Trading Symbols:
TSX: SEA
NYSE:
SA
340 meters of 0.53 g/T gold & 0.60%
copper within zone designated for underground mining
TORONTO, Oct. 7, 2015 /CNW/ - Seabridge Gold today
announced that results from two more core holes drilled into Deep
Kerr at its 100% owned KSM Project in northwestern British Columbia are substantially expanding
the deposit in an area being evaluated for low cost, underground
block cave mining. These holes are further step-outs down dip from
the current resource limits.
The holes drilled this year are confirming a high degree of
continuity of mineralization over very considerable distances.
K-15-49A intercepted 340 meters averaging 0.53 g/T gold and 0.60%
copper including a 197 meter interval grading 0.69 g/T gold and
0.72% copper. K-15-50 intercepted 334 meters grading 0.41 g/T gold
and 0.30% copper about 350 meters laterally to the south from
K-15-49. K-15-49A intersected the mineralized zone about 200 meter
above K-15-49 and roughly 200 meters below the existing resource
limit. (See link to cross-sections.) As reported on
August 26, 2015, K-15-49 intercepted
483 meters averaging 0.43 g/T gold and 0.56% copper including a 250
meter interval grading 0.49 g/T gold and 0.70% copper.
The two original holes, K-15-49 and K-15-50, have been
re-entered for so-called daughter holes which use part of the
original hole before being wedged into new intercepts of the target
zone. Daughter holes K-15-49B and K-15-50A have been completed and
assays are awaited. K-15-49B was designed to extend the dip
projection of the resource 200 meters north of K-15-49. K-15-50A is
a step-out nearly 200 meters to the south of, and about 300 meters
above, K-15-50. All the holes in the 2015 campaign have targeted
the projection of the west high grade limb of Deep Kerr. These
holes were not extended to test the east high grade limb because
projected depths would have been prohibitive. The east zone remains
open at depth and remains a high potential target.
In the past two years, Seabridge has successfully targeted
higher grade zones beneath KSM's near-surface porphyry deposits,
resulting in the discovery of Deep Kerr and the Iron Cap Lower
Zone, two copper-rich deposits that have added nearly one billion
tonnes of inferred resources to the project at a higher average
grade. The goal at Deep Kerr this year was to confirm the
continuity of the mineralized zone below the simulated block cave
shape used to constrain Deep Kerr resources. The north-central part
of the Kerr deposit was selected to test the expansion potential of
the deposit.
Seabridge Chairman and CEO Rudi
Fronk commented that "we are delighted by the ongoing
expansion of Deep Kerr. We are finding thick, continuously
mineralized intervals in orientations that are favorable for
efficient extraction. The result should be a sizeable increase in
resources which we expect will be amenable to block cave mining. We
are also pleased to see higher gold grades with depth. Overall,
Deep Kerr is once again demonstrating that it has very few equals
for size and grade."
The following table summarizes the drill hole intersections for
K-15-49A and K-15-50.
Drill
Hole
ID
|
Total
Depth
|
From
(meters)
|
To
(meters)
|
Interval
(meters)
|
Gold
(g/T)
|
Copper
%
|
Silver
(g/T)
|
K-15-49A
|
1710.4
including
|
1304.4
|
1644.2
|
339.8
|
0.53
|
0.60
|
3.1
|
1358.2
|
1555.0
|
196.8
|
0.69
|
0.72
|
4.0
|
K-15-50
|
1764.4
including
including
|
1430.4
|
1764.4
|
334.0
|
0.41
|
0.30
|
2.4
|
1433.0
|
1598.4
|
165.4
|
0.56
|
0.27
|
3.1
|
1659.4
|
1713.8
|
54.4
|
0.29
|
0.41
|
2.0
|
Drill holes were oriented using historical information and were
designed to intercept the mineralized target at right angles to the
strike of the zone. The orientation will be refined with additional
drilling but current information indicates the intervals listed
above approximate the true thickness of the mineralized zones.
Exploration activities by Seabridge at the KSM Project are
conducted under the supervision of William
E. Threlkeld, Registered Professional Geologist, Senior Vice
President of the Company and a Qualified Person as defined by
National Instrument 43-101. Mr. Threlkeld has reviewed and approved
this news release. An ongoing and rigorous quality control/quality
assurance protocol is employed in all Seabridge drilling campaigns.
This program includes blank and reference standards, and in
addition all copper assays that exceed 0.25% Cu are re-analyzed
using ore grade analytical techniques. Cross-check analyses are
conducted at a second external laboratory on at least 10% of the
drill samples. Samples are assayed at ALS Chemex Laboratory,
Vancouver, B.C., using fire assay
atomic adsorption methods for gold and ICP methods for other
elements.
Seabridge holds a 100% interest in several North American gold
projects. The Company's principal assets are the KSM Project
located near Stewart, British
Columbia, Canada and the Courageous Lake gold project
located in Canada's Northwest Territories. For a full breakdown of
Seabridge's mineral reserves and mineral resources by category
please visit the Company's website at
http://www.seabridgegold.net/resources.php.
