Voip Pal Com Inc (QB) (VPLM) Share Price

CDEL COME ON DOWN DIRT BAG.I WANT MY CHICKEN TRIOS.SELL DAMMIT SELL.

He isn't worth defending because NOTHING he has said has ever come true. Where's that .85 price per share he was just talking about a month or so ago?

This is EXACTLY right. 10/10 for a complete, correct response.

VPLM is nuffin butt an OBVIOUS scam from a career scammer (Emo).

ORCA YOU SAID IT BRO.AND THEY DELIVERED.LOL.YOU CAN NOT FIX STUPID.KEEP THEM COMING LIONS.
11/20/2024 Buy
Trade Details
VPLM
VOIP-PAL COM INC
994,922
$0.0071 $3.00 -$7,066.9

LIKE A SONG.ORCA SAID:::::COME ON DOWN MMs ORCA NEEDS TO MAKE CHICKEN TRIOS:::::
THEY SURE DID.LMAO.UNREAL.TO PREDICT WHAT THEY WILL DO IS WHAT MASTERY OF DAY TRADING IS ALL ABOUT.
I KNOW EXACTLY WHAT THEY WILL DO.AT ANY MOMENT.EVERYTHING FALLING ON MY LAP:)))
ON VDRM EVERYTHING WAS FALLING ON MY LAP BY THE MILLIONS AND VICIOUSLY.I WAS LMAO EACH TIME
SELLING ME .004 .005 AND .006.LOL.AND I WAS TELLING THEM.WE WILL SEE WHAT PRICES YOU WILL PAY TO BUY THEM BACK FROM ME.LOL.KEEP THEM COMING.THEY SURE DID:)))VPLM IS MY CHICKEN TRIO REWARDER.WHILE VDRM BUYS ME CARS:))LOL.BOTH RUN BY THE SAME PROMOTORAS.THIS IS WHY I MENTION THEM BOTH.THE V STOCKS.LOL
ADDED CLOSE TO 1 MILLION TODAY HERE.WE WILL SEE WHAT PRICES THEY WILL PAY TO BUY IT BACK FROM ME:))))THE KING FLIPPER.BUY LOW.SELL HIGH.THERE IS NO OTHER WAY FOR ORCA.REMEMBER ONE THING,.:::::THE LOWER YOU BRING HER THE BETTER FOR ME.I LOVE THAT.THIS IS WHAT VDRM WAS DOING.LOWER AND LOWER AND LOWER.AT ONE TIME THEY TOOK HER DOWN TO .0027.LMAO.THEN OUT OF NO WHERE ROCKS TO .0145S.
NO ONE TRADES LIKE ME.WHAT I MEAN BY THAT??NO MATTER HOW MANY SHARES I OWN IN A STOCK.I WANT IT TO GO LOWER AND LOWER AND LOWER,WHILE ME ADDING MILLIONS.THE STOCK WILL REACH AN AREA THAT MANY TRADERS WILL SAY::::MAN THIS THING IS WAY OVERSOLD.THEY WILL JUMP IN AND BOOM SHE WILL GO.
I HAVE STOCKS THAT I WAIT 20 YEARS IN ORDER TO MAKE A PROFIT.IT IS VERY HARD TO SHAKE ORCA OUT AT A LOSS.IF I LOSE EVERYONE LOSES.THERE IS NO OTHER WAY.THUS KEEP MAKING ME MONEY:)))I NAMED MYSELF
ORCA BECAUSE OF HOW SMART ORCAS ARE.THEY HAVE A PLAN.AND THEY EXECUTE THEIR PLAN.VICIOUSLY.
THE ONLY TREMENDOUS DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THIS ORCA=ME, IS I ACT ALONE.ALWAYS.ONE MAN SHOW.ONE ORCA SHOW.WHILE THE CHICKENS=ORCAS OF THE SEA.IN ORDER TO MAKE A BIG KILL THEY ARE LIKE A DOZEN OF THEM TOGETHER.BS WIN.IS LIKE A UFC CHAMP FIGHTS ONE ON ONE.OR A UFC CHAMP FIGHTS 5 GUYS.THEY WILL MURDER HIM IN THE CAGE.LOL.BUT THIS ORCA=ME CAN TAKE 20 OR 30 PRO TRADERS AND MAKE SUSHI OUT OF ALL OF THEM.THEY TRY ALL KINDS OF BS. TO MAKE ME LOSE.SHAKE ME OUT ETC.THAT STUPID ALGO SYSTEM DOES NOT WORK AGAINST ORCA.I WILL DISABLE THIS POS SYSTEM OF ALGO.IT TRIES TO UNDER CUT ME ALL THE TIME.HUGE MISTAKE.UNTIL THE SHARES FALL ON MY LAP STUPID B$TCH.A STUPID SYSTEM WILL TRY TO TAKE THE MONEY FROM A TRADER.LOL.THEY ARE LOSING THEIR A$$ES WITH THE ALGO SYSTEM.AND IN MANY PENNY STOCK THEY ARE NOT EVEN USE IT MUCH.LOL.IMAGINE THAT???A STUPID MACHINE IS TRYING TO TAKE OUR MONEY.LOL.REALLY????KEEP THE BS GOING ALGO.AND SEE WHAT HAPPENS.

