|
|
Item 1.
|
Financial Statements
|
SANDERSON FARMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except number of shares)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 31,
2018
|
|
October 31,
2017
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
(Note 1)
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$
|
388,896
|
|
|
$
|
419,285
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
134,045
|
|
|
138,868
|
|
Inventories
|
253,081
|
|
|
252,765
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
43,497
|
|
|
38,620
|
|
Total current assets
|
819,519
|
|
|
849,538
|
|
Property, plant and equipment
|
1,700,092
|
|
|
1,657,084
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation
|
(804,382
|
)
|
|
(780,276
|
)
|
|
895,710
|
|
|
876,808
|
|
Other assets
|
6,995
|
|
|
6,897
|
|
Total assets
|
$
|
1,722,224
|
|
|
$
|
1,733,243
|
|
Liabilities and stockholders’ equity
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
$
|
104,990
|
|
|
$
|
90,904
|
|
Dividends payable
|
7,305
|
|
|
—
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
56,606
|
|
|
101,168
|
|
Accrued income taxes
|
6,649
|
|
|
6,649
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
175,550
|
|
|
198,721
|
|
Claims payable and other liabilities
|
10,481
|
|
|
9,762
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
57,862
|
|
|
91,898
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
Stockholders’ equity:
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock:
|
|
|
|
Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock, $100 par value: authorized 500,000 shares, none issued
|
|
|
|
Par value to be determined by the Board of Directors: authorized 4,500,000 shares; none issued
|
|
|
|
Common Stock, $1 par value: authorized 100,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding shares—22,828,898 and 22,802,690 at January 31, 2018 and October 31, 2017, respectively
|
22,829
|
|
|
22,803
|
|
Paid-in capital
|
136,541
|
|
|
134,999
|
|
Retained earnings
|
1,318,961
|
|
|
1,275,060
|
|
Total stockholders’ equity
|
1,478,331
|
|
|
1,432,862
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
|
$
|
1,722,224
|
|
|
$
|
1,733,243
|
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
SANDERSON FARMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
January 31,
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
Net sales
|
$
|
771,948
|
|
|
$
|
688,346
|
|
Cost and expenses:
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
702,101
|
|
|
606,391
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
52,575
|
|
|
46,070
|
|
|
754,676
|
|
|
652,461
|
|
Operating Income
|
17,272
|
|
|
35,885
|
|
Other income (expense):
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
419
|
|
|
195
|
|
Interest expense
|
(523
|
)
|
|
(432
|
)
|
Other
|
2
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
(102
|
)
|
|
(235
|
)
|
Income before income taxes
|
17,170
|
|
|
35,650
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
(34,036
|
)
|
|
11,625
|
|
Net income
|
$
|
51,206
|
|
|
$
|
24,025
|
|
Earnings per share:
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
$
|
2.24
|
|
|
$
|
1.06
|
|
Diluted
|
$
|
2.24
|
|
|
$
|
1.06
|
|
Dividends per share
|
$
|
0.32
|
|
|
$
|
0.24
|
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
SANDERSON FARMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
January 31,
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
Operating activities
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
$
|
51,206
|
|
|
$
|
24,025
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
26,630
|
|
|
22,641
|
|
Non-cash stock compensation
|
6,230
|
|
|
5,685
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
(34,036
|
)
|
|
11,927
|
|
Change in assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
4,823
|
|
|
8,715
|
|
Income taxes
|
—
|
|
|
(20,232
|
)
|
Inventories
|
(316
|
)
|
|
(16,047
|
)
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets
|
(5,237
|
)
|
|
(3,194
|
)
|
Accounts payable
|
19,984
|
|
|
13,871
|
|
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
|
(44,316
|
)
|
|
(7,939
|
)
|
Total adjustments
|
(26,238
|
)
|
|
15,427
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
24,968
|
|
|
39,452
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
(51,734
|
)
|
|
(46,265
|
)
|
Net proceeds from sale of property and equipment
|
566
|
|
|
302
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
(51,168
|
)
|
|
(45,963
|
)
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of restricted stock under stock compensation plans
|
659
|
|
|
187
|
|
Payments from issuance of common stock under stock compensation plans
|
(4,848
|
)
|
|
(1,966
|
)
|
Net cash used in financing activities
|
(4,189
|
)
|
|
(1,779
|
)
|
Net change in cash and cash equivalents
|
(30,389
|
)
|
|
(8,290
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
419,285
|
|
|
234,111
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$
|
388,896
|
|
|
$
|
225,821
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash financing activity:
|
|
|
|
Dividends payable
|
$
|
(7,305
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,458
|
)
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
SANDERSON FARMS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
January 31, 2018
NOTE 1—ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles ("U.S. GAAP") for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments consisting of normal recurring accruals considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the
three
months ended
January 31, 2018
are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending
October 31, 2018
.
The condensed consolidated balance sheet at
October 31, 2017
has been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements at that date, but does not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. For further information, reference is made to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for its fiscal year ended
October 31, 2017
.
New Accounting Pronouncements
In July 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued guidance that requires an entity to measure inventory at the lower of cost or net realizable value. The guidance is effective for annual reporting periods and interim periods within those annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, our fiscal 2018. The Company adopted this guidance during the first quarter of fiscal 2018, and it did not have a material effect on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
During the third quarter of fiscal 2017, the Company early-adopted Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2016-09, Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting. The provisions of this update that materially affected our consolidated financial statements, or could potentially materially affect them in the future, require all
income tax effects of stock awards to be recognized in the statement of operations during the period the awards vest or are settled, rather than recording excess tax benefits or deficiencies in additional paid-in capital, and require the related amounts to be presented as operating activities on the statement of cash flows, rather than financing activities. During the period of adoption, the standard requires the Company to account for the transactions as if the standard had been adopted on the first day of the fiscal year in which it was adopted. As a result of adoption, our income tax expense for the first quarter of fiscal 2017 was reduced by approximately
$852,000
from excess tax benefits attributable to awards that vested during the first quarter of fiscal 2017. As a result, the income tax expense on the statement of operations for the three months ended January 31, 2017 on this Form 10-Q is
$852,000
less than the amount originally reported in our financial statements for the first quarter of fiscal 2017. Additionally, excess tax benefits are now presented as operating activities on the statement of cash flows, rather than financing activities. The Company chose to apply that provision retrospectively, and as a result, reclassified the
$2.2 million
of excess tax benefits originally reported in our financial statements for the first quarter of fiscal 2017 from financing activities to operating activities on the statement of cash flows for the three months ended January 31, 2017 in this Form 10-Q. Additional provisions from this guidance relate to accounting for forfeitures and the presentation of an employee's use of shares to satisfy the employer's statutory tax withholding obligations. Adoption of those two provisions did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements. The Company has elected to account for forfeitures as they occur, rather than estimating forfeitures when determining the amount of compensation cost to recognize each period. The Company will continue to present employees' use of shares to satisfy our statutory withholding obligations as financing activities on the statement of cash flows.
In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-09, Scope of Modification Accounting, which amends the requirements related to accounting for changes to stock compensation awards. The guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, our fiscal 2019. Early adoption is permitted. The impact this guidance will have on our consolidated financial statements will depend on the nature and extent of future changes, if any, to the terms and conditions of the Company's Stock Incentive Plan.
In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-07, Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Post-retirement Benefit Cost. The guidance requires the service cost component of defined benefit pension plans and other post-retirement benefit plans to be reported in the same line item or items as other compensation costs arising from the services rendered by the pertinent employees during the period. The other components of net benefit cost are required to be reported outside of operating income. The guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, our
fiscal 2019. Early adoption is permitted. We do not expect adoption to have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.
In February 2016, the FASB issued guidance which is intended to increase transparency and comparability among companies by requiring an entity that is a lessee to recognize on the balance sheet the right-of-use assets and lease liabilities arising from all leases with terms, as defined by the guidance, of greater than twelve months. The guidance also requires disclosures of key information about the leasing arrangements. The guidance is effective for annual reporting periods and interim periods within those annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018, our fiscal 2020. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact this guidance will have on our consolidated financial statements.
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which changes the criteria for recognizing revenue. ASU 2014-09 was amended by ASU 2015-14 to defer the effective date by one year. The guidance also modifies the related disclosure requirements, clarifies guidance for multiple-element arrangements and provides guidance for transactions that were not addressed fully in previous guidance. The guidance, as amended, is effective for annual reporting periods and interim periods within those annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, our fiscal 2019. Early adoption is permitted for annual reporting periods and interim periods within those annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. Companies have the option to adopt retrospectively or modified retrospectively with a cumulative effect adjustment. The Company expects to adopt this standard as of November 1, 2018, the beginning of our fiscal 2019, using the modified retrospective approach. The Company is currently evaluating the impact this guidance will have on our consolidated financial statements. Although we are still evaluating the impact, we do not currently expect adoption to have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements, other than additional disclosure requirements.
