ParkerVision Inc (QB) (PRKR) News

The fact is this judge is looking for any way to kick PRKR to the curb. He probably knew he would be overturned on appeal but assumed PRKR would simply go away. The big tech companies support politicians who view patent trolls like PRKR as harning innovation. Those politicians appoint judges with a similar opinion. That is why the judges look for any legal way to dismiss patent trolls infringement cases. The appeals court told the judge exactly what he needs to do to get rid of PRKR and implied they would not intervene. The appeals court said the Markman hearing must be held first before the case can be dismissed. The Markman hearing and subsequent ruling defines the patent and infringement. This judge will simply accept QCOMs claim construction where the terms of the patent are defined so as they do not infringe. I have seen this with other patent trolls. I even saw 1 judge give a favorable Markman ruling for a troll and the troll won then in another trials Markman ruling define the patent terms so there was no infringement. The troll lost that case. That judge ended up going to work for Facebook! lol. That is why I say with PRKR SELL the pops! IMO!

With potential damages in the billions it may be trading at call option value. Given that it has been sent back to the court there is now a higher probability of a settlement... which could be hundreds of millions / multiples of the current market cap.

There will be no trial until MAYBE 2025 then that takes YEARS. Even if you somehow win with a jury the judge would just throw out the verdict like your last attempt to sue QCOM back in 2014. Then comes the inevitable YEARS of appeals. Maybe even another US Patent Office reexam since they seem to grant most of them! That takes YEARS. The system is completely against "patent trolls" (non practicing entities). The politicians who get money from the big tech companies are appointing judges who share their opinion that patent trolls harm innovation and need to be sidelined. That is why the judge in the QCOM2 case tossed PRKR out of court. They recently won in appeals court and now the case will continue but that same judge will find another technicality to toss your case. I would sell the pop if I were you. PRKR has had a few pops over its life and you would have been wise to sell them.

Anyone have a timeline on next steps in the case since DC court of appeals sent it back for trial in Florida on September 6th?

$PRKR
$PRKR Exploded yesterday on strong volume..held most of its gains..see if can continue from here and start to build a strong base on the chart.. pic.twitter.com/61HbEKmxhj— Chris from Massachusetts AKA TommyboyTrader (@autumnsdad1) September 7, 2024

Time to poach another patent.

25M settlement today

We're getting close now. Seems like a real long shot but I believe Parker has a good case.
https://stocktwits.com/allsystemsgo/message/507461207

Does anybody have a link to their court dates?

Does anybody have a link to their court dates?

Bought, sold and rebought 3x's more. Waiting for a bigger bounce!

Going to bounce over 40 cents. Buy now.

Pharker Vision.

https://www.accesswire.com/685302/PTAB-Issues-Rulings-in-ParkerVision-IPRs-Filed-by-Intel

What the status of this company and the infringement case?

Sorry about that just transferred that link from ipad to iphone via this board as nobody was really using the board. feel free to delete it. l’ve looked at parker. it will possibly do well but felt nlst a bigger fish.

$PRKR Has my attention now..check it out..
https://twitter.com/QuabbinR/status/1419282098247114754?s=20

moving up after positive Markman ruling

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/parkervision-receives-second-favorable-markman-120000762.html

https://www.reddit.com/r/NLST/comments/oox68r/next_7_to_10_days/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf

DICE,
Victory #1. This is the first building block leading to the big $. X5, X10, X20. Sweet Street by this time next yr.

ParkerVision Secures Patent License and Settlement Agreement with Buffalo, Inc.

This bodes very well for their other patent infringement cases

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/parkervision-secures-patent-license-settlement-123000807.html

DICE,
I bought more PRKR in the past 2 wks. PRKR is in hibernation now but will come back to life in April or May when case is set for trial ). Last week another Texas Eastern District court found in favor of a small co. ( VLSI ) $2 billion verdict against Intel for patent infringement. Our cases could be HUGE.

I bought 10,750 shares at 54 cents each, not long before the Markman ruling, and am up almost $14k. It’s still way way undervalued. Looking forward to this ride.

DICE,
Just got this URL. Spread this URL

https://www.reddit.com/r/wallstreetbets/comments/l6a05v/prkr_parkervision_rallying_with_favorable_ruling/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf



https://www.reddit.com/r/investing/comments/l65gqi/stock_idea_parkervision_prkr/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf

DICE,
I am so surprised that no one post here. This will be the best stock play this yr. PRKR will win all lawsuits and that means billions w/ only 80 million shares outstanding.

I think you’re right. We ma see north of $10 very soon. Should be a fun ride. The more north the better.

