NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
References in the Notes to “Level 3 Communications, Inc.,” "Level 3," “we,” “us,” "its," the “Company” and “our”, unless the context otherwise requires, refer to Level 3 Parent, LLC and its consolidated subsidiaries.
(1) Background
General
We are an international facilities-based communications provider (that is, a provider that owns or leases a substantial portion of the property, plant and equipment necessary to provide our services) of a broad range of integrated communications services. We created our communications network by constructing our own assets and through a combination of purchasing other companies and purchasing or leasing facilities from others. We designed our network to provide communications services that employ and take advantage of rapidly improving underlying optical, Internet Protocol, computing and storage technologies.
Effective November 1, 2017, we were acquired by CenturyLink in a cash and stock transaction, including the assumption of our debt (the "CenturyLink Merger").
Basis of Presentation
Our consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2019, which was derived from our audited consolidated financial statements, and our unaudited interim consolidated financial statements provided herein have been prepared in accordance with the instructions for Form 10-Q. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP") have been condensed or omitted pursuant to rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"); however, in our opinion, the disclosures made are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. We believe that these consolidated financial statements include all normal recurring adjustments necessary to fairly present the results for the interim periods. The consolidated results of operations and cash flows for the first three months of the year are not necessarily indicative of the consolidated results of operations and cash flows that might be expected for the entire year. These consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include our accounts and the accounts of our subsidiaries in which we have a controlling interest. Intercompany amounts and transactions with our consolidated subsidiaries have been eliminated. Transactions with our non-consolidated affiliates (CenturyLink and its other subsidiaries, referred to herein as affiliates) have not been eliminated. Due to exchange restrictions and other conditions, effective at the end of the third quarter of 2015, we deconsolidated our Venezuelan subsidiary and began accounting for our investment in our Venezuelan subsidiary using the cost method of accounting. The factors that led to our conclusions at the end of the third quarter of 2015 continued to exist through the first quarter of 2020.
We reclassified certain prior period amounts to conform to the current period presentation, including the categorization of our revenue and expenses for three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019.
Segments
Our operations are integrated into and reported as part of CenturyLink. CenturyLink's chief operating decision maker ("CODM") is our CODM, but reviews our financial information on an aggregate basis only in connection with our quarterly and annual reports that we file with the SEC. Consequently, we do not provide our discrete financial information to the CODM on a regular basis. As such, we have one reportable segment.
Change in Accounting Policy
During the first quarter of 2020, we elected to change the presentation for taxes assessed by a governmental authority that are both imposed on and concurrent with a specific revenue-producing transaction, including federal and certain state Universal Service Fund (USF) regulatory fees, to present all such taxes on a net basis in our consolidated statement of operations. Prior to the first quarter of 2020, we assessed whether we were the primary obligor or principal taxpayer for the taxes assessed in each jurisdiction where we do business. The previous policy resulted in presenting such USF fees on a gross basis within operating revenue and cost of services and products, and all other significant taxes on a net basis. This change in accounting policy was applied retrospectively and decreased both operating revenue and cost of services and products by $96 million for both quarters ended March 31, 2020 and March 31, 2019. The change had no impact on operating income (loss) or net income (loss) in the consolidated statements of operations.
We changed our policy to present such taxes on the net basis and believe the new policy is preferable because of the historical and potential future regulatory rate changes outside of our control resulting in significant variability in tax and fee revenue that are not indicative of our operating performance. We believe the net presentation provides the most useful and transparent financial information and improves comparability and consistency of financial results.
Operating Lease Income
We lease various IRUs, office facilities, switching facilities and other network sites to third parties under operating leases. Lease and sublease income are included in operating revenue in the consolidated statements of operations.
For the three months ended March 31, 2020, our gross rental income was $176 million, which represents approximately 9% of our operating revenue. For the three months ended March 31, 2019, our gross rental income was $50 million, which represents approximately 3% of our operating revenue.
Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
During the first quarter of 2020, the SEC made significant changes to its disclosure requirements, Financial Disclosures About Guarantors and Issuers of Guaranteed Securities and Affiliates Whose Securities Collateralize a Registrant’s Securities, which amended disclosure requirements related to registered debt securities which have been updated and relocated to Rule 13-01 of Regulation S-X. The final rule allows for streamlined disclosure models and permits presentation to be included within Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. The rules become effective January 4, 2021, with voluntary compliance permitted immediately as elected by the Company.
Financial Instruments
In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, "Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments". The primary impact of ASU 2016-13 for us is a change in the model for the recognition of credit losses related to our financial instruments from an incurred loss model, which recognized credit losses only if it was probable that a loss had been incurred, to an expected loss model, which requires our management team to estimate the total credit losses expected on the portfolio of financial instruments.
We adopted ASU 2016-13 on January 1, 2020 and recognized a cumulative adjustment to our opening accumulated deficit as of the date of adoption. The impact was a $3 million reduction to member's equity in the consolidated financial statements.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-12, Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes (Topic 740). ASU 2019-12 removes certain exceptions for investments, intra-period allocations and interim calculations, and adds guidance to reduce complexity in accounting for income taxes. ASU 2019-12 will become effective for us in the first quarter of fiscal 2021 and early adoption is permitted. We are evaluating the impact the adoption will have on our consolidated financial statements.
In March 2020, the FASB issued ASU 2020-04, Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848): Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting. The ASU is intended to help stakeholders during the global market-wide reference rate transition period. Therefore, it will be in effect for a limited time through December 31, 2022. We are evaluating the optional expedients and exceptions for applying generally accepted accounting principles to contract modifications and hedging relationships, subject to meeting certain criteria, that reference LIBOR or another reference rate expected to be discontinued and the related impact on our consolidated financial statements.
Subsequent Event
As of the date of this report, $375 million of distributions were made to our parent during 2020, of which $100 million were made in the second quarter in 2020.
(2) Goodwill, Customer Relationships and Other Intangible Assets
Goodwill, customer relationships and other intangible assets consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2020
|
|
December 31, 2019
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
Goodwill
|
$
|
7,355
|
|
|
7,415
|
|
Customer relationships, less accumulated amortization of $1,700 and $1,538
|
$
|
6,657
|
|
|
6,865
|
|
Other intangible assets subject to amortization:
|
|
|
|
Capitalized software, less accumulated amortization of $179 and $146
|
$
|
406
|
|
|
395
|
|
Trade names, less accumulated amortization of $63 and $57
|
68
|
|
|
74
|
|
Total other intangible assets, net
|
$
|
474
|
|
|
$
|
469
|
|
Our goodwill was derived from CenturyLink's acquisition of us where the purchase price exceeded the fair value of the net assets acquired.
We assess our goodwill for impairment annually, or, under certain circumstances, more frequently, such as when events or changes in circumstances indicate there may be impairment. We are required to write down the value of goodwill only when our assessment determines the carrying value of equity of our reporting unit exceeds its fair value. Our annual impairment assessment date for goodwill is October 31, at which date we assessed goodwill at our reporting unit. In reviewing the criteria for reporting units, we have determined that we are one reporting unit.
Because CenturyLink's low stock price was a trigger for impairment testing, we estimated the fair value of our
operations using only the market approach in the quarter ended March 31, 2019. Applying this approach, we utilized
company comparisons and analyst reports within the telecommunications industry, which have historically
supported a range of fair values of annualized revenue and EBITDA multiples between 2.1x and 4.9x and 4.9x and
9.8x, respectively. We selected a revenue and EBITDA multiple within this range. As of March 31, 2019, based on
our assessments performed as described above, we concluded that the estimated fair value of equity was less than
our carrying value of equity as of the date of our triggering event during the first quarter. As a result, we recorded a
non-cash, non-tax-deductible goodwill impairment charge of $3.7 billion in the quarter ended March 31, 2019.
