Report of Foreign Issuer (6-k)

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549

FORM 6-K

REPORT OF FOREIGN PRIVATE ISSUER PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-16
OR 15d-16 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the month of September, 2014

Commission File Number: 001-31799

ROUGE RESOURCES INC.
(Translation of Registrant’s Name into English)

#203-409 Granville St, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V6C 1T2
(Address of principal executive offices)

[Indicate by check mark whether the registrant files or will file annual reports under cover Form 20-F or Form 40-F]
Form 20-F [X] Form 40-F [ ]

[Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(1)]
Yes [ ] No [X]

[Indicate by check mark if the registrant is submitting the Form 6-K in paper as permitted by Regulation S-T Rule 101(b)(7)]
Yes [ ] No [X]

[Indicate by check mark whether the registrant by furnishing the information contained in this Form is also thereby furnishing the information to the Commission pursuant to Rule 12-g-3-3(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934]
Yes [ ] No [X]

If “Yes” is marked, indicate below the file number assigned to the registrant in connection with Rule 12g3-2(b): 82-_______________

SUBMITTED HEREWITH

Exhibits

99.1		Interim Financial Statements for three months ended July 31, 2014

99.2		Management Discussion and Analysis for three months ended July 31, 2014

99.3		Form 52-109FV1 - Certification of Interim Filings - CEO

99.4		Form 52-109FV1 - Certification of Interim Filings - CFO

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on behalf of the Company by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Rouge Resources Ltd.

Dated: September 10, 2014	By:	/s/ Linda Smith


		Linda Smith
	Title:	Chief Executive Officer

ROUGE RESOURCES LTD.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

UNAUDITED CONDENSED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

SIX MONTHS ENDED JULY 31, 2014

(Expressed in Canadian Dollars)

	•	Statements of Financial Position

	•	Statements of Comprehensive Loss

	•	Statements of Changes in Equity

	•	Statements of Cash Flows

	•	Notes to Financial Statements

NOTICE OF NO AUDITOR REVIEW OF INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Under National Instrument 51-102, Part 4, subsection 4.3(3) (a), if an auditor has not performed a review of the condensed interim financial statements, they must be accompanied by a notice indicating that the financial statements have not been reviewed by an auditor.

The accompanying unaudited condensed interim financial statements of the Company have been prepared by management and approved by the Audit Committee and Board of Directors of the Company. They include appropriate accounting principles, judgement and estimates in accordance with IFRS for interim financial statements.

The Company’s independent auditors have not performed a review of these condensed interim financial statements in accordance with the standards established by the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants for a review of condensed interim financial statements by an entity’s auditors.

Rouge Resources Ltd.
Condensed Interim Statements of Financial Position
(Expressed in Canadian dollars – unaudited)

	Notes
			July 31,						January 31,
			2014			2013			2014
									(audited)

ASSETS

Current assets
Cash		$	25,483		$	178,317		$	96,466
GST receivable			1,002						1,425
						1,730
			26,485			180,047			97,891
Non-current assets
Credit card security deposit			6,900						6,900
						6,900
Equipment	4		1,085						1,268
						1,423
Exploration and evaluation assets	5		303,507			291,008			291,007
			311,492			299,331			299,175

TOTAL ASSETS		$	337,977		$	479,378		$	397,066

LIABILITIES

Current liabilities
Trade payables and accrued liabilities	6	$	18,340		$	10,905		$	25,607
Loan payable	7		39,676			39,676			39,676
Related party payables	8		69,853			38,960			46,555

TOTAL LIABILIITES			127,869			89,541			111,838

EQUITY

Share capital	9		3,953,590			3,953,590			3,953,590
Convertible debt reserve	10		53,357						53,357
						53,357
Deficit			(3,796,839	)		(3,617,110	)		(3,721,719	)

TOTAL EQUITY			210,108			389,837			285,228

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY		$	337,977		$	479,378		$	397,066

Going concern	1

Approved on behalf of the Board of Directors:

“Linda Smith”		“Ronald McGregor”
Director		Director

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements

Rouge Resources Ltd.
Condensed Interim Statements of Comprehensive Loss
(Expressed in Canadian dollars – unaudited)

															Year ended
	Notes		Three months ended July 31,						Six months ended July 31,						January 31,
			2014			2013			2014			2013			2014
															(audited)

Expenses
Amortization		$	88		$	194		$	183		$	388		$	543
Consulting fees	8		600			-			600			3,000			5,800
Listing application expenses			-			-			-			403			402
Management services	8		15,000			15,000			30,000			30,000			60,000
Office administration and travel	8		13,218			21,005			27,553			41,445			74,694
Professional fees	8		369			8,563			4,869			12,526			44,368
Transfer agent and filing fees			5,261			2,667			11,915			17,253			23,817

Net and comprehensive loss		$			$	(47,429	)	$	(75,120	)	$	(105,015	)	$
			(34,536	)											(209,624	)
Loss per share
– basic and diluted	9	$	(0.00	)	$	(0.00	)	$	(0.00	)	$	(0.00	)	$	(0.00	)
Weighted average number of shares outstanding
– basic and diluted			44,633,171			44,633,171			44,633,171			44,633,171			44,633,171

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements

Rouge Resources Ltd.
Condensed Interim Statement of Changes in Equity
(Expressed in Canadian dollars – unaudited)

						Convertible
		Common Shares				Debt
	Notes	Number		Amount		Reserve		Deficit		Total

Balance at January 31, 2013 (audited)		44,633,171	$	3,953,590	$	53,357	$	(3,512,095	)	494,852

Comprehensive loss for six months ended July 31, 2013								(105,015	)	(105,015	)

Balance at July 31, 2013		44,633,171		3,953,590		53,357		(3,617,110	)	389,837

Comprehensive loss for six months ended January 31, 2014								(104,609	)	(104,609	)

Balance at January 31, 2014 (audited)		44,633,171		3,953,590		53,357		(3,721,719	)	285,228

Comprehensive loss for six months ended July 31, 2014								(75,120	)	(75,120	)

Balance at July 31, 2014		44,633,171	$	3,953,590	$	53,357	$	(3,796,839	)	210,108

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements

Rouge Resources Ltd.
Condensed Interim Statements of Cash Flows
(Expressed in Canadian dollars – unaudited)

														Year ended
		Three months ended July 31,						Six months ended July 31,						January 31,
		2014			2013			2014			2013			2014
														(audited)

Operating activities
Net and comprehensive loss	$	(34,536	)	$	(47,429	)	$	(75,120	)	$	(105,015	)	$	(209,624	)
Adjustments for non-cash item:
Amortization					194			183			388			543
		88
Changes in non-cash working capital items:
GST receivable					5,304			423			2,392			2,697
		422
Prepaid expenses					-			-			-			1,625
		-
Trade payables and accrued liabilities					(19,293	)		(7,267	)		(27,978	)		(13,276	)
		(1,743	)

Net cash flows used in operating activities		(35,769	)		(60,411	)		(81,781	)		(128,588	)		(218,035	)

Investing activities
Exploration and evaluation expenditures		-			(9,934	)		(12,500	)		(22,434	)		(22,433	)

Net cash flows used in investing activities		-			(9,934	)		(12,500	)		(22,434	)		(22,433	)

Financing activities
Increase (decrease) in related party payables		(4,613	)		7,303			23,298			27,494			35,089

Net cash flows from financing activities		(4,613	)		7,303			23,298			27,494			35,089

Increase (decrease) in cash		(40,382	)		(63,042	)		(70,983	)		(123,528	)		(205,379	)
Cash, beginning		65,865			241,359			96,466			301,845			301,845

Cash, ending	$	25,483		$	178,317		$	25,483		$	178,317		$	96,466

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements

Rouge Resources Ltd.

Notes to the Condensed Interim Financial Statements

(Expressed in Canadian dollars - unaudited)

For the six months ended July 31, 2014 and 2013

1. Nature and continuance of operations

Rouge Resources Ltd (the “Company”) was incorporated on March 31, 1988 under the laws of the province of British Columbia, Canada, and its principal activity is the acquisition and exploration of mineral properties in Canada. The Company’s shares are traded on the TSX Venture Exchange (“TSX-V”) under the symbol ROU and quoted on the OTC:BB in the United States.

The Company’s registered and records office is located at Suite 203 - 409 Granville St., Vancouver, British Columbia, V6C 1T2.

