ADVFN Logo ADVFN

We could not find any results for:
Make sure your spelling is correct or try broadening your search.

Trending Now

Toplists

It looks like you aren't logged in.
Click the button below to log in and view your recent history.

Hot Features

Registration Strip Icon for smarter Trade smarter, not harder: Unleash your inner pro with our toolkit and live discussions.
Stratos Renewables Corporation (PK)

Stratos Renewables Corporation (PK) (SRNW)

0.1285
-0.0003
( -0.23% )
Updated: 03:50:15

Your Hub for Real-Time streaming quotes, Ideas and Live Discussions

Key stats and details

Current Price
0.1285
Bid
0.112
Offer
0.1288
Volume
24,402
0.113 Day's Range 0.1288
0.026 52 Week Range 0.42
Market Cap
Previous Close
0.1288
Open
0.113
Last Trade
101
@
0.1285
Last Trade Time
04:54:01
Financial Volume
US$ 3,105
VWAP
0.127253
Average Volume (3m)
48,062
Shares Outstanding
49,005,865
Dividend Yield
-
PE Ratio
-10.83
Earnings Per Share (EPS)
-0.01
Revenue
-
Net Profit
-590k

About Stratos Renewables Corporation (PK)

Sector
Industrial Organic Chemicals
Industry
Wood Hshld Furn, Ex Upholsrd
Headquarters
Reno, Nevada, USA
Founded
2007
Stratos Renewables Corporation (PK) is listed in the Industrial Organic Chemicals sector of the OTCMarkets with ticker SRNW. The last closing price for Stratos Renewables (PK) was US$0.13. Over the last year, Stratos Renewables (PK) shares have traded in a share price range of US$ 0.026 to US$ 0.42.

Stratos Renewables (PK) currently has 49,005,865 shares in issue. The market capitalisation of Stratos Renewables (PK) is US$6.37 million. Stratos Renewables (PK) has a price to earnings ratio (PE ratio) of -10.83.

SRNW Latest News

Period †ChangeChange %OpenHighLowAvg. Daily VolVWAP
10.00857.083333333330.120.130.11370180.12832519CS
4-0.0064-4.744255003710.13490.20.11727280.12484898CS
12-0.006-4.460966542750.13450.20.026480620.13202389CS
26-0.2115-62.20588235290.340.420.026612930.22150422CS
52-0.032-19.9376947040.16050.420.026711750.27324913CS
1560.018516.81818181820.112.3650.02545590.26556901CS
2600.12817539438.46153850.0003252.3650.0002798750.17204376CS

Market Movers

View all
  • Most Active
  • % Gainers
  • % Losers
SymbolPriceVol.
WELWinchester Energy Ltd
AUD 0.005
(150.00%)
3.87M
CNJConico Ltd
AUD 0.002
(100.00%)
4.97M
ICROInteliCare Holdings Limited
AUD 0.002
(100.00%)
911.35k
CLZClassic Minerals Limited
AUD 0.0015
(50.00%)
6.92M
SITSite Group International Ltd
AUD 0.003
(50.00%)
750k
LDROLode Resources Ltd
AUD 0.001
(-80.00%)
232.38k
DESODesoto Resources Ltd
AUD 0.01
(-54.55%)
5k
BASOBass Oil Limited
AUD 0.001
(-50.00%)
2.63M
BITOCBiotron Ltd
AUD 0.009
(-35.71%)
1.08M
IBGOIronbark Zinc Limited
AUD 0.002
(-33.33%)
833.33k
88E88 Energy Limited
AUD 0.002
(0.00%)
206.71M
SYASayona Mining Limited
AUD 0.035
(1.45%)
78.13M
LTRLiontown Resources Limited
AUD 0.94
(4.16%)
54.89M
COECooper Energy Limited
AUD 0.22
(-4.35%)
44.87M
PLSPilbara Minerals Limited
AUD 3.24
(2.69%)
43.54M

SRNW Discussion

View Posts
surfkast surfkast 5 minutes ago
One asshole with two aliases talking smack to each other is beyond pathetic. SMH
πŸ‘οΈ0
InspectorBullit InspectorBullit 58 minutes ago
Smith/Robinson = the same person.
Someone's probably already pointed that out.
The BS gives Sharp a run for his money.
πŸ‘οΈ0
surfkast surfkast 8 hours ago
Spewing Bullshit as usual!

