ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for default Register for Free to get streaming real-time quotes, interactive charts, live options flow, and more.

FINRA Ruins Barclays' Boxing Day With $3.75 Million Fine

Share On Facebook
share on Linkedin
Print

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) just put a wet blanket on the Barclays Capital (LSE:BARC) Yule Log.  At about noon EST, FINRA levied a $3.75 million fine on the financial firm for its failure to properly maintain “electronic records, emails and instant messages.”

Barclays is alleged to have violated SEC laws as well as FINRA and NASD rules and regulations by failing “to establish and maintain an adequate system and written procedures reasonable designed to achieve [regulator] compliance … as well as to timely detect and remedy deficiencies related to those requirements.”  C’mon, Barclays, this is basic stuff.

What Barclays failed to do was to maintain records of communications and transactions in a “Write Once, Read Many” (WORM) format. The format is important because it preserves the integrity of the original communications by preventing alteration and disposal.  The basic issue of preservation of records is essential to any responsible organization, but, perhaps even more so in the banking sector.  FINRA Executive Vice President made this point clear when he said that “Ensuring the integrity, accuracy and accessibility of electronic books and records is essential to a firm’s ability to meet its compliance obligations. The format errors in this case made it nearly impossible for Barclays to verify that these key materials remained in an unaltered condition.”

Its failure to comply with a fundamental business principle has exposed Barclay customers to potential fraud and to the effects of financial irresponsibility. Barclays settled at $3.75 million without admitting fault or blame.  The documentation and preservation shortcomings span a ten year period from 2002 to 2012 and includes order and trade ticket data.  FINRA said that “The issues were widespread and included all of the firm;s business areas.”

The banking industry continues to fail to impress me with its seemingly never-ending mission to make as much as it can for itself without giving a rat’s petooty about the security of its customers’ information and assets. How many probes will it take?  How many fines will be sufficient?” How many exposes must we have before we say, “Enough?”

Unfortunately, the powers that be are too afraid that they might create economic imbalance if they really brought the full force of the law into place in these events. Until then, banking executives are going to take their fat paychecks and bonuses and laugh all the way to the bank.

CLICK HERE TO REGISTER FOR FREE ON ADVFN, the world's leading stocks and shares information website, provides the private investor with all the latest high-tech trading tools and includes live price data streaming, stock quotes and the option to access 'Level 2' data on all of the world's key exchanges (LSE, NYSE, NASDAQ, Euronext etc).

This area of the ADVFN.com site is for independent financial commentary. These blogs are provided by independent authors via a common carrier platform and do not represent the opinions of ADVFN Plc. ADVFN Plc does not monitor, approve, endorse or exert editorial control over these articles and does not therefore accept responsibility for or make any warranties in connection with or recommend that you or any third party rely on such information. The information available at ADVFN.com is for your general information and use and is not intended to address your particular requirements. In particular, the information does not constitute any form of advice or recommendation by ADVFN.COM and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any investment decisions. Authors may or may not have positions in stocks that they are discussing but it should be considered very likely that their opinions are aligned with their trading and that they hold positions in companies, forex, commodities and other instruments they discuss.

Leave A Reply

 
Do you want to write for our Newspaper? Get in touch: newspaper@advfn.com