Hot Features
Premium
Register for real-time alerts, custom portfolio, and market movers
Conventional earnings numbers generally do not adequately allow for the fact that with some companies profits cannot be taken out if they are to maintain their unit volume of output, spend enough to maintain its economic franchise (e.g. on working capital, new machinery, marketing, service quality, employee training, etc.) and invest in all value enhancing projects.
Some firms need to invest so heavily in these items that little of the conventional earnings can be given to shareholders.
It’s often the case that owner earnings is more useful than conventional earnings for getting to the amount shareholders can take after allowing for necessary investment to maintain the quality of the business.
Marshall Motor (LSE:MMH) has an impressive history of conventional earnings relative to the current share price. Today I’d like to see how it shapes up under the owner earnings approach.
Owner earnings
With owner earnings we’re trying to obtain the earnings that, in future, would be left for shareholders after the managers’ use of the cash generated to pay for items of expenditure to maintain the strength of the economic franchise, maintain unit volume and to invest in all value-generating projects available.
Depending on circumstances, the owner earnings figure may be the same for every future year or on a steadily rising (or falling) trend.
Naturally, owner earnings are impossible to obtain with any degree of precision because many of the input numbers are merely educated guesses about the future. Despite this imprecision it remains an important method for thinking through valuations.
Owner earnings analysis is about future cash available for shareholders to take out of the business. But the only evidence we have available is past data. We start with that, and then use qualitative analysis to judge whether to simply project forward the past pattern or modify the previous trend for future orientated thinking.
In the following we use what the company actually invested in new working capital items and in new fixed capital items, and what they spent on marketing, R&D and staff training etc. already deducted from the P&L.
What the analysis really requires is the amount necessary to maintain the quality of the economic franchise, unit volume and invest in value generating projects.
When we move to forward-looking analysis to value the firm we need to make another bold assumption on the real amount needed to invest in new WC, fixed capital items, etc., in the future. The historical analysis helps us make that judgment.
Estimating Marshall Motor’s owner earnings is made much more complicated because it reports profits after excluding non-underlying items; profits with non-underlying items deducted, and; profits with both underlying items deducted and profits from the sale of businesses added.
In the table below profit before deduction of non-underlying items is shown. And then, in brackets in first row, profit after such a deduction; showing a more warts an’ all number. (The profits made on selling businesses is so large, and a result of events unlikely to reoccur to the same extent, that I exclude this measure).
Owner earnings in the past
| £m | 2019H1 x 2 | 2018 |
………………To read more subscribe to my premium newsletter Deep Value Shares – click here http://newsletters.advfn.com/deepvalueshares/subscribe-1
