|
|
|
2
|
|
KIRBY | 2025 PROXY STATEMENT |
March 7, 2025
DEAR FELLOW STOCKHOLDERS,
On behalf of the Board of Directors (the “Board”), we cordially invite you to attend Kirby Corporation’s (“Kirby” or the “Company”) 2025 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Information concerning the matters to be voted upon at the meeting is contained in this Notice of the 2025 Annual Meeting and our Proxy Statement.
2024 was a record year for Kirby. We experienced strong performance across the marine transportation (“KMT”) segment, and continued to strategically pivot within the Distribution and Services (“KDS”) business towards electrification and power generation. We are pleased with our financial results. No year is without challenges, and we did experience weather related headwinds, continuing inflationary pressures and supply chain issues. Our employees remained focused, resilient and successfully achieved strong operating and financial results. We stayed true to “No Harm to People, No Harm to Equipment, and No Harm to the Environment.”
In the KMT segment, despite seasonal weather challenges, inland marine had a positive year driven by strong demand, increased term and spot contract pricing, steady customer demand, and strong barge utilization. The first half of the year was impacted by normal winter weather conditions that drove an increase in delay days and impacted our operations. However, our team successfully navigated these challenges and managed to achieve operating margins in the low 20% range. The second half of the year did see some headwinds primarily due to a pause in refinery activity in Q4, but strong pricing and utilization allowed for inland marine to conclude the year with strong operating margins. In our coastal marine business, strong customer demand and limited supply of vessels, created a strong market dynamic that allowed the business to conclude 2024 with operating margins in the low teens.
In the KDS segment, we saw a year of mixed demand across our markets. Due to a slowdown in traditional fracturing equipment, our team continued to pivot towards electric equipment and the power generation business which has continued to see success and new growth. While there was softness in on-highway trucking, marine repair was strong and was able to offset that decline. Even despite some market headwinds, the KDS segment was able to conclude 2024 with operating margins in the high single digits.
During the year, Kirby continued to advance its sustainability journey impacting different areas of the Company at all levels. A focus on safety, adherence to human rights through training, and a commitment to positive environmental stewardship, all pushed our sustainability efforts forward.
While the Company is mindful of challenges moving into 2025 such as an acute mariner shortage, on-going inflationary pressures, supply chain issues, and unknown impacts from tariff negotiations, with the right focus and work ethic, we can still achieve great results. I’m proud of our teams who have successfully and proactively addressed new market opportunities.
We do anticipate another year of strong financial growth from the KMT business as we expect positive market dynamics. For KDS, we expect the year to remain flat as our power generation business will offset a decline in the traditional oil and gas market. I want to thank our employees for a great year and thank our stockholders for supporting us.
Your vote is important to us, regardless of the number of shares you hold or whether you plan to attend the Annual Meeting. Once you have reviewed the proxy materials and have made your decisions, please vote your shares using one of the methods outlined in the Proxy Statement. Thank you for your continued support and for investing in Kirby Corporation.
|
|
|
|
|
Sincerely,
DAVID W. GRZEBINSKI Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
KIRBY | 2025 PROXY STATEMENT |
|
PROXY SUMMARY |
|
7
|
2024 FINANCIAL SUMMARY
Consolidated revenues increased 6% in 2024 to $3.3 billion. The year-over-year improvement was driven by improved pricing and steady demand in the marine transportation segment and strong demand for our power generation equipment in the distribution and services segment. Net earnings attributable to Kirby in 2024 were $286.7 million or $4.91 per share. Net earnings attributable to Kirby, excluding one-time items,¹ were $318.8 million or $5.46 per share in 2024.
Marine transportation revenues increased 11% to $1.9 billion during 2024. The strong growth was primarily due to a 10% increase in inland marine revenues driven by increased term and spot contract pricing, steady demand, and strong barge utilization. Inland marine market conditions remained steady throughout 2024 despite seasonal challenges, headwinds from lock closures, and a temporary slowdown in refinery activity in the fourth quarter. The first quarter was impacted by normal winter weather conditions, including significant wind and fog along the Gulf Coast, that drove an increase in delay days and impacted our operations. In the second quarter, inland marine operating conditions improved and combined with strong utilization to push operating margins into the low 20% range. In the third quarter, strong market conditions continued and led to spot market prices increasing year-over-year in the low double-digit range and term contracts renewing up in the high single digits year-over-year. While refinery activity paused at the start of the fourth quarter, it steadily improved by the end of the quarter and kept our barge utilization in the 90% range. Inland marine was able to conclude the year with operating margins right at 20%. The inland marine market is expected remain strong in 2025, driven by limited new barge construction, steady customer demand, and improved pricing partially offset by inflationary pressures, labor shortages, and the high cost of new equipment.
In coastal marine, revenues increased 18% year-over-year as market conditions were favorable throughout the year due to solid customer demand and limited availability of vessels. In the first quarter, strong market conditions continued to push prices higher which drove operating margins to high single to low double-digit range. During the second quarter, steady customer demand and limited vessel capacity resulted in further price increases year-over-year on term contract renewals and operating margins in the low teens range. In the third quarter, business fundamentals remained strong and pushed operating margins into the mid-teens range. In the fourth quarter, with a high number of planned shipyards in the quarter, our team executed well and was able to keep margins in the low teens. The coastal marine business was able to finish the year with operating margins averaging in the low teens. In 2025, coastal marine is expected to continue seeing positive market dynamics with steady customer demand and limited availability of vessels.
In distribution and services, revenues decreased 1% year-over-year, as a result of mixed demand across the different parts of the segment. Our power generation business experienced a strong pace of order growth throughout the year with several large project wins in data centers, backup power and other industrial applications. Power generation ended 2024 with 20% growth in revenues year-over-year and operating margins in the high single digits. In the commercial and industrial market, while demand was strong in marine repair, the business did experience softness in on-highway truck service and repair. Despite the softness in on-highway trucking, commercial and industrial ended the year with operating income growth of 21% year-over-year and had operating margins in the high single digits. In the oil and gas market, while revenues were down 28% year-over-year due to the conventional diesel fracturing market slow down, the business continued to see growth in electric fracturing and related equipment. Overall, the KDS segment concluded the year with operating margins in the high single digits. In 2025, KDS is expected to see continued growth in power generation which is expected to mostly offset lingering softness in other areas.
From a cash flow and balance sheet perspective, Kirby generated $756 million in cash flow from operations in 2024 which was used to fund capital expenditures, buy back shares, pay down debt, and fund a small number of acquisitions. Total capital spending in 2024 was down 15% year-over-year to $343 million. Throughout the year, the Company remained committed to reducing debt and repaid $144 million of debt. At the end of 2024, Kirby’s total long-term debt had declined to $875 million, with the debt-to-capitalization ratio improving to 20.7%. During the year, Kirby also returned capital to stockholders by buying back 1.6 million shares at an average price of $106.40 for $174.6 million.
(1) |
Net earnings attributable to Kirby, excluding one-time items, is a non-GAAP financial measure. Please refer to Appendix A for additional information and a reconciliation to the most directly comparable generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) financial measures. |
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
PROXY SUMMARY |
|
KIRBY | 2025 PROXY STATEMENT |
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
The Board of Directors provides guidance to and oversight of management with respect to Kirby’s business strategy throughout the year. The Board represents the stockholders’ interest and is responsible for overseeing Company management, which includes monitoring the effectiveness of management practices and decisions, corporate performance, the integrity of the Company’s financial controls, and the effectiveness of its enterprise risk management programs. To that end, the Board has established governance practices including the guidelines and charters described below which are reviewed by the Board at least annually and changes are made as necessary.
