Advances in Radiation Therapy Enable Doctors to Improve the Quality of Treatments for Patients With Head and Neck Cancer
14 November 2009 - 12:00AM
PR Newswire (US)
Noted clinical experts detail recent developments at the annual
ASTRO meeting in Chicago PALO ALTO, Calif., Nov. 13
/PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- Clinical studies suggest that advanced
treatments like intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and
image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) are enabling radiation oncologists
to enhance post-treatment health-related quality of life for
patients with head and neck cancer. In an educational session for
radiotherapy professionals, delivered by two noted experts during
the annual meeting of the American Society for Radiation Oncology
(ASTRO) in Chicago last week, Avraham Eisbruch, M.D., professor at
the University of Michigan, discussed how careful implementation of
IMRT in the treatment of head and neck cancer can achieve high
tumor control rates while minimizing xerostomia, a dry mouth
condition that occurs when salivary glands are damaged. Citing a
new report summarizing results from RTOG 0022, a
multi-institutional study comparing IMRT with earlier forms of
treatment for head and neck cancer, Dr. Eisbruch said that IMRT for
head and neck cancer achieved important goals in reducing treatment
toxicity, notably xerostomia, and in yielding a high tumor control
rate of 90%.(1) For patients enrolled in the study and treated with
IMRT, only 55% experienced Grade 2 or worse xerostomia at six
months after treatment, as compared with 84% of patients treated
with earlier forms of radiotherapy -- a reduction of 35%. For the
IMRT group, the percentage of patients with Grade 2 or worse
xerostomia decreased steadily, to 25% at 12 months and 16% at 24
months. "This kind of improvement over time is not something we had
been seeing with conventional forms of radiotherapy,(2)" said Dr.
Eisbruch, who served as chair of RTOG 0022. "Also, emerging data is
suggesting that we can get improvements in broader aspects of
post-treatment quality of life by using IMRT, beyond reducing
xerostomia," Eisbruch said. "Several studies comparing IMRT with
conventional radiotherapy found that the IMRT patients did better
not just in terms of dry mouth, but also other quality of life
dimensions, including swallowing and nutrition."(3)(4)(5) According
to Eisbruch, RTOG 0225, another multi-institutional study looked at
IMRT with or without chemotherapy for head and neck cancer, and
also reached positive conclusions. "That group reproduced the
excellent results that individual treatment centers had been
reporting, namely, a 90% loco-regional progression-free survival
with minimal grade 3 and no grade 4 xerostomia."(6) IMRT involves
shaping radiotherapy treatment beams so that they deliver a dose
pattern that matches the size and shape of a targeted tumor while
minimizing exposure of surrounding healthy tissues and organs. This
approach has been widely adopted by radiation oncologists for the
treatment of diverse forms of cancer. Ongoing clinical studies are
now maturing, allowing long term outcomes to be assessed and
validating IMRT based on clinical data. Improving IMRT Through
Image-Guidance Lei Dong, PhD, associate professor of medical
physics at the MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, Texas,
detailed how new image-guidance technologies further enhance the
accuracy of IMRT treatments by enabling clinicians to correct for
patient set-up uncertainties and anatomical changes over a course
of treatment. "Clinicians naturally want to take advantage of the
more conformal dose distributions that IMRT makes possible by
reducing the treatment margins around a tumor, to protect more
healthy tissues," said Dr. Dong. "When we do that, it is important
to ensure that the treatments are targeted very precisely, so the
tumor receives the high dose treatments, and the dose to
surrounding tissues and organs is kept as low as possible." Dr.
Dong discussed the issue of basing radiotherapy treatment plans on
single CT scans taken during treatment simulation. "Internal motion
can affect the accuracy of tumor definition if the CT scan is
acquired while the patient is swallowing," he said, referencing a
study he worked on with colleagues from M. D. Anderson Cancer
Center.(7) According to Dr. Dong, stereoscopic X-ray imaging and
volumetric cone-beam CT imaging, two imaging techniques enabled by
Varian's On-Board ImagerĀ® kV imaging device, make it possible to
fine-tune patient positioning just prior to each daily treatment.
