When we use the terms “Gyrodyne,” the “Company,” “we,” “us,” and “our,” we mean Gyrodyne, LLC and all entities owned or controlled by us, including non-consolidated entities, except where it is clear that the term means only the parent company, and except where the reference relates to periods prior to September 1, 2015 (i.e., prior to the consummation of the merger of Gyrodyne Company of America, Inc. and Gyrodyne Special Distribution, LLC with and into Gyrodyne, LLC) in which case the term relates to Gyrodyne Company of America, Inc. and all entities owned or controlled by it. References herein to our
Annual Report are to this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017. References to “common shares” in this report refer to Gyrodyne, LLC’s common shares representing limited liability company interests. References to the “Board” in this report refer to the Board of Directors of Gyrodyne, LLC except where the reference relates to periods prior to September 1, 2015 in which case it relates to the Board of Directors of Gyrodyne Company of America, Inc.
Item 1. Business
.
Description of the Company's Business
Gyrodyne, LLC (“Gyrodyne”, the “Company” or the “Registrant”) is a limited liability company formed under the laws of the State of New York
whose primary business is the management of a geographically diverse portfolio of medical office and industrial properties and the pursuit of entitlement/re-zoning on the properties located in Suffolk and Westchester Counties, New York.
Gyrodyne is the surviving entity in the merger of Gyrodyne Company of America, Inc. (the “Corporation”) and Gyrodyne Special Distribution, LLC (“GSD”) with and into Gyrodyne (the “Merger”), effective August 31, 2015.
The Merger completed the Corporation’s plan of liquidation under the Internal Revenue Code.
Substantially all of
our developed properties are subject to leases in which the tenant reimburses the Company for a portion, all of or substantially all of the costs and/or cost increases for utilities, insurance, repairs, maintenance and real estate taxes. Certain leases provide that the Company is responsible for certain operating expenses.
The Company manages its business as one operating segment.
The Company’s corporate strategy is to pursue zoning and/or entitlement opportunities intended to increase the values of our two remaining major properties so that they can be sold at higher prices (than those achievable under current entitlements) that will maximize distributions to our shareholders during the liquidation process and then dissolve the Company. The value of the real estate reported in the Statement of Net Assets as of December 31, 2017 (predicated on current asset values), does not include any potential value impact that may result from such value enhancement efforts. There can be no assurance that our value enhancement efforts will result in property value increases that exceed the costs we incur in such efforts, or even any increase at all.
Our efforts to generate
the highest values for Flowerfield and Cortlandt Manor may involve in limited circumstances the acquisition of certain adjacent properties, pursuit of joint venture relationships, entitlements and/or zoning changes, other investments and/or other strategies to enhance the net value of Flowerfield and Cortlandt Manor to maximize the returns for our shareholders. The Company does not expect the acquisition of properties or the pursuit of joint ventures, if any, to adversely affect the timing of distributions to our shareholders. Gyrodyne intends to dissolve after it completes the disposition of all of its real property assets, applies the proceeds of such dispositions first to settle any debts and claims, pending or otherwise, against Gyrodyne, and then makes liquidating distributions to holders of Gyrodyne common shares. The liquidation process and the amount and timing of distributions involve risks and uncertainties. As such, it is impossible at this time to determine the ultimate amount of proceeds that will actually be distributed to our shareholders or the timing of such payments. Accordingly, no assurance can be given that the distributions will equal or exceed the estimate of net assets in liquidation presented in our Consolidated Statements of Net Assets.
The actual nature, amount and timing of all distributions will be determined by Gyrodyne’s Board in its sole discretion and will depend in part upon the Company’s ability to convert our remaining assets into cash in compliance with our obligations under the Stipulation entered into in connection with the class action lawsuit (See Item 3 – Legal Proceedings) and settle and pay our remaining liabilities and obligations. Under Gyrodyne’s Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement (the “LLC Agreement”), such dissolution may be effected upon the vote of holders of a majority of Gyrodyne common shares or, in the Board’s discretion and without any separate approval by the holders of the Gyrodyne common shares, at any time the value of Gyrodyne’s assets, as determined by the Board in good faith, is less than $1,000,000.
After giving effect to the Company
’s dispositions of real property through December 31, 2017, the Company owns one medical office park and one of fourteen buildings in a second medical office park, together comprising approximately 37,000 rentable square feet and a multitenant industrial park comprising approximately 130,000 rentable square feet. The aforementioned industrial park is situated on ten acres of a 68-acre property in St. James, New York. Each of the medical office park in Cortlandt Manor, the building in the Port Jefferson Professional Park and the Flowerfield Industrial Park (including its undeveloped portion) are individually owned in single asset LLCs wholly owned by the Company.
Properties
S
old
Port Jefferson Professional Park
.
During the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company sold three buildings and five buildings, respectively, (approximately 4,000 square feet each) in the Port Jefferson Professional Park as follows:
|
Port Jefferson
Professional
Park Location
|
|
Closing Date
|
|
|
Gross Sales Proceed
s
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
201
7
|
|
|
201
6
|
|
|
5380 Nesconset Highway and 9 Medical Drive
|
|
June 15, 2017
|
|
|
$
|
2,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 Medical Drive
|
|
August 4, 2017
|
|
|
|
800,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 Medical Drive
|
|
January 2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
850,000
|
|
|
8 Medical Drive
|
|
June 2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
820,000
|
|
|
4 Medical Drive
|
|
July 2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
900,000
|
|
|
3 Medical Drive
|
|
August 2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
876,000
|
|
|
2 Medical Drive
|
|
September 2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
800,000
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
$
|
2,800,000
|
|
|
$
|
4,246,000
|
|
Following the sale
s indicated above, the Company has one remaining building (comprising approximately 3,500 square feet in total) in the same medical park which is being actively marketed for sale.
Fairfax Medical Center
.
On May 4th, 2016, the Company sold the Fairfax Medical Center for $14,015,000.
Strategic Plan to Enhance Property Values, Liquidate and Dissolve
Our corporate strategy is to pursue zoning and/or entitlement opportunities intended to increase the values of our two remaining major properties so that they can be sold to a developer at higher prices (than those achievable under their current entitlements) that will maximize distributions to our shareholders during the liquidation process.
Gyrodyne intends to dissolve after it completes the disposition of all of its real property assets, applies the proceeds of such dispositions first to settle any debts and claims, pending or otherwise, against Gyrodyne, and then makes liquidating distributions to holders of Gyrodyne common shares. To accomplish this, the Company’s plan consists of:
|
●
|
managing the real estate portfolio to improve operating cash flow while simultaneously increasing the market values of the underlying properties;
|
|
●
|
managing the opportunistic sale of real estate assets;
|
|
●
|
pursuing the entitlement/re-zoning efforts of the Flowerfield and Cortlandt Manor properties, to maximize value;
|
|
●
|
focusing use of capital by the Company to preserve or improve the market value of the real estate portfolio; and
|
|
●
|
balancing working capital and funds available for the entitlement/re-zoning process.
|
Gyrodyne’s strategy is to enhance the value of Flowerfield and Cortlandt Manor by pursuing possible entitlement and/or zoning opportunities, which the Board believes will improve the chances of obtaining better values for such properties. The value of the real estate reported in the Statement of Net Assets as of December 31, 2017 (predicated on current asset values), does not include any potential value impact that may result from such value enhancement efforts. Our efforts to generate the highest values of Flowerfield and Cortlandt Manor may involve, in limited circumstances, the acquisition of certain adjacent properties, pursuit of joint venture relationships, entitlement and/or zoning changes and other investments and/or other strategies to maximize the returns for our shareholders. The Company does not expect the acquisition of properties or the pursuit of joint ventures, if any, to adversely affect the timing of distributions to our shareholders. Gyrodyne intends to dissolve after it completes the disposition of all of its real property assets, applies the proceeds of such dispositions first to settle any debts and claims, pending or otherwise, against Gyrodyne, and then makes liquidating distributions to holders of Gyrodyne common shares. We are unable to predict the precise nature, amount or timing of such distributions.
Sales of properties by Gyrodyne could take the form of individual sales of assets, as has been our recent experience in Port Jefferson, sales of groups of assets, a single sale of all or substantially all of the assets or some other form of sale. The assets may be sold to one or more purchasers in one or more transactions over a period of time.
A sale of substantially all of the assets of the Company would require shareholder approval under New York law.
However, in the event of the sale of individual properties, that do not constitute substantially all of the Company’s assets, it is not required or anticipated that any shareholder votes will be solicited. The prices at which the various assets may be sold depend largely on factors beyond our control, including, without limitation, the condition of financial and real estate markets, the availability of financing to prospective purchasers of the assets, regulatory approvals, public market perceptions, and limitations on transferability of certain assets.
We cannot give any assurance on the timing of the ultimate sale of all of the Company
’s properties. Assuming the liquidation process continues through the end of 2019 and giving effect to the estimated cash flows from the operation of our existing properties, we expect that Gyrodyne will have a cash balance of approximately $26.6 million, prior to any future special distributions based on the estimate of net assets in liquidation presented in our Consolidated Statements of Net Assets. Such cash would equate to future liquidating distributions of $17.97 per share based on Gyrodyne, having 1,482,680 common shares outstanding. These estimated distributions are based on values at December 31, 2017 and do not include any potential value that may be derived from the entitlement costs being incurred to maximize the value of Flowerfield and Cortlandt Manor. While the real estate market is dynamic and the economy is volatile, the Company believes that the increase in estimated distributions resulting from these enhancement efforts will exceed the estimated $2.5 million investment in those efforts, although there can be no assurance of such excess or whether any appreciation at all will be realized.
The
Statement of Net Assets is based on certain estimates. Uncertainties as to the precise value of our non-cash assets, which exclude any estimated additional value achievable from the costs incurred to pursue the maximum value on Flowerfield and Cortlandt Manor through the entitlement/re-zoning process and the ultimate amount of our liabilities make it impracticable to predict the aggregate net value ultimately distributable to shareholders in a liquidation. Land entitlement/re-zoning costs, claims, liabilities and expenses from operations, including operating costs, salaries, income taxes, payroll and local taxes, legal, accounting and consulting fees and miscellaneous office expenses, will continue to be incurred during our liquidation process, which includes certain enhancement efforts. Excluding the value that may be achieved from the entitlement efforts, expenses incurred in pursuing the Company’s business plan will reduce the amount of assets available for ultimate distribution to shareholders, and, while a precise estimate of those expenses cannot currently be made, management and our Board believe that available cash and amounts received on the sale of assets will be adequate to provide for our obligations, liabilities, expenses and claims (including contingent liabilities) and to make cash distributions to shareholders. However, no assurances can be given that available cash and amounts received on the sale of assets will be adequate to provide for our obligations, liabilities, expenses and claims and to make cash distributions to shareholders. If such available cash and amounts received on the sale of assets are not adequate to provide for our obligations, liabilities, expenses and claims, distributions of cash and other assets to our shareholders will be reduced and could be eliminated. In the event our shareholders receive distributions from Gyrodyne and there are insufficient funds to pay any creditors who seek payment of claims against Gyrodyne, shareholders could be held liable for payments made to them and could be required to return all or a part of distributions made to them.
Property Value Enhancement
The Company is pursuing entitlements/zoning to maximize the value of Flowerfield and Cortlandt Manor.
