UNITED STATES OF AMERICA SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C., 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ
|
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
|
For the Quarterly Period ended March 31, 2009
Commission File: 001-15849
SANTANDER BANCORP
(Exact name of Corporation as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico
|
|
66-0573723
|
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
|
|
|
|
207 Ponce de León Avenue, Hato Rey, Puerto Rico
|
|
00917
|
|
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code)
|
Registrants telephone number, including area code:
(787) 777-4100
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes
þ
No
o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every
Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T
(§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes
o
No
þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions
of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting
company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer
o
|
|
Accelerated filer
þ
|
|
Non-accelerated filer
o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
|
Smaller Reporting Company
o
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act).Yes
o
No
þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the Registrants classes of common stock as of
the last practicable date.
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934:
|
|
|
Title of each class
|
|
Outstanding as of March 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
Common Stock, $2.50 par value
|
|
46,639,104
|
SANTANDER BANCORP
CONTENTS
Forward-Looking Statements
. When used in this Form 10-Q or future filings by Santander BanCorp
(the Corporation) with the Securities and Exchange Commission, in the Corporations press
releases or other public or shareholder communications, or in oral statements made with the
approval of an authorized executive officer, the word or phrases would be, will allow, intends
to, will likely result, are expected to, will continue, is anticipated, estimate,
project, believe, or similar expressions are intended to identify forward looking statements
within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
The future results of the Corporation could be affected by subsequent events and could differ
materially from those expressed in forward-looking statements. If future events and actual
performance differ from the Corporations assumptions, the actual results could vary significantly
from the performance projected in the forward-looking statements.
The Corporation wishes to caution readers not to place undue reliance on any such
forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date made, and to advise readers that
various factors, including regional and national conditions, substantial changes in levels of
market interest rates, credit and other risks of lending and investment activities, competitive and
regulatory factors and legislative changes, could affect the Corporations financial performance
and could cause the Corporations actual results for future periods to differ materially from those
anticipated or projected. The Corporation does not undertake, and specifically disclaims any
obligation, to update any forward-looking statements to reflect occurrences or unanticipated events
or circumstances after the date of such statements.
PART I ITEM 1
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
SANTANDER BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (UNAUDITED)
AS OF MARCH 31, 2009 AND DECEMBER 31, 2008
(Dollars in thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks
|
|
$
|
405,012
|
|
|
$
|
217,311
|
|
Interest-bearing deposits
|
|
|
50,964
|
|
|
|
976
|
|
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to resell
|
|
|
152,024
|
|
|
|
64,871
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
608,000
|
|
|
|
283,158
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-Bearing Deposits
|
|
|
8,557
|
|
|
|
7,394
|
|
Trading Securities, at fair value
|
|
|
47,073
|
|
|
|
64,719
|
|
Investment Securities Available for Sale,
at fair value:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities pledged that can be repledged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
408,650
|
|
Other investment securities available for sale
|
|
|
323,640
|
|
|
|
393,462
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment securities available for sale
|
|
|
323,640
|
|
|
|
802,112
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Investment Securities,
at amortized cost
|
|
|
51,957
|
|
|
|
61,632
|
|
Loans Held for Sale,
net
|
|
|
30,498
|
|
|
|
38,459
|
|
Loans,
net
|
|
|
5,627,085
|
|
|
|
5,929,499
|
|
Accrued Interest Receivable
|
|
|
41,901
|
|
|
|
45,953
|
|
Premises and Equipment,
net
|
|
|
18,202
|
|
|
|
19,368
|
|
Real Estate Held for Sale
|
|
|
8,075
|
|
|
|
8,075
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
121,482
|
|
|
|
121,482
|
|
Intangible Assets
|
|
|
29,719
|
|
|
|
29,842
|
|
Other Assets
|
|
|
436,791
|
|
|
|
485,883
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,352,980
|
|
|
$
|
7,897,576
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non interest-bearing
|
|
$
|
698,498
|
|
|
$
|
692,963
|
|
Interest-bearing, including $82.5 million and $101.4 million at fair value in 2009
and 2008, respectively
|
|
|
4,401,183
|
|
|
|
4,321,939
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits
|
|
|
5,099,681
|
|
|
|
5,014,902
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal Funds Purchased and Other Borrowings
|
|
|
890
|
|
|
|
2,040
|
|
Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
375,000
|
|
Commercial Paper Issued
|
|
|
34,084
|
|
|
|
50,985
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Advances
|
|
|
970,000
|
|
|
|
1,185,000
|
|
Term Notes
|
|
|
20,117
|
|
|
|
19,967
|
|
Subordinated Capital Notes,
including $120.9 million and $118.3 million at fair value in 2009 and 2008,
respectively
|
|
|
309,063
|
|
|
|
306,392
|
|
Accrued Interest Payable
|
|
|
51,745
|
|
|
|
45,419
|
|
Other Liabilities
|
|
|
321,935
|
|
|
|
346,235
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
6,807,515
|
|
|
|
7,345,940
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contingencies and Commitments (Notes 9, 10, 12, 13 and 16)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series A Preferred stock, $25 par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized, none issued and outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $2.50 par value; 200,000,000 shares authorized, 50,650,364 shares issued;
46,639,104 shares outstanding
|
|
|
126,626
|
|
|
|
126,626
|
|
Capital paid in excess of par value
|
|
|
317,624
|
|
|
|
317,141
|
|
Treasury stock at cost, 4,011,260 shares
|
|
|
(67,552
|
)
|
|
|
(67,552
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of taxes
|
|
|
(29,185
|
)
|
|
|
(22,563
|
)
|
Retained earnings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve fund
|
|
|
139,250
|
|
|
|
139,250
|
|
Undivided profits
|
|
|
58,702
|
|
|
|
58,734
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
545,465
|
|
|
|
551,636
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
7,352,980
|
|
|
$
|
7,897,576
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements
1
SANTANDER BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2009 AND 2008
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
$
|
119,527
|
|
|
$
|
143,670
|
|
Investment securities
|
|
|
8,944
|
|
|
|
14,120
|
|
Interest-bearing deposits
|
|
|
189
|
|
|
|
451
|
|
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to resell
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
788
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income
|
|
|
128,675
|
|
|
|
159,029
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
28,037
|
|
|
|
39,206
|
|
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase and other borrowings
|
|
|
12,273
|
|
|
|
31,559
|
|
Subordinated capital notes
|
|
|
3,972
|
|
|
|
3,665
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense
|
|
|
44,282
|
|
|
|
74,430
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
84,393
|
|
|
|
84,599
|
|
Provision for Loan Losses
|
|
|
41,100
|
|
|
|
39,575
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income after provision for loan losses
|
|
|
43,293
|
|
|
|
45,024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Income (Loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank service charges, fees and other
|
|
|
10,358
|
|
|
|
12,425
|
|
Broker-dealer, asset management and insurance fees
|
|
|
12,965
|
|
|
|
21,987
|
|
Gain on sale of securities
|
|
|
9,251
|
|
|
|
2,874
|
|
Gain on sale of loans
|
|
|
2,246
|
|
|
|
1,438
|
|
Other (loss)
income
|
|
|
(9,452
|
)
|
|
|
13,635
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income
|
|
|
25,368
|
|
|
|
52,359
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Operating Expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and employee benefits
|
|
|
26,855
|
|
|
|
29,987
|
|
Occupancy costs
|
|
|
6,257
|
|
|
|
6,416
|
|
Equipment expenses
|
|
|
1,083
|
|
|
|
1,193
|
|
EDP servicing, amortization and technical assistance
|
|
|
10,254
|
|
|
|
10,178
|
|
Communication expenses
|
|
|
2,447
|
|
|
|
2,535
|
|
Business promotion
|
|
|
767
|
|
|
|
1,965
|
|
Other taxes
|
|
|
3,357
|
|
|
|
3,406
|
|
Other operating expenses
|
|
|
18,357
|
|
|
|
15,764
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other operating expenses
|
|
|
69,377
|
|
|
|
71,444
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income before provision for income tax
|
|
|
(716
|
)
|
|
|
25,939
|
|
(Benefit) Provision for Income Tax
|
|
|
(685
|
)
|
|
|
8,217
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (Loss) Income Available to Common Shareholders
|
|
$
|
(31
|
)
|
|
$
|
17,722
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and Diluted Earnings per Common Share
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
0.38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements
2
SANTANDER BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY (UNAUDITED)
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2009 AND YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
126,626
|
|
|
$
|
126,626
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
|
126,626
|
|
|
|
126,626
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital Paid in Excess of Par Value:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
|
|
317,141
|
|
|
|
308,373
|
|
Capital contribution
|
|
|
483
|
|
|
|
9,710
|
|
Payments to ultimate parent for long-term incentive plan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(942
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
|
317,624
|
|
|
|
317,141
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury Stock at cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
|
|
(67,552
|
)
|
|
|
(67,552
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
|
(67,552
|
)
|
|
|
(67,552
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss, net of tax:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
|
|
(22,563
|
)
|
|
|
(24,478
|
)
|
Unrealized net (loss) gain on investment securities available
for sale, net of tax
|
|
|
(4,672
|
)
|
|
|
13,449
|
|
Unrealized net gain on cash flow hedges, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,237
|
|
Minimum pension liability, net of tax
|
|
|
(1,950
|
)
|
|
|
(12,771
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of the period
|
|
|
(29,185
|
)
|
|
|
(22,563
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve Fund:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
|
|
139,250
|
|
|
|
139,250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of the period
|
|
|
139,250
|
|
|
|
139,250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Undivided Profits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
|
|
58,734
|
|
|
|
54,317
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
10,531
|
|
Deferred tax benefit amortization
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Common stock cash dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,329
|
)
|
Cummulative effect of the adoption of SFAS 159
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,219
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of the period
|
|
|
58,702
|
|
|
|
58,734
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
545,465
|
|
|
$
|
551,636
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements
3
SANTANDER BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) INCOME (UNAUDITED)
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2009 AND 2008
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
Comprehensive (loss) income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(31
|
)
|
|
$
|
17,722
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized holding (losses) gains on investment securities available for sale,
net of tax
|
|
|
(60
|
)
|
|
|
9,975
|
|
Reclassification adjustment for losses on investment securities available for sale
included in net (loss) income, net of tax
|
|
|
(4,612
|
)
|
|
|
(331
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized net (loss) gain on investment securities available for sale, net
of tax
|
|
|
(4,672
|
)
|
|
|
9,644
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized net loss on cash flow hedges, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,117
|
)
|
Minimum pension liability, net of tax
|
|
|
(1,950
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax
|
|
|
(6,622
|
)
|
|
|
8,527
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(6,653
|
)
|
|
$
|
26,249
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements
4
SANTANDER BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2009 AND 2008
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(31
|
)
|
|
$
|
17,722
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash provided
by (used in) operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
3,216
|
|
|
|
4,006
|
|
Deferred tax benefit
|
|
|
(4,603
|
)
|
|
|
(1,582
|
)
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
41,100
|
|
|
|
39,575
|
|
Gain on sale of securities available for sale
|
|
|
(9,251
|
)
|
|
|
(2,874
|
)
|
Gain on sale of loans
|
|
|
(2,246
|
)
|
|
|
(1,438
|
)
|
Loss (gain) on derivatives
|
|
|
3,928
|
|
|
|
(3,769
|
)
|
Gain on trading securities
|
|
|
(403
|
)
|
|
|
(1,582
|
)
|
Valuation loss on loans held for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,638
|
|
Net premiun amortization (discount accretion) on securities
|
|
|
309
|
|
|
|
(1,257
|
)
|
Net premium amortization on loans
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
Accretion of debt discount
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share based compensation sponsored by the ultimate parent
|
|
|
483
|
|
|
|
5,511
|
|
Purchases and originations of loans held for sale
|
|
|
(56,598
|
)
|
|
|
(107,774
|
)
|
Proceeds from sales of loans
|
|
|
111,834
|
|
|
|
36,235
|
|
Repayments of loans held for sale
|
|
|
734
|
|
|
|
4,788
|
|
Proceeds from sales of trading securities
|
|
|
226,772
|
|
|
|
820,165
|
|
Purchases of trading securities
|
|
|
(174,684
|
)
|
|
|
(811,888
|
)
|
Decrease in accrued interest receivable
|
|
|
4,052
|
|
|
|
12,617
|
|
Decrease (increase) in other assets
|
|
|
27,636
|
|
|
|
(28,983
|
)
|
Increase (decrease) in accrued interest payable
|
|
|
6,326
|
|
|
|
(18,611
|
)
|
(Decrease) increase in other liabilities
|
|
|
(2,033
|
)
|
|
|
2,377
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustments
|
|
|
176,874
|
|
|
|
(52,745
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
|
176,843
|
|
|
|
(35,023
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in interest-bearing deposits
|
|
|
(1,163
|
)
|
|
|
(3,695
|
)
|
Proceeds from sales of investment securities available for sale
|
|
|
450,258
|
|
|
|
128,158
|
|
Proceeds from maturities of investment securities available for sale
|
|
|
137,000
|
|
|
|
5,159,679
|
|
Purchases of investment securities available for sale
|
|
|
(129,339
|
)
|
|
|
(5,094,991
|
)
|
Proceeds from maturities of other investment securities
|
|
|
11,700
|
|
|
|
16,875
|
|
Purchases of other investments
|
|
|
(2,025
|
)
|
|
|
(22,500
|
)
|
Repayment of securities and securities called
|
|
|
23,850
|
|
|
|
20,308
|
|
Payments on derivative transactions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(929
|
)
|
Net decrease in loans
|
|
|
181,350
|
|
|
|
20,178
|
|
Purchases of premises and equipment
|
|
|
(360
|
)
|
|
|
(2,693
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by investing activities
|
|
|
671,271
|
|
|
|
220,390
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Continued)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements
5
SANTANDER BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2009 AND 2008
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in deposits
|
|
|
84,779
|
|
|
|
388,744
|
|
Net decrease in federal funds purchased and other borrowings
|
|
|
(216,150
|
)
|
|
|
(529,780
|
)
|
Net decrease in securities sold under agreements to repurchase
|
|
|
(375,000
|
)
|
|
|
(60,597
|
)
|
Net (decrease) increase in commercial paper issued
|
|
|
(16,901
|
)
|
|
|
298,697
|
|
Net increase in term notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
147
|
|
Net increase in subordinated capital notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
Dividends paid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,462
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
|
|
|
(523,272
|
)
|
|
|
89,758
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET CHANGE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
|
|
324,842
|
|
|
|
275,125
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF YEAR
|
|
|
283,158
|
|
|
|
201,697
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF YEAR
|
|
$
|
608,000
|
|
|
$
|
476,822
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Concluded
Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Cash paid during the year for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
$
|
37,457
|
|
|
$
|
93,874
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes
|
|
$
|
4,268
|
|
|
$
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncash transactions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised options recognized as capital contribution
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,616
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum pension liability
|
|
$
|
1,950
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan securitization
|
|
$
|
34,057
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements
6
SANTANDER BANCORP AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2009 AND 2008
1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies:
The accounting and reporting policies of Santander BanCorp (the Corporation), a 91% owned
subsidiary of Banco Santander, S.A. (Santander Group) conform with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America (hereinafter referred to as generally accepted
accounting principles or GAAP) and with general practices within the financial services
industry. The unaudited quarterly condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared
pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Certain
information and footnote disclosures normally included in the annual financial statements prepared
in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted pursuant
to such SEC rules and regulations. The results of the operations and cash flows for the three
month periods ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be
expected for the full year.
These statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements
included in the Corporations Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. The accounting
policies used in preparing these condensed consolidated financial statements are substantially the
same as those described in Note 1 to the 2008 consolidated financial statements in the
Corporations Form 10-K.
Following is a summary of the Corporations most significant policies:
Nature of Operations and Use of Estimates
Santander BanCorp is a financial holding company offering a full range of financial services
(including mortgage banking) through its wholly owned banking subsidiary Banco Santander Puerto
Rico and subsidiary (the Bank). The Corporation also engages in broker-dealer, asset management,
consumer finance, international banking, insurance agency services through its subsidiaries,
Santander Securities Corporation, Santander Asset Management Corporation, Santander Financial
Services, Inc. (Island Finance), Santander International Bank, Santander Insurance Agency and
Island Insurance Corporation (currently inactive), respectively.
Santander BanCorp is subject to the Federal Bank Holding Company Act and to the regulations,
supervision, and examination of the Federal Reserve Board.
In preparing the condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of the condensed consolidated financial statements, and the reported
amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from
those estimates. Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change in the
near term relate to the determination of the allowance for loan losses, impairment of goodwill and
other intangibles, income taxes, and the valuation of foreclosed real estate, deferred tax assets
and financial instruments.
Principles of Consolidation
The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Corporation, the
Bank and the Banks wholly owned subsidiary, Santander International Bank; Santander Securities
Corporation and its wholly owned subsidiary, Santander Asset Management Corporation; Santander
Financial Services, Inc., Santander Insurance Agency and Island Insurance Corporation. All
significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Securities Purchased/Sold under Agreements to Resell/Repurchase
Repurchase and resell agreements are treated as collateralized financing transactions and are
carried at the amounts at which the assets will be reacquired or resold at the contractual
maturity. The settlement of these agreements prior to maturity may be subject to early termination
penalties.
The counterparties to securities purchased under resell agreements maintain effective control
over such securities and accordingly, those securities are not reflected in the Corporations
consolidated balance sheets. The Corporation monitors the market value of the underlying
securities as compared to the related receivable, including accrued interest, and requests
additional collateral where deemed appropriate.
7
The Corporation maintains effective control over assets sold under agreements to repurchase;
accordingly, such securities continue to be carried on the consolidated balance sheets.
Investment
Securities
Investment securities are classified in four categories and accounted for as follows:
|
|
|
Debt securities that the Corporation has the intent and ability to hold to maturity are
classified as securities held to maturity and reported at cost adjusted for premium
amortization and discount accretion. The Corporation may not sell or transfer
held-to-maturity securities without calling into question its intent to hold securities to
maturity, unless a nonrecurring or unusual event that could not have been reasonably
anticipated has occurred.
|
|
|
|
|
Debt and equity securities that are bought and held principally for the purpose of
selling them in the near term are classified as trading securities and reported at fair
value with unrealized gains and losses included in the consolidated statements of
operations as part of other income. Financial instruments including, to a limited extent,
derivatives, such as option contracts, are used by the Corporation in dealing and other
trading activities and are carried at fair value. Interest revenue and expense arising from
trading instruments are included in the consolidated statements of operations as part of
net interest income.
|
|
|
|
|
Debt and equity securities not classified as either securities held to maturity or
trading securities, and which have a readily available fair value, are classified as
securities available for sale and reported at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses
reported, net of tax, in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). The specific
identification method is used to determine realized gains and losses on sales of securities
available for sale, which are included in gain (loss) on sale of investment securities in
the consolidated statements of operations.
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in debt, equity or other securities, that do not have readily determinable
fair values, are classified as other investment securities in the consolidated balance
sheets. These securities are stated at cost. Stock that is owned by the Corporation to
comply with regulatory requirements, such as Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) stock, is
included in this category.
|
The amortization of premiums is deducted and the accretion of discounts is added to net
interest income based on a method which approximates the interest method, over the outstanding life
of the related securities. The cost of securities sold is determined by specific identification.
For securities available for sale, held to maturity and other investment securities, the
Corporation reports separately in the consolidated statements of operations, net realized gains or
losses on sales of investment securities and unrealized loss valuation adjustments considered other
than temporary, if any.
Derivative Financial Instruments
The Corporation uses derivative financial instruments mostly as hedges of interest rate risk,
changes in fair value of assets and liabilities and to secure future cash flows.
All of the Corporations derivative instruments are recognized as assets or liabilities at
fair value. If certain conditions are met, the derivative may qualify for hedge accounting
treatment and be designated as one of the following types of hedges: (a) hedge of the exposure to
changes in the fair value of a recognized asset or liability or an unrecognized firm commitment
(fair value hedge); (b) a hedge of the exposure to variability of cash flows of a recognized
asset, liability or forecasted transaction (cash flow hedge) or (c) a hedge of foreign currency
exposure (foreign currency hedge).
Prior to the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS ) No. 159,
Fair
Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities- including an amendment of FASB
Statements No. 115"
, in the case of a qualifying fair value hedge, changes in the value of the
derivative instruments that have been highly effective were recognized in current period
consolidated statements of operations along with the change in value of the designated hedged item
attributable to the risk being hedged. If the hedge relationship was terminated, hedge accounting
was discontinued and any balance related to the derivative was recognized in current operations,
and the fair value adjustment to the hedged item continued to be reported as part of the basis of
the item and was amortized to earnings as a yield adjustment. The Corporation hedges certain
callable brokered certificates of deposits and subordinated capital notes by using interest rate
swaps. Prior to the adoption of SFAS 159 as of January 1, 2008, these swaps were designated for the
hedge accounting treatment under SFAS 133,
Accounting for Derivatives Instruments and Hedging
Activities
as amended and interpreted (SFAS 133). These financial instruments were accounted for
as fair value hedges, with changes in the fair value of both the derivative and the hedged item
included in other income and the interest included in net interest income in the consolidated
statements of operations. In connection with the adoption of SFAS
8
159 the Corporation carries certain callable brokered certificates of deposits and subordinated
capital notes at fair value with changes in fair value included in other income in the consolidated
statements of operations. The cost of funding of the Corporations borrowings, as well as
derivatives, continues to be included in interest expense and income, as applicable, in the
consolidated statements of operations. See Note 18 to the consolidated financial statements for
more information.
In the case of a qualifying cash flow hedge, changes in the value of the derivative
instruments that have been highly effective are recognized in other comprehensive income, until
such time as those earnings are affected by the variability of the cash flows of the underlying
hedged item. If the hedge relationship is terminated, the net derivative gain or loss related to
the discontinued cash flow hedge should continue to be reported in accumulated other comprehensive
income (loss) and would be reclassified into earnings when the cash flows that were hedged occur,
or when the forecasted transaction affects earnings or is no longer expected to occur. In either a
fair value hedge or a cash flow hedge, net earnings may be impacted to the extent the changes in
the value of the derivative instruments do not perfectly offset changes in the value of the hedged
items. If the derivative is not designated as a hedging instrument, the changes in fair value of
the derivative are recorded in consolidated statements of operations.
Certain contracts contain embedded derivatives. When the embedded derivative possesses
economic characteristics that are not clearly and closely related to the economic characteristics
of the host contract, it is bifurcated, carried at fair value, and designated as a trading or
non-hedging derivative instrument.
Loans Held for Sale
Loans held for sale are recorded at the lower of cost or market computed on the aggregate
portfolio basis. The amount, by which cost exceeds market value, if any, is accounted for as a
valuation allowance with changes included in the determination of results of operations for the
period in which the change occurs. The amount of loan origination cost and fees are deferred at
origination of the loans and recognized as part of the gain and loss on sale of the loans in the
consolidated statement of operations as part of other income.
Loans
Loans that management has the intent and ability to hold for the foreseeable future or until
maturity or pay-off are reported at their outstanding unpaid principal balances adjusted for the
allowance for loan losses, unearned finance charges and any deferred fees or costs on originated
loans.
Interest income is accrued on the unpaid principal balance. Loan origination fees, net of
certain direct origination costs, are deferred and amortized using methods that approximate the
interest method over the term of the loans as an adjustment to interest yield. Discounts and
premiums on purchased loans are amortized to results of operations over the expected lives of the
loans using a method that approximates the interest method.
The accrual of interest on commercial loans, construction loans, lease financing and
closed-end consumer loans is discontinued when, in managements opinion, the borrower may be unable
to meet payments as they become due, but in no event is it recognized after 90 days in arrears on
payments of principal or interest. Interest on mortgage loans is not recognized after four months
in arrears on payments of principal or interest. Income is generally recognized on open-end
(revolving credit) consumer loans until the loans are charged off. When interest accrual is
discontinued, unpaid interest is reversed on all closed-end portfolios. Interest income is
subsequently recognized only to the extent that it is collected. The non accrual status is
discontinued when loans are made current by the borrower.
The Corporation leases vehicles and equipment to individual and corporate customers. The
finance method of accounting is used to recognize revenue on lease contracts that meet the criteria
specified in (SFAS) No. 13,
Accounting for Leases
, as amended. Aggregate rentals due over the
term of the leases less unearned income are included in lease receivable, which is part of Loans,
net in the consolidated balance sheets. Unearned income is amortized to results of operations over
the lease term so as to yield a constant rate of return on the principal amounts outstanding.
Lease origination fees and costs are deferred and amortized over the average life of the portfolio
as an adjustment to yield.
9
Off-Balance Sheet Instruments
In the ordinary course of business, the Corporation enters into off-balance sheet instruments
consisting of commitments to extend credit, stand by letters of credit and financial guarantees.
Such financial instruments are recorded in the consolidated financial statements when they are
funded or when related fees are incurred or received. The Corporation periodically evaluates the
credit risks inherent in these commitments, and establishes loss allowances for such risks if and
when these are deemed necessary.
The Corporation recognized as liabilities the fair value of the obligations undertaken in
issuing the guarantees under the standby letters of credit issued or modified after December 31,
2002, net of the related amortization at inception. The fair value approximates the unamortized
fees received from the customers for issuing the standby letters of credit. The fees are deferred
and recognized on a straight-line basis over the commitment period. Standby letters of credit
outstanding at March 31, 2009 had terms ranging from one month to five years.
Fees received for providing loan commitments and letters of credit that result in loans are
typically deferred and amortized to interest income over the life of the related loan, beginning
with the initial borrowing. Fees on commitments and letters of credit are amortized to other
income as banking fees and commissions over the commitment period when funding is not expected.
Allowance for Loan Losses
The allowance for loan losses is a current estimate of the losses inherent in the present
portfolio based on managements ongoing quarterly evaluations of the loan portfolio. Estimates of
losses inherent in the loan portfolio involve the exercise of judgment and the use of assumptions.
This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires estimates that are susceptible to
significant revision as more information becomes available. The allowance is increased by a
provision for loan losses, which is charged to expense and reduced by charge-offs, net of
recoveries. Changes in the allowance relating to impaired loans are charged or credited to the
provision for loan losses. Because of uncertainties inherent in the estimation process,
managements estimate of credit losses in the loan portfolio and the related allowance may change
in the near term.
The Corporation follows a systematic methodology to establish and evaluate the adequacy of the
allowance for loan losses. This methodology consists of several key elements.
Larger commercial, construction loans and certain mortgage loans that exhibit potential or
observed credit weaknesses are subject to individual review. Where appropriate, allowances are
allocated to individual loans based on managements estimate of the borrowers ability to repay the
loan given the availability of collateral, other sources of cash flow and legal options available
to the Corporation.
Included in the review of individual loans are those that are impaired as defined by GAAP. Any
allowances for loans deemed impaired are measured based on the present value of expected future
cash flows discounted at the loans effective interest rate or on the fair value of the underlying
collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. Commercial business, commercial real estate,
construction and mortgage loans exceeding a predetermined monetary threshold are individually
evaluated for impairment. Other loans are evaluated in homogeneous groups and collectively
evaluated for impairment. Loans that are recorded at fair value or at the lower of cost or fair
value are not evaluated for impairment. Impaired loans for which the discounted cash flows,
collateral value or fair value exceeds its carrying value do not require an allowance. The
Corporation evaluates the collectivity of both principal and interest when assessing the need for
loss accrual.
Historical loss rates are applied to other commercial loans not subject to individual review.
The loss rates are derived from historical loss trends.
Homogeneous loans, such as consumer installment, credit card, residential mortgage and
consumer finance are not individually risk graded. Allowances are established for each pool of
loans based on the expected net charge-offs for one year. Loss rates are based on the average net
charge-off history by loan category, market loss trends and other relevant economic factors.
An unallocated allowance is maintained to recognize the imprecision in estimating and
measuring losses when estimating the allowance for individual loans or pools of loans.
Historical loss rates for commercial and consumer loans may also be adjusted for significant
factors that, in managements judgment, reflect the impact of any current condition on loss
recognition. Factors which management considers in the analysis include the effect of the national
and local economies, trends in the nature and volume of loans (delinquencies,
10
charge-offs, non-accrual and problem loans), changes in the internal lending policies and credit
standards, collection practices, and examination results from bank regulatory agencies and the
Corporations internal credit examiners.
Allowances on individual loans and historical loss rates are reviewed quarterly and adjusted
as necessary based on changing borrower and/or collateral conditions and actual collection and
charge-off experience.
Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities
Transfers of financial assets are accounted for as sales, when control over the transferred
assets is deemed to be surrendered: (1) the assets have been isolated from the Corporation, (2) the
transferee obtains the right (free of conditions that constrain it from taking advantage of that
right) to pledge or exchange the transferred assets, and (3) the Corporation does not maintain
effective control over the transferred assets through an agreement to repurchase them before their
maturity. The Corporation recognizes the financial assets and servicing assets it controls and the
liabilities it has incurred. At the same time, it ceases to recognize financial assets when control
has been surrendered and liabilities when they are extinguished.
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
The Corporation accounts for goodwill in accordance with SFAS No. 142,
Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets
. The reporting units are tested for impairment annually to determine whether
their carrying value exceeds their fair market value. Should this be the case, the value of
goodwill or indefinite-lived intangibles may be impaired and written down. Goodwill and other
indefinite lived intangible assets are also tested for impairment on an interim basis if an event
occurs or circumstances change between annual tests that would more likely than not reduce the fair
value of the reporting unit below its carrying amount. If there is a determination that the fair
value of the goodwill or other identifiable intangible asset is less than the carrying value, an
impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to the difference. Impairment losses, if any, are
reflected in operating expenses in the consolidated statement of operations.
In accordance with SFAS No. 144
Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived
Assets
, the Corporation reviews finite-lived intangible assets for impairment whenever an event
occurs or circumstances changes which indicate that the carrying amount of such assets may not be
fully recoverable. Determination of recoverability is based on the estimate of undiscounted future
cash flows resulting from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition. Measurement of an
impairment loss is based on the fair value of the asset compared to its carrying value. If the fair
value of the asset is determined to be less that the carrying value, an impairment loss is incurred
in the amount equal to the difference. Impairment losses, if any, are reflected in operation
expenses in the consolidated statements of operations.
The Corporation uses judgment in assessing goodwill and intangible assets for impairment.
Estimates of fair value are based on projections of revenues, operating costs and cash flows of
each reporting unit considering historical and anticipated future results, general economic and
market conditions as well as the impact of planned business or operational strategies. The
valuations employ a combination of present value techniques to measure fair value and consider
market factors. Generally, the Corporation engages third party specialists to assist with its
valuations. Additionally, judgment is used in determining the useful lives of finite-lived
intangible assets. Changes in judgments and projections could result in a significantly different
estimate of the fair value of the reporting units and could result in an impairment of goodwill.
Effective January 1, 2009, the Corporation has adopted SFAS 157 for fair value measurement of
goodwill and intangible assets pursuant to FASB Staff Position (FSP) FAS 157-2
Effective Date of
FASB Statement No. 157
issued in February 2008. The adoption of this statement for nonfinancial
assets and nonfinancial liabilities did not have material impact on the Corporations consolidated
financial statements and disclosures.
As a result of the purchase price allocations from prior acquisitions and the Corporations
decentralized structure, goodwill is included in multiple reporting units. Due to certain factors
such as the highly competitive environment, cyclical nature of the business in some of the
reporting units, general economic and market conditions as well as planned business or operational
strategies, among others, the profitability of the Corporations individual reporting units may
periodically suffer from downturns in these factors. These factors may have a relatively more
pronounced impact on the individual reporting units as compared to the Corporation as a whole and
might adversely affect the fair value of the reporting units. If material adverse conditions occur
that impact the Corporations reporting units, the Corporations reporting units, and the related
goodwill would need to be written down to an amount considered recoverable.
Mortgage-servicing Rights
Mortgage-servicing rights (MSRs) represent the cost of acquiring the contractual rights to
service loans for others. On a quarterly basis the Corporation evaluates its MSRs for impairment
and charges any such impairment to current period
11
earnings. In order to evaluate its MSRs the Corporation stratifies the related mortgage loans on
the basis of their risk characteristics which have been determined to be: type of loan
(government-guaranteed, conventional, conforming and non-conforming), interest rates and
maturities. Impairment of MSRs is determined by estimating the fair value of each stratum and
comparing it to its carrying value. No impairment loss was recognized for the three months ended
March 31, 2009 and 2008.
MSRs are also subject to periodic amortization. The amortization of MSRs is based on the
amount and timing of estimated cash flows to be recovered with respect to the MSRs over their
expected lives. Amortization may be accelerated or decelerated to the extent that changes in
interest rates or prepayment rates warrant.
Mortgage Banking
Mortgage loan servicing includes collecting monthly mortgagor payments, forwarding payments
and related accounting reports to investors, collecting escrow deposits for the payment of
mortgagor property taxes and insurance, and paying taxes and insurance from escrow funds when due.
No asset or liability is recorded by the Corporation for mortgages serviced, except for
mortgage-servicing rights arising from the sale of mortgages, advances to investors and escrow
advances.
The Corporation recognizes as a separate asset the right to service mortgage loans for others
whenever those servicing rights are acquired. The Corporation acquires MSRs by purchasing or
originating loans and selling or securitizing those loans (with the servicing rights retained) and
allocates the total cost of the mortgage loans sold to the MSRs (included in intangible assets in
the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets) and the loans based on their relative fair
values. Further, mortgage-servicing rights are assessed for impairment based on the fair value of
those rights. MSRs are amortized over the estimated life of the related servicing income.
Mortgage loan-servicing fees, which are based on a percentage of the principal balances of the
mortgages serviced, are credited to income as mortgage payments are collected.
Mortgage loans serviced for others are not included in the accompanying condensed consolidated
balance sheets. At March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the unpaid principal balances of mortgage
loans serviced for others amounted to approximately $1,290,000,000 and $1,281,000,000,
respectively. In connection with these mortgage-servicing activities, the Corporation administered
escrow and other custodial funds which amounted to approximately $3,541,000 and $4,001,000 at March
31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively.
Trust Services
In connection with its trust activities, the Corporation administers and is custodian of
assets amounting to approximately $153,000,000 and $200,000,000 at March 31, 2009 and December 31,
2008, respectively. Due to the nature of trust activities, these assets are not included in the
Corporations consolidated balance sheets. Since December 31, 2006, when the Corporation sold to an
unaffiliated third party the servicing rights for certain trust accounts, the Corporations Trust
Division is focusing its efforts on transfer and paying agent and Individual Retirement Account
(IRA) services.
Broker-dealer and Asset Management Commissions
Commissions of the Corporations broker-dealer operations are composed of brokerage commission
income and expenses recorded on a trade date basis and proprietary securities transactions recorded
on a trade date basis. Investment banking revenues include gains, losses and fees net of syndicate
expenses, arising from securities offerings in which the Corporation acts as an underwriter or
agent. Investment banking management fees are recorded on offering date, sales concessions on trade
date, and underwriting fees at the time the underwriting is completed and the income is reasonably
determinable. Revenues from portfolio and other management and advisory fees include fees and
advisory charges resulting from the asset management of certain funds and are recognized over the
period when services are rendered.
Insurance Commissions
The Corporations insurance agency operation earns commissions on the sale of insurance
policies issued by unaffiliated insurance companies. Commission revenue is reported net of the
provision for commission returns on insurance policy cancellations, which is based on managements
estimate of future insurance policy cancellations as a result of historical turnover rates by types
of credit facilities subject to insurance.
12
Income Taxes
The Corporation uses the asset and liability balance sheet method for the recognition of
deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have
been recognized in the Corporations financial statements or tax returns. Deferred income tax
assets and liabilities are determined for differences between financial statement and tax bases of
assets and liabilities that will result in taxable or deductible amounts in the future. The
computation is based on enacted tax laws and rates applicable to periods in which the temporary
differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Valuation allowances are established, when
necessary, to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized.
The Corporation accounts for uncertain tax positions in accordance with FASB Interpretation
No. 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes
(FIN 48). Accordingly, the Corporation
reports a liability for unrecognized tax benefits resulting from uncertain tax positions taken or
expected to be taken in a tax return. The Corporation recognizes interest and penalties, if any,
related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense.
Earnings Per Common Share
Basic and diluted earnings per common share are computed by dividing net income available to
common stockholders, by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period.
The Corporations average number of common shares outstanding, used in the computation of earnings
per common share was 46,639,104 for each of the quarters ended March 31, 2009 and 2008. Basic and
diluted earnings per common share are the same since no stock options or other potentially dilutive
common shares were outstanding during the periods ended March 31, 2009 and 2008.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements that Affect the Corporation
The adoption of these accounting pronouncements had the following impact on the Corporations
condensed consolidated statements of income and financial condition:
|
|
|
SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair
Value Measurements, which establishes a framework for measuring fair value under GAAP and enhances
disclosures about fair value measurements. The Corporation adopted SFAS 157, as of January 1, 2008
for financial assets and liabilities. Fair value is defined under SFAS 157 as the price that would
be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most
advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market
participants on the measurement date. In February 2008, the FASB issued a FASB Staff Position (FSP
FAS 157-2) that partially delayed the effective date of SFAS 157 for one year for certain
nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except for items that are recognized or disclosed
at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis. FSP FAS 157-2 states that a
measurement is recurring if it happens at least annually and defines nonfinancial assets and
nonfinancial liabilities as all assets and liabilities other than those meeting the definition of a
financial asset or financial liability in SFAS No. 159. Effective January 1, 2009, the Corporation
adopted SFAS 157 for nonfinancial assets and liabilities eligible for deferral under FSP FAS 157-2.
The adoption of this statement for nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities did not have
material impact on the Corporations consolidated financial statements and disclosures. See Notes
12 and 18 for additional information.
|
|
|
|
|
SFAS No. 159, Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities-
including an amendment of FASB Statements No. 115.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS
No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities. In
conjunction with the adoption of SFAS 157, the Corporation adopted SFAS 159, as of January
1, 2008. SFAS 159 provides an option for most financial assets and liabilities to be
reported at fair value on an instrument-by-instrument basis with changes in fair value
reported in earnings. The election is made at the initial adoption, at the acquisition of a
financial asset, financial liability or a firm commitment and it may not be revoked. Under
the SFAS 159 transition provisions, the Corporation has elected to report certain callable
brokered certificates of deposits and subordinated notes at fair value with future changes
in value reported in earnings. SFAS 159 provides an opportunity to mitigate volatility in
reported earnings as well as reducing the burden associated with complex hedge accounting
requirements. As a result of this adoption and election under the fair value option on
January 1, 2008 , the Corporation reported an after-tax increase to beginning of year
retained earnings of $3.2 million.
|
|
|
|
|
SFAS No. 161 Disclosure about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, an
amendment of FASB Statements No. 133.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, which
requires the enhancement of the current disclosure framework in Statement 133. The
Statement requires that objectives for using derivative instruments be disclosed in
|
13
|
|
|
terms
of underlying risk and accounting designation. This disclosure better conveys the purpose
of derivative use in terms of the risks that the entity is intending to manage. Disclosing
the fair values of derivative instruments and their
gains and losses in a tabular format should provide a more complete picture of the location
in an entitys financial statements of both the derivative positions existing at period end
and the effect of using derivatives during the reporting period. Disclosing information about
credit-risk-related contingent features should provide information on the potential effect on
an entitys liquidity from using derivatives. Finally, this Statement requires
cross-referencing within the footnotes, which should help users of financial statements
locate important information about derivative instruments. This Statement is effective for
financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15,
2008, with early application encouraged. This Statement encourages, but does not require,
comparative disclosures for earlier periods at initial adoption. The adoption of this
Statement did not have material impact on the Corporations consolidated financial statements
and disclosures.
|
|
|
|
|
Staff Position (FSP) FAS 142-3, Determination of Useful Life of Intangible Assets"(FSP
FAS 142-3).
In April 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) FAS 142-3,
Determination of Useful Life of Intangible Assets. This FASB Staff Position (FSP) amends
the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used
to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under FASB Statement No. 142,
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
. The intent of this FSP is to improve the consistency
between the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under Statement 142 and the period
of expected cash flows used to measure the fair value of the asset under FASB Statement No.
141 (revised 2007),
Business Combinations,
and other U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles (GAAP). An intangible asset may be acquired individually or with a group of
other assets. This FSP applies regardless of the nature of the transaction that resulted in
the recognition of the intangible asset, that is, whether acquired in a business
combination or otherwise. In developing assumptions about renewal or extension used to
determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset, an entity shall consider its
own historical experience in renewing or extending similar arrangements; however, these
assumptions should be adjusted for the entity-specific factors in paragraph 11 of Statement
142. In the absence of that experience, an entity shall consider the assumptions that
market participants would use about renewal or extension (consistent with the highest and
best use of the asset by market participants), adjusted for the entity-specific factors in
paragraph 11 of Statement 142. This FSP is for financial statements issued for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2008 and interim periods within those fiscal years. The
Corporation adopted FSP FAS 142-3 effective January 1, 2009. The adoption of this FSP did
not have a material impact on the Corporations financial statements and disclosures.
|
The Corporation is evaluating the impact that the following recently issued accounting
pronouncements may have on its consolidated financial condition and results of operations.
|
|
|
SFAS No. 162 The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.
In May 2008,
the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, which identifies the sources of accounting principles and the
framework for selecting the principles to be used in the preparation of financial
statements of nongovernmental entities that are presented in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles (GAAP) in the United States (the GAAP hierarchy). The
current GAAP hierarchy, as set forth in the American Institute of Certified Public
Accountants (AICPA) Statement on Auditing Standards No. 69,
The Meaning of
Present Fairly
in Conformity With Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, has been criticized because
(1) it is directed to the auditor rather than the entity, (2) it is complex, and (3) it
ranks FASB Statements of Financial Accounting Concepts, which are subject to the same level
of due process as FASB Statements of Financial Accounting Standards, below industry
practices that are widely recognized as generally accepted but that are not subject to due
process. The Board believes that the GAAP hierarchy should be directed to entities because
it is the entity (not its auditor) that is responsible for selecting accounting principles
for financial statements that are presented in conformity with GAAP. Accordingly, the Board
concluded that the GAAP hierarchy should reside in the accounting literature established by
the FASB and is issuing this Statement to achieve that result. This Statement is effective
60 days (expected to be July 1, 2009) following the SECs approval of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board amendments to AU Section 411,
The Meaning of
Present Fairly in
Conformity With Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.
|
|
|
|
|
Staff Position (FSP) FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1, Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of
Financial Instruments (FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 ).
In April 2009, the FASB issued FASB
Staff Position (FSP) FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1 which amends FASB Statement No. 107,
Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments,
to require disclosures about fair
value of financial instruments for interim reporting periods of publicly traded companies
as well as in annual financial statements. This FSP also amends APB Opinion No. 28,
Interim
Financial Reporting,
to require those disclosures in summarized financial information at
interim reporting periods. Fair value information disclosed in the notes shall be presented
together with the related carrying amount in a form that makes it clear whether the fair
value and carrying amount represent assets or liabilities and how the carrying amount
relates to what is reported in the
|
14
|
|
|
statement of financial position. An entity also shall
disclose the method(s) and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value of
financial instruments and shall describe changes in method(s) and significant assumptions,
if any, during the period. This FSP shall be effective for interim reporting periods ending
after June 15, 2009, with early
adoption permitted for periods ending after March 15, 2009. An entity may early adopt this
FSP only if it also elects to early adopt FSP FAS 157-4,
Determining Fair Value When the
Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and
Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly,
and FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2,
Recognition
and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments
. This FSP does not require disclosures
for earlier periods presented for comparative purposes at initial adoption. In periods after
initial adoption, this FSP requires comparative disclosures only for periods ending after
initial adoption.
|
|
|
|
Staff Position (FSP) FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2, Recognition and Presentation of
Other-Than-Temporary Impairments (FSP FAS 115-2 and 124-2).
In April 2009, the FASB
issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2 amends the other-than-temporary
impairment guidance in U.S. GAAP for debt securities to make the guidance more operational
and to improve the presentation and disclosure of other-than-temporary impairments on debt
and equity securities in the financial statements. This FSP does not amend existing
recognition and measurement guidance related to other-than-temporary impairments of equity
securities. The FSP shall be effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending
after June 15, 2009, with early adoption permitted for periods ending after March 15, 2009.
Earlier adoption for periods ending before March 15, 2009, is not permitted. If an entity
elects to adopt early either FSP FAS 157-4,
Determining Fair Value When the Volume and
Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying
Transactions That Are Not Orderly
, or FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1,
Interim Disclosures about
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
, the entity also is required to adopt early this FSP.
Additionally, if an entity elects to adopt early this FSP, it is required to adopt FSP FAS
157-4. This FSP does not require disclosures for earlier periods presented for comparative
purposes at initial adoption. In periods after initial adoption, this FSP requires
comparative disclosures only for periods ending after initial adoption.
|
|
|
|
Staff Position (FSP) FAS 157-4, Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of
Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying
Transactions That Are Not Orderly (FSP FAS 157-4).
In April 2009, the FASB issued FASB
Staff Position (FSP) FAS 157-4 which provides additional guidance for estimating fair value
in accordance with FASB Statement No. 157,
Fair Value Measurements
, when the volume and
level of activity for the asset or liability have significantly decreased. This FSP also
includes guidance on identifying circumstances that indicate a transaction is not orderly.
This FSP amends Statement 157 to require that a reporting entity disclose in interim and
annual periods the inputs and valuation technique(s) used to measure fair value and a
discussion of changes in valuation techniques and related inputs, if any, during the
period. Also, define major category for equity securities and debt securities based on the
nature and risks of the securities. This FSP shall be effective for interim and annual
reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009, and shall be applied prospectively. Early
adoption is permitted for periods ending after March 15, 2009. Earlier adoption for periods
ending before March 15, 2009, is not permitted. If a reporting entity elects to adopt early
either FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2 or FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1,
Interim Disclosures about
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
, the reporting entity also is required to adopt early
this FSP. Additionally, if the reporting entity elects to adopt early this FSP, FSP FAS
115-2 and FAS 124-2 also must be adopted early. This FSP does not require disclosures for
earlier periods presented for comparative purposes at initial adoption. In periods after
initial adoption, this FSP requires comparative disclosures only for periods ending after
initial adoption.
|
15
2. Investment Securities Available for Sale:
The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses, fair value and weighted average yield of
investment securities available for sale by contractual maturity are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Yield
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Treasury and agencies of the United States
Government:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within one year
|
|
$
|
157,200
|
|
|
$
|
817
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
158,017
|
|
|
|
1.78
|
%
|
After one year to five years
|
|
|
5,656
|
|
|
|
216
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,872
|
|
|
|
3.99
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
162,856
|
|
|
|
1,033
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
163,889
|
|
|
|
1.86
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and its subdivisions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within one year
|
|
|
1,460
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
1,457
|
|
|
|
4.23
|
%
|
After one year to five years
|
|
|
130,200
|
|
|
|
671
|
|
|
|
247
|
|
|
|
130,624
|
|
|
|
5.22
|
%
|
After five years to ten years
|
|
|
9,542
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
319
|
|
|
|
9,251
|
|
|
|
5.15
|
%
|
Over ten years
|
|
|
4,505
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
4,503
|
|
|
|
5.55
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
145,707
|
|
|
|
702
|
|
|
|
574
|
|
|
|
145,835
|
|
|
|
5.21
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Over ten years
|
|
|
13,672
|
|
|
|
194
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,866
|
|
|
|
5.63
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within one year
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
4.65
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
322,285
|
|
|
$
|
1,929
|
|
|
$
|
574
|
|
|
$
|
323,640
|
|
|
|
3.53
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Yield
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Treasury and agencies of the United States
Government:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within one year
|
|
$
|
164,844
|
|
|
$
|
1,164
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
166,007
|
|
|
|
2.30
|
%
|
After one year to five years
|
|
|
5,658
|
|
|
|
251
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,909
|
|
|
|
3.99
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
170,502
|
|
|
|
1,415
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
171,916
|
|
|
|
2.36
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and its subdivisions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within one year
|
|
|
1,460
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
1,454
|
|
|
|
4.23
|
%
|
After one year to five years
|
|
|
133,185
|
|
|
|
347
|
|
|
|
384
|
|
|
|
133,148
|
|
|
|
5.23
|
%
|
After five years to ten years
|
|
|
9,545
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
9,479
|
|
|
|
5.18
|
%
|
Over ten years
|
|
|
4,505
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
4,535
|
|
|
|
5.55
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
148,695
|
|
|
|
409
|
|
|
|
488
|
|
|
|
148,616
|
|
|
|
5.22
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After five years to ten years
|
|
|
193,630
|
|
|
|
2,258
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
195,815
|
|
|
|
4.39
|
%
|
Over ten years
|
|
|
282,235
|
|
|
|
3,525
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
285,715
|
|
|
|
5.41
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
475,865
|
|
|
|
5,783
|
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
481,530
|
|
|
|
4.99
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within one year
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
4.65
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
795,112
|
|
|
$
|
7,607
|
|
|
$
|
607
|
|
|
$
|
802,112
|
|
|
|
4.47
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
The duration of long-term (over one year) investment securities in the available for sale
portfolio is approximately 1.0 years at March 31, 2009, comprised of approximately 0.8 years for
treasuries and agencies of the United States Government, 1.2 years for instruments from the
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and its subdivisions, 2.1 years for mortgage backed securities and 0.5
year for all other securities.
The number of positions, fair value and unrealized losses at March 31, 2009 and December 31,
2008, of investment securities available for sale that have been in a continuous unrealized loss
position for less than twelve months and for twelve months or more, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
Less than 12 months
|
|
|
12 months or more
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
of
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
of
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
Positions
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Positions
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Positions
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
Commonwealth of Puerto
Rico and its subdivisions
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
6,509
|
|
|
$
|
319
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
$
|
9,883
|
|
|
$
|
255
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
$
|
16,392
|
|
|
$
|
574
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
Less than 12 months
|
|
|
12 months or more
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
of
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
of
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
Positions
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Positions
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Positions
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Treasury and
agencies of the United States
Government
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
30,000
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
30,000
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
Commonwealth of Puerto
Rico and its
subdivisions
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
705
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
19,338
|
|
|
|
416
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
20,043
|
|
|
|
488
|
|
Mortgage-backed
securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
33,091
|
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
33,091
|
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
30,705
|
|
|
$
|
73
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
$
|
52,429
|
|
|
$
|
534
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
$
|
83,134
|
|
|
$
|
607
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Corporation evaluates its investment securities for other-than-temporary impairment on a
quarterly basis or earlier if other factors indicative of potential impairment exist. An
impairment charge in the consolidated statements of operations is recognized when the decline in
the fair value of the securities below their cost basis is judged to be other-than-temporary. The
Corporation considers various factors in determining whether it should recognize an impairment
charge, including, but not limited to the length of time and extent to which the fair value has
been less than its cost basis, expectation of recoverability of its original investment in the
securities and the Corporations intent and ability to hold the securities for a period of time
sufficient to allow for any forecasted recovery of fair value up to (or beyond) the cost of the
investment.
As of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, management concluded that there was no
other-than-temporary impairment in its investment securities portfolio. The unrealized losses in
the Corporations investments in U.S. and P.R. Government agencies and subdivisions were caused by
changes in market interest rates. All U.S. and P.R. Government agencies securities are investment
grade, as rated by major rating agencies. The contractual terms of these investments do not permit
the issuer to settle the securities at a price less than the face value of the investment. Since
the Corporation has the ability and intent to hold these investments until a recovery of fair
value, which may be maturity, the Corporation does not consider these investments to be
other-than-temporarily impaired at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008. The unrealized losses in
the Corporations investment in mortgage-backed securities were also caused by changes in market
interest rates. The Corporation purchased these investments at a discount relative to their face
amount, and the contractual cash flows of these investments are guaranteed by an agency of the
U.S. government or by other government-sponsored corporations. Accordingly, it is expected that
the securities will be settled at a price not less than par value of the investment. The decline
in market value is attributable to changes in interest rates and not credit quality and since the
Corporation has the ability and intent to hold these
investments until a recovery of fair value, which may be maturity, the Corporation does not
consider these investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired at March 31, 2009 and December
31, 2008.
Contractual maturities on certain securities, including mortgage-backed securities, could
differ from actual maturities since certain issuers may have the right to call or prepay these
securities.
17
The weighted average yield on investment securities available for sale is based on amortized
cost, therefore it does not give effect to changes in fair value.
3. Assets Pledged:
At March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, investment securities and loans were pledged to
secure deposits of public funds and Federal Home Loan Bank advances. The classification and
carrying amount of pledged assets, which the secured parties are not permitted to sell or repledge
as of March 31, and December 31 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Investment securities available for sale
|
|
$
|
221,507
|
|
|
$
|
227,658
|
|
Other investment securities
|
|
|
43,650
|
|
|
|
53,325
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
2,470,286
|
|
|
|
2,511,098
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,735,443
|
|
|
$
|
2,792,081
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pledged securities that the creditor has the right or contract to repledge, are presented
separately on the consolidated balance sheets. At December 31, 2008, investment securities with a
carrying value of approximately $408,650,000 were pledged to securities sold under agreements to
repurchase.
4. Loans:
The Corporations loan portfolio consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Commercial and industrial
|
|
$
|
2,072,257
|
|
|
$
|
2,165,613
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
530,426
|
|
|
|
565,833
|
|
Consumer finance
|
|
|
936,795
|
|
|
|
996,919
|
|
Leasing
|
|
|
56,237
|
|
|
|
64,065
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
94,809
|
|
|
|
194,596
|
|
Mortgage
|
|
|
2,512,428
|
|
|
|
2,553,328
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,202,952
|
|
|
|
6,540,354
|
|
Unearned income and deferred fees/costs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial, industrial and others
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
(290
|
)
|
Consumer finance
|
|
|
(379,497
|
)
|
|
|
(418,676
|
)
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
(196,510
|
)
|
|
|
(191,889
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, net
|
|
$
|
5,627,085
|
|
|
$
|
5,929,499
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the quarter ended March 31, 2009, the Corporation sold certain loans including some
classified as impaired to an affiliate for $92.8 million in cash. These loans had a net book value
of $92.8 million comprised of an outstanding principal balance of $95.8 million and a specific
valuation allowance of $3.0 million. The type of loans sold, at net book value, was $65.6 million
in construction loans and $27.2 million in commercial loans. No gain or loss was recognized on this
transaction.
18
5. Allowance for Loan Losses:
Changes in the allowance for loan losses are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
191,889
|
|
|
$
|
166,952
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
41,100
|
|
|
|
39,575
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
232,989
|
|
|
|
206,527
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Losses charged to the allowance:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial
|
|
|
4,727
|
|
|
|
2,344
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
2,254
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage
|
|
|
1,380
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
13,067
|
|
|
|
9,537
|
|
Consumer finance
|
|
|
16,056
|
|
|
|
15,917
|
|
Leasing
|
|
|
313
|
|
|
|
488
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,797
|
|
|
|
28,352
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recoveries:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial
|
|
|
470
|
|
|
|
156
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
333
|
|
|
|
345
|
|
Consumer finance
|
|
|
414
|
|
|
|
376
|
|
Leasing
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,318
|
|
|
|
975
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loans charged-off
|
|
|
36,479
|
|
|
|
27,377
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
$
|
196,510
|
|
|
$
|
179,150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6. Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets:
Goodwill
The Corporation assigned goodwill to reporting units at the time of acquisition. Goodwill was
allocated to the Commercial Banking segment, the Wealth Management segment and the Consumer Finance
segment as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Commercial Banking
|
|
$
|
10,537
|
|
|
$
|
10,537
|
|
Wealth Management
|
|
|
24,254
|
|
|
|
24,254
|
|
Consumer Finance
|
|
|
86,691
|
|
|
|
86,691
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
121,482
|
|
|
$
|
121,482
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill assigned to the Commercial Banking segment is related to the acquisition of Banco
Central Hispano Puerto Rico in 1996, the goodwill assigned to the Wealth Management segment is
related to the acquisition of Merrill Lynchs retail brokerage business in Puerto Rico by Santander
Securities Corporation in 2000 and the goodwill assigned to the Consumer Finance segment is related
to the acquisition of Island Finance in 2006.
19
Other Intangible Assets
Other intangible assets at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Commercial Banking Mortgage-servicing rights
|
|
$
|
10,229
|
|
|
$
|
10,175
|
|
Wealth Management Advisory-servicing rights
|
|
|
1,190
|
|
|
|
1,267
|
|
Consumer Finance:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade name
|
|
|
18,300
|
|
|
|
18,300
|
|
Non-compete agreements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
29,719
|
|
|
$
|
29,842
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-servicing rights arise from the right to service mortgages sold and have an estimated
useful life of eight years. The advisory-servicing rights are related to the Corporations
subsidiary acquisition of the right to serve as the investment advisor for the First Puerto Rico
Tax-Exempt Fund, Inc. acquired in 2002 and for First Puerto Rico Growth and Income Fund Inc. and
First Puerto Rico Daily Liquidity Fund Inc. acquired in December 2006. This intangible asset is
being amortized over a 10-year estimated useful life. Trade name is related to the acquisition of
Island Finance and has an indefinite useful life and is therefore not being amortized but is tested
for impairment at least annually. Non-compete agreements were intangible assets related to the
acquisition of Island Finance. Non-compete agreements have been fully amortized as of March 31,
2009.
