CTR Investments and Consulting Inc New (PK) (CIVX) Share Price

Just need to wait it out

Patience pays!!

This thing is always thin just no substance yet. 🚀

Goodies coming here

Go $CIVX

Yes very clean. Our turn will come

clean trading thin trip play

Yeah we’ll get those mass buy orders once substantial merger news is announced

lol will find out soon. I think this has huge potential

Excellent buy

.0007s filled. I'm good 🚀

F bid whackers. Hope it runs tomorrow after they sold today

We will see 🤞

I'm thinking he got some kind of update soon

On watch for Epic updates. Ready for the buying rush 🚀

Loading for the epic weeks to come ⏳

100% agree. Getting closer each day

Look really thin one update it going to pop

he is helping his boy BUYHISELLLO who gets biatched slapped daily

It's not in violation of anything. You are clearly a low IQ idiot. It's Pink Current and fully compliant. Now we get the assets to make this move up bigtime.

Dude... Save your breath

Holding for then golden

Yes seems like it

Big merger in works

CIVX is in violation of FINRA Rule 6490

That's a lie.

The SEC accepted their shell request in 2023 indicating the SEC accepted the Reverse Merger.

A shell company is defined as follows: Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 defines a shell company as a company that has: (A) no or nominal operations; and, (B) either, (1) no or nominal assets: (2) assets consisting solely of cash and cash equivalents; or, (C) assets consisting of any amount of cash and cash equivalents and nominal other assets. The Company believes that it is no longer a shell company

Corporate Action Reverse Merger:
A unique variation is the reverse merger, where a privately held company acquires a publicly traded company, generally one that's struggling. Through this transaction, the private company essentially becomes public, sidestepping the cumbersome process of undertaking an initial public offering. Afterward, it may rebrand itself **and** **issue new shares.**

ISSUE NEW SHARES:
CIVX diluted 80M shares in 2023 before the owner passed away indicating new shares were issued.

Therefore a corporate action tooK place.

FINRA clearly does not agree CIVX violates rule 6490.

No merger coming for CIVX per SEC/FINRA regulations...no matter what the CEO of a penny stock company pumps in a press release to promote his company.

CIVX is in violation of FINRA Rule 6490 because of its missing financials and all publicly traded stocks need to conform with FINRA Rule 6490.

There is a huge gap of missing financials from 2008 - 2020 which means CIVX is in violation of FINRA Rule 6490 which will prevent CIVX from getting any corporate actions such as a merger approved by SEC/FINRA. The same thing caused GVSI's catastrophic collapse. Look at that ticker as a good example of what will happen here.

https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/CIVX/disclosure



More proof CIVX is a dirty shell and a scam.

HOW FINRA RULE 6490 lMPACTS REVERSE MERGERS

https://www.hg.org/legal-articles/how-finra-rule-6490-lmpacts-reverse-mergers-30567

FINRA Rule 6490, has evolved since it was enacted over two years ago. For some time, FINRA has required that issuers provide expansive disclosures and supporting documentation not only for the corporate change subject to the notice but for the company’s entire corporate history from inception.

These disclosures are required of both SEC reporting and non-reporting issuers if they undertake corporate actions including reverse mergers. Compliance with Rule 6490's requirements is a minor task for companies going public by filing a registration statement with the SEC. Companies filing registration statements rarely have difficulties obtaining DTC eligibility unlike reverse merger issuers.

The public filings of companies who register with the SEC contain most of the supporting documentation required by Rule 6490.

It is no surprise that compliance with the requirements of Rule 6490 is less burdensome for companies going public using a registration statement because these companies have fewer corporate changes in their company history than companies engaging in reverse mergers. This is especially true for reverse merger issuers who undergo multiple changes of control and periods of inactivity.

The Problem with Reverse Mergers & Disclosure under Rule 6490

For companies that engage in reverse mergers as part of their going public transaction, compliance with Rule 6490's requirements can be impossible particularly when custodianship or receivership actions have been used by shell brokers to create public shells after years of inactivity. These companies may have multiple corporate actions related to prior changes of control and often have sketchy corporate histories. Some have even been hijacked through custodianship or receivership actions. In these circumstances, documents may be unavailable or if provided to FINRA, it could potentially result in FINRA referring the matter to the SEC’s Division of Enforcement.

These companies are almost always plagued with incomplete or fraudulent corporate records which make it extremely difficult for the post-reverse merger company to comply with FINRA Rule 6490. As a result, these companies may never get FINRA approval of the contemplated corporate action.

