of a branch office or a subsidiary under the PRC laws, at each of the premises where it conducts business outside its registered domicile. As of the date of this annual report, we and the VIEs have registered certain regional offices, including those in Shenzhen, Chongqing, Tianjin, Hangzhou, Xi’an, Harbin, Hefei and Shijiazhuang, as our and the VIEs’ branches, and we and the VIEs’ have not yet received any inquiry or investigation from any PRC government authority regarding the absence of any registration. However, we cannot assure you that we and the VIEs will set up all necessary branches in a timely manner due to complex procedural requirements and the relocation of branch offices from time to time, if the PRC regulatory authorities determine that we and the VIEs have failed to complete registration in a timely manner as required by the applicable laws and regulations, we and the VIEs may be subject to penalties, including fines, confiscation of income and suspension of operation, which may adversely affect our and the VIEs’ business, results of operations, and financial condition.

21

Table of Contents

Our and the VIEs’ cooperation with a commercial bank might be deemed as operating financing guarantee business in violation of relevant financing guarantee regulations in China.

In October 2019, we and the VIEs commenced our and the VIEs’ referral services in collaboration with a commercial bank, where we and the VIEs facilitate the bank in expanding its cooperation with our and the VIEs’ industry customers to grow its auto loan business. With respect to such cooperation with the commercial bank, we and the VIEs are required to compensate the bank for the outstanding principal loan amount and interest of such auto loan upon the occurrence of certain events of default by the referred customers. The specified events of default by referred customers, include the failure to timely complete the vehicle mortgage registration within a certain period of time or the repayment of the first three installment of loan becoming overdue for more than thirty days. Therefore, such cooperation might be deemed as operating financing guarantee business without proper qualification under the Regulations on the Supervision and Administration of Financing Guarantee Companies (the “Financing Guarantee Regulations”), which were promulgated by State Council on August 2, 2017 and became effective on October 1, 2017, and the Supplementary Provisions on the Supervision and Administration of Financing Guarantee Companies (the “Financing Guarantee Supplementary Provisions”), which were promulgated by the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission (the “CBIRC”), and other eight PRC regulatory agencies and became effective on October 9, 2019.

Pursuant to the Financing Guarantee Regulations, “financing guarantee” refers to the activities in which guarantors provide guarantee to the guaranteed parties as to the debt financing (including but not limited to the extension of loans or issuance of bonds), and “financing guarantee companies” refer to companies legally established and operating financing guarantee business. According to the Financing Guarantee Regulations, the establishment of financing guarantee companies shall be subject to the approval by the competent government authorities, and, unless otherwise stipulated by the state, no entity may operate financing guarantee business without such approval. If any entity violates these regulations and operates financing guarantee business without approval, the entity may be subject to various penalties, including but not limited to suspension of operation, confiscation of illegal gains, fines of up to RMB1,000,000 and criminal liabilities if such operation constitutes a crime.

In addition to the Financing Guarantee Regulations, the Financing Guarantee Supplementary Provisions further clarifies that institutions providing services such as client recommendation and credit assessment to various institutional funding partners shall not render any financing guarantee services, directly or in disguised form, without the necessary approval. Otherwise, the penalties set forth in the Financing Guarantee Regulations may be imposed by the regulatory authorities, and the existing business shall be properly settled. In case an institution intends to continue the financing guarantee business, certain financing guarantee companies shall be established in accordance with the Financing Guarantee Regulations.

We and the VIEs have ceased to operate the referral services since April 2022. As of the date of this annual report, we and the VIEs have not been subject to any fine or other penalties with regard to our cooperation with the commercial bank. However, due to a lack of further interpretations, the exact definition and scope of “operating financing guarantee business” under the Financing Guarantee Regulations or “providing financing guarantee services in disguised form” under the Financing Guarantee Supplementary Provisions remain unclear. It is uncertain whether we and the VIEs would be deemed to have operated financing guarantee business or provided financing guarantee services in disguised form because of our and the VIEs’ arrangements with the commercial bank.

Nevertheless, we and the VIEs have been taking necessary measures to fully comply with the foregoing laws and regulations on financing guarantee business. However, we cannot assure you that we will not be subject to penalties for our past operation of such business. To the extent any of the foregoing were to occur, our and the VIEs’ business, results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected.

Material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting have been identified, and if we fail to implement and maintain effective internal control over financial reporting, we may be unable to accurately report our results of operations, meet our reporting obligations or prevent fraud.

We are subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the rules and regulations of the Nasdaq Capital Market. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires, among other things, that we maintain effective disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting. Commencing with our fiscal year ended December 31, 2019, we must perform system and process evaluation and testing of our internal control over financial reporting to allow management to report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting in our Form 20-F filing for that year, as required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.

22

Table of Contents

Our management has concluded that, as of December 31, 2022, our existing disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting were ineffective, due to a material weakness. In accordance with U.S. GAAP and financial reporting requirements set forth by the SEC, a “material weakness” is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our company’s annual or interim consolidated financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. The material weakness relates to lack of sufficient financial reporting and accounting personnel, especially those with U.S. GAAP knowledge.

To remedy the material weakness, we have begun to, and will continue to (1) hire additional finance and accounting staff with qualifications and work experiences in U.S. GAAP and SEC reporting requirements to formalize and strengthen the key internal control over financial reporting, (2) allocate sufficient resources to prepare and review consolidated financial statements and related disclosures in accordance with U.S. GAAP and SEC reporting requirements, and (3) hire qualified consultant to assess Sarbanes-Oxley Act compliance readiness, to assess where we can improve our overall internal control over financial reporting function, and to assist us in implementing improvements where necessary.

Once we cease to be an “emerging growth company” as such term is defined in the JOBS Act, our independent registered public accounting firm must attest to and report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. In the future, our management may conclude that our internal control over financial reporting remains ineffective. Moreover, even if our management concludes that our internal control over financial reporting is effective, our independent registered public accounting firm, after conducting its own independent testing, may issue a report that is qualified if it is not satisfied with our internal controls or the level at which our controls are documented, designed, operated or reviewed, or if it interprets the relevant requirements differently from us. In addition, our reporting obligations may place a significant strain on our management, operational and financial resources and systems for the foreseeable future. We may be unable to timely complete our evaluation testing and any required remediation.

Our internal control over financial reporting will not prevent or detect all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the control system’s objectives will be met. In light of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that misstatements due to error or fraud will not occur or that all control issues and instances of fraud will be detected.

During the course of documenting and testing our internal control procedures, in order to satisfy the requirements of Section 404, we may identify other weaknesses and deficiencies in our internal control over financial reporting. In addition, if we fail to maintain the adequacy of our internal control over financial reporting, as these standards are modified, supplemented or amended from time to time, we may not be able to conclude on an ongoing basis that we have effective internal control over financial reporting in accordance with Section 404. Generally, if we fail to achieve and maintain an effective internal control environment, we could suffer material misstatements in our financial statements and fail to meet our reporting obligations, which would likely cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial information. This could in turn limit our access to capital markets, harm our results of operations, and lead to a decline in the trading price of the ADSs. Additionally, ineffective internal control over financial reporting could expose us to increased risk of fraud or misuse of corporate assets and subject us to potential delisting from the stock exchange on which we list, regulatory investigations and civil or criminal sanctions. We may also be required to restate our financial statements from prior periods.

23

Table of Contents

Our and the VIEs’ failure or alleged failure to comply with China’s anti-corruption laws or the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act could result in penalties, which could harm our and the VIEs’ reputation and have an adverse effect on our and the VIEs’ business, results of operations, and financial condition.

We and the VIEs are subject to PRC laws and regulations related to anti-corruption, which prohibit bribery to government agencies, state or government owned or controlled enterprises or entities, to government officials or officials that work for state or government owned enterprises or entities, as well as bribery to non-government entities or individuals. We are also subject to the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (the “FCPA”), which generally prohibits companies and any individuals or entities acting on their behalf from offering or making improper payments or providing benefits to foreign officials for the purpose of obtaining or keeping business, along with various other anti-corruption laws. Our and the VIEs’ existing policies prohibit any such conduct and we and the VIEs are in the process of implementing additional policies and procedures, and providing training, to ensure that we, the VIEs and our and the VIEs’ employees and other third parties comply with PRC anti-corruption laws and regulations, the FCPA and other anti-corruption laws to which we and the VIEs are subject. There is, however, no assurance that such policies or procedures will work effectively all the time or protect us and the VIEs against liability under the FCPA or other anti-corruption laws. There is no assurance that our and the VIEs’ employees and other third parties would always comply with our and the VIEs’ policies and procedures. Further, there is uncertainty in connection with the implementation of PRC anti-corruption laws. We and the VIEs could be held liable for actions taken by our and the VIEs’ employees and other third parties with respect to our and the VIEs’ business or any businesses that we and the VIEs may acquire. As of the date of this annual report, significantly all our and the VIEs’ operations are in the PRC. If we or the VIEs are found not to be in compliance with PRC anti-corruption laws, the FCPA and other applicable anti-corruption laws, we and the VIEs may be subject to criminal, administrative, and civil penalties and other remedial measures, which could have an adverse impact on our and the VIEs’ business, results of operations and financial condition. Any investigation of any potential violations of the FCPA or other anti-corruption laws by U.S. or foreign authorities, including Chinese authorities, could adversely impact our and the VIEs’ reputation, cause us and the VIEs to lose customer relationships, subject us and the VIEs to administrative penalties or sanctions, and lead to other adverse impacts on our and the VIEs’ business, results of operations, and financial condition.

If we and the VIEs lose the services of any of our and the VIEs’ key executive officers, senior management, or other key employees, or are unable to retain, recruit and hire sufficiently qualified staff, our and the VIEs’ ability to effectively manage and execute our and the VIEs’ operations and meet our and the VIEs’ strategic objectives could be harmed.

Our and the VIEs’ future success depends on the continued service of our and the VIEs’ key executive officers, senior management, and other key employees. We and the VIEs benefit from the leadership of a strong management team with proven vision, rich professional work experience and extensive knowledge of China’s automotive industry. We and the VIEs also rely on a number of key staff for the development and operation of our and the VIEs’ business. In addition, we and the VIEs will need to continue attracting and retaining skilled and experienced staff for our and the VIEs’ businesses to maintain our competitiveness.

If one or more of our and the VIEs’ key personnel are unable or unwilling to continue in their present positions, we and the VIEs may not be able to replace them easily or at all and may incur additional expenses to recruit and train new personnel. In addition, if any of our and the VIEs’ executive officers, senior management, or key employees joins a competitor or forms a competing company, we and the VIEs may be disadvantaged in the competition and risk losing our and the VIEs’ know-how, trade secrets, suppliers and customers. Substantially all of our and the VIEs’ employees, including each of our and the VIEs’ executive officers, senior management, and key employees, have entered into employment agreements with us and the VIEs, respectively, which contain customary non-compete provisions. Although non-compete provisions are generally enforceable under PRC laws, PRC legal practice regarding the enforceability of such provisions is not as well-developed as in countries such as the United States. Therefore, if we and the VIEs lose the services of any of our and the VIEs’ key executive officers, senior management, or other key employees, or are unable to retain, recruit and hire experienced staff, our and the VIEs’ ability to effectively manage and execute our and the VIEs’ operations and meet our and the VIEs’ strategic objectives could be harmed.

24

Table of Contents

We and the VIEs rely upon certain online advertising service providers, and any significant change in our and the VIEs’ relationship with these suppliers could have a material adverse effect on our and the VIEs’ business, results of operations, and financial condition if we and the VIEs cannot find suitable replacements.

Historically we and the VIEs relied upon certain online advertising service providers to advertise our and the VIEs’ service offerings. Our and the VIEs’ two largest online advertising service providers accounted for approximately 47.4%, 62.2% and 38.9% of our total online advertising expenses in 2020, 2021 and 2022, respectively. Our and the VIEs’ agreements with them typically do not contain long-term contractual commitments. We cannot assure you that we and the VIEs will be able to maintain business relationships with these existing advertising suppliers. In the event that the existing major online advertising service providers terminate or refuse to renew their agreements with us or the VIEs, and we and the VIEs are unable to find new providers with similar or more favorable terms within a reasonable period of time or at all, our business, results of operations, and financial condition may be materially and adversely affected.

If we and the VIEs fail to protect our and the VIEs’ intellectual property rights, our and the VIEs’ brand and business performance may suffer.

We and the VIEs rely on a combination of trademark, patent, copyright and trade secret protection laws in China and other jurisdictions, as well as through confidentiality agreements and other measures, to protect our and the VIEs’ intellectual property rights. Our and the VIEs’ major brand names and logos are registered trademarks in China. Most of our and the VIEs’ professionally produced contents available on our and the VIEs’ websites are protected by copyright laws. Despite our and the VIEs’ precautions, third parties may obtain and use our and the VIEs’ intellectual property without our and the VIEs’ authorization. Historically, the Chinese legal system and courts have not protected intellectual property rights to the same extent as the U.S. legal system and courts, and companies operating in China continue to face an increased risk of intellectual property infringement. Furthermore, the validity, application, enforceability and scope of protection of intellectual property rights for many internet-related activities, such as internet commercial methods patents, are uncertain and still evolving in China and abroad, which may make it more difficult for us and the VIEs to protect our and the VIEs’ intellectual property. From time to time, other websites may use our and the VIEs’ articles, photographs or other content without our and the VIEs’ proper authorization. Although such use has not in the past caused any material damage to our and the VIEs’ business, it is possible that there may be misappropriation on a much larger scale with a material adverse impact to our and the VIEs’ brand, business, and results of operations.

Third parties may claim that we and the VIEs infringe their proprietary intellectual property rights, which could cause us and the VIEs to incur significant legal expenses and prevent us and the VIEs from promoting our and the VIEs’ services.

Internet, technology and media companies are frequently involved in litigation based on allegations of infringement of intellectual property rights, unfair competition, invasion of privacy, defamation and other violation of other parties’ rights. We and the VIEs have not experienced any material claims on these issues against us or the VIEs in the past, but as we and the VIEs face increasing competition and as litigation becomes more common in China in resolving commercial disputes, we and the VIEs face a higher risk of being the subject of intellectual property infringement claims. We and the VIEs may be subject to legal proceedings and claims from time to time relating to the intellectual property of others in the ordinary course of our and the VIEs’ business. We and the VIEs could also be subject to claims based upon the content that is displayed on our and the VIEs’ websites or accessible from our and the VIEs’ websites through links to other websites or information on our and the VIEs’ websites supplied by third parties. Intellectual property claims and litigation are expensive and time-consuming to investigate and defend and may divert resources and management attention from the operation of our websites. Such claims, even if they do not result in liability, may harm our and the VIEs’ reputation. Any resulting liability or expenses, or changes required of our and the VIEs’ websites to reduce the risk of future liability, may have a material adverse effect on our and the VIEs’ business, financial condition, and results of operations.

25

Table of Contents

We and the VIEs may be subject to liability for placing advertisements with inappropriate or misleading content.

PRC laws and regulations prohibit advertising companies from producing, distributing or publishing any advertisement with content that violates PRC laws and regulations, impairs the national dignity of China, involves designs of the national flag, the national emblem or the national anthem, is considered reactionary, obscene, superstitious or absurd, is fraudulent, or disparages similar products. As we and the VIEs provide advertising services to our and the VIEs’ industry customers, we and the VIEs are obligated to review supporting documents provided by advertisers, verify the content of the advertisements and are prohibited from publishing any advertisement inconsistent with or with the lack of supporting documents. In addition, in case we and the VIEs are advertisers, we and the VIEs are required by PRC laws and regulations to ensure that the content of our and the VIEs’ advertisements is true and in full compliance with applicable laws and regulations. While we and the VIEs have made significant efforts to comply with such verification requirements before publishing, we cannot assure you that all the content contained in the advertisements is true and accurate as required by the advertising laws and regulations, especially given the uncertainty in the interpretation of these PRC laws and regulations. If we and the VIEs are found to be in violation of applicable PRC advertising laws and regulations, we and the VIEs may be subject to penalties, including fines, confiscation of our and the VIEs’ advertising income, orders to cease dissemination of the advertisements, orders to publish an announcement correcting the misleading information, and suspension or termination of our and the VIEs’ advertising business, any of which may have a material and adverse effect on our and the VIEs’ business and results of operations. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—Regulation—Regulations Relating to Advertisements” in this annual report.

The performance and reliability of the internet infrastructure and wireless and landline telecommunications networks in China will affect our and the VIEs’ operations and growth, including our and the VIEs’ ability to accommodate prospective customers in the future.

With our principal executive offices located in China, we and the VIEs conduct central management of consumer data, provide data transmission and communications, and monitor our and the VIEs’ overall operations, relying on wireless and landline telecommunications networks in China. The national networks in China are connected to the internet through international gateways controlled by the PRC government, which are the only channels through which a domestic user can connect to the internet. These international gateways may not support the demand necessary for the continued growth in internet traffic by users in China. We cannot assure you that the development of China’s information infrastructure will be adequate to support our and the VIEs’ operations and growth. In addition, in the event of any infrastructure disruption or failure, we and the VIEs would have no access to alternative networks and services on a timely basis, if at all, which could have a material adverse effect on our and the VIEs’ business, results of operations, and prospects.

26

Table of Contents

Unintended leakage of consumer information or privacy breaches may materially and adversely affect our and the VIEs’ reputation and business performance.

