WTXR West Texas Resources Inc (PK)

 

 

FORM 10-Q

 

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

x

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the Quarterly Period Ended December 31, 2015

 

OR

 

o

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the transition period from             to             .

 

Commission file number: 333-178437

 

West Texas Resources, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

Nevada		99-0365272
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification no.)

 

5729 Lebanon Road, Suite 144

Frisco, Texas  75034

(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)

 

(972) 712-2154

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

 

Not Applicable

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes x No o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  Yes x No o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act):

 

Large accelerated filer o		Accelerated filer o
Non-accelerated filer o		Smaller reporting company x
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes o No x

 

As of February 12, 2016, there were outstanding 15,938,908 shares of the common stock of West Texas Resources, Inc.

 

 

 

		Page
	PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.	Financial Statements	3
	Balance Sheets	3
	Statements of Operations	4
	Statements of Cash Flows	5
	Notes to Financial Statements	6
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	15
	General	15
	Results of Operations	16
	Financial Condition	17
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	18
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	18
	PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
Item 6.	Exhibits	19

 

 

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION

 

Item 1.     Financial Statements

 

West Texas Resources, Inc.

 

BALANCE SHEETS

 

 

		December 31,				September 30,
		2015				2015
		(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Current Assets
Cash		$	82,815			$	142,762
Total Current Assets			82,815				142,762
Oil and gas properties, using successful efforts accounting			217,433				217,433
TOTAL ASSETS		$	300,248			$	360,195
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current Liabilities
Accrued expenses		$	152,896			$	161,370
Payroll liabilities			–				978
Investment payable			13,600				13,600
Lease payable			5,000				5,000
Asset retirement obligation			10,000				10,000
Shareholder advances			42,000				45,000
Other payable			49,621				40,414
Total Current Liabilities			273,117				276,362
Commitments and Contingencies
Shareholders' Equity
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued and outstanding			–				–
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 200,000,000 shares authorized; 14,515,400 and 14,515,400 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2015 and September 30, 2015, respectively			14,515				14,515
Additional paid-in capital			1,957,635				1,947,896
Common stock issuable			501,754				501,754
Accumulated deficit			(2,446,773	)			(2,380,332	)
Total Shareholders' Equity			27,131				83,833
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY		$	300,248			$	360,195

 

 

See accompanying notes to these financial statements

 

 

West Texas Resources, Inc.

 

UNAUDITED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

 

 

		For the Three Months Ended December 31,
		2015				2014
Revenues
Oil and gas sales		$	–			$	64,339
General and administrative expenses			65,930				128,121
Operating Loss			(65,930	)			(63,782	)
Other income (expenses)
Interest expense			(511	)			(4,393	)
Amortization of debt discount			–				(63,610	)
Other income			–				30,000
Loss Before Income Taxes			(66,441	)			(101,785	)
Tax provision			–				–
Net Loss		$	(66,441	)		$	(101,785	)
Loss per share
Basic and diluted weighted average number of common shares outstanding			14,515,400				14,415,400
Basic and diluted net loss per share		$	(0.00	)		$	(0.01	)

 

 

See accompanying notes to these financial statements

 

 

West Texas Resources, Inc.

 

UNAUDITED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

 

 

		For the Three Months Ended December 31,
		2015				2014
Cash flows from operating activities
Net loss		$	(66,441	)		$	(101,785	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash from operating activities:
Stock-based compensation			9,739				–
Amortization of debt discount			–				83,610
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable			–				5,055
Payroll liabilities			(978	)			(561	)
Other payables			9,207				(3,000	)
Accrued expenses			(8,474	)			(15,878	)
Net cash used in operating activities			(56,947	)			(32,559	)
Cash flows from financing activities
Repayment on note payable			–				(66,005	)
Shareholder advances			(3,000	)			–
Net cash used in financing activities			(3,000	)			(66,005	)
Net decrease in cash			(59,947	)			(98,564	)
Cash, beginning of period			142,762				144,506
Cash, end of period		$	82,815			$	45,942
Supplemental cash flow disclosure:
Interest paid		$	511			$	4,393
Income taxes paid		$	–			$	–

 

 

See accompanying notes to these financial statements

 

 

WEST TEXAS RESOURCES, INC.

 

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

December 31, 2015 and 2014

 

 

1.	Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

 

Organization and business

 

West Texas Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) was incorporated under the laws of Nevada on December 9, 2010 under the name Texas Resources Energy, Inc., a Texas corporation. On June 30, 2011, the Company changed its name to West Texas Resources, Inc. The Company intends to engage in the acquisition, exploration and development of oil and gas properties in North America. From its inception, the Company has devoted its activities to developing a business plan, raising capital and acquiring operating assets.

 

Basis of presentation

 

The accompanying unaudited financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (U.S.) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 8-03 of Regulation S-X promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and reflect all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments and other adjustments, which management believes are necessary to fairly present the financial position, results of operations and cash flows of the Company, for the respective periods presented. The results of operations for an interim period are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for any other interim period or the year as a whole. The accompanying unaudited financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes for the year ended September 30, 2015.

 

Going concern

 

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (GAAP) that contemplate continuation of the Company as a going concern. The Company has not earned any significant revenues since inception. During the three months ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, the Company incurred a net loss of $66,441 and $101,785, respectively. In addition, the Company had an accumulative deficit of $2,446,773 and $2,380,332, as of December 31, 2015 and September 30, 2015, respectively. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

 

The Company will require up to $1 million of additional capital in order to fund its proposed operations over the next 12 months. Management plans to continue to seek sources of financing on favorable terms; however, there are no assurances that any such financing can be obtained on favorable terms, if at all.   Management expects to monitor and control the Company’s operating costs until cash is available through financing or operating activities.  There are no assurances that the Company will be successful in achieving these plans.  The Company anticipates that losses will continue until such time, if ever, as the Company is able to generate sufficient revenues to support its operations.

 

Oil and gas properties

 

The Company uses the successful efforts method of accounting for oil and gas producing activities. Costs to acquire mineral interests in oil and gas properties, to drill and equip exploratory wells that find proved reserves, to drill and equip development wells and related asset retirement costs are capitalized. Costs to drill exploratory wells that do not find proved reserves, geological and geophysical costs, and costs of carrying and retaining unproved properties are expensed.

 

Unproved oil and gas properties that are individually significant are periodically assessed for impairment of value, and a loss is recognized at the time of impairment by providing an impairment allowance. Other unproved properties are amortized based on the Company's experience of successful drilling and average holding period. Capitalized costs of producing oil and gas properties, after considering estimated residual salvage values, are depreciated and depleted by the unit-of-production method.  

 

On the sale or retirement of a complete unit of a proved property, the cost and related accumulated depreciation, depletion, and amortization are eliminated from the property accounts, and the resultant gain or loss is recognized. On the retirement or sale of a partial unit of proved property, the cost is charged to accumulated depreciation, depletion, and amortization with a resulting gain or loss recognized in income.  On the sale of an entire interest in an unproved property for cash or cash equivalent, gain or loss on the sale is recognized, taking into consideration the amount of any recorded impairment if the property had been assessed individually. If a partial interest in an unproved property is sold, the amount received is treated as a reduction of the cost of the interest retained.

 

 

WEST TEXAS RESOURCES, INC.

 

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

December 31, 2015 and 2014

 

 

Impairment of long-lived assets

 

The Company accounts for the impairment and disposition of long-lived assets in accordance with ASC 360-10-35, Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets. In accordance with ASC 360-10-35, long-lived assets are reviewed for events of changes in circumstances, which indicate that their carrying value may not be recoverable.

 

Asset retirement obligations 

 

ASC 410-20, Asset Retirement Obligations, clarifies that a legal obligation to perform an asset retirement activity in which the timing and/or method of settlement are conditional on a future event that may or may not be within the control of the entity. The obligation to perform the asset retirement activity is unconditional even though uncertainty exists about the timing and/or method of settlement. ASC 410-20 requires a liability to be recognized for the fair value of a conditional asset retirement obligation if the fair value of the liability can be reasonably estimated.

 

Except for the Eastland County investment, the asset retirement obligations for the other properties are recognized by the operators of these properties and deducted against the revenue interest of the Company.

 

Cash, cash equivalents, and other cash flow statement supplemental information

 

Cash is commonly considered to consist of currency and demand in deposits. The Company considers all liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less that are readily convertible into cash to be cash equivalents.  The Company places its cash with high credit quality financial institutions.  Accounts at these institutions are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) up to $250,000. The Company performs ongoing evaluations of these institutions to limit its concentration of risk exposure.  Management believes this risk is not significant due to the financial strength of the financial institutions utilized by the Company.

 

Use of estimates

 

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect certain reported amounts and disclosures.  Accordingly, actual results could differ from those estimates.

 

Income taxes

 

The Company reports certain expenses differently for financial and tax reporting purposes and, accordingly, provides for the related deferred taxes.  Income taxes are accounted for under the liability method in accordance with ASC 740, Income Taxes.

 

Management has considered its tax positions and believes that all of the positions taken by the Company in its Federal and State tax returns are more likely than not to be sustained upon examination. The Company is subject to examination by U.S. Federal and State tax authorities from 2012 to the present, generally for three years after they are filed.

 

The Company has not filed its income tax returns for fiscal years 2012 to 2014. The Company plans to file these tax returns in second quarter of 2016. The Company believes that it should not have any material impact on the financials because the Company did not have any tax liabilities due to net loss incurred for these years.

 

Basic and diluted net income (loss) per share

 

Basic net income (loss) per share is based upon the weighted average number of common shares outstanding.  Diluted net income (loss) per share is based on the assumption that all dilutive convertible shares and stock options were converted or exercised.  Dilution is computed by applying the treasury stock method.  Under this method, options and warrants are assumed to be exercised at the beginning of the period (or at the time of issuance, if later), and as if funds obtained thereby were used to purchase common stock at the average market price during the period.  For the three months ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, all common stock equivalents were anti-dilutive.

 

 

WEST TEXAS RESOURCES, INC.

 

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

December 31, 2015 and 2014

 

 

Stock-based payments

 

Compensation costs for all share-based awards are measured based on the grant date fair value and are recognized over the vesting period. The Company has no awards with market or performance conditions. Excess tax benefits will be recognized as an addition to additional paid-in-capital.