He's just a regular dude with a practicing law degree
WRONG! SMH
πŸ‘οΈ0
ARobinson ARobinson 18 hours ago
If WNFT had an oil deal that was interested, it's possible they shifted to SRNW of course. I also checked and there seems to be a nascent (or established?) industry of Israeli oil companies, including at least one that is already public on OTCM.
πŸ‘οΈ0
MrSmith18 MrSmith18 18 hours ago
I would wager that GS will pick an international company in a mature industry. My first pick for SRNW would be gas and oil related. For FORW I'd guess something in health care.

GS is actually an easy read. He's not a rock scientist, although he'd like to think he is. He's just a regular dude with a practicing law degree and a huge ego, ...which come to think of it are one in the same. What he is not is a technology wiz. Just like he tells many people in his tweets to stop trying to be a lawyer, any tech geek would give him the same advice when it comes to tech stuff. After HMBL, I think he learned his lesson.

Learning lessons is a good thing. Let's hope he has learned a few in the past few years and will stay within his own self-imposed guardrails, going forward. If he does then my predictions above or similar would be likely outcomes, in my humble opinion.
👍️ 1
ARobinson ARobinson 19 hours ago
Hi MrSmith18, besides AI and blockchain what industries do you think FORW/SRNW might look at? Do you think they will both be in healthcare? There are a bunch of ventilator companies out there and perhaps one wants to go public.
πŸ‘οΈ0
MrSmith18 MrSmith18 23 hours ago
It's a possible scenario but unlikely. I think is looking for a straight and simple deal. A $100m MC company that after merging with SRNW can qualify for a NASDAQ listing within a year or less. If he merges SRNW first, then FORW will be a shoe-in for another similar and larger merger.

I doubt he's looking in the crypto or AI space any longer. He just wants steady cash flow in an established industry that he can understand from the git go. His experience with HMBL definitely jolted him into a personal reality check.

JMHO
👍️ 1
ARobinson ARobinson 2 days ago
MrSmith18 here's another thought I had. Say speculatively that FORW is merging with an investment fund and SRNW with one of their investments. If the investment fund is very diverse, it may be be investing in healthcare companies and also software companies and also more.

So in this case, GS is saying the company is in the "healthcare industry" and the fund is technically in that industry. Could GS be playing with words like this in order to mask the deal but still be accurate? On orders from the incoming investment fund and the company they are invested in?
πŸ‘οΈ0
I-Glow I-Glow 2 days ago
So you have been busted for fabricating more information. And you are always speaking about a group of Israeli partners/investors.

But oddly you never provide any information to verify the Israeli partners. If they are partners of Sharp which SEC filing can they be found.

"Let me reverse your argument... So, after GS does close a merger deal, then all those who listened to your GS-bashing nonsense for the past few years and panicked by selling out early will receive a personal invitation from you to move to Mexico and like you spend the rest of their lives lamenting what could have been had they not listened to you."

Sharp has never closed a deal - he has been the CEO of FORW for almost 6 years and the 2 assets he brought to FORW were both scams.

Never once have I told anyone to Sell their stock - I post facts to expose scams and I have never been wrong and I am certainly know the Sharp shells are a scam.

But you have tried your best to get others to invest in these scams and that is securities fraud.

I tell everyone to play the price action and always take profits - and to never believe the company hype or believe the forum pumpers.

I spend about half my time in Vegas.

You are looking like an idiot with each passing day. You certainly look like a paid pumper - because most of your posts seem to originate in pinky fantasyland - or instructions from Sharp.

Everyone look - Smith started posting on 07/07/2023 and immediately started pumping all of the Sharp shells.

IG

πŸ‘οΈ0
I-Glow I-Glow 2 days ago
Do you have any idea how many SPACs are scams or have failed.

I exposed one SPAC (SAGA) that was going to pay $450M to a OTC scam for two worthless shells that were subsidiaries.

I have never seen a SPAC do a deal with a hijacked shell.

"Personally, I doubt he or his partners are looking to merge another OTC company. GS even explains why. Their goal, in my humble opinion is to bring in a cash-rich SPAC with a viable MC and move the newly formed vehicle into a larger market, i.e. NASDAQ."

Who are these nefarious Israeli partners that haven't put any money into the Sharp scams.

WNFT and SRNW would have to file an 8-K is some unnamed group of Israeli had Investors had loaned Sharp money and the terms and conditions of the loan.