Risk Oversight
The full Board is responsible for the oversight of key risks to Kirby’s business and reviews with management the Company’s business, including identified risk factors. The Board periodically visits Kirby operations sites. These visits enable the directors to observe and provide input on practices, performance, technology, industry and corporate standards. The Board oversees a broad spectrum of interrelated risks with assistance from its committees. The Board has designated the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, and the ESG and Nominating Committee certain responsibilities to provide assistance in fulfilling the Board’s responsibilities. A particular risk will be monitored and evaluated by the Board committee with primary responsibility in the area of the subject matter involved. For example, the Compensation Committee reviews the risks related to the Company’s compensation policies and practices and the Audit Committee receives regular reports and updates on cybersecurity issues. See page 24 for further detail on risk oversight by the Board and its committees.
Business Ethics Guidelines
The Board has adopted Business Ethics Guidelines that apply to all directors, officers, and employees of the Company, including the Company’s chief executive officer, chief financial officer, chief accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions. A copy of the Business Ethics Guidelines is available on the Company’s website at www.kirbycorp.com in the Investor Relations section under Governance/Governance Documents. The Company is required to make prompt disclosure of any amendment to or waiver of any provision of its Business Ethics Guidelines that applies to any director or executive officer including its chief executive officer, chief financial officer, chief operating officer, chief accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions. The Company will make any such disclosure that may be necessary by posting the disclosure on its website at www.kirbycorp.com in the Investor Relations section under Governance/Governance Documents.
Corporate Governance Guidelines
The Board has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines. The Corporate Governance Guidelines are reviewed regularly and updated as appropriate. A copy of the guidelines is available on the Company’s website at www.kirbycorp.com in the Investor Relations section under Governance/Governance Documents.
Communication with Directors
Interested parties, including stockholders, may communicate with the full Board or any individual director, including the Chairmen of the Audit, Compensation, and Governance Committees, the Chairman of the Board, the lead independent director, if any, or the non-management or independent directors as a group, by writing to them c/o Kirby Corporation, P.O. Box 1745, Houston, Texas 77251-1745. The Company will refer the communication to the appropriate addressee(s). Complaints about internal controls and accounting or auditing matters should be directed to the Chairman of the Audit Committee at the same address. All communications will be forwarded to the person(s) to whom they are addressed.
Website Disclosures
The following documents and information are available on the Company’s website at www.kirbycorp.com in the Investor Relations section under Governance/Governance Documents:
|
• |
|
Audit Committee Charter |
|
• |
|
Compensation Committee Charter |
|
• |
|
ESG and Nominating Committee Charter |
|
• |
|
Criteria for the Selection of Directors |
|
• |
|
Business Ethics Guidelines |
|
• |
|
Corporate Governance Guidelines |
|
• |
|
Communication with Directors |
|
• |
|
Supplemental Insider Trading Policy |
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
PROXY SUMMARY |
|
KIRBY | 2025 PROXY STATEMENT |
CORPORATE SUSTAINABILITY
In 2024, Kirby continued to create value for our customers and stockholders while staying focused on its sustainability objectives. Safety, People, Excellence, Community, and Integrity, all core values of the ‘Kirby Way’, have been the foundation of Kirby’s success. These values help guide decisions and create a culture that embraces a sustainable direction. Treating our employees, customers and vendors well, lifting the communities in which we operate and respecting the environment are not just good for business, but ensure integrity is behind all our actions. From oversight at the Board and management level, down to the employees, the Company has been strategic in its environmental, social and governance journey.
While the ESG narrative has evolved, Kirby has remained steadfast in its commitments to “No Harm to People, No Harm to Equipment and No Harm to the Environment.” Safety, one of our core values, is paramount to the business and has continued to be priority number one. The Company emphasizes its safety commitment through programs oriented toward extensive monitoring of safety performance, initiating corrective action, and for continuously improving employee safety behavior and results. Treating all people, including employees, customers, vendors and others in our community, well is of great importance. This past year the Company set a goal to have human rights training completed company wide and this target was achieved. Kirby is committed to making a positive contribution to human rights and society and we encourage partners, suppliers and other third parties to adopt similar standards with respect to human dignity. In addition to human rights training, the Company also had employees take training for Business Ethics Guidelines to ensure the reputation of Kirby is respected and to also hold our employees to high ethical standards in all they do. In addition, adhering to these rules, ensures excellence and pushes employees to provide high quality service and products for our customers.
In 2024, the Company continued to advance its commitment to environmental protection and responsibility through several programs and initiatives. This commitment extends across all levels of the Company reinforcing the importance of environmental stewardship as important and necessary. From having comprehensive internal environmental policies with board and management oversight down to monitoring employee performance to conducting environmental audits, these practices direct us towards better environmental protection. From an external perspective the Company has continued to participate in organizations such as the American Waterways Operators Responsible Carrier program, which drives continuous improvement towards reducing the barge industry’s already low impact on the environment to being a founder and member of the Blue-Sky Maritime Coalition which focuses on reducing greenhouse gas emissions. In addition, we are proud to share the M/V Green Diamond has continued to perform and exceed operational performance, and construction on another diesel electric hybrid has commenced.
Kirby will continue to prioritize our core values that contribute to best business practices and initiatives for our employees, customers and the communities in which we operate.
Please note some of our Sustainability Highlights below. To learn more about these programs and initiatives, please visit the Sustainability section of our website at www.kirbycorp.com.
|
|
|
24
|
|
KIRBY | 2025 PROXY STATEMENT |
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
The Company’s business is managed under the oversight and direction of the Board, which is responsible for strategic oversight, broad corporate policy, and monitoring the effectiveness of Company management. Members of the Board are kept informed about the Company’s businesses by participating in meetings of the Board and its committees, through operating and financial reports made at Board and committee meetings by Company management, through various reports and by visiting Company facilities. The Board’s development includes onsite meetings at key operating facilities which include interaction with employees at those locations.
Director Independence
NYSE listing standards require listed companies to have at least a majority of independent directors. For a director to be considered independent, the Board must determine that the director does not have any direct or indirect material relationship with the Company.
The Board has determined that the following incumbent directors have no relationship with the Company except as directors and stockholders and are independent within the meaning of the NYSE listing standards:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anne-Marie N. Ainsworth |
|
Barry E. Davis |
|
William M. Waterman |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Richard J. Alario |
|
Susan W. Dio |
|
Shawn D. Williams |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tanya S. Beder |
|
Richard R. Stewart |
|
|
|
|
Our Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Grzebinski, has certified to the NYSE that the Company is in compliance with NYSE corporate governance listing standards.
Risk Oversight
The Board is responsible for the risk oversight function and has designated the Audit Committee, the Compensation Committee, and the ESG and Nominating Committee certain responsibilities to provide assistance in fulfilling the Board’s responsibilities. The Board seeks to align risk oversight with its disclosure controls and procedures, and a particular risk will be monitored and evaluated by another Board committee with primary responsibility in the area of the subject matter involved. For example, the Compensation Committee reviews the risks related to the Company’s compensation policies and practices and the Audit Committee receives regular reports and updates on cybersecurity issues. On a quarterly basis, management prepares and reviews with the Audit Committee and the Board the risks outlined in the Company’s most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K, any new risks identified in the Company’s most recent Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, and annually a comprehensive assessment of the identified internal and external risks of the Company that includes evaluations of the potential impact of each identified risk, its probability of occurrence and the effectiveness of the controls that are in place to mitigate the risk. The Audit Committee and the Board also receive regular reports of any events or circumstances involving risks outside the normal course of business of the Company. The ESG and Nominating Committee oversees the Company’s ESG programs, including environmental risk, including climate change, as well as the Corporate Sustainability report, Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures, and Sustainability Accounting Standards Board disclosures. The Board and its committees also review potential emerging risks as they seek to anticipate future threats and trends that may impact the Company. Management and, where appropriate, internal and external experts provide reports on risks in their respective areas of responsibility or expertise. Frequency of updates and discussion of risks varies depending on the immediacy or severity of the risk, with more immediate or severe risks being updated and reviewed more frequently.