 

Revenue recognition

 

In accordance with the requirements ASC topic 605 “Revenue Recognition”, revenues are recognized at such time as (1) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (2) delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, (3) the seller’s price to the buyer is fixed or determinable and (4) collectability is reasonably assured.

 

Fair value of financial instruments

 

The accounting standards regarding fair value of financial instruments and related fair value measurements defines financial instruments and requires disclosure of the fair value of financial instruments held by the Company. The Company considers the carrying amount of cash and other current assets and liabilities to approximate their fair values because of the short period of time between the origination of such instruments and their expected realization.

 

The Company has also adopted ASC 820-10 which defines fair value, establishes a three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosures of fair value measurement and enhances disclosure requirements for fair value measures. The three levels are defined as follows:

 

·	Level 1 inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.

 

·	Level 2 inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs that are observable for the assets or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instruments.

 

·	Level 3 inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value.

 

As of December 31, 2015 and September 30, 2015, the Company did not identify any assets or liabilities that are required to be presented on the balance sheet at fair value in accordance with ASC 820-10.

 

Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior year financial statements in order for them to be in conformity with the current year presentation.

 

Recent accounting pronouncement

 

In July 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued a new accounting standard that requires an unrecognized tax benefit to be presented as a decrease in a deferred tax asset where a net operating loss, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward exists and certain criteria are met. The new accounting standard is effective as of October 1, 2014 and is consistent with the Company’s present practice.

 

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09 " Revenue from Contracts with Customers " (Topic 606). Topic 606 supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in Topic 605, “Revenue Recognition”, including most industry-specific revenue recognition guidance throughout the Industry Topics of the Codification. In addition, the amendments create a new Subtopic 340-40, “Other Assets and Deferred Costs—Contracts with Customers”. In summary, the core principle of Topic 606 is that an entity recognizes revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. For a public entity, the amendments in this Update are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within that reporting period. Early application is not permitted. Management is currently evaluating the impact this guidance will have on Company’s financial position and statement of operations.

 

 

 

WEST TEXAS RESOURCES, INC.

 

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

December 31, 2015 and 2014

 

 

In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-12, "Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718)," which makes amendments to the codification topic 718, "Accounting for Share-Based Payments.” when the terms of an award provide that a performance target could be achieved after the requisite service period. The new guidance becomes effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2015, early adoption is permitted.  Management is currently evaluating the impact this guidance will have on our financial position and results of operations.

 

In August 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2014-15, “Presentation of Financial Statements – Going Concern”, Subtopic 205-40, “Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern.” The amendments in this ASU apply to all entities and require management to assess an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern by incorporating and expanding upon certain principles that are currently in U.S. auditing standards. Specifically, the amendments (1) provide a definition of the term substantial doubt, (2) require an evaluation every reporting period including interim periods, (3) provide principles for considering the mitigating effect of management’s plans, (4) require certain disclosures when substantial doubt is alleviated as a result of consideration of management’s plans, (5) require an express statement and other disclosures when substantial doubt is not alleviated, and (6) require an assessment for a period of one year after the date that the financial statements are issued (or available to be issued). The amendments in this Update are effective for the annual period ending after December 15, 2016, and for annual periods and interim periods thereafter. Early application is permitted. Management is currently evaluating the impact this guidance will have on Company’s financial position and results of operations.

 

 

2.

Oil and Gas Properties

 

Port Hudson Field, Baton Rouge Parish, Louisiana

 

Effective April 1, 2013, the Company acquired a 7.24625% working interest in the oil and gas leases, wells and attendant production in the Port Hudson field, Baton Rouge Parish, Louisiana, for a total consideration of $702,900. The Company’s working interest was subject to certain overriding royalty interests, subject to which it had a 5.65158% net revenue interest in the Port Hudson Field.

 

On April 5, 2014, the Company entered into an agreement with EnTek Partners, LLC for the sale of 44.1% of the Company’s working interest in the Port Hudson field for the total consideration of $290,000, less any payments received by the Company for production from the Port Hudson field occurring after January 1, 2014. Pursuant to the Company’s agreement with EnTek Partners, the Company sold to EnTek an undivided 3.1956% of 8/8^th working interest (2.4926% net revenue interest) out of the working interests in the Port Hudson field owned by the Company at that time. The transactions under the Entek Partners agreement closed on April 16, 2014, with an effective date of January 1, 2014. After giving effect to the sale, the Company continued to hold a 4.0506% working interest (3.1595% net revenue interest) in Port Hudson field. During the year ended September 30, 2014, the Company recorded a loss on sale of the working interest of $19,983.

 

Pursuant to the same agreement, EnTek Partners had also agreed to provide to the Company $275,000 in non-recourse financing to pay for its share of a dual recompletion in the D-1 well at West Cam 225 property in exchange for its agreement to provide EnTek Partners with 75% of the net profits derived by the Company from the West Cam 225 property until such time as EnTek Partners has recouped 100% of the recompletion costs advanced on the Company’s behalf and 50% of the net profits thereafter.

 

West Cam 225, Louisiana

 

On August 16, 2013, the Company entered into an agreement with Enovation Resources, LLC to purchase a 10.0167% working interest (7.2120% net revenue interest) in an offshore oil and gas field, known as West Cam 225, located in the shallow waters of the Gulf of Mexico near Cameron, Louisiana. The Company’s purchase price for the working interest was $50,000. In addition to the purchase price, the Company paid $230,459 as advance for costs for development.

 

 

WEST TEXAS RESOURCES, INC.

 

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

December 31, 2015 and 2014

 

 

Sunshine Prospect, Landry Parish, Louisiana

 

On August 1, 2014, the Company entered into an agreement with Restech Resources, LLC to purchase a 15% (14.25% net revenue interest) in an oil and gas prospect located in Landry Parish, Louisiana. The working interest concerns 248 gross acres and net acres in the Sunshine Prospect. Our purchase price for the working interest was $76,500.

 

Birnie Field,Motley County, Texas

 

On September 17, 2014, the Company entered into an agreement with Escopeta Oil and Gas Corporation to purchase a 10% working interest (7.5% net revenue interest) in a natural gas prospect located in the Birnie field in Motley County, Texas. The working interest concerns 5,760 leased acres in the Palo Duro Basin prospect. Our purchase price for the working interest was $70,000. In 2014, the operator drilled an initial well on the prospect, however the drilling was unsuccessful and resulted in a dry hole. The operator agreed to provide us, for no additional consideration, a 1% working interest in the Stansell field prospect described below.

 

Stansell Field, Floyd County, Texas

 

We hold a 1% working interest in an oil prospect located in Floyd County, Texas. The working interest comprises 15,000 leased acres in the southern section of the Palo Duro basin. The initial project will be the re-entry of the Stansell #1-A well, an existing wellbore that was drilled in 2006. The original drilling encountered oil shows in three separate reservoirs and the operator intends to re-enter and recomplete the Stansell #1-A the Companying current fracture stimulation technology. We have a carried 1% working interest in the Stansell #1-A well through the tanks. In April 2015, the operator has started the re-entry of the Stansell #1-A well.

 

Wolfcamp Field, Hale County, Texas

 

In June and July 2014, the Company acquired non-operating leases covering approximately 1,070 gross mineral acre leases in the Wolfcamp field located in Hale County, Texas. The leases were acquired for cash payments of $45,484. The leases have a primary term of five years with the Company option to extend the term for another five years. The leased properties constitute the surface acreage comprising a natural gas prospect, for which we hold 50% of the working interest and 40% net revenue interest. The leased properties are subject to a 20% royalty interest held by the owners and a third party. the Company is currently evaluating the Company options for the exploitation of the leased properties, including the Company sale of the leases or the Company farm-out of the leases to a natural gas operator. 

 

Sale of Port Hudson Field and West Cam 225

 

During the quarter ended March 31, 2015, the Company decided to sell 100% of its interest in Port Hudson field and West Cam 225. The net investment of $653,376 was reclassed as oil and gas properties held for sale and recorded at market value of $335,500. The Company recorded impairment loss of $317,876 due to reduction of the market value comparing to the cost of these investments.

 

On April 6, 2015, the Company entered into agreements with Hi-Tech exploration, LLC to sell its entire interests in the Port Hudson field and the West Cam 225 for a total consideration of $335,500. The Company completed the sale and paid $150,050 for outstanding costs and recorded it as loss on sale of oil and gas interest.

 

Leased Properties from Kiowa Oil Company

 

On September 30, 2015, the Company entered into an agreement with Kiowa Oil Company to lease 100% of interests, for a period of five years, of properties in North Dakota, Florida, Illinois, and Kentucky. The total price for the subject interests under this lease agreement is $5,000 and a 15% royalty interest in all the subject interests leased. The total price will be paid in the Company’s common shares at the per share price of $0.50.

 

As of December 31, 2015 and September 30, 2015, total oil and gas properties amounted to $217,433 and $217,433, respectively.

 

 

WEST TEXAS RESOURCES, INC.

 

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

December 31, 2015 and 2014

 

 

3.	Notes Payable – Related Parties

 

On August 14, 2013, the Company entered into a loan agreement with a shareholder, Gary Bryant, pursuant to which Mr. Bryant loaned the Company $417,762, the proceeds of which were used to partially finance the acquisition of the Port Hudson interest described in Note 2 above. The loan beared interest on the unpaid principal amount at the rate of 8% per annum. All principal and interest were payable over a four year period, commencing November 1, 2013, at the amortized rate of $10,198 per month. The Company’s obligations under the loan were secured by our working interest in the Port Hudson field.

 

On September 6, 2013, the Company entered into another loan agreement with Mr. Gary Bryant, pursuant to which Mr. Bryant loaned the Company $130,000, the proceeds of which were used to partially finance the Company’s payment of its allocable expenses associated with its working interest in the West Cam 225 field, described in Note 2 above. The loan beared interest on the unpaid principal amount at the rate of 6% per annum. All principal and interest were payable on December 6, 2013 and were convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock, at the option of the holder, at the rate of $0.50 per share. In December 2013, Mr. Bryant and the Company entered to an agreement to extend the due date of the loan to February 6, 2016. The Company’s obligations under the loan were secured by its working interest in the Port Hudson field. The Company also entered into an amendment to its loan agreement with Mr. Bryant dated August 14, 2013, in the original principal amount of $417,762, to provide that all principal and interest under that loan agreement were convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock, at the option of the holder, at the rate of $0.50 per share.