NOTE 2—INVENTORIES
Inventories consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 31, 2018
|
|
October 31, 2017
|
|
(In thousands)
|
Live poultry-broilers and breeders
|
$
|
164,894
|
|
|
$
|
161,575
|
|
Feed, eggs and other
|
39,077
|
|
|
35,361
|
|
Processed poultry
|
31,855
|
|
|
37,769
|
|
Prepared chicken
|
10,964
|
|
|
12,207
|
|
Packaging materials
|
6,291
|
|
|
5,853
|
|
|
$
|
253,081
|
|
|
$
|
252,765
|
|
NOTE 3—STOCK COMPENSATION PLANS
Refer to Note 8 and Note 9 of the Company’s
October 31, 2017
audited financial statements in the Company's
2017
Annual Report on Form 10-K for further information on our employee benefit plans and stock based compensation plans, respectively. Total stock based compensation expense during the
three
months ended
January 31, 2018
was
$6.2 million
as compared to total stock based compensation expense of
$5.7 million
for the
three
months ended
January 31, 2017
.
During the
three
months ended
January 31, 2018
, participants in the Company’s Management Share Purchase Plan (MSPP) elected to receive a total of
4,624
shares of restricted stock at an average price of
$142.25
per share instead of a specified percentage of their cash compensation, and the Company issued
1,116
matching restricted shares. During the
three
months ended
January 31, 2018
, the Company recorded compensation expense for the MSPP shares, included in the total stock based compensation expense above, of
$62,000
as compared to
$60,000
during the
three
months ended
January 31, 2017
.
During fiscal 2018, 2017 and 2016, the Company entered into performance share agreements that grant certain officers and key employees the right to receive shares of the Company's common stock, subject to the Company's achievement of certain performance measures. The performance share agreements specify a target number of shares that a participant can receive based upon the Company's average return on equity and average return on sales, as defined, during a two-year performance period beginning November 1 of each performance period. Although the performance share agreements have a
two
-year performance period, they are subject to an additional
one
-year period during which the participant must remain employed by the Company before they are paid out. If the Company's average return on equity and average return on sales exceed certain threshold amounts for the performance period, participants will receive
50 percent
to
200 percent
of the target number of
shares, depending upon the Company's level of performance. Accruals for performance shares begin during the period management determines that achievement of the applicable performance based criteria is probable at some level. In estimating the probability of the number of shares that will be awarded, the Company considers, among other factors, current and projected grain costs and chicken volumes and pricing, as well as the amount of the Company's commitments to procure grain at a fixed price throughout the performance period. Due to the high level of volatility of these commodity prices and the impact that the change in pricing can have on the Company's results, the Company's assessment of probability can change from period to period and can result in a significant revision to the amounts accrued related to the arrangements, as the accruals are adjusted using the cumulative catch-up method of accounting.
The target number of shares specified in the performance share agreements entered into on November 1, 2017 totaled
53,850
. As of
January 31, 2018
, the Company could not determine that achievement of the applicable performance based criteria is probable due to the uncertainties discussed above, and therefore recorded
no
compensation expense related to those agreements.
The Company also has performance share agreements in place with certain officers and key employees that were entered into on November 1, 2016. During the quarter ended January 31, 2018, the Company determined that achievement of the applicable performance based criteria for the November 1, 2016 agreements is probable at a level between the target and maximum levels. Accordingly, because the accrual is made using the cumulative catch-up method, the quarter ended January 31, 2018 includes compensation expense of
$3.3 million
, as compared to
no
compensation expense recorded during the quarter ended January 31, 2017 related to the agreements entered into on November 1, 2016. As of January 31, 2018, the aggregate number of shares estimated to be awarded related to the performance share agreements entered into on November 1, 2016 totaled
87,138
shares. The actual number of shares that can be awarded for those agreements could change materially from that estimate due to the Company's actual performance during the remaining nine months of the performance period ending October 31, 2018, and due to potential forfeitures. The Company will recognize the remaining unearned compensation related to these shares over the remaining service period.
The Compensation Committee of the Company's Board of Directors has determined that the performance share agreements entered into on November 1, 2015 have been earned at a level between the target and maximum levels, subject to the satisfaction of the additional
one
-year service period ending on October 31, 2018. Accordingly, the three months ended
January 31, 2018
include compensation expense of
$0.8 million
related to those agreements, as compared to compensation expense of
$3.3 million
during the three months ended
January 31, 2017
. Because management's initial determination of probability was made during the three months ended
January 31, 2017
, and because the accrual is made using the cumulative catch-up method, the compensation expense recorded during the three months ended
January 31, 2017
related to the agreements entered into on November 1, 2015 was greater than that recorded during the first quarter of fiscal
2018
. As of
January 31, 2018
, the aggregate number of shares estimated to be awarded related to the performance share agreements entered into on November 1, 2015 totaled
145,741
shares. Since the performance period for those agreements has ended, the actual number of shares that will be awarded can change only due to potential forfeitures during the remaining nine months of the service period ending October 31, 2018. The Company will recognize the remaining unearned compensation related to these shares over the remaining service period.
Had the Company determined that it was probable that the maximum amount of those outstanding awards from the agreements entered into on November 1, 2016 and November 1, 2017 would be earned, an additional
$1.8
million and
$1.3
million, respectively, would have been accrued as of
January 31, 2018
.
The Company's compensation cost related to performance share agreements is summarized as follows (in thousands, except number of shares):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
Date of Performance Share Agreement
|
|
Number of shares issued (actual (a) or estimated (e))
|
|
January 31, 2018
|
|
January 31, 2017
|
November 1, 2014
|
|
102,193 (a)
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
634
|
|
November 1, 2015
|
|
145,741 (e)
|
|
846
|
|
|
3,291
|
|
November 1, 2016
|
|
87,138 (e)
|
|
3,326
|
|
|
—
|
|
November 1, 2017 (1)
|
|
— (e)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total compensation cost
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,172
|
|
|
$
|
3,925
|
|
Note (1) - As of January 31, 2018, the Company could not determine that achievement of the applicable performance-based criteria is probable for the agreements entered into on November 1, 2017 due to the uncertainties discussed above, and therefore recorded no compensation expense related to those agreements.
On November 1, 2017, the Company granted
53,850
shares of restricted stock to certain officers and key management employees. The restricted stock had a grant date fair value of
$148.23
per share and will vest on
November 1, 2021
. On February 15, 2018, the Company granted an aggregate of
11,400
shares of restricted stock to all of its non-employee directors. The restricted stock had a grant date fair value of
$131.61
per share and vests
one
,
two
or
three
years from the date of grant. The Company also has unvested restricted stock grants outstanding that were granted during prior fiscal years to its officers, key employees and outside directors. The aggregate number of shares outstanding at
January 31, 2018
related to all unvested restricted stock grants totaled
282,854
. During the three months ended
January 31, 2018
, the Company recorded compensation expense, included in the total stock based compensation expense above, of
$2.0 million
related to restricted stock grants, as compared to
$1.7 million
during the three months ended
January 31, 2017
. The Company had
$15.9 million
in unrecognized share-based compensation costs as of
January 31, 2018
, that will be recognized over a weighted average remaining vesting period of approximately
2 years, 5 months
.
NOTE 4—EARNINGS PER SHARE
Certain share-based payment awards described in Note 3 - Stock Compensation Plans above entitling holders to receive non-forfeitable dividends before vesting are considered participating securities and thus are included in the calculation of basic earnings per share, to the extent they are dilutive. These awards are included in the calculation of basic earnings per share under the two-class method. The two-class method allocates earnings for the period between common shareholders and other security holders. The participating awards receiving dividends are allocated the same amount of income as if they were vested shares.
The following table presents earnings per share.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
|
January 31, 2018
|
|
January 31, 2017
|
|
(in thousands except per share amounts)
|
Net Income
|
$
|
51,206
|
|
|
$
|
24,025
|
|
Distributed and undistributed (earnings) to unvested restricted stock
|
(732
|
)
|
|
(368
|
)
|
Distributed and undistributed earnings to common shareholders—Basic
|
$
|
50,474
|
|
|
$
|
23,657
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding—Basic
|
22,501
|
|
|
22,379
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding—Diluted
|
22,501
|
|
|
22,379
|
|
Earnings per common share—Basic
|
$
|
2.24
|
|
|
$
|
1.06
|
|
Earnings per common share—Diluted
|
$
|
2.24
|
|
|
$
|
1.06
|
|
NOTE 5—FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The Company holds certain items that are required to be disclosed at fair value, primarily cash equivalents. Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. A three-level hierarchy is followed for disclosure to show the extent and level of judgment used to estimate fair value measurements:
Level 1 – Inputs used to measure fair value are unadjusted quoted prices that are available in active markets for the identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date.