All reserve and resource estimates reported by the
Corporation were calculated in accordance with the Canadian
National Instrument 43-101 and the Canadian Institute of Mining and
Metallurgy Classification system. These standards differ
significantly from the requirements of the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission. Mineral resources which are not mineral
reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability.
This document contains "forward-looking information" within
the meaning of Canadian securities legislation and "forward-looking
statements" within the meaning of the United States Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. This information and
these statements, referred to herein as "forward-looking
statements" are made as of the date of this document.
Forward-looking statements relate to future events or future
performance and reflect current estimates, predictions,
expectations or beliefs regarding future events and include, but
are not limited to, statements with respect to: (i) that the east
limb of the Deep Kerr deposit is a high potential target; (ii) that
the orientations of the continuous, thick intervals of better grade
material at Deep Kerr are favorable for efficient extraction; (iii)
that the results of this drilling should be a sizeable increase in
resources which the Corporation expects will be amenable to block
cave mining; (iv) the estimated amount and grade of mineral
reserves at a deposit; (v) the estimated amount and grade of
mineral resources at the core zone deposits. Any statements that
express or involve discussions with respect to predictions,
expectations, beliefs, plans, projections, objectives or future
events or performance (often, but not always, using words or
phrases such as "expects", "anticipates", "plans", "projects",
"estimates", "envisages", "assumes", "intends", "strategy",
"potential", "appears", "goals", "objectives" or variations thereof
or stating that certain actions, events or results "may", "could",
"would", "might" or "will" be taken, occur or be achieved, or the
negative of any of these terms and similar expressions) are not
statements of historical fact and may be forward-looking
statements.
All forward-looking statements are based on Seabridge's or
its consultants' current beliefs as well as various assumptions
made by them and information currently available to them. The
principle assumptions are listed above, but others include: (i) the
presence of and continuity of metals at the Project at modeled
grades; (ii) the capacities of various machinery and equipment and
the geotechnical characteristics of the resource material and its
continuity; (iii) the availability of personnel, machinery and
equipment at estimated prices; (iv) exchange rates; (v) metals
sales prices; (vi) appropriate discount rates; (vii) tax rates and
royalty rates applicable to the proposed mining operation; (viii)
financing structure and costs; (ix) anticipated mining losses and
dilution; * metallurgical performance; (xi) reasonable contingency
requirements; (xii) success in realizing proposed operations;
(xiii) receipt of regulatory approvals on acceptable terms; and
(xiv) the negotiation of satisfactory terms with impacted First
Nations groups. Although management considers these assumptions to
be reasonable based on information currently available to it, they
may prove to be incorrect. Many forward-looking statements are made
assuming the correctness of other forward looking statements, such
as statements of net present value and internal rates of return,
which are based on most of the other forward-looking statements and
assumptions herein. The cost information is also prepared using
current values, but the time for incurring the costs will be in the
future and it is assumed costs will remain stable over the relevant
period.
By their very nature, forward-looking statements involve
inherent risks and uncertainties, both general and specific, and
risks exist that estimates, forecasts, projections and other
forward-looking statements will not be achieved or that assumptions
do not reflect future experience. We caution readers not to place
undue reliance on these forward-looking statements as a number of
important factors could cause the actual outcomes to differ
materially from the beliefs, plans, objectives, expectations,
anticipations, estimates assumptions and intentions expressed in
such forward-looking statements. These risk factors may be
generally stated as the risk that the assumptions and estimates
expressed above do not occur, but specifically include, without
limitation: risks relating to variations in the mineral content or
geotechnical characteristics within the material identified as
mineral reserves or mineral resources from that predicted;
variations in rates of recovery and extraction; developments in
world metals markets; risks relating to fluctuations in the
Canadian dollar relative to the US dollar; increases in the
estimated capital and operating costs or unanticipated costs;
difficulties attracting the necessary work force; increases in
financing costs or adverse changes to the terms of available
financing, if any; tax rates or royalties being greater than
assumed; changes in development or mining plans due to changes in
logistical, technical or other factors; changes in project
parameters as plans continue to be refined; risks relating to
receipt of regulatory approvals or settlement of an agreement with
impacted First Nations groups; the effects of competition in the
markets in which Seabridge operates; operational and infrastructure
risks and the additional risks described in Seabridge's Annual
Information Form filed with SEDAR in Canada (available at
www.sedar.com) for the year ended December 31, 2014 and in the Corporation's Annual
Report Form 40-F filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission on EDGAR (available at
www.sec.gov/edgar.shtml). Seabridge cautions that the
foregoing list of factors that may affect future results is not
exhaustive.
When relying on our forward-looking statements to make
decisions with respect to Seabridge, investors and others should
carefully consider the foregoing factors and other uncertainties
and potential events. Seabridge does not undertake to update any
forward-looking statement, whether written or oral, that may be
made from time to time by Seabridge or on our behalf, except as
required by law.
ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD
"Rudi Fronk"
Chairman & C.E.O.
SOURCE Seabridge Gold Inc.