22 January 2025
Savannah Resources
Plc
(AIM: SAV)
('Savannah', or the 'Company')
Extensive New Lithium
Mineralisation Identified at the Barroso Lithium
Project
Savannah Resources plc (AIM: SAV)
('Savannah' or the 'Company'), the
developer of the Barroso Lithium Project (the 'Project') in
Portugal, Europe's largest spodumene lithium
deposit, is pleased to announce further
excellent results from rock chip sampling completed as part of the
ongoing exploration programme at the Project. These results provide a firm indication that significant
follow up targets exist on the Project's licence areas in addition
to the potential extensions of the existing orebodies.
Highlights:
·
Lab generated assay results from exploration works
on both the C-100 and Aldeia (Block B) Mining Licences have shown
that lithium mineralisation within the two licence areas is
extensive.
C-100 Licence:
·
New mineralised pegmatites have been identified at
the western end of the C-100 licence, which provide further targets
for follow up work.
·
Extensions to the known lithium mineralisation at
Carvalha da Baccora and Altos dos Cortiços have been confirmed,
increasing the potential of these areas. Significant lithium
mineralisation from rock chip samples include:
o From
Carvalha da Bacora: 1.66% Li₂O; 1.5% Li₂O; 1.75% Li₂O; 1.46%
Li₂O
o From
Alto dos Corticos: 3.01% Li₂O; 1.9% Li₂O
Aldeia Licence, Block B:
·
Reconnaissance rock chip and channel sampling on
Aldeia Block B has highlighted multiple new lithium bearing
pegmatites which are beyond Savannah's initial estimation.
Significant lithium mineralisation includes:
o Rock
chips: 2.11% Li₂O and 1.32% Li₂O
Channel samples:
o 6m @
1.39% Li₂O from Trench 1
o 14m
@ 1.01% Li₂O from Trench 1b
o 4m @
2.08% Li₂O and 4m @ 2.62% Li₂O from Trench 2
Light and Detection ('LIDAR') Survey:
·
The first LIDAR drone survey conducted over the
Project has identified several historical tin mining areas hidden
by vegetation. Savannah will follow up these targets as at Grandão
and Pinheiro, zones of historical mining indicate a possible
association between the spodumene and tin bearing
pegmatites.
Conclusions:
·
These results reiterate the significant potential
which exists to add to Savannah's current 28Mt at 1.05%
Li2O (at 0.5% Li2O cut-off) JORC resource
inventory in the future.
Savannah's Chief Executive Officer, Emanuel Proença
said, "The
results from the surface exploration which our team undertook are
truly exciting. All of these results come from targets which have
received little or no significant exploration work to date and are
separate to the Project's five existing orebodies, all of which
themselves have known extensions we are still to fully define.
While there remains much work to do as a result of these initial
high-grade chip and channel samples, the early conclusion is very
clear: the Barroso Lithium Project remains highly prospective for
further spodumene lithium resource delineation.
"We are firmly focused on the many
workstreams required for the Definitive Feasibility Study and
enablement of the Project's startup.
However, we can and will
continue to develop these,
and other, additional exploration targets at the same time. In this
way, we can build a
pipeline of opportunities to increase the Project's existing
resources and life of mine over time. Furthermore, as our
experience on the C-100 licence has shown, the full extent of the
mineralisation is easily underestimated from outcrops alone. For
example, at Grandão, outcropping pegmatite is found mainly at the top of the hill
with no indications of subsurface continuity. Through subsequent
drilling however, Grandão
has now been delineated as the largest orebody at
the Project.
"It's great to be able to add
significant further exploration upside to our already compelling
European lithium development story."
Further Information
Savannah has completed a field
exploration programme of rock chip sampling and mapping to identify
further mineralised pegmatite targets for future follow up drill
programmes (Figure 1). The pegmatite field within the C-100 and
adjoining Aldeia Licence B licence areas is extensive and is
controlled by a broad east - west trending structural corridor. To
date Savannah has concentrated most of its work on the main
pegmatite clusters at Grandão,
Reservatório, Pinheiro, NOA and Aldeia
Block A. Some initial preliminary evaluations have been carried out
at several locations including Piagro Negro and Carvalha da Bacora
which demonstrated their prospectivity. The field programme
concentrated on locating more pegmatites with lithium
mineralisation at the western end of the C-100 licence, and on the
Aldeia Block B licence area, which have only had a limited amount
of historical exploration work carried out.
Figure 1: Project summary map showing location of rock chip
sampling & mapped pegmatites
Access in these areas was very
limited in places due to the amount of dense undergrowth requiring
a significant amount of clearing to assess an area in detail.
However, the team managed to conduct a comprehensive programme,
collecting 110 samples in total.