During the ordinary course of our and the VIEs’ business, we and the VIEs collect and store a large amount of automobile consumer data gathered from our and the VIEs’ offline events and mobile applications we operated. We and the VIEs rely on encryption and authentication technology to provide the security and authentication necessary for secure transmission of such data. However, our and the VIEs’ security control may not prevent the improper leakage of consumer data. Anyone may circumvent our and the VIEs’ security measures and misappropriate proprietary information or cause interruptions in our and the VIEs’ operations. A security breach that leads to leakage of our and the VIEs’ consumer data could still harm our and the VIEs’ reputation. Moreover, many jurisdictions have passed laws regulating the storage, sharing, use, disclosure and protection of personally identifiable or other confidential information and data. The Chinese government has enacted a series of laws and regulations relating to the protection of privacy and personal information, under which internet service providers and other network operators are required to clearly indicate the purposes, methods and scope of any information collection and usage, obtain appropriate user consent and establish user information protection systems with appropriate remedial measures. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—Regulations—Regulations Relating to Internet Information Security and Privacy Protection” in this annual report. However, the regulatory framework for privacy protection in China and other jurisdictions is fast-evolving, and therefore, involves uncertainties and is subject to change in the foreseeable future. We cannot assure you that our and the VIEs’ existing privacy and personal information protection measures will be considered sufficient under the current or future applicable laws and regulations. In addition to laws, regulations and other applicable rules, industry associations or other private parties may adopt different privacy protection standards. Because the interpretation and application of privacy and data protection laws and privacy protection standards is still uncertain, it is possible that these laws or privacy standards may be interpreted and applied in a manner inconsistent with our and the VIEs’ practices. Our and the VIEs’ actual or perceived failure to comply with industry standards, governmental regulation and other legal obligations related to user privacy could harm our and the VIEs’ business. We and the VIEs may be required to expend significant capital and other resources to prevent such security breaches or alleviate problems caused by such breaches. Any of the circumstances may materially and adversely affect our and the VIEs’ business and results of operations.

Failure to obtain, renew, or retain licenses, permits or approvals or failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations may affect our and the VIEs’ ability to conduct business.

We and the VIEs have obtained all material licenses, permits or approvals from the PRC regulatory authorities for our and the VIEs’ current operations, except that we and the VIEs may need to obtain certain permits each time before we and the VIEs hold an offline event. See “—Our and the VIEs’ failure to obtain necessary permits for our and the VIEs’ offline events may subject us and the VIEs to penalties and adversely affect our and the VIEs’ business, results of operations, and financial condition.” However, the licensing requirements in China are constantly evolving, and we and the VIEs may be subject to more stringent regulatory requirements due to changes in the political or economic policies in the relevant jurisdictions. We cannot assure you that we and the VIEs will be able to satisfy such regulatory requirements and as a result we and the VIEs may be unable to retain, obtain or renew relevant licenses, permits or approvals in the future. If we and the VIEs fail to do so, we and the VIEs may be subject to administrative penalties or sanctions, which may materially and adversely affect our and the VIEs’ business, financial condition, and results of operations. For example, TuanChe Internet has obtained certain value-added telecommunications service license for the operation of internet content service from the Beijing Administration of Telecommunications which will remain valid until September 2023, Drive New Media has obtained certain value-added telecommunications service license for the operation of internet content service from the Guangdong Administration of Telecommunications which will remain valid until June 2024, and TuanChe (Beijing) Automobile Sales & Service Co., Ltd., a subsidiary of TuanChe Internet, has obtained certain value-added telecommunications service license for the operation of internet content service from the Beijing Administration of Telecommunications which will remain valid until January 2026. However, as we and the VIEs provide mobile applications to mobile device users, it is uncertain if we and the VIEs will be required to obtain a separate operating license for our mobile applications in addition to the value-added telecommunications service licenses, although we believe that not obtaining such separate license is in line with the current market practice.

27

Table of Contents

We and the VIEs may need additional capital, and we and the VIEs may be unable to obtain such capital in a timely manner or on acceptable terms, or at all.

We and the VIEs may require additional capital from time to time to grow our and the VIEs’ business, including to expand into and develop the new electric vehicle business, better serve our and the VIEs’ customers, develop new features or enhance our and the VIEs’ marketplace, improve our and the VIEs’ operating and technology infrastructure or conduct acquisition of complementary businesses and technologies. Accordingly, we and the VIEs may need to sell additional equity or debt securities or obtain a credit facility. Future issuances of equity or equity-linked securities could significantly dilute our existing shareholders, and any new equity securities we issue could have rights, preferences and privileges superior to those of holders of our ordinary shares. The incurrence of debt financing would result in increased debt service obligations and could result in operating and financing covenants that would restrict our and the VIEs’ operations or our ability to pay dividends to our shareholders.

Our and the VIEs’ ability to obtain additional capital is subject to a variety of uncertainties, including: our market position and competitiveness in the automotive industry;

We and the VIEs may be unable to obtain additional capital in a timely manner or on acceptable terms or at all, and such financing may also be subject to regulatory requirements. On February 17, 2023, the CSRC promulgated Trial Administrative Measures of the Overseas Securities Offering and Listing by Domestic Companies (the “Overseas Listing Trial Measures”) and five relevant guidelines, which will become effective on March 31, 2023. The Overseas Listing Trial Measures will comprehensively improve and reform the existing regulatory regime for overseas offering and listing of securities of PRC domestic companies and will regulate both direct and indirect overseas offering and listing of securities of PRC domestic companies by adopting a filing-based regulatory regime. The Overseas Listing Trial Measures may make it difficult for us to obtain additional financings through future overseas offering of securities. See “—Risks Related to Doing Business in China—The approval of and the filing with the CSRC or other PRC government authorities may be required in connection with our future offshore offering under PRC law, and, if required, we cannot predict whether or for how long we will be able to obtain such approval or complete such filing.” If we and the VIEs are unable to obtain adequate financing on terms satisfactory to us and the VIEs and when we and the VIEs require it in the future, our and the VIEs ability to continue to support our and the VIEs business growth and our ability to continue as a going concern could be significantly impaired, and our and the VIEs’ business and prospects could be adversely affected.

Failure to renew or retain any preferential tax treatments that are available in China could adversely affect our and the VIEs’ results of operations and financial condition.

The modified Enterprise Income Tax Law, effective on December 29, 2018 and its implementation rules and regulations generally impose a uniform income tax rate of 25% on all enterprises, but grant preferential treatments, including a preferential enterprise tax rate of 15%, to high and new technology enterprises (the “HNTEs”), strongly supported by the state. Such preferential tax rate is subject to reapplication and renewal every three years. During the three-year period, an HNTE must conduct annual qualification self-reviews, and will lose the 15% preferential rate and be subject to the regular 25% rate for any year in which it does not meet relevant criteria. TuanYuan, TuanChe Internet and Drive New Media have been accredited as HNTEs and are eligible for a preferential enterprise tax rate of 15% for as long as they meet the criteria of HNTE in each year of the accredited period. We cannot assure you that our PRC subsidiaries or the VIEs will continue to meet the relevant criteria, and that the tax authorities will continue to approve the preferential tax rate of 15% even if these entities are accredited as HNTE. Moreover, it is uncertain how the modified Enterprise Income Tax Law and its implementing rules and regulations will be interpreted or implemented in the future. It is possible that the HNTE status currently enjoyed by TuanYuan, TuanChe Internet and Drive New Media, and other income tax exemptions for which our PRC subsidiaries or the VIEs qualify, will be challenged by tax authorities and be repealed. Future implementation of rules and regulations might be inconsistent with current interpretations of the modified Enterprise Income Tax.

28

Table of Contents

Seasonality may cause fluctuations in our and the VIEs’ results of operations.

Our quarterly net revenues and other results of operations have fluctuated in the past and may continue to fluctuate depending upon a number of factors, many of which are beyond our control. For these reasons, comparing our results of operations on a period-to-period basis may not be meaningful, and you should not rely on our past results as an indication of our future performance. For example, consumer purchases typically slow down in the first quarter, and then increase through the next three quarters of each year. Therefore, the demand for booth spaces in our and the VIEs’ auto shows is generally the lowest in the first quarter of each year, primarily due to a general slowdown in business activities and a reduced number of working days during the Chinese New Year holiday period. The timing of such releases, however, is subject to uncertainties due to various factors such as automakers’ design or manufacturing issues, their marketing plans, general marketing conditions and government incentives or restrictions. These factors may make our and the VIEs’ results of operations difficult to predict and cause our quarterly results of operations to fall short of expectations.

We and the VIEs may be held liable for injuries to individual participants of our and the VIEs’ offline events or damages to automobiles displayed in our and the VIEs’ offline events, which may adversely affect our and the VIEs’ reputation and adversely affect our and the VIEs’ financial condition and results of operations.

We and the VIEs strive to ensure the safety of the participants and the automobiles displayed during our and the VIEs’ offline events. However, we cannot guarantee that no physical injury or damages will occur during such events, for which we and the VIEs could be held liable. For example, under the PRC laws and regulations, the undertaker of a mass activity bears tort liability for damages to a third party arising from such undertakers’ failure to fulfill its security obligations. If the act of a third party results in damage to others in a mass activity, the undertaker that failed to fulfill security obligations shall also bear supplementary liability. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—Regulation—Regulations Relating to Consumer Rights Protection and Tort Liabilities” in this annual report.

In addition, we and the VIEs have contractual obligations to compensate the event venue provider for any damages it suffers arising from the accident occurring on the venue and claims by the participants of the event. Therefore, we and the VIEs might face negligence claims alleging that we and the VIEs failed to maintain our and the VIEs’ facilities or to supervise our and the VIEs’ employees. In addition, if any participants of our and the VIEs’ offline events commit acts of violence, we and the VIEs could also face allegations that we and the VIEs failed to provide adequate security or were otherwise responsible for his or her actions.

We and the VIEs typically require our and the VIEs’ event set-up service providers to purchase liability insurance. However, such insurance might not be adequate to cover our and the VIEs’ potential liabilities, or may not cover us and the VIEs at all. If we and the VIEs are held liable for the injury or damages, we and the VIEs may be subject to litigations, and our and the VIEs’ financial condition and results of operations may be adversely affected. Additionally, our and the VIEs’ offline events may be perceived to be unsafe, which may discourage prospective consumers and industry customers from attending. These negative perceptions might also adversely affect our and the VIEs’ reputation and results of operations.

We and the VIEs may be subject to claims under consumer protection laws, product quality laws and tort liabilities law, including health and safety claims and product liability claims, if people or properties are harmed by automobiles sold during our and the VIEs’ events or through our and the VIEs’ previous virtual dealership networks.

The automobiles sold during our and the VIEs’ events or through our and the VIEs’ virtual dealership networks are designed and manufactured by third parties, and we cannot guarantee that none of these automobiles is defectively designed or manufactured. We and the VIEs may be subject to claims under applicable consumer protection laws, product quality laws and tort liabilities law, including health and safety claims and product liability claims for damages to third parties arising from the defects of automobiles sold through our and the VIEs’ previous virtual dealership networks. Although we and the VIEs would have legal recourse against the manufacturer or the dealer of such products under PRC law if the liabilities are attributable to such manufacturer or dealer, attempting to enforce our and the VIEs’ rights against such manufacturer or dealer may be expensive, time-consuming and ultimately futile. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—Regulation—Regulations Relating to Consumer Rights Protection and Tort Liabilities” in this annual report.

29

Table of Contents

In addition, we, our WFOEs and the VIEs do not currently maintain any third-party liability insurance or product liability insurance in relation to most of the automobiles sold during our and the VIEs’ events. As a result, any material product liability claim or litigation could have a material adverse effect on our and the VIEs’ business, financial condition and results of operations. Even unsuccessful claims could result in the expenditure of funds and managerial efforts in defending them and could have a negative impact on our and the VIEs’ reputation.

Our and the VIEs’ lack of insurance could expose us and the VIEs to significant costs and business disruption.

The insurance industry in China is still at an early stage of development. Insurance companies in China offer limited business insurance products and are, to our and the VIEs’ knowledge, not well-developed in the field of business liability insurance. We and the VIEs do not have any business liability or disruption insurance to cover our and the VIEs’ operations in China, which, based on public information available to us and the VIEs relating to China’s automotive industry, is consistent with customary industry practice in China. We and the VIEs have determined that the costs of insuring for these risks and the difficulties associated with acquiring such insurance on commercially reasonable terms make it impractical for us and the VIEs to have such insurance. In addition, we and the VIEs do not maintain any insurance policies covering risks including loss and theft of and damages to our and the VIEs’ servers or other technology infrastructure. Any uninsured occurrence of business disruption, litigation or natural disaster, or significant damages to our and the VIEs’ uninsured equipment or technology infrastructure could result in substantial costs and diversion of resources for us and the VIEs and could adversely affect our and the VIEs’ financial condition and results of operations.

Any catastrophe, including outbreak of health pandemics and other extraordinary events, could have a negative impact on our and the VIEs’ business operations.

We and the VIEs are vulnerable to natural disasters and other calamities. Fire, floods, typhoons, earthquakes, power loss, telecommunications failures, wars, riots, terrorist attacks or similar events may give rise to server interruptions, breakdowns, system failures or internet failures, which could cause the loss or corruption of data or malfunctions of software or hardware as well as adversely affect our and the VIEs’ ability to provide our and the VIEs’ services.

Our and the VIEs’ business could also be adversely affected by the effects of Ebola virus diseases, H1N1 flu, H7N9 flu, avian flu, Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS), COVID-19 or other epidemics. Our and the VIEs’ business operation could be disrupted if any of our and the VIEs’ employees is suspected of having any of the aforementioned epidemics or another contagious disease or condition, since it could require our and the VIEs’ employees to be quarantined and/or our and the VIEs’ offices to be disinfected. In addition, our and the VIEs’ business, results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected to the extent that any of these epidemics harms the Chinese economy in general.

Risks Related to Our Corporate Structure

If the PRC government finds that the agreements that establish the structure for operating some of the VIEs’ operations in China do not comply with PRC regulations relating to the relevant industries, or if these regulations or the interpretation of existing regulations change in the future, we and the VIEs could be subject to severe penalties or be forced to relinquish our interests in those operations.

Foreign investment in the value-added telecommunications services industry in China is extensively regulated and subject to numerous restrictions. For example, foreign investors are not allowed to own more than 50% of the equity interests in a value-added telecommunications service provider with certain exceptions relating to e-commerce business, domestic multi-party communications services business, store-and-forward business and call center business in accordance with the special management measures for the entry of foreign investment (as amended) (the “Negative List”), and other applicable laws and regulations.

30

Table of Contents

We are a Cayman Islands company and our wholly-owned subsidiaries in China are currently considered foreign-invested enterprises. Accordingly, our subsidiaries in China are not eligible to provide certain value-added telecommunications services in China. Due to these restrictions, we carry out our value-added telecommunications business in China through the VIEs. We, through TuanYuan, Sangu Maolu and Chema Beijing, entered into a series of contractual arrangements with the VIEs and their respective shareholders, in order to (1) exercise significant influence over the VIEs, (2) receive substantially all of the economic benefits of the VIEs, and (3) have an exclusive option to purchase all or part of the equity interests in the VIEs when and to the extent permitted by PRC law. We have been and expect to continue to be dependent on the VIEs to operate our value-added telecommunications business. As a result of these contractual arrangements, we have significant influence over and are the primary beneficiary of the VIEs and hence consolidate the financial results of the VIEs, provided that we meet the conditions for consolidation under U.S. GAAP.

In the opinion of our PRC counsel, Shihui Partners, the ownership structures of our WFOEs and the VIEs, currently do not result in any violation of the applicable PRC laws or regulations currently in effect; and the contractual arrangements among our WFOEs, the VIEs and their respective shareholders, are governed by PRC laws or regulations, and are currently valid, binding and enforceable in accordance with the applicable PRC laws or regulations currently in effect, and do not result in any violation of the applicable PRC laws or regulations currently in effect, except that the equity pledge under that certain equity pledge agreement would not be deemed validly created until they are registered with the competent governmental authorities. However, Shihui Partners has also advised us that there are substantial uncertainties regarding the interpretation and application of current or future PRC laws and regulations, and there can be no assurance that the PRC government will ultimately take a view that is consistent with the opinion of our PRC counsel.

In particular, in March 2019, the National People’s Congress (the “NPC”), passed the PRC Foreign Investment Law, which became effective as of January 1, 2020. For the effect of the PRC Foreign Investment Law on us, see “—Risks Related to Our Corporate Structure—Uncertainties exist with respect to the interpretation and implementation of the PRC Foreign Investment Law and how it may impact the viability of our current corporate structure, corporate governance and business operations.”

If our ownership structure and contractual arrangements are found to violate any PRC laws or regulations, or if we or the VIEs are found to be required but failed to obtain any of the permits or approvals for our or the VIEs’ value-added telecommunications business, the relevant PRC regulatory authorities, including the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (the “MIIT”), would have broad discretion in imposing fines or administrative penalties upon us and/or the VIEs for such violations, including: revoking the business and operating licenses of our company;

31

Table of Contents

On February 17, 2023, the CSRC released the Overseas Listing Trial Measures and five supporting guidelines, which will take effect on March 31, 2023. At the press conference held for the Overseas Listing Trial Measures on the same day, officials from the CSRC clarified that, as for companies seeking overseas listing with contractual arrangements, the CSRC will solicit opinions from relevant regulatory authorities and complete the filing of the overseas listing of such companies if they duly meet the compliance requirements, and support the development and growth of these companies by enabling them to utilize two markets and two kinds of resources. If we, our PRC subsidiaries and the VIEs fail to complete the filing with the CSRC in a timely manner, or at all, for any future offering or any other capital raising activities, which are subject to the filings under the Overseas Listing Trial Measures, due to our contractual arrangements, our ability to raise or utilize funds could be materially and adversely affected. However, given that the Overseas Listing Trial Measures were recently promulgated, there remains substantial uncertainties as to their interpretation, application, and enforcement and how they will affect our operations and our future financing.

As of the date of this annual report, similar ownership structure and contractual arrangements have been used by many China-based companies listed overseas, including a number of value-added telecommunications companies listed in the United States. To our knowledge, none of the fines or punishments listed above has been imposed on any of these public companies. However, we cannot assure you that such fines or punishments will not be imposed on us, the VIEs or any other companies in the future. If any of the above fines or punishments is imposed on us or the VIEs, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. If any of these penalties results in our inability to direct the activities of the VIEs that most significantly impact their economic performance, and/or our failure to receive the economic benefits from the VIEs, we may not be able to consolidate them in our financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP. However, we do not believe that such actions would result in the liquidation or dissolution of our company, our WFOEs or the VIEs or their subsidiaries. To the extent commercially practicable and in compliance with the relevant PRC laws and regulations, we plan to conduct the VIEs’ current businesses through our subsidiaries in China and cease substantially all of the operation of the VIEs within the next three to five years.