11/20/2024 Buy
Trade Details
VPLM
VOIP-PAL COM INC
994,922
$0.0071 $3.00 -$7,066.9

F.FIDELITY.THEY WILL PAY FOR WHAT THEY DID THE MFs.I DO NOT EVEN USE THAT ACCOUNT ANYMORE.I ONLY USE SCHWAB FOR TRADING.I WANT FIDELITY TO GO BANKO.TO LOSE EVERYTHING.THE SCAMBAGS.FOR THE SCAM THEY PULLED ON INVESTOR TRADERS.THEY ARE FD.THEY ARE LOSING ACCOUNTS LIKE CRAZY.MANY TRADERS MOVING AWAY FROM THEM.

To Orca: On Fidelity I can currently buy any penny stock in multiples of 40k/shares with individual trade submissions.

Agreed. I noticed those same 2 facts but the foot in mouth disease is like stage 4 and that and all the rest of the contradicting, conflicting and ignorant statements have quickly become fully expected M.O.

When a person is shown the facts contradict his fiction, and instead of acknowledging, correcting and apologizing, they push it even farther into lala land, there's a mental issue of some sort imho. This has now occurred too many times to count. Amusement is giving way to concern for well being.

THE VOLUMES ARE GONE.WOW.I WILL NOT BE ABLE TO MAKE CHICKEN TRIOS.F.COME ON DOWN MMs ORCA NEEDS TO MAKE CHICKEN TRIOS.

Nah, what's really funny is this statement by you: What is sunspotter's connection to Verizon that he would be privy to this kind of sensitive material Also, not knowing that if the judge rules against the reconsideration, that he doesn't have to say anything about his ruling, BUT, BUT then to say that the judge basically owes an explanation. PUMPER ALERT!!!!! PUMPER ALERT!!!!

History show us that nothing will come of this. Get back to me when they get financial judgements that are in-line with the "billions and billions of ongoing" infringements that the CEO has spoken about. If not then it's a complete failure and confirmation that the patents aren't worth near as claimed.

Not as hilarious as you opining on the merits of a case you haven’t even read.

Especially as the thing you found so amusing was actually a made up distortion of a factual comment I once made.

LOL! Bulldawg99, that was hilarious.

“ I have not read it (and probably won't).”

While you may find that ignorance is bliss, reality dictates otherwise.

"and I won't"

How many times can one underwater dweller put their foot in their mouth re: one worthless rogue stock? Apparengly, no end to it. Worth the price of admission...

He got it from the Feds. You know, the ones that he has been working with for 12 years to “take this down”

Thanks for posting, and no, I have not read it (and probably won't).

I can't believe there's STILL dummkopfs out there that STILL think the 36 positive IPRs prove anything and/or are somehow legally valuable to vplm. The only value they have is to stock dummies who buy more shares based on that. You know who I'm talkin to, Mr PROCESS CHEESEHEAD... 1st you must learn to process info and your thoughts.

