Chinook Energy Inc. ("Chinook" or the "Company") (TSX:CKE) is pleased to
announce its financial and operating results for the three and twelve months
ended December 31, 2010.


2010 was a very active year at Chinook and its predecessor Storm Ventures
International Inc. ("SVI"). Undoubtedly, it was also challenging, and sometimes
confusing, for our shareholders to follow the many changes we underwent while
strengthening our platform to deliver growth, liquidity and ultimately, a better
valuation. We started the year with a strong portfolio of oil prone exploration
licenses and undeveloped discoveries in Tunisia and a capital intensive natural
gas weighted development portfolio and operatorship of the Victoria natural gas
field in the southern natural gas basin of the UK sector of the North Sea. By
early summer, we had completed a number of transactions and by year end we had
assembled a 62.5 million barrel proved plus probable oil equivalent asset base,
49 percent of which are liquids. The majority of the scalable opportunities in
Canada are targeting natural gas despite roughly 30 percent of the production
volumes and 58 percent of the revenue coming from liquids projects. The scalable
development inventory on the oil side comes from our onshore Tunisian position,
in particular the Bir Ben Tartar (TT) discovery at Sud Remada, where we have an
independent resource assessment that quantifies a Discovered Petroleum
Initially-In- Place ("DPIIP") resource of 297 million barrels of oil (gross).
With 57 percent of our Canadian reserves (42 percent of the total reserves)
being classified as proved developed producing and an 11 year reserve life index
(based on average fourth quarter production and proved plus probable reserves)
we believe the $3.55 net asset value per fully diluted share, on an after tax
basis discounted at 10 percent ($4.91 net asset value per fully diluted share on
a before tax basis discounted at 10 percent), is a conservative estimate of the
value of the Company. Over 2010 we completed the following transactions:




--  On March 1, the acquisition of West Central Alberta assets from
    Provident Energy Ltd. for $175 million, after adjustments, through the
    issuance of 42.9 million shares at $3.50 per share. In connection with
    the transaction, we established and drew down a portion of a $55 million
    credit facility. This was a reasonably priced, stable cash flow stream
    from mature assets that supported a re -focus in Canada. The acquisition
    was intended to improve our access to debt, equity and cash flow and was
    successful in two out of three of those objectives. The year end 2010
    proved plus probable reserves, net of 2010 production and non-core
    property dispositions totaling $13 million, were 12.4 million barrels of
    oil equivalent with a present value before tax discounted at ten percent
    for these assets of $156 million. 
--  On March 11, the acquisition of a Tunisian producing company with a five
    percent non-operated interest in the prolific Acacus oil fairway that
    brought 600 barrels of oil equivalent per day of production, in- country
    cash flow and marketing experience, 1.7 million barrels of oil
    equivalent of reserves, continued exploration upside to expansions in
    the play fairway, exposure to strategic facilities and infrastructure,
    and a good technical window on a play where we have similar prospects on
    other high interest operated lands. This acquisition was completed for
    USD $18 million and financed in large part through the January 2010
    issuance of 4.52 million shares at $3.00 per share. The year end 2010
    proved plus probable reserves, net of 2010 production, were 2.4 million
    barrels of oil equivalent with a present value before tax discounted at
    ten percent for these assets of $34.9 million. We expect this asset to
    continue to appreciate in value for a number of years. 
--  On March 26, the merger of our indirect wholly-owned UK subsidiary
    Silverstone Energy Limited with Bridge Energy Norge AS in exchange for
    28.8 million shares of Bridge Energy ASA ("Bridge Energy") that
    represented at closing 80 percent of the then issued and outstanding
    shares. Concurrent with that transaction Bridge Energy raised USD $54.1
    million in new equity through the issuance of 16.2 million shares at 20
    Norwegian Kroner per share (equivalent to USD $3.33 per share) and
    listed on the Norwegian Borse. These shares were distributed to our
    shareholders on the basis of 0.23398 of a Bridge Energy share for each
    common share of SVI held. We believed it was necessary to diversify the
    portfolio of assets in our North Sea business and improve our access to
    capital in an attempt to mitigate risk associated with our debt exposure
    to The Royal Bank of Scotland and 100 percent exposure to natural gas.
    The initial value assigned to the shares received and distributed was
    approximately 60 percent of the equity contributed to that business
    since it was started in 2004. Two members of our board are directors of
    Bridge Energy. The company is pursuing a strategy of oil exploration in
    Norway and natural gas development/oil acquisition in the UK. 
--  On June 29, the acquisition of Iteration Energy Ltd. ("Iteration") for
    total consideration of $555 million (including fees and severance). This
    acquisition was financed with the sale at closing of $150 million of
    assets representing approximately 25 percent of the acquired assets,
    52.1 million shares issued to Iteration shareholders (valued at $141.8
    million at closing), the assumption of $175 million of Iteration debt,
    and a portion of the proceeds of a $125 million financing through the
    issuance of 38.5 million shares at $3.25 per share. Through the
    Iteration acquisition we have attempted to acquire a strong undeveloped
    land position and a natural gas growth asset focused along the western
    corridor of the province from Grande Prairie through the Fort St John
    area. The year end 2010 reserves, net of 2010 production and asset
    sales, were 29.1 million barrels of oil equivalent with a present value
    before tax discounted at ten percent for these assets of $480.0 million.
--  On June 30, the purchase of assets in our core area of Gilby, Alberta
    for consideration of $44.6 million, including adjustments, which was
    financed through non-core asset sales and utilization of a portion of a
    newly expanded $240 million syndicated revolving credit facility with a
    consortium of six banks. The year end 2010 proved plus probable
    reserves, net of 2010 production, were 3.8 million barrels of oil
    equivalent with a present value before tax discounted at ten percent for
    these assets of $57.9 million. 
--  On July 6, the listing of the common shares of the combined entity as
    Chinook on the TSX. Over the fourth quarter of 2010, we traded
    approximately 310,000 shares per day within a range from $1.76 to $2.43
    per share, closing the year at $2.14 per share. 



