CALGARY,
AB, July 26, 2023 /CNW/ - (TSXV: GRD)
(OTCQB: GRDAF) - Grounded Lithium Corp. ("GLC" or the
"Company") is pleased to announce the results of our
preliminary economic assessment ("PEA") on the first phase
11,000 tonnes per year of battery-grade lithium hydroxide
monohydrate ("LHM") production from the Kindersley Lithium
Project ("KLP"). We anticipate development of additional
phases at the KLP motivated largely by the compelling
commercial merits of the economics of the PEA.
Phase 1 KLP
Highlights:
- Generates an after-tax internal rate of return ("IRR") of
48.5% using a realized sales price of USD $25,000/tonne of LHM (flat for the duration of
the model) and an after-tax USD $1.0
billion net present value ("NPV") at an 8% discount rate, on
a capital investment of USD $335
million;
- Payout of initial capital costs is only 3.7 years inclusive
of lead time design and construction of 1.5 years. We anticipate
future KLP phases will be materially financed via internally
generated cash flow;
- Initial capital estimate of USD $335
million (including USD $45
million for contingencies) delivers a capital intensity of
USD $30,500/tonne of LHM for our
initial 11,000 tonnes per year project, one of the lower capital
intensities of North American lithium from brine projects;
- All-in operating costs are anticipated to be USD
$3,899 per tonne of LHM, or USD
$42.9 million annually;
- Only 24 of our current 300 sections of lithium rights will
be developed in Phase 1 of the KLP. The balance of the sections
will support the development of subsequent phases of the KLP;
and
- Phase 1 infrastructure investment is expected to underpin
capital and operating cost efficiencies for all future
phases.
"Grounded is pleased to have achieved another significant
milestone in less than three years from incorporation," commented
Gregg Smith, President and CEO. "The
independent economic results of Phase 1 of the KLP compare
favourably within the lithium mining industry from a CAPEX and OPEX
perspective and we believe the results of the PEA bode well for
critical future steps, including securing strategic partnerships,
off-take agreements, and capital formulation for a commercial
project. We now focus our corporate attention on the completion of
a field pilot with Koch Technologies Solutions' ("KTS")
extraction process, while at the same time undertaking certain
field activities to provide higher certainty on our resources
leading to a pre-feasibility study."
Project Summary
The economic analysis of the PEA is based on the following main
assumptions:
- realized sales price of USD $25,000 per tonne of LHM;
- annual production of 11,000 tonnes per year of LHM;
- commerciality of KTS' Li-Pro™ lithium
extraction technology;
- minimal prefiltering expenditures due to the absence of
hydrocarbons and H2S;
- large diameter wellbores to mitigate pressure loss due to
friction and permit installation of large volume electrical
submersible pumps; and
- estimated operating and capital costs for the project based on
the most current industry data available inclusive of recent strong
inflationary pressures on facilities and labour.
The PEA is based on the expected first phase of production at
the KLP which is derived from the mineral resource estimate for the
KLP set out in Company's NI 43-101 technical report titled, "NI
43-101 Technical Report: Resource Assessment of the Kindersley
Lithium Project in Saskatchewan,
Canada for Grounded Lithium Corp. (As of March 15, 2023)" (the "Technical
Report") which is available on SEDAR at www.sedarplus.com.
All values reported are in USD unless otherwise noted. The
Company will file the PEA on SEDAR (www.sedarplus.com) within 45
days of this press release. The PEA presents data provided by
several leading experts in their respective fields, namely Sproule
Associates Limited, Grey Owl Engineering, Codeco - Vanoco
Engineering Inc., Tundra Engineering Inc. and Fracture Modeling
Inc.
