ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for smarter Trade smarter, not harder: Unleash your inner pro with our toolkit and live discussions.
IonQ Inc

IonQ Inc (IONQ)

37.97
2.02
(5.62%)
Closed 07 December 8:00AM
38.48
0.51
( 1.34% )
Pre Market: 9:15PM

Real-time discussions and trading ideas: Trade with confidence with our powerful platform.

IONQ News

Official News Only

IONQ Discussion

View Posts
Jack Torrance Jack Torrance 2 minutes ago
Upper right hand of screen, click on your account icon, then "My Profile" in the dropdown menu. Then when your profile comes up, there is an option for "edit profile image" on the left hand side of the screen, under where your profile image/icon would be. If that doesn't work, I don't know what to tell you.
👍️0
Jack Torrance Jack Torrance 6 minutes ago
I agree. Margaret Arakawa is a babe, but she is dropping the ball. Or perhaps she is under strict guidelines ... or maybe she's not getting the marketing budget she wants? I don't know.

Or maybe they want to stay away from hard figures like I just gave, since it may be dependent on fidelity or other technical aspects, and they don't want to be accused of false advertising because Tempo eventually proves to be *only* 250 million times more powerful than Forte rather than 268.4 million times more powerful.

But yes, like you, I want more of an advertising push. With Tempo coming soon, I think it's time.
👍️0
Konaploinks Konaploinks 22 minutes ago
Jack. How did you get your pic in your profile? I went to account etc. No button to click on to load pic from my pics. Do you have to be a paying premium member?
👍️0
Konaploinks Konaploinks 30 minutes ago
Why isn’t IonQ trying to attract more investors through their marketing department? I’m seeing no effort being made. Anyone know why? What’s the big secret? The Tec writers don’t have a clue as to what we have and have coming up. Why is that?
👍️0
Konaploinks Konaploinks 38 minutes ago
Jack. That’s awesome! But why didn’t IonQ explain that and or do the same math you did? You’d think they would have. Not just say. Each qubit doubles the power. Our marketing department is not marketing us well. They should have stated what you just did to really get that doubling of power across and also mentioned how much more powerful Tempo would be. You’d think they would have been all over that Right ? I’m not seeing much if any marketing going on. No ads. No t v commercials No one on t v shows. Nothing. Why is that?
👍️0
Jack Torrance Jack Torrance 2 hours ago
So, according to IonQ, each additional qubit doubles the computational power of their machines. Sounds awesome, right? Well, I just did the math on what that means for the jump from AQ36 (Forte) to AQ64 (Tempo), and it's astounding.

This represents 28 individual qubit increases, doubling the power from each one previous. 37 is double 36, 38 is double 37, 39 is double 38, etc.... The rise is of course exponential, not linear.

If my math is correct, that means that Tempo will be 268,435,456 times more powerful than Forte.

Yes, you read that right

268.4 MILLION TIMES MORE POWERFUL.

Forte, from what I'm reading, is already right at the precipice of surpassing classical computers at most computational types, and even surpassing them in some. IonQ's Forte system is already reducing compute time considerably for some problems.

NOW IMAGINE A COMPUTER 268.4 MILLION TIMES MORE POWERFUL.

