ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for tools Level up your trading with our powerful tools and real-time insights all in one place.
Amarin Corporation PLC

Amarin Corporation PLC (AMRN)

13.36
0.11
( 0.83% )

Professional-Grade Tools, for Individual Investors.

Premium

AMRN News

Official News Only

AMRN Discussion

View Posts
Sagaponack Sagaponack 2 hours ago
Glad to hear. Let's get the word out about GoodRx for others.
👍️0
Nukemtiltheyglow Nukemtiltheyglow 2 hours ago
Morning Sag; $98.40, pleasantly surprised. No red tape. Once the wife is on Medicare. Things will get better. Thanks 
👍️0
JRoon71 JRoon71 2 hours ago
Nuke, the modest increase in LDL in some patients is not a big issue. But it's common knowledge that EPA can slightly raise LDL. That's not a knock on Vascepa.

My point in bringing it up was that what some perceived as a negative study on EPA (showing that it raises LDL) was not a big deal, because we already knew that it modestly increases LDL.

EDIT: Also, it should be noted that DHA raises LDL by even more than EPA (though still only a modest amount).
👍 2
rosemountbomber rosemountbomber 2 hours ago
Nuke, most have no conception of what infringing is. I am even wondering if you bring that up with some doctors that you might get that same deer in the headlights look.  Every part of the system, including lack of knowledge, has conspired against Amarin.  
Would love to think that some of the PBM and insurance coverage gains Amarin has made recently that we are hearing about is due to these entities realizing the illegality of what they were doing, but it sounds like their of heart was fashioned by Amarin undercutting the Generics on price.  Hopefully we get more info on this.  
As far as the $296, before you went to Walgreens did you try going to the GoodRx website and putting in your zip code to check the price?  
👍️0
Sagaponack Sagaponack 3 hours ago
should only be $98 with GoodRx. Sorry to hear about this.
👍️0
DMC8 DMC8 4 hours ago
https://stocktwits.com/SanDiegoLiving/message/617987260
👍 1
Nukemtiltheyglow Nukemtiltheyglow 8 hours ago
Went to Walgreens today "locked and loaded" with my Good Rx membership card. 90 days worth of Vascepa "out of pocket" will cost $296? What really pissed me off was my wife's script specifically said DAW, yet the young woman who took our order said "Did you really want Brand?" I reminded her that the Generic was infringing... I got a Deer in headlights look. Nothing registered. Disgraceful. 
👍️0
Nukemtiltheyglow Nukemtiltheyglow 8 hours ago
Already did by posting what's called "logic" ever hear of it? 
👍️0
DMC8 DMC8 10 hours ago
https://stocktwits.com/SanDiegoLiving/message/617987427