Level 2 – Inputs used to measure fair value, other than quoted prices included in Level 1, are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date through correlation with market data, including quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets and quoted prices in markets that are not active. Level 2 also includes assets and liabilities that are valued using models or other pricing methodologies that do not require significant judgment since the input assumptions used in the models, such as interest rates and volatility factors, are corroborated by readily observable data from actively quoted markets for substantially the full term of the financial instrument.
Level 3 – Inputs used to measure fair value are unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and reflect the use of significant management judgment. These values are generally determined using pricing models for which the assumptions utilize management’s estimates of market participant assumptions.
At January 31, 2018, and October 31, 2017, the fair value of the Company's cash and cash equivalents approximated their carrying value due to the short maturity of these financial instruments and were categorized as a Level 2 measurement. Inputs used to measure fair value were primarily recent trading prices and prevailing market interest rates.
NOTE 6—COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Property, Plant and Equipment
In March 2017, the Company announced the selection of sites in Lindale, Mineola and Smith County, Texas, for the construction of a new poultry processing complex. The completed complex will consist of a hatchery, feed mill, processing plant and waste water treatment facility. Construction commenced on this project during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017, and initial operations of the completed complex are expected to begin during the first calendar quarter of 2019. The Company estimates the total investment in the complex will be approximately
$200.5 million
. As of January 31, 2018, the Company has spent approximately
$28.3 million
on the project and has entered into commitments related to the new complex totaling approximately
$115.7 million
.
As of January 31, 2018, the Company has outstanding commitments totaling
$26.2 million
related to purchase agreements for future delivery of aircraft. These commitments are expected to be paid as follows:
$22.1 million
during the remainder of fiscal 2018 and
$4.1 million
during fiscal 2019.
Litigation
Between September 2, 2016 and October 13, 2016, Sanderson Farms, Inc. and our subsidiaries were named as defendants, along with 13 other poultry producers and certain of their affiliated companies, in multiple putative class action lawsuits filed by direct and indirect purchasers of broiler chickens in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. The complaints allege that the defendants conspired to unlawfully fix, raise, maintain and stabilize the price of broiler chickens, thereby violating federal and certain states' antitrust laws, and also allege certain related state-law claims. The complaints also allege that the defendants fraudulently concealed the alleged anticompetitive conduct in furtherance of the conspiracy. The complaints seek damages, including treble damages for the antitrust claims, injunctive relief, costs and attorneys’ fees. As detailed below, the court has consolidated all of the direct purchaser complaints into one case, and the indirect purchaser complaints into two cases, one on behalf of commercial and institutional indirect purchaser plaintiffs and one on behalf of end-user consumer plaintiffs.
On October 28, 2016, the direct and indirect purchaser plaintiffs filed consolidated, amended complaints, and on November 23, 2016, the direct and indirect purchaser plaintiffs filed second amended complaints. On December 16, 2016, the indirect purchaser plaintiffs separated into two cases. On that date, the commercial and institutional indirect purchaser plaintiffs filed a third amended complaint, and the end-user consumer plaintiffs filed an amended complaint. On January 27, 2017, the defendants filed motions to dismiss the amended complaints in all of the cases, and on November 20, 2017, the motions to dismiss were denied. On February 7, 2018, the direct purchaser plaintiffs filed their third amended complaint, adding three additional poultry producers as defendants. On February 12, 2018, the end-user consumer plaintiffs filed their second amended complaint, in which they also added three additional poultry producers as defendants, along with Agri Stats. On February 15, 2018, the commercial indirect purchaser plaintiffs filed a motion for leave to file their fourth amended complaint. The Company is awaiting a ruling on that motion. The lawsuits will now move into discovery, and we intend to continue to defend them vigorously; however, the Company cannot predict the outcome of these actions. If the plaintiffs were to prevail, the Company could be liable for damages, which could have a material, adverse effect on our financial position and results of operations.
Between December 8, 2017 and January 30, 2018, additional purported direct purchaser entities individually brought four separate suits against 16 poultry producers, including Sanderson Farms, and Agri Stats in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. These suits allege substantially similar claims to the direct purchaser class complaint described above and are now pending in front of the same judge. They are likely to move into discovery on the same or similar timeline as the putative class action lawsuits. It is possible additional individual actions may be filed.
Sanderson Farms, Inc.; Joe F. Sanderson, Jr., the Chairman of the Registrant’s Board of Directors and its Chief Executive Officer; and D. Michael Cockrell, director and Chief Financial Officer, were named as defendants in a putative class action lawsuit filed on October 28, 2016, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. On March 30, 2017, the lead plaintiff filed an amended complaint adding Lampkin Butts, director, Chief Operating Officer, and President, as a defendant, and on June 15, 2017, the lead plaintiff filed a second amended complaint. The complaint alleges that the defendants made statements in the Company's SEC filings and press releases, and other public statements, that were materially false and misleading in light of the Company's alleged, undisclosed violation of the federal antitrust laws described above. The complaint also alleges that the material misstatements were made in order to, among other things, “artificially inflate and maintain the market price of Sanderson Farms securities.” The complaint alleges the defendants thereby violated the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), including Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, and, for the individual defendants, Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act, and seeks damages, interest, costs and attorneys’ fees. On January 19, 2018, the Court granted the defendants' motion to dismiss and entered judgment for the defendants. On January 31, 2018, the plaintiff filed a notice of appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The Company cannot predict the outcome of this action or the appeal. If the plaintiffs were to prevail in the action, the Company could be liable for damages, which could have a material, adverse effect on our financial position and results of operations.
On January 30, 2017, the Company received a letter from a putative shareholder demanding that the Company take action against current and/or former officers and directors of the Company for alleged breach of their fiduciary duties. The shareholder asserted that the officers and directors (i) failed to take any action to stop the alleged antitrust conspiracy described above, despite their alleged knowledge of the conspiracy, and (ii) made and/or caused the Company to make materially false and misleading statements by failing to disclose the alleged conspiracy. The shareholder also asserted that certain directors engaged in “insider sales” from which they improperly benefited. The shareholder also demanded that the Company adopt unspecified corporate governance improvements. On February 9, 2017, pursuant to statutory procedures available in connection with demands of this type, the Company’s board of directors appointed a special committee of qualified directors to determine, after conducting a reasonable inquiry, whether it is in the Company’s best interests to pursue any of the actions asserted in the shareholder’s letter. On April 26, 2017, the special committee reported to the Company’s board of directors its determination that it is not in the Company’s best interests to take any of the demanded actions at this time, and that no governance improvements related to the subject matter of the demand are needed at this time. On May 5, 2017, the special committee’s counsel informed the shareholder’s counsel of the committee’s determination. As of the date of filing of this report, and to the Company’s knowledge, no legal proceedings related to the shareholder’s demand have been filed.
On January 27, 2017, Sanderson Farms, Inc. and our subsidiaries were named as defendants, along with four other poultry producers and certain of their affiliated companies, in a putative class action lawsuit filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma. On March 27, 2017, Sanderson Farms, Inc. and our subsidiaries were named as defendants, along with four other poultry producers and certain of their affiliated companies, in a second putative class action lawsuit filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma. The court ordered the suits consolidated into one proceeding, and on July 10, 2017, the plaintiffs filed a consolidated amended complaint. The consolidated amended complaint alleges that the defendants unlawfully conspired by sharing data on compensation paid to broiler farmers, with the purpose and effect of suppressing the farmers’ compensation below competitive levels. The consolidated amended complaint also alleges that the defendants unlawfully conspired to not solicit or hire the broiler farmers who were providing services to other defendants. The consolidated amended complaint seeks treble damages, costs and attorneys’ fees. On September 8, 2017, the defendants filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint, on October 23, 2017, the plaintiffs filed their response, and on November 22, 2017, the defendants filed a reply. On January 19, 2018, the Court granted the defendants' motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. On February 2, 2018, the plaintiffs filed a letter with the Court stating their intention to file a substantially similar complaint against Sanderson Farms in a judicial district in which both personal jurisdiction and venue would be proper. Should the plaintiffs file another complaint, we intend to defend it vigorously; however, the Company cannot predict the outcome of this action. If the plaintiffs were to prevail, the Company could be liable for damages, which could have a material, adverse effect on our financial position and results of operations.
On February 21, 2017, Sanderson Farms, Inc. received an antitrust civil investigative demand from the Office of the Attorney General, Department of Legal Affairs, of the State of Florida. Among other things, the demand seeks information related to the Georgia Dock Index and other information on poultry and poultry products published by the Georgia Department of Agriculture and its Poultry Market News division. The Company is cooperating fully with the investigative demand, and we are unable to predict its outcome at this time.