The market multiples approach that we used in the quarter ended March 31, 2019 incorporated significant
estimates and assumptions related to the forecasted results for the remainder of the year, including revenues,
expenses, and the achievement of certain cost synergies. In developing the market multiple, we also considered
observed trends of our industry participants. Our assessment included many qualitative factors that required
significant judgment. Alternative interpretations of these factors could have resulted in different conclusions
regarding the size of our impairments.
During the first quarter of 2020, we observed a decline in CenturyLink's stock price as a result of events occurring after the end of 2019, including the COVID-19 pandemic. We evaluated whether such events would indicate the fair value of our reporting unit was below its carrying value. We believe these events have impacted the global economy more directly than us, and when considered with other factors, we have concluded it is not more
likely than not that our fair value of our reporting unit was less than its carrying value as of the quarter ended March 31, 2020. In light of the negative impacts of COVID-19 on the global economy, we will continue to evaluate the general economic trends which could have an impact on our assessment of whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of our reporting unit is less than its carrying amount. Future changes could cause our reporting unit fair value to be less than our carrying value, resulting in potential impairments of our goodwill which could have a material effect on our results of operations and financial condition. The extent of the impact, if any, will depend on future developments including actions taken to contain the coronavirus and its long-term impacts on the overall economy.
The following table shows the rollforward of goodwill from December 31, 2019 through March 31, 2020:
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
As of December 31, 2019
|
$
|
7,415
|
|
Effect of foreign currency exchange rate change and other
|
(60
|
)
|
As of March 31, 2020
|
$
|
7,355
|
|
Total amortization expense for intangible assets for the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019, was $208 million and $193 million, respectively. As of March 31, 2020, the gross carrying amount of goodwill, customer relationships, indefinite-life and other intangible assets was $16.4 billion.
We estimate that total amortization expense for intangible assets for the years ending December 31, 2020 through 2024 will be as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
2020 (remaining nine months)
|
$
|
628
|
|
2021
|
836
|
|
2022
|
776
|
|
2023
|
747
|
|
2024
|
735
|
|
(3) Revenue Recognition
Reconciliation of Total Revenue to Revenue from Contracts with Customers
The following table provides the amount of revenue that is not subject to ASC 606, but is instead governed by other accounting standards:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
2020
|
|
2019
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
Total revenue (1)
|
$
|
1,980
|
|
|
1,950
|
|
Adjustments for non-ASC 606 revenue (2)
|
(225
|
)
|
|
(50
|
)
|
Total revenue from contracts with customers
|
$
|
1,755
|
|
|
1,900
|
|
_____________________________________________________________________
(1) Reclassifications were made within certain 2019 comparative figures due to the retrospective application of an accounting policy election during the first quarter of 2020. Refer to Note 1 - Background and our Form 8-K filing dated May 7, 2020 for further information.
(2) Includes sublease rental income and revenue from fiber capacity lease arrangements which are not within the scope of ASC 606.
Customer Receivables and Contract Balances
The following table provides balances of customer receivables, contract assets and contract liabilities as of March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2020
|
|
December 31, 2019
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
Customer receivables (1)
|
$
|
731
|
|
|
678
|
|
Contract assets
|
40
|
|
|
32
|
|
Contract liabilities
|
378
|
|
|
423
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Gross customer receivables of $748 million and $691 million, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $17 million and $13 million, at March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively.
|
Contract liabilities are consideration we have received from our customers or billed in advance of providing goods or services promised in the future. We defer recognizing this consideration as revenue until we have satisfied the related performance obligation to the customer. Contract liabilities include recurring services billed one month in advance and installation and maintenance charges that are deferred and recognized over the actual or expected contract term, which ranges from one to five years depending on the service. Contract liabilities are included within deferred revenue in our consolidated balance sheets. During the three months ended March 31, 2020 and March 31, 2019, we recognized $99 million and $95 million, respectively, of revenue that was included in contract liabilities as of January 1, 2020 and January 1, 2019, respectively.