Holy. Effing. Shit.
👍️0
Konaploinks Konaploinks 2 hours ago
Doc. I stand corrected. They just had the filed date. I see it was granted on Dec 3 2024. Mahalo
👍️0
Konaploinks Konaploinks 7 hours ago
Yep sorry. I’m not prejudice. I hate everybody. lol. J k. Yeah I was gonna include Samsung , Mitsubishi, LG, etc but hey. There are so many international corps that would love to own IonQ. The world list is very, very long. I think it’s going to get very interesting real soon I honestly wouldn’t be surprised to see some 30 to 40% up days. Hands and feet inside the car. AND NO STANDING UP PETER!
👍️0
$5.95akadawson-m $5.95akadawson-m 7 hours ago
Hey Kona: you just spelled out all American corps! There are many European/Asian/??? That want a piece of IONQ!
👍️ 1
Konaploinks Konaploinks 10 hours ago
My pic
👍️0
PonderosaPack PonderosaPack 11 hours ago
what kinda pic?
👍️0
doc2016 doc2016 12 hours ago
Software-defined quantum computer
Patent number: 12159194
Abstract: The disclosure describes various aspects of a software-defined quantum computer. For example, a method is described for generating an intermediate representation of source code for a software-defined quantum computer. The method includes performing a lexical analysis on a high-level intermediate representation of a quantum programming language; performing semantic analysis on an output of the lexical analysis; and generating a mid-level intermediate representation of the quantum programming language based on an output of the semantic analysis.
Type: Grant
Filed: January 31, 2022
Date of Patent: December 3, 2024
Assignees: DUKE UNIVERSITY, IonQ, Inc.
Inventors: Jungsang Kim, David Moehring, Omar Shehab, Yunseong Nam, Jonathan Mizrahi, Stewart Allen
👍️ 1
Konaploinks Konaploinks 12 hours ago
Dic. That’s not their newest patent. That was back in 2022
👍️0
Konaploinks Konaploinks 12 hours ago
That writer needs to do a lot more homework. He’s basically laughable. If he only knew what we on this board know. Very few people have the knowledge about quantum computing that we on this board have. We’ve done our homework He hasn’t done squat yet. Pretty pathetic at best. When will we see a really up to date article from one of these want to be writers. They make me laugh
👍️ 1
Monksdream Monksdream 15 hours ago
TECHNOLOGY
The Costs and Benefits of Quantum Computing
Photo illustration of IBM's quantum computer
Photo illustration by Connor Lin / The Daily Upside, Photos by Lars Plougmann via CC BY-SA 2.0 and IBM España
AI may be the current darling of the tech industry, but many firms may already have their sights on what could be the next big thing: Quantum computing.

While this revolutionary approach to computation based on the principles of quantum physics is often dismissed as theoretical and far off, scientists are actually getting closer to making quantum computers that blow away traditional ones. Though adoption faces significant roadblocks, as these devices must be kept in a delicate state to work properly, the payoff could be huge for a variety of industries, experts told The Daily Upside.

“Once we deploy it, in terms of the benefits it's going to provide, I have no qualms about the ROI,” said Karthee Madasamy, founder and managing partner at deep tech venture fund MFV Partners. “It's not just a pure science project, let's put it that way. We’re beyond that.”

The Brass Tacks
If you’re confused about what exactly quantum computing is, these are devices that are potentially capable of performing incredibly complex calculations at a rate far faster than that of an everyday, classical computer. Rather than the typical ones and zeros that make a normal computer run, a quantum computer uses qubits capable of existing as both one and zero at once, a phenomenon known as superposition. Those qubits become entangled, meaning they can influence one another, enabling faster problem-solving.

“Think of a road that has cars that can go one direction or the other, and all of a sudden, you can have cars go in any direction at the same time, instantaneously,” said Karl Holmqvist, Founder and CEO of cybersecurity firm Lastwall. This creates “massive parallelization potential, and it allows you to solve problems that currently are extremely difficult in almost negligible amounts of time.”

Superposition is a state of being that, while extremely delicate to maintain, has the potential to completely transform a number of industries – and has already proven itself useful in research: A quantum computer built by Google, a leader in the nascent market, was able to instantly execute a task in July that would have taken a supercomputer 47 years to process.

Besides Google, other Big Tech companies and startups are also making leaps in quantum computing. Microsoft announced in November plans to launch a commercial quantum computer in 2025 in partnership with Atom Computing. IBM launched its most advanced quantum computer yet last month, performing at “record levels of scale, speed, and accuracy.” Amazon AWS announced Quantum Embark, a program aimed at helping customers figure out how to prepare for and utilize quantum technology.

In the startup world, PsiQuantum announced plans in July to build a campus in Chicago to create and operate the first “US-based, utility-scale, fault-tolerant quantum computer,” bringing $1 billion in investments to the city. Honeywell is reportedly considering a 2025 IPO for its own quantum unit, Quantinuum, at a valuation of $10 billion.