On June 22, 2017, the Company was named as a defendant in a lawsuit filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The complaint, which was brought by three non-profit organizations (the Organic Consumers Association, Friends of the Earth, and Center for Food Safety) alleged that the Company is violating the California Unfair
Competition Law and the California False Advertising Law by representing that its poultry products are “100% Natural” products raised with “100% Natural” farming procedures. Among other things, the plaintiffs alleged that the Company’s products contain residues of human and animal antibiotics, other pharmaceuticals, hormones, steroids, and pesticides. Plaintiffs seek an order enjoining the Company from continuing its allegedly unlawful marketing program and requiring the Company to conduct a corrective advertising campaign; an accounting of the Company’s profits derived from the allegedly unlawful marketing practices; and attorneys’ fees, costs and interest. On August 2, 2017, the Company moved to dismiss the lawsuit on various grounds. On August 23, 2017, the plaintiffs filed an amended complaint, which includes substantially similar allegations as the original complaint, and the Company filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint on September 13, 2017. On February 9, 2018, the Court denied the Company's motion to dismiss. On February 13, 2018, the Company filed a motion for sanctions under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11 on the basis that Plaintiffs and their counsel knowingly included false or inaccurate statements and unsupported allegations in their complaints and other filings. The Company is awaiting a ruling on that motion. An initial scheduling conference is currently scheduled for March 1, 2018. The lawsuit is in its early stages, and we intend to defend it vigorously; however, the Company cannot predict the outcome of this action. If the plaintiffs were to prevail, the Company's reputation and marketing program could be materially, adversely affected.
The Company is involved in various other claims and litigation incidental to its business. Although the outcome of these matters cannot be determined with certainty, management, upon the advice of counsel, is of the opinion that the final outcome of currently pending matters, other than those discussed above, should not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated results of operations or financial position.
The Company recognizes the costs of legal defense for the legal proceedings to which it is a party in the periods incurred. After a considerable analysis of each case, the Company has determined that no accrual is required for any of the foregoing matters as of January 31, 2018. Future reserves may be required if losses are deemed reasonably estimable and probable due to changes in the Company’s assumptions, the effectiveness of legal strategies, or other factors beyond the Company’s control. Future results of operations may be materially affected by the creation of reserves or by accruals of losses to reflect any adverse determinations in these legal proceedings.
NOTE 7—CREDIT AGREEMENT
The Company is a party to a revolving credit facility dated April 28, 2017, as amended on November 22, 2017, with a maximum available borrowing capacity of
$900.0 million
. The facility has annual capital expenditure limitations of
$105.0 million
,
$110.0 million
,
$115.0 million
,
$120.0 million
and
$125.0 million
for fiscal years 2018 through 2022, respectively, and permits up to
$20.0 million
of the unused capital expenditure limitation for any fiscal year starting with fiscal 2017 to be carried over to the next fiscal year. The normal capital expenditure limitation for fiscal 2018 is
$125.0 million
, including
$20.0 million
carried over from fiscal 2017.
The credit facility also permits capital expenditures up to
$200.5
million on the construction of a new poultry processing complex in Lindale, Mineola and Smith County, Texas, up to
$210.0 million
on the construction of a potential additional new poultry complex, up to
$15.0 million
on expansion of the Company's existing prepared chicken facility in Flowood, Mississippi, up to
$60.0 million
on a potential new prepared chicken facility, and up to
$70.0 million
on the purchase of
three
new aircraft. As amended on November 22, 2017, the facility also excludes from the normal capital expenditure limits certain capital projects in an aggregate amount of up to
$135.0 million
. These additional projects, which include the construction of a new feed mill, and other expansions, equipment and changes to the Laurel, Collins, McComb and Hazlehurst, Mississippi complexes; the Waco, Palestine and Brazos, Texas complexes; the Moultrie, Georgia complex; and the Kinston, North Carolina complex, are each subject to their own expenditure limitations.
Under the credit facility, the Company may not exceed a maximum debt to total capitalization ratio of
50%
. The Company has a one-time right, at any time during the term of the agreement, to increase the maximum debt to total capitalization ratio then in effect by
five percentage points
in connection with the construction of any of the three aforementioned new complexes for the four fiscal quarters beginning on the first day of the fiscal quarter during which the Company gives written notice of its intent to exercise this right. The Company has not exercised this right. The facility also sets a minimum net worth requirement that at January 31, 2018, was
$1,007.2 million
. The credit is unsecured and, unless extended, will expire on
April 28, 2022
. As of January 31 and February 20, 2018, the Company had
no
outstanding draws under the facility, and had approximately
$23.5 million
outstanding in letters of credit, leaving
$876.5 million
of borrowing capacity available under the facility.
NOTE 8—INCOME TAXES
On December 22, 2017, President Trump signed the "Tax Cut and Jobs Act" (the "Tax Act") into law. The provisions of the Tax Act that will materially affect our fiscal years 2018 and thereafter include, but are not limited to, a reduction in the corporate federal income tax rate from 35% to 21% and a change in the bonus depreciation rules to allow full expensing of qualified property in the year placed in service. Provisions of the Tax Act that will not affect our fiscal year 2018, but could materially affect our fiscal years 2019 and thereafter include, but are not limited to, a lower tax rate on foreign-derived intangible income, the repeal of the domestic production activities deduction and changes to the rules regarding the deductibility of excessive employee remuneration for certain employees.
Our financial statements for the first quarter of fiscal 2018 were materially affected by the changes enacted by the Tax Act to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. U.S. GAAP requires that the effects from changes in tax laws be recognized in the period in which the new law is enacted, which for the Tax Act is our first quarter of fiscal 2018. For fiscal 2018, our statutory federal income tax rate will decrease from the previously enacted 35% to approximately
23.3%
. The fiscal 2018 statutory rate will not decrease entirely to 21%, because it is a blended rate of two months at 35% (before the Tax Act became effective) and ten months at 21% (after the Tax Act became effective). In addition to benefiting from the lower corporate federal income tax rate on current earnings, the Company recorded a tax benefit in accordance with U.S. GAAP related to the revaluation of its deferred tax assets and liabilities using the enacted tax rate expected to apply when the temporary differences from which the deferred taxes arose are expected to be settled.
Following the enactment of the Tax Act, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission issued guidance in Staff Accounting Bulletin 118 which provides the Company up to a one-year measurement period, beginning on the Tax Act's enactment date, in which to complete the required analysis and accounting for the effects of the Tax Act. The guidance allows the Company to record provisional adjustments related to the impacts of the Tax Act when the accounting for the effects of the Tax Act is incomplete, but when reasonable estimates can be made regarding the effects of the Tax Act. Our accounting for the Tax Act is not complete, because it required the Company to estimate the timing of settlement of the temporary differences from which our deferred taxes arose; however, we were able to make reasonable estimates, and we recorded those estimates as provisional adjustments as described in the paragraph below. The Company will continue to monitor these estimates as we move through the measurement period. If any adjustments to the provisional amounts are required, those adjustments will be recorded in the period such new information becomes available.
The Company's effective tax rate for the first quarter of fiscal 2018 was
(198.23)%
, as compared to
32.61%
for the first quarter of fiscal 2017. The revaluation of our deferred taxes using the newly enacted tax rate resulted in a
$37.5 million
income tax benefit, or an approximately
(218.4)%
impact to the effective tax rate for the first quarter of fiscal 2018. Additionally, the effective tax rates for the first quarter of fiscal 2018 and 2017, respectively, include approximately
(4.2)%
and
(2.4)%
favorable impacts related to excess tax benefits from share-based payments to employees. Excluding the impacts of the deferred tax revaluation and the excess tax benefits, the Company's effective tax rates for the first quarter of fiscal 2018 and 2017 would have been approximately
24.4%
and
35.0%
, respectively.
REVIEW REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Sanderson Farms, Inc.
We have reviewed the condensed consolidated balance sheet of Sanderson Farms, Inc. and subsidiaries as of
January 31, 2018
, and the related condensed consolidated statements of operations and cash flows for the
three
-month periods ended
January 31, 2018
and
2017
. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management.
We conducted our review in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.
Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the condensed consolidated financial statements referred to above for them to be in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We have previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet of Sanderson Farms, Inc. and subsidiaries as of
October 31, 2017
, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the year then ended not presented herein and we expressed an unqualified audit opinion on those consolidated financial statements in our report dated December 14, 2017. In our opinion, the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet of Sanderson Farms, Inc. and subsidiaries as of
October 31, 2017
, is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
New Orleans, Louisiana
February 21, 2018
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
General
The following Discussion and Analysis should be read in conjunction with Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in Item 7 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for its fiscal year ended
October 31, 2017
.