OTC companies only have access to toxic loans.

IG
πŸ‘οΈ0
I-Glow I-Glow 2 days ago
What does SRNW have to offer a Blockchain or CPU company. A CPU company is complete nonsense - Intel generated about $13 Billion in 2024 Q1. Obviously, you don't understand the cost of building a CPU production facility - and there isn't anyway a CPU company is going public via an OTC hijacked shell.

SRNW doesn't have any technical expertise in anything Blockchain - they have one employee - Sharp.

"It would indeed make more sense. The "healthcare company" caught me off guard. However, i wonder if he is allowed to talk about a fifth agreement with a healthcare company if it is actually a fifth agreement with a blockchain or CPU company instead. Not sure about the rules there."

Sharp screwed up again by renaming GOFF - Worldwide NFT - as it is a trend that has pasted. And WNFT doesn't have any NFT assets.

IG
πŸ‘οΈ0
I-Glow I-Glow 2 days ago
The rest of your post - doesn't answer some major questions.

"The real intent of his tweet, in my humble opinion was to place both WNFT and GVSI out of the range of possibilities in the near term, or ever."

I know that GVSI has too much baggage for any company to become involved.

WNFT was a SEC filer and Sharp blamed everything on Calasse - so he files a Form 15 to deregister the stock and then allows WNFT to go to Expert Market. If Sharp knew that he was going to win the Calasse lawsuit why would he file the Form 15?

What is the delay in the S-1 for FORW?

Why hasn't Sharp found a company for a reverse merger with SRNW?

Sharp can only stall for so long and it has been 3 years and still nothing.

What happened to taking investors to the Promised Land?

IG


πŸ‘οΈ0
I-Glow I-Glow 2 days ago
I basically agree with part of your statement - "That would make more sense than what he tweeted recently, regarding a merger candidate with a 'good match' for his FORW ventilator company. That pitch felt like a stretch to say the least. He basically was saying something but actually reveal nothing."

The Nigerian Doctor's resuscitator has been pumped since 2016. Sharp has posted 3 times that the resuscitator was on the FDA fast track for approval for a medical device.

And that it was going to be approved as a EUA.

FORW doesn't have anything to offer a Healthcare company - the ventilator shortage is long gone.

It was just more pumping.

IG

πŸ‘οΈ0
ARobinson ARobinson 2 days ago
It would indeed make more sense. The "healthcare company" caught me off guard. However, i wonder if he is allowed to talk about a fifth agreement with a healthcare company if it is actually a fifth agreement with a blockchain or CPU company instead. Not sure about the rules there.
πŸ‘οΈ0
MrSmith18 MrSmith18 2 days ago
That would make more sense than what he tweeted recently, regarding a merger candidate with a 'good match' for his FORW ventilator company. That pitch felt like a stretch to say the least. He basically was saying something but actually reveal nothing. The real intent of his tweet, in my humble opinion was to place both WNFT and GVSI out of the range of possibilities in the near term, or ever.

JMHO
👍️ 1
ARobinson ARobinson 2 days ago
Yes i remember the "cash position" line with SRNW. If he is indeed on a fifth agreement with the SRNW deal from last August, we are good. Hope that's the case.
πŸ‘οΈ0
MrSmith18 MrSmith18 2 days ago
No typo, but thanks. I actually thought it was an oil deal with SRNW. No matter, really. It was, however, the low cash position of the merger candidate that held him back. Check it out...

WNFT has been dead for a long time. I can't imagine he would have announced a possible deal there when a legal decision was pending.
👍️ 1
ARobinson ARobinson 2 days ago
I believe that was a typo "oil deal" where he meant "old deal" for wnft. However, there was a deal with an international company proposed last August where 230m shares would be issued. I'm surprised there has been no mention of that deal since then. The share structure was very specific.
πŸ‘οΈ0
MrSmith18 MrSmith18 2 days ago
GS mentioned a deal for SRNW in the oil and gas industry around Sept last year. He held back due to the companies current cash position. Assuming his assessment was accurate, it's possible that the 5 agreement iterations he mentioned in his tweet may be related to this deal. The additional time may also be giving the merger candidate more time to strengthen their cash position or further negotiate terms of concern.

...just a hunch!

