AtlasQ
8 hours ago
Honestly most of my posts are usually sarcastic posts against what I feel is "deception"
If I feel (assume) that someone is trying to deceive with their posts about 5000% 10,000% Gains, I get bothered and make sarcastic comments.
My same approach happened towards Vivos contradicting posts about timelines, it felt like we were being deceived and I got bothered and became sarcastic/whiny.
Like I said before, I don't have MK headshot as my screensaver, I do care for the science but like everyone else, I invested for Gains and for some of y'all 7-10 years could be a norm, but to me is an eternity.
We all process information differently. From the beginning you got me mixed up with someone else, and you have been incorrect with your conclusions about why I post. Not trying to convince you. I could care less
AtlasQ
11 hours ago
ChatGPT being sill today
Subject: Radiogelβs Legendary Timeline β A Masterpiece of Precision!
Ah, fellow shareholders, gather βround! Itβs that time again when we get to marvel at the sheer artistry of βnear futureβ timelines. Who needs rigid deadlines when we can bask in the ambiguity of soon-ish, almost there, and just around the corner?
Rest assured, the masters of expectation management have spoken: the IDE submission remains on track! (A track that, much like a scenic train ride, has plenty of unexpected detours, breathtaking views of delays, and an occasional missing bridge.)
Whatβs next, you ask? Well, updates will flow as information becomes availableβwhich, judging by past patterns, is as predictable as a meteor shower. Stay tuned, stay hopeful, and above all, stay patient. After all, precision is overrated when you can simply embrace the mystery of the near future!
Gobsmacked01
16 hours ago
All just my opinion, but I like to link to help DD and ask others to do the same to up the overall education game/discussion.
Form 10Q filed with SEC for Q End dated 09/30/2024
Go to Item 2, scroll down to "Financing and Strategy". Its a good read, imo. 3rd paragraph from the bottom of page 21, specifically, makes a reference to Class 2 vs Class 3 or otherwise FDA approval subject to whatever FDA goes with. This implies to me that Class 2 is on the table for discussion with FDA and I understand we have had our final FDA Sprint meeting.
Radiogel Feb 2025
Again, I just express my opinion here same as everyone else. Does this help you understand my opinion better?
As for my bright future opinion? I am unaware of ANY Class 2 FDA approved Brachytherapy Device in this $30 Billion industry (depending on whether you use 8-11% cancer market share and/or 5-8% CAGR) so while some of the over 3000 Class 3 Brachytherapy devices will always have uses moving forward, a very favorable FDA Class 2 ruling would put our Breakthrough Device Designated product into a market class all its own... with Isopet as a corporate division and future Alpha gel, etc... for additional growth beyond the roughly 16-18 revenue verticals being unlocked potentially in India this year....
Orrrr, maybe I'm wrong n we just all turn the lights out n go home this year, lol, just saying "Time Will Tell"
-Go $RDGL
Gobsmacked01
17 hours ago
The "sticky wicket" with FDA is still Class II device vs Class III, imho.
FDA Class Examples
I think Vivos claims we are as safe or safer than a simple Cardiac Pacemaker or a Defibrillator (Class II),
but all Brachytherapy devices approved so far are at Class 3 like an infusion pump or implantable pacemaker; likely due to the glass/polyresin/metal beads and/or glue etc used to deliver the radiation dose (which our product DOES NOT use).
As a result, the Cost/Benefit data used by FDA for a new Brachytherapy may arguably not really apply to our product and the Human Trials for safety combined with anecdotal data from Isopet and the successful Rabbit and genotoxicity write ups are essential for identifying more reasonable cost/benefit data.
In other words, we could have had Class 3 approval some time ago, imho, because all the IDE needed data is done but by continuing to press for a Class 2 the FDA response has been to favor more info to prove the Class level upgrade. FDA'S 1st chance to indicate acceptance as Class 2 is possible would be the 30 day post injection Human Clinical Trial preliminary data.
All in my opinion, of course, but by July 1, I think the 1st 5 patients data from our 1st Human Clinical Trial is complete, described, and published in a peer reviewed journal by end of year. This could be true for significantly more than 5 Humans treated.
Feb 2025 PR on IDE Human Trial milestones
If FDA really just needs human safety data before they can approve Human Safety trials as a Class II (truly a cleft stick/ Catch 22), then I think Good data is available now, better data is planned by Fourth of July holiday and the data is literally as good as it gets by end of year.
It looks to me as though whether or not FDA ever approves our product, we are on track to produce revenue all year from Isopet clinics with an International expansion into and across Human treatment populations by year's end. I think the market generally looks 6 months ahead, so June 2025 could see Human Clinical Trial safety results published Phase 1/2 from India that may trigger investor interest.
It looks to me like domestic US 3 letter govt agencies are experiencing some volatility for budget and political reasons that levels out around March 2025 when a new budget plan gets done and it then defines some political decisions moving forward. Since March is next week and some investors might prefer buying low to sell high I think we see a general uptrend in share price over the next 2 months subject to spikes up for good news and dips for bad or neutral news... imho. If all goes well, I would not be surprised to see a repeat of the Winter/Spring 2012 chart regarding market driven share prices for this share structure.
Thoughts, anyone?
I think the future is so bright, I gotta wear shades
-Go $RDGL
CatfishHunter
17 hours ago
From what I was told by someone from Vivos, the India clinical data was not expected by FDA to submit the IDE. However, because the clinical trials India have started, it was determined that by submitting data from the India trials, it would strengthen the submission, when that happens. And as there will be no more Sprint meetings, I assuming Vivos wants to make sure they have as strong as application as possible before the final submission.
We just don't know what the qualifier is for "sufficient clinical data" Vivos feels they need which dictates the timeline.