This Quarterly Report, and other periodic reports filed by the Company under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), and other written or oral statements made by it or on its behalf, may include forward-looking statements within the meaning of the "Safe Harbor" provisions of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Exchange Act. These forward-looking statements are based on a number of assumptions about future events and are subject to various risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from the views, beliefs and estimates expressed in such statements. These risks, uncertainties and other factors include, but are not limited to, the risks described in the "Risk Factors" section of our latest 10-K and 10-Q reports, and to the following:
(1)
Changes in the market price for the Company’s finished products and feed grains, both of which may fluctuate substantially and exhibit cyclical characteristics typically associated with commodity markets.
(2)
Changes in economic and business conditions, monetary and fiscal policies or the amount of growth, stagnation or recession in the global or U.S. economies, any of which may affect the value of inventories, the collectability of accounts receivable or the financial integrity of customers, and the ability of the end user or consumer to afford protein.
(3)
Changes in the political or economic climate, trade policies, laws and regulations or the domestic poultry industry of countries to which the Company or other companies in the poultry industry ship product, and other changes that might limit the Company’s or the industry’s access to foreign markets.
(4)
Changes in laws, regulations, and other activities in government agencies and similar organizations applicable to the Company and the poultry industry and changes in laws, regulations and other activities in government agencies and similar organizations related to food safety.
(5)
Various inventory risks due to changes in market conditions, including, but not limited to, the risk that market values of live and processed poultry inventories might be lower than the cost of such inventories, requiring a downward adjustment to record the value of such inventories at the lower of cost or market value as required by generally accepted accounting principles.
(6)
Changes in and effects of competition, which is significant in all markets in which the Company competes, and the effectiveness of marketing and advertising programs. The Company competes with regional and national firms, some of which have greater financial and marketing resources than the Company.
(7)
Changes in accounting policies and practices adopted voluntarily by the Company or required to be adopted by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
(8)
Disease outbreaks affecting the production, performance and/or marketability of the Company’s poultry products, or the contamination of its products.
(9)
Changes in the availability and cost of labor and growers.
(10)
The loss of any of the Company’s major customers.
(11)
Inclement weather that could hurt Company flocks or otherwise adversely affect its operations, or changes in global weather patterns that could affect the supply and price of feed grains.
(12)
Failure to respond to changing consumer preferences and negative or competitive media campaigns.
(13)
Failure to successfully and efficiently start up and run a new plant or integrate any business the Company might acquire.
(14)
Unfavorable results from currently pending litigation and proceedings, or litigation and proceedings that could arise in the future.
Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements made by or on behalf of Sanderson Farms. Each such statement speaks only as of the day it was made. The Company undertakes no obligation to update or to revise any forward-looking statements. The factors described above cannot be controlled by the Company. When used in this report, the words “believes,” “estimates,” “plans,” “expects,” “should,” “outlook,” and “anticipates” and similar expressions as they relate to the Company or its management are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Examples of forward-looking statements include statements about management’s beliefs about future growth plans, future earnings, production levels, capital expenditures, grain prices, global economic conditions, supply and demand factors and other industry conditions.
GENERAL
The Company’s poultry operations are integrated through its control of all functions relative to the production of its chicken products, including hatching egg production, hatching, feed manufacturing, raising chickens to marketable age (“grow out”), processing, marketing and distribution. The Company’s prepared chicken product line includes approximately 95 institutional and consumer packaged chicken items that it sells nationally, primarily to distributors and food service establishments. A majority of the prepared chicken items are made to the specifications of food service users.
Consistent with the poultry industry, the Company’s profitability is substantially affected by the market prices for its finished products and feed grains, both of which may fluctuate substantially and exhibit cyclical characteristics typically associated with commodity markets. Other costs, excluding feed grains, related to the profitability of the Company’s poultry operations, including hatching egg production, hatching, growing, and processing cost, are responsive to efficient cost containment programs and management practices.
In February 2015, the Company began initial operations at a new poultry processing complex in Palestine, Texas. The complex consists of a feed mill, hatchery, poultry processing plant and wastewater facility with the capacity to process 1.25 million chickens per week. The facility reached full capacity during fiscal 2016.
In March 2015, the Company announced the selection of St. Pauls and Robeson County, North Carolina, for the construction of a new poultry processing complex. The completed complex consists of a hatchery, processing plant, waste water treatment facility with the capacity to process 1.25 million chickens per week, and an expansion of the Company's existing feed mill in Kinston, North Carolina. Construction began in July 2015, initial operations of the new complex began during the first quarter of fiscal 2017, and the facility reached near full capacity during January 2018. The Company expects the facility will reach full capacity during April 2018. During the
first
quarter of fiscal
2018
, the St. Pauls processing plant processed approximately 122.7
million pounds of dressed poultry meat, as compared to 4.0 million pounds during the
first
quarter of fiscal
2017
.
In March 2017, the Company announced the selection of sites in Lindale, Mineola and Smith County, Texas, for the construction of a new poultry processing complex. The completed complex will consist of a hatchery, feed mill, processing plant and waste water treatment facility with the capacity to process 1.25 million chickens per week. We are in the early stages of construction, and initial operations of the new complex are expected to begin during the first calendar quarter of 2019. Before the complex can become operational, we will need to obtain the necessary licenses and permits, enter into construction contracts, enter into contracts with a sufficient number of independent contract poultry producers to house the live inventory and hire and train our workforce. See "The construction and potential benefits of our new facilities are subject to risks and uncertainties" in the Risk Factors section of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2017.
The Company is a party to a revolving credit facility dated April 28, 2017, as amended on November 22, 2017, with a maximum available borrowing capacity of
$900.0 million
. The facility has annual capital expenditure limitations of
$105.0 million
,
$110.0 million
,
$115.0 million
,
$120.0 million
and
$125.0 million
for fiscal years 2018 through 2022, respectively, and permits up to
$20.0 million
of the unused capital expenditure limitation for any fiscal year starting with fiscal 2017 to be carried over to the next fiscal year. The normal capital expenditure limitation for fiscal 2018 is
$125.0 million
, including
$20.0 million
carried over from fiscal 2017.
The credit facility also permits capital expenditures up to
$200.5
million on the construction of a new poultry processing complex in Lindale, Mineola and Smith County, Texas, up to
$210.0 million
on the construction of a potential additional new poultry complex, up to
$15.0 million
on expansion of the Company's existing prepared chicken facility in Flowood, Mississippi, up to
$60.0 million
on a potential new prepared chicken facility, and up to
$70.0 million
on the purchase of three new aircraft. As amended on November 22, 2017, the facility also excludes from the normal capital expenditure limits certain capital projects in an aggregate amount of up to
$135.0 million
. These additional projects, which include the construction of a new feed mill, and other expansions, equipment and changes to the Laurel, Collins, McComb and Hazlehurst, Mississippi complexes; the Waco, Palestine and Brazos, Texas complexes; the Moultrie, Georgia complex; and the Kinston, North Carolina complex, are each subject to their own expenditure limitations.
Under the credit facility, the Company may not exceed a maximum debt to total capitalization ratio of
50%
. The Company has a one-time right, at any time during the term of the agreement, to increase the maximum debt to total capitalization ratio then in effect by
five percentage points
in connection with the construction of any of the three aforementioned new complexes for the four fiscal quarters beginning on the first day of the fiscal quarter during which the Company gives written notice of its intent to exercise this right. The Company has not exercised this right. The facility also sets a minimum net worth requirement that at January 31, 2018, was
$1,007.2 million
. The credit is unsecured and, unless extended, will expire on
April 28, 2022
. As of January 31 and February 20, 2018, the Company had
no
outstanding draws under the facility, and had approximately
$23.5 million
outstanding in letters of credit, leaving
$876.5 million
of borrowing capacity available under the facility. For more information about the facility, see Item 1.01 of our Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 4, 2017, and Item 1.01 of our Current Report on Form 8-K filed November 29, 2017, which are incorporated herein by reference.
EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW OF RESULTS
The Company's margins decreased during the first quarter of fiscal 2018 when compared to the same period a year ago, reflecting lower average sales prices and higher average costs of good sold. Our lower average sales prices reflect a mix of lower market prices for products sold to food service customers, higher market prices for products sold to export customers and stable market prices for products sold to retail grocery store customers. Our higher average costs of goods sold reflect a decrease in feed costs per pound of chicken processed, which was more than offset by an increase in other costs of goods sold, details of which are described in more detail in the "Results of Operations" section below.