Our full time staff in Calgary and Tunis increased to 113 full-time employees in
2010 from 30 at the end of 2009 as we staffed up the Canadian operation and
undertook the integration of the assets, systems and new staff. We began and
completed the design and testing of the internal controls over financial
reporting, as required of new Canadian public companies, and prepared for the
transition to International Financial Reporting Standards.


OPERATIONS SUMMARY

The key commodity price benchmarks for Chinook are the AECO natural gas price
for incremental natural gas and Brent crude oil prices for incremental oil
volumes. At March 21st prices the revenue equivalency is 31:1 and looking to the
2012 forward curve it averages 26:1. Based on this huge price disparity in
comparison to heating equivalency of 6 mcf:1 bbl and resulting recycle rates, we
intend to dedicate a minimum of 75 percent of capital expenditures to oil
projects in 2011.


Our recycle ratio in Canada, excluding acquisitions was 0.74 times on a proved
plus probable basis, based on netbacks of $16.69 per barrel of oil equivalent,
28 percent liquids contribution and a natural gas price of $3.62 per thousand
cubic feet. We require both a higher natural gas price and better drilling
results to generate competitive returns from investments in our natural gas
assets. Capital spent on natural gas projects will be focused on proving up
resource play concepts in our core areas and on locations supported by secondary
oil objectives at Gilby and Grande Prairie. We are not confident at calling the
timing of a turn on natural gas prices but generally believe that accelerated
decline rates and a drop in rig activity could support AECO prices rising to
$5.00-$6.00 per thousand cubic feet possibly as early as 2012. With an increase
in price to that level, we anticipate producers will aggressively hedge,
activity will ramp up, supply will increase and natural gas prices will have a
difficult time narrowing the unusually wide discount to oil prices without a
step change in consumption.


We have had interesting initial drilling success on our light oil prospects at
Winmore, Gilby and Valhalla that will be developed over the balance of 2011 and
may increase our domestic liquids weighting to 35 percent and 45 percent on a
corporate basis by 2012. We are also evaluating the shale potential of our lands
on the liquids-rich portions of both the Muskwa and Nordegg play fairways. We
also have heavy oil mineral rights on three bitumen accumulations, two of which
are being actively evaluated with pilot steam-assisted gravity drainage projects
that we will follow the results of and use to assist in assessing the commercial
viability of our acreage.