Uncertainties exist with respect to the interpretation and implementation of the PRC Foreign Investment Law and how it may impact the viability of our current corporate structure, corporate governance and business operations.

On March 15, 2019, the NPC approved the Foreign Investment Law, which came into effect on January 1, 2020 and replaced the trio of existing laws regulating foreign investment in China, i.e., the Sino-foreign Equity Joint Venture Enterprise Law, the Sino-foreign Cooperative Joint Venture Enterprise Law and the Wholly Foreign-invested Enterprise Law, together with their implementation rules and ancillary regulations. In December 2019, the State Council promulgated the Implementation Regulation on the Foreign Investment Law to further clarify relevant provisions of the Foreign Investment Law, which came into effect on January 1, 2020. The Foreign Investment Law and its implementation regulation embody an expected PRC regulatory trend to rationalize its foreign investment regulatory regime in line with prevailing international practice and the legislative efforts to unify the corporate legal requirements for both foreign and domestic investments.

32

Table of Contents

However, since the Foreign Investment Law and its implementation regulation are relatively new, uncertainties still exist in relation to their interpretation and implementation. For instance, under the Foreign Investment Law, “foreign investment” refers to the investment activities directly or indirectly conducted by foreign individuals, enterprises or other entities in China. Though it does not explicitly classify contractual arrangements as a form of foreign investment, there is no assurance that foreign investment via contractual arrangements would not be deemed as a type of indirect foreign investment activities under the definition in the future. In addition, the definition has a catch-all provision which includes investments made by foreign investors through means stipulated in laws or administrative regulations or other methods prescribed by the State Council. The Special Administrative Measures (Negative Lest) for Foreign Investment Access (2021 Version) (the “Negative List (2021 version)”) stipulates that any domestic enterprise in China engaging in prohibited business under the Negative List shall be subject to review by and shall obtain the consent of the relevant competent PRC authorities for overseas listing, and the foreign investors shall not participate in the operation and management of such enterprise, and the shareholding percentage of the foreign investors in such enterprise shall be subject, mutatis mutandis, to the relevant administrative provisions of the PRC domestic securities investment by foreign investors. The Negative List does not further elaborate whether existing overseas listed enterprises, like us, will be subject to such requirements. Further, pursuant to the press conference held by the National Development and Reform Commission (the “NDRC”) on January 18, 2022, the foresaid requirements shall not be applicable to domestic enterprises that seek to offer and list securities in overseas markets indirectly. Although it does not explicitly classify contractual arrangements as a form of foreign investment, there is no assurance that foreign investment via contractual arrangement would not be interpreted as a type of indirect foreign investment activities in the future. In any of these cases, it will be uncertain whether our contractual arrangements will be deemed to be in violation of the market access requirements for foreign investment under the PRC laws and regulations. Furthermore, if future laws, administrative regulations or provisions prescribed by the State Council mandate further actions to be taken by companies with respect to existing contractual arrangements, we may face substantial uncertainties as to whether we can complete such actions in a timely manner, or at all.

In addition, the Foreign Investment Law provides that foreign-invested enterprises established before the Foreign Investment Law came into effect may maintain their structure and corporate governance within a five-year transition period, which means that we may be required to adjust the structure and corporate governance of certain of our subsidiaries in China when such transition period ends. Failure to take timely and appropriate measures to cope with any of these or similar regulatory compliance challenges could materially and adversely affect our current corporate structure, corporate governance and business operations.

We may rely on dividends and other distributions on equity paid by our subsidiaries in China and Hong Kong to fund any cash and financing requirements we may have, and any limitation on the ability of our subsidiaries to make payments to us could have a material and adverse effect on our ability to conduct the business.

Under our current corporate structure, our ability to pay dividends depends upon dividends paid by our Hong Kong subsidiary, which in turn depends on dividends paid by our subsidiaries in China, which further depends on payments from the VIEs under the contractual arrangements. To the extent cash or assets in the business is in mainland China or Hong Kong or an entity domiciled in mainland China or Hong Kong, and may need to be used to fund operations outside of mainland China or Hong Kong, the funds and assets may not be available to fund operations or for other uses outside of mainland China or Hong Kong due to interventions in or the imposition of restrictions and limitations by the government on our, our subsidiaries’ or the VIEs’ ability to transfer cash and assets.

Although we consolidate the results of the VIEs and their subsidiaries, we only have access to the assets or earnings of the VIEs and their subsidiaries through the contractual arrangements. If the PRC authorities determine that the contractual arrangements constituting part of the VIE structure do not comply with PRC regulations, or if current regulations change or are interpreted differently in the future, our ability to settle amount owed by the VIEs under the contractual arrangements may be seriously hindered. In addition, if our existing subsidiaries in China or any newly formed ones incur debt on their own behalf in the future, the instruments governing their debt may restrict their ability to pay dividends to us.

Our WFOEs are permitted to pay dividends to us only out of its retained earnings, if any, as determined in accordance with PRC accounting standards and regulations. Under PRC laws, each of our subsidiary, the VIEs and their subsidiaries in China is required to set aside at least 10% of its after-tax profits each year, if any, to fund certain statutory reserve funds until such reserve funds reach 50% of its registered capital. In addition, after making an allocation to the statutory reserve funds from their after-tax profits, our wholly owned subsidiary in China, the VIEs and their subsidiaries may allocate a portion of their after-tax profits based on PRC accounting standards to a discretionary surplus fund at their discretion. The statutory reserve funds and the discretionary funds are not distributable as cash dividends.

33

Table of Contents

There are limitations on our ability to transfer cash between us, our subsidiaries and the VIEs, and there is no assurance that the PRC government will not intervene or impose restrictions on cash transfer between us, our subsidiaries and the VIEs. We may encounter difficulties in our ability to transfer cash between subsidiaries in China and other subsidiaries largely due to various PRC laws and regulations imposed on foreign exchange. The majority of our income is denominated in Renminbi, and shortage in foreign currencies may restrict our ability to pay dividends or other payment to satisfy our foreign currency denominated obligations, if any. Under existing PRC foreign exchange regulations, payments of current account items, including profit distributions, interest payments and expenditures from trade-related transactions can be made in foreign currencies without prior approval from the State Administration of the Foreign Exchange in the PRC as long as certain procedural requirements are met. Approval from appropriate government authorities is required if Renminbi is converted into foreign currency and remitted out of the PRC to pay capital expenses such as the repayment of loans denominated in foreign currencies. The PRC government may, at its discretion, impose restrictions on access to foreign currencies for current account transactions and if this occurs in the future, we may not be able to pay dividends in foreign currencies to our shareholders. The PRC government has implemented a series of capital control measures, including stricter vetting procedures for China-based companies to remit foreign currency for overseas acquisitions, dividend payments and shareholder loan repayments. It may continue to strengthen its capital controls and dividends and other distributions of our subsidiaries in China may be subjected to tighter scrutiny and may limit the ability of our Cayman Islands holding company, to use capital from our subsidiaries in China, which may restrict our ability to satisfy our liquidity requirements.

Our Hong Kong subsidiary may be considered a non-resident enterprise for tax purposes, so that any dividends our subsidiary in China pays to our Hong Kong subsidiary may be regarded as China-sourced income and, as a result, may be subject to PRC withholding tax at a rate of up to 10% unless a tax treaty or similar arrangement provides otherwise. If we are required under the PRC Enterprise Income Tax Law to pay income tax for any dividends we receive from our subsidiaries in China, or if our Hong Kong subsidiary is determined by PRC government authority as receiving benefits from reduced income tax rate due to a structure or arrangement that is primarily tax-driven, it would materially and adversely affect the amount of dividends, if any, we may pay to our shareholders.

If the PRC tax authorities determine that our Cayman Islands holding company is a PRC resident enterprise for enterprise income tax purposes and unless a tax treaty or similar arrangement provides otherwise, we may be required to withhold a 10% tax from dividends we pay to our shareholders that are non-resident enterprises, including the holders of the ADSs. In addition, non-resident enterprise shareholders, including the ADS holders, may be subject to PRC tax at a rate of 10% on gains realized on the sale or other disposition of ADSs or ordinary shares if such income is treated as sourced from within the PRC. Furthermore, if we are deemed a PRC resident enterprise, dividends paid to our non-PRC individual shareholders, including the ADS holders, and any gain realized on the transfer of ADSs or ordinary shares by such shareholders may be subject to PRC tax at a rate of 20% which in the case of dividends may be withheld at source. Any such tax may reduce the returns on your investment in the ADSs.

We may lose the ability to use and enjoy assets held by the VIEs and their subsidiaries that are important to our business if the VIEs and their subsidiaries declare bankruptcy or become subject to a dissolution or liquidation proceeding.

The VIEs and their subsidiaries hold a significant portion of our assets in China. Under our contractual arrangements, the shareholders of the VIEs may not voluntarily liquidate the VIEs or approve them to sell, transfer, mortgage or dispose of their assets or legal or beneficial interests exceeding certain threshold in the business in any manner without our prior consent. However, in the event that the shareholders breach this obligation and voluntarily liquidate the VIEs, or the VIEs declare bankruptcy, or all or part of their assets become subject to liens or rights of third-party creditors, we may be unable to continue some or all of our operations, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. Furthermore, if the VIEs or their subsidiaries undergo a voluntary or involuntary liquidation proceeding, their shareholders or unrelated third-party creditors may claim rights to some or all of its assets, hindering our ability to operate our business, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

34

Table of Contents

If the custodians or authorized users of our and the VIEs’ controlling non-tangible assets, including chops and seals, fail to fulfill their responsibilities, or misappropriate or misuse these assets, our and the VIEs’ business and operations may be materially and adversely affected.

Under PRC law, legal documents for corporate transactions, including agreements and contracts that our and the VIE’ business relies on, are executed using the chop or seal of the signing entity or with the signature of a legal representative whose designation is registered and filed with the relevant local branch of State Administration for Market Regulations (the “SAMR”). We and the VIEs generally execute legal documents by affixing chops or seals, rather than having the designated legal representatives sign the documents.

We and the VIEs have three major types of chops, corporate chops, contract chops and finance chops. We and the VIEs use corporate chops generally for documents to be submitted to government agencies, such as applications for changing business scope, directors or company name, and for legal letters. We and the VIEs use contract chops for executing leases and commercial contracts. We and the VIEs use finance chops generally for making and collecting payments, including issuing invoices. Use of corporate chops and contract chops must be approved by our and the VIEs’ legal department and administrative department, and use of finance chops must be approved by our finance department. The chops of our subsidiary and the VIEs are generally held by the relevant entities so that documents can be executed locally. Although we and the VIEs usually utilize chops to execute contracts, the registered legal representatives of our subsidiary and VIEs and their subsidiaries have the apparent authority to enter into contracts on behalf of such entities without chops, unless such contracts set forth otherwise.

In order to maintain the physical security of our and the VIEs’ chops, we and the VIEs generally have them stored in secured locations accessible only to the designated key employees of our and the VIEs’ legal, administrative or finance departments. Our and the VIEs’ designated legal representatives generally do not have access to the chops. Although we and the VIEs have approval procedures in place and monitor our and the VIEs’ key employees, including the designated legal representatives of our subsidiaries and the VIEs and their subsidiaries, the procedures may not be sufficient to prevent all instances of abuse or negligence. There is a risk that our and the VIEs’ key employees or designated legal representatives could abuse their authority, for example, by binding our subsidiaries and the VIEs and their subsidiaries with contracts against our interests, as we and the VIEs would be obligated to honor these contracts if the other contracting party acts in good faith in reliance on the apparent authority of our and the VIEs’ chops or signatures of our and the VIEs’ legal representatives. If any designated legal representative obtains control of the chop in an effort to obtain control over the relevant entity, we and the VIEs would need to have a shareholder or board resolution to designate a new legal representative and to take legal action to seek the return of the chop, apply for a new chop with the relevant authorities, or otherwise seek legal remedies for the legal representative’s misconduct. If any of the designated legal representatives obtains and misuses or misappropriates our and the VIEs’ chops and seals or other controlling intangible assets for whatever reason, we and the VIEs could experience disruption to our and the VIEs’ normal business operations. We and the VIEs may have to take corporate or legal action, which could involve significant time and resources to resolve while distracting management from our and the VIEs’ operations, and our and the VIEs’ business and operations may be materially and adversely affected.

We rely on contractual arrangements with the VIEs and their respective shareholders for a large portion of our business operations which may not be as effective as direct ownership in exercising operational influence.

We have relied and expect to continue to rely on the contractual arrangements with the VIEs and their respective shareholders to operate our value-added telecommunications business. For a description of these contractual arrangements, see “Item 4. Information on the Company—C. Organizational Structure.” The revenue contribution of the VIEs accounted for a significant portion of our net revenues in 2020, 2021 and 2022. However, these contractual arrangements may not be as effective as direct equity ownership in providing us with significant influence over the VIEs. Any failure by the VIEs and their respective shareholders, to perform their obligations under the contractual arrangements would have a material adverse effect on our financial position and results of operations. For example, should any dispute relating to the contractual arrangements arises, we will have to enforce our rights under the contracts through the operations of PRC law and arbitration, litigation and other legal proceedings and therefore will be subject to uncertainties in the PRC legal system. Therefore, our contractual arrangements with the VIEs and their respective shareholders may not be as effective in ensuring our significant influence over the relevant portion of our business operations as direct ownership would be.

35

Table of Contents

Furthermore, we are a holding company incorporated in the Cayman Islands. As a holding company with no material operations of our own, we conduct substantially all of our operations through our subsidiaries established in China, the VIEs, and their subsidiaries in China. We control and receive the economic benefits of the VIEs and their subsidiaries’ business operations through certain contractual arrangements. The ADSs listed on the Nasdaq Stock Market represents shares of our offshore holding company instead of shares of the VIEs or their subsidiaries in China. We may not be able to continue to satisfy the applicable requirements and rules with respect to such structure. If we are unable to satisfy the Nasdaq Stock Market criteria for maintaining our listing, our securities could be subject to delisting.

Any failure by the VIEs and their respective shareholders to perform their obligations under our contractual arrangements with them would have a material adverse effect on our business.

If the VIEs and their respective shareholders fail to perform their respective obligations under the contractual arrangements, we may have to incur substantial costs and expend additional resources to enforce such arrangements. We may also have to rely on legal remedies under PRC law, including seeking specific performance or injunctive relief, and claiming damages, which we cannot assure will be effective under PRC law. For example, if the shareholders of the VIEs refuse to transfer their equity interest in the VIEs to us or our designee if we exercise the purchase option pursuant to the contractual arrangements, or if they otherwise act in bad faith toward us, then we may have to take legal actions to compel them to perform their contractual obligations. In addition, if any third parties claim any interest in such shareholders’ equity interests in the VIEs, our ability to exercise shareholders’ rights or foreclose the share pledge according to the contractual arrangements may be impaired.

All of the contractual arrangements are governed by and interpreted in accordance with PRC law, and disputes arising from the contractual arrangements will be resolved through arbitration in China. The legal system in the PRC is not as developed as in some other jurisdictions, such as the United States. As a result, uncertainties in the PRC legal system could limit our ability to enforce these contractual arrangements. See “—Risks Related to Doing Business in China—Uncertainties with respect to the PRC legal system could have a material adverse effect on us and the VIEs” in this annual report. Meanwhile, there are very few precedents and little formal guidance as to how contractual arrangements in the context of a variable interest entity should be interpreted or enforced under PRC law. There remain significant uncertainties regarding the ultimate outcome of such arbitration should legal action become necessary. In addition, under PRC law, rulings by arbitrators are final, parties cannot appeal the arbitration results in courts, and if the losing parties fail to carry out the arbitration awards within a prescribed time limit, the prevailing parties may only enforce the arbitration awards in PRC courts through arbitration award recognition proceedings, which would require additional expenses and delay. In the event we are unable to enforce the contractual arrangements, or if we suffer significant delays or other obstacles in the process of enforcing these contractual arrangements, we may not be able to exert effective control over the VIEs, and our ability to conduct our business may be negatively affected.

The shareholders of the VIEs may have actual or potential conflicts of interest with us, which may materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

The shareholders of the VIEs may have actual or potential conflicts of interest with us. These shareholders may refuse to sign or breach, or cause the VIEs to breach, or refuse to renew, the existing contractual arrangements we have with them and the VIEs, which would have a material adverse effect on our ability to effectively control the VIEs and receive economic benefits from them. For example, the shareholders may be able to cause our agreements with the VIEs to be performed in a manner adverse to us by, among other things, failing to remit payments due under the contractual arrangements to us on a timely basis. We cannot assure you that when conflicts of interest arise any or all of these shareholders will act in the best interests of our company or such conflicts will be resolved in our favor. Currently, we do not have any arrangements to address potential conflicts of interest between these shareholders and our company, except that we could exercise our purchase option under the exclusive option agreement with these shareholders to request them to transfer all of their equity interests in the variable interest entities to a PRC entity or individual designated by us, to the extent permitted by PRC laws. If we cannot resolve any conflict of interest or dispute between us and these shareholders, we would have to rely on legal proceedings, which could result in disruption of our business and subject us to substantial uncertainty as to the outcome of any such legal proceedings.

36

Table of Contents

Our contractual arrangements may be subject to scrutiny by the PRC tax authorities, and they may determine that we or the VIEs owe additional taxes, which could negatively affect our and the VIEs’ business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Under applicable PRC laws and regulations, arrangements and transactions among related parties may be subject to audit or challenge by the PRC tax authorities. The tax authorities may impose reasonable adjustments on taxation if they have identified any related party transactions that are inconsistent with arm’s length principles. We and the VIEs could face material and adverse tax consequences if the PRC tax authorities determine that our contractual arrangements were not entered into on an arm’s-length basis in such a way as to result in an impermissible reduction in taxes under applicable PRC laws, rules and regulations, and adjust the income of the VIEs in the form of a transfer pricing adjustment. A transfer pricing adjustment could, among other things, result in a reduction of expense deductions recorded by the VIEs for PRC tax purposes, which could in turn increase its tax liabilities without reducing our PRC subsidiary’s tax expenses. In addition, if our WFOEs request the shareholders of the VIEs to transfer their equity interests at nominal or no value pursuant to the contractual arrangements, such transfer could be viewed as a gift and subject our WFOEs to PRC income tax. Furthermore, the PRC tax authorities may impose late payment fees and other penalties on the VIEs for the adjusted but unpaid taxes according to the applicable regulations. Our and the VIEs’ financial position could be materially and adversely affected if the VIEs’ tax liabilities increase or if they are required to pay late payment fees and other penalties.