 

On April 3, 2015, Mr. Bryant agreed to release the security interest in the Port Hudson field as the Company engaged in negotiations to sell the property.

 

On September 6, 2013, the Company entered into a second loan agreement with a company controlled by one of the shareholders pursuant to which the lender loaned the Company $100,000. The proceeds of which were used to partially finance the Company’s payment of its allocable expenses associated with its working interest in the West Cam 225 field, described in Note 2 above. The loan carried interest on the unpaid principal amount at the rate of 6% per annum. The Company’s obligations under the loan were secured by the Company’s working interest in the West Cam 225 field. In connection with the loan, the Company granted the lender a warrant to purchase 200,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, at an exercise price of $0.50 per share, over a two year period expiring on September 5, 2015. This note was fully paid off in April 2014.

 

The Company determined that the fair value of the above conversion options and the warrants using the Black–Scholes model with the variables listed below:

 

·

Volatility: 160%

 

·

Risk free rate of return: 0.01% to 0.875%

 

·

Expected term: 0.25 to 4 years

 

On September 16, 2014, the Company entered into a Note purchase agreement with Lake Oswego Oil Company, LLC, an Oregon limited liability company controlled by one of the shareholders, pursuant to which the Company sold a secured promissory note in the principal amount of $50,000, for a purchase price of $50,000. Interest accrues on the unpaid principal balance of the note at the rate of six percent per annum. This note was fully paid off in the quarter ended December 31, 2014. As an inducement to the note holder to enter into this agreement, the Company also granted the note holder a warrant to purchase 100,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, and exercisable at $0.50 per share over a two year period expiring on September 16, 2019.

 

The Company determined that the fair value of the warrants using Black–Scholes model with the variable listed below:

 

·

Volatility: 340%

 

·

Risk free rate of return: 1.688%

 

·

Expected term: 2 years

 

 

WEST TEXAS RESOURCES, INC.

 

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

December 31, 2015 and 2014

 

 

On September 30, 2015, Mr. Bryant agreed to convert the outstanding principal amounts of $325,146 and $130,000 and accrued interest to the Company’s common stock at $0.5 and $0.5 per share respectively.

 

In connection with the issuance of the above notes, the Company recorded a note discount of $50,000 and $647,762 for the years ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, which are to be amortized over the lives of the notes. On September 30, 2015, due to conversion of the full outstanding principal amount owed to Mr. Bryant, the related note discount was fully amortized.

 

 

4.	Shareholder Advances

 

During the year ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, a shareholder made advances to the Company to support its daily operations. These advances are due on demand and do not bear any interest. As of December 31, 2015 and September 30, 2015, the total outstanding amount due to the shareholder was $35,000 and $35,000, respectively.

 

During the year ended September 30, 2015, a shareholder paid a total amount of $15,000 for payment of legal fees on behalf of the Company through his personal credit line. The Company repaid $3,000 during the three months ended December 31, 2015. The outstanding balance is due on demand and bears variable interest of 25.99%. As of December 31, 2015 and September 30, 2015, the total outstanding amount due to the shareholder was $7,000 and $10,000, respectively.

 

 

5.	Shareholders’ Equity

 

The Company is authorized to issue 200,000,000 shares of common stock, par value of $0.001, and 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value of $0.001.

 

During the year ended September 30, 2014, the Company entered into various subscription agreements with accredited investors to sell 336,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at $0.50 per share. The total amount of $168,000 was received upon signing of the subscription agreements.

 

In September 2015, the Company entered into a subscription agreement with an accredited investor to sell 100,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at $0.25 per share. The total amount of $25,000 was received and shares were issued in September 2015.

 

On September 30, 2015, Mr. Bryant, a shareholder and convertible note holder, agreed to convert the outstanding principal amounts of $325,146 and $130,000 due to him to the Company’s common stock at $0.50 per share. As of December 31, 2015, these shares had not been issued and were recorded as common stock payable.

 

As of December 31, 2015 and September 30, 2015, the Company had 14,515,400 and 14,515,400 shares of common stock issued and outstanding and had not issued any of its preferred stock.

 

On September 15, 2011, the Company adopted the West Texas Resources, Inc. 2011 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) providing for the grant of non-qualified stock options and incentive stock options to purchase its common stock and for grant of restricted and unrestricted grants. The Company has reserved 3,000,000 shares of its common stock under the Plan. All officers, directors, employees and consultants to the Company are eligible to participate under the Plan. The purpose of the Plan is to provide eligible participants with an opportunity to acquire an ownership interest in the Company.

 

In 2011, the Company granted options to certain consultants to purchase 400,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. The options vest immediately and expire on September 15, 2016. The fair value of each share-based award was estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model or a lattice model. The fair value of these options, determined to be $65,402, was included in general and administrative expenses for the year ended September 30, 2011.

 

 

WEST TEXAS RESOURCES, INC.

 

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

December 31, 2015 and 2014

 

 

The following assumptions were used in the fair value method calculation:

 

·

Volatility: 83%

 

·

Risk free rate of return: 1%

 

·

Expected term: 5 years

 

On March 7, 2014, the Company granted options to certain consultants to purchase 1,500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, of which 200,000 options vested upon the date of grant and the balance of 1,300,000 options expired in October 2014 in connection with the termination of the consulting arrangement. The 200,000 vested options expire on March 7, 2019. The fair value of the vested options for 200,000 shares, determined to be $116,137, was recorded in general and administrative expenses for the year ended September 30, 2014.

 

On March 11, 2014, the Company granted options to its officers to purchase a total of 200,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. The options expire on March 11, 2019 and vest immediately. The fair value of these options determined to be $116,119 and was included in general and administrative expenses for the year ended September 30, 2014.

 

The following assumptions were used in the fair value method calculation:

 

·

Volatility: 190%

 

·

Risk free rate of return: 1.5%

 

·

Expected term: 5 years

 

On April 16, 2015, the Company granted options to Mr. Paul Brogan, the Company’s director, to purchase a total of 200,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. The options have an exercise price of $0.5 per share and expire on April 16, 2020 and 66,667 shares vest immediately with the rest vest equally on April 16, 2016 and 2017. The fair value of these options was determined to be $99,712, of which $9,739 was amortized and included in general and administrative expenses for the three months ended December 31, 2015.

 

The following assumptions were used in the fair value method calculation:

 

·

Volatility: 266%

 

·

Risk free rate of return: 1.375%

 

·

Expected term: 5 years

 

The following information applies to all options outstanding at December 31, 2015:

 

·

Weighted average exercise price: $0.43

 

·

Options outstanding and exercisable: 913,890

 

·

Average remaining life: 2.24 years

 

 

WEST TEXAS RESOURCES, INC.

 

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

December 31, 2015 and 2014

 

 

6.	Income Taxes

 

Based on the available information and other factors, management believes it is more likely than not that the net deferred tax assets at September 30, 2015 and 2014 will not be fully realizable. Accordingly, management has recorded a full valuation allowance against its net deferred tax assets at September 30, 2015 and 2014. As of September 30, 2015 and 2014, the Company had federal net operating loss carry-forwards of approximately $2,400,000 and $1,300,000, respectively, expiring beginning in 2032.

 

Deferred tax assets consist of the following components:

 

		September 30,				September 30,
		2015				2014
Net loss carryforward		$	840,000			$	455,000
Valuation allowance			(840,000	)			(455,000	)
Total deferred tax assets		$	–			$	–

 

 

7.	Subsequent Event

 

Events subsequent to December 31, 2015 have been evaluated through the date these financial statements were issued to determine whether they should be disclosed to keep the financial statements from being misleading. Management noted the following subsequent events that should be disclosed:

 

·

In January 2016, the Company entered into an agreement with Mr. Gary Bryant to convert the outstanding balance of shareholder advances of $42,000 to the Company’s common stock at a price of $0.10 per share.

 

 

 

Item 2.     Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

 

Cautionary Statement

 

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our unaudited financial statements and the related notes thereto contained elsewhere in this report. The information contained in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q is not a complete description of our business or the risks associated with an investment in our common stock. We urge you to carefully review and consider the various disclosures made by us in this report and in our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, including our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2015 filed with the SEC on December 30, 2015 and our subsequently filed periodic reports, which discuss our business in greater detail.

 

In this report we make, and from time to time we otherwise make, written and oral statements regarding our business and prospects, such as projections of future performance, statements of management’s plans and objectives, forecasts of market trends, and other matters that are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Statements containing the words or phrases “will likely result,” “are expected to,” “will continue,” “is anticipated,” “estimates,” “projects,” “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “target,” “goal,” “plans,” “objective,” “should” or similar expressions identify forward-looking statements, which may appear in documents, reports, filings with the SEC, news releases, written or oral presentations made by officers or other representatives made by us to analysts, stockholders, investors, news organizations and others, and discussions with management and other of our representatives.

 

Our future results, including results related to forward-looking statements, involve a number of risks and uncertainties, including those risks included in the section “Risk Factors” set forth in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2015 filed with the SEC on December 30, 2015. No assurance can be given that the results reflected in any forward-looking statements will be achieved. Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which such statement is made. Our forward-looking statements are based upon assumptions that are sometimes based upon estimates, data, communications and other information from suppliers, government agencies and other sources that may be subject to revision. Except as required by law, we do not undertake any obligation to update or keep current either (i) any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances arising after the date of such statement, or (ii) the important factors that could cause our future results to differ materially from historical results or trends, results anticipated or planned by us, or which are reflected from time to time in any forward-looking statement.

 

General

 

We were formed on December 9, 2010 under the laws of Nevada for the purpose of oil and gas exploration and development in North America. We commenced revenue producing oil and gas operations effective as of April 1, 2013.

 

Eastland County Field

 

In September 2011, we acquired our initial property consisting of a 31.25% working interest in an exploratory oil and gas drilling prospect covering 120 acres in Eastland County, Texas. The Eastland County prospect includes two exploratory wells, known as Rutherford #1 and C.M. Knott #1, that had been operating at a minimum level required to maintain the lease rights. In October 2011, the operator reentered the Rutherford #1 well and conducted drilling and casing activities, which were completed in November 2011. In January 2012, a third party conducted the fracture stimulation of the Rutherford #1. In February 2013, the operator placed a pump jack on the Rutherford #1 well, however no meaningful revenue has been derived from the well to date. During the three months ended June 30, 2013, we determined that our investment in the Eastland County prospect was impaired due to an unsuccessful fracture stimulation of the Rutherford #1. Accordingly, we recorded an impairment loss of $108,373 to write off the capitalized fracture stimulation costs. The operator has undertaken no further activity on the Eastland County prospect as of the date of this report.