https://stocktwits.com/SanDiegoLiving/message/617987394
👍 1
Number sleven Number sleven 13 hours ago
Nuke, Why don't you post a link, providing evidence that supports your position?
Sleven,
👍️0
Nukemtiltheyglow Nukemtiltheyglow 17 hours ago
But your Honor, the Defendant is paraphrasing, they're mixing Apples with Walnuts (hmmm Waldorf salad). In reality they're case truly shows their glass is half empty whereas our glass is Half full (of Bourbon). Vascepa does actually lower LDL-C from the Cheeseburger + placebo control group. 
👍️ 1
lizzy241 lizzy241 23 hours ago
Here's an eye opener for those who want to know how much their docs are being compensated by Amarin for prescribing Vascepa. I put my PA's name in the search bar and guess what showed up Amarin. It wasn't much, just lunch money. But the mere fact that there's another piece of the pie that drug companies kick back to the docs who prescribe certain drugs is shocking to me. If you're interested researching your doc or practice.
Here's the link, enjoy!
https://openpaymentsdata.cms.gov/?mc_cid=50c96995b7&mc_eid=d9e34d1756
👍️0
rosemountbomber rosemountbomber 23 hours ago
Your Honor, if it may please the court, the argument presented by the Opposition, would be totally watertight if the placebo group was strictly the absence of Icosapent Ethyl.  However, that was not the case, since it contained an equal amount of mineral oil.  Not to mention that the Opposition previously stated they would accept findings presented by Dr. Bhatt. 
👍 4
Nukemtiltheyglow Nukemtiltheyglow 1 day ago
Playing Devils Advocate (Hikma Lawyers) here. The placebo group had a 10.2% increase in LDL. The Vascepa group had a 3.1% increase in LDL. Therefore it was actually a LDL decrease of 7.1%. I rest my case your Honor. 
👍️0
Number sleven Number sleven 1 day ago
RMB, Looks like you know what your talking about.
Sleven,
👍️0
DMC8 DMC8 1 day ago
https://www.facebook.com/share/19GpLgEdkY/?mibextid=wwXIfr
👍️0
rosemountbomber rosemountbomber 1 day ago
Well, Dr. Bhatt is the primary author:
"The median change in LDL cholesterol level from baseline was an increase of 3.1% (2.0 mg per deciliter [0.05 mmol per liter]) in the icosapent ethyl group and an increase of 10.2% (7.0 mg per deciliter [0.18 mmol per liter]) in the placebo group — a 6.6% (5.0 mg per deciliter [0.13 mmol per liter]) lower increase with icosapent ethyl than with placebo (P<0.001)."
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1812792
👍️ 5
Nukemtiltheyglow Nukemtiltheyglow 1 day ago
Rose; If Bhatt or Mason said it, then I'll believe it. Anybody else can go pound sand. 
👍️0
Nukemtiltheyglow Nukemtiltheyglow 1 day ago
Oh? So now instead of being condescending, you're sticking your nose into other people's business? Stick to being the moderator instead of egging others on. You're like the kid who starts the fight then when things get dicey you go run away. 
👍️0
Number sleven Number sleven 1 day ago
RMB, Post a link that confirms your opinion.
Sleven,
👍️0
Nukemtiltheyglow Nukemtiltheyglow 1 day ago
When the words... "according to some studies, Vascepa "may" slightly raise LDL? WHO's studies (Nissen?) and may is not  I know Vascepa doesn't lower LDL if at all. So, the point being from Roonie Toon? 
👍️0
DMC8 DMC8 2 days ago
https://stocktwits.com/SanDiegoLiving/message/617948079
👍️ 3
rosemountbomber rosemountbomber 2 days ago
Just check the R-I data.  About 3% increase However that was much less of an increase than placebo.  
👍️0
ramfan60 ramfan60 2 days ago
Well Nuke..... I would file "it raises LDL" even if it does under "so what"..... so much focus and gazillions of dollars in wasted treatments on the goal of lowering LDL. Shame on the industry......... just eat a bunch of processed junk foods and you will lower your LDL and we know how good that is for you. Inflammation, damaged cholesterol caused by oxidation, and insulin resistance are the real bad guys...... hopefully we'll be sitting on a gold mine when the healthcare industry finally gives in and accepts the truth.
👍 1
Nukemtiltheyglow Nukemtiltheyglow 2 days ago
Please show me where it says EPA raises LDL? 
👍️0
rosemountbomber rosemountbomber 2 days ago
You are completely right about this. Another thing is that while EPA does not lower LDL (and in fact may slightly raise it), it may prevent LDL cholesterol from being oxidized. And, it is the oxidized LDL that can be a problem.
👍️ 2
JRoon71 JRoon71 2 days ago
RMB, also, there has never been a claim made that EPA reduces cholesterol. In fact, in many cases, LDL is modestly increased. But despite the modest rise in LDL, it's been proven to reduce cardiovascular risk.

I wouldn't be overly concerned about this study. If anything, it simply confirms what was already known.
👍 2
rosemountbomber rosemountbomber 2 days ago
Agreed Capt, not a good thing, BUT, two things about this.  First this is discussing in vitro examination. Secondly, the authors themselves explain that despite this possible negative finding, that there are other attributes of EPA that explain its CVD benefits:
"This apparent discrepancy with in vivo trials can be explained by the fact that the cardioprotective effects of the n-3 fatty acid EPA likely result from multiple mechanisms, particularly its anti-inflammatory and antioxidant"
👍️0
DMC8 DMC8 2 days ago
🚨 NEW special #podcast

In this special DCU episode, @NeilSkolnik sorts fact from fiction on fish oil and explores the difference between omega-3 fatty acids and icosapent ethyl.