During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company incurred $1.7 million of land entitlement/re-zoning costs, of which approximately $353,000 (inclusive of closing costs) was for the purchase of a residential 0.3-acre lot adjacent to the Cortlandt Manor Medical Center. The balance is mainly attributable to market analysis and feasibility studies inclusive of traffic studies to support the Company’s respective entitlement/zoning efforts. Although there can be no assurances, we anticipate that the acquired land will enhance the achievable development density and sale value of the Cortlandt property. We estimate that the Company may incur approximately $2.5 million in additional land entitlement/re-zoning costs through 2019 in pursuit of entitlements (approximately $0.6 million in Cortlandt Manor and $1.9 million in Flowerfield).
The Company
is focusing its resources on positioning the properties to be sold with all entitlements necessary to achieve maximum pre-construction values in the shortest period of time with the least amount of risk to the Company. During the process of pursuing such entitlements, the Company may entertain offers from potential buyers who may be willing to pay prices for the properties that the Company finds more attractive from a timing or value perspective than completing the entitlement process.
While the real estate market is dynamic, the economy is uncertain and there can be no assurances, we anticipate that these expenditures will result in higher sale prices of the properties and larger liquidating distributions to our shareholders than could otherwise be achievable.
Cortlandt Manor
. On March 15, 2016, the Town of Cortlandt Manor (the “Town”) adopted a 2016 Sustainable Comprehensive Plan (the “Plan”) of which one key strategy was the simultaneous creation of a Medical Oriented District (“MOD”). The purpose of the MOD is to expand the Town’s existing medical infrastructure and encourage economic development, including capital investment, job creation and housing options. The MOD allows for a continuum of care, i.e., independent living, assisted living and nursing/hospital care, within or in neighboring facilities by centralizing medical services and related activities. As a designated zoning district, the MOD could include hospital, ambulatory surgery, primary and urgent care, hospice, laboratories, social services, boutique hotels and a wide range of housing.
The Company
’s existing 33,871 square foot Cortlandt Medical Center and its approximate twelve acres are located directly opposite New York Presbyterian’s Hudson Valley Hospital Center and within the boundaries of the MOD. The Company has committed resources toward both market research and feasibility studies in support of achieving entitlements to maximize the value of the property. For approximately two years the Company along with its planner and engineers have been working closely with the Town to identify issues and solutions involved in creating the Plan and more specifically, the MOD.
On April 20, 2017, the Company closed on the purchase of a 1,950-square foot single-family residential dwelling located on approximately 0.3 acres in Cortlandt Manor, New York. The purchase price, inclusive of closing costs, was approximately $
353,000. The Company was able to take advantage of a distressed sale following foreclosure action by the lender. The property which adjoins the Cortlandt Medical Center and is across the street from New York Presbyterian Hudson Valley Hospital Center, is expected to become part of the Cortlandt Manor MOD. The property may provide additional vehicular access to the site from Buttonwood Drive and State Route 202 and additional parking which, although there can be no assurances, the Company believes will further increase the yield in a manner that is cost effective and should provide a significant return on investment to the shareholders.
The Company filed an application with the Town of Cortlandt Manor to develop the Cortlandt Manor property, on March 31, 2017, as follows:
|
SUBDIVISION LOT #
|
BUILDING SIZE/YIELD
|
|
Medical office
|
100,000 sft
|
|
Multi-family apartments
|
200 units
|
|
Retail
|
4,000 sft
|
The Company has been working closely with Town officials on entitlement complexity, environmental impact studies, traffic mitigation, effluent, financial impact and other variables to ensure the application synchronizes with the Town
’s vision on the MOD. Furthermore, while we are pursuing the above entitlements, we are also seeking the approval of yield that can be transferred among the three proposed uses as market demand changes.
The entitlement/re-zoning costs from December 2013 through December 31, 2017 associated with the ownership and development of this property consisted of architectural and engineering costs, legal expenses, economic analysis, soil management, surveys and land acquisitions totaling $1,302,284.
As a property owner with eligible parcels in this proposed district, Gyrodyne submitted an Environmental Assessment Form to the Town of Cortlandt Planning Department in December 2017 to support its application to receive a MOD campus designation. Once designated, the parcels would be governed by the use, dimensional and other provisions of the MOD zoning regulations and MOD zoning would replace the existing zoning. While the MOD zoning has not been formally adopted, Gyrodyne is proposing medical office and residential use and has designed the site to function as part of a future "hamlet center” with mixed use, streetscape improvements, a hamlet green and public plaza, and significant open space around Orchard Lake.
We anticipate the Town of Cortlandt Manor Planning Department to host a public hearing (community outreach meeting) in June, 2018, at which the Company will present its development plan for the Cortlandt Manor property, and after which the Town Planning Board will formally issue a positive or negative ruling under the State Environmental Quality Review Act (“SEQRA”).
The Company does not plan on developing the property but rather positioning the properties to be sold with all entitlements necessary to achieve maximum pre-construction value for the Company in the shortest period of time with the least amount of risk to the Company.
Flowerfield
. Following extensive market research and related feasibility studies, we identified the entitlements that we believe will maximize the value of Flowerfield in the shortest amount of time with the lowest amount of risk. The Company has been in discussions with the Town of Smithtown on the potential real estate development projects identified by the market research and feasibility studies, all of which currently fall within our “as of right to build” zoning. We are also exploring with the Town of Smithtown whether it would be amenable to certain entitlements, special permits, or other concessions that would allow for the identified development projects.
In March 2017, the Company filed a pre-subdivision application with the Town of Smithtown (the “Pre-application”) for the Flowerfield property along with the previously sold (2002) catering hall facility for an eight-lot subdivision. In June 2017, the Company filed a subdivision application with the Town of Smithtown based on feedback provided by the Town of Smithtown staff in the Pre-application process.
Because of the property’s location within 500 feet of a municipal boundary and a state road, the Town of Smithtown referred the Company’s subdivision application to the Suffolk County Planning Commission as required by the Suffolk County Administrative Code and the New York State General Municipal Law.
On August 2, 2017, the Suffolk County Planning Commission voted 11-0 to approve Gyrodyne
’s subdivision application without conditions. Although the approval by the Suffolk County Planning Commission is not binding on the Town of Smithtown, the approval without conditions means that the requisite vote threshold at the Town of Smithtown’s Planning Board is a simple majority; had the Suffolk County Planning Commission approved the subdivision application with conditions, a supermajority would have been required for the Town of Smithtown’s Planning Board to approve the Company’s subdivision application.
On November 15, 2017, the Town of Smithtown Planning Board hosted a public hearing where the Company presented its subdivision plan of the Flowerfield property.
The Company awaits the Planning Board’s Determination of Significance under SEQRA, which will either be a Negative Declaration (a determination that the project will not result in significant adverse environmental impacts), a Conditioned Negative Declaration (a determination that the project may have potentially significant adverse environmental impacts which can be eliminated or mitigated by conditions imposed by the Planning Board) or a Positive Declaration (the project may result in one or more significant environmental impacts and will require the preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement). The former Town Plan Board Chairman communicated that a Positive Declaration will require up to one year to complete the SEQRA process. The Company has already submitted various studies to the Town of Smithtown Planning Department prior to the public hearing that it hopes will reduce the time frame to complete the SEQRA process in the event a Positive Declaration is issued. In addition, the Company believes the new Town Planning Board Chairman is more aligned with the newly elected current Town Supervisor’s support of economic development which may serve to narrow the time to complete the SEQRA process. The Company does not plan on developing the property but rather positioning the properties to be sold with all entitlements necessary to achieve maximum pre-construction values in the shortest period of time with the least amount of risk to the Company.
The details of the Company
’s subdivision application are as follows:
SUBDIVISION LOT #
|
LOT SIZE
(acres)
|
LAND USE
|
BUILDING SIZE/YIELD
|
1
|
18
|
Existing Industrial Park
– Mixed Use
|
132,719 sft
|
2
|
12
|
Catering Hall (sold in 2002)
|
34,685sft
|
3
|
6
|
Hotel with Restaurant,
Spa/Fitness
and Conference Center
|
150 Rooms plus 150 seat restaurant
10,000 sft
500 seats
|
4
|
4
|
Medical Office /R&D Office building
|
53,400 sft
|
5
|
6
|
Medical Office/R&D Office building
|
76,350 sft
|
6
|
2
|
Assisted Living
|
104 units
|
7
|
3
|
Assisted Living
|
116 units
|
8
|
23
|
Common Area
|
|
In addition to the common area within Lot 8, the plan envisions an open space network of trails, benches and passive recreation that will serve as a recreational amenity to tie together the uses within the overall Flowerfield campus landscape.
The entitlement costs from December 2013 through December 31, 2017 associated with the ownership and development of this property consisted of architectural and engineering costs, legal expenses, economic analysis, soil management and surveys totaling $1,923,740. The Company has an additional 5.2 acres bordering the industrial park that are currently zoned residential and are not part of the subdivision application.
While we cannot predict the outcome of the subdivision application, we have undertaken to subdivide the Flowerfield property in a manner that is economically advantageous to the Company.
As envisioned in the chart above, the subdivision application will seek to subdivide the Flowerfield property using a low-impact development
campus approach that provides a complementary mix of land uses with a green space network throughout the subdivision. Opportunities for shared green space, roads, utilities and parking are incorporated into the plan and preserves the historic 200-foot setback from Route 25A. The Flowerfield campus would be a beautiful, environmentally sound and amenity enriched community that wouldn’t overly burden existing infrastructure and the local community with the additional costs of the education of elementary and high school students. We believe the campus will generate a significant new real estate tax base for the Town of Smithtown and the Smithtown Central School District.
The Company
’s subdivision application is expected to include proposed uses for the subdivided lots, although the specific uses will be determined by the eventual purchasers. It is anticipated that the proposed uses described herein would be typical of those chosen by the future owners and as a result we requested that the subdivision be considered with those uses so that the purchasers of the lots would have an assigned density. Furthermore, while we are pursuing the above entitlements, we are also seeking the approval of yield that can be transferred between the proposed uses as market demand changes. The Company’s subdivision application includes perfecting the subdivision of the catering facility (12 acres hereafter referred to as lot 2) which the Company sold in 2002.
In accordance with the draft Smithtown Comprehensive Plan Update
, the new additions to the Flowerfield campus would be focused on uses supportive and beneficial to Stony Brook University (SBU), inclusive of Stony Brook University Hospital, namely, the development of a first class 150 bed hotel with conference facilities, restaurant and health club; medical office facilities; and assisted living facilities. Furthermore, the connection with SBU via the existing LIRR crossing, which we are actively negotiating the re-opening of, will help to foster synergies between Flowerfield and SBU.
Lot 1 encompasses the exi
sting uses of the current light industrial park being retained thereby keeping in place jobs from the local business community, locations for back
office operations of SBU, and studios for a vibrant arts community that yields cultural benefits to Smithtown and the surrounding communities.
Lot 2 owned by a catering facility that sits on a 12-acre lot that was sold in 2002. The subdivision was deferred by the town until the overall plan for Flowerfield was submitted.
Lot 3 is planned as a 150-room hotel
that would include a 150-seat restaurant. The hotel could also have a 500-seat conference space and a 10,000-square foot day spa/fitness center. It is envisioned that this hotel would serve the adjacent catering facility, as well as the office uses on-site and the nearby SBU.
Lots 4 and 5 are envisioned as medical office, general office, or tech space (R&D) in support of SBU, its Hospital and Children
’s Hospital, and its Center of Excellence in Wireless and Information Technology (CEWIT). The two lots could be developed separately or as one larger lot. Approximately 129,750 square feet of office space in two buildings (53,400 and 76,350 sf) would be provided.