Performance Obligations
As of March 31, 2020, our estimated revenue expected to be recognized in the future related to performance obligations associated with customer contracts (including affiliates) that are unsatisfied (or partially satisfied) is approximately $3.9 billion. We expect to recognize approximately 89% of this revenue through 2022, with the balance recognized thereafter.
We do not disclose the value of unsatisfied performance obligations for contracts for which we are contractually entitled to bill pre-determined amounts for future services (for example, uncommitted usage or non-recurring charges associated with professional or technical services to be completed), or contracts that are classified as leasing arrangements that are not subject to ASC 606.
Contract Costs
The following table provides changes in our contract acquisition costs and fulfillment costs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
2020
|
|
2019
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
Acquisition Costs
|
|
Fulfillment Costs
|
|
Acquisition Costs
|
|
Fulfillment Costs
|
Beginning of period balance
|
$
|
79
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
84
|
|
Costs incurred
|
23
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
26
|
|
Amortization
|
(16
|
)
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
(13
|
)
|
End of period balance
|
$
|
86
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
97
|
|
Acquisition costs include commission fees paid to employees as a result of obtaining contracts. Fulfillment costs include third party and internal costs associated with the provision, installation and activation of telecommunications services to customers, including labor and materials consumed for these activities.
Deferred acquisition and fulfillment costs are amortized based on the transfer of services on a straight-line basis over an expected contract term of 12 to 60 months for our business customers. Amortized fulfillment costs are included in cost of services and products, and amortized acquisition costs are included in selling, general and administrative expenses in our consolidated statements of operations. The amount of these deferred costs that are anticipated to be amortized in the next twelve months are included in other current assets on our consolidated balance sheets. The amount of deferred costs expected to be amortized beyond twelve months is included in other non-current assets on our consolidated balance sheets. Deferred acquisition and fulfillment costs are assessed for impairment on an annual basis.
(4) Credit Losses on Financial Instruments
In accordance with ASC 326, "Financial Instruments - Credit Losses" ("ASC 326"), we aggregate financial assets with similar risk characteristics such that expected credit losses reflect the credit quality or deterioration over the life of the asset. We monitor certain risk characteristics within our aggregated financial assets and revise their composition accordingly, to the extent internal and external risk factors change each reporting period. Financial assets that do not share risk characteristics with other financial assets are evaluated separately. Our financial assets measured at amortized costs primarily consist of accounts receivable.
In developing our accounts receivable portfolio, we pooled certain assets with similar credit risk characteristics based on the nature of our customers, their industry, policies used to grant credit terms, and their historical and expected credit loss patterns.
Prior to the adoption of the new credit loss standard, the allowance for doubtful accounts receivable reflected our best estimate of probable losses inherent in our receivable portfolio determined based on historical experience, specific allowances for known troubled accounts, and other currently available evidence.
We implemented the new standard, using a loss rate method to estimate our allowance for credit losses. Our current expected credit loss rate begins with the use of historical loss experience as a percentage of accounts receivable. We measure our historical loss period based on the average days to move accounts receivable to credit loss. When asset specific characteristics and current conditions change from those in the historical period, due to changes in our credit and collections strategy, or credit loss and recovery policies, we perform a qualitative and quantitative assessment to update our current loss rate, which as noted below has increased due to an increase in historic loss experience and weakening economic forecasts. We use regression analysis to develop an expected loss rate using historical experience and economic data over a forecast period. We measure our forecast period based on the average days to collect payment on billed accounts receivable. The historical, current, and expected credit loss rates are combined and applied to period end accounts receivable, which results in our allowance for credit losses.
If there is a deterioration of a customer's financial condition or if future default rates in general, including impacts of COVID-19, differ from those currently anticipated, we may have to adjust the allowance for credit losses, which would affect earnings in the period that adjustments are made.
The assessment of the correlation between historical observed default rates, current conditions, and forecast economic conditions requires judgment. Alternative interpretations of these factors could have resulted in different conclusions regarding the allowance for credit losses. The amount of credit loss is sensitive to changes in circumstances and forecasted economic conditions. Our historical credit loss experience, current conditions, and forecast of economic conditions may also not be representative of the customer’s actual default in the future.