 

Port Hudson Field

 

In August 2013, we acquired a 7.24625% working interest (5.65158% net revenue interest) in the oil and gas leases, wells and attendant production in the Port Hudson field, Baton Rouge Parish, Louisiana for $702,900. On April 15, 2014, we sold 44.1% of our original working interest in the Port Hudson field for the total consideration of $290,000, less any payments received by us for production from the Port Hudson field occurring after January 1, 2014. On April 6, 2015, we entered into an agreement with Hi-Tech Exploration, LLC to sell our entire 4.0506% working interest (3.1595% net revenue interest) in the Port Hudson field for the total consideration of $205,000, less any payments received by us for production from the Port Hudson field occurring after March 1, 2015.

 

 

 

West Cam 225 Field

 

In September 2013, we acquired a 10.0167% working interest (7.2120% net revenue interest) in an offshore oil and gas field, known as West Cam 225, located in the shallow waters of the Gulf of Mexico near Cameron, Louisiana for $280,459. On April 6, 2015, we entered into an agreement with Hi-Tech to sell our entire 10.0167% working interest (7.2118% net revenue interest) in the West Cam 225 property for the total consideration of $130,500.

 

Wolfcamp Field

 

In June and July 2014, we acquired non-operating leases covering approximately 1,070 gross mineral acre leases in the Wolfcamp field located in Hale County, Texas for $45,484. The leases have a primary term of five years with our option to extend the term for another five years. The leased properties constitute the surface acreage comprising a natural gas prospect, for which we hold 50% of the working interest and 40% net revenue interest. The leased properties are subject to a 20% royalty interest held by the owners and a third party. We are currently evaluating our options for the exploitation of the leased properties, including our sale of the leases or our farm-out of the leases to a natural gas operator.

 

Sunshine Prospect

 

We hold a 15% (14.25% net revenue interest) in a non-operating oil and gas prospect located in Landry Parish, Louisiana. The working interest concerns 248 gross acres and net acres in the Sunshine Prospect. The operator intends to drill an initial well in the prospect in 2016.

 

Stansell Field

 

We hold a 1% working interest in an oil prospect located in Floyd County, Texas. The working interest comprises 15,000 leased acres in the southern section of the Palo Duro basin. The initial project will be the re-entry of the Stansell #1-A well, an existing well bore that was drilled in 2006. The original drilling encountered oil shows in three separate reservoirs and the operator intends to re-enter and recomplete the Stansell #1-A using current fracture stimulation technology. We have a carried 1% working interest in the Stansell #1-A well through the tanks. The operator commenced the re-entry of the Stansell #1-A well in January 2015 and is currently evaluating the drilling results.

  

Kiowa Properties

 

On September 30, 2015, we leased 100% of interests, for a period of five years, of properties in North Dakota, Florida, Illinois, and Kentucky. The total price for the subject interests under this lease agreement is $5,000 and a 15% royalty interest in all the subject interests leased. The $5,000 purchase price will be paid by us in our common shares at the per share price of $0.50, or 10,000 common shares.

 

Subject to our receipt of additional capital, we intend to pursue the acquisition of additional equity interests in other oil and gas properties in North America. However, as of the date of this report, we have no understandings or agreements in place concerning our acquisition of an interest in any other properties.

 

Results of Operations

 

We commenced revenue producing oil and gas operations effective as of April 1, 2013. From April 1, 2013 to December 2013, all of our revenue was derived from our working interest in the Port Hudson field. Commencing in January 2014, we derived revenue from our working interest in the West Cam 225 field. During the three month periods ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, we had nil and $64,339 of revenue, respectively. The decrease in revenue was due to our sale of a our entire interest in Port Hudson and West Cam in April 2015.

 

For the three month period ended December 31, 2015, we had general and administrative expenses of $65,930 compared to general and administrative expenses of $128,121 during the prior year period. The decrease in expenses is attributable to a decrease in consulting and professional fees.  

 

For the three month period ended December 31, 2015, we had other expenses of $511 compared to other expenses of $38,003 during the prior year period. The decrease in other expenses was driven by the conversion of $501,754 of principal and accrued interest under two promissory notes into shares of our common stock as of September 30, 2015.  

 

 

For the three month periods ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, we incurred a net loss of $(66,441) and $(101,785), respectively. The decrease in our net loss was the result of lower expenses in 2015.

 

Subject to our receipt of additional capital, our plan of operations over the next 12 months is to pursue the acquisition of additional equity interests in oil and gas properties to be thereafter exploited by us in conjunction with other oil and gas producers. As of the date of this report, we have no understandings or agreements in place concerning our acquisition of an interest in any other properties.

 

At the present time, we have one employee, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, John Kerr, who has limited experience in the oil and gas exploration and development business. Subject to our receipt of significant additional capital, we intend to hire senior management and staff with experience in oil and gas exploration. Until such time, we intend to pursue an operating strategy that is based on our participation in exploration prospects as a non-operator. Based on that strategy, our plan of operations over the next 12 months is to pursue the acquisition of oil and natural gas interests in partnership with other companies with exploration, development and production expertise. We will also pursue alliances with partners in the areas of geological and geophysical services and prospect generation, evaluation and prospect leasing. Pursuant to this strategy, we intend to engage and rely on third party geologists and geophysicists, among others, to review the available data concerning each potential acquisition. In each case, we expect that the operator of the prospect will assemble the appropriate data and conduct the appropriate studies and that our consultants will conduct an independent review of the operator’s data and studies for purposes of advising us of the merits of each potential acquisition.

 

The business of oil and gas acquisition, drilling and development is capital intensive and the level of operations attainable by an oil and gas company is directly linked to and limited by the amount of available capital. Therefore, a principal part of our plan of operations is to acquire the additional capital required to finance the acquisition of such properties and our share of the development costs. As explained under “Financial Condition” below, we will seek additional working capital through the sale of our securities and, subject to the successful deployment of our cash on hand, we will endeavor to obtain additional capital through bank lines of credit and project financing.

 

Financial Condition

 

As of December 31, 2015, we had total assets of $300,248 and a working capital deficit of $(190,302). Our ability to achieve commercial success is dependent on our ability to obtain additional capital either through the additional sale of our equity or debt securities, bank lines of credit, project financing or cash generated from oil and gas operations. We seek to obtain additional working capital through the sale of our securities and, subject to the successful deployment of our cash on hand, we will endeavor to obtain additional capital through bank lines of credit and project financing. However, we have no agreements or understandings with any third parties at this time for our receipt of additional working capital and we have a limited history of generating cash from oil and gas operations. We may not be able to obtain access to capital as and when needed and, if so, the terms of any available financing may not be subject to commercially reasonable terms. In addition, any continuation in the recent decline in the price of oil and gas may have an material adverse effect on our ability to raise capital as well as our financial condition and results of operations.

 

The report of our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2015 states that due to our losses from operations and lack of working capital there is substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.

 

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

 

We do not have any off-balance sheet financing arrangements.

 

 

 

Item 3.     Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risks

 

Not applicable.

 

Item 4.     Controls and Procedures

 

(a)  Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.

 

Our management, with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rule 15d-15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.  Based on this evaluation, our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, concluded that as of December 31, 2015 our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective due to existing material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting, as described below.

 

In connection with our evaluation of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015, and included in our annual report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on December 30, 2015, we determined that there were control deficiencies that constituted material weaknesses which are indicative of many small companies with small staff, including:

 

	·	Due to our small size, we do not maintain effective internal controls to assure segregation of duties as we have only two employees who are responsible for initiating and approving of transactions, thereby creating the segregation of duties weakness;
	·	Our board of directors does not have an audit committee or a financial expert to maintain effective oversight of our financial reporting process; and
	·	Lack of formal policies or procedures to provide assurance that relevant information is identified, captured, processed, and reported in an appropriate and timely fashion.

 

(b)  Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.

 

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the three-month period ended December 31, 2015 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.

 

 

 

 

 

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION

 

Item 6.     Exhibits

 

Exhibit No.		Description		Method of Filing
31.1		Certifications Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.		Filed electronically herewith
31.2		Certifications Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.		Filed electronically herewith
32.1		Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350).		Filed electronically herewith
101.INS		XBRL Instance Document		Filed electronically herewith
101.SCH		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document		Filed electronically herewith
101.CAL		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document		Filed electronically herewith
101.LAB		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document		Filed electronically herewith
101.PRE		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document		Filed electronically herewith
101.DEF		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document		Filed electronically herewith

 

 

 

 

SIGNATURES

 

In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

		WEST TEXAS RESOURCES, INC.
Date:	February 16, 2016	By:	/s/ John D. Kerr
			John D. Kerr,
			President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

 

 

 

EXHIBIT 31.1

 

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

 

Section 302 Certification

 

I, John D. Kerr, certify that:

 

1)

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of West Texas Resources, Inc.;

 

2)

Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3)

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4)

The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

 

a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b)

Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

 

c)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

d)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s fiscal quarter presented in this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5)

The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data information; and

 

b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 

Date: February 16, 2016	By:	/s/ John D. Kerr
		John D. Kerr, President and Chief Executive Officer

 

EXHIBIT 31.2

 

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

 

Section 302 Certification

 

I, John D. Kerr, certify that:

 

1)

I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of West Texas Resources, Inc.;

 

2)

Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3)

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4)

The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

 

a)

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b)

Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles

 

c)

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

d)

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s fiscal quarter presented in this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5)

The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a)

All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data information; and

 

b)

Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 

Date: February 16, 2016	By:	/s/ John D. Kerr
		John D. Kerr, Chief Financial Officer

 

EXHIBIT 32.1

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of West Texas Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2015, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John D. Kerr, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

By:		/s/ John D. Kerr		Dated:	February 16, 2016
		John D. Kerr
Title:		President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

 

This certification is made solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other purpose.