Remember... I issued at least 2, no 3, challenges for anyone to show a single case where a judge has used positive IPR outcomes, as a basis, on any level, for a trial decision.

I CAN'T HEARRRR YOUUU!!!

BWAHAHAHA!!
So, it's ok that you regularly post your WAG's as to what's going on, even though there is a zero percent chance you're correct, but now you're accusing a poster on here of inside info because he posted public info?....
Even funnier is that you NEVER challenged DB for posting his daily inside info (he claimed) garbage.

If you aren't being paid from the company, you should be. You've taken over exactly where DB left off. Be very careful.....the lawyers are following this board.
Ironic that you came back as DB left

" VPLM put something out using a penny stock board, you would laugh them up and down...."

You do know who MoFo are, and what their reputation is, right?

I'm sure I don't know what you mean about putting something out using a penny stock board- until very recently VPLM were doing exactly that on a daily basis. Maybe you should read the exhibits and this very message board again..................................

Hobby, LOL!!!!!

If roles were reversed and VPLM put something out using a penny stock board, you would laugh them up and down....

Dumbest thing I've ever read. Can't even believe their lawyers are that dumb.

but, but, but Judge, did you see what that Deerballs said on Ihub? Judge: What's Ihub? It's a penny stock board that 5 people read.

THAT...is SOOOO funny!! 😅😆😂

A connection.....YA THINK??

Given that we have established that even VPLM boosters who claim to understand the antitrust case haven't even read it (that's you, @chazzy1) I thought it might be helpful to post the entire MoFo letter here (I obviously obtained this via devious Verizon contacts - or maybe it was Pacer):

Did you really just this, LMAO!! Only Sun and everyone else on the planet, DUH!!!

“how did sunspotter obtain a written copy?”

It’s included in VPLM’s own filing which you have already declared all-conquering and a masterpiece of legal argumentation, so you must have read it yourself already, mustn’t you?

I’m amazed that someone as knowledgeable and indeed opinionated as you on matters of law hasn’t heard of Pacer.

Duh.

What piques my curiosity is that if this so-called "MoFo letter" is authentic, and was actually addressed to VPLM's lawyers from Verizon's lawyers, how did sunspotter obtain a written copy? Wouldn't this be considered confidential and priveleged, even sensitive (and potentially insider) information? Shouldn't lawyer to lawyer communications be kept confidential? What is sunspotter's connection to Verizon that he would be privy to this kind of sensitive material, or has this letter been published elsewhere. Just curious.

boy, you are begging people to post now...Nobody is worried or running from that ridiculous letter.

I think most are done wasting their time responding to stupidity. Seeing you grovel for attention, I decided to throw you a bone.

Hobby, LOL!!!! How much is Verizon paying lately?

Classic sun. .... you post a positive you are either Rich or a pumper. Stop posting, you are on the run... but you are just here for the truth...

YOU GUYS KEEP THE NOISE GOING,WHILE I AM MAKING MY CHICKEN TRIOS:))I LOVE IT THAT WE STAYED DOWN AT THESE LEVELS TO KEEP MAKING MY CHICKEN TRIOS:))HOPING WE TRADE DOWN AT THESE LEVELS FOR THE NEXT 10 YEARS SO I CAN KEEP FLIPPING IT AND MAKE CHICKEN TRIOS:))

We haven't heard a peep out of numerous previously extremely prolific and regular posting aliases since MoFo sent their letter to VPLM's lawyers identifying DeerBalls as one of their targets in Discovery.

The shock must have been too much for them. Before then they were hardly off the board in their fervid defense of VPLM and DB.

So what you’re saying, the antitrust lawsuits were just fabricated just to pump up a penny stock? Do I understand you correctly?

Anyone with common sense knows no one would put themselves it that position.

No, actually I have better words than laughable if you want to know the truth.

You can think all you want, it’s not going to change anything. It’s wasted energy.

IMHO

“ It’s a ridiculous “assumption” they’re derived just to pump up a penny stock. I mean, how weak is that. Laughable!!!!”

Have you read this MB?

Anyone who has ( including you) knows that far from being laughable, it’s the stone cold truth.