Board Leadership Structure
The Board has no set policy concerning the separation of the positions of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, but retains the flexibility to decide how the two positions should be filled based on the circumstances existing at any given time. Currently, the positions of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer are separated.
|
|
|
KIRBY | 2025 PROXY STATEMENT |
|
27
|
Attendance at Meetings
It is the Company’s policy that directors are expected to attend Board meetings and meetings of committees on which they serve and are expected to attend the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Company. During 2024, the Board met four times, the Audit Committee met eight times, the Compensation Committee met five times and the ESG and Nominating Committee met four times. Each director then serving attended more than 75% of the aggregate number of the meetings of the Board and of all the committees on which he or she served. All directors then serving attended the 2024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Company.
Director Compensation
Directors who are employees of the Company receive no additional compensation for their service on the Board. Compensation of nonemployee directors is determined by the full Board, which may consider recommendations of the Compensation Committee. Past practice has been to review director compensation when the Board believes that an adjustment may be necessary in order to remain competitive with director compensation of comparable companies. Management of the Company periodically collects published survey information on director compensation for purposes of comparison.
Each nonemployee director receives an annual fee of $85,000. A director may elect to receive the annual fee in cash, stock options or restricted stock. The Chairman of the Board receives an additional annual fee of $150,000, the Chairman of the Audit Committee receives an additional annual fee of $20,000, the Chairman of the Compensation Committee receives an additional annual fee of $15,000, and the Chairman of the ESG and Nominating Committee receives an additional annual fee of $10,000. If not the Chairman of the Board, the lead independent director or presiding director at executive sessions of the non-management directors receives an additional annual fee of $20,000. In addition, each director receives an annual fee of $7,500 for each committee of the Board on which he or she serves. All fees are payable in four equal quarterly payments made at the end of each calendar quarter. The annual director fee is prorated for any director elected between annual stockholder meetings and the Chairman of the Board, committee chairman, lead independent or presiding director, and committee member fees are prorated for any director who is elected to such position between annual meetings of the Board. Directors are reimbursed for reasonable expenses incurred in attending meetings.
Prior to 2024, each nonemployee director received a fee of $3,000 for each board meeting attended, in person or by telephone, in excess of six meetings in any one calendar year. Also, prior to 2024, each member of a committee of the board received a fee of $3,000 for each committee meeting attended, in person or by telephone, in excess of ten meetings in any one calendar year in the case of the Audit Committee, in excess of eight meetings in any one calendar year in the case of the Compensation Committee and in excess of eight meetings in any one calendar year in the case of the ESG and Nominating Committee. In 2024, additional director and committee meeting fees were eliminated when the annual fee was raised.
In addition to the fees described above provided to the directors, the Company has a stock award plan for nonemployee directors of the Company which provides for the issuance of stock options and restricted stock. The director plan provides for automatic grants of restricted stock to nonemployee directors after each annual meeting of stockholders. Each director receives restricted shares of the Company’s common stock after each annual meeting of stockholders. The number of shares of restricted stock issued is equal to (a) $167,500 divided by (b) the fair market value of a share of stock on the date of grant multiplied by (c) 1.2. The director plan also provides for discretionary grants of up to an aggregate of 10,000 shares in the form of stock options or restricted stock. In addition, the director plan allows for the issuance of stock options or restricted stock in lieu of cash for all or part of the annual director fee at the option of the director. A director who elects to receive stock options in lieu of the annual cash fee will be granted an option for a number of shares equal to (a) the amount of the fee for which the election is made divided by (b) the fair market value per share of the common stock on the date of grant multiplied by (c) 3. A director who elects to receive restricted stock in lieu of the annual cash fee will be issued a number of shares of restricted stock equal to (a) the amount of the fee for which the election is made divided by (b) the fair market value per share of the common stock on the date of grant multiplied by (c) 1.2. The exercise price for all stock options granted under the director plan is the fair market value per share of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. The restricted stock issued after each annual meeting of stockholders vests six months after the date of issuance. Stock options granted and restricted stock issued in lieu of cash director fees vest in equal quarterly increments during the year to which they relate. The stock options generally remain exercisable for ten years after the date of grant.
The Board has established stock ownership guidelines for officers and directors of the Company. Nonemployee directors must be in compliance within five years after first election as a director, but are expected to accumulate the required number of shares ratably over the applicable five-year period. Under the guidelines, nonemployee directors are required to own common stock of the Company having a value equal to a multiple of the annual cash director fee, which was raised from four to five in January 2024. As of December 31, 2024, all directors were in compliance with the then current stock ownership guidelines. The ESG and Nominating Committee of the Board will monitor compliance with the guidelines and may recommend modifications or exceptions to the Board.
|
|
|
KIRBY | 2025 PROXY STATEMENT |
|
29
|
TRANSACTIONS WITH
RELATED PERSONS
The Board has adopted a written policy on transactions with related persons that provides that certain transactions involving the Company and any of its directors, executive officers, or major stockholders or members of their immediate families, including all transactions that would be required to be disclosed as transactions with related persons in the Company’s Proxy Statement, are subject to approval in advance by the ESG and Nominating Committee, except that a member of the Committee will not participate in the review of a transaction in which that member has an interest. The Committee has the discretion to approve any transaction which it determines is in, or not inconsistent with, the best interests of the Company and its stockholders. If for any reason a transaction with a related person has not previously been approved, the Committee will review the transaction within a reasonable period of time and either ratify the transaction or recommend other actions, including modification, rescission or termination, taking into consideration the Company’s contractual obligations. If a transaction is ongoing or consists of a series of similar transactions, the Committee will review the transaction at least annually and either ratify the continuation of the transaction or recommend other actions, including modification, rescission or termination, taking into consideration the Company’s contractual obligations. The policy provides certain exceptions, including compensation approved by the Board or its Compensation Committee.
Mr. Grzebinski, Chief Executive Officer and a director of the Company, is a member of the board of directors of American Bureau of Shipping (“ABS”), a not-for-profit that provides global classification services to the marine, offshore and gas industries. The Company paid ABS $1.4 million in 2024 to perform audits and surveys of the Company’s vessels in the ordinary course of business.
Mr. Grzebinski is a member of the board of directors of the UK Protection & Indemnity Association (“UK P&I”), a mutual marine protection and indemnity organization that provides protection and indemnity insurance for third party liabilities and expenses arising from vessel operations. The Company paid the UK P&I $3.6 million in premiums during 2024 for coverage in the 2024-2025 policy period in the ordinary course of business.
Amy D. Husted, Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of the Company, is a member of the board of directors of Signal Mutual Indemnity Association Ltd (“Signal”), a group self-insurance not-for-profit organization authorized by the U.S. Department of Labor as a longshore worker’s compensation insurance provider. The Company has been a member of Signal since it was established in 1986. The Company paid Signal $0.6 million in 2024 in the ordinary course of business.
The husband of Ms. Husted is a partner in the law firm of Clark Hill PLC. The Company paid the law firm $2.6 million in 2024 for legal services. However, Mr. Husted is not involved in representing the Company in any legal matters related to the Company. Further, Mr. Grzebinski approves each engagement of the firm by the Company and the payment of fees billed by the firm.
The brother of Christian G. O’Neil, President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company, is a partner in the law firm of W. Sean O’Neil Attorney at Law. The Company paid the law firm $0.2 million in 2024 for legal services. Mr. Sean O’Neil does represent the Company in legal matters. However, Mr. Christian O’Neil is not involved in the engagement of Mr. Sean O’Neil. Further, Ms. Husted approves each engagement of the firm by the Company and the payment of fees billed by the firm.