These condensed interim financial statements have been prepared on the assumption that the Company will continue in operation for the foreseeable future and will be able to realize assets and discharge liabilities in the ordinary course of business. As at July 31, 2014, the Company had not advanced any of its properties to commercial production and is not able to finance day-to-day activities through operations. The Company’s continuation as a going concern is dependent upon the successful results from its mineral property exploration activities; its ability to attain profitable operations and generate funds therefrom; and its ability to raise equity capital or borrowings sufficient to meet current and future obligations. These factors indicate the existence of a material uncertainty that may cast significant doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management intends to finance operating costs over the next twelve months with existing cash on hand, loans from directors and companies controlled by directors, and/or private placement of common shares. Should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern, the net realizable value of its assets may be materially less than the amounts on its Statements of Financial Position.

2. Significant accounting policies and basis of preparation

These condensed interim financial statements were authorized for issue on September 10, 2014 by the directors of the Company.

Statement of compliance and conversion to International Financial Reporting Standards
These condensed interim financial statements comply with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”) and with interpretations of the International Financial Reporting Interpretations Committee (“IFRIC”). Therefore, these financial statements also comply with International Accounting Standard (“IAS”) 34, Interim Financial Reporting.

This interim financial report does not include all of the information required of a full annual financial report and is intended to provide users with an update in relation to events and transactions that are significant to an understanding of the changes in financial position and performance of the Company since the end of the last annual reporting period. It is therefore recommended that this financial report be read in conjunction with the audited annual financial statements of the Company for the year ended January 31, 2014 filed on SEDAR and EDGAR. However, this interim financial report provides selected significant disclosures that are required in the annual financial statements under IFRS.

Basis of preparation
These condensed interim financial statements have been prepared on an accrual basis; are based on historical costs, modified where applicable; and are presented in Canadian dollars unless otherwise noted.

Significant estimates and assumptions
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with IFRS requires the Company to make estimates and assumptions concerning the future. The Company’s management reviews these estimates and underlying assumptions on an ongoing basis, based on experience and other factors, including expectations of future events that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Revisions to estimates are adjusted prospectively in the period in which the estimates are revised.

Estimates and assumptions where there is significant risk of material adjustments to assets and liabilities in future accounting periods include: the useful lives of equipment, the recoverability of the carrying value of exploration and evaluation assets, fair value measurements for financial instruments, recoverability and measurement of deferred tax assets, and provisions for restoration and environmental obligations and contingent liabilities.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements

Rouge Resources Ltd.

Notes to the Condensed Interim Financial Statements

(Expressed in Canadian dollars - unaudited)

For the six months ended July 31, 2014 and 2013

Significant judgments
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with IFRS requires the Company to make judgments, apart from those involving estimates and assumptions, in applying accounting policies. The most significant judgments in preparing the Company’s financial statements include:

-	assessment of the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern and whether there are events or conditions that may give rise to significant uncertainty; and
-	classification / allocation of expenditures as exploration and evaluation assets or operating expenses.

Foreign currency translation, transactions and balances
The functional currency of a Company is measured using the currency of the primary economic environment in which it operates. These financial statements are presented in Canadian dollars which is the Company’s functional and presentation currency.

Foreign currency transactions, where applicable, are translated into the functional currency using the exchange rates prevailing at the date of the transaction. Foreign currency monetary items are translated at the period-end exchange rate. Non-monetary items measured at historical cost continue to be carried at the exchange rate at the date of the transaction. Non-monetary items measured at fair value are reported at the exchange rate at the date when fair values were determined.

Exchange differences arising on the translation of monetary items or on settlement of monetary items are recognized in the Statement of Comprehensive Loss in the period in which they arise, except where deferred in equity as a qualifying cash flow or net investment hedge.

Exchange differences arising on the translation of non-monetary items are recognized in other comprehensive income to the extent that gains and losses arising on those non-monetary items are also recognized in other comprehensive income. Where the non-monetary gain or loss is recognized in profit or loss, the exchange component is also recognized in profit or loss.

Exploration and evaluation assets
Costs incurred before the Company has obtained the legal rights to explore an area are expensed as incurred. Exploration and evaluation expenditures include the costs of acquiring licenses and costs associated with exploration and evaluation activity. Option payments are considered acquisition costs provided that the Company has the intention of exercising the underlying option.

Property option agreements are exercisable entirely at the option of the optionee. Therefore, option payments (or recoveries) are recorded when payment is made (or received) and are not accrued.

Exploration and evaluation expenditures are capitalized. The Company capitalizes costs to specific blocks of claims or areas of geological interest. Government tax credits received are recorded as a reduction to the cumulative costs incurred and capitalized on the related property.

Exploration and evaluation assets are tested for impairment if facts or circumstances indicate that impairment exists. Examples of such facts and circumstances are as follows:

-	the period for which the Company has the right to explore in the specific area has expired during the period or will expire in the near future, and is not expected to be renewed;

-	substantive expenditure on further exploration for and evaluation of mineral resources in the specific area is neither budgeted nor planned;

-	exploration for and evaluation of mineral resources in the specific area have not led to the discovery of commercially viable quantities of mineral resources and the entity has decided to discontinue such activities in the specific area; and

-	sufficient data exist to indicate that, although a development in the specific area is likely to proceed, the carrying amount of the exploration and evaluation asset is unlikely to be recovered in full from successful development or by sale.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements

Rouge Resources Ltd.

Notes to the Condensed Interim Financial Statements

(Expressed in Canadian dollars - unaudited)

For the six months ended July 31, 2014 and 2013

After technical feasibility and commercial viability of extracting a mineral resource are demonstrable, the Company stops capitalizing expenditures for the applicable block of claims or geological area of interest and tests the asset for impairment. The capitalized balance, net of any impairment recognized, is then reclassified to either tangible or intangible mine development assets according to the nature of the asset.

Development expenditures
Costs arising from the construction, installation or completion of infrastructure facilities are capitalized within mine development assets until the mine achieves commercial production at which point accumulated costs are transferred to producing mine assets.

Share-based payments
The Company has a stock option plan. Share-based payments to employees are measured at the fair value of the instruments issued and amortized over the vesting periods. Share-based payments to non-employees are measured at the fair value of goods or services received or the fair value of the equity instruments issued, if it is determined the fair value of the goods or services cannot be reliably measured, and are recorded at the date the goods or services are received. Compensation expense is recognized and the corresponding amount is recorded in the share option reserve. The fair value of options is determined using the Black–Scholes pricing model. The number of shares and options expected to vest is reviewed and adjusted at the end of each reporting period such that the amount recognized for services received as consideration for the equity instruments granted shall be based on the number of equity instruments that eventually vest. When the options are exercised, share capital is credited for the consideration received and the related share option reserve is decreased.

Loss per share
Basic loss per share is calculated by dividing the loss attributable to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding in the period. For all periods presented, the loss attributable to common shareholders equals the reported loss attributable to owners of the Company. Diluted loss per share is calculated by the treasury stock method. Under this method, the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the calculation of diluted loss per share assumes that the proceeds to be received on the exercise of dilutive share options and warrants are used to repurchase common shares at the average market price during the period. Any stock options or share purchase warrants outstanding cause the calculation of diluted loss per share to be anti-dilutive and are therefore not included in the calculation.

Financial instruments
The Company classifies its financial instruments in the following categories: fair value through profit or loss (“FVTPL”), loans and receivables, held-to-maturity investments, available-for-sale and financial liabilities. The classification depends on the purpose for which the financial instruments were acquired. Management determines the classification of its financial instruments at initial recognition.

Fair value through profit or loss investments are either held-for-trading for the purpose of short-term profit taking, derivatives not held for hedging purposes, or held on fair value basis with a documented risk management or investment strategy. when designated as such to avoid an accounting mismatch or to enable performance evaluation where a group of financial assets is managed by key management personnel. Such assets are subsequently measured at fair value with unrealized changes in carrying value being included in profit or loss.

Loans and receivables are non-derivative financial assets with fixed or determinable payments that are not quoted in an active market and are subsequently measured at amortized cost. They are included in current assets except for maturities greater than 12 months after the end of the reporting period. These are classified as non-current assets. Held-to-maturity investments are non-derivative financial assets that have fixed maturities and fixed or determinable payments with Company’s intention to hold these investments to maturity. They are subsequently measured at amortized cost. Held-to-maturity investments are included in non-current assets, except for those instruments that are expected to mature within 12 months after the end of the reporting period.