JMHO
👍️ 1
surfkast surfkast 2 days ago
Setting investors up for his failures!
πŸ‘οΈ0
Dagz Dagz 3 days ago
@MrSmith18 @ARobinson i had the exact same thoughts. He almost sounds like a nutcase when he says not many legitimate companies want to list on the OTC. You are shopping shells on the OTC but at the same time being almost to honest. Is he tempering investor expectations?
πŸ‘οΈ0
ARobinson ARobinson 3 days ago
Thanks. This would make sense if he has a deal already in place for FORW and SRNW and there's no risk of them running away.

Even if he is looking for established companies, I think they would find it troubling that the sponsor of their shell himself is saying "OTC is not great right now". It's like a real estate agent in London telling clients that it's a bad time to buy in London.

Do you think the rhetoric he is using implies he has solid deals for FORW/SRNW already?
πŸ‘οΈ0
gr8grins gr8grins 3 days ago
Thanks Mr Smith, and like a few others on this board, we, like you will continue to take the β€˜high road’, and disregard those on this board that spend their time discrediting any good/valuable information. We all know who they are. . .
πŸ‘οΈ0
MrSmith18 MrSmith18 3 days ago
By the reserved tone and timing of GS's recent tweet, I'd say we could still see something as early as this July or August. It's hard to tell what is holding it up but I would guess that the 5 iterations of a deal that he mentioned about FORW are actually for SRNW. ...just a hunch. Both are joined at the hip by warrants, however, it's pretty clear that merging SRNW first, would benefit both at the same time.

JMHO
πŸ‘οΈ0
surfkast surfkast 3 days ago
OMG! What a bunch of BS Hopium! LOLOLOL
πŸ‘οΈ0
Dagz Dagz 3 days ago
@MrSmith18 I assume you are moving the goal post again? No more July reveal? For either FORW or SRNW. End of year maybe? What’s your take?
πŸ‘οΈ0
MrSmith18 MrSmith18 3 days ago
Let me reverse your argument... So, after GS does close a merger deal, then all those who listened to your GS-bashing nonsense for the past few years and panicked by selling out early will receive a personal invitation from you to move to Mexico and like you spend the rest of their lives lamenting what could have been had they not listened to you.

Yea, I get it! Sure!
πŸ‘οΈ0
MrSmith18 MrSmith18 3 days ago
GS is doing everything possible to reset expectations. His partners have made it clear that if a deal is to happen, he needs to tone down his rhetoric. Personally, I doubt he or his partners are looking to merge another OTC company. GS even explains why. Their goal, in my humble opinion is to bring in a cash-rich SPAC with a viable MC and move the newly formed vehicle into a larger market, i.e. NASDAQ.

It's a simple play. Take an MC > $100m from a viable business and convert it into >$1b by upgrading it to a larger marketplace.

At this point I sincerely doubt GS is looking at crypto or similar young tech companies with a glowing promise. We already know from HMBL that he doesn't even understand the tech. I would wager that he wants something established, instead. Something he actually understands, such as a privately family-owned international company.

JMHO
👍️ 1
Drugdoctor Drugdoctor 3 days ago
YES - $SRNW and $FORW - time-to-HODL!!!
πŸ‘οΈ0
ARobinson ARobinson 4 days ago
Thanks MrSmith18. Here's another nuance I've picked up on. GS is trying to close merging companies into his OTC shells, but is simultaneously saying that "legitimate companies are afraid of OTC right now". Isn't this self-sabotaging? Why do you think he's doing this? He would be making legitimate companies think twice before dealing with his OTC shells, which is the opposite of what GS wants.

Thanks in advance, always appreciate your commentary.
πŸ‘οΈ0
I-Glow I-Glow 5 days ago
Sharp never provides truthful information - you don't post about LOIs or MOUs - it is typical OTC pumping.

There has never been a real company use a hijacked shell to go public.

It has been 3 years and still nothing.

IG
πŸ‘οΈ0
I-Glow I-Glow 5 days ago
No real company would ever become involved with Sharp. His business acumen is Zero.

Where is the proof that Sharp has a group of Israeli partners - what exactly are they partners in - which companies - they certainly have provided money to any of his scam shells. Why do you post nonsense like this and never provide any facts?

"GS's Israeli partners clearly read him the riot act with GVSI. The language he used to dismiss the deal said it all. "No one is going to do a deal with a chaotic group of shareholders." That was crystal clear."

