Monument Mining Limited (TSX-V: MMY and FSE: D7Q1) ("Monument" or
the "Company") is pleased to announce that the independent
flotation testwork undertaken at Bureau Veritas Laboratory (“BV”)
in Perth has successfully replicated the positive results achieved
by the on-site metallurgical laboratory to produce a marketable
gold concentrate at the Selinsing Gold Mine.
CEO and President Cathy Zhai commented: “We are
very pleased with the test results that are a milestone step in
achieving a sustainable cash supply from our Selinsing gold
sulphide inventory by the sale of a sulphide concentrate produced
through the planned flotation plant to third parties. The Phase II
plant upgrade may follow to construct a BIOX-leaching circuit if
deemed economically viable to treat both the Selinsing concentrates
and third party concentrates on-site in order to further enhance
the revenue level. Our new business model of expanding
operations into treating third parties concentrates through a
planned BIOX®-leaching circuit continues to be assessed.”
She further added: “We have noted that the
recent announcements of tighter Chinese import restriction for the
arsenic levels in gold concentrates imply that a number of
producers of complex gold concentrates that currently sell into
China will be looking for new off-take partners. Consequentially
Selinsing’s proposed BIOX® plant could be their new home.”
Flotation Testwork Results
Highlights
- Gold concentrate produced from fresh sulphide ore contains an
average 34g/t of gold from BV testwork, compared to 33.1g/t of gold
from the on-site Selinsing testwork;
- Gold concentrate produced from transition sulphide ore contains
an average 42.5g/t of gold from BV testwork compared to 31.7g/t of
gold from the on-site Selinsing testwork;
- The arsenic (“As)” contained in gold concentrates was achieved
at an average of 5.1% for fresh and 7.0% for transition ores close
to the 8% limit that initially set for the testwork program.
It can be lowered to 3.5% through concentrate blending.
- Final concentrate grades showed elevated antimony (“Sb”) grades
in the fresh material (5.7 – 13.3% Sb), but less than 0.2% Sb in
the transition ores.
Orway Mineral Consultants (“OMC”) was engaged by
the Company to modify the flotation conceptual engineering design
that was reported in the Snowden feasibility study in February
2019, in order to produce gold concentrates as a final product for
sale instead of a mid-product for further bio-leach treatment to
accommodate a two stage approach Sulphide treatment plant expansion
strategy.
The independent testwork was carried out from
February to May 2021 in Perth, Australia through Bureau Veritas
Laboratory (“BV Lab”) under OMC’s supervision. The aim of
this testwork was to independently verify the process parameters
developed by the on-site laboratory through extensive
testwork. Based on the test results, the optimized flotation
conceptual engineering design was completed by OMC in June 2021
under the “Sulphide Flotation Circuit Design - Selinsing Gold
Project”, including flotation testwork parameters, process design
criteria, circuit modelling, engineering design brief and
consumables estimates.
Flotation Testwork
Parameters
Diamond drilling was conducted at Buffalo Reef
pits BRC2, BRC3, BRC4 and BR North to provide samples. BV Lab
testwork was designed to ensure repeatability of the on-site
testwork and all flotation tests were carried out in duplicate.
The BV Lab testwork has proved that the
Selinsing onsite laboratory test results are repeatable in a
commercial lab for Fresh and Transition ore (Table 1. Summary of
the BV Lab results), and the onsite laboratory recovery numbers can
be used by OMC with reasonable confidence for engineering design
(refer to news release dated April 27, 2021 “Monument Commences
Flotation Plant Work at Selinsing”).
Table 1: Summary of the BV Lab
results
Parameter |
Fresh Average |
Transition Average |
|
Site |
BV |
Site |
BV |
Mass Pull (%) |
5.1 |
4.1 |
4.5 |
3.3 |
Au recovery (%) |
94.3 |
92.6 |
81.8 |
80.0 |
Au grade (g/t) |
33.1 |
34.0 |
31.7 |
42.5 |
As (%) |
|
5.1 |
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
- The fresh ore results report gold
concentrate at an average 34 g/t in line with what was reported at
site in the 30-35 g/t range at a recovery in the low to mid-90s.