Quantum computing’s most powerful asset is its ability to optimize, said Ashley Manraj, chief technology officer at Pvotal Technologies. This means it can be applied to practically anything, including industries like finance, logistics, and medicine, as well as applications on the “civil side, the military side, and the governmental side,” he said.

That broad scope means that this tech has some “very high dollar-value applications,” said Holmqvist, including industries like drug discovery, disease research, climate and agricultural modelling, portfolio management, and risk modeling.

One of the best immediate use cases is going to be “basic science,” said Sebastian Hassinger, host of The New Quantum Era podcast and business development specialist for quantum technology at AWS. For example, material science, small-molecule chemistry, and chemicals research can benefit from these devices’ capability to quickly calculate and simulate outcomes.

“We're sure it’s going to be very, very powerful in terms of science … investing in and accelerating science is definitely worth it,” said Hassinger.

The Barriers
Quantum computers are still quite finicky, which complicates their adoption in the marketplace. These devices are deeply impacted by their surrounding environments and can easily get knocked out of superposition, rendering their computations invalid. They need to be kept entirely isolated and only work at temperatures close to absolute zero, or nearly -460 degrees Fahrenheit. They’re also extremely sensitive to noise, such as vibrations or electrical interference.

Because of this delicate nature, quantum error correction is essential. This is done using a large number of physical qubits to make a “logical” one, or one that’s reliable and resistant to error, said Manraj. It’s estimated that a quantum device needs roughly 1,000 physical qubits per logical qubit.

“There are currently very hard limits that we know of to the stabilization of a qubit,” said Manraj. And to solve major computation problems, these devices will need “another two to three to 10 to 100 times more qubits.”

But several different paths are being researched to solve these problems, Holmqvist noted. For example, startups like IonQ are working on the “trapped ion” approach, which uses charged atoms caught in electromagnetic traps as qubits. Others, like Psiquantum, are working on what’s called the “photonic” approach, which uses particles of lights as qubits, making them more resilient to noise. Some, like Quantum Brilliance, are using diamonds as a means of stabilizing qubits, allowing them to exist at room temperature.

The research doesn’t come cheap: According to Forbes, governments globally have invested more than $55 billion in this technology. Quantum computing startups have raised $1.5 billion in VC funding so far in 2024, Crunchbase reported, more than double investments made in 2023.

“We're in this noisy, intermediate phase of quantum computing, because we haven't hit fault tolerance yet, but we're making breakthroughs in stability,” he said.

Questions Unanswered
The question on the industry’s mind isn’t whether quantum will bring value, but when that value will manifest, Holmqvist said. Quantum development has been happening for years, he said. As a result, breakthroughs in scaling these devices have been “10 years away for the last 30 years,” he added.

While the industry is confident that quantum computers will show returns in some capacity, it’s impossible to tell what, exactly, that value may turn out to be without having a quantum computer powerful enough to do something that classical computers can't, Hassinger said. “It's very chicken and egg.”

But with the sheer amount of computing power being gobbled up by tech developments like AI, the tech industry may have no choice but to forge ahead with quantum as we’re “getting to the end of Moore’s Law with the classical [computing],” said Madasamy. “We don't have the fundamental technologies to be able to keep up with [our computation needs]. So what is the next step?”

Despite the lingering unknowns, Holmqvist said, the payoff may be an “almost incalculably large prize at the far end of making these things work.”

“We probably couldn't have anticipated how the internet would change our business world,” Holmqvist added. “In the same way, it's difficult to understand how quantum computers will change those things at scale.”

Written by Nat Rubio-Licht
👍️0
doc2016 doc2016 15 hours ago
how might ionq recruit/maintain/operated their os in network?
https://www.nowsolutions.com/services/
hr of people or machines? would seem to be the same components with different object names/functions/meta data?

it's not mumbo jumbo, but seems pretty straightforward?