The GVSI could never do a reverse merger at any time. Sharp couldn't do a simple name change.

"SRNW is clearly the first port of entry for his tickers. It's positioned well for a significant deal...Anyone selling out of FORW will regret it. It's best to HODL under these circumstances."

SRNW can't do a reverse merger until it files a 15c2-11 - what is the delay.

The blood is on your hands for telling investors to keep holding - when Sharp hasn't accomplished anything of value in 3 years.

You are a Sharp pumper boy - who posts fraudulent information.

IG
πŸ‘οΈ0
MrSmith18 MrSmith18 5 days ago
Absolutely! GS's Israeli partners clearly read him the riot act with GVSI. The language he used to dismiss the deal said it all. "No one is going to do a deal with a chaotic group of shareholders." That was crystal clear.

That's why GVSI and WNFT have been put to pasture. GS needed to tone down the P&D rhetoric associated with his name. He even removed the 'OTC Wiz' label from his X account, ...also another sign of his cleaning up his act for future investors.

SRNW is clearly the first port of entry for his tickers. It's positioned well for a significant deal. When it happens, FORW will respond in kind. As for the FORW pitch in his latest tweet... It was an obvious filler. The tone from his message was less than enthusiastic but logical at the same time. He basically was telling his FORW buddy shareholders to hold on. Something big is definitely brewing and worth waiting for.

Anyone selling out of FORW will regret it. It's best to HODL under these circumstances.

JMHO
👍️ 1
ARobinson ARobinson 5 days ago
Do you think it's possible that the August 2023 deal is still on and GS was asked to put up a "cool off" tweet to make it look like it was off? He did this in January as well. And he used the same language back then that SRNW had "nothing concrete".

What do you think?
πŸ‘οΈ0
ARobinson ARobinson 5 days ago
Do you think it's possible that the August 2023 deal is still on and GS was asked to put up a "cool off" tweet to make it look like it was off? He did this in January as well. And he used the same language back then that SRNW had "nothing concrete".

What do you think?
πŸ‘οΈ0
I-Glow I-Glow 6 days ago
WNFT filed a Form 10 and was a SEC reporter. So there is no comparison to GVSI. As Sharp withdrew the Form 10 for GVSI 2 years and 7 months ago.

GVSI is a Dead ticker. And there isn't any audit fees.

"Personally, I feel he wrote the tweet today specifically to let everyone know that GVSI is a very long way out as in 'very unlikely' or 'it's never gonna happen'. I wouldn't be surprised if in a few days or a week he pulls a number similar to WNFT, ...where he announced that he could save on the $40k/yr accounting fees by sending it back to the Expert Market category. What he did with WNFT recently is going to happen with GVSI. Watch and learn..."

The $40k is from an audit - GVSI wasn't audited.

Sharp doesn't have to do anything to GVSI - FINRA won't process any Corporate Actions.

Sharp could stop filing any financial information.

IG
πŸ‘οΈ0
Drugdoctor Drugdoctor 6 days ago
Bring those shares on home to daddy
👍️ 1 💯 1
Drugdoctor Drugdoctor 6 days ago
Anyone not loading $SRNW and $FORW now, just doesn't know how to make $$$$
🤡 1 🤣 1
Hooplahboneup Hooplahboneup 6 days ago
I remember he tweeted before that he's looking for companies with more cash. Probably alot of scammy companies that are inquiring and he's pushing them aside.
πŸ‘οΈ0
MrSmith18 MrSmith18 7 days ago
It's a tough call to pinpoint when a merger will happen. His latest tweet seems to indicate that if and when one does happen, it will involve either FORW or SRNW. It's pretty obvious to me that he'll start with SRNW, since FORW already owns a piece of it.

Personally, I feel he wrote the tweet today specifically to let everyone know that GVSI is a very long way out as in 'very unlikely' or 'it's never gonna happen'. I wouldn't be surprised if in a few days or a week he pulls a number similar to WNFT, ...where he announced that he could save on the $40k/yr accounting fees by sending it back to the Expert Market category. What he did with WNFT recently is going to happen with GVSI. Watch and learn...

All the other talk in the tweet on SRNW and FORW were just fill ins, in my opinion.

That said, he's clearly working on a merger deal and wants to clean the decks prior to making an announcement. Otherwise, once he releases a merger announcement for SRNW, we already know that by association alone, all of his tickers will take off including GVSI.