Available now, with @SOTHCardiology

👂Listen now at: https://t.co/Cng025u6wo

This special… pic.twitter.com/mc9uYO5bez— ADA Professional Publications (@ADA_Pubs) June 12, 2025
👍 1
CaptBeer CaptBeer 2 days ago
OT: Happy Birthday US Army. Hooah!
👍️ 1
CaptBeer CaptBeer 2 days ago
Way above my paygrade, but this seems to suggest that EPA (in vitro) is Pro-Atherogenic. Not a good thing.
👍️0
DMC8 DMC8 2 days ago
Eicosapentaenoic acid inhibits cholesterol efflux pathways from cholesterol-loaded human THP-1 macrophages by reducing the hydrolysis of cholesteryl esters mediated by carboxylesterase 1
13 June 2025
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S138819812500054X
👍️0
caddiedad caddiedad 2 days ago
That tryhard is a legend in his own mind.
👍️0
Snd101 Snd101 2 days ago
If you are so confident about your TA, then why don’t you short the hell out of this stock. Specially now that the stock has gained 50% in the recent few weeks. Make use of your skills to make some money while you are helping the community to not waste their hard earned money.
👍 2
ORBAPU ORBAPU 3 days ago
Up 66% since April 3. Must be one of the longest dead cat bounces in history. 
👍️ 3
Number sleven Number sleven 3 days ago
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=176178413
Sleven,
👍️0
rosemountbomber rosemountbomber 3 days ago
Interesting that the last two posts dissect technical indicators with two different takes on the situation here.  
👍️0
FlyFishingStocks FlyFishingStocks 3 days ago
Before y'all get too carried away thinking you have been rescued from your mistake of holding this stock all the way down to the bottom, take a look at this monthly chart:



Clearly, there is grave concern about the prospects for higher prices based on:
1. The inability to take out overhead resistance (purple highlight).
2. The anemic volume behind the recent rally (red arrow).
3. The pattern of sharp reversals on the heels of the 2nd green impulse candles. This pattern has been intact since the breakdown from the top.
4. The RSI remains well below the bullish level of 50 (pink highlight).

Looking at the right edge, prices stabbed up into resistance on the weakest volume over the past 4 monthly candles. This demonstrates the strength of the trend which is down. If prices were going blow up through this resistance, we would see expanding volume as overhead is approached. Instead, we see the opposite.
What do you think is in store for the next candle? Now you know why I keep asking if anyone out there is wise enough to sell into this dead-cat bounce. Now you know why I keep talking about resistance, volume, trend, and RSI strength. They are all extremely weak on the long term chart.
Everyone is giddy about riding this recent wave... not realizing that the tide is working against that wave.

FOMO makes you blood thirsty to the extent you can't stop licking a knife edge covered with frozen blood.
👎️ 1 😂 2 ☠️ 1
ORBAPU ORBAPU 3 days ago
MarketEdge: Stock is a buy.On 06/13/2025, The stock has outperformed the market over the last 50 trading days when compared to the S&P 500. MACD-LT, an intermediate-term trend indicator, is bullish at this time. Upside momentum, as measured by the 14-day RSI indicator is very strong. Over the last 50 trading sessions, there has been more volume on up days than on down days, indicating that AMRN is under accumulation, which is a bullish condition. The stock is trading above a rising 50-day moving average. This validates the strong technical condition for AMRN. The stock is above its 200-day moving average which is pointed up indicating that the intermediate term trend is bullish.

Up 19.3 % since upgraded to buy on 5/27/2025
👍️ 3
KnowNothingJonSnow KnowNothingJonSnow 3 days ago
I hate this shitco more than most but didn’t you predict that 60% ago?
👍️0
Dancing in the dark Dancing in the dark 3 days ago
for you fans of ai prompting ...