data transformation is very important in prepping the data for consumption/learning. wags.
moving data to needed/specified locations/servers/services is important
security is important.
moving the legacy to the cloud is one of their jobs?
👍️ 1 😃 1
Konaploinks Konaploinks 15 hours ago
With IonQ’s latest partnerships , new patents, Switzerland online and the buying of Qubitek etc etc there are going to be a lot of possible buyers. To name just a few NVDA, IBM , Msft, Apple, Salesforce, Oracle, Dell, Intel , AMD, AWS, HP, etc etc etc None of these corporations are going to want to be shut out. Over 600 patents and on track to rake in100 mil this year while still in development stage is unheard of. Ionq is killing it and the one all of these corporations have been keeping their eye on. So you too should , keep your eye on IonQ. I think you’ll be glad you did. Me a pumper? HELL YALE !
👍️0
Konaploinks Konaploinks 16 hours ago
doc2016
Re: None
Thursday, 12/05/2024 11:53:50 AM
newest ionq patent:
newest patent:https://patents.justia.com/patent/12159194
software defined quantum computer....digital twinning?
ability to send the data to the remote quantum computer to set the parameters desired for it's work use case?
combine, kona, with the cruz patent and admin instructions of emPath and 8x8 networking, routing, and authentication. wags.

8x8 elevation partners, including msft teams, sagemaker, servicenow.........via apis talk to the servers , now including quantum computers/ since not all physical qubits might be the same, there could be a difference in the logical qubits depending on their use cases?
guessing.
Bullish
BULLISH
👍️0
Konaploinks Konaploinks 18 hours ago
Jack or anyone know how to put your pic on here? I got to where It says to click browse above but there is no browse word to click on. Anyone know?
👍️0
Konaploinks Konaploinks 19 hours ago
5.95. I don’t know for sure, but it would be my guess. I doubt the rest of the industry is just going to sit back and watch one company run away with the whole ball of wax. Why would they? Over 600 patents and counting! Whoever has these will quite easily be able to stay in the Quantum lead. Who ever leads quantum will be the next Apple and Msft combined. Maybe even bigger than that with their new Quantum O S , hybrid suite, mfg , and networking etc. etc. I’m hoping for a bidding war. With that 500,000 share buy at the close on Friday it signals to me the first shot across our bow.
LIFE IN THE QUANTUM LANE
SURELY MAKES YOU FIND YOUR MIND
LIFE IN THE QUANTUM LANE
EVERYTHING. ALL THE TIME
AH HAA !

Keep your eye on IonQ

Oh IonQ
Oh IonQ !!!
Oh IonQ
Baby I love you
IonQ

I like the way you tick
I like the way you click !
I like the way you tick
I like the way you click
IonQ

Copyright. J. W. N.
👍️0
$5.95akadawson-m $5.95akadawson-m 19 hours ago
Kona: you know that there are going to be multiple bidders on IONQ?
👍️0
Konaploinks Konaploinks 21 hours ago
Relax Jack. I think we could fly up to around a hundred bucks if any leak of a buyout. A bidding war could ensue That would be our best scenario. Then the buyer would have to pay 3 to five times a hundred per share. Remember . There aren’t that many shares. Insiders and institutions own 53% So not that many out there left to buy . The BoD can see who’s buying and how many. They have access to that info. And the buyer is probably buying them up now for under 40 bucks . He’s trying to do it slowly but the word is getting out. IMO I’d want half cash and half shares probably going to be in Nvda. We’d all be sitting pretty. Nvda would then run back over 1,000 and split again imo
👍️ 1
Konaploinks Konaploinks 22 hours ago
Ponderosa. Jensen has a few billion in pocket change to take IonQ anywhere it needs to go. He needs to diversify badly as the chip sharks are surrounding him. Ionq is the perfect fit and will bring in more rev to satisfy all shareholders. There would be no stopping him if he controlled quantum too. Or at least some of the best quantum computers out there. Not to mention the data centers , networks, software , manufacturing , new O S and hybrid systems . Yep imo it’s gonna be Jensen. He’s gonna need a bigger leather jacket.
👍️ 1
Konaploinks Konaploinks 22 hours ago
I think after reading the 8 k again that was just out Friday, we’re about to be acquired imo or our BoD knows we’re about to be. They have assured their performance bonuses will be paid if they are terminated basically for any reason. Who could it be? I think it’s Jensen. It makes the most sense to me. They have been collaborating for awhile now and I see where Margaret Arakawa was at Nvda for 7 years before coming to Ionq . There is no big advertising campaign for IonQ. Why waste the money if they are being acquired. Right. Jensen stacked up a big pile of cash over the summer for something. He needs to diversify badly. Ionq could be his salvation out of being a one trick pony, or a one hit wonder if you will. Think of how powerful Nvda would be with ionQ’s over 600 patents, and nvda’s chips. Wow!! The added rev from IonQ machines and data centers etc etc could take Nvda over 1,000.00 again Elizabeth has smoke coming out of her ears, but she’ll get over it. We’re about to be acquired by someone, and Nvda is my bet. Hang in there everyone. The show is about to start. Keep your eye on IonQ.
👍️ 3
Konaploinks Konaploinks 23 hours ago
IonQ has developed a significant patent portfolio that underscores its leadership in quantum computing technology. As of December 2024, the company holds over 600 issued and pending U.S. and international patents, which focus on innovations that enhance performance, scalability, and enterprise-grade capabilities.