GS probably wants to limit the inevitable pump and dump to help everyone focus on his two key tickers, SRNW and FORW.

JMHO
πŸ‘οΈ0
I-Glow I-Glow 7 days ago
Sharp posted about WNFT:

Sharp X Post: "$WNFT - Awaiting the ruling on Calasse's appeal from the Nevada Supreme Court. OTC application for access to OTC Link has been filed and will hopefully be approved by Independence Day."

Sharp had almost 6 years to do anything with FORW and he hasn't accomplished anything of value. I know Sharp really means it this time.

"GS just confirmed once again that GVSI and WNFT are on the back burner and his focus remains on FORW and SRNW."

He had 3 years to do anything with SRNW and hasn't done anything.

How many times are you going to keep falling for the Sharp hype - but everyone knows you are a paid pumper - just look at you pumping history..

"So, don't expect him to suggest in the slightest anything that will give the pumpers cause to P&D his tickers."

You are the biggest pumper and none of your nonsense has been truthful or accurate.

IG
πŸ‘οΈ0
gr8grins gr8grins 7 days ago
I’m sure you, like some us were hoping for merger/timeline and mid summer optimism. I have 3 questions after reading your most recent post, and although I don’t expect you to have answers, I’m curious of your thoughts.

Do you think the SRNW August deal is dead?

Why do you think FORW still have warrants?

Who do you think the 2 directors are?

Thanks beforehand for sharing your opinions on these questions.
πŸ‘οΈ0
spectrader82 spectrader82 1 week ago
Is it a bit weird that such a perfect shell share structure wise can't find an amazing company to merge in with? Maybe he is just looking for something VERY VERY GOOD, instead of just good? I don't know.
πŸ‘οΈ0
Don Faton Don Faton 1 week ago
$SRNW Facts:

1- $2m Warrants are intact per latest financials filings @ 30c / 50c

2- $62k cash & debt πŸ†“

3- George sharp has the audit intact for a potential merger agreement (cost $40k per year)

That’s how you know how much confidence GS has to sign an agreement any week now— LA Traders (@LaTraders2024) June 19, 2024
πŸ‘οΈ0
MrSmith18 MrSmith18 1 week ago
Yesterday I was at a conference and came across a prominent Jewish business venture dude whose company is based our of Israel. I asked him if the war in Gaza was affecting investments (i.e. M&A, startups, etc.). He said absolutely not. His immediate reaction surprised me, I had expected him to give me some hand wavy explanation. He didn't. He did say, however, that the mood of Israeli citizens is somber at best, while the business community remains solid or business-as-usual.

That said, I believe GS's efforts are moving forward and may be waiting for further developments (i.e. approval from Ghana) or regulatory approvals. These deals don't just come together on their own. It takes a lot of back and forth between parties.

With the way AI has been roaring forward, I would have thought he'd find something in that space without too much trouble. The problem is now that it is so overextended, that investors are waiting for a pause to reassess. So far that hasn't happened.

When it does, that's when money will start to flow back into smaller deals like his tickers.

JMHO
👍️ 1
ARobinson ARobinson 1 week ago
Do you still have hopes that June/July are possible for a SRNW reveal?
πŸ‘οΈ0
MrSmith18 MrSmith18 1 week ago
Not necessarily... GS just confirmed once again that GVSI and WNFT are on the back burner and his focus remains on FORW and SRNW. He also stated that unlike his rival, he will NOT trickle out rumors because he knows well what can happen and prefers not to go there.

That said, he made it crystal clear again that he will not divulge any intel until a deal is signed, sealed, and delivered. So, don't expect him to suggest in the slightest anything that will give the pumpers cause to P&D his tickers.

In short, his tweet just confirmed what we already knew. By releasing it today, he at the very least let everyone know that he's still actively working on his deals.

JMHO
👍️ 1
ARobinson ARobinson 1 week ago
Hi MrSmith18, well it looks like the deal from last year is off. I guess this year is out of the question now for SRNW?
πŸ‘οΈ0
Golden Cross Golden Cross 1 week ago
Sharp X Post: $SRNW - working to find suitable candidate but nothing concrete yet.
💩 1 🤡 1
Don Faton Don Faton 1 week ago
Don’t worry IGLOW I’m ok. Made over 200k on GVSI. Awhile back I’m ok.
πŸ‘οΈ0