Aldeia Block B licence area
In the Aldeia Block B licence area,
several northeast trending pegmatite bodies seen in the western
part of the Block follow the same trend as the pegmatite at
the Reservatório deposit, and rock chip sampling has shown them to contain
significant lithium mineralisation (Figure 2). Two of the larger
outcrops are seen to align along the same strike, similar to what
is seen at Reservatório, and could represent a part buried pegmatite with
approximately 500m of strike length. In the eastern part of the
Block, two distinct north - south trending clusters of pegmatites
have been sampled in detail with channel samples collected across
available faces of the pegmatite. Significant Aldeia Block B
results are as follows:
Rock chips: 2.11% Li₂O and 1.32% Li₂O
Channel samples:
·
6m @ 1.39% Li₂O
from Trench 1
·
14m @ 1.01% Li₂O
from Trench 1b
·
4m @ 2.08% Li₂O
and 4m @ 2.62% Li₂O from Trench 2
Figure 2. Aldeia Block B potential showing location of
significant rock chip and channel samples
In addition, several historical tin
mining areas were evident from Savannah's recently flown LIDAR
(Light detection and ranging survey), which was able to map the
underlying topography in fine detail through the vegetation cover.
While not the main focus of the exploration programme, these tin
mining areas are of potential interest as significant amounts of
lithium mineralisation may be associated with these pegmatite
bodies. Further assessment is required but at Grandão and Pinheiro there are also
zones of historical mining peripheral to the main pegmatite bodies
that indicate a possible association between the spodumene and tin
bearing pegmatites.
C-100 licence area
At Carvalha da Bacora, on the C-100
licence area, previous drilling (see RNS announcements dated 25 May
2017 and 6 September 2018) had intersected a west dipping pegmatite
body that contained significant mineralisation which
included:
· 26m at 1.09% Li₂O from 17m in 18CDBRC002*
· 12m at 1.22% Li₂O from 50m in SAC2
*Assay corrected from that reported
in the Company's RNS dated 6 September 2018. The Carvalha da Bacora
target and this assay do not feature in any JORC Resource
estimations for the Project and had no impact on the Project's
economics, as reported in the June 2023 Scoping Study.
The mapping was able to locate
further pegmatite bodies to the south of the drilling (Figure 3)
and rock chip sampling highlighted these pegmatites as lithium
bearing with significant results at Carvalha da Bacora
including: 1.75% Li₂O; 1.66% Li₂O; 1.5% Li₂O; 1.46%
Li₂O.
This area will be the target for
follow up work, with the aim of carrying out further preliminary
reverse circulation drilling to define the extent of the lithium
mineralisation.
Figure 3. Carvalha da Bacora potential showing significant
drill intersections and rock chip sample
location
At Altos dos Corticos, there is a
pegmatite body that outcrops in a forestry road cutting that can be
traced to the north on satellite imagery. The trend of the
pegmatite is north - south and it extends for approximately
600m up to the major ridge
line where it is seen to outcrop in a large fire break clearing.
The Altos Corticos pegmatite zone contains areas of historical tin
workings and rock chip sampling from this zone returned significant
lithium mineralisation including 3.01% Li₂O and 1.9%
Li₂O.
This zone has only had a very
limited amount of exploration work on it to date and is worthy of
further evaluation so its full potential can be understood. Results
to date have indicated that there could be a significant zone of
lithium mineralisation that will be the focus of future follow up
exploration work.
A third area of pegmatite occurrence
is found at the western end of the licence. Called Altos da Urreta, the area is marked by
small, isolated outcrops and sub outcrops of pegmatite consisting
of small blocks visible above the surface vegetation. There is
evidence that the previous holders of the licence carried out a
trenching programme in the area and mapped an east - west trending
pegmatite. However, this area has been backfilled and there is
little evidence of pegmatite apart from small pegmatite rocks and
boulders in the general vicinity. While no high-grade lithium
mineralisation was encountered there were several samples that
contained anomalous Li₂O, greater than 0.1% Li₂O, with two of the
samples being above 0.5%
Li₂O. The limited outcrop highlights that more work needs to
be carried out to fully assess the potential of the
area.
Conclusion
The results of the mapping programme
have continued to highlight the enormous potential to discover and
delineate further resources within Savannah's Barroso Lithium
Project and in particular the C-100 and Aldeia Block B mining
licences.
The surface mapping highlighted that
pegmatite outcrop is often randomly dispersed and, from Savannah's
experience on the C-100 licence, is often not indicative of the
full extent of the associated mineralisation. For example,
at Reservatório, pegmatite outcrop was limited to just two locations at the
eastern and western end of the deposit, but Savannah's drill
programme highlighted the continuity of the pegmatite body (Figure
4). This was also evident at Grandão
where the pegmatite is found mainly at the top of
the hill and no indications of subsurface continuity were
evident. Grandão has now been delineated through drilling as the largest
orebody at the Project. At Pinheiro outcropping pegmatite was
confined to three restricted areas and drilling has confirmed
continuity of the pegmatite below the surface.
Hence, Savannah is encouraged by the
findings from this field programme, indicating that significant
follow up targets exist on the Project's licence areas in addition
to extensions of the existing orebodies. This highlights that the
Barroso pegmatite field is a major lithium bearing province and
that Savannah is ideally placed to add to its already considerable
lithium resource.