                               Three months ended              Year ended   
                                      December 31             December 31   
($ thousands, except per                                                    
 unit amounts)                   2010        2009        2010        2009   
--------------------------------------------------------------------------  
Sales and prices (3)                                                        
--------------------------------------------------------------------------  
Oil sales (bbl/d)               4,125          93       2,225          68   
Natural gas liquids sales                                                   
 (bbl/d)                        1,410           -         899           -   
Natural gas sales (mcf/d)      62,346           -      40,282           -   
Average daily sales 6:1                                                     
 (boe/d)                       15,927          93       9,839          68   
Average oil price ($/bbl)       76.49       72.71       73.13       70.23   
Average natural gas                                                         
 liquids price ($/bbl)          55.93           -       53.33           -   
Average natural gas price                                                   
 ($/mcf)                         3.47           -        3.75           -   
--------------------------------------------------------------------------  
Production (4)                                                              
--------------------------------------------------------------------------  
Oil (bbl/d)                     3,552          93       2,181          68   
Natural gas liquids                                                         
 (bbl/d)                        1,410           -         899           -   
Natural gas (mcf/d)            62,346           -      40,282           -   
Average daily production                                                    
 (boe/d)                       15,354          93       9,795          68   
--------------------------------------------------------------------------  
Financial operations                                                        
--------------------------------------------------------------------------  
Oil, gas and natural gas                                                    
 liquids revenue, net of                                                    
 royalties (3)                 47,227         620     114,620       1,735   
Cash flow (1)                  22,576        (784)     51,729      (1,236)  
 Per share-basic and                                                        
  diluted (1)               $    0.11   $   (0.01)  $    0.32   $   (0.02)  
Net loss from continuing                                                    
 operations                   (12,893)     (1,332)    (31,952)     (5,999)  
 Per share-basic and                                                        
  diluted                   $   (0.06)  $   (0.02)  $   (0.20)  $   (0.09)  
Net loss                      (12,893)    (16,327)    (45,492)    (19,617)  
 Per share-basic and                                                        
  diluted                   $   (0.06)  $   (0.23)  $   (0.28)  $   (0.27)  
Capital expenditures (2)                                                    
 (3)                           25,454       3,692     761,059       7,983   
Net debt (5)                  170,526      (2,165)    170,526      (2,165)  
Total assets                  805,732     394,200     805,732     394,200   
--------------------------------------------------------------------------  
Common shares (thousands)                                                   
--------------------------------------------------------------------------  
Weighted average during                                                     
 period                                                                     
 - basic                      214,188      73,839     162,003      73,681   
 - diluted                    214,188      73,839     162,003      73,681   
Outstanding at period end                                                   
 - basic                      214,188      75,224     214,188      75,224   
 - diluted                    227,603      79,164     227,603      79,164   
--------------------------------------------------------------------------  

1.  Cash flow is a non-GAAP measurement and is defined under the Non-GAAP
    Measures section of this MD&A. 
2.  Includes asset retirement obligations incurred during the period and
    other non-cash acquisition alloctions. 
3.  Excludes discontinued operations. 
4.  Production volumes differ from sales volumes in Tunisia where volumes of
    oil are stored as inventory until title, responsibility and risk of the
    oil transfer to a third party occurs. 
5.  Net debt includes bank debt, both current and long-term, and working
    capital deficit (surplus). 



Our recycle ratio in Tunisia, excluding acquisitions, was 2.92 times on a proved
plus probable basis and supports expanded commitments of capital as soon as the
initial appraisal results can be incorporated into the Plan of Development and
we receive regulatory approval. We are planning a five to six vertical
development well program before year end 2011.