Market prices for corn were slightly higher and for soybean meal were slightly lower during the first quarter of fiscal 2018 as compared to the same period a year ago. This combination, along with improved broiler performance, resulted in a decrease in our average feed cost in broiler flocks processed of
1.9%
, as compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2017. We have priced a portion of our grain needs through the second quarter of fiscal 2018. Both corn and soybean balance tables are healthy as we head into the 2018 planting season, but market prices have moved higher over the past several weeks based on weather concerns in Argentina and strong export demand. Had we priced our remaining fiscal 2018 needs at February 19, 2018 cash market prices, our costs of feed grains would be approximately $52.9 million higher during fiscal 2018 as compared to fiscal 2017.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Net sales for the
first
quarter ended
January 31, 2018
were
$771.9 million
as compared to
$688.3 million
for the
first
quarter ended
January 31, 2017
,
an increase
of
$83.6 million
, or
12.1%
. Net sales of poultry products for the
first
quarter ended
January 31, 2018
and
2017
, were
$731.4 million
and
$647.5 million
, respectively,
an increase
of
$83.9 million
, or
13.0%
. The
increase
in net sales of poultry products resulted from a
14.4%
increase
in the pounds of poultry products sold, partially offset by a
1.2%
decrease
in the average sales price of poultry products sold. During the
first
quarter of fiscal
2018
, the Company sold
1,106.0 million
pounds of poultry products, up from
967.2 million
pounds during the
first
quarter of fiscal
2017
. The increased pounds of poultry products sold resulted from a 12.4% increase in the number of head processed and a 1.6% decrease in the average live weight of poultry processed. The new St. Pauls processing facility, which began initial operations in January 2017, processed approximately 14.4 million head during the
first
quarter of fiscal
2018
, or approximately 10.0% of the Company's total head processed during the period, and sold approximately 123.6 million pounds of poultry products during the
first
quarter of fiscal
2018
, or approximately 11.2% of the Company's total poultry pounds sold during the period. By comparison, the St. Pauls facility processed approximately 0.5 million head during the
first
quarter of fiscal
2017
, or approximately 0.4% of the Company's total head processed during the period, and sold approximately 8.8 million pounds of poultry products during the
first
quarter of fiscal
2017
, or approximately 0.9% of the Company's total poultry pounds sold during the period. Overall, market prices for poultry products decreased during the
first
quarter of fiscal
2018
as compared to the same quarter of fiscal
2017
. When compared to the
first
quarter of fiscal
2017
, Urner Barry average market prices for jumbo wings, boneless breast meat and tenders decreased by 9.0%, 2.8% and 1.7%, respectively, while market prices for bulk leg quarters increased by 15.9%. Average market prices for chicken products sold to retail grocery store customers remained relatively strong during the first quarter of fiscal 2018 and continue to reflect good demand. Net sales of prepared chicken products for the
first
quarter ended
January 31, 2018
and
2017
were
$40.5 million
and
$40.8 million
, respectively, or
a decrease
of
0.8%
. This
decrease
resulted from a
0.9%
decrease
in the pounds of prepared chicken products sold, partially offset by a
0.1%
increase
in the average sales price of prepared chicken products sold. During the
first
quarter of fiscal
2018
, the Company sold
20.5 million
pounds of prepared chicken products,
down
from
20.7 million
pounds during the
first
quarter of fiscal
2017
.
Cost of sales for the
first
quarter of fiscal
2018
was
$702.1 million
as compared to
$606.4 million
during the
first
quarter of fiscal
2017
,
an increase
of
$95.7 million
, or
15.8%
. Cost of sales of poultry products during the
first
quarter of fiscal
2018
, as compared to the
first
quarter of fiscal
2017
, was
$666.9 million
and
$571.0 million
, respectively, which represents a
2.1%
increase
in the average cost of sales of poultry products. As illustrated in the table below, which for comparative purposes
includes poultry products sold to the Company's prepared chicken plant, and excludes poultry products processed and sold under our agreement with House of Raeford Farms as described in "Note (2)" to the table, the
increase
in the average cost of sales of poultry products resulted from a
$0.0188
per pound
increase
in other costs of sales of poultry products, partially offset by
a decrease
in the cost of feed per pound of broilers processed of
$0.0047
, or
1.9%
.
Poultry Cost of Sales
(In thousands, except per pound data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter 2018
|
|
First Quarter 2017
|
|
Increase/(Decrease)
|
Description
|
Dollars
|
|
Per lb.
|
|
Dollars
|
|
Per lb.
|
|
Dollars
|
|
Per lb.
|
Beginning Inventory
|
$
|
37,769
|
|
|
$
|
0.4437
|
|
|
$
|
15,378
|
|
|
$
|
0.3397
|
|
|
$
|
22,391
|
|
|
$
|
0.1040
|
|
Feed in broilers processed
|
265,757
|
|
|
0.2446
|
|
|
245,149
|
|
|
0.2493
|
|
|
20,608
|
|
|
(0.0047
|
)
|
All other cost of sales
|
396,050
|
|
|
0.3645
|
|
|
339,972
|
|
|
0.3457
|
|
|
56,078
|
|
|
0.0188
|
|
Less: Ending Inventory
|
31,855
|
|
|
0.4405
|
|
|
21,300
|
|
|
0.3925
|
|
|
10,555
|
|
|
0.0480
|
|
Total poultry cost of sales
|
$
|
667,721
|
|
(1) (2)
|
$
|
0.6077
|
|
|
$
|
579,199
|
|
(1)
|
$
|
0.5947
|
|
|
$
|
88,522
|
|
|
$
|
0.0130
|
|
Pounds:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning Inventory
|
85,120
|
|
|
|
|
45,272
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Poultry processed
|
1,086,434
|
|
(2)
|
|
|
983,400
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Poultry sold
|
1,098,783
|
|
(1) (2)
|
|
|
973,874
|
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending Inventory
|
72,322
|
|
|
|
|
54,273
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note (1) - For comparative purposes, includes the costs and pounds of product sold to the Company's prepared chicken plant.
Note (2) -
On April 17, 2017, the Company announced that it had agreed to process chickens grown by House of Raeford Farms at the Company's processing facility located in St. Pauls, North Carolina. House of Raeford Farms, a private company headquartered in Rose Hill, North Carolina, operates poultry grow-out operations and processing facilities in four southeastern states. The House of Raeford Farms Teachey, North Carolina, facility was severely damaged by a fire in late February 2017. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company purchased, processed and sold chickens grown by House of Raeford Farms through mid-December 2017. During the first quarter of fiscal 2018, the Company processed and sold approximately 14.2 million pounds as a result of this agreement. For comparative purposes, those pounds and the associated direct and indirect costs have been excluded from the data set forth in this table.
Other costs of sales of poultry products include labor, contract grower pay, packaging, freight and certain fixed costs, among other costs. These non-feed related costs of poultry products sold
increased
by
$0.0188
per pound processed, or
5.4%
, during this year’s
first
fiscal quarter compared to the same quarter a year ago, primarily attributable to higher labor, freight and fixed costs across our operations, partially offset by efficiencies realized at the Company's St. Pauls, North Carolina facilities, which were in the early stages of initial operations during the first quarter of fiscal 2017 and operating at near full capacity during the first quarter of fiscal 2018. Excluding St. Pauls, other costs of sales would have increased by $0.0264 per pound processed, or 7.7%.
Costs of sales of the Company’s prepared chicken products during the
first
quarter of fiscal
2018
were
$35.2 million
as compared to
$35.4 million
during the same quarter a year ago,
a decrease
of $0.2 million, or
0.4%
, primarily attributable to a
0.9%
decrease
in the pounds of prepared chicken sold and a 3.1% decrease in the costs per pound of raw material purchases, partially offset by a 12.9% increase in processing costs per pound. The increase in processing costs per pound is primarily attributable to a 4.5% decrease in the Company's prepared chicken pounds processed compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2017.
The Company recorded the value of live broiler inventories on hand at
January 31, 2018
at cost. When market conditions are favorable, the Company values the broiler inventories on hand at cost, and accumulates costs as the birds are grown to a marketable age subsequent to the balance sheet date. In periods where the Company estimates that the cost to grow live birds in inventory to a marketable age, process, and distribute those birds will be higher in the aggregate than the anticipated sales price, the Company will make an adjustment to lower the value of live birds in inventory to the market value. No such charge was required at
January 31, 2018
or
January 31, 2017
.
Selling, general and administrative ("SG&A") costs during the
three
months ended
January 31, 2018
were
$52.6 million
,
an increase
of
$6.5
million compared to the
$46.1
million during the
three
months ended
January 31, 2017
. The following table includes the components of SG&A costs for the
three
months ended
January 31, 2018
and
2017
.