Available-for-sale financial assets are non-derivative financial assets that are designated as available-for-sale or are not suitable to be classified as financial assets at fair value through profit or loss , loans and receivables or held-to-maturity investments and are subsequently measured at fair value. These are included in current assets to the extent they are expected to be realized within 12 months after the end of the reporting period. Unrealized gains and losses are recognized in other comprehensive income, except for impairment losses and foreign exchange gains and losses on monetary financial assets which are recognized in profit or loss.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements

Rouge Resources Ltd.

Notes to the Condensed Interim Financial Statements

(Expressed in Canadian dollars - unaudited)

For the six months ended July 31, 2014 and 2013

Non-derivative financial liabilities (excluding financial guarantees) are subsequently measured at amortized cost. Regular purchases and sales of financial assets are recognized on the trade-date, ie. the date on which the group commits to purchase the asset.

Financial assets are derecognized when the rights to receive cash flows from the investments have expired or have been transferred and the Company has transferred substantially all risks and rewards of ownership.

At each reporting date, the Company assesses whether there is objective evidence that a financial instrument has been impaired. In the case of available-for-sale financial instruments, a significant and prolonged decline in the value of the instrument is considered to determine whether an impairment has arisen.

Transaction costs related to financial instruments include professional, consulting, regulatory, agency commissions and other costs that are incremental to the acquisition, issuance or disposition of financial assets, liabilities or equity instruments. Transaction costs are initially charged to the related financial instrument or equity instrument, except where the financial instrument is classified as fair value through profit or loss , in which case transaction costs are expensed to the Statement of Comprehensive Loss immediately.

The Company does not have any derivative financial assets and liabilities.

Impairment of assets
The carrying amount of the Company’s non-current assets, which include equipment and exploration and evaluation assets, is reviewed at each reporting date to determine whether there is an indication of impairment. If such indication exists, the recoverable amount of the asset is estimated in order to determine the extent of the impairment loss. An impairment loss is recognized in the Statement of Comprehensive Loss whenever the carrying amount of the asset, or its cash-generating unit, exceeds its recoverable amount.

The recoverable amount is the greater of an asset’s fair value less costs to sell and its value in use. In assessing value in use, the estimated future cash flows are discounted to their present value using a pre-tax discount rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the asset. For an asset that does not generate cash flows largely independent of those from other assets, the recoverable amount is determined for the cash-generating unit to which the asset belongs.

A cash-generating unit is the smallest identifiable group of assets that generates cash inflows largely independent of the cash flows from other assets or groups of assets. Impairment losses recognized in respect of cash-generating units are allocated first to reduce the carrying amount of any goodwill allocated to the cash-generating unit and then to reduce the carrying amount of the other assets in the unit on a pro-rata basis.

An impairment loss is only reversed if there is an indication that the impairment loss may no longer exist and there has been a change in the estimates used to determine the recoverable amount. However, any reversal of impairment cannot increase the carrying value of the asset to an amount higher than the carrying amount that would have been determined had no impairment loss been recognized in previous years. An impairment loss with respect to goodwill is never reversed.

Assets that have an indefinite useful life are not subject to amortization and are tested annually for impairment.

Cash
Cash includes cash on hand and deposits held at call with banks.

Income taxes
Current income tax
Current income tax assets and liabilities for the current period are measured at the amount expected to be recovered from or paid to the taxation authorities. The tax rates and tax laws used to compute the amount are those that are enacted or substantively enacted, at the reporting date, in the countries where the Company operates and generates taxable income.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements

Rouge Resources Ltd.

Notes to the Condensed Interim Financial Statements

(Expressed in Canadian dollars - unaudited)

For the six months ended July 31, 2014 and 2013

Current income tax relating to items recognized directly in other comprehensive income or equity is recognized in other comprehensive income or equity and not in profit or loss. Management periodically evaluates positions taken in the tax returns with respect to situations in which applicable tax regulations are subject to interpretation and establishes provisions where appropriate.

Deferred income tax
Deferred income tax is recognized using the asset and liability method on temporary differences at the reporting date arising between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts for financial reporting purposes. The carrying amount of deferred income tax assets is reviewed at the end of each reporting period and recognized only to the extent that it is probable that sufficient taxable profit will be available to allow all or part of the deferred income tax asset to be utilized.

Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are measured at the tax rates that are expected to apply to the year when the asset is realized or the liability is settled, based on tax rates (and tax laws) that have been enacted or substantively enacted by the end of the reporting period.

Deferred income tax assets and deferred income tax liabilities are offset, if a legally enforceable right exists to set off current tax assets against current income tax liabilities and the deferred income taxes relate to the same taxable entity and the same taxation authority.

Flow-through shares
On the issuance of flow-through shares, any premium received in excess of the closing market price of the Company’s common shares is initially recorded as a liability (“flow-through tax liability”). Provided that the Company has renounced the related expenditures, or that there is a reasonable expectation that it will do so, the flow-through tax liability is reduced on a pro-rata basis as the expenditures are incurred. If such expenditures are capitalized, a deferred tax liability is recognized. To the extent that the Company has suitable unrecognized deductible temporary differences, an offsetting recovery of deferred income taxes would be recorded.

Restoration and environmental obligations
The Company recognizes liabilities for statutory, contractual, constructive or legal obligations associated with the retirement of long-term assets, when those obligations result from the acquisition, construction, development or normal operation of the assets. The net present value of future restoration cost estimates arising from the decommissioning of plant and other site preparation work is capitalized to the related asset along with a corresponding increase in the restoration provision in the period incurred. Discount rates using a pre-tax rate that reflects the time value of money are used to calculate the net present value.

The Company’s estimates of restoration costs could change as a result of changes in regulatory requirements, discount rates and assumptions regarding the amount and timing of the future expenditures. These changes are recorded directly to exploration and evaluation assets with corresponding entries to the related asset and the restoration provision. The Company’s estimates are reviewed annually for changes in regulatory requirements, discount rates, effects of inflation and changes in estimates.

Changes in the net present value, excluding changes in the Company’s estimates of restoration costs, are charged to the Statement of Comprehensive Loss for the period. The net present value of restoration costs arising from subsequent site damage that is incurred on an ongoing basis during production are charged to the Statement of Comprehensive Loss in the period incurred. These changes are recorded directly to the related asset with a corresponding entry to the provision. The increase in the restoration provision due to the passage of time is recognized as interest expense.

The net present value of restoration costs arising from subsequent site damage that is incurred on an ongoing basis during production are charged to the statement of comprehensive loss in the period incurred.

The costs of restoration projects that were included in the provision are recorded against the provision as incurred. The costs to prevent and control environmental impacts at specific properties are capitalized in accordance with the Company’s accounting policy for exploration and evaluation assets.

At present, the Company has not identified any significant restoration and environmental obligations in its operations. Accordingly, no provision has been made.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements

Rouge Resources Ltd.

Notes to the Condensed Interim Financial Statements

(Expressed in Canadian dollars - unaudited)

For the six months ended July 31, 2014 and 2013

Equipment
Equipment is stated at historical cost less accumulated amortization and accumulated impairment losses. Subsequent costs are included in the asset’s carrying amount or recognized as a separate asset, as appropriate, only when it is probable that future economic benefits associated with the item will flow to the Company and the cost of the item can be measured reliably. The carrying amount of the replaced part, if applicable, is derecognized. All other repairs and maintenance are charged to the Statement of Comprehensive Loss during the financial period in which they are incurred.

Gains and losses on disposals are determined by comparing the proceeds with the carrying amount and are recognized in the Statement of Comprehensive Loss.

Amortization is calculated on a declining balance method to write-off the cost of the equipment to its residual value over its estimated useful life at the rate of 30% per year.

Comparative figures
Certain comparative figures have been reclassified to conform with the current period’s presentation.

3. Accounting standards issued recently

New standard IFRS 9 “Financial Instruments”
This new standard is a partial replacement of IAS 39 “Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement”. IFRS 9 uses a single approach to determine whether a financial asset is measured at amortized cost or fair value, replacing the multiple rules in IAS 39. The approach in IFRS 9 is based on how an entity manages its financial instruments in the context of its business model and the contractual cash flow characteristics of the financial assets.

The new standard also requires a single impairment method to be used, replacing the multiple impairment methods in IAS 39. The proposed effective date for IFRS 9 is for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2018.

Amendments to IAS 32 “Financial Instruments: Presentation”
These amendments address inconsistencies when applying the offsetting requirements, and is effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2014.

The Company has not early adopted these standards and is currently assessing the impact that these standards will have on its financial statements.