We may lose the ability to use, or otherwise benefit from, the licenses, approvals and assets held by the VIEs, which could severely disrupt our business, render us unable to conduct some or all of our business operations and constrain our growth.

We currently conduct our operations in China through our PRC subsidiaries and the VIEs through our contractual arrangements with them and their respective shareholders. As part of these arrangements, certain assets, licenses and permits that are material to our and the VIEs’ business operations are held by the VIEs and their subsidiaries, such as value-added telecommunications business license. The contractual arrangements contain terms that specifically obligate shareholders of the VIEs to ensure the valid existence of the VIEs and restrict the disposal of material assets of the VIEs. However, in the event shareholders of the VIEs breach the terms of the contractual arrangements and voluntarily liquidate the VIEs, or any of the VIEs declares bankruptcy and all or part of its assets become subject to liens or rights of third-party creditors, or are otherwise disposed of without our consent, we may be unable to conduct some or all of our and the VIEs’ business operations or otherwise benefit from the assets held by the VIEs, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Furthermore, if the VIEs undergo a voluntary or involuntary liquidation proceeding, their shareholders or unrelated third-party creditors may claim rights to some or all of the assets of the VIEs, thereby hindering our ability to operate our and the VIEs’ business as well as constrain our growth.

Certain existing shareholders have substantial influence over our company and their interests may not be aligned with the interests of our other shareholders.

As of the date of this annual report, our directors, officers and principal shareholders collectively own an aggregate of 73.3% of the total voting power of our outstanding ordinary shares. As a result, they have substantial influence over our and the VIEs’ business, including significant corporate actions such as mergers, consolidations, election of directors and other significant corporate actions.

They may take actions that are not in the best interest of us or our other shareholders. This concentration of ownership may discourage, delay or prevent a change in control of our company, which could deprive our shareholders of an opportunity to receive a premium for their shares as part of a sale of our company and may reduce the price of the ADSs. These actions may be taken even if they are opposed by our other shareholders. In addition, the significant concentration of share ownership may adversely affect the trading price of the ADSs due to investors’ perception that conflicts of interest may exist or arise.

Risks Related to Doing Business in China

PRC economic, political and social conditions, as well as changes in any government policies, laws and regulations, could adversely affect the overall economy in China or the automotive market, which could harm our and the VIEs’ business.

Substantially all of our and the VIEs’ operations are conducted in China, and substantially all of our net revenues are derived from China. Accordingly, our and the VIEs’ business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations are subject, to a significant extent, to economic, political and legal developments in China.

37

Table of Contents

The PRC economy differs from the economies of most developed countries in many respects. Although the PRC economy has been transitioning from a planned economy to a more market-oriented economy since the late 1970s, the PRC government continues to play a significant role in regulating the industry. The PRC government continues to exercise significant control over China’s economic growth through allocating resources, controlling the incurrence and payment of foreign currency-denominated obligations, setting monetary policy and providing preferential treatment to particular industries or companies. Uncertainties or changes in any of these policies, laws and regulations, including but without limitations, those affecting the automotive industry in China, could adversely affect the economy in China or our and the VIEs’ business. For example, the CBIRC, promulgated the Interim Measures for Administration of Internet Loans Issued by Commercial Banks (the “Commercial Banks Online Lending Measures”) in July 2020, and the Circular on Further Regulating the Internet Loan Business of Commercial Banks (“Circular 24”) in February 2021. The Commercial Banks Online Lending Measures, as well as Circular 24, set several rules for commercial banks to collaborate with external institutions on online lending, which may affect our cooperation with commercial banks in China.

While the PRC economy has experienced significant growth in the past two to three decades, growth has been uneven, both geographically and among various sectors of the economy. Demand for our services depends, in large part, on economic conditions in China. Any significant slowdown in China’s economic growth may reduce our net revenues. In addition, any sudden changes to China’s political system or the occurrence of social unrest could also have a material adverse effect on our and the VIEs’ business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations.

Furthermore, our Company, the VIEs and their subsidiaries, and our investors may face uncertainty about future actions by the PRC government that could significantly affect the VIEs and their subsidiaries’ financial performance and operations, including the enforceability of the contractual arrangements. As of the date of this annual report, neither our company nor the VIEs have received or have been denied permission from Chinese authorities to list on U.S. exchanges. However, there is no guarantee that our company or the VIEs will receive or not be denied permission from Chinese authorities to list on U.S. exchanges in the future.

Uncertainties with respect to the PRC legal system could have a material adverse on us and the VIEs.

The PRC legal system is a civil law system based on written statutes. Unlike the common law system, prior court decisions in a civil law system may be cited as reference but have limited precedential value. Since 1979, newly introduced PRC laws and regulations have significantly enhanced the protections of interest relating to foreign investments in China. However, since these laws and regulations are relatively new and the PRC legal system continues to evolve rapidly, the interpretations of such laws and regulations may not always be consistent, and enforcement of these laws and regulations involves significant uncertainties, any of which could limit the available legal protections.

In addition, the PRC administrative and judicial authorities have significant discretion in interpreting, implementing or enforcing statutory rules and contractual terms, and it may be more difficult to predict the outcome of administrative and judicial proceedings and the level of legal protection we and the VIEs may enjoy in the PRC than under some more developed legal systems. Furthermore, the PRC legal system is based in part on government policies and internal rules (some of which are not published in a timely manner, or at all) that may have retroactive effect. These uncertainties may affect our decisions on the policies and actions to be taken to comply with PRC laws and regulations, and may affect our and the VIEs’ ability to enforce our and their contractual or tort rights, respectively. In addition, the regulatory uncertainties may be exploited through unmerited legal actions or threats in an attempt to extract payments or benefits from us or the VIEs. Such uncertainties may therefore increase our and the VIEs’ operating expenses and costs, and materially and adversely affect our and the VIEs’ business and results of operations.

38

Table of Contents

The PRC government may exert, at any time, substantial intervention and influence over the manner of our operations, and the rules and regulations to which we are subject, including the ways they are enforced, may change rapidly and with little advance notice to us or our shareholders. Any such actions by the Chinese government, including any decision to intervene or influence the operations of our subsidiaries in China or the VIEs or to exert control over any offering of securities conducted overseas and/or foreign investment in China-based issuers, may cause us to make material changes to the operations of our subsidiaries in China or the VIEs, may limit or completely hinder our ability to offer or continue to offer securities to investors, and may cause the value of such securities to significantly decline or be worthless.

The ability of our subsidiaries and the VIEs to operate in China may be impaired by changes in its laws and regulations, including those relating to value-added telecommunications service industry, taxation, foreign investment limitations, and other matters.

The PRC government may exert, at any time, substantial intervention and influence over the manner of our operations, and the rules and regulations to which we are subject, including the ways they are enforced, may change rapidly and with little advance notice to us or our shareholders. Recently, the PRC government initiated a series of regulatory actions and statements to regulate business operations in China with little advance notice, including cracking down on illegal activities in the securities market, enhancing supervision over China-based companies listed overseas, and adopting new measures to extend the scope of cybersecurity reviews and new laws and regulations relating to data security. The PRC government may impose new, stricter regulations or interpretations of existing regulations that would require additional expenditures and efforts on our part to ensure our subsidiaries in China and the VIEs’ compliance with such regulations or interpretations. As such, our subsidiaries in China and the VIEs may be subject to various government actions and regulatory interference in the provinces in which they operate. They could be subject to regulation by various political and regulatory entities, including various local and municipal agencies and government sub-divisions. They may incur increased costs necessary to comply with existing and newly adopted laws and regulations or penalties for any failure to comply.

Furthermore, it is uncertain when and whether we will be required to obtain permission from the PRC government to maintain our listing status on U.S. exchanges in the future, and even when such permission is obtained, whether it will be later denied or rescinded. On February 17, 2023, the CSRC issued the Overseas Listing Trial Measures, which adopts a filing-based regulatory regime for direct and indirect overseas offering and listing of securities of PRC domestic companies. At the press conference held for the Overseas Listing Trial Measures on the same date, officials from the CSRC clarified that the domestic companies that have already been listed overseas on or before March 31, 2023 shall be deemed as existing issuers (the “Existing Issuers”). Existing Issuers are not required to complete the filing procedures immediately and shall be required to file with the CSRC upon the occurrence of certain subsequent matters, such as follow-on offerings of securities. Although we believe that, under existing applicable PRC laws, regulations and regulatory rules, our company, our WFOEs, the VIEs and their subsidiaries, are not required to obtain permission from the CSRC to maintain our listing status on U.S. exchange, and none of them has received any notice of denial of permission to list on a U.S. exchange from any Chinese authorities, we cannot assure you that the relevant PRC government agencies, including the CSRC, would reach the same conclusion as we do. If the CSRC or any other PRC regulatory body subsequently determines that we need to file with the CSRC or obtain the CSRC’s approval to maintain our listing status on U.S. exchanges or if the CSRC or any other PRC government authorities promulgates any interpretation or implements rules that would require us to file with or obtain approvals of the CSRC or other governmental bodies for any such listing status, we may face adverse actions that could have a material and adverse effect on our business, reputation, financial condition, results of operations, prospects, as well as the trading price of the ADSs.

Accordingly, government actions in the future, including any decision to intervene or influence the operations of our subsidiaries in China or the VIEs at any time, or to exert control over an offering of securities conducted overseas and/or foreign investment in China-based issuers, may cause us to make material changes to the operations of our subsidiaries in China or the VIEs, may limit or completely hinder our ability to offer or continue to offer securities to investors, and/or may cause the value of such securities to significantly decline or be worthless. As of the date of this annual report, we or the VIEs have not received any inquiry, notice, warning, or sanctions regarding our corporate structure, contractual arrangements and the VIEs’ operations from the CSRC, CAC or any other PRC government authorities.

39

Table of Contents

The filing procedure with the CSRC shall be fulfilled and the approval of other PRC government authorities may be required in connection with our future offshore offering under PRC law, and, we cannot predict whether or for how long we will be able to complete the filing procedure with the CSRC and obtain such approval or complete such filing, if required.

The Regulations on Mergers and Acquisitions of Domestic Companies by Foreign Investors (the “M&A Rules”), adopted by six PRC regulatory agencies in 2006 and amended in 2009, include, among other things, provisions that purport to require that an offshore special purpose vehicle, formed for the purpose of an overseas listing of securities through acquisitions of domestic enterprises in China or assets and controlled by enterprises or individuals in China, to obtain the approval of the CSRC prior to the listing and trading of such special purpose vehicle’s securities on an overseas stock exchange. On September 21, 2006, pursuant to the M&A Rules and other PRC laws, the CSRC published on its official website relevant guidance regarding its approval of the listing and trading of special purpose vehicles’ securities on overseas stock exchanges, including a list of application materials. However, substantial uncertainty remains regarding the scope and applicability of the M&A Rules to offshore special purpose vehicles. We completed our initial public offering on November 23, 2018.

On July 6, 2021, the relevant PRC government authorities issued Opinions on Strictly Cracking Down Illegal Securities Activities in accordance with the Law. These opinions emphasized the need to strengthen the administration over illegal securities activities and the supervision on overseas listings by China-based companies and proposed to take effective measures, such as promoting the construction of relevant regulatory systems to deal with the risks and incidents faced by China-based overseas-listed companies. These opinions and any related implementation rules to be enacted may subject us to additional compliance requirement in the future. As these opinions were recently issued, official guidance to act upon and the interpretation thereof remain unclear at this time. We cannot assure that we will remain fully compliant with all new regulatory requirements of these opinions or any future implementation rules on a timely basis, or at all.

On February 17, 2023, the CSRC promulgated the Overseas Listing Trial Measures and five relevant guidelines, which will take effect on March 31, 2023. According to the Overseas Listing Trial Measures, PRC domestic companies that seek to offer and list securities in overseas markets, either in direct or indirect means, are required to fulfill the filing procedure with the CSRC and report relevant information. The Overseas Listing Trial Measures provides that an overseas listing or offering is explicitly prohibited, if any of the following: (1) such securities offering and listing is explicitly prohibited by provisions in laws, administrative regulations and relevant state rules; (2) the intended securities offering and listing may endanger national security as reviewed and determined by competent authorities under the State Council in accordance with law; (3) the domestic company intending to make the securities offering and listing, or its controlling shareholder(s) and the actual controller, have committed relevant crimes such as corruption, bribery, embezzlement, misappropriation of property or undermining the order of the socialist market economy during the latest three years; (4) the domestic company intending to make the securities offering and listing is currently under investigations for suspicion of criminal offenses or major violations of laws and regulations, and no conclusion has yet been made thereof; or (5) there are material ownership disputes over equity held by the domestic company’s controlling shareholder(s) or by other shareholder(s) that are controlled by the controlling shareholder(s) and/or actual controller.

The Overseas Listing Trial Measures also provides that if the issuer meets both the following criteria, the overseas securities offering and listing conducted by such issuer will be deemed as indirect overseas offering by PRC domestic companies: (1) 50% or more of any of the issuer’s operating revenue, total profit, total assets or net assets as documented in its audited consolidated financial statements for the most recent fiscal year is accounted for by domestic companies; and (2) the issuer’s main business activities are conducted in China, or its main place(s) of business are located in China, or the majority of senior management staff in charge of its business operations and management are PRC citizens or have their usual place(s) of residence located in China. Where an issuer submits an application for initial public offering to competent overseas regulators, such issuer must file with the CSRC within three business days after such application is submitted. In addition, the Overseas Listing Trial Measures provide that the direct or indirect overseas listings of the assets of domestic companies through one or more acquisitions, share swaps, transfers or other transaction arrangements shall be subject to filing procedures in accordance with the Overseas Listing Trial Measures. The Overseas Listing Trial Measures also requires subsequent reports to be filed with the CSRC on material events, such as change of control or voluntary or forced delisting of the issuer(s) who have completed overseas offerings and listings.

40

Table of Contents

At a press conference held for these new regulations (“Press Conference”), officials from the CSRC clarified that the domestic companies that have already been listed overseas on or before March 31, 2023 shall be deemed as existing issuers (the “Existing Issuers”). Existing Issuers are not required to complete the filling procedures immediately, and they shall be required to file with the CSRC upon occurrences of certain subsequent matters such as follow-on offerings of securities. According to the Overseas Listing Trial Measures and the Press Conference, the existing domestic companies that have completed overseas offering and listing before March 31, 2023, such as us, shall not be required to perform filing procedures for the completed overseas securities issuance and listing. However, from the effective date of the regulation, any of our subsequent securities offering in the same overseas market or subsequent securities offering and listing in other overseas markets shall be subject to the filing requirement with the CSRC within three working days after the offering is completed or after the relevant application is submitted to the relevant overseas authorities, respectively. If it is determined that any approval, filing or other administrative procedures from other PRC governmental authorities is required for any future offering or listing, we cannot assure you that we, our WFOEs and the VIEs can obtain the required approval or accomplish the required filings or other regulatory procedures in a timely manner, or at all. If we, our WFOEs or the VIEs fail to fulfill filing procedure as stipulated by the Trial Measures or offer and list securities in an overseas market in violation of the Trial Measures, the CSRC may order rectification, issue warnings to us, our WFOEs and the VIE, and impose a fine of between RMB1,000,000 and RMB10,000,000. Persons-in-charge and other persons that are directly liable for such failure shall be warned and each imposed a fine from RMB500,000 to RMB5,000,000. Controlling shareholders and actual controlling persons of us, our WFOEs and the VIEs that organize or instruct such violations shall be imposed a fine from RMB1,000,000 and RMB10,000,000.

If we fail to obtain the relevant approval or complete the filings and other relevant regulatory procedures, we, our WFOEs and the VIEs may face adverse actions or sanctions by the CSRC or other PRC regulatory agencies. In any such event, these regulatory agencies may impose fines and penalties on our operations in China, limit our operating privileges in China, delay or restrict the repatriation of the proceeds from offshore fund-raising activities into the PRC or take other actions that could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, reputation and prospects, as well as the trading price of the ADSs.

On December 27, 2021, the NDRC and MOFCOM jointly issued the Negative List (2021 Version), which became effective on January 1, 2022. Pursuant to the Negative List (2021 Version), if a company in China engaging in the prohibited business stipulated in the Negative List (2021 Version) seeks an overseas offering and listing, it shall obtain the approval from the competent governmental authorities. The foreign investors of the issuer shall not be involved in the company’s operation and management, and their shareholding percentages shall be subject, mutatis mutandis, to the relevant regulations on the domestic securities investments by foreign investors. As the 2021 Negative List is relatively new, there remain substantial uncertainties as to the interpretation and implementation of these new requirements, and it is unclear as to whether and to what extent listed companies like us will be subject to these new requirements. If we and the VIEs’ are required to comply with these requirements and fail to do so on a timely basis, if at all, our and the VIEs’ business operation, financial condition and business prospect may be adversely and materially affected.

On February 24, 2023, the CSRC published the Provisions on Strengthening the Confidentiality and Archives Administration Related to the Overseas Securities Offering and Listing by Domestic Enterprises (the “Provisions on Confidentiality and Archives Administration”), which will come into effect on March 31, 2023. The Provisions on Confidentiality and Archives Administration requires that, in the process of overseas issuance and listing of securities by domestic entities, the domestic entities, and securities companies and securities service institutions that provide relevant securities service shall strictly implement the provisions of relevant laws and regulations and the requirements of these provisions, establish and improve rules on confidentiality and archives administration. Where the domestic entities provide with or publicly disclose documents, materials or other items related to the state secrets and government work secrets to the relevant securities companies, securities service institutions, overseas regulatory authorities, or other entities or individuals, the companies shall apply for approval of competent departments with the authority of examination and approval in accordance with law and report the matter to the secrecy administrative departments at the same level for record filing. Where there is unclear or controversial whether or not the concerned materials are related to state secrets, the materials shall be reported to the relevant secrecy administrative departments for determination. However, the Provisions on Confidentiality and Archives Administration have not yet become effective, and there remain uncertainties regarding the further interpretation and implementation of the Provisions on Confidentiality and Archives Administration.