Prompt Name: "7 Lens Analysis for a Well-Defined Problem"
Analyze the following well-defined problem sequentially using these seven thinking approaches:
1. Analytical Thinking: (Decompose this problem into distinct, non-overlapping components. Map the causal relationships between components. Classify each component by controllability and impact level. Identify which components are symptoms versus root causes. Present this analysis in a structured format showing dependencies and influence chains.)
2. Critical Thinking: (Identify and systematically question at least three core assumptions embedded in this problem. For each assumption, generate counter-evidence and alternative framings. Explicitly state what changes about the problem if each assumption proves false. Question whether the problem as stated is the actual problem worth solving.)
3. Concrete Thinking: (Provide specific, detailed examples and observable evidence. Include precise descriptions of what happens versus theoretical expectations. Reference specific cases, data points, and real-world instances. Distinguish between verified facts and interpretations or assumptions.)
4. Abstract Thinking: (Extract the underlying patterns, principles, and meta-structures governing this problem. Connect this situation to broader frameworks from multiple disciplines. Identify what class of problem this represents and what universal dynamics are at play. Draw analogies to systems in nature, technology, and human organization that exhibit similar patterns.)
5. Creative Thinking: (Generate novel approaches by combining concepts from unrelated domains. Apply systematic creativity techniques like assumption reversal, constraint removal, and perspective shifting. Propose solutions that would seem counterintuitive or impossible under current assumptions. Include both incremental innovations and paradigm-shifting possibilities.)
6. Divergent Thinking: (Generate a comprehensive set of distinct solution pathways, ensuring each operates from different assumptions or attacks various aspects of the problem. Include options across risk levels, resource requirements, time horizons, and stakeholder involvement. For each option, specify key success factors and potential failure modes.)
7. Convergent Thinking: (Synthesize insights from all previous analyses to recommend the optimal approach. Explicitly weigh trade-offs using clear criteria. Consider implementation feasibility, resource constraints, and risk factors. Provide a clear rationale for your recommendation and identify key assumptions that would change your conclusion. Include specific next steps and success metrics.)

Ask for problem description.

==============================================================================
Prompt Name: "7 Lens Analysis for a Poorly/Un-Defined Problem"
Analyze the following poorly-defined problem sequentially using these seven thinking approaches:
1. Concrete Thinking: (Provide specific, detailed examples and observable evidence. Include precise descriptions of what happens versus theoretical expectations. Reference specific cases, data points, and real-world instances. Distinguish between verified facts and interpretations or assumptions.)
2. Analytical Thinking: (Decompose this problem into distinct, non-overlapping components. Map the causal relationships between components. Classify each component by controllability and impact level. Identify which components are symptoms versus root causes. Present this analysis in a structured format showing dependencies and influence chains.)
3. Critical Thinking: (Identify and systematically question at least three core assumptions embedded in this problem. For each assumption, generate counter-evidence and alternative framings. Explicitly state what changes about the problem if each assumption proves false. Question whether the problem as stated is the actual problem worth solving.)
4. Abstract Thinking: (Extract the underlying patterns, principles, and meta-structures governing this problem. Connect this situation to broader frameworks from multiple disciplines. Identify what class of problem this represents and what universal dynamics are at play. Draw analogies to systems in nature, technology, and human organization that exhibit similar patterns.)
5. Creative Thinking: (Generate novel approaches by combining concepts from unrelated domains. Apply systematic creativity techniques like assumption reversal, constraint removal, and perspective shifting. Propose solutions that would seem counterintuitive or impossible under current assumptions. Include both incremental innovations and paradigm-shifting possibilities.)
6. Divergent Thinking: (Generate a comprehensive set of distinct solution pathways, ensuring each operates from different assumptions or attacks various aspects of the problem. Include options across risk levels, resource requirements, time horizons, and stakeholder involvement. For each option, specify key success factors and potential failure modes.)
7. Convergent Thinking: (Synthesize insights from all previous analyses to recommend the optimal approach. Explicitly weigh trade-offs using clear criteria. Consider implementation feasibility, resource constraints, and risk factors. Provide a clear rationale for your recommendation and identify key assumptions that would change your conclusion. Include specific next steps and success metrics.)

Ask for problem description.