Other accounting standards or amendments to existing accounting standards that have been issued but have future effective dates are either not applicable or are not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements

Rouge Resources Ltd.

Notes to the Condensed Interim Financial Statements

(Expressed in Canadian dollars - unaudited)

For the six months ended July 31, 2014 and 2013

4. Equipment

		Accumulated		Net book
	Cost	amortization		Value
	$	$		$

Balance at January 31, 2013	8,710	(6,899	)	1,811
Amortization expense for six months ended July 31, 2013	-	(388	)	(388	)

Balance at July 31, 2013	8,710	(7,287	)	1,423
Amortization expense for six months ended January 31, 2014		(155	)	(155	)

Balance at January 31, 2014	8,710	(7,442	)	1,268
Amortization expense for six months ended July 31, 2014		(183	)	(183	)

Balance at July 31, 2014	8,710	(7 625	)	1 085

5. Exploration and evaluation assets

The following table summarizes the amounts expended on exploration and evaluation assets for the six months ended July 31, 2014 and year ended January 31, 2014:

			Total for six		Total for year
	North-Central Ontario		months ended		ended
	Dotted Lake	Lampson	July 31,		January 31,
	mining claims	Lake mining	2014		2014
	$	claims	$		$
		$

Property acquisition costs
Balance, beginning	24,607	49,533	74,140	$	61,640
Additions	-		12,500		12,500
		12,500
Balance, ending	24,607	62,033	86,640		74,140

Exploration and evaluation costs
Balance, beginning	216,867	-	216,867		206,934
Additions
Field and camp costs			-		-
Geological consulting and reporting			-		-
Geo-referencing					9,933
Project administration			-		-
Soil sample analysis			-		-
			-		9,933
Balance, ending	216,867	-	216,867		216,867

Total balance, ending	241,474	62,033	303,507	$	291,007

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements

Rouge Resources Ltd.

Notes to the Condensed Interim Financial Statements

(Expressed in Canadian dollars - unaudited)

For the six months ended July 31, 2014 and 2013

We now hold a 100% interest in eighteen claims in the Thunder Bay Mining District of North Central Ontario area, called the Dotted Lake Property, following our final payment in April 2014 pursuant to the exclusive Lampson Lake agreement with local prospectors (“Optionors”) regarding the acquisition of two additional claims adjacent to the Dotted Lake Property. Since the outset, Lampson Lake option payments totaling $60,000 have been paid as follows: $7,000 payment when the agreement was signed on April 20, 2010; $12,000 payment on April 20, 2011; $16,000 payment on April 20, 2012; and a final amount of $25,000 due on April 20, 2013. However on March 1, 2013, the Company agreed with the optionors to split the final payment into two equal amounts of $12,500. The first was paid on April 20, 2013 and the second and final payment was made on April 20, 2014.

The Lampson Lake claims are subject to a 2% net smelter royalty (“NSR”) in favour of the optionors on one claim and with respect to the other, a combination of a 2% NSR in favour of the optionors and a 1% NSR on any metals and/or a 1% NSR payable to Ontario Exploration Company (“OEC”) on any precious metals recovered from the property. The Company has the right to buy back 1% of the NSR in favour of the optionors for $1,000,000 and to buy back three-quarters of 1% of the royalty vested with OEC over 10 years on an increasing scale from $15,000 to $750,000.

6. Trade payables and accrued liabilities

Trade payables and accrued liabilities included in the Statements of Financial Position are as follows:

		July 31,				January 31,
		2014		2013		2013
						(audited)

Trade payables	$	15,340	$	10,905	$	10,367
Accrued liabilities		3,040		1,760		15,240
	$	18,380	$	10,905	$	25,607

7. Loan payable

This $39,676 debt to a former professional advisor is unsecured and non-interest bearing. The balance was due after July 31, 2013; however there has been no demand for repayment.

It continues to be a current liability at July 31, 2014 and is unsecured and non-interest bearing.

8. Related party payables and transactions

Related party payables included in the Statements of Financial Position are as follows:

		July 31,				January 31,
		2014		2013		2014
						(audited)
Payable to Company directors and companies controlled by directors	$	69,853	$	38,960	$	46,555

These amounts are non-interest bearing and unsecured with no fixed term of repayment.

Related party transactions with directors and companies controlled by directors included in the Statements of Comprehensive Loss are as follows:

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements

Rouge Resources Ltd.

Notes to the Condensed Interim Financial Statements

(Expressed in Canadian dollars - unaudited)

For the six months ended July 31, 2014 and 2013

						Year ended
		Six months ended July 31,				January 31,
		2014		2013		2014
						(audited)
Consulting fees	$	600	$	1,000	$	2,800
Management fees		30,000		30,000		60,000
Office rent		15,000		15,000		30,000
Professional fees		4,267		3,575		16,170
	$	49,867	$	49,575	$	108,970

These transactions are recorded at the exchange amount, which is the consideration agreed to between the related parties.

9. Share capital

Authorized share capital
Unlimited number of common shares without par value.

Issued share capital
At July 31, 2014, there were 44,633,171 issued and fully paid common shares outstanding (January 31, 2014 – 44,633,171) of which 2,842,200 shares are held in escrow, subject to release under regulatory approval.

Basic and diluted loss per share
The calculation of basic and diluted loss per share for six months ended July 31, 2014 was based on the comprehensive loss attributable to common shareholders of $75,120 (July 31, 2013 - $105,015 ) and the weighted average number of common shares outstanding of 44,633,171 (July 31, 2013 - 44,633,171). The diluted loss per share will not include the effect of any share purchase warrants outstanding in the future since the effect would be anti-dilutive.

Stock options
The Company has adopted an incentive stock option plan which provides that the Board of Directors of the Company may from time to time, in its discretion and in accordance with the TSX-V requirements, grant to directors, officers, employees and technical consultants to the Company, non-transferable stock options to purchase common shares, provided that the number of common shares reserved for issuance in any twelve month period will not exceed 10% of the Company’s issued and outstanding common shares. Such options will be exercisable for a period of up to 5 years from the date of grant at a price not less than the closing price of the Company’s shares on the last trading day before the grant of such options less any discount, if applicable, but in any event not less than $0.10 per share In connection with the foregoing, the number of common shares reserved for issuance to any one optionee insider in any twelve month period will not exceed ten percent (10%) of the issued and outstanding common shares and the number of common shares reserved for issuance to any one employee or consultant will not exceed two percent (2%) of the issued and outstanding common shares. Options may be exercised no later than 90 days following cessation of the optionee’s position with the Company or 30 days following cessation of an optionee conducting investor relations activities.

At July 31, 2014, the Company had no issued or outstanding stock options.

Share purchase warrants
The changes in warrants outstanding during the six months ended July 31, 2014 and year ended January 31, 2014 are as follows:

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements

Rouge Resources Ltd.

Notes to the Condensed Interim Financial Statements

(Expressed in Canadian dollars - unaudited)

For the six months ended July 31, 2014 and 2013

Six Months Ended July 31, 2014

Year Ended January 31, 2014

Number of

Exercise price

Number of

Exercise price

warrants

Balance, beginning

4,068,000

0.40

Warrants issued

Warrants expired

(4,068,000

)

Balance, ending

10. Convertible debt reserve

The convertible debt reserve records the equity component of convertible debt with liability and equity components. On conversion, the amount recorded is transferred to share capital.

11. Income taxes

At July 31, 2014 and year ended January 31, 2014, the Company had various tax pools relating to deductible temporary differences available to reduce future taxable income which expire as follows:

		Canadian non-
		capital losses		Resources pool		Equipment		Share issue costs
2015	$	83,521	$	-	$	-	$	-
2026		132,052		-		-		-
2027		175,837		-		-		-
2028		152,040		-		-		-
2029		182,808		-		-		-
2030		105,295		-		-		-
2031		243,513		-		-		-
2032		278,811		-		-		-
2033		273,858
2034		244,457
No expiry		-		491,007		2,407		105,059
	$	1,872,192	$	491,007	$	2,407	$	105,059

A valuation allowance has been used to offset the net benefit related to the future tax assets arising from these deductible temporary differences due to the uncertainty associated with the ultimate realization of both the non-capital losses and the resource pools before expiry.

These tax pools will be updated during year ended January 31, 2015.