Figure 4. Outlining pegmatite outcrop vs actual extent of
pegmatite body at Reservatório and NOA
Competent Person and Regulatory Information
The information in this announcement
that relates to exploration results is based upon information
compiled by Mr Dale Ferguson, Technical Director of Savannah
Resources Limited. Mr Ferguson is a Member of the Australasian
Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (AusIMM) and has sufficient
experience which is relevant to the style of mineralisation and
type of deposit under consideration and to the activity which he is
undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the
December 2012 edition of the "Australasian Code for Reporting of
Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves" (JORC
Code) and is a Qualified Person under the AIM Rules. Mr Ferguson
consents to the inclusion in the report of the matters based upon
the information in the form and context in which it
appears.
Regulatory Information
This Announcement contains inside
information for the purposes of the UK version of the market abuse
regulation (EU No. 596/2014) as it forms part of United Kingdom
domestic law by virtue of the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018
("UK MAR").
Savannah - Enabling Europe's energy
transition.
**ENDS**
Follow @SavannahRes on X (Formerly
known as Twitter)
Follow
Savannah Resources on LinkedIn
For further information please
visit www.savannahresources.com
or contact:
Savannah Resources PLC
Emanuel Proença, CEO
|
Tel: +44 20 7117 2489
|
SP
Angel Corporate Finance LLP (Nominated Advisor &
Broker)
David Hignell/ Charlie Bouverat
(Corporate Finance)
Grant Barker/Abigail Wayne (Sales
& Broking)
|
Tel: +44 20 3470 0470
|
Camarco (UK Financial PR)
Gordon Poole/ Emily Hall / Nuthara
Bandara
|
Tel: +44 20 3757 4980
|
|
|
Portugal Media Relations
Savannah Resources: Antonio
Neves Costa, Communications Manager
LPM: Herminio Santos/ Jorge
Coelho / Margarida Pinheiro
|
Tel: +351 962 678 912
Tel: +351 218 508 110
|
About Savannah
Savannah Resources is a mineral
resource development company and the sole owner of the Barroso
Lithium Project (the 'Project') in northern Portugal, the largest
battery grade spodumene lithium resource outlined to date in
Europe.
Through the Project, Savannah will
help Portugal to play an important role in providing a long-term,
locally sourced, lithium raw material supply for Europe's lithium
battery value chain. Once in operation the Project will produce
enough lithium (contained in c.190,000tpa of spodumene concentrate)
for approximately half a million vehicle battery packs per year,
and hence make a significant contribution towards the European
Commission's Critical Raw Material Act goal of a minimum 10% of
European endogenous lithium production from 2030. Savannah is being
supported in its development goals by its strategic partner and
largest shareholder, AMG Critical Materials N.V., the global
critical materials business.
Savannah is focused on the
responsible development and operation of the Barroso Lithium
Project so that its impact on the environment is minimised and the
socio-economic benefits that it can bring to all its stakeholders
are maximised.
The Company is listed and regulated
on the London Stock Exchange's Alternative Investment Market (AIM)
and trades under the ticker "SAV".
APPENDIX 1 - Rock Chip Locations from Mapping Program.
Prospect
|
SampleID
|
Sample Type
|
NAT_East
|
NAT_North
|
Trench Loc
|
Li₂O_pct2
|
Carvalha da Bacora
|
S01232
|
Rock chip
|
598514
|
4608548
|
|
0.15
|
Carvalha da Bacora
|
S01233
|
Rock chip
|
598511
|
4608525
|
|
0.04
|
Carvalha da Bacora
|
S01234
|
Rock chip
|
598514
|
4608522
|
|
0.09
|
Carvalha da Bacora
|
S01235
|
Rock chip
|
598465
|
4608169
|
|
1.66
|
Carvalha da Bacora
|
S01236
|
Rock chip
|
598454
|
4608168
|
|
1.5
|
Carvalha da Bacora
|
S01237
|
Rock chip
|
598459
|
4608157