In addition, frequent imaging can alert clinicians to changes in a
patient's anatomy over time, so that a new treatment plan can be
developed part-way through a course of treatment whenever
warranted--a process called adaptive radiotherapy. "Preliminary
studies have shown that combining IGRT and adaptive IMRT replanning
can improve the overall quality of the treatment plan and, most
importantly, reduce unnecessary doses to normal organs surrounding
the tumor, such as the parotid glands and oral cavities," Dr. Dong
said.(8) "Combining IGRT with IMRT creates a powerful tool for high
precision radiation therapy." ABOUT VARIAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS Varian
Medical Systems, Inc., of Palo Alto, California, is the world's
leading manufacturer of medical devices and software for treating
cancer and other medical conditions with radiotherapy,
radiosurgery, proton therapy, and brachytherapy. The company
supplies informatics software for managing comprehensive cancer
clinics, radiotherapy centers and medical oncology practices.
Varian is a premier supplier of tubes and digital detectors for
X-ray imaging in medical, scientific, and industrial applications
and also supplies X-ray imaging products for cargo screening and
industrial inspection. Varian Medical Systems employs approximately
5,100 people who are located at manufacturing sites in North
America, China, and Europe and in its 79 sales and support offices
around the world. For more information, visit
http://www.varian.com/. (1) Eisbruch A et al. Multi-Institutional
Trial of Accelerated Hypofractionated Intensity-Modulated Radiation
Therapy for Early-Stage Oropharyngeal Cancer (RTOG-022). Int. J.
Radiation Oncology Biol. Phys., in press,
doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.04.011. (2) Logemann JA et al.
Xerostomia: 12-month changes in saliva production and its
relationship to perception and performance of swallow function,
oral intake, and diet after chemoradiation. Head Neck. 2003
Jun;25(6):432-7. (3) Pow EHN et al. Xerostomia and quality of life
after intensity-modulated radiotherapy vs. conventional
radiotherapy for early-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Initial
report on a randomized controlled clinical trial. Int. J. Radiation
Oncology Biol. Phys., 2006;66:981-991. (4) Graf P et al. Impact of
Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy on Health-Related Quality of Life
for Head and Neck Cancer Patients: Matched-Pair Comparison with
Conventional Radiotherapy. Int. J. Radiation Oncology Biol. Phys.,
2007;67:1309-1317. (5) Vergeer MR et al. Intensity-Modulated
Radiotherapy Reduces Radiation-Induced Morbidity and Improves
Health-Related Quality of Life: Results of a Nonrandomized
Prospective Study Using a Standardized Follow-Up Program. Int. J.
Radiation Oncology Biol. Phys., 2009;74:1-8 (6) Lee N et al.
Intensity-modulated radiation therapy with or without chemotherapy
for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: radiation therapy oncology group
phase II trial 0225. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Aug 1;27(22):3684-90. (7)
L. Dong, Y. P. Chen, M. E. Lindberg, A. S. Garden, D. I. Rosenthal,
S. V. Sejpal, S. J. Shah, W. H. Morrison, K. K. Ang, D. L. Schwartz
. Inter-fractional Movement of the Larynx and Oropharynx during
Radiotherapy. (8) D. Schwartz, K. Ang, G. Chronowski, D. I.
Rosenthal, S. V. Sejpal, S. J. Shah, Y. Zhang, J. Garcia, A.
Garden, L. Dong. Prospective Experience with CT-Guided Adaptive
Radiotherapy for Head and Neck Cancer. FOR INFORMATION CONTACT:
Meryl Ginsberg, (650) 424-6444 DATASOURCE: Varian Medical Systems,
Inc. CONTACT: Meryl Ginsberg of Varian Medical Systems, Inc.,
+1-650-424-6444, Web Site: http://www.varian.com/
Copyright