DICE,
Here we go . Surprised that no one here. $2.00 tomorrow. Trial starts on Monday. Look for an out of court settlement. $5. coming

MEL,
Great info. Thanks. I am buying more shares next week. $1. = $10.

Here are some eye-opening numbers published by Intro-act:

https://www.intro-act.com/uploads/profile_documents/T5Q3LYU8OFMPPRKR_Update_012721.pdf

ParkerVision wins favorable Marmkan ruling vs Intel.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/finance.yahoo.com/amphtml/news/texas-court-markman-ruling-favorable-113000670.html

MEL,
PRKR ready to start to get ruling any day. Load up. Could double any day and really explode in May or April. Eastern District Court of Texas is called the ROCKET DOCKET. Filed one day and a ruling the next day. Billions coming in rulings. Look at the recent ruling out of ED. Apple had to pay over $1 billion + to another small company.

I think it was when ParkerVision hired Louis Freeh a former Director of the FBI, that I really took notice of how this could possibly play-out.

https://www.accesswire.com/548273/Louis-Freeh-and-Freeh-Sporkin-Sullivan-LLP-Join-ParkerVision-Litigation-Team

GLTA do your own DD.

There is an excellent background article called "ParkerVision's Day in Court Coming Soon," by Karl Egeland Published by Tailwinds here:
https://twresearchgroup.com/2020/05/parkervisions-day-in-court-coming-soon/

Parkervision visit the main website here: https://www.parkervision.com/

Here you go: https://www.accesswire.com/607778/ParkerVision-Files-Against-Hisense-for-Patent-Infringement

As we move into the fall/winter there may be further developments regarding PRKRs patent litigation.

For a really good backgrounder: https://tailwindsresearch.com/?s=ParkerVision

Nice little gap to fill up at 2.25

BUX,
Do not be surprised to see a $billion.+ There are multiple lawsuits in the works. Look at the Apple lawsuit settlement of $2.5 billion w/ someone else on patent infringement. Parker is a genius w many patents.I think that 50 cents becomes $5. per share at the minimum. Qualcom has the $ and may settle out of court just to made it go away. However, PRKR is also suing many other companies using the stolen patent ( intellectual property ). The recent ruling was huge. The former FBI director Louis Freeh is the lead attorney.

How valuable do expect the settlements to be?

BUX,
I had sold my position before. However, I am going tobuy back in because the upside can be X10. PRKR will win the case in Florida as well as the case in West Texas. The big boys will settle.

N I C E


ParkerVision Receives Favorable Markman Order in Patent Infringement Action Against Qualcomm and HTC

Thursday, April 30, 2020 9:00 AM

JACKSONVILLE, FL / ACCESSWIRE / April 30, 2020 / ParkerVision, Inc. (OTCQB:PRKR) announced today that the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida (Orlando division) issued its patent claim construction ruling, or Markman Order, in the ongoing patent infringement action between ParkerVision and Qualcomm, Inc. (QCOM) and HTC. The court adopted ParkerVision's position as to the proper interpretation of the majority of the key terms in dispute in the litigation.

The parties identified a total of ten disputed claim terms. The court's order adopted ParkerVision's proposed construction for seven of the disputed terms and adopted a slightly modified version of ParkerVision's proposed construction for the remaining three terms.

In a Markman Order, the presiding district court sets out the meaning of specific disputed terms that appear in the asserted patent claims. The court reviews written briefs and hears oral arguments from the patent holder and the alleged infringer each of whom makes recommendations to the court as to how the disputed terms should be defined. The court then issues a Markman Order, also known as the claim construction ruling, in which the court determines how each term is to be construed. The court's claim constructions are then applied in motions and at trial in the determinations of patent infringement and validity.

Jeffrey Parker, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of ParkerVision stated, "We are pleased with the court's Markman Order, and we remain confident in our position concerning Qualcomm's infringement of the patent claims at issue in this case. We believe the court's Markman Order is another significant step towards the successful resolution of this litigation."

This patent infringement action, filed in May 2014, alleges that certain Qualcomm and HTC product infringe numerous claims of four patents owned by ParkerVision. The parties originally filed claim construction briefs in June 2015 and presented arguments in a claim construction hearing in August 2015. Prior to the court's ruling, the case was stayed pending resolution of other actions. After the stay was lifted in 2019, additional briefs were filed by the parties and a second claim construction hearing was held in November 2019. The case is currently scheduled for trial commencing December 1, 2020.

About ParkerVision

ParkerVision, Inc. has designed, developed, and patented proprietary radio-frequency (RF) technologies which enable advanced wireless solutions for current and next-generation wireless communication products. ParkerVision is engaged in a number of patent enforcement actions to protect patented rights that it believes are broadly infringed by others. For more information, please visit www.parkervision.com

Safe Harbor Statement
This press release contains forward-looking information. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any such forward-looking statements, each of which speaks only as of the date made. Such statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties which are disclosed in the Company's SEC reports, including the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019. These risks and uncertainties could cause actual results to differ materially from those currently anticipated or projected.