Lots 6 and 7 are envisioned as assisted living communities, comprising a total of 220 units, again
either as two separate lots or one combined lot. There would be a synergy with the SBU Hospital and with the medical office uses for medical care of the residents of the assisted living facilities.
Summary
. The Company is in the process of pursuing entitlements, density and/or rezoning, and our ability to obtain required permits and authorizations is subject to factors beyond our control, including environmental concerns of governmental entities and community groups. The process involves extensive analysis internally at the government entity level, as well as between government entities such as town planning departments and Gyrodyne, and will continue up until such time as entitlement, rezoning and density decisions are made by the relevant government entities. We hope to secure favorable decisions on entitlements, rezoning and density so that we can then seek the sale of our remaining properties at higher prices than otherwise obtainable and then proceed with the intended liquidation and dissolution of the Company. As referred to above, the Suffolk County Planning Commission voted on August 2, 2017 to approve the Company’s subdivision application without conditions. Accordingly, the application will require approval of a simple majority, and not a supermajority, of the Town Board for the Company to be able to proceed with its subdivision plan. The Town is now obligated to comply with the provisions of SEQRA in connection with its review of the subdivision application. The time period for the Town of Smithtown to complete its review of the subdivision application will not begin to run until the SEQRA process has been completed. The Company cannot predict with any reasonable degree of certainty the length of time it will take for the Town of Smithtown to complete the SEQRA process. The Company expects the process of pursuing entitlements, rezoning and density could take up to an additional two years with the ultimate timing to a certain extent managed by Gyrodyne but ultimately dependent and under the control of the applicable municipality’s planning board or other governmental authority. During this process, the subdivision plan could be amended depending on market forces.
Flowerfield Industrial Park Value Enhancement Strategy
.
The Company’s primary strategy is to pursue the entitlements. In addition, the Company is also implementing a secondary but parallel strategy of maximizing the value of the Flowerfield Industrial Park’s current buildings through targeting certain uses which the Company also believes will help maximize the achievable density from the entitlements it is pursuing on the undeveloped property.
The Company
’s strategy to maximize the value of the Flowerfield Industrial Park includes repositioning the park’s industrial buildings to service Stony Brook University, inclusive of Stony Brook University Hospital, while also making it a cultural destination (arts, health and wellness center) for the community. The Company believes this strategy will enhance the value of the entitlements (via a lower traffic impact versus its historical use) while also increasing the cashflow and market value of the industrial buildings.
Our business relationship with Stony Brook University is expanding.
Effective October 24, 2017, the Company and the State of New York acting through Stony Brook University Hospital (“SBU Hospital”) entered into an amendment to the existing lease with SBU Hospital (approved by the New York State Controller’s Office on January 19, 2018) for the expansion of the existing space currently occupied by SBU Hospital from approximately 13,747 square feet at a rate of $24.76 per square foot to 26,573 square feet at rate of $19.00 (plus annual escalators) per square foot. The total lease commitment from the amendment net of the existing lease is approximately $3.5 million and extends through 2025. The lease amendment obligates the Company, at its sole cost and expense, to build out the additional 12,826 square feet (the “Additional Space”) and provide a "turnkey" facility in accordance with an agreed-upon work letter.
To finance the buildout of the additional space, the Company secured a non-revolving credit line with a bank for up to $3,000,000, which closed on March 21, 2018.
There will be an interest only phase for the first eight months of the loan (“Interest-Only Phase”) after which it will automatically convert to a permanent loan maturing on November 30, 2025 (84 months after conversion to a permanent loan) (the “Permanent Phase”). The interest rate during the Interest-Only Phase shall be a variable rate equal to the daily highest prime rate published by the Wall Street Journal plus 100 basis points (1% rounded up to the nearest 1/8 percent). During the Permanent Phase, the Company will pay interest at a fixed rate based on the Federal Home Loan Bank rate for a 7 year maturity as made available by the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York plus a margin of 200 basis points (2%) rounded up to the nearest 1/8 percent but in no event less than 4.25%, plus principal based on a 20-year amortization period.
The first advance of up to $1.1 million will be used to finance the tenant improvements pursuant to the expanded signed leasing relationship with SBU Hospital described above. The balance of the loan can be drawn upon for improvements to be completed by the Company, as landlord, pursuant to a lease with State University of New York or its affiliates (or other tenants subject to the bank
’s approval) anytime during the Interest-Only Phase.
The mortgage loan is secured by approximately 31.8 acres of the Flowerfield Industrial Park including the respective buildings and related leases. The only significant financial covenant associated with the loan is a debt service ratio on GSD Flowerfield, LLC of 1.35 to 1.
The Company anticipates modifying the terms of the loan following the completion of its subdivision.
The Company is committed to focusing its current capital on supporting operations and the pursuit of entitlements.
The loan is financing the Company’s secondary but dual strategy of maximizing the value of the Flowerfield.
Health Care Industry
Our tenants in our Cortlandt Manor and Port Jefferson properties are healthcare service providers. Furthermore,
the Company is repositioning the industrial buildings, in the Flowerfield Industrial Park, to expand and support Stony Brook University and Stony Brook University Hospital.
The healthcare industry is subject to substantial regulation and faces increased regulation particularly relating to fraud, waste and abuse, cost control and healthcare management. The healthcare industry may experience a significant expansion of applicable federal, state or local laws and regulations, previously enacted or future healthcare reform, new interpretations of existing laws and regulations or changes in enforcement priorities, all of which could materially impact the business and operations of our tenants and therefore the marketability of our medical office properties.
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 (the “ACA”) impacted the healthcare marketplace by decreasing the number of uninsured individuals in the United States through the establishment of health insurance exchanges to facilitate the purchase of health insurance, expanded Medicaid eligibility, subsidized insurance premiums and included requirements and incentives for businesses to provide healthcare benefits. The ACA remains subject to continuing and increasing legislative and administrative scrutiny, including current efforts by Congress and the current presidential administration to repeal, alter and replace the ACA in total or in part. In 2017, Congress unsuccessfully sought to replace substantial parts of the ACA with different mechanisms for facilitating insurance coverage in the commercial and Medicaid markets, but was able to enact legislation eliminating the tax penalty for individuals who do not purchase insurance. Additionally, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (“CMS”) discontinued providing cost-sharing reduction subsidies to insurance providers, which is expected to have the result of increasing the cost of insurance premiums. Further, CMS has begun approving waivers permitting states to alter state Medicaid programs by, among other things, requiring individuals to meet certain requirements, such as work requirements, in order to maintain eligibility for Medicaid. These and other actions may impact the insurance markets and reduce the number of individuals purchasing insurance or qualifying for Medicaid and may negatively impact the operations and financial condition of our medical office tenants, which in turn may adversely impact us. Congress may revisit ACA or Medicaid reform legislation in 2018. If the ACA is repealed or further substantially modified, or if implementation of certain aspects of the ACA are suspended, such actions could negatively impact the operations and financial condition of our medical office tenants, which in turn may adversely impact us.
Our tenants are subject to extensive federal, state, and local licensure laws, regulations and industry standards governing business operations, the physical plant and structure, patient rights and privacy and security of health information. Our tenants
’ failure to comply with any of these laws could result in loss of licensure, denial of reimbursement, imposition of fines or other penalties, suspension or exclusion from the government sponsored Medicare and Medicaid programs, loss of accreditation or certification, or closure of the facility. In addition, efforts by third-party payors, such as the Medicare and Medicaid programs and private insurance carriers, including health maintenance organizations and other health plans, impose greater discounts and more stringent cost controls upon healthcare provider operations (through changes in reimbursement rates and methodologies, discounted fee structures, the assumption by healthcare providers of all or a portion of the financial risk or otherwise). Our tenants may also face significant limits on the scope of services reimbursed and on reimbursement rates and fees, all of which could impact their ability to pay rent or other obligations to us.
Real Estate
The Company owns
properties in St. James, Port Jefferson Station and Cortlandt Manor, New York.
St. James, New York
.
In St. James, New York, the Company owns a 68-acre site called Flowerfield, primarily zoned for light industry, which is located approximately 50 miles east of New York City on the North Shore of Long Island in the Town of Smithtown. Flowerfield's location places it in Hydrogeologic Zone VIII
,
one of the most liberal with respect to effluent discharge rates. Gyrodyne currently has 130,533 square feet of rentable space located on approximately 10 acres of developed property at Flowerfield. As of December 31, 2017, there were 28 tenants, comprising 38 leases and 2 long-term tenants under month-to-month commitments. The annual base rent at Flowerfield based on the rates in effect as of December 2017 is $1,132,974 which included month-to-month annualized base rent of $8,211 on 1,208 square feet. The occupancy rate was 61% as of December 31, 2017.
As discussed under Property Value Enhancements,
new additions to the Flowerfield campus would be focused on uses supportive and beneficial to SBU, namely, the development of a first class 150 bed hotel with conference facilities, restaurant and health club; medical office facilities; and assisted living facilities. Furthermore, the connection with SBU via the existing LIRR crossing, which we are actively negotiating the re-opening of, will help to foster synergies between Flowerfield and SBU. Consistent with this strategy, the Company is repositioning the industrial buildings to expand and support Stony Brook University. Through the end of the first quarter of 2018, the Company expanded its leasing relationship with SBU from 16,420 square feet to 29,246 square feet or approximately 22% of the Flowerfield Industrial buildings rentable square feet. Furthermore, the company is actively discussing with SBU how Flowerfield could further support the needs of SBU.
Port Jefferson Station, New York
.
On June 27, 2007, the Company acquired ten buildings in the Port Jefferson Professional Park in Port Jefferson Station, New York. The buildings were located at 1-6, 8, 9 and 11 Medical Drive and 5380 Nesconset Highway in Port Jefferson Station, and situated on 5.16 acres with 39,329 square feet of rentable space. During the Company’s plan of liquidation, it has sold nine of the ten buildings comprising approximately 36,000 square feet. During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company sold three buildings (comprising approximately 11,000 square feet) for $2.8 million, five buildings in 2016 (comprising approximately 20,000 square feet) for $4,246,000 and one building in 2015 (comprising approximately 4,000 square feet) for $760,000. Subsequent to December 31, 2017, the Company continues to actively market the one remaining building. As of December 31, 2017, there were 3 tenants, comprising 3 leases. The annual base rent based on the rates in effect as of December 2017 is $80,062. The occupancy rate was 100% as of December 31, 2017.
Cortlandt Manor, New York
. On June 2, 2008, the Company acquired the Cortlandt Medical Center in Cortlandt Manor, New York. The property consists of five office buildings which are situated on 5.01 acres with 31,198 square feet of rentable space on the date of acquisition. As of December 31, 2017, there were 9 tenants, comprising 13 leases. The annual base rent based on the rates in effect as of December 2017, is approximately $845,000. The property was 96% occupied as of December 31, 2017. Following certain capital improvements, the rentable square feet currently is 31,421 square feet.
On
August 29, 2008, the Company acquired a 1,600-square foot single-family residential dwelling located on 1.43 acres at 1987 Crompond Road, Cortlandt Manor, New York. The property is located directly across the street from New York Presbyterian Hudson Valley Hospital Center and adjoins the Cortlandt Medical Center. The property is zoned for medical office use by special permit and is potentially a future development site for expansion of the Cortlandt Medical Center.