The TT discovery on the Sud Remada permit in the Ghadames Basin represents our
near term oil development focus and the key catalyst to unlocking the
considerable remaining exploration potential of the 1.2 million acre permit.
When we acquired our interest in the block in 2003, it was considered a natural
gas prone, lightly explored, shallow extension of a prolific oil province. Our
Ordovician light oil discovery confirms a new zone and material extension to the
recognized oil window. An independent resource assessment by InSite Petroleum
Consultants Ltd. confirmed gross DPIIP of 297 million barrels of oil and
forecast reserves and a best case contingent resource of 36.8 million barrels of
oil (12 percent primary recovery) was attributable to three of the four
recognized pay zones mapped over the 16,000 acre TT structure (65 square
kilometres) on the 90,000 acre TT concession. Our contractor share of 38 percent
totals 14.1 million barrels of oil of which 3.6 million barrels of oil are
currently booked as proven and probable. Net pay in the four zones present in
the three wells drilled to date averages 52 feet with porosities of over 11
percent and permeability between 0.1 and 100 millidarcy. Approximately
two-thirds of these net pays will need to be fracture stimulated to produce at
commercial rates and we are in the process of mobilizing the service rig and
frac spread to complete an eight frac campaign beginning in April. We expect the
results of the frac campaign and first stage drilling of five to six wells later
this year will give us the experience we need to successfully land and complete
multi-stage frac'd horizontal wells as a preferred option in exploiting the
field. The approval of the development concession, which we anticipate to
receive in the second quarter of 2011, will create a single cost centre for cost
recovery purposes and will allow us to develop and produce from the field, and
any other discoveries on the concession, for up to 30 years. Our 2011 exit
target rate for Sud Remada is 2,500 barrels of oil per day (gross). Our goal for
2012 is to have a continuous drilling and completion operation employing
fit-for-purpose equipment and having a sales pipeline connected central facility
in place by year end. Early stage cash flow from Sud Remada will support
acceleration of the exploration activity on the balance of the concession and
development of the first offshore field at Cosmos. As we approach full cost
recovery on the Sud Remada permit, exploration costs incurred on the next
operation on other permits at Jenein and the Hammamet offshore permit can be
used to extend the payout calculation on the TT concession in much the same way
as tax pools are used to shelter income from multiple properties in different
provinces in Canada.


Exploration in sparsely drilled regions (Sud Remada averages one well per four
townships!) usually begins with drilling of seismically defined structural
closures with recognition of stratigraphically trapped accumulations and more
subtle play types developing as more data is generated. We have a five to ten
kilometre grid of 2D seismic data over the balance of the permit on which we
have identified eight additional structures which we will begin to test
immediately after entering the first of two possible three year renewal periods
beginning in the fall of this year. There are eleven wells drilled to date on
the block and based on the petrophysical understanding gained in our TT
appraisal work, we now have conventional targets in three prospective zones and
interpret wells on two of the structures to have by-passed pay. The Tannezuft
hot shale is the source rock for the oil at Sud Remada, and for most of the oil
in the Ghadames Basin. It has been cored and completed in at least four wells in
southern Tunisia in 2010. The information regarding whether the early stage work
supports a commercial shale play for natural gas and/or liquids is not currently
public. However, we cored our TT-3 appraisal well, the interpreted data from
which will be available by mid-year, and we intend to exchange that data with
other operators in an attempt to answer that question by the end of this year.
Based on the maturity information from TT, we know that at least 750,000 acres
of our block is in the oil generation window in the Tannezuft formation.


On our Adam project we continue to see oil production curtailed as gas oil
ratios increase and work towards the sanctioning of the Southern Tunisia Gas
Pipeline ("STGP") project continues. The STGP is expected on stream by early
2014 facilitating increased oil production, conservation and sale of solution
gas and commencement of production of non-associated natural gas from the Acacus
and the Ordovician. We drilled an exploration well on the Bochra prospect on the
Borj El Khadra block in March 2011 that has resulted in a discovery in the
Acacus and Ordovician. We expect the operator to submit a concession application
on a large portion of the 730,000 acre permit before the end of 2011. The
Tannezuft hot shale was cored in this well and a completion decision will be
made following a full petrophysical and core evaluation.


At Jenein, we plan to propose a workover of the Acacus and completion of the
Ordovician zones for late 2011 or early 2012 dependent on service rig
availability.


On our Hammamet offshore permit, we are shooting two 3D seismic surveys during
2011 and plan to move into the first four year renewal period with a new well
commitment made prior to year end.