No family relationship exists among the executive officers or among the executive officers and the directors.
|
|
|
30
|
|
KIRBY | 2025 PROXY STATEMENT |
VOTING ITEM 2:
AUDIT COMMITTEE MATTERS
RATIFICATION OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE’S SELECTION OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM (PROPOSAL 2)
The Audit Committee has selected KPMG LLP (“KPMG”) as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2025. KPMG served as the Company’s independent accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2024 and has served in such capacity since 1992. Although the Audit Committee has the sole authority and responsibility to select and evaluate the performance of the independent accounting firm for the Company, the Board is requesting, as a matter of good corporate governance, that the Company’s stockholders ratify the selection of KPMG for 2025.
The Board of Directors of the Company unanimously recommends that you vote “FOR” the ratification of the Audit Committee’s selection of KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2025.
Ratification of the selection of KPMG requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the shares represented at the meeting in person or by proxy. If the stockholders do not ratify the selection of KPMG, the Audit Committee will reconsider the selection. However, because of the difficulty and expense of changing independent auditors at this point in the year, the selection of KPMG would probably be continued for 2025 in the absence of extraordinary reasons for making an immediate change. If the stockholders do ratify the selection of KPMG, the Audit Committee will retain the authority to make a change if warranted in its judgment.
Representatives of KPMG are expected to be present at the 2025 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, with the opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so, and are expected to be available to respond to appropriate questions.
Fees Paid to the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The following table sets forth the fees billed by KPMG, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, during the last two fiscal years:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2024 |
|
|
2023 |
|
|
|
|
Audit Fees |
|
$ |
2,025,160 |
|
|
$ |
1,853,350 |
|
|
|
|
Tax Fees |
|
|
45,000 |
|
|
|
42,500 |
|
|
|
|
All Other Fees |
|
|
— |
|
|
|
— |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
2,070,160 |
|
|
$ |
1,895,850 |
|
Audit Fees are fees for professional services rendered by KPMG for the audit of the Company’s annual financial statements, audit of internal control over financial reporting, review of the Company’s quarterly financial statements, or services normally provided in connection with statutory or regulatory filings. This category also includes fees for issuance of comfort letters, consents and review of documents filed with the SEC. There were no separate Audit-Related Fees for the reported periods.
Tax Fees are fees for professional services rendered by KPMG for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning. Services performed by KPMG in this category included the review of the Company’s federal income tax returns.
All other fees are the aggregate fees billed for services other than “Audit Fees” or “Tax Fees.”
Each engagement of the independent registered public accounting firm to perform audit or non-audit services must be and were approved in advance by the Company’s Audit Committee or by its Chairman pursuant to delegated authority.
|
|
|
38
|
|
KIRBY | 2025 PROXY STATEMENT |
Financial Performance Measure Definitions
Adjusted EBITDA for the year is calculated by adding the following amounts shown in the Company’s audited financial statements:
|
(1) |
net earnings attributable to Kirby; |
|
(2) |
depreciation and amortization; |
|
(4) |
provision for taxes on income; and |
|
(5) |
impairment of assets. |
Adjusted earnings per share is diluted net earnings per share attributable to the Company’s common stockholders as shown in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Earnings for 2024, adjusted for impairment of assets and a Louisiana tax law change. Operating performance and ESG are based on the achievement of certain operating performance and ESG targets set for 2024.
Return on total capital for the year is calculated by dividing (i) Adjusted net earnings attributable to Kirby plus provision for taxes on income plus interest expense by (ii) the average total equity plus long-term debt for the year.
Goal Setting Process
The Committee considered multiple factors in setting target performance levels for performance metrics under the 2024 Annual Incentive Plan (“AIP”), including the operational and macroeconomic environment in which we operated during 2024. Specifically, target performance metrics were calibrated based upon the following considerations:
|
• |
|
Macroeconomic environment: The estimated economic growth, impact of inflation, supply chain disruptions, commodity and fuel prices, and regulatory activity on the Company’s business in 2024; |
|
• |
|
Strategic and operating plan for 2024: Assessment of the Company’s planned activities for the year. These activities for 2024 included both business segments achieving targeted levels of utilization and pricing to enhance strong financial performance, achieving high safety targets, expanding KDS power generation revenue through penetration of new emerging markets outside of conventional oil and gas with the overarching goal of achieving higher operating margins; and |
|
• |
|
Anticipated levels of capital expenditure: age of our fleet and plans for equipment upgrades or replacement for both business segments. |
Considering these factors and to ensure that our 2024 AIP continued to appropriately incentivize our executives to maximize stockholder value, the Committee determined that the goals established in our annual incentive plan were appropriately challenging.
Plan Administration for 2024
Financial Performance (80% weight)
The table below summarizes performance goals, achievement and payout for the financial portion of the annual incentive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PERFORMANCE METRIC |
|
THRESHOLD |
|
TARGET |
|
MAXIMUM |
|
ACTUAL |
|
PAYOUT |
|
WEIGHTED PAYOUT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA (50%) |
|
|
$ |
533.4M |
|
|
|
$ |
666.7M |
|
|
|
$ |
800.0M |
|
|
|
$ |
708.3M |
|
|
|
|
131.2 |
% |
|
|
|
65.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EPS (37.5%) |
|
|
$ |
3.86 |
|
|
|
$ |
4.82 |
|
|
|
$ |
5.78 |
|
|
|
$ |
5.46 |
|
|
|
|
166.7 |
% |
|
|
|
62.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on Capital (12.5%) |
|
|
|
7.9 |
% |
|
|
|
9.9 |
% |
|
|
|
11.9 |
% |
|
|
|
10.9 |
% |
|
|
|
152.4 |
% |
|
|
|
19.1 |
% |
|
|
Weighted Average Payout (Financial Performance) |
|
|
|
|
147.2 |
% |
Operational Performance (20% weight)
The operating performance metrics for our 2024 AIP were a basket of ten (10) internal strategic and operating goals designed to provide direct line of sight to achievement of key strategic priorities that support sustainable financial success. Categories, as described above, include vessel uptime, vessel utility, labor utilization, safety performance, e-commerce growth, increasing ESG-related revenue, cost management, and working capital management.
|
|
|
KIRBY | 2025 PROXY STATEMENT |
|
41
|
Payout Calculation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EXECUTIVE |
|
2022 TARGET AWARD VALUE |
|
X |
|
WEIGHTED PAYOUT FACTOR |
|
= |
|
ACTUAL PAYOUT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
David W. Grzebinski |
|
|
$ |
1,500,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
137.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
2,064,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Raj Kumar |
|
|
$ |
320,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
137.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
440,320 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Christian G. O’Neil |
|
|
$ |
600,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
138.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
831,000 |
|
The earned amounts for Mr. Grzebinski, Mr. Kumar and Mr. O’Neil are included in the Non-Equity Incentive Plan column of the Summary Compensation Table.
Retirement Plans
Prior to 2022, the Company maintained two primary retirement plans in which the named executive officers were eligible to participate on the same basis as broad categories of employees — a Profit Sharing Plan and a 401(k) Plan. In January 2022, the Profit Sharing Plan funds and administration were transferred into the 401(k) Plan, but maintained as a separate source, and future contributions for the Profit Sharing Plan will be contributed by the Company to the 401(k) Plan on the same basis. All employees of the Company are eligible to participate in the 401(k) Plan, under which the Company matches employee contributions in an amount up to 3% of an employee’s base salary.