 

 

v3.3.1.900

Document and Entity Information - shares	3 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2015	Feb. 12, 2016
Document And Entity Information
Entity Registrant Name	West Texas Resources, Inc.
Entity Central Index Key	0001518985
Document Type	10-Q
Document Period End Date	Dec. 31, 2015
Amendment Flag	false
Current Fiscal Year End Date	--09-30
Is Entity a Well-known Seasoned Issuer?	No
Is Entity a Voluntary Filer?	No
Is Entity's Reporting Status Current?	Yes
Entity Filer Category	Smaller Reporting Company
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding		15,938,908
Document Fiscal Period Focus	Q1
Document Fiscal Year Focus	2016

v3.3.1.900

BALANCE SHEETS (Unaudited) - USD ($)	Dec. 31, 2015	Sep. 30, 2015
Current Assets
Cash	$ 82,815	$ 142,762
Total Current Assets	82,815	142,762
Oil and gas properties, using successful efforts accounting	217,433	217,433
TOTAL ASSETS	300,248	360,195
Current Liabilities
Accrued expenses	152,896	161,370
Payroll liabilities	0	978
Investment payable	13,600	13,600
Lease payable	5,000	5,000
Asset retirement obligation	10,000	10,000
Shareholder advances	42,000	45,000
Other payable	49,621	40,414
Total Current Liabilities	$ 273,117	$ 276,362
Commitments and Contingencies
Shareholders' Equity
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued and outstanding	$ 0	$ 0
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 200,000,000 shares authorized;14,515,400 and 14,415,400 shares issued and outstanding at Decembember 31, 2015 and September 30, 2014, respectively	14,515	14,515
Additional paid-in capital	1,957,635	1,947,896
Common Stock issuable	501,754	501,754
Accumulated deficit	(2,446,773)	(2,380,332)
Total Shareholders' Equity	27,131	83,833
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY	$ 300,248	$ 360,195

v3.3.1.900

BALANCE SHEETS (Parenthetical) - $ / shares	Dec. 31, 2015	Sep. 30, 2015
Statement of Financial Position [Abstract]
Preferred stock par value	$ 0.001	$ 0.001
Preferred stock shares authorized	10,000,000	10,000,000
Preferred stock shares issued	0	0
Preferred stock shares outstanding	0	0
Common stock par value	$ 0.001	$ 0.001
Common stock shares authorized	200,000,000	200,000,000
Common stock shares issued	14,515,400	14,515,400
Common stock shares outstanding	14,515,400	14,515,400

v3.3.1.900

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited) - USD ($)	3 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2015	Dec. 31, 2014
Revenues
Oil and gas sales	$ 0	$ 64,339
General and administrative expenses	65,930	128,121
Operating Loss	(65,930)	(63,782)
Other income (expenses)
Interest expense	(511)	(4,393)
Amortization of debt discount	0	(63,610)
Other income	0	30,000
Loss Before Income Taxes	(66,441)	(101,785)
Tax Provision	0	0
Net Loss	$ (66,441)	$ (101,785)
Loss per share
Basic and diluted weighted average number of common shares outstanding	14,515,400	14,415,400
Basic and diluted net loss per share	$ 0.00	$ .001

v3.3.1.900

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited) - USD ($)	3 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2015	Dec. 31, 2014
Cash flows from operating activities
Net loss	$ (66,441)	$ (101,785)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash from operating activities:
Stock-based compensation	9,739	0
Amortization of debt discount	0	83,610
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable	0	5,055
Payroll liabilities	(978)	(561)
Other payables	9,207	(3,000)
Accrued expenses	(8,474)	(15,878)
Net cash used in operating activities	(56,947)	(32,559)
Cash flows from financing activities
Repayment on note payable	0	(66,005)
Shareholder Advances	(3,000)	0
Net cash used in financing activities	(3,000)	(66,005)
Net decrease in cash	(59,947)	(98,564)
Cash, beginning of period	142,762	144,506
Cash, end of period	82,815	45,942
Supplemental cash flow disclosure:
Interest paid	511	4,393
Income taxes paid	$ 0	$ 0

v3.3.1.900

1. Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies	3 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2015
Organization, Consolidation and Presentation of Financial Statements [Abstract]
Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies	Organization and business   West Texas Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) was incorporated under the laws of Nevada on December 9, 2010 under the name Texas Resources Energy, Inc., a Texas corporation. On June 30, 2011, the Company changed its name to West Texas Resources, Inc. The Company intends to engage in the acquisition, exploration and development of oil and gas properties in North America. From its inception, the Company has devoted its activities to developing a business plan, raising capital and acquiring operating assets.   Basis of presentation   The accompanying unaudited financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (U.S.) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 8-03 of Regulation S-X promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and reflect all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments and other adjustments, which management believes are necessary to fairly present the financial position, results of operations and cash flows of the Company, for the respective periods presented. The results of operations for an interim period are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for any other interim period or the year as a whole. The accompanying unaudited financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes for the year ended September 30, 2015.   Going concern   The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (GAAP) that contemplate continuation of the Company as a going concern. The Company has not earned any significant revenues since inception. During the three months ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, the Company incurred a net loss of $66,441 and $101,785, respectively. In addition, the Company had an accumulative deficit of $2,446,773 and $2,380,332, as of December 31, 2015 and September 30, 2015, respectively. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.   The Company will require up to $1 million of additional capital in order to fund its proposed operations over the next 12 months. Management plans to continue to seek sources of financing on favorable terms; however, there are no assurances that any such financing can be obtained on favorable terms, if at all.   Management expects to monitor and control the Company’s operating costs until cash is available through financing or operating activities.  There are no assurances that the Company will be successful in achieving these plans.  The Company anticipates that losses will continue until such time, if ever, as the Company is able to generate sufficient revenues to support its operations.   Oil and gas properties   The Company uses the successful efforts method of accounting for oil and gas producing activities. Costs to acquire mineral interests in oil and gas properties, to drill and equip exploratory wells that find proved reserves, to drill and equip development wells and related asset retirement costs are capitalized. Costs to drill exploratory wells that do not find proved reserves, geological and geophysical costs, and costs of carrying and retaining unproved properties are expensed.   Unproved oil and gas properties that are individually significant are periodically assessed for impairment of value, and a loss is recognized at the time of impairment by providing an impairment allowance. Other unproved properties are amortized based on the Company's experience of successful drilling and average holding period. Capitalized costs of producing oil and gas properties, after considering estimated residual salvage values, are depreciated and depleted by the unit-of-production method.     On the sale or retirement of a complete unit of a proved property, the cost and related accumulated depreciation, depletion, and amortization are eliminated from the property accounts, and the resultant gain or loss is recognized. On the retirement or sale of a partial unit of proved property, the cost is charged to accumulated depreciation, depletion, and amortization with a resulting gain or loss recognized in income.  On the sale of an entire interest in an unproved property for cash or cash equivalent, gain or loss on the sale is recognized, taking into consideration the amount of any recorded impairment if the property had been assessed individually. If a partial interest in an unproved property is sold, the amount received is treated as a reduction of the cost of the interest retained.   Impairment of long-lived assets   The Company accounts for the impairment and disposition of long-lived assets in accordance with ASC 360-10-35, Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets. In accordance with ASC 360-10-35, long-lived assets are reviewed for events of changes in circumstances, which indicate that their carrying value may not be recoverable.   Asset retirement obligations   ASC 410-20, Asset Retirement Obligations, clarifies that a legal obligation to perform an asset retirement activity in which the timing and/or method of settlement are conditional on a future event that may or may not be within the control of the entity. The obligation to perform the asset retirement activity is unconditional even though uncertainty exists about the timing and/or method of settlement. ASC 410-20 requires a liability to be recognized for the fair value of a conditional asset retirement obligation if the fair value of the liability can be reasonably estimated.   Except for the Eastland County investment, the asset retirement obligations for the other properties are recognized by the operators of these properties and deducted against the revenue interest of the Company.   Cash, cash equivalents, and other cash flow statement supplemental information   Cash is commonly considered to consist of currency and demand in deposits. The Company considers all liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less that are readily convertible into cash to be cash equivalents.  The Company places its cash with high credit quality financial institutions.  Accounts at these institutions are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) up to $250,000. The Company performs ongoing evaluations of these institutions to limit its concentration of risk exposure.  Management believes this risk is not significant due to the financial strength of the financial institutions utilized by the Company.   Use of estimates   The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect certain reported amounts and disclosures.  Accordingly, actual results could differ from those estimates.   Income taxes   The Company reports certain expenses differently for financial and tax reporting purposes and, accordingly, provides for the related deferred taxes.  Income taxes are accounted for under the liability method in accordance with ASC 740, Income Taxes.   Management has considered its tax positions and believes that all of the positions taken by the Company in its Federal and State tax returns are more likely than not to be sustained upon examination. The Company is subject to examination by U.S. Federal and State tax authorities from 2012 to the present, generally for three years after they are filed.   The Company has not filed its income tax returns for fiscal years 2012 to 2014. The Company plans to file these tax returns in second quarter of 2016. The Company believes that it should not have any material impact on the financials because the Company did not have any tax liabilities due to net loss incurred for these years.   Basic and diluted net income (loss) per share   Basic net income (loss) per share is based upon the weighted average number of common shares outstanding.  Diluted net income (loss) per share is based on the assumption that all dilutive convertible shares and stock options were converted or exercised.  Dilution is computed by applying the treasury stock method.  Under this method, options and warrants are assumed to be exercised at the beginning of the period (or at the time of issuance, if later), and as if funds obtained thereby were used to purchase common stock at the average market price during the period.  For the three months ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, all common stock equivalents were anti-dilutive.   Stock-based payments   Compensation costs for all share-based awards are measured based on the grant date fair value and are recognized over the vesting period. The Company has no awards with market or performance conditions. Excess tax benefits will be recognized as an addition to additional paid-in-capital.   Revenue recognition   In accordance with the requirements ASC topic 605 “Revenue Recognition”, revenues are recognized at such time as (1) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (2) delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, (3) the seller’s price to the buyer is fixed or determinable and (4) collectability is reasonably assured.   Fair value of financial instruments   The accounting standards regarding fair value of financial instruments and related fair value measurements defines financial instruments and requires disclosure of the fair value of financial instruments held by the Company. The Company considers the carrying amount of cash and other current assets and liabilities to approximate their fair values because of the short period of time between the origination of such instruments and their expected realization.   The Company has also adopted ASC 820-10 which defines fair value, establishes a three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosures of fair value measurement and enhances disclosure requirements for fair value measures. The three levels are defined as follows:   · Level 1 inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.   · Level 2 inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs that are observable for the assets or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instruments.   · Level 3 inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value.   As of December 31, 2015 and September 30, 2015, the Company did not identify any assets or liabilities that are required to be presented on the balance sheet at fair value in accordance with ASC 820-10.   Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior year financial statements in order for them to be in conformity with the current year presentation.   Recent accounting pronouncement   In July 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued a new accounting standard that requires an unrecognized tax benefit to be presented as a decrease in a deferred tax asset where a net operating loss, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward exists and certain criteria are met. The new accounting standard is effective as of October 1, 2014 and is consistent with the Company’s present practice.   In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09 " Revenue from Contracts with Customers " (Topic 606). Topic 606 supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in Topic 605, “Revenue Recognition”, including most industry-specific revenue recognition guidance throughout the Industry Topics of the Codification. In addition, the amendments create a new Subtopic 340-40, “Other Assets and Deferred Costs—Contracts with Customers”. In summary, the core principle of Topic 606 is that an entity recognizes revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. For a public entity, the amendments in this Update are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within that reporting period. Early application is not permitted. Management is currently evaluating the impact this guidance will have on Company’s financial position and statement of operations.   In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-12, "Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718)," which makes amendments to the codification topic 718, "Accounting for Share-Based Payments.” when the terms of an award provide that a performance target could be achieved after the requisite service period. The new guidance becomes effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2015, early adoption is permitted.  Management is currently evaluating the impact this guidance will have on our financial position and results of operations.   In August 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2014-15, “Presentation of Financial Statements – Going Concern”, Subtopic 205-40, “Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern.” The amendments in this ASU apply to all entities and require management to assess an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern by incorporating and expanding upon certain principles that are currently in U.S. auditing standards. Specifically, the amendments (1) provide a definition of the term substantial doubt, (2) require an evaluation every reporting period including interim periods, (3) provide principles for considering the mitigating effect of management’s plans, (4) require certain disclosures when substantial doubt is alleviated as a result of consideration of management’s plans, (5) require an express statement and other disclosures when substantial doubt is not alleviated, and (6) require an assessment for a period of one year after the date that the financial statements are issued (or available to be issued). The amendments in this Update are effective for the annual period ending after December 15, 2016, and for annual periods and interim periods thereafter. Early application is permitted. Management is currently evaluating the impact this guidance will have on Company’s financial position and results of operations.