41

Table of Contents

We cannot assure you that any new rules or regulations promulgated in the future will not impose additional requirements on us and the VIEs. If it is determined in the future that approval and filing from the CSRC or other regulatory authorities or other procedures, including the cybersecurity review under the Measures for Cybersecurity Review and the annual data security review under the Administrative Measures for Internet Data Security (Draft for Comments), are required for our listing status or future offshore offerings, it is uncertain whether we can or how long it will take us to obtain such approval or complete such filing procedures and any such approval or filing could be rescinded or rejected. For details, see “— Failure to comply with governmental regulations and other legal obligations concerning data protection and cybersecurity may materially and adversely affect our and the VIEs’ business.” Given the current regulatory environment in China, there remains uncertainty regarding the interpretation and enforcement of PRC laws, which can change quickly with little notice in advance and subject us and the VIEs to any future actions within the discretion of PRC authorities.

If we are classified as a PRC resident enterprise for PRC enterprise income tax purposes, such classification could result in unfavorable tax consequences to us and our non-PRC shareholders and the ADS holders.

The PRC enterprise income tax law and its implementing rules provide that enterprises established outside of China whose “de facto management bodies” are located in China are considered “resident enterprises” under PRC tax laws. The implementing rules define the term “de facto management bodies” as a management body which substantially manages, or has control over the business, personnel, finance and assets of an enterprise. In April 2009, the State Administration of Taxation (the “SAT”), issued the Notice Regarding the Determination of Chinese-Controlled Overseas Incorporated Enterprises as PRC Tax Resident Enterprises on the Basis of De Facto Management Bodies (“SAT Circular 82”), which provides that a foreign enterprise controlled by a PRC company or a group of PRC companies will be classified as a “resident enterprise” with its “de facto management body” located within China if all of the following requirements are satisfied: (1) the senior management and core management departments in charge of its daily operations function are mainly in China; (2) its financial and human resources decisions are subject to determination or approval by persons or bodies in China; (3) its major assets, accounting books, company seals, and minutes and files of its board and shareholders’ meetings are located or kept in China; and (4) at least half of the enterprise’s directors with voting right or senior management reside in China. The SAT issued a bulletin in August 2011 to provide more guidance on the implementation of SAT Circular 82. The bulletin clarifies certain matters relating to resident status determination, post-determination administration and competent tax authorities. Although both the circular and the bulletin only apply to offshore enterprises controlled by PRC enterprises and not those by PRC individuals, the determination criteria set forth in the circular and administration clarification made in the bulletin may reflect the general position of the SAT on how the “de facto management body” test should be applied in determining the tax resident status of offshore enterprises and the administration measures should be implemented, regardless of whether they are controlled by PRC enterprises or PRC individuals.

In addition, the SAT issued a bulletin in January 2014 to provide more guidance on the implementation of SAT Circular 82. This bulletin further provides that, among other things, an entity that is classified as a “resident enterprise” in accordance with the circular shall file the application for classifying its status of residential enterprise with the local tax authorities where its main domestic investors are registered. From the year in which the entity is determined as a “resident enterprise,” any dividend, profit and other equity investment gain shall be taxed in accordance with the enterprise income tax law and its implementing rules.

As the tax resident status of an enterprise is subject to the determination by the PRC tax authorities, if we are deemed as a PRC “resident enterprise,” we will be subject to PRC enterprise income tax on our worldwide income at a uniform tax rate of 25.0%, although dividends distributed to us from our existing PRC subsidiaries and any other PRC subsidiaries which we may establish from time to time could be exempt from the PRC dividend withholding tax due to our PRC “resident recipient” status. This could have a material adverse effect on our overall effective tax rate, our income tax expenses and our net income. Furthermore, dividends, if any, paid to our shareholders and ADS holders may be decreased as a result of the decrease in distributable profits. In addition, if we were to be considered a PRC “resident enterprise,” dividends we pay with respect to the ADS or ordinary shares and the gains realized from the transfer of the ADS or ordinary shares may be considered income derived from sources within China and be subject to PRC withholding tax, which could have a material adverse effect on the value of your investment in us and the price of the ADS.

42

Table of Contents

PRC regulation of loans to and direct investment in PRC entities by offshore holding companies and governmental control of currency conversion may delay or prevent us from using the proceeds of our offering of securities to make loans to or make additional capital contributions to our PRC subsidiaries and the VIEs, which could materially and adversely affect our liquidity and our ability to fund and expand our and the VIEs’ business.

As an offshore holding company of our PRC subsidiaries, we may make loans to our PRC subsidiaries and the VIEs, or we may make additional capital contributions to our PRC subsidiaries. Such loans to our PRC subsidiaries or the VIEs in China and capital contributions are subject to PRC regulations and approvals. For example, loans by us to our PRC subsidiaries and the VIEs cannot exceed statutory limits and must be filed with the State Administration of Foreign Exchange (“SAFE”) via SAFE’s official online system. Besides SAFE filing, such loans may also need to be filed with the NDRC or its local branches. Capital contributions to our PRC subsidiaries must be approved by or filed with the MOFCOM or its local counterpart. In addition, the PRC government also restricts the convertibility of foreign currencies into Renminbi and use of the proceeds. In March 2015, SAFE promulgated SAFE Circular 19, which took effect and replaced certain previous SAFE regulations from June 2015. SAFE further promulgated the Notice of the State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Reforming and Standardizing the Administrative Provisions on Capital Account Foreign Exchange Settlement (“SAFE Circular 16”), effective in June 2016, which, among other things, amend certain provisions of SAFE Circular 19. According to SAFE Circular 19 and SAFE Circular 16, the flow and use of the Renminbi capital converted from foreign currency denominated registered capital of a foreign-invested company is regulated such that Renminbi capital may not be used for business beyond its business scope or to provide loans to persons other than affiliates unless otherwise permitted under its business scope. In October 2019, the SAFE promulgated the Circular Regarding Further Promotion of the Facilitation of Cross-Border Trade and Investment (“SAFE Circular 28”), pursuant to which all foreign-invested enterprises can make equity investments in the PRC with their capital funds in accordance with the law. The Circular Regarding Further Optimizing the Cross-border Renminbi Policy to Support the Stabilization of Foreign Trade and Foreign Investment jointly promulgated by the People’s Bank of China (the “PBOC”), the NDRC, MOFCOM, the State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission of the State Council, the CBIRC and SAFE on December 31, 2020 and effective on February 4, 2021 allows the non-investment foreign-invested enterprises to make domestic reinvestment with capital denominated in Renminbi in accordance with the law on the premise that they comply with prevailing regulations and the invested projects in China are authentic and compliant.

Violations of the applicable circulars and rules may result in severe penalties, including substantial fines as set forth in the Foreign Exchange Administration Regulations. If the VIEs require financial support from us or our wholly owned subsidiaries in the future and we find it necessary to use foreign currency-denominated capital to provide such financial support, our ability to fund the VIEs’ operations will be subject to statutory limits and restrictions, including those described above.

The applicable foreign exchange circulars and rules may significantly limit our ability to convert, transfer and use the net proceeds from our overseas offerings or any offering of additional equity securities in China, which may adversely affect our and the VIEs’ business, financial condition and results of operations. As the foreign exchange related regulatory regime and practice are complex and still evolving and involve many uncertainties, we cannot assure you that we have complied or will be able to comply with all applicable foreign exchange circulars and rules, or that we will be able to complete the necessary government registrations or filings on a timely basis, if at all, with respect to future loans by us to our PRC subsidiaries or with respect to future capital contributions by us to our PRC subsidiaries. If we fail to complete such registrations or filings, our ability to contribute additional capital to fund our and the VIEs’ PRC operations may be negatively affected, which could adversely and materially affect our liquidity and our ability to fund and expand our and the VIEs’ business.

There are significant uncertainties under the PRC enterprise income tax law relating to the withholding tax liabilities of our PRC subsidiaries, and dividends payable by our PRC subsidiaries to our offshore subsidiaries may not qualify to enjoy certain treaty benefits.

Under the PRC enterprise income tax and its implementation rules, the profits of a foreign-invested enterprise generated through operations, which are distributed to its immediate holding company outside China, will be subject to a withholding tax rate of 10.0%. Pursuant to a special arrangement between Hong Kong and China, such rate may be reduced to 5.0% if a Hong Kong resident enterprise owns at least 25.0% of the equity interest in the PRC company and satisfies other conditions as provided under the special tax arrangement. Our current PRC subsidiaries are wholly owned by our Hong Kong subsidiary.

Moreover, under the Notice of the State Administration of Taxation on Issues regarding the Administration of the Dividend Provision in Tax Treaties promulgated in February 2009, the taxpayer that is a tax resident of the other contracting party to the tax

43

Table of Contents

treaty and also the beneficial owner of the relevant dividends needs to satisfy certain conditions to enjoy the benefits under a tax treaty. These conditions include: (1) the taxpayer should be a company as provided in the tax treaty, (2) the taxpayer must directly own the required percentage of equity interests and voting rights in the PRC subsidiaries, and (3) the corporate shareholder to receive dividends from the PRC subsidiaries must have continuously met the direct ownership thresholds during the 12 consecutive months preceding the receipt of the dividends. Additionally, the SAT promulgated the Notice on Issues Related to the “Beneficial Owner” in Tax Treaties in February 2018, which requires the “beneficial owner” to have ownership and the right to dispose of the income or the rights and properties giving rise to the income and generally engage in substantive business activities and sets forth certain detailed factors in determining the “beneficial owner” status. The SAT promulgated the Announcement on How to Recognize the “Beneficial Owner” in Tax Treaties on June 29, 2012, which further clarified and supplemented the application of the Notice on How to Understand and Recognize the “Beneficial Owner” in Tax Treaties. Furthermore, the SAT promulgated the Announcement of the State Administration of Taxation on Issues Relating to “Beneficial Owner” in Tax Treaties (“Circular 9”), in February 3, 2018, which took effect on April 1, 2018, replaced the Notice on How to Understand and Recognize the “Beneficial Owner” in Tax Treaties and the Announcement on How to Recognize the “Beneficial Owner” in Tax Treaties and provides guidance for determining whether a resident of a contracting party is the “beneficial owner” of an item of income under China’s tax treaties and tax arrangements.

According to Circular 9, when determining an applicant’s status as a “beneficial owner” regarding tax treatments in connection with dividends, interests or royalties in tax treaties, several factors, including without limitation, whether the applicant is obligated to pay more than 50% of its income in 12 months to residents in a third country or region, whether the business operated by the applicant constitutes actual business activities, and whether the counterparty country or region to the tax treaties does not levy any tax or grant tax exemption on relevant incomes or levy tax at an extremely low rate, will be taken into account and analyzed based on specific circumstances. Circular 9 further provides that applicants who intend to prove his or her status as a “beneficial owner” shall submit relevant documents to tax bureau according to the Administrative Measures for Non-Resident Enterprises to Enjoy Treatments under Tax Treaties. Entitlement to a lower tax rate on dividends according to tax treaties or arrangements between the PRC central government and governments of other countries or regions is subject to inspection or approval of the relevant tax authorities. As a result, we cannot assure you that we will be entitled to any preferential withholding tax rate under tax treaties for dividends received from our PRC subsidiaries.

We face uncertainties with respect to indirect transfers of the equity interests in PRC resident enterprises by their non-PRC holding companies.

In February 2015, the SAT issued the Public Notice Regarding Certain Corporate Income Tax Matters on Indirect Transfer of Properties by Non-Tax Resident Enterprises (“SAT Bulletin 7”). SAT Bulletin 7 extends its tax jurisdiction to transactions involving the transfer of taxable assets through offshore transfer of a foreign intermediate holding company. In addition, SAT Bulletin 7 has introduced safe harbors the purchase and sale of equity through a public securities market. SAT Bulletin 7 also brings challenges to both foreign transferor and transferee (or other person who is obligated to pay for the transfer) of taxable assets.

In October 2017, the SAT issued the Announcement of the State Administration of Taxation on Issues Concerning the Withholding of Non-resident Enterprise Income Tax at Source (“SAT Bulletin 37”), which came into effect in December 2017. The SAT Bulletin 37 further clarifies the practice and procedure of the withholding of non-resident enterprise income tax.

Where a non-resident enterprise transfers taxable assets indirectly by disposing of the equity interests of an overseas holding company, which is an Indirect Transfer, the non-resident enterprise as either transferor or transferee, or the PRC entity that directly owns the taxable assets, may report such Indirect Transfer to the relevant tax authority. Using a “substance over form” principle, the PRC tax authority may disregard the existence of the overseas holding company if it lacks a reasonable commercial purpose and was established for the purpose of reducing, avoiding or deferring PRC tax. As a result, gains derived from such Indirect Transfer may be subject to PRC enterprise income tax, and the transferee or other person who is obligated to pay for the transfer is obligated to withhold the applicable taxes, currently at a rate of 10% for the transfer of equity interests in a PRC resident enterprise. Both the transferor and the transferee may be subject to penalties under PRC tax laws if the transferee fails to withhold the taxes and the transferor fails to pay the taxes.

44

Table of Contents

We face uncertainties as to the reporting and other implications of certain past and future transactions where PRC taxable assets are involved, such as offshore restructuring, sale of the shares in our offshore subsidiaries and investments. Our company may be subject to filing obligations or taxed if our company is transferor in such transactions, and may be subject to withholding obligations if our company is transferee in such transactions, under SAT Bulletin 7 and/or SAT Bulletin 37. For transfer of shares in our company by investors who are non-PRC resident enterprises, our PRC subsidiaries may be requested to assist in the filing under SAT Bulletin 7 and/or SAT Bulletin 37. As a result, we may be required to expend valuable resources to comply with SAT Bulletin 7 and/or SAT Bulletin 37 or to request the relevant transferors from whom we purchase taxable assets to comply with these circulars, or to establish that our company should not be taxed under these circulars, which may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

Restrictions on currency exchange may limit our ability to receive and use our net revenues effectively.

Substantially all of our net revenues are denominated in Renminbi. As a result, restrictions on currency exchange may limit our ability to use net revenues generated in Renminbi to fund any business activities we may have outside China in the future or to make dividend payments to our shareholders and ADS holders in U.S. dollars. Under current PRC laws and regulations, Renminbi is freely convertible for current account items, such as trade and service-related foreign exchange transactions and dividend distributions. However, Renminbi is not freely convertible for direct investment or loans or investments in securities outside China, unless such use is approved by SAFE. For example, foreign exchange transactions under our subsidiary’s capital account, including principal payments in respect of foreign currency-denominated obligations, remain subject to significant foreign exchange controls and the approval requirement of SAFE. These limitations could affect our ability to obtain foreign exchange for capital expenditures.

Our PRC subsidiaries are permitted to declare dividends to our offshore subsidiary holding their equity interest, convert the dividends into a foreign currency and remit to its shareholder outside China. In addition, in the event that our PRC subsidiaries liquidate, proceeds from the liquidation may be converted into foreign currency and distributed outside China to our overseas subsidiary holding its equity interest.

Other than the above distributions by and through our PRC subsidiaries which are permitted to be made without the necessity to obtain further approvals, any conversion of the Renminbi-denominated net revenues generated by the VIEs for direct investment, loan or investment in securities outside China will be subject to the limitations discussed above. To the extent we need to convert and use any Renminbi-denominated net revenues generated by the VIEs not paid to our PRC subsidiaries and net revenues generated by our PRC subsidiaries not declared and paid as dividends, the limitations discussed above will restrict the convertibility of, and our ability to directly receive and use such net revenues. As a result, our and the VIEs’ business and financial condition may be adversely affected. In addition, we cannot assure you that the PRC regulatory authorities will not impose more stringent restrictions on the convertibility of Renminbi in the future, especially with respect to foreign exchange transactions.

Our subsidiaries and the VIEs in China are subject to restrictions on making dividends and other payments to us.

We are a holding company and rely principally on dividends paid by our subsidiaries in China for our cash needs, including paying dividends and other cash distributions to our shareholders to the extent we choose to do so, servicing any debt we may incur and paying our operating expenses. The income for our PRC subsidiaries, especially our WFOEs, in turn depends on the service fees paid by the VIEs. Current PRC regulations permit our subsidiaries in China to pay dividends to us only out of their accumulated profits, if any, determined in accordance with Chinese accounting standards and regulations. Under the applicable requirements of PRC law, our PRC subsidiaries may only distribute dividends after they have made allowances to fund certain statutory reserves. These reserves are not distributable as cash dividends. Furthermore, if our subsidiaries or the VIEs in China incur debt on their own behalf in the future, the instruments governing the debt may restrict their ability to pay dividends or make other payments to us. Any such restrictions may materially affect such entities’ ability to make dividends or make payments, in service fees or otherwise, to us, which may materially and adversely affect our and the VIEs’ business, financial condition and results of operations.

​

45

Table of Contents

Fluctuations in the value of the Renminbi may have a material adverse effect on your investment.

The value of the Renminbi against the U.S. dollar and other currencies may fluctuate. The change in value of the Renminbi against the U.S. dollar and other currencies is affected by, various factors, such as changes in China’s political and economic conditions. In July 2005, the PRC government changed its decade-old policy of pegging the value of the Renminbi to the U.S. dollar. Under such policy, the Renminbi was permitted to fluctuate within a narrow and managed band against a basket of certain foreign currencies. Later on, the PBOC has decided to further implement the reform of the RMB exchange regime and to enhance the flexibility of RMB exchange rates. Such changes in policy have resulted in a significant appreciation of the Renminbi against the U.S. dollar since 2005. There remains significant international pressure on the PRC government to adopt a more flexible currency policy, which could result in a further and more significant adjustment of the Renminbi against the U.S. dollar.

Any significant appreciation or revaluation of the Renminbi may have a material adverse effect on the value of, and any dividends payable on, the ADS in foreign currency terms. More specifically, if we decide to convert our Renminbi into U.S. dollars, appreciation of the U.S. dollar against the Renminbi would have a negative effect on the U.S. dollar amount available to us. To the extent that we need to convert U.S. dollars we receive from offerings of securities into Renminbi for our and the VIEs’ operations, appreciation of the Renminbi against the U.S. dollar would have an adverse effect on the Renminbi amount we would receive from the conversion. In addition, appreciation or depreciation in the exchange rate of the Renminbi to the U.S. dollar could materially and adversely affect the price of the ADS in U.S. dollars without giving effect to any underlying change in our and the VIEs’ business or results of operations.