Mr. O’Neil and Ms. Husted are participants in one of the Company’s pension plans pursuant to the Company’s acquisition of Hollywood Marine in 1999. Effective December 31, 1999, the plan ceased to accrue additional benefits for former shore-side employees of Hollywood Marine. As of December 31, 2024, the present value of accumulated benefits was $10,038 for Mr. O’Neil and $23,071 for Ms. Husted. No other named executive officers were eligible to participate in the Company’s pension plans.
The Company maintains an unfunded, nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan for Key Employees, which is designed primarily to provide additional benefits to eligible employees to restore benefits to which they would be entitled under the Company’s 401(k) Plan were it not for certain limits imposed by the Internal Revenue Code. The plan is designed to restore benefits for employees being compensated in excess of certain limits (base salary of $345,000 per annum for 2024). In 2024, the Committee approved contributions for each participant at the maximum amounts allowed by the Plan.
Perquisites and Personal Benefits
The only perquisites or other personal benefits that the Company provides to the named executive officers are an automobile allowance that is given to approximately 233 executive and management employees. Club memberships that are used for both business and personal purposes are provided to the CEO and divisional presidents and officers in sales where required for business. Perquisites could also include air travel that is considered personal income under Internal Revenue Service regulations for family members to attend business related and customer events. There was no air travel that qualified as personal use in 2024. The Committee believes the personal benefits are reasonable in amount and help the Company attract and retain key employees.
Change of Control Payments
The Company entered into change of control agreements with Messrs. Grzebinski, Kumar, O’Neil and Miller and Ms. Husted. The terms of the change of control agreements for each such named executive officer were substantially similar except with regard to the multiplier to be used in calculating the portion of the cash payment associated with annualized base salary, which is 2.99 in the case of Mr. Grzebinski and 2.0 for Messrs. Kumar, O’Neil and Miller and Ms. Husted, and the non-solicitation and noncompetition covenant periods, which is 36 months for Mr. Grzebinski and 24 months for Messrs. Kumar, O’Neil and Miller and Ms. Husted. In the event of qualifying termination of employment in a change of control period which begins on the date the Company enters into a definitive written agreement that would result in a change of control if the transactions contemplated therein were consummated and ends on the second anniversary of the change of control, the severance payments to the covered executive officer would be the sum of the annualized base salary times the applicable multiplier, twice the applicable target annual bonus, prorated Profit Sharing based on the prior year, and 24 months of COBRA premiums for the Company’s medical, dental, vision, and prescription drug plans. Further, the covered executive officer will become fully vested in any outstanding equity award, the amount or vesting of which is to be determined based on the achievement of performance criteria, with the performance criteria deemed achieved at the greater of (a) target levels for
|
|
|
42
|
|
KIRBY | 2025 PROXY STATEMENT |
the relevant performance period(s) or (b) actual performance as of the date immediately preceding the executive’s termination date. A qualifying termination is a termination by the Company other for cause, death or disability or by the employee with “Good Reason.” “Good Reason” is defined in the change of control agreements as any one or more of the following without the individual’s written consent: (i) a material reduction in base annual salary; (ii) a material adverse change in authority, duties or responsibilities; (iii) a material breach by the Company of any material provision of the change of control agreement; or (iv) relocation of the primary work place by more than 30 miles, and the new location is farther from his or her primary residence. In 2023, the Committee amended the Change in Control Agreements with Messrs. Grzebinski, Kumar and O’Neil to clarify that they will also become fully vested in any long-term performance award, the amount of which is to be determined based on the achievement of performance criteria, with the performance criteria deemed achieved at the greater of (a) target levels for the relevant performance period(s) or (b) actual performance as of the date immediately preceding the executive’s termination date. Similar amendments were made to the Change in Control Agreements with Mr. Miller and Ms. Husted in 2025. Such payment and accelerated vesting are conditioned upon execution of a release and waiver of claims against the Company along with traditional confidentiality, non-solicitation, noncompetition and non-disparagement restrictive covenants. The vesting of each equity award outstanding as of the covered executive officer’s termination date that is not a performance-based equity award will be determined by the terms of the applicable equity incentive plan and award agreement.1
Separate from the change of control agreements, the named executive officers are generally entitled to accelerated vesting of outstanding stock options, restricted stock, and RSUs upon a qualifying termination of employment following a change in control of the Company, and a right to receive a proportionate part of outstanding long-term performance awards upon a change in control of the Company.
Retention Awards – Final Vesting in 2023
Mr. Grzebinski and Mr. O’Neil received retention awards comprised of RSUs and a cash bonus pursuant to their 2021 incentive and retention award agreements. The cash awards vested in equal installments in December of 2021, 2022 and 2023. The final installments vesting for Mr. Grzebinski and Mr. O’Neil in 2023 were $416,667 and $125,000, respectively. These amounts appear in the “All Other Compensation” column of the Summary Compensation Table. The RSUs cliff vested in full on January 24, 2024 (24,626 RSUs for Mr. Grzebinski and 9,850 RSUs for Mr. O’Neil).
Employment Agreements
The Company has no employment agreements with any of its executive officers but entered into the previously described incentive and retention award agreements for Messrs. Grzebinski and O’Neil, the previously described change of control agreements for Messrs. Grzebinski, Kumar, O’Neil and Miller and Ms. Husted.
Compensation Oversight and Process
Role of the Compensation Committee
The Compensation Committee (the “Committee”) of the Board’s principal functions include conducting periodic reviews of the Company’s compensation and benefits programs to ensure that they are properly designed to meet corporate objectives and are aligned with our compensation philosophy, approving compensation opportunity and performance objectives for our CEO and other NEOs, overseeing of the administration of the long-term performance award incentive and equity-based plans, and developing the compensation program for the Directors.
The Committee is composed of four members, all of whom are “independent directors,” “Non-Employee Directors” and “outside directors” as those terms are defined in applicable SEC and NYSE standards and federal securities and tax regulations.
The Committee does not delegate any of its authority to determine executive compensation. The Committee considers recommendations from the CEO in making its compensation decisions for executive officers other than the CEO. The Committee takes those recommendations into account when setting compensation for other executive officers since the CEO is in the best position to evaluate the contributions of the other executive officers to the success of the Company. The Board undertakes an independent evaluation of the individual performance of the CEO before the Committee sets his compensation.
In determining the compensation of the named executive officers, the Committee considered all elements of total compensation, including salary, annual incentive compensation, long-term incentive compensation, and projected payouts under the Company’s retirement plans, as applicable. The Committee has discretion to adjust formula-driven factors or
1 |
The foregoing summary of the terms of the change of control agreements is qualified by reference to the copies of the agreements filed as Exhibits 10.1, 10.2, 10.3, and 10.4 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 20, 2022, as Exhibits 10.4, 10.5, and 10.6 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed May 8, 2023, and Exhibits 10.15, 10.19, and 10.20 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024. |
|
|
|
KIRBY | 2025 PROXY STATEMENT |
|
43
|
provide additional incentive compensation based on executive retention considerations, or in recognition of specific achievements in extraordinary circumstances. The final decisions of the Committee are to some extent subjective and do not result from a formulaic application of any of those factors.
Details of the Committee’s authority and responsibilities are specified in the Committee’s charter, which may be accessed with other governance documents at our website, www.kirbycorp.com, by clicking “Investor Relations,” and then “Governance.”
Role of Compensation Consultant
For 2024, the Committee engaged Meridian to provide information for the Committee to consider in making compensation decisions. Meridian was engaged directly by the Committee to:
|
• |
|
review the peer group of comparable companies used for comparisons of Company performance and executive compensation; |
|
• |
|
perform a marketplace analysis of direct compensation for senior executive officers compared to the peer group of companies and published compensation surveys; |
|
• |
|
perform a marketplace analysis on Director compensation; |
|
• |
|
update the Committee on current trends in executive compensation; and |
|
• |
|
consult with the Committee concerning risks of the Company’s compensation policies and practices. |
At the Committee’s request, Meridian addressed the six independence factors for compensation committee advisors that are identified in SEC regulations. Based on its evaluation, the Committee concluded that there were no independence or conflicts of interest concerns related to Meridian’s engagement with the Committee. Meridian performed no services during 2024 for the Company or any of its affiliates other than for the Committee.