v3.3.1.900

2. Oil and Gas Properties	3 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2015
Extractive Industries [Abstract]
Oil and Gas Properties	Port Hudson Field, Baton Rouge Parish, Louisiana   Effective April 1, 2013, the Company acquired a 7.24625% working interest in the oil and gas leases, wells and attendant production in the Port Hudson field, Baton Rouge Parish, Louisiana, for a total consideration of $702,900. The Company’s working interest was subject to certain overriding royalty interests, subject to which it had a 5.65158% net revenue interest in the Port Hudson Field.   On April 5, 2014, the Company entered into an agreement with EnTek Partners, LLC for the sale of 44.1% of the Company’s working interest in the Port Hudson field for the total consideration of $290,000, less any payments received by the Company for production from the Port Hudson field occurring after January 1, 2014. Pursuant to the Company’s agreement with EnTek Partners, the Company sold to EnTek an undivided 3.1956% of 8/8th working interest (2.4926% net revenue interest) out of the working interests in the Port Hudson field owned by the Company at that time. The transactions under the Entek Partners agreement closed on April 16, 2014, with an effective date of January 1, 2014. After giving effect to the sale, the Company continued to hold a 4.0506% working interest (3.1595% net revenue interest) in Port Hudson field. During the year ended September 30, 2014, the Company recorded a loss on sale of the working interest of $19,983.   Pursuant to the same agreement, EnTek Partners had also agreed to provide to the Company $275,000 in non-recourse financing to pay for its share of a dual recompletion in the D-1 well at West Cam 225 property in exchange for its agreement to provide EnTek Partners with 75% of the net profits derived by the Company from the West Cam 225 property until such time as EnTek Partners has recouped 100% of the recompletion costs advanced on the Company’s behalf and 50% of the net profits thereafter.   West Cam 225, Louisiana   On August 16, 2013, the Company entered into an agreement with Enovation Resources, LLC to purchase a 10.0167% working interest (7.2120% net revenue interest) in an offshore oil and gas field, known as West Cam 225, located in the shallow waters of the Gulf of Mexico near Cameron, Louisiana. The Company’s purchase price for the working interest was $50,000. In addition to the purchase price, the Company paid $230,459 as advance for costs for development.   Sunshine Prospect, Landry Parish, Louisiana   On August 1, 2014, the Company entered into an agreement with Restech Resources, LLC to purchase a 15% (14.25% net revenue interest) in an oil and gas prospect located in Landry Parish, Louisiana. The working interest concerns 248 gross acres and net acres in the Sunshine Prospect. Our purchase price for the working interest was $76,500.   Birnie Field,Motley County, Texas   On September 17, 2014, the Company entered into an agreement with Escopeta Oil and Gas Corporation to purchase a 10% working interest (7.5% net revenue interest) in a natural gas prospect located in the Birnie field in Motley County, Texas. The working interest concerns 5,760 leased acres in the Palo Duro Basin prospect. Our purchase price for the working interest was $70,000. In 2014, the operator drilled an initial well on the prospect, however the drilling was unsuccessful and resulted in a dry hole. The operator agreed to provide us, for no additional consideration, a 1% working interest in the Stansell field prospect described below.   Stansell Field, Floyd County, Texas   We hold a 1% working interest in an oil prospect located in Floyd County, Texas. The working interest comprises 15,000 leased acres in the southern section of the Palo Duro basin. The initial project will be the re-entry of the Stansell #1-A well, an existing wellbore that was drilled in 2006. The original drilling encountered oil shows in three separate reservoirs and the operator intends to re-enter and recomplete the Stansell #1-A the Companying current fracture stimulation technology. We have a carried 1% working interest in the Stansell #1-A well through the tanks. In April 2015, the operator has started the re-entry of the Stansell #1-A well.   Wolfcamp Field, Hale County, Texas   In June and July 2014, the Company acquired non-operating leases covering approximately 1,070 gross mineral acre leases in the Wolfcamp field located in Hale County, Texas. The leases were acquired for cash payments of $45,484. The leases have a primary term of five years with the Company option to extend the term for another five years. The leased properties constitute the surface acreage comprising a natural gas prospect, for which we hold 50% of the working interest and 40% net revenue interest. The leased properties are subject to a 20% royalty interest held by the owners and a third party. the Company is currently evaluating the Company options for the exploitation of the leased properties, including the Company sale of the leases or the Company farm-out of the leases to a natural gas operator.    Sale of Port Hudson Field and West Cam 225   During the quarter ended March 31, 2015, the Company decided to sell 100% of its interest in Port Hudson field and West Cam 225. The net investment of $653,376 was reclassed as oil and gas properties held for sale and recorded at market value of $335,500. The Company recorded impairment loss of $317,876 due to reduction of the market value comparing to the cost of these investments.   On April 6, 2015, the Company entered into agreements with Hi-Tech exploration, LLC to sell its entire interests in the Port Hudson field and the West Cam 225 for a total consideration of $335,500. The Company completed the sale and paid $150,050 for outstanding costs and recorded it as loss on sale of oil and gas interest.   Leased Properties from Kiowa Oil Company   On September 30, 2015, the Company entered into an agreement with Kiowa Oil Company to lease 100% of interests, for a period of five years, of properties in North Dakota, Florida, Illinois, and Kentucky. The total price for the subject interests under this lease agreement is $5,000 and a 15% royalty interest in all the subject interests leased. The total price will be paid in the Company’s common shares at the per share price of $0.50.   As of December 31, 2015 and September 30, 2015, total oil and gas properties amounted to $217,433 and $217,433, respectively.

v3.3.1.900

3. Notes Payable - Related Parties	3 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2015
Debt Disclosure [Abstract]
Notes Payable - Related Parties	On August 14, 2013, the Company entered into a loan agreement with a shareholder, Gary Bryant, pursuant to which Mr. Bryant loaned the Company $417,762, the proceeds of which were used to partially finance the acquisition of the Port Hudson interest described in Note 2 above. The loan beared interest on the unpaid principal amount at the rate of 8% per annum. All principal and interest were payable over a four year period, commencing November 1, 2013, at the amortized rate of $10,198 per month. The Company’s obligations under the loan were secured by our working interest in the Port Hudson field.   On September 6, 2013, the Company entered into another loan agreement with Mr. Gary Bryant, pursuant to which Mr. Bryant loaned the Company $130,000, the proceeds of which were used to partially finance the Company’s payment of its allocable expenses associated with its working interest in the West Cam 225 field, described in Note 2 above. The loan beared interest on the unpaid principal amount at the rate of 6% per annum. All principal and interest were payable on December 6, 2013 and were convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock, at the option of the holder, at the rate of $0.50 per share. In December 2013, Mr. Bryant and the Company entered to an agreement to extend the due date of the loan to February 6, 2016. The Company’s obligations under the loan were secured by its working interest in the Port Hudson field. The Company also entered into an amendment to its loan agreement with Mr. Bryant dated August 14, 2013, in the original principal amount of $417,762, to provide that all principal and interest under that loan agreement were convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock, at the option of the holder, at the rate of $0.50 per share.   On April 3, 2015, Mr. Bryant agreed to release the security interest in the Port Hudson field as the Company engaged in negotiations to sell the property.   On September 6, 2013, the Company entered into a second loan agreement with a company controlled by one of the shareholders pursuant to which the lender loaned the Company $100,000. The proceeds of which were used to partially finance the Company’s payment of its allocable expenses associated with its working interest in the West Cam 225 field, described in Note 2 above. The loan carried interest on the unpaid principal amount at the rate of 6% per annum. The Company’s obligations under the loan were secured by the Company’s working interest in the West Cam 225 field. In connection with the loan, the Company granted the lender a warrant to purchase 200,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, at an exercise price of $0.50 per share, over a two year period expiring on September 5, 2015. This note was fully paid off in April 2014.   The Company determined that the fair value of the above conversion options and the warrants using the Black–Scholes model with the variables listed below:   · Volatility: 160%   · Risk free rate of return: 0.01% to 0.875%   · Expected term: 0.25 to 4 years   On September 16, 2014, the Company entered into a Note purchase agreement with Lake Oswego Oil Company, LLC, an Oregon limited liability company controlled by one of the shareholders, pursuant to which the Company sold a secured promissory note in the principal amount of $50,000, for a purchase price of $50,000. Interest accrues on the unpaid principal balance of the note at the rate of six percent per annum. This note was fully paid off in the quarter ended December 31, 2014. As an inducement to the note holder to enter into this agreement, the Company also granted the note holder a warrant to purchase 100,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, and exercisable at $0.50 per share over a two year period expiring on September 16, 2019.   The Company determined that the fair value of the warrants using Black–Scholes model with the variable listed below:   · Volatility: 340%   · Risk free rate of return: 1.688%   · Expected term: 2 years   On September 30, 2015, Mr. Bryant agreed to convert the outstanding principal amounts of $325,146 and $130,000 and accrued interest to the Company’s common stock at $0.5 and $0.5 per share respectively.   In connection with the issuance of the above notes, the Company recorded a note discount of $50,000 and $647,762 for the years ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, which are to be amortized over the lives of the notes. On September 30, 2015, due to conversion of the full outstanding principal amount owed to Mr. Bryant, the related note discount was fully amortized.