Key patents highlight advancements in quantum circuit optimization, laser-based ion control, error mitigation techniques, and scalable architectures. Notable examples include a patent for a “Double Individual-Addressing Multi-Beam Raman System,” which improves ion trap control by introducing multiple laser beams for precise operation, and a patent for “Amplitude, Frequency, and Phase Modulated Entangling Gates,” which enhances the control of laser beams for gate operations ? ?.

Additionally, IonQ is expanding its intellectual property base through the acquisition of Qubitekk’s 118 patents, further solidifying its technical and competitive position ? ?.

This extensive patent activity reflects IonQ’s commitment to advancing the field of quantum computing and scaling its systems to meet complex commercial and research challenges.
👍️0
Konaploinks Konaploinks 1 day ago
Doc I think he’s going to have to fight Gates, Benioff and Dell not to mention a ton of other billionaires for IonQ We got the goods/ patents. Not to mention our patent machines. I think we could simply market them as patent machines 😱. Tammy! Why not!
👍️0
doc2016 doc2016 1 day ago
all they've got to do is get an audience with berkshire hathaway. warren has the billions in cash ready for the right spend. a deal including ionq and a few others would solidify his fund and legend and place in history of usa. wags. gates and folks can give him the skinny and what it's going to take for usa to payoff it's debt and make money for generations to come while being healthier both in usa and the world......
👍️0
TheDane TheDane 2 days ago
It feels better knowing I’m not alone.
👍️ 1
Konaploinks Konaploinks 2 days ago
A poison pill is a defensive strategy that a public company uses to prevent a hostile takeover. It's also known as a shareholder rights plan.
A poison pill works by:
Giving shareholders the right to buy more stock at a discount, usually when a hostile bidder announces an intention to buy a certain percentage of the company's stock
Making it more expensive for the hostile bidder to buy shares
Diluting the hostile bidder's ownership stake in the company
The goal of a poison pill is to make the company less appealing to the hostile bidder and to give the company time to evaluate the offer. It can also give the company leverage to negotiate directly with the bidder.
A company might adopt a poison pill if it's concerned about being taken over, or if it has significant net operating losses. For example, in 2018, Papa John's adopted a poison pill to prevent ousted founder John Schnatter from gaining control of the company.
The name "poison pill" comes from the idea that spies would carry a poison pill in case they were captured by enemies.
👍️ 1
Konaploinks Konaploinks 2 days ago
Ponderosa. Yep. It’s just a mere formality , just for starters. This latest 8 k just beefed up their wallets. As far as the corp I believe new 8 k’s are being drafted. Gotta take care of mom and dad first. Right! Now I’d like to see a ton of preferred shares issued at some crazy high price each, that any acquirer would have to pay for. That is a poison pill. And it protects the shareholders. Someone or some group is and has been acquiring shares. Over 500,000 right before the close on Friday. Not chump change. IonQ has