ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for default Register for Free to get streaming real-time quotes, interactive charts, live options flow, and more.

Crypto Needs Clarity, Not Conflict

Share On Facebook
share on Linkedin
Print

The Securities and Exchange Commission has abandoned its role as a market regulator, instead transforming into an anti-crypto crusader. This agency, once a bastion of investor protection, is now a threat to innovation and financial freedom.

©

The SEC’s hostility towards crypto is palpable. Chair Gary Gensler has openly displayed disdain for the industry, using his position to obstruct rather than regulate. The approval of spot bitcoin ETFs, a long-overdue step, only came after years of arbitrary rejections and a humiliating court rebuke. This victory for investors was a direct repudiation of the SEC’s anti-crypto agenda.

The SEC’s disregard for due process reached a new low in the DEBT Box case. Two agency lawyers were forced to resign after a judge condemned their “gross abuse of power.” This is not the behavior of a regulator committed to fair markets; it’s the conduct of a persecutor.

Bitcoin ETFs, approved by the SEC under pressure, are now holding billions in assets. They offer investors a safe and regulated way to participate in the crypto market. The SEC’s initial resistance to these products was not only misguided but detrimental to investors.

It’s time for a fundamental overhaul of the SEC. Its leadership has proven incapable of fulfilling its core mission. Investors deserve a regulator that protects their interests, not one that wages war on an entire industry.

sec

The SEC’s Crypto Stalemate
The crypto industry is trapped in a regulatory limbo, primarily due to the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) inconsistent and often hostile approach. This lack of clarity is stifling innovation and investor confidence.

A prime example is the SEC’s treatment of Ethereum. Despite its immense market cap and global significance, the agency has refused to definitively classify it as a security or a commodity. This evasion, coupled with the SEC’s public attacks on the industry, creates a climate of fear and uncertainty.

It’s clear that the SEC under Chair Gary Gensler has a broader agenda than simply regulating cryptocurrencies. Rather than fostering a productive dialogue with industry leaders, the agency has opted for confrontation.

The United States risks losing its position as a global financial leader if it continues to stifle innovation. Cryptocurrencies have the potential to revolutionize finance, payments, and beyond. A clear and sensible regulatory framework is essential to harnessing this potential.

The crypto industry needs a regulator that is a partner, not an adversary. It’s time for a fresh start with an SEC that prioritizes collaboration over confrontation.

Learn from market wizards: Books to take your trading to the next level

CLICK HERE TO REGISTER FOR FREE ON ADVFN, the world's leading stocks and shares information website, provides the private investor with all the latest high-tech trading tools and includes live price data streaming, stock quotes and the option to access 'Level 2' data on all of the world's key exchanges (LSE, NYSE, NASDAQ, Euronext etc).

This area of the ADVFN.com site is for independent financial commentary. These blogs are provided by independent authors via a common carrier platform and do not represent the opinions of ADVFN Plc. ADVFN Plc does not monitor, approve, endorse or exert editorial control over these articles and does not therefore accept responsibility for or make any warranties in connection with or recommend that you or any third party rely on such information. The information available at ADVFN.com is for your general information and use and is not intended to address your particular requirements. In particular, the information does not constitute any form of advice or recommendation by ADVFN.COM and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any investment decisions. Authors may or may not have positions in stocks that they are discussing but it should be considered very likely that their opinions are aligned with their trading and that they hold positions in companies, forex, commodities and other instruments they discuss.

Leave A Reply

 
Do you want to write for our Newspaper? Get in touch: newspaper@advfn.com