TORONTO, Nov. 20, 2012
/PRNewswire/ -- Noble Mineral Exploration Inc. (the
"Company" or "Noble") (TSX-V:NOB, FRANKFURT:NB7,
OTC.PK:NLPXF) is pleased to provide an update, further to its press
releases of August 22, 2012 and
September 10, 2012, on the carbon
sequestration modelling undertaken on Project 81 (the
"Property"). Subject to the assumptions discussed below,
Mikro-Tek Inc. ("Mikro-Tek"), the consultant engaged by
Noble to prepare carbon sequestration modelling, has estimated the
amount of carbon credits that may be generated from the
Property. Using a carbon price of $15 /tCO2 and Mikro-Tek's estimated
carbon sequestration figures, IBK Capital Corp. ("IBK"),
which is advising Noble on this and other aspects relating to the
Property, calculates the net present value of the credits to be in
the order of $100 million.
The regulatory filings made with respect to Project 81 have
classified the Property as hosting a "Degraded Forest" with poor
age class distribution of timber resources.
Current Forest Inventory Estimate of Harvestable Volume (m3) of
Project 81:
Working
Group
|
Ha. per
species
|
Harvestable m3
|
Total
m3
|
Estimated tCO2
|
Spruce
|
36,454
|
54
|
1,968,516
|
2,637,811
|
Balsam
|
5,911
|
54
|
319,194
|
427,719
|
Poplar
|
4,926
|
9
|
44,334
|
59,407
|
Total:
|
47,291
|
|
|
3,124,937
|
Source: Forest Management Plan prepared and filed for the
Property in 2002.
This classification is largely due to the unsustainable forest
management techniques applied on the Property in the 1960s and
1970s. The degraded nature of the forest, however, places it in a
good position to increase its carbon sequestration potential due to
the natural re-growth and reduced harvesting that has taken place
over the last ten years. These improved forestry practices can be
used to capitalize on the carbon offset requirements of major
industrial projects being developed in the near to medium term
across Canada and, potentially,
other jurisdictions in North
America.
Provided that the boreal forest owned by Noble progresses from a
"poor age class distribution" into a "good age class distribution"
over a 20-year period, the tree growth on the property will capture
and store millions of tonnes of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere.
This process would allow the Company to register and sell carbon
credits (with each credit representing one tonne of carbon dioxide,
or CO2) into emissions trading markets. Such carbon
sequestration could potentially provide the carbon offset credits
required or sought for large-scale industrial development projects
throughout North America or to
otherwise offset carbon emissions produced by heavy emitters who
exceed their emission allotments, assuming those allotments are
mandatory in the jurisdictions in which they operate.
The physical footprints of these types of industrial projects
vary from 500 to 2,000 hectares (ha) for a typical mine site, 2,000
to 5,000 ha for an oil sands project, and 10 ha per kilometer of
corridor (assuming a width of 100 meters) for transportation or
transmission projects. For example a road corridor for development
of Ontario's Ring of Fire mine
sites would be approximately 300 km in length (requiring 3,000 ha
of offsetting property) and for an oil transmission corridor across
Ontario, would be in excess of
1,500 km (requiring an offset of approximately 15,000 ha).
The Company's Carbon Sequestration Strategy
The previous owner of the Property developed a Forestry
Management Plan (the "FMP" or the "Plan") for the
Property in 2002. The Company has adopted this Plan and had the
Plan updated by Merin Forest Management of North Bay, Ontario, which shows that the
Property's forest could support an annual sustainable harvest that
could yield 54 m3/ha of conifer and 9 m3/ha
of hardwood. These forest production rates are significantly
lower than provincial averages, which are 146 m3/ha for
conifer and 277 m3/ha for hardwoods within a medium site
class and 238 m3/ha for conifer and 328 m3/ha
for hardwoods within a good site class (Source: Planting Trees
for Carbon Credits, prepared for the Tree Canada Foundation,
1995) The difference in the projected yield rates compared to the
provincial average is due to the degraded nature of the Property's
forest.
To improve the state of the Property's forest, the Company is
proposing to initiate a carbon sequestration project that would
return the forest to its full production potential. Under the
proposal, the Company would restrict harvesting on the property to
allow the forest to regenerate from its current degraded state to a
productive state with a fully balanced age class with yields that
would fall within the ranges of the current provincial
averages. As the harvested sections of the forest are
currently regenerating with acceptable stocking levels, the
recovery of the uneven age classes within the forest will take
place over time with minimal forest management expenses. During
this period, Noble would seek to capture the value of this carbon
sequestration for investors by marketing the Property as a source
of carbon credits. If successful, Noble could realize on this value
in the near to medium term.
The number of carbon credits available would be based on the
difference between the amount of carbon dioxide currently
sequestered on the Property and the amount of carbon dioxide that
would be sequestered on the Property in 20 years. Mikro-Tek has
used the FMP and other recent timber inventory data on the Property
to project an estimate of the carbon sequestration potential of the
Property.
Harvestable Volume for a good site class (achieved by twenty
years' growth):
Working
Group
|
Ha. per
species
|
Harvestable m3
|
Total
m3
|
Estimated tCO2
|
Spruce
|
36,454
|
238
|
8,676,052
|
11,625,909
|
Balsam
|
5,911
|
238
|
1,406,818
|
1,885,136
|
Poplar
|
4,926
|
328
|
1,615,728
|
2,165,075
|
Total:
|
47,291
|
|
|
15,676,120
|
A copy of Mikro-Tek's report to Noble is available on the
Company's website.
Carbon Credit Pricing
The global market-wide average price in 2011 for forestry
projects, for both the compliance and voluntary markets, was
$9.20/tCO2, being double
the 2010 price (Source: Molly
Peters-Stanley et al., Leveraging the Landscape State of
the Forest Carbon Markets 2012, for Ecosystem Marketplace,
November 2012, Executive
Summary).
Yesterday, preliminary results of California's emissions trading program were
announced. The first auction of 2013 carbon allowances resulted in
23,126,110 tonnes of CO2 sold at a weighted average
settlement price of $10.09/tCO2. Bloomberg New Energy
Finance in its website report of November 6,
2012 (Available at
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-11-06/california-carbon-forecast-cut-before-auction-bnef-says.html)
estimates that the price of carbon allowances will average
$29 per tonne from 2013 to 2020. The
Company believes the results of the California auction are relevant because
Ontario and California are both members (along with
British Columbia, Manitoba and Quebec) of the Western Climate Initiative,
even if the Government of Ontario
has not provided an estimate as to when it will implement the
Western Climate Initiative emissions trading scheme.
In its report to Noble, Mikro-Tek projected that if the boreal
forest on the Property was allowed to recover from its current
degraded site class to a good site class, 12.5 million
tCO2 could be sequestered on the Property. The costs
associated with the forest management and the verification and
registration of the carbon credits have been estimated to average
$75,000 per year over the life of the
project. These costs have been estimated based on quotes provided
by multiple third-party forest carbon experts. If Ontario
were assumed to adopt a similar set of regulations as Alberta, where carbon is taxed at a rate of
$15/tCO2, and after
applying an annual discount rate of 6% the net present value
("NPV") of the Project's carbon credits would be in excess
of $100 million. This scenario does
not take into account any escalation in cost or any increase in
carbon credit prices during the 20 year time frame modelled. The
following table demonstrates estimated project NPV outputs for
various long-term carbon credit pricing scenarios.
Net
Present Value Sensitivity - Carbon Credit Pricing
Scenarios:
|
$10/
tCO2
|
$15/
tCO2
|
$20/
tCO2
|
$25/
tCO2
|
$30/
tCO2
|
$66,911,961
|
$100,933,832
|
$134,955,704
|
$168,977,576
|
$202,999,447
|
The Carbon Market:
Recent articles in the national media highlight the Shell,
Marathon Oil and Chevron $1.35billion
Quest Capture and Storage Project to capture one million
tCO2 per year from the Scotford Upgrader (Alberta) and store it 2 km underground,
helping to reduce the carbon footprint of their Athabasca Oil Sands
project in Alberta. This project
puts into focus the cost and importance of carbon dioxide capture
and storage requirements in Canada, as we all work toward a lower carbon
future. As a means of raising funds for mineral resource
exploration at Project 81 and at other Noble projects, the Company
proposes to realize on the value of Project 81 as a cost-effective
source of carbon sequestration, in particular considering that the
cost of carbon sequestration using forestry properties is
dramatically lower than the costs of carbon capture and storage
projects such as the Quest Capture and Storage Project.