On May 20, 2010, the Company acquired the building located at 1989 Crompond Road, Cortlandt Manor, New York. The property consists of 2,450 square feet of rentable space on 1.6 acres. This property is adjacent to the
1.43-acre property acquired by the Company in August 2008, and these two properties combined result in the Company owning approximately three acres directly across Crompond Road from the New York Presbyterian Hudson Valley Hospital Center in addition to the 5.01-acre Cortlandt Medical Center site. The property was 100% occupied as of December 31, 2017, by two tenants with a total annual base rent of $33,600.
In
March 2016, the Company acquired a four-acre undeveloped lot in Cortlandt Manor for $210,000, inclusive of closing costs, which the Company believes is synergistic to maximizing the value on that property.
On April 20, 2017, the Company closed on the purchase of a 1,950-square foot single-family residential dwelling located on approximately 0.3 acres in Cortlandt Manor, New York. The purchase price, inclusive of closing costs, was approximately $
353,000. The Company was able to take advantage of a distressed sale following foreclosure action by the lender. The property which adjoins the Cortlandt Medical Center and is across the street from New York Presbyterian Hudson Valley Hospital Center, is expected to become part of the Cortlandt Manor MOD. The property may provide additional vehicular access to the site from Buttonwood Drive and State Route 202 and additional parking which the Company believes will further increase the yield in a manner that is cost effective and should provide a significant return on investment to the shareholders.
Fairfax, Virginia
. On March 31, 2009, the Company acquired the Fairfax Medical Center in Fairfax City, Virginia. The property consisted of two office buildings which were situated on 3.5 acres with 57,621 square feet of rentable space at date of acquisition. On May 4th, 2016, the Company sold the Fairfax Medical Center for $14,015,000.
Limited Partnership Investment in Callery-
Judge Grove
, L.P
.
The Company has a 10.12% limited partnership interest in Callery-Judge Grove, L.P. (the “Grove”).
The Grove previously owned a 3,700+ acre citrus grove (the “Grove Property”) located in Palm Beach County, Florida as its only asset, which is the subject of a plan for mixed-use development. On September 19, 2013, the Grove Property was sold in a foreclosure proceeding to Minto Florida Developments, LLC (“Minto”) pursuant to a purchase and sale agreement which provided that the Grove had the right to receive certain payments on the sale of single family residential units constructed on the property or on the sale of the property itself. During 2016, Gyrodyne was informed by the Grove’s managing partner that Minto transferred the property to an affiliate which triggered an appraisal process that resulted in the payment (in lieu of being required to make payments on the sale of individual units or the property itself) by Minto to the Grove of $1,968,750. The Grove’s managing partner also informed Gyrodyne that the payment along with some of its existing cash would be utilized to repay certain debt obligations owed to certain limited partners in the amount of $2.7 million. In light of the foregoing, Gyrodyne believes that the Grove will most likely not receive any additional payments from Minto beyond the aforementioned $1,968,750. Inasmuch as the Grove’s obligations to certain limited partners exceeded the payment it received from Minto, it is unlikely that Gyrodyne could expect to receive any final liquidating distribution from the Grove.
Tax Status
Gyrodyne is structured as a limited liability company. Gyrodyne is not subject to an entity level income tax but rather is treated as a partnership for tax purposes, with its items of income, gain, deduction, loss and credit being reported on the Company
’s information return, on Form 1065, and allocated annually on a Schedule K-1 to its members pro rata. Flowerfield Properties, Inc. (“FPI”) is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. FPI is a “C” corporation and therefore any income generated by FPI is subject to a corporate level tax. The Company’s investment in the Grove is held in FPI.
Under current law, when the IRS audits a partnership tax return, the IRS generally determines tax adjustments at the partnership level, but is required to collect any additional taxes, interest and penalties from each of the partners.
The Bipartisan Budget Act of 2015 (the “2015 Act”) changed this procedure for partnership tax audits and audit adjustments for partnership returns of large partnerships for fiscal years beginning after December 31, 2017. Pursuant to the 2015 Act, if any audit by the IRS of our income tax returns for any taxable year beginning after December 31, 2017 results in any adjustments, the IRS may collect any resulting taxes, including any applicable penalties and interest, directly from Gyrodyne. IRS tax audit assessments on tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2018 will require Gyrodyne and, indirectly, its members, to bear any tax liability resulting from such audit, unless we elect, once the tax adjustments have been calculated at the Company level to “push out” such tax audit adjustments to those persons who were members of the Company during the taxable year(s) to which the tax liability relates, in which case an increased interest charge will be applied to the tax deficiency.
Tax legislation signed into law on December 22, 2017, makes numerous changes to the tax rules. For example, the top federal income tax rate for individuals is reduced to 37%, there is a new deduction available for certain Qualified Business Income, that reduces the top effective tax rate applicable to ordinary dividends from REITs to 29.6% (through a 20% deduction for ordinary REIT dividends received) and various deductions are eliminated or limited. Most of the changes applicable to individuals are temporary. There are only minor changes to the REIT rules (other than the 20% deduction applicable to individuals for ordinary REIT dividends received). To date, the Internal Revenue Service has issued only limited guidance on the changes made by the new legislation. It is unclear at this time whether Congress will address these issues or when the Internal Revenue Service will issue additional administrative guidance on the changes made by the new legislation.
The December 31, 2017 and 2016 Statements of Net Assets include a tax benefit comprised of federal and state tax current receivables of $12,544 and $32,293, respectively, and the federal and state benefit of approximately $73,000 and $85,000, respectively, directly related to the potential net operating loss carryback benefit from it
’s investment in the Grove.
The Company does not expect to receive any further distributions from the Grove. As a result, the Company received a tax refund of $73,085 (the aforementioned tax benefit) in early 2018 following its filing of the net operating loss carryback claim.
Competition
T
he rental properties are located in St. James, Port Jefferson Station, and Cortlandt Manor, New York. The Company competes in the leasing of medical, professional and general office space and engineering, manufacturing and warehouse space with a considerable number of other real estate companies, some of which may have greater marketing and financial resources than the Company and may generally be able to accept more risk than we can prudently manage, including risk with respect to creditworthiness of tenants. Principal factors of competition in the Company’s rental property business are: the quality of properties, leasing terms (including rent and other charges and allowances for tenant improvements), attractiveness and convenience of location, financial strength of its competitors, the quality and breadth of tenant services provided and reputation as an owner and operator of quality office properties in its relevant market. Additionally, the Company’s ability to compete depends upon, among other factors, trends in the national and local economies, investment alternatives, financial condition and operating results of current and prospective tenants, availability and cost of capital, construction and renovation costs, taxes, governmental regulations, legislation and population trends.
In
pursuit of its business plan, and the sale of properties, the Company competes with other real estate investors, including pension funds, insurance companies, foreign investors, real estate partnerships, public and private real estate investment trusts, private individuals and other domestic real estate companies, many of which have greater financial and other resources than the Company. With respect to properties presently owned by the Company, it competes with other owners of like properties for tenants.
Internal Growth and Effective
Asset
Management
Tenant Relations and
L
ease
C
ompliance
. We strive to maintain strong contacts with our tenants in order to understand their current and future real estate rental and development needs. We directly monitor each of our rental properties to ensure they are properly maintained and meet the needs of our tenants.
Extending Lease
M
aturitie
s
. We seek to extend leases in advance of expirations to achieve high occupancy levels. Additionally, our strategy includes expanding our leasing relationship with Stony Brook University and New York Presbyterian Hudson Valley Medical center which we believe will enhance the value of the existing buildings as well as the entitlements being pursued.
Financing Strategy
The Company believes it is
currently well capitalized with adequate cash levels to operate our business and complete our strategic plan of positioning our remaining properties for sale at enhanced values and making liquidating distributions to our shareholders. The Company focuses its available capital to operate the Company and pursue the entitlements/re-zoning strategy.
Debt Facility.
To finance the buildout of the SBU expansion, the Company secured a non-revolving credit line with a bank for up to $3,000,000, which closed on March 21, 2018. There will be an interest only phase for the first eight months of the loan (“Interest-Only Phase”) after which it will automatically convert to a permanent loan maturing on November 30, 2025 (84 months after conversion to a permanent loan) (the “Permanent Phase”). The interest rate during the Interest-Only Phase shall be a variable rate equal to the daily highest prime rate published by the Wall Street Journal plus 100 basis points (1% rounded up to the nearest 1/8 percent). During the Permanent Phase, the Company will pay interest at a fixed rate based on the Federal Home Loan Bank rate for a 7 year maturity as made available by the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York plus a margin of 200 basis points (2%) rounded up to the nearest 1/8 percent but in no event less than 4.25%, plus principal based on a 20-year amortization period.
The first advance of up to $1.1 million will be used to finance the tenant improvements pursuant to the expanded signed leasing relationship with SBU Hospital described above. The balance of the loan can be drawn upon for improvements to be completed by the Company, as landlord, pursuant to a lease with State University of New York or its affiliates (or other tenants subject to the bank
’s approval) anytime during the Interest-Only Phase.
The mortgage loan is secured by approximately 31.8 acres of the Flowerfield Industrial Park including the respective buildings and related leases. The only significant financial covenant associated with the loan is a debt service ratio on GSD Flowerfield, LLC of 1.35 to 1.
The Company anticipates modifying the terms of the loan following the completion of its subdivision.
Special Distributions
. On May 26, 2016, the Company declared a non-recurring special cash distribution on the Company’s common shares of limited liability company interests of $9.25 per share, payable June 15, 2016 to shareholders of record at the close of business on June 6, 2016. Nasdaq set the ex-dividend date as June 16, 2016.
On August 29, 2016, the Company declared another non-recurring special cash distribution on the Company
’s common shares of limited liability company interests of $1.50 per share, payable September 15, 2016 to shareholders of record at the close of business on September 9, 2016.
On June 16, 2017, the Company declared a special cash distribution on the Company
’s shares of limited liability company interests of $1.00 per share, or $1,482,680 in the aggregate, payable on July 7, 2017 to shareholders of record at the close of business on June 27, 2017.
Environmental Matters
In connection with the conduct of our business, we may order, on any of our properties, a Phase 1 environmental report and, when necessary, a Phase 2 environmental report.
Based on a review of such reports, and our ongoing review of each of our properties, as of the date of this report, we are not aware of any environmental condition with respect to any of the properties which we believe would be reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and/or results of operations. There can be no assurance that (i) changes in law, (ii) the conduct of tenants, (iii) activities related to properties in the surrounding area, (iv) contamination through the water table due to the low elevation and immediate proximity of the industrial park to the Long Island Sound or (v) the discovery of environmental conditions the extent or severity of which were unknown, will not expose us to material liability in the future.
The Company believes that each of its properties is in compliance, in all material respects, with federal, state and local regulations
regarding hazardous waste and other environmental matters and is not aware of any environmental contamination at any of its properties that would require any material capital expenditure for the remediation thereof. No assurance can be given, however, that environmental regulations will not in the future have a materially adverse effect on the properties.
Insurance
The Company
carries comprehensive liability, property, terrorism and umbrella insurance coverage which includes fire, flood, earthquakes and business interruption insurance and covers all our properties. The Company annually reviews its policies with regard to both risk management and the underlying premiums and believes the policy specifications, insurance limits and deductibles are appropriate given the relative risk of loss, the cost of the coverage and industry practice and, in the opinion of the Company’s management, all its properties are adequately insured.
Major
Tenants
Fo
r the year ended December 31, 2017, pro forma rental income (excluding revenue related to assets sold on or prior to December 31, 2017) from the three largest tenants represented approximately 16%, 11% and 6% of total rental income.