The following table presents the activity of our allowance for credit losses for our accounts receivable portfolio:
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
Beginning balance at January 1, 2020(1)
|
$
|
18
|
|
Current Period provision for expected losses
|
5
|
|
Write-offs charged against the allowance
|
(7
|
)
|
Recoveries collected
|
3
|
|
Foreign currency exchange rate change adjustment
|
(2
|
)
|
Ending Balance at March 31, 2020
|
$
|
17
|
|
______________________________________________________________________
|
|
(1)
|
The beginning balance includes the cumulative effect of the adoption of new credit loss standard
|
For the three months ended March 31, 2020, our allowance for credit losses for our business accounts receivable portfolio decreased due to a devaluation of foreign currency, partially offset by an increase in historical loss experience and weakening economic forecasts.
(5) Long-Term Debt
The following chart reflects our consolidated long-term debt, including finance leases, unamortized discounts and premiums, and unamortized debt issuance costs, but excluding intercompany debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rates(1)
|
|
Maturities
|
|
March 31, 2020
|
|
December 31, 2019
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
Level 3 Financing, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Secured Debt:(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior notes (3)
|
3.400% - 3.875%
|
|
2027 - 2029
|
|
$
|
1,500
|
|
|
1,500
|
|
Tranche B 2027 Term Loan (4)
|
LIBOR + 1.75%
|
|
2027
|
|
3,111
|
|
|
3,111
|
|
Senior Notes and other debt:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior notes (3)
|
4.625% - 5.625%
|
|
2022 - 2027
|
|
5,515
|
|
|
5,515
|
|
Finance leases
|
Various
|
|
Various
|
|
171
|
|
|
171
|
|
Unamortized premiums, net
|
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
104
|
|
Unamortized debt issuance costs
|
|
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
(34
|
)
|
Total long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
10,363
|
|
|
10,367
|
|
Less current maturities
|
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
(11
|
)
|
Long-term debt, excluding current maturities
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
10,353
|
|
|
10,356
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
As of March 31, 2020.
|
(2)
|
See the remainder of this Note for a description of certain parent and subsidiary guarantees and liens securing this debt.
|
(3)
|
As described further below, the notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed by certain affiliates of Level 3 Financing, Inc., including Level 3 Parent, LLC and Level 3 Communications, LLC.
|
(4)
|
The Tranche B 2027 Term Loan had an interest rate of 2.739% as of March 31, 2020 and 3.549% at December 31, 2019.
|
Aggregate Maturities of Long-Term Debt
Set forth below is the aggregate principal amount of our long-term debt and finance leases (excluding unamortized premiums, net and unamortized debt issuance costs) maturing during the following years:
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
2020 (remaining nine months)
|
$
|
8
|
|
2021
|
8
|
|
2022
|
850
|
|
2023
|
1,211
|
|
2024
|
911
|
|
2025 and thereafter
|
7,309
|
|
Total long-term debt
|
$
|
10,297
|
|
Covenants
The term loan and senior notes of Level 3 Financing, Inc. contain extensive affirmative and negative covenants. Such covenants include, among other things and subject to certain significant exceptions, restrictions on its ability to declare or pay dividends, repay certain other indebtedness, create liens, incur additional indebtedness, make investments, engage in transactions with its affiliates including CenturyLink and its other subsidiaries, dispose of assets and merge or consolidate with any other person. Also, in connection with a "change of control" of Level 3 Parent, LLC, or Level 3 Financing, Inc., Level 3 Financing will be required to offer to repurchase or repay certain of its long-term debt at a price of 101% of the principal amount of debt repurchased or repaid, plus accrued and unpaid interest.
Certain of CenturyLink's and our debt instruments contain cross acceleration provisions.
Compliance
At March 31, 2020, we believe we were in compliance with the financial covenants contained in our debt agreements in all material respects.