The following table reflects the components of other intangible assets at March 31, 2009 and
December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Banking Mortgage-servicing rights
|
|
$
|
19,033
|
|
|
$
|
8,804
|
|
|
$
|
10,229
|
|
Wealth Management Advisory-servicing rights
|
|
|
3,050
|
|
|
|
1,860
|
|
|
|
1,190
|
|
Consumer Finance:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade name
|
|
|
18,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
40,383
|
|
|
$
|
10,664
|
|
|
$
|
29,719
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Banking Mortgage-servicing rights
|
|
$
|
18,382
|
|
|
$
|
8,207
|
|
|
$
|
10,175
|
|
Wealth Management Advisory-servicing rights
|
|
|
3,050
|
|
|
|
1,783
|
|
|
|
1,267
|
|
Consumer Finance:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade name
|
|
|
18,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,300
|
|
Non-compete agreements
|
|
|
3,356
|
|
|
|
3,256
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
43,088
|
|
|
$
|
13,246
|
|
|
$
|
29,842
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of the other intangibles assets for the three month period ended March 31, 2009
and year ended December 31, 2008 was approximately $0.8 million and $3.1 million, respectively.
20
7. Other Assets:
The Corporations other assets consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Deferred tax assets, net
|
|
$
|
63,365
|
|
|
$
|
56,542
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for claim receivable
of $25.1 million
|
|
|
43,071
|
|
|
|
40,581
|
|
Repossesed assets, net
|
|
|
28,410
|
|
|
|
22,306
|
|
Software, net
|
|
|
6,512
|
|
|
|
7,295
|
|
Prepaid expenses
|
|
|
11,195
|
|
|
|
13,835
|
|
Income tax credits
|
|
|
20,205
|
|
|
|
19,645
|
|
Customers liabilities on acceptances
|
|
|
198
|
|
|
|
610
|
|
Derivative assets
|
|
|
171,457
|
|
|
|
197,192
|
|
Confirming advances
|
|
|
77,462
|
|
|
|
122,540
|
|
Other
|
|
|
14,916
|
|
|
|
5,337
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
436,791
|
|
|
$
|
485,883
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of software assets for the three month period ended March 31, 2009 and year ended
December 31, 2008 was approximately $0.9 million and $4.8 million, respectively.
The Corporation had counterparty exposure to Lehman Brothers, Inc. (LBI) in connection
with the sale of securities sold under agreements to repurchase amounting to $200.2 million at
September 19, 2008 under a Master Repurchase Agreement. LBI was placed in a Securities Investor
Protection Corporation (SIPC) liquidation proceeding on September 19, 2008. The filing of the
SIPC liquidation proceeding was an event of default under the terms of the Master Repurchase
Agreement, which resulted in the acceleration of repurchase dates under the Master Repurchase
Agreement to September 19, 2008. This action resulted in a reduction in the Corporations total
assets of $225.3 million and a reduction in its total liabilities of $200.2 million in 2008. As
soon as claims procedures have been established in the LBI liquidation proceeding, the Corporation
intends to file a claim for the amount $25.1 million, which is the amount it is owed by LBI as a
result of the acceleration of repurchase date and the exercise by the Corporation of its rights
under the Master Repurchase Agreement, plus incidental expenses and damages. The Corporation has
recognized a claim receivable from LBI for $25.1 million and has established a valuation allowance
for the same amount since management, in consultation with legal counsel, believes that based on
current information and events, it is probable that the Corporation will be unable to collect all
amounts due. The tax effect related to the recognition of this valuation allowance was a deferred
tax benefit of $9.8 million.
The Law 197 of Puerto Rico (Law 197) of 2007 granted certain credits to home buyers on the
purchase of certain qualified new or existing homes. The incentives was as follows: (a) for a newly
constructed home that will constitute the individuals principal residence, a credit equal to 20% of
the sales price or $25,000, whichever is lower; (b) for newly constructed homes that will not
constitute the individuals principal residence, a credit of 10% of the sales price or $15,000,
whichever is lower; and (c) for existing homes a credit of 10% of the sales price or $10,000,
whichever is lower. The credits were generally granted to home buyers by the financial
institutions financing the home acquisition and later claimed on the financial institutions tax
return as a tax credit. Credits available under Law 197 needed to be certified by the Puerto Rico
Secretary of Treasury and the total amount of credits available under the law was $220,000,000,
which was depleted in December of 2008.
The tax credits do not expire and may be used against income taxes, including estimated income
taxes, for tax years commencing after December 31, 2007 in three installments, subject to certain
limitations. In addition, the tax credits may be ceded, sold or otherwise transferred to any other
person; and any tax credit not used in a given tax year, may be claimed as a refund but only for
taxable years commenced after December 31, 2010. The Corporation had $20.2 million unused income
tax credits certified by the Secretary at March 31, 2009.
21
8. Other Borrowings:
Following are summaries of borrowings as of and for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
Federal Funds
|
|
|
Securities Sold
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
|
Purchased and
|
|
|
Under Agreements
|
|
|
Paper
|
|
|
|
Other Borrowings
|
|
|
to Repurchase
|
|
|
Issued
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Amount outstanding at period-end
|
|
$
|
890
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
34,084
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average indebtedness outstanding during the period
|
|
$
|
1,669
|
|
|
$
|
311,667
|
|
|
$
|
52,959
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum amount outstanding during the period
|
|
$
|
2,040
|
|
|
$
|
375,000
|
|
|
$
|
59,100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average interest rate for the period
|
|
|
0.19
|
%
|
|
|
4.42
|
%
|
|
|
0.98
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average interest rate at period-end
|
|
|
0.16
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.09
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
Federal Funds
|
|
|
Securities Sold
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
|
Purchased and
|
|
|
Under Agreements
|
|
|
Paper
|
|
|
|
Other Borrowings
|
|
|
to Repurchase
|
|
|
Issued
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Amount outstanding at year-end
|
|
$
|
2,040
|
|
|
$
|
375,000
|
|
|
$
|
50,985
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average indebtedness outstanding during the year
|
|
$
|
190,097
|
|
|
$
|
523,873
|
|
|
$
|
209,480
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum amount outstanding during the year
|
|
$
|
751,000
|
|
|
$
|
625,006
|
|
|
$
|
625,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average interest rate for the year
|
|
|
4.21
|
%
|
|
|
4.87
|
%
|
|
|
3.60
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average interest rate at year-end
|
|
|
0.09
|
%
|
|
|
4.35
|
%
|
|
|
0.75
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal funds purchased and other borrowings, securities sold under agreements to repurchase and
commercial paper issued mature as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Federal funds purchased and other borrowings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Over ninety days
|
|
$
|
890
|
|
|
$
|
2,040
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thirty to ninety days
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
75,000
|
|
Over ninety days
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
300,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
375,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial paper issued:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within thirty days
|
|
$
|
34,084
|
|
|
$
|
50,985
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2009 the weighted average maturity of Federal Funds purchased and other
borrowings over ninety days was 9.02 months.
During the first quarter ended March 31, 2009, the Corporation cancelled $300 million of
securities sold under agreement to repurchase. As a
result of this early cancellation, the Corporation paid $9.6 million
of penalty and recognized as a loss included in other income in the
consolidated statements of operations.
22
As of December 31, 2008, securities sold under agreements to repurchase (classified by
counterparty) were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value of
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Balance of
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
Maturity
|
|
|
|
Borrowings
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
in Months
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
|
|
$
|
375,000
|
|
|
$
|
408,650
|
|
|
|
10.98
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following investment securities were sold under agreements to repurchase as of December 31,
2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
Value of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value of
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
Balance of
|
|
|
Underlying
|
|
|
Interest Rate
|
|
|
Interest Rate
|
|
Underlying Securities
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Borrowings
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Borrowings
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities
|
|
$
|
408,650
|
|
|
$
|
375,000
|
|
|
$
|
408,650
|
|
|
|
5.12
|
%
|
|
|
4.35
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9. Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank:
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Non-callable advances at 2.77% and 2.63% averages fixed rate at March 31,
2009 and December 31, 2008 , respectively, with maturities during 2009
|
|
$
|
50,000
|
|
|
$
|
310,000
|
|
Non-callable advances at 2.75% and 2.98% averages fixed rate at March 31,
2009 and December 31, 2008 , respectively, with maturities during 2010
|
|
|
595,000
|
|
|
|
500,000
|
|
Non-callable advances at 3.85% averages fixed rate at March 31, 2009 and
December 31, 2008 with maturities during 2011
|
|
|
325,000
|
|
|
|
325,000
|
|
Non-callable advances at 4.28% average floating rate tied to 3-month LIBOR
with maturities during 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
970,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,185,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Corporation had $2.1 billion in mortgage loans and investment securities pledged as
collateral for Federal Home Loan Bank advances as of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008,
respectively.
23
10. Term Notes, Subordinated Capital Notes and Trust Preferred Securities:
Term Notes
Term notes payable outstanding consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Term notes
maturing January 29, 2010 linked to the S&P 500 index
|
|
$
|
4,815
|
|
|
$
|
4,815
|
|
Term notes maturing May 31, 2011 with a spread of 0.25%:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Linked to
the S&P 500
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
Linked to the Dow Jones Euro STOXX 50
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
|
|
3,000
|
|
Term notes maturing May 25, 2012 linked to the Euro STOXX 50
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
Term notes maturing May 25, 2012 linked to the NIKKEI
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
|
21,815
|
|
|
|
21,815
|
|
Unamortized discount
|
|
|
(1,698
|
)
|
|
|
(1,848
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
20,117
|
|
|
$
|
19,967
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subordinated Capital Notes
Subordinated capital notes consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Subordinated notes with fixed interest of 7.50% maturing December 10, 2028
|
|
$
|
60,000
|
|
|
$
|
60,000
|
|
Subordinated notes with fixed interest of 6.30% maturing June 1, 2032, at
fair value
|
|
|
73,822
|
|
|
|
72,076
|
|
Subordinated notes with fixed interest of 6.10% maturing June 1, 2032, at
fair value
|
|
|
47,123
|
|
|
|
46,206
|
|
Subordinated notes with fixed interest of 6.75% maturing July 1, 2036
|
|
|
129,000
|
|
|
|
129,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
309,945
|
|
|
|
307,282
|
|
Unamortized discount
|
|
|
(882
|
)
|
|
|
(890
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
309,063
|
|
|
$
|
306,392
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trust Preferred Securities:
At December 31, 2006, the Corporation had established a trust for the purpose of issuing trust
preferred securities to the public in connection with the acquisition of Island Finance. In
connection with this financing arrangement, the Corporation completed the private placement of $125
million Preferred Securities and issued Junior Subordinated Debentures in the aggregate principal
amount of $129 million in connection with the issuance of the Preferred Securities. The Preferred
Securities are classified as subordinated notes (included on the table for subordinated capital
notes above) and the dividends are classified as interest expense in the accompanying consolidated
statements of operations.
24
11. Income Tax:
For the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, the Corporation recognized $0.4 million
and $0.2 million of interest and penalties, respectively, for uncertain tax positions in accordance
with provisions of FIN48. As of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the related accrued interest
amounted to approximated $4.1 million and $3.7 million, respectively. As of March 31, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, the Corporation had $10.7 million and $10.3 million, respectively, of
unrecognized tax benefits which, if recognized, would decrease the effective income tax rate in
future periods.
The amount of unrecognized tax benefits may increase or decrease in the future for various
reasons including adding amounts for current tax year positions, expiration of open income tax
returns due to the statutes of limitation, changes in managements judgment about the level of
uncertainty, status of examinations, litigation and legislative activity, and the addition or
elimination of uncertain tax positions.
In assessing the realization of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more
likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The
ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable
income during the periods in which the temporary differences become deductible. Management
considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income, and
tax planning strategies in making this assessment. Based upon the level of historical taxable
income and projections for future taxable income, management believes it is more likely than not,
the Corporation will not realize the benefits of the deferred tax assets related to Santander
Financial Services, Inc. and Santander Bancorp (parent company only) amounting to $20.5 million and
$0.1 million at March 31, 2009, respectively. Accordingly, a deferred tax asset valuation allowance
of $20.5 million and $0.1 million for Santander Financial Services, Inc and Santander Bancorp
(parent company only), respectively, were recorded at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008.
12. Derivative Financial Instruments:
As of March 31, 2009, the Corporation had the following derivative financial instruments
outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (Loss) for
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the period
|
|
|
|
Notional
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ended
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Mar. 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
ECONOMIC UNDESIGNATED HEDGES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
$
|
125,000
|
|
|
$
|
3,959
|
|
|
$
|
(1,252
|
)
|
OTHER DERIVATIVES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
118,214
|
|
|
|
1,919
|
|
|
|
(1,854
|
)
|
Embedded options on stock-indexed deposits
|
|
|
118,214
|
|
|
|
(1,919
|
)
|
|
|
1,854
|
|
Interest rate caps
|
|
|
536
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Customer interest rate caps
|
|
|
536
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Customer interest rate swaps
|
|
|
1,762,091
|
|
|
|
157,537
|
|
|
|
(18,911
|
)
|
Interest rate swaps-offsetting position
of customer swaps
|
|
|
1,762,091
|
|
|
|
(157,428
|
)
|
|
|
19,193
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(287
|
)
|
Loan commitments
|
|
|
4,125
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1,266
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
As of December 31, 2008, the Corporation had the following derivative financial instruments
outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (Loss) for
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the year
|
|
|
Gain* for the
|
|
|
|
Notional
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ended
|
|
|
year ended
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Dec. 31, 2008
|
|
|
Dec. 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOW HEDGES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,237
|
|
ECONOMIC UNDESIGNATED HEDGES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
|
125,000
|
|
|
|
5,210
|
|
|
|
4,311
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER DERIVATIVES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options
|
|
|
118,214
|
|
|
|
3,774
|
|
|
|
(18,995
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Embedded options on stock-indexed deposits
|
|
|
118,214
|
|
|
|
(3,774
|
)
|
|
|
18,974
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate caps
|
|
|
583
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Customer interest rate caps
|
|
|
583
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer interest rate swaps
|
|
|
1,729,209
|
|
|
|
176,447
|
|
|
|
130,778
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps-offsetting position
of customer swaps
|
|
|
1,729,209
|
|
|
|
(176,787
|
)
|
|
|
(131,991
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
|
90,000
|
|
|
|
287
|
|
|
|
821
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan commitments
|
|
|
3,862
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,946
|
|
|
$
|
1,237
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Corporations principal objective in holding interest rate swap agreements is the
management of interest rate risk and changes in the fair value of assets and liabilities.
Prior to the adoption of SFAS 159, changes in the value of the derivatives instruments
qualifying as fair value hedges that have been highly effective were recognized in the current
period results of operations along with the change in the value of the designated hedged item. If
the hedge relationship was terminated, hedge accounting was discontinued and any balance related to
the derivative was recognized in current operations, and fair value adjustment to the hedge item
continued to be reported as part of the basis of the item and was amortized to earnings as a yield
adjustment. After adoption of SFAS 159 for certain callable brokered certificates of deposit and
subordinated capital notes, the hedge relationship was terminated, and both previously hedged items
and the respective hedging derivatives are presented at fair value with changes recorded in the
current period results of operations.
The Corporation hedges certain callable brokered certificates of deposit and subordinated
capital notes by using interest rate swaps. Prior to the adoption of SFAS 159 as of January 1,
2008, these swaps were designated for hedge accounting treatment under SFAS 133. For designated
fair value hedges, the changes in the fair value of both the hedging instrument and the underlying
hedged instrument were included in other income and the interest flows were included in the net
interest income in the consolidated statements of operations. In connection with the adoption of
SFAS 159, the Corporation elected the fair value option for certain callable brokered certificates
of deposit and subordinated capital notes and is no longer required to maintain hedge accounting
documentation to achieve a similar financial statements outcome.
As of March 31, 2009, the Corporation had outstanding interest rate swap agreements with a
notional amount of approximately $125.0 million, maturing through the year 2032. The weighted
average rate paid and received on these contracts is 1.69% and 6.22%, respectively. As of March
31, 2009, the Corporation had two subordinated notes aggregating approximately $125 million, with
a fair value of $120.9 million, swapped to create a floating rate source of funds. For the
three-month period ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, the Corporation recognized a loss of
approximately $1.3 million and a gain of $3.1 million, respectively, on these economic hedges,
which is included in other income in the consolidated statements of operations and was the result
of incorporating the credit risk component in the fair value of the subordinated note.
26
As of December 31, 2008, the Corporation had outstanding interest rate swap agreements with a
notional amount of approximately $125.0 million, maturing through the year 2032. The weighted
average rate paid and received on these contracts
is 3.24% and 6.22%, respectively. As of December 31, 2008, the Corporation had two subordinated
notes agregating to approximately $125 million, with a fair value of $118.3 million, swapped to
create a floating rate source of funds. As a result of the bankruptcy filing of Lehman Brothers
Holding, Inc. (LBHI) and the default on its contractual payments as of September 19, 2008, the
Corporation terminated $23.8 million of fixed-for-floating interest rate swaps. The derivative
liability of the swaps with Lehman Brothers Special Financing (LBSF) was $681,535 as of September
19, 2008 and was paid on December 5, 2008.
The Corporation issues certificates of deposit, individual retirement accounts and notes with
returns linked to the different equity indexes, which constitute embedded derivative instruments
that are bifurcated from the host deposit and recognized on the consolidated balance sheets. The
Corporation enters into option agreements in order to manage the interest rate risk on these
deposits and notes; however, these options have not been designated for hedge accounting, therefore
gains and losses on the market value of both the embedded derivative instruments and the option
contracts are marked to market through results of operations and recorded in other income in the
consolidated statements of operatings. For the three-month period ended March 31, 2009, a gain of
approximately $1.9 million was recorded on embedded options on stock-indexed deposits and notes and
a loss of approximately $1.9 million was recorded on the option contracts. For the three-month
period ended March 31, 2008, a loss of approximately $9.5 million was recorded on embedded options
on stock-indexed deposits and notes and a gain of approximately $9.5 million was recorded on the
option contracts.
The Corporation enters into certain derivative transactions to provide derivative products to
customers, which includes interest rate caps, collars and swaps, and simultaneously covers the
Corporations position with related and unrelated third parties under substantially the same terms
and conditions. These derivatives are not linked to specific assets and liabilities on the
consolidated balance sheets or to forecasted transactions in an accounting hedge relationship and,
therefore, do not qualify for hedge accounting. These derivatives are carried at fair value with
changes in fair value recorded as part of other income. For the three-month period ended March 31,
2009 and 2008, the Corporation recognized a gain and a loss on these transactions of $282,000 and
$436,000, respectively.
To a lesser extent, the Corporation enters into freestanding derivative contracts as a
proprietary position taker, based on market expectations or on benefits from price differentials
between financial instruments and markets. These derivatives are not linked to specific assets and
liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets or to forecasted transactions in an accounting hedge
relationship and, therefore, do not qualify for hedge accounting. For the three-month period ended
March 31, 2009 and 2008, the Corporation recognized a loss of $287,000 and a gain $982,000,
respectively, on these transactions. There were no outstanding derivatives as of March 31, 2009.
The Corporation enters into loan commitments with customers to extend mortgage loans at a
specified rate. These loan commitments are written options and are measured at fair value pursuant
to SFAS 157 and SFAS 133. As of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the Corporation had loan
commitments outstanding for approximately $4.1 million and $3.9 million, respectively. The
Corporation recognized a loss of $9,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and a gain of
$84,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2008 on these commitments.
The Corporation is exposed to certain risk relating to its ongoing business operations. The
primary risk managed by using derivative instruments is the interest rate risk. The following table
presents the fair value of derivative instruments in a statement of financial position:
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets Derivatives
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet
|
|
|
as of
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Location
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
under Statement 133:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
Other assets
|
|
$
|
169,441
|
|
|
$
|
193,312
|
|
Interest rate caps
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Options
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
1,919
|
|
|
|
3,774
|
|
Loan commitment
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
171,457
|
|
|
$
|
197,192
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities Derivatives
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet
|
|
|
as of
|
|
|
|
Location
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
under Statement 133:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
$
|
165,373
|
|
|
$
|
187,525
|
|
Interest rate caps
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Options
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
1,919
|
|
|
|
3,774
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
167,305
|
|
|
$
|
191,312
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents the effect of the derivative instruments on the statement of results
of operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain or (Loss) recognized in
|
|
|
|
Location of Gain or (Loss)
|
|
|
Income on derivatives
|
|
|
|
recognized in Income on
|
|
|
as of
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Derivatives
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
under Statement 133:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
Interest Income (Expense)
|
|
$
|
1,220
|
|
|
$
|
1,452
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
Other Income (Loss)
|
|
|
(1,042
|
)
|
|
|
9,086
|
|
Loan commitment
|
|
Other Income (Loss)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
169
|
|
|
$
|
10,586
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contingent Features
Certain of the Corporations derivative instruments contain provisions that require the
Corporations debt to maintain an investment grade credit rating from each of the major credit
rating agencies. If the Companys debt were to fall below investment grade, it would be in
violation of these provisions, and the counterparties to the derivative instruments could request
immediate payment or demand immediate and ongoing full overnight collateralization on derivative
instruments in net liability positions. The aggregate fair value of all derivative instruments with
credit-risk-related contingent features that are in a liability position on March 31, 2009 is $17
million, for which the Corporation has posted collateral of $9 million in the normal course of
business.
28
13. Contingencies:
The Corporation is involved as plaintiff or defendant in a variety of routine litigation
incidental to the normal course of business. Management believes, based on the opinion of legal
counsel, that it has adequate defense with respect to such litigation and that any losses therefrom
will not have a material adverse effect on the condensed consolidated statements of income or
condensed consolidated financial position of the Corporation.
14. Employee Benefits Plan:
Pension Plan
The Corporation maintains two inactive qualified noncontributory defined benefit pension
plans. One plan covers substantially all active employees of the Corporation (the Plan) before
January 1, 2007, while the other plan was assumed in connection with the 1996 acquisition of Banco
Central Hispano de Puerto Rico (the Central Hispano Plan).
The components of net periodic cost (benefit) for the Plan for the three month periods ended
March 31, 2009 and 2008 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation
|
|
$
|
594
|
|
|
$
|
587
|
|
Expected return on assets
|
|
|
(515
|
)
|
|
|
(674
|
)
|
Net amortization
|
|
|
292
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic pension cost (benefit)
|
|
$
|
371
|
|
|
$
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The expected contribution to the Plan for 2009 is $584,000.
The components of net periodic pension cost for the Central Hispano Plan for three month
periods ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation
|
|
$
|
476
|
|
|
$
|
460
|
|
Expected return on assets
|
|
|
(389
|
)
|
|
|
(518
|
)
|
Net amortization
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic pension cost
|
|
$
|
279
|
|
|
$
|
68
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The expected contribution to the Central Hispano Plan for 2009 is $522,000.
Savings Plan
The Corporation also provides three contributory savings plans pursuant to Section 1165(e) of
the Puerto Rico Internal Revenue Code for substantially all the employees of the Corporation.
Investments in the plans are participant-directed, and employer matching contributions are
determined based on the specific provisions of each plan. Employees are fully vested in the
employers contribution after three and five years of service, respectively. The Corporations
plans contribution for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 were approximately $188,000
and $420,000, respectively.
29
15. Long Term Incentive Plans:
Santander Group sponsors various non-qualified share-based compensation programs for certain
of its employees and those of its subsidiaries, including the Corporation. All of these plans have
been approved by the Board of Directors of the Corporation. A summary of each of the plans
follows:
|
|
|
A long term incentive plan for certain eligible officers and key employees which
contains service, performance and market conditions. This plan provides for settlement in
cash or stock of Santander Group to the participants and is classified as a liability
plan. Accordingly, the Corporation accrues a liability and recognizes monthly
compensation expense over the fourteen month vesting period through January 2008. The
Corporation recognized a reversal of compensation expense under this plan amounting to
$4.0 million due to a favorable change in plan valuation during the three months ended
March 31, 2008. As options were exercised as of March 31, 2008, $4.6 million was
reclassified as a capital contribution.
|
|
|
|
|
A long term incentive plan for certain eligible officers and key employees which
contains service, performance and market conditions. This plan comprehends two cycles,
one expiring in 2009 and another expiring in 2010. This plan provides for settlement in
stock of Santander Group to the participants and is classified as an equity plan.
Accordingly, the Corporation recognizes monthly compensation expense over the two and
three year cycles and credits additional paid in capital. The Corporation recognized
compensation expense under this plan amounting to $0.4 million and 0.9 million for the
three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
A long term incentive plan for certain eligible officers and key employees which
contains service, performance and market conditions. This plan comprehends one cycle
expiring in 2011. This plan provides for settlement in stock of Santander Group to the
participants and is classified as an equity plan. Accordingly, the Corporation recognizes
monthly compensation expense over the two and three year cycles and credits additional
paid in capital. The Corporation recognized compensation expense under this plan
amounting to $0.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009.
|
16. Guarantees:
The Corporation issues financial standby letters of credit to guarantee the performance of its
customers to third parties. If the customer fails to meet its financial performance obligation to
the third party, then the Corporation would be obligated to make the payment to the guaranteed
party. In accordance with the provisions of FIN 45,
Guarantors Accounting and Disclosure
Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others An
Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 5, 57, and 107 and Rescission of FASB Interpretation No. 34,
the Corporation recorded a liability of $971,000 at March 31, 2009, which represents the fair value
of the obligations undertaken in issuing the guarantees under the standby letters of credit issued
or modified after December 31, 2002, net of the related amortization. The fair value at inception
of the obligation undertaken when issuing the guarantees and commitments that qualify under FIN 45
is typically equal to the net present value of the future amount of premium receivable under the
contract. The fair value of the liability recorded at inception is amortized into income as lending
and deposit-related fees over the life of the guarantee contract. Standby letters of credit
outstanding at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 had terms ranging from one month to five years.
The aggregate contract amount of the standby letters of credit of approximately $91,238,000 and
$95,660,000 at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, represent the maximum potential
amount of future payments the Corporation could be required to make under the guarantees in the
event of non-performance by its customers. These standby letters of credit typically expire
without being drawn upon. Management does not anticipate any material losses related to these
guarantees.
30
17. Segment Information:
Types of Products and Services
The Corporation has five reportable segments: Commercial Banking, Mortgage Banking, Consumer
Finance, Treasury and Investments and Wealth Management. Insurance operations and International
Banking are other lines of business in which the Corporation commenced its involvement during 2000
and 2001, respectively, and are included in the Other column below since they did not meet the
quantitative thresholds for disclosure of segment information.
Measurement of Segment Profit or Loss and Segment Assets
The Corporations reportable business segments are strategic business units that offer
distinctive products and services that are marketed through different channels. These are managed
separately because of their unique technology, marketing and distribution requirements.