The mass pulls were slightly lower.
- The transition ore performed very
well in the BV Lab, with an average concentrate grade of 42.5 g/t
being produced from the two rougher cleaner tests being >10 g/t
higher than the results reported from site. This is linked with
smaller mass pulls as the overall gold recoveries were fairly
similar between the two labs (80% versus 82%).
Testwork results comparison between the
Selinsing on-site lab and the BV Lab are summarized in Table 2:
Testwork comparison between Selinsing on-site and BV Perth
flotation:
- Rougher flotation concentrate was
collected in six fractions. The first rougher concentrate was
consistently high grade and required no cleaning. Rougher
concentrates 2-6 were lower grade and subjected to three stages of
cleaning. Third cleaner concentrate was combined with the first
rougher concentrate to make the final concentrate.
- A minimum of two cleaner stages,
with the ability to direct the material for a third stage in the
event of poor Au grades, was recommended for both ore types based
on the BV Lab results. Adjusting the scheme to increase the mass
pull to ensure the gold grade remains within 30-35 g/t should limit
the need to operate the third stage.
- Recirculating the cleaner tails as
part of the eventual closed-circuit operation will further minimize
the gold lost to tails. The recovery figures from the
closed-circuit mass balance will be used as the basis for the
circuit design.
Table 2: Testwork comparison
between Selinsing on-site and BV Perth
flotation is available at
https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/df990d43-314d-4f3e-8f47-e9dfd0ca01da
Variability Testwork
The Selinsing on-site lab also tested the
flotation scheme on the individual ore zones, which allowed for
benchmarking of both the site and BV Lab composite results against
the projected weighted average. The comparison is below in
Table 3: Final Concentrates Results.
There was better precision when comparing the
calculated weighted average data against both the on-site lab and
the BV Lab composite results for the fresh testwork. When
benchmarked against the calculated weighted average, the transition
ore concentrate grades reported by BV Lab were consistently higher
and mass pulls lower than the site lab data respectively.
Table 3: Final Concentrates Results
Ore Source |
Final Concentrate Results |
Au grade (g/t) |
Mass Pull (%) |
Recovery (%) |
Fresh |
|
|
|
BRC2 |
40.35 |
5.15 |
92.34 |
BRC3 |
33.78 |
4.53 |
89.07 |
BRC4 |
31.90 |
5.02 |
94.69 |
BRN |
35.07 |
4.55 |
94.70 |
Zone Weighted Average |
35.29 |
4.94 |
92.52 |
Site Composite |
33.10 |
5.05 |
94.32 |
BV Lab Composite Average |
33.96 |
4.06 |
92.59 |
Transition |
|
|
|
BRC2 |
40.61 |
4.89 |
82.02 |
BRC3 |
33.66 |
3.22 |
69.70 |
BRC4 |
32.90 |
2.59 |
74.80 |
BRN |
N/A |
N/A |
N/A |
Zone Weighted Average |
36.31 |
3.64 |
76.30 |
Site Composite Average |
31.65 |
4.49 |
81.80 |
BV Lab Composite Average |
42.54 |
3.33 |
79.96 |
Process Plant Engineering
Design
OMC completed the process plant design in early
June 2021, and has submitted the process engineering design
including the process design criteria, major equipment summary,
flowsheet, mass balance and consumables estimates. The battery
limits for the Selinsing Stage 1 sulphide flotation circuit are the
primary mill feed conveyor, the concentrate storage facility and
the tails thickener underflow pump discharge as shown in Figure 1:
Proposed Flotation Circuit Configuration. The process design
has indicated that 6 x 30m3 cells for Rougher, 2 x 20m3 cells for
Cleaner 1, 2 x 4.3m3 cells for Cleaner 2 and 2 x 0.5m3 cells for
Cleaner 3 are to be used.
Further testwork was recommended by OMC to
consider, including:
- Confirmatory locked cycle testing
to be done in parallel with the detailed design to ensure the stage
recovery approach is appropriate;
- The sizing of the thickening and
filtration circuit to be further tested in a pilot plant stage to
ensure it is appropriate;
- Additional filtration testing on
the transition concentrate produced.