The three largest tenants by revenue as of December 31, 2017, consist of Stony Brook University Hospital, located in the industrial park, another tenant in the industrial park (which vacated in August 2017) and a medical tenant in the Cortlandt Manor Medical Center. We recently entered into an amendment to the existing lease with Stony Brook University Hospital for a 93% expansion of its currently leased space. The space covered by the amended lease would constitute approximately 19.3% of our annual rental revenue for 2018.
Fo
r the year ended December 31, 2016, pro forma rental income (excluding revenue related to assets sold on or prior to December 31, 2017) from the three largest tenants represented approximately 15%, 11% and 10% of total rental income.
The three largest tenants
by revenue as of December 31, 2016, consisted of a state agency located in the industrial park, another tenant in the industrial park (which vacated in August 2017) and a medical tenant in the Cortlandt Manor Medical Center.
The current economic challenges facing
state and local budgets impacted 2 of the 3 largest tenants. One of these tenants has recently agreed to amend its existing lease with us, including a seven-year extension of lease term and a 93% expansion of the existing space with a 23.3% reduction in rental rate per square foot. There can be no assurance that the remaining leases will renew for the same square footage, at favorable rates net of tenant improvements, if at all.
Fiscal
Y
ear 20
1
7
Transaction Summary
The following summarizes our significant transactions and other activity during the year ended December 31,
2017.
Financing Activity
. On June 16, 2017, the Company declared a special cash distribution on the Company’s common shares of limited liability company interests of $1.00 per share, or $1,482,680 in the aggregate, payable July 7, 2017 to shareholders of record at the close of business on June 27, 2017.
Acquisition Activity
. On April 20, 2017, the Company closed on the purchase of a single family residential building on approximately 0.3 acres bordering the Cortlandt Manor Medical Center for approximately $353,000 inclusive of closing costs. The Company believes the property may provide additional vehicular access to its Cortlandt Manor property from Buttonwood Drive and State Route 202 and additional parking which the Company believes will further increase the yield in a manner that is cost effective.
Disposition Activity
.
On June 15, 2017, Gyrodyne, through its wholly owned subsidiary GSD Port Jefferson, LLC, completed the sale of the two buildings located at 9 Medical Drive and 5380 Nesconset Highway, respectively, in the Port Jefferson Professional Park for an aggregate purchase price of $2,000,000 pursuant to the previously announced Purchase and Sale Agreement dated as of March 30, 2017.
On August 4, 2017, Gyrodyne, through its wholly owned subsidiary GSD Port Jefferson, LLC, completed the sale of the building located at 1 Medical Drive in the Port Jefferson Professional Park for a purchase price of $800,000 pursuant to the previously announced Purchase and Sale Agreement dated as of May 23, 2017.
The Company has
one remaining buildings in the Port Jefferson Professional Park, comprising approximately 3,500 square which is being actively marketed for sale.
Investments.
During 2017 the market experienced a significant increase in interest rates that continued into the first quarter of 2018. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2017, and prior to the substantial increase in interest rates, the Company sold 100% of its investments in mortgage backed securities for $3,983,562. The Company received principal payments during the twelve months ended December 31, 2017 of $129,587 from these investments.
Leasing
Activity
.
During 2017, the Company signed seven new leases comprising annual base rent of approximately $191,400, excluding tenant reimbursements, at an average rate per square foot of $17.06, which were offset by fourteen terminations comprising approximately $474,400 in annual revenue, excluding tenant reimbursements at an average rate per square foot of $20.51. The net impact was a decrease in annual lease commitments and rented square footage of approximately $283,000 and approximately 12,000 square feet, respectively. A total of sixteen lease renewals were signed during 2017 comprising approximately 18,500 square feet, $322,000 in annual revenue and $829,000 in total commitments. The aforementioned leasing activity by asset type is as follows:
|
●
|
Medical Parks
– During 2017 we entered into three new leases in our medical parks encompassing approximately 4,000 square feet, $105,700 in annual rent and total lease commitments over the term of such leases of approximately $394,000. We also renewed four leases comprising approximately 7,000 square feet, $200,000 in annual revenues and total lease commitments of approximately $679,500.
|
|
●
|
Industrial
P
ark
– During 2017, we entered into four new leases in the Flowerfield industrial park encompassing approximately 7,000 square feet and $85,700 in annual revenue and total lease commitments of approximately $261,000. We also renewed twelve leases comprising approximately 11,000 square feet, $122,000 in annual revenue and total lease commitments of approximately $149,500.
|
None of the above leasing activity relate to building
s sold during 2017. As a result, the aforementioned activity is the same on a proforma basis to exclude assets sold.
Retention
B
onus
P
lan
As a result of the determination by the Corporation
’s Board of Directors in September 2013 that it was in the best interests of the Corporation and its shareholders to pursue the actual disposition of the its remaining assets, the Company’s properties have been and will continue to be managed and marketed in an orderly manner designed to obtain the best value reasonably available for such assets. Accordingly, in May 2014, the Corporation’s Board of Directors approved a Retention Bonus Plan designed to recognize the nature and scope of the responsibilities related to such business plan, to reward and incent performance in connection therewith, to align the interests of directors, executives and employees with our shareholders and to retain such persons during the term of such plan. The Retention Bonus Plan provides for bonuses to directors, officers and employees determined by the date of sale and a percentage of the excess of gross sales proceeds from the sale of each property over the designated appraised value.
The Retention Bonus Plan provides for a bonus pool that would be funded upon the sale of each of the Company
’s properties with an initial amount equal to 5% of the specified appraised value of such properties (set forth in the Plan), so long as the gross selling price of the property is equal to or greater than 100% of its appraised value as designated in the bonus plan. The aggregate amount of the 2013 appraisals for the Company’s properties was utilized by the Company to help set the aggregate valuation of the real estate that was included in the non-cash dividend distributed on December 30, 2013. Additional funding of the bonus pool would occur on a property-by-property basis when the gross sales price of a property is in excess of its appraised value as follows: 10% on the first 10% of appreciation, 15% on the next 10% of appreciation and 20% on appreciation greater than 20%. Furthermore, if a specified property is sold on or before a designated date to be specified in the Retention Bonus Plan, an additional amount equal to 2% of the gross selling price of such property also would be funded into the bonus pool.
The bonus pool is distributable in the following proportions to the named participants in the bonus plan for so long as they are directors or employees of the Company: 15% for the Chairman, 50%
in the aggregate for the directors other than the Chairman (10% for each of the other directors assuming five other directors on the Board) and 35% in the aggregate (the “Employee Pool”) for the Company’s executives and employees. Such share of the bonus pool is earned only upon the completion of the sale of a property at a gross selling price equal to or greater than its appraised value and is paid to the named beneficiaries of the Retention Bonus Plan or their designees within 60 days of the completion of such sale or, if later, within 60 days of receipt of any subsequent post-completion installment payment related to such sale. All allocations to individual beneficiaries of the Employee Pool shall be determined by the Board of Directors of the Company in consultation with its President.
On May 24, 2016, the
Company’s Board of Directors amended its Retention Bonus Plan to provide that land development costs incurred on a property since the date of the 2013 appraisal will be added to the appraised value of the property in calculating appreciation for the purpose of determining the bonus pool. The foregoing change was approved in order to better align the interests of the participants in the Retention Bonus Plan with those of the shareholders. The amendment also provides that each of the ten buildings in the Port Jefferson Professional Park will be treated as a “property”, so that a participant’s right to bonus payment on the sale of a Port Jefferson building will vest on, and payments to the bonus pool may be made shortly following, the closing of the sale of that building. As originally adopted, all ten buildings in the Port Jefferson Professional Park were treated as one property, so that a participant departing prior to the sale of all ten buildings would forfeit bonus on all ten buildings. The reason for this original designation was that, at the time of adoption, the Board of Directors believed that Gyrodyne’s entire Port Jefferson property would be sold as one block, not as individual buildings. Subsequent to adoption, the Gyrodyne Board came to believe that the sale of individual buildings would generate the greatest aggregate values and thus would be in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders.
On January 2
6, 2018, the Board of Directors of the Company approved Amendment No. 2 to its Retention Bonus Plan (the “Plan Amendment”). The Plan Amendment provides for (i) vesting of benefits upon the sale of each individual post-subdivision lot at Flowerfield and Cortlandt Manor, (ii) entitlement to a future benefit in the event of death, voluntary termination following substantial reduction in compensation or board fees, mutually agreed separation to right-size the board or involuntary termination without cause, and (iii) clarification of how development costs are calculated. As to any of the events referred to in clause (ii) above, a participant will only be eligible to receive a benefit to the extent that a property is sold within three years following the event and the sale produces an internal rate of return equal to at least four percent of the property’s value as of December 31 immediately preceding such event. The Plan Amendment does not have the effect of increasing the size of the participant pool, but rather only how benefits are divided among plan participants.
The value of the real estate reported in the Statement of Net Assets as of
December 31, 2017, does not include the increase in value that may result from the estimated land entitlement costs. As a result, the value reported does not exceed the adjusted appraised value under the Retention Bonus Plan on certain properties and accordingly the Company has not included any estimated retention bonuses on the sales of such properties.
Payments made during the
twelve months ended December 31, 2017 under the Retention Bonus Plan relating to the sales of three buildings in the Port Jefferson Professional Park were as follows:
|
RETENTION BONUS PLAN PARTICIPANTS
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Board of Directors
|
|
$
|
197,633
|
|
|
Chief Operating Officer
|
|
|
46,863
|
|
|
Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
50,898
|
|
|
Other Employees
|
|
|
8,658
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
304,052
|
|
Taxes
attributable to
the taxable REIT
subsidiary
Taxes attributable to the limited partnership investment in The Grove.
As of December 31, 2017, FPI has a deferred tax benefit of $73,085 reflecting taxes paid on income recognized for tax but not for book purposes. The Company does not expect to receive any further distributions from the Grove. As a result, the Company received a tax refund of $73,085 (the aforementioned tax benefit) in early 2018 following its filing of the net operating loss carryback claim.
Subsequent
Business
Event
s
Leasing Activity
.
Subsequent to December 31, 2017, the Company signed three new leases and lease extensions comprising approximately 3,300 square feet, $45,000 in annual revenue and $60,000 in total lease commitments. Additionally, the Company signed one expansion and one reduction comprising net increase of approximately 10,500 square feet, $82,000 in annual revenue and $3,200,000 in total lease commitments.
Subsequent to December 31, 201
7, the Company has experienced two lease terminations comprising approximately 1,600 square feet with approximately $14,000 in annual revenue.
Debt Facility.
To finance the buildout of the SBU expansion, the Company secured a non-revolving credit line with a bank for up to $3,000,000, which closed on March 21, 2018. There will be an interest only phase for the first eight months of the loan (“Interest-Only Phase”) after which it will automatically convert to a permanent loan maturing on November 30, 2025 (84 months after conversion to a permanent loan) (the “Permanent Phase”). The interest rate during the Interest-Only Phase shall be a variable rate equal to the daily highest prime rate published by the Wall Street Journal plus 100 basis points (1% rounded up to the nearest 1/8 percent). During the Permanent Phase, the Company will pay interest at a fixed rate based on the Federal Home Loan Bank rate for a 7 year maturity as made available by the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York plus a margin of 200 basis points (2%) rounded up to the nearest 1/8 percent but in no event less than 4.25%, plus principal based on a 20-year amortization period.