==============================================================================
Prompt Name: "7 Lens Analysis for Business Knowledge Sharing for Strategic Decision-Makers"
Share strategic knowledge about the following topic using these seven approaches:
1. Abstract Thinking: (Begin by connecting this strategic knowledge to broader business patterns and market dynamics. Show how this knowledge fits into larger competitive frameworks, industry trends, and organizational capabilities. Help leaders recognize the universal principles they can apply across different business contexts and strategic decisions.)
2. Divergent Thinking: (Present multiple strategic contexts where this knowledge applies, including different market conditions, competitive scenarios, and organizational phases. Show how this knowledge adapts across various strategic timeframes, from quarterly planning to multi-year initiatives. Include applications across different business functions and stakeholder groups.)
3. Critical Thinking: (Identify the most common strategic misconceptions and implementation failures that prevent organizations from realizing value. Address typical assumptions that lead to strategic misalignment or execution gaps. Anticipate the organizational and market pressures that might interfere with proper strategic application.)
4. Analytical Thinking: (Break this strategic knowledge into systematic decision frameworks with clear strategic priorities. Organize information by strategic impact and implementation complexity, showing what requires immediate leadership attention versus longer-term development. Identify key strategic decision points and success metrics.)
5. Concrete Thinking: (Provide specific examples of strategic success and failure, including measurable business outcomes and competitive impacts. Show exactly how this strategic knowledge translates into better market positioning, resource allocation, or organizational capabilities.)
6. Creative Thinking: (Develop innovative strategic frameworks and mental models that make complex strategic concepts accessible to leadership teams. Create strategic tools that work within executive decision-making processes and board-level discussions.)
7. Convergent Thinking: (Synthesize all approaches into strategic priorities with clear implementation pathways. Provide specific next steps for strategic development, success metrics for strategic progress, and escalation criteria for strategic course corrections.)Ask for topic.

Ask for topic.

==============================================================================
Prompt Name: "7 Lens Analysis for Business Knowledge Sharing for Operational Implementers"
Share operational knowledge about the following topic using these seven approaches:
1. Concrete Thinking: (Start with specific, detailed procedures and step-by-step operational processes. Show exactly what needs to be done, when, and by whom. Provide concrete examples of successful operational execution, including measurable efficiency gains and quality improvements.)
2. Analytical Thinking: (Break operational knowledge into systematic implementation processes with clear, sequential steps. Organize by operational priority and dependencies, showing what must be completed before other processes can begin. Identify key operational decision points, quality checkpoints, and performance metrics.)
3. Critical Thinking: (Identify common operational mistakes and process failures that reduce efficiency or quality. Address typical misconceptions that lead to procedural errors or workflow disruptions. Anticipate operational constraints and resource limitations that might interfere with proper implementation.)
4. Divergent Thinking: (Show operational applications across different workflow scenarios, team configurations, and resource constraints. Present alternative operational approaches that accommodate different staffing levels, technology capabilities, and process maturity stages.)
5. Abstract Thinking: (Help practitioners recognize operational patterns that apply across different processes and departments. Connect specific procedures to broader operational principles that support consistent execution and continuous improvement.)
6. Creative Thinking: (Develop practical operational tools, checklists, and process aids that support reliable execution under normal and stressed conditions. Create memory devices and quick-reference guides that work within operational time constraints.)
7. Convergent Thinking: (Synthesize all approaches into immediately executable operational knowledge with clear implementation steps. Provide specific performance metrics, troubleshooting guides, and process improvement recommendations.)

Ask for topic.
==============================================================================
Prompt Name: "7 Lens Analysis for Knowledge Sharing in an Academic Environment"
Share foundational knowledge about the following topic sequentially using these seven educational approaches:
1. Critical Thinking: (Identify fundamental misconceptions and conceptual barriers that prevent students from grasping basic principles. Address common confusions by contrasting correct foundational understanding with typical beginner mistakes. Anticipate what students might find counterintuitive about fundamental concepts.)
2. Concrete Thinking: (Provide multiple simple, relatable examples that illustrate fundamental principles without complex variables. Use familiar analogies and everyday experiences to make abstract foundations accessible. Start with the most basic manifestations of the concept before introducing complexity.)
3. Analytical Thinking: (Break foundational concepts into the most basic building blocks, organizing information from simple to complex. Identify essential prerequisite knowledge and ensure no conceptual gaps in the learning progression. Structure explanations to build rock-solid foundational understanding.)
4. Abstract Thinking: (Connect foundational concepts to the broader discipline framework, helping students understand where this knowledge fits in their overall learning journey. Show how mastering these foundations enables access to more advanced concepts and applications.)
5. Creative Thinking: (Develop engaging foundational explanations that make basic concepts memorable and interesting. Create multiple entry points into fundamental ideas to accommodate different learning approaches and background knowledge levels.)
6. Divergent Thinking: (Present foundational concepts from multiple perspectives to ensure comprehensive understanding. Show various contexts where these basic principles apply, helping students recognize fundamental patterns across different situations.)
7. Convergent Thinking: (Synthesize foundational understanding into solid conceptual mastery that students can build upon. Provide clear indicators of foundational competence and specific pathways for advancing to more complex applications.)