Other Compensation Matters
Compensation Related Risk
With the assistance of Meridian, the Committee undertook a review of the Company’s compensation policies and practices and concluded that the Company’s compensation programs do not encourage excessive risk taking and do not present risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.
Tax Considerations
Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code generally disallows a tax deduction to public companies for compensation over $1 million paid to the CEO and certain other highly compensated executive officers. Prior to the enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Tax Act”), certain performance-based compensation was exempt from the deduction limit. The Tax Act eliminated the exemption for performance-based compensation effective for tax years beginning after December 31, 2017. While the Committee takes tax deductibility into account, the Committee retains discretion to award compensation that it believes to be consistent with our executive compensation program, even if not tax deductible.
Clawback Policy
In October 2020, the Board adopted a clawback policy effective January 1, 2021, under which it will seek to recoup certain executive compensation in the event of a specified accounting restatement resulting in excess compensation paid to executive officers. In October 2023, the clawback policy was amended in order to comply with recent SEC rule changes and related NYSE listing standards with regard to erroneously awarded compensation. Under the policy, if a financial statement error results in excess compensation during the three most recently completed fiscal years, any such excess compensation that has not yet been paid shall be forfeited and any that has been paid shall be subject to repayment to the Company. The Company will attempt to recover such excess compensation by requiring cash reimbursement of compensation paid, offsetting excess compensation against any other compensation owed, forfeiture of any awards, or any other actions permitted by applicable law.
Timing of Compensation Decisions
The Committee generally makes executive compensation decisions in January of each year. RSUs approved to be granted at the regular January meeting of the Committee, which takes place several days before the Company’s public release of
|
|
|
44
|
|
KIRBY | 2025 PROXY STATEMENT |
earnings information for the previous year, are granted on a specified date shortly after the earnings release, in which case the later date is considered the date of grant. RSUs are based upon a specific compensation target for each grantee and are determined by dividing the compensation target by the fair market value of one share of the Company’s stock on the date of grant. Base salary increases are reviewed by the Committee in its January meeting, approved in its April meeting of each year, and generally become effective July 1st of that year.
Stock Ownership Guidelines
The Board has established stock ownership guidelines for executive officers of the Company and its subsidiaries. Executive officers must be in compliance within five years after becoming an executive officer or within two-years form the date of promotion from one executive level to another. In the case of a base salary change, a separate one-year time frame is given to reach the incremental minimum levels. Executive officers are expected to accumulate the required number of shares ratably over the applicable period. Required ownership levels are listed below by level:
|
|
|
EXECUTIVE LEVEL |
|
OWNERSHIP REQUIREMENT |
|
|
Executive Chairman of the Board, President or CEO of Kirby |
|
5 times base salary |
|
|
Business Unit Presidents and EVPs of Kirby, Chief Operating Officers, Chief Commercial Officers of Business Units |
|
3 times base salary |
|
|
Senior Vice Presidents and VPs of Kirby |
|
2 times base salary |
As of December 31, 2024, all named executive officers then serving were in compliance with the stock ownership guidelines.
Hedging
The Company has adopted a policy prohibiting hedging the economic risk of ownership of Company stock. The policy, which applies to all transactions that establish protection against a decline in the market price of Company stock, provides that Company directors and employees, including named executive officers, may not (a) engage in short sales of Company stock, (b) pledge Company stock as collateral for a loan or hold Company stock in a margin account or (c) engage in transactions involving other financial instruments that are designed to, or have the effect of, hedging or protecting against any decline in the market value of any Company stock held, directly or indirectly, by such person. Hedging transactions include, but are not limited to, prepaid variable forward contracts, equity swaps, exchange funds, short sales and puts, calls, collars or similar options to buy or sell Company stock, but do not include the exercise of stock options granted by the Company.
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION
The current members of the Compensation Committee are Messrs. Alario, Davis, Waterman and Williams. None of such persons is or has been an officer or employee of the Company or any of its subsidiaries. In 2024, no executive officer of the Company served on the board of directors or compensation committee of another entity, any of whose executive officers served on the Board or Compensation Committee of the Company.
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT
The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company has reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis in this Proxy Statement. Based on that review and discussion, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement.
Compensation Committee
Barry E. Davis, Chairman
Richard J. Alario
William M. Waterman
Shawn D. Williams
|
|
|
58
|
|
KIRBY | 2025 PROXY STATEMENT |
SOLICITATION OF PROXIES
The Proxy Card
Your shares will be voted as specified on the enclosed proxy card. If a proxy is signed without choices specified, those shares will be voted for the election of the Class III directors named in this Proxy Statement, for the ratification of the Audit Committee’s selection of KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2025, for the approval on an advisory basis of executive compensation and at the discretion of the proxies on any other matters.
You are encouraged to complete, sign and return the proxy card or vote your shares via the phone or internet even if you expect to attend the meeting. If you sign a proxy card and deliver it to us, but then want to change your vote, you may revoke your proxy at any time prior to the Annual Meeting by sending us a written revocation or a new proxy, or by attending the Annual Meeting and voting your shares in person.
Cost of Soliciting Proxies
The solicitation of proxies is made by the Company on behalf of its Board of Directors and the cost of soliciting proxies will be paid by the Company. The Company has retained Georgeson LLC to solicit proxies at an estimated cost of $12,000, plus out-of-pocket expenses. Employees of the Company may also solicit proxies, for which the expense would be nominal and borne by the Company. Solicitation may be by mail, facsimile, electronic mail, telephone or personal interview.
VOTING
Stockholders Entitled to Vote
Stockholders of record at the close of business on March 3, 2025 will be entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting. As of the close of business on March 3, 2025, the Company had approximately 56,897,000 outstanding shares of common stock. Each share of common stock is entitled to one vote on each matter to come before the meeting.
Quorum and Votes Necessary to Adopt Proposals
In order to transact business at the Annual Meeting, a quorum consisting of a majority of all outstanding shares entitled to vote must be present. Abstentions and proxies returned by brokerage firms for which no voting instructions have been received from their beneficial owners will be counted for the purpose of determining whether a quorum is present. A majority of the votes cast (not counting abstentions and broker nonvotes) is required for the election of directors (Proposal 1). A majority of the outstanding shares entitled to vote that are represented at the meeting via attendance or by proxy is required for the ratification of the Audit Committee’s selection of KPMG LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2025 (Proposal 2). Proposal 3 is a non-binding advisory vote on matters related to executive compensation and therefore there is no voting standard for that proposal, since the voting results will be informational only.
Please note that if your shares are held in the name of a brokerage firm on your behalf, your broker may not vote your shares on the election of directors or the matters related to executive compensation without voting instructions from you.