The first advance of up to $1.1 million will be used to finance the tenant improvements pursuant to the expanded signed leasing relationship with SBU Hospital described above. The balance of the loan can be drawn upon for improvements to be completed by the Company, as landlord, pursuant to a lease with State University of New York or its affiliates (or other tenants subject to the bank
’s approval) anytime during the Interest-Only Phase.
The mortgage loan is secured by approximately 31.8 acres of the Flowerfield Industrial Park including the respective buildings and related leases. The only significant financial covenant associated with the loan is a debt service ratio on GSD Flowerfield, LLC of 1.35 to 1.
The Company anticipates modifying the terms of the loan following the completion of its subdivision.
The Company is committed to focusing its current capital on supporting operations and the pursuit of entitleme
nts. The loan is financing the Company’s secondary but dual strategy of maximizing the value of the Flowerfield.
Employees
As of December 31, 201
7 and 2016 we had 4 employees and 6 employees, respectively. The number of employees was reduced to five following the separation of Frederick C. Braun III from the Company which was mutually agreed upon and effective April 30, 2017. The Company reduced staff in late 2017 to right size the Company based on its forecasted needs during the balance of the business plan of liquidation.
Industry Segments
We operate primarily in one
segment the management of multi-tenanted industrial and medical office buildings.
Available Information
We electronically file annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and all amendments to those reports, and proxy statements, with the SEC. You may read and copy any materials we file with the SEC at the SEC
’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, D.C. 20549, or you may obtain information by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC maintains an internet address at http://www.sec.gov that contains reports, proxy statements and information statements, and other information, which you may obtain free of charge. In addition, copies of our filings with the SEC may be obtained from our website located at
www.gyrodyne.com
.
We make available, free of charge, on or through the Investor Relations section of our website, Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Current Reports on Form 8-K and any amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as well as prospectuses and Proxy Statements, as soon as reasonably practicable following the electronic filing of such material with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Also available on our website is our Audit Committee Charter and our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics governing our directors, officers and employees. In addition, our web site includes information with respect to purchases and sales of securities by our officers, directors as well as any non-GAAP financial disclosures (defined by SEC’s Regulation G) that we may make public orally, or in writing. We are not incorporating our website or any information from the website into this Form 10-K.
Our Investor Relations department can be contacted at One Flowerfield
, Suite 24, St. James, New York 11780, ATTN: Investor Relations or by Telephone: 631-584-5400.
Principal Executive Offices
– Our principal executive office is located at One Flowerfield, Suite 24, St James, New York 11780. Our telephone number is 631-584-5400.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
.
Gyrodyne
’s business, financial condition, results of operations and liquidating distribution potential are subject to risks customary for real property owners, as well as additional risks associated with Gyrodyne’s strategic plan of positioning our remaining properties for sale at enhanced values and making liquidating distributions to our shareholders. In addition to the factors discussed elsewhere in this Report, the following risks and uncertainties could materially harm the value of our properties and the magnitude of distributions to our shareholders, including causing Gyrodyne’s actual results to differ materially from those projected in any forward-looking statements. The following summary of significant risk factors is not all-inclusive or necessarily in order of importance. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to Gyrodyne or that Gyrodyne currently deems immaterial also may materially adversely affect us in future periods. For more information about forward-looking statements, see the section of this report entitled “Cautionary Statement Concerning Forward-Looking Information” below.
I
lliquidity of real estate
and l
ack of diversification
may make it difficult for us to sell properties or
achieve satisfactory returns
in one or more properties
within projected timelines
.
Our assets consist substantially of real properties which are relatively illiquid assets. Therefore, we will be limited in our ability to reconfigure our real estate portfolio in response to economic changes. We may encounter difficulty in disposing of properties when tenants vacate either at the expiration of the applicable lease or otherwise. When we decide to sell a particular property, our ability to do so and the prices we receive on their sale may be affected by many factors, including the number of potential buyers, the number of competing properties on the market and other market conditions, as well as whether the property is leased and if it is leased, the terms of the lease. As a result, we may be unable to sell our properties for an extended period of time at the values disclosed in our Consolidated Statement of Net Assets, which would adversely affect our results of operations, liquidity and financial condition. We expect to complete our process of pre-development enhancement and liquidation of all our properties by the end of 2019.
However, the illiquid nature of real estate and the short timeframe that we have chosen to complete the pre-development value enhancement and liquidation process could adversely impact the prospects for achieving our value enhancement and sale objectives and may ultimately result in an extension of the timeline and or additional costs for achieving our pre-development property value enhancement and liquidation objectives.
If our
land
entitlement
and
liquidation costs or unpaid liabilities are greater than we expect, our liquidating distributions to our
shareholders
may be delayed or reduced.
The Company estimates that it may incur approximately $
2.5 million in additional land entitlement costs through 2019 to continue pre-development property value enhancement efforts, including the pursuit of entitlements, zoning changes and special permits. Land entitlement costs, claims, liabilities and expenses from operations, including operating costs, salaries, income taxes, payroll and local taxes, legal, accounting and consulting fees and miscellaneous office expenses, will continue to be incurred during the process of value enhancement and liquidation. After we complete the sale of all our real properties, we will apply the proceeds of such dispositions first to settle any claims against Gyrodyne and then to make liquidating distributions to holders of Gyrodyne common shares. Before making liquidating distributions on our common shares, we will need to pay or arrange for the payment of all our transaction costs incurred on the sales of our properties, including enhancements of certain properties, and all valid claims of our creditors, including obligations under our Retention Bonus Plan. The total amount of land entitlement costs, transaction fees and all operating and administrative costs in the liquidation is not yet known and, therefore, we have used estimates of these costs in calculating the amounts of our projected liquidating distributions to our shareholders. To the extent that we have underestimated these costs in calculating our projections or we incur unforeseen additional costs, our actual liquidating distributions may be lower than our estimated net assets in liquidation. In addition, if the claims of our creditors are greater than we have anticipated, or we decide to acquire one or more insurance policies covering unknown or contingent claims against us, our liquidating distributions may be delayed or reduced. Further, if a reserve fund is established, payment of liquidating distributions to our holders of common shares may be delayed or reduced.
Stipulation of Settlement
prohibits us from selling
our remaining properties
at prices below December 2014 appraised values.
On July 3, 2014, a purported
shareholder of the Corporation filed a putative class action lawsuit against the Company, the Corporation, GSD and members of our Board of Directors (the "Action"). The complaint alleged, among other things, that (i) our directors breached their fiduciary duties or aided and abetted the breach of those duties in connection with the Merger and (ii) the Corporation and the directors breached their fiduciary duties by failing to disclose material information in the proxy statement/prospectus relating to the Merger. On August 14, 2015, the parties to the Action entered a Stipulation of Settlement (the "Settlement") providing for the settlement of the Action, subject to the court's approval. Under the Settlement, Gyrodyne amended its proxy statement relating to the Merger with certain supplemental disclosures and agreed that any sales of its properties would be effected only in arm's-length transactions at prices at or above their appraised values as of 2014.
The 2014
aggregate appraised value for our properties was approximately $100,000 higher than the 2013 aggregate appraised value for such properties. As of December 31, 2017, the aggregate appraised value of our remaining unsold properties was $4,416,665 higher than the 2014 aggregate appraised value for such properties.
The requirement in the Settlement that the Company sell its remaining properties at prices above the December 2014 appraised values could limit the options available to the Company.
The Company believes that it is in the best interests of the shareholders to pursue certain pre-development enhancements to its remaining properties prior to seeking their ultimate disposition to a developer or other purchaser because doing so will result in higher estimated distributions as compared with selling the properties with their current zoning and entitlements. The Company may also entertain offers from potential buyers who may be willing to pay prices for the properties in their current entitlement and zoning status that the Company finds more attractive from a timing or value perspective than might be achievable through completing an entitlement process. If the Company receives an offer prior to the completion of the entitlement process that it believes is in the best interests of the shareholders, it may nevertheless be prevented from consummating such transaction because of the price floor set in the Settlement. In addition, a severe downturn in the general economy or in the real estate market, or other negative factors beyond our control, may drive down the values of commercial real estate properties, or otherwise result in the values of our remaining properties being reduced to levels below the 2014 appraised values, in which case we may be prohibited under the Settlement from selling such properties. Such limitation on the options available to the Company may make it more difficult to accomplish our stated objective of completing the liquidation process prior to the end of 2019.
Furthermore, the Stipulation
’s price floor provision does not factor in land entitlement costs that may be incurred in enhancing the value of any particular property. Although the Company intends only to engage in value enhancement efforts and incur land entitlement costs if it reasonably believes that property values will increase more than the amount of such costs, and the Retention Bonus Plan as amended properly incentivizes the Company to do so by calculating the bonus pool as a percentage of the excess of gross sales proceeds from the sale of each property over the designated appraised value as adjusted by land entitlement costs, the price floor provision may nevertheless create a perverse incentive for the Company to incur certain land entitlement costs to increase the value of a property beyond its stipulated price floor even if the land entitlement costs incurred exceed the amount of the increase.
Risks incidental to real estate ownership and management.
Because our business plan is to pursue the opportunistic disposition of our properties, we do not expect to make any further investments other than to enhance the values of the Flowerfield and Cortlandt Manor properties which may include acquisitions of land and/or executing land swaps. Accordingly, an investment in Gyrodyne depends upon the financial performance and the value of our current portfolio of properties, which properties are subject to the risks normally associated with the ownership and management of
rental properties and real estate in general. The risks associated with ownership and management of rental properties include the non-performance of lease obligations by tenants, leasehold improvements that will be costly or difficult to remove should it become necessary to re-rent the leased space for other uses, covenants in certain retail leases that limit the types of tenants to which available space can be rented (which may limit demand or reduce the rents realized on re-renting), rights of termination of leases due to events of casualty or condemnation affecting the leased space or the property or due to interruption of the tenant's quiet enjoyment of the leased premises, and obligations of a landlord to restore the leased premises or the property following events of casualty or condemnation. The risks associated with ownership and management of real estate in general include:
|
•
|
adverse changes in general and local economic conditions which affect the demand for real estate assets;
|
|
•
|
competition from other properties;
|
|
•
|
fluctuations in interest rates;
|
|
•
|
reduced availability of financing;
|
|
•
|
the cyclical nature of the real estate industry and possible oversupply of, or reduced demand for, properties in the markets in which our investments are located;
|
|
•
|
the attractiveness of our properties to tenants and purchasers;
|
|
•
|
how well we manage our properties;
|
|
•
|
changes in market rental rates and our ability to rent space on favorable terms;
|
|
•
|
the financial condition of our tenants including their becoming insolvent and bankrupt;
|
|
•
|
the need to periodically renovate, repair and re-lease space and the costs thereof; and
|
|
•
|
increases in maintenance, insurance and operating costs.
|
There are risks associated with seeking to enhance the value of certain properties.
Gyrodyne is currently exploring enhancements of the value of our Flowerfield and Cortlandt Manor properties by pursuing various entitlement and/or zoning opportunities. The Board believes that the cost of doing so will be exceeded by the resulting increase in value in such properties. Our efforts to seek enhancements of such properties are subject to various risks, including the following:
|
•
|
any delay or denial of a required entitlement or permit, including zoning, land use, environmental, emissions or other related permits, would adversely impact our property enhancement plans;
|
|
•
|
our analysis of site context, of demographic trends, of decisions of anchor institutions and of growth opportunities generally may not result in identifying the correct high value land uses and programmatic synergies;
|
|
•
|
capital improvement costs and other expenses of such enhancements may be higher than projected, potentially making the project unfeasible or unprofitable;
|
|
•
|
we may not have funds available or be able to obtain financing for these value-enhancement projects on favorable terms, if at all;
|
|
•
|
we may experience delays in the repositioning or improvement process.
|
For these and other reasons, we cannot assure you that we will realize growth in the value of our Flowerfield and Cortlandt Manor properties that exceeds our land entitlement costs or any at all, and as a result our ability to make distributions to our shareholders could be adversely affected.