Rule 6490 Disclosures

Issuers must provide a cover letter disclosing the full corporate history for the issuer itemizing all material facts including every corporate change that has occurred from inception to present day.

Triggers for Review under FINRA RULE 6490

A FINRA review will be triggered if any of the five factors set forth in Rule 6490 are thought to be present:

• FINRA believes the forms are incomplete, inaccurate or filed without the appropriate corporate authority;

• The issuer is not current in its reporting obligations with the Securities and Exchange Commission;

• Persons involved in or related to the corporate action are the subject of pending or settled regulatory action or are under investigation by a regulatory body or are the subject of a pending criminal action related to fraud or securities law violations;

• Persons related to the corporate action are likely involved in fraudulent activities involving securities or may pose a threat to investors;

• There is significant uncertainty in the settlement and clearance process for the issuer’s securities.

Any company contemplating going public using a reverse merger must consider the potential impact Rule 6490 could have on its future corporate actions. Rule 6490 provides one more compelling reason why private companies seeking to go public should do so using a registration statement instead of a reverse merger.

https://bradshawlawgroup.com/reverse-mergers-a-basic-primer/

Conducting effective due diligence on the shell company is essential, as merging with a “dirty” shell (i.e., a shell whose management failed to follow proper SEC reporting procedures) could prove fatal for the private company.[13] In searching for “clean” shells, private companies should consider the shell’s number of stockholders, reporting record, and how and where it is listed.[14]

Pumpers here are desperate to spread false information so as not to let the truth out.

Cavan has not denied that the company consultant Christopher Martinez - the indicted and FINRA banned ex-broker and financial advisor and consultant is not the consultant for the company.

This scammer has the same name, was a broker before getting banned by FINRA and was/is also a financial advisor and consultant.

Christopher Martinez who is CIVX's "consultant" is a shyster.

Expert Market and .0001 no bid coming soon for this scam.

https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/CIVX/profile





https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://files.brokercheck.finra.org/individual/individual_4072355.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwjA-9CQot6GAxVj4MkDHW3DDx0QFnoECB8QAQ&usg=AOvVaw0PGAqtt2DEJXJ5Q_H6hCAm

It could be few days few weeks or few months before we here from ceo I'm sure some will getting tired of waiting Mable I can pick up cheaper shares

It all depends on what cavan brings into shell

It's a wild gamble at this point. I played so many of these stocks so far. VAYK did nothing and the share price did barely nothing. AXTG went current didn't do anything. LTNC went current and did a huge 2000% run. I hope to see that here.😆 🤣 😂

I'm hoping stay at this price for couple more weeks I love to buy ton of theme 0.0007

Bottom is in. Correction in chart is happening. This is fully compliant Alternate Reporting via OTC Markets Group and is current in Reporting. Watch this run very soon 🚀

Stunning and foolish .. took some 7’s
hope they are out

Issuing new shares is considered a corporate action. CIVX diluted shares therefore issuing new shares.

It's right there in my post. Lol. Didn't you read it?

"I know my goal is attainable"

-Cavan Carlson

I trust our CEO.

HOLDING AND ADDING!!!

$CIVX

The SEC accepted their shell request in 2023 indicating the SEC accepted the Reverse Merger.
Indicating? LOL!!!

A shell dedignation change is not a corporate action which needs SEC approval, you ignorant, lying pumper.

Still waiting for verifiable documentation from you about the SEC merger corporate action approval for CIVX.

An SEC corporate action approval for a merger will never happen because of CIVX's 14 years of missing financials.CIVX is a regulatory disaster because of this.

More proof CIVX is a dirty shell and a scam:

https://www.hg.org/legal-articles/how-finra-rule-6490-lmpacts-reverse-mergers-30567

HOW FINRA RULE 6490 lMPACTS REVERSE MERGERS

FINRA Rule 6490, has evolved since it was enacted over two years ago. For some time, FINRA has required that issuers provide expansive disclosures and supporting documentation not only for the corporate change subject to the notice but for the company’s entire corporate history from inception.

These disclosures are required of both SEC reporting and non-reporting issuers if they undertake corporate actions including reverse mergers. Compliance with Rule 6490's requirements is a minor task for companies going public by filing a registration statement with the SEC. Companies filing registration statements rarely have difficulties obtaining DTC eligibility unlike reverse merger issuers.