|
|
1.75
|
Carvalha da Bacora
|
S01238
|
Rock chip
|
598462
|
4608150
|
|
1.46
|
Carvalha da Bacora
|
S01239
|
Rock chip
|
598462
|
4608142
|
|
1.06
|
Carvalha da Bacora
|
S01240
|
Rock chip
|
598461
|
4608133
|
|
0.79
|
Carvalha da Bacora
|
S01241
|
Rock chip
|
598488
|
4608167
|
|
0.09
|
Carvalha da Bacora
|
S01242
|
Rock chip
|
598601
|
4608164
|
|
0.71
|
Carvalha da Bacora
|
S01243
|
Rock chip
|
598585
|
4608193
|
|
0.2
|
Carvalha da Bacora
|
S01244
|
Rock chip
|
598611
|
4608217
|
|
1.09
|
Carvalha da Bacora
|
S01245
|
Rock chip
|
598625
|
4608177
|
|
0.34
|
Carvalha da Bacora
|
S01246
|
Rock chip
|
598480
|
4608208
|
|
0.02
|
Carvalha da Bacora
|
S01247
|
Rock chip
|
598452
|
4607950
|
|
0.08
|
Carvalha da Bacora
|
S01248
|
Rock chip
|
598514
|
4607950
|
|
0.17
|
Carvalha da Bacora
|
S01249
|
Rock chip
|
598567
|
4607875
|
|
0.04
|
Carvalha da Bacora
|
S01250
|
Rock chip
|
598612
|
4607952
|
|
0.21
|
Alto dos Corticos
|
S01251
|
Rock chip
|
597836
|
4608674
|
|
0.08
|
Alto dos Corticos
|
S01252
|
Rock chip
|
597817
|
4608727
|
|
0.02
|
Alto dos Corticos
|
S01253
|
Rock chip
|
597889
|
4608589
|
|
0.04
|
Alto dos Corticos
|
S01254
|
Rock chip
|
597793
|
4608755
|
|
0.05
|
Alto dos Corticos
|
S01255
|
Rock chip
|
597817
|
4608811
|
|
0.39
|
Alto dos Corticos
|
S01256
|
Rock chip
|
597845
|
4608863
|
|
0.1
|
Alto dos Corticos
|
S01257
|
Rock chip
|
597863
|
4608857
|
|
3.01
|
Alto dos Corticos
|
S01258
|
Rock chip
|
597911
|
4608879
|
|
0.36
|
Alto dos Corticos
|
S01259
|
Rock chip
|
597865
|
4608886
|
|
0.23
|
Alto da Urreta
|
S01260
|
Rock chip
|
597366
|
4609493
|
|
0.04
|
Alto da Urreta
|
S01261
|
Rock chip
|
597365
|
4609496
|
|
0.02
|
Alto da Urreta
|
S01262
|
Rock chip
|
597354
|
4609491
|
|
0.03
|
Alto da Urreta
|
S01263
|
Rock chip
|
597354
|
4609498
|
|
0.02
|
Alto da Urreta
|
S01264
|
Rock chip
|
597356
|
4609505
|
|
0.01
|
Alto da Urreta
|
S01265
|
Rock chip
|
597352
|
4609524
|
|
0.14
|
Alto da Urreta
|
S01266
|
Rock chip
|
597348
|
4609526
|
|
0.02
|
Alto dos Corticos
|
S01267
|
Rock chip
|
597901
|
4609036
|
|
0.53
|
Alto dos Corticos
|
S01268
|
Rock chip
|
597909
|
4609053
|
|
0.7
|
Alto dos Corticos
|
S01269
|
Rock chip
|
597910
|
4609066
|
|
1.9
|
Alto da Urreta
|
S01270
|
Rock chip
|
597333
|
4609530
|
|
0.03
|
Alto da Urreta
|
S01271
|
Rock chip
|
597324
|
4609552
|
|
0.04
|
Alto da Urreta
|
S01272
|
Rock chip
|
597282
|
4609590
|
|
0.03
|
Alto da Urreta
|
S01273
|
Rock chip
|
597319
|
4609594
|
|
0.01
|
Alto da Urreta
|
S01274
|
Rock chip
|
597228
|
4609606
|
|
0.03
|
Alto da Urreta
|
S01275
|
Rock chip
|
597258
|
4609568
|
|
0.04
|
Alto da Urreta
|
S01276
|
Rock chip
|
597251
|
4609580
|
|
0.06
|
Alto da Urreta
|
S01277
|
Rock chip
|
597140
|
4609678
|
|
0.01
|
Alto da Urreta
|
S01278
|
Rock chip
|
597234
|
4609731
|
|
0.07
|
Alto da Urreta
|
S01279
|
Rock chip
|
597186
|
4609760
|
|
0.71
|
Alto da Urreta
|
S01280
|
Rock chip
|
596991
|
4609764
|
|
0.29
|
Alto da Urreta
|
S01281
|
Rock chip
|
596993
|
4609749
|
|
0.14
|
Alto da Urreta
|
S01282
|
Rock chip
|
597019
|
4609681
|
|
0.03
|
Alto da Urreta
|
S01283
|
Rock chip
|
597011
|
4609699
|
|
0.59
|
Alto da Urreta
|
S01284
|
Rock chip
|
597019
|
4609722
|
|
0.13
|
Alto da Urreta
|
S01285
|
Rock chip
|
596977
|
4609686
|
|
0.03
|
Alto da Urreta
|
S01286
|
Rock chip
|
596946
|
4609682
|
|
0.23
|
Aldeia B
|
A001
|
Chip Sample
|
600718
|
4608462
|
|
0.14
|
Aldeia B
|
A002
|
Chip Sample
|
600676
|
4608335
|
|
0.53
|
Aldeia B
|
A003
|
Chip Sample
|
600675
|
4608273
|
|
2.52
|
Aldeia B
|
A004
|
Chip Sample
|
600317
|
4608228
|
|
2.11
|
Aldeia B
|
A005
|
Chip Sample
|
600342
|
4608356
|
|
0.75
|
Aldeia B
|
A006
|
Chip Sample
|
599723
|
4608595
|
|
0.14
|
Aldeia B
|
A007
|
Chip Sample
|
599296
|
4608458
|
|
0.04
|
Aldeia B
|
A008
|
Chip Sample
|
599326
|
4608460
|
|
1.32
|
Aldeia B
|
A009
|
Chip Sample
|
599358
|
4608466
|
|
0.08
|
Aldeia B
|
S01022
|