12. Financial instruments and financial risk management

The Company is exposed in varying degrees to financial instrument related risks. The Board of Directors approves and monitors the risk management processes, inclusive of documented investment policies, counterparty limits, and controlling and reporting structures. The type of risk exposure and the way in which such exposure is managed is as follows:

Credit risk
Credit risk is the risk that one party to a financial instrument will fail to discharge an obligation and cause the other party to incur a financial loss. The Company’s primary exposure to credit risk is on its cash held in bank accounts and its credit and security deposit. The Company’s cash and credit card deposit are deposited in bank accounts held with one major bank in Canada so there is a concentration of credit risk. This risk is managed by using a major bank that is a high credit quality financial institution as determined by rating agencies. The Company’s secondary exposure to risk is on its GST receivable is minimal since it is refundable from the Canadian Government.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements

Rouge Resources Ltd.

Notes to the Condensed Interim Financial Statements

(Expressed in Canadian dollars - unaudited)

For the six months ended July 31, 2014 and 2013

Liquidity risk
Liquidity risk is the risk that the Company will not be able to meet its financial obligations as they fall due. The Company has a planning and budgeting process in place to help determine the funds required to support the Company’s normal operating requirements on an on-going basis. The Company ensures there are sufficient funds to meet short-term business requirements, taking into account its current cash position and potential funding sources. Historically, the Company's source of funding has been either the issuance of equity securities for cash through private placements or loans from Company directors and officers. The Company’s access to financing is always uncertain and there can be no assurance of continued access to significant funding from these sources.

Foreign exchange risk
Foreign currency risk is the risk that the fair values of future cash flows of a financial instrument will fluctuate because they are denominated in currencies that differ from the Company’s functional currency. The Company only operates in Canada and is therefore not exposed to foreign exchange risk arising from transactions denominated in a foreign currency.

Interest rate risk
Interest rate risk is the risk that the fair value of future cash flows of a financial instrument will fluctuate because of changes in market interest rates. The Company’s exposure to interest rate risk relates to its ability to earn interest income on cash balances at variable rates. Changes in short term interest rates will not have a significant effect on the fair value of the Company’s cash account.

Classification of financial instruments
Financial assets included in the Statements of Financial Position are as follows:

		July 31,				January 31,
		2014		2013		2014
						(audited)
Fair value through profit and loss:
Cash	$	25,483	$	178,317	$	96,466
Credit card security deposit		6,900		6,900		6,900
	$	32,383	$	185,217	$	103,366

Other financial liabilities included in the Statements of Financial Position are as follows:

		July 31,			January 31,
		2014		2013	2014
					(audited)
Non-derivative financial liabilities:
Trade payables	$	15,340	$	9,145	10,367
Loan payable		39,676		39,676	39,676
Related party payables		69,853		38,960	46,555
	$	124,869	$	87,781	96,598

Fair value
The fair value of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities approximate the carrying amounts. Financial instruments measured at fair value are classified into one of three levels in the fair value hierarchy according to the relative reliability of the inputs used to estimate the fair values. The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are:

	•	Level 1 – Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;
	•	Level 2 – Inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability either directly or indirectly; and

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements

Rouge Resources Ltd.

Notes to the Condensed Interim Financial Statements

(Expressed in Canadian dollars - unaudited)

For the six months ended July 31, 2014 and 2013

•

Level 3 – Inputs that are not based on observable market data.

13. Capital management

The Company's policy is to maintain a sufficient capital base so as to maintain investor and creditor confidence, safeguard the Company’s ability to support the exploration and development of its exploration and evaluation assets and to sustain future development of the business. The capital structure of the Company consists of share and working capital. There were no changes in the Company's approach to capital management during the year and the Company is not subject to any restrictions on its capital.

14. Segmented information

The Company operates in a single reportable operating segment being the acquisition, exploration and development of mineral properties, currently all located in Canada.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements

Rouge Resources Ltd.
Management Discussion and Analysis
Six Months Ended July 31, 2014

ROUGE RESOURCES LTD.
(An Exploration Stage Company)

MANAGEMENT DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

FOR SIX MONTHS ENDED JULY 31, 2014
(Stated in Canadian Dollars)

Rouge Resources Ltd.
Management Discussion and Analysis
Six Months Ended July 31, 2014

ITEM 1.1 DATE AND INTRODUCTION

This Management Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A”) was prepared as of September 10, 2014 and authorized for issuance by the directors of the Company effective on this date. This report should be read in conjunction with both the condensed interim financial statements and notes for the six months ended July 31, 2014 and the audited financial statements and notes for the year ended January 31, 2014. It focuses on events and activities that affected the Company during the six months ended July 31, 2014 and to the date of this report.

The financial information contained herein complies with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”) along with interpretations of the International Financial Reporting Interpretations Committee (“IFRIC”). Therefore, they comply with International Accounting Standard (“IAS”) 34, “Interim Financial Reporting.”

The Company (“We”) was incorporated under the name “Gemstar Resources Ltd.” on March 31, 1988 pursuant to the provisions of the Company Act (British Columbia). In March 2006, we were transitioned to the Business Corporations Act (British Columbia). On March 25, 2008, the Company’s name was changed to “Rouge Resources Ltd”. Our registered and records office is located at 203-409 Granville Street, Vancouver BC, V6C 1T2.

We have been a reporting issuer in British Columbia and Alberta since April 3, 1989 and became a “foreign private issuer” in the United States pursuant to filings with the US Securities and Exchange Commission in November 2003. Prior to August 30, 2012, our common shares were quoted OTC:BB in the United States under the symbol ROUGF and now, effective on this date, are also listed for trading on the TSX Venture Exchange under the symbol ROU.

At July 31, 2014, there were 44,633,171 issued and fully paid common shares outstanding (January 31, 2014 –same number) of which 2,842,200 shares are held in escrow, subject to release following regulatory approval.

We have not been involved in any bankruptcy, receivership or similar proceedings, nor have we been a party to any material reclassification, merger, consolidation, purchase or sale of a significant amount of assets. Additional information on the Company is available on both SEDAR at www.sedar.com and EDGAR at www.sec.gov/edgar.

Description of business

The Company is a Vancouver-based junior mineral exploration company engaged in the business of acquiring, exploring, evaluating and, if warranted, developing mineral resource properties in Canada. No revenue has been generated since inception and there is no assurance that a commercially viable mineral deposit exists on our exploration and evaluation assets. Further exploration is required before a final evaluation of the economic feasibility can be determined. Significant financing and considerable time and effort will be required before our mineral claims can be further explored and, if warranted, developed into a commercial enterprise.

We hold a 100% interest in 18 claims in the Thunder Bay Mining District of North Central Ontario area called the Dotted Lake Property, following our final payment of $12,500 in April 2014 pursuant to the exclusive Lampson Lake option agreement. We continue to monitor claims in North-Central Ontario and plan to make additional acquisitions in this and other areas when and if the claims are considered to be strategic or otherwise beneficial to the Company.

Rouge Resources Ltd.
Management Discussion and Analysis
Six Months Ended July 31, 2014

ITEM 1.2 OVERALL PERFORMANCE

During the six months ended July 31, 2014, the Company reported a net and comprehensive loss of $75,120 compared to a net and comprehensive loss of $105,015 for the same period last year. In addition, we spent $12,500 on our exploration and evaluation assets in April 2014 as final payment pursuant to the exclusive Lampson Lake option agreement.

Management continues to defer sizable exploration expenditures on the Dotted Lake Property due to the continuation of challenging economic circumstances for junior mineral exploration companies which have been in place now for a considerable period of time.

Exploration and evaluation assets

The following table summarizes the amounts expended on exploration and evaluation assets for the six months ended July 31, 2014 and year ended January 31, 2014:

			Total for six		Total for
	North-Central Ontario		months		year ended
			ended		January 31,
	Dotted Lake	Lampson	July 31,		2014
	mining	Lake mining	2014		$
	claims	claims	$
	$	$

Property acquisition costs
Balance, beginning	24,607	49,533	74,140	$	61,640
Additions	-	12,500	12,500		12,500
Balance, ending	24,607	62,033	86,640		74,140

Exploration and evaluation costs
Balance, beginning	216,867	-	216,867		206,934
Additions
Field and camp costs			-		-
Geological consulting and Reporting			-		-
Geo-referencing					9,933
Project administration			-		-
Soil sample analysis			-		-
			-		9,933
Balance, ending	216,867	-	216,867		216,867
Total balance, ending	241,474	62,033	303,507	$	291,007

We now hold a 100% interest in 18 claims in the Thunder Bay Mining District of North Central Ontario area, called the Dotted Lake Property, following our final payment in April 2014 pursuant to the exclusive Lampson Lake agreement with local prospectors (“Optionors”) regarding the acquisition of two additional claims adjacent to the Dotted Lake Property. Since the outset, Lampson Lake option payments totaling $60,000 have been paid as follows: $7,000 payment when the agreement was signed on April 20, 2010; $12,000 payment on April 20, 2011; $16,000 payment on April 20, 2012; and a final amount of $25,000 due on April 20, 2013. However on March 1, 2013, the Company agreed with the optionors to split the final payment into two equal amounts of $12,500. The first was paid on April 20, 2013 and the second and final payment was made on April 20, 2014.