Pay vs Performance Disclosure - USD ($)
|
12 Months Ended |
Dec. 31, 2024 |
Dec. 31, 2023 |
Dec. 31, 2022 |
Dec. 31, 2021 |
Dec. 31, 2020 |
Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
|
|
Pay vs Performance Disclosure, Table |
As discussed in the CD&A above, the Compensation Committee has designed the Company’s executive compensation program to align a substantial portion of total compensation to motivating consistent performance over time in achievement of the Company’s strategic, operational, and financial objectives that result in increased profitability and stockholder returns. The following table sets forth additional compensation information for its named executive officers (“NEOs”), calculated in accordance with SEC regulations , for 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021 and 2020.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value of Initial Fixed $100 Investment as of January 1, 2020 Based On: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Summary Compensation Table Total For CEO (1) |
|
Compensation Actually Paid to CEO (2)(3) |
|
Average Summary Compensation Table Total for Non-CEO NEOs (4) |
|
Average Compensation Actually Paid to Non-CEO NEOs (2)(4)(5) |
|
|
|
Peer Group Total Stockholder Return (6) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,031,547 |
|
|
|
$ |
9,436,272 |
|
|
|
$ |
2,280,399 |
|
|
|
$ |
3,008,599 |
|
|
|
$ |
118.17 |
|
|
|
$ |
156.71 |
|
|
|
$ |
286,707 |
|
|
|
$ |
708,328 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,722,709 |
|
|
|
|
9,257,534 |
|
|
|
|
2,005,619 |
|
|
|
|
2,030,002 |
|
|
|
|
87.66 |
|
|
|
|
154.31 |
|
|
|
|
222,905 |
|
|
|
|
557,319 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,243,919 |
|
|
|
|
6,766,826 |
|
|
|
|
1,869,027 |
|
|
|
|
1,987,378 |
|
|
|
|
71.88 |
|
|
|
|
127.96 |
|
|
|
|
122,761 |
|
|
|
|
410,536 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,899,132 |
|
|
|
|
6,887,444 |
|
|
|
|
1,833,167 |
|
|
|
|
2,183,344 |
|
|
|
|
66.37 |
|
|
|
|
155.22 |
|
|
|
|
(246,771 |
) |
|
|
|
306,116 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,278,144 |
|
|
|
|
1,175,077 |
|
|
|
|
1,402,759 |
|
|
|
|
(70,165 |
) |
|
|
|
57.89 |
|
|
|
|
116.52 |
|
|
|
|
(271,592 |
) |
|
|
|
359,629 |
|
|
The dollar amounts reported are the amounts of total compensation reported for the Company’s CEO, Mr. Grzebinski, in the Summary Compensation Tables for 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021 and 2020. Mr. Grzebinski served as CEO for each of the years presented. |
|
The dollar amounts reported represent the amount of “compensation actually paid”, as computed in accordance with SEC rules. The dollar amounts do not reflect the actual amounts of compensation paid to the Company’s CEO or other NEOs during the applicable year, as they also include (i) the year-end value of equity awards granted during the reported year and (ii) the change in the value of equity awards that were unvested at the end of the prior year, measured through the date the awards vested or were forfeited, or through the end of the reported fiscal year. |
|
To calculate Compensation Actually Paid to the Company’s CEO, the grant date fair value of the equity awards to the Company’s CEO, as reported in the “Stock Awards” column in the Summary Compensation Table for each applicable year, were deducted from the CEO’s “Total” compensation as reported in the Summary Compensation Table, and the following equity award adjustments were added to or deducted from (as applicable) the balance: 2024 - $4,479,879, 2023 - $ 3,905,017, 2022 - $2,773,165, 2021 - $4,306,800, and 2020 - $(1,034,588). The equity award adjustments represent the year-over-year change in the fair value of equity awards to the Company’s CEO. |
|
For 2020, Mr. William Harvey, former Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Mr. Joseph Reniers, former President - Kirby Distribution and Services, Inc., Mr. O’Neil and Ms. Husted are included as non-CEO NEOs. For 2021, Messrs. Kumar, O’Neil, Harvey, and Reniers and Ms. Husted are included as non-CEO NEOs. For 2022, Messrs. Kumar and O’Neil and Mss. Husted and Clarke are included as non-CEO NEOs. For 2023, Messrs. Kumar, O’Neil and Miller and Mss. Husted and Clarke are included as non-CEO NEOs. For 2024, Messrs. Kumar, O’Neil and Miller and Ms. Husted are included as non-CEO NEOs. |
|
To calculate Average Compensation Actually Paid to the Company’s non-CEO NEOs, the average of the grant date fair value of the equity awards to the Company’s NEOs (other than the CEO), as reported in the “Stock Awards” column in the Summary Compensation Table for each applicable year, were deducted from the average of the “Total” compensation of the Company’s non-CEO NEOs as reported in the Summary Compensation Table, and the following equity award adjustments were added to or deducted from (as applicable) the balance: 2024 - $1,503,386, 2023 - $604,525, 2022 - $822,973, 2021 - $1,332,309, and 2020 - $(761,423). The equity award adjustments represent the average of the year-over-year change in the fair value of equity awards to the Company’s NEOs (other than the CEO). |
|
Reflects cumulative total stockholder return of the Dow Jones US Transportation Average index (“DJTA”), as of December 31, 2024. The DJTA is the peer group used by the Company for purposes of Item 201(e) of Regulation S-K under the Exchange Act in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024. The DJTA has been selected by the Company as its peer group based on its inclusion in that index. The DJTA is a price-weighted average of twenty transportation stocks traded in the United States. The index includes railroads, airlines, trucking, marine transportation, delivery services, and logistics companies. While the Company believes the index is useful for providing insight into the state of the U.S. economy, the index does not include the Company’s primary competitors in the KMT segment who are largely private companies. In addition, the Company derived 41% of its revenues in 2024 from its KDS segment whose operations are not typical of other members of the index. Therefore, stock performance of the DJTA may not correlate to the Company’s stock performance due to the inherent variations in operations between those of the Company and the other members of the index. |
|
Adjusted EBITDA for 2020 excludes $553.3 million related to impairment of long-lived assets, impairment of goodwill, and inventory write-downs. Pursuant to its authority to interpret the AIP guidelines to assure that awards are consistent with the AIP’s purposes and the Company’s interests, the Committee approved the exclusion of those items in determining the annual incentive compensation payouts for all participants, as the Compensation Committee determined that those exclusions were appropriate given the Compensation Committee’s opinion that the impairments and other charges were primarily due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. The Committee also took into account the effects of the Company to protect its employees and continue operations despite the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, with minimal disruptions, including by moving many of its shoreside employees to remote operations. Adjusted EBITDA for 2021 excludes $340.7 million related to impairment of long-lived assets and impairment of goodwill. For 2021, the Compensation Committee determined that this exclusion was appropriate given the Compensation Committee’s opinion that the impairment was primarily due to the impact of the strategic decision to sell the Hawaii assets and retire wire assets, which will benefit the Company long-term. For compensation payout purposes, no adjustments were made to return on total capital, EBITDA, or earnings per share for 2022 and 2023. Adjusted EBITDA for 2024 excludes $56.3 million related to an impairment charge associated with conventional diesel fracturing equipment inventory. For 2024, the Compensation Committee determined that this exclusion was appropriate given the Compensation Committee’s opinion that the impairment charge was primarily due to the impact of a rapid paradigm shift in technology from conventional diesel-powered equipment to both dual-fuel and electric-powered hydraulic equipment as certain of the Company’s customers and other pressure pumpers disclosed in the fourth quarter of 2024 retirements and impairments of their conventional diesel hydraulic fracturing equipment. The Compensation Committee also determined that it was appropriate to exclude the 2024 one-time deferred tax credit that the Company received in connection with a change in Louisiana tax law. Please refer to Appendix B for a reconciliation to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures. |
|
|
|
|
|
Company Selected Measure Name |
Adjusted EBITDA
|
|
|
|
|
Named Executive Officers, Footnote |
For 2020, Mr. William Harvey, former Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Mr. Joseph Reniers, former President - Kirby Distribution and Services, Inc., Mr. O’Neil and Ms. Husted are included as non-CEO NEOs. For 2021, Messrs. Kumar, O’Neil, Harvey, and Reniers and Ms. Husted are included as non-CEO NEOs. For 2022, Messrs. Kumar and O’Neil and Mss. Husted and Clarke are included as non-CEO NEOs. For 2023, Messrs. Kumar, O’Neil and Miller and Mss. Husted and Clarke are included as non-CEO NEOs. For 2024, Messrs. Kumar, O’Neil and Miller and Ms. Husted are included as non-CEO NEOs.