According to Ecosystem Marketplace, the global market for forest
carbon sequestration credits in 2010 was over 26 million
tCO2 representing a value of over US$ 237 million. Since governments across the
world are moving toward increasingly regulated carbon credit
markets, both the price and volume of credits transacted will
likely increase over the next several years. Ontario emitted approximately 171.3 million
tCO2 in 2010, with the transportation sector accounting
for approximately 59.8 million tonnes CO2 equivalent.
These numbers are expected to increase substantially with the
expansion and development of the Golden Horseshoe Area in
Southern Ontario and the mining
and smelting sectors in Northern Ontario.
When Canada signed the
Copenhagen Accord in December 2009,
it committed to reduce its greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions to 17%
below 2005 levels by 2020, establishing an annual reduction target
of 607 Megatonnes (Mt), mirroring the reduction targets
set by the United States. To meet
these targets, Canada is generally
seen to be moving toward regulating GHGs on a sector-by-sector
basis, aligning with the U.S where appropriate, starting with the
transportation and electricity sectors. Plans are now in place to
move forward with regulating large final emitters (entities
emitting more than 25,000 tCO2 annually) in other
sectors such as oil and gas, mining and mineral refining.
About Project 81
Project 81 is Noble's 100% privately owned 60,701 hectares
(149,000 acres) forested land package. This land package is
one of the largest freehold land packages in the province, if not
the country, and Noble has retained all mineral rights.
Project 81 is located within the Northern Ontario boreal biome. Globally,
the boreal biome is the world's largest and most important
forest carbon storehouse holding almost twice as much carbon per
unit area as tropical rain forests. Canada's boreal forest stores about 71.4
billion tonnes of carbon in its forest ecosystems and 136.7 billion
tonnes in its peatland ecosystems (Boreal Carbon the World Forgot – Canadian Boreal
Initiative
http://www.borealbirds.org/resources/carbon/report-pressrelease-nov12.doc)
Project 81 is the Company's flagship project of patented and
staked land packages and is divided into two blocks. The patented
properties include surface, mineral and timber rights, and host a
significant timber resource plus a number of zones that have hosted
historical exploration identifying nickel and gold mineralization
(these sample results are historical and non 43-101 compliant) from
work carried out in the 1960s and 1970s. These results have
been confirmed by recent assay results from the current, ongoing
drill program.
About Noble Mineral Exploration Inc.:
Noble Mineral Exploration Inc. is a Canadian based junior
exploration company holding in excess of 72,000 hectares of
property in the Timmins,
Iroquois Falls and Smooth Rock Falls areas of Northern
Ontario. The Company also holds a portfolio of diversified
exploration projects at various stages of exploration and drilling
for, Gold in the Wawa area of
Northern Ontario, and Uranium in
Northern Saskatchewan.
Randy Singh P.Geo (ON), P.Eng
(ON) VP- Exploration & Project Development a "qualified person"
as such term defined by National Instrument 43-101 has verified the
data disclosed in this news release, and has otherwise reviewed and
approved the technical information in this news release on behalf
of the Company.
More detailed information is available on the website at
www.noblemineralexploration.com
Cautionary Statement:
Neither TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services
Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX
Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or
accuracy of this release. No stock exchange,
securities commission or other regulatory authority has approved or
disapproved the information contained herein.
The foregoing information may contain forward-looking statements
relating to the future performance of Noble Mineral Exploration
Inc. Forward-looking statements, specifically those concerning
future performance, are subject to certain risks and uncertainties,
and actual results may differ materially from the Company's plans
and expectations. These plans, expectations, risks and
uncertainties are detailed herein and from time to time in the
filings made by the Company with the TSX Venture Exchange and
securities regulators. Noble Mineral Exploration Inc. does
not assume any obligation to update or revise its forward-looking
statements, whether as a result of new information, future events
or otherwise.
Contacts:
Noble Mineral Exploration
Inc.
H. Vance White,
President
Phone: 416-214-2250
Fax: 416-367-1954
eMail: info@noblemineralexploration.com
Investor Relations
Phone: 416-214-2250
eMail: ir@noblemineralexploration.com
SOURCE Noble Mineral Exploration Inc.