You’re the one that’s not keeping up. Or shall I say, comprehending and processing it. Your cut and paste means nothing. Doesn’t hold water!

Bringing more eye balls with these lawsuits, is an opinion and certainly doesn’t make them meritless. It’s a ridiculous assumption they’re derived just to pump up a penny stock. I mean, how weak is that. Laughable!!!!

Still not too sure what’s wrong with being encouraged with the value of VPLM’s patents and recent success, aka successful 36 IPR’s, successful Alice with the Mobile Gateway, and favorable reconsideration with the ‘606 patent with the active case with Amazon.

Any knowledge of this, is public information and should be very encouraging and exciting to all shareholders. IMHO

Yeah, yeah, I know, the Mobil Gateway has been dismissed until further review. But, this patent has nothing to do with the antitrust lawsuits. Which is clearly stated, if you have been keeping up.

IMHO

I agree, DesktopDR. Once these errors of law have been cited by Mr. Hudnell, it would seem that this judge would be compelled to explain his rational behind his rather odd conclusion; a conclusion which cites the wrong precedent (an error of law) and a conclusion which seems to contradict the very claim term definitions which had already been allowed during claim construction (namely, that a single message may be broken up into multiple transmissions). A failure to reconsider this flawed opinion would result in a manifest injustice to the plaintiff. Although motions for reconsideration are generally frowned upon by the court, there are three situations where they are justified. Two of those justifying situations are cited in Mr. Hudnell's motion (a third justification would have been to introduce new evidence which was not available at the time of the hearing). The US Court of Appeals is poised to address these errors, should this judge neglect to correct them himself. IMHO.

You should try and keep up. It’s your money after all (or is it?) - you don’t want a repeat of HDVY, where the insiders took away millions and the retail shareholders nothing, surely?

I was merely wondering what the link was between the recent disappearance of previously prolific pro-VPLM posters and the legal documents shown here:

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=175407494

IMO AND I AM 99% SURE THE JUDGE RULED AGAINST VPLM,BECAUSE HE GOT AN EAR FULL FROM THE DEFENCE LAWYERS THAT THE INSIDERS WERE SELLING AND MAKING KILLING.ALL ALONG.HE GOT PISSED OFF AND DID WHAT HE DID.AS I SAID I AM 99% SURE ABOUT IT.IMO.

Yes, I have no idea what he is talking about. He seems to be speaking in some kind of code.

Do keep up!

Here are the edited highlights.


But the whole MoFo letter is worth reading, I promise you. I've rarely seen an attorney to attorney letter that shows such contempt for the lack of professionalism of the Plaintiff's lawyers

Please elaborate on what exactly you’re referring to?

"If the judge doesn't reconsider and bring this back to the courts, I would consider him paid off."

A new and very strong contender for the most stupid post in living memory on this MB.

You "all" tried to pull that stunt with Judge Koh.

The fact that the most patent troll friendly judge in the land, Judge Albright - selected specifically on that basis by Hudnell - agrees entirely with her shows just how pathetic, vexatious and frivolous VPLM's infringement cases are.

Almost as pathetic, vexatious and frivolous as the antitrust suits.

https://www.mondaq.com/unitedstates/patent/1188736/federal-circuit-declines-to-fix-voip-pals-problem-of-its-own-making

If the judge doesn't reconsider and bring this back to the courts, I would consider him paid off. There is too much proof that his lack of knowledge pertaining of the patents and previous rulings has caused his error. The pps should be up near .30 with a reconsideration.

A judge may consider granting a motion for reconsideration if there is new evidence, the final decision was based on an incorrect interpretation of the law, or denying the motion would result in an injustice. I don't know if the judge is under any time restriction to respond.

Hey Prophet, what is the governing body that published the regulations? Thanks for the research.

DID YOU GUYS SEE THIS??HMM.
Meta antitrust case cleared for trial
Share
By Andrew Barker, Editor at LinkedIn News
Updated 3 days ago


A federal antitrust case targeting Meta's acquisitions of Instagram and WhatsApp has been cleared to go to trial. The Federal Trade Commission, which brought the lawsuit in 2020, is seeking to break up the company, says The Washington Post. The suit was somewhat reduced in scale by a U.S. district judge, though he retained the core argument that the Facebook parent bought Instagram and WhatsApp to dominate the social-networking market. Meanwhile, The Information, citing anonymous sources, reports that Meta, "hoping to cash in on the app’s rapid growth," plans to introduce ads to Threads next year.

