ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for default Register for Free to get streaming real-time quotes, interactive charts, live options flow, and more.

Cable – RBS fined and shares could be distributed to UK citizens

Share On Facebook
share on Linkedin
Print

Option to issue RBS sharesto UK citizens remains “open”.

Vince Cable, the UK’s Business Secretary, has argued that government-held Royal Bank of Scotland shares could be divided amongst UK citizens.

Speaking in an interview with the BBC Dr Cable said whilst there was “no immediate prospect” of the troubled bank returning to the private sector that he wants to the option of issuing shares to UK citizens to kept “alive”.

During the banking crisis of 2008 the then UK government acquired an 81% stake in RBS to prevent it from collapsing, along with a 43.4% stake in the Lloyd’s Banking Group.

Stating that RBS “could be mutualised, shares given to the public” Dr Cable was advocating a policy supported by his party, the Liberal Democrats, rather than the official position of the UK government, in which the Liberal Democrats are the junior partner in coalition with the Conservatives.

The Business Secretary said all options for the bank were “open and we haven’t foreclosed on any of them” and that it could also “remain in semi-public ownership for a prolonged period of time” or “be reprivatised when the positions are better.”

Dr Cable argued that the government’s initial plans to re-privatise the banks were no longer feasible, saying that “Recapitalisation may be the best solution but it is currently impractical; full nationalisation would cost the taxpayer billions and, except in a new financial emergency, this is unlikely to take precedence over other claims on spending”.

Commenting on the £400m fine that Royal Bank of Scotland is expected to receive for its role in the Libor scandal the Business secretary said that the “problem is that these are global banks and if they’ve committed breaches of the law in the US they have to be punished accordingly”.

Dr Cable insisted that the fine should be paid from funds intended for bonuses and not from taxpayers or customers, saying “it is absolutely galling for UK taxpayers to be asked to stump up for it” but said the government was not in a position to force the bank to make such a decision.

In a statement RBS said it was in “late-stage settlement discussions” with UK and US authorities regarding fines, but accepted that whilst “settlements remain to be agreed, RBS expects they will include the payment of significant penalties as well as certain other sanctions”.

UPDATES:

13:28 – RBS has been fined a total of £390m, including £87.5m to the UK’s Financial Standards Authority and over £300 to US regulators.

15:19 – Stephen Hester, RBS chief exectutive, has announced it will pay the £390m of Libor fines from its bonus pool, as Vince Cable had previously suggested.

CLICK HERE TO REGISTER FOR FREE ON ADVFN, the world's leading stocks and shares information website, provides the private investor with all the latest high-tech trading tools and includes live price data streaming, stock quotes and the option to access 'Level 2' data on all of the world's key exchanges (LSE, NYSE, NASDAQ, Euronext etc).

This area of the ADVFN.com site is for independent financial commentary. These blogs are provided by independent authors via a common carrier platform and do not represent the opinions of ADVFN Plc. ADVFN Plc does not monitor, approve, endorse or exert editorial control over these articles and does not therefore accept responsibility for or make any warranties in connection with or recommend that you or any third party rely on such information. The information available at ADVFN.com is for your general information and use and is not intended to address your particular requirements. In particular, the information does not constitute any form of advice or recommendation by ADVFN.COM and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any investment decisions. Authors may or may not have positions in stocks that they are discussing but it should be considered very likely that their opinions are aligned with their trading and that they hold positions in companies, forex, commodities and other instruments they discuss.

Leave A Reply

 
Do you want to write for our Newspaper? Get in touch: newspaper@advfn.com