Rock chip
|
600694
|
4608151
|
Aldeia B 01_1b
|
1.51
|
Aldeia B
|
S01023
|
Rock chip
|
600693
|
4608151
|
Aldeia B 01_1b
|
1.4
|
Aldeia B
|
S01024
|
Rock chip
|
600692
|
4608151
|
Aldeia B 01_1b
|
2.69
|
Aldeia B
|
S01025
|
Rock chip
|
600691
|
4608151
|
Aldeia B 01_1b
|
0.55
|
Aldeia B
|
S01026
|
Rock chip
|
600690
|
4608151
|
Aldeia B 01_1b
|
1.32
|
Aldeia B
|
S01027
|
Rock chip
|
600689
|
4608151
|
Aldeia B 01_1b
|
1.23
|
Aldeia B
|
S01028
|
Rock chip
|
600688
|
4608151
|
Aldeia B 01_1b
|
1.29
|
Aldeia B
|
S01029
|
Rock chip
|
600687
|
4608151
|
Aldeia B 01_1b
|
1.21
|
Aldeia B
|
S01030
|
Rock chip
|
600686
|
4608151
|
Aldeia B 01_1b
|
0.22
|
Aldeia B
|
S01031
|
Rock chip
|
600685
|
4608151
|
Aldeia B 01_1b
|
1.42
|
Aldeia B
|
S01032
|
Rock chip
|
600684
|
4608151
|
Aldeia B 01_1b
|
0.82
|
Aldeia B
|
S01033
|
Rock chip
|
600683
|
4608151
|
Aldeia B 01_1b
|
0.08
|
Aldeia B
|
S01034
|
Rock chip
|
600682
|
4608151
|
Aldeia B 01_1b
|
0.13
|
Aldeia B
|
S01035
|
Rock chip
|
600681
|
4608151
|
Aldeia B 01_1b
|
0.21
|
Aldeia B
|
S01036
|
Rock chip
|
600680
|
4608151
|
Aldeia B 01_1b
|
0.06
|
Aldeia B
|
S01037
|
Rock chip
|
600679
|
4608151
|
Aldeia B 01_1b
|
0.05
|
Aldeia B
|
S01038
|
Rock chip
|
600678
|
4608151
|
Aldeia B 01_1b
|
0.06
|
Aldeia B
|
S01039
|
Rock chip
|
600677
|
4608151
|
Aldeia B 01_1b
|
0.03
|
Aldeia B
|
S01040
|
Rock chip
|
600676
|
4608151
|
Aldeia B 01_1b
|
0.02
|
Aldeia B
|
S01041
|
Rock chip
|
600675
|
4608151
|
Aldeia B 01_1b
|
0.03
|
Aldeia B
|
S01042
|
Rock chip
|
600674
|
4608151
|
Aldeia B 01_1b
|
0.06
|
Aldeia B
|
S01043
|
Rock chip
|
600673
|
4608151
|
Aldeia B 01_1b
|
0.07
|
Aldeia B
|
S01044
|
Rock chip
|
600672
|
4608151
|
Aldeia B 01_1b
|
0.03
|
Aldeia B
|
S01045
|
Rock chip
|
600671
|
4608152
|
Aldeia B 01_2b
|
0.03
|
Aldeia B
|
S01075
|
Rock chip
|
600696
|
4608175
|
Aldeia B 01_2b
|
0.06
|
Aldeia B
|
S01076
|
Rock chip
|
600695
|
4608175
|
Aldeia B 01_2b
|
0.03
|
Aldeia B
|
S01077
|
Rock chip
|
600694
|
4608176
|
Aldeia B 01_2b
|
0.03
|
Aldeia B
|
S01078
|
Rock chip
|
600693
|
4608176
|
Aldeia B 01_2b
|
0.02
|
Aldeia B
|
S01079
|
Rock chip
|
600693
|
4608177
|
Aldeia B 01_2b
|
0.03
|
Aldeia B
|
S01080
|
Rock chip
|
600683
|
4608260
|
Aldeia B 02_1
|
1.16
|
Aldeia B
|
S01081
|
Rock chip
|
600682
|
4608260
|
Aldeia B 02_1
|
2.24
|
Aldeia B
|
S01082
|
Rock chip
|
600681
|
4608259
|
Aldeia B 02_1
|
2.15
|
Aldeia B
|
S01083
|
Rock chip
|
600680
|
4608259
|
Aldeia B 02_1
|
2.76
|
Aldeia B
|
S01084
|
Rock chip
|
600677
|
4608267
|
Aldeia B 02_2
|
1.83
|
Aldeia B
|
S01085
|
Rock chip
|
600676
|
4608267
|
Aldeia B 02_2
|
2.93
|
Aldeia B
|
S01086
|
Rock chip
|
600675
|
4608266
|
Aldeia B 02_2
|
3.9
|
Aldeia B
|
S01087
|
Rock chip
|
600674
|
4608266
|
Aldeia B 02_2
|
1.81
|
Aldeia B
|
S01088
|
Rock chip
|
600679
|
4608329
|
Aldeia B 02_1b
|
0.03
|
Aldeia B
|
S01089
|
Rock chip
|
600678
|
4608330
|
Aldeia B 02_1b
|
0.02
|
Aldeia B
|
S01090
|
Rock chip
|
600678
|
4608331
|
Aldeia B 02_1b
|
0.62
|
Aldeia B
|
S01091
|
Rock chip
|
600677
|
4608332
|
Aldeia B 02_1b
|
0.81
|
Aldeia B
|
S01092
|
Rock chip
|
600677
|
4608332
|
Aldeia B 02_1b
|
2.45
|
Aldeia B
|
S01093
|
Rock chip
|
600676
|
4608333
|
Aldeia B 02_1b
|
2.26
|
Aldeia B
|
S01094
|
Rock chip
|
600676
|
4608334
|
Aldeia B 02_1b
|
1.75
|
Aldeia B
|
S01095
|
Rock chip
|
600675
|
4608335
|
Aldeia B 02_1b
|
0.46
|
Aldeia B
|
S01096
|
Rock chip
|
600675
|
4608336
|
Aldeia B 02_1b
|
0.04
|
APPENDIX 2 - JORC 2012 Table
1
JORC Table 1 Section 1
Sampling Techniques and Data
Criteria
|
JORC Code
Explanation
|
Commentary
|
Sampling
techniques
|
·
Nature and
quality of sampling (e.g. cut channels, random chips, or specific
specialised industry standard measurement tools appropriate to the
minerals under investigation, such as down hole gamma sondes, or
handheld XRF instruments, etc). These examples should not be taken
as limiting the broad meaning of sampling.