Ask for topic.

==============================================================================
Prompt Name: "7 Lens Analysis for Knowledge Sharing in an Academic Environment"
Share advanced knowledge about the following topic sequentially using these seven educational approaches:
1. Abstract Thinking: (Begin with sophisticated frameworks that connect this advanced knowledge to multiple theoretical perspectives and research domains. Help advanced learners recognize complex patterns and meta-principles that govern expert-level application.)
2. Analytical Thinking: (Break advanced concepts into nuanced components that require integration of multiple foundational concepts. Organize by theoretical sophistication and application complexity, showing how expert-level thinking synthesizes various knowledge domains.)
3. Critical Thinking: (Identify subtle misconceptions and advanced application pitfalls that can trap sophisticated learners. Address expert-level assumptions and examine the limitations and boundaries of advanced applications. Question the conditions under which advanced approaches might fail.)
4. Creative Thinking: (Develop sophisticated analytical tools and expert-level frameworks that support advanced reasoning and novel applications. Create intellectual challenges that push learners toward original thinking and innovative applications.)
5. Concrete Thinking: (Provide complex, real-world applications that demonstrate expert-level judgment and sophisticated implementation. Show nuanced examples that require integration of multiple advanced concepts and demonstrate expert decision-making.)
6. Divergent Thinking: (Explore advanced applications across innovative contexts and emerging domains. Present alternative expert approaches that reflect different theoretical schools and research methodologies. Include interdisciplinary applications that require sophisticated synthesis.)
7. Convergent Thinking: (Synthesize advanced understanding into expert-level capabilities with clear mastery indicators. Provide pathways for original research, professional application, and continued intellectual development at the highest levels.)

Ask for topic.
==============================================================================
👍️0
FlyFishingStocks FlyFishingStocks 3 days ago
Oh oh...
😂 2 🤭 2
Number sleven Number sleven 3 days ago
TalShu, Thank you. Was anything of importance changed?
Sleven,
👍️0
TalShu TalShu 3 days ago
N sleven,

https://ec.europa.eu/health/documents/community-register/2025/20250123165277/anx_165277_en.pdf
👍️0
Number sleven Number sleven 3 days ago
https://ec.europa.eu/health/documents/community-register/2025/20250123165277/dec_165277_en.pdf
Does anyone have more detail about this committee decision?
Has the company ever made public comment?
Sleven,
👍️0
lizzy241 lizzy241 3 days ago
DMC, SDL's assumptions are 99% accurate. But in the case of the change in the CVS formulary, it is material and the SEC requires an 8 K to be filed. As an alternative, they may choose to bury it in the 2nd quarter 10-Q, hiding it in the subsequent events section, since CVS coverage becomes effective July 1, which is one day after the 2nd quarter ends. I guess we'll have to wait till their July 29th CC.
👍️0
DMC8 DMC8 3 days ago
https://stocktwits.com/SanDiegoLiving/message/617765440
👍️ 2
DMC8 DMC8 3 days ago
https://www.facebook.com/share/v/16be5Q2KYV/?mibextid=wwXIfr
👍️ 7
rosemountbomber rosemountbomber 3 days ago
With the attack on Iran today, hopefully Amarin is a safe haven as market is getting overnight. 
👍️0
rosemountbomber rosemountbomber 4 days ago
I agree that if we do go to over $100 that there will definitely be some ties (you know fif ties, etc) that will bypass. Be interesting to see the next few earnings reports to see how the restored insurance coverage impacts revenue.
👍️0

Your Recent History

Delayed Upgrade Clock