The public filings of companies who register with the SEC contain most of the supporting documentation required by Rule 6490.

It is no surprise that compliance with the requirements of Rule 6490 is less burdensome for companies going public using a registration statement because these companies have fewer corporate changes in their company history than companies engaging in reverse mergers. This is especially true for reverse merger issuers who undergo multiple changes of control and periods of inactivity.

The Problem with Reverse Mergers & Disclosure under Rule 6490

For companies that engage in reverse mergers as part of their going public transaction, compliance with Rule 6490's requirements can be impossible particularly when custodianship or receivership actions have been used by shell brokers to create public shells after years of inactivity. These companies may have multiple corporate actions related to prior changes of control and often have sketchy corporate histories. Some have even been hijacked through custodianship or receivership actions. In these circumstances, documents may be unavailable or if provided to FINRA, it could potentially result in FINRA referring the matter to the SEC’s Division of Enforcement.

These companies are almost always plagued with incomplete or fraudulent corporate records which make it extremely difficult for the post-reverse merger company to comply with FINRA Rule 6490. As a result, these companies may never get FINRA approval of the contemplated corporate action.

Rule 6490 Disclosures

Issuers must provide a cover letter disclosing the full corporate history for the issuer itemizing all material facts including every corporate change that has occurred from inception to present day.

Triggers for Review under FINRA RULE 6490

A FINRA review will be triggered if any of the five factors set forth in Rule 6490 are thought to be present:

• FINRA believes the forms are incomplete, inaccurate or filed without the appropriate corporate authority;

• The issuer is not current in its reporting obligations with the Securities and Exchange Commission;

• Persons involved in or related to the corporate action are the subject of pending or settled regulatory action or are under investigation by a regulatory body or are the subject of a pending criminal action related to fraud or securities law violations;

• Persons related to the corporate action are likely involved in fraudulent activities involving securities or may pose a threat to investors;

• There is significant uncertainty in the settlement and clearance process for the issuer’s securities.

Any company contemplating going public using a reverse merger must consider the potential impact Rule 6490 could have on its future corporate actions. Rule 6490 provides one more compelling reason why private companies seeking to go public should do so using a registration statement instead of a reverse merger.

The SEC accepted their shell request in 2023 indicating the SEC accepted the Reverse Merger.
You are such a scamning and pumping liar.

Show us documentation where the SEC EVER approved a reverse merger (or any) corporate action for CIVX?

You can't because it's a scammer's pumping lie.

CIVX is SEC delinquent Expert Market garbage.

That won't happen here.

I bet you said that about GVSI too!
Show us where I said that, liar.

Come on people. Stop engaging with the bashers.

I'm buying more next week just transfer funds

That won't happen here.

I bet you were screaming that on GVSI chat too.

The opposite always happens when hi_lo is around.

When he starts pumping RUN!

CIVX is in violation of FINRA Rule 6490

That's a lie.

The SEC accepted their shell request in 2023 indicating the SEC accepted the Reverse Merger.

A shell company is defined as follows: Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 defines a shell company as a company that has: (A) no or nominal operations; and, (B) either, (1) no or nominal assets: (2) assets consisting solely of cash and cash equivalents; or, (C) assets consisting of any amount of cash and cash equivalents and nominal other assets. The Company believes that it is no longer a shell company

Corporate Action Reverse Merger:
A unique variation is the reverse merger, where a privately held company acquires a publicly traded company, generally one that's struggling. Through this transaction, the private company essentially becomes public, sidestepping the cumbersome process of undertaking an initial public offering. Afterward, it may rebrand itself **and** **issue new shares.**

ISSUE NEW SHARES:
CIVX diluted 80M shares in 2023 before the owner passed away indicating new shares were issued.

Therefore a corporate action tooK place.

FINRA clearly does not agree CIVX violates rule 6490.

That won't happen here.

I bet you said that about GVSI too!

Great sign for CIVX.

The more Hi_li bashes the higher the stock goes.

I am shocked that some are actually bid whacking at $0.0007

-22.22%

Down it goes again.

The cat is getting out of the bag about this stock scam and the scammer "consultant."

.0001 coming soon!

https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/CIVX/profile





https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://files.brokercheck.finra.org/individual/individual_4072355.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwjA-9CQot6GAxVj4MkDHW3DDx0QFnoECB8QAQ&usg=AOvVaw0PGAqtt2DEJXJ5Q_H6hCAm

Don't forget that the new custodian of $GVSI was George Sharp who had a hand in the rise of TSNP. Imo, that played a role in the rise of the pps there
Yup. Sharp's pumping lies and an army of pumpers was the reason for that price rise.