·
Include
reference to measures taken to ensure sample representivity and the
appropriate calibration of any measurement tools or systems
used.
·
Aspects of the
determination of mineralisation that are Material to the Public
Report. In cases where 'industry standard' work has been done this
would be relatively simple (e.g. 'reverse circulation drilling was
used to obtain 1 m samples from which 3 kg was pulverised to
produce a 30 g charge for fire assay'). In other cases more
explanation may be required, such as where there is coarse gold
that has inherent sampling problems. Unusual commodities or
mineralisation types (e.g. submarine nodules) may warrant
disclosure of detailed information.
|
· The
samples consisted of random chips of available pegmatite outcrop,
selected to give a representative sample of the rock forming the
outcrop and channel samples across continuous outcrop. The rock
chips and channel samples were collected and placed in pre-numbered
sample bag and the bag sealed.
· The
form of the pegmatite was assessed to find the best vantage to get
a sample that is representative of the style of mineralisation.
Where an outcrop presented a face that was greater than a metre,
chips of the rock face were selected across the face and placed in
the sample bag. Where the sample was made of isolated blocks
appearing above the vegetation, a collection of chips from the
outcropping blocks were taken and placed in the sample bag. Where a
pegmatite showed continuity across the strike, then continuous
channel samples were taken to get a better understanding of the
true grade of the pegmatite.
· The
outcropping pegmatites are often silicified remnants that have
resisted erosion and assessment of the mineralisation is difficult.
The lithium mineralisation is predominantly in the form of
Spodumene, which on weathered surfaces is not readily evident.
Therefore to best assess the geochemical character of the outcrop
several chips from around the outcrop are taken or where possible
channel samples were taken.
|
Drilling
techniques
|
·
Drill type (e.g.
core, reverse circulation, open-hole hammer, rotary air blast,
auger, Bangka, sonic, etc) and details (e.g. core diameter, triple
or standard tube, depth of diamond tails, face-sampling bit or
other type, whether core is oriented and if so, by what method,
etc).
|
• No drilling was carried out during
this program.
|
Drill sample
recovery
|
·
Method of
recording and assessing core and chip sample recoveries and results
assessed.
·
Measures taken
to maximise sample recovery and ensure representative nature of the
samples.
·
Whether a
relationship exists between sample recovery and grade and whether
sample bias may have occurred due to preferential loss/gain of
fine/coarse material.
|
· No
drilling was carried out during this program.
|
Logging
|
·
Whether core and
chip samples have been geologically and geotechnically logged to a
level of detail to support appropriate Mineral Resource estimation,
mining studies and metallurgical studies.
·
Whether logging
is qualitative or quantitative in nature. Core (or costean,
channel, etc) photography.
·
The total length
and percentage of the relevant intersections
logged.
|
· No
drilling was carried out during this program.
|
Sub-sampling techniques and
sample preparation
|
·
If core, whether
cut or sawn and whether quarter, half or all core
taken.
·
If non-core,
whether riffled, tube sampled, rotary split, etc and whether
sampled wet or dry.
·
For all sample
types, the nature, quality and appropriateness of the sample
preparation technique.
·
Quality control
procedures adopted for all sub-sampling stages to maximise
representivity of samples.
·
Measures taken
to ensure that the sampling is representative of the in situ
material collected, including for instance results for field
duplicate/second-half sampling.
·
Whether sample
sizes are appropriate to the grain size of the material being
sampled.
|
· Samples were random rock chips of available outcrop, or
continuous channels, no sub sampling has taken place.
· The
sampling was conducted using industry standard field sampling
techniques and were considered appropriate for the program that was
undertaken.
· Due to
the reconnaissance nature of the surface sampling, and randomness
of the rock chips along with the coarse nature of the
mineralisation, field duplicates were not considered appropriate as
form of quality control.