Additional Information
For additional information on our long-term debt, see Note 6—Long-Term Debt to our consolidated financial statements in Item 8 of Part II of our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019.
(6) Products and Services Revenue
We categorize our products, services and revenue among the following five categories:
|
|
•
|
IP and Data Services, which include primarily VPN data networks, Ethernet, IP, video (including our facilities-based video services, CDN services and Vyvx broadcast services) and other ancillary services;
|
|
|
•
|
Transport and Infrastructure, which includes private line (including business data services), wavelength, colocation and data center services, including cloud, hosting and application management solutions, professional services, network security services, dark fiber services and other ancillary services;
|
|
|
•
|
Voice and Collaboration, which includes primarily TDM voice services, VoIP and other ancillary services;
|
|
|
•
|
Other, which includes sublease rental income and information technology services and managed services, which may be purchased in conjunction with our other network services; and
|
|
|
•
|
Affiliate services, which includes telecommunication services that we also provide to our external customers.
|
From time to time, we may change the categorization of our products and services.
Our operating revenue for our products and services consisted of the following categories:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
2020
|
|
2019 (1)
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
IP and Data Services
|
$
|
905
|
|
|
923
|
|
Transport and Infrastructure
|
648
|
|
|
630
|
|
Voice and Collaboration
|
353
|
|
|
340
|
|
Other
|
26
|
|
|
2
|
|
Affiliate Services
|
48
|
|
|
55
|
|
Total operating revenue
|
$
|
1,980
|
|
|
1,950
|
|
_____________________________________________________________________
|
|
(1)
|
Reclassifications were made within certain 2019 comparative figures due to the retrospective application of an accounting policy election during the first quarter of 2020, in addition to product reclassification changes. Refer to Note 1 - Background and our Form 8-K filing dated May 7, 2020 for further information.
|
(7) Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Our financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts receivable, note receivable-affiliate, accounts payable, accounts payable-affiliate and long-term debt, excluding finance lease and other obligations. Due to their short-term nature, the carrying amounts of our cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, accounts receivable, note receivable-affiliate, accounts payable and accounts payable-affiliate approximate their fair values.
The three input levels in the hierarchy of fair value measurements are defined by the Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure framework are generally as follows:
|
|
|
|
Input Level
|
|
Description of Input
|
Level 1
|
|
Observable inputs such as quoted market prices in active markets.
|
Level 2
|
|
Inputs other than quoted prices in active markets that are either directly or indirectly observable.
|
Level 3
|
|
Unobservable inputs in which little or no market data exists.
|
The following table presents the carrying amounts and estimated fair values of our long-term debt, excluding finance leases, as well as the input level used to determine the fair values indicated below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2020
|
|
December 31, 2019
|
|
Input Level
|
|
Carrying Amount
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Carrying Amount
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
Liabilities-Long-term debt, excluding finance leases
|
2
|
|
$
|
10,192
|
|
|
9,810
|
|
|
10,196
|
|
|
10,244
|
|
(8) Commitments, Contingencies and Other Items
We are subject to various claims, legal proceedings and other contingent liabilities, including the matters described below, which individually or in the aggregate could materially affect our financial condition, future results of operations or cash flows. As a matter of course, we are prepared to both litigate these matters to judgment as needed, as well as to evaluate and consider reasonable settlement opportunities.
Irrespective of its merits, litigation may be both lengthy and disruptive to our operations and could cause significant expenditure and diversion of management attention. We review our litigation accrual liabilities on a quarterly basis, but in accordance with applicable accounting guidelines only establish accrual liabilities when losses are deemed probable and reasonably estimable and only revise previously-established accrual liabilities when warranted by changes in circumstances, in each case based on then-available information. As such, as of any given date we could have exposure to losses under proceedings as to which no liability has been accrued or as to which the accrued liability is inadequate. Amounts accrued for our litigation and non-income tax contingencies at March 31, 2020 aggregated to approximately $60 million and are included in other current liabilities and other liabilities in our consolidated balance sheet as of such date. The establishment of an accrual does not mean that actual funds have been set aside to satisfy a given contingency. Thus, the resolution of a particular contingency for the amount accrued could have no effect on our results of operations but nonetheless could have an adverse effect on our cash flows.