Certain PRC regulations, including the M&A Rules and national security regulations, may require a complicated review and approval process which could make it more difficult for us to pursue growth through acquisitions in China.

The M&A Rules established additional procedures and requirements that could make merger and acquisition activities in China by foreign investors more time-consuming and complex. For example, MOFCOM must be notified in the event a foreign investor takes control of a PRC domestic enterprise. Moreover, certain acquisitions of domestic companies by offshore companies that are related to or affiliated with the same entities or individuals of the domestic companies, are subject to approval by the anti-monopoly law enforcement agency. In addition, the Implementing Rules Concerning Security Review on Mergers and Acquisitions by Foreign Investors of Domestic Enterprises, issued by MOFCOM in August 2011, require that mergers and acquisitions by foreign investors in “any industry with national security concerns” be subject to national security review by MOFCOM. Furthermore, any activities attempting to circumvent such review process, including structuring the transaction through a proxy or contractual control arrangement, are strictly prohibited. Moreover, in December 2020, the NDRC and the MOFCOM promulgated the Measures for Security Review of Foreign Investment, which became effective on January 18, 2021. Pursuant to the Measures for Security Review of Foreign Investment, any foreign investment activities falling in the scope such as important cultural products and services, important information technologies and internet products and services, important financial services, key technologies and other important fields that concern state security while obtaining the actual control over the enterprises invested in, a foreign investor or a party concerned in the PRC shall take the initiative to make a declaration to the working mechanism office prior to making the investment. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—Regulation—Regulations Relating to Foreign Investment in Value-added Telecommunications Companies” in this annual report.

There is significant uncertainty regarding the interpretation and implementation of these regulations relating to merger and acquisition activities in China. In addition, complying with these requirements could be time-consuming, and the required notification, review or approval process may materially delay or affect our ability to complete merger and acquisition transactions in China. As a result, our ability to seek growth through acquisitions may be materially and adversely affected.

46

Table of Contents

It may be difficult for overseas regulators to conduct investigations or collect evidence within China.

Shareholder claims or regulatory investigation that are common in the United States generally are difficult to pursue as a matter of law or practicality in China. For example, in China, there are significant legal and other obstacles to providing information needed for regulatory investigations or litigation initiated outside China. Although the authorities in China may establish a regulatory cooperation mechanism with the securities regulatory authorities of another country or region to implement cross-border supervision and administration, such cooperation with the securities regulatory authorities in the Unities States may not be efficient in the absence of mutual and practical cooperation mechanism. Furthermore, according to Article 177 of the PRC Securities Law, which became effective in March 2020, no foreign securities regulator is allowed to directly conduct investigations or evidence collection activities within the PRC territory. While detailed interpretation of or implementation rules under Article 177 have yet to be promulgated, the inability for a foreign securities regulator to directly conduct investigations or evidence collection activities within China may further increase the difficulties you face in protecting your interests.

A failure by the beneficial owners of our shares who are PRC residents to comply with certain PRC foreign exchange regulations could restrict our ability to distribute profits, restrict our overseas and cross-border investment activities and subject us to liability under PRC law.

SAFE has promulgated regulations, including the Notice on Relevant Issues Relating to Foreign Exchange Control on Domestic Residents’ Investment and Financing and Round-Trip Investment through Special Purpose Vehicles (“SAFE Circular 37”), effective in July 2014, and its appendices, that require PRC residents, including PRC institutions and individuals, to register with local branches of SAFE in connection with their direct establishment or indirect control of an offshore entity, for the purpose of overseas investment and financing, with such PRC residents’ legally owned assets or equity interests in domestic enterprises or offshore assets or interests, referred to in SAFE Circular 37 as a “special purpose vehicle.” The term “control” under SAFE Circular 37 is broadly defined as the operation rights, beneficiary rights or decision-making rights acquired by the PRC residents in the offshore special purpose vehicles by such means as acquisition, trust, proxy, voting rights, repurchase, convertible bonds or other arrangements. SAFE Circular 37 further requires amendment to the registration in the event of any significant changes with respect to the special purpose vehicle, such as increase or decrease of capital contributed by PRC individuals, share transfer or exchange, merger, division or other material event. In the event that a PRC shareholder holding interests in a special purpose vehicle fails to fulfill the required SAFE registration, the PRC subsidiaries of that special purpose vehicle may be prohibited from making profit distributions to the offshore parent and from carrying out subsequent cross-border foreign exchange activities, and the special purpose vehicle may be restricted in its ability to contribute additional capital into its PRC subsidiaries. Further, failure to comply with the various SAFE registration requirements described above could result in liability under PRC law for foreign exchange evasion.

These regulations apply to our direct and indirect shareholders who are PRC residents and may apply to any offshore acquisitions or share transfers that we make in the future if our shares are issued to PRC residents. However, in practice, different local SAFE branches may have different views and procedures on the application and implementation of SAFE regulations. As of the date of this annual report, all PRC residents known to us that currently hold direct or indirect interests in our company have completed the necessary registrations with SAFE as required by SAFE Circular 37. However, we may not be informed of the identities of all the PRC residents or entities holding direct or indirect interest in our company, nor can we compel our beneficial owners to comply with the requirements of SAFE Circular 37. As a result, we cannot assure you that these individuals or any other direct or indirect shareholders or beneficial owners of our company who are PRC residents will be able to successfully complete the registration or update the registration of their direct and indirect equity interest as required in the future. If they fail to make or update the registration, our PRC subsidiaries could be subject to fines and legal penalties, and SAFE could restrict our cross-border investment activities and our foreign exchange activities, including restricting our PRC subsidiaries’ ability to distribute dividends to, or obtain loans denominated in foreign currencies from, our company, or prevent us from contributing additional capital into our PRC subsidiaries. As a result, our and the VIEs’ business operations and our ability to make distributions to you could be materially and adversely affected.

47

Table of Contents

Failure to comply with governmental regulations and other legal obligations concerning data protection and cybersecurity may materially and adversely affect our and the VIEs’ business.

We and the VIEs are subject to PRC laws and regulations governing the collecting, storing, sharing, using, processing, disclosure and protection of data on the internet and mobile platforms as well as cybersecurity. The PRC regulators, including the MIIT and the CAC, have been increasingly focused on regulation in the areas of cybersecurity and data protection and governmental authorities have enacted a series of laws and regulations to enhance the protection of privacy and data, which require certain authorization or consent from users prior to collection, use or disclosure of their personal data and also protection of the security of the personal data of such users. The MIIT issued the Order for the Protection of Telecommunications and Internet User Personal Information on July 16, 2013, requiring internet service providers to establish and publish protocols relating to the collection or use of personal information, keep any collected information strictly confidential and take technological and other measures to maintain the security of such information. Institutions and their employees are prohibited from selling or otherwise illegally disclosing a person’s personal information obtained during the course of performing duties or providing services. Pursuant to the PRC Cybersecurity Law, effective on June 1, 2017, network operators are required to fulfill certain obligations to safeguard cyber security and enhance network information management. See “Item 4. Information on the Company — B. Business Overview — Regulations — Regulations relating to internet information security and privacy protection” in this annual report.

Moreover, existing PRC privacy, cybersecurity and data protection-related laws and regulations are evolving and subject to potentially differing interpretations, and various legislative and regulatory bodies may expand current or enact new laws and regulations regarding privacy, cybersecurity and data protection-related matters. These developments could adversely affect our and the VIEs’ business, operating results and financial condition. Any failure or perceived failure by us or the VIEs to comply with new or existing PRC privacy, cybersecurity or data protection laws, regulations, policies, industry standards or legal obligations, or any systems failure or security incident that results in the unauthorized access to, or acquisition, release or transfer of, personally identifiable information or other data relating to customers or individuals may result in governmental investigations, inquiries, enforcement actions and prosecutions, private claims and litigation, fines and penalties, adverse publicity or potential loss of business. For example, on June 10, 2021, the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress (the “Standing Committee of the NPC”), promulgated the PRC Data Security Law, which took effect in September 2021. The PRC Data Security Law provides for data security obligations on entities and individuals carrying out data activities. The PRC Data Security Law also introduces a national security review procedure for those data activities which may affect national security and imposes export restrictions on certain data information. Furthermore, along with the promulgation of the Opinions on Strictly Cracking Down Illegal Securities Activities in accordance with the Law, overseas-listed China-based companies are experiencing a heightened scrutiny over their compliance with laws and regulations regarding data security, cross-border data flow and management of confidential information from PRC regulatory authorities.

On August 20, 2021, the Standing Committee of the NPC issued the Personal Information Protection Law, which has been effective from November 1, 2021 and reiterates the circumstances under which a personal information processor could process personal information and the requirements for such circumstances. The Personal Information Protection Law clarifies the scope of application, the definition of personal information and sensitive personal information, the legal basis of personal information processing and the basic requirements of notice and consent.

​

48

Table of Contents

On October 29, 2021, the CAC publicly solicited opinions on the Measures for the Security Assessment of Data Cross-border Transfer (Draft for Comments), which requires that any data processor who provides to an overseas recipient important data collected and generated during operations within the territory of the PRC or personal information that should be subject to security assessment shall conduct security assessment. The Measures for the Security Assessment of Data Cross-border Transfer was adopted on July 7, 2022 and will take effect on September 1, 2022.

On November 14, 2021, the CAC publicly solicited opinions on the Administrative Measures for Internet Data Security (Draft for Comments) (the “Draft Measures for Internet Data Security”), which requires that data processors processing “important data” or listed overseas shall conduct an annual data security assessment by itself or commission a data security service provider to do so and submit the assessment report for the preceding year to the municipal cybersecurity department by the end of January each year. As of the date of this annual report, the Draft Measures for Internet Data Security has not been formally adopted. However, if the Draft Measures for Internet Data Security were to be enacted in the current form, we, as an overseas listed company, will be required to conduct an annual data security review and comply with the relevant reporting obligations. Furthermore, according to the Draft Measures for Internet Data Security, data processors shall, in accordance with relevant state provisions, apply for cyber security review when carrying out the following activities: (1) the merger, reorganization or separation of internet platform operators that have acquired a large number of data resources related to national security, economic development or public interests, which affects or may affect national security, (2) data processors that handle the personal information of more than one million people intends to be listed abroad, (3) the data processor intends to be listed in Hong Kong, which affects or may affect national security, and (4) other data processing activities that affect or may affect national security. It remains uncertain whether the requirement of cybersecurity review applies to follow-on offerings of securities by an overseas-listed online platform operator that possesses personal data of more than one million users. We completed our initial public offering on November 23, 2018, and the ADSs have been listed on Nasdaq Capital Market since November 2018. Considering the substantial uncertainties existing with respect to the enactment timetable, final content, interpretation and implementation of the Draft Measures for Internet Data Security, in particular with respect to the explanation or interpretation for “affects or may affect national security,” there remain uncertainties as to whether our data processing activities may be deemed to affect national security, thus subjecting us to a cybersecurity review. As of the date of this annual report, we have not received any formal notice from any cybersecurity regulator that we shall be subject to a cybersecurity review.

49

Table of Contents

On December 28, 2021, the CAC and 12 other government authorities published the Measures for Cybersecurity Review, which took effect on February 15, 2022. The Measures for Cybersecurity Review provides that certain operators of critical information infrastructure purchasing internet products and services or network platform operators carrying out data processing activities, which affect or may affect national security, must apply with the Cybersecurity Review Office for a cybersecurity review. On July 30, 2021, the State Council promulgated the Regulations on Protection of Critical Information Infrastructure, which became effective on September 1, 2021. Pursuant to the Regulations on Protection of Critical Information Infrastructure, critical information infrastructure shall mean any important network facilities or information systems of an important industry or field, such as public communication and information service, energy, communications, water conservation, finance, public services, e-government affairs and national defense science, and any other important network facilities or information system which may endanger national security, people’s livelihoods and public interest in the event of damage, function loss or data leakage. In addition, relevant administrative departments of each critical industry and sector, shall be responsible to formulate eligibility criteria and determine the critical information infrastructure operator in the respective industry or sector. The operators shall be informed about the final determination as to whether they are categorized as critical information infrastructure operators. As of the date of this annual report, the exact scope of “critical information infrastructure operators” under the current regulatory regime remains unclear, and we have not been informed that we are identified as a critical information infrastructure operator by any governmental authorities. Furthermore, since the Measures for Cybersecurity Review is relatively new and the determination of “affecting national security” are subject to further explanations and interpretations, there remain uncertainties as to whether our data processing activities may be deemed to affect national security and whether we would be required to apply for a cybersecurity review. In light of such uncertainties in relation to the interpretations and implementation of Measures for Cybersecurity Review, we cannot predict the impact of the Measures for Cybersecurity Review and will continue to closely monitor and assess the statutory developments in this regard. If we are identified as an operator of “critical information infrastructure,” we would be required to fulfill various obligations as required under PRC cybersecurity laws and other applicable laws for such operators of “critical information infrastructure,” and we may be subject to cybersecurity review procedure before making certain purchases of network products and services, which could lead to adverse impacts on our business and a diversion of time and attention of our management and our other resources. Furthermore, there can be no assurance that we will obtain the clearance or approval for these applications from the Cybersecurity Review Office and the relevant regulatory authorities in a timely manner, or at all. If we are found to be in violation of cybersecurity requirements of the PRC, the relevant governmental authorities may conduct investigations, levy fines, or require us to change our business practices in a manner materially adverse to our business. Any of these actions may disrupt our operations and adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. Currently, the cybersecurity laws and regulations in force have not directly affected our or the VIEs’ business and operations, but in anticipation of the strengthened implementation of cybersecurity laws and regulations and the expansion of our business, we face potential risks if we are deemed as a CIIO under the Cybersecurity Law. In such case, we must fulfill certain obligations as required under the Cybersecurity Law and other applicable laws, including, among others, storing personal information and important data collected and produced within the PRC territory during our operations in China, which we are already doing in our business, and we may be subject to review when purchasing internet products and services. As the Measures for Cybersecurity Review took effect in February 2022, we may be subject to review when conducting data processing activities, and may face challenges in addressing its requirements and make necessary changes to our internal policies and practices in data processing. As of the date of this annual report, we, our subsidiaries and the VIEs have not been involved in any investigations on cybersecurity review made by the CAC on such basis, and we, our subsidiaries and the VIEs have not received any inquiry, notice, warning, or sanctions in such respect. Based on the foregoing, we and our PRC legal counsel do not expect that, as of the date of this annual report, the applicable PRC laws on cybersecurity currently in effect would have a material adverse impact on our and the VIEs’ business.

Complying with these obligations concerning data protection and cybersecurity could cause us and the VIEs to incur substantial costs. As the interpretation and application of cybersecurity laws, regulations and standards of the PRC are still uncertain and evolving, we and the VIEs may be required to make further adjustments to our and the VIEs’ business practices to comply with the enacted form of the laws, which may increase our and the VIEs’ compliance cost and adversely affect our business performance. We expect that there will continue to be new proposed laws, rules of self-regulatory bodies, regulations and industry standards concerning privacy, data protection and information security in the PRC, and we cannot yet determine the impact such future laws, rules, regulations and standards may have on our and the VIEs’ business.

Moreover, we and the VIEs may not disclose any personal data or information, unless required by the competent PRC authorities through certain procedures required by the laws, for the purpose of, among others, safeguarding the national security, investigating crimes, investigating infringement of information network communications rights, or cooperating with the supervision and inspection of telecommunications regulatory authorities. Failure to comply with these requirements could subject us and the VIEs to fines and penalties.

50

Table of Contents

We face regulatory uncertainties in China that could restrict our ability to grant share incentive awards to our employees or consultants who are PRC citizens.

Pursuant to SAFE Circular 37, PRC residents who participate in stock incentive plans in overseas non-publicly-listed companies may submit applications to SAFE or its local branches for the foreign exchange registration with respect to offshore special purpose vehicles. In the meantime, pursuant to the Notices on Issues concerning the Foreign Exchange Administration for Domestic Individuals Participating in a Stock Incentive Plan of an Overseas Publicly-Listed Company issued by SAFE in February 2012 (“SAFE Circular 7”), a qualified PRC agent (which could be the PRC subsidiary of the overseas-listed company) is required to file, on behalf of  “domestic individuals” (both PRC residents and non-PRC residents who reside in China for a continuous period of not less than one year, excluding the foreign diplomatic personnel and representatives of international organizations) who are granted shares or share options by the overseas-listed company according to its share incentive plan, an application with SAFE to conduct SAFE registration with respect to such share incentive plan, and obtain approval for an annual allowance with respect to the purchase of foreign exchange in connection with the share purchase or share option exercise. Such PRC individuals’ foreign exchange income received from the sale of shares and dividends distributed by the overseas listed company and any other income shall be fully remitted into a collective foreign currency account in China, which is opened and managed by the PRC domestic agent before distribution to such individuals. In addition, such domestic individuals must also retain an overseas entrusted institution to handle matters in connection with their exercise of share options and their purchase and sale of shares. The PRC domestic agent also needs to update registration with SAFE within three months after the overseas-listed company materially changes its share incentive plan or make any new share incentive plans.

We and our directors, executive officers and other employees who are PRC citizens or who reside in the PRC for a continuous period of no less than one year and who have been granted stock options are subject to these regulations. Failure to complete the SAFE registrations may subject them to fines and legal sanctions, and may also limit our ability to contribute additional capital into our PRC subsidiaries and limit our PRC subsidiaries’ ability to distribute dividends to us. We also face regulatory uncertainties that could restrict our ability to adopt additional incentive plans for our directors, executive officers and employees under PRC law. See “Item 4. Information on the Company—B. Business Overview—Regulation—Regulations Relating to Foreign Currency Exchange—Share Option Rules” in this annual report.

Labor contract laws in China may adversely affect our and the VIEs’ results of operations.