I wonder why so many aliases that used to post so regularly have suddenly gone quiet since MoFo put VPLM on notice that they’re investigating DeerBalls?

It’s a real mystery. Not.

.0063 LOW TODAY.INSIDERS KEEP ON SELLING,THAT IS OKAY.NO PROBLEM.ORCA WILL BE SELLING TOO:)))FLIP THIS B4TCH TO NO END.I NEED TO GET MY CHICKEN TRIOS:)))WE MAYBE HAVE TO STAY DOWN HERE FOR THE NEXT 10 YEARS WTF KNOWS.NO PROBLEM FOR ORCA.AS I WILL BE FLIPPING IT ALL ALONG:)))

I think that Mr. Hudnell has identified multiple reversable errors of law in his motion for reconsideration, and that the judge's original ruling would be ripe for a reversal on appeal.

Sure, that's why the company has withdrawn from any further patent infringement cases and going the class action route instead. It's because Hudnell is winning these cases and they don't want to make the Defendants look bad?
Do you think anyone is buying your repetitive nonsense?

BTW, at least spell courteous correctly. You can do it! It has the word "court" in it. Ya know, like VPLM keeps losing in.

“ it still seems to me that a formal reply would be a curteous gesture for the sake of closure”

The act of filing a motion for reconsideration - for an original lawsuit that was not only roundly dismissed by the judge but also was marked as so frivolous that legal costs were awarded against the plaintiffs - was in itself an act of extreme discourtesy.

This was exacerbated by the fact that the plea for reconsideration was factually inaccurate (it accused Albright of ignoring precedents that he in fact considered carefully, amongst other egregious errors).

The only “courtesy” Judge Albright owes is not to vexatious litigator VPLM. It’s to let the defendants know how much of the legal costs he encouraged them to claim he will allow.

Betcha it’s close to 100%.

A good thing! Only fools would want to buy vplm fakery at this point. Helps clean up the cheap chicken, soda drinkin, livin in their cars, homeless population plaguing the cities.

Put these unfortunate peeps out of their misery...

I was wise enough to put a self imposed no buy restriction years ago. Good thing as it's been nothing but a loser ever since.

TO ALL VPLM HOLDERS.THIS IS VERY BAD NEWS FOR NOT ONLY VPLM BUT ALL PENNY STOCKS.AND PENNY STOCK TRADERS.FIDELITY SCAMBAG PULLED THE PLUG ON PENNY STOCKS.YOU CAN NOT EVEN BUY 100K OF VPLM.I PLACED A BUY ORDER OF 100K SHARES, AND I GOT THIS NOTE. MANY OTHER TRADERS GETTING THE SAME NOTE ON OTHER PENNY STOCKS.THIS GUY BELOW CALLED FIDELITY AND READ WHAT HE SAID.
IF SCHWAB DOES THE SAME.IT WILL BE THE END OF PENNY STOCKS,AND MOST COMPANIES WILL GO OUT OF BUSINESS.THIS IS VERY SERIOUS.
(314217) The share quantity is limited due to the average volume of the security. Please edit the order.

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=175393038
azco_com

Re: lasernat post# 4984355

Friday, November 15, 2024 1:28:32 PM

Post#
4984364
of 4984546
No I just spoke to a representative at Fidelity and starting today they have put huge restrictions on the buy side to penny stocks. Some I can’t even buy 100,000 shares. It sucks. May have to move brokerages and I have been real happy with them up until now.

Thank you, prophet2. Although a judge is not required to formally reply to a motion for reconsideration, it still seems to me that a formal reply would be a curteous gesture for the sake of closure, even if that reply were simply, "motion denied." Regardless of Judge Albright's final decision, I think that Mr. Hudnell has identified multiple reversable errors of law in his motion for reconsideration, and that the judge's original ruling would be ripe for a reversal on appeal.