Selling, General and Administrative Costs
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Description
|
Three Months Ended January 31, 2018
|
|
Three Months Ended January 31, 2017
|
|
Increase/(Decrease)
|
Trainee expense
|
$
|
5,189
|
|
|
$
|
3,312
|
|
|
$
|
1,877
|
|
Administrative salaries
|
10,210
|
|
|
8,467
|
|
|
1,743
|
|
Legal expense
|
2,592
|
|
|
1,556
|
|
|
1,036
|
|
Start-up expense (Tyler)
|
846
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
846
|
|
Stock compensation expense
|
6,051
|
|
|
5,607
|
|
|
444
|
|
Advertising expense
|
8,774
|
|
|
8,734
|
|
|
40
|
|
Start-up expense (St. Pauls)
|
—
|
|
|
4,022
|
|
|
(4,022
|
)
|
All other S,G & A
|
18,913
|
|
|
14,372
|
|
|
4,541
|
|
Total S,G & A
|
$
|
52,575
|
|
|
$
|
46,070
|
|
|
$
|
6,505
|
|
The increases in trainee expense and administrative salaries are primarily attributable to increases in personnel that coincide with the Company's current and future growth plans, as well as wage increases. The increase in legal expense is primarily attributable to our ongoing defense of the litigation described in "Part II. Other Information, Item 1. Legal Proceedings" of this Form 10-Q. The change in start-up expense in any particular period relates to the stage of the start-up process in which a facility under construction is in during the period. Non-construction related expenses, such as labor, training and office-related expenses for a facility under construction are recorded as start-up expense until the facility begins operations. As a facility moves closer to start-up, the expenses incurred for labor, training, etc. increase. As a result, amounts classified as start-up expenses will increase period over period until the facility begins production. Once production begins, the expenses from that point forward are recorded as costs of goods sold. The increase in all other SG&A expenses is the result of a net increase in various other categories of SG&A costs.
The Company’s operating
income
for the
three
months ended
January 31, 2018
was
$17.3 million
, as compared to operating
income
for the
three
months ended
January 31, 2017
of
$35.9 million
. The decrease in operating income for the three months ended
January 31, 2018
, as compared to the same period a year ago, resulted primarily from a 1.7% decrease in average selling prices per pound and a 1.6% increase in average costs of goods sold per pound, partially offset by a 14.0% increase in pounds sold.
Interest income during the
first
quarter of fiscal
2018
was
$0.4 million
, as compared to
$0.2 million
during the same period a year ago. Interest expense during the
first
quarter of fiscal
2018
was
$0.5 million
, as compared to
$0.4 million
during the same period a year ago.
The Company’s effective tax rate for the
three
months ended
January 31, 2018
was
(198.2)%
, as compared to
32.6%
for the
three
months ended
January 31, 2017
. As described in our financial statement footnote "Note 8 - Income Taxes," the revaluation of our deferred taxes using the newly enacted tax rate resulted in a $37.5 million discrete income tax benefit, or an approximately (218.4)% impact to the effective tax rate for the first quarter of fiscal 2018. Additionally, the effective tax rates for the first quarter of fiscal 2018 and 2017, respectively, include approximately (4.2)% and (2.4)% favorable discrete impacts related to excess tax benefits from share-based payments to employees. Excluding the impacts of these discrete items, the Company's effective tax rates for the first quarter of fiscal 2018 and 2017 would have been approximately 24.4% and 35.0%, respectively. The Company estimates its effective tax rate for the full fiscal 2018 will be approximately 24.4%.
As of
January 31, 2018
, the Company's long-term deferred income tax liability was $57.9 million as compared to $91.9 million at
October 31, 2017
, a decrease of $34.0 million. This decrease is attributable to the revaluation of our deferred tax assets and liabilities, as U.S. GAAP requires that deferred tax assets and liabilities be measured using the enacted tax rate expected to apply when the temporary differences from which the deferred taxes arose are expected to be settled. Prior to the enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, our deferred taxes were measured using the enacted 35% federal income tax statutory rate. Following enactment, we remeasured our deferred taxes using a 23.3% blended federal income tax statutory rate for temporary differences expected to reverse in fiscal 2018 and a 21% federal income tax statutory rate for temporary differences expected to reverse after fiscal 2018.
During the
three
months ended
January 31, 2018
, the Company’s net
income
was
$51.2 million
, or
$2.24
per share. Excluding the $37.5 million discrete income tax benefit for the revaluation of deferred income taxes, net income for the three months ended January 31, 2018 would have been $13.7 million, or $0.60 per share. For the
three
months ended
January 31, 2017
, the Company’s net income was
$24.0 million
, or
$1.06
per share.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The Company’s working capital, calculated by subtracting current liabilities from current assets, at
January 31, 2018
was
$644.0 million
, and its current ratio, calculated by dividing current assets by current liabilities, was
4.7
to 1. The Company’s working capital and current ratio at
October 31, 2017
were
$650.8 million
and
4.3
to 1. These measures reflect the Company’s ability to meet its short term obligations and are included here as a measure of the Company’s short term market liquidity. The Company’s principal sources of liquidity during fiscal
2018
include cash on hand at
October 31, 2017
, cash flows from operations, and funds available under the Company’s revolving credit facility. As described below, the Company is a party to a revolving credit facility dated April 28, 2017, with a maximum available borrowing capacity of $900.0 million. As of
January 31,
and
February 19, 2018
, the Company had no outstanding draws under the facility and had approximately
$23.5 million
outstanding in letters of credit, leaving
$876.5 million
of borrowing capacity available under the facility.
The Company’s cash position at
January 31, 2018
and
October 31, 2017
consisted of
$388.9 million
and
$419.3 million
, respectively, in cash and short-term cash investments. The Company’s ability to invest cash is limited by covenants in its revolving credit agreement to short term investments. All of the Company’s cash at
January 31, 2018
and
October 31, 2017
was held in bank accounts and highly-liquid investment accounts. There were no restrictions on the Company’s access to its cash, and such cash was available to the Company on demand to fund its operations.
Cash flows provided by operating activities during the
three
months ended
January 31, 2018
and
2017
, were
$25.0 million
and
$39.5 million
, respectively. Cash flows from operating activities
decreased
by
$14.5 million
, resulting primarily from an increase in cash bonuses paid by the Company, which were approximately $36.0 million during the first quarter of 2018, as compared to $0.4 million during the first quarter of 2017, partially offset by a decrease in cash paid for income taxes. During the first quarter of 2017, the Company paid approximately $19.9 million in income taxes, but did not pay any income taxes during the first quarter of 2018.
Cash flows used in investing activities during the first
three
months of fiscal
2018
and
2017
were
$51.2 million
and
$46.0 million
, respectively. The Company’s capital expenditures during the first
three
months of fiscal
2018
were approximately
$51.7 million
, and included approximately $15.0 million related to construction at the Tyler, Texas complex, and $10.0 million related to progress payments made under purchase agreements for future delivery of new aircraft as described below. Capital expenditures for the first
three
months of fiscal
2017
were
$46.3 million
, including approximately $14.0 million related to progress payments made under the aircraft purchase agreements, and approximately $11.7 million related to construction at the St. Pauls, North Carolina complex.
Cash flows used in financing activities during the
three
months ended
January 31, 2018
and
2017
were
$4.2 million
and
$1.8 million
, respectively. The Company made no change to the net outstanding borrowings under its revolving credit facility in either of the comparative periods.
As of February 18, 2018, the Company’s capital budget for fiscal
2018
, excluding operating leases, is expected to be approximately $345.6 million. The Company expects the
2018
capital budget to be funded by internally generated working capital, cash flows from operations and, as needed, funds available under the Company's revolving credit facility. The Company had
$876.5 million
available under the revolving line of credit at
January 31, 2018
. The fiscal
2018
capital budget includes approximately $178.0 million for construction of the Company's new Tyler, Texas complex, approximately $32.2 million for progress payments due under purchase agreements for future delivery of new aircraft as described below, approximately $37.3 million combined for multiple large-scale equipment upgrades and corresponding building upgrades at multiple complexes further described below and approximately $4.2 million to complete the expansion of the Company's existing prepared chicken facility in Flowood, Mississippi. Excluding the budgets for the projects detailed above, the fiscal
2018
capital budget is approximately $93.9 million. These amounts are estimates and are subject to change as we move through fiscal
2018
.
The Company has entered into three separate purchase agreements for three new aircraft to be delivered at different dates during fiscal 2018 and 2019. The new aircraft will replace aircraft currently owned by the Company that are scheduled to be retired and removed from service in the ordinary course of business. The agreements require that the Company make periodic payments, with final payments due upon delivery of each aircraft. To date, the Company has made payments totaling $39.0
million under the agreements, and expects to make payments of approximately $22.2 million during the remainder of fiscal 2018 and approximately $4.0 million during fiscal 2019.