· Every
effort was made to ensure that the samples were representative and
not biased in any way.
|
Quality of assay data and
laboratory tests
|
·
The nature,
quality and appropriateness of the assaying and laboratory
procedures used and whether the technique is considered partial or
total.
·
For geophysical
tools, spectrometers, handheld XRF instruments, etc, the parameters
used in determining the analysis including instrument make and
model, reading times, calibrations factors applied and their
derivation, etc.
·
Nature of
quality control procedures adopted (e.g. standards, blanks,
duplicates, external laboratory checks) and whether acceptable
levels of accuracy (i.e. lack of bias) and precision have been
established.
|
· Samples were received, sorted, labelled, and dried.
· Samples were crushed to 70% less than 2mm, riffle split off
250g, pulverise split to better than 85% passing 75 microns and 5g
was split of for assaying.
· The
samples were analysed using ALS Laboratories ME-MS89L Super Trace
method which combines a sodium peroxide fusion with ICP-MS
instrumentation utilising collision/reaction cell technologies to
provide the lowest detection limits available.
· A
prepared sample (0.2g) is added to sodium peroxide flux, mixed well
and then fused in at 670°C. The resulting melt is cooled and then
dissolved in 30% hydrochloric acid. This solution is then analysed
by ICP-MS and the results are corrected for spectral inter-element
interferences.
· The
final solution is then analysed by ICP-MS, with results corrected
for spectral inter-element interferences.
· Standards/blanks were inserted on a per batch basis due to the
small amount of samples sent for analysis.
· No
duplicate samples were added.
· The
use of QA/QC controls for reconnaissance field rock chip samples is
less critical as the aim is to gain indicative results to assess
mineralisation rather than absolute results for assessing the
nature of the mineral deposit. The use of standards and blanks on a
per batch process is considered appropriate for the style of
sampling used.
· A
QA/QC review of all information indicated that all assays were
satisfactory.
|
Verification of sampling and
assaying
|
·
The verification
of significant intersections by either independent or alternative
company personnel.
·
The use of
twinned holes.
·
Documentation of
primary data, data entry procedures, data verification, data
storage (physical and electronic) protocols.
·
Discuss any
adjustment to assay data.
|
· All
information was internally audited by company personnel.
· No
drilling was carried out.
· Savannah's experienced project geologists supervised all
processes.
· All
field data is entered into a custom sample sheet and then into
excel spreadsheets at site and subsequently validated as it is
imported into the centralised Access database.
· Hard
copies of sampling data are stored in the local office and
electronic data is stored on the company's cloud drive.
· Results were reported as Li (ppm) and were converted to a
percentage by dividing by 10,000 and then to Li2O% by
multiplying by 2.153.
|
Location of data
points
|
·
Accuracy and
quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar and down-hole
surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations used in
Mineral Resource estimation.
·
Specification of
the grid system used.
·
Quality and
adequacy of topographic control.
|
· The
coordinate of each rock chip sample or channel was taken at the
time of collecting using a handheld GPS with an accuracy of
5m.
· The
grid system used is WSG84 Zone29N.
· An
accurate, aerial topographic survey was obtained with accuracy of
+/- 0.5m, and used to verify the location of the sample.
|
Data spacing and
distribution
|
·
Data spacing for
reporting of Exploration Results.
·
Whether the data
spacing and distribution is sufficient to establish the degree of
geological and grade continuity appropriate for the Mineral
Resource and Ore Reserve estimation procedure(s) and
classifications applied.
·
Whether sample
compositing has been applied.
|
· The
surface sampling program was of a reconnaissance nature and
therefore sample locations was dependant on available outcrop,
which was variable depending on terrain and vegetation
cover.
· The
data spacing is not considered appropriate to assess grade
continuity.
· Some
compositing of rock chips was carried out in areas where outcrop
was spread out and rock chips from each small area would be added
to the sample bag.
|
Orientation of data in
relation to geological structure
|
·
Whether the
orientation of sampling achieves unbiased sampling of possible
structures and the extent to which this is known, considering the
deposit type.
·
If the
relationship between the drilling orientation and the orientation
of key mineralised structures is considered to have introduced a
sampling bias, this should be assessed and reported if
material.
|
· Often
the pegmatite outcrop is limited in extent and strike and dip of
the body is hard to distinguish, therefore random chip samples are
taken across the face. Where there is an obvious orientation of
pegmatite, channel samples were taken from across the
face
· Due to
the random nature of outcropping pegmatite, it is possible that
some orientation bias is included in the sample.
|
Sample
security
|
·
The measures
taken to ensure sample security.
|
· Samples were delivered to a courier and chain of custody is
managed by Savannah.
|
Audits or
reviews
|
·
The results of
any audits or reviews of sampling techniques and
data.
|
· Internal company auditing based on previous programs is
carried out and an external review will be carried out by the
resource consultant to assure that all data collection and QA/QC
procedures were conducted to industry standards.
|
JORC Table 1 Section 2
Reporting of Exploration Results
Criteria
|
JORC
Code explanation
|
Commentary
|
Mineral tenement and land
tenure status
|
·
Type, reference
name/number, location and ownership including agreements or
material issues with third parties such as joint ventures,
partnerships, overriding royalties, native title interests,
historical sites, wilderness or national park and environmental
settings.