Rouge Resources Ltd.
Management Discussion and Analysis
Six Months Ended July 31, 2014

The Lampson Lake claims are subject to a 2% net smelter royalty (“NSR”) in favour of the Optionors on one claim and with respect to the other, a combination of a 2% NSR in favour of the Optionors and a 1% NSR on any metals and/or a 1% Net Sales Return royalty payable to Ontario Exploration Company (“OEC”) on any precious metals recovered from the property. The Company has the right to buy back 1% of the NSR in favour of the Optioners for $1,000,000 and to buy back three-quarters of 1% of the royalty vested with OEC over 10 years on an increasing scale from $15,000 to $750,000.

Although our work on the Dotted Lake Property in the past three years has identified some gold mineralization hosted in sulphide rich shear bands in granitoid rock, there is no assurance that a commercially viable mineral deposit exists on our exploration and evaluation assets. Accordingly, we consider the Dotted Lake-Lampson Lake Property to be an early stage exploration project upon which further exploration should be conducted in order to gain better understanding of the strike content and width of the gold mineralization uncovered in past exploration programs. Significant additional financing and considerable time and effort will be required before our property can be further explored and, if warranted, developed into a commercial enterprise.

Our NI 43-101 Technical Report from late 2010 recommended a Phase 1 budget for future exploration totaling $226,600 to continue with more soil sampling, prospecting and trenching on the Property followed by a Phase 2 including diamond drilling depending on results of the first phase. However, due to the challenging economic circumstances still persisting for the Junior Mineral Exploration industry, implementation has been delayed. This delay will continue until more favorable market conditions return.

ITEM 1.3 SELECTED FINANCIAL INFORMATION

The following table summarizes selected financial information as at and for the six months ended July 31, 2014 and 2013 with comparative figures as at and for the year ended January 31, 2014:

	Six Months Ended July 31,		Year Ended
	2014	2013	January 31, 2014
FINANCIAL POSITION
Total Assets	$ 337,977	$ 479,378	$ 397,066
Total Liabilities	$ 127,869	$ 89,541	$ 111,838
Accumulated Deficit	$ (3,796,839)	$ (3,617,110)	$(3,721,719)

OPERATIONS
Total Revenues	Nil	Nil	Nil
Comprehensive Loss	$ (75,120)	$ (105,015)	$ (209,624)
Comprehensive Loss per sh.	$ (0.00)	$ (0.00)	$ (0.00)

Rouge Resources Ltd.
Management Discussion and Analysis
Six Months Ended July 31, 2014

ITEM 1.4 RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following table summarizes results of operations for the three and six months ended July 31, 2014 and 2013 with comparative figures for the year ended January 31, 2014:

														Year ended
		Three months ended July 31,						Six months ended July 31,						January 31,
		2014			2013			2014			2013			2014
														(audited)

Expenses
Amortization	$	88		$	194		$	183		$	388		$	543
Consulting fees		600			-			600			3,000			5,800
Listing application expenses		-			-			-			403			402
Management fees		15,000			15,000			30,000			30,000			60,000
Office admin and travel		13,218			21,005			27,553			41,445			74,694
Professional fees		369			8,563			4,869			12,526			44,368
Transfer agent/ filing fees		5,261			2,667			11,915			17,253			23,817

Comprehensive loss	$	34,536		$	(47,429	)	$	(75,120	)	$	(105,015	)	$	(209,624	)

Loss per share
– basic and diluted	$	(0.00	)	$	(0.00	)	$	(0.00	)	$	(0.00	)	$	(0.00	)
Weighted average number of shares outstanding
– basic and diluted		44,633,171			44,633,171			44,633,171			44,633,171			44,633,171

The Company is in the exploration stage and has not generated any revenues since inception.

Six months ended July 31, 2014

For six months ended July 31, 2014, a net and comprehensive loss of $75,120 was recorded versus $105,015 for the same period last year. This $29,895 decrease in comprehensive loss resulted from the following:

-	Minor $205 decrease in amortization of equipment.
-	$2,400 decrease in business consulting fees.
-	$403 decrease in listing application fees and expenses, not applicable this year.
-	$13,892 decrease in office administration and travel expenses mainly due to lower cost of doing business compared to last year.
-	$7,657 decrease in professional fees (legal, audit and accounting) primarily due to relatively low level of business activity compared to last year.
-	$5,338 decrease in transfer agent and filing fees due to relatively low level of regulatory requirements compared to last year.

Rouge Resources Ltd.
Management Discussion and Analysis
Six Months Ended July 31, 2014

Three months ended July 31, 2014
For three months ended July 31, 2014, a comprehensive loss of $34,536 was reported versus a comprehensive loss of $47,429 for the same period last year. This $12,893 decrease in comprehensive loss resulted from the following:

-	Minor $106 decrease in amortization of equipment.
-	$600 increase in business consulting fees
-	$7,787 decrease in office administration and travel expenses due to lower cost of doing business this year compared to last year.
-	$8,194 decrease in professional fees (legal, audit and accounting) due to relatively low level of business activity compared to last year.
-	$2,594 increase in transfer agent and filing fees resulting from higher expenses this quarter compared to last year, even though year to date expenses are lower.

ITEM 1.5 SUMMARY OF QUARTERLY RESULTS

The following table summarizes operating results for the eight most recently completed quarters:

	2^ndQtr ended July 31 14	1^stQtr ended Apr. 30 14	4^thQtr ended Jan. 31 14	3^rdQtr ended Oct. 31 13	2^ndQtr ended July 31 13	1^stQtr ended Apr. 30 13	4^thQtr ended Jan. 31 13	3^rdQtr ended Oct. 31 12
Total revenues	Nil	Nil	Nil	Nil	Nil	Nil	Nil	Nil
Net and Comprehensive Loss	($34,536)	($40,584)	($62,627)	($41,982)	($47,429)	($57,586)	($73,254)	(35,584)
Loss per share	($0.00)	($0.00)	($0.00)	($0.00)	($0.00)	($0.00)	($0.00)	($0.00)
Operating cash flow (Deficiency)	($40,382)	($46,012)	($47,102)	($42,345)	($60,411)	($68,177)	($30,048)	(164,545)

Our net and comprehensive losses are fairly consistent from quarter to quarter being comprised mainly of management fees, professional fees, office administration & travel expenses and transfer agent & filing fees. However, due to normal year-end audit adjustments, the 4^th quarters ended January 31, 2014 and 2013 show higher losses than average.

ITEM 1.6 LIQUIDITY

The following table summarizes the Company’s working capital position at July 31, 2014 and 2013 with comparative figures at year ended January 31, 2013:

		As at July 31,						As at
Working Capital		2014			2013			January 31, 2014
Current assets	$	26,485		$	180,047		$	97,891
Current liabilities		(127,869	)		(89,541	)		(111,838	)
Working capital (deficiency)	$	(101,384	)	$	90,506		$	(13,947	)

Rouge Resources Ltd.
Management Discussion and Analysis
Six Months Ended July 31, 2014

During the six months ended July 31, 2014, working capital (deficiency) increased to $101,384 from $13,947 at year ended January 31, 2014. This $87,437 increase was due to on-going operating losses and capital expenditures on exploration and evaluation assets.

Current assets at July 31, 2014 include cash $25,483 (January 31, 2014 - $96,466) and GST receivable $1,002 (January 31, 2014 - $1,425). Current liabilities at July 31, 2014 include trade payables/ accrued liabilities $18,340 (January 31, 2014 - $25,607), loan payable $39,676 (January 31, 2013 – same amount), and related party payables $69,853 (January 31, 2014 - $46,555).