The following present financial information of reportable segments as of and for the three
months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008. General corporate expenses and income taxes have not been
added or deducted in the determination of operating segment profits. The Other column includes
insurance and international banking operations and the items necessary to reconcile the identified
segments to the reported consolidated amounts. Included in the Other column are expenses of the
internal audit, investors relations, strategic planning, administrative services, mail, marketing,
public relations, electronic data processing departments and comptrollers departments. The
Eliminations column includes all intercompany eliminations for consolidation purposes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
Mortgage
|
|
Consumer
|
|
Treasury and
|
|
Wealth
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Banking
|
|
Banking
|
|
Finance
|
|
Investments
|
|
Management
|
|
Other
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total external revenue
|
|
$
|
64,066
|
|
|
$
|
41,686
|
|
|
$
|
34,862
|
|
|
$
|
9,100
|
|
|
$
|
13,499
|
|
|
$
|
4,146
|
|
|
$
|
(13,316
|
)
|
|
$
|
154,043
|
|
Intersegment revenue
|
|
|
6,984
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
6,285
|
|
|
|
(13,316
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
54,246
|
|
|
|
39,404
|
|
|
|
33,036
|
|
|
|
8,295
|
|
|
|
832
|
|
|
|
5,049
|
|
|
|
(12,187
|
)
|
|
|
128,675
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
9,910
|
|
|
|
15,199
|
|
|
|
7,418
|
|
|
|
16,415
|
|
|
|
340
|
|
|
|
5,230
|
|
|
|
(10,230
|
)
|
|
|
44,282
|
|
Depreciation and
amortization
|
|
|
1,096
|
|
|
|
671
|
|
|
|
323
|
|
|
|
236
|
|
|
|
372
|
|
|
|
518
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,216
|
|
Segment income (loss)
before income tax
|
|
|
7,453
|
|
|
|
21,687
|
|
|
|
415
|
|
|
|
(9,806
|
)
|
|
|
3,841
|
|
|
|
(22,348
|
)
|
|
|
(1,958
|
)
|
|
|
(716
|
)
|
Segment assets
|
|
|
3,351,042
|
|
|
|
2,628,179
|
|
|
|
661,890
|
|
|
|
751,698
|
|
|
|
126,478
|
|
|
|
851,476
|
|
|
|
(1,017,783
|
)
|
|
|
7,352,980
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
Mortgage
|
|
Consumer
|
|
Treasury and
|
|
Wealth
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Banking
|
|
Banking
|
|
Finance
|
|
Investments
|
|
Management
|
|
Other
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total external revenue
|
|
$
|
86,442
|
|
|
$
|
42,465
|
|
|
$
|
35,186
|
|
|
$
|
17,220
|
|
|
$
|
22,119
|
|
|
$
|
14,706
|
|
|
$
|
(6,750
|
)
|
|
$
|
211,388
|
|
Intersegment revenue
|
|
|
398
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
6,281
|
|
|
|
(6,750
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
66,738
|
|
|
|
41,986
|
|
|
|
35,154
|
|
|
|
14,933
|
|
|
|
714
|
|
|
|
5,739
|
|
|
|
(6,235
|
)
|
|
|
159,029
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
20,924
|
|
|
|
21,610
|
|
|
|
7,359
|
|
|
|
22,126
|
|
|
|
668
|
|
|
|
6,062
|
|
|
|
(4,319
|
)
|
|
|
74,430
|
|
Depreciation and
amortization
|
|
|
1,078
|
|
|
|
610
|
|
|
|
761
|
|
|
|
235
|
|
|
|
328
|
|
|
|
994
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,006
|
|
Segment income (loss)
before income tax
|
|
|
20,676
|
|
|
|
16,776
|
|
|
|
(1,308
|
)
|
|
|
(6,853
|
)
|
|
|
9,091
|
|
|
|
(10,527
|
)
|
|
|
(1,916
|
)
|
|
|
25,939
|
|
Segment assets
|
|
|
3,924,742
|
|
|
|
2,769,609
|
|
|
|
671,626
|
|
|
|
1,646,630
|
|
|
|
125,358
|
|
|
|
1,213,516
|
|
|
|
(1,046,463
|
)
|
|
|
9,305,018
|
|
31
Reconciliation of Segment Information to Consolidated Amounts
Information for the Corporations reportable segments in relation to the consolidated totals
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues for reportable segments
|
|
$
|
163,213
|
|
|
$
|
203,432
|
|
Other revenues
|
|
|
4,146
|
|
|
|
14,706
|
|
Elimination of intersegment revenues
|
|
|
(13,316
|
)
|
|
|
(6,750
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consolidated revenues
|
|
$
|
154,043
|
|
|
$
|
211,388
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income before tax of reportable segments
|
|
$
|
23,590
|
|
|
$
|
38,382
|
|
Loss before tax of other segments
|
|
|
(22,348
|
)
|
|
|
(10,527
|
)
|
Elimination of intersegment profits
|
|
|
(1,958
|
)
|
|
|
(1,916
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated (loss) income before tax
|
|
$
|
(716
|
)
|
|
$
|
25,939
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets for reportable segments
|
|
$
|
7,519,287
|
|
|
$
|
9,137,965
|
|
Assets not attributed to segments
|
|
|
851,476
|
|
|
|
1,213,516
|
|
Elimination of intersegment assets
|
|
|
(1,017,783
|
)
|
|
|
(1,046,463
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consolidated assets
|
|
$
|
7,352,980
|
|
|
$
|
9,305,018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18. Fair Value of Financial Instruments:
As discussed in Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Other Matters to the
Consolidated Financial Statement, effective January 1, 2008, the Corporation adopted SFAS 157,
which provides a framework for measuring fair value under US GAAP.
The Corporation also adopted SFAS 159 on January 1, 2008. SFAS 159 allows an entity the
irrevocable option to elect fair value for the initial and subsequent measurement for certain
financial assets and liabilities on a contract-by-contract basis. The Corporation elected to adopt
the fair value option for callable brokered certificates of deposits and subordinated notes on the
adoption date. SFAS 159 requires that the difference between the carrying value before election of
the fair value option and the fair value of these instruments be recorded as an adjustment to
beginning retained earnings in the period of adoption.
The following table summarizes the impact of adopting the fair value option for certain
financial instruments on January 1, 2008. Amounts shown represent the carrying value of the
affected instruments before and after the changes in accounting resulting from the adoption SFAS
159.
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending Balance as of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Opening Balance as of
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
Adoption Net
|
|
|
January 01, 2008
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
(Prior to Adoption)*
|
|
|
Gain (Loss)
|
|
|
(After Adoption)
|
|
Impact of Electing the Fair Value Option under SFAS 159:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Callable Brokered Certificates of Deposits
|
|
$
|
(763,476
|
)
|
|
$
|
64
|
|
|
$
|
(763,412
|
)
|
Subordinated Capital Notes
|
|
|
(123,686
|
)
|
|
|
5,134
|
|
|
|
(118,552
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative-effect Adjustments (pre-tax)
|
|
$
|
(887,162
|
)
|
|
|
5,198
|
|
|
$
|
(881,964
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax Impact
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,979
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative-effect Adjustment Increase to Retained
Earmings, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,219
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*Net of debt issue cost, placement fees and basis adjustments as of December 31, 2007
|
Fair Value Hierarchy
SFAS 157 defines fair value as the price that would be received for an asset or paid to
transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or
liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. SFAS 157
also establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable
inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The standard
describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or
liabilities. Level 1 assets and liabilities include debt and
equity securities and derivative contracts that are traded in an
active exchange market, as well as certain U.S. treasury, other
U.S. government and agency mortgage-backed debt securities that
are highly liquid and are actively traded in over-the-counter
markets.
|
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices
for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that
are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be
corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full
term of the assets or liabilities. Level 2 assets and liabilities
include securities with quoted prices that are traded less
frequently than exchange-traded instruments, securities and
derivative contracts and financial liabilities whose value is
determined using a pricing model with inputs that are observable
in the market or can be derived principally from or corroborated
by observable market data. This category generally includes
certain mortgage-backed debt securities, corporate debt
securities, derivative contracts, callable brokered certificates
of deposits and subordinated notes.
|
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market
activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets
or liabilities. Level 3 assets and liabilities include financial
instruments whose value is determined using pricing models,
discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar techniques, as well
as instruments for which the determination of fair value requires
significant management judgment or estimation. This category
generally includes certain Puerto Rico corporate debt securities,
closed end funds, and certain derivative contracts.
|
Recurring Measurements
The following table presents for each of these hierarchy levels, the Corporations assets and
liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis, including financial instruments
for which the Corporation has elected the fair value option at March 31, 2009 and December 31,
2008.
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading Securities
|
|
$
|
248
|
|
|
$
|
20,715
|
|
|
$
|
26,110
|
|
|
$
|
47,073
|
|
Investment Securities Available for Sale
|
|
|
163,889
|
|
|
|
159,751
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
323,640
|
|
Derivative Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
171,238
|
|
|
|
219
|
|
|
|
171,457
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets, at Fair Value
|
|
$
|
164,137
|
|
|
$
|
351,704
|
|
|
$
|
26,329
|
|
|
$
|
542,170
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits (1)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
82,494
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
82,494
|
|
Subordinated Capital Notes (2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
120,945
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
120,945
|
|
Derivative Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
167,170
|
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
167,305
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities, at Fair Value
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
370,609
|
|
|
$
|
135
|
|
|
$
|
370,744
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading Securities
|
|
$
|
117
|
|
|
$
|
35,083
|
|
|
$
|
29,519
|
|
|
$
|
64,719
|
|
Investment Securities Available for Sale
|
|
|
171,916
|
|
|
|
630,196
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
802,112
|
|
Derivative Assets
|
|
|
463
|
|
|
|
195,993
|
|
|
|
736
|
|
|
|
197,192
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets, at Fair Value
|
|
$
|
172,496
|
|
|
$
|
861,272
|
|
|
$
|
30,255
|
|
|
$
|
1,064,023
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits (1)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
101,401
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
101,401
|
|
Subordinated Capital Notes (2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
118,282
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
118,282
|
|
Derivative Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
190,669
|
|
|
|
643
|
|
|
|
191,312
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities, at Fair Value
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
410,352
|
|
|
$
|
643
|
|
|
$
|
410,995
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Amounts represent certain callable brokered certificates of deposits for which the Corporation has elected the fair value option
under SFAS 159.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Amounts represent certain subordinated capital notes for which the Corporation has elected the fair value option under SFAS 159.
|
Level 3 assets and liabilities were 4.9% and 0.04% of total assets at fair value and total
liabilities at fair value, respectively, as of March 31, 2009
and 2.8% and 0.16% as of December 31, 2008, respectively.
The following table presents the reconciliation for all assets and liabilities measured at
fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the period from
January 1, 2009 to March 31, 2009 and January 1, 2008 to March 31, 2008:
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized/unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
loss included in
|
|
|
Transfers
|
|
|
Purchases,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
in and/or
|
|
|
issuances
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
losses
|
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
out of
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
still
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
settlements
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
held (2)
|
|
Trading Securities (1)
|
|
$
|
29,519
|
|
|
$
|
(551
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(2,858
|
)
|
|
$
|
26,110
|
|
|
$
|
(421
|
)
|
Derivatives, net
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
29,612
|
|
|
$
|
(560
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(2,858
|
)
|
|
$
|
26,194
|
|
|
$
|
(430
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized/unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gains included in
|
|
|
Transfers
|
|
|
Purchases,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
in and/or
|
|
|
issuances
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gains
|
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
out of
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
still
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
settlements
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
held (2)
|
|
Trading Securities (1)
|
|
$
|
20,150
|
|
|
$
|
1,191
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
17,796
|
|
|
$
|
39,137
|
|
|
$
|
228
|
|
Derivatives, net
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
20,195
|
|
|
$
|
1,275
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
17,796
|
|
|
$
|
39,266
|
|
|
$
|
357
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Changes in fair value and gains and losses from sales for
these instruments are recorded in other income while interest revenue and expense are included in the net interest income based on the contractual coupons on the consolidated statements of income. The amounts above do not include interest.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Represents the amount of total gains or losses for the period, included in earmings, attributable to the change in unrealized gains (losses)
|
|
|
|
relating to assets and liabilities classified as Level 3 that are still held at March 31, 2009 and 2008.
|
The table below summarizes gains and losses due to changes in fair value, including both
realized and unrealized gains and losses, recorded in earnings for Level 3 assets and liabilities
for the three-month period ended March 31, 2009 and 2008. These amounts include gains and losses
generated by derivative contracts and trading securities, which were carried at fair value prior to
the adoption of SFAS 159.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
Total Gains (Losses)
|
|
|
Total Gains (Losses)
|
|
|
|
Trading
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Trading
|
|
|
Net
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Derivatives
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Derivatives
|
|
Classification of gains and losses (realized/unrealized)
included in earnings for the period :
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(551
|
)
|
|
$
|
(9
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,191
|
|
|
$
|
84
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The table below summarizes changes in unrealized gains or losses recorded in earnings for the
three-month periods ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 for Level 3 assets and liabilities that are still
held at March 31, 2009 and 2008. These amounts include changes in fair value for derivative
contracts and trading securities, which were carried at fair value prior to the adoption of SFAS
159.
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
Changes in Unrealized Gains (Loss)
|
|
|
Changes in Unrealized Gains (Loss)
|
|
|
|
Trading
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Trading
|
|
|
Net
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Derivatives
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Derivatives
|
|
Classification of unrealized gains (losses)
included in earnings for the period :
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income
|
|
$
|
(421
|
)
|
|
$
|
(9
|
)
|
|
$
|
(228
|
)
|
|
$
|
(129
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Determination of Fair Value
The following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for instruments recorded at
fair value and for estimating fair value for financial instruments not recorded, but disclosed at
fair value. The estimated fair value was calculated using certain facts and assumptions, which
vary depending on the specific financial instrument.
Trading Securities
Trading securities are recorded at fair value and consist primarily of US Government and
agencies, US corporate debt and equity securities, Puerto Rico Government, corporate debt and
equity securities. Fair value is generally based on quoted market prices. Level 1 trading
securities include those identical securities traded in active markets. If these market prices are
not available, fair values are estimated based on dealer quotes, pricing models, discounted cash
flow methodologies or similar techniques for which the determination of fair value may require
significant management judgment or estimation. Level 2 trading securities primarily include Puerto
Rico Government and open ended funds. Investments in Puerto Rico open ended funds are valued using
a net asset value approach and can be redeemed at net asset value.
Level 3 trading securities primarily include Puerto Rico Government and Agencies debt
securities and fixed income closed end funds. At March 31, 2009 the majority of these instruments
were valued based on dealer indicative quotes.
Investment Securities Available for Sale
Investment securities available for sale are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Fair
value measurement is based upon quoted prices, if available. If quoted prices are not available,
fair values are measured using independent pricing models or other model-based valuation techniques
such as discounted cash flow methodologies, adjusted for the securitys credit rating, prepayment
assumptions and other factors such as credit loss assumptions. Level 1 Investment securities
available for sale include those identical securities traded in active markets, such as U.S.
treasury and agency securities. Level 2 securities primarily include Puerto Rico Government
securities and mortgage-backed securities.
Loans Held for Sale
Loans held for sale are carried at the lower of cost or market. Fair values for loans held for
sale are based on observable inputs, such as observable market prices, credit spreads and interest
rate yield curves when available. In instances when significant valuation assumptions are not
readily observable in the market, instruments are valued based on the best available data in order
to approximate fair value. This data may be internally developed and considers types of loans,
conformity of loans, delinquency statistics and risk premiums that a market participant would
require, and accordingly may be classified as Level 3 in a non-recurring fair value measurement.
Loans
Loans are not recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. As such, valuation techniques
discussed herein for loans are primarily for estimating fair value for disclosure purposes.
However, any allowance for collateral dependent loans deemed
36
impaired is measured based on the fair value of the underlying collateral and its estimated
disposition costs. The fair value of collateral is determined by external valuation specialists,
and accordingly classified as Level 3 inputs for impaired loans in a non-recurring fair value
measurement disclosure.
The fair value for disclosure purposes are estimated for portfolios of loans held to maturity
with similar financial characteristics, such as loan category, pricing features and remaining
maturity. Loans are segregated by type such as commercial, consumer, mortgage, construction, and
other loans. Each loan category is further segmented based on similar market and credit risk
characteristics. The fair value is calculated by discounting the contractual cash flows using
discount rates that reflect the current pricing for loans with similar characteristics and
remaining maturity. Fair values consider the credit risk of the counterparties.
Derivatives
For exchange-traded contracts, fair value is based on quoted market prices, and accordingly,
classified as Level 1. For non-exchange traded contracts, fair value is based on internally
developed proprietary models or discounted cash flow methodology using various inputs. The inputs
include those characteristics of the derivative that have a bearing on the economics of the
instrument.
The determination of the fair value of many derivatives is mainly derived from inputs that are
observable in the market place. Such inputs include yield curves, publicly available volatilities,
floating indexes, foreign exchange prices, and accordingly, are classified as Level 2 inputs.
Level 3 derivatives include interest rate lock commitments (IRLC), the fair value for which is
derived from the fair value of related mortgage loans primarily based on observable inputs. In
estimating the fair value of an IRLC, the Corporation assigns a probability to the loan commitment
based on an expectation that it will be exercised and the loan will be funded. In addition, certain
OTC equity linked options are priced by counterparties, and accordingly are classified as Level 3
inputs.
Valuations of derivative assets and liabilities reflect the value of the instruments including
the values associated with counterparty risk. With the issuance of SFAS 157, these values must also
take into account the Corporations own credit standing, thus including in the valuation of the
derivative instrument the value of the net credit differential between the counterparties to the
derivative contract. Effective January 1, 2008, the Corporation updated its methodology to include
the impact of both counterparty and its own credit standing.
Deposits and Subordinated Capital Notes
Under SFAS 159, the Corporation elected to carry callable brokered certificates of deposits
and subordinated notes at fair value. The fair value of callable brokered certificates of deposits,
included within deposits, and subordinated capital notes is determined using discounted cash flow
analyses over the full term of the instruments. The valuation uses an industry-standard model for
the instruments with callable option components. The model incorporates such observable inputs as
yield curves, publicly available volatilities and floating indexes and accordingly, is classified
as Level 2 inputs. Effective January 1, 2008, the Corporation updated its methodology to include
the impact of its own credit standing.
Deposits, other than those recorded at fair value under SFAS 159, are carried at historical
cost.
Non-Recurring Measurements for Assets
The following table presents the change in carrying value of those assets measured at fair
value on a non-recurring basis, for which impairment was recognized as of March 31, 2009 and
December 31, 2008.
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying Value as of March 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Using
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
Valuation
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Active Markets for
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
|
Allowance
|
|
|
|
as of
|
|
|
Identical Assets
|
|
|
Observable Inputs
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
as of
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
Loans, net(1)
|
|
$
|
36,407
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
36,407
|
|
|
$
|
17,725
|
|
Repossesed Assets (2)
|
|
|
5,399
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,399
|
|
|
|
1,472
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
41,806
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
41,806
|
|
|
$
|
19,197
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Amount represented loans measured for impairment based on the fair value of the collateral using the practical expedient in SFAS 114,
Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan.
|
|
(2)
|
|
Amount represented real estate owned properties measured for impairment based on the fair value of the collateral accordance with the
adoption of FSP FAS 157-2
Effective date of FASB Statements No. 157 as of March 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying Value as of December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Using
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
Significant
|
|
|
Valuation
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Active Markets for
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Unobservable
|
|
|
Allowance
|
|
|
|
as of
|
|
|
Identical Assets
|
|
|
Observable Inputs
|
|
|
Inputs
|
|
|
as of
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Dec. 31, 2008
|
|
|
(Level 1)
|
|
|
(Level 2)
|
|
|
(Level 3)
|
|
|
Dec. 31, 2008
|
|
Loans, net(1)
|
|
$
|
59,152
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
59,152
|
|
|
$
|
18,410
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Amount represented loans measured for impairment based on the fair value of the collateral using the practical expedient in SFAS 114,
Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan.
|
Fair Value Option
Callable Brokered Certificates of Deposits and Subordinated Capital Notes
The Corporation elected to account at fair value certain of its callable brokered certificates
of deposits and subordinated capital notes that were hedged with interest rate swaps designated for
fair value hedge accounting in accordance with SFAS 133. As of March 31, 2009, these callable
brokered certificates of deposits had a fair value of $82.5 million and principal balance of $100.8
million recorded in interest-bearing deposits; and subordinated capital notes had a fair value of
$120.9 million and principal balance of $125.0 million. Interest expense on these items is
recorded in Net Interest Income whereas net gains (losses) resulting from the changes in fair value
of these items, were recorded within Other Income on the Corporations consolidated statement of
operations. Electing the fair value option allows the Corporation to avoid the burden of complying
with the requirements for hedge accounting under SFAS 133 (e.g., documentation and effectiveness
assessment) without introducing earnings volatility. Subsequent to the adoption of SFAS 159, debt
issuance costs are recognized in Net Interest Income when incurred. Interest rate risk on the
callable brokered certificates of deposits and subordinated capital notes measured at fair value
under SFAS 159 continues to be economically hedged with callable interest rate swaps with the same
terms and conditions.
As a result of the adoption of SFAS 159, the Corporation elected to also apply the fair value
option to new positions within the brokered certificates of deposits and subordinated capital
notes, where the Corporation would otherwise have hedged with interest rate swaps designated as a
fair value hedge in accordance with SFAS 133.
38
The following table represents changes in fair value for the three months ended March 31, 2009
and 2008 which includes the interest expense on callable brokered certificates of deposits of $1.1
million and interest expense on subordinated capital notes of $1.9 million. Interest expense on
callable brokered certificates of deposits and subordinated capitals notes that the Corporation has
elected to carry at fair value under the provisions of SFAS 159 are recorded in interest expense in
the Consolidated Statements of Operations based on their contractual coupons.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
Changes in
|
|
|
Changes in
|
|
|
Total Changes in
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
included in
|
|
|
included in
|
|
|
included in
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Interest Expense
|
|
|
Other Income
|
|
|
Current Period Earnings
|
|
Callable Brokered Certificates of Deposits
|
|
$
|
(1,100
|
)
|
|
$
|
316
|
|
|
$
|
(784
|
)
|
Subordinated Capital Notes
|
|
|
(1,944
|
)
|
|
|
(2,663
|
)
|
|
|
(4,607
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
(3,044
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,347
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,391
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
Changes in
|
|
|
Changes in
|
|
|
Total Changes in
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
included in
|
|
|
included in
|
|
|
included in
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Interest Expense
|
|
|
Other Income
|
|
|
Current Period Earnings
|
|
Callable Brokered Certificates of Deposits
|
|
$
|
(8,050
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,217
|
)
|
|
$
|
(12,267
|
)
|
Subordinated Capital Notes
|
|
|
(1,944
|
)
|
|
|
(431
|
)
|
|
|
(2,375
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
(9,994
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,648
|
)
|
|
$
|
(14,642
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The impacts of changes in the Corporations credit risk on subordinated capital notes for the
three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 presented in the table below have been calculated as the
difference between the fair value of those instruments as of the reporting date and the theoretical
fair values of those instruments calculated by using the yield curve prevailing at the end of the
reporting period, adjusted up or down for changes in credit spreads from the transition date to the
reporting date.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
Gain (Loss)
|
|
|
Gain (Loss)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
related
|
|
|
not related
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Credit Risk
|
|
|
Credit Risk
|
|
|
(Losses)
|
|
Subordinated Capital Notes
|
|
$
|
(4,081
|
)
|
|
$
|
(526
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,607
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
Gain (Loss)
|
|
|
Gain (Loss)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
related
|
|
|
not related
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Credit Risk
|
|
|
Credit Risk
|
|
|
(Losses)
|
|
Subordinated Capital Notes
|
|
$
|
3,866
|
|
|
$
|
(6,241
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,375
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39
19. Subsequent Events:
On April 2009, the Corporation completed the sales of certain impaired loans to an affiliate
for $49.2 million in cash. These loans had an outstanding principal balance of $53.4 million and a
specific valuation allowance of $4.2 million. The type of loans by
net book value was $33.9 million in commercial loans and $15.3
million in mortgage loans. No gain or loss was recognized on this transaction.
40
PART
I
ITEM 2
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
41
Santander BanCorp
Selected Financial Data
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
$
|
128,675
|
|
|
$
|
159,029
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
44,282
|
|
|
|
74,430
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
|
|
|
84,393
|
|
|
|
84,599
|
|
Gain on sale of securities
|
|
|
9,251
|
|
|
|
2,874
|
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
(9,600
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Broker-deaker, asset management and insurance fees
|
|
|
12,965
|
|
|
|
21,987
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
12,752
|
|
|
|
27,498
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
69,377
|
|
|
|
71,444
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
41,100
|
|
|
|
39,575
|
|
Income tax (benefit) provision
|
|
|
(685
|
)
|
|
|
8,217
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(31
|
)
|
|
$
|
17,722
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PER COMMON SHARE DATA*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
0.38
|
|
Book value
|
|
$
|
11.70
|
|
|
$
|
12.15
|
|
Outstanding shares:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
46,639,104
|
|
|
|
46,639,104
|
|
End of period
|
|
|
46,639,104
|
|
|
|
46,639,104
|
|
Cash Dividend per Share
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.10
|
|
AVERAGE BALANCES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans held for sale and loans, net of allowance for loans losses
|
|
$
|
5,836,035
|
|
|
$
|
6,961,929
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
192,800
|
|
|
|
166,531
|
|
Earning assets
|
|
|
6,968,818
|
|
|
|
8,405,199
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
7,757,024
|
|
|
|
9,170,097
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
5,010,354
|
|
|
|
5,005,184
|
|
Borrowings
|
|
|
1,830,525
|
|
|
|
3,275,570
|
|
Common equity
|
|
|
555,441
|
|
|
|
552,733
|
|
PERIOD END BALANCES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans held for sale and loans, net of allowance for loans losses
|
|
$
|
5,657,583
|
|
|
$
|
6,918,077
|
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
196,510
|
|
|
|
179,150
|
|
Earning assets
|
|
|
6,696,810
|
|
|
|
8,609,111
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
7,352,980
|
|
|
|
9,309,018
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
5,099,681
|
|
|
|
5,553,665
|
|
Borrowings
|
|
|
1,334,154
|
|
|
|
2,847,096
|
|
Common equity
|
|
|
545,465
|
|
|
|
566,849
|
|
Continued
42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
SELECTED RATIOS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest margin on a tax-equivalent basis (on an annualized basis)
|
|
|
4.98
|
%
|
|
|
4.12
|
%
|
Efficiency ratio (1)
|
|
|
62.38
|
%
|
|
|
55.76
|
%
|
Return on average total assets (on an annualized basis)
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
|
0.78
|
%
|
Return on average common equity (on an annualized basis)
|
|
|
(0.02
|
)%
|
|
|
12.90
|
%
|
Dividend payout
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
|
26.32
|
%
|
Average net loans/average total deposits
|
|
|
116.48
|
%
|
|
|
139.09
|
%
|
Average earning assets/average total assets
|
|
|
89.84
|
%
|
|
|
91.66
|
%
|
Average stockholders equity/average assets
|
|
|
7.16
|
%
|
|
|
6.03
|
%
|
Fee income to average assets (annualized)
|
|
|
1.22
|
%
|
|
|
1.51
|
%
|
Capital:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier I capital to risk-adjusted assets
|
|
|
8.95
|
%
|
|
|
7.70
|
%
|
Total capital to risk-adjusted assets
|
|
|
13.68
|
%
|
|
|
10.74
|
%
|
Leverage Ratio
|
|
|
6.21
|
%
|
|
|
5.83
|
%
|
Asset quality:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-performing loans to total loans
|
|
|
4.07
|
%
|
|
|
4.42
|
%
|
Annualized net charge-offs to average loans
|
|
|
2.45
|
%
|
|
|
1.54
|
%
|
Allowance for loan losses to period-end loans
|
|
|
3.36
|
%
|
|
|
2.52
|
%
|
Allowance for loan losses to non-performing loans
|
|
|
82.53
|
%
|
|
|
57.06
|
%
|
Allowance for loan losses to non-performing loans plus
accruing loans past-due 90 days or more
|
|
|
77.37
|
%
|
|
|
55.32
|
%
|
Non-performing assets to total assets
|
|
|
3.62
|
%
|
|
|
3.56
|
%
|
Recoveries to charge-offs
|
|
|
3.49
|
%
|
|
|
3.44
|
%
|
EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excluding interest on deposits
|
|
|
0.96
|
x
|
|
|
1.71
|
x
|
Including interest on deposits
|
|
|
0.98
|
x
|
|
|
1.34
|
x
|
OTHER DATA AT END OF PERIOD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer financial assets under management
|
|
$
|
13,598,000
|
|
|
$
|
14,096,000
|
|
Bank branches
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
Consumer Finance branches
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Branches
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
127
|
|
ATMs
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
144
|
|
(Concluded)
|
|
|
*
|
|
Per share data is based on the average number of shares outstanding during the periods.
|
|
(1)
|
|
Operating expenses divided by net interest income on a tax equivalent basis, plus other income
excluding gain on sale of securities, gain on equity securities and loss on extinguisment of debts
and derivatives.
|
43
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
This financial discussion contains an analysis of the consolidated financial position and
consolidated results of operations of Santander BanCorp and its wholly-owned subsidiaries (the
Corporation) and should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements, notes
and tables included elsewhere in this report.
The Corporation, similarly to other financial institutions, is subject to certain risks, many
of which are beyond managements control, though efforts and initiatives are undertaken to manage
those risks in conjunction with return optimization. Among the risks being managed are: (1) market
risk, which is the risk that changes in market rates and prices will adversely affect the
Corporations financial condition or results of operations, (2) liquidity risk, which is the risk
that the Corporation will have insufficient cash or access to cash to meet operating needs and
financial obligations, (3) credit risk, which is the risk that loan customers or other
counterparties will be unable to perform their contractual obligations, and (4) operational risk,
which is the risk of loss resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes, people and
systems, or from external events. In addition, the Corporation is subject to legal, compliance and
reputational risks, among others.
As a provider of financial services, the Corporations earnings are significantly affected by
general economic and business conditions. Credit, funding, including deposit origination and fee
income generation activities are influenced by the level of business spending and investment,
consumer income, spending and savings, capital market activities, competition, customer
preferences, interest rate conditions and prevailing market rates on competing products. The
Corporation constantly monitors general business and economic conditions, industry-related trends
and indicators, competition from traditional and non-traditional financial services providers,
interest rate volatility, indicators of credit quality, demand for loans and deposits, operational
efficiencies, including systems, revenue and profitability improvement and regulatory changes in
the financial services industry, among others. The Corporation operates in a highly regulated
environment and may be adversely affected by changes in federal and local laws and regulations.
Also, competition with other financial services providers could adversely affect the Corporations
profitability.
In addition to the information contained in this Form 10-Q, readers should consider the
description of the Corporations business contained in Item 1 of the Corporations Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2008. While not all inclusive, Item 1 of the Form 10-K, discusses
additional information about the business of the Corporation and risk factors, many beyond the
Corporations control, that provides further discussion of the operating results, financial
condition and credit, market and liquidity risks is presented in the narrative and tables included
herein.
Critical Accounting Policies
The consolidated financial statements of the Corporation and its wholly-owned subsidiaries are
prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America (hereinafter referred to as generally accepted accounting principles or GAAP) and with
general practices within the financial services industry. In preparing the consolidated financial
statements, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported
amount of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the consolidated financial statements and the reported amount of revenues and expenses during the
reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The Corporations critical
accounting policies are detailed in the Financial Review and Supplementary Information section of
the Corporations Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
Current Accounting Developments
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, which establishes
a framework for measuring fair value under GAAP and enhances disclosures about fair value
measurements. The Corporation adopted SFAS 157, as of January 1, 2008 for financial assets and
liabilities. Fair value is defined under SFAS 157 as the price that would be received for an asset
or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for
the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement
date. In February 2008, the FASB issued a FASB Staff Position (FSP FAS 157-2) that partially
delayed the effective date of SFAS 157 for one year for certain nonfinancial assets and
nonfinancial liabilities, except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the
financial statements on a recurring basis. FSP FAS 157-2 states that a measurement is recurring if
it happens at least annually and defines nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities as all
assets and liabilities other than those meeting the definition of a financial asset or financial
liability in SFAS No. 159. Effective January 1, 2009, the Corporation adopted SFAS 157 for
nonfinancial assets and liabilities eligible for deferral under FSP FAS 157-2. The adoption of this
statement
44
did not have
material impact on the Corporations consolidated financial statements and disclosures. See Notes
12 and 18 for additional information.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, which requires the enhancement of the current
disclosure framework in Statement 133. The Statement requires that objectives for using derivative
instruments be disclosed in terms of underlying risk and accounting designation. This disclosure
better conveys the purpose of derivative use in terms of the risks that the entity is intending to
manage. Disclosing the fair values of derivative instruments and their gains and losses in a
tabular format should provide a more complete picture of the location in an entitys financial
statements of both the derivative positions existing at period end and the effect of using
derivatives during the reporting period. Disclosing information about credit-risk-related
contingent features should provide information on the potential effect on an entitys liquidity
from using derivatives. Finally, this Statement requires cross-referencing within the footnotes,
which should help users of financial statements locate important information about derivative
instruments. This Statement is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and
interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008, with early application encouraged. This
Statement encourages, but does not require, comparative disclosures for earlier periods at initial
adoption. The adoption of this statement did not have material impact on the Corporations
consolidated financial statements and disclosures.
In April 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) FAS 142-3, Determination of Useful
Life of Intangible Assets. This FASB Staff Position (FSP) amends the factors that should be
considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a
recognized intangible asset under FASB Statement No. 142,
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
. The
intent of this FSP is to improve the consistency between the useful life of a recognized intangible
asset under Statement 142 and the period of expected cash flows used to measure the fair value of
the asset under FASB Statement No. 141 (revised 2007),
Business Combinations,
and other U.S.
generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). An intangible asset may be acquired individually
or with a group of other assets. This FSP applies regardless of the nature of the transaction that
resulted in the recognition of the intangible asset, that is, whether acquired in a business
combination or otherwise. In developing assumptions about renewal or extension used to determine
the useful life of a recognized intangible asset, an entity shall consider its own historical
experience in renewing or extending similar arrangements; however, these assumptions should be
adjusted for the entity-specific factors in paragraph 11 of Statement 142. In the absence of that
experience, an entity shall consider the assumptions that market participants would use about
renewal or extension (consistent with the highest and best use of the asset by market
participants), adjusted for the entity-specific factors in paragraph 11 of Statement 142. This FSP
is for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008 and interim
periods within those fiscal years. The Corporation adopted FSP FAS 142-3 effective January 1, 2009.
The adoption of this FSP did not have a material impact on the Corporations financial statements
and disclosures.
Overview of Results of Operations for the Three-Month Periods Ended March 31, 2009 and 2008
Santander BanCorp is the financial holding company for Banco Santander Puerto Rico and
subsidiary (the Bank), Santander Securities Corporation and subsidiary (SSC), Santander
Financial Services, Inc. (SFS), Santander Insurance Agency, Inc. (SIA) and Island Insurance
Corporation (IIC).
For the three-month periods ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, net income and other selected
financial information, as reported are the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended
|
($ in thousands, except earnings per share)
|
|
31-Mar-09
|
|
31-Mar-08
|
Net (loss) income
|
|
$
|
(31
|
)
|
|
$
|
17,722
|
|
EPS
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.38
|
|
ROA
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
|
0.78
|
%
|
ROE
|
|
|
(0.02
|
)%
|
|
|
12.90
|
%
|
Efficiency Ratio (*)
|
|
|
62.38
|
%
|
|
|
55.76
|
%
|
|
|
|
(*)
|
|
Operating expenses divided by net interest income on a tax equivalent basis plus other income
excluding
a gain on sale of securities, gain on equity securities and loss on extinguishment of debt.
|
45
Results of Operations for the Three-Month Periods March 31, 2009 and 2008
The Corporation reported a net loss of $31,000 for the three-month period ended March 31, 2009
as compared to net income of $17.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008. The
Corporations earnings per common share (EPS) was zero for the three-month period ended March 31,
2009 as compared to $0.38 for the three-month period ended March 31, 2008. The Corporations return
on average assets (ROA) was zero for the first quarter of 2009 compared with 0.78% for the first
quarter of 2008. For the same comparative periods, the annualized return on average common equity
(ROE) was (0.02)% compared to 12.90%. The efficiency ratio, on a tax equivalent basis, for the
three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 was 62.38% and 55.76%, respectively.
Overview of Financial Results
The Corporations financial results for the three-month period ended March 31, 2009 were
impacted by the following:
|
|
|
The Corporation experienced an improvement of 86 basis points in net interest margin, on
a tax equivalent basis, to 4.98% for the three months ended March 31, 2009 from 4.12% for
the same period in 2008;
|
|
|
|
|
In order to reduce counterparty exposure, improve net interest margin and strategically
manage its balance sheet, the Corporation sold $441 million of investment securities
available for sale and realized a gain of $9.3 million. This gain was offset by a loss of
$9.6 million on the extinguishment of a debt pertaining to securities sold under agreement
to repurchase of $300 million that were funding the securities sold;
|
|
|
|
|
The provision for loan losses increased $1.5 million or 3.8% for the three months ended
March 31, 2009 compared to the same period in 2008. The provision for loan losses
represented 112.7% and 144.6% of the net charge-offs for the three months ended March 31,
2009 and 2008, respectively;
|
|
|
|
|
The allowance for loan losses of $196.5 million as of March 31, 2009 represented 3.4% of
total loans, 82.5% of non-performing loans and 263.2% of non-performing loans excluding
loans secured by real estate. As of December 31, 2008 and March 31, 2008, the allowance
for loan losses was $191.9 million and $179.2 million, respectively, represented 3.1% and
2.5% of total loans, and 90.2% and 57.1% of non-performing loans and 225.1% and 85.9% of
non-performing loans excluding loans secured by real estate, respectively;
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest income decreased $27.0 million or 51.6% for the first quarter of 2009 as
compared to the three-month period ended March 31, 2008, respectively. Non-interest income
was impacted principally by: (i) a gain of $9.3 million due to the sale of certain
investment securities available for sale offset by a loss of $9.6 million on extinguishment
of a debt pertaining to securities sold under agreement to repurchase of $300 million;
(ii) a decrease in broker-dealer, asset management and insurance fees of $9.0 million for
the quarter ended March 31, 2009 compared with the same period in 2008; (iii) a gain of
$8.6 million on the sale of a portion of the Corporations investment in Visa, Inc. in
connection with its initial public offering during the first quarter of 2008; (iv) a
decrease in gain on derivatives of $7.4 million and (v) a decrease of $1.2 million in
trading gains;
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses for the first quarter of 2009 reflected a decrease of $2.1 million or
2.9% as compared to the three-month period ended March 31, 2008. This decrease was
affected principally by: (i) a $6.7 million decrease in salaries and other employee
benefits for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 as compared with the same quarter in 2008;
(ii) $1.2 million decrease in business promotion; (iii) $1.2 million increase in FDIC
assessment due to the assessment systems implemented under the Federal Deposit Insurance
Reform Act of 2005 that imposed insurance premiums based on factors such as capital level,
supervisory rating, certain financial ratios and risk information; (iv) $0.8 million
increase in professional fees due to an increment in consulting fees related to the review
of certain operational procedures (v) partially offset by a favorable adjustment reducing
stock incentive plan expense of $3.5 million recorded during the first quarter of 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
During 2009, the Corporation sold certain loans, including some classified as impaired,
to an affiliate for $92.8 million in cash. These loans had a net book value of $92.8
million comprised of an outstanding principal balance
|
46
|
|
|
of $95.8 million and a specific valuation allowance of $3.0 million. The type of loans
by net book value was $65.6 million in construction loans and $27.2 million in commercial
loans. No gain or loss was recognized on these transactions.
|
Net Interest Income
The Corporations net interest income for the three months ended March 31, 2009 was $84.4
million, remaining basically flat when compared with the same period in prior year. There were
decreases of $24.1 million and $5.2 million in interest income on loans and investment securities,
respectively offset by $11.2 million decrease in interest expense on deposits and $19.0 million
decrease on other borrowings when compared with the same period in prior year. The average cost of
funds on interest-bearing liabilities experienced a decrease of 106 basis points from 3.99% for the
three-month period ended March 31, 2008 to 2.93% for the same period in 2009. This was influenced
by the reduction in federal funds rates made by the Federal Reserve. The average yield on
interest-earning assets reflected a decrease of 13 basis points to reach 7.55% in the quarter ended
March 31, 2009.
The table on page 50, Quarter to Date Average Balance Sheet and Summary of Net Interest Income
Tax Equivalent Basis, presents average balance sheets, net interest income on a tax equivalent
basis and average interest rates for the quarters ended March 31, 2009 and 2008. The table on
Interest Variance Analysis Tax Equivalent Basis on page 49, allocates changes in the
Corporations interest income (on a tax-equivalent basis) and interest expense among changes in the
average volume of interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities and changes in their
respective interest rates for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2009 compared with the same
periods of 2008.
To permit the comparison of returns on assets with different tax attributes, the interest
income on tax-exempt assets has been adjusted by an amount equal to the income taxes which would
have been paid had the income been fully taxable. This tax equivalent adjustment is derived using
the applicable statutory tax rate and resulted in adjustments of $1.1 million and $1.4 million for
the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
The following table sets forth the principal components of the Corporations net interest
income for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2009 and 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter ended
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Interest income tax equivalent basis
|
|
$
|
129,777
|
|
|
$
|
160,463
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
44,282
|
|
|
|
74,430
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income tax equivalent basis
|
|
$
|
85,495
|
|
|
$
|
86,033
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest margin tax equivalent basis (1)
|
|
|
4.98
|
%
|
|
|
4.12
|
%
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
|
Net interest margin for any period equals tax-equivalent net interest income divided by average
interest-earning assets for the period
(on an annualized basis.)
|
For the three-month period ended March 31, 2009, net interest margin, on a tax equivalent
basis, was 4.98% compared to net interest margin, on a tax equivalent basis, of 4.12% for the same
period in 2008. The 86 basis points increase in net interest margin, on a tax equivalent basis, was
mainly due to a decrease in the cost of average interest-bearing liabilities of 106 basis points
resulting in a decrease of $30.1 million in interest expense. The reduction of $30.1
47
million or 40.5% in interest expense was principally due to the significant reductions of 109
basis points in the cost of funds of average interest-bearing deposits from 3.73% for the three
months ended March 31, 2008 to 2.64% for the three months ended March 31, 2009 reflecting the
Federal Reserves interest rate cuts. The impact of the decrease in average cost of funds was
partially offset by a 13 basis points decrease in yield on the average interest-earning assets
resulting in a decrease of $30.7 million or 19.1% in interest income on average interest-earning
assets, on a tax equivalent basis,. This reduction was mainly due to a $24.6 million decrease in
interest income on average gross loans mainly due to the sale of loans to an affiliate.
The average interest-earning assets at March 31, 2009 decreased $1.4 billion or 17.1% when
compared with figures reported at March 31, 2008. This decrease was mainly due to a decrease of
$1.1 billion in average net loans mainly due to the sale of commercial and construction loans,
including some classified as impaired, to an affiliate and repayments on loans, net of originations
for the year ended December 31, 2008. The decrease in average net loans was comprised of the
following items:
|
|
|
a decrease in the average commercial and construction loans of $492.5 million or 18.8%
and $335.4 million or 68.8%, respectively, which considers the effect of the sale of loans
to an affiliate and net repayments during the period;
|
|
|
|
|
a decrease of $118.5 million or 4.4% in average mortgage loans mainly due to a $51.2
million decrease in mortgage loans originations and $16.2 million increase in mortgage
loans sales and securitizations when compared to the quarter ended March 31, 2008;
|
|
|
|
|
a decrease in average consumer loans (including consumer finance) of $122.7 million or
9.9% which comprised $102.6 million and $34.9 million decreases in average personal loans
and consumer finance, respectively, offset by $14.8 million increase in average credit
cards;
|
|
|
|
|
a decrease in average leasing portfolio of $30.5 million or 34.9%, since the Corporation
has strategically reduced this line of lending;
|
|
|
|
|
an increase in the average allowance for loan losses of $26.3 million when compared with
figures reported in 2008.
|
Also, there was a decrease of $490.1 million or 37.9% in average investment securities due to
a sale of investment securities available for sale of $441.0 million during the first quarter of
2009 partially offset by an increase of $179.6 million in average interest bearing deposits.
The decrease in average interest-bearing liabilities of $1.4 billion or 18.3% for the
three-month period ended March 31, 2009, was driven by a decrease in average borrowings of $1.4
million when compared to the three-month period ended March 31, 2008. The decrease in average
interest-bearing liabilities was composed of:
|
|
|
a decrease in average federal funds and other borrowings of $667.9 million mainly due to
the payment of the $700.0 million outstanding indebtedness incurred under a bridge facility
agreement among the Corporation, SFS and National Australia Bank Limited during the first
quarter of 2008;
|
|
|
|
|
a reduction in average securities sold under agreements to repurchase of $284.1 million
mainly caused by the cancellation of $200 million of securities sold under agreements to
repurchase with Lehman Brothers Inc. (LBI) as result of the bankruptcy of its parent,
Lehman Brothers Holding Inc. (LBHI) during 2008;
|
|
|
|
|
reductions of $424.5 million in average commercial paper ;
|
|
|
|
|
a decrease in average Federal Home Loan Bank Advances (FHLB) of $120.9 million for
the three months ended March 31, 2009 compared with the same period in 2008;
|
|
|
|
|
an increase of $51.8 million in average subordinated capital notes due to a subordinated
purchase agreement undertook with an affiliate;
|
|
|
|
|
an increase of $70.9 million in average total interest bearing deposits comprised of an
increase of $384.8 million and $90.7 million in average other time deposits and average
savings and NOW accounts, respectively, offset by a $404.6 million decrease in average
brokered deposits. The increase in average total interest bearing deposits was
|
48
|
|
|
principally due to a certificate of deposit for the amount of $630 million opened by Banco
Santander, S.A. with Banco Santander Puerto Rico during first quarter of 2008.
|
The following table allocates changes in the Corporations interest income, on a
tax-equivalent basis, and interest expense for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2009,
compared to the three-month periods ended March 31, 2008, among changes related to the average
volume of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, and changes related to interest
rates. Volume and rate variances have been calculated based on the activity in average balances
over the period and changes in interest rates on average interest-earning assets and average
interest-bearing liabilities. The changes that are not due solely to volume or rate are allocated
to volume and rate based on the proportion of change in each category.
INTEREST VARIANCE ANALYSIS
on a Tax Equivalent Basis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
Compared to the Three Months
|
|
|
|
Ended March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
Increase (Decrease) Due to Change in:
|
|
|
|
Volume
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Interest income, on a tax equivalent basis:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal funds sold and securities purchased
under agreements to resell
|
|
$
|
(377
|
)
|
|
$
|
(396
|
)
|
|
$
|
(773
|
)
|
Time deposits with other banks
|
|
|
490
|
|
|
|
(752
|
)
|
|
|
(262
|
)
|
Investment securities
|
|
|
(5,883
|
)
|
|
|
814
|
|
|
|
(5,069
|
)
|
Loans
|
|
|
(23,141
|
)
|
|
|
(1,441
|
)
|
|
|
(24,582
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income, on a tax equivalent basis
|
|
|
(28,911
|
)
|
|
|
(1,775
|
)
|
|
|
(30,686
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Savings and NOW accounts
|
|
|
568
|
|
|
|
(4,932
|
)
|
|
|
(4,364
|
)
|
Other time deposits
|
|
|
(215
|
)
|
|
|
(6,591
|
)
|
|
|
(6,806
|
)
|
Borrowings
|
|
|
(13,166
|
)
|
|
|
(6,125
|
)
|
|
|
(19,291
|
)
|
Long-term borrowings
|
|
|
698
|
|
|
|
(385
|
)
|
|
|
313
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense
|
|
|
(12,115
|
)
|
|
|
(18,033
|
)
|
|
|
(30,148
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income, on a tax equivalent basis
|
|
$
|
(16,796
|
)
|
|
$
|
16,258
|
|
|
$
|
(538
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table shows average balances and, where applicable, interest amounts earned on a
tax-equivalent basis and average rates for the Corporations assets and liabilities and
stockholders equity for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2009 and 2008.
49
SANTANDER BANCORP
QUARTER TO DATE AVERAGE BALANCE SHEET AND SUMMARY OF NET INTEREST INCOME
Tax Equivalent Basis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annualized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annualized
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest bearing deposits
|
|
$
|
314,876
|
|
|
$
|
189
|
|
|
|
0.24
|
%
|
|
$
|
51,200
|
|
|
$
|
451
|
|
|
|
3.54
|
%
|
Federal funds sold and securities purchased
under agreements to resell
|
|
|
16,208
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
0.38
|
%
|
|
|
100,268
|
|
|
|
788
|
|
|
|
3.16
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest bearing deposits
|
|
|
331,084
|
|
|
|
204
|
|
|
|
0.25
|
%
|
|
|
151,468
|
|
|
|
1,239
|
|
|
|
3.29
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury securities
|
|
|
42,876
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
0.28
|
%
|
|
|
64,939
|
|
|
|
623
|
|
|
|
3.86
|
%
|
Obligations
of other U.S. government
agencies and corporations
|
|
|
74,750
|
|
|
|
684
|
|
|
|
3.71
|
%
|
|
|
507,773
|
|
|
|
4,960
|
|
|
|
3.93
|
%
|
Obligations of government of Puerto Rico
and political subdivisions
|
|
|
204,081
|
|
|
|
3,442
|
|
|
|
6.84
|
%
|
|
|
94,990
|
|
|
|
1,338
|
|
|
|
5.67
|
%
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations and
mortgage backed securities
|
|
|
420,154
|
|
|
|
5,359
|
|
|
|
5.17
|
%
|
|
|
544,376
|
|
|
|
6,453
|
|
|
|
4.77
|
%
|
Other
|
|
|
59,838
|
|
|
|
179
|
|
|
|
1.21
|
%
|
|
|
79,724
|
|
|
|
1,389
|
|
|
|
7.01
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment securities
|
|
|
801,699
|
|
|
|
9,694
|
|
|
|
4.90
|
%
|
|
|
1,291,802
|
|
|
|
14,763
|
|
|
|
4.60
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
2,124,371
|
|
|
|
24,882
|
|
|
|
4.75
|
%
|
|
|
2,616,880
|
|
|
|
39,534
|
|
|
|
6.08
|
%
|
Construction
|
|
|
152,121
|
|
|
|
1,006
|
|
|
|
2.68
|
%
|
|
|
487,514
|
|
|
|
5,611
|
|
|
|
4.63
|
%
|
Consumer
|
|
|
551,781
|
|
|
|
21,407
|
|
|
|
15.73
|
%
|
|
|
639,580
|
|
|
|
21,502
|
|
|
|
13.52
|
%
|
Consumer Finance
|
|
|
568,878
|
|
|
|
32,893
|
|
|
|
23.45
|
%
|
|
|
603,826
|
|
|
|
34,943
|
|
|
|
23.27
|
%
|
Mortgage
|
|
|
2,574,757
|
|
|
|
38,756
|
|
|
|
6.02
|
%
|
|
|
2,693,219
|
|
|
|
41,420
|
|
|
|
6.15
|
%
|
Lease financing
|
|
|
56,927
|
|
|
|
935
|
|
|
|
6.66
|
%
|
|
|
87,441
|
|
|
|
1,451
|
|
|
|
6.67
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross loans
|
|
|
6,028,835
|
|
|
|
119,879
|
|
|
|
8.06
|
%
|
|
|
7,128,460
|
|
|
|
144,461
|
|
|
|
8.15
|
%
|
Allowance for loan losses
|
|
|
(192,800
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(166,531
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, net
|
|
|
5,836,035
|
|
|
|
119,879
|
|
|
|
8.33
|
%
|
|
|
6,961,929
|
|
|
|
144,461
|
|
|
|
8.35
|
%
|
Total interest earning assets/ interest
income (on a tax equivalent basis)
|
|
|
6,968,818
|
|
|
|
129,777
|
|
|
|
7.55
|
%
|
|
|
8,405,199
|
|
|
|
160,463
|
|
|
|
7.68
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest earning assests
|
|
|
788,206
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
764,898
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
7,757,024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9,170,097
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and stockholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Savings and NOW accounts
|
|
$
|
1,722,194
|
|
|
$
|
6,386
|
|
|
|
1.50
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,631,511
|
|
|
$
|
10,750
|
|
|
|
2.65
|
%
|
Other time deposits
|
|
|
1,674,523
|
|
|
|
13,689
|
|
|
|
3.32
|
%
|
|
|
1,289,696
|
|
|
|
12,416
|
|
|
|
3.87
|
%
|
Brokered deposits
|
|
|
907,281
|
|
|
|
7,962
|
|
|
|
3.56
|
%
|
|
|
1,311,879
|
|
|
|
16,040
|
|
|
|
4.92
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest bearing deposits
|
|
|
4,303,998
|
|
|
|
28,037
|
|
|
|
2.64
|
%
|
|
|
4,233,086
|
|
|
|
39,206
|
|
|
|
3.73
|
%
|
Federal funds purchased and other borrowings
|
|
|
1,669
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
|
669,604
|
|
|
|
7,029
|
|
|
|
4.22
|
%
|
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
|
|
|
311,667
|
|
|
|
3,389
|
|
|
|
4.41
|
%
|
|
|
595,745
|
|
|
|
7,408
|
|
|
|
5.00
|
%
|
Federal Home Loan advances
|
|
|
1,143,889
|
|
|
|
8,602
|
|
|
|
3.05
|
%
|
|
|
1,264,816
|
|
|
|
12,208
|
|
|
|
3.88
|
%
|
Commercial paper
|
|
|
52,959
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
0.98
|
%
|
|
|
477,426
|
|
|
|
4,765
|
|
|
|
4.01
|
%
|
Term Notes
|
|
|
20,048
|
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
|
3.12
|
%
|
|
|
19,451
|
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
3.08
|
%
|
Subordinated Notes
|
|
|
300,293
|
|
|
|
3,972
|
|
|
|
5.36
|
%
|
|
|
248,528
|
|
|
|
3,665
|
|
|
|
5.93
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest bearing liabilities/interest expense
|
|
|
6,134,523
|
|
|
|
44,282
|
|
|
|
2.93
|
%
|
|
|
7,508,656
|
|
|
|
74,430
|
|
|
|
3.99
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-interest bearing liabilities
|
|
|
1,067,060
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,108,708
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
7,201,583
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,617,364
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders Equity
|
|
|
555,441
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
552,733
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
7,757,024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9,170,097
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income, on a tax equivalent basis
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
85,495
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
86,033
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest spread
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.62
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.69
|
%
|
Cost of funding earning assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.58
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.56
|
%
|
Net interest margin, on a tax equivalent basis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.98
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.12
|
%
|
50
Provision for Loan Losses
The Corporations provision for loan losses increased $1.5 million or 3.8% from $39.6 million
for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 to $41.1 million for the same period in 2009. The increase in
the provision for loan losses was due primarily to the deterioration in economic conditions in
Puerto Rico, requiring the Corporation to increase the level of its allowance for loan losses.
Refer to the discussions under Allowance for Loan Losses and Risk Management for further
analysis of the allowance for loan losses and non-performing assets and related ratios.
Other Income
Other income consists of service charges on the Corporations deposit accounts, other service
fees, including mortgage servicing fees and fees on credit cards, broker-dealer, asset management
and insurance fees, gains and losses on sales of securities, gain on sale of mortgage servicing
rights, certain other gains and losses and certain other income.
The following table sets forth the components of the Corporations other income for the
periods indicated:
OTHER INCOME
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the quarters ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Bank service fees on deposit accounts
|
|
$
|
3,335
|
|
|
$
|
3,580
|
|
Other service fees:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit card and payment processing fees
|
|
|
2,119
|
|
|
|
2,019
|
|
Mortgage servicing fees
|
|
|
996
|
|
|
|
854
|
|
Trust fees
|
|
|
277
|
|
|
|
376
|
|
Confirming advances fees
|
|
|
749
|
|
|
|
2,408
|
|
Other fees
|
|
|
2,882
|
|
|
|
3,188
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fee income
|
|
|
10,358
|
|
|
|
12,425
|
|
Broker/dealer, asset management, and insurance fees
|
|
|
12,965
|
|
|
|
21,987
|
|
Gain on sale of securities, net
|
|
|
9,251
|
|
|
|
2,874
|
|
Gain on sale of loans
|
|
|
2,246
|
|
|
|
1,438
|
|
Trading gains
|
|
|
403
|
|
|
|
1,582
|
|
Gain (loss) on derivatives
|
|
|
(3,613
|
)
|
|
|
3,769
|
|
Other gains (losses), net
|
|
|
(8,596
|
)
|
|
|
7,437
|
|
Other
|
|
|
2,354
|
|
|
|
847
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
25,368
|
|
|
$
|
52,359
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51
The table below details the breakdown of fees from broker-dealer, asset management and
insurance agency operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the quarters ended
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Broker-dealer
|
|
$
|
6,489
|
|
|
$
|
13,086
|
|
Asset management
|
|
|
6,128
|
|
|
|
6,598
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Santander Securities
|
|
|
12,617
|
|
|
|
19,684
|
|
Insurance
|
|
|
348
|
|
|
|
2,303
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
12,965
|
|
|
$
|
21,987
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the quarter ended March 31, 2009, other income reached $25.4 million, a $27.0 million or
51.6% decrease when compared to $52.4 million for the same period in 2008. The other income was
impacted by the following:
|
|
|
Broker-dealer, asset management and insurance fees reflected a decrease of $9.0 million
for the three-month period ended March 31, 2009, due to decreases in broker-dealer and
asset management fees of $7.0 million and a decrease of $2.0 million in insurance fees due
to a reduction in credit life commissions generated from the Bank and Island Finance
operation. The broker-dealer operation is carried out through Santander Securities
Corporation, whose business includes securities underwriting and distribution, sales,
trading, financial planning and securities brokerage services. In addition, Santander
Securities provides investment management services through its wholly-owned subsidiary,
Santander Asset Management Corporation. The broker-dealer, asset management and insurance
operations contributed 51.1% to the Corporations other income for the three-month period
ended March 31, 2009 and 42.0% for same period in 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
There was an increase in gain on sale of securities available for sale of $6.4 million
for the three-month period ended March 31, 2009 compared with the three-month period ended
March 31, 2008. During the first quarter of 2009, the Corporation sold $441 million of
investment securities available for sale and realized a gain of $9.3 million. This gain was
offset by a loss of $9.6 million, included in other gains, net, on the extinguishment of a
debt pertaining to securities sold under agreement to repurchase of $300 million that were
funding the securities sold. During the first quarter of 2008, the Corporation sold $125.3
million of investment securities available for sale, resulting in a gain of $2.9 million.
|
|
|
|
|
The Corporation reported a decrease in gain on derivative instruments of $7.4 million
for the three-month period ended March 31, 2009 compared with the same period in 2008
mostly resulting from the credit risk component incorporated into the fair value
calculation of a subordinated note pursuant to SFAS 157 as of January 1, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
During the first quarter of 2008, a gain of $8.6 million on the sale of part of the
investment in Visa, Inc. in connection with its initial public offering was recognized
through earnings and included within other gains and losses, net.
|
|
|
|
|
A valuation adjustment of $1.6 million for loans held for sale was recorded through
earnings and included within other gains and losses during the three-month period ended
March 31, 2008. No valuation adjustment was required for the quarter ended March 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
There was an increase in other income of $1.5 million for the three months ended March
31, 2009 compared with the same period in 2008. This increase was mainly due to $0.7
million of loan administration fees collected from an affiliate, $0.4 million gain on tax
credit purchased and $0.3 million gain from freestanding derivatives.
|
|
|
|
|
There was a decrease of $1.2 million in trading gains.
|
52
Operating Expenses
The following table presents the detail of other operating expenses for the periods indicated:
OPERATING EXPENSES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarters ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Salaries
|
|
$
|
15,042
|
|
|
$
|
17,828
|
|
Stock incentive plans
|
|
|
482
|
|
|
|
(3,067
|
)
|
Pension and other benefits
|
|
|
12,568
|
|
|
|
17,382
|
|
Expenses deferred as loan origination costs
|
|
|
(1,237
|
)
|
|
|
(2,156
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total personnel costs
|
|
|
26,855
|
|
|
|
29,987
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Occupancy costs
|
|
|
6,257
|
|
|
|
6,416
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equipment expenses
|
|
|
1,083
|
|
|
|
1,193
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EDP servicing expense, amortization and technical services
|
|
|
10,254
|
|
|
|
10,178
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Communication expenses
|
|
|
2,447
|
|
|
|
2,535
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business promotion
|
|
|
767
|
|
|
|
1,965
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other taxes
|
|
|
3,357
|
|
|
|
3,406
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional fees
|
|
|
4,776
|
|
|
|
4,020
|
|
Amortization of intangibles
|
|
|
773
|
|
|
|
734
|
|
Printing and supplies
|
|
|
334
|
|
|
|
389
|
|
Credit card expenses
|
|
|
1,641
|
|
|
|
978
|
|
Insurance
|
|
|
540
|
|
|
|
1,037
|
|
Examinations and FDIC assessment
|
|
|
2,653
|
|
|
|
1,489
|
|
Transportation and travel
|
|
|
460
|
|
|
|
675
|
|
Repossessed assets provision and expenses
|
|
|
1,036
|
|
|
|
1,325
|
|
Collections and related legal costs
|
|
|
448
|
|
|
|
321
|
|
All other
|
|
|
5,696
|
|
|
|
4,796
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other operating expenses
|
|
|
18,357
|
|
|
|
15,764
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-personnel expenses
|
|
|
42,522
|
|
|
|
41,457
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Operating expenses
|
|
$
|
69,377
|
|
|
$
|
71,444
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Corporations operating expenses reflected a decrease of $2.1 million or 2.9% for the
three-month periods ended March 31, 2009 when compared with the three-month period ended March 31,
2008. The variances in operating expenses are described below:
|
|
|
Total salaries and other employee benefits reflected a decrease of $3.2 million during
the three months ended March 31, 2009 compared with the same period of the prior year. This
reduction is mostly attributed to a decrease of $6.7
million in salaries and other employee benefits for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 as
compared with the same quarter in 2008 partially offset by a favorable adjustment reducing
stock incentive plan expense of $3.5 million recorded during the first quarter of 2008. The
decrease in salaries and other employee benefits of $6.7 million was mainly driven by a $4.1
million decrease in commissions and bonuses and $0.9 million decrease in expense deferred as
loan origination costs for the quarter ended March 31, 2009 as compared with quarter ended
March 31, 2008.
|
53
|
|
|
The Corporations non-personnel expenses increased $1.1 million for the three months
ended March 31, 2009 compared with the same period in prior year. This increase was mainly
due to $1.2 million decrease in business promotion partially offset by $1.2 million
increase in FDIC assessment due to the assessment systems implemented under the Federal
Deposit Insurance Reform Act of 2005 that imposed insurance premiums based on factors such
as capital level, supervisory rating, certain financial ratios and risk information and
$0.8 million increase in professional fees due to an increment in consulting fees related
to the review of certain operational procedures.
|
The Efficiency Ratio, on a tax equivalent basis, for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and
2008 was 62.38% and 55.76%, respectively, reflecting a decrease of 662 basis points. This change
was mainly the result of a reduction in non-interest income of $27.0 million, as previously
discussed.
Provision for Income Tax
The Corporation and each of its subsidiaries are treated as separate taxable entities and are
not entitled to file consolidated tax returns in Puerto Rico. The maximum statutory marginal
corporate income tax rate is 39%. Furthermore, there is an alternative minimum tax of 22%. The
difference between the statutory marginal tax rate and the effective tax rate is primarily due to
the interest income earned on certain investments and loans, which is exempt from income tax (net
of the disallowance of expenses attributable to the exempt income) and to the disallowance of
certain expenses and other items.
The Corporation is also subject to municipal license tax at various rates that do not exceed
1.5% on the Corporations taxable gross income. Under the Puerto Rico Internal Revenue Code, as
amended (the PR Code), the Corporation and each of its subsidiaries are treated as separate
taxable entities and are not entitled to file consolidated tax returns. The PR Code provides
dividends received deduction of 100% on dividends received from controlled subsidiaries subject to
taxation in Puerto Rico.
Puerto Rico international banking entities, or IBEs, such as Santander International Bank
(SIB), are currently exempt from taxation under Puerto Rico law. During 2004, the Legislature of
Puerto Rico and the Governor of Puerto Rico approved a law amending the IBE Act. This law imposes
income taxes at normal statutory rates on each IBE that operates as a unit of a bank, if the IBEs
net income generated was 20% of the banks net income in the taxable year commencing on July 1,
2005, and thereafter. It does not impose income taxation on an IBE that operates as a subsidiary of
a bank as is the case of SIB.
The Corporation adopted the provisions of FIN 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Tax
an interpretation of FASB Statement No 109
issued by FASB
.
FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for
uncertainty of income tax recognized in a enterprises financial statements in accordance with SFAS
No 109,
Accounting for Income Tax.
This interpretation prescribes a recognition threshold and
measurement attribute for the financial statements recognition and measurement of a tax position
taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. This interpretation also provides guidance on
derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure
and transition.
In assessing the realization of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more
likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The
ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable
income during the periods in which the temporary differences become deductible. Management
considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income, and
tax planning strategies in making this assessment. Based upon the level of historical taxable
income and projections for future taxable income, management believes it is more likely than not,
the Corporation will not realize the benefits of the deferred tax assets related to Santander
Financial Services, Inc. and Santander Bancorp (parent company only) amounting to $20.5 million and
$0.1 million at March 31, 2009. Accordingly, a deferred tax asset valuation allowance of $20.5
million and $0.1 million for Santander Financial Services, Inc and Santander Bancorp (parent
company only), respectively, were recorded at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008.
The income tax benefit amounted to $0.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009
compared to an income tax provision of $8.2 million for the same period in 2008. The decrease in
the provision for income tax for three month ended
March 31, 2009 when compared with prior year resulted from a lower taxable income in the quarter
ended March 31, 2009 compared to quarter ended March 31, 2008.
54
Financial Position March 31, 2009
Assets
The Corporations assets reached $7.4 billion as of March 31, 2009, a 6.9% or $0.5 billion
decrease compared to total assets of $7.9 billion at December 31, 2008 and a 21.0% or $2.0 billion
decrease compared to total assets of $9.3 billion at March 31, 2008. The reduction of $0.5
billion, for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, on Corporations total assets was driven by a
decrease of $478.5 million in investment securities available for sale mainly due to a sale of $441
million investment securities during the first quarter of 2009. Also, there was a decrease of
$310.4 million in net loan portfolio partially offset by an increase in cash and cash equivalents
of $324.8 million compared to December 31, 2008 balances. The reduction of $2.0 billion compared to
March 31, 2008 balances was principally due to a $1.3 billion decrease in net loan portfolio and
$749.4 million decrease in investment securities available for
sale due to the sale of investment
securities of $346.7 million during 2008 and $441.0 million during the first quarter of 2009.
The composition of the loan portfolio, including loans held for sale, was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
Dec. 31,
|
|
|
Mar. 09/Dec. 08
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
Mar. 09/Mar. 08
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Variance
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Variance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and
industrial
|
|
$
|
2,071,533
|
|
|
$
|
2,164,786
|
|
|
$
|
(93,253
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,602,835
|
|
|
$
|
(531,302
|
)
|
Construction
|
|
|
94,354
|
|
|
|
194,026
|
|
|
|
(99,672
|
)
|
|
|
488,367
|
|
|
|
(394,013
|
)
|
Mortgage
|
|
|
2,546,593
|
|
|
|
2,595,588
|
|
|
|
(48,995
|
)
|
|
|
2,684,962
|
|
|
|
(138,369
|
)
|
Consumer
|
|
|
530,982
|
|
|
|
566,589
|
|
|
|
(35,607
|
)
|
|
|
629,001
|
|
|
|
(98,019
|
)
|
Consumer Finance
|
|
|
557,298
|
|
|
|
578,243
|
|
|
|
(20,945
|
)
|
|
|
607,838
|
|
|
|
(50,540
|
)
|
Leasing
|
|
|
53,333
|
|
|
|
60,615
|
|
|
|
(7,282
|
)
|
|
|
84,224
|
|
|
|
(30,891
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Loans
|
|
|
5,854,093
|
|
|
|
6,159,847
|
|
|
|
(305,754
|
)
|
|
|
7,097,227
|
|
|
|
(1,243,134
|
)
|
Allowance for loan
losses
|
|
|
(196,510
|
)
|
|
|
(191,889
|
)
|
|
|
(4,621
|
)
|
|
|
(179,150
|
)
|
|
|
(17,360
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Loans
|
|
$
|
5,657,583
|
|
|
$
|
5,967,958
|
|
|
$
|
(310,375
|
)
|
|
$
|
6,918,077
|
|
|
$
|
(1,260,494
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The net loan portfolio, including loans held for sale, reflected a decrease of $310.4 million
or 5.2%, reaching $5.7 billion at March 31, 2009, compared to the figures reported as of December
31, 2008, and a decrease of $1.3 billion or 18.2%, when compared to March 31, 2008. The
construction and commercial loan portfolio decreased $99.7 million and $93.3 million, respectively,
when compared to the December 31, 2008 balances. The reduction in these portfolios was basically
due to the sale to an affiliate of $92.8 million of commercial and construction loans, including
some classified as impaired, and $100.2 million of repayments, net of originations for the quarter
ended March 31, 2009. The loans sold to an affiliate had a net book value of $92.8 million
comprised of an outstanding principal balance of $95.8 million and a specific valuation allowance
of $3.0 million. The type of loans sold, at net book value, was $65.6 million in construction loans
and $27.2 million in commercial loans. Compared with March 31, 2008 balances, the construction and
commercial loans portfolios reflected decreases of $394.0 million and $531.3 million, respectively,
due to $392.9 million loans sold to an affiliate and $532.4 million of repayments, net of
originations. Also, the Corporation reported a decrease in consumer loans (including
consumer finance) of $56.6 million or 4.9% when compared with December 31, 2008 balances and
$148.6 million or 12.0% when compared with March 31, 2008 balances. The leasing portfolio reflected
decreases of $7.3 million and $30.9 million when compared with December 31, 2008 and March 31,
2008, respectively.
The mortgage portfolio reflected a decreased of $49.0 million, or 1.9%, and $138.4 million, or
5.2%, decreases compared to December 31, 2008 and March 31, 2008 balances. Residential mortgage
loan origination for the three months ended March 31, 2009 was $56.6 million, 47.5% less than the
$107.8 million originated during the same period in 2008. Total mortgage loans sold and securitized
during the three months ended March 31, 2009 were $51.0 million compared to $34.8 million for the
same period in 2008.
55
Allowance for Loan Losses
The Corporation assesses the overall risks in its loan portfolio and establishes and maintains
an allowance for probable losses thereon. The allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level
sufficient to provide for estimated loan losses based on the evaluation of known and inherent risks
in the Corporations loan portfolio. The Corporations management evaluates the adequacy of the
allowance for loan losses on a monthly basis.
The determination of the allowance for loan losses is one of the most complex and critical
accounting estimates the Corporations management makes. The allowance for loan losses is composed
of three different components. An asset-specific reserve based on the provisions of Statements of
Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 114 Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan
(as amended), an expected loss estimate based on the provisions of SFAS No. 5 Accounting for
Contingencies, and an unallocated reserve based on the effect of probable economic deterioration
above and beyond what is reflected in the asset-specific component of the allowance.
Commercial, construction loans and certain mortgage loans exceeding a predetermined monetary
threshold are identified for evaluation of impairment on an individual basis pursuant to SFAS No.
114. The Corporation considers a loan impaired when interest and/or principal is past due 90 days
or more, or, when based on current information and events it is probable that the Corporation will
be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. The
asset-specific reserve on each individual loan identified as impaired is measured based on the
present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loans effective interest rate,
except as a practical expedient, the Corporation may measure impairment based on the loans
observable market price, or the fair value of the collateral, net of estimated disposal costs, if
the loan is collateral dependent. Most of the asset-specific reserves of the Corporations impaired
loans are measured on the basis of the fair value of the collateral. The fair value of the
collateral is determined by external valuation specialist and since these values cannot be observed
or corroborated with market data, they are classified as Level 3 and presented as part of
non-recurring measurement disclosures.
A reserve for expected losses is determined under the provisions of SFAS No. 5 for all loans
not evaluated individually for impairment, based on historical loss experience by loan type,
management judgment of the quantitative factors (historical net charge-offs, statistical loss
estimates, etc.), as well as qualitative factors (current economic conditions, portfolio
composition, delinquency trends, industry concentrations, etc.). The Corporation groups small
homogeneous loans by type of loan (consumer, credit card, mortgage, etc.) and applies a loss
factor, which is determined using an average history of actual net losses and other statistical
loss estimates. Historical loss rates are reviewed at least quarterly and adjusted based on
changing borrower and/or collateral conditions and actual collections and charge-off experience.
Historical loss rates for the different portfolios may be adjusted for significant factors that in
managements judgment reflect the impact of any current conditions on loss recognition. Factors
that management considers in the analysis include the effect of the trends in the nature and volume
of loans (delinquency, charge-offs, non accrual), changes in the mix or type of collateral, asset
quality trends, changes in the internal lending policies and credit standards, collection practices
and examination results from internal and external agencies.
An additional, or unallocated, reserve is maintained to cover the effect of probable economic
deterioration above and beyond what is reflected in the asset-specific component of the allowance.
This component represents managements view that given the complexities of the lending portfolio
and the assessment process, including the inherent imprecision in the financial models used in the
loss forecasting process, there are estimable losses that have been incurred but not yet
specifically identified, and as a result not fully provided for in the asset-specific component of
the allowance. The level of the unallocated reserve may change periodically after evaluating
factors impacting assumptions used in the calculation of the asset specific component of the
reserve.
The underlying assumptions, estimates and assessments used by management to determine the
components of the allowance for loan losses are periodically evaluated and updated to reflect
managements current view of overall economic conditions and other relevant factors impacting
credit quality and inherent losses. Changes in such estimates could significantly impact the
allowance and provision for loan losses. The Corporation could experience loan losses that are
different from the current estimates made by management. Based on current and expected economic
conditions, the expected level of net loan losses and the methodology established to evaluate the
adequacy of the allowance for loan losses, management considers that the Corporation has
established an adequate position in its allowance for loan losses. Refer to the Non-performing
Assets and Past Due Loans section for further information.
56
ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the quarters ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
191,889
|
|
|
$
|
166,952
|
|
Provision for loan losses
|
|
|
41,100
|
|
|
|
39,575
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
232,989
|
|
|
|
206,527
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Losses charged to the allowance:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial
|
|
|
4,727
|
|
|
|
2,344
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
2,254
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage
|
|
|
1,380
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
13,067
|
|
|
|
9,537
|
|
Consumer finance
|
|
|
16,056
|
|
|
|
15,917
|
|
Leasing
|
|
|
313
|
|
|
|
488
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,797
|
|
|
|
28,352
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recoveries:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial
|
|
|
470
|
|
|
|
156
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
333
|
|
|
|
345
|
|
Consumer finance
|
|
|
414
|
|
|
|
376
|
|
Leasing
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,318
|
|
|
|
975
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loans charged-off
|
|
|
36,479
|
|
|
|
27,377
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
$
|
196,510
|
|
|
$
|
179,150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratios:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses to period-end loans
|
|
|
3.36
|
%
|
|
|
2.52
|
%
|
Recoveries to charge-offs
|
|
|
3.49
|
%
|
|
|
3.44
|
%
|
Annualized net charge-offs to average loans
|
|
|
2.45
|
%
|
|
|
1.54
|
%
|
The Corporations allowance for loan losses was $196.5 million or 3.36% of period-end loans at
March 31, 2009, a 833 basis point increase compared to $179.2 million, or 2.52% of period-end loans
at March 31, 2008. The $196.5 million in the allowance for loan losses is comprised of $127.4
million related to the Bank and $69.1 million related to Island Finance entity, with a provision
for loan losses of $25.5 million and $15.6 million for each respective segment for the three months
ended March 31, 2009. At March 31, 2008, the composition of the allowance for loan losses of $179.2
million was comprised of $109.5 million related to the Bank and $69.7 million related to Island Finance
entity, with a provision for loan losses of $22.7 million and $16.9 million for the same period for
each respective entities.
The 84 basis points increment in the allowance for loan losses to period-end loan was driven
by an increment of the loss factor applied to all loans not evaluated individually for impairment.
On a quarterly basis, the Corporation reviews and evaluates historical loss experience by loan
type, quantitative factors (historical net charge-offs, statistical loss estimates, etc.)
as well as qualitative factors (current economics conditions, portfolio composition,
delinquency trends, industry concentrations, etc.).
The ratio of the allowance for loan losses to non-performing loans and accruing loans past due
90 days or more was 77.37% and 55.32% at March 31, 2009 and March 31, 2008, respectively, an
increase of 22.05 percentage points. At March 31, 2009, this ratio decreased 747 basis points when
compared to 84.84% at December 31, 2008. Excluding non-performing mortgage loans (for which the
Corporation has historically had a minimal loss experience) this ratio was 216.97% at March 31,
2009 compared to 82.03% as of March 31, 2008 and 194.37% as of December 31, 2008.
The annualized ratio of net charge-offs to average loans for the three-month period ended
March 31, 2009 was 2.45%, increasing 91 basis points from 1.54% for the same period in 2008. This
change was due to an increment in net charge-offs of $9.1 million during the first quarter ended
March 31, 2009 when compared with the same period in 2008
57
combined with a decrease in average gross loans of $1.1 billion for the first quarter in 2009
compared with the first quarter in 2008. The commercial and construction loan portfolios
experienced an increment in charge-offs reported of $4.7 million for the three-month period ended
March 31, 2009 versus March 31, 2008 mainly resulting from the sale of construction and commercial
loans of $92.8 million to an affiliate during the three-month period ended March 31, 2009.
At March 31, 2009, impaired loans (loans evaluated individually for impairment) and related
allowance amounted to approximately $122.0 million and $24.1 million, respectively. At December 31,
2008 impaired loans and related allowance amounted to $100.9 million and $18.4 million,
respectively.
Although the Corporations provision and allowance for loan losses will fluctuate from time to
time based on economic conditions, net charge-off levels and changes in the level and mix of the
loan portfolio, management considers that the allowance for loan losses is adequate to absorb
probable losses on its loan portfolio.
Non-performing Assets and Past Due Loans
As of March 31, 2009, the Corporations total non-performing loans (excluding other real
estate owned) reached $238.1 million or 4.07% of total loans from $212.7 million or 3.45% of total
loans as of December 31, 2008 and from $314.0 million or 4.42% of total loans as of March 31, 2008.
The Corporations non-performing loans reflected a decrease of $75.9 million or 24.2% compared to
non-performing loans as of March 31, 2008 and an increase of $25.4 million or 8.1% compared to
non-performing loans as of December 31, 2008. The $75.9 million decrease in non-performing loans
was principally due to the $136.6 million decrease in nonperforming construction loans due to the
sale of certain impaired construction loans to an affiliate during 2008 and first quarter of 2009
partially offset by increases of $55.2 million and $3.1 million in non-performing residential
mortgage and consumer loans (including consumer finance), respectively when compared to March 31,
2008. Compared to December 31, 2008, the increase of $25.4 million was composed mainly of $33.7
million or 35.4% increase in non-performing residential mortgage loans partially offset by $7.9
million decrease in non-performing construction loans.
The Corporation continuously monitors non-performing assets and has deployed significant
resources to manage the non-performing loan portfolio. Management expects to continue to improve
its collection efforts by devoting more full time employees and outside resources.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-performing Assets and Past Due Loans
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Commercial and Industrial
|
|
$
|
27,624
|
|
|
$
|
30,564
|
|
|
$
|
24,551
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
5,912
|
|
|
|
13,856
|
|
|
|
142,497
|
|
Mortgage
|
|
|
150,136
|
|
|
|
116,473
|
|
|
|
94,984
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
13,825
|
|
|
|
13,479
|
|
|
|
12,926
|
|
Consumer Finance
|
|
|
38,080
|
|
|
|
35,508
|
|
|
|
35,938
|
|
Leasing
|
|
|
2,524
|
|
|
|
2,493
|
|
|
|
2,371
|
|
Restructured Loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
341
|
|
|
|
689
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing loans
|
|
|
238,101
|
|
|
|
212,714
|
|
|
|
313,956
|
|
Repossessed Assets
|
|
|
28,410
|
|
|
|
21,592
|
|
|
|
17,513
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-performing assets
|
|
$
|
266,511
|
|
|
$
|
234,306
|
|
|
$
|
331,469
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accruing loans past-due 90 days or more
|
|
$
|
15,899
|
|
|
$
|
13,462
|
|
|
$
|
9,877
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-Performing loans to total loans
|
|
|
4.07
|
%
|
|
|
3.45
|
%
|
|
|
4.42
|
%
|
Non-Performing loans plus accruing loans
past due 90 days or more to total loans
|
|
|
4.34
|
%
|
|
|
3.67
|
%
|
|
|
4.56
|
%
|
Non-Performing assets to total assets
|
|
|
3.62
|
%
|
|
|
2.97
|
%
|
|
|
3.56
|
%
|
58
Liabilities
The Corporations total liabilities reached $6.8 billion as of March 31, 2009, reflecting a
decrease of $0.5 billion or 7.3% compared to December 31, 2008. This reduction in total liabilities
was principally due to a decrease in total borrowings (comprised of federal funds purchased and
other borrowings, securities sold under agreements to repurchase, commercial paper issued, federal
home loan advances, term and capital notes) of $0.6 billion or 31.2% at March 31, 2009 from $1.9
billion at December 31, 2008. This decrease was partially offset by an increase in total deposits
of $84.8 million or 1.7% to $5.1 billion as of March 31, 2009 from $5.0 billion as of December 31,
2008.
Total deposits of $5.1 billion as of March 31, 2009 were composed of $0.9 billion in brokered
deposits and $4.2 billion of customer deposits. Compared to December 31, 2008, brokered deposits
reflected a decrease of $117.1 million or 12.0% and customer deposits reflected increases of $201.8
million, or 5.0% as of March 31, 2009. Total deposits reflected a decrease of $454.0 million
compared with $5.6 billion as of March 31, 2008 which comprised decreases of $410.2 million and
$43.8 million in brokered deposits and customer deposits, respectively.
Total borrowings at March 31, 2009 (comprised of federal funds purchased and other borrowings,
securities sold under agreements to repurchase, commercial paper issued, federal home loan bank
advances and term and capital notes) decreased $605.2 million or 31.2% and 1.5 billion or 53.1%
compared to borrowings at December 31, 2008 and March 31, 2008, respectively. The $605.2 million
reduction was mainly due to the cancellation of $375 millions in securities sold under agreements
to repurchase, $215 million decrease in federal home loan bank advances and $16.9 million decrease
in commercial paper issued. The $1.5 billion reduction compared with March 31, 2008 balances was
mainly due to the cancellation of $575 millions in securities sold under agreements to repurchase
(including cancellation of $200 millions by Lehman Brothers Inc. (LBI) as a result of bankruptcy
of its parent Lehman Brothers Holding, Inc. (LBHI) on September 19, 2008), $549.1 million
decrease in commercial paper issued, $400 million decrease in federal home loan bank advances and
$51.4 millions in federal funds purchased partially offset by $62.0 million increase in
subordinated capital notes.
On December 10, 2008, the Bank undertook a Subordinated Note Purchase Agreement with Crefisa,
Inc, (Crefisa), an affiliate, for $60 million due on December 10, 2028 and to pay interest
thereon from December 10, 2008 or from the most recent interest payment date to which interest has
been paid or duly provided for, semiannually on the tenth (10
th
) day of June and the
tenth (10
th
) of December of each year, commencing on June 10, 2009, at the rate of 7.5%
per annum, until the principal hereof is paid or made available for payment. The interest so
payable, and punctually paid or duly provided for, on any interest payment date will, as provided
in such Note Purchase Agreement, be paid to Crefisa at the close of business on the regular record
date for such interest, which shall be the tenth (10
th
) day of the month next preceding
the relevant interest payment date.
On September 24, 2008, Santander BanCorp and Santander Financial Services, Inc., entered into
a collateralized loan agreement (the Loan Agreement) with Banco Santander Puerto Rico. Under the
Loan Agreement, the Bank advanced $200 million and $430 million (the Loans) to the Corporation
and Santander Financial, respectively. The proceeds of the Loans were used to refinance the
outstanding indebtedness incurred under the loan agreement, dated March 25, 2008, among the
Corporation, Santander Financial and the Bank, and for general corporate purposes. The Loans are
collateralized by a certificate of deposit in the amount of $630 million held by Banco Santander,
S.A., the parent of the Corporation, with the Bank and provided as security for the Loans pursuant
to the terms of a Security Agreement, Pledge and Assignment between the Bank and Banco Santander,
S.A. The Corporation and Santander Financial have agreed to pay an annual fee of 0.10% net of
taxes, deductions and withholdings to Banco Santander, S.A. in connection with its agreement to
collateralize the Loans with the deposit.
During October 2006, the Corporation completed the private placement of $125 million Trust
Preferred Securities (Preferred Securities) and issued Junior Subordinated Debentures in the
aggregate principal amount of $129 million in connection with the issuance of the Preferred
Securities. The Preferred Securities are fully and unconditionally guaranteed (to the extent
described in the guarantee agreement between the Corporation and the guarantee trustee, for the
benefit of the holders from time to time of the Preferred Securities) by the Corporation. The Trust
Preferred Securities were acquired by an affiliate of the Corporation. In connection with the
issuance of the Preferred Securities, the Corporation issued an aggregate principal amount of
$129,000,000 of its 7.00% Junior Subordinated Debentures, Series A, due July 1, 2037.
59
Capital and Dividends
As an investment-grade rated entity by several nationally recognized rating agencies, the
Corporation has access to a variety of capital issuance alternatives in the United States and
Puerto Rico capital markets. The Corporation continuously monitors its capital issuance
alternatives. It may issue capital in the future, as needed, to maintain its well-capitalized
status.
Stockholders equity was $545.5 million, or 7.4% of total assets at March 31, 2009, compared
to $551.6 million or 7.0% of total assets at December 31, 2008. The $6.2 million decrease in
stockholders equity was composed of an increase in accumulated other comprehensive loss of $4.7
million and an increase in minimum pension liability of $2.0 million partially offset by stock
incentive plan expense recognized as capital contribution of $0.5 million during the three months
ended March 31, 2009.
In light of the continuing challenging general economic conditions in Puerto Rico and the
global capital markets, the Board of Directors of the Corporation voted during August 2008 to
discontinue the payment of the quarterly cash dividends on the Corporations common stock to
strengthen the institutions core capital position. The Corporation may use a portion of the funds
previously paid as dividends to reduce its outstanding debt. The Corporations decision is part of
the significant actions it has proactively taken in order to face the on-going challenges presented
by the Puerto Rico economy, which among others, include: selling the merchant business to an
unrelated third party; maintaining an on-going strict control on operating expenses; an efficiency
plan driven to lower its current efficiency ratio; and merging its mortgage banking and commercial
banking subsidiaries. While each of the Corporation and its banking subsidiary remain above well
capitalized ratios, this prudent measure will preserve and continue to reinforce the Corporations
capital position.
The Corporation adopted and implemented various Stock Repurchase Programs in May 2000,
December 2000 and June 2001. Under these programs the Corporation acquired 3% of its then
outstanding common shares. During November 2002, the Corporation started a fourth Stock Repurchase
program under which it planned to acquire 3% of its outstanding common shares. In November 2002,
the Corporations Board of Directors authorized the Corporation to repurchase up to 928,204 shares,
or approximately 3%, of its shares of outstanding common stock, of which 325,100 shares have been
purchased. The Board felt that the Corporations shares of common stock represented an attractive
investment at prevailing market prices at the time of the adoption of the common stock repurchase
program and that, given the relatively small amount of the program, the stock repurchases would not
have any significant impact on the Corporations liquidity and capital positions. The program has
no time limitation and management is authorized to effect repurchases at its discretion. The
authorization permits the Corporation to repurchase shares from time to time in the open market or
in privately negotiated transactions. The timing and amount of any repurchases will depend on many
factors, including the Corporations capital structure, the market price of the common stock and
overall market conditions. All of the repurchased shares will be held by the Corporation as
treasury stock and reserved for future issuance for general corporate purposes.
During the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, the Corporation did not repurchase any
shares of common stock. As of March 31, 2009, the Corporation had repurchased 4,011,260 shares of
its common stock under these programs at a cost of $67.6 million. The Corporations management
believes that the repurchase program will not have a significant effect on the Corporations
liquidity and capital positions.
The Corporation has a Dividend Reinvestment Plan and a Cash Purchase Plan wherein holders of
common stock have the opportunity to automatically invest cash dividends to purchase more shares of
the Corporation. Shareholders may also make, as frequently as once a month, optional cash payments
for investment in additional shares of the Corporations common stock.
As of March 31, 2009, the Corporations common stock price per share was $7.88, resulting in a
market capitalization of $367.5 million, including affiliated holdings compared to book value
equity of $545.5 million.
The Corporation is subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the
federal banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain
mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could
have a direct material effect on the Corporations consolidated financial statements. The
regulations require the Corporation to meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative
measures of the Corporations assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance sheet items as
calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The Corporations capital classification is also
subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings, and other
factors.
60
At March 31, 2009 the Corporation continued to exceed the regulatory risk-based capital
requirements. Tier I capital to risk-adjusted assets and total capital ratios at March 31, 2009
were 8.95% and 13.68%, respectively, and the leverage ratio was 6.21%.
Liquidity
The Corporations general policy is to maintain liquidity adequate to ensure its ability to
honor withdrawals of deposits, make repayments at maturity of other liabilities, extend loans and
meet its own working capital needs. Liquidity is derived from the Corporations capital, reserves,
and securities portfolio. The Corporation has established lines of credit with foreign and
domestic banks, has access to U.S. markets through its commercial paper program, and also has
broadened its relations in the federal funds and repurchase agreement markets to increase the
availability of other sources of funds and to augment liquidity as necessary.
Management monitors liquidity levels continuously. The focus is on the liquidity ratio, which
presents total liquid assets over net volatile liabilities and core deposits. The Corporation
believes it has sufficient liquidity to meet current obligations.
Derivative Financial Instruments:
The Corporation uses derivative financial instruments mostly as hedges of interest rate risk,
changes in fair value of assets and liabilities and to secure future cash flows. Refer to Notes 1,
12 and 18 to the accompanying consolidated financial statements for additional details of the
Corporations derivative transactions as of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008.
In the normal course of business, the Corporation utilizes derivative instruments to manage
exposure to fluctuations in interest rates, currencies and other markets, to meet the needs of
customers and for proprietary trading activities. The Corporation uses the same credit risk
management procedures to assess and approve potential credit exposures when entering into
derivative transactions as those used for traditional lending.
Economic Undesignated Hedges:
The following table summarizes the derivative contracts designated as economic undesignated
hedges as of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Notional
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Amounts
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Loss
|
|
Income*
|
Economic Undesignated Hedges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Swaps
|
|
$
|
125,000
|
|
|
$
|
3,959
|
|
|
$
|
(1,252
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals
|
|
$
|
125,000
|
|
|
$
|
3,959
|
|
|
$
|
(3,914
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
Notional
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Amounts
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Gain
|
|
|
Income*
|
|
Economic Undesignated Hedges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Swaps
|
|
$
|
125,000
|
|
|
$
|
5,210
|
|
|
$
|
4,311
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals
|
|
$
|
125,000
|
|
|
$
|
5,210
|
|
|
$
|
4,311
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61
The Corporation adopted SFAS 159 effective January 1, 2008 which permit the measurement of
selected financial instruments at fair value. The Corporation elected to account at fair value
certain of its brokered deposits and subordinated capital notes that were previously designated for
fair value hedge accounting in accordance with SFAS 133. The selected financial instruments are
reported at fair value with changes in fair value reported in condensed consolidated statements of
income.
As of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the economic undesignated hedges have maturities
through the year 2032. The weighted average rate paid and received on these contracts is 1.69% and
6.22% as of March 31, 2009 and 3.24% and 6.22% as of December 31, 2008, respectively.
The Corporation had issued fixed rate debt swapped to create a floating rate source of funds.
In this case, the Corporation matches all of the relevant economic variables (notional, coupon,
payments date and exchanges, etc) of the fixed rate sources of funds to the fixed rate portion of
the interest rate swaps, (which it received from counterparty), and pays the floating rate portion
of the interest swaps. The effectiveness of these transactions is very high since all of the
relevant economic variables are matched. As of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the
Corporation has $4.0 million and $5.2 million, respectively, in fair value of these economic
undesignated hedges.
Derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments:
Any derivative not associated to hedging activity is booked as a freestanding derivative. In
the normal course of business the Corporation may enter into derivative contracts as either a
market maker or proprietary position taker. The Corporations mission as a market maker is to meet
the clients needs by providing them with a wide array of financial products, which include
derivative contracts. The Corporations major role in this aspect is to serve as a derivative
counterparty to these clients. Positions taken with these clients are hedged (although not
designated as hedges) in the OTC market with interbank participants or in the organized futures
markets. To a lesser extent, the Corporation enters into freestanding derivative contracts as a
proprietary position taker, based on market expectations or to benefit from price differentials
between financial instruments and markets. These derivatives are not linked to specific assets and
liabilities on the balance sheet or to forecasted transactions in an accounting hedge relationship
and, therefore, do not qualify for hedge accounting. These derivatives are carried at fair value
and changes in fair value are recorded in earnings. The market and credit risk associated with
these activities is measured, monitored and controlled by the Corporations Market Risk Group, a
unit independent from the treasury department. Among other things, this group is responsible for:
policy, analysis, methodology and reporting of anything related to market risk and credit risk. The
following table summarizes the aggregate notional amounts and the reported derivative assets or
liabilities (i.e. the fair value of the derivative contracts) as of March 31, 2009 and December 31,
2008, respectively:
62
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
Notional
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Amounts *
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Gain (Loss)
|
|
Interest Rate Contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Swaps
|
|
$
|
3,524,182
|
|
|
$
|
109
|
|
|
$
|
(5
|
)
|
Interest Rate Caps
|
|
|
1,072
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
4,125
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
Equity Derivatives
|
|
|
236,428
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals
|
|
$
|
3,765,807
|
|
|
$
|
193
|
|
|
$
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
Notional
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Amounts *
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Gain (Loss)
|
|
Interest Rate Contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Swaps
|
|
$
|
3,548,418
|
|
|
$
|
(53
|
)
|
|
$
|
(392
|
)
|
Interest Rate Caps
|
|
|
1,166
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
3,862
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
Equity Derivatives
|
|
|
236,428
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Totals
|
|
$
|
3,789,874
|
|
|
$
|
40
|
|
|
$
|
(365
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
The notional amount represents the gross sum of long and short.
|
63
PART I ITEM 3
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES
ABOUT MARKET RISK
Credit Risk Management and Loan Quality
The lending activity of the Corporation represents its core function, and as such, the quality
and effectiveness of the loan origination and credit risk areas are imperative to management for
the growth and success of the Corporation. The importance of the Corporations lending activity has
been considered when establishing functional responsibilities, organizational reporting, lending
policies and procedures, and various monitoring processes and controls.
Critical risk management responsibilities include establishing sound lending standards,
monitoring the quality of the loan portfolio, establishing loan rating systems, assessing reserves
and loan concentrations, supervising document control and accounting, providing necessary training
and resources to credit officers, implementing lending policies and loan documentation procedures,
identifying problem loans as early as possible, and instituting procedures to ensure appropriate
actions to comply with laws and regulations. Due to the challenging environment, the Corporation
continuously evaluates its underwriting and lending criteria.
Credit risk management for our portfolio begins with initial underwriting and continues
throughout the borrowers credit cycle. Experiential judgment in conjunction with statistical
techniques are used in all aspects of portfolio management including underwriting, product pricing,
risk appetite, setting credit limits, operating processes and metrics to quantify balance risks and
returns. In addition to judgmental decisions, statistical models are used for credit decisions.
Tolerance levels are set to decrease the percentage of approvals as the risk profile increases.
Statistical models are based on detailed behavioral information from external sources such as
credit bureaus and/or internal historical experience. These models are an integral part of our
credit management process and are used in the assessment of both new and existing credit decisions,
portfolio management, strategies including authorizations and line management, collection practices
and strategies and determination of the allowance for credit losses.
The Corporation has also established an internal risk rating system and internal
classifications which serve as timely identification of potential deterioration in loan quality
attributes in the loan portfolio.
Credit extensions for commercial loans are approved by credit committees including the Small
Loan Credit Committee, the Regional Credit Committee, the Credit Administration Committee, the
Management Credit Committee, and the Board of Directors Credit Committee. A centralized department
of the Consumer Lending Division approves all consumer loans.
The Corporations collateral requirements for loans depend on the financial strength and
liquidity of the prospective borrower and the principal amount and term of the proposed financing.
Acceptable collateral includes cash, marketable securities, mortgages on real and personal
property, accounts receivable, and inventory.
In addition, the Corporation has an independent Loan Review Department and an independent
Internal Audit Division, each of which conducts monitoring and evaluation of loan portfolio
quality, loan administration, and other related activities, carried on as part of the Corporations
lending activity. Both departments provide periodic reports to the Board of Directors,
continuously assess the validity of information reported to the Board of Directors and maintain
compliance with established lending policies.
64
The following table provides the composition of the Corporations loan portfolio as of March
31, 2009 and December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
Commercial and industrial
|
|
$
|
2,072,257
|
|
|
$
|
2,165,613
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer banking operations
|
|
|
530,426
|
|
|
|
565,833
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer Finance:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer Installment Loans
|
|
|
631,197
|
|
|
|
686,277
|
|
Mortgage Loans
|
|
|
305,598
|
|
|
|
310,642
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
936,795
|
|
|
|
996,919
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leasing
|
|
|
56,237
|
|
|
|
64,065
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
94,809
|
|
|
|
194,596
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage Loans
|
|
|
2,512,428
|
|
|
|
2,553,328
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sub-total
|
|
|
6,202,952
|
|
|
|
6,540,354
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unearned income and deferred fees/cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banking operations
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
(290
|
)
|
Consumer finance
|
|
|
(379,497
|
)
|
|
|
(418,676
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loans losses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banking operations
|
|
|
(127,425
|
)
|
|
|
(122,761
|
)
|
Consumer finance
|
|
|
(69,085
|
)
|
|
|
(69,128
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,627,085
|
|
|
$
|
5,929,499
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Corporations gross loan portfolio as of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 amounted to
$6.2 billion and $6.5 billion respectively, which represented 92.6% and 90.9%, respectively, of the
Corporations total earning assets. The loan portfolio is distributed among various types of
credit, including commercial business loans, commercial real estate loans, construction loans,
small business loans, consumer lending and residential mortgage loans. The credit risk exposure
provides for diversification among specific industries, specific types of business, and related
individuals. As of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, there was no obligor group that
represented more than 2.5% of the Corporations total loan portfolio. Obligors resident or having
a principal place of business in Puerto Rico comprised approximately 99% of the Corporations loan
portfolio.
As of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the Corporation had over 370,000 consumer loan
customers each and over 8,000 and 7,000 commercial loan customers, respectively, As of such dates,
the Corporation had 38 and 50 clients with commercial loans outstanding over $10.0 million,
respectively. Although the Corporation has generally avoided cross-border loans, the Corporation
had approximately $23.2 and $31.3 million in cross-border loans as of March 31, 2009 and December
31, 2008, respectively, which are collateralized with real estate in the United States of America,
cash and marketable securities.
The Corporation uses an underwriting system for the origination of residential mortgage loans.
These loans are fully underwritten by experienced underwriters. The methodology used in
underwriting the extension of credit for each residential mortgage loan employs objective
mathematical principles which relate the mortgagors income, assets, and liabilities to the
proposed payment and such underwriting methodology confirmed that at the time of origination
(application/approval) the borrower had a reasonable ability to make timely payments on the
residential mortgage loan. Also the character of the borrower or willingness to pay is evaluated by
analyzing the credit report. We apply the basic principles of the borrowers willingness and
ability to pay.
The risk involved with a loan decision is kept in perspective and must be considered in the
analysis of a loan. Certain characteristics of the transaction are indicators of risk such as
occupancy, loan amount, purpose, product type, property type, loan amount size in relation to
borrowers previous credit depth and loan to value, cash out of the transaction, time of occupancy,
etc. Risk will be mitigated, in part, by requiring a higher equity, risk pricing, additional
documentation and obtaining and documenting compensating factors.
65
The purpose of mortgage credit analysis is to determine the borrowers ability and willingness
to repay the mortgage debt, and thus, limit the probability of default or collection difficulties.
There are four major elements which, typically, are evaluated in assessing a borrowers ability and
willingness to repay the mortgage debt and the property to determine it complies with the agency
and investors requirement, has marketability, and is a sound collateral for the loan. The elements
above mentioned comprised (1) stability documentation, (2) continuity and adequacy of income, (3)
credit and assets and (4) collateral.
The Corporation follows the established guidelines and requirements for all government insured
or guaranteed loans such as FHA, VA, RURAL, PR government products, as well as conforming loans
sold to FHLMC and FNMA. In addition to conforming loans and government insured or guaranteed loans,
we also provide loans designed to offer an alternative to individuals who do not qualify for an
Agency conforming mortgage loan. These non-conforming loans typically have: (1) LTV higher than
80% with mortgage insurance or additional collateral; (2) the mortgage amount may exceed the
FNMA/FHLMC limits and (3) may have different documentation requirements.
Commencing in late 2006, the Corporation adjusted the underwriting policies to take into
consideration the worsening macroeconomic conditions in PR. The implementation of more tight
underwriting standards to reduce the exposure of risks, has contributed to a significant reduction
of mortgage loans originations, and to improve the credit quality of our portfolio. These
underwriting criteria reflect the Corporations effort to minimize the impact of the local
recession on its overall loan portfolio, including its mortgage business and protect the value of
its franchise from the higher risk levels caused by declining assets quality.
Residential real estate mortgages are one of the Corporations core products and pursuant to
our credit management strategy the Corporation offers a broad range of alternatives of this product
to borrowers that are considered mostly prime or near prime or Band C (borrowers with Fair Isaac
Corporation (Fico Scores) of 620 or less among other factors including income and its source,
nature and location of collateral, loan-to-value and other guarantees, if any). Near prime or Band
C lending policies and procedures do not differ from our general residential mortgages and
consumer lending policies and procedures to other customers. The concentration of residential
mortgages loans of the Bank are presented in the followings tables:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Vintage
|
|
|
Non-performing
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
mortgage
|
|
|
mortgage
|
|
|
mortgage
|
|
|
Mortgage
|
|
|
% of total
|
|
|
loans
|
|
|
total loans
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Vintage:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
9,945
|
|
|
$
|
40
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
9,985
|
|
|
|
0
|
%
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
|
0.06
|
%
|
2008
|
|
|
106,058
|
|
|
|
2,306
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
108,364
|
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
|
907
|
|
|
|
0.84
|
%
|
2007
|
|
|
263,819
|
|
|
|
2,482
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
266,301
|
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
|
|
7,107
|
|
|
|
2.67
|
%
|
2006
|
|
|
571,104
|
|
|
|
4,257
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
575,388
|
|
|
|
23
|
%
|
|
|
37,346
|
|
|
|
6.49
|
%
|
2005
|
|
|
591,688
|
|
|
|
608
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
592,296
|
|
|
|
24
|
%
|
|
|
33,775
|
|
|
|
5.70
|
%
|
2004 and earlier
|
|
|
958,059
|
|
|
|
1,942
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
960,094
|
|
|
|
38
|
%
|
|
|
40,636
|
|
|
|
4.23
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sub- Total
|
|
$
|
2,500,673
|
|
|
$
|
11,635
|
|
|
$
|
120
|
|
|
|
2,512,428
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
$
|
119,777
|
|
|
|
4.77
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Vintage
|
|
|
Non-performing
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
mortgage
|
|
|
mortgage
|
|
|
mortgage
|
|
|
mortgage
|
|
|
Mortgage
|
|
|
% of total
|
|
|
loans
|
|
|
total loans
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Vintage:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
$
|
106,836
|
|
|
$
|
2,359
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
109,195
|
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
|
$
|
638
|
|
|
|
0.58
|
%
|
2007
|
|
|
269,220
|
|
|
|
2,546
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
271,766
|
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
|
|
5,701
|
|
|
|
2.10
|
%
|
2006
|
|
|
578,086
|
|
|
|
4,319
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
|
582,593
|
|
|
|
23
|
%
|
|
|
32,198
|
|
|
|
5.53
|
%
|
2005
|
|
|
604,142
|
|
|
|
636
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
604,778
|
|
|
|
24
|
%
|
|
|
24,251
|
|
|
|
4.01
|
%
|
2004
|
|
|
439,674
|
|
|
|
487
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
440,161
|
|
|
|
17
|
%
|
|
|
16,256
|
|
|
|
3.69
|
%
|
2003 and earlier
|
|
|
543,044
|
|
|
|
1,578
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
|
544,835
|
|
|
|
21
|
%
|
|
|
22,953
|
|
|
|
4.21
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sub- Total
|
|
$
|
2,541,002
|
|
|
$
|
11,925
|
|
|
$
|
86
|
|
|
$
|
315
|
|
|
|
2,553,328
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
$
|
101,997
|
|
|
|
3.99
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Corporation originates mortgage loans through three main channels: retail sales force,
licensed real estate brokers and purchases from third parties. The production originated through
the retail sales force represent 58% and 44% of the total mortgage originations for the three
months ended March 31, 2009 and the year ended December 31, 2008, respectively. The Corporation
performed strict quality control reviews of third party originated loans, which represented 42% for
the three-month period ended March 31, 2009 and 55% of the total originated mortgage portfolio for
the year ended December 31, 2008. The Corporation offered fixed rate first and second mortgages
which are almost entirely secured by a primary residence for the purpose of purchase money,
refinance, debt consolidation, or home equity loans. Residential real estate mortgages of banking
operations represent approximately 41% and 39% of total gross loans at March 31, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, respectively. As of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the first mortgage
portfolio totaled approximately $2.5 billion while the second mortgage portfolio was approximately
$11.6 million for both periods from banking operations.
The Corporation has not originated option adjustable-rate mortgage products (option ARMs) or
variable-rate mortgage products with fixed payment amounts, commonly referred to within the
financial services industry as negative amortizing mortgage loans, as the Corporation believes
these products rarely provide a benefit to our customers. The interest rates impact the amount and
timing of origination and servicing fees because consumer demand for new mortgages and the level of
refinancing activity are sensitive to changes in mortgage interest rates. The ARMs currently
outstanding in the residential mortgage portfolio came from previous acquisitions made by the
Corporation. The Corporation also mitigated its credit risk in its residential mortgage loan
portfolio through sales and securitizations transactions.
The mortgage real estate loans in the Corporations consumer finance subsidiary Santander
Financial Services, Inc. (Island Finance) are presented in the followings tables:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
ARM
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Vintage
|
|
|
Non-performing
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
mortgage
|
|
|
mortgage
|
|
|
mortgage
|
|
|
Mortgage*
|
|
|
% of total
|
|
|
loans
|
|
|
total loans
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Vintage:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
2,801
|
|
|
$
|
70
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,871
|
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
2008
|
|
|
31,145
|
|
|
|
671
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,816
|
|
|
|
19
|
%
|
|
|
1,050
|
|
|
|
3.30
|
%
|
2007
|
|
|
27,766
|
|
|
|
1,428
|
|
|
|
1,181
|
|
|
|
30,375
|
|
|
|
18
|
%
|
|
|
1,060
|
|
|
|
3.49
|
%
|
2006
|
|
|
13,292
|
|
|
|
1,206
|
|
|
|
22,235
|
|
|
|
36,733
|
|
|
|
22
|
%
|
|
|
4,189
|
|
|
|
11.40
|
%
|
2005
|
|
|
12,089
|
|
|
|
1,212
|
|
|
|
19,071
|
|
|
|
32,372
|
|
|
|
19
|
%
|
|
|
3,303
|
|
|
|
10.20
|
%
|
2004 and earlier
|
|
|
23,657
|
|
|
|
8,454
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,111
|
|
|
|
19
|
%
|
|
|
4,702
|
|
|
|
14.64
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
110,750
|
|
|
$
|
13,041
|
|
|
$
|
42,487
|
|
|
$
|
166,278
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
$
|
14,304
|
|
|
|
8.60
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Net of unearned finance charges and deferred income/cost
|
67
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
ARM
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Vintage
|
|
|
Non-performing
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
mortgage
|
|
|
mortgage
|
|
|
mortgage
|
|
|
Mortgage*
|
|
|
% of total
|
|
|
loans
|
|
|
total loans
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Vintage:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
$
|
31,441
|
|
|
$
|
696
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
32,137
|
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
$
|
262
|
|
|
|
0.82
|
%
|
2007
|
|
|
28,323
|
|
|
|
1,498
|
|
|
|
1,246
|
|
|
|
31,067
|
|
|
|
19
|
%
|
|
|
572
|
|
|
|
1.84
|
%
|
2006
|
|
|
13,409
|
|
|
|
1,281
|
|
|
|
22,355
|
|
|
|
37,045
|
|
|
|
22
|
%
|
|
|
3,196
|
|
|
|
8.63
|
%
|
2005
|
|
|
12,208
|
|
|
|
1,219
|
|
|
|
19,953
|
|
|
|
33,380
|
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
|
3,014
|
|
|
|
9.03
|
%
|
2004
|
|
|
11,524
|
|
|
|
3,108
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,632
|
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
|
|
1,776
|
|
|
|
12.14
|
%
|
2003 and earlier
|
|
|
13,129
|
|
|
|
6,185
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,314
|
|
|
|
12
|
%
|
|
|
2,160
|
|
|
|
11.18
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
110,034
|
|
|
$
|
13,987
|
|
|
$
|
43,554
|
|
|
$
|
167,575
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
$
|
10,980
|
|
|
|
6.55
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Net of unearned finance charges and deferred income/cost
|
The Corporation originates loans to near prime or Band C borrowers (customers with Fair
Isaac Corporation (FICO) scores of 620 or less among other factors, including level of income and
its source, loan-to-value (LTV), other guarantees and banking relationships and nature and location
of collateral, if any,). The
following table provides information on the Corporations residential mortgage and consumer
installments loans exposure from banking operations and consumer finance business, including near
prime or Band C loans at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
"BAND A"
|
|
|
Avg.
|
|
|
"BAND B"
|
|
|
Avg.
|
|
|
"BAND C"
|
|
|
Avg.
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Avg.
|
|
|
|
FICO>=660
|
|
|
LTV
|
|
|
FICO>620 and <660
|
|
|
LTV
|
|
|
FICO<=620
|
|
|
LTV
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
LTV
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Mortgage Loan
Portfolio:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banking Operations
|
|
$
|
2,020,273
|
|
|
|
75
|
%
|
|
$
|
275,991
|
|
|
|
72
|
%
|
|
$
|
216,164
|
|
|
|
63
|
%
|
|
$
|
2,512,428
|
|
|
|
72
|
%
|
Consumer Finance
|
|
|
69,796
|
|
|
|
61
|
%
|
|
|
40,367
|
|
|
|
62
|
%
|
|
|
56,115
|
|
|
|
61
|
%
|
|
|
166,278
|
|
|
|
61
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,090,069
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
316,358
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
272,279
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,678,706
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer
Installment Loans*:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banking Operations
|
|
$
|
329,479
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
$
|
91,984
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
$
|
108,963
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
$
|
530,426
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
Consumer Finance
|
|
|
170,333
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
113,210
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
107,476
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
391,019
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
499,812
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
205,194
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
216,439
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
921,445
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Net of unearned finance charges and deferred income/cost
|
68
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
"BAND A"
|
|
|
Avg.
|
|
|
"BAND B"
|
|
|
Avg.
|
|
|
"BAND C"
|
|
|
Avg.
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Avg.
|
|
|
|
FICO>=660
|
|
|
LTV
|
|
|
FICO>620 and <660
|
|
|
LTV
|
|
|
FICO<=620
|
|
|
LTV
|
|
|
Loans
|
|
|
LTV
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Mortgage Loan Portfolio:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banking Operations
|
|
$
|
1,984,652
|
|
|
|
80
|
%
|
|
$
|
308,690
|
|
|
|
81
|
%
|
|
$
|
259,986
|
|
|
|
76
|
%
|
|
$
|
2,553,328
|
|
|
|
80
|
%
|
Consumer Finance
|
|
|
65,516
|
|
|
|
61
|
%
|
|
|
41,652
|
|
|
|
62
|
%
|
|
|
60,407
|
|
|
|
61
|
%
|
|
|
167,575
|
|
|
|
61
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,050,168
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
350,342
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
320,393
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,720,903
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer Installment
Loans*:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banking Operations
|
|
$
|
427,056
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
$
|
59,070
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
$
|
79,707
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
$
|
565,833
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
Consumer Finance
|
|
|
176,334
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
119,492
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
114,842
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
410,668
|
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
603,390
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
178,562
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
194,549
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
976,501
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Net of unearned finance charges and deferred income/cost
|
At March 31, 2009, residential mortgage portfolio categorized as near prime or Band C loans
was approximately $216 million and $56 million for banking operations and consumer finance
business, respectively, a 9% and 34% of its total residential mortgage portfolio, respectively. The
mortgage loans amounts reported in Band C as of March 31, 2009 includes $1.4 million or 1.0% of
originated loans during the year for banking operations and $0.4 million or 1% for consumer finance
portfolio. At December 31, 2008, residential mortgage portfolio categorized as near prime or Band
C loans was approximately $260 million and $60 million for banking operations and consumer finance
business, respectively, a 10% and 36% of its total residential mortgage portfolio, respectively.
The mortgage loans amounts reported in Band C as of December 31, 2008 includes $5.3 million or
1.5% of originated loans during the year for banking operations and $7.9 million or 13% for
consumer finance portfolio.
The Corporations risk management considers a FICO credit score, an indicator of credit
rating and credit profile, and loan-to value ratios, the proportional lending exposure relative to
property value, as a key determinant of credit performance. The average FICO score for the
residential mortgage portfolio of banking operations, as of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008
was 646 and 706, respectively and an average LTV of 72% as compared to 80% as of December 31, 2008.
For its consumer finance business residential mortgages, average FICO score, as of March 31, 2009
and December 31, 2008 was 641 and 648, respectively and an average LTV of 61% as of March 31, 2009
as compared to 61% as of December 31, 2008. The actual rates of delinquencies, foreclosures and
losses on these loans could be higher than anticipated during economic slowdowns.
Residential mortgage loan origination for banking operations was $56.6 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2009, $345.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 and $107.8 million
for the quarter ended March 31, 2008. The Corporation sold and
securitized $51.0 million, $213.4
million and $34.8 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, the year ended December 31, 2008
and quarter ended March 31, 2008, respectively, to unaffiliated third parties. Within the sales and
securitizations numbers mentioned above, the Corporation sold and
securitized $2.2 million and
$18.8 million of near prime or Band C loans for the three months ended March 31, 2009 and the
year ended December 31, 2008, respectively.
The Corporation added strength to the control over its credit activities and does not pursue
near prime or Band C residential mortgage and consumer installment as a core product of its
lending activities. Under the Corporations Loss Mitigation Policy (LMP), we evaluate, several
alternatives for identifying near prime or Band C residential mortgage loan borrowers who are at
risk of default in order to design and offer loan mitigation strategies, including repayment plans
and loan modifications to such borrowers. The objective of the Loss Mitigation Policy is to
document the approach to loss mitigation manage and reduce the risk of loss for the consumer and
mortgage portfolios and takes into consideration the current stress that consumer and mortgage
borrowers are facing in Puerto Rico. The Corporations strategy is to maximize the
recovery from delinquent and past due consumer and mortgage loans by actively working with
borrowers to develop repayment plans that avoid foreclosure or other legal remedies.
The policy applies to the Corporations consumer lending business, including personal loans,
credit cards and credit lines and mortgage business including conforming, guaranteed & insured
mortgages and non-conforming mortgages. Loss
69
mitigation, where applicable, is intended to benefit
both the Corporation and the borrower. The Corporation avoids a costly and time consuming
foreclosure process while the borrower maintains ownership of his/her home. The Loss Mitigation
Policy describes the Corporations approach to identifying borrowers with higher risk of default,
assessing their ability to pay taking into account various factors, including debt to income
ratios; assessing the likelihood of default; explore loss mitigation techniques that might avoid
foreclose or other legal remedies and ensuring compliance with the appropriate regulations and
policies of each regulatory or investment agency.
Asset and Liability Management
The Corporations policy with respect to asset liability management is to maximize its net
interest income, return on assets and return on equity while remaining within the established
parameters of interest rate and liquidity risks provided by the Board of Directors and the relevant
regulatory authorities. Subject to these constraints, the Corporation takes mismatched interest
rate positions. The Corporations asset and liability management policies are developed and
implemented by its Asset and Liability Committee (ALCO), which is composed of senior members of
the Corporation including the President, Chief Operating Officer, Chief Accounting Officer,
Treasurer and other executive officers of the Corporation. The ALCO reports on a monthly basis to
the members of the Banks Board of Directors.
Market Risk and Interest Rate Sensitivity
A key component of the Corporations asset and liability policy is the management of interest
rate sensitivity. Interest rate sensitivity is the relationship between market interest rates and
net interest income due to the maturity or repricing characteristics of interest-earning assets and
interest-bearing liabilities. For any given period, the pricing structure is matched when an equal
amount of such assets and liabilities mature or reprice in that period. Any mismatch of
interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities is known as a gap position. A positive
gap denotes asset sensitivity, which means that an increase in interest rates would have a positive
effect on net interest income, while a decrease in interest rates would have a negative effect on
net interest income. A negative gap denotes liability sensitivity, which means that a decrease in
interest rates would have a positive effect on net interest income, while an increase in interest
rates would have a negative effect on net interest income. Because different types of assets and
liabilities with the same or similar maturities may react differently to changes in overall market
rates or conditions, changes in interest rates may affect net interest income positively or
negatively even if an institution were perfectly matched in each maturity category.
The Corporations one-year cumulative GAP position at March 31, 2009, was negative $1.0
billion or -14.7% of total earning assets. This is a one-day position that is continually changing
and is not indicative of the Corporations position at any other time. This denotes liability
sensitivity, which means that an increase in interest rates would have a negative effect on net
interest income while a decrease in interest rates would have a positive effect on net interest
income. While the GAP position is a useful tool in measuring interest rate risk and contributes
toward effective asset and liability management, shortcomings are inherent in GAP analysis since
certain assets and liabilities may not move proportionally as interest rates change.
The Corporations interest rate sensitivity strategy takes into account not only rates of
return and the underlying degree of risk, but also liquidity requirements, capital costs and
additional demand for funds. The Corporations maturity mismatches and positions are monitored by
the ALCO and managed within limits established by the Board of Directors.
The following table sets forth the repricing of the Corporations interest earning assets and
interest bearing liabilities at March 31, 2009 and may not be representative of interest rate gap
positions at other times. In addition, variations in interest rate sensitivity may exist within
the repricing period presented due to the differing repricing dates within the period. In preparing
the interest rate gap report, the following assumptions are made, all assets and liabilities are
reported according to their repricing characteristics. For example, a commercial loan maturing in
five years with monthly variable interest rate payments is stated in the column of up to 90 days.
The investment portfolio is reported considering the effective duration of the securities. Expected
prepayments and remaining terms are considered for the residential mortgage portfolio. Core
deposits are reported in accordance with their effective duration. Effective duration of core
deposits is based on price and volume elasticity to market rates. The Corporation reviews on a
monthly basis the effective duration of core deposits. Assets and liabilities with embedded options
are stated based on full valuation of the asset/liability and the option to ascertain their
effective duration.
70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SANTANDER BANCORP
|
|
|
MATURING GAP ANALYSIS
|
|
|
As of March 31, 2009
|
|
|
0 to 3
|
|
3 months
|
|
1 to 3
|
|
3 to 5
|
|
5 to 10
|
|
More than
|
|
No Interest
|
|
|
|
|
months
|
|
to a Year
|
|
Years
|
|
Years
|
|
Years
|
|
10 Years
|
|
Rate Risk
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(dollars in thousands)
|
ASSETS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment Portfolio
|
|
$
|
1,457
|
|
|
$
|
162,114
|
|
|
$
|
40,415
|
|
|
$
|
12,195
|
|
|
$
|
9,556
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
196,933
|
|
|
$
|
422,670
|
|
Deposits in Other Banks
|
|
|
233,202
|
|
|
|
7,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
376,355
|
|
|
|
616,557
|
|
Loan Portfolio
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
1,213,994
|
|
|
|
162,090
|
|
|
|
274,744
|
|
|
|
115,997
|
|
|
|
180,480
|
|
|
|
83,046
|
|
|
|
94,515
|
|
|
|
2,124,866
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
63,635
|
|
|
|
7,766
|
|
|
|
10,716
|
|
|
|
2,375
|
|
|
|
5,285
|
|
|
|
4,577
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94,354
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
336,224
|
|
|
|
197,012
|
|
|
|
334,600
|
|
|
|
177,500
|
|
|
|
35,751
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
7,178
|
|
|
|
1,088,280
|
|
Mortgage
|
|
|
109,537
|
|
|
|
272,305
|
|
|
|
536,216
|
|
|
|
445,709
|
|
|
|
882,178
|
|
|
|
308,743
|
|
|
|
(8,095
|
)
|
|
|
2,546,593
|
|
Fixed and Other Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
459,660
|
|
|
|
459,660
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
$
|
1,958,049
|
|
|
$
|
808,287
|
|
|
$
|
1,196,691
|
|
|
$
|
753,776
|
|
|
$
|
1,113,250
|
|
|
$
|
396,381
|
|
|
$
|
1,126,546
|
|
|
$
|
7,352,980
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
External Funds Purchased
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Paper
|
|
$
|
34,084
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
34,084
|
|
Repurchase Agreements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal
Funds Purchased and Other
Borrowings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
445,890
|
|
|
|
525,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
970,890
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certificates of Deposit
|
|
|
899,715
|
|
|
|
1,426,631
|
|
|
|
212,847
|
|
|
|
64,165
|
|
|
|
10,318
|
|
|
|
28,176
|
|
|
|
(32,671
|
)
|
|
|
2,609,181
|
|
Demand Deposits and Savings Accounts
|
|
|
144,815
|
|
|
|
40,736
|
|
|
|
206,762
|
|
|
|
180,662
|
|
|
|
127,676
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,153
|
)
|
|
|
698,498
|
|
Transactional Accounts
|
|
|
228,029
|
|
|
|
375,437
|
|
|
|
654,165
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
534,664
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(292
|
)
|
|
|
1,792,003
|
|
Term and Subordinated Debt
|
|
|
55,000
|
|
|
|
4,815
|
|
|
|
6,536
|
|
|
|
198,728
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,000
|
|
|
|
4,101
|
|
|
|
329,180
|
|
Other Liabilities and Capital
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
919,144
|
|
|
|
919,144
|
|
|
|
|
Total Liabilities and Capital
|
|
$
|
1,361,643
|
|
|
$
|
2,293,509
|
|
|
$
|
1,605,310
|
|
|
$
|
443,555
|
|
|
$
|
672,658
|
|
|
$
|
88,176
|
|
|
$
|
888,129
|
|
|
$
|
7,352,980
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Balance Sheet Financial Information
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Swaps (Assets)
|
|
$
|
1,656,409
|
|
|
$
|
143,934
|
|
|
$
|
2,707
|
|
|
$
|
141,708
|
|
|
$
|
1,543,424
|
|
|
$
|
36,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,524,182
|
|
Interest Rate Swaps (Liabilities)
|
|
|
1,791,690
|
|
|
|
133,934
|
|
|
|
2,707
|
|
|
|
16,427
|
|
|
|
1,543,424
|
|
|
|
36,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,524,182
|
|
Caps
|
|
|
1,072
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,072
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,144
|
|
Caps Final Maturity
|
|
|
1,072
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,072
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,144
|
|
|
|
|
GAP
|
|
$
|
461,125
|
|
|
$
|
(1,475,222
|
)
|
|
$
|
(408,619
|
)
|
|
$
|
435,502
|
|
|
$
|
440,592
|
|
|
$
|
308,205
|
|
|
$
|
238,417
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative GAP
|
|
$
|
461,125
|
|
|
$
|
(1,014,097
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,422,716
|
)
|
|
$
|
(987,214
|
)
|
|
$
|
(546,622
|
)
|
|
$
|
(238,417
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative interest rate gap to
earning assets
|
|
|
6.69
|
%
|
|
|
-14.71
|
%
|
|
|
-20.64
|
%
|
|
|
-14.32
|
%
|
|
|
-7.93
|
%
|
|
|
-3.46
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate risk is the primary market risk to which the Corporation is exposed. Nearly all
of the Corporations interest rate risk arises from instruments, positions and transactions entered
into for purposes other than trading. They include loans, investment securities, deposits,
short-term borrowings, senior and subordinated debt and derivative financial instruments used for
asset and liability management.
As part of its interest rate risk management process, the Corporation analyzes on an ongoing
basis the profitability of the balance sheet structure, and how this structure will react under
different market scenarios. In order to carry out this task, management prepares three
standardized reports with detailed information on the sources of interest income and expense: the
Financial Profitability Report, the Net Interest Income Shock Report and the Market Value
Shock Report. The former report deals with historical data while the latter two deal with expected
future earnings.
The Financial Profitability Report identifies individual components of the Corporations
non-trading portfolio independently with their corresponding interest income or expense. It uses
the historical information at the end of each month to track the yield of such components and to
calculate net interest income for such time period.
71
The Net Interest Income Shock Report uses a simulation analysis to measure the amount of net
interest income the Corporation would have from its operations throughout the next twelve months
and the sensitivity of these earnings to assumed shifts in market interest rates throughout the
same period. The important assumptions of this analysis are: ( i ) rate shifts are parallel and
immediate throughout the yield curve; (ii) rate changes affect all assets and liabilities equally;
(iii) interest-bearing demand accounts and savings passbooks will run off in a period of one year;
and (iv) demand deposit accounts will run off in a period of one to three years. Cash flows from
assets and liabilities are assumed to be reinvested at market rates in similar instruments. The
object is to simulate a dynamic gap analysis enabling a more accurate interest rate risk
assessment.
The ALCO monitors interest rate gaps in combination with net interest margin (NIM) sensitivity
and duration of market value equity (MVE).
NIM sensitivity analysis captures the maximum acceptable net interest margin loss for a one
percent parallel change of all interest rates across the curve. Duration of market value equity
analysis entails a valuation of all interest bearing assets and liabilities under parallel
movements in interest rates. The ALCO has established limits of $27.0 million of NIM sensitivity
for a 1% parallel shock and $115 million of MVE sensitivity for a 1% parallel shock.
As of March 31, 2009, it was determined for purposes of the Net Interest Income Shock Report
that the Corporation had a potential loss in net interest income of approximately $2.6 million if
market rates were to increase 100 basis points immediately parallel across the yield curve, less
than the $27.0 million limit. For purposes of the Market Value Shock Report it was determined that
the Corporation had a potential loss of approximately $51.9 million if market rates were to
increase 100 basis points immediately parallel across the yield curve, less than the $115.0 million
limit. The tables below present a summary of the Corporations net interest margin and market value
shock reports, considering several scenarios as of March 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INTEREST MARGIN SHOCK REPORT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
-200 BPs
|
|
|
-100 BPs
|
|
|
-50 BPs
|
|
|
Base Case
|
|
|
+50 BPs
|
|
|
+100 BPs
|
|
|
+200 BPs
|
|
Gross Interest Margin
|
|
$
|
365.5
|
|
|
$
|
365.0
|
|
|
$
|
364.3
|
|
|
$
|
362.7
|
|
|
$
|
361.8
|
|
|
$
|
360.1
|
|
|
$
|
356.1
|
|
|
Sensitivity
|
|
$
|
2.8
|
|
|
$
|
2.3
|
|
|
$
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(0.9
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2.6
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6.6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MARKET VALUE SHOCK REPORT
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
-200 BPs
|
|
|
-100 BPs
|
|
|
-50 BPs
|
|
|
Base Case
|
|
|
+50 BPs
|
|
|
+100 BPs
|
|
|
+200 BPs
|
|
Market Value of Equity
|
|
$
|
859.2
|
|
|
$
|
894.3
|
|
|
$
|
889.3
|
|
|
$
|
855.6
|
|
|
$
|
854.1
|
|
|
$
|
803.7
|
|
|
$
|
757.1
|
|
|
Sensitivity
|
|
$
|
3.6
|
|
|
$
|
38.7
|
|
|
$
|
33.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1.5
|
)
|
|
$
|
(51.9
|
)
|
|
$
|
(98.5
|
)
|
As of March 31, 2009 the Corporation had a liability sensitive profile as explained by the
negative gap, the NIM shock report and the MVE shock report. Any decision to reposition the balance
sheet is taken by the ALCO committee, and is subject to compliance with the established risk
limits. Some factors that could lead to shifts in policy could be, but are not limited to, changes
in views on interest rate markets, monetary policy, and macroeconomic factors as well as legal,
fiscal and other factors which could lead to shifts in the asset liability mix.
72
Liquidity Risk
Liquidity risk is the risk that not enough cash will be generated from either assets or
liabilities to meet deposit withdrawals or contractual loan funding. The Corporations general
policy is to maintain liquidity adequate to ensure its ability to honor withdrawals of deposits,
make repayments at maturity of other liabilities, extend loans and meet its own working capital
needs. The Corporations principal sources of liquidity are capital, core deposits from retail and
commercial clients, and wholesale deposits raised in the inter-bank and commercial markets. The
Corporation manages liquidity risk by maintaining diversified short-term and long-term sources
through the Federal funds market, commercial paper program, repurchase agreements and retail
certificate of deposit programs. As of March 31, 2009, the Corporation had $1.5 billion in
unsecured lines of credit ($639.2 million available) and $3.7 billion in collateralized lines of
credit with banks and financial entities ($2.7 billion available). All securities in portfolio are
highly rated and very liquid enabling the Corporation to treat them as a secondary source of
liquidity.
The Corporation does not have significant usage or limitations on the ability to upstream or
downstream funds as a method of liquidity. However, the Corporation faces certain tax constraints
when borrowing funds (excluding the placement of deposits) from Santander Group or affiliates
because Puerto Ricos tax code requires local corporations to withhold 29% of the interest income
paid to non-resident affiliates. The current intra-group credit line provided by Santander Group
and affiliates to the Corporation is $1.4 billion.
Liquidity is derived from the Corporations capital, reserves and securities portfolio. The
Corporation has established lines of credit with foreign and domestic banks, has access to U.S.
markets through its commercial paper program and also has broadened its relations in the federal
funds and repurchase agreement markets to increase the availability of other sources of funds and
to augment liquidity as necessary.
On December 10, 2008, the Bank undertook a Subordinated Note Purchase Agreement with Crefisa,
Inc, (Crefisa), an affiliate, for $60 million due on December 10, 2028 and to pay interest
thereon from December 10, 2008 or from the most recent interest payment date to which interest has
been paid or duly provided for, semiannually on the tenth (10
th
) day of June and the
tenth (10
th
) of December of each year, commencing on June 10, 2009, at the rate of 7.5%
per annum, until the principal hereof is paid or made available for payment. The interest so
payable, and punctually paid or duly provided for, on any interest payment date will, as provided
in such Note Purchase Agreement, be paid to Crefisa at the close of business on the regular record
date for such interest, which shall be the tenth (10
th
) day of the month next preceding
the relevant interest payment date.
On September 24, 2008, Santander BanCorp (the Corporation) and Santander Financial Services,
Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of the Corporation (Santander Financial), entered into a
collateralized loan agreement (the Loan Agreement) with Banco Santander Puerto Rico (the Bank).
Under the Loan Agreement, the Bank advanced $200 million and $430 million (the Loans) to the
Corporation and Santander Financial, respectively. The proceeds of the Loans were used to refinance
the outstanding indebtedness incurred under the previously announced loan agreement among the
Corporation, Santander Financial and the Bank, and for general corporate purposes. The Loans are
collateralized by a certificate of deposit in the amount of $630 million opened by Banco Santander,
S.A., the parent of the Corporation, at the Bank and provided as security for the Loans pursuant to
the terms of a Security Agreement, Pledge and Assignment between the Bank and Banco Santander, S.A.
The Corporation and Santander Financial have agreed to pay an annual fee of 0.10% net of taxes,
deductions and withholdings to Banco Santander, S.A. in connection with its agreement to
collateralize the Loans with the deposit.
In October 2006, the Corporation also completed the private placement of $125 million Trust
Preferred Securities (Preferred Securities) and issued Junior Subordinated Debentures in the
aggregate principal amount of $129 million in connection with the issuance of the Preferred
Securities. The Preferred Securities are fully and unconditionally guaranteed (to the extent
described in the guarantee agreement between the Corporation and the guarantee trustee, for the
benefit of the holders from time to time of the Preferred Securities) by the Corporation. The Trust
Preferred Securities were acquired by an affiliate of the Corporation. In connection with the
issuance of the Preferred Securities, the Corporation issued an aggregate principal amount of
$129,000,000 of its 7.00% Junior Subordinated Debentures, Series A, due July 1, 2037 to the Trust.
Management monitors liquidity levels each month. The focus is on the liquidity ratio, which
compares net liquid assets (all liquid assets not subject to collateral or repurchase agreements)
against total liabilities plus contingent liabilities. As of March 31, 2009, the Corporation had a
liquidity ratio of 9.29%. At March 31, 2009, the Corporation had total available liquid assets of
$736.8 million. The Corporation believes it has sufficient liquidity to meet current obligations.
The Corporation does not contemplate material uncertainties in the rolling over of deposits,
both retail and wholesale, and is not engaged in capital expenditures that would materially affect
the capital and liquidity positions. Should
73
any deficiency arise for seasonal or more critical
reasons, the Bank would make recourse to alternative sources of funding such as the commercial
paper program, its lines of credit with domestic and national banks, unused collateralized lines
with Federal Home Loan Banks and others.
74
PART I. ITEM 4
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, the Corporations
management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Accounting Officer (as the
Corporations principal financial officer), conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the
design and operation of the Corporations disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934). Based upon that
evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Accounting Officer (as the Corporations
principal financial officer) concluded that the design and operation of these disclosure controls
and procedures were effective.
On February 2009, SFS conducted a conversion of its loan platform and cash collection systems.
Management understands that this system conversion, which includes significant modifications to
procedures could represent a material change in internal control over financial reporting. Changes
to certain processes, and information systems and other
components of internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13-159(e) and 15d-15(e)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) resulting from the system conversion, referred to above
, may occur and are in the process of being evaluated by management as certain processes,
activities and controls are implemented. Management intends to complete its assessment of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting for the 2009 annual management report on
internal control over financial reporting.
Changes in Internal Controls
Besides the matter described above, there have been no changes in the Corporations internal
controls over financial reporting during the three-month periods covered by this Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the
Corporations internal controls over financial reporting.
75
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM I LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The Corporation is involved as plaintiff or defendant in a variety of routine litigation
incidental to the normal course of business. Management believes, based on the opinion of legal
counsel, that it has adequate defense with respect to such litigation and that any losses there
from would not have a material adverse effect on the consolidated results of operations or
consolidated financial condition of the Corporation. For discussion of certain other legal
proceedings involving the Corporation, please, refer to the Corporations Annual Report on Form 10K
for the year ended December 31, 2008.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
There are no material changes in risk factors as previously disclosed under Item 1A of the
Corporations Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.
ITEM 2 UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
None
ITEM 3 DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
None
ITEM 4 SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
None
ITEM 5 OTHER INFORMATION
None
76
ITEM 6 EXHIBITS
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No.
|
|
Description
|
|
Reference
|
(2.0)
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger-Banco Santander Puerto Rico and
Santander BanCorp
|
|
Exhibit 3.3 8-A12B
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.1)
|
|
Stock Purchase Agreement Santander BanCorp and Banco Santander
Central Hispano, S.A.
|
|
Exhibit 2.1 10K-12/31/00
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.2)
|
|
Stock Purchase Agreement dated as of November 28, 2003 by and among
Santander BanCorp, Administración de Bancos Latinoamericanos
Santander, S.L. and Santander Securities Corporation
|
|
Exhibit 2.2 10Q-06/30/04
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.3)
|
|
Settlement Agreement between Santander BanCorp and Administración
de Bancos Latinoamericanos Santander, S.L.
|
|
Exhibit 2.3 10Q-06/30/04
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.1)
|
|
Articles of Incorporation
|
|
Exhibit 3.1 8-A12B
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.2)
|
|
Bylaws
|
|
Exhibit 3.1 8-A12B
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4.1)
|
|
Authoring and Enabling Resolutions 7% Noncumulative Perpetual
Monthly Income Preferred Stock, Series A
|
|
Exhibit 4.1 10Q-06/30/04
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4.2)
|
|
Offering Circular for $30,000,000 Banco Santander PR Stock Market Growth
Notes Linked to the S&P 500 Index
|
|
Exhibit 4.6 10Q-03/31/04
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4.3)
|
|
Private Placement Memorandum Santander BanCorp $75,000,000 6.30%
Subordinated Notes
|
|
Exhibit 4.3 10KA-12/31/04
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4.4)
|
|
Private Placement Memorandum Santander BanCorp $50,000,000 6.10%
Subordinated Notes
|
|
Exhibit 4.4 10K-12/31/05
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4.5)
|
|
Indenture dated as of February 28, 2006, between the Santander BanCorp and
Banco Popular de Puerto Rico
|
|
Exhibit 4.6 10Q-03/31/06
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4.6)
|
|
First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of February 28, 2006, between Santander
Bancorp and Banco Popular de Puerto Rico
|
|
Exhibit 4.7 10Q-03/31/06
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4.7)
|
|
Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust and Trust Agreement, dated as of
February 28, 2006, among Santander BanCorp, Banco Popular de Puerto Rico
Wilmintong Trust Company, the Administrative Trustees named therein and
the holders from time to time, of the undivided beneficial ownership interest in
The Assets of the Trust.
|
|
Exhibit 4.8 10-Q-03/31/06
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4.8)
|
|
Guarantee Agreement, dated as of February 28, 2006 between Santander
BanCorp and Banco Popular de Puerto Rico
|
|
Exhibit 4.9 10-Q-03/31/06
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4.9)
|
|
Global Capital Securities Certificate
|
|
Exhibit 4.10 10Q-03/31/06
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4.10)
|
|
Certificate of Junior Subordinated Debenture
|
|
Exhibit 4.11 10Q-03/31/06
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4.11)
|
|
Private Placement Memorandum Santander BanCorp $60,000,000 7.50%
Subordinated Notes
|
|
Exhibit 4.11 10K-12/31/08
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10.0)
|
|
Code of Ethics
|
|
Exhibit 14 10-KA-12/31/04
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10.1)
|
|
Contract for Systems Maintenance between ALTEC & Banco
Santander Puerto Rico
|
|
Exhibit 10A 10K-12/31/02
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10.2)
|
|
Deferred Compensation Contract-María Calero
|
|
Exhibit 10C 10K-12/31/02
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10.3)
|
|
Information Processing Services Agreement between America Latina
Tecnología de Mexico, SA and Banco Santander Puerto Rico, Santander
International Bank of Puerto Rico and Santander Investment International
Bank, Inc.
|
|
Exhibit 10A 10Q-06/30/03
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10.4)
|
|
Employment Contract-Lillian Díaz
|
|
Exhibit 10.5 10Q-03/31/05
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10.5)
|
|
Technology Assignment Agreement between CREFISA, Inc. and Banco
Santander Puerto Rico
|
|
Exhibit 10.12 10KA-12/31/04
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10.6)
|
|
Altair System License Agreement between CREFISA, Inc. and Banco
Santander Puerto Rico
|
|
Exhibit 10.13 10KA-12/31/04
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10.7)
|
|
2005 Employee Stock Option Plan
|
|
Exhibit B Def14-03/26/05
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10.8)
|
|
Asset Purchase Agreement by and among Wells Fargo & Company, Island
Finance Puerto Rico, Inc., Island Finance Sales Finance Corporation and
Santander BanCorp and Santander Financial Services, Inc. for the purpose
and sale of certain assets of Island Finance Puerto Rico, Inc. and Island
Finance Sales Corporation dated as of January 22, 2006.
|
|
Exhibit 10.1 8K-01/25/06
|
77
EXHIBIT INDEX Cont
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No.
|
|
Exhibit Description
|
|
Reference
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10.9)
|
|
Employment Contract-Tomás Torres
|
|
Exhibit 10.16 10Q-09/30/06
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10.10)
|
|
Employment Contract-Eric Delgado
|
|
Exhibit 10.17 10Q-09/30/06
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10.11)
|
|
Agreement of Benefits Coverage Agreed with Officers of Grupo Santander
|
|
Exhibit 10.18 10K-12/31/06
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10.12)
|
|
Employment Contract-Justo Muñoz
|
|
Exhibit 10.18 10Q-06/30/07
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10.13)
|
|
Sales and Leaseback Agreement with Corporación Hato Rey Uno
and Corporación Hato Rey Dos for the Banks two principal properties and
certain parking spaces
|
|
Exhibit 10.18 10K-12/31/07
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10.14)
|
|
Option Agreement among Crefisa, Inc., D&D Investment Group, S.E.,
and Quisqueya 12, Inc.
|
|
Exhibit 10.19 10K-12/31/07
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10.15)
|
|
Merge Agreement among Banco Santander Puerto Rico and Santander
Mortgage Corporation
|
|
Exhibit 10.20 10K-12/31/07
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10.16)
|
|
Regulations for the first and second cycle of The Share Plan (Long Term
Incentive Plan) among Santander BanCorp and Santander Spain
|
|
Exhibit 10.21 10K-12/31/07
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10.17)
|
|
Loan Agreement Agreement between Santander BanCorp, Santander Financial
Services, Inc. and Banco Santander Puerto Rico
|
|
Exhibit 10.1 8K-09/24/08
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10.18)
|
|
Employment Contract-Juan Moreno Blanco
|
|
Exhibit 10.19
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10.19)
|
|
Agreement and General Release (the Agreement) entered into between
Carlos M. García, Santander BanCorp (the Company), Banco Santander
Puerto Rico and Santander Overseas Bank, Inc.
|
|
Exhibit 10.19 10K-12/31/08
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12)
|
|
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
|
|
Exihbit 12
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22)
|
|
Registrants Proxy
Statement for the March 30, 2009 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders
|
|
Def14A-03/30/09
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31.1)
|
|
Certification from the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
Exhibit 31.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31.2)
|
|
Certification from the Chief Accounting Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
Exhibit 31.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32.1)
|
|
Certification from the Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Accounting Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
Exhibit 32.1
|
78
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly
authorized.
SANTANDER BANCORP
Name of Registrant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: May 08, 2009
|
By:
|
/s/ Juan Moreno
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dated: May 08, 2009
|
By:
|
/s/ Roberto Jara
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and
|
|
|
Chief Accounting Officer
|
|
|
79
Santander (NYSE:SBP)
Historical Stock Chart
From Oct 2024 to Nov 2024
Santander (NYSE:SBP)
Historical Stock Chart
From Nov 2023 to Nov 2024