TUNISIAN SECURITY SITUATION

Tunisia was the initial catalyst to a wave of civil unrest across the Middle
East and North Africa region that has caused the collapse of autocratic regimes
in Tunisia, Egypt and threatens civil war in Libya. The president of 23 years
resigned and left the country in the face of increasing dissent over youth
underemployment, police brutality and corruption. In comparison to other actions
in the region, the Tunisian Jasmine Revolution was quick, relatively peaceful
and the country appears to be moving towards a society with greater personal
freedoms and expression and a more representative political system. The short
term effects on our business were minimal in that our production has not been
interrupted and our operational delays to date have been predominantly
associated with equipment availability as opposed to security issues. Our staff
have been able to continue to manage our business, albeit with reduced
effectiveness due in large part to curfews, personal security restrictions and
the government shutting down for a period.


The longer term effect on our business is still to be determined but we are
optimistic and attribute a high probability to the outcome being neutral to our
interests. Legislative elections have been set for July 24 and more than 30
political parties have been registered. Expectations of the population are very
high with respect to the government's ability to increase employment and there
are periodic demonstrations demanding unrealistically high increases in staff
levels of public enterprises that threaten to spill over to demands on private
companies. Stability from a policy standpoint, maintaining a stable environment
for continued foreign investment, and the intent to honor the government's
obligations under existing contracts have been clearly articulated as policies
of the interim government. Chinook received a tangible indication of the
government's support in these areas with written notification of Entreprise
Tunisienne D'Activites Petrolieres's support for the joint concession request at
Sud Remada submitted to the General Directorate for Energy in Tunisia in late
March. Increased employment, increased revenue and stability will be key to the
success of any government and are benefits our project can begin to deliver
immediately. Energy will be a key aspect of any new budget balance and foreign
investment is critical in maintaining the domestic supply of energy at close to
a balanced level. From a timing perspective, it is our view that it is unlikely
that any clear direction from a new government will occur prior to the end of
2011. Several opinions we respect suggest a broad secular-based coalition is
very likely. The requirements in our existing contracts that we support the
development of Tunisian-based businesses will become even more critical in the
current environment.


During 2011, we hope to demonstrate commerciality of our onshore Tunisian assets
and have increasing oil volumes from the TT discovery drive increasing volumes
and higher barrels of oil equivalent revenue corporately. We will work to
improve the profitability and growth projections from our Canadian activities
through an increased focus on oil projects and activity in our core project
areas and will evaluate the key resource concepts that are prospective on our
540,000 undeveloped acre land base.


The Company has filed its audited consolidated financial statements and related
management's discussion and analysis ("MD&A") for the year ended December 31,
2010 on www.sedar.com and www.chinookenergyinc.com. Certain selected financial
and operational information for the three and twelve month periods ended
December 31, 2010 and 2009 comparatives contained in this news release should be
read in conjunction with Chinook's audited consolidated financial statements for
the year ended December 31, 2010 and related MD&A.


About Chinook Energy Inc.

Chinook is a Calgary-based public oil and natural gas exploration and
development company that combines high quality gas-weighted assets in Western
Canada with an exciting high growth oil business onshore and offshore Tunisia in
North Africa.


Reader Advisory

Certain information regarding Chinook in this news release including
management's assessment of the future plans and operations of Chinook and the
timing thereof constitute forward-looking statements under applicable securities
laws. In addition, statements relating to "reserves" and "resources" are deemed
to be forward-looking statements as they involve the implied assessment, based
on certain estimates and assumptions, that the reserves described exist in the
quantities predicted or estimated and be profitably produced in the future. In
particular, this news release contains, without limitation, forward-looking
statements pertaining to the following: management's assessment of the future
plans and operations of Chinook and the timing thereof and future production
volumes of oil and natural gas.