The following table summarizes cash flows for six and three months ended July 31, 2014 and 2013 with comparative figures for year ended January 31, 2014:

Cash Flows		Six Months Ended July 31,						Year Ended
		2014			2013			January 31, 2014
Net cash used in operating activities	$	(81,781	)	$	(128,588	)	$	(218,035	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(12,500	)		(22,434	)		(22,433	)
Net cash provided by financing activities		23,298			27,494			35,089
Increase (decrease) in cash		(70,983	)		(123,528	)		(205,379	)
Cash, beginning		96,466			301,845			301,845
Cash, end	$	25,483		$	178,317		$	96,466

At July 31, 2014, the Company’s cash position was $25,483 compared to $96,466 at January 31, 2014. This $70,983 decrease in cash for six months ended July 31, 2014 (“2014 period”) and the $123,528 decrease in cash for same period last year (“2013 period”) resulted from the following cash flow activities:

(i) Net cash used in operating activities of $81,781 in 2014 period and $128,588 in 2013 period was due in both periods to on-going operating losses adjusted for changes in non-cash working capital items.

(ii) Net cash used in investing activities of $12,500 in 2014 period and $22,434 in 2013 period was due to final payment in 2014 period under the option agreement to purchase the Lampson Lake Property and in 2013 period due to second last payment on the same option agreement along with cost of geo-referencing of the Dotted Lake claims to bring location information up to the new GPS standards now required by the Ontario Ministry of Northern Development and Mines.

(iii) Net cash provided by financing activities of $23,298 in 2014 period and $27,494 in 2013 period was due exclusively to partial funding of operating expenses by related parties.

ITEM 1.7 CAPITAL RESOURCES

Share Capital

Authorized share capital
Unlimited number of common shares without par value.

Issued share capital
At July 31, 2014, there were 44,633,171 issued and fully paid common shares outstanding (January 31, 2014 – same number) of which 2,842,200 shares are held in escrow, subject to release under regulatory approval.

Rouge Resources Ltd.
Management Discussion and Analysis
Six Months Ended July 31, 2014

Basic and diluted loss per share
The calculation of basic and diluted loss per share for six months ended July 31, 2014 was based on net and comprehensive loss attributable to common shareholders of $75,120 (July 31, 2013 - $105,015 ) and the weighted average number of common shares outstanding of 44,633,171 (July 31, 2013 – same number). The diluted loss per share will not include the effect of any share purchase warrants outstanding in the future since the effect would be anti-dilutive.

At July 31, 2014, the Company had no issued or outstanding stock options.

Share purchase warrants
The changes in warrants outstanding during the six months ended July 31, 2014 and year ended January 31, 2014 are as follows:

Six Months Ended July 31,

Year Ended January 31,

2014

Number of

Exercise

Number of

Exercise

warrants

price

warrants

price

Balance, beginning

4,068,000

0.40

Warrants issued

Warrants expired

(4,068,000

)

Balance, ending

The Company's policy is to maintain a sufficient capital base so as to maintain investor and creditor confidence, safeguard the Company’s ability to support its exploration and evaluation assets and to sustain future development of the business. The capital structure of the Company consists of share and working capital. There were no changes in the Company's approach to capital management during the year and the Company is not subject to any restrictions on its capital.

With no operating revenues to date, we continue to finance our operations through the issuance of common shares and advances from related parties. Although two private placements were completed in late August 2012 raising a net amount of $842,794 after share issue costs, there is no assurance that additional financing will be available when needed in the future nor, if available, on commercially reasonable terms. If we are unable to obtain additional financing on a timely basis, either through issuance of more common shares or obtaining additional advances from related parties, we may not be able to meet our obligations as they come due which may impact our ability to continue as a going concern in the future.

Rouge Resources Ltd.
Management Discussion and Analysis
Six Months Ended July 31, 2014

To a significant extent, our ability to continue raising capital is affected by trends and uncertainties beyond our control. These include general economic conditions, the market prices for precious metals and results from our exploration programs. The Company’s ability to reach its business objectives may be significantly impaired if general economic conditions continue to deteriorate, prices for metals such as zinc, gold, copper and platinum fall or if results from planned exploration programs are unsuccessful.

ITEM 1.8 OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

The Company has no off-balance sheet arrangements.

ITEM 1.9 TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PARTIES

The following amounts are due to related parties as at July 31, 2014 and 2013 with comparative figures at year ended January 31, 2014:

						As At
		As At July 31,				January 31,
		2014		2013		2014
						(audited)
Payable to Company directors and companies controlled by directors	$	69,853	$	38,960	$	46,555

These amounts are non-interest bearing and unsecured with no fixed term of repayment.

Related party transactions with directors and companies controlled by directors included in the statements of comprehensive loss are as follows:

						Year ended
		Six months ended July 31,				January 31,
		2014		2013		2014
						(audited)
Consulting fees	$	600	$	1,000	$	2,800
Management fees		30,000		30,000		60,000
Office rent		15,000		15,000		30,000
Professional fees		4,267		3,575		16,170

	$	49,867	$	49,575	$	108,970

These transactions are recorded at the exchange amount, which is the consideration agreed to between the related parties.

ITEM 1.10 FOURTH QUARTER ENDED JANUARY 31, 2014

Not applicable at this time.

ITEM 1.11 SUBSEQUENT AND PROPOSED TRANSACTIONS

Nothing material at this time.

Rouge Resources Ltd.
Management Discussion and Analysis
Six Months Ended July 31, 2014

ITEM 1.12 CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES AND JUDGEMENTS

Significant estimates and assumptions
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with IFRS requires the Company to make estimates and assumptions concerning the future. The Company’s management reviews these estimates and underlying assumptions on an ongoing basis, based on experience and other factors, including expectations of future events that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Revisions to estimates are adjusted for prospectively in the period in which the estimates are revised.

-	Assessment of the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern and whether there are events or conditions that may give rise to significant uncertainty; and
-	Classification / allocation of expenditures as exploration and evaluation assets or operating expenses.

ITEM 1.13 CHANGES IN ACCOUNTING POLICIES

There were no changes in accounting policies during the current year. However, new accounting standards issued recently are as follows:

The Company has not early adopted these revised standards and is currently assessing the impact that these standards will have on its financial statements.

Rouge Resources Ltd.
Management Discussion and Analysis
Six Months Ended July 31, 2014

ITEM 1.14. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS, FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT AND CAPITAL MANAGEMENT

The Company is exposed in varying degrees to financial instrument related risks. The Board of Directors approves and monitors the risk management processes, inclusive of documented investment policies, counterparty limits, and controlling & reporting structures. The type of risk exposure and the way in which such exposure is managed by the Company is as follows:

Credit risk
Credit risk is the risk that one party to a financial instrument will fail to discharge an obligation and cause the other party to incur a financial loss. The Company’s primary exposure to credit risk is on its cash held in bank accounts and its credit card deposit. The majority of cash is deposited in bank accounts held with one major bank in Canada so there is a concentration of credit risk. This risk is managed by using a major bank that is a high credit quality financial institution as determined by rating agencies. The Company’s secondary exposure to risk is on its harmonized sales tax refundable which is minimal since it is recoverable from the Canadian Government.

Historically, the Company's source of funding has been either the issuance of equity securities for cash through private placements or advances from directors and officers. The Company’s access to financing is always uncertain and there can be no assurance of continued access to significant funding from these sources.

Commodity Price Risk
The Company’s ability to raise capital to fund exploration or development activities is subject to risks associated with fluctuations in the market price of precious metals. The Company closely monitors commodity prices to determine the most appropriate course of action.

Rouge Resources Ltd.
Management Discussion and Analysis
Six Months Ended July 31, 2014

Classification of financial instruments

Financial assets included in the Statement of Financial Position are as follows:

		July 31,				January 31,
		2014		2013		2014
						(audited)
Fair value through profit and loss:
Cash	$	25,483	$	178,317	$	96,466
Credit card security deposit		6,900		6,900		6,900
	$	32,383	$	185,217	$	103,366

Other financial liabilities included in the statements of financial position are as follows:

		July 31,			January 31,
		2014		2013	2014
					(audited)
Non-derivative financial liabilities:
Trade payables	$	15,340	$	9,145	10,367
Loan payable		39,676		39,676	39,676
Related party payables		69,853		38,960	46,555
	$	124,869	$	87,781	96,598

Fair value

The fair value of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities approximate the carrying amounts. Financial instruments measured at fair value are classified into one of three levels in the fair value hierarchy according to the relative reliability of the inputs used to estimate the fair values. The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are:

	•	Level 1 – Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;
	•	Level 2 – Inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability either directly or indirectly; and
	•	Level 3 – Inputs that are not based on observable market data.