Figure 1: Proposed Flotation Circuit
Configuration is available at
https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/ec16fa91-9db7-4aca-982a-dddc4c7450e0
The scientific and technical information in this
press release has been prepared by Charlie Northfield, B.Sc.(Hons),
ACSM, of Monument Mining Limited; reviewed and approved by Fred
Kock (FAusIMM), Principal Metallurgist of Orway Mineral
Consultants, Qualified Person as defined by NI43-101.
About Monument
Monument Mining Limited (TSX-V: MMY, FSE:D7Q1)
is an established Canadian gold producer that owns and operates the
Selinsing Gold Mine in Malaysia. Its experienced management team is
committed to growth and is also advancing the Murchison Gold
Projects comprising Burnakura, Gabanintha and Tuckanarra (20%
interest) in the Murchison area of Western Australia. The Company
employs approximately 200 people in both regions and is committed
to the highest standards of environmental management, social
responsibility, and health and safety for its employees and
neighboring communities.
Cathy Zhai, President and CEOMonument Mining
LimitedSuite 1580 -1100 Melville StreetVancouver, BC V6E 4A6
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION visit the company web
site at www.monumentmining.com or contact:
Richard Cushing, MMY Vancouver T:
+1-604-638-1661 x102 rcushing@monumentmining.com
"Neither TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation
Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the
TSX Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or
accuracy of this release."
Forward-Looking Statement
This news release includes statements containing
forward-looking information about Monument, its business and future
plans ("forward-looking statements"). Forward-looking statements
are statements that involve expectations, plans, objectives or
future events that are not historical facts and include the
Company's plans with respect to its mineral projects and the timing
and results of proposed programs and events referred to in this
news release. Generally, forward-looking information can be
identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as
"plans", "expects" or "does not expect", "is expected", "budget",
"scheduled", "estimates", "forecasts", "intends", "anticipates" or
"does not anticipate", or "believes", or variations of such words
and phrases or state that certain actions, events or results "may",
"could", "would", "might" or "will be taken", "occur" or "be
achieved". The forward-looking statements in this news release are
subject to various risks, uncertainties and other factors that
could cause actual results or achievements to differ materially
from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking
statements. These risks and certain other factors include,
without limitation: risks related to general business, economic,
competitive, geopolitical and social uncertainties; uncertainties
regarding the results of current exploration activities;
uncertainties in the progress and timing of development activities;
foreign operations risks; other risks inherent in the mining
industry and other risks described in the management discussion and
analysis of the Company and the technical reports on the Company's
projects, all of which are available under the profile of the
Company on SEDAR at www.sedar.com. Material factors and
assumptions used to develop forward-looking statements in this news
release include: expectations regarding the estimated cash
cost per ounce of gold production and the estimated cash flows
which may be generated from the operations, general economic
factors and other factors that may be beyond the control of
Monument; assumptions and expectations regarding the results of
exploration on the Company's projects; assumptions regarding the
future price of gold of other minerals; the timing and amount of
estimated future production; the expected timing and results of
development and exploration activities; costs of future activities;
capital and operating expenditures; success of exploration
activities; mining or processing issues; exchange rates; and all of
the factors and assumptions described in the management discussion
and analysis of the Company and the technical reports on the
Company's projects, all of which are available under the profile of
the Company on SEDAR at www.sedar.com. Although the Company
has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual
results to differ materially from those contained in
forward-looking statements, there may be other factors that cause
results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. There can
be no assurance that such statements will prove to be accurate, as
actual results and future events could differ materially from those
anticipated in such statements. Accordingly, readers should not
place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. The Company
does not undertake to update any forward-looking statements, except
in accordance with applicable securities laws.
Monument Mining (TSXV:MMY)
Historical Stock Chart
From Nov 2024 to Dec 2024
Monument Mining (TSXV:MMY)
Historical Stock Chart
From Dec 2023 to Dec 2024