The current PRC labor contract law imposes considerable liabilities on employers and significantly affects the cost of an employer’s decision to reduce its workforce. Further, it requires certain terminations be based on the mandatory retirement age. In the event we and the VIEs decide to significantly change or decrease our and the VIEs’ workforce, the Labor Contract Law could adversely affect our and the VIEs’ ability to enact such changes in a manner that is most advantageous to our and the VIEs’ business or in a timely and cost-effective manner, thus materially and adversely affecting our and the VIEs’ financial condition and results of operations.

Increases in labor costs and employee benefits in China may adversely affect our and the VIEs’ business and profitability.

The PRC economy has been experiencing significant growth, leading to inflation and increased labor costs. China’s overall economy and the average wage in China are expected to continue to grow. In addition, we are required by PRC laws and regulations to pay various statutory employee benefits, including pensions, housing fund, medical insurance, work-related injury insurance, unemployment insurance and maternity insurance to designated government agencies for the benefit of our and the VIEs’ employees. It is subject to the determination of the relevant government agencies whether an employer has made adequate payments of the requisite statutory employee benefits, and employers that fail to make adequate payments may be subject to late payment fees, fines and/or other penalties. Future increases in China’s inflation and material increases in labor costs and employee benefits may materially and adversely affect our and the VIEs’ profitability and results of operations. If we and the VIEs are subject to late fees or fines in relation to the underpaid employee benefits, our and the VIEs’ financial condition and results of operations may be adversely affected.

51

Table of Contents

Failure to make adequate contributions to various mandatory social security plans and withhold individual income tax as required by PRC regulations may subject us and the VIEs to penalties.

PRC laws and regulations require us and the VIEs to pay several statutory social welfare benefits for our and the VIEs’ employees, as applicable, including pensions, medical insurance, work-related injury insurance, unemployment insurance, maternity insurance and housing provident fund contributions. Local governments usually implement localized requirements as to mandatory social security plans considering differences in economic development in different regions. PRC laws and regulations also require us and the VIEs to withhold individual income tax on employees’ salaries based on the actual salary of each employee upon payment. Our and the VIEs’ failure in making contributions to various mandatory social security plans, withholding individual income tax and in complying with applicable PRC labor-related laws may subject us and the VIEs to late payment penalties. With respect to the underpaid statutory social welfare benefits, we and the VIEs may be required to make up the contributions for these plans as well as to pay late fees and fines; with respect to the underwithheld individual income tax, we and the VIEs may be required to make up sufficient withholding and pay late fees and fines. If we and the VIEs are subject to late fees or fines in relation to the failure in making contributions to various mandatory social security or withholding individual income tax, our and the VIEs’ financial condition and results of operations may be affected.

Trading in our securities on any U.S. stock exchange and the U.S. over-the-counter market may be prohibited under the HFCA Act or the Accelerating Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act if the SEC subsequently determines our audit work is performed by auditors that the PCAOB is unable to inspect or investigate completely, and as a result, U.S. national securities exchanges, such as the Nasdaq, may determine to delist our securities, and our securities may be prohibited from being traded over the counter.

The HFCA Act was enacted on December 18, 2020. Trading in our securities on U.S. markets, including the over-the-counter market, may be prohibited under the HFCA Act if the PCAOB determines that it is unable to inspect or investigate completely our auditor for two consecutive years.

On March 24, 2021, the SEC adopted interim final rules relating to the implementation of certain disclosure and documentation requirements of the HFCA Act. On September 22, 2021, the PCAOB adopted a final rule implementing the HFCA Act, which provides a framework for the PCAOB to determine, as contemplated under the HFCA Act, whether the PCAOB is unable to inspect or investigate completely registered public accounting firms located in a foreign jurisdiction because of a position taken by one or more authorities in that jurisdiction. On December 2, 2021, the SEC adopted amendments to finalize the implementation of disclosure and documentation measures, which require us to identify, in our annual report on Form 20-F, (1) the auditors that provided opinions to the financial statements presented in the annual report, (2) the location where the auditors’ report was issued, and (3) the PCAOB ID number of the audit firm or branch that performed the audit work.

52

Table of Contents

On December 16, 2021, the PCAOB issued the HFCA Act Determination Report to notify the SEC of its determinations that the PCAOB was unable to inspect or investigate completely registered public accounting firms headquartered in mainland China and Hong Kong (the “2021 Determinations”). On August 26, 2022, the PCAOB signed a Statement of Protocol (the “Protocol”) with the CSRC and Ministry of Finance of China, taking the first step toward opening access for the PCAOB to inspect and investigate registered public accounting firms headquartered in mainland China and Hong Kong. The Protocol sets forth, among other terms, that (1) the PCAOB has independent discretion to select any issuer audits for inspection or investigation, (2) the PCAOB gets direct access to interview or take testimony from all personnel of the audit firms whose issuer engagements are being inspected or investigated, (3) the PCAOB has the unfettered ability to transfer information to the SEC in accordance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and (4) the PCAOB inspectors can see audit work papers without redactions. On December 15, 2022, the PCAOB announced that it was able to conduct inspections and investigations completely of PCAOB-registered public accounting firms headquartered in mainland China and Hong Kong in 2022. The PCAOB vacated its previous 2021 Determinations accordingly. As a result, we do not expect to be identified as a “commission-identified issuer” under the HFCA Act for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022 after we file our annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year of 2022. However, whether the PCAOB will continue to conduct inspections and investigations completely to its satisfaction of PCAOB-registered public accounting firms headquartered in mainland China and Hong Kong is subject to uncertainty and depends on a number of factors out of our, and our auditor’s, control, including positions taken by authorities of the PRC. The PCAOB is expected to continue to demand complete access to inspections and investigations against accounting firms headquartered in mainland China and Hong Kong in the future and states that it has already made plans to resume regular inspections in early 2023 and beyond. The PCAOB is required under the HFCA Act to make its determination on an annual basis with regards to its ability to inspect and investigate completely accounting firms based in the mainland China and Hong Kong. The possibility of being a “commission-identified issuer” and risk of delisting could continue to adversely affect the trading price of our securities. Should the PCAOB again encounter impediments to inspections and investigations in mainland China or Hong Kong as a result of positions taken by any authority in either jurisdiction, the PCAOB will make determinations under the HFCA Act as and when appropriate.

Our current auditor, Marcum Asia CPAs LLP (“Marcum Asia”), the independent registered public accounting firm that issues the audit report included in this annual report, as an auditor of companies that are traded publicly in the United States and a firm registered with the PCAOB, is subject to laws in the United States pursuant to which the PCAOB conducts regular inspections to assess its compliance with the applicable professional standards. Marcum Asia is headquartered in New York, New York, and as of the date of this annual report, Marcum Asia is not included in the 2021 Determinations.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, our ability to retain an auditor subject to PCAOB inspection and investigation, including but not limited to inspection of the audit working papers related to us, may depend on the relevant positions of U.S. and Chinese regulators. If, in the future, we have been identified by the SEC for two consecutive years as a “commission-identified issuer” whose registered public accounting firm is determined by the PCAOB that it is unable to inspect or investigate completely because of a position taken by one or more authorities in China, the SEC may prohibit our shares or the ADSs from being traded on a national securities exchange or in the over-the-counter trading market in the United States. In addition, it remains unclear what the SEC’s implementation process related to the above rules will entail or what further actions the SEC, the PCAOB or Nasdaq will take to address these issues and what impact those actions will have on companies that have significant operations in China and have securities listed on a U.S. stock exchange (including a national securities exchange or over-the-counter stock market). We cannot assure you whether regulatory authorities would apply additional and more stringent criteria to us after considering the effectiveness of our auditor’s audit procedures and quality control procedures, adequacy of personnel and training, or sufficiency of resources, geographic reach or experience as it relates to the audit of our financial statements. If we fail to meet the new listing standards specified in the HFCA Act, we could face possible delisting from the Nasdaq Stock Market, cessation of trading in over-the-counter market, deregistration from the SEC and/or other risks, which may materially and adversely affect the trading price of the ADSs or terminate the trading of the ADSs in the United States. Such a prohibition would substantially impair your ability to sell or purchase the ADSs when you wish to do so, and the risk and uncertainty associated with delisting would have a negative impact on the price of the ADSs. Also, such a prohibition would significantly affect our ability to raise capital on terms acceptable to us, or at all, which would have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition, and prospects.

53

Table of Contents

Regulation and censorship of information disseminated over the internet in China may adversely affect our and the VIEs’ business and reputation and subject us and the VIEs to liability for information displayed on our and the VIEs’ website.

The PRC government has adopted regulations governing internet access and the distribution of news and other information over the internet. Under these regulations, internet content providers and internet publishers are prohibited from posting or displaying over the internet content that, among other things, violates PRC laws and regulations, impairs the national dignity of China, or is reactionary, obscene, superstitious, fraudulent or defamatory. Failure to comply with these requirements may result in the revocation of licenses to provide internet content and other licenses, and the closure of the concerned websites. The website operator may also be held liable for such censored information displayed on or linked to the websites. If our and the VIEs’ website is found to be in violation of any such requirements, we and the VIEs may be penalized by relevant authorities, and our and the VIEs’ operations or reputation could be adversely affected.

There are difficulties in bringing actions and enforcing foreign judgments in China against us, our management or our assets.

We are incorporated in the Cayman Islands, but most of our, our subsidiaries’ and the VIEs’ operations are conducted in China and most of our, our subsidiaries’ and the VIEs’ assets are located in China. In addition, most of our directors and officers are nationals and/or residents of the PRC, and all or a substantial portion of their assets are located in China. As a result, it may be difficult or impossible for you to bring an action against us or against these individuals in the United States in the event that you believe we have violated your rights or have a claim against us, either under United States federal or state securities laws or otherwise. Even if you are successful in bringing an action of this kind, the laws of the Cayman Islands and of China may not allow you to enforce a judgment against our assets or the assets of our directors and officers.

It may also be difficult for our shareholders to effect service of process upon us or those persons in China. As advised by our PRC legal counsel, China currently does not have treaties providing for the reciprocal recognition and enforcement of court judgments with the Cayman Islands, United States and many other countries and regions. Therefore, with respect to matters that are not subject to a binding arbitration provision, it may be difficult or impossible to recognize and enforce judgments of any of those non-PRC jurisdictions in a China court.

Risks Related to Our Securities, including the ADSs

We are an emerging growth company within the meaning of the Securities Act and may take advantage of certain reduced reporting requirements.

We are an “emerging growth company,” as defined in the JOBS Act, and we may take advantage of certain exemptions from requirements applicable to other public companies that are not emerging growth companies including, most significantly, not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 for so long as we are an emerging growth company until the fifth anniversary from the date of our initial listing. As a result, if we elect not to comply with such auditor attestation requirements, our investors may not have access to certain information they may deem important. The JOBS Act also provides that an emerging growth company does not need to comply with any new or revised financial accounting standards until such date that a private company is otherwise required to comply with such new or revised accounting standards.

The trading price of the ADSs is likely to be volatile, which could result in substantial losses to investors.

The trading price of the ADSs is likely to be volatile and could fluctuate widely due to factors beyond our control. This may happen because of broad market and industry factors, akin to the performance and fluctuation of the market prices of other companies with business operations located mainly in China that have listed their securities in the United States. A number of Chinese companies have listed or are in the process of listing their securities on U.S. stock markets. The securities of some of these companies have experienced significant volatility, including price declines in connection with their initial public offerings. The trading performances of these Chinese companies’ securities after their offerings may affect the perception and attitudes of investors toward Chinese companies listed in the United States in general and consequently may impact the trading performance of the ADSs, regardless of our actual operating performance.

54

Table of Contents

In addition to market and industry factors, the price and trading volume for the ADSs may be highly volatile due to a number of factors, including the following:

Any of these factors may result in large and sudden changes in the volume and price at which the ADSs will trade.

In the past, shareholders of public companies have often brought securities class action suits against those companies following periods of instability in the market price of their securities. If we were involved in a class action suit, it could divert a significant amount of our management’s attention and other resources from our business and operations and require us to incur significant expenses to defend the suit, which could harm our and the VIEs’ results of operations. Any such class action suit, whether or not successful, could harm our and the VIEs’ reputation and restrict our ability to raise capital in the future. In addition, if a claim is successfully made against us, we may be required to pay significant damages, which could have a material adverse effect on our and the VIEs’ financial condition and results of operations.

If we fail to regain compliance with Nasdaq’s minimum bid price requirement, the ADSs could be subject to delisting.

The ADSs are currently listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market. The Nasdaq Listing Rules has minimum requirements that a company must meet for continued listing on the Nasdaq Capital Market. These requirements include maintaining a minimum closing bid price of US$1.00 per ADS for a period of 30 consecutive trading days. On February 17, 2023, we received a notice from Nasdaq that we failed to comply with the minimum closing bid price requirement set forth in Rule 5550(a)(2) of the Nasdaq Listing Rules as the closing bid price per ADS had been below US$1.00 for a period of 30 consecutive business days. The Nasdaq notification letter does not result in the immediate delisting of our securities. Pursuant to Rule 5810(c)(3)(A) of the Nasdaq Listing Rules, we had a compliance period of 180 calendar days, or until August 16, 2023 to regain compliance with Nasdaq’s minimum bid price requirement. To regain compliance, the closing bid price per ADS must meet or exceed US$1.00 per ADS for a minimum of 10 consecutive business days on or prior to August 16, 2023. In the event that we do not regain compliance by August 16, 2023, subject to the determination by the staff of Nasdaq, we may be eligible for an additional 180-calendar-day compliance period if we meet the continued listing requirements for market value of publicly held shares and all other initial listing standards, with the exception of bid price requirement, of the Nasdaq Capital Market, and provides written notice to Nasdaq of our intention to cure the deficiency.

55

Table of Contents

We have not regained compliance with the minimum bid price requirement as of the date of annual report. We are closely monitoring the bid price of the ADSs, and may consider available options, such as an adjustment of the ADS-to-Class A ordinary share ratio, to increase the per ADS price of the ADSs. There can be no assurance that we will be able to regain compliance with the minimum bid price requirement in a timely manner. If we fail to regain compliance by August 16, 2023, or if we fail to meet the other continued listing requirements of the Nasdaq Capital Market, we may be subject to delisting. The delisting of the ADSs may significantly reduce the liquidity of the ADSs, cause further declines to the market price of the ADSs, and make it more difficult for us to obtain adequate financing to support our continued operation.

The issuance and sale of any securities in the future may be dilutive to our existing shareholders and may cause the price of the ADSs to decline. The issuance of additional shares by us that has the effect of reducing the price of the trading price of ADSs may also prevent us from being able to maintain compliance with the minimum bid price requirement of Nasdaq Listing Rule 5550(a)(2), which may result in the ADSs being suspended or delisted from the Nasdaq Capital Market. If a suspension or delisting of the ADSs were to occur, there would be significantly less liquidity in the suspended or delisted ADSs. In addition, our ability to raise additional capital through equity or debt financing would be greatly impaired.

Our dual-class share structure with different voting rights will limit your ability to influence corporate matters and could discourage others from pursuing any change of control transactions that holders of our Class A ordinary shares and ADSs may view as beneficial.

Mr. Wei Wen beneficially owns 71.4% of the aggregate voting power of our company as of the date of this annual report. See “Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees—E. Share Ownership.” As a result of the dual-class share structure and the concentration of ownership, Mr. Wei Wen has considerable influence over matters such as decisions regarding mergers, consolidations, sale of all or substantially all of our assets, election of directors and other significant corporate actions. He may take actions that are not in the best interest of us or our other shareholders. This concentration of ownership may discourage, delay or prevent a change in control of our company, which could have the effect of depriving our other shareholders of the opportunity to receive a premium for their shares as part of a sale of our company and may reduce the price of the ADSs. This concentrated control will limit your ability to influence corporate matters and could discourage others from pursuing any potential merger, takeover or other change of control transactions that holders of Class A ordinary shares and ADSs may view as beneficial.

Substantial future sales or perceived potential sales of the ADSs in the public market could cause the price of the ADSs to decline.

Sales of substantial amounts of the ADSs in the public market, or the perception that these sales could occur, could adversely affect the market price of the ADSs. All of the outstanding ADSs are freely transferable without restriction or additional registration under the Securities Act, subject to certain restrictions. Sales of these shares into the market could cause the market price of the ADSs to decline. The sale of ADSs issued upon the exercise of warrant instruments could further dilute the holdings of our then existing shareholders.

If securities or industry analysts do not publish research or publish inaccurate or unfavorable research about our and the VIEs’ business, the market price for the ADSs and trading volume could decline.

The trading market for the ADSs will depend in part on the research and reports that securities or industry analysts publish about us, the VIEs or our and the VIEs’ business. If research analysts do not establish and maintain adequate research coverage or if one or more of the analysts who covers us downgrades the ADSs or publishes inaccurate or unfavorable research about our and the VIEs’ business, the market price for the ADSs would likely decline. If one or more of these analysts cease coverage of our company or fail to publish reports on us regularly, we could lose visibility in the financial markets, which, in turn, could cause the market price or trading volume for the ADSs to decline.

Uncertainty involving certain proposed transactions that we have announced from time to time may adversely affect our business and the market price of the ADSs.

On January 21, 2021, our board of directors received a preliminary non-binding proposal letter from Mr. Wei Wen, our chairman and chief executive officer, proposing a “going-private” transaction. On November 12, 2021, Mr. Wei Wen withdrew the non-binding going-private proposal, in order to open up more opportunities for our company.

56

Table of Contents

We cannot assure you that Mr. Wei Wen or other members of our senior management team will not in the future propose similar going-private transactions and seek to acquire all of the outstanding ordinary shares of our company. Such transaction, whether or not consummated, may divert management focus, employee attention and resources from other strategic opportunities and from operational matters. Uncertainty about the future direction of our company may inhibit investors from buying the ADSs, which may reduce liquidity in the market for the ADSs.

Techniques employed by short sellers may drive down the market price of the ADSs.

Short selling is the practice of selling securities that the seller does not own but rather has borrowed from a third party with the intention of buying identical securities back at a later date to return to the lender. The short seller hopes to profit from a decline in the value of the securities between the sale of the borrowed securities and the purchase of the replacement shares, as the short seller expects to pay less in that purchase than it received in the sale. As it is in the short seller’s interest for the price of the security to decline, many short sellers publish, or arrange for the publication of, negative opinions regarding the relevant issuer and its business prospects in order to create negative market momentum and generate profits for themselves after selling a security short. These short attacks have, in the past, led to selling of shares in the market.

