The last newsletter looked at the toy industry as a whole and concluded that there are sound reasons for the documented high returns on capital employed. But industry analysis is only the first step. We need to examine Character (LSE:CCT) to see if it has any extraordinary resources allowing it to sustain high rates of return on capital left in the business by shareholders.
Does Character own tangible resources providing a competitive edge?
The term tangible is stretched here to include assets such as trademarks, copyrights and exclusive rights to sell a franchised item (e.g. Dr Who figures) in a specified territory. Character has two categories of toys, (a) in-house developed products, and (b) TV/Film franchise characters.
In-house.
Blinger
Chillfactor
Cra-Z-Loom
Cra-Z-Sand
Cra-Z-Slimy
Shimmer ‘n Sparkle
Easy Nails/Tattoo/Wrap
Fizz ‘n’ Surprise
Foam Alive
FlipAZoo
Funatic Foam
Hairdooz
LaserX
Luvi Pups
Mine It
ORB Mocheez Babies
ORB Odditeez
OOnies
Orbeez
Zombie Blast
Smart Sketcher
Soft ‘n’ Slo Squishies
Swarm Squad
Treasure X
Zookiez Slappy
Franchises
Ballerina dancer
Ben & Holly
Chu Chu TV (YouTube Channel)
Disney Doorables
Dr Who
Fireman Sam
Mash’ems
Peppa Pig
Pokemon
Postman Pat
Teletubbies
Stretch Armstrong
Not sure whether in-house or licensed franchises
Goo Goo Galaxy
Heroes of Goo Jit Zu
Little Live Pets
Little Live Raptiles
Really RAD Robots
If the in-house developed toys take-off Character will benefit greatly because it does not have to pay royalties to the license holder, e.g. it did well out of slime a few years ago.
Once it has an exclusive license for a product such as Bob the Builder or Peppa Pig then good profits can flow due the character’s popularity. So, for a time, the Group has
………………To read more subscribe to my premium newsletter Deep Value Shares – click here http://newsletters.advfn.com/deepvalueshares/subscribe-1