a lot to buy. The patents. Four proven models. The brain trust. The factory. The Quantum software. The Quantum network. The Quantum cloud i e data centers The Quantum LLM’s . The Quantum ML. IonQ’s current partnerships and accusition of Qubitek. Not to mention all of our current clients leasing time at our data centers. We already have the whole ball of wax and it’s all run by the finest team of scientists and managers in the world. IonQ is bigger than you can imagine. The big boys see this and want in. I’ve said it before. I think a hui has been formed. A partnership if you will. There will have to be some kind of agreement to basically keep everything and everyone in place but they take over the ownership. This is possible and the easiest solution imo to get the billions in funding needed to truly take the quantum leap out in front of all competition and make IonQ ubiquitous in the industry. IonQ could be the next IBM, APPLE, MSFT, AMZ ,NVDA, INTEL etc etc all rolled into one. Quantum is no longer coming. Quantum is here. I think a bidding war is about to start or , has it already started? Keep your eye on. IonQ .
👍️ 3
longboard251 longboard251 2 days ago
You guys pumped the entire first page of the board on friday... congrats
👍️ 1 🤣 1
THEBEASTMUGABI THEBEASTMUGABI 2 days ago
It's my understanding they already have big sharks investing, though be it in the millions? I don't have the billionaires mind and do not know what it's like just to throw around millions of dollars.  But the ones that have invested are impressive.   But :   Who knows, to me and you it's like buying a house.  To them it's like driving trough Starbucks to get a cup of coffee.  
👍️ 2
PonderosaPack PonderosaPack 2 days ago
Not sure it's a poison pill - most of the big dogs can gulp that and maybe get indigestion at the most - but certainly it's a barrier. These folks at IONQ are some serious folks bent on being bad ass in Quantum. IMO But they may need some big swingers to put in a couple billion to make it to the end goal. not sure IonQ has the big hammer that is needed. we shall see. lots of big sharks out there.
👍️ 1
PonderosaPack PonderosaPack 2 days ago
got it
👍️0
PonderosaPack PonderosaPack 2 days ago
Kona - If I am reading you correctly - you are stating that these statements are to protect IonQ? I believe this verbiage is for that purpose.
👍️0
Konaploinks Konaploinks 2 days ago
Every shareholder needs to read the 8 k that I copied and pasted a few posts back. . Take it point by point. There must be some , maybe many buyout offers being submitted imo This is probably just the first of a few 8 k’s to set up a poison pill for any hostile takeover etc. The next should be about the issuance of preferred shares at a super high price. Then there could be other 8 k’s to widen the moat , if you will. Exciting times for all longs for sure. Keep your eye on IonQ
👍️ 1
Jack Torrance Jack Torrance 2 days ago
Indeed it's coming fast. It really puts into perspective how stagnant that 2005-2020 era was. Sure we got faster laptops and cool cell phones and huge flatscreen TVs, but it really represented a technological plateau of sorts. We have essentially reached the limit of what classical computer chips can give us. To achieve a radical advancement from here, quantum and A.I. is needed.