|
|
|
|
|
Peer Group Issuers, Footnote |
Reflects cumulative total stockholder return of the Dow Jones US Transportation Average index (“DJTA”), as of December 31, 2024. The DJTA is the peer group used by the Company for purposes of Item 201(e) of Regulation S-K under the Exchange Act in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2024. The DJTA has been selected by the Company as its peer group based on its inclusion in that index. The DJTA is a price-weighted average of twenty transportation stocks traded in the United States. The index includes railroads, airlines, trucking, marine transportation, delivery services, and logistics companies. While the Company believes the index is useful for providing insight into the state of the U.S. economy, the index does not include the Company’s primary competitors in the KMT segment who are largely private companies. In addition, the Company derived 41% of its revenues in 2024 from its KDS segment whose operations are not typical of other members of the index. Therefore, stock performance of the DJTA may not correlate to the Company’s stock performance due to the inherent variations in operations between those of the Company and the other members of the index.
|
|
|
|
|
PEO Total Compensation Amount |
$ 7,031,547
|
$ 7,722,709
|
$ 6,243,919
|
$ 5,899,132
|
$ 4,278,144
|
PEO Actually Paid Compensation Amount |
$ 9,436,272
|
9,257,534
|
6,766,826
|
6,887,444
|
1,175,077
|
Adjustment To PEO Compensation, Footnote |
To calculate Compensation Actually Paid to the Company’s CEO, the grant date fair value of the equity awards to the Company’s CEO, as reported in the “Stock Awards” column in the Summary Compensation Table for each applicable year, were deducted from the CEO’s “Total” compensation as reported in the Summary Compensation Table, and the following equity award adjustments were added to or deducted from (as applicable) the balance: 2024 - $4,479,879, 2023 - $ 3,905,017, 2022 - $2,773,165, 2021 - $4,306,800, and 2020 - $(1,034,588). The equity award adjustments represent the year-over-year change in the fair value of equity awards to the Company’s CEO.
|
|
|
|
|
Non-PEO NEO Average Total Compensation Amount |
$ 2,280,399
|
2,005,619
|
1,869,027
|
1,833,167
|
1,402,759
|
Non-PEO NEO Average Compensation Actually Paid Amount |
$ 3,008,599
|
2,030,002
|
1,987,378
|
2,183,344
|
(70,165)
|
Adjustment to Non-PEO NEO Compensation Footnote |
To calculate Average Compensation Actually Paid to the Company’s non-CEO NEOs, the average of the grant date fair value of the equity awards to the Company’s NEOs (other than the CEO), as reported in the “Stock Awards” column in the Summary Compensation Table for each applicable year, were deducted from the average of the “Total” compensation of the Company’s non-CEO NEOs as reported in the Summary Compensation Table, and the following equity award adjustments were added to or deducted from (as applicable) the balance: 2024 - $1,503,386, 2023 - $604,525, 2022 - $822,973, 2021 - $1,332,309, and 2020 - $(761,423). The equity award adjustments represent the average of the year-over-year change in the fair value of equity awards to the Company’s NEOs (other than the CEO).
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation Actually Paid vs. Total Shareholder Return |
The following charts reflect that the Compensation Actually Paid over the f ive -year period ended December 31, 202 4 aligns to trends in the Company’s TSR, net income (loss) and adjusted EBITDA results over the same period.
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation Actually Paid vs. Net Income |
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation Actually Paid vs. Company Selected Measure |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Shareholder Return Vs Peer Group |
The following charts reflect that the Compensation Actually Paid over the f ive -year period ended December 31, 202 4 aligns to trends in the Company’s TSR, net income (loss) and adjusted EBITDA results over the same period.
|
|
|
|
|
Tabular List, Table |
The list of items below identifies the three most important financial performance measures used by the Company’s Compensation Committee to link the “compensation actually paid” to the Company’s CEO and other NEOs in 202 4 , calculated in accordance with SEC regulations, to Company performance. The role of each of these performance measures on NEO compensation is discussed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section beginning on page 33.
|
Financial Performance Measures |
EBITDA |
Return on Total Capital |
Earnings per Share |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Shareholder Return Amount |
$ 118.17
|
87.66
|
71.88
|
66.37
|
57.89
|
Peer Group Total Shareholder Return Amount |
156.71
|
154.31
|
127.96
|
155.22
|
116.52
|
Net Income (Loss) |
$ 286,707,000
|
$ 222,905,000
|
$ 122,761,000
|
$ (246,771,000)
|
$ (271,592,000)
|
Company Selected Measure Amount |
708,328,000
|
557,319,000
|
410,536,000
|
306,116,000
|
359,629,000
|
PEO Name |
Mr. Grzebinski
|
Mr. Grzebinski
|
Mr. Grzebinski
|
Mr. Grzebinski
|
Mr. Grzebinski
|
Impairment of Long Lived Assets Including Goodwill |
|
|
|
$ 340,700,000
|
$ 553,300,000
|
Measure:: 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
EBITDA
|
|
|
|
|
Non-GAAP Measure Description |
Adjusted EBITDA for 2020 excludes $553.3 million related to impairment of long-lived assets, impairment of goodwill, and inventory write-downs. Pursuant to its authority to interpret the AIP guidelines to assure that awards are consistent with the AIP’s purposes and the Company’s interests, the Committee approved the exclusion of those items in determining the annual incentive compensation payouts for all participants, as the Compensation Committee determined that those exclusions were appropriate given the Compensation Committee’s opinion that the impairments and other charges were primarily due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. The Committee also took into account the effects of the Company to protect its employees and continue operations despite the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, with minimal disruptions, including by moving many of its shoreside employees to remote operations. Adjusted EBITDA for 2021 excludes $340.7 million related to impairment of long-lived assets and impairment of goodwill. For 2021, the Compensation Committee determined that this exclusion was appropriate given the Compensation Committee’s opinion that the impairment was primarily due to the impact of the strategic decision to sell the Hawaii assets and retire wire assets, which will benefit the Company long-term. For compensation payout purposes, no adjustments were made to return on total capital, EBITDA, or earnings per share for 2022 and 2023. Adjusted EBITDA for 2024 excludes $56.3 million related to an impairment charge associated with conventional diesel fracturing equipment inventory. For 2024, the Compensation Committee determined that this exclusion was appropriate given the Compensation Committee’s opinion that the impairment charge was primarily due to the impact of a rapid paradigm shift in technology from conventional diesel-powered equipment to both dual-fuel and electric-powered hydraulic equipment as certain of the Company’s customers and other pressure pumpers disclosed in the fourth quarter of 2024 retirements and impairments of their conventional diesel hydraulic fracturing equipment. The Compensation Committee also determined that it was appropriate to exclude the 2024 one-time deferred tax credit that the Company received in connection with a change in Louisiana tax law. Please refer to Appendix B for a reconciliation to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures.
|
|
|
|
|
Measure:: 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
Return on Total Capital
|
|
|
|
|
Measure:: 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
Earnings per Share
|
|
|
|
|
PEO |
|
|
|
|
|
Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount |
$ 4,479,879
|
$ 3,905,017
|
$ 2,773,165
|
4,306,800
|
(1,034,588)
|
Non-PEO NEO | Adjusted EBITDA [Member] |
|
|
|
|
|
Pay vs Performance Disclosure |
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to Compensation, Amount |
$ 1,503,386
|
$ 604,525
|
$ 822,973
|
$ 1,332,309
|
$ (761,423)
|