In March 2015, the Company announced the selection of St. Pauls and Robeson County, North Carolina, for the construction of a new poultry processing complex. The completed complex consists of a hatchery, processing plant, waste water treatment facility with the capacity to process 1.25 million chickens per week, and an expansion of the Company's existing feed mill in Kinston, North Carolina. Construction began in July 2015, initial operations of the new complex began during the first quarter of fiscal 2017, and the facility reached near full capacity during January 2018. The Company expects the facility will reach full capacity during April 2018. As of
January 31, 2018
, the Company has spent approximately $163.3 million on the project, of which approximately $1.4 million was spent during the first
three
months of fiscal
2018
.
In March 2017, the Company announced the selection of sites in Lindale, Mineola and Smith County, Texas, for the construction of a new poultry processing complex. The completed complex will consist of a hatchery, feed mill, processing plant and waste water treatment facility with the capacity to process 1.25 million chickens per week. We are in the early stages of construction, and initial operations of the new complex are expected to begin during the first calendar quarter of 2019. Before the complex can become operational, we will need to obtain the necessary licenses and permits, enter into construction contracts, enter into contracts with a sufficient number of independent contract poultry producers to house the live inventory and hire and train our workforce. See "The construction and potential benefits of our new facilities are subject to risks and uncertainties" in the Risk Factors section of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2017.
On October 2, 2017, the Company filed a shelf registration statement on Form S-3 to register for possible future sale shares of the Company's common and/or preferred stock. An indeterminate amount of common stock and preferred stock may be offered by the Company in amounts, at prices and on terms to be determined by the board of directors if and when shares are issued. The registration statement became automatically effective upon filing with the SEC on October 2, 2017.
The Company regularly evaluates both internal and external growth opportunities, including acquisition opportunities and the possible construction of new production assets, and conducts due diligence activities in connection with such opportunities. The cost and terms of any financing to be raised in conjunction with any growth opportunity, including the Company’s ability to raise debt or equity capital on terms and at costs satisfactory to the Company, and the effect of such opportunities on the Company’s balance sheet, are critical considerations in any such evaluation.
Revolving Credit Facility
The Company is a party to a revolving credit facility dated April 28, 2017, as amended on November 22, 2017, with a maximum available borrowing capacity of
$900.0 million
. The facility has annual capital expenditure limitations of
$105.0 million
,
$110.0 million
,
$115.0 million
,
$120.0 million
and
$125.0 million
for fiscal years 2018 through 2022, respectively, and permits up to
$20.0 million
of the unused capital expenditure limitation for any fiscal year starting with fiscal 2017 to be carried over to the next fiscal year. The normal capital expenditure limitation for fiscal 2018 is
$125.0 million
, including
$20.0 million
carried over from fiscal 2017.
The credit facility also permits capital expenditures up to
$200.5
million on the construction of a new poultry processing complex in Lindale, Mineola and Smith County, Texas, up to
$210.0 million
on the construction of a potential additional new poultry complex, up to
$15.0 million
on expansion of the Company's existing prepared chicken facility in Flowood, Mississippi, up to
$60.0 million
on a potential new prepared chicken facility, and up to
$70.0 million
on the purchase of three new aircraft. As amended on November 22, 2017, the facility also excludes from the normal capital expenditure limits certain capital projects in an aggregate amount of up to
$135.0 million
. These additional projects, which include the construction of a new feed mill, and other expansions, equipment and changes to the Laurel, Collins, McComb and Hazlehurst, Mississippi complexes; the Waco, Palestine and Brazos, Texas complexes; the Moultrie, Georgia complex; and the Kinston, North Carolina complex, are each subject to their own expenditure limitations.
Under the credit facility, the Company may not exceed a maximum debt to total capitalization ratio of
50%
. The Company has a one-time right, at any time during the term of the agreement, to increase the maximum debt to total capitalization ratio then in effect by
five percentage points
in connection with the construction of any of the three aforementioned new complexes for the four fiscal quarters beginning on the first day of the fiscal quarter during which the Company gives written notice of its intent to exercise this right. The Company has not exercised this right. The facility also sets a minimum net worth requirement that at January 31, 2018, was
$1,007.2 million
. The credit is unsecured and, unless extended, will expire on
April 28, 2022
. As of January 31 and February 20, 2018, the Company had
no
outstanding draws under the facility, and had approximately
$23.5 million
outstanding in letters of credit, leaving
$876.5 million
of borrowing capacity available under the facility. For more
information about the facility, see Item 1.01 of our Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 4, 2017, and Item 1.01 of our Current Report on Form 8-K filed November 29, 2017, which are incorporated herein by reference.
Critical Accounting Estimates
We consider accounting policies related to allowance for doubtful accounts, inventories, long-lived assets, accrued self-insurance, performance share plans, income taxes and contingencies to be critical accounting estimates. These policies are summarized in Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
October 31, 2017
.
New Accounting Pronouncements
In July 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued guidance that requires an entity to measure inventory at the lower of cost or net realizable value. The guidance is effective for annual reporting periods and interim periods within those annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, our fiscal 2018. The Company adopted this guidance during the first quarter of fiscal 2018, and it did not have a material effect on the Company's consolidated financial statements.
During the third quarter of fiscal 2017, the Company early-adopted Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2016-09, Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting. The provisions of this update that materially affected our consolidated financial statements, or could potentially materially affect them in the future, require all
income tax effects of stock awards to be recognized in the statement of operations during the period the awards vest or are settled, rather than recording excess tax benefits or deficiencies in additional paid-in capital, and require the related amounts to be presented as operating activities on the statement of cash flows, rather than financing activities. During the period of adoption, the standard requires the Company to account for the transactions as if the standard had been adopted on the first day of the fiscal year in which it was adopted. As a result of adoption, our income tax expense for the first quarter of fiscal 2017 was reduced by approximately $852,000 from excess tax benefits attributable to awards that vested during the first quarter of fiscal 2017. As a result, the income tax expense on the statement of operations for the three months ended January 31, 2017 on this Form 10-Q is $852,000 less than the amount originally reported in our financial statements for the first quarter of fiscal 2017. Additionally, excess tax benefits are now presented as operating activities on the statement of cash flows, rather than financing activities. The Company chose to apply that provision retrospectively, and as a result, reclassified the $2.2 million of excess tax benefits originally reported in our financial statements for the first quarter of fiscal 2017 from financing activities to operating activities on the statement of cash flows for the three months ended January 31, 2017 in this Form 10-Q. Additional provisions from this guidance relate to accounting for forfeitures and the presentation of an employee's use of shares to satisfy the employer's statutory tax withholding obligations. Adoption of those two provisions did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements. The Company has elected to account for forfeitures as they occur, rather than estimating forfeitures when determining the amount of compensation cost to recognize each period. The Company will continue to present employees' use of shares to satisfy our statutory withholding obligations as financing activities on the statement of cash flows.
In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-09, Scope of Modification Accounting, which amends the requirements related to accounting for changes to stock compensation awards. The guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, our fiscal 2019. Early adoption is permitted. The impact this guidance will have on our consolidated financial statements will depend on the nature and extent of future changes, if any, to the terms and conditions of the Company's Stock Incentive Plan.
In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-07, Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Post-retirement Benefit Cost. The guidance requires the service cost component of defined benefit pension plans and other post-retirement benefit plans to be reported in the same line item or items as other compensation costs arising from the services rendered by the pertinent employees during the period. The other components of net benefit cost are required to be reported outside of operating income. The guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, our fiscal 2019. Early adoption is permitted. We do not expect adoption to have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.
In February 2016, the FASB issued guidance which is intended to increase transparency and comparability among companies by requiring an entity that is a lessee to recognize on the balance sheet the right-of-use assets and lease liabilities arising from all leases with terms, as defined by the guidance, of greater than twelve months. The guidance also requires disclosures of key information about the leasing arrangements. The guidance is effective for annual reporting periods and interim periods within those annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018, our fiscal 2020. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact this guidance will have on our consolidated financial statements.
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which changes the criteria for recognizing revenue. ASU 2014-09 was amended by ASU 2015-14 to defer the effective date by one year. The guidance also modifies the related disclosure requirements, clarifies guidance for multiple-element arrangements and provides guidance for transactions that were not addressed fully in previous guidance. The guidance, as amended, is effective for annual reporting periods and interim periods within those annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, our fiscal 2019. Early adoption is permitted for annual reporting periods and interim periods within those annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. Companies have the option to adopt retrospectively or modified retrospectively with a cumulative effect adjustment. The Company expects to adopt this standard as of November 1, 2018, the beginning of our fiscal 2019, using the modified retrospective approach. The Company is currently evaluating the impact this guidance will have on our consolidated financial statements. Although we are still evaluating the impact, we do not currently expect adoption to have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements, other than additional disclosure requirements.