As far as IonQ goes. If there is a quiet time between now and AQ64, where the share price slowly slides down, I will plan on adding. I don't like averaging up, but if it comes to that, I will.
👍️ 1
PonderosaPack PonderosaPack 2 days ago
I got involved in NVDA in 2015 because of gaming. then I became wise to the fact of AI - now I realize AI needs more power and robots are coming and classical chips are not going to be capable of the need after that. So I know we may get kicked in the teeth a couple times with naysayers - but I'm ok with all that because all them people that didn't see NVDA don't see IONQ. but they will soon enough.

I personally am dropping more down on the table next week for IONQ - I ride the ladder up and don't fret about what I lost not buying earlier - but I enjoy my gain. I see the future - and it's bright. it's coming and its coming fast.
👍️ 2
Konaploinks Konaploinks 2 days ago
Homework. The 8 k skinny. Then we’ll take a deep dive class . My take. A merger , buyout or hostile takeover is about to happen.

Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers.
Amended Severance Plan and Amendment to Performance Based Award Agreements
On December 3, 2024, the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of IonQ, Inc. (the “Company”) adopted an amendment to the Company’s Executive Severance Plan (previously named our Change in Control Severance Plan) (the “Plan”) to make certain changes to the Plan which was previously adopted by the Board on July 22, 2021. The Plan provides for certain severance payments and benefits to eligible executives, including each of the Company’s named executive officers, in the event that the Company terminates the employment of an eligible executive without Cause (as defined in the Plan) or if an eligible executive resigns with Good Reason (as defined in the Plan) in qualifying circumstances (such termination or resignation, a “Covered Termination”).
The material terms of the Plan, which is filed as Exhibit 10.36 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-4/A (File No. 333-254840) with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on August 5, 2021, remain unchanged by the amendment, except that (1) any termination occurring following the Change in Control Period (as defined in the Plan) will not qualify as a Covered Termination; (2) in a Covered Termination occurring prior to a Change in Control, an eligible executive will be eligible to receive his or her target annual bonus and pro-rated target annual bonus for the year in which the Covered Termination occurs and acceleration of his or her unvested time-based vesting equity awards; (3) the mere conversion of the Company to a subsidiary, division or unit of an acquiring entity in connection with a Change in Control (as defined in the Plan), or a change in the eligible executive’s reporting relationships or title following a Change in Control, will continue to not be deemed a material diminution of the duties, authority or responsibilities of an eligible executive in and of itself for the purposes of the definition of Good Reason, except in the case of our Chief Executive Officer; (4) the relocation of an eligible executive’s primary work location will not represent Good Reason if the eligible executive is permitted to work from home; and (5) in a Covered Termination occurring upon or within 12 months following a Change in Control, an eligible executive will be eligible to receive his or her pro-rated target annual bonus for the year in which the Covered Termination occurs.
The foregoing description of the Amended Plan is qualified in its entirety by reference to the Executive Severance Plan and Summary Plan Description, a copy of which is filed as Exhibit 10.1 to this Current Report on Form 8-K and is incorporated by reference herein.
Additionally, on December 3, 2024, the Board approved an amendment (the “Amendment”) to each of the Company’s outstanding Performance Based Award Agreements, which include agreements with each of the Company’s named executive officers (the “Award Agreements”), to provide that (1) the methodology for determining the number performance stock units (“PSUs”) that will accelerate in the case of an Involuntary Termination (as defined in the Award Agreement) upon or within 12 months following a Change in Control (as defined in the Award Agreement) will be the greater of (x) the target number of PSUs under the award or (y) based on projected performance achievement, provided that the satisfaction of the stock price hurdle will continue to apply, and (2) the definition of Good Reason for the purposes of the Award Agreement will be the same definition used in the Plan.
The foregoing description of the Amendment is qualified in its entirety by reference to the form of Award Agreement (as amended), a copy of which is filed as Exhibit 10.2 to this Current Report on Form 8-K and is incorporated by reference herein.
.
.
👍️0
moondogaz moondogaz 2 days ago
Your right. $100+ in a blink of an eye..
👍️ 1
Jack Torrance Jack Torrance 2 days ago
I laugh at all these technology prognosticators. Notice how their predictions never change, even though years have passed? For instance, about 10 years ago, everyone would say quantum computers are the future but they're about 10 years out. Well, 10 years have passed, and quantum computers, even if not fully developed to their utmost potential, are here NOW. They are not 10 years out, or 15 years out. They literally exist now, are doing computations now, and are earning revenue now. Government agencies are starting to invest. The US government is starting to build a quantum network to stay ahead of other countries.