Table 1 – Summary Economics
Description
|
Value
|
Units
|
Value
|
Units
|
Average Annual Production
(LHM)
|
11,000
|
tonnes/year
|
12,125
|
tons/year
|
Average Annual Production
(LCE)
|
9,685
|
tonnes/year
|
10,676
|
tons/year
|
Project Life
|
20
|
years
|
20
|
years
|
Foreign Exchange (FX)
|
0.75
|
ratio
|
1.33
|
ratio
|
Total Capital Cost
(CAPEX)
|
447,323
|
CAD$M
|
335,492
|
USD$M
|
Annual Operating Expenditure
(OPEX)
|
57,188
|
CAD$M
|
42,891
|
USD$M
|
OPEX per tonne LHM
|
5,199
|
CAD/tonne
|
3,899
|
USD/tonne
|
LHM Commodity Price
|
33,333
|
CAD/tonne
|
25,000
|
USD/tonne
|
Average Annual Revenue
|
366,592
|
CAD$M
|
274,944
|
USD$M
|
Economic Indicators
|
Before-Tax
(Btax)
|
Units
|
After-Tax
(Atax)
|
Units
|
Net Present Value
(NPV@8%)
|
1,819,507
|
CAD$M
|
1,309,860
|
CAD$M
|
Net Present Value
(NPV@8%)
|
1,364,630
|
USD$M
|
982,395
|
USD$M
|
Internal Rate of Return
(IRR)
|
58.2
|
%
|
48.5
|
%
|
Payout (PO)
|
3.5
|
years
|
3.7
|
years
|
Profitability Index
(PI@8%)
|
5.1
|
ratio
|
3.9
|
ratio
|
Note 1: The PEA is a
preliminary cost estimate and includes inferred mineral resources
that are considered too geologically speculative to have the
economic considerations applied to them that would enable them to
be categorized as mineral reserves under National Instrument 43-101
– Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects ("NI
43-101"). There is no certainty the results of the KLP
outlined by the PEA will be realized.
|
Capital Costs
Table 2 – KLP Capital Cost Summary
($ thousands)
|
Total
CAD
|
Total
USD
|
Wellfield
|
Drilling
|
$
31,051
|
$
23,289
|
Completion
|
17,280
|
12,960
|
Pipelines
|
55,782
|
41,836
|
Subtotal
|
$
104,113
|
$
78,085
|
Central
Processing Facility
|
Infrastructure
|
$ 238,754
|
$ 179,066
|
Planning, Engineering, Legal & Administration
|
14,922
|
11,192
|
Construction & Commissioning
|
29,844
|
22,383
|
Subtotal
|
$
283,520
|
$
212,640
|
Contingency
|
$
59,689
|
$
44,766
|
TOTAL
|
$
447,322
|
$
335,492
|
Given the operating conditions, the capital intensity for the
KLP is forecasted to be materially lower than some of the other
operations in the industry. Capital efficiency is vitally important
in projects of this size and the leverage that accrues to project
stakeholders due to industry leading capital efficiency ratios
directly impact rates of return. These capital estimates will be
further refined as the Company moves toward the pre-feasibility and
bankable feasibility milestones. These estimates represent a Class
5 engineering cost estimate. We do expect modifications to these
estimates with the completion of more precise and detailed
engineering.
Operating Costs
Table 3 – KLP Operating Cost Summary
Annual OPEX in $ thousands per year
OPEX in $ per metric tonne LHM
|
Annual OPEX
CAD/yr
|
Annual OPEX
USD/yr
|
OPEX
CAD/tonne
LHM
|
OPEX
USD/tonne
LHM
|
Personnel
|
$
6,250
|
$
4,688
|
$
568
|
$
426
|
Electric Power
|
13,626
|
10,220
|
1,239
|
929
|
Reagents and
Consumables
|
21,218
|
15,914
|
1,929
|
1,447
|
Maintenance and
Servicing
|
7,839
|
5,879
|
713
|
534
|
Product Transport &
Disposal
|
2,555
|
1,916
|
232
|
174
|
Direct Operational
Expenditures
|
$
51,489
|
$
38,617
|
$4,681
|
$3,511
|
Indirect Operational
Expenditures
|
$
2,528
|
$
1,896
|
$230
|
$172
|
Land Fess, Taxes, Other
|
$
3,172
|
$
2,379
|
$288
|
$216
|
TOTAL
|
$
57,188
|
$
42,891
|
$5,199
|
$3,899
|
Total operating costs of USD $42.9
million per year, or USD $3,899 per tonne of LHM, are broken out by each
major project step and are inclusive of direct and indirect costs.
The majority of the operating costs are associated with reagents
required within the system and power consumption. For purposes of
the PEA, we assumed that sufficient power can be secured from the
existing grid structure. However, as we advance the KLP towards
commercialization, there is the potential to construct owner
secured power options such as a cogeneration unit. This would
represent an additional capital charge offset by the benefit of
stable, predictable, cost-efficient power supply. Excess power
generated from such a unit could be sold into the existing power
market to partially offset the operating costs.