We cannot assure you of the exact timing and amount of any further distributions to our shareholders.
Our estimate of net assets in liquidation at December 31, 2017 is $26.6 million or $17.97 per common share. These estimated amounts are based on a number of assumptions and factors outside of our control. The process of disposing of our real property assets in an orderly manner designed to obtain the best value reasonably available for such assets may fail to create value or may result in lower than expected value and may result in lower than expected proceeds, or in no proceeds, for distribution to our shareholders. The actual nature, amount and timing of all distributions will be determined by Gyrodyne in our sole discretion, and will depend on, and could be delayed by, among other things, sales of our real estate assets, claim settlements with creditors, resolution of outstanding litigation matters, payment of incentive bonuses to those employees and directors who are vested under the Retention Bonus Plan and unanticipated or greater-than-expected expenses. Examples of uncertainties that could reduce the value of or eliminate distributions to our shareholders include unanticipated costs relating to:
|
•
|
failure to achieve favorable values for our properties in their disposition;
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
the defense, satisfaction or settlement of lawsuits or other claims that may be made or threatened against us in the future;
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
delay or failure to settle claims; and
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
administration and settlement of federal and state tax audits, if any.
|
As a result, we cannot determine with certainty the amount or timing of distributions to our shareholders.
If we are unable to find buyers for our properties at our expected sales prices, distributions may be delayed or reduced.
In calculating our estimated net assets in liquidation, we assume that we will be able to find buyers for all our properties at our estimated amounts. However, we may have overestimated the sales prices that we will be able to obtain for these properties or underestimated the costs associated with such sales. If we are not able to find buyers for these properties in a reasonably timely manner or if we have overestimated the sales prices we will receive, distributions payable to holders of our common shares would be delayed or reduced. Furthermore, our estimated net assets in liquidation are based on current market conditions, but real estate market values are constantly changing and tend to fluctuate with changes in interest rates, supply and demand dynamics, occupancy percentages, lease rates, the availability of suitable buyers, the perceived quality and dependability of income flows from tenancies and a number of other factors, both local and national. In addition, transactional fees and expenses, environmental contamination at our properties or unknown liabilities, if any, may adversely impact the net liquidation proceeds from those properties.
Distributions to shareholders may be delayed or reduced as a result of sale agreement provisions that allow purchasers to terminate
agreements
and
/or
result
in
purchaser defaults
.
P
urchase and sale agreements that we have entered into with respect to properties we previously sold contained provisions that gave the purchaser the right to terminate the agreement, for any reason or no reason, prior to the expiration of an evaluation period, and receive a refund of earnest money deposits, and it can be anticipated that agreements for future property sales will have similar provisions. The consummation of property sales for which we will enter into sale agreements in the future will also be subject to satisfaction of standard closing conditions. If any property sale contemplated by future sale agreements does not close because a purchaser exercises its termination right or defaults, or because of a failure of a closing condition or for any other reason, we will need to locate a new buyer for the property, which we may be unable to do promptly or at a price or on terms that are as favorable as contained in the original sale agreement. Many of the costs incurred due to a sale that fails to close are sunk costs with no future value and we will also incur additional costs involved in negotiating a new sale agreement for such property. These additional costs are not included in our projections. In the event that we incur these additional costs, distributions to our shareholders would be delayed or reduced.
Our shareholders may be liable to our creditors for an amount up to the amount distributed by us if our reserves for payments to creditors are inadequate.
In the event our shareholders receive distributions from Gyrodyne and there are insufficient funds to pay any creditors who seek payment of claims against Gyrodyne, shareholders could be held liable under New York State
’s fraudulent conveyance laws for payments made to them and could be required to return all or a part of distributions made to them.
Our properties may subject us to known and unknown liabilities.
Our existing properties may have known and unknown liabilities for which we would have no recourse, or only limited recourse, to the former owners of such properties. As a result, if a liability were asserted against us based upon ownership of an acquired property, we might be required to pay significant sums to settle it, which could adversely affect our financial results, cash flow and proceeds available for distribution. Unknown liabilities relating to acquired properties could include:
|
•
|
liabilities for clean-up of pre-existing disclosed or undisclosed environmental contamination;
|
|
•
|
claims by tenants, vendors or other persons arising on account of actions or omissions of the former owners of the properties; and
|
|
•
|
liabilities incurred in the ordinary course of business.
|
If we are unable to maintain the occupancy rates of currently leased space and
/or to
lease currently available space, if tenants default under their leases or other obligations to us or if our cash flow is otherwise less than we expect, distributions to our shareholders may be delayed or reduced.
The sales proceeds that could be generated from opportunistic dispositions of our real properties depend in large part on occupancy and rental rates, our success in renting currently available space and the existence of any significant tenant defaults that were not subsequently cured.
In calculating the estimated range of liquidating distributions, it was assumed that we would maintain the occupancy rates of currently leased space, that we would be able to rent currently available space in the ordinary course and that we would not experience any significant tenant defaults during the liquidation process that were not subsequently cured. Negative trends in one or more of these factors may adversely affect the resale value of the properties, which would reduce our distributions. Disposition proceeds and related distributions will be reduced to the extent that we receive less rental income than we expect. We may also decide in the event of a tenant default to restructure the lease, which could require us to substantially reduce the rent payable to us under the lease or make other modifications that are unfavorable to us.
We are subject to risks associated with the financial condition of our tenants.
Our tenants may experience a downturn in their business resulting in their inability to make rental payments when due.
In addition, a tenant may seek the protection of bankruptcy, insolvency or similar laws, which could result in the rejection and termination of such tenant’s lease and cause a reduction in our cash flow. We cannot evict a tenant solely because of its filing for bankruptcy. A bankruptcy court, however, may authorize a tenant to reject and terminate its lease. In such a case, our claim against the tenant for past due rent and unpaid future rent would be subject to a statutory cap that might be substantially less than the remaining rent owed under the lease. In any event, it is unlikely that a bankrupt tenant will pay the entire amount it owes us under a lease. The loss of rental payments from tenants would likely reduce proceeds from real property dispositions and distributions from such proceeds.
The loss of a major tenant could adversely affect our financial condition.
We are and expect that we will continue to be subject to a degree of tenant concentration at certain of our operating properties.
As indicated above, we are subject to risks associated with the financial condition of our tenants. In the event that a tenant occupying a significant portion of one or more of our properties or whose rental income represents a significant portion of the rental revenue at such property or properties were to experience financial weakness, default on its lease, elect not to renew its lease or file bankruptcy it would negatively impact our financial condition and, as a result, our distributions. We recently entered into an amendment to the existing lease with Stony Brook University Hospital for a 93% expansion of its currently leased space. The space covered by the amended lease would constitute approximately 15.9% of our total rentable square feet and the annual rent is expected to represent approximately 19.3% of our annual rental revenue for 2018.
We may experience increased operating costs, which might reduce our estimated net assets in liquidation and the sales prices received for our properties.
Our properties are subject to increases in operating expenses such as for cleaning, electricity, heating, ventilation and air conditioning, administrative costs and other costs associated with security, landscaping and repairs and maintenance of our properties.
In general, under our leases with tenants, we pass through all or a portion of these costs to them. There can be no assurance that tenants will actually bear the full burden of these higher costs, or that such increased costs will not lead them, or other prospective tenants, to seek space elsewhere. If operating expenses increase, the availability of other comparable space in the geographic markets of our properties might limit our ability to increase rents; if operating expenses increase without a corresponding increase in revenues, our profitability could diminish thereby reducing our estimated proceeds on disposition of real properties and limit the amount and likely delay the timing of our distributions.
Some of our potential losses may not be covered by insurance.
We use our discretion in determining amounts, coverage limits and deductibility provisions of insurance, with a view to maintaining appropriate insurance coverage on our properties at a reasonable cost and on suitable terms.
This may result in insurance coverage that, in the event of a substantial loss, would not be sufficient to pay the full current market value or current replacement cost of the property and also may result in certain losses being totally uninsured. Inflation, changes in building codes, zoning or other land use ordinances, environmental considerations or other factors might not make it feasible to use insurance proceeds to replace a building after such building has been damaged or destroyed. Under such circumstances, the insurance proceeds, if any, received by us might not be adequate to restore our economic position with respect to such property.
We may incur costs to comply with environmental laws.
The obligation to pay for the cost of complying with existing environmental laws, ordinances and regulations, as well as the cost of complying with future legislation, may increase our operating costs.
Under various federal, state and local environmental laws, ordinances and regulations, a current or previous owner or operator of real property may be liable for the costs of removal or remediation of hazardous or toxic substances on or under the property. Environmental laws often impose liability whether or not the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the presence of such hazardous or toxic substances and whether or not such substances originated from the property. Insurance that we maintain related to potential environmental issues on our properties may not be adequate to cover all possible contingencies.
Our common
shares are
thinly traded and there may not be an active, liquid trading market for our common
shares
.
Our common
shares are thinly traded and have substantially less liquidity than the average trading market for many other publicly traded companies. Thinly traded stocks can be more volatile than stock trading in an active public market. Our stock price has been volatile in the past and several factors could cause the price to fluctuate substantially in the future. These factors include but are not limited to our announcement of developments related to our plan to sell our properties opportunistically (some of which are or may be the subject of enhancement efforts), stock performance of other companies deemed to be peers, news reports of issues related to REITs or other real property owners and the real estate market and market forces generally. Over the past several years, the stock market has experienced a high level of price and volume volatility, and market prices for the stock of many companies, including those in the real estate sector, have experienced wide price fluctuations that have not necessarily been related to operating performance. Our stock price may fluctuate significantly in the future, and these fluctuations may be unrelated to our performance. General market declines or market volatility in the future, especially in the real estate sector of the economy, could adversely affect the price of our common shares, and the current market price may not be indicative of future market prices. There is no guarantee that an active trading market for our common shares will be maintained on Nasdaq, or that the volume of trading will be sufficient to allow for timely trades. Investors may not be able to sell their shares quickly or at the latest market price if trading in our stock is not active or if trading volume is limited. In addition, if trading volume in our common shares is limited, trades of relatively small numbers of shares may have a disproportionate effect on the market price of our common shares. Therefore, our shareholders may not be able to sell their shares at the volume, prices or times that they desire.
If our
common share
s
are
delisted from N
asdaq
, shareholders may find it difficult to dispose of their shares
.
We believe we are
currently in compliance with all of our Nasdaq listing requirements. Nevertheless, there are no assurances that we will be able to sustain long-term compliance with Nasdaq’s stockholders’ equity requirement or minimum bid price requirement for continued listing, particularly as we reduce our overall assets through the distribution of sales proceeds to our shareholders. If we fail to maintain compliance with applicable Nasdaq listing requirements, our common shares may be delisted by Nasdaq involuntarily. In addition, even if we are successful in maintaining compliance with applicable Nasdaq listing requirements, our board of directors may decide that the costs of compliance and the demands of management time and Company resources required to maintain our Nasdaq listing are greater than the benefits received by the Company and its shareholders from being a listed company and that, accordingly, consistent with other cash management and cost reduction measures that we have implemented, we should voluntarily delist from the Nasdaq Capital Market. If our common shares were delisted from Nasdaq voluntarily or involuntarily, trading of our common shares most likely will be conducted in the over-the-counter market on an electronic bulletin Board established for unlisted securities such as OTCQX, OTCBX or OTC Pink which will reduce the market liquidity of our common shares. Delisting may result in lower levels of ownership and trading by institutional shareholders, who are generally guided by quantitative and qualitative investment standards such as market capitalization, minimum share price and liquidity, which in turn often produces lower trading volumes and reduced liquidity. As a result, an investor would find it more difficult to dispose of, or obtain accurate quotations for the price of, our common shares. Also, many brokers will not allow customers to hold non-listed securities in managed accounts or place restrictions which inhibit holding or trading, and it is generally understood that brokers will not recommend non-listed securities to retail clients, perhaps not as official policy but rather as a practical reality. We cannot assure you that our common shares, if delisted from Nasdaq voluntarily, or if they would be delisted involuntarily by Nasdaq, will be listed on another national securities exchange or quoted on an over-the counter quotation system.
We do not anticipate making distributions other than distributions from property dispositions or of liquidation proceeds.
We have not paid any dividends other than the following special
dividends/distributions:
|
•
|
June 15, 2016- A special distribution of $9.25 per share.
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
September 15, 2016- A special distribution of $1.50 per share.
|
|
|
|
|
•
|
July 7, 2017 – A special distribution of $1.00 per share.
|
We have a history of losses and
we anticipate losses in the future, excluding proceeds from the sale of assets. There can be no guarantee that we will have income to distribute other than proceeds from the sale of properties or of the Company, and we may not make any dividends or distributions in the future other than distributions of proceeds on the sale of the Company or any of our assets.
The value of our medical office parks may be affected by factors in the healthcare industry.
On a pro for
ma basis to exclude assets sold, approximately 37,000 square feet of our rentable space and approximately 39% of our gross revenues for 2017 was attributable to our medical office properties. The medical office properties are subject to various operating risks common to the healthcare industry, many of which are beyond our control, including the following:
|
•
|
competition from other medical properties in our markets;
|
|
•
|
over-building of medical parks in our markets, which adversely affects occupancy and revenues at our properties;
|
|
•
|
hospitals servicing the local markets increasing their interest in employing private practitioners or increasing their real estate portfolio of medical office space for rent or real estate/medical practice related joint ventures;
|
|
•
|
reductions in medical reimbursements from Medicaid and Medicare which directly impact private practitioners;
|
|
•
|
unknown or unidentified adverse consequences from the recent federal healthcare legislation on private practitioners will adversely affect our medical properties in the form of rent rates and tenant reimbursements; and
|
|
•
|
changes in governmental laws and regulations, fiscal policies and zoning ordinances and the related costs of compliance with laws and regulations, fiscal policies and ordinances.
|
Investment in medical parks is capital intensive.
Our medical properties require periodic capital expenditures and renovation to remain competitive. Maintaining our occupancy upon renewals or locating new tenants may require rent concessions, tenant improvements or a combination of both. Additionally, the recent federal healthcare legislation has caused some medical professionals to increase their space requirements. Our ability to relocate our tenants into more suitable space within our medical parks may be limited due to the size of the suites currently vacant and the willingness of tenants to relocate within the building.
Our ability to fund capital expenditures may be limited.
Federal health care legislation has affected medical office real estate.
Our tenants in our Cortlandt Manor and Port Jefferson properties are hea
lthcare service providers. The healthcare industry is subject to substantial regulation and faces increased regulation particularly relating to fraud, waste and abuse, cost control and healthcare management. The healthcare industry may experience a significant expansion of applicable federal, state or local laws and regulations, previously enacted or future healthcare reform, new interpretations of existing laws and regulations or changes in enforcement priorities, all of which could materially impact the business and operations of our tenants and therefore the marketability of our medical office properties. The recent U.S. presidential election, coupled with a Republican-controlled Congress, makes the repeal and replacement of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (the “Affordable Care Act”) a possibility. In 2017, Congress unsuccessfully sought to replace substantial parts of the Affordable Care Act with different mechanisms for facilitating insurance coverage in the commercial and Medicaid markets, but was able to enact legislation eliminating the tax penalty for individuals who do not purchase insurance. A shift toward less comprehensive health insurance coverage and increased consumer cost-sharing on health expenditures could have a material adverse effect on our tenants’ financial conditions and results of operations and, in turn, their ability to satisfy their contractual obligations.
Our tenants are subject to extensive federal, state, and local licensure laws, regulations and industry standards governing business operations, the physical plant and structure, patient rights and privacy and security of health information. Our tenants
’ failure to comply with any of these laws could result in loss of licensure, denial of reimbursement, imposition of fines or other penalties, suspension or exclusion from the government sponsored Medicare and Medicaid programs, loss of accreditation or certification, or closure of the facility. In addition, efforts by third-party payors, such as the Medicare and Medicaid programs and private insurance carriers, including health maintenance organizations and other health plans, impose greater discounts and more stringent cost controls upon healthcare provider operations (through changes in reimbursement rates and methodologies, discounted fee structures, the assumption by healthcare providers of all or a portion of the financial risk or otherwise). Our tenants may also face significant limits on the scope of services reimbursed and on reimbursement rates and fees, all of which could impact their ability to pay rent or other obligations to us.
Illiquidity of real estate investments could significantly impede our ability to respond to adverse changes in the performance of our properties and harm our financial condition.
Because real estate investments are relatively illiquid, our ability to promptly sell one or more properties in the portfolio in response to changing economic, financial and investment conditions is limited.
The real estate market is affected by many factors that are beyond our control, including:
|
•
|
adverse changes in international, national, regional and local economic and market conditions;
|
|
•
|
changes in interest rates and in the cost and terms of debt financing;
|
|
•
|
absence of liquidity in credit markets which limits the availability and amount of debt financing;
|
|
•
|
changes in governmental laws and regulations, fiscal policies and zoning ordinances and the related costs of compliance with laws and regulations, fiscal policies and ordinances;
|
|
•
|
the ongoing need for capital improvements, particularly in older structures;
|
|
•
|
changes in operating expenses; and
|
|
•
|
civil unrest, acts of God, including earthquakes, floods and other natural disasters, and acts of war or terrorism, including the consequences of the terrorist acts, such as those that occurred on September 11, 2001.
|
We are subject to risks stemming from the New York State budget crisis.
Our industrial park borders Stony Brook University and the University
’s leases with us represent over 15% of our overall rentable space. The New York State budget crisis put additional pressure on Stony Brook University, part of the State University of New York system, to cut costs. Many of our tenants service the local area and may be adversely affected by a reduction in business from Stony Brook University. Stony Brook University currently has two remaining lease with Gyrodyne.
Geographic concentration of our properties will make our business vulnerable to economic downturns in the New York metropolitan area.
A
ll our remaining properties are located in the New York metropolitan area, specifically Northern Westchester and eastern Long Island. Economic conditions in these locations will significantly affect our revenues and the value of our properties. Business layoffs or downsizing, industry slowdowns, changing demographics and other similar factors may adversely affect the economic climate in these areas. Any resulting oversupply or reduced demand for space in the New York metropolitan area would therefore have a disproportionate negative impact on our revenues.
We are subject to risks associated with renovations and capital improvements.
Our properties have an ongoing need for renovations and other capital improvements, including replacement of HVAC systems, parking lots, and other structural items.
Tenants often require us to make periodic capital improvements as a condition of renewing leases. For the year ended December 31, 2017 we spent approximately $566,000 on capital improvements to our real estate portfolio. Capital improvements and renovation projects may give rise to the following risks:
|
•
|
possible environmental problems;
|
|
•
|
construction cost overruns and delays;
|
|
•
|
a possible shortage of available cash to fund capital improvements and the related possibility that financing for these capital improvements may not be available to us on affordable terms; and
|
|
•
|
uncertainties as to market demand or a loss of market demand after capital improvements have begun.
|
The costs associated with capital improvements on our properties could adversely affect our financial condition.
Cybersecurity risks and cyber incidents may adversely affect our business by causing a disruption to our operations, a compromise or corruption of our confidential information, and/or damage to our tenant and other business relationships, all of which could negatively impact our financial condition.
A cyber incident is considered to be any adverse event that threatens the confidentiality, integrity or availability of our information resources. These incidents may be an intentional attack or an unintentional event and could involve gaining unauthorized access to our information systems for purposes of misappropriating assets, stealing confidential information, corrupting data or causing operational disruption. The result of these incidents may include disrupted operations, misstated or unreliable financial data, liability for stolen assets or information, increased cybersecurity protection and insurance costs, litigation and damage to our tenant and investor relationships. As our reliance on technology has increased, so have the risks posed to our information systems, both internal and those we have outsourced. There is no guarantee that any processes, procedures and internal controls we have implemented or will implement will prevent cyber intrusions, which could have a negative impact on our financial condition, operations, tenant and other business relationships or confidential information.
Our mortgage indebtedness could adversely impact the value of our shareholders
’ investment if the value of the property securing the debt falls or if we are forced to refinance the debt during adverse economic conditions.
On March 21, 2018, our wholly owned subsidiary, GSD Flowerfield, LLC, closed on a non-revolving credit line with a bank for up to $3,000,000, secured by approximately 31.8 acres of the Flowerfield Industrial Park including the respective buildings and related leases and guaranteed by the Company.
If there is a shortfall between the cash flow from the mortgaged property and the cash flow needed to service mortgage debt on that property, then the amount available for distributions to shareholders may be reduced. In addition, incurring mortgage debt generally increases the risk of loss since defaults on indebtedness secured by a property may result in lenders initiating foreclosure actions. In that case, we could lose the property securing the loan that is in default and our ability to pay cash distributions to our shareholders will be adversely affected.
Increases in interest rates could increase the amount of our debt payments and adversely affect our ability to pay distributions to our shareholders.
As of March 21, 2018, we had a revolving credit line with a bank for up to $3,000,000. The credit line provides for an interest only phase for the first eight months of the loan (“Interest-Only Phase”) after which it will automatically convert to a permanent loan maturing on November 30, 2025 (84 months after conversion to a permanent loan) (the “Permanent Phase”). The interest rate during the Interest-Only Phase will be a variable rate equal to the daily highest prime rate published by the Wall Street Journal plus 100 basis points (1% rounded up to the nearest 1/8 percent). During the Permanent Phase, the Company will pay interest at a fixed rate.
Increases in interest rates during the Interest-Only Phase would increase our interest costs, which could reduce our cash flows and our ability to pay distributions to shareholders.
Changes in federal tax law could adversely affect distributions to our shareholders.
Legislative, regulatory or administrative changes could be enacted or promulgated at any time, either prospectively or with retroactive effect, and may adversely affect the Company and our shareholders.
Gyrodyne is not subject to an entity level income tax but rather is treated as a partnership for tax purposes, with its items of income, gain, deduction, loss and credit being reported on the Company’s information return, on Form 1065, and allocated annually on Schedule K-1 to our shareholders pro rata. Tax legislation informally known as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (the “2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act”) was signed into law on December 22, 2017, generally effective for taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2018. In addition to modifying income tax rates for individuals and corporations, the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act made certain changes to the tax treatment for pass-through entities, such as Gyrodyne. Shareholders are urged to consult a tax advisor regarding the implications of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act on their shares in Gyrodyne.