And the worst part is, that you see so many people still parroting these old sayings everywhere on the internet: in comment threads, forums, etc... Hello, 2014 called and they want their sayings back. It's 2025 in a couple weeks, and a lot of this "future tech" from years past is literally here. We have rockets going into space and landing back on launch pads with zero damage. Satellite internet. Self driving cars. A.I.-piloted fighter jets. That inflection point in technology that everyone talked about in decades past is upon us. I firmly believe that the next 15 years or so will see more advancement in technology than the past 150 years.
👍️0
Konaploinks Konaploinks 2 days ago
If a buyout. We should take no less than half cash and half stock in the acquiring company. Better off 40% cash, 60% stock. The acquiring company will have all the patent protection and will go on for years as the leader in quantum. No way in hell all cash. Peter and the BoD need to have millions of high dollar preferred shares for any acquirer to swallow first. If they are not already in place, they need to get it done. Presto! We’re all sittin pretty. Hang tight longs!.
👍️ 1
THEBEASTMUGABI THEBEASTMUGABI 2 days ago
I've read possibly 5 years myself. But who knows.  Uncharted territory here.  👍💰. Hopefully. 
👍️0
PonderosaPack PonderosaPack 2 days ago
Agree - I still believe it's a buy at $38. The potential is there. If it dips to the 20s from lack of momentum - I'll still pick it up. Heck - Im picking up more in the 30s here and there. One day I hope I kick myself I didn't get more in the 40s - and I'm sure I will. the next 18 months will be a wild ride for sure. I'm loaded for bear. I'll be here in any case. Quantum is not projected to take hold until 2035 - so the really smart AI models say ... LOL All the smart AI models also say IonQ will be worth $25 in 2035 ... haha. SMH
👍️0
Jack Torrance Jack Torrance 2 days ago
Agree on all counts. One thing that's for sure, the next 18 months or so are going to be a wild ride, whatever happens.
👍️ 2
PonderosaPack PonderosaPack 2 days ago
Good Job Jack - congrats for the foresight. I was in late around $5-6 - but recently got busy in past 6 months. Hats off to you for the long haul. I saw something 12 years ago about Quantum - so I had my eye on it. You got in way before me and I'm sure that first 3 years was brutal. so hats off to you. I agree - would suck if it got bought out for peanuts. Too much potential here. When it comes - gunna be large beyond what anyone understands. I just hope this video you show does not preclude a potential executive bail out plan. Personally I believe this language is to protect the Executives in case stuff goes south and not as planned. Smart move IMO. I do believe IONQ will need $ to make it big time at the current burn rate. the patents are the barrier of entrance. IONQ is crushing it for the IP. everyone can see that. Im long - and I know this investment is solid gold.
👍️ 2
Jack Torrance Jack Torrance 2 days ago
True. I am realistic. I just want a great outcome for us investors, especially the longs. If there is a buyout, I would prefer shares in the acquiring company over cash, since the acquiring company will become the defacto lead quantum computing company with all IonQ's tech and employee talent. Even a mega-cap like Nvidia would grow immensely if they take over quantum computing and quantum networking in the near-future.
👍️ 2
PonderosaPack PonderosaPack 2 days ago
From Q3 call - 18 months was when the projected net income turns black. With this analysis video you showed Jack is a potential acquisition. However - 18 months is a lifetime in Quantum - and so much can happen. One way or the other. Why all these companies investing all this money into Quantum? they realize its coming and IonQ is a perfect target. Possibly the change in executive compensation is a way to again build more to that moat - for protection of the people and to dissuade any easy acquisition without positive outcome for shareholders - and mainly the IONQ team. all speculation - but i don't think personally that IONQ wants to give up the shake and bake easy. They are making quick moves and making things happen. But they may need that big hammer to see the dream to dominate. just thoughts.
👍️ 2
Jack Torrance Jack Torrance 2 days ago
Yeah, I think it would be mental if IonQ is acquired for about $12 billion. I don't see any scenario where that happens. No use in selling for that price. This is one of THE biggest start-ups humankind may ever see. Quantum computing will launch technology and communication into the next evolution of the human species. No way they sell for peanuts like that. Absolutely zero chance, IMO.

I will also add, that I have been an IonQ investor for 4 years on Feb 1st of next year. If I wake up one day, and there is cash in my trading account and all my IonQ shares have been taken by some big tech giant, I will be super pissed. I want my 100x from here. That's where IonQ is going if it all pans out. If there is a buyout, we might get a 3x, or a 5x, or a 10x maybe. But our gain will not be as big, for sure.
👍️ 1
PonderosaPack PonderosaPack 2 days ago
A couple more contracts will fix that problem. The longer it runs - the more patents acquired - the more interest and practical applications with results - IonQ will keep rolling. So an acquisition soon seems imminent. The longer IonQ runs - the more value and I realize the IonQ team also realized they are a target for acquisition and not going to give away the farm. more patents coming. More contracts are in the works. Cash is there for a longer run way. so maybe in summer of 2025 or Q3-4 2025 if things don't align exactly as planned - an acquisition may be in store. time will tell.
👍️ 1

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock