ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for smarter Trade smarter, not harder: Unleash your inner pro with our toolkit and live discussions.

Buffett’s ideas on which is the better business

Share On Facebook
share on Linkedin
Print

Here is a quiz for you: Which is the better business?

©

Company A produced post-tax profits of $2m last year. Company B did the same.

Company A has only $8m of net tangible assets whereas Company B has five times as much, $40m of net tangible assets.

Profit growth is anticipated to be the same – in 20 years from now each will be producing $20m after tax (and report the same profits in the years inbetween).

Make your choice now, before reading on.

Here is Warren Buffett’s logic.

Company A is a candy manufacturer and retailer, whereas Company B is a steel manufacturer – it is a profitable steel producer with a good niche and so it can keep up with Company A in terms of profits reported in the annual report.

Note that to increase output and after-tax profits for Company A by ten-fold we would need (assumption for illustration) to add to the initial net tangible assets 9 x $8m = $72m. Thus after 20 years it is using $80m of capital.

To achieve a ten-fold increase in the output and profits of Company B we need to add 9 x $40m = $360m in net tangible assets. Say, nine more steels mills. Thus after 20 years it is using $400m of capital.

Company A over that 20 years can distribute to shareholders $360m – $72m = $288m more than Company B to achieve the same annual profit in the final year.

So, despite the lower balance sheet value for Company A, it is more valuable. This is because it can do more of what investors want: passing cash generated over to them The steel mill company, on the other hand, has to use a high proportion of the money it generates in accounting profit to sustain the franchise and grow – “owner earnings” are less than reported accounting earnings because of the need to invest so much cash.

What happened at See’s?

After 20 years of ownership See’s operated very efficiently with only $25m of net tangible assets in 1991.

The initial assets of $8m were………..To read the rest of this article, and more like it, subscribe to my premium newsletter Deep Value Shares – click here http://newsletters.advfn.com/deepvalueshares/subscribe-1

CLICK HERE TO REGISTER FOR FREE ON ADVFN, the world's leading stocks and shares information website, provides the private investor with all the latest high-tech trading tools and includes live price data streaming, stock quotes and the option to access 'Level 2' data on all of the world's key exchanges (LSE, NYSE, NASDAQ, Euronext etc).

This area of the ADVFN.com site is for independent financial commentary. These blogs are provided by independent authors via a common carrier platform and do not represent the opinions of ADVFN Plc. ADVFN Plc does not monitor, approve, endorse or exert editorial control over these articles and does not therefore accept responsibility for or make any warranties in connection with or recommend that you or any third party rely on such information. The information available at ADVFN.com is for your general information and use and is not intended to address your particular requirements. In particular, the information does not constitute any form of advice or recommendation by ADVFN.COM and is not intended to be relied upon by users in making (or refraining from making) any investment decisions. Authors may or may not have positions in stocks that they are discussing but it should be considered very likely that their opinions are aligned with their trading and that they hold positions in companies, forex, commodities and other instruments they discuss.

Leave A Reply

 
Do you want to write for our Newspaper? Get in touch: newspaper@advfn.com