Sensitivity Analysis
Table 4 – Economic Sensitivity Summary (USD)
OFAT Sensitivity Analysis -
CAPEX
|
($ thousands)
|
Low Case
CAPEX -40%
USD
|
Low Case
CAPEX -20%
USD
|
Base Case
CAPEX
USD
|
High Case
CAPEX +20%
USD
|
High Case
CAPEX +40%
USD
|
CAPEX
|
$
201,295
|
$
268,394
|
$
335,492
|
$
402,590
|
$
469,689
|
NPV@8% - Btax
|
$
1,473,192
|
$
1,418,999
|
$
1,364,630
|
$
1,310,615
|
$
1,256,423
|
NPV@8% - Atax
|
$
1,067,559
|
$
1,025,042
|
$
982,395
|
$
940,007
|
$
897,328
|
IRR (%) - Btax
|
92
|
71
|
58
|
49
|
42
|
IRR (%) - Atax
|
76
|
59
|
49
|
41
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OFAT Sensitivity Analysis -
OPEX
|
($ thousands)
|
Low Case
OPEX -40%
USD
|
Low Case
OPEX -20%
USD
|
Base Case
OPEX
USD
|
High Case
OPEX +20%
USD
|
High Case
OPEX +40%
USD
|
OPEX
|
$
25,735
|
$
34,313
|
$
42,891
|
$
51,469
|
$
60,047
|
NPV@8% - Btax
|
$
1,498,577
|
$
1,431,692
|
$
1,364,630
|
$
1,297,922
|
$
1,231,037
|
NPV@8% - Atax
|
$
1,080,176
|
$
1,031,350
|
$
982,395
|
$
933,698
|
$
884,872
|
IRR (%) - Btax
|
62
|
60
|
58
|
56
|
54
|
IRR (%) - Atax
|
52
|
50
|
49
|
47
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OFAT Sensitivity Analysis - LHM
Price
|
($ thousands)
|
Low Case
LHM Price -40%
USD
|
Low Case
LHM Price -20%
USD
|
Base Case
LHM Price
USD
|
High Case
LHM Price +20%
USD
|
High Case
LHM Price +40%
USD
|
LHM Price per tonne
|
$
15
|
$
20
|
$
25
|
$
30
|
$
35
|
NPV@8% - Btax
|
$
576,730
|
$
970,769
|
$
1,364,630
|
$
1,758,846
|
$
2,152,885
|
NPV@8% - Atax
|
$
406,465
|
$
694,876
|
$
982,395
|
$
1,270,172
|
$
1,557,821
|
IRR (%) - Btax
|
31
|
45
|
58
|
71
|
83
|
IRR (%) - Atax
|
27
|
38
|
49
|
59
|
68
|
A table similar to Table 4 expressed in Canadian dollars can be
found on the Company's website. A detailed future pricing study for
lithium chemicals was not completed for the PEA. The average price
used for future sales of battery-quality LHM was developed by
reviewing pricing data generated from reliable sources as reported
in publicly disclosed data collected from peer companies. The
future average selling price of USD $25,000/tonne for LHM is consistent with that
used in publicly released economic assessments of other lithium
projects in recent history. Current spot pricing for battery-grade
lithium products average greater than USD $40,000/tonne, therefore the potential upside
leverage to KLP economics is noteworthy.
Sensitivities demonstrate that the KLP is expected to provide
torque to the upside upon any potential future increase in
underlying commodity prices. With the demand for critical minerals
expected to exceed world supply, the low-cost structure of the KLP
is expected to provide elastic returns to the upside. The low-cost
structure of the KLP was a key determinant in the Company
focusing on the KLP area, since during downturns in commodity
cycles, low-cost operations provide projects with improved price
resilience.
About Grounded Lithium
Corp.
GLC is a publicly traded lithium brine exploration and
development company that controls approximately 4.2 million metric
tons of lithium carbonate equivalent of inferred resource over our
focused land holdings in Southwest
Saskatchewan as of the effective date of the Technical
Report. The Company's PEA reports a Phase 1 NPV8
after-tax of US$1.0 billion with an
after-tax internal rate of return of 48.5%. GLC's multi-faceted
business model involves the consolidation, delineation,
exploitation and ultimately development of our opportunity base to
fulfill our vision to build a best-in-class, environmentally
responsible, Canadian lithium producer supporting the global energy
transition shift. U.S. investors can find current financial
disclosure and Real-Time Level 2 quotes for the Company
on https://www.otcmarkets.com/.
Qualified Persons and Technical
Report
Scientific and technical information contained in this press
release has been prepared under the supervision of Doug Ashton, P.Eng., Suryanarayana Karri, P. Geoph., Alexey Romanov, P. Geo. and Meghan Klein, P. Eng., Dean Quirk, P.Eng., Jeffrey Weiss, P.Eng., Chad Hitchings., P.L. Eng., and Michael Munteanu, P.Eng., each of whom is a
qualified person within the meaning of NI 43-101.