With respect to the forward-looking statements contained in this news release,
Chinook has made assumptions regarding, among other things: the ability of
Chinook to continue to operate in Tunisia with limited logistical issues, future
capital expenditure levels, future oil and natural gas prices, future oil and
natural gas production levels, Chinook's ability to obtain equipment in a timely
manner to carry out development activities, the impact of increasing
competition, the ability of Chinook to add production and reserves through
development and exploitation activities. Although Chinook believes that the
expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements contained in this news
release, and the assumptions on which such forward-looking statements are made,
are reasonable, there can be no assurance that such expectations will prove to
be correct. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking
statements included in this news release, as there can be no assurance that the
plans, intentions or expectations upon which the forward-looking statements are
based will occur. By their nature, forward-looking statements involve numerous
assumptions, known and unknown risks and uncertainties that contribute to the
possibility that predictions, forecasts, projections and other forward-looking
statements will not occur, which may cause Chinook's actual performance and
financial results in future periods to differ materially from any estimates or
projections of future performance or results expressed or implied by such
forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties include, without
limitation, political risk associated with Chinook's Tunisian operations, risks
associated with oil and gas exploration, development, exploitation, production,
marketing and transportation, loss of markets, volatility of commodity prices,
currency fluctuations, imprecision of reserve and resource estimates,
environmental risks, competition from other producers, inability to retain
drilling rigs and other services, capital expenditure costs, including drilling,
completion and facilities costs, unexpected decline rates in wells, delays in
projects and/or operations resulting from surface conditions, wells not
performing as expected, delays resulting from or inability to obtain the
required regulatory approvals and ability to access sufficient capital from
internal and external sources. As a consequence, actual results may differ
materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements. Readers are
cautioned that the forgoing list of factors is not exhaustive. Additional
information on these and other factors that could effect Chinook's operations
and financial results are included in reports on file with Canadian securities
regulatory authorities and may be accessed through the SEDAR website
(www.sedar.com) and at Chinook's website (www.chinookenergyinc.com).


Furthermore, the forward-looking statements contained in this news release are
made as at the date of this news release and Chinook does not undertake any
obligation to update publicly or to revise any of the forward-looking
statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise,
except as may be required by applicable securities laws.


Barrels of Oil Equivalent

Barrels of oil equivalent (boe) is calculated using the conversion factor of 6
mcf (thousand cubic feet) of natural gas being equivalent to one barrel of oil.
Boe may be misleading, particularly if used in isolation. A boe conversion ratio
of 6 mcf:1 bbl (barrel) is based on an energy equivalency conversion method
primarily applicable at the burner tip and does not represent a value
equivalency at the wellhead.


Reserve Life Index

The reader is also cautioned that this news release contains the term reserve
life index ("RLI"), which is not a recognized measure under GAAP. Management
believes that this measure is a useful supplemental measure of the length of
time the reserves would be produced over at the rate used in the calculation.
Readers are cautioned, however, that this measure should not be construed as an
alternative to other terms such as net income determined in accordance with GAAP
as a measure of performance. Chinook's method of calculating this measure may
differ from other companies, and accordingly, they may not be comparable to
measures used by other companies.


Discovered Petroleum Initially-In-Place

DPIIP (equivalent to discovered resources) is defined in the Canadian Oil and
Gas Evaluation Handbook as that quantity of petroleum that is estimated, as of a
given date, to be contained in known accumulations prior to production. The
recoverable portion of discovered petroleum initially-in-place includes
production, reserves, and contingent resources; the remainder is unrecoverable.
"Contingent Resources" are defined in the COGE Handbook as those quantities of
petroleum estimated to be potentially recoverable from known accumulations using
established technology or technology under development, but which are not
currently considered to be commercially recoverable due to one or more
contingencies. Contingencies include factors such as economic, legal,
environmental, political, and regulatory matters, or a lack of markets. It is
also appropriate to classify as contingent resources the estimated discovered
recoverable quantities associated with a project in the early evaluation stage.
The Contingent Resources estimates and the DPIIP estimates are estimates only
and the actual results may be greater than or less than the estimates provided
herein. There is no certainty that it will be commercially viable to produce any
portion of the resources except to the extent identified as proved or probable
reserves. Best Case Estimate: This is considered to be the best estimate of the
quantity that will actually be recovered. It is equally likely that the actual
remaining quantities recovered will be greater or less than the best estimate.
If probabilistic methods are used, there should be at least a 50% probability
(P50) that the quantities actually recovered will equal or exceed the best
estimate.


Possible reserves are those additional reserves that are less certain to be
recovered than probable reserves. There is a 10% probability that the quantities
actually recovered will equal or exceed the sum of proved plus probable plus
possible reserves.


StorageVault Canada (TSX:SVI)
Historical Stock Chart
From Apr 2024 to May 2024 Click Here for more StorageVault Canada Charts.
StorageVault Canada (TSX:SVI)
Historical Stock Chart
From May 2023 to May 2024 Click Here for more StorageVault Canada Charts.