DeerBalls
9 hours ago
$.0076 Been getting many calls asking for clarification on where we are. Some think VPLM has forgotten about the patents and I tell them there is nothing further from the truth. VPLM will appeal Judge Albright's decision, so it's a waiting game.
On the RICO/ANTI-TRUST/CLASS-ACTION cases, we are waiting on defendants being served and I would guess this will happen over the next few weeks. Once done, I believe the real fun starts.
Hey, for the long-term holders, a few more weeks is nothing. Like I’ve said, I'm not at all worried, quite to the contrary, I'M VERY, VERY, VERY EXCITED!! The news comes when it comes.
BTW, I have posting privileges again and will go at those that come at me, just my nature! 🦌🏀z Out! Have a great weekend, longs!
nyt
17 hours ago
Thanks for that. Appreciate.. I probably have it in my DD repository but it's not organized very well so hard to find stuff.
Shortly after the announcement by vplm about the monopoly/antitrust/RICO charges/suits being brought, I looked for and found something, can't remember exactly what it was, that explained the charges. Whatever document it was, the part I read, briefly but concisely laid out the basic reasons for the charges.
Immediately, I found the whole thing ridiculous and felt it must just be another in the long list of Vplm bullshit, diversionary, stalling, whoppers, they bring out every so often (I've talked about it here many times) in order to divert attention from all the constant never ending, rising water around most shareholders. At the time, it was the only thing I read about the cases and I felt compelled to post my take on it. I did so here:
____________________________________
["nyt
Re: None
Wednesday, 12/04/2024 3:07:05 PM
Vplm, aka lord emu of eGipped, states that they invented/brought forth/made possible.... Wifi calling. OMG....the blatant LIES you ppl allow them to get away with (by the boatloads and for many years). You FULLY DESERVE WHAT YOU'RE GETTING BACK FROM VPLM for allowing them to get away with one whopper after another. Either that or you're so naive, it's a wonder how you make it thru your day.
Wifi calling has been around for a long time and before Vplm was even a thought. Not only that, but Vplm never invented anything. They simply bought the core patents from digi-phony-ca. Digi-phony-ca didn't want them, which is pretty strange considering the big emu says digi hired some 20 engineers, paying some $17 mil to create them. And then they did nothing with them and sold for dirt cheap to their buds. Sounds like utter nonsense... and most likely, it is. And to make it even utterly more nonsensical, soon as Vplm bought them and finished getting them approved, they ALSO tried to get rid of them like a hot potato. Again, makes no sense, does it? Of course not...
It was a bullshit, deceptive scam from the git. They never had the slightest intention of selling the patents. They used the patents a carrot, along with the blatant lying PRs for 2 to 3 yrs, in order to build the everlasting GIANT MEAN Green, fiat, SHARE PRINTING/SELLING SHARES MACHINE WITH THE OPTIONAL INSIDER ATM ATTACHMENT (batteries included).
Never, to my knowledge, has Vplm so much as uttered the word wifi, much less claimed to have invented it.
Wifi calling, happens to be one of those things that's highly limited. It could NEVER REPLACE regular cellular calling and the suggestion in the antitrust and monopoly suits recently started, that wifi calling should replace cellular network.....is such utter bull that those who accept and agree with this idea put forth in the suits, ought to be deported to some dummy colony...
Wifi calling is only a working choice when using one's home internet or at some Hotspot. It's not a mobile thing. Mobile phones are a mobile thing, designed to work wherever you go, within certain limitations. You CANNOT DO WIFI CALLS WHILE YOU ARE ON THE MOVE! ONLY WHEN YOU'RE STATIONARY WITH A WIFI SIGNAL. Now, just because cellular service is able to let calls switch back and forth between cellular and wifi seamlessly, IS NOT, I REPEAT, NOT A REASON TO CLAIM CUSTOMERS ARE BEING RIPPED OFF BY THE CELL COMPANIES BECAUSE THEY HAVE THE ABILITY TO SWITCH YOUR CALL OVER TO WIFI WHEN AVAILABLE, THEREBY SAVING MONEY THAT THEY ARE ALLEGEDLY NOT PASSING ON TO THE CONSUMERS.
THEY MOST CERTAINLY ARE PASSING THOSE SAVINGS ON TO THE CUSTOMERS, AS WITNESSED BY THE OBVIOUS FACT THAT CELLULAR PRICES HAVE BEEN COMING DOWN SURELY AND STEADILY OVER THE YEARS. TO THE POINT WHERE YOU GET SO MUCH SERVICE (and often hardware as well) for so little nowadays, it's amazing! It's a ridiculous notion that vplm is claiming, that the answer is to provide wifi phone service seperate from cellular, for a much cheaper price. OBVIOUSLY, that's never gonna happen because no one, unless I suppose, they are non ambulatory, can use wifi calling as their main gig. But YES....NOW you can be switched back and forth automatically by the system and now most if not all phones have the wifi capability built in. But the main point here is that their phone and carrier must be able to handle both technologies. You CANNOT SIT ALL DAY LONG AT A MCDONALD'S OR AT HOME OR SOME HOTSPOT WITH A LAPTOP OR A WIFI CAPABLE PHONE AND DO IT LIKE THAT! IT'S NOT PRACTICAL. YOU NEED TO MOVE. YOU CANNOT MOVE WITH WIFI ONLY! YOU MUST HAVE BOTH WIFI AND CELLULAR AVAILABLE AND WORKING. THE ONLY EXCEPTION IS IF YOU WERE CHRONICALLY BEDRIDDEN. Then, you would not need a handset. You would simply use a mic from computer and use wifi if you had home internet...