· The security of the tenure
held at the time of reporting along with any known impediments to
obtaining a license to operate in the area.
|
· All
work was completed inside the Mina do Barroso project C-100 and
within the company's Aldeia Block B tenement.
· Savannah has received written confirmation from the DGEG that
under article 24 of Decree-Law no. 88/90 of March 16 being relevant
justification based on the resources allocated exploited and
intended, Savannah has been approved an expansion up to 250m of
C100 mining concession in specific areas where a resource has been
defined and the requirement for the expansion can be
justified.
|
Exploration done by other
parties
|
·
Acknowledgment
and appraisal of exploration by other parties.
|
· Limited exploration work has been carried out by previous
operators.
· No
historic information has been included in the Mineral Resource
estimates.
|
Geology
|
·
Deposit type,
geological setting and style of mineralisation.
|
·
The lithium mineralisation is predominantly in the
form of Spodumene-bearing pegmatites which are hosted in
meta-pelitic and mica schists, and occasionally carbonate schists
of upper Ordovician to lower Devonian age. The pegmatites vary in
thickness from 5m-109m.
|
Drill hole
information
|
· A summary of all information
material to the under-standing of the exploration results including
a tabulation of the following information for all Material drill
holes:
· easting and northing of the
drill hole collar
· elevation or RL (Reduced
Level - elevation above sea level in metres) of the drill hole
collar
· dip and azimuth of the
hole
· down hole length and
interception depth
· hole
length
· If the exclusion of this
information is justified on the basis that the information is not
Material and this exclusion does not detract from the understanding
of the report, the Competent Person should clearly explain why this
is the case.
|
·
No drilling was carried out.
.
|
Data aggregation
methods
|
· In reporting Exploration
Results, weighting averaging techniques, maximum and/or minimum
grade truncations (e.g. cutting of high grades) and cut-off grades
are usually Material and should be stated.
· Where aggregate intercepts
incorporate short lengths of high grade results and longer lengths
of low grade results, the procedure used for such aggregation
should be stated and some typical examples of such aggregations
should be shown in detail.
·
The assumptions
used for any reporting of metal equivalent values should be clearly
stated.
|
·
No aggregation or weighting of the results was
applied.
·
No high-grade cuts have been applied to reported
grades.
·
Metal equivalent values are not being reported;
however Li is reported as ppm and converted to the oxide
Li2O for resource purposes. The conversion factor used
is to divide the Li value by 10,000 and multiplying by 2.153 to
represent the value as a percentage.
|
Relationship between
mineralisation widths and intercept lengths
|
· These relationships are
particularly important in the reporting of Exploration
Results.
·
If the geometry
of the mineralisation with respect to the drill hole angle is
known, its nature should be reported.
· If it is not known and only
the down hole lengths are reported, there should be a clear
statement to this effect (e.g. 'down hole length, true width not
known').
|
·
The rock chip samples were from the random
locations on an outcrop and is not representative of true width of
the mineralised body. In places where there was continuity in the
strike direction of the pegmatite and enough of the face was
exposed then continuous channel samples were taken.
·
It was not always possible to assess the true
strike and dip of the pegmatite being sampled. In places where this
could be assessed the orientation data was recorded.
|
Diagrams
|
· Appropriate maps and
sections (with scales) and tabulations of intercepts should be
included for any significant discovery being reported. These should
include, but not be limited to a plan view of drill hole collar
locations and appropriate sectional views.
|
· A
relevant plan showing the location of all samples is included
within this release.
|
Balanced
Reporting
|
·
Accuracy and
quality of surveys used to locate drill holes (collar and down-hole
surveys), trenches, mine workings and other locations used in
Mineral Resource estimation.
· Where comprehensive
reporting of all Exploration Results is not practicable,
representative reporting of both low and high grades and/or widths
should be practiced to avoid misleading reporting of Exploration
Results.
|
· All
relevant results available have been previously
reported.
|
Other substantive exploration
data
|
· Other exploration data, if
meaningful and material, should be reported including (but not
limited to): geological observations; geophysical survey results;
geochemical survey results; bulk samples - size and method of
treatment; metallurgical test results; bulk density, groundwater,
geotechnical and rock characteristics; potential deleterious or
contaminating substances.
|
· Drilling has been carried out in several locations and four
major mineral deposits have been reported previously. Geological
mapping and rock chip sampling has been conducted over other areas
of C-100 license and adjoining Aldeia license areas.
|
Further
work
|
·
The nature and
scale of planned further work (e.g. tests for lateral extensions or
depth extensions or large- scale step-out
drilling).
·
Diagrams clearly
highlighting the areas of possible extensions, including the main
geological interpretations and future drilling areas, provided this
information is not commercially sensitive.
|
·
The present program was designed to assess the
extent of lithium mineralisation within the C-100 and Aldeia Block
B license area, new pegmatites were discovered and known areas of
mineralisation were extended. A follow up program will be initiated
at a later stage consisting of trenching and drilling to assess the
true extent of the pegmatites and corresponding lithium
mineralisation.
·
Diagrams showing the extent of mapped pegmatites
are included.
|