Certain data verification, exploration information and other
disclosure regarding the mineral resources data contained in this
press release is included in the Technical Report.
Market Support Agreement
The Company has transitioned its market making services to Red
Cloud Securities Inc. ("Red
Cloud"). Red Cloud will
provide these services for trading on the TSX Venture Exchange
("TSXV") in accordance with the TSXV policies, for the
purpose of maintaining an orderly market. The Company will
engage Red Cloud on a month-to-month basis for a fee of
$5,000 cash per month. Red Cloud and GLC are unrelated and
unaffiliated entities. Red Cloud
will not receive shares or options as consideration. Red Cloud or affiliate(s) of Red Cloud currently hold 145,834 common shares
and 2,326,137 broker warrants of GLC received in consideration for
services previously performed for GLC. The capital used for market
making will be provided by Red
Cloud.
Technical Abbreviations and CIM
Definition Standards
The disclosure in this news release uses mineral resources and
mineral reserves classification terms that comply with reporting
standards in Canada, and the
mineral resource and mineral reserve estimates are made in
accordance with the CIM Definition Standards and NI 43-101.
In this news release, the following abbreviations have the
meanings set forth below:
bbls
|
barrels
|
bbls/d
|
barrels per
day
|
km
|
kilometres
|
m
|
metres
|
m3
|
cubic metres
|
mi
|
miles
|
mg/L
|
milligram per
litre
|
ppm
|
parts per
million
|
Forward-Looking
Statements
This press release may contain forward-looking statements and
forward-looking information within the meaning of applicable
Canadian securities laws. The opinions, forecasts, projections and
statements about future events of results, are forward looking
information, forward-looking statements or financial outlooks
(collectively, "forward-looking statements") under the meaning of
applicable Canadian securities laws. These statements are made as
of the date of this press release and the fact that this press
release remains available does not constitute a representation by
GLC that the Company believes these forward-looking statements
continue to be true as of any subsequent date. Although GLC
believes that the assumptions underlying, and expectations
reflected in, these forward-looking statements are reasonable, it
can give no assurance that these assumptions and expectations will
prove to be correct. Such statements include, but are not limited
to, statements regarding the NPV of the first phase of production
at the KLP, the expected realized sales price of LHM, the capital
intensity of the first phase of production at the KLP, the
operating cost and capital cost of the first phase of production at
the KLP, the expectation the Company will implement multiple 10,000
tonnes/year phases of production of LCE on the KLP, the completion
of the Company's field pilot, obtaining higher certainty on GLC's
resources leading to a pre-feasibility study, obtaining funding
under government programs, securing strategic partnerships,
off-take agreements and capital formulation, supply in the battery
mineral market, creating shareholder value, the amount of annual
production at the KLP, the commerciality of KTS'
Li-ProTM lithium extraction technology, re-injection of
brine in the reservoir, the number of production wells and injector
wells on the KLP, the average brine production from each production
well, the drilling of additional production wells and the impact of
same on project economics, the project life of the KLP, the
pre-treatment required for KLP brine, the timing of the
construction of the field pilot, obtaining power from the grid,
constructing owner secured power such as a co-generation unit, the
use of contractors in the process of commercializing the KLP, and
GLC's vision of becoming a best-in-class, environmentally
responsible, Canadian lithium producer supporting the global energy
transition.
Among the important factors, risks, uncertainties and
assumptions that could cause actual results to differ materially
from those indicated by such forward-looking statements are: those
assumptions listed under "Project Summary" above, GLC's
expectation that our operations will be in Western Canada, unexpected problems can arise
due to technical difficulties and operational difficulties which
impact the production, transport or sale of our products;
geographic and weather conditions can impact the production; the
risk that current global economic and credit conditions may impact
commodity prices and consumption more than GLC currently predicts;
the failure to obtain financing on reasonable terms; the risk that
unexpected delays and difficulties in developing currently owned
properties may occur; the failure of drilling to result in
commercial projects; unexpected delays due to the limited
availability of drilling equipment and personnel; and the other
risk factors detailed from time to time in GLC's periodic
reports. GLC's forward-looking statements are expressly
qualified in their entirety by this cautionary statement.
This news release shall not constitute an offer to sell or
the solicitation of an offer to buy any securities in any
jurisdiction.
Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services
Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX
Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or
accuracy of this news release.
View original content to download
multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/grounded-lithium-announces-robust-investment-metrics-in-preliminary-economic-assessment-for-the-kindersley-lithium-project-301885805.html
SOURCE Grounded Lithium Corp