So the whole concept touted by the emu and the rest of the bozos promulagating the choice of customers to get dirt cheap wifi calling........ IS AS MUCH A JOKE AND A FARCE AS VPLM TRILLION DOLLAR PATENTS ARE!!!
While I'm at it, JUST AS RIDICULOUS......IS THE BOGUS NOTION THAT THERE IS A MONOPOLY GOING ON BY THE CELL COMPANIES... THERE IS NO SUCH THING... IN FACT, THE OPPOSITE, IS AND HAS BEEN LONG IN PLACE. THERE ARE 4 MAIN CELL COMPANIES, NOW DOWN TO 3 SINCE SPRINT WAS BOUGHT OUT. A MONOPOLY IS PERPETRATED BY ONE COMPANY, NOT 3! FURTHERMORE, it's really not 3 anyway, because approx half of the cell companies providing service today are MVNOs. They rent out the infrastructure to all those smaller companies. They have varying deals and services available. So in actual fact, the 3 main companies PLUS all the many MVNOs, have and do PROMOTE A HUGE AMOUNT OF COMPETITION AMONGST EA OTHER WHICH HAS INDEED RESULTED IN WAAAAY LOWER PRICES AND WAAAAAY MORE INCLUDED SERVICES!!! THAT, MY DEAR FREINDS IS COMPETITIVENESS AT ITS FINEST AND HAS RESULTED IN SO MUCH MORE VALUE FOR ALL CONSUMERS, ACROSS THE BOARD!
FOR ABOVE REASONS......THESE SO CALLED ANTITRUST AND MONOPOLY SUITS WILL BE SO LAUGHED OUT OF COURT, IT WON'T EVEN BE FUNNY.
NOW.....GO AHEAD AND IGNORE ALL I'VE SAID ABOVE.......or HAVE THE BALLS TO REFUTE! (yeah, like that's gonna happen...)]
_____________________________________
It was sometime after I posted that, that I came across suns posting of the piece from the Verizon lawyers and to my surprise, while they of course lay it out way better than I, as reposted above by Sun, they said they pointed out the exact same reasons as I did in my post. It showed me I was understanding the issues correctly. Seems I hit the nails pretty squarely on the head.
It also shows, quite clearly and in utter contrast to a recent post that claimed the defendants were scared shitless about the RICO suit. Sounds to me like they were as calm, cool and collected, sure as can be of themselves, that the whole thing was frivolous.
kaboomski
DeerBalls
1 day ago
$.008 Geez, the whining is sounding like a new group, maybe the 'Staple Savior Singers'? I think there are more than a few not suited for the volatility of VPLM.
Wow, this DB character sure attracts alot of attention! Now he's mentally ill, is living in Vegas, in addition to Vancouver/Florida. Vancouver because he's Emil and Florida cuz he's Rich... "Their" knowledge of DB is about the level of "their" knowledge of VPLM!
I just love the "insider activities" being looked into!? RIGHT? Please, enlighten us all on the "insider info": Is there some "insider knowledge" of the court rulings? Obviously not, as I was wrong on the reconsideration ruling? DUH!
The little stooge claims I'm bringing down VPLM...RIGHT! Haven't sold a share in years and bought some a couple months ago. I'm waiting on put spreads on Costco/aapl to bust a move and I'll probably buy more.
Remember, the market doesn't care about your situation, your health, your frustrations, your whining. THE MARKET GOES WHEN IT GOES! VPLM isn't making new lows, NOR HAS IT DROPPED 400%🤔🤔🤣🤣! AGAIN, 🦌🏀z is as excited as ever and can't wait for service of the bigs!
Folks, if you think 20/40/60/80 to one returns are simple/easy, maybe you should try THINKING! I've been around the markets for 50+ years(I started in my teens), I was a broker for 14 years. EXPERIENCE TEACHES PATIENCE!
GreenBackClub
2 days ago
VOIP-PAL.COM, INC. v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al
Texas Western District Court
Judge: Alan D Albright
Case #: 6:21-cv-00674
Nature of Suit 830 Property Rights - Patent
Cause 35:271 Patent Infringement
Case Filed: Jun 25, 2021
Terminated: Aug 15, 2024
Docket
Parties (6)
Opinions (2)
Docket last updated: 5 hours ago
Wednesday, March 05, 2025
305 minutes Motion Hearing Wed 03/05 11:58 AM
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Alan D Albright. Motion Hearing held on 3/5/2025. PARTIES ANNOUNCE READY. STATEMENTS AND ARGUMENTS OF COUNSEL HEARD. WRITTEN ORDER FORTHCOMING. (Minute entry documents are not available electronically.) (Court Reporter Kristie Davis.) (cap)
—-
VOIP-PAL.COM, INC. v. Verizon Communications, Inc. et al
Texas Western District Court
Judge: Alan D Albright
Case #: 6:21-cv-00672
Nature of Suit 830 Property Rights - Patent
Cause 35:271 Patent Infringement
Case Filed: Jun 25, 2021
Terminated: Aug 15, 2024
Docket
Parties (5)
Opinions (2)
Docket last updated: 5 hours ago
Wednesday, March 05, 2025
223 minutes Motion Hearing Wed 03/05 3:26 PM
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Alan D Albright: Motion Hearing held on 3/5/2025. PARTIES ANNOUNCE READY. STATEMENTS AND ARGUMENTS OF COUNSEL HEARD. WRITTEN ORDER FORTHCOMING. (Minute entry documents are not available electronically.). (Court Reporter Kristie Davis.)(cav)