Public companies that have substantially all of their operations in China have been the subject of short selling. Much of the scrutiny and negative publicity has centered on allegations of a lack of effective internal control over financial reporting resulting in financial and accounting irregularities and mistakes, inadequate corporate governance policies or a lack of adherence thereto and, in many cases, allegations of fraud. As a result, many of these companies are now conducting internal and external investigations into the allegations and, in the interim, are subject to shareholder lawsuits and/or SEC enforcement actions.

It is not clear what effect such negative publicity could have on us. If we were to become the subject of any unfavorable allegations, whether such allegations are proven to be true or untrue, we could have to expend a significant amount of resources to investigate such allegations and/or defend ourselves. While we would strongly defend against any such short seller attacks, we may be constrained in the manner in which we can proceed against the relevant short seller by principles of freedom of speech, applicable state law or issues of commercial confidentiality. Such a situation could be costly and time-consuming, and could distract our management from growing our business. Even if such allegations are ultimately proven to be groundless, allegations against us could severely impact our and the VIEs’ business operations, and any investment in the ADSs could be greatly reduced or even rendered worthless.

We do not intend to apply for any listing of the warrant instruments issued in connection with our November 2022 Offering on any exchange or nationally recognized trading system, and we do not expect a market to develop for such warrants.

On November 25, 2022, we completed a registered direct offering (the “November 2022 Offering”) with investors for the purchase and sale of (1) 3,654,546 ADSs, (2) certain pre-funded warrants to purchase 1,800,000 ADSs (the “Pre-Funded Warrants”) in lieu of the ADSs being offered, and (3) certain warrants to purchase up to 5,454,546 ADSs (the “Warrants”), to certain institutional investors pursuant to a securities purchase agreement dated November 21, 2022. We do not intend to apply for any listing of the Warrants or the Pre-Funded Warrants on Nasdaq Stock Market or any other securities exchange or nationally recognized trading system, and we do not expect a market to develop for the Warrants or the Pre-Funded Warrants. Without an active market, the liquidity of the Warrants and the Pre-Funded Warrants will be limited. Further, the existence of the Warrants and the Pre-Funded Warrants may act to reduce both the trading volume and the trading price of the ADSs.

The Warrants are speculative in nature.

For a period of five years commencing upon the date of issuance, holders of the Warrants purchased in the November 2022 Offering may exercise their right to acquire the ADSs at an exercise price of US$2.75 per share. There can be no assurance that the market price of the ADSs will ever equal or exceed the exercise price of the Warrants, and consequently, whether it will ever be profitable for holders of the Warrants to exercise them.

57

Table of Contents

Except as otherwise provided in the Warrants or the Pre-Funded Warrants, holders of the Warrants purchased in the November 2022 Offering will have no rights as our shareholders.

The Warrants and the Pre-Funded Warrants offered in the November 2022 Offering do not confer any rights as shareholders of our company on their holders, such as voting rights or the right to receive dividends, but rather merely represent the right to acquire the ADSs at a fixed price for a limited period of time. Specifically, a holder of the Warrants may exercise the right to acquire one ADS at an exercise price equal to US$2.75 per ADS prior to the 5th anniversary of the original issuance date, upon which date any unexercised Warrants will expire and have no further value. A holder of a Pre-Funded Warrant may exercise the right to acquire one ADS and pay a nominal exercise price at any time. Upon exercise of the Warrants, their holders will be entitled to exercise the rights of a holder of the ADSs only as to matters for which the record date occurs after the exercise date. Holders of the ADSs may only exercise their voting rights with respect to the underlying Class A ordinary shares in accordance with the provisions of the deposit agreement.

Because we do not expect to pay dividends in the foreseeable future, you must rely on price appreciation of the ADSs for return on your investment.

We currently intend to retain most, if not all, of our available funds and any future earnings to fund the development and growth of our and the VIEs’ business. As a result, we do not expect to pay any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Therefore, you should not rely on an investment in the ADSs as a source for any future dividend income.

Our board of directors has complete discretion as to whether to distribute dividends, subject to applicable laws. In addition, our shareholders may by ordinary resolution declare a dividend, but no dividends may exceed the amount recommended by our board of directors. Even if our board of directors decides to declare and pay dividends, the timing, amount and form of future dividends, if any, will depend on, among other things, our future results of operations and cash flow, our capital requirements and surplus, the amount of distributions, if any, received by us from our subsidiaries, our financial condition, contractual restrictions and other factors deemed relevant by our board of directors. Accordingly, the return on your investment in the ADSs will likely depend entirely upon any future price appreciation of the ADSs. We cannot guarantee that the ADSs will appreciate in value or even maintain the price at which you purchased the ADSs. You may not realize a return on your investment in the ADSs and you may even lose your entire investment in the ADSs.

As a “controlled company” under the Nasdaq Stock Market Rules, we may be exempt from certain corporate governance requirements that could adversely affect our public shareholders.

Since Mr. Wei Wen, our chairman of the board and chief executive officer, is the beneficial owner of a majority of the voting power of our issued and outstanding share capital following, we qualify as a “controlled company” under the Nasdaq Stock Market Rules. Under these rules a company of which more than 50% of the voting power is held by an individual, group or another company is a controlled company and may elect not to comply with certain corporate governance requirements, including the requirement that a majority of our directors be independent, as defined in the Nasdaq Stock Market Rules, and the requirement that our compensation and nominating and corporate governance committees consist entirely of independent directors. Although we do not intend to rely upon any such exemptions, we could elect to rely on any or all of these exemptions in the future. Should we choose to do so, so long as we remain a controlled company relying on any of such exemptions and during any transition period following the time when we are no longer a controlled company, you would not have the same protections afforded to shareholders of companies that are subject to all of Nasdaq corporate governance requirements.

58

Table of Contents

We may be classified as a passive foreign investment company for United States federal income tax purposes, which could result in adverse United States federal income tax consequences to United States investors in the ADSs or ordinary shares.

We will be classified as a “passive foreign investment company,” or PFIC, if, in the case of any particular fiscal year, either (1) 75.0% or more of our gross income for such year consists of certain types of passive income, or (2) 50.0% or more of the average quarterly value of our assets during such year produce or are held for the production of passive income. Although the law in this regard is unclear, we treat the VIEs as being owned by us for United States federal income tax purposes, not only because we exercise significant influence over the operation of such entities but also because we are entitled to substantially all of their economic benefits, and, as a result, we consolidate their results of operation in our financial statements. Assuming that we are the owner of the VIEs for United States federal income tax purposes, and based upon our historical and current income and assets, we do not believe that we were classified as a PFIC for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022, and we do not expect to be classified as a PFIC for the current fiscal year.

The determination of whether we are or will become a PFIC will depend upon the composition of our income (which may differ from our historical results and current projections) and assets and the value of our assets from time to time, including, in particular, the value of our goodwill and other unbooked intangibles (which may depend upon the market value of the ADSs or ordinary shares from time-to-time and may be volatile). Among other matters, if our market capitalization declines, we may be classified as a PFIC for the current fiscal year or future fiscal years. It is also possible that the IRS, may challenge our classification or valuation of our goodwill and other unbooked intangibles, which may result in our company being, or becoming classified as, a PFIC for the current fiscal year or future fiscal years.

While we do not expect to become a PFIC in the current fiscal year, the determination of whether we will be or become a PFIC may also depend, in part, on how, and how quickly, we use our liquid assets and cash. Under circumstances where we retain significant amounts liquid assets, or if the VIEs were not treated as owned by us for United States federal income tax purposes, our risk of being classified as a PFIC may substantially increase. Because there are uncertainties in the application of the relevant rules and PFIC status is a factual determination made annually after the close of each fiscal year, we cannot assure you that we will not be a PFIC for the current fiscal year or any future fiscal year.

If we are classified as a PFIC in any fiscal year, a U.S. Holder (as defined in “Item 10. Additional Information—E. Taxation—United States Federal Income Taxation”) may incur significantly increased United States federal income tax on gain recognized on the sale or other disposition of the ADSs, ordinary shares, the Warrants or the Pre-Funded Warrants and on the receipt of distributions on the ADSs or ordinary shares (and, if applicable, the Warrants or the Pre-Funded Warrants) to the extent such gain or distribution is treated as an “excess distribution” under the United States federal income tax rules, and such holders may be subject to burdensome reporting requirements. Further, if we are classified as a PFIC for any year during which a U.S. Holder holds the ADSs, ordinary shares, the Warrants or the Pre-Funded Warrants, we generally will continue to be treated as a PFIC for all succeeding years during which such U.S. Holder holds the ADSs, ordinary shares, the Warrants or the Pre-Funded Warrants. For more information, see “Item 10. Additional Information—E. Taxation—United States Federal Income Taxation.”

59

Table of Contents

Our memorandum and articles of association contains anti-takeover provisions that could have a material adverse effect on the rights of holders of our Class A ordinary shares and ADSs.

Our memorandum and articles of association contain provisions to limit the ability of others to acquire control of our company or cause us to engage in change-of-control transactions. These provisions could have the effect of depriving our shareholders of an opportunity to sell their shares at a premium over prevailing market prices by discouraging third parties from seeking to obtain control of our company in a tender offer or similar transaction. For example, our board of directors has the authority, subject to any resolution of the shareholders to the contrary, to issue preferred shares in one or more series and to fix their designations, powers, preferences, privileges, and relative participating, optional or special rights and the qualifications, limitations or restrictions, including dividend rights, conversion rights, voting rights, terms of redemption and liquidation preferences, any or all of which may be greater than the rights associated with our Class A ordinary shares, in the form of ADS or otherwise. Preferred shares could be issued quickly with terms calculated to delay or prevent a change in control of our company or make removal of management more difficult. If our board of directors decides to issue preferred shares, the price of the ADSs may fall and the voting and other rights of the holders of our Class A ordinary shares and ADSs may be materially and adversely affected. However, under Cayman Islands law, our board of directors may only exercise the rights and powers granted to them under our memorandum and articles of association for a proper purpose and for what they believe in good faith to be in the best interest of our company.

Because we are incorporated under Cayman Islands law and conduct our operations primarily in emerging markets, you may face difficulties in protecting your interests, and your ability to protect your rights through U.S. courts may be limited.

We are an exempted company incorporated under the laws of the Cayman Islands. Our corporate affairs are governed by, among other things, our memorandum and articles of association, the Companies Act (As Revised) of the Cayman Islands (the “Companies Act”), and the common law of the Cayman Islands. The rights of shareholders to take action against the directors, actions by minority shareholders and the fiduciary responsibilities of our directors to us under Cayman Islands law are to a large extent governed by the common law of the Cayman Islands. The common law of the Cayman Islands is derived in part from comparatively limited judicial precedent in the Cayman Islands as well as from the common law of England, the decisions of whose courts are of persuasive authority, but are not binding, on a court in the Cayman Islands. The rights of our shareholders and the fiduciary responsibilities of our directors under Cayman Islands law are not as clearly established as they would be under statutes or judicial precedent in some jurisdictions in the United States. In particular, the Cayman Islands has a less developed body of securities laws than the United States. Some U.S. states, such as Delaware, have more fully developed and judicially interpreted bodies of corporate law than the Cayman Islands. In addition, Cayman Islands companies may not have standing to initiate a shareholder derivative action in a federal court of the United States.

The courts of the Cayman Islands are unlikely (1) to recognize or enforce against us or our directors or officers judgments of courts of the United States that are predicated upon the civil liability provisions of U.S. securities laws, or (2) in original actions brought in the Cayman Islands to impose liabilities against us or our directors or officers that are predicated upon the federal securities laws of the United States or the securities laws of any state in the United States so far as the liabilities imposed by those provisions are penal in nature.

Although there is no statutory enforcement in the Cayman Islands of judgments obtained in the federal or state courts of the United States, the courts of the Cayman Islands will, at common law, recognize and enforce a foreign money judgment of a foreign court of competent jurisdiction without re-trial of the merits of the underlying disputes based on the principle that a judgment of a competent foreign court imposes upon the judgment debtor an obligation to pay the liquidated sum for which judgment has been given provided certain conditions are met. For such a foreign judgment to be enforced in the Cayman Islands, such judgment must be final and conclusive and for a liquidated sum, and must not be in respect of taxes or a fine or penalty, is not inconsistent with a Cayman Islands judgment in respect of the same matter, is not impeachable on the grounds of fraud and was not obtained in a manner and is not of a kind the enforcement of which is, contrary to natural justice or the public policy of the Cayman Islands (awards of punitive or multiple damages may well be held to be contrary to public policy). However, the Cayman Islands courts are unlikely to enforce a judgment obtained from the U.S. courts under civil liability provisions of the U.S. federal securities law if such judgment is determined by the courts of the Cayman Islands to give rise to obligations to make payments that are penal or punitive in nature. A Cayman Islands court may stay enforcement proceedings if concurrent proceedings are being brought elsewhere.

60

Table of Contents

In addition, we conduct substantially all of our business operations in emerging markets, including China, and substantially all of our directors and senior management are based in China. The SEC, U.S. Department of Justice and other authorities often have substantial difficulties in bringing and enforcing actions against non-U.S. companies and non-U.S. persons, including company directors and officers, in certain emerging markets, including China. Additionally, our public shareholders may have limited rights and few practical remedies in emerging markets where we operate, as shareholder claims that are common in the United States, including class action securities law and fraud claims, generally are difficult or impossible to pursue as a matter of law or practicality in many emerging markets, including China. For example, in China, there are significant legal and other obstacles for the SEC, the DOJ and other U.S. authorities to obtaining information needed for shareholder investigations or litigation. Although the competent authorities in China may establish a regulatory cooperation mechanism with the securities regulatory authorities of another country or region to implement cross-border supervision and administration, the regulatory cooperation with the securities regulatory authorities in the United States has not been efficient in the absence of a mutual and practical cooperation mechanism. In China, without the consent of the competent PRC securities regulators and relevant authorities, no organization or individual may provide the documents and materials relating to securities business activities to foreign securities regulators.

As a result of all of the above, our public shareholders may have more difficulty in protecting their interests in the face of actions taken by management, members of the board of directors or large shareholders than they would as public shareholders of a company incorporated in the United States.

We are a foreign private issuer within the meaning of the rules under the Exchange Act, and as such we are exempt from certain provisions applicable to United States domestic public companies.

Because we are a foreign private issuer under the Exchange Act, we are exempt from certain provisions of the securities rules and regulations in the United States that are applicable to U.S. domestic issuers, including:

We are required to file an annual report on Form 20-F within four months of the end of each fiscal year. In addition, we intend to publish our results on a quarterly basis through press releases, distributed pursuant to the Nasdaq Stock Market Rules. Press releases relating to financial results and material events will also be furnished to the SEC on Form 6-K. However, the information we are required to file with or furnish to the SEC will be less extensive and less timely compared to that required to be filed with the SEC by U.S. domestic issuers. As a result, you may not be afforded the same protections or information, which would be made available to you, were you investing in a U.S. domestic issuer.

61

Table of Contents

As a company incorporated in the Cayman Islands, we are permitted to adopt certain home country practices in relation to corporate governance matters that differ significantly from Nasdaq corporate governance listing standards; these practices may afford less protection to shareholders than they would enjoy if we complied fully with Nasdaq corporate governance listing standards.

As a Cayman Islands exempted company listed on Nasdaq, we are subject to Nasdaq corporate governance listing standards. However, the Nasdaq Stock Market Rules permit a foreign private issuer like us to follow the corporate governance practices of its home country. Certain corporate governance practices in the Cayman Islands, which is our home country, may differ significantly from Nasdaq corporate governance listing standards. For instance, we are not required to: (1) have a majority of the board be independent; (2) have a compensation committee or a nominating and corporate governance committee consisting entirely of independent directors; or (3) have regularly scheduled executive sessions with only independent directors each year. We intend to rely on some of these exemptions. As a result, you may not be provided with the benefits of certain corporate governance requirements of the Nasdaq Capital Market.

Certain corporate governance practices in the Cayman Islands, which is our home country, differ significantly from requirements for companies incorporated in other jurisdictions such as the United States. To the extent we choose to follow home country practice with respect to corporate governance matters, our shareholders may be afforded less protection than they otherwise would under rules and regulations applicable to U.S. domestic issuers.

The voting rights of holders of ADSs are limited by the terms of the deposit agreement, and you may not be able to exercise your right to vote your Class A ordinary shares.

As a holder of the ADSs, you will only be able to exercise the voting rights with respect to the underlying Class A ordinary shares represented by your ADSs in accordance with the provisions of the deposit agreement. Under the deposit agreement, you must vote by giving voting instructions to the depositary. Upon receipt of your voting instructions, the depositary will vote the underlying Class A ordinary shares represented by your ADSs in accordance with these instructions. You will not be able to directly exercise your right to vote with respect to the underlying Class A ordinary shares represented by your ADSs unless you withdraw such shares. Under our memorandum and articles of association, the minimum notice period required for convening a general meeting is seven calendar days. When a general meeting is convened, you may not receive sufficient advance notice to withdraw the underlying Class A ordinary shares represented by your ADSs to allow you to vote with respect to any specific matter. If we ask for your instructions, the depositary will notify you of the upcoming vote and will arrange to deliver our voting materials to you. We cannot assure you that you will receive the voting materials in time to ensure that you can instruct the depositary to vote your shares. In addition, the depositary and its agents are not responsible for failing to carry out voting instructions or for their manner of carrying out your voting instructions. This means that you may not be able to exercise your right to vote and you may have no legal remedy if the underlying Class A ordinary shares represented by your ADSs are not voted as you requested.

The depositary for the ADSs gave us a discretionary proxy to vote our Class A ordinary shares underlying your ADSs if you do not vote at shareholders’ meetings, except in limited circumstances, which could adversely affect your interests.

Under the deposit agreement for the ADSs, if you do not vote, the depositary will give us a discretionary proxy to vote our underlying Class A ordinary shares represented by your ADSs at shareholders’ meetings if:

62

Table of Contents