Peruvian Tax Litigation
In 2005, the Peruvian tax authorities ("SUNAT") issued tax assessments against one of our Peruvian subsidiaries asserting $26 million of additional income tax withholding and value-added taxes ("VAT"), penalties and interest for calendar years 2001 and 2002 on the basis that the Peruvian subsidiary incorrectly documented its importations. After taking into account the developments described below, as well as the accrued interest and foreign exchange effects, we believe the total amount of exposure was $6 million at March 31, 2020.
We challenged the assessments via administrative and then judicial review processes. In October 2011, the highest administrative review tribunal (the "Tribunal") decided the central issue underlying the 2002 assessments in SUNAT's favor. We appealed the Tribunal's decision to the first judicial level, which decided the central issue in favor of Level 3. SUNAT and we filed cross-appeals with the court of appeal. In May 2017, the court of appeal issued a decision reversing the first judicial level. In June 2017, we filed an appeal of the decision to the Supreme Court of Justice, the final judicial level. Oral argument was held before the Supreme Court of Justice in October 2018. A decision on this case is pending.
In October 2013, the Tribunal decided the central issue underlying the 2001 assessments in SUNAT’s favor. We appealed that decision to the first judicial level in Peru, which decided the central issue in favor of SUNAT. In June 2017, we filed an appeal with the court of appeal. In November 2017, the court of appeals issued a decision affirming the first judicial level and we filed an appeal of the decision to the Supreme Court of Justice. Oral argument was held before the Supreme Court of Justice in June 2019. A decision on this case is pending.
Brazilian Tax Claims
In December 2004, March 2009, April 2009 and July 2014, the São Paulo state tax authorities issued tax assessments against one of our Brazilian subsidiaries for the Tax on Distribution of Goods and Services (“ICMS”) with respect to revenue from leasing certain assets (in the case of the December 2004, March 2009 and July 2014 assessments) and revenue from the provision of Internet access services (in the case of the April 2009 and July 2014 assessments), by treating such activities as the provision of communications services, to which the ICMS tax applies. In September 2002, July 2009 and May 2012, the Rio de Janeiro state tax authorities issued tax assessments to the same Brazilian subsidiary on similar issues.
We have filed objections to these assessments, arguing that the lease of assets and the provision of Internet access are not communication services subject to ICMS. The objections to the September 2002, December 2004 and March 2009 assessments were rejected by the respective state administrative courts, and we have appealed those decisions to the judicial courts. In October 2012 and June 2014, we received favorable rulings from the lower court on the December 2004 and March 2009 assessments regarding equipment leasing, but those rulings are subject to appeal by the state. No ruling has been obtained with respect to the September 2002 assessment. The objections to the April and July 2009 and May 2012 assessments are still pending final administrative decisions. The July 2014 assessment was confirmed during the fourth quarter of 2014 at the first administrative level, and we appealed this decision to the second administrative level.
We are vigorously contesting all such assessments in both states and, in particular, view the assessment of ICMS on revenue from equipment leasing to be without merit. These assessments, if upheld, could result in a loss of $37 million up to $42 million at March 31, 2020 in excess of the accruals established for these matters.
Qui Tam Action
We were notified in late 2017 of a qui tam action pending against Level 3 Communications, Inc. and others in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, captioned United States of America ex rel., Stephen Bishop v. Level 3 Communications, Inc. et al. The original qui tam complaint was filed under seal on November 26, 2013, and an amended complaint was filed under seal on June 16, 2014. The court unsealed the complaints on October 26, 2017.