That definitely won't be happening here.

.05 coming lift off. Same thing Hi Lo did with GVSI and it mooned to .05+. 🚀🚀

Don't forget that the new custodian of $GVSI was George Sharp who had a hand in the rise of TSNP. Imo, that played a role in the rise of the pps there.

GLTA

No merger coming for CIVX per SEC/FINRA regulations...no matter what the CEO of a penny stock company pumps in a press release to promote his company.

CIVX is in violation of FINRA Rule 6490 because of its missing financials and all publicly traded stocks need to conform with FINRA Rule 6490.

There is a huge gap of missing financials from 2008 - 2020 which means CIVX is in violation of FINRA Rule 6490 which will prevent CIVX from getting any corporate actions such as a merger approved by SEC/FINRA. The same thing caused GVSI's catastrophic collapse. Look at that ticker as a good example of what will happen here.

https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/CIVX/disclosure



More proof CIVX is a dirty shell and a scam.

https://bradshawlawgroup.com/reverse-mergers-a-basic-primer/

Conducting effective due diligence on the shell company is essential, as merging with a “dirty” shell (i.e., a shell whose management failed to follow proper SEC reporting procedures) could prove fatal for the private company.[13] In searching for “clean” shells, private companies should consider the shell’s number of stockholders, reporting record, and how and where it is listed.[14]

HOW FINRA RULE 6490 lMPACTS REVERSE MERGERS

https://www.hg.org/legal-articles/how-finra-rule-6490-lmpacts-reverse-mergers-30567

FINRA Rule 6490, has evolved since it was enacted over two years ago. For some time, FINRA has required that issuers provide expansive disclosures and supporting documentation not only for the corporate change subject to the notice but for the company’s entire corporate history from inception.

These disclosures are required of both SEC reporting and non-reporting issuers if they undertake corporate actions including reverse mergers. Compliance with Rule 6490's requirements is a minor task for companies going public by filing a registration statement with the SEC. Companies filing registration statements rarely have difficulties obtaining DTC eligibility unlike reverse merger issuers.

The public filings of companies who register with the SEC contain most of the supporting documentation required by Rule 6490.

It is no surprise that compliance with the requirements of Rule 6490 is less burdensome for companies going public using a registration statement because these companies have fewer corporate changes in their company history than companies engaging in reverse mergers. This is especially true for reverse merger issuers who undergo multiple changes of control and periods of inactivity.

The Problem with Reverse Mergers & Disclosure under Rule 6490

For companies that engage in reverse mergers as part of their going public transaction, compliance with Rule 6490's requirements can be impossible particularly when custodianship or receivership actions have been used by shell brokers to create public shells after years of inactivity. These companies may have multiple corporate actions related to prior changes of control and often have sketchy corporate histories. Some have even been hijacked through custodianship or receivership actions. In these circumstances, documents may be unavailable or if provided to FINRA, it could potentially result in FINRA referring the matter to the SEC’s Division of Enforcement.

These companies are almost always plagued with incomplete or fraudulent corporate records which make it extremely difficult for the post-reverse merger company to comply with FINRA Rule 6490. As a result, these companies may never get FINRA approval of the contemplated corporate action.

Rule 6490 Disclosures

Issuers must provide a cover letter disclosing the full corporate history for the issuer itemizing all material facts including every corporate change that has occurred from inception to present day.

Triggers for Review under FINRA RULE 6490

A FINRA review will be triggered if any of the five factors set forth in Rule 6490 are thought to be present:

• FINRA believes the forms are incomplete, inaccurate or filed without the appropriate corporate authority;

• The issuer is not current in its reporting obligations with the Securities and Exchange Commission;

• Persons involved in or related to the corporate action are the subject of pending or settled regulatory action or are under investigation by a regulatory body or are the subject of a pending criminal action related to fraud or securities law violations;

• Persons related to the corporate action are likely involved in fraudulent activities involving securities or may pose a threat to investors;

• There is significant uncertainty in the settlement and clearance process for the issuer’s securities.

Any company contemplating going public using a reverse merger must consider the potential impact Rule 6490 could have on its future corporate actions. Rule 6490 provides one more compelling reason why private companies seeking to go public should do so using a registration statement instead of a reverse merger.