ITEM 1.15 OTHER MD&A REQUIREMENTS

Management’s Responsibility for Financial Statements
Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of the Company’s financial statements in accordance with IFRS, and for such internal control as management determines is necessary to enable the preparation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

Conflicts of interest
The Company’s directors and officers may serve as directors or officers, or may be associated with, other reporting companies, or have significant shareholdings in other public companies. To the extent that such other companies may participate in business or asset acquisitions, dispositions, or ventures in which the Company may participate, the directors and officers of the Company may have a conflict of interest in negotiating and concluding on terms with respect to the transaction. If a conflict of interest arises, the Company will follow the provisions of the Business Corporations Act (BC) (“Corporations Act”) dealing with conflict of interest. These provisions state that where a director has such a conflict, that director must, at a meeting of the Company’s directors, disclose his or her interest and refrain from voting on the matter unless otherwise permitted by the Corporations Act. In accordance with the laws of the Province of British Columbia, the directors and officers of the Company are required to act honestly, in good faith, and in the best interest of the Company.

Rouge Resources Ltd.
Management Discussion and Analysis
Six Months Ended July 31, 2014

Business and Regulatory Risks
We are engaged in the mineral exploration business and manage related industry risk directly. We are potentially at risk for environmental reclamation and fluctuations and commodity-based market prices associated with resource property interests. Management is of the opinion that the Company addresses environmental risk and compliance in accordance with industry standards and specific project environmental requirements. At present, the Company is not required to provide for restoration and environmental obligations so no provision has been made. However, there is no certainty that all environmental risks and contingencies have been addressed.

Our exploration program will require significant future expenditures and there is no assurance any commercial mineral quantities will be found. If we are unable to generate significant revenues from our mineral claims, continued losses are expected into the foreseeable future. There is no history upon which to base any assumption as to the likelihood we will prove successful, and there is no assurance that we will generate any revenues nor ever achieve profitability. If unsuccessful in addressing these risks, the business will fail and investors could lose all of their investment in the company.

Regulatory risks include the possible delays in getting regulatory approval to the transactions that senior management and the Board of Directors believe to be in the Company’s best interest, increased fees for statutory filings, and the introduction of increasingly more complex reporting requirements which must be complied with in order to maintain our public company position.

Cautionary note regarding forward-looking statements
This Management Discussion and Analysis may contain certain “forward-looking statements”, as defined in the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and within the meaning of Canadian securities legislation, relating to the proposed use of proceeds. Forward-looking statements are statements that are not historical facts; they are generally, but not always, identified by the words “expects,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “intends,” “estimates,” ”projects,” “aims,” “potential,” “goal,” “objective,” “prospective,” and similar expressions, or that events or conditions “will,” “would,” “may,” “can,” “could” or “should” occur. Forward-looking statements are based on the beliefs, estimates and opinions of the Company’s management on the date the statements are made and they involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Consequently, there can be no assurances that such statements will prove to be accurate and actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Factors that could cause future results to differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, the following: a change in the use of proceeds, the volatility of mineral prices, the possibility that exploration efforts will not yield economically recoverable quantities of minerals, accidents and other risks associated with mineral exploration and development operations, the risk that the Company will encounter unanticipated geological factors, the Company’s need for and ability to obtain additional financing, the possibility that the Company may not be able to secure permitting and other governmental clearances necessary to carry out the Company’s exploration and development plans, and the other risk factors discussed in greater detail in the Company’s various filings on SEDAR (www.sedar.com) with Canadian securities regulators and its filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on EDGAR (www.sec.gov). Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date hereof. We undertake no obligation to publicly release the results of any revisions to these forward-looking statements that may be made to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

FORM 52-109FV2

CERTIFICATE OF INTERIM FILINGS

VENTURE ISSUER BASIC CERTIFICATE

I, Linda Smith, Chief Executive Officer for Rouge Resources Ltd., certify the following:

1.	*Review:* I have reviewed the interim financial report and interim MD&A (together the “interim filings”) of Rouge Resources Ltd. (the "Issuer") for the interim period ended July 31, 2014.

2.	*No misrepresentations:* Based on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the interim filings do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact required to be stated or that is necessary to make a statement not misleading in light of the circumstances under which it was made, for the period covered by the interim filings.

3.	*Fair presentation:* Based on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the interim financial report together with the other financial information included in the interim filings fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, financial performance and cash flows of the issuer, as of the date of and for the periods presented in the interim filings.

Date: September 10, 2014

/s/ Linda Smith
___________________________________
Linda Smith
Chief Executive Officer
Rouge Resources Ltd

NOTE TO READER

In contrast to the certificate required for non-venture issuers under National Instrument 52-109 Certification of Disclosure in Issuer's Annual and Interim Filings (NI 52-109), this Venture Issuer Basic Certificate does not include representations relating to the establishment and maintenance of disclosure controls and procedures (DC&P) and internal control over financial reporting (ICFR), as defined in NI 52-109. In particular, the certifying officers filing this certificate are not making any representations relating to the establishment and maintenance of:

i)	controls and other procedures designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by the issuer in its annual filings, interim filings or other reports filed or submitted under securities legislation is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in securities legislation; and

ii)	a process to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with the issuer's GAAP.

The issuer's certifying officers are responsible for ensuring that processes are in place to provide them with sufficient knowledge to support the representations they are making in this certificate.

Investors should be aware that inherent limitations on the ability of certifying officers of a venture issuer to design and implement on a cost effective basis DC&P and ICFR as defined in NI 52-109 may result in additional risks to the quality, reliability, transparency and timeliness of interim and annual filings and other reports provided under securities legislation.

FORM 52-109FV2

CERTIFICATE OF INTERIM FILINGS

VENTURE ISSUER BASIC CERTIFICATE

I, Ronald McGregor, Chief Financial Officer for Rouge Resources Ltd., certify the following:

1.	*Review:* I have reviewed the interim financial report and interim MD&A (together the “interim filings”) of Rouge Resources Ltd. (the "Issuer") for the interim period ended July 31, 2014.

2.	*No misrepresentations:* Based on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the interim filings do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact required to be stated or that is necessary to make a statement not misleading in light of the circumstances under which it was made, for the period covered by the interim filings.

3.	*Fair presentation:* Based on my knowledge, having exercised reasonable diligence, the interim financial report together with the other financial information included in the interim filings fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, financial performance and cash flows of the issuer, as of the date of and for the periods presented in the interim filings.

Date: September 10, 2014

/s/ Ronald McGregor
________________________________
Ronald McGregor
Chief Financial Officer
Rouge Resources Ltd

NOTE TO READER

In contrast to the certificate required for non-venture issuers under National Instrument 52-109 Certification of Disclosure in Issuer's Annual and Interim Filings (NI 52-109), this Venture Issuer Basic Certificate does not include representations relating to the establishment and maintenance of disclosure controls and procedures (DC&P) and internal control over financial reporting (ICFR), as defined in NI 52-109. In particular, the certifying officers filing this certificate are not making any representations relating to the establishment and maintenance of:

i)	controls and other procedures designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by the issuer in its annual filings, interim filings or other reports filed or submitted under securities legislation is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in securities legislation; and

ii)	a process to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with the issuer's GAAP.

The issuer's certifying officers are responsible for ensuring that processes are in place to provide them with sufficient knowledge to support the representations they are making in this certificate.

Investors should be aware that inherent limitations on the ability of certifying officers of a venture issuer to design and implement on a cost effective basis DC&P and ICFR as defined in NI 52-109 may result in additional risks to the quality, reliability, transparency and timeliness of interim and annual filings and other reports provided under securities legislation.

Fiore Cannabais (CE) (USOTC:FIORF)
Historical Stock Chart
From Jun 2024 to Jul 2024

Click Here for more Fiore Cannabais (CE) Charts.

Fiore Cannabais (CE) (USOTC:FIORF)
Historical Stock Chart
From Jul 2023 to Jul 2024

Market Data

News

Trading Tools

Markets

Discover

Hot Features

Follow Feed

Options Flow

Monitor

FIORF Fiore Cannabais Ltd (CE)

Rouge Resources Ltd. News

Your Recent History

Company

Business

Popular

Get The App

Trending Now

Toplists

Market Data

News

Trading Tools

Markets

Discover

Hot Features

Follow Feed

Options Flow

Monitor

FIORF Fiore Cannabais Ltd (CE)

Rouge Resources Ltd. News

Your Recent History

Company

Business

Popular

Get The App