The amended complaint alleges that we, principally through two former employees, submitted false claims and made false statements to the government in connection with two government contracts. The relator seeks damages in this lawsuit of approximately $50 million, subject to trebling, plus statutory penalties, pre-and-post judgment interest, and attorney’s fees. The case is currently stayed.
We are evaluating our defenses to the claims. At this time, we do not believe it is probable we will incur a material loss. If, contrary to our expectations, the plaintiff prevails in this matter and proves damages at or near $50 million, and is successful in having those damages trebled, the outcome could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations in the period in which a liability is recognized and on our cash flows for the period in which any damages are paid.
Several people, including two former Level 3 employees, were indicted in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia on October 3, 2017, and charged with, among other things, accepting kickbacks from a subcontractor, who was also indicted, for work to be performed under a prime government contract. Of the two former employees, one entered a plea agreement, and the other is deceased. We are fully cooperating in the government’s investigations in this matter.
Letters of Credit
It is customary for us to use various financial instruments in the normal course of business. These instruments include letters of credit which are conditional commitments issued on our behalf in accordance with specified terms and conditions. As of both March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, we had outstanding letters of credit or other similar obligations of approximately $23 million, of which $17 million and $18 million, respectively, are collateralized by cash that is reflected on the consolidated balance sheets as restricted cash and securities.
Other Proceedings, Disputes and Contingencies
From time to time, we are involved in other proceedings incidental to our business, including patent infringement allegations, administrative hearings of state public utility commissions relating primarily to our rates or services, actions relating to employee claims, various tax issues, environmental law issues, grievance hearings before labor regulatory agencies and miscellaneous third-party tort actions.
We are currently defending several patent infringement lawsuits asserted against us by non-practicing entities, many of which are seeking substantial recoveries. These cases have progressed to various stages and one or more may go to trial during 2020 if they are not otherwise resolved. Where applicable, we are seeking full or partial indemnification from our vendors and suppliers. As with all litigation, we are vigorously defending these actions and, as a matter of course, are prepared to litigate these matters to judgment, as well as to evaluate and consider all reasonable settlement opportunities.
We are subject to various foreign, federal, state and local environmental protection and health and safety laws. From time to time, we are subject to judicial and administrative proceedings brought by various governmental authorities under these laws. Several such proceedings are currently pending, but none individually is reasonably expected to exceed $100,000 in fines and penalties.
The outcome of these other proceedings described under this heading is not predictable. However, based on current circumstances, we do not believe that the ultimate resolution of these other proceedings, after considering available defenses and any insurance coverage or indemnification rights, will have a material adverse effect on us.
The matters listed above in this Note do not reflect all of our contingencies. For additional information on our contingencies, see Note 17 - Commitments, Contingencies and Other Items to the financial statements included in Item 8 of Part II of our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019. The ultimate outcome of the above-described matters may differ materially from the outcomes anticipated, estimated, projected or implied by us in certain of our statements appearing above in this Note, and proceedings currently viewed as immaterial by us may ultimately materially impact us.
(9) Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
The table below summarizes changes in accumulated other comprehensive loss recorded on our consolidated balance sheets by component for the three months ended March 31, 2020:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Plans
|
|
Foreign Currency Translation Adjustment and Other
|
|
Total
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
Balance at December 31, 2019
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
(181
|
)
|
|
(179
|
)
|
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax
|
—
|
|
|
(228
|
)
|
|
(228
|
)
|
Net other comprehensive loss
|
—
|
|
|
(228
|
)
|
|
(228
|
)
|
Balance at March 31, 2020
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
(409
|
)
|
|
(407
|
)
|
The table below summarizes changes in accumulated other comprehensive loss recorded on our consolidated balance sheets by component for the three months ended March 31, 2019:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Plans
|
|
Foreign Currency Translation Adjustment and Other
|
|
Total
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
Balance at December 31, 2018
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
(176
|
)
|
|
(171
|
)
|
Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications, net of tax
|
—
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
3
|
|
Net other comprehensive loss
|
—
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
3
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2019
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
(173
|
)
|
|
(168
|
)
|