v3.3.1.900

4. Shareholder Advances	3 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2015
ShareholderAdvancesAbstract
Shareholder Advances	During the year ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, a shareholder made advances to the Company to support its daily operations. These advances are due on demand and do not bear any interest. As of December 31, 2015 and September 30, 2015, the total outstanding amount due to the shareholder was $35,000 and $35,000, respectively.   During the year ended September 30, 2015, a shareholder paid a total amount of $15,000 for payment of legal fees on behalf of the Company through his personal credit line. The Company repaid $3,000 during the three months ended December 31, 2015. The outstanding balance is due on demand and bears variable interest of 25.99%. As of December 31, 2015 and September 30, 2015, the total outstanding amount due to the shareholder was $7,000 and $10,000, respectively.

v3.3.1.900

5. Shareholders' Equity	3 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2015
Shareholders' Equity
Shareholders' Equity	The Company is authorized to issue 200,000,000 shares of common stock, par value of $0.001, and 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value of $0.001.   During the year ended September 30, 2014, the Company entered into various subscription agreements with accredited investors to sell 336,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at $0.50 per share. The total amount of $168,000 was received upon signing of the subscription agreements.   In September 2015, the Company entered into a subscription agreement with an accredited investor to sell 100,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at $0.25 per share. The total amount of $25,000 was received and shares were issued in September 2015.   On September 30, 2015, Mr. Bryant, a shareholder and convertible note holder, agreed to convert the outstanding principal amounts of $325,146 and $130,000 due to him to the Company’s common stock at $0.50 per share. As of December 31, 2015, these shares had not been issued and were recorded as common stock payable.   As of December 31, 2015 and September 30, 2015, the Company had 14,515,400 and 14,515,400 shares of common stock issued and outstanding and had not issued any of its preferred stock.   On September 15, 2011, the Company adopted the West Texas Resources, Inc. 2011 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) providing for the grant of non-qualified stock options and incentive stock options to purchase its common stock and for grant of restricted and unrestricted grants. The Company has reserved 3,000,000 shares of its common stock under the Plan. All officers, directors, employees and consultants to the Company are eligible to participate under the Plan. The purpose of the Plan is to provide eligible participants with an opportunity to acquire an ownership interest in the Company.   In 2011, the Company granted options to certain consultants to purchase 400,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. The options vest immediately and expire on September 15, 2016. The fair value of each share-based award was estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model or a lattice model. The fair value of these options, determined to be $65,402, was included in general and administrative expenses for the year ended September 30, 2011.   The following assumptions were used in the fair value method calculation:   · Volatility: 83%   · Risk free rate of return: 1%   · Expected term: 5 years   On March 7, 2014, the Company granted options to certain consultants to purchase 1,500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, of which 200,000 options vested upon the date of grant and the balance of 1,300,000 options expired in October 2014 in connection with the termination of the consulting arrangement. The 200,000 vested options expire on March 7, 2019.The fair value of the vested options for 200,000 shares, determined to be $116,137, was recorded in general and administrative expenses for the year ended September 30, 2014.   On March 11, 2014, the Company granted options to its officers to purchase a total of 200,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. The options expire on March 11, 2019 and vest immediately. The fair value of these options determined to be $116,119 and was included in general and administrative expenses for the year ended September 30, 2014.   The following assumptions were used in the fair value method calculation:   · Volatility: 190%   · Risk free rate of return: 1.5%   · Expected term: 5 years   On April 16, 2015, the Company granted options to Mr. Paul Brogan, the Company’s director, to purchase a total of 200,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. The options have an exercise price of $0.5 per share and expire on April 16, 2020 and 66,667 shares vest immediately with the rest vest equally on April 16, 2016 and 2017. The fair value of these options was determined to be $99,712, of which $9,739 was amortized and included in general and administrative expenses for the three months ended December 31, 2015.   The following assumptions were used in the fair value method calculation:   · Volatility: 266%   · Risk free rate of return: 1.375%   · Expected term: 5 years   The following information applies to all options outstanding at December 31, 2015:   · Weighted average exercise price: $0.43   · Options outstanding and exercisable: 913,890   · Average remaining life: 2.24 years

v3.3.1.900

6. Income Taxes	3 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2015
Income Tax Disclosure [Abstract]
6. Income Taxes	Based on the available information and other factors, management believes it is more likely than not that the net deferred tax assets at September 30, 2015 and 2014 will not be fully realizable. Accordingly, management has recorded a full valuation allowance against its net deferred tax assets at September 30, 2015 and 2014. As of September 30, 2015 and 2014, the Company had federal net operating loss carry-forwards of approximately $2,400,000 and $1,300,000, respectively, expiring beginning in 2032.   Deferred tax assets consist of the following components:       September 30,     September 30,       2015     2014                 Net loss carryforward   $ 840,000     $ 455,000   Valuation allowance     (840,000 )     (455,000 ) Total deferred tax assets   $ –     $ –

v3.3.1.900

7. Subsequent Event	3 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2015
Subsequent Events [Abstract]
Subsequent Event	Events subsequent to December 31, 2015 have been evaluated through the date these financial statements were issued to determine whether they should be disclosed to keep the financial statements from being misleading. Management noted the following subsequent events that should be disclosed:   · In January 2016, the Company entered into an agreement with Mr. Gary Bryant to convert the outstanding balance of shareholder advances of $42,000 to the Company’s common stock at a price of $0.10 per share.