CONTACT:

Cindy Poehlman
Chief Financial Officer
ParkerVision, Inc.
904-732-6100
[email protected]

SOURCE: ParkerVision, Inc.
SHARE ARTICLE

https://www.accesswire.com/587730/ParkerVision-Receives-Favorable-Markman-Order-in-Patent-Infringement-Action-Against-Qualcomm-and-HTC

What do you guys think about today's news from PRKR?

AXLE,
PRKR filed suit today against Intel for patent infringement. Big bucks coming,

Stock,
PRKR will go 10X or 15X bagger this summer. Apple just paid a $1.5 billion patent infringementPRKR will win against Qualcomm and Apple.

Parkervision Financing

Parkervision Inc, Corporation just released form D announcing $930,000 debt financing. This is a new filing. Parkervision was able to fundraise $930,000. That is 100.00 % of the round of financing. The total offering amount was $930,000. The financing form was filed on 2019-07-30. The reason for the financing was: The Company issued convertible notes in an aggregate principal amount of $750,000. The Company issued warrants to purchase 1,800,000 shares of common stock as a nonrefundable retainer for consulting services

Analysis of Parkervision Offering"

On average, companies in the Telecommunications sector, sell 85.70 % of the total offering amount. Parkervision sold 100.00 % of the offering. Could this mean that the trust in Parkervision is high? The average fundraising size for companies in the Telecommunications industry is $125,000. The total amount raised is 644.00 % bigger than the average for companies in the Telecommunications sector. The minimum investment for this financing is set at $0. If you know more about the reasons for the fundraising, please comment below.

Why Fundraising Reporting Is Good For Parkervision Also:

The Form D signed by Cynthia L Poehlman might help Parkervision Inc’s sector. First, it helps potential customers feel more safe to deal with a firm that is well financed. The odds are higher that it will stay in the business. Second, this could attract other investors such as venture-capital firms, fund


https://makdaily.com/parkervision-930000-fundraising-cynthia-l-poehlman-published-jul-30-d-form/

i copied and pasted the offical court filing from today. it is scheduled to go to trial august 2020 if there isnt a settlement beforehand.

Trial set August 2020?

The pacer is separate from? If so a pr is forthcoming?

""These decisions pave the way for a jury trial in this case, and a proposed trial schedule is required to be submitted by the parties by July 30, 2019."

https://ecf.flmd.uscourts.gov/doc1/047120432513


UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
JACKSONVILLE DIVISION
PARKERVISION, INC., ))
Plaintiff, ))
v. ) Case No. 3:15-cv-1477-J-39JBT
)
APPLE INC., et al., ))
Defendants. ))
CASE MANAGEMENT REPORT
I. Background
The Court issued its Markman Order on July 15, 2019. Dkt. No. 151. Prior to the
Markman Order, the parties completed the exchange of information required under Fed.
R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1).
II. Schedule
The parties have met and conferred regarding a schedule and have agreed on the
following dates pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f), Local Rule 3.05(c), and this Court’s
Order of July 15, 2019. This proposed schedule includes the remaining deadlines
necessary before reaching a possible trial:
Event Parties’ Proposal
Final Infringement Contentions September 27, 2019
Final Invalidity Contentions October 25, 2019
Close of Fact Discovery December 20, 2019
Expert Reports of Parties with Burden of Proof,
including Secondary Considerations
January 31, 2020
Rebuttal Expert Reports February 28, 2020
Event Parties’ Proposal
Completion of Expert Witness Depositions March 27, 2020
Final Day for Filing Dispositive Motions,
Daubert/Kumho Tire Motions
April 17, 2020
Final Day to Respond to Dispositive and
Daubert/Kumho Tire Motions
May 8, 2020
Motions in Limine July 1, 2020
Pretrial Statement July 8, 2020
Pretrial Conference July 15, 2020
Trial Term August 2020
III. Protective Order
The parties are currently discussing a confidentiality agreement among the parties
that is intended to cover future document productions and replace the protective order
that governed the production of documents in the ITC investigation.
IV. Meeting of Parties
Lead counsel shall meet in person or, upon agreement of all parties, by telephone.
(If all parties agree to conduct the case management conference by telephone, they may
do so without filing a motion with the Court.) Pursuant to Local Rule 3.05(c)(2)(B) or
(c)(3)(A), a telephonic meeting occurred on July 29, 2019, and was attended by counsel
for all parties

these are upcoming court dates from pacer document that was posted today.