v3.3.1.900

1. Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Policies)	3 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2015
Organization, Consolidation and Presentation of Financial Statements [Abstract]
Organization and business	Organization and business   West Texas Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) was incorporated under the laws of Nevada on December 9, 2010 under the name Texas Resources Energy, Inc., a Texas corporation. On June 30, 2011, the Company changed its name to West Texas Resources, Inc. The Company intends to engage in the acquisition, exploration and development of oil and gas properties in North America. From its inception, the Company has devoted its activities to developing a business plan, raising capital and acquiring operating assets.
Basis of presentation	Basis of presentation   The accompanying unaudited financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (U.S.) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 8-03 of Regulation S-X promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and reflect all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments and other adjustments, which management believes are necessary to fairly present the financial position, results of operations and cash flows of the Company, for the respective periods presented. The results of operations for an interim period are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for any other interim period or the year as a whole. The accompanying unaudited financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes for the year ended September 30, 2015.
Going concern	Going concern   The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (GAAP) that contemplate continuation of the Company as a going concern. The Company has not earned any significant revenues since inception. During the three months ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, the Company incurred a net loss of $66,441 and $101,785, respectively. In addition, the Company had an accumulative deficit of $2,446,773 and $2,380,332, as of December 31, 2015 and September 30, 2015, respectively. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.   The Company will require up to $1 million of additional capital in order to fund its proposed operations over the next 12 months. Management plans to continue to seek sources of financing on favorable terms; however, there are no assurances that any such financing can be obtained on favorable terms, if at all.   Management expects to monitor and control the Company’s operating costs until cash is available through financing or operating activities.  There are no assurances that the Company will be successful in achieving these plans.  The Company anticipates that losses will continue until such time, if ever, as the Company is able to generate sufficient revenues to support its operations.
Oil and gas properties	Oil and gas properties   The Company uses the successful efforts method of accounting for oil and gas producing activities. Costs to acquire mineral interests in oil and gas properties, to drill and equip exploratory wells that find proved reserves, to drill and equip development wells and related asset retirement costs are capitalized. Costs to drill exploratory wells that do not find proved reserves, geological and geophysical costs, and costs of carrying and retaining unproved properties are expensed.   Unproved oil and gas properties that are individually significant are periodically assessed for impairment of value, and a loss is recognized at the time of impairment by providing an impairment allowance. Other unproved properties are amortized based on the Company's experience of successful drilling and average holding period. Capitalized costs of producing oil and gas properties, after considering estimated residual salvage values, are depreciated and depleted by the unit-of-production method.     On the sale or retirement of a complete unit of a proved property, the cost and related accumulated depreciation, depletion, and amortization are eliminated from the property accounts, and the resultant gain or loss is recognized. On the retirement or sale of a partial unit of proved property, the cost is charged to accumulated depreciation, depletion, and amortization with a resulting gain or loss recognized in income.  On the sale of an entire interest in an unproved property for cash or cash equivalent, gain or loss on the sale is recognized, taking into consideration the amount of any recorded impairment if the property had been assessed individually. If a partial interest in an unproved property is sold, the amount received is treated as a reduction of the cost of the interest retained.
Impairment of long-lived assets	Impairment of long-lived assets   The Company accounts for the impairment and disposition of long-lived assets in accordance with ASC 360-10-35, Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets. In accordance with ASC 360-10-35, long-lived assets are reviewed for events of changes in circumstances, which indicate that their carrying value may not be recoverable.
Asset retirement obligations	Asset retirement obligations   ASC 410-20, Asset Retirement Obligations, clarifies that a legal obligation to perform an asset retirement activity in which the timing and/or method of settlement are conditional on a future event that may or may not be within the control of the entity. The obligation to perform the asset retirement activity is unconditional even though uncertainty exists about the timing and/or method of settlement. ASC 410-20 requires a liability to be recognized for the fair value of a conditional asset retirement obligation if the fair value of the liability can be reasonably estimated.   Except for the Eastland County investment, the asset retirement obligations for the other properties are recognized by the operators of these properties and deducted against the revenue interest of the Company.
Cash, cash equivalents, and other cash flow statement supplemental information	Cash, cash equivalents, and other cash flow statement supplemental information   Cash is commonly considered to consist of currency and demand in deposits. The Company considers all liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less that are readily convertible into cash to be cash equivalents.  The Company places its cash with high credit quality financial institutions.  Accounts at these institutions are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) up to $250,000. The Company performs ongoing evaluations of these institutions to limit its concentration of risk exposure.  Management believes this risk is not significant due to the financial strength of the financial institutions utilized by the Company.
Use of estimates	Use of estimates   The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect certain reported amounts and disclosures.  Accordingly, actual results could differ from those estimates.
Income taxes	Income taxes   The Company reports certain expenses differently for financial and tax reporting purposes and, accordingly, provides for the related deferred taxes.  Income taxes are accounted for under the liability method in accordance with ASC 740, Income Taxes.   Management has considered its tax positions and believes that all of the positions taken by the Company in its Federal and State tax returns are more likely than not to be sustained upon examination. The Company is subject to examination by U.S. Federal and State tax authorities from 2012 to the present, generally for three years after they are filed.   The Company has not filed its income tax returns for fiscal years 2012 to 2014. The Company plans to file these tax returns in second quarter of 2016. The Company believes that it should not have any material impact on the financials because the Company did not have any tax liabilities due to net loss incurred for these years.
Basic and diluted net income (loss) per share	Basic and diluted net income (loss) per share   Basic net income (loss) per share is based upon the weighted average number of common shares outstanding.  Diluted net income (loss) per share is based on the assumption that all dilutive convertible shares and stock options were converted or exercised.  Dilution is computed by applying the treasury stock method.  Under this method, options and warrants are assumed to be exercised at the beginning of the period (or at the time of issuance, if later), and as if funds obtained thereby were used to purchase common stock at the average market price during the period.  For the three months ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, all common stock equivalents were anti-dilutive.
Stock-based payments	Stock-based payments   Compensation costs for all share-based awards are measured based on the grant date fair value and are recognized over the vesting period. The Company has no awards with market or performance conditions. Excess tax benefits will be recognized as an addition to additional paid-in-capital.
Revenue recognition	Revenue recognition   In accordance with the requirements ASC topic 605 “Revenue Recognition”, revenues are recognized at such time as (1) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (2) delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, (3) the seller’s price to the buyer is fixed or determinable and (4) collectability is reasonably assured.
Fair value of financial instruments	Fair value of financial instruments   The accounting standards regarding fair value of financial instruments and related fair value measurements defines financial instruments and requires disclosure of the fair value of financial instruments held by the Company. The Company considers the carrying amount of cash and other current assets and liabilities to approximate their fair values because of the short period of time between the origination of such instruments and their expected realization.   The Company has also adopted ASC 820-10 which defines fair value, establishes a three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosures of fair value measurement and enhances disclosure requirements for fair value measures. The three levels are defined as follows:   · Level 1 inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.   · Level 2 inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs that are observable for the assets or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instruments.   · Level 3 inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value.   As of December 31, 2015 and September 30, 2015, the Company did not identify any assets or liabilities that are required to be presented on the balance sheet at fair value in accordance with ASC 820-10.   Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior year financial statements in order for them to be in conformity with the current year presentation.
Recent accounting pronouncement	Recent accounting pronouncement   In July 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued a new accounting standard that requires an unrecognized tax benefit to be presented as a decrease in a deferred tax asset where a net operating loss, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward exists and certain criteria are met. The new accounting standard is effective as of October 1, 2014 and is consistent with the Company’s present practice.   In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09 " Revenue from Contracts with Customers " (Topic 606). Topic 606 supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in Topic 605, “Revenue Recognition”, including most industry-specific revenue recognition guidance throughout the Industry Topics of the Codification. In addition, the amendments create a new Subtopic 340-40, “Other Assets and Deferred Costs—Contracts with Customers”. In summary, the core principle of Topic 606 is that an entity recognizes revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. For a public entity, the amendments in this Update are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within that reporting period. Early application is not permitted. Management is currently evaluating the impact this guidance will have on Company’s financial position and statement of operations.   In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-12, "Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718)," which makes amendments to the codification topic 718, "Accounting for Share-Based Payments.” when the terms of an award provide that a performance target could be achieved after the requisite service period. The new guidance becomes effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2015, early adoption is permitted.  Management is currently evaluating the impact this guidance will have on our financial position and results of operations.   In August 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2014-15, “Presentation of Financial Statements – Going Concern”, Subtopic 205-40, “Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern.” The amendments in this ASU apply to all entities and require management to assess an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern by incorporating and expanding upon certain principles that are currently in U.S. auditing standards. Specifically, the amendments (1) provide a definition of the term substantial doubt, (2) require an evaluation every reporting period including interim periods, (3) provide principles for considering the mitigating effect of management’s plans, (4) require certain disclosures when substantial doubt is alleviated as a result of consideration of management’s plans, (5) require an express statement and other disclosures when substantial doubt is not alleviated, and (6) require an assessment for a period of one year after the date that the financial statements are issued (or available to be issued). The amendments in this Update are effective for the annual period ending after December 15, 2016, and for annual periods and interim periods thereafter. Early application is permitted. Management is currently evaluating the impact this guidance will have on Company’s financial position and results of operations.

v3.3.1.900

6. Income Taxes (Tables)	3 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2015
Income Tax Disclosure [Abstract]
Schedule of deferred tax assets	September 30,     September 30,       2015     2014                 Net loss carryforward   $ 840,000     $ 455,000   Valuation allowance     (840,000 )     (455,000 ) Total deferred tax assets   $ –     $ –

v3.3.1.900

1. Organization (Details Narrative) - USD ($)	3 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2015	Dec. 31, 2014	Sep. 30, 2015
Organization, Consolidation and Presentation of Financial Statements [Abstract]
Net loss	$ (66,441)	$ (101,785)
Accumulated deficit	$ (2,446,773)		$ (2,380,332)

v3.3.1.900

2. Oil and Gas Properties (Details Narrative) - USD ($)	3 Months Ended	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2015	Sep. 30, 2015	Sep. 30, 2014	Mar. 31, 2015
Oil and gas properties, successful effort	$ 217,433	$ 217,433
Port Hudson
Working interest percentage in oil and gas property	4.0506%
Net revenue interest percentage in oil and gas property	3.1595%
Loss on sale of working interest			$ (19,983)
West Cam
Working interest percentage in oil and gas property	10.0167%
Net revenue interest percentage in oil and gas property	7.212%
Sunshine Prospect [Member]
Costs incurred to acquire oil and gas property			76,500
Working interest percentage in oil and gas property	15.00%
Net revenue interest percentage in oil and gas property	14.25%
Birnie Field [Member]
Costs incurred to acquire oil and gas property			70,000
Working interest percentage in oil and gas property	10.00%
Net revenue interest percentage in oil and gas property	7.50%
Stansell Field
Working interest percentage in oil and gas property	1.00%
Wolfcamp Field [Member]
Costs incurred to acquire oil and gas property			$ 45,484
Working interest percentage in oil and gas property	50.00%
Net revenue interest percentage in oil and gas property	40.00%
Port Hudson and West Cam 225
Oil and gas properties, successful effort				$ (653,376)
Oil and gas property held for sale				$ 335,500
Impairment loss on investment		317,876
Kiowa Oil Company
Costs incurred to acquire oil and gas property		$ 5,000
Working interest percentage in oil and gas property		100.00%
Royalty interest given as consideration		15.00%

v3.3.1.900

3. Notes Payable - Related Parties (Details Narrative) - USD ($)	12 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2015	Sep. 30, 2014
Gary Bryant
Conversion of notes and interest payable	$ 325,146	$ 130,000

v3.3.1.900

4. Shareholder Advances (Details Narrative) - USD ($)	3 Months Ended	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2015	Sep. 30, 2015
Due to shareholder	$ 42,000	$ 45,000
Shareholder
Due to shareholder	35,000	35,000
Shareholder
Proceeds from shareholder		15,000
Repayments to shareholder	3,000
Due to shareholder	$ 7,000	$ 10,000
Interest rate		25.99%

v3.3.1.900

5. Shareholders' Equity (Details Narrative) - USD ($)	3 Months Ended	12 Months Ended
	Dec. 31, 2015	Sep. 30, 2015	Sep. 30, 2014
Weighted average exercise price of options	$ 0.43
Options outstanding	913,890
Options exercisable	913,890
Average remaining life options	2 years 2 months 26 days
2011 Stock Incentive Plan
Common stock reserved under plan		3,000,000
Director Brogan
Options granted		200,000
Options vested		66,667
Fair value of options vested		$ 99,712
Consultants [Member]
Share based compensation expense	$ 9,739
Options granted			1,500,000
Options vested			200,000
Options expired			1,300,000
Fair value of options vested			$ 116,137
Officers
Options granted			200,000
Options vested			200,000
Fair value of options vested			$ 116,119
Accredited Investors
Subscriptions sold, shares			336,000
Proceeds from subscriptions			$ 168,000
Accredited Investor
Proceeds from subscriptions		$ 25,000
Stock issued for cash, shares issued		100,000

v3.3.1.900

6. Income Taxes (Details) - USD ($)	Sep. 30, 2015	Sep. 30, 2014
Income Tax Disclosure [Abstract]
Net loss carryforward	$ 840,000	$ 455,000
Valuation allowance	(840,000)	(455,000)
Total deferred tax assets	$ 0	$ 0

v3.3.1.900

6. Income Taxes (Details Narrative) - USD ($)	12 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2015	Sep. 30, 2014
Income Tax Disclosure [Abstract]
Federal net operating loss carryforward	$ 2,400,000	$ 1,300,000
Operating loss carryforward expiration date	Dec. 31, 2032